Knowledge talk:WikiProject American Old West/Archive 1

508:

lost in that process. For example, it's been said that Western novels and movies are a good way to see how American popular culture views the country's past. For example, Gunsmoke had a huge impact on how entire generations thought of both Frontier law enforcement and the cattle town...and that image bore only a faint resemblance to the reality of life in Dodge City during the peak of the Texas cattle trade. And the West was also somewhat unique in that fiction of the times had a great deal to do with shaping public perception. Just think of the dime novelist in Unforgiven. I like the subproject idea, but I'm just not sure that you can easily separate the Western reality from the myth that cleanly. Hope that makes some sense...

2251:

scope doesn't change and the project doesn't get dissolved. I would like to assure you that neither is the intent. The only thing that would differ would be to replace the American Old West banner with the United States banner and a parameter for American Old West. The Project would then be included in the list at the top of WikiProject United States and to the Newsletter. I would also like to note that this project to the United States banner also allows it to take advantage of the other parameters in Use on the WPUS template like Needs infobox, needs image, needs attention, contains comments, etc. Would it be alright if I begin the process of adding it to the supported projects list? --

380:

not include every movie or book that happens to have horses in it because the project would be eaten alive just by films. We also have a Thoroughbred Racing WikiProject that is affiliated, but with very few cross links. So for here, if there isn't a project specifically about the Western film genre, maybe there should be. Or there could also be a task force created (joint between here and films, perhaps?) where the tag is modified to send all the movies to one particular place for those who care. (Again, using the WPEQ example, we have a training task force and a breeds task force). Of course, that said, it isn't a huge issue to me, personally.

862:

major impact on what were then contemporary perceptions and opinions about the West. I'm looking at the issue solely from the historical point of view, and thus get concerned when people talk about excluding works of fiction entirely (which would be a major mistake). I'm somewhat neutral about discussions dealing with later works (to include movies). Obviously John Ford and Louis L'Amour had a major impact on how people remember and view the Old West, as have a number of other moviemakers and authors, but even there I tend to look at them through a historical accuracy lens (my declared bias). Some are better than others.

2016:

article and not suitable. That said, I also am not in a position to be of much help. My thinking is to go through the main article and do some ruthless copyediting and consolidating to tighten it up. Then some needed splits may suggest themselves -- perhaps the route article COULD be the place to go more into detail on geography. It may also make sense to make spinoffs for certain Forts, passes, rivers, side-routes or other locations along the way where there is too much detail for a general article. Just thoughts.

731:

was ever done on Henry VIII??) I guess at the end of the day, I just suggest that fiction should simply be minimized. As for what's appropriate, I guess we could start with a checklist: Does the work have the old west as its primary focus? Does it attempt to accurately portray the history and culture of the region? (even if it failed to do so...LOL!) On the other hand, it does NOT belong if it merely uses a western theme as a backdrop to other matters (thinking that, for example, a quasi-sci fi movie like

429:

the best insight into social life in the Frontier Army...something that might have been lost to history if he hadn't written his 'romances'. Within the historical community this stuff is more often called "History of the West," Frontier History, or a specific regional study. One could also argue that popular perception of the West has been so heavily influenced by fiction that it's difficult to separate the two (especially since the historical and fictional versions of many individuals are VERY different).

1180:

consider a time period running from (say) the Lewis and Clark Expedition to 1900 to be narrow or limited. And if you take the native side back as far as one theoretically could, the timeframe expands to the 1500s. The California Gold Rush period alone could generate hundreds of articles, as could a detailed examination of ALL the tribes that inhabited the frontier (taking that as west of the Mississippi). Adding in the later, fictional, visions of all of those would quickly render this unmanageable.

2914:

misunderstanding of how the Army awarded campaign streamers for the Indian Wars, and it took on a life of its own after that. The article mashes the Kiowa campaigns of the early 1870s, Custer's operations against the Cheyenne, and the Red River War into a nasty whole that makes little to no sense. So far there's been silence on the article's talk page, so I figured I'd raise the issue here. Since the campaign as such doesn't really exist, I think deleting the article is the best option.

1091:... comprises the history, geography, people, lore, and cultural expression of life in the Western United States." I agree that fictional portrayals are "more romantic and exciting", but is this reason to exclude individual films? Are there no academics that analyze a Western film to compare it against the reality of the American Old West? It seems like such analysis must be out there, especially for influential films that represent "cultural expression of life ". Erik ( 2866:

important may be ranked high in one project and low in another. Here, Plains Indians may be worth ranking high importance even if C- or Start- class. Red Cloud's War compared to The Battle of the Little Big Horn versus The Baker Massacre versus Fetterman -- oh dear! Versus, say Conestoga wagons or....? You see the problem. We don't want to rank everything "high," either. My thinking is maybe try bumping some of this up to "mid" and see if anyone complains.

2671: 2626: 2514: 1619:) 16:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)...ETA I took a look at the linked historynet.com article (the first listed source), and it's a pretty decent overview of the whole mess. You could most likely source a good chunk of a rewrite from it (and the author points out that there is no evidence that Ringo was in the county during a good part of the war), but that article doesn't list any sources. It's possible that the print version (it came from a 2005 issue of 31: 3439: 3507: 3264: 220:, etc. Then I'd tag all the articles in those categories. If you like you can also specify an importance for each category, for example tagging outlaws and lawmen as mid importance and forts as low importance. There will, however, be some incorrect importances, for example some particularly notable outlaws may have to be tagged as high importance, but the vast majority of importances should be correct. - 2099:. After reviewing the project it appears that there is some active discussions on the talk page and some content updates to the project page but being supported by a larger project might be beneficial. This discussion is intended to start the process of determining if the project members are interested in the project being added to the projects supported by WikiProject United States. -- 1137:, I guess) than at-the-time. It should ultimately be disqualified. In any case, I think the new scope is too narrow. The real core of this WikiProject is undoubtedly the history, but it's not detrimental to encompass film articles as a set of related low-importance articles. If that is how this project's community feels, though, that is fine. Just don't be claiming 360:). The Wikiproject page states that the scope of this project is for the historical Old West. Nothing on the project page suggest articles on fiction set in the Old West belong. It seems very clear to me that extending the coverage of the Old West to fiction does not make sense for this project. Such a endeavor would be much more appropriate as a sub-project of 2212:

our advantage and coordinate multiple projects on article improvements easier. The last few months the focus has been on getting WPUS going again and getting the infrastructure in place. In the future we will be focusing more on article content with improvement drives (tagging, stub reduction, assessment, picking a topic for improvement, etc.). --

3377:"Gunmen" is kind of a silly categorization and one-dimensional ... Annie Oakley was a sharpshooter, Buffalo Bill was (mostly) a showman and former market hunter, Calamity Jane was ... complicated, but was alleged to have some gun skills. Frankly, the entire category is vague and I'd recommend diffusing everything in it to more specific cats. 3621:, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time. 1525: 695:, which we DEFINITELY excluded from WPEQ! LOL!) Where is the line between legitimate, if romanticized and not wholly accurate, portrayals of the west and crap like "Back to the Future?" Seriously, do we really want the project to encompass EVERY book by Zane Gray and Louis L'Amour? "All" is a mighty big place. 1994:, which are the main article's longest sections. I haven't removed the same content from the main article yet, because I'm waiting for more input on the talk page regarding whether or not the split is/was actually a good idea. I won't do anything else significant with the articles until there's consensus. Thanks. 3230:

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Knowledge struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for

3209:

Lest there is any confusion for people who don't speak the same language, the words "logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories" refer to the feature that was supposed to allow this WikiProject's template to "inherit" class and importance ratings from other WikiProjects. Kumioko

2799:

Although I wasn't involved with the rating, I suspect it might have something to do with the umbrella nature of the category. If you want to raise the priority, I can't see a major problem. The article itself needs some work, though, and certainly needs to look at the period before the arrival of the

2358:

reduce it to a task force! It is still an active WikiProject with an important scope and active participants. This was in no way meant to insult or downgrade the project in any way. The statement was also made that they haven't gained anything for it. Well thats true but the bot only finished pulling

2211:

I understand, my hope is that by supporting these projects under the WPUS umbrella we can use the infrastructure in place for WPUS (Collaboration, portal, Noticeboard, newsletter, etc to increase visibiliy and participation. Additionally, since many projects have overlapping scopes we can use that to

1583:

In a nutshell, the Mason County War (or Hoo Doo War) in Texas was about cattle rustling, vigilante mobs and questionable law enforcement. It is sometimes portrayed as a racial war against the German population, but that is misleading as non-Germans were also victims. The usual names that surface in

1297:

Simple answer: anything written after 1900 goes. Once you clear that date, you start getting into what would be considered pop culture and other areas. In terms of the events of the Frontier, there is no good reason to include anything created after 1900 in the scope. OldWestHistorian is correct, and

1203:

I'm probably late because I've been busy travelling around. I don't think we should include any fiction in this project. As an experienced historian, I can tell you that the Old West is one of the most notable parts of American history, and as such there are probably alot of Old West articles here on

1167:

That's basically the argument, Erik, yes. The problem here is that the project is already unbelievably huge. Adding too much modern stuff is getting beyond the scope. Someone could start a "child" project for fictional portrayals of the Old West, maybe (like dog and cat projects are a spinoff from

861:

I think we're talking about two different things. I'm talking about the impact of period literature on the Old West and not the impact of later works on popular perception of the Old West (as seen in the past tense, not present). The Old West is rather unique in that fiction written at the time had a

831:

I would suggest the use of a date cut-off if we're going to focus on historical events (that date could be 1891 or 1900). That will avoid the entire movie/TV thing and focus on what was (for the time) contemporary fiction that influenced attitudes, perceptions, and settlement. If we just use the term

612:

the history was taking place. A number of novels about Kit Carson and Buffalo Bill (just two examples) appeared while they were still alive, and Cody in particular was quick to graft the myth on to his own accounts of his life and adventures. So if it's a question of historical coverage, we also have

3189:

because they were empty. These categories were previously populated by a bot that hasn't run since 2011 and the categories aren't used. Removal of this uneeded/unused logic will greatly reduce the size and complexity of the WikiProject United States template. Any comments or questions are encouraged

2918:

The original confusion arose because the Army issued campaign streamers for actions against various tribes during this period (Comanche, Apache, and so on) if there were no major operations ongoing at the time. That's why you'll see streamers for the Little Big Horn and Comanches on the same guidon.

2865:

A comment on ranking articles low, medium, high and top. Each wikiproject does its own ranking, and as a rule, the default is "low" until the project has had a chance to review what its priorities are and decide which articles are the "lead" ones of highest importance. Clearly, many things that are

2263:

WikiProject American Old West currently has 1,090 articles under its scope. If we replaced the American Old West banner with the United States banner, we'd have to go back and edit the talk pages of all 1,090 articles, wouldn't we? Unless we edited the American Old West project template directly, of

2128:

This project seems to be reasonably active, there is no reason to deprecate or eliminate it. If it fits under the broad "tree" of WikiProject US or US History or whatever, we could probably become a member of the "family" (I am thinking of a "tree" the way that WP Mammals is under WP Animals, which

2036:

Wyatt Earp was listed as a GA in April, then went through a GAR and was delisted. It is now going through another GAN. Wyatt Earp is one of Knowledge's most popular articles and is on an important and complex topic. The GAN is on an initial seven day hold while the reviewer checks sources. Meanwhile

1113:

had an impact on developments on the Frontier. I think if you're going to seriously focus on the historical Old West, then movies DO need to be excluded. The "cultural expression of life" section, IMO, refers more to how various cultures developed on the Frontier (ranchers as opposed to farmers, the

730:

Too much of a judgement call as to what's "popular", though I suppose "respected" or "significant" are equally a judgement call. I think that maybe we could take a look at other history projects and see the extent to which they tag pop culture stuff. (I mean, does a UK project list every movie that

568:

were an important part of Americans' interpretation of the Old West and perhaps even influenced the Old West by causing some adventure seekers to migrate (anybody want to back me up on this?). If true, dime novels, in general, and perhaps even individual books if they were influential enough, should

428:

This is actually a tough question, since even the term "Old West" is very tied into the fiction about the period. Cody's reputation was actually influenced by popular fiction of the period, as was Carson's, Hickock's, Pawnee Bill, and a number of others. The fiction of Charles King actually gives us

3731:

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you?

2934:

My suggestion is to place some "mergefrom" tags on it and figure out which article(s) you can pop appropriate paragraphs into (if any), then if no one objects to a merge in a week or so, blank it with a redirect to the closest decent article, put any useful paragraphs into articles where they could

2396:

of activity but a lot of the DC members have been working on DC related subprojects (many under the umbrella of GLAM like Smithsonian Museum, Library of Congress, National Archives, etc). They also meet at least monthly to discuss things and have recently started a Wikichapter and have been working

2250:

Sorry for the delay I was gone most of July and I need to wrap up some other issues. I wanted to come back and see if we can wrap up this discussion. So it seems like the members of the project are ok with adding the project to the list of those supported by WikiProject United States as long as the

1610:

From a quick brush, I'd say this would also take original research...something Wiki frowns on. If you check the text, the original author seems to have lifted most of it from the linked web sources. I'd also be very cautious with any story that mentions Ringo. If I get time, I'll take a look at it,

1579:

was set up 2-1/2 years ago by an unregistered editor with unknown sources. Possibly lifted verbatim from elsewhere. Possibly somebody just deciding to tell the story in their own words after having read something. It's not well done. The whole section of "Background" really is not relevant to the

1033:

I noticed the removal of this WikiProject's banner from individual film articles. I was under the impression that WikiProject categorizations were liberally added. I can understand that items of pop culture would be of low-importance under this WikiProject, but there seem to be some films that miss

3131:

Well, it's not particularly well worded for non-userpages, but yeah, this WikiProject is now setup and still in the early stages of building its project area before user-participation can really begin to function. Anyone interested, please feel free to join. Note, this project not only covers film

2950:

It's only been edited by one person since August of 2011, and before that it was quiet for about another year. The bulk of the poor content came in that recent edit, and that user was blocked not long ago for copyvio. I may just revert it to the early version and make some adjustments, as the 2011

2739:

before I take on the task I wanted make sure that one hadn't been done before then deleted due to lack of notability or something. Levy was an Irish immigrant of Jewish ancestry -- something unusual among the noted gunfighters of the period. I've found at least a couple decent reliable sources and

2326:

No problem, since it appears that the members of the project are ok with this I will go ahead and make the changes. It may take a week or two to complete the process due to the number of projects that have recently been added. I will continue to leave comments here as I make them so that if anyone

1962:

I've been working my way through and adding some Old West Project tags to Army units that played a major role on the Frontier. It looks like only a handful had been tagged before, and some important ones were not included. This is a slow project, as I'm also trying to upgrade the Old West-specific

1726:

My suggestion is that someone create a sandbox, either off of the article or (better practice) off their own talk page and throw a link here and at the article's talk page to everyone, inviting contributors, then just start a rewrite from scratch. Then, when there's enough to be a "real" article,

573:

of the Old West but not the Old West itself. Accurate historical coverage of the Old West requires we see through the mist of perception, which is view skewed, and concerns itself with the way things actually were. So, my suggestion is that this Wikiproject's scope should not include movies at all

544:

I'm new to this project though not new to writing articles that fall under the scope of the project. I've also been a part of the MILHIST group for some time and I see some resemblance between the two projects in that both are about history. MILHIST breaks out its subgroups as Task Forces (as do

507:

For me that's really a tough call. To a degree it brings up the historical purist in me...as in when you say "Old West" you almost by default include the fictional portraits with the hard history. It would certainly (I think) be easier to manage as two subprojects, but some of the linkage might be

462:

You may want to clarify the original heading for this discussion, then. Right now it's just indicating fiction and not films. And again this is a tough area because the perception of the Old West has really been shaped more by fiction (print and film) than it has actual historical events. So would

379:

I basically agree with you. Certainly about Back to the Future, anyway!! I spend most of my time at WikiProject Equine, and while we include a few movies and books specifically about horses (National Velvet, Seabiscuit, Misty of Chincoteague, The Black Stallion, The Horse Whisperer, etc.) we do

2711:

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:American Old West will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in within American old western society. We've created an event page on English Knowledge (please translate!) and I

2286:

The project doesnt appear to support some of the classes though like FL, FM and the various non article classes like File, Template, Category and Project. If it is added to the supported projects list of WPUS I would like to add those classes as well so that it is equal to the others supported by

2015:

The main article is probably in need of better organizing; too many subheadings, TMI on minor points, and I'm not sure such a simple split is really the best way to do it; history and geography are often intertwined. I think that a separate "history" article is actually a content fork of the main

607:

Adding - I see, Quinn, that you said "most, if not all, works of fiction" above. That would be, IMO, a major mistake. There was just too much *contemporary* fiction about the Old West (Beadle novels and so on) for you to make such an arbitrary cut. They were doing stage plays about the James Gang

569:

fall under the scope of the project. However, when it comes to movies, movies for the most part started right about the time that what is considered the "Old West" was ending. Anything released after say about 1920 did not actually influence the Old West. Sure, it may have influenced the public's

1246:

Oh dear, there is a fine line, after all, the Lone Ranger, Tom Mix, and Trigger all had comic books. I just sold a few of my father's childhood Tom Mix Big Little Books (aka hardcover comic books from the 30s) for a surprisingly satisfying amount...I'd say, lump 'em in with TV, movies and Louis

1179:

Including the Western genre just opens up too many headaches, IMO. Just the historical stuff is tough enough (I'm thinking of just the regimental histories that would need to be updated to deal adequately with the Indian Wars...and that doesn't include ANY of the tribal information). And I don't

447:

Wikiproject Films? I'm certain there's enough articles on western films to warrant a subproject based on that genre, and a good deal of them mention in detail, usually in the production sections, how the events in the films tie in with actual events in Old West history. On this basis, I think it

3279:

is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating

2566:

One way that an individual editor or a project can participate is to sponsor their own challenge. For example, somebody here might want to include a challenge such as "A barnstar will be awarded to the photographer who adds the most photos of previously non-illustrated NRHP sites that include

2913:

is a real mess for a number of reasons. Not only is the recently-added "synopsis" of the campaign fatally flawed, I am unaware of any serious historical account that even mentions such a campaign in the way it's discussed in the article. It looks like the article itself was created based on a

2461:

Your absolutely right in fact all the projects icons need to be larger and more prominent in the banner. The icon was accidentally shrunk and should be fixed with the next update. Other than that I'm not sure how its an embarrassment. I just increased it and all of the other icons some more

592:

Quinn - You are quite correct regarding the contemporary influence of dime novels. It also goes back to Cooper's fiction and carries through to the King novels I mentioned earlier. I don't know that we can honestly exclude the Beadle novels (for one example) from the project, as they were

2490:

for a Bot to do an assessment run through the 3500+ Unassessed articles that currently fall under WikiProject United States and the projects supported by it. If you do not want the bot to autoassess the articles for your project or if you have any comments or concerns please let us know.

3592:

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template

608:

while the gang was still active, for just one example. I might be in favor of a statement that said something like "fiction written after 1900," for example, but not a blanket exclusion. The Old West is somewhat unique historically in that the myth of the West was being created

1545:

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as

545:

other projects) and maybe in time it would make sense to have a Task Force or two for the fiction side of The American Old West. However, as this project is in the earlier stages of development, refining the scope to nonfictional makes sense; re-assess in 6 months or so. --

290:

There already are subcategories to the above categories, which would be included. The discussion here isn't about creating the categories, they already exist, it's about finding categories that are relevant to the project, so that we can tag articles in them accordingly. -

2783:

is rated as "low importance." That seems odd as the Plains Indians played a huge role in the history of the American Old West: Custer, Crazy Horse, Sitting Bull, Sacagawea, and all that. Perhaps somebody should take a look at the rating? I vote for "high importance."

3450:

on the English Knowledge. A treasure trove of adventure awaits you as we improve and expand upon the wealth, heritage, history and impact of this music genre. What is a project without participants like you? If your interest is piqued please leave your calling card and

914:

Old West. That was why I tossed out some cutoff dates for literature. If we're looking at the Old West as both a historical period and a popular culture phenomenon, then things are somewhat different. I just got concerned when it sounded like some folks wanted to take

2166:

I think adding it to the list of projects supported by WikiProject United States is a good idea. We're by no means inactive, but we're not as active as we could be. I think it'd be great for this project if it were included in the list of projects supported by WPUS.

487:

I think we either need to redefine our scope to include western literature and movies, or, as Wilhelmina Will suggested, we need to create subprojects: one for films and another for books. What do you all think? Should we redefine our scope or create subprojects?

271:

Pardon me for being new to this, but how complex is it to create further subgroups within the two main categories you mentioned above? I like the idea of having two overall categories to start with, but as this progresses I can see the need for some more precise

574:

and should exclude most, if not all, works of fiction, barring the occasional exception that fails under some "use common sense" clause. Having a Wikiproject that covers Western films exclusively is a good idea. However it should be viewed as a sister project,

1443:

I know exactly who started all of this. The person that tagged the Western shows and books, that's who. They've been tagging more than just American Old West articles without assessing them. I'll let them know they've got to clean up the mess they made.

919:

fiction off the table. So my take in short: if it's just the historical Old West, don't include anything after 1900. If it's taking a wider scope, then we should consider taking later stuff (but my historian side advises that we exercise serious caution

652:

I undid the change. I think it's too early to decide. Would you care to address some of my concerns? If you are for movies falling under the scope, what about TV shows? Above your comment seemed to indicate you were against that. What's the difference?

1930: 1894: 876:

And that appears to be precisely the problem, John Wayne and Hopalong Cassidy got added to the project by someone! I have no issue with period literature of historical significant interest, my impression was that the debate was over newer stuff.

2560: 2550: 2353:

A couple of editors have views concerns and misgivings about this project being supported by WikiProject United States so I wanted to come here and leave a message. The action to add this project to the supported projects list of United States

3831:

Project-independent quality assessments Quality assessments are used by Knowledge editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at

2140:

Just to clarify were not talking about deprecating the project. Just adding it to the list of projects supported by WPUS. The only significant change would be to add this project to the WPUS template and you can see what that looks like here

90:

One of the links in the Wild west shows page is incorrect, it mentions Jonny Baker who performed in the Buffalo Bill WWS. when you click on his name ( a highlighted link ), it goes to a Jonny Baker that was a athlete for USC in the 1930s!!!

1528:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at 413:

I was tempted to just go ahead and remove them too. I decide to what and see what others thought. If it's clear that they shouldn't fall under the scope of the project, we should perhaps mention this in the Wikiproject page more explicitly.

2919:

In some cases there were coherent, planned campaigns (the Red River War being one example), but in other cases it was recognizing the grinding, routine patrols that most regiments carried out in specific regions during a set period of time.

3231:

the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please

3081: 2842:

The Plains Indians article isn't in very good shape, and it's more of a holding tank (I think) to refer people to more specific articles on the various tribes. There's a lot of work that can be done on many of these, starting with the

739:

even though his trainer started out as a cowboy), or if it makes use of western themes so loosely as to have little relevance to the project. For example, the TV show Bonanza, yes. The TV show Kung Fu, probably no. Zorro? Maybe.

3455:

to our proposed Project page. You will be kept informed of the development of this new project in the coming weeks. To leave your valuable opinions and suggestions, please contact me. With All Cordiality and The Very Best of Regards,

1835:. We're trying to come up with the "most correct" name for this war, which goes by all three of those names. Input from someone from one of those three nations or familiar with the history of the region would be greatly appreciated. 3445:

Most courteous Greetings to you historical music lovers! Your participation is ardently sought in helping to establish one of Knowledge's newest projects - 19-century American Music a collaborative venture to improve the coverage of

1034:

out on falling under this WikiProject. I'm not going to push for restoration of the banner as I don't find banners to be of utmost importance, but I would not be surprised if people tried to put certain films under this WikiProject,

1594:

This is not something that should be repaired patchwork, a source here, a source there. And because this is one of those history areas where different sources will present a different slant, the sourcing needs to be cross-checked.

686:

My humble opinion is that fictional portrayals, as a group, get into the realm of trivia and thus should be minimized. I mean, so we add wild west shoot 'em up video games as well? (This was a problem over at WPEQ... apparently

3633:. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals. 1390:. There are over six hundred in the backlog already, and I don't want it to become as extensive as some of the backlogs I've seen that have tens of thousands of articles. For now, ignore the fiction books, movies, and TV shows. 1928:

easy to track three of four balancing dimensions when selecting articles for showcasing at a portal - quality, importance and popularity. When tracking the fourth dimension, topic, the related article lists tool (such as for

1247:

L'Amour. Whatever we do with those we can probably do with comic books. (Which begs the next question: anime and video games?? =:-O ) If it helps, by consensus of the group, we over at WikiProject Equine decided that

1765:

You would want to click "Limited Preview and Full" to avoid the "Snippet only" results. Pick a result, and it pulls up select pages. Therein, on the left-hand side is "Get This Book". Amazon will give you ISBN numbers.

710:

Western books? That is, the ones that influenced our thoughts of the American Old West the most. Same with movies and TV shows. We could probably exclude all but the most popular Western video games. How does that sound?

1587:

I started out to try and add some sourcing about the burning of the courthouse, which happened a year after the war ended - but which the writer would have us believe was "an obvious case of arson" and tied to the war.

2151:

with others such as District of Columbia. This would allow the project to be visible to a much larger pool of editors as well as take advantage of the various bots and scripts currently running on the WPUS articles.

2226:

No problem so long as the scope of Old West doesn't change. We spent some time defining the scope and sweep of this, and I'd hate to go through that again because someone wants to add Louis L'Amour stuff back into

231:

OK...That sounds like a plan for me. They three CATS are good, but as I just joined this project, like an ahour ago, I'm not too familair with every other Category that its associated with, but you have my vote to

3630: 3582:

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

2567:

ranches in western states to the NRHP county lists." To sponsor a challenge all you need to do is come up with an idea, post it on the contest page, and do the small bit of work needed to judge the winner(s).

1132:

not fall under this WikiProject? I see that it's high-importance for this WikiProject, but by the strictly historical criteria applied here, the products of that genre would be more retrospective (except for

3559:

here on Knowledge, but this is the first portal I've done and would gladly take pointers/help on refining it and making it run smoothly/look nice. Let me know if you're interested/feel free to help on it.

3358:. According to the category, this should reflect "gunfighters", i.e. "outlaws" and "lawmen". Are the articles contained in this category correct? Annie Oakley, for example, was recently recategorized from 2290:

I also notice that the American Old West template template doesn't support parameters for Contains comments or Needs Infobox, image, map or attention. If supported by WPUS I would also like to add these.

2287:

WPUS if thats ok. This would give both projects visibility of these other content types so that Article Alert bot would notify the project if someone submits them for something like Category for deletion.

2688:

newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

2643:

newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

2531:

newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

1897:

used for generating assessment statistics. The Popular pages lists include the rank, total views, average daily views, quality and importance ratings for the listed articles. Here is the full list of

4004:

and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

1255:

were. It was kind of a convoluted conversation in the process, but it ultimately made sense. (One having something to do with real horses, the other having virtually nothing to do with real horses)

1353:

Works for me. 1900 as good a cutoff as any. The 1890 date when Frederick Jackson Turner declared the frontier "closed" (based in part on census data) gives adequate wiggle room to use 1900, IMHO.

2522: 560:

Some more comments: As presently written, the goal of this project is "help cover the history of the American Old West on Knowledge". Saying "history" excludes most fictional works in my opinion.

2634: 252: 2563:

running from Oct. 21-Dec. 4, 2011. I'd like to encourage anybody who enjoys photography, and anybody who is interested in historic places to participate as a photographer, a sponsor, or both.

2679: 593:

contemporary fiction and did have a hand in influencing both public perception and migration West. Many Frontier Army officers read James Fennimore Cooper's fiction before coming West as well.

3637: 631:

I have redefined the goals to include movies, television programs, and books. If you would like to make any changes, or if you feel that I did this too early, feel free to edit the section.

1860: 1109:

Old West. Contemporary fiction does play into academic discussions of the Old West, but that's because the Old West was somewhat unique (as I've mentioned before) in that fiction written

3884:

parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present.

3521: 3513: 3724:! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the 3186: 182::). It can also automatically assess short articles as stubs, inherit the class from other WikiProjects, and choose an importance level based on what categories the page is in :). - 3320: 1623:), but I don't have access to that version. The tone of the article is somewhat florid, but it has a decent narrative. Without cited sources, I can't vouch for its accuracy, though. 1510: 2712:

hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here:

3809: 1704:

From what I've seen here and there, Johnny Ringo was part of Scott Cooley's group. It's just more than I have time to deal with presently. Your attention is appreciated.

3870:

However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass

3323:. I'm having trouble finding editors in this topic area (Old West and Native Americana), so I'm posting this here in the hope that it will generate some interest. Thanks! 1068:

American Old West, not the fictional portrayals of the Old West, for, as we all know, fictional portrayals are more romantic and exciting than the true American Old West.

3781:

Alternately, if you have any interest at all, feel free to reply right here, on this talk page. please ping me when you do so, by typing {{ping|sm8900}} in your reply.

3763:

If you have any experience at all with standard WikiProject processes such as quality assessment, article help, asking questions, feel free to come by and get involved.

1473:

No response. I've been hacking through the backlog for a while now, but getting through that backlog is just as hard as trying to cut a diamond with a butter knife. ;)

3650: 3284:! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! 2600: 2596: 2588: 1204:

wikipedia. Intothatdarkness is right, if we add the fiction, this project would become unmanageable and would probably become as abandoned as the coal mining towns in

3759:. we need people there!! right now the project seems to be semi-inactive. I am going to various WikiProjects whose topics overlap with ours, to request volunteers. 944:

OK, so what we do is, we specifically state in the scope that this WikiProject deals with the historical aspect of the American Old West. Anybody agree or disagree?

963:

I agree. That leaves room for discussion of period fiction and its influence on historical events but avoids bringing Gunsmoke and other things into the discussion.

259:, those two alone will get you loads of articles (approx. 3000), which is quite a lot for a new WikiProject. You can always tag more categories later, if needed. - 2965:

And it's worse than I thought. Someone created a category for this that has all sorts of unrelated stuff tacked in (like Custer and Beecher's Island). What a mess!

1428:

Nope, because someone else went and tagged everything without assessing it at the time...the mad mass tagger is the first person responsible to assess! (grin and

3837: 1387: 1379: 1844: 3918: 47: 17: 3692:. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like 2612: 1937: 2095:

It was recently suggested that this project might be inactive or semiactive and it might be beneficial to include it in the list of projects supported by

2463: 209: 2397:

to get DC as the host for the 2012 Wikimania. So aside from what the comments might lead the reader to believe the DC project is extremely active. --

2307:

Thanks for the explanation. All of my concerns have been addressed, so as long as nobody else has any concerns, go ahead and do what you need to do.

3359: 3191: 3031: 2487: 2065: 1591:

As I read the article, I realized it needs a complete re-write. Something I am not able to devote time to at present, but the project is worthy.

256: 213: 2885:

That's a fine solution. I've done that with some Army regiments, as the ratings didn't always reflect their level of participation on the Frontier.

3733: 217: 2037:

there is some work to be done on trimming back excessive detail, and on making the article flow more by reducing the amount of subsections. See

2935:

be fit and be done with it. Or, if the edit history is pretty quiet, maybe just be bold and see if anyone squawks, and if they do, then BRD.

2283:

The quick answer is yes we would but I could do that in a day or 2 with AWB. I did notice a couple things though that I would like to mention:

2836: 1727:

even if C-class or so, do a wholesale cut and paste. That said, this is also an area where I don't focus much, so I guess we need to find a

667:

Television programs and TV shows are the same thing; therefore, I did not oppose the idea. I think TV shows should be included in the scope.

4055: 2713: 2316: 2273: 2176: 1751: 1506: 1484: 1455: 1421: 1399: 1321: 1287: 1232: 1077: 1023: 986: 953: 903: 823: 800: 774: 720: 676: 640: 531: 497: 403: 139: 123: 3857:

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to

3520:. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more 2827:, this seems way, way off. The Fetterman Massacre, part of the war, was arguably the second most important battle on the Great Plains. 3243:(Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) 2685: 2663: 2640: 2619: 2528: 2507: 2096: 564:

makes a good point however that excluding all fiction is probably too stringent. For example, it is my understanding that the so-called

3867:, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. 3728:

that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

3452: 3774: 3608: 3291: 3182: 3058: 2725: 2375: 1685: 1667: 782: 357: 3861: 3848: 2446:

Damn. I take a couple months off and come back to find my favourite new WikiProject emasculated. The banner is an embarassment. --

2378:

For clarity, the person who commented on possible gains (or lack thereof) from a merger was referring to the Washington, DC project.

1828: 98: 1064:

that tagged most, if not all, of those movies. As Intothatdarkness and I were discussing, this project was created to focus on the

3597: 1105:

Obviously there are such academics, but these discussions fall into popular culture or film studies, and not examinations of the

353: 3854:, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. 394:

has the tag, too. I've already removed some of them, but I've been so busy with school, I haven't been able to remove them all.

4051: 3409: 1902: 691:

and her friends have a horse riding game. and there are horses in other video games too...it never ends! Oh, and don't forget

3696:), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the 3355: 1278:? The project is big enough as it is; even with the fiction out of the scope we'll still have over 900 articles in the scope. 850:

Unfortunately, that doesn't solve the problem; what if the book/movie is ABOUT the Old West and has tremendous significance.

4032: 3103: 3091: 3054: 2599:. All editors interested in improving these articles or voting for next months collaboration are encouraged to participate 4016: 3756: 3617: 3273:

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that

3132:

and TV, but Western novels, comics, actors, directors and authors, etc who make the fictional-Wild West possible. Thanks,

1913: 786: 2735:

I'm considering creating a Wiki for old west gunfighter James H. (Jim) Levy as I've noticed there's not one for him yet.

3833: 443:

How about a subproject on the western film genre, which could be considered a sub of both Wikiproject American Old West

4059: 3893: 3821: 3794: 3745: 3709: 3672: 3667: 3569: 3545: 3492: 3488: 3465: 3424: 3385: 3371: 3332: 3305: 3253: 3219: 3203: 3199: 3171: 3148: 3123: 3066: 3043: 3011: 2997: 2974: 2960: 2941: 2928: 2894: 2872: 2856: 2809: 2793: 2768: 2753: 2701: 2656: 2581: 2544: 2500: 2475: 2455: 2434: 2420: 2406: 2387: 2368: 2336: 2321: 2300: 2278: 2236: 2221: 2206: 2192: 2181: 2161: 2135: 2123: 2108: 2085: 2054: 2022: 2009: 1987: 1972: 1952: 1875: 1813: 1775: 1756: 1737: 1713: 1632: 1604: 1565: 1486: 1468: 1457: 1438: 1423: 1404: 1359: 1326: 1307: 1292: 1261: 1237: 1217: 1189: 1174: 1150: 1123: 1100: 1082: 1047: 1028: 1006: 991: 972: 958: 929: 905: 883: 871: 856: 841: 825: 802: 776: 746: 725: 701: 681: 662: 645: 622: 602: 587: 554: 536: 517: 502: 472: 457: 438: 423: 408: 386: 373: 361: 343:

Result of discussion: Any article about a subject notable after 1900 does not belong in the scope of this WikiProject.

319: 297: 281: 265: 241: 226: 203: 188: 168: 144: 106: 80: 3638:

article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject

3181:

There is a discussion regarding removal of the logic used to populate Automatically assessed article categories from

3725: 1661:

John Ringo, King of the Cowboys: His Life and Times from the Hoo Doo War to Tombstone, Second Edition (A. C. Greene)

3773:

For anyone who wants to get involved, please come by and add your name at our talk page, at our talk page section:

3656:

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the

3538: 3328: 3007: 2970: 2956: 2924: 2890: 2852: 2805: 2764: 2416: 2383: 2232: 2202: 2119: 2079: 1968: 1628: 1616: 1580:

war itself. The content, while having some validity, is often questionable. Not much has been done with it since.

1555: 1539: 1530: 1303: 1213: 1185: 1146: 1119: 1096: 1043: 1000:

that encompass both old west and modern times? Just wanting to be sure our discussion has a clear statement. ;-)

968: 925: 867: 837: 618: 598: 513: 468: 434: 315: 277: 38: 3697: 3397: 1991: 453: 2197:

That's my concern as well. Supporting the project is one thing; absorbing/dissolving it is something else again.

1011:

By post I meant things created about the Old West after the Old West, like Gunsmoke, Bonanza, and 3:10 to Yuma.

4012: 3904: 2313: 2270: 2186:

I also see no harm in extra eyes. As long as no one is trying to "kill" the project due to "under-activity."

2173: 1748: 1479: 1462:

That's usually the functional approach. The stick is to un-tag everything not assessed by a certain point ...

1450: 1416: 1396: 1318: 1284: 1229: 1074: 1020: 983: 950: 898: 888:

That was my impression, too. I thought we were talking about including fairly newer stuff, such as the TV show

818: 795: 769: 717: 673: 637: 528: 494: 400: 156: 136: 120: 3556: 2129:

is under WP Biology, etc...). Not sure precisely what is requested, though. Can you clarify this, Kumioko?

3233: 1832: 3461: 3281: 3275: 3263: 3062: 3002:

I wiped most of the article and turned it into an explanation of the term. Now let the shouting begin... :-)

1642: 996:

Define "Post" If we are just talking entertainment stuff, sure. But what about crossover articles, such as

1274:

This is getting difficult. Why don't we just say that this project is for the historical American Old West

613:

to be willing to acknowledge this effect, and take it into serious consideration when developing the scope.

3643:

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

3484: 3195: 2721: 2697: 2145: 3237:

and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my

3973: 3874: 3657: 3531: 3324: 3003: 2966: 2952: 2920: 2886: 2848: 2801: 2760: 2412: 2379: 2228: 2198: 2115: 1964: 1924:

Because this project was not included, I am bringing up the popular pages tool here. This tool makes it

1624: 1612: 1299: 1209: 1181: 1115: 964: 921: 863: 833: 658: 614: 594: 583: 561: 509: 464: 430: 419: 369: 311: 273: 102: 3993: 3684: 3565: 3367: 3210:

says that there are no longer any bots performing the function that formerly copied those ratings. --

2832: 2789: 2577: 2425:

No problem. Not trying to be defensive I just wanted to provide some context about WikiProject DC. --

1855: 1547: 1138: 449: 94: 1963:

information in those articles at the same time, but I wanted folks to be aware of what was going on.

1223:

Do you all think I should at least remove the comic book-related articles from the project's scope?

448:

would make sense to have a "Wikiproject:Western films" or such, as a sub to both of these projects.

4001: 3909:

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to

3416: 3383: 3290:

To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to

3163: 2749: 2308: 2265: 2168: 2038: 1809: 1743: 1474: 1445: 1411: 1391: 1313: 1298:

echos what I've been saying. If you include post-1900 items, the scope will quickly become swamped.

1279: 1224: 1069: 1015: 978: 945: 893: 832:"most influential" things could get bogged down in nit-picking arguments about what is influential. 813: 790: 764: 712: 668: 632: 550: 523: 489: 395: 349: 237: 199: 131: 115: 2670: 2625: 2513: 1517:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the 4028: 3889: 3741: 3457: 3177:

Discussion to remove the Automatically assessed logic from the WikiProject United States template

3167: 3134: 3109: 2051: 2002: 1948: 1871: 1840: 1824: 1797: 1060:

I think it's important to mention that it wasn't a project member that tagged the movies. It was

2744:

be kind and save me a lot of effort for nothing. Much thanks and have a great Wiki kind of day!

3768:

and if you have NO Experience, but just want to come by and get involved, feel free to do so!!!

3631:

RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace

3963: 3914: 3817: 3039: 2910: 2717: 2693: 2652: 2608: 2540: 2496: 2471: 2451: 2430: 2402: 2364: 2332: 2296: 2256: 2217: 2157: 2104: 1771: 1709: 1682: 1664: 1600: 1562: 1542:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th. 1088: 1429: 348:

I noticed that many movies set in the Old West have been tagged with this Wikiproject (e.g.,

4040: 3790: 3576: 3215: 2820: 1801: 1576: 654: 579: 415: 365: 164: 3438: 1653: 178:

By the way, if you guys need a mass tagging of some categories, I'd be happy to do it with

3997: 3721: 3561: 3363: 3301: 3249: 3238: 3097: 2828: 2785: 2573: 1134: 1129: 910:

I'm honestly not in favor of including newer stuff in a project that's dealing with the

4036: 3402: 3378: 2992: 2936: 2867: 2824: 2780: 2745: 2556: 2187: 2130: 2075: 2017: 1805: 1732: 1728: 1538:

and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at

1463: 1433: 1354: 1256: 1248: 1169: 1142: 1092: 1039: 1001: 878: 851: 741: 696: 692: 546: 381: 233: 195: 75: 4024: 3910: 3885: 3737: 3705: 3517: 3351: 3159: 2847:, which wasn't a "war" at all but a convenient tag created for Army lineage purposes. 2740:

searching for more. If anyone knows if he's previously had a Wiki and it was deleted

2044: 1995: 1944: 1867: 1836: 1790: 1638: 1205: 1061: 3804:

Hi there, editors at your Wikiproject may be interesting in the related WikiProject

3516:, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the 3506: 3101:

articles. If you are interested in participating, you are welcome to sign up at the

2411:

Not saying it was good or bad...just providing a context for the "no gains" comment.

3983: 3813: 3805: 3347: 3343: 3280:

easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested,

3095:, a collaborative effort to improve and maintain Knowledge's coverage of fictional 3035: 2844: 2648: 2604: 2536: 2492: 2467: 2447: 2426: 2398: 2360: 2328: 2292: 2252: 2213: 2153: 2100: 1983: 1767: 1705: 1596: 1252: 761:

See? This is why my English teacher tells us to choose our words carefully! Hehe...

391: 292: 260: 221: 183: 179: 2551:

Knowledge:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest

2359:

in the articles this morning, so we haven't really had time to do anything yet. --

1762: 1535: 2823:

is rated of "low importance?" As in my previous comment about the importance of

2595:

One or more articles relating to this project have been nominated to be a future

74:

I think this page kept being deleted because it was empty. So I'm fixing that.

3786: 3211: 2716:. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! 565: 160: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2114:

I honestly don't know if I see a lot of value in that, but that may just be me.

3297: 3245: 2029: 736: 194:

That seems like a good idea. How are the articles chosen, that need tagging?--

3649:

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the

3615:

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members

3089:

Your editing history indicates that you may be interested in joining the new

2392:

The DC project is actually a rather bad example. The DC proejct in fact has

2070: 1898: 1518: 732: 1501:

American Old West articles have been selected for the Knowledge 0.8 release

1312:

OK, I'll rewrite our scope and get to work removing the pop culture stuff.

3294:. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X. 3080: 1909: 522:

I agree. Probably the easiest thing to do would be to redefine our scope.

3917:. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 3479: 3162:, so feel free to check it out and make edits or provide some feedback! 2759:

Is there a source aside from Metz? That might help answer your question.

578:

as a sub-project. That is the correct logical structure, in my opinion.

4011:, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at 3316: 889: 1916:

and the nominations sections for each of the selected articles boxes.

3947: 3926: 2909:

I've been trolling through some of the Indian Wars articles, and the

1509:

for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were

997: 808:

I see that this discussion has died down. Should we just include the

763:

I'll be busy most of today, but I'll see what I can dig up tomorrow.

735:

would NOT fall into this project, nor would the movie and book about

688: 3158:

Hi All! I just wrote an article (that was previously a stub) on the

1890: 3185:. Most of the categories (over 220 Knowledge wide) were deleted in 1554:

to extend the reach of Knowledge worldwide. Please help us, with

1505:

Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge articles selected by the

2991:

Good luck my friend! Sounds like a classic time for WP:BEBOLD!

1141:

as a Featured Article if someone ever makes the effort! ;) Erik (

1114:

dynamic of a mining town as opposed to a cattle town, and so on).

1893:. These lists are similar to project-related article lists like 1679:

The Mason County ""Hoo Doo"" War, 1874-1902 (A.C. Greene Series)

1551: 977:

So should I remove the tags on post-American Old West articles?

3589:

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

2327:

has comments or questions they can be answered or addressed. --

2091:

Suggestion to pull this project under WikiProject United States

1933:) also might be useful by filtering on categories of interest. 1742:

I'll take care of it, but I'll need some help finding sources.

1534:

with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's

25: 3030:

There is a proposal at WikiProject United States to start an

208:

Well, we'd have to pick out relevant categories, for example

3836:, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent 3262: 2669: 2624: 2512: 1859:

is a current featured portal candidate. Please feel free to

253:

Category:Wars between the United States and Native Americans

3693: 3433: 3034:

related articles. Please stop by and join the discussion.

4048:

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.

3959:

It will work on a variety of links, including those from

2045: 1526:

American Old West articles and revisionIDs we have chosen

1886: 1831:

which is a "SYNTH" title; please see name discussion at

1511:

selected based on their assessed importance and quality

3689: 1936:

If you do decide to use this tool, feel free to update

3935:

John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.

3321:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Irataba/archive1

2482:

Bot run to auto assess some of the Unassessed articles

2597:

United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month

2589:

United States Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Month

1818: 2586: 4015:. Questions, comments and requests can be made at 3430:WikiProject 19th-century American Music invitation 1036:especially with the scope mentioning films for now 3026:Proposal for United States A-Class review process 293: 261: 222: 184: 3720:Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the 3498:WikiProject United States - The 50,000 Challenge 2064:I have listed San Diego for peer review. Please 1386:I need help reducing the backlog of articles in 114:Please provide a link. I can't seem to find it. 3840:was approved and has been implemented to add a 1881:Adding "Popular pages" to U.S.-related projects 1819:Coeur d'Alene War, Spokane War, or Palouse War? 251:You could have me tag the two main categories, 1388:Category:Unassessed American Old West articles 1380:Category:Unassessed American Old West articles 2951:version was MUCH better (though not perfect). 1637:Here's where I think some of that came from: 8: 3732:We have collected all of these questions at 1920:Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject American Old West 3921:. The idea is that it takes something like 1938:Portal:United States/Projects/Popular pages 1761:For anyone wanting a handy research tool: 3755:Hi everyone. I am the new coordinator for 3575:WikiProject collaboration notice from the 3075: 130:Never mind, I have found it and fixed it. 3716:Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 3319:, and after a successful GAN it's now at 2775:Plains Indians article of low importance? 210:Category:Outlaws of the American Old West 3899:User script to detect unreliable sources 3808:proposal, which you can see and support 3360:Category:People of the American Old West 3356:Category:Gunmen of the American Old West 3032:A-Class review process for United States 1850:Featured portal candidate: United States 1648:Here's some other available data on it: 337:The following discussion has concluded. 257:Category:People of the American Old West 214:Category:Lawmen of the American Old West 3827:Project-independent quality assessments 3606:The discussion about this can be found 2570:Any and all contributions appreciated. 1659:Johnson, David; Parsons, Chuck (2008). 1524:We would like to ask you to review the 1038:. (Scope adjusted since, I see.) Erik ( 218:Category:Forts in the American Old West 3919:39th most imported script on Knowledge 3881: 3841: 3512:You are invited to participate in the 3480:https://wikiconference.org/Submissions 2374:One of these discussions can be found 1561:For the Knowledge 1.0 editorial team, 1401:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 722:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 678:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 642:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 533:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 499:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 463:you cross into film and fiction, then? 405:My mistakes; I mean, er, contributions 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3315:Hello! I recently wrote the article, 3226:Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 3087:Howdy, WikiProject American Old West! 2815: 2466:. I think that looks a lot better. -- 1833:Talk:Coeur_d'Alene_War#Moved_reversed 1677:Johnson, David; Miller, Rick (2009). 1611:but Texas isn't really my main focus. 7: 3400:. I'd appreciate a review. Thanks.-- 1251:was NOT part of the project, though 330:Fictional portrayals of the Old West 3736:where you can leave your response. 3354:have been included in the category 1908:I recently added links to lists of 1681:. University of North Texas Press. 1663:. University of North Texas Press. 1654:Handbook of Texas Mason County Wars 706:I got it. How about we include the 4009:not a script to be mindlessly used 3785:we welcome your input. thanks!! -- 3678:A new newsletter directory is out! 3292:Knowledge:WikiProject X/Newsletter 3183:Template:WikiProject United States 1914:the U.S. Portal - WikiProjects box 1899:projects using popular pages lists 358:Talk:The Gambler (TV movie series) 340:Please do not modify this section. 24: 3941:and turns it into something like 3800:WikiProject Grand Canyon proposal 3775:WikiProject History needs you!!!! 3700:and someone will add it for you. 2816:Red Cloud's War of low importance 1571:If anyone feels up to a challenge 3751:WikiProject History needs people 3688:has been created to replace the 3646:So far, 84 editors have joined. 3505: 3437: 3079: 1829:Spokane-Coeur d'Alene-Paloos War 354:Talk:Back to the Future Part III 29: 3338:Gunmen of the American Old West 3141: 3137: 3135: 3116: 3112: 3110: 2060:San Diego is up for peer review 1986:article into two sub-articles, 1982:Hello. A while ago I split the 1903:User:Mr.Z-man/Popular pages FAQ 1891:WikiProject Popular pages lists 1885:A very interesting tool of the 3992:The script is mostly based on 3586:Portals are being redesigned. 3425:17:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC) 2506:September 2011 Newsletter for 1901:. An FAQ also is available at 1800:about merging and redirecting 1566:00:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC) 1487:22:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1469:02:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC) 1458:13:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 1439:04:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 1424:03:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 1405:00:07, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 1101:22:20, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 1083:22:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 1048:22:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 1029:21:46, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 1007:21:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 992:21:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 973:14:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC) 959:21:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC) 930:22:12, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 906:21:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 884:15:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 872:14:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 857:19:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC) 842:13:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC) 826:21:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC) 803:00:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC) 777:13:45, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 747:04:30, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 726:00:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 702:21:33, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 682:01:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 623:19:15, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 4017:User talk:Headbomb/unreliable 3822:08:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC) 3466:14:44, 15 December 2015 (UTC) 3410: 3333:18:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC) 2810:15:55, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 2794:11:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 2769:16:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC) 2706: 2657:01:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC) 2618:December 2011 Newsletter for 2545:03:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 1953:02:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC) 1876:14:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC) 1804:. Any input would be great.-- 1731:willing to take it on. :-) 1480: 1475: 1451: 1446: 1417: 1412: 1392: 899: 894: 819: 814: 796: 791: 787:Knowledge:WikiProject History 770: 765: 713: 669: 663:23:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 646:21:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 633: 603:13:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 588:05:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 555:01:47, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 537:22:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 524: 518:22:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 503:22:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 490: 473:22:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 458:18:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 439:14:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 424:13:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 409:12:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 396: 387:17:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 374:15:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC) 145:22:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 128:22:00, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 107:16:27, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 3834:Knowledge:Content assessment 3795:20:45, 12 January 2020 (UTC) 3746:04:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 3546:22:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC) 3448:19th-century American Music' 3417: 3306:16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC) 2754:01:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 2726:20:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 2702:18:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 2662:January 2012 Newsletter for 2613:19:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 2582:02:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC) 1845:18:40, 30 January 2011 (UTC) 1360:01:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 1327:21:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1308:14:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1293:03:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1262:02:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1238:15:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC) 1013:Awesome movie, by the way ;) 3555:Hello all, I've created an 3403: 3254:22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC) 3241:. Thank you for your time! 3220:22:54, 31 August 2013 (UTC) 3204:18:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 3149:01:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 3124:01:43, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 3107:. We hope you will join us! 3067:09:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 3044:01:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 2501:14:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC) 2476:03:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 2456:03:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC) 2435:17:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 2421:16:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 2407:16:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 2388:16:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 2369:15:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC) 1814:08:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC) 1776:12:15, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 1757:01:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC) 1738:20:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 1714:16:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 1633:16:27, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 1605:14:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC) 1556:your WikiProject's feedback 1218:19:38, 3 October 2010 (UTC) 1190:19:54, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 1175:19:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 1151:16:22, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 1124:14:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 4075: 4060:16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC) 4052:MediaWiki message delivery 3902: 3710:03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC) 3570:02:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC) 3493:00:26, 6 August 2016 (UTC) 3386:08:17, 9 August 2015 (UTC) 3372:11:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC) 3012:14:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC) 2998:21:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 2975:22:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 2961:16:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 2942:15:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 2929:14:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 2895:14:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC) 2337:20:31, 7 August 2011 (UTC) 2322:20:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 2301:20:41, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 2279:20:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC) 2023:04:00, 24 April 2011 (UTC) 2010:03:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 1973:15:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC) 1540:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 1536:articles with cleanup tags 1531:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8 320:21:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 298:21:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 282:20:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 266:17:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 242:17:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 227:17:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 204:17:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 189:17:25, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 169:13:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 81:00:20, 1 August 2010 (UTC) 3894:13:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC) 3398:United States Camel Corps 3392:United States Camel Corps 3362:by an IP user. Thanks. -- 3172:20:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC) 2905:Delete Comanche Campaign? 2873:23:55, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 2857:15:03, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2837:14:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2714:WikiWomen's History Month 2707:WikiWomen's History Month 2686:WikiProject United States 2664:WikiProject United States 2641:WikiProject United States 2620:WikiProject United States 2529:WikiProject United States 2508:WikiProject United States 2097:WikiProject United States 2055:20:06, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 812:fiction and media, then? 159:in your tagging process, 4013:User:Headbomb/unreliable 3933:. Accessed 2020-02-14. ( 3905:User:Headbomb/unreliable 3882:|QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom 3862:WikiProject banner shell 3849:WikiProject banner shell 3673:07:25, 30 May 2018 (UTC) 3557:American Old West portal 3551:American Old West Portal 3475:Please See - Submissions 3234:review the proposal here 2237:16:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC) 2222:18:40, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2207:18:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2193:18:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2182:03:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC) 2162:20:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2136:19:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2124:17:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2109:17:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC) 2086:00:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC) 157:Category:Western (genre) 3658:WikiProject's talk page 3629:On April 8th, 2018, an 3598:Transclude lead excerpt 3055:WP:WikiProject Westerns 2349:Some recent discussions 1931:U.S. article lists tool 1823:The article now titled 1796:There is discussion at 759:You're probably right. 3955:. Accessed 2020-02-14. 3267: 3259:WikiProject X is live! 2674: 2666:and supported projects 2629: 2517: 2486:There is a discussion 1827:was originally titled 1584:this are not German. 1168:the mammal project). 783:the related discussion 155:I would suggest using 4007:Do note that this is 3838:Village pump proposal 3396:I've been working on 3266: 2673: 2628: 2516: 1552:Knowledge for Schools 42:of past discussions. 3704:– Sent on behalf of 3698:template's talk page 3690:old, out-of-date one 3685:Newsletter directory 3092:Westerns WikiProject 3072:WikiProject Westerns 1887:Wikimedia Toolserver 1856:Portal:United States 1548:One Laptop per Child 1139:The Searchers (film) 151:Suggested population 70:Saving the talk page 3757:WikiProject History 3577:Portals WikiProject 3049:New project started 2039:Talk:Wyatt Earp/GA3 1958:Frontier Army Units 1895:U. S. article lists 1410:Anybody up for it? 350:Talk:Wild Wild West 3915:predatory journals 3911:unreliable sources 3651:newsletter archive 3268: 2675: 2630: 2561:Fall Photo Contest 2518: 1912:as shown below to 1763:Google Book Search 1507:Knowledge 1.0 team 3948:Article of things 3927:Article of things 3668:The Transhumanist 3528: 3527: 3485:RightCowLeftCoast 3472: 3471: 3342:Such articles as 3244: 3129: 3128: 2911:Comanche Campaign 2083: 2041:for more detail. 1825:Coeur d'Alene War 1812: 1089:American Old West 1014: 762: 362:WikiProject Films 97:comment added by 67: 66: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4066: 4049: 4044: 3988: 3982: 3978: 3972: 3968: 3962: 3950: 3936: 3883: 3879: 3873: 3866: 3860: 3853: 3847: 3843: 3734:this Google form 3671: 3602: 3596: 3541: 3534: 3533:Another Believer 3514:50,000 Challenge 3509: 3502: 3501: 3441: 3434: 3423: 3421: 3414: 3407: 3381: 3325:Rationalobserver 3270:Hello everyone! 3242: 3145: 3143: 3139: 3120: 3118: 3114: 3083: 3076: 3004:Intothatdarkness 2995: 2967:Intothatdarkness 2953:Intothatdarkness 2939: 2921:Intothatdarkness 2887:Intothatdarkness 2870: 2849:Intothatdarkness 2802:Intothatdarkness 2761:Intothatdarkness 2587:Nomination as a 2413:Intothatdarkness 2380:Intothatdarkness 2311: 2268: 2229:Intothatdarkness 2199:Intothatdarkness 2190: 2171: 2150: 2144: 2133: 2116:Intothatdarkness 2073: 2053: 2047: 2020: 2007: 2000: 1965:Intothatdarkness 1808: 1802:Ollie P. Roberts 1746: 1735: 1691: 1673: 1625:Intothatdarkness 1613:Intothatdarkness 1577:Mason County War 1482: 1477: 1466: 1453: 1448: 1436: 1419: 1414: 1394: 1357: 1316: 1300:Intothatdarkness 1282: 1259: 1227: 1210:OldWestHistorian 1182:Intothatdarkness 1172: 1116:Intothatdarkness 1072: 1018: 1012: 1004: 981: 965:Intothatdarkness 948: 922:Intothatdarkness 901: 896: 892:, in the scope. 881: 864:Intothatdarkness 854: 834:Intothatdarkness 821: 816: 810:most influential 798: 793: 772: 767: 760: 744: 715: 699: 671: 635: 615:Intothatdarkness 610:at the same time 595:Intothatdarkness 562:Intothatdarkness 526: 510:Intothatdarkness 492: 465:Intothatdarkness 431:Intothatdarkness 398: 384: 342: 312:Intothatdarkness 295: 274:Intothatdarkness 263: 224: 186: 134: 118: 109: 78: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4074: 4073: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4047: 4023: 3986: 3980: 3976: 3970: 3966: 3960: 3946: 3934: 3907: 3901: 3877: 3871: 3864: 3858: 3851: 3845: 3829: 3802: 3753: 3718: 3680: 3664: 3627: 3600: 3594: 3580: 3553: 3544: 3539: 3532: 3500: 3477: 3432: 3401: 3394: 3379: 3340: 3313: 3261: 3228: 3179: 3156: 3074: 3053:FYI, there's a 3051: 3028: 2993: 2937: 2907: 2868: 2821:Red Cloud's War 2818: 2779:The article on 2777: 2733: 2709: 2668: 2623: 2593: 2554: 2511: 2484: 2351: 2319: 2309: 2276: 2266: 2188: 2179: 2169: 2148: 2142: 2131: 2093: 2062: 2042: 2034: 2018: 2003: 1996: 1980: 1960: 1883: 1852: 1821: 1794: 1754: 1744: 1733: 1688: 1676: 1670: 1658: 1573: 1513:, then article 1503: 1464: 1434: 1402: 1384: 1376: 1355: 1324: 1314: 1290: 1280: 1257: 1235: 1225: 1170: 1135:Western fiction 1130:Western (genre) 1080: 1070: 1026: 1016: 1002: 989: 979: 956: 946: 879: 852: 742: 723: 697: 679: 643: 534: 500: 450:Wilhelmina Will 406: 382: 338: 332: 176: 153: 142: 132: 126: 116: 92: 88: 76: 72: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4072: 4070: 4050:Delivered by: 3957: 3956: 3953:Deprecated.com 3939: 3938: 3931:Deprecated.com 3900: 3897: 3828: 3825: 3801: 3798: 3783: 3782: 3778: 3777: 3770: 3769: 3765: 3764: 3752: 3749: 3717: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3679: 3676: 3626: 3623: 3579: 3573: 3552: 3549: 3536: 3526: 3525: 3510: 3499: 3496: 3482: 3476: 3473: 3470: 3469: 3442: 3431: 3428: 3405:Jim in Georgia 3393: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3339: 3336: 3312: 3309: 3260: 3257: 3227: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3178: 3175: 3155: 3152: 3127: 3126: 3084: 3073: 3070: 3050: 3047: 3027: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2945: 2944: 2915: 2906: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2860: 2859: 2825:Plains Indians 2817: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2781:Plains Indians 2776: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2732: 2729: 2708: 2705: 2691: 2667: 2660: 2646: 2622: 2616: 2592: 2585: 2553: 2548: 2534: 2523:September 2011 2510: 2504: 2483: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2350: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2317: 2310:The Utahraptor 2304: 2303: 2288: 2274: 2267:The Utahraptor 2248: 2247: 2246: 2245: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2195: 2184: 2177: 2170:The Utahraptor 2126: 2092: 2089: 2061: 2058: 2033: 2027: 2026: 2025: 1979: 1976: 1959: 1956: 1922: 1918: 1882: 1879: 1862:leave comments 1851: 1848: 1820: 1817: 1793: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1752: 1745:The Utahraptor 1729:Little Red Hen 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1687:978-1574412628 1686: 1674: 1669:978-1574412437 1668: 1656: 1646: 1572: 1569: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1400: 1383: 1377: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1322: 1315:The Utahraptor 1288: 1281:The Utahraptor 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1249:My Little Pony 1241: 1240: 1233: 1226:The Utahraptor 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1078: 1071:The Utahraptor 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1024: 1017:The Utahraptor 987: 980:The Utahraptor 954: 947:The Utahraptor 943: 942: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 845: 844: 806: 805: 789:'s talk page. 758: 757: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 721: 693:My Little Pony 677: 649: 648: 641: 628: 627: 626: 625: 605: 542: 541: 540: 539: 532: 498: 486: 485: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 475: 404: 346: 345: 333: 331: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 303: 302: 301: 300: 285: 284: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 175: 172: 152: 149: 148: 147: 140: 133:The Utahraptor 124: 117:The Utahraptor 87: 84: 71: 68: 65: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4071: 4062: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4045: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4020: 4018: 4014: 4010: 4005: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3994:WP:RSPSOURCES 3990: 3985: 3975: 3965: 3954: 3949: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3932: 3928: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3920: 3916: 3912: 3906: 3898: 3896: 3895: 3891: 3887: 3876: 3868: 3863: 3855: 3850: 3844:parameter to 3839: 3835: 3826: 3824: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3799: 3797: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3780: 3779: 3776: 3772: 3771: 3767: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3758: 3750: 3748: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3729: 3727: 3723: 3715: 3711: 3707: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3687: 3686: 3677: 3675: 3674: 3670: 3669: 3661: 3659: 3654: 3652: 3647: 3644: 3641: 3639: 3634: 3632: 3624: 3622: 3620: 3619: 3613: 3611: 3610: 3604: 3599: 3590: 3587: 3584: 3578: 3574: 3572: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3558: 3550: 3548: 3547: 3542: 3535: 3523: 3519: 3518:United States 3515: 3511: 3508: 3504: 3503: 3497: 3495: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3481: 3474: 3468: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3458:Barbara (WVS) 3454: 3453:add your name 3449: 3443: 3440: 3436: 3435: 3429: 3427: 3426: 3422: 3420: 3415: 3413: 3408: 3406: 3399: 3391: 3387: 3384: 3382: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3369: 3365: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3352:Calamity Jane 3349: 3345: 3337: 3335: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3310: 3308: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3283: 3278: 3277: 3276:WikiProject X 3271: 3265: 3258: 3256: 3255: 3251: 3247: 3240: 3236: 3235: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3208: 3207: 3206: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3188: 3187:February 2013 3184: 3176: 3174: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3160:Mendocino War 3154:Mendocino War 3153: 3151: 3150: 3147: 3146: 3125: 3122: 3121: 3106: 3105: 3100: 3099: 3094: 3093: 3088: 3085: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3071: 3069: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3056: 3048: 3046: 3045: 3041: 3037: 3033: 3025: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2996: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2986: 2985: 2984: 2983: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2943: 2940: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2916: 2912: 2904: 2896: 2892: 2888: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2874: 2871: 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2791: 2787: 2782: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2743: 2738: 2731:James H. Levy 2730: 2728: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2704: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2689: 2687: 2683: 2681: 2672: 2665: 2661: 2659: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2644: 2642: 2638: 2636: 2635:December 2011 2627: 2621: 2617: 2615: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2590: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2568: 2564: 2562: 2558: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2532: 2530: 2526: 2524: 2515: 2509: 2505: 2503: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2489: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2404: 2400: 2395: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2357: 2348: 2338: 2334: 2330: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2320: 2314: 2312: 2306: 2305: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2289: 2285: 2284: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2277: 2271: 2269: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2258: 2254: 2238: 2234: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2194: 2191: 2185: 2183: 2180: 2174: 2172: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2147: 2146:United States 2139: 2138: 2137: 2134: 2127: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2090: 2088: 2087: 2084: 2081: 2080:Contributions 2077: 2072: 2068:. Thank you. 2067: 2059: 2057: 2056: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2040: 2031: 2028: 2024: 2021: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2008: 2006: 2001: 1999: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1977: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1957: 1955: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1941: 1939: 1934: 1932: 1927: 1921: 1917: 1915: 1911: 1910:popular pages 1906: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1880: 1878: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1863: 1858: 1857: 1849: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1816: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1798:Billy the Kid 1792: 1791:Billy the Kid 1789: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1749: 1747: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1736: 1730: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1703: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1689: 1684: 1680: 1675: 1671: 1666: 1662: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1639:Glenn Hadeler 1636: 1635: 1634: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1592: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1578: 1570: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1500: 1488: 1485: 1483: 1478: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1467: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1456: 1454: 1449: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1437: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1415: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1397: 1395: 1389: 1382:is backlogged 1381: 1378: 1361: 1358: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1328: 1325: 1323:Contributions 1319: 1317: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1289:Contributions 1285: 1283: 1277: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1263: 1260: 1254: 1253:Breyer horses 1250: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1234:Contributions 1230: 1228: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1206:Carbon County 1191: 1187: 1183: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1131: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1081: 1079:Contributions 1075: 1073: 1067: 1063: 1062:User:Dimadick 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1027: 1025:Contributions 1021: 1019: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1005: 999: 995: 994: 993: 990: 988:Contributions 984: 982: 976: 975: 974: 970: 966: 962: 961: 960: 957: 955:Contributions 951: 949: 931: 927: 923: 918: 913: 909: 908: 907: 904: 902: 897: 891: 887: 886: 885: 882: 875: 874: 873: 869: 865: 860: 859: 858: 855: 849: 848: 847: 846: 843: 839: 835: 830: 829: 828: 827: 824: 822: 817: 811: 804: 801: 799: 794: 788: 784: 780: 779: 778: 775: 773: 768: 748: 745: 738: 734: 729: 728: 727: 724: 718: 716: 709: 705: 704: 703: 700: 694: 690: 685: 684: 683: 680: 674: 672: 666: 665: 664: 660: 656: 651: 650: 647: 644: 638: 636: 630: 629: 624: 620: 616: 611: 606: 604: 600: 596: 591: 590: 589: 585: 581: 577: 572: 567: 563: 559: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 538: 535: 529: 527: 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 506: 505: 504: 501: 495: 493: 474: 470: 466: 461: 460: 459: 455: 451: 446: 442: 441: 440: 436: 432: 427: 426: 425: 421: 417: 412: 411: 410: 407: 401: 399: 393: 390: 389: 388: 385: 378: 377: 376: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 355: 351: 344: 341: 335: 334: 329: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 299: 296: 289: 288: 287: 286: 283: 279: 275: 270: 269: 268: 267: 264: 258: 254: 243: 239: 235: 230: 229: 228: 225: 219: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 181: 173: 171: 170: 166: 162: 158: 150: 146: 143: 137: 135: 129: 127: 121: 119: 112: 111: 110: 108: 104: 100: 96: 85: 83: 82: 79: 69: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4046: 4021: 4008: 4006: 4002:WP:CITEWATCH 3991: 3974:cite journal 3958: 3952: 3945:John Smith " 3940: 3930: 3925:John Smith " 3908: 3875:WPBannerMeta 3869: 3856: 3830: 3806:Grand Canyon 3803: 3784: 3754: 3730: 3719: 3683: 3681: 3666: 3663:Thank you. 3662: 3655: 3648: 3645: 3642: 3635: 3628: 3616: 3614: 3607: 3605: 3591: 3588: 3585: 3581: 3554: 3529: 3478: 3447: 3444: 3418: 3411: 3404: 3395: 3348:Buffalo Bill 3344:Annie Oakley 3341: 3314: 3296: 3287: 3286: 3282:check us out 3274: 3272: 3269: 3232: 3229: 3180: 3157: 3133: 3130: 3108: 3104:project page 3102: 3096: 3090: 3086: 3059:76.65.128.60 3052: 3029: 2917: 2908: 2845:Comanche War 2819: 2778: 2741: 2736: 2734: 2718:SarahStierch 2710: 2694:Kumi-Taskbot 2690: 2680:January 2012 2678: 2676: 2645: 2633: 2631: 2594: 2572: 2569: 2565: 2559:is having a 2555: 2533: 2521: 2519: 2485: 2445: 2393: 2355: 2352: 2249: 2094: 2069: 2066:comment here 2063: 2043: 2035: 2004: 1997: 1984:Oregon Trail 1981: 1978:Oregon Trail 1961: 1942: 1935: 1925: 1923: 1919: 1907: 1884: 1861: 1854: 1853: 1822: 1795: 1678: 1660: 1620: 1593: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1574: 1563:SelectionBot 1560: 1544: 1529: 1523: 1514: 1504: 1385: 1275: 1202: 1110: 1106: 1065: 1035: 916: 911: 809: 807: 708:most popular 707: 609: 575: 570: 543: 444: 392:Talk:Bonanza 364:. Comments? 347: 339: 336: 250: 177: 174:Mass Tagging 154: 113: 89: 86:Johnny Baker 73: 60: 43: 37: 3903:Main page: 3694:WikiSpecies 3636:There's an 3311:Irataba FAC 1521:algorithm. 1111:at the time 781:Please see 655:Jason Quinn 580:Jason Quinn 566:dime novels 416:Jason Quinn 366:Jason Quinn 99:66.76.13.49 93:—Preceding 36:This is an 3722:WP 1.0 Bot 3625:Background 3562:Drown Soda 3364:Chaswmsday 2829:Smallchief 2786:Smallchief 2574:Smallbones 2030:Wyatt Earp 1889:is called 1806:Adam in MO 1481:Utahraptor 1432:). LOL! 1393:The Raptor 1128:So should 1107:historical 1066:historical 912:historical 900:Utahraptor 820:Utahraptor 797:Utahraptor 737:Seabiscuit 714:The Raptor 670:The Raptor 634:The Raptor 571:perception 525:The Raptor 491:The Raptor 397:The Raptor 272:groupings. 232:proceed.-- 3380:Montanabw 3239:talk page 3098:Wild West 2994:Montanabw 2938:Montanabw 2869:Montanabw 2746:Sector001 2591:candidate 2189:Montanabw 2132:Montanabw 2019:Montanabw 1943:Regards, 1940:as well. 1734:Montanabw 1621:Wild West 1519:WikiTrust 1465:Montanabw 1435:Montanabw 1356:Montanabw 1258:Montanabw 1171:Montanabw 1003:Montanabw 880:Montanabw 853:Montanabw 743:Montanabw 733:Westworld 698:Montanabw 547:Rosiestep 383:Montanabw 234:Jojhutton 196:Jojhutton 77:Montanabw 61:Archive 1 4025:Headbomb 3998:WP:NPPSG 3964:cite web 3886:Aymatth2 3738:Walkerma 3726:web tool 3706:Headbomb 3412:Contribs 3164:Bellitan 2318:Contribs 2275:Contribs 2264:course. 2178:Contribs 2046:SilkTork 1998:Jsayre64 1945:RichardF 1868:RichardF 1837:Skookum1 1753:Contribs 1643:Mike Cox 1515:versions 1147:contribs 1097:contribs 1044:contribs 141:Contribs 125:Contribs 95:unsigned 3842:|class= 3814:Kingsif 3317:Irataba 3196:Kumioko 3057:now -- 3036:Kumioko 2737:However 2684:of the 2649:Kumioko 2639:of the 2605:Kumioko 2557:WP:NRHP 2537:Kumioko 2527:of the 2493:Kumioko 2468:Kumioko 2448:Hutcher 2427:Kumioko 2399:Kumioko 2361:Kumioko 2356:did not 2329:Kumioko 2293:Kumioko 2253:Kumioko 2214:Kumioko 2154:Kumioko 2101:Kumioko 1988:history 1768:Maile66 1706:Maile66 1597:Maile66 1430:noogies 890:Bonanza 310:Got ya. 294:EdoDodo 262:EdoDodo 223:EdoDodo 185:EdoDodo 180:DodoBot 39:archive 3880:a new 3787:Sm8900 3682:A new 3212:Orlady 2800:horse. 2742:please 2005:(talk) 1452:raptor 1418:raptor 998:cowboy 920:here). 771:raptor 689:Barbie 255:, and 161:Sadads 3298:Harej 3288:Note: 3246:Harej 2682:issue 2637:issue 2525:issue 2394:a lot 2376:here. 1992:route 16:< 4056:talk 4000:and 3979:and 3913:and 3890:talk 3818:talk 3810:here 3791:talk 3742:talk 3618:here 3609:here 3566:talk 3540:Talk 3522:here 3489:talk 3462:talk 3419:Talk 3368:talk 3350:and 3329:talk 3302:talk 3250:talk 3216:talk 3200:talk 3192:here 3168:talk 3140:usBr 3115:usBr 3063:talk 3040:talk 3008:talk 2971:talk 2957:talk 2925:talk 2891:talk 2853:talk 2833:talk 2806:talk 2790:talk 2765:talk 2750:talk 2722:talk 2698:talk 2677:The 2653:talk 2632:The 2609:talk 2603:. -- 2601:here 2578:talk 2541:talk 2520:The 2497:talk 2488:here 2472:talk 2464:here 2452:talk 2431:talk 2417:talk 2403:talk 2384:talk 2365:talk 2333:talk 2297:talk 2257:talk 2233:talk 2227:mix. 2218:talk 2203:talk 2158:talk 2120:talk 2105:talk 2076:Talk 2071:JJ98 1990:and 1969:talk 1949:talk 1926:very 1872:talk 1841:talk 1810:Talk 1772:talk 1710:talk 1683:ISBN 1665:ISBN 1629:talk 1617:talk 1601:talk 1575:The 1550:and 1447:Utah 1413:Utah 1304:talk 1276:only 1214:talk 1186:talk 1143:talk 1120:talk 1093:talk 1040:talk 969:talk 926:talk 868:talk 838:talk 766:Utah 659:talk 619:talk 599:talk 584:talk 551:talk 514:talk 469:talk 454:talk 435:talk 420:talk 370:talk 316:talk 278:talk 238:talk 200:talk 165:talk 103:talk 4022:- 3984:doi 3530:--- 3142:iti 3117:iti 2032:GAN 1905:. 1866:-- 1558:! 1476:The 917:all 895:The 815:The 792:The 785:on 576:not 445:and 4058:) 4039:· 4035:· 4031:· 4019:. 3996:, 3989:. 3987:}} 3981:{{ 3977:}} 3971:{{ 3969:, 3967:}} 3961:{{ 3951:" 3929:" 3892:) 3878:}} 3872:{{ 3865:}} 3859:{{ 3852:}} 3846:{{ 3820:) 3812:! 3793:) 3744:) 3708:. 3665:— 3660:. 3653:. 3640:. 3612:. 3603:. 3601:}} 3595:{{ 3568:) 3560:-- 3524:! 3491:) 3483:-- 3464:) 3370:) 3346:, 3331:) 3304:) 3252:) 3218:) 3202:) 3194:. 3170:) 3144:sh 3138:®© 3136:Ma 3119:sh 3113:®© 3111:Ma 3065:) 3042:) 3010:) 2973:) 2959:) 2927:) 2893:) 2855:) 2835:) 2808:) 2792:) 2767:) 2752:) 2724:) 2700:) 2692:-- 2655:) 2647:-- 2611:) 2580:) 2543:) 2535:-- 2499:) 2491:-- 2474:) 2454:) 2433:) 2419:) 2405:) 2386:) 2367:) 2335:) 2299:) 2291:-- 2259:) 2235:) 2220:) 2205:) 2160:) 2152:-- 2149:}} 2143:{{ 2122:) 2107:) 2078:/ 1971:) 1951:) 1874:) 1843:) 1774:) 1712:) 1641:, 1631:) 1603:) 1306:) 1216:) 1208:. 1188:) 1149:) 1145:| 1122:) 1099:) 1095:| 1046:) 1042:| 971:) 928:) 870:) 840:) 661:) 621:) 601:) 586:) 553:) 516:) 471:) 456:) 437:) 422:) 372:) 356:, 352:, 318:) 280:) 240:) 216:, 212:, 202:) 167:) 105:) 4054:( 4043:} 4041:b 4037:p 4033:c 4029:t 4027:{ 3937:) 3888:( 3816:( 3789:( 3740:( 3564:( 3543:) 3537:( 3487:( 3460:( 3446:' 3366:( 3327:( 3300:( 3248:( 3214:( 3198:( 3166:( 3061:( 3038:( 3006:( 2969:( 2955:( 2923:( 2889:( 2851:( 2831:( 2804:( 2788:( 2763:( 2748:( 2720:( 2696:( 2651:( 2607:( 2576:( 2539:( 2495:( 2470:( 2450:( 2429:( 2415:( 2401:( 2382:( 2363:( 2331:( 2315:/ 2295:( 2272:/ 2255:( 2231:( 2216:( 2201:( 2175:/ 2156:( 2118:( 2103:( 2082:) 2074:( 2050:* 1967:( 1947:( 1870:( 1864:. 1839:( 1770:( 1750:/ 1708:( 1690:. 1672:. 1645:. 1627:( 1615:( 1599:( 1398:/ 1320:/ 1302:( 1286:/ 1231:/ 1212:( 1184:( 1118:( 1087:" 1076:/ 1022:/ 985:/ 967:( 952:/ 924:( 866:( 836:( 719:/ 675:/ 657:( 639:/ 617:( 597:( 582:( 549:( 530:/ 512:( 496:/ 467:( 452:( 433:( 418:( 402:/ 368:( 314:( 276:( 236:( 198:( 163:( 138:/ 122:/ 101:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject American Old West/Archive 1 - Knowledge

Index