Knowledge talk:WikiProject Open/Archive 2

963:

the open culture movement. This is a good thing, but unless there is reason to believe they are interested in pursuing ideas like those you mention, I would personally be a little cautious about how much energy I'd put into it. It would be great if they are willing to make a substantial investment in developing ties to, and an understanding of, our efforts and volunteer base. In my view, the amount of potential benefit to Knowledge's readership and open content is the most important consideration. Are they seeking an active partnership, or merely seeking appeasement? It may take some careful listening to determine which it is. -

993:

organization, and this kind of tool is already overdue for development. I also disagree with Tvol that we need to organize a more in-depth discussion on best practices for marking licensed works - right now this is Springer's problem and I think we would do fine by offering to guide them in their training of people who can come into Knowledge to discuss these things as peer Wikipedians rather than for us as a community to try to organize a discussion to generate proposals to present to Springer as a gift.

1970:

information in page history, but is is nearly impossible to verify such information from a history some template. The template OA-attribution does not provide any information that are necessary per laws. And moreover if somebody will replace some text that is really necessary with this template, then this template is illegal. I would delete the template. But if members(!) of this project are able to replace information about used CC-BY text with just open access, then I must say that

31: 2773: 2308: 612: 2574: 2109: 393:

you have written in the scope section, and what they think of this WikiProject in general. Tagging articles is useful to me because I want to have some understanding of how broad this project could be, but also I do not want to tag things outside of a reasonable scope or set a precedent for showing interest in articles which will not be among our priorities. What you have written is what I was thinking, though.

2783: 2318: 999:

the Knowledge community offers to them the same excellent deal it offers everyone - membership in a noble project. They can either accept the deal now or they can accept it later but they and every other such organization is going to take the deal eventually, and I would rather they do it sooner and with forethought from the Knowledge community.

1876: 302:? I would love to see any naming and classification system wherein someone scholarly has named a top-level descriptive term, then subcategories, then reviewed the applications in the field. Thoughts? Comments? I really have no idea what to think about this and would appreciate feedback, guidance, and suggestions on how to manage this. 1480:

organizations and the general public to free information which traditionally had been restricted. In a similar way, Choosing Wisely is an outreach effort by large medical societies to start sharing information on Knowledge when previously they had not acknowledged Knowledge as a communication channel. Anyone can see my message at

1969:

could collapse. Generally the use of templates in copyright issues is very limited because, for example, 1) there would be need approximately such many templates for texts that are on Wikimedia Commons for images and 2) copyrights statuses are changing atl east each year and it is easy to verify such

1957:

Not all texts that are open access are possible to incorporate into Knowledge. This is the main idea and this project could more promote materials, that are more consistent with copyright policies of Knowledge. I think, that the project name is so misleading, that even some members of the project are

1235:

of terminology and topics related to open educational resources. To me, this sounds like they are experiencing the same problem this group has in that many of the articles on fundamental open access topics need development if anyone outside the community ever wanted to use Knowledge as an entry point

1173:

We have to be careful using someone's opinion that a company (NBC) is committing a crime. IMO, we need more than just a source saying it. Additionally, Nowpublic is hardly a reliable source. The fact that it hasn't been blacklisted actually surprises me. Nowpublic is little more than a blog, owned by

286:

above suggested "open source", and this term has been applied outside of software, but the term seems heavily and particularly associated with software to me and I wanted to capture both software and non-software uses of the word. It seemed to me that "open data" might work since software is data and

1964:

is redundant. It is impossible to replace all of its uses with something universally useful. Each of its uses must be resolved separately. It states "This article incorporates text from an open access publication: ...". Open Access means (more or less) any information that is freely available on the

392:

If your scope is broader than what I originally suggested then you have only put into words what I wished to convey. If you have more to add then feel free to do so; I am going to slow down a bit and meet with some people face to face in my city (Seattle) to discuss the articles I have tagged, what

1074:

I've heard about some sort of controversy over NBC having the right to remove home videos of the Olympic Games on grounds of copyright "infringement"... NBC would be the ones committing copyright infringement by claiming rights to content they don't have. I think Open Access would be interested in

998:

It is always time to offer deals. Among the things that I might propose that they do is have their staff participate in Knowledge training, encourage their staff to become Wikipedians, fund or support a Wikipedian in Residence, or otherwise make content contributions flow into Knowledge. In return

962:

If I were to speculate, the main thing they are likely after is an understanding of how Knowledge/Wikimedia/Creative Commons operate, what values are important in our culture; in short, the kind of understanding that would help them avoid conflict and, perhaps, be perceived as a friend and ally in

716:

In my opinion, Knowledge should wait and see what other interested parties do. We are singularly ill-adapted to making the kind of quick decisions that EFF, Reddit, etc. can make. They can make a decision and implement it while we are still trying to get consensus. Because of this, we should wait

176:

I myself am still reviewing the literature and I created this WikiProject to clarify the scope of "open access" to myself and see who else had ideas. I work in biotech outreach and ultimately whatever came of this would be used in science policy, so that is the perspective from which I am entering

170:

and in other cases it means free to access or use. It may have other uses. If discussions on the topic of openness happened before the advent of software then I am not aware of it; so far as I know the concept is intimately tied with the notion that software is a product of potentially great value

842:

This is a new project that is supported by a few wikipedians and the Hewlett Foundation, who has broadly suported OA and OER work for years. I think it makes sense to combine that young project with this established one, somehow -- people frequenting this project might work with the new group on

1953:

Hello, I have serious doubts about proper and useful naming of this project since its start. Why this project is called Open Access when Knowledge has more strict inclusion copyright policy than just bare open access? If I would name this project, it would be maybe "Open Content" or maybe "Open

977:

I agree if there's an opportunity here to get Springer on board with more openness (either through the release of bibliographic metadata or something else), then would be good to pursue. But save this, perhaps a more in depth discussion on norms and best practices for marking licensed works? In

1274:

is coordinating this and wants to find some way to sort this wonderful collection. He can deliver more pictures if we could find some way to feasibly argue that they are well-sorted and better known to the public; the organization only want them to be used, viewed, or otherwise appreciated.

1479:

Hello, I just posted a message on WikiProject Medicine about Choosing Wisely, a public health educational campaign with which I work. I thought it might be of interest to WikiProject Open Access since the concept of "open access" necessarily requires new kinds of collaboration between large

992:

I disagree with Pete that there is a need to be cautious about the energy put into this. Forming a proposal about collaboration in this instance is not only about building a relationship with Springer because any Wikipedian could reuse such a proposal to form relationships with any other

2528:

to help bring together the Open Access and Wikimedia communities. At the moment we're focusing on identifying open access initiatives in both Wikimedia and the wider world in order to find ways to enable collaboration. All help is appreciated, so if you're interested keep an eye on the

1369:

situation ever arises and someone needs direction on what to do. Also, such a tutorial would be a very fun way to do outreach to non-Wikipedians by giving them an easy and productive task to do, and a fun way to exhibit the huge amount of media files which Daniel's bot is finding.

1364:

I was thinking of using Max's work to teach people to integrate Commons Files into Knowledge, along with Daniel's huge collection of very interesting media files, to create a resource to which people can link when doing GA reviews of science articles if any situation like the

281:

I wanted to name this project after the all-encompassing top-level descriptor for everything which is called "open". I asked different people about this and I had trouble settling on a term. "Openness" is not really a word that is widely used, nor is the term "Open culture".

1021:

Well said, Lane! I was speaking only of my personal time/energy investment into developing a proposal specific to this one organization -- I certainly agree that an invitation to them to invest their own time or resources in the ways you discuss would be a good step.

372:

I agree "open source" is closely related to software and may not be the best umbrella term either. There may be reliable sources which have researched and classified these movements and terms, but I'm guessing they'll simply represent a few scholar's different

2955:

No source has been found yet that uses the date of the anniversary to explain the date of the suicide. According to Swartz’s partner, family, and lawyer, he killed himself 2 days after prosecutors rejected his second request for a plea deal. See, for example,

876:

to make research funded by the US government publicly accessible. This will be done by way of a blog post on Friday morning PST; as noted, we are not trying to speak on behalf of the community, but just the Foundation itself. You can read more in the

2918:: We have two webinar planning sessions scheduled during the week of October 14 -- the first is during waking hours for the Americas, Asia, and Australia; the second, for Europe, Africa, and the Americas. Please join us -- the specifics are on our 129:: unrestricted access via the Internet to articles published in scholarly journals, and also increasingly to book chapters or monographs. I can see open government being related to that, but not free software, software patents, or music piracy. 2454:

It is obvious now that you state it but I did not immediately see that the word "petition" in the link was a problem. This is not a problem with Access2Research, but rather a problem with the bot and tagging. Let me talk to the operator.

2003:

In short: Open access is only about availability. Copyright issues are different things. Copyright informations (especially those necessary ones) should not be replaced with informations about open access. I hope that it is clear now.

468:

about disambiguating the category title. While articles are usually named for their primary topic, category names should be unambiguous on their own. "Open access" could mean other things. Please participate in the discussion there.

1434: 1356:

to be featured as "Open Access Media Files of the Day". (Also, post {{Open access file of the day}} on your user page or wherever to promote WikiProject Open Access!) It so happens that Daniel's bot has found a lot of the

671:

a WikiProject Open Access on Commons, so as to deal with the upload and reuse of Open Access materials across Wikimedia projects. Four members required for a WikiProject to start there. Anyone here interested in joining?

2947:

Should a explanatory comment be (re)inserted in the bio lead saying that Swartz killed himself “just after the second anniversary of his arrest”? (“On January 6, 2011, Swartz was arrested.... On January 11, 2013,

1326:, and this article needs to be a good article. I am sure the people who developed this article are able Wikipedians, but somehow they neglected to integrate much non-text media into the article. A lot exists at 165:

I am not sure what the scope of this project is. There is some general concept of "openness" which I wanted to organize. Different sources use the word "open" to mean different things. In some cases it means

978:

general, I probably lean more toward Pete's analysis of the situation at this point. But it doesn't hurt to listen. Has anyone at Springer proactively contacted WMF beyond the reference in the blog post?

3017:

These two articles could use some attention from interested editors here. I have proposed the second one for speedy deletion as copyvio, but list it anyway just in case that the CSD is denied. Thanks. --

516: 295:

article is currently the most developed of all articles related to openness, and it does capture the difference between open and non-open things; if people have access to something, then it is open.

378:

Maybe we'd be better off defining the scope first. I attempted a bold definition of a somewhat broader scope on the project page. Please edit it, and let's see if we can get on the same page. –

1505:

The article went through a review process and then went live. I just posted a question about disseminating information from this campaign onto Knowledge. Anyone may see this question here -

1807: 873: 2615: 2150: 1403: 638: 1270:"The Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) is one of the largest collections of digitized illustrations of animals, plants and other forms of life (i.e. biodiversity) on the internet." 485: 465: 249: 908: 836: 222: 119: 2373: 89:

Put the discussion template on articles related to the concept of "open access" and rate them. If you rate them, they will be automatically sorted by class and importance on the

2057: 1924: 563: 541:

Feel free to spread it by using {{Knowledge ads}} or {{Knowledge ads|ad=234}} on suitable pages. The former displays a randomly selected Wiki ad, the latter just this one. --

2987: 1857:

I am vaguely remembering discussion of a mini open-access template that we could use to indicate OA articles in citations? Did I imagine this? Does such a thing exist? --

118:

Could you better clarify the scope of this project? I just learned of it via some banners added to pages I watch. I noticed that a number of topics which interest me are

815: 515: 1643:

to citation templates. Anyone can create their own ORCID ID, and they can also be added to Knowledge user pages (mine has one, for example) using the same template.

1349: 287:

so is anything else which could be open, but data is a restrictive word against culture, practices, and behaviors which are not termed data. I found out there was a

2752: 2287: 2630: 2525: 2165: 1224:

is coordinating this. There is some overlap in the goals of this project and the scope of WikiProject Open Access. I wanted to share two of their projects here.

1759:

Hi, folks! The article doesn't seem to describe the term in detail, most notably how two licenses are described as similar or not. Can you expand it? Thanks! --

913:

will also be reaching out to Creative Commons and Knowledge to investigate whether working together might help us to find the best approach to these challenges.

698: 1539: 1571:

recently asked what kind of metrics users would want. I want stats about particular classes of articles, just as you are proposing. I wrote more about this

1337:

developed a project to teach non-Wikipedians how to browse Wikimedia Commons to find interesting media and put it into Knowledge articles. His tutorial is

2100:

is an open research hub, a place for organizing our amazing community of research and reference experts to collaborate and help improve the encyclopedia.

2036:

would be a description very close to its scope, since the vast majority of activities that involve imported materials are on CC BY stuff - see, e.g., the

359:

are related, but CC isn't primarily or originally academic and OpenCourseWare is about access for learning, not research. The closely related concept of

76: 71: 59: 1341:. I was thinking of adapting what he did there to WikiProject Open Access to create a never-ending task for anyone to do if they visit this project. 2650: 2185: 2534: 1966: 1595:

I gave this another look and currently the queue is not accepting new applications. The notice says that it will be functional again by November.

2070:

was part of an earlier attempt into the same direction, and somehow remained incomplete. I'll work on that soon and get back to you here then. --

1353: 922:

and think they could easily be extended to include Creative Commons, e.g. by talking about the release of bibliographical metadata under CC0 (as

668: 1279: 1899:

See also this discussion in which it is proposed to integrate this icon into a project to give Wikipedians access to a subscription journal -

2675: 2589: 2210: 2124: 1192: 1160: 1137: 1123: 1086: 782: 764: 702: 327:

to apply primarily to scientific and scholarly research. I think we agree that it's closely related with a number of other topics, such as

2566:

I wonder if we could connect the library portal to this wikiproject by placing the Library navigation box somewhere in this WikiProject.

2041: 1345: 2919: 2892: 2709: 2244: 1900: 1659: 1506: 1481: 423:

There's a discussion going on at this article's talk page about the correct spelling of the name. Input from editors here is welcome. --

1457: 207: 1154: 2530: 1708: 938:), making license information machine readable, and helping with text mining more generally. Any thoughts and suggestions welcome. 90: 900: 2655: 2645: 2190: 2180: 1327: 1239: 2714: 2249: 1157: 2896: 2582: 2380: 2117: 2060:

exists as to how to signal more clearly how open some reference actually is, and your input on that would be much appreciated.

2053: 1188: 171:

which, once created, can be replicated and distributed for free. This is why I tagged some software articles with the template.

47: 17: 1877:

Knowledge:WikiProject Open Access/Wikimedia at OAI8/Reuse of Open Access materials on Wikimedia platforms/Signalling OA-ness

2689: 2224: 1965:

internet. If editors would think, that such information is enough for inclusion of text to the Knowledge, then overhelming

918:

I think this could turn into a great opportunity for our WikiProject. I have listed some quick ideas for the Wikimedia end

2476: 1784: 935: 1701: 1120: 1053: 927: 1572: 912: 2747: 2660: 2282: 2195: 2438: 2032:

is missing license information. I do not agree with your wider conclusions - if the project were to be renamed, then

2888: 2814: 2809: 2757: 2665: 2292: 2200: 1673: 1640: 1633: 38: 2957: 2996: 2822: 2640: 2426: 2175: 2076: 1933: 1889: 1841: 1689: 1556: 1217: 951: 878: 745: 682: 651: 600: 576: 551: 3011: 2733: 2704: 2699: 2620: 2268: 2239: 2234: 2155: 1399: 1196: 1164: 1141: 1127: 1090: 1057: 786: 768: 706: 1430: 2937:

Aaron Swartz RfC: Should the bio lead say Swartz killed himself just after the 2nd anniversary of his arrest?

1312:

pointed out to me that a user posted a request that the Knowledge community conduct GA review on the article

2064: 2026: 1961: 1655: 1407: 923: 428: 167: 2971: 2868:

Thanks to Lane for all his contributions and sorry Daniel couldn't join. Looking forward to next steps. -

2635: 2463: 2170: 1911: 1818: 1793: 1743: 1716: 1603: 1583: 1517: 1492: 1465: 1442: 1381: 1314: 1292: 1253: 1108: 1007: 889: 523: 446: 401: 310: 264: 185: 101: 298:

Is there a better term? And more interestingly - is there any taxonomy for this in the literature or any

2927: 2859: 2830: 2501: 2484: 2445: 1179: 1027: 968: 424: 340: 2825:. Please join us this Thursday for a planning discussion! Or add your ideas to the page or talk page. - 1538:'s Task 3 provides monthly statistics of pageviews for articles within the scope of a WikiProject (see 611: 3022: 2992: 2694: 2422: 2229: 2072: 1929: 1881: 1833: 1779: 1681: 1548: 1334: 1309: 1228: 943: 737: 674: 643: 592: 568: 543: 364: 328: 214: 136: 3026: 3001: 2975: 2931: 2908: 2877: 2863: 2849: 2834: 2797: 2549: 2505: 2488: 2470: 2449: 2431: 2399: 2081: 2013: 1997: 1938: 1918: 1894: 1869: 1846: 1825: 1797: 1768: 1747: 1720: 1694: 1663: 1610: 1590: 1561: 1524: 1499: 1469: 1446: 1419: 1388: 1299: 1260: 1200: 1183: 1168: 1145: 1131: 1115: 1094: 1061: 1031: 1014: 987: 972: 956: 893: 855: 830: 809: 790: 772: 750: 726: 710: 687: 656: 627: 605: 581: 556: 497: 478: 453: 432: 408: 387: 317: 271: 238: 192: 159: 108: 2904: 2845: 2762: 2545: 2297: 826: 805: 722: 2378:

Come and create your profile, and see how we can leverage your talent, expertise, and dedication:

3007: 1764: 1646: 530: 1542:). I think this would be useful for us as well. Requests to include our WikiProject can be made 250:

Knowledge:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_November_22#Template:Intellectual_property_activism

2967: 2942: 2456: 1904: 1811: 1789: 1739: 1712: 1596: 1576: 1510: 1485: 1461: 1438: 1374: 1338: 1285: 1246: 1101: 1000: 885: 623: 439: 394: 303: 257: 178: 94: 2524:. It will be held in London and one of the tracks will be on open access. I'm working as the 1373:

I intend to draft something soon, but I thought I would introduce the project now. Thoughts?

1242:

on November 20 and 27 2012 there are to be live-streamed videos explaining the nature of OER.

1122:- about the Beijing games, because the Chinese decided to engage in mass dickery (as usual). 821:

This proposal relates to copyrights. Feel free to improve the consensus by clicking above. --

2923: 2873: 2855: 2826: 2625: 2497: 2480: 2441: 2409: 2160: 2009: 1993: 1864: 1221: 1175: 1049: 1023: 964: 352: 348: 2037: 1482:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Choosing_Wisely_-_a_model_for_organizational_engagement

3018: 2521: 2493:

And it seems there is a resolution (or at least, movement toward resolution) -- see here:

2417: 1954:

Access and Open Content" or maybe "Free Content resources" or maybe completely different.

1348:. This bot pulls non-text media files from open access science journals and posts them at 1220:

is a project to increase access to and awareness of "online educational resources" (OER).

336: 1567:

I agree that we need this but the processing for managing such metrics is not clear. The

1232: 291:

and this gentleman had previously set some precedent for calling this "open access". The

486:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_17#Category:Open_Access_attribution

2900: 2841: 2670: 2541: 2205: 1831:

That's free to read, with limited options for reuse, and incompatible with CC BY-SA. --

1323: 1191:

seems to be the root of the problem. (Hint hint: I'd like large parts of it repealed.)

983: 931: 822: 801: 718: 356: 2573: 2108: 288: 2371:

1760: 1535: 1150: 493: 474: 383: 363:

seems significantly to predate FOSS – an idea which didn't exist until the advent of

234: 155: 800:

Even if there's no black-out per say, there should at least be a banner of sorts. --

1735: 1731: 1082: 849: 760: 619: 360: 299: 1475:

Choosing Wisely - an effort to get organizational engagement in Wikimedia projects

717:

and see what other major websites do, then decide whether to follow their lead. --

2728: 2263: 2869: 2818: 2794: 2396: 2005: 1989: 1858: 1753: 1271: 1079: 1041: 324: 292: 147: 143: 126: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2742: 2277: 1988:

I am sorry for this very criticizing message. Thank you for your attention, --

1543: 1076: 344: 1568: 979: 466:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_17#Category:Open_access

332: 2520:

This year's Wikimania is only just over but we're already looking towards

1901:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Marking_articles_with_open_access_icon

1159:- but the video does contain more than 15 seconds of infringing material. 1330:, and some more content from that category needs to go into the article. 778: 489: 470: 417: 379: 283: 230: 177:

this. I am going to address the point about the name in another section.

151: 2601: 2136: 1625:. ORCID IDs for journal contributors who have them can be obtained from 1456:

An article relating to a journal of possible interest to this project,

1429:

An article relating to a journal of possible interest to this project,

846: 1885: 1837: 1685: 1552: 947: 881:, and leave any comments or questions you might have on its talkpage. 741: 678: 647: 634: 596: 572: 547: 125:

I don't understand how they're in the scope, though. From the lead of

223:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_January_7#Category:Libre

210:– nominated for deletion; should be merged with the recently created 2475:

Yes, there's a (more appropriate) request somebody else filed here:

2533:

page on the conference wiki. We've also started a brief history of

1622: 1305:

Encouraging editors to integrate media from Commons into Knowledge

2772: 2307: 2568: 2103: 1344:

Perhaps some of you know that Daniel Mietchen is managing the

869: 25: 1507:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine#Health_campaign_citations

1460:, published in Iran, has been proposed for deletion. Thanks, 907:

In reaction to the licensing problems in SpringerImages (cf.

1707:

See discussion of possible interest to this WikiProject, at

610: 203:

These active Cfd and Tfds are of interest to this project:

2479:

Hopefully this gets closer to the source of the problem. -

1923:

That discussion is long; an overview of the options is at

2807:

Everyone: several of us have been talking about starting

2782: 2420:

as blacklisted because they contain the word petition. --

2317: 1350:

Commons:Category:Uploaded with Open Access Media Importer

1435:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Journal of Global Health

1404:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Public Relations Journal

2593: 2559:

Hey folks! One of The Knowledge Library's goals is to

2494: 2413: 2387: 2128: 1971: 919: 618:

Here's another possible WikiAd, if you want to use it.

587: 2561:

Promote broader open access in publishing and research

2813:, which would support the improvement of topics like 1925:

Knowledge:WikiProject Open Access/Signalling OA-ness

641:

too, where the old one is a bit worn out. Thanks! --

564:

File:Provisional logo of WikiProject Open Access.png

323:

From the article and my own experience I understand

208:

Knowledge:Templates_for_discussion#Template:Openness

1949:

OA-attribution is redundant and misleading template

1626: 562:The file is also available in a higher resolution: 2988:Knowledge:WikiProject Open Access/Open Access Week 2887:WikiProject Open has been developing further: see 1736:Carmen Ortiz: Aaron Swartz prosecution and suicide 1458:International Journal of Forest, Soil and Erosion 1452:International Journal of Forest, Soil and Erosion 816:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Copyright 146:. A better main article for the project might be 868:The Wikimedia Foundation has decided to endorse 763:community) because they're going to imitate us. 460:Disambiguating the category name for open access 2950:just after the second anniversary of his arrest 1629:and added to their Knowledge biographies using 1621:Project members will probably be interested in 1354:Commons:Open Access File of the Day/Nominations 1322:is the extensively studied nematode which is a 1433:, has been nominated for deletion. Please see 1280:Commons:Category:Biodiversity Heritage Library 1136:I'm finding it hard to find reliable sources. 861:Wikimedia Foundation endorsing Access2Research 2743:Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers 2278:Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers 1100:Do you have a sources describing this issue? 8: 2329:We are working together towards 5 big goals: 1346:Commons:User:Open Access Media Importer Bot 777:Just like last time. Too bad we don't have 2537:in order to trace past work in this area. 510: 2359:, helping editors to find and use sources 1040:Yes agree collaboration would be useful. 2958:“Legal Case Strained Troubled Activist,” 2345:, databases, universities, and libraries 1075:this article, along with articles about 2535:Wikimedia's engagement with open access 2405:== Access2Research needs maintenance == 1967:Knowledge:WikiProject Copyright Cleanup 1328:Commons:Category:Caenorhabditis elegans 289:Wikimedian in Residence on Open Science 225:– proposed rename to Open methodologies 2690:The Knowledge Library Bookshelf (meta) 2477:MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#petition 2225:The Knowledge Library Bookshelf (meta) 2022:Hi Snek, thanks for pointing out that 1958:unintentionally doing harmful things. 1732:Aaron Swartz: Arrest and state charges 1402:, has been nominated for deletion see 1352:, where they eventually may end up at 1233:a project to help people develop a map 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2352:of editors, libraries, and librarians 2052:, even though the most authoritative 1156:? This one's probably more relevant: 7: 1734:. (An expanded version is found at 1398:An article relating to this project 1174:Examiner.com, which IS blacklisted. 2793:Let me know what you think. Best, 2336:local library and freely accessible 2048:is frequently used in the sense of 1810:. Hopefully this sets a precedent. 1803:UNESCO makes publications more free 911:), Springer have stated that they " 1730:Interesting changes being made at 663:WikiProject Open Access on Commons 24: 2350:relationships among our community 2056:basically equates it to CC BY. A 1978:against Creative Commons licenses 1540:example from WikiProject Medicine 244:One of those links to this also - 91:Knowledge:WikiProject Open Access 2781: 2771: 2572: 2343:access to paywalled publications 2316: 2306: 2107: 1240:Knowledge:Communicate OER Events 930:), data publishing (I know that 759:, though, (I'm representing the 514: 142:I see a much broader focus than 29: 2982:Activities for Open Access Week 2748:Be a Knowledge Visiting Scholar 2540:Hopefully see you in London! -- 2283:Be a Knowledge Visiting Scholar 1189:Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 901:Springer Science+Business Media 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Open 2952:, Swartz was found dead....”) 2913: 2850:21:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC) 2835:18:13, 30 September 2013 (UTC) 508:It currently looks like this: 1: 2978:10:00, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 2854:Glad to know it resonate :) - 2798:12:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC) 2526:Open Access Community Liaison 1785:Chronicle of Higher Education 1562:01:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC) 1500:14:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC) 1484:. Thanks for your attention. 1470:01:08, 18 February 2013 (UTC) 1414: 1408: 1389:16:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 1300:00:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 1266:Biodiversity Heritage Library 1261:17:05, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 582:14:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 557:14:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC) 85:Using the discussion template 3027:15:59, 21 October 2013 (UTC) 3002:21:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC) 2976:08:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 2932:23:50, 12 October 2013 (UTC) 2909:10:03, 10 October 2013 (UTC) 2661:Find Your Local Library tips 2602:Get free access to research! 2196:Find Your Local Library tips 2137:Get free access to research! 1774:Article of possible interest 1702:List of open-access journals 1447:20:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC) 498:00:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 479:00:09, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 454:21:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 433:19:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC) 409:19:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC) 388:18:03, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 318:05:26, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 272:05:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 239:19:56, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 193:05:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC) 160:19:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC) 109:18:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC) 2878:17:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) 2864:22:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC) 2609:Research tools and services 2550:09:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC) 2506:02:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC) 2489:20:00, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 2471:14:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 2450:13:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 2432:08:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC) 2400:14:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 2334:Connect editors with their 2144:Research tools and services 2082:13:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC) 2038:Open Access File of the Day 2014:19:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 1998:18:46, 23 August 2013 (UTC) 1420:15:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC) 1411: 1236:to learn about open access. 735:That's what I think too. -- 637:and am pondering to use it 3042: 3012:2013 Science sting outcome 2966:(This is my first RfC.) -- 2815:open educational resources 2810:Knowledge:WikiProject Open 2729:Get free access to sources 2695:Universities and Libraries 2366:in publishing and research 2264:Get free access to sources 2230:Universities and Libraries 2044:. We are fully aware that 2042:Open Access Media Importer 1748:15:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 1695:14:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 1664:13:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 831:16:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 810:01:02, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 791:23:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 773:23:31, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 751:16:13, 18 April 2012 (UTC) 727:06:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 711:01:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC) 688:23:24, 24 March 2012 (UTC) 606:00:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC) 464:I started a discussion at 2920:WikiProject Open planning 2823:free/open source software 2803:Planning WikiProject Open 2710:Knowledge Loves Libraries 2245:Knowledge Loves Libraries 1939:20:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 1919:16:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 1895:15:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC) 1721:17:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC) 1641:proposed adding ORCID IDs 1611:14:54, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 1591:16:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 1531:Metrics for popular pages 1525:16:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC) 1218:Knowledge:Communicate OER 1201:20:52, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 1184:16:50, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 1169:15:40, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 1146:15:26, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 1132:15:09, 19 July 2012 (UTC) 1095:13:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC) 1062:15:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 1032:16:49, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 1015:13:48, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 988:23:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 973:16:51, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 957:09:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC) 633:I have placed it over my 513: 2715:Wikidata source metadata 2395:-Hope to see you there, 2389:Introduce yourself :-) 2357:research for Wikipedians 2341:Partner to provide free 2250:Wikidata source metadata 1981:against Knowledge policy 1870:00:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC) 1847:23:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 1826:20:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 1798:13:55, 15 May 2013 (UTC) 1431:Journal of Global Health 1425:Journal of Global Health 1400:Public Relations Journal 1394:Public Relations Journal 1116:17:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC) 1085:where this is an issue. 894:19:24, 24 May 2012 (UTC) 657:19:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC) 628:22:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC) 120:tagged with this project 1962:Template:OA-attribution 1769:01:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC) 1679:on my user page now. -- 924:Nature Publishing Group 856:22:31, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 256:which is still in use. 168:Transparency (behavior) 2941:Requesting comment on 2840:Thanks for this Pete! 2651:Free newspaper sources 2186:Free newspaper sources 1333:At the end of October 1315:Caenorhabditis elegans 837:Open education project 615: 2753:Teach Library Interns 2666:Find Your Source tips 2583:The Knowledge Library 2555:The Knowledge Library 2531:Open Access Advocates 2516:Wikimania 2014 London 2288:Teach Library Interns 2201:Find Your Source tips 2118:The Knowledge Library 2098:The Knowledge Library 2092:The Knowledge Library 1669:Thanks, Andy. I have 614: 484:Another related Cfd: 438:Thanks. I responded. 277:Name for this project 42:of past discussions. 2986:can be collected at 2758:Become a Coordinator 2676:Citation tools guide 2631:Free Resource Guides 2626:Discover open access 2293:Become a Coordinator 2211:Citation tools guide 2166:Free Resource Guides 2161:Discover open access 1984:against moral rights 1726:Aaron Swartz article 1335:User:Maximilianklein 1310:User:Daniel Mietchen 1229:Athabasca University 1070:Olympics controversy 667:I am considering to 365:proprietary software 329:open-source software 2961:Wall Street Journal 2778:Support Open Access 2671:How to find sources 2313:Support Open Access 2206:How to find sources 1573:on my personal blog 1231:is trying to start 899:Collaboration with 199:Related Cfd and Tfd 3008:2013 Science sting 2416:multiple links in 2327: 1361:media in Commons. 1151:Coverage from CNET 616: 504:WikiAd for WP:OPEN 2943:Talk:Aaron Swartz 2791: 2790: 2736:Books & Bytes 2616:Resource Exchange 2597: 2326: 2325: 2271:Books & Bytes 2151:Resource Exchange 2132: 2102: 2034:WikiProject CC BY 1868: 1674:Authority control 1634:Authority control 1339:on P2P University 909:Signpost coverage 539: 538: 82: 81: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3033: 3000: 2917: 2893:project planning 2889:WikiProject Open 2785: 2775: 2604: 2587: 2586: 2576: 2569: 2468: 2467: 2461: 2437:Requested here: 2430: 2410:User:Cyberbot II 2390: 2362:Promote broader 2320: 2310: 2139: 2122: 2121: 2111: 2104: 2080: 2069: 2063: 2031: 2025: 1937: 1916: 1915: 1909: 1893: 1862: 1845: 1823: 1822: 1816: 1788:. Kind regards, 1693: 1678: 1672: 1662: 1653: 1649: 1638: 1632: 1627:http://orcid.org 1608: 1607: 1601: 1588: 1587: 1581: 1560: 1522: 1521: 1515: 1497: 1496: 1490: 1437:. Kind regards, 1416: 1413: 1410: 1386: 1385: 1379: 1297: 1296: 1290: 1258: 1257: 1251: 1222:User:Peteforsyth 1113: 1112: 1106: 1046: 1012: 1011: 1005: 955: 854: 852: 749: 697:Should we treat 686: 655: 604: 580: 555: 533: 526: 518: 511: 451: 450: 444: 406: 405: 399: 353:Creative Commons 349:open-source film 315: 314: 308: 269: 268: 262: 219: 213: 190: 189: 183: 141: 135: 106: 105: 99: 68: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3041: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3032: 3031: 3030: 3015: 2993:Daniel Mietchen 2991: 2984: 2939: 2805: 2787: 2786: 2768: 2767: 2763:Learn about TWL 2719: 2680: 2656:Online archives 2641:Journal Sources 2600: 2580: 2557: 2518: 2465: 2464: 2457: 2423:Daniel Mietchen 2421: 2418:Access2Research 2393: 2392: 2388: 2322: 2321: 2303: 2302: 2298:Learn about TWL 2254: 2215: 2191:Online archives 2176:Journal Sources 2135: 2115: 2095: 2073:Daniel Mietchen 2071: 2067: 2061: 2029: 2023: 1951: 1930:Daniel Mietchen 1928: 1913: 1912: 1905: 1882:Daniel Mietchen 1880: 1855: 1834:Daniel Mietchen 1832: 1820: 1819: 1812: 1805: 1776: 1757: 1728: 1705: 1682:Daniel Mietchen 1680: 1676: 1670: 1651: 1645: 1644: 1636: 1630: 1619: 1605: 1604: 1597: 1585: 1584: 1577: 1549:Daniel Mietchen 1547: 1533: 1519: 1518: 1511: 1494: 1493: 1486: 1477: 1454: 1427: 1396: 1383: 1382: 1375: 1307: 1294: 1293: 1286: 1268: 1255: 1254: 1247: 1215: 1213:Communicate OER 1110: 1109: 1102: 1072: 1042: 1009: 1008: 1001: 944:Daniel Mietchen 942: 936:working on this 905: 870:Access2Research 863: 850: 844: 840: 819: 738:Daniel Mietchen 736: 695: 693:CISPA blackout? 675:Daniel Mietchen 673: 665: 644:Daniel Mietchen 642: 593:Daniel Mietchen 591: 569:Daniel Mietchen 567: 544:Daniel Mietchen 542: 531: 524: 506: 462: 448: 447: 440: 421: 403: 402: 395: 337:Lawrence Lessig 312: 311: 304: 300:reliable source 279: 266: 265: 258: 217: 211: 201: 187: 186: 179: 139: 133: 132:When I look at 116: 103: 102: 95: 87: 64: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3039: 3037: 3014: 3005: 2983: 2980: 2938: 2935: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2804: 2801: 2789: 2788: 2770: 2769: 2766: 2765: 2760: 2755: 2750: 2745: 2740: 2731: 2725: 2718: 2717: 2712: 2707: 2702: 2697: 2692: 2686: 2679: 2678: 2673: 2668: 2663: 2658: 2653: 2648: 2646:Bibliographies 2643: 2638: 2633: 2628: 2623: 2621:Reference Desk 2618: 2612: 2606: 2598: 2579: 2577: 2556: 2553: 2517: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2459:Blue Rasberry 2452: 2407: 2406: 2386: 2385: 2377: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2360: 2353: 2346: 2339: 2330: 2324: 2323: 2305: 2304: 2301: 2300: 2295: 2290: 2285: 2280: 2275: 2266: 2260: 2253: 2252: 2247: 2242: 2237: 2232: 2227: 2221: 2214: 2213: 2208: 2203: 2198: 2193: 2188: 2183: 2181:Bibliographies 2178: 2173: 2168: 2163: 2158: 2156:Reference Desk 2153: 2147: 2141: 2133: 2114: 2112: 2094: 2090:Come and join 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2065:OA-attribution 2027:OA-attribution 2017: 2016: 1986: 1985: 1982: 1979: 1950: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1907:Blue Rasberry 1854: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1814:Blue Rasberry 1804: 1801: 1775: 1772: 1756: 1751: 1727: 1724: 1704: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1639:. I have also 1618: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1599:Blue Rasberry 1593: 1579:Blue Rasberry 1569:Analytics Team 1532: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1513:Blue Rasberry 1488:Blue Rasberry 1476: 1473: 1453: 1450: 1426: 1423: 1406:. Regards ★☆ 1395: 1392: 1377:Blue Rasberry 1324:model organism 1306: 1303: 1288:Blue Rasberry 1283: 1282: 1267: 1264: 1249:Blue Rasberry 1244: 1243: 1237: 1214: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1193:68.173.113.106 1161:68.173.113.106 1148: 1138:68.173.113.106 1134: 1124:68.173.113.106 1104:Blue Rasberry 1087:68.173.113.106 1071: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1035: 1034: 1018: 1017: 1003:Blue Rasberry 995: 994: 990: 975: 932:BioMed Central 904: 897: 862: 859: 839: 834: 818: 813: 798: 797: 796: 795: 794: 793: 783:68.173.113.106 775: 765:68.173.113.106 755:We have to do 730: 729: 703:68.173.113.106 701:the same way? 694: 691: 664: 661: 660: 659: 609: 608: 584: 537: 536: 528: 520: 519: 505: 502: 501: 500: 461: 458: 457: 456: 442:Blue Rasberry 420: 415: 414: 413: 412: 411: 397:Blue Rasberry 375: 374: 369: 368: 357:OpenCourseWare 306:Blue Rasberry 278: 275: 260:Blue Rasberry 254: 253: 246: 245: 227: 226: 220: 200: 197: 196: 195: 181:Blue Rasberry 173: 172: 115: 112: 97:Blue Rasberry 86: 83: 80: 79: 74: 69: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3038: 3029: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3013: 3009: 3006: 3004: 3003: 2998: 2994: 2989: 2981: 2979: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2964: 2962: 2959: 2953: 2951: 2945: 2944: 2936: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2916: 2911: 2910: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2861: 2857: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2802: 2800: 2799: 2796: 2784: 2779: 2774: 2764: 2761: 2759: 2756: 2754: 2751: 2749: 2746: 2744: 2741: 2739: 2737: 2732: 2730: 2727: 2726: 2724: 2723: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2708: 2706: 2703: 2701: 2698: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2688: 2687: 2685: 2684: 2677: 2674: 2672: 2669: 2667: 2664: 2662: 2659: 2657: 2654: 2652: 2649: 2647: 2644: 2642: 2639: 2637: 2634: 2632: 2629: 2627: 2624: 2622: 2619: 2617: 2614: 2613: 2611: 2610: 2605: 2603: 2595: 2591: 2585: 2584: 2578: 2575: 2571: 2570: 2567: 2564: 2562: 2554: 2552: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2538: 2536: 2532: 2527: 2523: 2515: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2469: 2462: 2460: 2453: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2428: 2424: 2419: 2415: 2411: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2398: 2391: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2376: 2375: 2365: 2361: 2358: 2354: 2351: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2337: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2319: 2314: 2309: 2299: 2296: 2294: 2291: 2289: 2286: 2284: 2281: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2272: 2267: 2265: 2262: 2261: 2259: 2258: 2251: 2248: 2246: 2243: 2241: 2238: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2220: 2219: 2212: 2209: 2207: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2197: 2194: 2192: 2189: 2187: 2184: 2182: 2179: 2177: 2174: 2172: 2169: 2167: 2164: 2162: 2159: 2157: 2154: 2152: 2149: 2148: 2146: 2145: 2140: 2138: 2130: 2126: 2120: 2119: 2113: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2101: 2099: 2093: 2089: 2083: 2078: 2074: 2066: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2028: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1983: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1973: 1968: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1948: 1940: 1935: 1931: 1926: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1917: 1910: 1908: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1866: 1860: 1852: 1848: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1824: 1817: 1815: 1809: 1802: 1800: 1799: 1795: 1791: 1790:DA Sonnenfeld 1787: 1786: 1781: 1773: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1725: 1723: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1713:DA Sonnenfeld 1710: 1703: 1700: 1696: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1675: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1652:Pigsonthewing 1648: 1642: 1635: 1628: 1624: 1616: 1612: 1609: 1602: 1600: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1582: 1580: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1530: 1526: 1523: 1516: 1514: 1508: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1498: 1491: 1489: 1483: 1474: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1462:DA Sonnenfeld 1459: 1451: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439:DA Sonnenfeld 1436: 1432: 1424: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1405: 1401: 1393: 1391: 1390: 1387: 1380: 1378: 1371: 1368: 1362: 1360: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1342: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1316: 1311: 1304: 1302: 1301: 1298: 1291: 1289: 1281: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1265: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1252: 1250: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1223: 1219: 1212: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1158: 1155: 1152: 1149: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1114: 1107: 1105: 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1078: 1069: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1045: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1006: 1004: 997: 996: 991: 989: 985: 981: 976: 974: 970: 966: 961: 960: 959: 958: 953: 949: 945: 939: 937: 933: 929: 925: 921: 916: 914: 910: 902: 898: 896: 895: 891: 887: 882: 880: 875: 871: 866: 860: 858: 857: 853: 848: 838: 835: 833: 832: 828: 824: 817: 814: 812: 811: 807: 803: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 753: 752: 747: 743: 739: 734: 733: 732: 731: 728: 724: 720: 715: 714: 713: 712: 708: 704: 700: 692: 690: 689: 684: 680: 676: 670: 662: 658: 653: 649: 645: 640: 636: 632: 631: 630: 629: 625: 621: 613: 607: 602: 598: 594: 589: 585: 583: 578: 574: 570: 565: 561: 560: 559: 558: 553: 549: 545: 534: 529: 527: 525:Knowledge ads 522: 521: 517: 512: 509: 503: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 482: 481: 480: 476: 472: 467: 459: 455: 452: 445: 443: 437: 436: 435: 434: 430: 426: 425:Guillaume2303 419: 416: 410: 407: 400: 398: 391: 390: 389: 385: 381: 377: 376: 373:perspectives. 371: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 316: 309: 307: 301: 296: 294: 290: 285: 276: 274: 273: 270: 263: 261: 251: 248: 247: 243: 242: 241: 240: 236: 232: 224: 221: 216: 209: 206: 205: 204: 198: 194: 191: 184: 182: 175: 174: 169: 164: 163: 162: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 138: 130: 128: 123: 121: 113: 111: 110: 107: 100: 98: 92: 84: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3016: 2985: 2968:Dervorguilla 2965: 2960: 2954: 2949: 2946: 2940: 2914: 2912: 2886: 2808: 2806: 2792: 2777: 2735: 2722:Get involved 2721: 2720: 2682: 2681: 2636:Book Sources 2608: 2607: 2599: 2581: 2565: 2560: 2558: 2539: 2522:the next one 2519: 2458: 2408: 2394: 2379: 2372: 2370: 2363: 2356: 2349: 2342: 2335: 2328: 2312: 2270: 2257:Get involved 2256: 2255: 2217: 2216: 2171:Book Sources 2143: 2142: 2134: 2116: 2097: 2096: 2091: 2050:free to read 2049: 2045: 2033: 1987: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1906: 1875:Here we go: 1856: 1813: 1806: 1783: 1780:this article 1777: 1758: 1740:Dervorguilla 1729: 1706: 1660:Andy's edits 1656:Talk to Andy 1647:Andy Mabbett 1620: 1598: 1578: 1534: 1512: 1487: 1478: 1455: 1428: 1415:PEANUTBUTTER 1397: 1376: 1372: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1343: 1332: 1319: 1313: 1308: 1287: 1284: 1269: 1248: 1245: 1216: 1153:. How about 1103: 1073: 1043: 1002: 940: 917: 906: 886:Okeyes (WMF) 883: 867: 864: 841: 820: 799: 781:'s support. 761:Uncyclopedia 756: 696: 666: 617: 540: 507: 463: 441: 422: 396: 361:open society 341:free culture 305: 297: 280: 259: 255: 228: 202: 180: 131: 124: 117: 96: 88: 65: 43: 37: 2819:open access 2364:open access 2355:Facilitate 2046:open access 1808:See article 1754:Share-alike 1272:User:Gaurav 1176:Niteshift36 843:this. :-) 339:'s idea of 325:open access 293:open access 215:Open access 148:open source 144:open access 137:Open navbox 127:open access 36:This is an 3019:Randykitty 2738:newsletter 2705:Publishers 2700:Archivists 2273:newsletter 2240:Publishers 2235:Archivists 2054:definition 1865:talk to me 1711:. Thanks, 1367:C. elegans 1359:C. Elegans 1320:C. Elegans 345:open music 2901:Lawsonstu 2899:pages. - 2842:Lawsonstu 2734:Read the 2542:Lawsonstu 2338:resources 2269:Read the 1972:this edit 1853:templates 1782:, at the 1709:this page 1044:Doc James 928:just done 823:George Ho 802:ABC Order 757:something 719:Guy Macon 635:WiR pages 586:Now also 532:file info 333:Knowledge 77:Archive 4 72:Archive 3 66:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 2683:Outreach 2218:Outreach 2058:proposal 1761:NaBUru38 1536:Mr.Z-bot 1080:sporting 1054:contribs 884:Thanks! 874:petition 872:and its 865:Hey all 779:Facebook 418:PLoS ONE 367:in 1969. 284:User:Pnm 2922:page. - 2870:Sara FB 2381:Join in 2374:Sign up 2040:or the 669:propose 639:at PLoS 620:Kaldari 588:at PLoS 39:archive 2915:UPDATE 2891:, its 2821:, and 2795:Ocaasi 2466:(talk) 2414:tagged 2397:Ocaasi 2348:Build 2006:Snek01 1990:Snek01 1914:(talk) 1886:WiR/OS 1859:phoebe 1838:WiR/OS 1821:(talk) 1738:.) -- 1686:WiR/OS 1606:(talk) 1586:(talk) 1553:WiR/OS 1520:(talk) 1495:(talk) 1384:(talk) 1295:(talk) 1256:(talk) 1111:(talk) 1083:events 1010:(talk) 948:WiR/OS 742:WiR/OS 679:WiR/OS 648:WiR/OS 597:WiR/OS 573:WiR/OS 548:WiR/OS 535:– #234 449:(talk) 404:(talk) 347:, and 313:(talk) 267:(talk) 188:(talk) 104:(talk) 93:page. 1623:ORCID 1617:ORCID 1077:other 1058:email 926:have 699:CISPA 114:Scope 16:< 3023:talk 3010:and 2997:talk 2990:. -- 2972:talk 2928:talk 2924:Pete 2905:talk 2897:talk 2895:and 2874:talk 2860:talk 2856:Pete 2846:talk 2831:talk 2827:Pete 2780:... 2594:edit 2590:talk 2546:talk 2502:talk 2498:Pete 2485:talk 2481:Pete 2446:talk 2442:Pete 2427:talk 2412:has 2315:... 2129:edit 2125:talk 2077:talk 2010:talk 1994:talk 1974:is: 1934:talk 1927:. -- 1890:talk 1879:. -- 1842:talk 1794:talk 1778:See 1765:talk 1744:talk 1717:talk 1690:talk 1557:talk 1546:. -- 1544:here 1466:talk 1443:talk 1409:DUCK 1197:talk 1180:talk 1165:talk 1142:talk 1128:talk 1091:talk 1050:talk 1028:talk 1024:Pete 984:talk 980:Tvol 969:talk 965:Pete 952:talk 934:are 920:here 890:talk 827:talk 806:talk 787:talk 769:talk 746:talk 723:talk 707:talk 683:talk 652:talk 624:talk 601:talk 590:. -- 577:talk 566:. -- 552:talk 494:talk 475:talk 429:talk 384:talk 355:and 235:talk 156:talk 150:. – 2776:... 2311:... 1654:); 1418:☆★ 879:FAQ 490:Pnm 471:Pnm 380:Pnm 231:Pnm 152:Pnm 3025:) 2999:) 2974:) 2963:. 2930:) 2907:) 2876:) 2862:) 2848:) 2833:) 2817:, 2592:| 2563:. 2548:) 2504:) 2487:) 2448:) 2429:) 2127:| 2079:) 2068:}} 2062:{{ 2030:}} 2024:{{ 2012:) 2004:-- 1996:) 1936:) 1903:. 1892:) 1884:- 1861:/ 1844:) 1836:- 1796:) 1767:) 1746:) 1719:) 1692:) 1684:- 1677:}} 1671:{{ 1658:; 1637:}} 1631:{{ 1575:. 1559:) 1551:- 1509:. 1468:) 1445:) 1412:IS 1318:. 1199:) 1182:) 1167:) 1144:) 1130:) 1093:) 1060:) 1056:· 1052:· 1030:) 986:) 971:) 954:) 946:- 941:-- 915:" 892:) 847:SJ 845:– 829:) 808:) 789:) 771:) 748:) 740:- 725:) 709:) 685:) 677:- 672:-- 654:) 646:- 626:) 603:) 595:- 579:) 571:- 554:) 546:- 496:) 488:– 477:) 469:– 431:) 386:) 351:. 343:, 335:, 331:, 237:) 229:– 218:}} 212:{{ 158:) 140:}} 134:{{ 122:. 3021:( 2995:( 2970:( 2926:( 2903:( 2872:( 2858:( 2844:( 2829:( 2596:) 2588:( 2544:( 2500:( 2496:- 2483:( 2444:( 2440:- 2425:( 2131:) 2123:( 2075:( 2008:( 1992:( 1932:( 1888:( 1867:) 1863:( 1840:( 1792:( 1763:( 1742:( 1715:( 1688:( 1650:( 1555:( 1464:( 1441:( 1195:( 1178:( 1163:( 1140:( 1126:( 1089:( 1048:( 1026:( 1022:- 982:( 967:( 950:( 903:? 888:( 851:+ 825:( 804:( 785:( 767:( 744:( 721:( 705:( 681:( 650:( 622:( 599:( 575:( 550:( 492:( 473:( 427:( 382:( 252:, 233:( 154:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Open/Archive 2 - Knowledge

Index