Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Awards/Archive 1

1629:

a quote, is it questioned, is it likely to be questioned or is it controversial? if so, inline') such gems as 'One participant was Tracey Emin, known in the art world but largely unknown to the wider public at that time. She appeared completely drunk (she has said this was caused by painkillers she was taking for a broken finger), swearing, insulting the other panel members and saying that she wanted to go home to her mum (she then left). It caused considerable media attention and brought her national fame.' and 'The Chapman Brothers (Jake and Dinos Chapman) were given what was generally felt to be a long-overdue nomination', both uncited and potentially controversial (the last one, for example, is weasley unless linked to artists/news orgs going "its about bloody time!" and whatnot). The referencing needs a large overhaul, tbh. Fix that up and I have no problem. In addition the wider B-class criteria include statements like "No reader should be left wanting" and comments that there shouldn't be anything large missing; we have 6-year long gaps in coverage of the artists in the "history" section. Personally I'd move to have all that condensed anyway; it is too gappy to be set out like that, and if you fill in all the missing years then it will be, well, boring. It'd do much better as a few lumps of prose.

3122:

WikiProject scale (especially with a WikiProject of such wide scope) is asking for unnecessary conflict. How much prose there is in the article is a poor parameter of what is an article and a list, as we have lists that are pure prose. As for your example though, awards typically go two routes from my experience. You have the main article and a separate list of winners/nominees or you have simply the awards article that acts as a list. In the former, the awards article goes to GAN and the winners/nominees list goes to FLC. In the latter, the awards article goes to FLC. —

5176: 5907: 31: 5584: 3479: 4657: 2130: 5169: 5172: 3147:

fails. (I've seen a numer of FLC candidated that had come directly from the failed GAN for just this reason) I'll submit to FLC now, and hopefully it wont result in 2 weeks then fail only due to there being too much text. Listing all the nominees on one article would have been too long imo, hence this situation of a main article acting as a list

152: 3342:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators. 2638:, and agreed that cups, prizes directly competed for should not be included. I have not had time to look through all the content taggings and as such there probably remain some inconsistencis, for which I apologise. If you find any in your course of work please feel free to untag them. Lastly welcome, it is great to have you on board. 3587:

about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.

3949:. I am a member of the Canada Project music. This article is currently unassessed for quality and importance for both our projects. I think that the list sections dealing with the Award recipients by year should be spun off to separate articles. Other than that, I really can't comment on the article. Please help, somebody. 3915: 3764: 4245: 3586:

We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable

3058:

should go to FLC or GAN. There is little to say about this extremely niche award apart from listing the winners, and at the moment the list at the article is longer than the prose, but as it is the main article, it should also make the case for notability, which is not really needed in the lead for a

1894:

Oh god no. How about this; we work it on intent. If the participants sign themselves up of their own volition directly for the running it can be taken as a general rule that the contest is ineligible; it is a hallmark of most awards that candidates are put forward by their peers. I advise whatever we

1868:

Ah, a good point, hrm. I would consider those to be quite imporant. Sports Personality of the Year is chosen the same way (With televoting). That something is a competition shouldn't make it inelligible, just if it is a sporting trophy that is granted automatically for participation or something like

1628:

I'd disagree on your point about good inline citations, which is the big pillar most B-class articles rest on. Background: 3 para's with no inline citations. At least 6 of the yearly blow-by-blow paragraphs have no citations, and the article includes (noting that the normal rule for inlines is 'is it

3146:

i've never had a GA or FL fail, so wanted to make sure i was submitting to right process first. Failing because a GA reviwer thinks it is too listy would be just time-wasting for all involved, if we can form a guideline to point reveiwers of either process too, it might prevent wrong submissions and

3100:

I agree with your points, but with the stated assumption that it isn't just a size ratio they need to qualify; they do need to be a certain quality (obviously). In regards to your example: Have you considered turning it into a Featured Topic? If the lists are all FL-quality and the parent article is

4730:

I went ahead and started the task force after a couple of other active editors expressed interest in participation. I strongly encourage WP Awards members to join if interested, or to at least stop by and help with setting up the task force. I need to figure out how to adjust the WP Awards template

3602:

or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help

1602:

It definatly makes the B-class criteria, with its inline citations, coverage from 84 to modern day, coverage of all the turners various things (though admitedly not in all detail) and inclusion of other media (Though I would say it could do with /less/ media, unless such media was of the art rather

1285:

was tagged in this project. It got me thinking of whether pages like this should be included. I think there is a subtle but important difference between awards where a winner is selected, or decided for some predetermined criteria, and competitions that have a trophy at the end of them. I'm am open

3318:

I had started to clean the main page up for this category of awards and began to realize it was more of a major work project than I had either the time or resources to fix. The main page is horribly formatted and the lists need to be inverted. There are two complete years included in tables at the

3062:

So, what do people think (in general and for this example). Would a fail at GAN for being to listy be acceptable for an argument at acceptance at FLC? or the other way around (failing FL for having too much prose cf. to list?). Currently some main article for awards are structured as articles, and

1767:

Agree with the hockey ones. Eurovision is difficult; on the one hand, it is "judged", not based on a scoring system, on the other hand it can be said that entries go in to "win" and it is therefore a competition. A third and completely British viewpoint would be that it isn't a competition because

870:

Overall my point is thus: lots of lists are already Featured, just divided up, and many more are close to that level. Through very little effort we can get a lot of pretty stars. Three FT's is a lot to focus on at once (although one is practically done) so I'll leave it there; any suggestions from

531:

I'm not sure which Maths award is considered better Fields or Abel. I would lean towards Abel as it has no "not over 40 years" criteria or anything, and the Field Medal article mentions that Abel may be the more Nobel equivalent prize. I have already changed the High-Importance to Golden Globe, to

1551:

goes all blaxploitation* nuh-uhh girlfriend! Fraid military and national awards are covered by the Orders, medals and awards (or some variant thereof, not sure the exact name) wikiproject. This'n was set up entirely because for some unknown reason they don't cover anything that isn't a "national"

962:

I like the topic workshop idea, as it caters for all users, allowing them to edit any areas of expertise they may have. I think this might be better than the whole project focusing on a specific topic, as some users might not be interested in the topic, and as such be lost from the WikiProject. I

3827:

is a top importance article here on this project and lately I have bee trying to make it into a GA. I have, however, come to a point where I need some help with opinions and somebody to look at the article with a new set of eyes, perhaps doing some copy editing etc. I could really need a hand if

1434:

I have to say I agree. I saw we had a featured article within the project scope, and then noticed it was the Stanley Cup....which strikes me as not a prize or award in the sense we seem to be going off but is simply a sporting trophy. Is what is agreed that FA Cup/Stanley Cup/European Cup is not

1135:

Suggestion; if we have "X" and "list of winners of X" I propose we have the latter a step-down on the importance scale. For example; the Nobel Prize is a top-importance article. List of winners of it, however, are not as important as the medal itself, and should be bumped down a notch. Thoughts?

100:

We need a way to categorise our articles per importance. Strictly speaking we're going to have a lot more lists than other projects, mainly because unless they are something where the medal itself is extremely notable (example: the pulitzer, the nobel) it is most likely going to be "article with

5887:

to use the number instead of the year for the Grammy awards. I noticed that the word "or" was used in the lead sentence: "The 2005 (or 47th) Grammy Awards were held". As a matter of grammar I would recommend removing the word "or" - "The 2005 (47th) Grammy Awards were held", from every article.

1500:

Indeed; gymnastics, for example, is judged. It is, however, a directly competitive event, which imo should be the deciding factor. When a mathematician discovers a new lie group he isn't doing it to win a Fields Medal; athletes, on the other hand, have a specific goal of performing well to win

4708:

I was wondering if project members would have any interest in a Grammy Awards task force (to be housed under the WikiProject Awards and prizes umbrella). I would love to get some editors together to keep the Grammy lists and articles up-to-date. Please let me know if you would be interested.

3121:

Trying to make a WikiProject guideline here on what is and is not a list is a bad idea. The only time you get a clear answer is when you go to GAN or FLC, as there has been no wiki-wide consensus on what divides the gray area between articles and lists. Trying to set an arbitrary rule on a

157:

scaled down. Probably the best known award we'll work on. In the absence of more contributors I'll judge this discussion to be (current) consensus on how importance will work, and I'll put it on the main page. Future people with problems with it can discuss it here and we'll reevaluate.

2772:

We could judge it the same way as we do standard sporting awards, i.e on what grounds they are awarded. Those with specific entry criteria (you must be X high to ride this hall of fame!) are thrown out; those 'judged' (rock hall of fame, country music hall of fame, so on) are included.

5721:, who gave the award, went quiet in 2008, only to become active again in 2012. I have yet to see if they will continue giving the award. The downside: only one recipient links to the article, besides the link to Angell's article, so it may be deleteable as "unused" or "obsolete". — 1460:

Indeed. Competitive awards (directly competitive, that is) such as sporting trophies are not within our revised scope. This may be a problem (and I'd like to gauge people's opinion on this) with awards given to individuals but judged based on their performance in competitive games.

2588:

My on-wiki time will be limited and mainly dedicated to discussions and some judicial work (work on judicial pages, that is) for a few days. I have exams coming up and by working on law articles I can pretend I am revising :P. I'll be back soon, though; I have two FTs to work on.

685:

Pulitzers and Emmy's are US awards, and i would be wary of assuming international importance. Similarly with Tony's, , Grammys, BAFTAS, Brit awards, Booker prize - all only high imo. Every country has awards, few can claim true international importance - i don't think Emmy's get

4813: 4265:

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as

1358:. List of X awards, I feel, is a step too far; it is something simpsons-focused that happens to be about awards. List of simpsons awards= no. List of annie awards for Best Animated Television Program (which includes the simspons)=yes. People are welcome to disagree, of course. 923:

Works for me! I was thinking of more of a sorta focus thing; the entire project turns their attention to one particular topic, we do it, we move on, so on so forth. If this works better it is fine with me! I'll add the film ones once I've finished the additions I'm making now.

3972: 1643:

Well, I'll respect your opinion and I've dropped it to C (Guess that C-class finally has a use!). I do think it could probably be brought up to a good standard with some relative ease, and it is a pretty well known prize, so we might want to make note of it for futue work.

85:

Straight off the bat we need someone to create a template box we can stick on the talk page of our articles. Firstly it allows us to "stake claim" and show ourselves off, but more importantly it is needed to appropriately categorise our articles per importance/quality.

4086:

Hello, I have a question regarding awards received by musical artists, notable figures, etc. Is it required to have an awards table when showing the awards that someone was nominated for or won? The reason I am asking this is because of the merge proposal presented

693:

Pulitzers are not more highly regarded than other countries' awards - i know there are french / German / Italian awards that are considered only a small step below the Nobel in literature and go to international authors - if Pulitzers are top, then so are they. Eg

3345:

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. —

3637: 4467:, and could appreciate any help that would improve the page. I'm really not sure if this is the best place to post this, but someone recommended I try so I thought it was worth a shot. Any help in cleaning the article would be much appreciated. Thanks so much. 2506:

Just as an FYI, that section's purpose is to list as many possible topics as you see fit, no matter how difficult you think it is. The more options you present to people in terms of what they can work on, the more work that will get done. So fire away ;-) —

1603:

than the artists). I don't think it would pass a GA either, but I thik it would be useful to get a point by point run down there on where to proceed, as it is, currently, a JOAT artile, with all areas ok but not great rather than any single huge failing.

3595: 3573: 3387: 1327:

It is difficult, I would leann on including those as they are decided on my fans or whoever, and to me are "awards". I realise that there is a lot of them though. Another thing I was going to ask was what is you view on "List of awards won by..." e.g.

1167:

I agree that "List of ..." should be bumped down one level, and was going to suggest it myself. For now, I think an extra template is not necessary (at least at this early stage) as it will increase maintenance and possibly complicate things overall.

4046:

article), and a strong consensus there that this article shouldn't even exist as a list on its own, some editors are still adamant that this singer's nine awards should be split from a 35KB article, which makes zero sense to me. All of his awards

3599: 3579: 2200:

I am going away (no internet) for a week, so won't be participating in any discussions for a bit. Also the WikiProject banner looks like it is broken, but it is a Meta problem and has been reported. Keep up the good work with the project all.

4248:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at 1032:

I am impressed by your Photoshop (or whatever you use) skills. My graphics editing skills are non-existent, so I appreciate your work on this. I think this should replace the image we currently use. If others agree, I will make the changes.

736:

is with. I thought that the nobel prize icon that we currently use is slightly misleading, or rather leading, in the sense that we don't only cover science or science-related articles. Thoughts and suggestions for improvement are welcomed.

943: 3858: 1515:

So, military medals would still come under the scope? (As one doesn't run into fire to get a victoria cross and it s awarded by a panel) Sory for twenty questions, just figure it is better to have clarity now than murky water later.

5266: 3046:

I'*'m guessing this project is quite new, but i was wondering if you/we could maybe have a discussion about when an article is better assessed at FLC or GAN, maybe resulting in a few (non-binding but helpful) project guidelines.

5219:

Although reality TV does not involve acting (theoretically), what types of awards are reality shows eligible for. What kinds of things have they won or been nominated for? Does the Emmys have a primetime host category. I know

2676:

I must admit this is (suprisingly) not something I had considered before. I think they should be within the scope as they are often "awarded" as recognition for something. There is occasionally even cross-over in the name e.g.

5528: 4295:

Hello all. I have made some new articles about some new/quite unknown Orders and Medals (and a single hall of fame). It would be nice for me, if some of you would take a look at them and give some comments on what you think

3591: 3563: 3723: 1669:

Finally, my opinion is worth something somewhere :P. It does (as you said) seem to be easy to upgrade a few bits; I'll start a discussion about the history section on the talk page there for you and others to chip in on

2749:

where people go in when they meet a certain number of tour points). It would be nice to judge everything case by case, however this isn't really feasible. At the moment I think I lean towards inclusion having looked at

2521:

Sweet. Medals of the Royal Society are goooo! Alright, so it doesn't have the ring of 'thunderbirds' but then we don't have to go out rescuing people stupid enough to get trapped under burning buildings/bombs/oceans.

3727: 3076:

If list is longer than prose, but this is because prose requires significant expansion, list can be renamed and go to FLC, and a second article discussing the award in general created (with no list, but a link to

101:

description of medal and list of recipents"; so, a list. Because of this it will be difficult to say "this is high importance, this is mid importance"; after all, they're all prizes. I recommend it works like so:

800:

maybe better. It is difficult though ,as anything that isn't a real award may indicate that the project is dealing with fictional awards (i.e. for Wikipedians). What's your view, and anyone else for that matter.

4181:

I found it by searching down this page, but it seems to me that it should be placed on the main page with its own ToC entry, so that people can find it more easily--perhaps next to the Assessment section? Best,

3791: 3719: 2957: 4390: 1985:(you only have to show evidence you're studying towards being a barrister, not that you are yet qualified) I'm only a student and couldn't really justify it. Also I'm a cheap bastard and don't own one :P. 5462: 4055:. I was wondering if I could get an uninvolved editor from this WikiProject, who would likely be more experienced in this area than myself and the other contributors to the discussion, to leave a comment 1200: 267: 5452: 1599:

Turner prize definitely isn't a GA; it is difficult to consider it a B, to be honest, the referencing is fairly bad. I'm useless at prose but I'll tag in a load of references in a bit when I have time

597:

should be added, but I don't feel strongly about this. I don't think the Turner Prize should be "Top-", it is certainly well known, but not sure about it being high up in prestige for the art world.

3529: 2965:"Knowledge (XXG)" and "Knowledge (XXG) talk" namespaces. "User" space is fine, and I don't thing going changing "User talk" archives is necessary as they are just that, archives of what used to be. 4096: 4088: 4056: 4052: 2931: 1768:

nobody with two brain cells to bang together gives a toss about the Eurovision and many of the entries patently aren't in it to win (unless there is a 'talentless bozo' category I'm not aware of).

3339: 3964: 3911: 3051: 477:

Support all but the Wolf Prize. The Wolf is a key prize but comes second/third/fourth to the nobel in every field; I'd say the "core" articles are the nobel ones. I'd like to propose to have the

1420:

Alrighty, can somebody (preferably Rambo, since he knows the new criteria) remove those articles not under our revised scope from the Featured list and also take the tag off their talk pages?

981:

Good point. Also that attitude is a good way to attract new users; "hey, you might not be interested in awards as a whole, but you like maths? Well we're working on the Fields Medal and...".

963:

don't really know how to go about setting one up though. Hopefully this should page will be moved to the WikiProject space today, and then we can start drafting up ideas in a subpage there.

3235: 2347:

Excellent! :). I think tagging is the first thing to be done, then we should work on the current projects or whatnot. Useless having a 'scope' is articles within that scope are not tagged.

447: 3239: 754:

I see what you are saying, but personally think a made up image is more confusing. If that is Jimbo, as I believe, it will be associated with Knowledge (XXG) and possibly therefore to the

4230: 5795:

I'm not sure whether this article ought even to exist, as there may be nothing more useful than a dicdef to say about award ceremonies as a whole, but there are a lot of incoming links.

4092: 4036: 4005:, one of the most important articles of this project has a dispute which needs to be resolved. I would be happy if people could help by adding their opinions (support or oppose) to the 2547: 4485: 2990: 610: 471: 2543: 5442: 2978: 532:

allow the Oscars to be Top. Grammy Awards added, I haven't get anywhere in my search to find the top award for art, can you think of any other prominent disciplines we have missed.

3583:

has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.

2950: 2767: 1762: 5432: 4664: 4214: 976: 107:

Mid Importance: Awards at a national level, or awards given by a not-so-reputable (foundation, say, instead of a massive university or committee of elites)/industry association.

4660: 4649: 2694: 2651: 3027: 2923: 2860: 2016:

the chart on the main page of the project and the priorities don't line up. We have 'High' listed as a valid priority, and not none.....yet...the chart has none but not High.

517:

would fall? Highly prestigious, but I'm not sure where it is in the public conscience. If it isn't top-rated you could use it as the high-rated example instead of the oscars.

149:

You can do that? Awesome, I'll get on to working out which articles go where. Give me a poke when you have it done and I'll start uploading. We need an image, I guess; I vote

4464: 2109: 1254: 1118: 1046: 814: 775: 3694: 1393: 1349: 1313:

That makes sense. If we're talking sporting, here; how would individual awards work? So "player of the year" awards and so on rather than direct competitions between teams.

1181: 901:

passes FLC, Scorpion and I will nominate it as part of our Nobel Laureates FT. Given that this project especially caters to topics, might I suggest something similar to the

675: 545: 508: 387: 231: 195: 5836:

For those who will say it's irrelevant: That's a Prize about religion. It is relevant to put each laureate's religion, as it is relevant to put each laureate's language at

3394:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 3246:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 3211:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 2554:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 2985: 1821:

I'd say any televoting system is a bit dubious as it doesnt make clear the criteria or those judging, without that it becomes very difficult to accept it as a real award.

513:

Haha, that's ok. We probably need to look further afield (i.e out of sciency articles) for the top uns as well; grammy awards, may I suggest. Also, where do you think the

4149: 3862: 3846: 3451:. I'd thought people associated with this WikiProject might be interested so I thought I'd give a heads up, this is the only way I know how!! Reasons can be found on the 3204: 2662:

Glad to be aboard, I figured that since I have worked on so many awards-related pages that I might as well join. Just another question, what about Hall/walks of fame? --

1863: 5225: 3626: 2889: 2825: 1938:

Exactly :). I'm afraid this doesn't mean we get made barons, unfortunately. Maybe we could have that as the title of coordinators if this project gets big, though :P.

104:

High Importance: Awards at an international level, internationally recognised and awarded by a reputable institution. Examples: The Nobel, the Pulizer, the Royal Medal

4820:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 4413: 3922:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 3798:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 3644:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 2062:

Since the title was very similar to a preexisting WikiProject, I took the liberty of changing the WikiProject's title to "Awards and prizes" to distinguish this from

5792:

a chunk of unsourced, poorly linked, text about one narrow kind of award ceremony, which has been in place pretty much untouched since the stub was created in 2008.

562:

for ice hockey, maybe? Country-limited, though. And of course we're forgetting those non-notable ones, what are they called.. Olympic medals, those are the ones :P.

1286:

to suggestions, but possibly think we should leave out things that are awarded as a result of a direct competition format to win them. For example, I'm not sure a

3452: 2608:

I was wondering if this project includes trophies given to league champions. I'm assuming it doesn't, but there are inconsistancies, for example, it includes the

5947: 5942: 71: 66: 5860: 2681:. But I am by no means am a definitive member in deciding what is included here. It would be good to know other members opinion on this, in fact what is yours? 2452: 1988:

I could make some off colour jokes, but shan't. We are likely confusing others enough as is. How did we end up this off topic? - Oh, back on topic for a moment,

458:

I'm not sure about these, as it will be hard to keep the list to the best few. The Nobel Prize is an obvious choice, as for the others I'm open to suggestions.

4821: 3923: 3799: 3645: 3395: 3247: 3212: 3177:, so please add any comments / supports / opposes. The previous lists struggled to get enough reviews of any sort, so hopefully a new project will remedy this. 2555: 1307: 695: 3733:

In short if i was to get this to FL quality would i be required to make this list sortable or could i go with the man booker style and still get it passed?

3748:

Disregarding all the above info as ive decided on a table format. Would someone be able to do quick copyedit on the lead, it would be greatly appreciated.

2870: 2063: 755: 144: 593:

would be High-Class as it is country & sport specific. Also in my opinion there should only be one Top-Importance field per field, so i'm not sure if

5864: 5468:

in hopes of encouraging editors to work on the most critically acclaimed episodes and highlight the most critically acclaimed episodes for the readers.--

4809: 4798: 4439: 2997: 2937:

The only incorrect links in the Knowledge (XXG) space are archived MfDs, or inactive (kept as an archive) pages. I don't think these should be updated.

2878: 1199: 3488: 3070:

If the list is much longer than the prose, but the prose is substantial, it should be split off anyway, the would have 2 articles, one for GAN one FLC.

2634:, and I have removed and untagged it. Originally there was a very rough scope and in the start up lots of things go tagged. We had a little discussion 2308:

Awards judged by a panel rather than competitively? Go for it. If we argue that "joke" awards shouldn't be present then we rule out the Turner imo :P.

1782:

Eurovision isn't an award. It is a competition, at least that is my view. I'm with wogan that it is an exercise in futility more than a competition ;)

796:

I personally think that using the Nobel Prize, one of the worlds most famous awards is acceptable. However if you feel it is not, a more generic award

3448: 3444: 3437: 1570:

Might be worth telling Neuro this ;) The little advert thing is a series of military medals ;) Oh, I think I ound an article that needs GA reviewing.

1354:

I meant awards 1) awarded by official bodies but 2) based on the performance of an individual rather than a competitive team. An example would be the

478: 422: 5658: 4365:

for intiating the improvement! Article is improved, copyedited, verified on recipient names and got one more reference. Article is now also moved to

5307: 4852: 5385: 3418: 5509: 2910:

in the "Knowledge (XXG) talk" space and there are no doubt more in other space as well. I will endeavour to fix these when I have some more time.

363: 4226: 2214: 495:

That's fine, I hadn't realised it wasn't actually considered an official Nobel Prize. And I'm one of the people heading up this project–oh dear!

3670:

is currently at a FLC, can you please please PLEASE review it, it's in dire need of reviews after 5 days without so much as a blink of the eye.

4817: 3919: 3795: 3641: 1287: 3558: 5837: 4366: 2724: 2394: 2330: 2290: 4668: 4645: 182:. I have linked the project to my userspace, whilst it remains here. I will update it if & when this is moved to Knowledge (XXG) space. 5923: 5340: 4904:. At some point I will probably get to the Oscars and maybe the BAFTAs. To see what I am talking about see the navboxes at the bottom of 3730:

which is featured. I prefer the man booker style as it shows the different years better but it isnt sortable whereas the other format is.

3009: 2901: 2882: 2782: 2707: 2229: 1889: 1777: 1429: 1407: 1367: 1322: 1268: 1062: 990: 791: 625: 571: 526: 490: 401: 245: 209: 167: 47: 17: 3861:

will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the

2220:

As your 'second' I'll keeping things in order *wink, wink*. When you come back we should have a Featured Topic up and another half done.

1725:

With respect to the refined scope, I was about to start retagging things but thought I'd check some things. From the refinement it seems

5089:. I have changed the Pulitzer Prize, Drama Desk and Olivier Awards colors so that they are all different shades from the Tony Awards.-- 5047: 5006: 4999: 4362: 4347: 3200: 3073:

If the List is as long as or little longer than the prose, but prose will not be expanded as all sources exhausted, it can go to either.

1151:

How about a separate template: "This article is a fork of X. X has an importance rating of Y, but due to our ], this has been rated Z."

898: 860:

Getting all the Royal Society awards and lectures up to Featured (I've already done two) gives us "Royal Society Medals and Lectures" FT

850: 3391: 3243: 3208: 2551: 5841: 5718: 5478: 5353: 5279: 5238: 5141: 5099: 5060: 5019: 4975: 4934: 4865: 4775: 4681: 4621: 4584: 4498: 4326: 4191: 3633: 1329: 558:

is probably the most well-known art award, although not necessarily the highest unless you have a very limited view of the art world.

5662: 4608: 5402: 5392: 4758: 4709:

Similarly, feel free to express opposition if you are concerned about the task force being incorporated into the project. Thanks! --

3616: 3170:

Well, the first comment after submitting was "shouldn't this go to GA first?", but i think that is sorted for this example. Anyway,

294: 5184: 5798:

Someone might like to improve it, so it actually says something useful about award ceremonies in general (Nobel Prize ceremony?).

5482: 5422: 5357: 5283: 5242: 5145: 5103: 5064: 5023: 4979: 4938: 4869: 4779: 4685: 4625: 4588: 4502: 328: 311: 277: 4331: 3888: 3319:

bottom that seem to be mangled. I just wanted to alert the project about this as it is beyond my resources to check and repair.

762:. As a new project in its place, I think we want to be clear that this is completely detatched from the aforementioned project. 5684: 5412: 4343: 3693:

Please weigh in with your thoughts about having Razzie Awards templates at the bottom of film-related articles. Check in here:

2751: 1746: 1372:

It seems we are reading off the same page, I agree exactly with what you said above, but just wanted to check. I would include

2874: 2866: 759: 3383: 1847: 1282: 893:

So basically all non-government awards fall under this WikiProject's scope? If that's the case, check the featured lists for

5650: 5637: 5595: 5573: 3594:

for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the

131:

I agree with your idea for how the importances will work. I can make a tempate for talkpages. In fact I will get on it now.

797: 2742: 1742: 1734: 5654: 4486:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_March_22#Category:Academy_Award_for_Best_Original_Screenplay_templates

4275: 4259: 4250: 299:

Subject is one of the top of recognitions in its field. This should be familiar to most people internationally. Example:

5833:. Would it be a good idea to add each laureate's religion? There are sources for religions at each laureate's article. 5829:

Greetings, Prize community! I'd like to initiate a consensus debate (is that the right way to do it?) on the article of

4316: 3521: 3274: 2096:

Don't worry about it, anyone who was interested and clicks on the ad will still be redirected to the correct place. :)

4568: 4023: 3368: 2386:

Can't we add a scroll bar? I think we should all of our featured content, though I agree that it takes a lot of room.—

442: 176: 4207: 4142: 4103:. I also have asked this question, because I have never seen awards listed in a prose on a Knowledge (XXG) article. 3695:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#Gaining_consensus:_Razzie_award_templates_at_the_bottom_of_articles

3577:

has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A

3020: 2971: 2943: 2916: 2853: 2760: 2687: 2644: 2207: 2102: 1856: 1755: 1386: 1342: 1300: 1247: 1174: 1111: 1039: 1005: 969: 807: 768: 668: 603: 538: 501: 464: 380: 224: 188: 137: 5914: 5558:, advanced from 8-year-old {stub} to far beyond that (marked C), essentially by one editor 10-12 September 2011. -- 4893: 4739: 4717: 4553: 3312: 1501:

medals/gongs/whatnot. Indeed, in athletics your "value" as an athlete is based largely around your trophy cabinet.

728:

Proposed this to Ironholds after doing some tagging - after six revisions it has been suggested that I propose it.

659: 38: 5591: 5577: 5512:? What more needs doing for it to become a FL? I've been working on this list, but I've never done a FL before. 3055: 2729: 2713: 2678: 2399: 2335: 2295: 1726: 1333: 703: 371: 2716:

is within the scope since it is an award recoginizing recordings. As for other Hall of Fames, I am not so sure.—

1899:

rule rather than a specific by-the-book one; as contract law is teaching me there are exceptions to everything.

1207: 348:

Works for me. Some articles are going to need to be retagged, and you'll need to create the top-class category.

5748: 5704: 5694: 4321: 4187: 3677: 3501:

Apologies for the notice, but this is being posted to every WikiProject to avoid accusations of systemic bias.

3278: 3172: 1011:

I just rendered the Nobel prize and removed the holders, since you seem intent on keeping it as the logo. Does

3828:

possible. If not with editing I would appriciate if somebody at least gave some opinions on the talk page :)

2371:

50+ lists and so on is a lot to put in the mainpage. Suggest we do a MILHIST and simply link to the category.

4311: 333:

Subject is notable in its field, but not highly regarded. These may be little known to most people. Example:

5884: 5845: 4351: 4154:

Thanks for responding. I was referring to award nominations and awards won by a notable figure like the one

3324: 2746: 854: 334: 5474: 5349: 5275: 5234: 5137: 5095: 5056: 5015: 4971: 4930: 4861: 4771: 4677: 4617: 4580: 4494: 4408: 3302: 2802: 2705: 2668: 2622: 2567: 2279: 1291: 1259:

Agreed! Perhaps you need to design a barnstar so we can award it to you for your fantastic project work :P

5666: 3080:

If the list is shorter than the prose, it should go to GAN (even if it passes the 10 item FL requirment).

1475:

Hrm. Some olympic medals get a bit into the grey area, but I'd suggest we just blanket say 'No' to them.

5315: 4901: 4833: 4732: 4710: 4561: 4202: 4137: 3612: 3379: 3297:. Perhaps someone can check them out (these have separate articles for different categories of awards). 3063:

others as lists, usually the former for awards with many sources (so they actually have more to write).

3015: 3005: 2966: 2938: 2911: 2897: 2848: 2833: 2755: 2682: 2639: 2202: 2097: 1851: 1750: 1381: 1337: 1295: 1242: 1169: 1106: 1034: 964: 802: 763: 663: 598: 533: 496: 459: 375: 219: 183: 132: 5897: 5873: 5849: 5817: 5752: 5730: 5708: 5678: 5612: 5567: 5540: 5521: 5495: 5370: 5319: 5296: 5255: 5209: 5158: 5116: 5077: 5036: 4992: 4951: 4882: 4841: 4792: 4746: 4724: 4698: 4638: 4601: 4538: 4515: 4474: 4453: 4428: 4397: 4378: 4355: 4305: 4285: 4171: 4111: 4076: 4042:

Despite this failing at FLC with an early close (for the fact that it can be easily merged to the main

4030: 3984: 3958: 3935: 3900: 3877: 3835: 3811: 3776: 3757: 3742: 3708: 3683: 3657: 3620: 3543: 3510: 3464: 3430: 3407: 3328: 3306: 3269:

I just found this WP. It appears you're brand new. I went ahead and tagged three articles for your WP:

3259: 3224: 3186: 3160: 3130: 3110: 3092: 2837: 2804: 2736: 2670: 2624: 2598: 2578: 2573: 2531: 2515: 2493: 2479: 2464: 2437: 2423: 2406: 2380: 2356: 2342: 2317: 2302: 2259: 2245: 2189: 2160: 2091: 2074: 2051: 2036: 1972: 1947: 1933: 1908: 1841: 1816: 1802: 1704: 1679: 1664: 1638: 1623: 1594: 1561: 1536: 1510: 1495: 1470: 1455: 1235: 1162: 1145: 1096: 1078: 1026: 955: 933: 917: 902: 880: 838: 748: 715: 653: 639: 357: 124: 95: 5386:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#Reformating_Emmy_Awards_episodic_Directing_and_Writing_templates

3857:

will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's

1398:

Okies. We should perhaps set these out in a "what is/is not good to tag" guide for people patrolling.

5869: 4267: 3980: 3976: 3931: 3927: 2718: 2388: 2324: 2284: 1738: 1012: 286:

related article and is considered a core to the project. This should be familiar worldwide. Example:

5486: 5361: 5287: 5246: 5149: 5107: 5068: 5027: 4983: 4942: 4873: 4783: 4689: 4629: 4592: 4506: 3567:. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the 706:, which are world-wide. I think it is only English language bias that makes them seem less notable. 366:

already existed. I believe it should be used sparingly though, under 10 articles or something. i.e.

5779: 5744: 5700: 5128: 4897: 4549: 4183: 4155: 4070: 3807: 3672: 3460: 3106: 2778: 2594: 2527: 2475: 2433: 2376: 2352: 2313: 2255: 2225: 2047: 1943: 1904: 1812: 1773: 1675: 1634: 1557: 1506: 1466: 1425: 1403: 1363: 1318: 1264: 1141: 1092: 986: 951: 929: 897:, as there's quite a few FLs that would fall under the scope of this project. And yeah, as soon as 876: 834: 649: 635: 621: 567: 522: 486: 397: 353: 241: 205: 163: 120: 110:

Low Importance: Internal awards made at a national or sub-national level. Example: scouting awards.

91: 4237:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the 3973:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Nobel_laureates_affiliated_with_Princeton_University

550:

Ehh, lesse. Sports, Science, Film, Music.. Is there some TV equivalent to the oscars? Oh, and the

3896: 3653: 3426: 3403: 3320: 3255: 3220: 3123: 2881:. This has left a lot of links to the wrong target. The barnstar template talk redirects were to 2508: 2416: 2187: 2067: 1913:

A Lord Denning rule, what? If the outcome is absurd, assume the process made a little mistake ;)

1214: 910: 300: 3568: 2412: 2166:

Nice. I was actually thinking that the barnstar should be something like that. Good work Neuro.

1869:

eurovision where itis just a TV show or such. I mean, we don't want to include X-factor, do we?

906: 5726: 5674: 5633: 5608: 5536: 5469: 5344: 5270: 5229: 5132: 5090: 5051: 5010: 4966: 4962: 4925: 4856: 4766: 4762: 4672: 4612: 4575: 4528: 4521: 4489: 4374: 4301: 4282: 4262:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th. 3954: 3772: 3753: 3738: 3359: 3298: 3290: 2797: 2700: 2663: 2617: 2559: 2489: 2460: 200:

Alrighty then. Can you give an example of the base template we'd use rather than the backend?

5490: 5365: 5291: 5250: 5153: 5111: 5072: 5031: 4987: 4946: 4877: 4802: 4787: 4693: 4633: 4596: 4510: 894: 5893: 5311: 5187: 4825: 4535: 4471: 4169: 4109: 4006: 3991: 3608: 3604: 3506: 3196: 3182: 3156: 3088: 3001: 2893: 2829: 2027: 1963: 1924: 1880: 1832: 1793: 1695: 1655: 1614: 1585: 1527: 1486: 1446: 1373: 1355: 711: 5768: 5620: 5127:

Does anyone have any information on the relative importance of the various Pulitzers. See

3492: 5830: 5823: 5517: 4531:

for the upcoming awards, and any help in improving it would be much appreciated. Thanks!--

4017: 3946: 3854: 3270: 2745:

for significant contributions in their chosen field of work), whereas others do not (e.g.

2238: 2153: 2084: 1228: 1155: 1071: 1055: 1019: 784: 741: 283: 4118: 3554: 3525: 3101:

FL-quality then it qualifies; you just need to add a template to the bottom and submit.

1982: 5808: 5772: 5761: 5619:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

5333: 4909: 4557: 4449: 4424: 4258:

and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at

4062: 3803: 3704: 3539: 3456: 3102: 2774: 2590: 2523: 2471: 2429: 2372: 2348: 2309: 2275: 2251: 2221: 2043: 1939: 1900: 1808: 1769: 1671: 1630: 1553: 1502: 1462: 1421: 1399: 1359: 1314: 1260: 1137: 1088: 982: 947: 925: 872: 830: 645: 631: 617: 563: 518: 482: 432: 393: 349: 317: 237: 201: 159: 116: 87: 214:

Not quite sure what you mean. If you mean how it is used, an example would be placing

5563: 5555: 4921: 4917: 4100: 4043: 3892: 3872: 3667: 3649: 3422: 3399: 3251: 3216: 3014:

I have added a hatnote here, but don't have time to address the links at the moment.

2167: 437: 218:

on the Nobel Prize talk page. I have now also added a documentation to the template.

5740: 5722: 5670: 5604: 5532: 5221: 4913: 4905: 4370: 4297: 3950: 3787: 3768: 3749: 3734: 3349: 3286: 2485: 2456: 1571: 699: 658:

Not sure about the Olympics. There isn't an article about the Olympic medal, and a

555: 514: 452: 4403:

Deletion review discussion - Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners

4255: 5186:

One editor has questioned if the award is notable or not. Some feedback please.

594: 551: 5922:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5889: 5377: 5085: 4564:. I am trying to determine if they should have {{Film|Awards-task-force=yes}}, 4532: 4468: 4164: 4129: 4124: 4104: 4051:

nominations could easily be covered in simply two paragraphs, as I demonstrated

4002: 3824: 3817: 3502: 3294: 3178: 3152: 3084: 2613: 2019: 1955: 1916: 1872: 1824: 1785: 1730: 1687: 1647: 1606: 1577: 1519: 1478: 1438: 707: 590: 559: 417: 367: 287: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5267:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes

5261:

Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes

5228:. It seems like they should have best Comedy, Drama and Reality show awards.-- 3054:

for each catergory made featured lists, and i am confilicted as to whether the

1051:

I'll duplicate this to the page, then, so that we can see if consensus exists.

316:

Subject is well recognised within its field or its country of origin. Example:

5513: 5180: 4394: 4099:

because it would be too big to have all of the awards tables for the article,

4010: 3832: 3282: 2818: 2631: 2609: 586: 427: 5643:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

4095:

could be kept as a stand-alone list, and not a prose, like the one presented

944:

List of actors nominated for Academy Awards for foreign language performances

5799: 5717:

It's a "retired" award, although no sources can be found to state that. The

4444: 4419: 4238: 3699: 3534: 662:

isn't quite the same. So I'd keep it from the select few for those reasons.

4117:

No it is definately not required. Here are two exmaples of sections from a

2129: 2080:

Shit, should I do that ad again? I don't have the source files any more :(

5559: 3868: 5310:

and replace the custom divs with the adequate award template. Thanks. --

4274:

to extend the reach of Knowledge (XXG) worldwide. Please help us, with

4225:

Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge (XXG) articles selected by the

3845:

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the

151: 5867:. I would appreciate the thoughts from members of this WikiProject. -- 4440:

Talk:Acceptance_of_Golden_Raspberry_Awards#RfC:_Removal_of_sourced_info

4082:

Question about awards and nominations received by musical artists, etc.

863:

BBC sports personality of the year can have the same sort of thing done

4221:

Awards articles have been selected for the Knowledge (XXG) 0.8 release

3143:

Jepp, it's just that last main list/article that needs to pass for FT.

702:

covers the whole commonwealth, again a larger population than the US,

4229:

for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were

4924:, who had ranges showing on their Oscars original score templates.-- 4391:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of Jewish Nobel laureates

1376:

in our scope, the key reason for me deciding that is the page says "

733: 729: 3598:. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the 5083:

For anyone wondering what I did with colors look at the bottom of

3491:

discussing if our policy on plot, WP:PLOT, should be removed from

2958:

Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Awards and prizes

2741:

I agree it is not clear cut. Some make me think they should (e.g.

1435:

within the project while BBC Sports Personality or such would be?

150: 4369:. I deleted the proposal for deletion and unreferenced template. 3530:

Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/29th Golden Raspberry Awards/archive1

4271: 3419:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list criteria#Revised criteria III

2885:

so they became double redirects in December 2008 and were fixed

698:

covers a greater population and has bigger prize money, and the

4816:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the 3918:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the 3794:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the 3640:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the 3495:. Please feel free to comment on the discussion and straw poll. 2934:(article talk looks OK for this but not Knowledge (XXG) space) 1290:

page would be of worthy inclusion to the project., because the

5901: 4254:

with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's

3473: 3413:

Proposed changes to FL criteria WRT length and content forking

3059:

FL (notability is usually assumed to be shown in the parent).

2282:. Does anyone think these two should be part of this project?— 616:

My feeling almost exactly. I'll add the emmy awards in, then.

25: 2932:

Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes

829:

Ideas? We've got a community portal post up.. anything else?

5582: 5501:

More work needed for list of presidents of the Royal Society

4731:

so that the task force can have its own assessment chart. --

3965:

List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Princeton University

3912:

List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Princeton University

3367:

on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at

1192:

Okay, we are now on the ad rotation. Hope you guys like it:

4609:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Template:WikiProject_Awards

3889:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured lists#Awards and prizes issue

3390:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 3242:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 3207:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 2550:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 2042:

Sorry, run that past me again but with help files enabled.

5865:

Talk:Melbourne International Film Festival#List of winners

4757:

There may be a problem in the writing credits for certain

2869:

was originally the project for barnstars and was moved to

4669:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

1850:

need to go as well, because it is a music "competition".

909:? Probably a good way to orient our work flow. Cheers, — 5695:

User talk:Anna Frodesiak#David Angell Humanitarian Award

4851:

Please help me sort out who the award is credited to at

4231:

selected based on their assessed importance and quality

4037:

List of awards and nominations received by Justin Bieber

2888:

by a bot who couldn't know they should be retargeted to

2415:

is probably a good idea given how many lists we have. —

5789: 5739:

That makes sense. So, how about if I merge it into the

5661:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

5463:

DirectorsGuildofAmericaOutstandingDirectingComedySeries

4853:

Talk:Grammy_Award_for_Record_of_the_Year#Person_or_song

4198: 2991:

Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Awards

2962: 2907: 2890:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) Awards

2886: 2844: 2826:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) Awards

2822: 2815: 2754:, but I could probably be persuaded/pushed either way. 5626:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

5453:

DirectorsGuildofAmericaOutstandingDirectingDramaSeries

4892:

I have added the year range to the templates for the

4665:

Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay 1940-1960

4121:

that document awards in prose without using a table:

3767:

if anyone is interested in waying in their comments.

3236:

Golden Globe Award for Best Director – Motion Picture

3230:

Golden Globe Award for Best Director – Motion Picture

4661:

Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay1940-1949

4650:

Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay1940-1949

3000:. Maybe there should also be one on this talk page. 853:

passes FL we can have a Featured Topic based around

448:

Lauréat Prix International de Géographie Vautrin Lud

4763:

Talk:Grammy_Award#Grammy_Award_for_Song_of_the_Year

4465:

List of people who accepted Golden Raspberry Awards

4414:

Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2010 December 1

732:is the version without the text at the bottom, and 5603:Awarded only four times. Largely unknown price. -- 4667:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 2986:Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards 2871:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) Awards 2796:Does anyone else have any comments about this? -- 2544:Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture — Drama 2064:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) Awards 1294:is more of a competition than an award. Thoughts? 5226:Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Game Show Host 3627:List of BBC Sports Personality of the Year awards 2699:I don't know actually, I could go either way. -- 2630:No you are quite right the scope doesn't include 5341:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Template:ESPYs 4327:Most Honorable Order of Omukama Chwa II Kabalega 4007:Talk:Nobel Prize#Conductive polymers controversy 3992:Talk:Nobel Prize#Conductive polymers controversy 3603:with a particular article, please contact me or 3590:If any members are interested, please visit the 3553:This message is being sent to WikiProjects with 3338:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new 2814:Many barnstar template talk pages redirect here. 682:I agree with Nobel's, Oscars, Miss world as Top. 5428:. The intention is to make them look more like 5164:Is the Jessie Richardson Theatre Award notable? 3971:Hello, the FLC suggested an AFD so here it is: 1952:No powdered wigs? Bad form old bean! Bad form! 481:included; it is considered equal to the nobel. 4246:Awards articles and revisionIDs we have chosen 2817:Most or all appear to have been redirected by 2234:And I'll have another 2000 lists tagged... :P 216:{{WikiProject Awards|importance=High|class=B}} 5861:Talk:List of International Emmy Award winners 5443:WritersGuildofAmericaEpisodicComedyScreenplay 5046:I have a second issue in need of feedback at 3945:I'm looking for this Project's help with the 3607:and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! 2998:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Awards and prizes 2879:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Awards and prizes 2470:Thanks! Considered working with the project? 2453:List of Norwich City F.C. Players of the Year 8: 5433:WritersGuildofAmericaEpisodicDramaScreenplay 5007:Template talk:PulitzerPrize History#Reformat 4434:RFC at Acceptance of Golden Raspberry Awards 4281:For the Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 editorial team, 4176: 696:Austrian State Prize for European Literature 589:is the TV equivalent to the oscars. I think 412:Attempt to decide on Top-Importance articles 4753:Wrting credits for 21st century group songs 3516:29th Golden Raspberry Awards at Peer review 2906:Yes you are quite right. I found some more 1552:award (VC, Queens Gallantry Medal, so on). 4810:Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score 4799:Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score 4332:Hall of Fame of the Bunyoro-Kitara Kingdom 3281:. I also want to give you a heads up for: 2411:IMO, doing a redesign and showing it like 2322:Done tagging all related articles. Thanks— 2250:You better! Work faster tagmonkey! *whip* 2138:The WikiProject Awards and Prizes Barnstar 1194: 5048:Template talk:PulitzerPrize History#Color 3726:. However i then came across a format on 3449:Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences 3445:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 3438:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 2928:Wrong targets can also be found in these: 2635: 1015:look appropriate to use as project logo? 479:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 423:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences 5308:1998 New York Film Critics Circle Awards 4548:I am working on lists and templates for 3689:Discussion about Razzie Awards templates 1749:should go, after all it is a "contest". 1745:). Is that agreed? Also do people think 938:Do people think we should include award 273: 5859:There are some unanswered questions at 5771:because a newby editor had put it into 5632:notice, but please explain why in your 5510:List of presidents of the Royal Society 5329:There is a discussion about the use of 5179:all have results. New sources such as 4244:We would like to ask you to review the 4091:. If an awards table is required, then 3520:I've done some work improving the page 3453:Requested move section of the talk page 3340:WikiProject coordinators' working group 2883:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Awards 2865:Thanks. It appears the problem is that 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Awards 5920:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5885:Talk:2012 Grammy Awards#Requested move 3557:under their scope. Since August 2007, 2847:them all. Thanks for letting me know, 2484:I'll add it to my to-do list... :-) -- 1288:List of Football League Trophy winners 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 5838:List of Nobel laureates in Literature 5265:Please be advised of a discussion at 4463:I've been trying to improve the page 4407:Deletion review discussion regarding 4367:IEEE Donald G. Fink Prize Paper Award 2270:Should these be part of this project? 644:Minus the olympicy ones, all tagged. 7: 5775:, although it's got a long-standing 5531:. FL nom will happen once reviewed. 4847:Award to songwriter/performer/song ? 4663:has been nominated for merging with 4177:Where's the Project Banner template? 1684:Rightio. Back to my castle project. 5508:Could someone take a quick look at 5000:Template:Pulitzer Prize for History 3990:Nobel Prize, request for opinions ( 3201:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates 3192:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates 899:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates 851:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates 5767:This stub came to my notice while 5621:deleted for any of several reasons 5598:because of the following concern: 5224:has won for best host, but it was 4389:Notifying the relevant project of 4317:Royal Order of the Omujwaara Kondo 3634:BBC Sports Personality of the Year 3052:Gaylactic spectrum awards nominees 2875:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Awards 2867:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Awards 2428:Move it to another page, coolies. 760:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Awards 756:WikiProject Knowledge (XXG) Awards 24: 5384:I have initiated a discussion at 5168:A Google news archive search for 5005:I am requesting your feedback at 4963:Talk:Grammy_Award#Award_Templates 4759:Grammy Award for Song of the Year 4346:has been nominated for deletion. 3782:All-NBA Team Featured List Review 3728:the Gaylactic Spectrum Award list 2810:Barnstar talk pages redirect here 2066:. Made the moving easier also. — 1067:Any supporters/opposers of this? 554:should probably be included. The 5905: 4655: 4260:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Version 0.8 4251:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Version 0.8 3477: 2128: 1198: 1105:I gave earlier on my talk page. 29: 5685:David Angell Humanitarian Award 4527:Hi! I've created an article at 4344:IEEE Donald G. Fink Prize Paper 4338:IEEE Donald G. Fink Prize Paper 4197:Thanks for letting us know. Is 2752:List of halls and walks of fame 1747:Eurovision Song Contest winners 690:coverage in Europe for example. 374:would stay as High-Importance. 5818:10:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 5753:01:17, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 5731:22:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 5541:23:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 4442:. Thank you for your time, -- 4417:. Thank you for your time, -- 4385:List of Jewish Nobel laureates 4306:14:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC) 4286:21:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 4125:Frank Zappa#Acclaim and honors 3906:Feature list removal candidate 3684:00:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 3571:. After nearly two years, the 3384:BBC Young Musician of the Year 3375:BBC Young Musician of the Year 1848:BBC Young Musician of the Year 1574:. It isat least almost there. 1283:List of UEFA Super Cup winners 780:What would you suggest, then? 758:that only recently moved from 1: 5496:06:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC) 5170:Jessie Richards Theater Award 4957:Grammy Award template clutter 4398:02:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC) 4379:10:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC) 4356:08:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC) 3812:15:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC) 3777:17:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC) 3369:04:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC) 2824:. Shouldn't they redirect to 2743:Sault Ste. Marie Walk of Fame 2448:Have a featured list on me... 2110:18:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 2092:18:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 2075:17:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 2052:16:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 2037:15:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1973:15:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1948:14:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1934:14:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1909:14:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1890:14:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1864:13:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1842:13:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1817:13:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1807:I'd go with competition too. 1803:12:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1778:12:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1763:12:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1705:13:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1680:13:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1665:12:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1639:12:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1624:12:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1595:11:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1562:11:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1537:11:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1511:11:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1496:10:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1471:10:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1456:10:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 1430:20:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1408:14:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1394:14:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1368:14:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1350:14:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1323:14:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1308:14:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1269:14:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1255:13:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1236:13:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1182:13:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1163:13:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1146:12:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1119:13:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1097:12:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1079:12:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1063:12:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1047:11:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 1027:10:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 991:11:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 977:11:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 956:04:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 934:04:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 918:04:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 881:02:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 839:00:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 815:00:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 792:00:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 776:23:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 749:22:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 716:08:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC) 676:00:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 654:00:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 640:00:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 626:00:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 611:00:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 572:23:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 546:23:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 527:23:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 509:23:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 491:22:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 472:22:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 402:22:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 388:22:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 358:22:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 246:19:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 232:18:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 210:18:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 196:18:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 168:18:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 145:18:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 125:17:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 96:17:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC) 5898:18:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC) 5874:03:45, 19 October 2012 (UTC) 5371:06:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 4761:winners. Please comment at 4475:23:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC) 4454:20:30, 16 January 2011 (UTC) 4429:19:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC) 3878:02:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3836:13:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 3758:11:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 3743:03:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC) 3709:07:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 3522:29th Golden Raspberry Awards 3333: 3329:11:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC) 3307:02:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 3275:Carnegie Medal in Literature 3260:00:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 3225:13:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 3187:15:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC) 3161:10:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 3131:10:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 3111:10:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 3093:09:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 3042:Lists vs. Articles Guideline 3028:20:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 3010:17:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2979:16:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2951:16:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC) 2924:13:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2902:13:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2861:12:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2838:12:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 2805:18:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC) 2783:20:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC) 2768:20:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2737:20:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2708:19:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2695:19:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2671:18:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2652:18:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2625:18:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2599:15:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2579:02:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 2538:Featured list removal status 266:Articles are categorised by 5850:20:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC) 5709:00:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC) 5665:allows discussion to reach 5646:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 5629:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 5320:23:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC) 5297:00:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC) 5256:23:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC) 4276:your WikiProject's feedback 4272:Knowledge (XXG) for Schools 3528:process for it. Please see 3493:what Knowledge (XXG) is not 3443:I proposed the movement of 3334:Coordinators' working group 2532:20:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2516:20:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC) 2494:10:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2480:10:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2465:10:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2438:02:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2424:02:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2407:02:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2381:01:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2357:10:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2343:22:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2318:22:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2303:22:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2260:01:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2246:01:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC) 2230:19:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2215:19:32, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2190:03:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 2161:02:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 1131:Suggestion as to importance 443:Laureus World Sports Awards 5966: 5690:What should become of it? 5657:exist. In particular, the 5551:(re section 2, far above) 5522:22:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 4916:. The idea hit me seeing 4894:Screen Actors Guild Awards 4814:featured list removal here 4699:02:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 4639:04:47, 30 March 2011 (UTC) 4602:01:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC) 4554:Screen Actors Guild Awards 4539:02:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 4516:17:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC) 4256:articles with cleanup tags 4215:09:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 4192:06:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 4172:17:39, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 4150:09:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 4112:01:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC) 4077:03:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 3916:featured list removal here 3901:03:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC) 3851:Saturday, January 23, 2010 3792:featured list removal here 3638:featured list removal here 3561:has been participating in 3511:13:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC) 3465:06:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 3431:22:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC) 3408:01:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC) 3388:featured list removal here 3313:Category:Black Reel Awards 3265:Just tagged three articles 3240:featured list removal here 3205:featured list removal here 2548:featured list removal here 5883:There is a discussion at 5679:17:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 5651:proposed deletion process 5613:17:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC) 5210:01:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC) 4747:23:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 4725:15:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC) 4704:Grammy Awards task force? 4322:Royal Order of the Engabu 3559:WikiProject Good Articles 2714:Grammy Hall of Fame Award 2679:Grammy Hall of Fame Award 2134: 2127: 1727:Clarence S. Campbell Bowl 1197: 704:Prince of Asturias Awards 372:Nobel Prize in Literature 5403:EmmyAward DirectingDrama 5393:EmmyAward ComedyDirector 5159:02:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 5117:00:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC) 5078:19:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 5037:17:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC) 4993:05:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC) 4952:07:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 4883:04:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC) 4227:Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 team 4059:? That would be great. – 4031:18:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC) 3985:20:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC) 3959:01:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC) 3936:11:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC) 3847:WP 1.0 assessment system 3658:20:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC) 3621:22:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC) 3279:Coretta Scott King Award 3173:Gaylactic Spectrum Award 2821:(retired) in March 2007. 2604:Question about the scope 5638:the article's talk page 5568:16:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 5423:EmmyAward ComedyWriting 5388:regarding reformatting 5123:Major and lesser prizes 4842:03:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC) 4793:14:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC) 4484:Please come comment at 4312:Medal of Honor of ARKBK 3883:FL categorization issue 3863:WP 1.0 project homepage 3841:WP 1.0 bot announcement 3714:Opinion on tabel format 3544:03:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 2747:World Golf Hall of Fame 855:List of Nobel Laureates 825:Attracting more editors 335:Pipe Smoker of the Year 282:Subject is a must-have 5592:Büchergilde-Essaypreis 5587: 5578:Büchergilde-Essaypreis 5413:EmmyAward DramaWriting 5306:Please take a look to 4818:featured list criteria 4646:Nomination for merging 4409:Golden Raspberry Award 3920:featured list criteria 3796:featured list criteria 3642:featured list criteria 3392:featured list criteria 3244:featured list criteria 3209:featured list criteria 2996:There is a hatnote on 2873:in December 2008, but 2552:featured list criteria 2280:Golden Raspberry Award 1380:to have contributed". 1292:Football League Trophy 630:Oh, and the olympics? 155: 5918:of past discussions. 5663:articles for deletion 5596:proposed for deletion 5586: 5376:Reformating selected 5183:do cover the awards. 5173:Jessie Richards Award 5131:for the discussion?-- 4902:Primetime Emmy Awards 4562:Primetime Emmy Awards 4130:The Wiggles#Reception 3380:User:Diaa abdelmoneim 1846:If we lose that does 154: 42:of past discussions. 4544:redundant templates? 4411:winners, please see 4268:One Laptop per Child 3549:GA Sweeps invitation 1739:Hart Memorial Trophy 1277:Refinement of scope? 5879:Grammy award naming 4898:Golden Globe Awards 4888:Year added to title 4550:Golden Globe Awards 3718:I recently created 2274:I am talking about 1895:decide should be a 1209:Knowledge (XXG) ads 857:and lists per prize 5655:deletion processes 5588: 4961:Please comment at 4607:Please comment at 4569:WikiProject Awards 4057:at this discussion 3596:running total page 844:Suggested projects 370:would be top, but 364:Top-Class category 301:Golden Globe Award 236:Right got it, ta. 177:WikiProject Awards 172:Template created: 156: 5953: 5952: 5930: 5929: 5924:current talk page 5574:Proposed deletion 5494: 5369: 5295: 5254: 5215:Reality TV awards 5157: 5115: 5076: 5035: 4991: 4950: 4881: 4840: 4808:I have nominated 4791: 4697: 4637: 4600: 4529:The Comedy Awards 4522:The Comedy Awards 4514: 4291:Miniature Review? 4212: 4147: 4119:featured articles 4009:page. Thank you! 3910:I have nominated 3876: 3786:I have nominated 3632:I have nominated 3509: 3499: 3498: 3436:Proposed move of 3371: 3365: 3291:Bram Stoker Award 3234:I have nominated 3025: 2976: 2948: 2921: 2877:now redirects to 2858: 2765: 2692: 2649: 2542:I have nominated 2212: 2148: 2147: 2107: 1861: 1760: 1391: 1347: 1305: 1252: 1223: 1222: 1179: 1116: 1044: 1009: 974: 812: 773: 673: 660:list of medalists 608: 543: 506: 469: 385: 344: 343: 229: 193: 142: 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5957: 5939: 5932: 5931: 5909: 5908: 5902: 5872: 5815: 5806: 5784: 5778: 5743:legacy section? 5715:Propose deletion 5648: 5647: 5631: 5630: 5585: 5505:Hello everyone, 5472: 5467: 5461: 5457: 5451: 5447: 5441: 5437: 5431: 5427: 5421: 5417: 5411: 5407: 5401: 5397: 5391: 5347: 5338: 5332: 5273: 5232: 5206: 5203: 5200: 5197: 5194: 5191: 5135: 5093: 5054: 5013: 4969: 4928: 4859: 4838: 4832: 4830: 4769: 4742: 4735: 4734:Another Believer 4720: 4713: 4712:Another Believer 4675: 4659: 4658: 4615: 4578: 4573: 4567: 4492: 4480:CFD notification 4459:Help with a list 4208: 4167: 4143: 4107: 4073: 4065: 4029: 4026: 4020: 4013: 3866: 3682: 3680: 3524:and started the 3505: 3481: 3480: 3474: 3362: 3357: 3354: 3347: 3197:User:AdjustShift 3175:is now up for FL 3128: 3021: 2972: 2944: 2917: 2854: 2800: 2761: 2735: 2732: 2727: 2721: 2703: 2688: 2666: 2645: 2620: 2576: 2570: 2564: 2513: 2502:Potential topics 2421: 2405: 2402: 2397: 2391: 2367:Featured content 2341: 2338: 2333: 2327: 2301: 2298: 2293: 2287: 2244: 2241: 2208: 2184: 2181: 2178: 2175: 2171: 2159: 2156: 2132: 2125: 2124: 2118:Project barnstar 2103: 2090: 2087: 2072: 2035: 2032: 2024: 1971: 1968: 1960: 1932: 1929: 1921: 1888: 1885: 1877: 1857: 1840: 1837: 1829: 1801: 1798: 1790: 1756: 1703: 1700: 1692: 1663: 1660: 1652: 1622: 1619: 1611: 1593: 1590: 1582: 1535: 1532: 1524: 1494: 1491: 1483: 1454: 1451: 1443: 1387: 1374:Jack Adams Award 1356:Jack Adams Award 1343: 1301: 1248: 1234: 1231: 1217: 1210: 1202: 1195: 1175: 1161: 1158: 1112: 1077: 1074: 1061: 1058: 1040: 1025: 1022: 1003: 970: 915: 808: 790: 787: 769: 747: 744: 724:Wikiproject logo 669: 604: 539: 502: 465: 381: 274: 225: 217: 189: 181: 175: 138: 80:Initial thoughts 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5965: 5964: 5960: 5959: 5958: 5956: 5955: 5954: 5935: 5906: 5881: 5870:John Vandenberg 5868: 5857: 5831:Templeton Prize 5827: 5824:Templeton Prize 5809: 5800: 5782: 5776: 5765: 5688: 5659:speedy deletion 5645: 5644: 5628: 5627: 5583: 5581: 5549: 5503: 5465: 5459: 5455: 5449: 5445: 5439: 5435: 5429: 5425: 5419: 5415: 5409: 5405: 5399: 5395: 5389: 5382: 5336: 5330: 5327: 5304: 5263: 5217: 5204: 5201: 5198: 5195: 5192: 5189: 5166: 5125: 5044: 5003: 4959: 4890: 4849: 4834: 4826: 4806: 4755: 4745: 4740: 4733: 4723: 4718: 4711: 4706: 4656: 4653: 4571: 4565: 4546: 4525: 4482: 4461: 4436: 4405: 4387: 4340: 4293: 4233:, then article 4223: 4204:Rambo's Revenge 4179: 4165: 4139:Rambo's Revenge 4105: 4084: 4071: 4063: 4040: 4024: 4018: 4015: 4011: 3996: 3969: 3947:Covenant Awards 3943: 3941:Covenant Awards 3908: 3885: 3843: 3821: 3784: 3724:man booker list 3716: 3691: 3678: 3671: 3665: 3630: 3551: 3518: 3478: 3472: 3441: 3415: 3377: 3360: 3350: 3336: 3316: 3271:Caldecott Medal 3267: 3232: 3194: 3124: 3044: 3017:Rambo's Revenge 2968:Rambo's Revenge 2940:Rambo's Revenge 2913:Rambo's Revenge 2850:Rambo's Revenge 2812: 2798: 2757:Rambo's Revenge 2734: 2730: 2725: 2719: 2717: 2701: 2684:Rambo's Revenge 2664: 2660: 2641:Rambo's Revenge 2618: 2606: 2586: 2574: 2568: 2560: 2540: 2509: 2504: 2450: 2417: 2404: 2400: 2395: 2389: 2387: 2369: 2340: 2336: 2331: 2325: 2323: 2300: 2296: 2291: 2285: 2283: 2272: 2239: 2235: 2204:Rambo's Revenge 2198: 2182: 2179: 2176: 2173: 2169: 2154: 2150: 2120: 2099:Rambo's Revenge 2085: 2081: 2068: 2060: 2028: 2020: 2017: 1964: 1956: 1953: 1925: 1917: 1914: 1881: 1873: 1870: 1853:Rambo's Revenge 1833: 1825: 1822: 1794: 1786: 1783: 1752:Rambo's Revenge 1696: 1688: 1685: 1656: 1648: 1645: 1615: 1607: 1604: 1586: 1578: 1575: 1528: 1520: 1517: 1487: 1479: 1476: 1447: 1439: 1436: 1383:Rambo's Revenge 1339:Rambo's Revenge 1297:Rambo's Revenge 1279: 1244:Rambo's Revenge 1229: 1225: 1215: 1208: 1190: 1188:On ads template 1171:Rambo's Revenge 1156: 1152: 1133: 1108:Rambo's Revenge 1072: 1068: 1056: 1052: 1036:Rambo's Revenge 1020: 1016: 1001: 966:Rambo's Revenge 946:, for example. 911: 891: 889:More FLs, ideas 846: 827: 804:Rambo's Revenge 785: 781: 765:Rambo's Revenge 742: 738: 726: 665:Rambo's Revenge 600:Rambo's Revenge 535:Rambo's Revenge 498:Rambo's Revenge 461:Rambo's Revenge 414: 377:Rambo's Revenge 345: 264: 221:Rambo's Revenge 215: 185:Rambo's Revenge 179: 173: 134:Rambo's Revenge 82: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5963: 5961: 5951: 5950: 5945: 5940: 5928: 5927: 5910: 5880: 5877: 5856: 5853: 5826: 5821: 5773:Category:Stubs 5764: 5762:Award ceremony 5759: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5745:Anna Frodesiak 5734: 5733: 5701:Anna Frodesiak 5687: 5682: 5669:for deletion. 5649:will stop the 5617: 5616: 5580: 5571: 5548: 5545: 5544: 5543: 5527:Submitted for 5502: 5499: 5381: 5374: 5326: 5325:Template:ESPYs 5323: 5303: 5302:broken infobox 5300: 5262: 5259: 5216: 5213: 5165: 5162: 5124: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5043: 5040: 5002: 4998:Formatting of 4996: 4958: 4955: 4910:Jack Nicholson 4889: 4886: 4848: 4845: 4805: 4796: 4754: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4737: 4715: 4705: 4702: 4652: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4558:Academy Awards 4545: 4542: 4524: 4519: 4481: 4478: 4460: 4457: 4435: 4432: 4404: 4401: 4386: 4383: 4382: 4381: 4339: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4329: 4324: 4319: 4314: 4292: 4289: 4222: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4184:Aristophanes68 4178: 4175: 4162: 4161: 4160: 4159: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4127: 4083: 4080: 4039: 4034: 3995: 3988: 3968: 3962: 3942: 3939: 3907: 3904: 3884: 3881: 3842: 3839: 3823:Hey guys. The 3820: 3815: 3783: 3780: 3761: 3760: 3715: 3712: 3690: 3687: 3664: 3661: 3629: 3624: 3592:GA sweeps page 3550: 3547: 3517: 3514: 3497: 3496: 3482: 3471: 3468: 3440: 3434: 3414: 3411: 3382:has nominated 3376: 3373: 3348:Delievered by 3335: 3332: 3315: 3310: 3266: 3263: 3231: 3228: 3199:has nominated 3193: 3190: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3144: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3113: 3082: 3081: 3078: 3074: 3071: 3066:Suggestions: 3056:parent article 3043: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3031: 3030: 2994: 2988: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2929: 2811: 2808: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2723: 2659: 2658:Hall of Fames? 2656: 2655: 2654: 2612:, but not the 2605: 2602: 2585: 2582: 2539: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2503: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2449: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2393: 2368: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2329: 2289: 2276:Ig Nobel Prize 2271: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2197: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2146: 2145: 2141: 2140: 2135: 2133: 2119: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2113: 2112: 2059: 2056: 2055: 2054: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1733:etc. (in fact 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1707: 1565: 1564: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1539: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1241:Awesome work! 1221: 1220: 1212: 1204: 1203: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1165: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1101:Reiterate the 1099: 1083:Works for me! 1010: 1000: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 960: 959: 958: 905:I created for 903:topic workshop 890: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 865: 864: 861: 858: 845: 842: 826: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 725: 722: 721: 720: 719: 718: 691: 683: 680: 679: 678: 656: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 456: 455: 450: 445: 440: 435: 433:Pulitzer Prize 430: 425: 420: 413: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 342: 341: 340: 339: 331: 325: 324: 323: 322: 318:Heisman Trophy 314: 308: 307: 306: 305: 297: 291: 290: 280: 272: 263: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 128: 127: 113: 112: 111: 108: 105: 98: 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5962: 5949: 5946: 5944: 5941: 5938: 5934: 5933: 5925: 5921: 5917: 5916: 5911: 5904: 5903: 5900: 5899: 5895: 5891: 5886: 5878: 5876: 5875: 5871: 5866: 5862: 5855:Emmy and MIFF 5854: 5852: 5851: 5847: 5843: 5839: 5834: 5832: 5825: 5822: 5820: 5819: 5816: 5814: 5813: 5807: 5805: 5804: 5796: 5793: 5791: 5786: 5781: 5774: 5770: 5763: 5760: 5754: 5750: 5746: 5742: 5738: 5737: 5736: 5735: 5732: 5728: 5724: 5720: 5716: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5706: 5702: 5697: 5696: 5691: 5686: 5683: 5681: 5680: 5676: 5672: 5668: 5664: 5660: 5656: 5652: 5641: 5639: 5635: 5624: 5622: 5615: 5614: 5610: 5606: 5601: 5600: 5599: 5597: 5593: 5579: 5575: 5572: 5570: 5569: 5565: 5561: 5557: 5556:Olympic medal 5554:There is now 5552: 5547:Olympic medal 5546: 5542: 5538: 5534: 5530: 5526: 5525: 5524: 5523: 5519: 5515: 5511: 5506: 5500: 5498: 5497: 5492: 5488: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5471: 5464: 5454: 5444: 5434: 5424: 5414: 5404: 5394: 5387: 5379: 5375: 5373: 5372: 5367: 5363: 5359: 5355: 5351: 5346: 5342: 5335: 5324: 5322: 5321: 5317: 5313: 5309: 5301: 5299: 5298: 5293: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5277: 5272: 5268: 5260: 5258: 5257: 5252: 5248: 5244: 5240: 5236: 5231: 5227: 5223: 5214: 5212: 5211: 5208: 5207: 5185: 5182: 5178: 5174: 5171: 5163: 5161: 5160: 5155: 5151: 5147: 5143: 5139: 5134: 5130: 5122: 5118: 5113: 5109: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5092: 5088: 5087: 5082: 5081: 5080: 5079: 5074: 5070: 5066: 5062: 5058: 5053: 5049: 5041: 5039: 5038: 5033: 5029: 5025: 5021: 5017: 5012: 5008: 5001: 4997: 4995: 4994: 4989: 4985: 4981: 4977: 4973: 4968: 4964: 4956: 4954: 4953: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4932: 4927: 4923: 4922:Maurice Jarre 4919: 4918:John Williams 4915: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4887: 4885: 4884: 4879: 4875: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4858: 4854: 4846: 4844: 4843: 4839: 4837: 4831: 4829: 4823: 4819: 4815: 4811: 4804: 4800: 4797: 4795: 4794: 4789: 4785: 4781: 4777: 4773: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4752: 4748: 4743: 4736: 4729: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4721: 4714: 4703: 4701: 4700: 4695: 4691: 4687: 4683: 4679: 4674: 4671:. Thank you. 4670: 4666: 4662: 4651: 4647: 4644: 4640: 4635: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4619: 4614: 4610: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4598: 4594: 4590: 4586: 4582: 4577: 4570: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4551: 4543: 4541: 4540: 4537: 4534: 4530: 4523: 4520: 4518: 4517: 4512: 4508: 4504: 4500: 4496: 4491: 4487: 4479: 4477: 4476: 4473: 4470: 4466: 4458: 4456: 4455: 4451: 4447: 4446: 4441: 4433: 4431: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4421: 4416: 4415: 4410: 4402: 4400: 4399: 4396: 4392: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4368: 4364: 4363:76.66.203.138 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4353: 4349: 4348:76.66.203.138 4345: 4337: 4333: 4330: 4328: 4325: 4323: 4320: 4318: 4315: 4313: 4310: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4303: 4299: 4290: 4288: 4287: 4284: 4279: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4263: 4261: 4257: 4253: 4252: 4247: 4242: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4220: 4216: 4213: 4211: 4206: 4205: 4200: 4196: 4195: 4194: 4193: 4189: 4185: 4174: 4173: 4170: 4168: 4157: 4153: 4152: 4151: 4148: 4146: 4141: 4140: 4135: 4131: 4128: 4126: 4123: 4122: 4120: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4113: 4110: 4108: 4102: 4101:Justin Bieber 4098: 4094: 4090: 4081: 4079: 4078: 4074: 4068: 4067: 4066: 4058: 4054: 4050: 4045: 4044:Justin Bieber 4038: 4035: 4033: 4032: 4027: 4021: 4014: 4008: 4004: 3999: 3993: 3989: 3987: 3986: 3982: 3978: 3974: 3967:for deletion. 3966: 3963: 3961: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3940: 3938: 3937: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3921: 3917: 3913: 3905: 3903: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3882: 3880: 3879: 3874: 3870: 3864: 3860: 3859:summary table 3856: 3852: 3848: 3840: 3838: 3837: 3834: 3829: 3826: 3819: 3816: 3814: 3813: 3809: 3805: 3801: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3781: 3779: 3778: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3759: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3731: 3729: 3725: 3722:based of the 3721: 3713: 3711: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3701: 3696: 3688: 3686: 3685: 3681: 3676: 3675: 3669: 3668:Rumford Prize 3663:Rumford Prize 3662: 3660: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3628: 3625: 3623: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3601: 3597: 3593: 3588: 3584: 3582: 3581: 3576: 3575: 3574:running total 3570: 3566: 3565: 3560: 3556: 3548: 3546: 3545: 3541: 3537: 3536: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3515: 3513: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3483: 3476: 3475: 3469: 3467: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3439: 3435: 3433: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3412: 3410: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3374: 3372: 3370: 3366: 3363: 3355: 3353: 3343: 3341: 3331: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3321:Wildhartlivie 3314: 3311: 3309: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3264: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3229: 3227: 3226: 3222: 3218: 3214: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3191: 3189: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3176: 3174: 3162: 3158: 3154: 3150: 3145: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3132: 3129: 3127: 3126:sephiroth bcr 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3079: 3075: 3072: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3064: 3060: 3057: 3053: 3048: 3041: 3029: 3026: 3024: 3019: 3018: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2987: 2984: 2980: 2977: 2975: 2970: 2969: 2964: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2949: 2947: 2942: 2941: 2936: 2935: 2933: 2930: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2920: 2915: 2914: 2909: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2859: 2857: 2852: 2851: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2809: 2807: 2806: 2803: 2801: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2766: 2764: 2759: 2758: 2753: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2733: 2728: 2722: 2715: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2706: 2704: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2686: 2685: 2680: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2669: 2667: 2657: 2653: 2650: 2648: 2643: 2642: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2623: 2621: 2615: 2611: 2603: 2601: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2583: 2581: 2580: 2577: 2571: 2565: 2563: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2514: 2512: 2511:sephiroth bcr 2501: 2495: 2491: 2487: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2447: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2422: 2420: 2419:sephiroth bcr 2414: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2403: 2398: 2392: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2366: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2339: 2334: 2328: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2315: 2311: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2299: 2294: 2288: 2281: 2277: 2269: 2261: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2243: 2242: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2213: 2211: 2206: 2205: 2195: 2191: 2188: 2186: 2185: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2158: 2157: 2143: 2142: 2139: 2136: 2131: 2126: 2123: 2117: 2111: 2108: 2106: 2101: 2100: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2089: 2088: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2070:sephiroth bcr 2065: 2057: 2053: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2033: 2031: 2025: 2023: 1987: 1986: 1984: 1983:Lincoln's Inn 1980: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1969: 1967: 1961: 1959: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1930: 1928: 1922: 1920: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1886: 1884: 1878: 1876: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1855: 1854: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1838: 1836: 1830: 1828: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1799: 1797: 1791: 1789: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1754: 1753: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1706: 1701: 1699: 1693: 1691: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1661: 1659: 1653: 1651: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1620: 1618: 1612: 1610: 1601: 1600: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1591: 1589: 1583: 1581: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1550: 1549: 1538: 1533: 1531: 1525: 1523: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1492: 1490: 1484: 1482: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1452: 1450: 1444: 1442: 1433: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1385: 1384: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1341: 1340: 1335: 1331: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1299: 1298: 1293: 1289: 1284: 1276: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1253: 1251: 1246: 1245: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1232: 1218: 1213: 1211: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1196: 1193: 1187: 1183: 1180: 1178: 1173: 1172: 1166: 1164: 1160: 1159: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1130: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1110: 1109: 1104: 1100: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1059: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1038: 1037: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1014: 1007: 998: 992: 988: 984: 980: 979: 978: 975: 973: 968: 967: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 936: 935: 931: 927: 922: 921: 920: 919: 916: 914: 913:sephiroth bcr 908: 904: 900: 896: 888: 882: 878: 874: 869: 868: 867: 866: 862: 859: 856: 852: 848: 847: 843: 841: 840: 836: 832: 824: 816: 813: 811: 806: 805: 799: 795: 794: 793: 789: 788: 779: 778: 777: 774: 772: 767: 766: 761: 757: 753: 752: 751: 750: 746: 745: 735: 731: 723: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 692: 689: 684: 681: 677: 674: 672: 667: 666: 661: 657: 655: 651: 647: 643: 642: 641: 637: 633: 629: 628: 627: 623: 619: 615: 614: 613: 612: 609: 607: 602: 601: 596: 592: 588: 573: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 548: 547: 544: 542: 537: 536: 530: 529: 528: 524: 520: 516: 512: 511: 510: 507: 505: 500: 499: 494: 493: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 475: 474: 473: 470: 468: 463: 462: 454: 451: 449: 446: 444: 441: 439: 438:Academy Award 436: 434: 431: 429: 426: 424: 421: 419: 416: 415: 411: 403: 399: 395: 391: 390: 389: 386: 384: 379: 378: 373: 369: 365: 361: 360: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346: 338: 337: 336: 332: 330: 327: 326: 321: 320: 319: 315: 313: 310: 309: 304: 303: 302: 298: 296: 293: 292: 289: 285: 281: 279: 276: 275: 271: 269: 261: 247: 243: 239: 235: 234: 233: 230: 228: 223: 222: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 199: 198: 197: 194: 192: 187: 186: 178: 171: 170: 169: 165: 161: 153: 148: 147: 146: 143: 141: 136: 135: 130: 129: 126: 122: 118: 114: 109: 106: 103: 102: 99: 97: 93: 89: 84: 83: 79: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5936: 5919: 5913: 5882: 5858: 5842:94.65.35.192 5835: 5828: 5811: 5810: 5802: 5801: 5797: 5794: 5787: 5769:stub-sorting 5766: 5741:David Angell 5714: 5698: 5692: 5689: 5653:, but other 5642: 5634:edit summary 5625: 5618: 5602: 5590:The article 5589: 5553: 5550: 5507: 5504: 5470:TonyTheTiger 5383: 5345:TonyTheTiger 5328: 5305: 5271:TonyTheTiger 5264: 5230:TonyTheTiger 5222:Tom Bergeron 5218: 5188: 5177:Jessie Award 5167: 5133:TonyTheTiger 5126: 5091:TonyTheTiger 5084: 5052:TonyTheTiger 5045: 5011:TonyTheTiger 5004: 4967:TonyTheTiger 4960: 4926:TonyTheTiger 4914:Sally Fields 4906:Meryl Streep 4891: 4857:TonyTheTiger 4850: 4835: 4827: 4807: 4767:TonyTheTiger 4756: 4707: 4673:TonyTheTiger 4654: 4613:TonyTheTiger 4576:TonyTheTiger 4547: 4536:(let's chat) 4526: 4490:TonyTheTiger 4483: 4472:(let's chat) 4462: 4443: 4437: 4418: 4412: 4406: 4388: 4341: 4294: 4283:SelectionBot 4280: 4264: 4249: 4243: 4234: 4224: 4209: 4203: 4180: 4163: 4144: 4138: 4085: 4061: 4060: 4048: 4041: 4000: 3997: 3970: 3944: 3909: 3886: 3850: 3844: 3830: 3822: 3788:All-NBA Team 3785: 3762: 3732: 3717: 3698: 3692: 3673: 3666: 3631: 3589: 3585: 3580:new worklist 3578: 3572: 3562: 3552: 3533: 3519: 3500: 3487:There is an 3485:WP:NOT#PLOT: 3484: 3442: 3416: 3378: 3356: 3351: 3344: 3337: 3317: 3299:Einbierbitte 3287:Nebula Award 3268: 3233: 3195: 3171: 3169: 3148: 3125: 3083: 3065: 3061: 3049: 3045: 3022: 3016: 2973: 2967: 2945: 2939: 2918: 2912: 2855: 2849: 2813: 2795: 2762: 2756: 2689: 2683: 2661: 2646: 2640: 2607: 2587: 2561: 2541: 2510: 2505: 2455:. Cheers! -- 2451: 2418: 2370: 2273: 2236: 2209: 2203: 2199: 2168: 2151: 2149: 2137: 2121: 2104: 2098: 2082: 2069: 2061: 2029: 2021: 2015: 1981:a member of 1978: 1965: 1957: 1926: 1918: 1896: 1882: 1874: 1858: 1852: 1834: 1826: 1795: 1787: 1757: 1751: 1737:), but keep 1697: 1689: 1657: 1649: 1616: 1608: 1587: 1579: 1572:Turner Prize 1529: 1521: 1488: 1480: 1448: 1440: 1388: 1382: 1377: 1344: 1338: 1330:The Simpsons 1302: 1296: 1280: 1249: 1243: 1226: 1224: 1191: 1176: 1170: 1153: 1134: 1113: 1107: 1102: 1084: 1069: 1053: 1041: 1035: 1017: 1004:(originally 1002: 971: 965: 939: 912: 892: 828: 809: 803: 782: 770: 764: 739: 727: 700:Booker prize 687: 670: 664: 605: 599: 584: 556:Turner Prize 540: 534: 515:Fields Medal 503: 497: 466: 460: 457: 453:Grammy Award 382: 376: 270:as follows. 265: 226: 220: 190: 184: 139: 133: 60: 43: 37: 5912:This is an 5840:. Thanks!-- 5723:WylieCoyote 5533:WylieCoyote 5529:peer review 5378:Emmy Awards 5312:Enric Naval 5086:Chorus Line 4438:Please see 4241:algorithm. 4003:Nobel Prize 3887:Please see 3825:Nobel Prize 3818:Nobel Prize 3609:Nehrams2020 3605:OhanaUnited 3569:GA criteria 3526:peer review 3470:WP:NOT#PLOT 3295:Edgar Award 3002:PrimeHunter 2894:PrimeHunter 2830:PrimeHunter 2614:Stanley Cup 2584:Just a note 1977:Well why I 1741:etc. (i.e. 1731:Stanley Cup 591:Stanley Cup 560:Stanley Cup 418:Nobel Prize 392:Fair does. 368:Nobel Prize 288:Nobel Prize 36:This is an 5785:template. 5780:award-stub 5693:See also: 5487:WP:CHICAGO 5362:WP:CHICAGO 5288:WP:CHICAGO 5247:WP:CHICAGO 5181:Canada.com 5150:WP:CHICAGO 5108:WP:CHICAGO 5069:WP:CHICAGO 5028:WP:CHICAGO 4984:WP:CHICAGO 4943:WP:CHICAGO 4874:WP:CHICAGO 4784:WP:CHICAGO 4690:WP:CHICAGO 4630:WP:CHICAGO 4593:WP:CHICAGO 4574:or both.-- 4507:WP:CHICAGO 4201:okay now? 3977:Sandman888 3928:Sandman888 3855:WP 1.0 bot 3697:. Thanks! 3283:Hugo Award 3151:sub-lists. 2843:Yep, I've 2819:User:Evrik 2632:Vanier Cup 2610:Vanier Cup 2569:Squawk box 2122:Enjoy. :) 1334:Kanye West 999:JPG to PNG 595:Palme d'Or 587:Emmy Award 552:Palme d'Or 428:Miss World 268:importance 115:Comments? 5948:Archive 3 5943:Archive 2 5937:Archive 1 5667:consensus 5594:has been 5380:templates 4239:WikiTrust 3865:. — Carl 3831:Cheers -- 3804:Barkeep49 3720:this list 3564:GA sweeps 3457:kittyKAY4 3103:Ironholds 2828:instead? 2775:Ironholds 2591:Ironholds 2575:Fight on! 2524:Ironholds 2472:Ironholds 2430:Ironholds 2373:Ironholds 2349:Ironholds 2310:Ironholds 2252:Ironholds 2222:Ironholds 2044:Ironholds 1940:Ironholds 1901:Ironholds 1809:Ironholds 1770:Ironholds 1672:Ironholds 1631:Ironholds 1554:Ironholds 1503:Ironholds 1463:Ironholds 1422:Ironholds 1400:Ironholds 1360:Ironholds 1315:Ironholds 1281:I notice 1261:Ironholds 1216:file info 1138:Ironholds 1089:Ironholds 983:Ironholds 948:Ironholds 926:Ironholds 873:Ironholds 831:Ironholds 798:like this 646:Ironholds 632:Ironholds 618:Ironholds 564:Ironholds 519:Ironholds 483:Ironholds 394:Ironholds 350:Ironholds 238:Ironholds 202:Ironholds 160:Ironholds 117:Ironholds 88:Ironholds 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 5699:Thanks. 4235:versions 4093:the list 4025:contribs 3893:Dabomb87 3650:Dabomb87 3600:worklist 3423:Dabomb87 3400:Dabomb87 3252:Dabomb87 3217:Dabomb87 2799:Scorpion 2712:I think 2702:Scorpion 2665:Scorpion 2619:Scorpion 2413:WP:VG/FA 2144:{{{1}}} 1378:adjudged 907:WP:ANIME 871:others? 585:(←) The 262:Criteria 5915:archive 5790:removed 5671:Kolja21 5605:Kolja21 5491:WP:FOUR 5366:WP:FOUR 5292:WP:FOUR 5251:WP:FOUR 5154:WP:FOUR 5112:WP:FOUR 5073:WP:FOUR 5032:WP:FOUR 4988:WP:FOUR 4947:WP:FOUR 4878:WP:FOUR 4828:Cheetah 4788:WP:FOUR 4694:WP:FOUR 4634:WP:FOUR 4597:WP:FOUR 4511:WP:FOUR 4371:SchreyP 4361:Thanks 4298:Skibden 3998:Hello, 3951:Argolin 3769:Salavat 3750:Salavat 3735:Salavat 3617:contrib 3361:Disable 3352:§hepBot 2486:Dweller 2457:Dweller 1897:general 1103:support 1085:Support 942:pages? 940:related 895:WP:FILM 39:archive 5890:Apteva 5636:or on 4836:(talk) 4533:Yaksar 4469:Yaksar 4395:Jayjg 4210:(talk) 4166:Rp0211 4145:(talk) 4136:Best, 4106:Rp0211 3853:, the 3763:Now a 3503:Hiding 3293:, and 3179:Yobmod 3153:Yobmod 3085:Yobmod 3023:(talk) 2974:(talk) 2946:(talk) 2919:(talk) 2856:(talk) 2763:(talk) 2720:Chris! 2690:(talk) 2647:(talk) 2390:Chris! 2326:Chris! 2286:Chris! 2210:(talk) 2196:Update 2105:(talk) 2022:Narson 1958:Narson 1919:Narson 1875:Narson 1859:(talk) 1827:Narson 1788:Narson 1758:(talk) 1690:Narson 1650:Narson 1609:Narson 1580:Narson 1522:Narson 1481:Narson 1441:Narson 1389:(talk) 1345:(talk) 1303:(talk) 1250:(talk) 1219:– #169 1177:(talk) 1114:(talk) 1042:(talk) 972:(talk) 810:(talk) 771:(talk) 708:Yobmod 671:(talk) 606:(talk) 541:(talk) 504:(talk) 467:(talk) 383:(talk) 284:awards 227:(talk) 191:(talk) 140:(talk) 5514:Nwhit 5334:ESPYs 5205:Focus 5042:Color 4064:Chase 4012:Esuzu 3849:. On 3833:Esuzu 2963:Fixed 2845:fixed 2636:above 2616:. -- 2240:neuro 2155:neuro 2086:neuro 1743:these 1735:these 1230:neuro 1157:neuro 1073:neuro 1057:neuro 1021:neuro 849:Once 786:neuro 743:neuro 16:< 5894:talk 5863:and 5846:talk 5749:talk 5727:talk 5705:talk 5675:talk 5609:talk 5564:talk 5537:talk 5518:talk 5458:and 5418:and 5316:talk 5175:and 5129:here 4920:and 4900:and 4822:here 4812:for 4803:FLRC 4741:Talk 4719:Talk 4560:and 4450:talk 4445:Cirt 4425:talk 4420:Cirt 4375:talk 4352:talk 4342:FYI 4302:talk 4270:and 4199:this 4188:talk 4156:here 4097:here 4089:here 4072:talk 4053:here 4019:talk 4001:The 3981:talk 3955:talk 3932:talk 3924:here 3914:for 3897:talk 3873:talk 3808:talk 3800:here 3790:for 3773:talk 3754:talk 3739:talk 3705:talk 3700:Cirt 3654:talk 3646:here 3636:for 3613:talk 3540:talk 3535:Cirt 3461:talk 3455:. -- 3427:talk 3417:See 3404:talk 3396:here 3386:for 3325:talk 3303:talk 3277:and 3256:talk 3248:here 3238:for 3221:talk 3213:here 3203:for 3183:talk 3157:talk 3107:talk 3089:talk 3077:it). 3050:Eg: 3006:talk 2908:here 2898:talk 2834:talk 2779:talk 2595:talk 2556:here 2546:for 2528:talk 2490:talk 2476:talk 2461:talk 2434:talk 2377:talk 2353:talk 2314:talk 2278:and 2256:talk 2226:talk 2058:Move 2048:talk 2030:Talk 1966:Talk 1944:talk 1927:Talk 1905:talk 1883:Talk 1835:Talk 1813:talk 1796:Talk 1774:talk 1698:Talk 1676:talk 1658:Talk 1635:talk 1617:Talk 1588:Talk 1558:talk 1530:Talk 1507:talk 1489:Talk 1467:talk 1449:Talk 1426:talk 1404:talk 1364:talk 1319:talk 1265:talk 1142:talk 1093:talk 1013:this 1006:here 987:talk 952:talk 930:talk 877:talk 835:talk 734:here 730:Here 712:talk 650:talk 636:talk 622:talk 568:talk 523:talk 487:talk 398:talk 362:The 354:talk 295:High 242:talk 206:talk 164:talk 121:talk 92:talk 5803:Pam 5719:ASA 5576:of 5560:P64 5483:BIO 5448:, 5358:BIO 5343:.-- 5339:at 5284:BIO 5269:.-- 5243:BIO 5146:BIO 5104:BIO 5065:BIO 5050:.-- 5024:BIO 5009:.-- 4980:BIO 4965:.-- 4939:BIO 4912:or 4870:BIO 4855:.-- 4824:.-- 4801:at 4780:BIO 4765:.-- 4686:BIO 4648:of 4626:BIO 4611:.-- 4589:BIO 4503:BIO 4488:.-- 4278:! 4049:and 3869:CBM 3765:FLC 3679:Mar 3674:Res 3555:GAs 3489:RfC 3447:to 3149:and 2562:KV5 1332:or 688:any 329:Low 312:Mid 278:Top 5896:) 5848:) 5788:I 5783:}} 5777:{{ 5751:) 5729:) 5707:) 5677:) 5640:. 5623:. 5611:) 5566:) 5539:) 5520:) 5493:) 5466:}} 5460:{{ 5456:}} 5450:{{ 5446:}} 5440:{{ 5438:, 5436:}} 5430:{{ 5426:}} 5420:{{ 5416:}} 5410:{{ 5408:, 5406:}} 5400:{{ 5398:, 5396:}} 5390:{{ 5368:) 5337:}} 5331:{{ 5318:) 5294:) 5253:) 5156:) 5114:) 5075:) 5034:) 4990:) 4949:) 4908:, 4896:, 4880:) 4790:) 4696:) 4636:) 4599:) 4572:}} 4566:{{ 4556:, 4552:, 4513:) 4452:) 4427:) 4393:. 4377:) 4354:) 4304:) 4190:) 4075:) 4022:• 3983:) 3975:. 3957:) 3934:) 3926:. 3899:) 3891:. 3871:· 3810:) 3775:) 3756:) 3741:) 3707:) 3656:) 3648:. 3619:) 3615:• 3542:) 3532:. 3463:) 3429:) 3421:. 3406:) 3398:. 3327:) 3305:) 3289:, 3285:, 3273:, 3258:) 3250:. 3223:) 3215:. 3185:) 3159:) 3109:) 3091:) 3008:) 2900:) 2892:. 2836:) 2781:) 2597:) 2572:• 2566:• 2558:. 2530:) 2492:) 2478:) 2463:) 2436:) 2379:) 2355:) 2316:) 2258:) 2237:— 2228:) 2152:— 2083:— 2050:) 2034:• 2026:~ 2018:-- 1979:am 1970:• 1962:~ 1954:-- 1946:) 1931:• 1923:~ 1915:-- 1907:) 1887:• 1879:~ 1871:-- 1839:• 1831:~ 1823:-- 1815:) 1800:• 1792:~ 1784:-- 1776:) 1729:, 1702:• 1694:~ 1686:-- 1678:) 1662:• 1654:~ 1646:-- 1637:) 1621:• 1613:~ 1605:-- 1592:• 1584:~ 1576:-- 1560:) 1534:• 1526:~ 1518:-- 1509:) 1493:• 1485:~ 1477:-- 1469:) 1453:• 1445:~ 1437:-- 1428:) 1406:) 1366:) 1336:. 1321:) 1267:) 1227:— 1154:— 1144:) 1095:) 1087:. 1070:— 1054:— 1018:— 989:) 954:) 932:) 879:) 837:) 783:— 740:— 714:) 652:) 638:) 624:) 570:) 525:) 489:) 400:) 356:) 244:) 208:) 180:}} 174:{{ 166:) 123:) 94:) 5926:. 5892:( 5844:( 5812:D 5747:( 5725:( 5703:( 5673:( 5607:( 5562:( 5535:( 5516:( 5489:/ 5485:/ 5481:/ 5479:C 5477:/ 5475:T 5473:( 5364:/ 5360:/ 5356:/ 5354:C 5352:/ 5350:T 5348:( 5314:( 5290:/ 5286:/ 5282:/ 5280:C 5278:/ 5276:T 5274:( 5249:/ 5245:/ 5241:/ 5239:C 5237:/ 5235:T 5233:( 5202:m 5199:a 5196:e 5193:r 5190:D 5152:/ 5148:/ 5144:/ 5142:C 5140:/ 5138:T 5136:( 5110:/ 5106:/ 5102:/ 5100:C 5098:/ 5096:T 5094:( 5071:/ 5067:/ 5063:/ 5061:C 5059:/ 5057:T 5055:( 5030:/ 5026:/ 5022:/ 5020:C 5018:/ 5016:T 5014:( 4986:/ 4982:/ 4978:/ 4976:C 4974:/ 4972:T 4970:( 4945:/ 4941:/ 4937:/ 4935:C 4933:/ 4931:T 4929:( 4876:/ 4872:/ 4868:/ 4866:C 4864:/ 4862:T 4860:( 4786:/ 4782:/ 4778:/ 4776:C 4774:/ 4772:T 4770:( 4744:) 4738:( 4722:) 4716:( 4692:/ 4688:/ 4684:/ 4682:C 4680:/ 4678:T 4676:( 4632:/ 4628:/ 4624:/ 4622:C 4620:/ 4618:T 4616:( 4595:/ 4591:/ 4587:/ 4585:C 4583:/ 4581:T 4579:( 4509:/ 4505:/ 4501:/ 4499:C 4497:/ 4495:T 4493:( 4448:( 4423:( 4373:( 4350:( 4300:( 4186:( 4158:. 4069:( 4028:) 4016:( 3994:) 3979:( 3953:( 3930:( 3895:( 3875:) 3867:( 3806:( 3802:. 3771:( 3752:( 3737:( 3703:( 3652:( 3611:( 3538:( 3507:T 3459:( 3425:( 3402:( 3364:) 3358:( 3323:( 3301:( 3254:( 3219:( 3181:( 3155:( 3105:( 3087:( 3004:( 2993:. 2896:( 2832:( 2777:( 2731:t 2726:c 2593:( 2526:( 2488:( 2474:( 2459:( 2432:( 2401:t 2396:c 2375:( 2351:( 2337:t 2332:c 2312:( 2297:t 2292:c 2254:( 2224:( 2183:l 2180:a 2177:m 2174:a 2172:h 2170:C 2046:( 1942:( 1903:( 1811:( 1772:( 1674:( 1633:( 1556:( 1505:( 1465:( 1424:( 1402:( 1362:( 1317:( 1263:( 1140:( 1091:( 1008:) 985:( 950:( 928:( 875:( 833:( 710:( 648:( 634:( 620:( 566:( 521:( 485:( 396:( 352:( 240:( 204:( 162:( 119:( 90:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Awards/Archive 1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index