Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 20

3658:

question, thus meeting the rationale requirements, whereas the subject of these cosplay photographs are mostly just non-notable fans wearing costumes attempting to resemble their favourite characters, which do not help in identifying the actual media in question at all. A character's design in an anime, manga or game is its most defining characteristic, since anime, manga and games are visual media, with such essential features as character facial design only represented by authentic/canon images such as screenshots. In my humble opinion, therefore, cosplay images simply do not have any place in visual media articles, and only authentic or canon media (such as screenshots, covers, etc.) should be used to identify the series, its characters and themes. ···

3437:

of buildings, people and other objects, and don't demand "official plans / photos by manufactures / approved by the photographed person", so should cosplay approximations be allowed (and welcomed). Remember that screenshots are increasingly deleted and I'd not be suprised if in a near future they would all be removed; other copyright material (posters, covers) will not last much longer (which is unfortunate, but it is the board policy). Hence we should try to get as much free (cosplay) images as possible to fill the inevevitablly growing gaps in our visual coverage. PS. And remember that fair use is illegal in most places outside USA, that we were able to use it - briefly - on en wiki - is a temporary luxury, nothing more.--

1876:

applying the new WP:FICT correctly can save all this hard work from deletion by transwiki or redirecting it to the parent article (it could have very well said that "anything not meeting this standard should be deleted", but that would defeat the purpose of a compromising guideline that we tried to strike). It's also important to look at it in the long-run: if WP:FICT was not rewritten and the standards at AfD kept increasing, then we'd have contradicting guidelines and policies, as well as new users being misled. There's a lot of work/adjusting to do, sure, but in the larger picture, it beats mass deletion and a conflict with Knowledge's stress on real-world perspective. —

1027:. Maybe it's time we locked down the rules about when to include a demographic. It's my feeling that we should only include a demographic when it is obvious, and not include them if there is some doubt. Not every anime or manga fits into one of the four main demographics. If the original manga runs in a magazine with a clear demographic, then by all means list it. Should original anime (not based on a manga) have demographics? I'm fuzzy on this. Light Novels do not use the shonen/seinen shojo/josei demographics, and the words should not be applied arbitrarily to those articles. 3935:. In short, the issue is that articles for television episodes need to show that the individual episode has been discussed in reliable sources, and also need to have substantial out-of-universe information such as production information, reviews, ratings and impact. If a series' episode articles consist of nothing but plot summaries and cast lists, some editors will want to turn the article into a redirect to the relevant list of episodes. The guidelines for television episodes are at 31: 2966:". I really can't begin to explain how this is completely unnecessary. First of all, it's not important to the article. Second, it provides undue weight towards fansubs and also has a singe of POV pushing. Third, it is rare that you can verify it through reliable third-party sources. And lastly, we should only mention when the anime or manga is licensed in English, which is 2827:

If someone could reason with him and ask him to stop, that'd be good, but he's already been banned several times for violating 3RR, so he does not appear to be the reasonable type (again, it's why I label him a vandal so quickly). What we need is for someone to monitor his edits and quickly undo them if he tries to apply his anti-fansub bias to an article. Thanks!

3357:; if I went there with a goal of getting more cosplay photos (and better batteries... :( ) I could've had dozens of characters. So I strongly suggest - hunt for freely licenced cosplay images online, ask for free licences if status is unclear, ask your convention-going friends for their photos, and when you go to a con - carry a camera and take photos!-- 1785:

left, next is... etc" text. It is a crappy way to identify characters, it is better to have them in a picture where you are not distracted by their more flashy neighbors. Of course, the policy doesn't make any attempt at addressing this concern and how it makes the encyclopedia less useful rather than improving it as you claim.

1585:, led to the rewrite. It tries to compromise by translating "...subject of multiple reliable secondary sources (even for subarticles)" to the more reasonable "...contains significant real-world information (even for subarticles)", and I think it's about as good of a compromise as we could strike. Plus, with transwiki to the 1765:, that admin is completely right to remove those pictures because they are the second images to identify the characters, while another image is already doing that. I'm sorry, but the disruption you speak of is normally the result of users who are acting like you are acting, and is not the result of good, sound advice. -- 2602:? The Kodansha ones are all artists only, the Shogakukan unlabeled and Childrens are artists, but the Shogakukan are all works only. I'm comfuzzled about the intent. (Also, should they be all split by category or all lumped by awarder?) It's something we should probably straighten out, as awards are a good prop for 3939:; please review them, and be ready when the review folks come. A few of the reviewers are very keen on turning as many episode articles as possible into redirects. If you want to keep the episode articles, the best thing is to include those sources and real-world information as soon as possible. Good luck! — 1853:(as opposes to arguing what major/minor characters are). Lastly, the rewrite stresses better use of AfD as a last resort: WPAnime's numerous character lists should not be popping up at AfD unless no real-world info can be found, the info is already at Wikia or other Wikis, and/or nothing can be merged. — 4010:

For the record, the options which are generally considered in the review process are keeping episode articles or turning them into redirects; deletion isn't usually on the table. If the episode articles are turned into redirects, the notes will still be in the article's history, so if you don't have

3991:

At the very least, the plot summaries from each individual episode article need to be copied into the list of episodes article so that that information can be preserved. As far as all the notes and stuff, I hope there's a way we can preserve that material...I'm gonna be mega-pissed if all the time I

3674:

was featured on the main page, it did not use a fair use picture - but that of a cosplayer. Of course, any cosplayer image will be less accurate that the original drawing - but the free factor should not be underestimated, and accuracy of costumes (if not faces, for the obvious reasons) can be pretty

2306:

That will definitely be something to use, even if just to say that you used it... (if you have the title, you might try to peep through Google Books). Also, did you check the specialised magazines, like newtype, etc? They all had articles on it, and they are definitely available, even if only through

1746:

Of course there are more GA and FA articles now than before, suggesting that more rules is the cause of this is a stretch. Expansion of rules does not improve the encyclopedia on its own, good editing does that. We don't need more guidlelines or MOS pages to improve editing and the way the guidelines

664:

Generally speaking, there's a TON of ways we can relate one article to another, and make a succession box for that. If we did it for each situation we'd have a mess. People who are looking to navigate between these articles are more likely going to be doing so from the article for the award, or maybe

2826:

has been going around to many articles and removing info related to fansubs. Since fansubs are a critical part in how much anime develops its popularity in the states, he's removing content with encyclopedic value (i.e. vandalism). I've undone some of the damage he's done, but I could use some help.

2689:

Just to be clear, guys, the categories already exist. You're proposing merges? (Keep in mind that the Shogakukan's been going for 50-odd years, with multiple categories for a couple decades, and Kodansha for 30 years with three categories -- with each award getting double entries in the caegory, for

2373:

Fan sites? You're right, that's not appropriate (unless you want to talk about fan sites, and even then). I never even heard of Newtype before I joined this project; but some people in the project do buy it, and may share it or even better give you a succinct summary. You just need to find something

1815:

I think what Ned is saying is this: It's better to have guidelines that represent what the WHOLE of the body of editors want rather than the subset of editors who might be working on a specific area. Just because a few people might want a certain relaxed standard (which is often called 'crufty', god

1732:

Actual practice is exactly why we're making these pages. You might not think so, but more and more stuff on Knowledge is coming in line with these guidelines and policies. We have more fictional GAs and FAs, we have lots of merges and AfDs (did ya know they finally merged the Pokemon articles?), and

1521:

This argument is moot, trite, and trivial. Even if a work is marketed and geared towards a particular demographic -- it does not imply that the market will respond as such. As consumers, anyone has the choice of buying anything. For some works, the distinction does not apply at all. Furthermore,

771:

Some do already, some don't -- I'm putting it in where it wasn't, sometimes adding detail where it was (such as, for what work). Always wikilinking to the award article as I can. When I add it, I try to make it prominant, as part of something notable about it, but sometimes there's an existing place

229:

I thought there was some rule against including measurements like height and weight in infoboxes? I think it was in reference to real people, though, in which case it's sort of more crufty than with fictional characters (since with characters, it's a lot harder to just look at them and tell). Anyone

3848:

The photos are not derivative works, but the costumes are. Thus a photo of a derivative work still carries some of the copyright of the work that the costume was derived from. Thus to make a cosplay image totally free, you would have to get the photographer to license the photograph, the creator of

3473:

You seem to completly misunderstand both my point and how this site works. I like fair use, but they are being deleted - if you don't like that, contact Board of Wikimedia Fundation or take part in relevant discussions. If you dislike cosplay images so much, reach a consensus - for example, on this

3436:

I am afraid I don't agree with that logic. For starters, we are dealing with medium which is not "real", the only "pure official" media are the copyrighted scans/screenshots anime/manga. Cosplay images are of course an approximation - but a good, free approximation. Just as we accept amateur photos

3340:

Commonly, anime-related articles (as many other screen media ones), have problems due to fair use images disputed - particulary painful when we are dealing with a FA article, which sometimes lacks even a single free image. However we are in a very lucky situation, as there is a great source of free

3312:

with information that was on the main page of the project. This will allow the main page to be less cluttered, and also provide an easy place to find this information that is consistent with what it was: a manual of style for anime- and manga-related articles. Feel free to participate in keeping it

3099:

Hi everyone. It seems like someone finally decided to do something about the EVA article, but needs the Susan J. Napier article, "When the Machines Stop: Fantasy, Reality, and Terminal Identity in Neon Genesis Evangelion and Serial Experiments Lain" from Sci Fi journal. Any chance anyone has it and

2837:

Spot checking his contributions...occasionally he carries it a bit too far (Haruhi's popularity before release was based on fansubs, and that is probably notable) but the vast majority of his changes are ones I entirely agree with. There is no reason to note the availability of fansubs for a series

2524:

If there is an infobox on an article already, we don't add/change it to our own infobox. If a film article doesn't have an infobox then the preference is to use this Wikiproject's infobox, but it has always been optional whether an editor wanted to use our infobox. Just like editors have the option

2089:

In large part, I think the best approach would be to use the aux* fields. If you combine two English titles together, it would be confusing if they were located in the same cell. But then, I also thought that the JapaneseTitle was suppose to be primarily for the English translation with Romaji used

1576:

That's basically the core concept. Too many lists of fictional things were being created; there was no real-world information being shown, and minor fictional universes were being covered in greater depth than most of the extremely notable works. Many of these lists are being deleted. That, and the

1043:

Check your own talk page. We had this conversation a few months ago. Light novels are aimed at male or female audiences, but these particular terms are not used. I lived in Japan five years and base my opinion on that and the light novel guidebooks I've read, and a native Japanese speaker backed me

312:

When you say "without having to track down and edit numerous series specific infoboxes" does that mean you intend to replace existing character infoboxes with yours? I hope that is not the case, editors should be allowed the freedom to design and use their own templates. We don't enforce editors to

286:

I'm leaning towards blood type being more or less trivia that should be removed from the infobox, unless someone can demonstrate that blood type is important to the plotline. But what about hair and eye color? Granted the infobox's instructions says to only use them if they are not obvious, but are

3698:

is not just any old fan, that's the director of the series himself! That makes the person in the photo not only notable enough for inclusion, but the fact that he's cosplaying as his own character in the series only just makes it good enough for inclusion in that article, but just barely. And your

3506:

But fur can be disputed, image listed at IfD and then deleted. I have seen this happen over and over again - you might have noticed, for example, removal of all 'one screenshop per episode' fair uses... bottom line is, fair use is losing the battle, and that makes free images (out of which cosplay

1722:

Agreed, but these things should reflect consensus and not make rules disregarding the reality of the situation. Knowledge may not be a fansite, but creating subjective rules while blatantly disregarding actual practice is a bad idea. More care should be taken to create rules that have a snowball's

1084:

Absolutely not true. There are light novels for a male audience. There is no such thing as shonen light novels. Same goes for girls. These demographic terms are not used with light novels. I have asked you several times to provide any sources that use those terms, and you have simply insisted on a

3902:. Unfortunately while it states that it is possible to copyright a photo of a public domain statue, it doesn't say whether a photo of a copyrighted statue can be re-copyrighted by the photographer, and the second section on the talk page addresses the question slightly with the answer of "maybe". 3413:

article, are not only unneeded, but unwanted in normal anime/manga articles since they rarely ever give an accurate depiction of what the characters look like in the actual anime/manga, unless they are very very good cosplaying costumes, but even then, I doubt anyone wants cosplay photos all over

2879:

I must say that I disagree with Buspar's opinion on Folken de Fanel's intentions. I checked some of Folken's contributions, and many of the infact were helpful, and would be edits I would make myself; fansubs really have no place on wikipedia unless cited by a published/reliable source (as in the

2629:

What about the lumping or splitting of categories? There's currently Kodansha categories for Children's, General, Shonen, and Shojo (not no generic winner), and Shogakukan for Children's, Shonen, and generic (but no General or Shojo). I'd say there's a clear case for splitting the latter into the

2069:

If you add another title parameter, I don't think it should be in a new column; vertical space is cheap, but horizontal space is valuable, especially with smaller resolutions (800 and 1024), and multiple long columns will likely look scrunched-up and ugly. The above-linked Sailor Moon list barely

3897:

But it's not just the costume, it's the entire design of the character being demonstrated (which I suppose is your point on trademarks, but I'm pretty sure that we're still looking at a copyright issue). That said, I think a more relevant comparison is the issue with photographs of statues - see

3669:

But by the same logic, one can argue for exclusion of paintings or photographs of statues, not to mention allegorical ones which are far from being "historical" or "realistic". Using a photo of a cosplayer to illustrate the article is no different from an using a photo of an actor or a statue to

1784:

And in regards to the "second" image claim, yes, these are the second images containing the characters. But a solo shot identifies better than a group shot where the character is small and blends in. Yes, you can expand the image by clicking on it, but then you lose the "this character is on the

1604:

So to take a semi-concrete example, suppose for a series there's subarticles for the five main characters. Two of them are notably popular (shown by pop-culture references, allusions in other works, poll results, fan art, iconic uses, and so on) but the others, while just as important within the

1085:

blanket definition that is completely unsupported, and actively denied by native Japanese speakers and myself. I realize that essentially boils down to two opinions versus yours. But we don't need a reference to not include a term, while we do need a reference to include a term that is in doubt.

2317:

I thought fansites were a no-no when it came to references? I looked at Google books, and nothing came up. And I don't have any anime magazines. We don't all buy Newtype USA. And they don't seem to upload previous reviews and the like onto their site, such as with other magazines. But seriously

1871:

recommends to handle these scenerios. I think the best thing right now is not to worry about character lists quite yet; instead, I recommend focusing on merging individual articles that cannot establish notability into the lists. If the lists cannot establish notability, then it's just a simple

3657:

article, for example, which contains screenshots describing many of the film's pivotal scenes and good rationales to support their inclusion. Such screenshots are also the most accurate and authentic method of identifying a particular character or a particular scene within the actual series in

1875:

This guideline is going to be hardest to apply on anime series, since all the great interviews describing these characters are in Japanese, and there are a lot of enthusiastic anime fans on Knowledge who like to describe the characters in detail. But AfD standards are increasing steadily, and

1774:

Yes, because questioning the wisdom of the vocal motivated minority is bad. I forgot. I'll blindly accept and not raise my voice from now on. I'm sorry, I thought we were supposed to discuss changes. I must have been thinking about some other encyclopdia that is actually built from consensus.

1566:

So digesting it, my understanding of the major change is that notability is now not automatically inherited by subarticles. The basic argument being that if something is split off for length, either a) the subject is notable enough for an article, which case that needs to be documented in the

3018:, Yotsuba lacks a "development and design" section: Azuma's inspirations for the manga and how it came to be; themes, art style and so on. The "Reception" section needs some "bad" critics; someone, somewhere, must have said something bad about the manga, it can't be all good. The GA-reviewer 1614:

Pretty much. Or, if you want all the characters in one place, you can put them all in a cast of characters article, since the real-world info for those two characters will probably be enough for a characters article (and you can probably find other info about the characters in general). —

376:

If versitile enough, it will not be a problem replacing all the other infoboxes with this one. Looking at those infoboxes, they're basically the same -- and perform the same exact function. Deciding on a color scheme can be decided upon later on. That blue color seems universal enough.

930:. I felt I would be silly not to inform this Wikiproject. I would appreciate help populating and policing these categories. Alternatively, I would also appreciate the project's thoughts on the categories (positive, negative, should exist, shouldn't exist, and everything in between). 2143:

I'm not sure your tone is appropriate. "Much slower than expected" is a very heavy indicator of expected outcome (in this case, approval to move), that you expected this to be done over the course of a few hours. It would seem that you have clearly come here with the sole intent to

424:

One thing I want to bring up before the template is used on a wider scale. That is what to do with the Kanji. I'm opting to just leave it out since it will already be present in the lead paragraph and really doesn't add anything to the infobox. It is also a bit gaudy as well, IMO.

2242:, in regards to how the japanese went about producing the series, and what their intentions were. There is no such material on my DVD's, and I have searched for some time on the internet with no success. I had planned on including english production anyway, but forgot about it. 246:. So that would probably eliminate such fields as height, weight, measurements, blood type, and etc. that aren't essential information to the character or storyline. While these fields are now on the chopping block, I won't remove them just yet until there is more input. -- 2525:

of using International English or American. We do need to either redesign the infobox to display information more concisely or start making fields like Director, Studio and Network optional so that the larger ones can omit repeated information. But that's a discussion for

1169:

I'm talking about light novels that are published under shounen muke labels and light novels that are published under shoujo muke labels. a light novel thats published under a shounen muke label is a light novel thats aimed at boys. demographic = shounen(boy). thats it.

1094:

What exactly are you talking about? again? the existance of light novels that are aimed at boys? of course there are light novels that are aimed at boys. Lets take for example the new light novel label for boys: GaGaGa Bunko, as mentioned by the publisher in this link:

670:

Although, I would like to point out that this is excellent information. We should definitely make sure it's noted somewhere in each of these articles that they've won this award (which would give a link path so that people can still reasonable find "who was next"). --

799:

article some guy put in a bunch of info about the various Arabic dubs and which are more accurate, etc. In my opinion, this sort of thing is a waste of space. If I wanted to know what Sailor Moon's name was in Spanish, I'd check the Spanish wiki. Obviously the

2589:

Question about the subcategories of the Anime and manga awards category -- the various Winner of the Kodansha/Shogakukan Manga Awards. (I'd wikilink, but I haven't figured out the trick for to a category page.) Are they intended to be applied to articles about

553:) that there had been little description in English Knowledge, though each award should be already well-known and recognized their authorities at least by anime fans in Japan. I thinked, if wikipedia treats about the awards, should enhance these a little more. 3079:

But with that, it has FA potential? Hmm -- a "development and design" section will be hardest: I've seen pretty much zilch on that in English, aside from what's already in the Story and Reception sections. But that gives a list of things to poke at. Thanks.

1971:

When the template was first made I didn't think people would want to list four possible titles when the dub title was different from the original (as in, Title in English, romaji, kanji/kana, dub title), but there seems to be a few lists like that (such as

1522:

other mediums (such as movies, books, music, etc) do not have categorization based on demographics. So, the most neutral position on this topic is complete omission. It should not be in the template at all. Regardless, all this would be better served by

3390:". Is there, by any chance, some guideline from this wikiproject recommending agaisnt use of cosplay images? Consicering that they are the only free type of image available (other then fanart), I'd be quite interested in learning the rationale for it.-- 1059:

Like I said then, light novels for males and females does not imply the use of the manga demographic jargon. Look, I don't want to rehash these arguments; I just want to make sure that these demographics are appearing on everything by group consensus.

3535:

And I agree with you. But all signs show that fair use will be gone from wiki completly in few years. Anyway, we are getting off topic here: the question is - is there any reason to delete cosplay images from articles that have ample space for more

3875:

I'm not sure the copyright would extend like that in regards to the costume. Just like how designs of clothes can be copyrighted, but pictures of people wearing those clothes can be free. You could still probably make a trademark claim, though. --

1069:

What exactly are you talking about? manga demographic jargon? LOL there are light novels for boys and light novels for girls, thats a demographic. aimed at boys = shounen demographic, and aimed at girls means shoujo demographic. its as easy as

394:

I decided to drop the whole template extension thing and went with several auxiliary fields instead. It does make the template a bit more complicated to use, but I could see problems with every anime/manga series wanting its own extension.

2216:

info on the production, even in Japanese. In this case, however, english is ok. It shouldn't be overdone to compensate, however; consider it as you would consider stating the technical tools used in production: a minor, but still notable,

1816:

I hate that word, but it fits for the moment), doesn't mean the policies SHOULD. There are other sites for such. Think about it this way -- instead of trying to get WP to be what /you/ want it to be, get WP to be what /it/ wants it to be.

3003:

have the potential to be FA, or is it pretty much inherently a GA kind of article? I'm asking not so much for a peer review as a pre-PR -- is it worth the effort of another peer review and so on. Thanks for any direction you might have.

2719:

The articles I was watching were all under just the award name, not divided by demographic. I'd be in favor of a merger. Or two categories - one for the artists and one for the works. That would be a more sensible way to divide things.

1428:

Basically, I just don't think the demographic of the original work should be determined by the adaptations. Welcome to the NHK is not a shonen novel or even a light novel, despite the highly successful shonen manga it was adapted into.

696:

Just to comment, I found the navigation boxes useful. Regardless, I agree with Ned Scott that the info should end up in the appropriate articles as it establishes notability and provides independant references for the series involved.

290:

Height/Weight information is rather trivial. As an example: that could be "interesting" regarding female characters; however, I could care less about that info regarding the males. Blood-type is also trivia. Also, something like a

631:

I did not know about this rule, for I do not usually edit in the category so much though I capriciously participating this time. By chance, do the anime articles have something a special rule about navigation boxes? Is this NOT a

1914:

17:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC) ETA: To expand on that - what's the proper use of the template when the English translation (the first argument) is separated from the Japanese text by, for example, being in a different table column?

2165:

Nah, that's a bit overreactive. Sesshomaru has actually done a very good job at leaving a neutral message regarding the situation. We should not live in fear of WP:CANVAS accusations when informing others about discussions. --

1003:) AfD's, been thinking about whether or not this is OC, and I haven't quite mad eup my mind on that yet. I'll definitely have to think more about it and I welcome more opinions here or on my talk page if any editor wishes. :) 1073:

BACCANO is published under a label for boys, its as easy as that. there's no need for a group consensus about this. if you want to remove a demographic so much, then how about removing the "shoujo" from the shoujo light novel

999:, I can see where you're coming from on this, I didn't really intend to claim this is a genre of anime as much as it is a genre of the tradition and reception of mythology. I have, in the process of discussing various 'IPC' ( 715:. Participating in Sport related articles, Navigation boxes are predominantly used there as well. While mentioning the awards in prose is reasonable, it is also natural to be curious about the sequentiality of the awards. 3703:

because that is using a 3D medium to illustrate a 3D person. Similarly, a 2D painting can be used to illustrate a 3D person since it's going from 3D to 2D, not 2D to 3D which is the equivalent of the anime to your cosplay

1833:, as well as the numerous working models that have shown that fiction can be covered correctly. Before, WP:FICT was a grand exception to policy; it allowed lengthy unverifiable lists of minor terms (directly contradicting 2318:

people, when I say I found nothing verifiable on japanese production I mean it. I didn't just spend five minutes browsing google and give up. I looked through english and japanese sites for some time, and found nothing.

114:

for an anime and manga character infobox. Partly to provide a uniform design, and also to make changes to the overall layout easier to implement without having to track down and edit numerous series specific infoboxes.

1751:

page where an edit war is occuring right now because one admin continues to remove pictures used for identification purposes of characters who deserve pictures for identification purposes (which is still allowed).

3631:

But we can't. A cosplayer picture shows a cosplayer, not the original character design. That would be like showing the picture of a counterfeit Louis Vuitton bag to illustrate an article about Louis Vuitton bags.

118:

The template provides numerous general fields that can be applied to a wide array of anime and manga characters. More series specific fields can be added using template extensions, if they are deemed appropriate.

1589:

becoming an option soon, I'm hoping fiction AfDs will be used only as a last resort. In essence, it raises the bar, but reduces the harshness by discouraging deletion and encouraging merges/transwiki instead. —

2335:

have a production section and there you have them. I think you could do without it. But when the time comes for the article to become featured, you'll need a well referenced "development and design" section.--

884: 3805:

you in fact effectively hid the last few sections of the article, including Notes and references, External links, and categories; I was merely correcting your mistakes, while at the same time removing the

1245:

Then remove the brackets "[[" and keep it like this: Demographic = Shounen. and not linking to the shounen wiki entry. describing the demographic has never been "wrong" so its fine mentioning these terms.

3612:

That applies even more to fair use images. Besides, illustrating characters (in 'character' section) is perfectly acceptable, and if we can use a free image instead of the fair use one, we should do so.--

1990:

No opinion on that, but as long as you're fiddling with the template, it could use a misc column. I've been using the EpisodeNumber2 slot for that sort of thing, but it would look better after the title.

136:

Oh good. I was wondering if one of these exists. It would be fitting to have a uniform character infobox. Sorting through the individual character pages, they natually tend to have different infoboxes.

3456:

If you don't like fair-use images that much, contact the copyright owners and ask if they will create images and license them under GFDL or something similar so that we can use them here. --Malevious

2753:

I edited a couple cats, but other articles were already using the divided categories. Division by work/creator would work. "Winner of" would be the person, I presume. What to name the work category? —

3832:

Regarding this whole issue: As far as I understand, cosplay photos are derivative work of the original characters (which are copyrighted). Am I correct in assuming that cosplay photographs are thus

3309: 3699:

locic is flawd. We are talking about drawn media here: anime/manga/games, it's all drawn. Therefore, you cannot accurately depict 2D images with a 3D photograph. This is not like, as you said

3594:(Indent) If copyrighted images are used logically and actually serve a purpose for the article, there's no reason to be deleted (as long as they don't lack a fair use rationale). But using 3345:

images. Most anime (and multigenre) conventions feature many characters from anime/manga in cosplay costumes; we can take freely licenced pictures and upload them to Wikimedia Commons (see

3858:

Ironically, the original anime people might take a dimmer view of their articles being illustrated with cosplay pictures, than of their articles being illustrated with official pictures.

3849:

the cosplay costume to license their creative contribution in making the costume, and get the original anime people to license their creative contribution in drawing the original anime.

646:

There's no rule, but it's entirely unnecessary and just adds to the clutter at the bottom of an article. So yes, I agree with Ned Scott's reasoning on removing those succession boxes. --

2508: 1733:

all in all, more editors are learning how to make better articles. Yes, there's still a large amount of work to be done, and new editors won't know this stuff right away, but that's

2129: 860:

talk page. I just created it because the main project page was becoming too crowded (IMHO). It will also provide a good way to keep style discussions organized and in one place. ···

808:

relevant, but I have no interest in the quality of the Sinhalese Evangelion dub. What do you guys think? Sometimes people get irate at me for removing what I find to be trivial.

2403:

Okay, but who are these people? And what's the email for? I do know there's one japanese Newtype that has a Boogiepop article. It can be seen (or parts of it can be seen) here -

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3782:

I see you have now removed not only the images I added, but also new sections and copyediting changes (ex. 'characters' in Chobits). I am quite disappointed by such reactions.--

665:

from a category or "list of" type article. The general reader who visits the article about a given anime probably won't be wondering "who won this award next" right off the bat.

818:

Our guidelines specifically indicate that the only ones that should be included are the English and Japanese. Any others should go on their specific language version wikis. ···

712: 3285:

I think it'd be a good idea, since it's similar to the all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares (all yaoi is shōnen-ai, but not all shōnen-ai is yaoi). --

525:

Please let me know about idea of the project on the navigation box in the articles. I was trying to translate and enhance the articles about major Japanese anime awards, like

3526:

Cosplay pics won't help with the episode screenshots problem. I think it's perfectly okay for notable characters who have an article to have, at least, one fair-use picture.

2799: 322:

I honestly don't see a problem with replacing one infobox template with another if the new infobox template lends itself to be more versatile then the one it is replacing. --

189:

OK. Maybe the explanation of those parameters should be reworded to date of birth and date of death then; given years tend to be vague or nonexistent most of the time. --

2107: 1053:

Yeah, I remember that discussion. but I also mentioned the existance of light novels for boys. there are light novels for boys just like there are light novels for girls.

2183:

In an anime article where there are no verifiable facts regarding the japanese production, is it acceptable to instead include aspects of the english production process?

1747:

and such are normally used is actually counterproductive and disruptive, as in the case of the edit war fests of SPOILER and the FUC changes. (If you doubt this, see the

707:

Actually. We can begin using those navigation boxes for Awards. It's just a matter of determining which award is the most notable. In the case of movies, there's the

1704:

Agreed, WP:FICT and WAF are pretty much ignored anyways by "fandom". There needs to be a rewrite of FICT but making it even more restrictive isn't the right direction.

795:

I've noticed many articles covering (often in great detail) foreign versions of anime. Editors put in huge lists of foreign names for characters. For example, in the

2798:

subtemplates. Four of them are duplicates of documented subtemplates and the rest are simply junk. So I've put them all up for deletion. You can see the discussion at

1332: 2436: 923: 1124:

We could obviously do this for weeks, but the reason I posted it here instead of on your talk page is to hear what everyone else thought. I'm gonna shut up now.

915: 550: 952:, but I think both options are too long. I'm actually not even convinced the categories are needed, seeing how it's not even really a genre. I think having 2288:

From what I've heard, they do. I read about some stuff on a fansite. But I don't have the artbook or script books anyway, so that avenue isn't open to us.

1454: 47: 17: 1605:

story, haven't caught on. The two warrant their own articles, but the three should possibly be merged back into the main article. Something like that? —

1037:

Anime based on light novels do have a certain demographic. where exactly did you get the idea that light novels aren't aimed at a certain demographic?

2881: 263: 2070:

squeezes by on a 1024x768 display with average font sizes; forget trying to add in another column (such as FirstEngAirDate) to something like that.

454: 1849:

sources, it's still fine. It was built to take an objective approach to notability for fiction by requiring notability from the perspective of the

538: 213:

which showed some minor issues with the extensions which I was able to fix. I would still like to see more comments for or against the design. --

1925:

Just don't use the template. What you did pretty much defeated two of the proposes of the template, which is to declare the Kanji characters as

1419:

Well, for the most part, adaptions tend to stay in the same demographic. I don't see why something can't have multiple demographics though.--

3275:, which is something different (basically more sex). If you agree, I'll take it up to cat proposals, but let me know if I shouldn't bother. 3924: 3201: 1737:

it's a guideline page. If people did everything correctly right off the bat, without being told, then we wouldn't even need guidelines. --

1567:

subarticle, or b) the writing is not summary enough and probably should be merged or moved. Does this fit other people's interpretations? —

949: 728:

That's why we have a page for the award itself, with a list of all recipients. Easily reached by the link from the mention in the article.

2762:(BTW, I'll keep sorting as I have been for now, until we get a new system in place--it'll be easier to resort once everything's tagged. — 1867:

To summarize, the key will be to approach one matter at a time; nobody will be slapping hundreds of AfD tags, because it contradicts how

1474:

You mean something like this: Demographic = males or Demographic = females. Doceirias mentioned this above, I have no problem with this.

3204: 1554: 411:

Indeed. Soon, Wiki will be filled with hundreds of anime templates for separate series - and all of them have the same basic function.

3137:

You can't do that without changing it for all the links since it's a local template that's used by every portal. In any case, it's at

1973: 1903: 3653:

containing fair-use television and film screenshots and covers, which contain rationales that have passed featured reviews. Take the

347:

Well I hope that it will be versatile. There are a few of these that are formatted in the blue style that the Infobox animanga uses.

4021: 3949: 3198: 3174: 2073: 1976:). With that in mind, I was thinking there should probably be something like "DubTitle" parameter added, and have it display in the 3353:, and that many members of this project had taken some in the past - and will in the future. I am uploading some images I took at 2133: 953: 169:

The parameter will take any format you like. Just be sure to wikilink it so that individual's preferred date format will work. --

3463: 3041: 352: 276: 2148:. If you were to do this properly, you would also have notified users involved in the other concerned pages of this move. -- 1910:

use of the nihongo template. If someone who knows more about its proper use could provide some guidance, we'd appreciate it. —

2526: 1540: 762:

Thing is. Do the articles (the winners) themselves have the awards mentioned? If so, how easily can that info. be spotted?

557: 542: 492:

It's been a while since I last worked on the template, but variable color is one of the first parameters of the template. --

482:-- recommend allowing variable color use. Plenty of characters besides Sailor Moon characters also have attributed colors. 364: 3386:

Yes, I linked it above. By the way, one of my recent edits adding a cosplay image to an article was revert with a summary "

3114:

Where does one go to find the code for portal links? I'd like to substitute Wikiep-tan's head for the puzzle piece in the

1500:

Let's stick to light novels now (and a simple choice of male or female.) We can debate whether to change the others later.

4040: 4001: 3975: 3127: 2999:

Since I've never been through the FAC process, a question for those with more experience and a better feel for this. Does

2616:

They are award to an artists for a specific work, so it makes no sense to have only the artists. Both should be included.

1899: 1762: 1748: 3932: 1438:

Welcome to the NHK novel wasn't published under a shounen label, but a general label. thats why its not a shounen novel.

995:

from popping up. You are right, SeizureDog, that this naming is a bit problematic, I'll have to think on that. As for

919: 3983: 3341:

images available, many of which members of this project can easily make in the future (if they haven't done so before):

2048: 3349:). I am very suprised to find that this category is so tiny; I am sure there are many free images that can be found on 2110:

where episode order is a variable. Unlike series or character templates, single template for episode lists won't fit.

3923:

Hi, folks. This is just a heads-up that articles for individual episodes of anime series are likely to come up under

3650: 3240: 2125: 1321: 360: 356: 348: 4011:

time to find real-world sources before the reviews begin, the info will still be accessible if you find them later. —

2234:

Well, we can verify who worked on the series, but that's it. We have no material like the kind which can be found in

1761:

It's not "more rules", it's a better guideline. They're not counterproductive, and they're not disruptive. Regarding

530: 4063: 4044: 4026: 4005: 3986: 3954: 3906: 3880: 3862: 3853: 3842: 3823: 3796: 3776: 3721: 3689: 3664: 3636: 3626: 3606: 3566: 3550: 3530: 3521: 3501: 3492: 3466: 3451: 3431: 3404: 3381: 3371: 3329: 3319: 3297: 3279: 3256: 3233: 3184: 3158: 3131: 3104: 3084: 3066: 3031: 3008: 2985: 2937: 2901: 2866: 2842: 2831: 2813: 2766: 2757: 2724: 2694: 2668: 2647: 2638: 2620: 2610: 2574: 2542: 2533: 2518: 2443: 2410: 2382: 2356: 2339: 2322: 2311: 2292: 2267: 2246: 2221: 2207: 2187: 2170: 2156: 2136: 2114: 2101: 2083: 2058: 2033: 2016: 2003: 1984: 1966: 1953: 1940: 1919: 1885: 1862: 1820: 1789: 1779: 1769: 1756: 1741: 1727: 1717: 1708: 1695: 1686: 1662: 1640: 1624: 1609: 1599: 1571: 1561: 1547: 1530: 1504: 1495: 1468: 1433: 1423: 1414: 1405: 1377: 1343: 1287: 1260: 1239: 1164: 1128: 1113: 1089: 1064: 1048: 1031: 1007: 980: 960: 934: 893: 866: 843: 824: 812: 776: 766: 757: 732: 719: 701: 688: 675: 657: 640: 628:

it's good to note this award, but it's not really a logical system of navigation once you are on that -this- article

612: 512: 503: 486: 479: 468: 445: 436: 415: 406: 381: 371: 342: 333: 317: 299: 281: 257: 237: 224: 202: 180: 160: 140: 130: 3740: 1999:

both had an extra bit of information that probably didn't NEED to be there, but a misc. column would allow for it.

1996: 1373:

Jumping back in here: I would have no problem with the light novel articles saying demographic = male (or female).

38: 3497:

Which pictures are getting deleted exactly? Only pictures with no fair-use rationales are supposed to be deleted.

3052:

are two examples to use as references. The article could also use a good copy-edit. Solicit the aid of someone at

3044:. The lead needs to be expanded and sourced. As Nohansen pointed out, a development and design section is needed. 2926:

is one of the core policies of Knowledge and any information or statement that can't pass it has to be removed. --

3756: 2795: 2787: 2538:

I've noticed that "they" seem to have no compunctions against adding/changing OUR infobox to theirs, though...

2029:

Ah. Maybe I should have reread the template before trying to add that stuff in. Got SZS sorted out, so thanks.

1410:

Manga adaptations of light novels are not really reliable. Shinigami no Ballad's manga is shojo, for instance.

1310:

light novels for boys are of course light novels for boys so its: Demographic = Shounen, and not Demographic =

1160:

being used in the West for "pornographic anime" (when in Japan it's used for "perverts"). I might be wrong...--

991:

Points well taken. This worries me, because these categories are, in part, intended to prevent articles like

945: 3675:

high, making them an informative visual addition to the article (particulary for the 'characters' section).--

1453:

Perhaps we should just avoid demographic descriptors as shojo, shonen, seinen, and josei altogether and just

441:

Indeed. No point to be that redundant. Within English text, kana tends to stick out rather easily anyways.

3899: 2555:

Those probably should be reverted and the editors told to bring it up with the respective WikiProjects. But

2374:

they're doing and help them. I'll try and track them for you. In the meantime, write a nice little email to

2235: 2150: 992: 941: 796: 1825:

Exactly; the rewrite was created to reflect the rapidly increasing inclusion standards at AfD and GAC/FAC,

1401:, a shōnen magazine. That's pretty much how we determine these demographics, by where they're serialized.-- 556:

Therefore, after the enhancing/creating of two of three articles, I put navigation boxes for winners, like

2852: 2631: 2474: 750: 111: 2499:, but when the article's about only one medium the TV and film infoboxes provide better information (see 1292:

Then the word shounen thats associated with manga is wrong. thats what should be corrected; it should be

4017: 3945: 3179: 2078: 1786: 1776: 1753: 1724: 1705: 1328: 1044:

up on it. You refused to believe us, so we let the matter drop...but there is clearly sufficient doubt.

3268: 4031:

Good to know, thanks for that. If/when the review process comes to them, I'll ask that that be done.

1480:

And "young boys", "young girls", and etc. But that it also applies to all topics withing the scope of

3963: 3293: 2955: 2919: 2823: 1075: 969:

I have to agree, this seem to be a degree of overcategorizing that is better left on the ash heap. --

746: 2530: 1645:

Well, WP:SPOIL wasn't based on other policies and guidelines; the WP:FICT update is an extention of

368: 314: 3460: 3272: 1926: 1881: 1858: 1658: 1620: 1595: 272: 2800:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 August 18#Various Template:Infobox animanga subtemplates

2263:

The anime artbook and script books might contain something, but I think they're all out of print.

3562: 3058: 2981: 2933: 2862: 2809: 2570: 2097: 2055: 1936: 1682: 1636: 1464: 1397: 1354:

wiki entry like the japanese entry 少年漫画 and a shounen wiki entry for the japanese wiki entry 少年.

976: 653: 499: 464: 432: 402: 329: 253: 234: 220: 176: 126: 4057:

to secondary sources. Of course, a plan of action and a list of sources should help... Regards,

3555:

Cosplay images falls under the same non-free use and copyright violations are as fanart does. --

3474:

project pages - banning them from articles; don't remove them because you don't like them (per

4036: 3997: 3971: 3936: 3815: 3789: 3768: 3713: 3682: 3619: 3543: 3514: 3485: 3444: 3423: 3397: 3364: 3244: 3150: 3123: 3115: 3019: 2893: 2195: 1296:

wiki entry and not a wiki entry for shounen(boy). just like how the italian wiki entry is for

1004: 931: 546: 190: 148: 2375: 1543:

has been updated recently with a rewrite. Everyone should take a moment and check it out. --

4012: 3940: 3346: 3226: 3214: 3081: 3005: 2763: 2754: 2691: 2635: 2607: 2407: 2353: 2352:

Well, I would like to do the Production section now rather than have to do it later anyway.

2319: 2289: 2243: 2184: 2145: 1950: 1916: 1911: 1606: 1568: 1558: 857: 773: 754: 262:

Blood type might actually have a use since the Japanese use bloodtype as a way to determine

3859: 3850: 3286: 3276: 3218: 3138: 3015: 2838:

like Legend of Galactic Heroes, or discuss the history of fansubbing on Kodomo no Omocha.

2332: 1492: 1481: 1420: 1402: 1253: 957: 856:

Hmm...I'm unable to find them at the moment. I suggest we take this discussion to the new

2331:

Now that I think about it, I say, "don't worry about it." Almost none of the anime/manga

3409:

Cosplaying photos outside of obvious articles where inclusion is proper, such as in the

1949:

So we need to leave the kanji bare and manually italicize the romanji? Gotcha. Thanks. —

1553:

Thanks for the heads-up. Stuff worth thinking about -- especially the discussion on the

3877: 3752: 3457: 3326: 3053: 2971: 2839: 2721: 2665: 2664:

Yeah, I'd say there should only be one category for the award. No need to split it up.

2617: 2556: 2264: 2167: 2030: 2013: 2000: 1992: 1981: 1878: 1868: 1855: 1766: 1738: 1714: 1692: 1675:. But that attempt hasn't gone any further then the occasional editor mentioning it. -- 1668: 1655: 1617: 1592: 1544: 1501: 1430: 1411: 1374: 1137: 1125: 1110: 1086: 1061: 1045: 1028: 911: 729: 708: 698: 672: 608: 580: 534: 267: 210: 2643:

There aren't enough of them yet. Just one category for all the awards would suffice.

1207:" is not used to describe light novels? Only manga. Even the shounen article says so, 3744: 3603: 3557: 3475: 3314: 3230: 3100:

can get it to him? Gwern and I lost it, and GunnarRene is on an extended WikiBreak.--

3028: 2976: 2928: 2857: 2804: 2565: 2539: 2515: 2336: 2204: 2092: 2052: 1931: 1834: 1826: 1677: 1646: 1631: 1582: 1459: 1351: 1340: 1311: 1293: 1284: 1257: 1236: 1161: 1000: 971: 888: 861: 819: 809: 648: 592: 573: 494: 459: 427: 397: 324: 248: 243: 231: 215: 171: 121: 4049:

Regarding the review process; it should be enough if you can show that the episodes

1691:

I'm not understanding where the similarities are between WP:FICT and WP:SPOILER. --

4032: 3993: 3967: 3808: 3785: 3761: 3736: 3706: 3678: 3659: 3633: 3615: 3539: 3527: 3510: 3498: 3481: 3440: 3416: 3393: 3378: 3360: 3222: 3143: 3119: 2886: 2560: 2480: 2200: 1817: 1348:

LOL so they have tricked me, they have shounen linking to shounen manga entry : -->

1235:) in all its articles to describe the demographic, however "wrong" they might be?-- 996: 3000: 2992: 3040:

Moving the characters into a separate article would be preferable. For instance,

3903: 3209: 2967: 2959: 2951: 2923: 2828: 2644: 2603: 2111: 1842: 1838: 1830: 1672: 1650: 1578: 1527: 1475: 1439: 1384: 1355: 1315: 1272: 1266: 1247: 1200: 1171: 1149: 1119: 1104: 1079: 1054: 1038: 1020: 940:

Terrible naming. The way the category is named, I would expect articles such as

763: 716: 509: 483: 442: 412: 378: 296: 295:

could be trivia, when character age would suffice. After all, they rarely age.

137: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3701:

from an using a photo of an actor or a statue to illustrate a historical person

2484:) use the Film infobox; why don't anime TV series articles use the TV infobox? 2051:

uses all four titles. And yeah, as Ned Scott says we use the Aux parameters. --

4059: 3838: 3695: 3671: 3654: 3049: 1629:

Sounds like Spoiler Debate Redux. I really can't see how this can end well. --

839: 685: 637: 3101: 2922:'s edits which removed unverifiable information from articles. Remember that 2440: 2379: 2308: 2218: 339: 2469: 2439:. The email is for getting scans of magazines, as stated on the web page. -- 1667:

Well the current spoiler guideline was rewritten to deal with problems with

1118:

Muke, not muke, doesn't matter to me at all. aimed at boys = aimed at boys.

1109:

Yes. And "shonen muke" does not equal "shonen." These are different things.

1096: 927: 604: 2404: 1487:

I'm against this. Are we supposed to say "18–30 year old males" instead of

1336: 1215:. The point is: Are the members of the Project OK with using these terms ( 3960:

Thanks for the notice. *sigh* I need to get paid for all this work...

2468:

a few hours to see how long it would take to be reverted. It didn't take

2124:

Dear WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 20, you are invited to join the

3748: 3410: 3354: 3342: 2963: 1216: 1204: 1141: 1024: 526: 453:

Future discussions about the template's fields should be conducted at

3982:

Oh crud. We will have to gut the articles in order to save them. --

3350: 3045: 3027:

Also, I think the character descriptions could be shorter, tighter.--

2495: 2239: 1491:? Or the more vague "yound adult males"? I prefer words to phrases.-- 1488: 1232: 1224: 1220: 1157: 2690:

the title and artist. And that's not counting the numerous ties.) —

3022:

the article was in-universe, so something must be done about that.

2855:

when the already reference link to ANN is more then sufficient. --

2489: 1872:

transwiki and redirect to the main article sometime in the future.

1523: 1228: 1153: 1145: 745:

Exactly. I've started working on this, as part of filling in the

2970:, instead of mentioning that it is not available in English (see 2962:

is reverting is things like "Only available in North American as

926:. I'd hoped to create a navigation tool for those interested in 2132:

and thought you could help in seeking the answer. Much thanks,

1980:

column. Or is having four titles going overboard? Thoughts? --

948:(articles which we don't need btw). A better phrasing would be 1305: 25: 3310:

Knowledge:Manual of Style (Anime- and manga-related articles)

1256:

and Knowledge in general, be contradicting ourselves, then?--

1156:, whether or not they are aimed at boys or girls. Kinda like 1841:). Even now, the rewrite is fairly lenient when compared to 3507:

are the most popular) even more valuable to the articles.--

3213:

article. I'd understand if my edit was unreasonable, but I

1723:

chance in hell of being followed and not being disruptive.

3649:

In regards to featured article reviews, there are several

2794:

I just discovered a whole slew of undocumented and unused

3414:

anime/manga artilces just because they can be free use.--

3325:

We've grown so big that this does seem to make sense. --

1586: 147:

Can you put month and day in the the birth parameter? --

338:

Agreed. Seems like the whole point of using templates.--

3802: 3595: 3387: 2918:

I'm going back through Buspar reversions and restoring

2500: 2465: 1209:

Shounen is a Japanese word used in English to refer to

623: 621: 619: 4053:

improved beyond a mere plot summary and appropriately

3670:

illustrate a historical person. Note, also, that when

1350:

anyway that doesn't mean it shouldn't be corrected. a

3197:

How does one go about protecting an article? There's

950:

Category:Anime and manga featuring Japanese mythology

2563:

doesn't have a veto over our choice of infoboxes. --

887:. Anyone interested in participating is welcome. ··· 287:

they really necessary or are they also just trivia?

618:However, they have been removed from some articles 367:. That style should be an option to use as well. -- 2507:be problematic (see SandyGeorgia's comment on the 2128:since it's been much slower than expected. I also 2108:List of The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya episodes 1265:Contradicting ourselves by mentioning the truth? 1023:is edit warring about demographics again over on 772:in a biographic narrative where it fits better. — 3992:spent referencing those articles goes to waste. 2090:when an English translation wasn't available. -- 3271:? Currently most shōnen-ai articles are in the 2487:I understand why we use it for franchises like 1929:and add a CSS class to it (t_nihongo_kanji). -- 1845:; if you have significant real-world info from 3118:link, but I can't find the template anywhere. 1275:is shounen, when the shounen article says its 924:Category:Japanese mythology in anime and manga 3598:images for decorative purposes, even if they 1671:, and there have been an attempt to bring in 916:Category:Chinese mythology in anime and manga 684:OK. I removed all navigation boxes. Thanks,-- 8: 3377:You might want to check www.flickr.com too. 2634:, only a generic award without categories. — 1277:a Japanese word used in English to refer to 837:say so, as I could not find them. Regards, 1484:including anime, manga, and light novels. 562: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Anime and manga 2882:The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya (anime) 2851:Or restore the link to a fansub group on 1306:http://it.wikipedia.org/Sh%C5%8Dnen_manga 1097:http://gagaga-lululu.jp/gagaga/about.html 313:use our Infobox animanga, for example. -- 3900:Knowledge:Copyright FAQ#Derivative works 2405:http://megaten.net/boogiepop/frames.html 455:Template talk:Infobox animanga character 230:else remember what I'm talking about? -- 3739:has been including cosplay photos are: 3735:(Aside) The articles in question where 2630:four categories, except the award was, 1577:fact that the old WP:FICT contradicted 636:? I have been very perplexed. Thanks,-- 266:. All the other fields can go, though. 3786:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3679:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3616:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3540:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3511:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3482:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3441:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3394:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3361:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 2435:These kind, helpful people are listed 508:Oh, I see. I completely missed that. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3217:I'm just following the guidelines of 2503:). Furthermore, the animanga infobox 244:WP:WAF#Infoboxes and succession boxes 7: 2472:. So I ask, If anime film articles ( 1383:I have no problem with that either. 833:While I agree, I would like to know 3933:Talk:List of Oh My Goddess episodes 3207:who keeps reverting my edit of the 3336:A solution to non-free image issue 3141:, but it's a protected template.-- 2212:It is very unlikely that there is 1974:List of Digimon Adventure episodes 1101:entertainment novel bunko for boys 883:I've started a discussion on this 24: 3927:soon. The episode articles for 3042:List of Yotsuba&! characters 2203:nominee. Feedback appreciated.-- 2106:Then there's the unique case of 954:Category:Fantasy anime and manga 29: 3931:are already being discussed at 3267:Would it be valuable to have a 1713:Knowledge is not a fansite. -- 3978:) 04:37, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 2527:Template talk:Infobox animanga 1967:Template:Japanese episode list 1962:Template:Japanese episode list 1900:List of Yotsuba&! chapters 1541:Knowledge:Notability (fiction) 1517:Omit Demographics All-Together 711:. Randomly, I took a look at 613:16:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 3984:Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 3801:What? You do realize that in 2958:over this. Much of the stuff 1763:List of Code Geass characters 1749:List of Code Geass characters 469:02:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC) 3602:free, doesn't help at all.-- 2790:subtemplates up for deletion 2049:List of Sailor Moon episodes 2012:There's Aux1= (and 2,3). -- 634:logical system of navigation 558:Academy award (Best Picture) 478:Looking at the template for 4064:20:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 4045:18:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 4027:17:24, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 4006:14:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 3987:14:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 3955:04:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 3907:04:49, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 3881:02:53, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 3863:00:01, 29 August 2007 (UTC) 3854:23:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 3843:06:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 3824:22:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3797:22:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3777:22:13, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3741:List of Chobits characters‎ 3722:22:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3690:22:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3665:22:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3637:21:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3627:21:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3607:21:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3567:21:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3551:21:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3531:21:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3522:21:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3502:21:26, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3493:21:24, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3467:21:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3452:21:03, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3432:20:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3405:20:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3382:20:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3372:20:14, 26 August 2007 (UTC) 3330:18:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 3320:06:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 3298:02:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 3280:08:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 3257:19:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3241:Knowledge:Protection policy 3234:17:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3185:01:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 3159:00:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC) 3132:17:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3105:10:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 3085:14:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 3067:00:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 3032:21:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 3009:19:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC) 2986:14:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2938:22:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2902:22:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2867:22:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2843:22:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2832:22:28, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2814:19:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2767:17:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2758:01:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2725:00:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC) 2695:23:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2669:21:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2648:20:57, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2639:22:16, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 2621:18:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2611:18:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2575:16:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2543:16:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2534:00:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 2519:13:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2444:10:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2411:09:41, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2383:16:46, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 2357:15:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 2340:01:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 2323:17:31, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2312:16:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 2293:20:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2268:20:36, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2247:20:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2222:16:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2208:14:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2193:The article in question is 2188:09:16, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2171:00:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 2157:13:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2137:16:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2115:22:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2102:18:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2084:18:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2059:02:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2034:03:06, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2017:02:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 2004:02:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 1985:02:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC) 1954:22:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1941:19:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1920:18:13, 13 August 2007 (UTC) 1894:Use of the nihongo template 1886:12:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1863:12:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1821:10:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1790:07:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1780:07:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1770:06:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1757:06:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1742:06:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1728:06:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1718:06:21, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1709:05:51, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1696:05:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 1687:23:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1663:13:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1641:03:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1625:13:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1610:02:04, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1600:00:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1572:00:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 1562:21:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1548:06:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1531:20:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 1505:05:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1496:05:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC) 1099:少年向けエンターテインメントノベル文庫 --: --> 894:18:59, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 867:06:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC) 844:17:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 804:language dub/names/changes 791:Foreign-language dubs, etc. 777:21:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 767:05:37, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 758:22:40, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 733:18:47, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 720:18:28, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 513:05:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 504:21:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 487:18:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 446:06:11, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 437:04:00, 18 August 2007 (UTC) 416:05:42, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 407:22:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 382:17:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 300:17:56, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 141:17:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 4090: 3925:television episodes/Review 3757:List of Bleach characters‎ 2954:is going to edit war with 2130:asked something at WP:WPDB 1837:and the parent guideline, 1469:23:06, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1434:19:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1424:19:23, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1415:19:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1406:19:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1378:22:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1344:22:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1288:22:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1261:22:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1240:21:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1165:21:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1129:21:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1114:21:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1090:20:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1065:19:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1049:19:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1032:18:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 1008:02:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 981:02:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 961:00:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 935:23:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 914:the following categories: 825:04:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 813:04:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 702:14:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 689:14:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 676:03:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC) 658:21:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 641:15:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 106:Infobox animanga character 3388:no pictures of cosplayers 2796:Template:Infobox animanga 2788:Template:Infobox animanga 2514:What do you guys think?-- 1252:But wouldn't we, meaning 1148:are not used to describe 589: 578: 570: 565: 372:05:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 343:15:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 334:13:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 318:07:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 282:22:49, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 258:20:55, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 238:15:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 225:15:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC) 203:18:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 181:18:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 161:18:23, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 131:18:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC) 3478:and related policies).-- 946:Kappa in anime and manga 3904:Confusing Manifestation 3651:featured media articles 2378:and see what happens!-- 2236:Serial Experiments Lain 1997:Sayonara Zetsubō Sensei 1395:manga is serialized in 1337:Italian Shounen article 1203:, but you do see that " 797:Space Battleship Yamato 110:I've been working on a 3694:That cosplay photo in 3014:Compared to the other 2853:Tsukuyomi -Moon Phase- 2475:Metropolis (2001 film) 993:Oni in anime and manga 942:Oni in anime and manga 480:Sailor Moon characters 2950:Well It's clear that 2126:move request for Goku 1898:As part of revamping 1140:' point is the words 529:'s Anime Grand Prix ( 242:You may be referring 42:of past discussions. 3171:parameters are for? 3163:Isn't that what the 2956:User:Folken de Fanel 2920:User:Folken de Fanel 2824:User:Folken de Fanel 1818:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1076:Maria-sama ga Miteru 581:Animation Kobe Award 521:About navigation box 2995:: potential for FA? 3269:Category:Shōnen-ai 2179:English Production 2152:Oni Ookami Alfador 1906:about our current 1398:Dengeki Comic Gao! 209:I did a test with 4025: 3979: 3966:comment added by 3953: 3290: 3116:Portal:Evangelion 3016:featured articles 2196:Boogiepop Phantom 2155: 1455:use English terms 1281:intended for boys 1213:intended for boys 956:is good enough.-- 713:Lord of the Rings 615: 599: 598: 547:Tokyo Anime Award 474:Variable Coloring 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4081: 4062: 4015: 3961: 3943: 3919:Episode articles 3841: 3834:also copyrighted 3822: 3819: 3812: 3794: 3792: 3775: 3772: 3765: 3720: 3717: 3710: 3687: 3685: 3662: 3624: 3622: 3548: 3546: 3519: 3517: 3490: 3488: 3449: 3447: 3430: 3427: 3420: 3402: 3400: 3369: 3367: 3347:Category:Cosplay 3317: 3288: 3254: 3249: 3183: 3157: 3154: 3147: 3110:Portal templates 3065: 3063: 2900: 2897: 2890: 2585:Award categories 2153: 2149: 2146:canvas for votes 2082: 1814:<outdent: --> 1787:Kyaa the Catlord 1777:Kyaa the Catlord 1754:Kyaa the Catlord 1725:Kyaa the Catlord 1706:Kyaa the Catlord 1329:redefine reality 891: 864: 842: 835:which guidelines 822: 601: 563: 280: 200: 195: 158: 153: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4089: 4088: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4080: 4079: 4078: 4058: 3921: 3837: 3817: 3810: 3807: 3795: 3790: 3784: 3770: 3763: 3760: 3753:Bleach (manga)‎ 3715: 3708: 3705: 3688: 3683: 3677: 3660: 3625: 3620: 3614: 3549: 3544: 3538: 3520: 3515: 3509: 3491: 3486: 3480: 3450: 3445: 3439: 3425: 3418: 3415: 3403: 3398: 3392: 3370: 3365: 3359: 3338: 3315: 3313:up-to-date. ··· 3308:I have created 3306: 3265: 3250: 3245: 3195: 3193:Page protection 3172: 3152: 3145: 3142: 3139:Template:Portal 3112: 3097: 3059: 3057: 2997: 2895: 2888: 2885: 2821: 2792: 2632:for a long time 2587: 2462: 2307:this project.-- 2181: 2151: 2134:Lord Sesshomaru 2122: 2071: 1964: 1896: 1538: 1519: 1018: 908: 889: 862: 838: 820: 793: 616: 602:s-awards -: --> 595: 576: 523: 476: 270: 196: 191: 154: 149: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4087: 4085: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4067: 4066: 3920: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3831: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3783: 3745:Trinity Blood‎ 3733: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3676: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3613: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3571: 3570: 3569: 3537: 3508: 3479: 3438: 3391: 3358: 3337: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3305: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3264: 3261: 3260: 3259: 3194: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3111: 3108: 3096: 3095:Napier Article 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3072: 3071: 3070: 3069: 3035: 3034: 3024: 3023: 2996: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2972:Negative proof 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2846: 2845: 2820: 2817: 2791: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2760: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2624: 2623: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2461: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2326: 2325: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2180: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2160: 2159: 2121: 2118: 2087: 2086: 2066: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2007: 2006: 1993:Oh! Edo Rocket 1963: 1960: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1944: 1943: 1895: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1873: 1865: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1782: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1612: 1564: 1537: 1536:WP:FICT update 1534: 1518: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1331:. Make that, " 1324:was right. We 1308: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1071: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 986: 985: 984: 983: 964: 963: 907: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 849: 848: 847: 846: 828: 827: 792: 789: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 781: 780: 779: 753:award pages. — 738: 737: 736: 735: 723: 722: 709:Academy Awards 694: 693: 692: 691: 679: 678: 667: 666: 661: 660: 630: 626: 625:by the reason: 600: 597: 596: 591: 588: 586: 583:for TV Feature 582: 577: 572: 568: 567: 535:Animation Kobe 522: 519: 518: 517: 516: 515: 475: 472: 451: 450: 449: 448: 421: 420: 419: 418: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 353:Oh My Goddess! 345: 310: 309: 308: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 227: 211:Naruto Uzumaki 206: 205: 186: 185: 184: 183: 164: 163: 144: 143: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4086: 4065: 4061: 4056: 4055:be referenced 4052: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4029: 4028: 4023: 4019: 4014: 4009: 4008: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3985: 3981: 3980: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3956: 3951: 3947: 3942: 3938: 3934: 3930: 3929:Oh My Goddess 3926: 3918: 3908: 3905: 3901: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3882: 3879: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3864: 3861: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3852: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3840: 3835: 3825: 3821: 3820: 3814: 3813: 3804: 3800: 3799: 3798: 3793: 3787: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3774: 3773: 3767: 3766: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3742: 3738: 3723: 3719: 3718: 3712: 3711: 3702: 3697: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3686: 3680: 3673: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3663: 3656: 3652: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3643: 3638: 3635: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3623: 3617: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3605: 3601: 3597: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3559: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3547: 3541: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3529: 3525: 3524: 3523: 3518: 3512: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3500: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3489: 3483: 3477: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3465: 3464:Contributions 3462: 3459: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3448: 3442: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3429: 3428: 3422: 3421: 3412: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3401: 3395: 3389: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3368: 3362: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3344: 3335: 3331: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3311: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3278: 3274: 3273:Category:Yaoi 3270: 3262: 3258: 3255: 3253: 3248: 3242: 3238: 3237: 3236: 3235: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3211: 3206: 3203: 3200: 3192: 3186: 3182: 3181: 3176: 3170: 3166: 3162: 3161: 3160: 3156: 3155: 3149: 3148: 3140: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3133: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3117: 3109: 3107: 3106: 3103: 3094: 3086: 3083: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3068: 3064: 3062: 3061:Sephiroth BCR 3055: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3033: 3030: 3026: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3007: 3002: 3001:Yotsuba&! 2994: 2993:Yotsuba&! 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2978: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2903: 2899: 2898: 2892: 2891: 2883: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2859: 2854: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2830: 2825: 2818: 2816: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2806: 2801: 2797: 2789: 2785: 2768: 2765: 2761: 2759: 2756: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2726: 2723: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2696: 2693: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2649: 2646: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2637: 2633: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2622: 2619: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2584: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2567: 2562: 2558: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2544: 2541: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2532: 2528: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2517: 2512: 2510: 2509:Lupin infobox 2506: 2502: 2498: 2497: 2492: 2491: 2485: 2483: 2482: 2477: 2476: 2471: 2467: 2459: 2445: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2412: 2409: 2406: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2384: 2381: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2358: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2341: 2338: 2334: 2333:good articles 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2321: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2310: 2294: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2269: 2266: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2248: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2223: 2220: 2215: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2186: 2178: 2172: 2169: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2147: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2138: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2119: 2117: 2116: 2113: 2109: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2095: 2094: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2075: 2068: 2067: 2060: 2057: 2054: 2050: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2015: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1969: 1968: 1961: 1955: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1893: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1857: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1819: 1813: 1791: 1788: 1783: 1781: 1778: 1773: 1772: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1736: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1726: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1660: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1619: 1613: 1611: 1608: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1570: 1565: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1546: 1542: 1535: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1525: 1516: 1506: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1483: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461: 1456: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1432: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1376: 1357: 1353: 1352:Shounen manga 1347: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1313: 1312:Shounen manga 1309: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1298:shounen manga 1295: 1294:Shounen manga 1291: 1290: 1289: 1286: 1282: 1280: 1274: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1212: 1206: 1202: 1199:(Indent) Ok, 1173: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1088: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1072: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1063: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1015: 1009: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 989: 988: 987: 982: 978: 974: 973: 968: 967: 966: 965: 962: 959: 955: 951: 947: 943: 939: 938: 937: 936: 933: 929: 925: 921: 917: 913: 905: 895: 892: 886: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 868: 865: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 845: 841: 836: 832: 831: 830: 829: 826: 823: 817: 816: 815: 814: 811: 807: 803: 798: 790: 778: 775: 770: 769: 768: 765: 761: 760: 759: 756: 752: 748: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 734: 731: 727: 726: 725: 724: 721: 718: 714: 710: 706: 705: 704: 703: 700: 690: 687: 683: 682: 681: 680: 677: 674: 669: 668: 663: 662: 659: 655: 651: 650: 645: 644: 643: 642: 639: 635: 629: 624: 622: 620: 614: 610: 606: 603:s-ach | aw 594: 593:Angelic Layer 585: 584: 575: 574:Turn A Gundam 569: 564: 561: 559: 554: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 528: 520: 514: 511: 507: 506: 505: 501: 497: 496: 491: 490: 489: 488: 485: 481: 473: 471: 470: 466: 462: 461: 456: 447: 444: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 429: 423: 422: 417: 414: 410: 409: 408: 404: 400: 399: 393: 392: 383: 380: 375: 374: 373: 370: 366: 362: 361:School Rumble 358: 354: 350: 346: 344: 341: 337: 336: 335: 331: 327: 326: 321: 320: 319: 316: 311: 301: 298: 294: 289: 288: 285: 284: 283: 278: 274: 269: 265: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 250: 245: 241: 240: 239: 236: 233: 228: 226: 222: 218: 217: 212: 208: 207: 204: 201: 199: 194: 188: 187: 182: 178: 174: 173: 168: 167: 166: 165: 162: 159: 157: 152: 146: 145: 142: 139: 135: 134: 133: 132: 128: 124: 123: 116: 113: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4054: 4050: 3928: 3922: 3833: 3830: 3816: 3809: 3769: 3762: 3737:User:Piotrus 3734: 3714: 3707: 3700: 3599: 3593: 3556: 3424: 3417: 3339: 3307: 3266: 3251: 3246: 3219:this project 3208: 3196: 3178: 3168: 3164: 3151: 3144: 3113: 3098: 3060: 2998: 2975: 2927: 2894: 2887: 2880:case of the 2856: 2822: 2803: 2793: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2588: 2564: 2513: 2504: 2494: 2488: 2486: 2481:Perfect Blue 2479: 2473: 2463: 2305: 2213: 2199:, a current 2194: 2182: 2123: 2105: 2091: 2088: 2077: 1977: 1970: 1965: 1930: 1907: 1902:, we have a 1897: 1877: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1734: 1676: 1654: 1630: 1616: 1591: 1539: 1520: 1458: 1452: 1396: 1392: 1372: 1325: 1301: 1300:and not for 1297: 1278: 1276: 1271:By saying a 1210: 1208: 1198: 1150:light novels 1134: 1100: 1019: 1016:Demographics 1005:CaveatLector 970: 932:CaveatLector 909: 834: 805: 801: 794: 695: 647: 633: 627: 617: 590:Succeeded by 579: 555: 524: 493: 477: 458: 452: 426: 396: 323: 292: 247: 214: 197: 192: 170: 155: 150: 120: 117: 109: 78: 43: 37: 4013:Josiah Rowe 3962:—Preceding 3941:Josiah Rowe 3461:•Talk Page• 3210:Outlaw Star 3175:TangentCube 3082:Quasirandom 3006:Quasirandom 2884:article).-- 2764:Quasirandom 2755:Quasirandom 2692:Quasirandom 2636:Quasirandom 2608:Quasirandom 2376:this person 2120:Two matters 2074:TangentCube 1951:Quasirandom 1917:Quasirandom 1912:Quasirandom 1607:Quasirandom 1587:Wikia Annex 1569:Quasirandom 1559:Quasirandom 1320:Well, then 1273:light novel 1021:User:ChuChu 918:(currently 774:Quasirandom 755:Quasirandom 571:Preceded by 365:Tenchi Muyo 264:personality 36:This is an 3937:WP:EPISODE 3860:Carcharoth 3851:Carcharoth 3696:Excel Saga 3672:Excel Saga 3289:ヴィルヴェルヴィント 3287:Wirbelwind 3277:Ninja neko 3102:SidiLemine 3050:Excel Saga 2968:verifiable 2441:SidiLemine 2380:SidiLemine 2309:SidiLemine 2219:SidiLemine 1851:real world 1493:SeizureDog 1421:SeizureDog 1403:SeizureDog 958:SeizureDog 751:Shogakukan 340:SidiLemine 293:birth-date 98:Archive 25 90:Archive 22 85:Archive 21 79:Archive 20 73:Archive 19 68:Archive 18 60:Archive 15 3878:Ned Scott 3806:photos.-- 3803:this edit 3704:photos.-- 3536:images?-- 3327:Ned Scott 3227:WP:TRIVIA 3215:explained 3202:anonymous 3180:Dialogues 2840:Doceirias 2722:Doceirias 2666:Doceirias 2618:Doceirias 2531:Squilibob 2466:something 2460:Infoboxes 2408:Hellspawn 2354:Hellspawn 2320:Hellspawn 2290:Hellspawn 2265:Doceirias 2244:Hellspawn 2217:detail.-- 2185:Hellspawn 2168:Ned Scott 2079:Dialogues 2031:Doceirias 2014:Ned Scott 2001:Doceirias 1982:Ned Scott 1767:Ned Scott 1739:Ned Scott 1715:Ned Scott 1693:Ned Scott 1555:talk page 1545:Ned Scott 1502:Doceirias 1431:Doceirias 1412:Doceirias 1393:Baccano's 1375:Doceirias 1333:Wikiality 1138:Doceirias 1126:Doceirias 1111:Doceirias 1087:Doceirias 1062:Doceirias 1046:Doceirias 1029:Doceirias 928:mythology 885:over here 858:WP:MOS-AM 730:Doceirias 699:Edward321 673:Ned Scott 369:Squilibob 315:Squilibob 268:NeoChaosX 112:prototype 4041:contribs 4022:contribs 4002:contribs 3976:contribs 3964:unsigned 3950:contribs 3749:Chobits‎ 3604:Nohansen 3458:Userpage 3231:Nohansen 3128:contribs 3029:Nohansen 2786:Various 2540:Snarfies 2516:Nohansen 2464:I tried 2337:Nohansen 2205:Nohansen 2053:Masamage 1927:Japanese 1904:question 1482:WP:ANIME 1341:Nohansen 1285:Nohansen 1258:Nohansen 1254:WP:ANIME 1237:Nohansen 1162:Nohansen 906:New cats 810:Evan1975 747:Kodansha 537:Awards ( 232:Masamage 4033:Willbyr 3994:Willbyr 3968:Willbyr 3634:Kariteh 3596:cosplay 3528:Kariteh 3499:Kariteh 3411:Cosplay 3379:Kariteh 3355:Gen Con 3343:Cosplay 3263:New cat 3120:Willbyr 3054:WP:LOCE 2964:fansubs 2596:artists 2557:WP:FILM 1879:Deckill 1869:WP:FICT 1856:Deckill 1847:primary 1669:WP:NPOV 1656:Deckill 1618:Deckill 1593:Deckill 1322:Colbert 1302:shounen 1217:shounen 1205:shounen 1152:, only 1142:shounen 1135:believe 1025:Baccano 912:created 910:I have 802:English 566:Awards 527:Animage 39:archive 4051:can be 3755:, and 3476:WP:OWN 3351:flickr 3304:MOS-AM 3252:Sphere 3247:Broken 3046:Madlax 2960:Buspar 2952:Buspar 2829:Buspar 2819:Vandal 2645:KyuuA4 2496:BLEACH 2240:Madlax 2112:KyuuA4 1835:WP:NOT 1827:WP:NOT 1647:WP:NOT 1583:WP:NOT 1528:KyuuA4 1489:seinen 1476:ChuChu 1440:ChuChu 1385:ChuChu 1356:ChuChu 1349:.: --> 1316:ChuChu 1267:ChuChu 1248:ChuChu 1233:kodomo 1225:seinen 1221:shoujo 1201:ChuChu 1172:ChuChu 1158:hentai 1120:ChuChu 1105:ChuChu 1080:ChuChu 1055:ChuChu 1039:ChuChu 1001:WP:IPC 922:) and 764:KyuuA4 749:& 717:KyuuA4 541:) and 510:KyuuA4 484:KyuuA4 443:KyuuA4 413:KyuuA4 379:KyuuA4 363:, and 297:KyuuA4 198:Sphere 193:Broken 156:Sphere 151:Broken 138:KyuuA4 4060:G.A.S 3839:G.A.S 3791:talk 3684:talk 3621:talk 3558:Farix 3545:talk 3516:talk 3487:talk 3446:talk 3399:talk 3366:talk 3223:WP:SS 3205:users 3199:these 3165:image 2977:Farix 2974:). -- 2929:Farix 2858:Farix 2805:Farix 2592:works 2566:Farix 2561:WP:TV 2490:Ranma 2201:WP:GA 2093:Farix 1932:Farix 1678:Farix 1632:Farix 1524:Genre 1460:Farix 1279:manga 1229:josei 1211:manga 1154:manga 1146:shojo 1070:that. 997:WP:OC 972:Farix 840:G.A.S 686:Morio 649:Farix 638:Morio 587:2000 495:Farix 460:Farix 428:Farix 398:Farix 357:Ranma 349:Kanon 325:Farix 249:Farix 216:Farix 172:Farix 122:Farix 16:< 4037:talk 4018:talk 3998:talk 3972:talk 3946:talk 3563:Talk 3294:talk 3239:See 3225:and 3169:size 3167:and 3124:talk 3048:and 3020:said 2982:Talk 2934:Talk 2924:WP:V 2863:Talk 2810:Talk 2802:. -- 2604:WP:N 2600:both 2571:Talk 2559:and 2529:. -- 2501:here 2493:and 2470:long 2437:here 2098:Talk 1978:next 1937:Talk 1908:hack 1843:WP:N 1839:WP:N 1831:WP:N 1829:and 1683:Talk 1673:WP:V 1653:. — 1651:WP:N 1649:and 1637:Talk 1581:and 1579:WP:N 1465:Talk 1335:". ( 1231:and 1144:and 977:Talk 944:and 920:here 654:Talk 609:talk 605:Bazj 500:Talk 465:Talk 457:. -- 433:Talk 403:Talk 330:Talk 277:walk 273:talk 254:Talk 221:Talk 177:Talk 127:Talk 3759:.-- 3655:300 3600:are 3316:日本穣 3243:. 3229:.-- 2606:. — 2598:or 2594:or 2511:). 2505:can 2238:or 1995:or 1735:why 1557:. — 1339:)-- 1326:can 1283:.-- 890:日本穣 863:日本穣 821:日本穣 806:are 545:'s 543:TFA 533:), 4043:) 4039:| 4020:• 4004:) 4000:| 3974:• 3948:• 3836:? 3751:, 3747:, 3743:, 3661:巌流 3565:) 3296:) 3221:, 3177:, 3130:) 3126:| 3056:. 2984:) 2936:) 2865:) 2812:) 2573:) 2478:, 2214:no 2139:. 2100:) 2076:, 1939:) 1882:er 1859:er 1685:) 1659:er 1639:) 1621:er 1596:er 1526:. 1467:) 1457:-- 1314:. 1304:: 1227:, 1223:, 1219:, 1133:I 1103:. 1078:. 979:) 656:) 611:) 560:: 551:ja 539:ja 531:ja 502:) 467:) 435:) 425:-- 405:) 395:-- 359:, 355:, 351:, 332:) 275:, 256:) 223:) 179:) 129:) 119:-- 94:→ 64:← 4035:( 4024:) 4016:( 3996:( 3970:( 3952:) 3944:( 3818:八 3811:十 3788:| 3771:八 3764:十 3716:八 3709:十 3681:| 3618:| 3561:( 3542:| 3513:| 3484:| 3443:| 3426:八 3419:十 3396:| 3363:| 3292:( 3173:— 3153:八 3146:十 3122:( 3080:— 3004:— 2980:( 2932:( 2896:八 2889:十 2861:( 2808:( 2769:) 2569:( 2096:( 2072:— 2056:♫ 1935:( 1915:— 1681:( 1635:( 1463:( 975:( 652:( 607:( 549:( 498:( 463:( 431:( 401:( 328:( 279:) 271:( 252:( 235:♫ 219:( 175:( 125:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 20 - Knowledge

Index