Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Archive 22

4423:), and not up to us (in the case of "undue" media coverage). If a bunch of reporters want to cover something seen by the astronomical community as trivial, they can do that. The flip side is that they're going to start repeating themselves very soon, so there ultimately wouldn't be much more than a sentence or 3 to write about. I have no problem with the inclusion of this behavior, and I'm comfortable with the scope of NASTRO and the like—we shouldn't be so strictly re-deciding the important of something that many other people already decided the importance on, that we censor an article's existence. Instead, we should mention the field's perception of a discovery's importance, if we think it's necessary. 4397:

nevertheless make for a good news story. Coverage by specialized science and astronomy publications would be a much more reliable indicator of notability. (2) The number of discoveries attributed to a person seems to be used as a basis for asserting notability. At the very least, with so many new objects discovered every year, I think that there needs to be a governing rule (e.g., which types of discoveries and how many). But even beyond that, I would argue that the emphasis should be on the individual's relative contribution to astronomy beyond mere discoveries, as it paints a misleading picture of astronomy if it gets reduced to a list of discoveries by individual observers.

2481:. I have been removing all self-redirect on that list up to #200,000 and now is easy to see how the actual articles get thinner and thinner. So a "compact" (not really) category, listing only articles, is much better. Also, I normally added the "Category:Numbered asteroids" in 2nd position, after the Main-belt/family category and before the "Discoverer" category. If everybody adds a 6-digit sortkey to that category, I will do so as well. (Until recently only up to #2,000 the category entries were numerically sorted, from there on, in 99% of all cases, the higher numbered bodies were sorted by the standard name-based on the DEFAULTSORT key). 4177:, etc. are discovered, many of them by amateurs. Moreover, the general media seems to conflate "discovery" of an astronomical object with "notability," so a web search on these amateurs turns up media coverage which, in my opinion, is a poor indicator of the discoverer's notability. For example, if an amateur astronomer has discovered a total of 10 supernovae over the years, I don't think that that fact alone establishes notability. But perhaps someone else would disagree. 31: 2586:, especially those numbered 1-2000, I'm only adding a 6-digit sortkey if the DEFAULTSORT is not already 6-digits. This might change as I go up in number, if I see a lot of disorder. As of ~1/2 way through, I'm deciding to add a 6-digit sortkey IF other categories on the page also have one, regardless of the DEFAULTSORT. I'll be making a 2nd pass through all the minor planets to include this and other rule changes I've made since I started. 4697:

Category:Multiple star systems, or Category:Kuiper belt objects. Every one of these categories contains a fairly large amount of objects in it and covers an important topic, but in most of these cases, and in quite a few more, there is no clearly established system or sort order for these objects, and in this discussion I seek to put an end to this, and provide a consensus for the outcome of this.

2199:) while adding the category to all of the ~19k pages. I'm thinking about taking up this request in the near future (as I did with the then-incomplete request to selectively redirect the many asteroid stubs), so I'll ping all those previously involved to see if any opinions have changed or been added, since I haven't really kept up with WP:AST, nor WP in general, over the last 6 months. 2549:

pattern. The first 2 variants are roughly equally common, and the 3rd is less common. The categories did not seem to always account for these DEFAULTSORT variants. More category maintenance is needed here, and I don't trust the average editor to keep Cat:Numbered asteroids tidy (nor the other cats, but I'm only focusing on Cat:NA at the moment; see the semi-proposal below).

4521:

so having a comet named after somebody doesn't confer notability. For the same reason, there is no number of asteroids one could discover that would in itself confer notability, notability comes from how much non-trivial coverage that person has gotten in reliable sources. There's no difference between scientific and non-scientific reliable sources in this regard.

4364:) is that a person is presumed to be notable if there is significant, reliable coverage of the individual in secondary sources that are independent of the individual. Since discoveries by amateurs frequently receive media attention, this requirement is often satisfied for biographies of discoverers — even if the discovery isn't astronomically notable. 1735:' could easily be read as implying that the list actually contains the most massive stars in the universe (i.e., that the list is complete), while in reality, the most massive stars in the universe remain undiscovered (statistically almost certain). Therefore it is important to point this out in the lead, as has already been done in this example: 6162: 2846: 4059:, a new star was on the top. However, I cannot understand the reference because it is too technical. And as I analyze, it does not give the radius. The star is EV Carinae and was jot down by a long time watcher of the list, who I know is responsible enough. Putting a new star on top is crucial, since the world watches it. Join the talk at 2036:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 1422:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 4848:

the basic question of whether or not such as default-option should be used in the first place is not mentioned in the proposal. Frankly, I've come to the conclusion that such an generic sort-option does potentially more damage than it helps. I suggest its removal from all articles about minor planets

4787:

These are my proposals, yea or nay? Also, any comments or input? This is still a work in progress, and most of this I have based only on what I have encountered so far on wikipedia. Either way, I believe that this could be immensely helpful for providing meaningful information on Knowledge (XXG), and

4281:

Reyk's point illustrates why it might be useful to have more specific criteria for notability of astronomers, including amateurs. Editors without a background in astronomy could simply see if an article meets straightforward, objective criteria specific to astronomy; specialized knowledge wouldn't be

3161:

The taskforces serve as good places to map out content, even if inactive. Rursus set it up, I found it later and a few of us have found it a good place to plan constellation article improvement. It will have only one active member soon as Stringtheory is not active much but no matter, it may be again

4520:

It needs to be fairly deep, ongoing coverage, not trivial mention in the media ("Somebody discovered something".) Unfortunately, the AfD process is more or less broken and the notability guidelines are at best just post-hoc justification. And I should point out that there is no inherited notability,

4236:

It's usually better to get an outside view, because editors who aren't familiar with a subject area aren't likely to have prior inclinations towards keeping or deleting. Knowledgeable editors are useful, of course, but a problem that frequently comes up is that enthusiasts often want to uncritically

4217:

For this article it was a bit of a puff piece, listing every asteroid discovered, but the only references were the subject's home page and twitter. If others have written about this person, then I reckon a neutrally written recreation would be in order. I suppose the lesson for us is perhaps we need

2804:

It's my strong conviction that the magic word DEFAULTSORT is detrimental, as it is a source for well-meant bad ideas. Soon someone will come up with a 7 or 8-digit Sortkey and change a few hundreds articles/redirs before anyone will notice the changes. By then, a category's entries in the 1000s will

2708:

ways to approach this: 1) enforce a standard DEFAULTSORT on all articles, then adjust each cat's sortkey for consistency, or 2) abide by the current DEFAULTSORT, then adjust each cat's sortkey for consistency. Since each cat needs to be checked anyway, I'm slightly in favor of #2. Either way, a sort

4160:

I've been nominating a number of biographies of amateur astronomers for deletion because I don't think that they fulfill the notability requirement. There seems to be some uncertainty as to the conditions under which discoveries confer notability upon the discoverer. My position is that in general,

4091:

The VLTI is an interferometer, so it looks like they're using that, in combination with a stellar atmosphere model, to derive an approximate angular diameter for the photosphere. (There seems to be some certainty because their models don't accurately predict the larger angular diameters seen in the

3672:

to being unambiguous, but "The Constellations Task Force" should be moved farther away from "Sub-projects", probably into its own sentence. All of these issues should be corrected or improved somehow, since I think they're part of the problem/confusion here. At they very least, they're not helping.

3182:

Merging the task forces creates an active task force that could also serve as good place to map out content. The resulting taskforce would be a good place to plan constellation and eclipse article improvement. If we decide to let the task force cover some additonal topics it would also attract more

2937:

The 201 categorized redirects were done intentionally, so there's no need to change anything. I'd rather fix an existing category on a redirect than to remove the cat. Otherwise, this would send a mixed message to future editors, or the cat might be lost if/when the redirect is reverted, if the cat

5120:

I think a reasonable course of action is, as expolanetaryscience suggested, to state on each category page exactly how it should be sorted, both for preliminarily-designated objects and for numbered objects, but only if the intended sorting method for each category is obvious. If the category is a

5027:

It is my opinion that readers are most likely to search for an article by its title. In the case of minor planets, this means the name, or if there is none, the number. In the case of stars, nebulae, galaxies, etc., this would mean the most commonly used designation, or common name if that is used

4760:

For default: Numbered comets will be sorted as (A)NNNN- where the N is the designation of the comet. A is invariable and simply serves as a discriminant as to not confuse comets and asteroids, as well as establish numbered comets before unnumbered comets. comet 1P/Halley would be sorted A0001, and

4742:

default: If it does not have a numbered designation, the provisional designation would be sorted YYYY MNNNL, in which 2015 FG345 would be sorted 2015 F345G, 1992 QB1 would be sorted 1992 Q001B, and 2014 RC would be sorted 2014 R000C. This is to establish hierarchy of the classification, as 2014 RC

4598:

My sense has been that the "significant coverage" and "reliability" requirements are independent; the former can just be satisfied by entries in the External Links section, if that content doesn't prove particularly useful or reliable for referencing purposes. For the article body I usually prefer

3592:

Yes, for one thing the resulting name can be misleading unless the visitor is well informed. I.e. most people viewing the group name may not realize that it is about eclipses and constellations. A second reason is that returning participants may not be aware of the revision and believe the project

4899:

I agree with most of exoplanetaryscience's post. I'm unfamiliar with comet nomenclature, so I'm neutral on the comet issue. I don't agree that anything should be sorted by distance; we had several categories sorting objects by light years from Earth, but they were thankfully done away with with a

2502:

Indeed, I have been placing that category in the 2nd position, though not intentionally. I first attempt to place the category (if non-existent) alphabetically against other categories that begins with 'N', going from the top down. If unsuccessful, alphabetically against 'M' categories (Main-belt

493:

That's an interesting idea. However, I was thinking of making a list from raw data. I mean, from catalogs like SIMBAD. I can find a database of the brightest stars down to mag 1.5, but I'm not sure if I have the time to check whether the stars have their own article and if so, if they are FA, Ga,

5096:

Ding ding ding ding ding! Yes these categories are very handy for contributors! Casual readers that barely understand how to use Knowledge (XXG) are obviously not going to browse through categories to find what they are looking for but instead they are going to use the search feature. The bigger

4764:

Unnumbered comets are sorted as PYYYYMNN with P being the orbit of the comet- X, D, P, or C, and YYYYMNN being the comet designation, formatted much the same way as asteroids- Caeser's comet would be C-043K01, C/2013 US10 would be C2013U010S, P/2012 F5 would be P2012F05, and D/1993 F2-K would be

4749:

For date sorts: Specifically for Category:Astronomical objects discovered in (year), asteroids, comets, and all other objects will be sorted by YYYYMMDD of discovery in UTC- the introduction of the year, even though it is implied, is because without the year included it would simply be MMDD, and

1659:

I will add my support to removing "known" from the titles of the other lists. It is not adding any value, and it makes it harder to type and find the list. To Mu301's categories of unreality, I would also add fictional, something that someone made up. But in any case "known real" is the default

4696:

There are quite a few important categories relating to astronomy on wikipedia, and groups of categories. These range from category groups like Category:Astronomical objects discovered in , Category:Discoveries by , and Category:-type asteroids, to more specific categories like Category:Quasars,

2548:

no matter what the DEFAULTSORT. I decided on this after seeing at least 3 (if not 4) different DEFAULTSORT variations for this group: 0-padded 6-digit, "YYYY Wwww", and "(#####) YYYY Wwwww" ("##### YYYY Wwwww" probably exists too, but I wasn't interested in getting that specific), with no clear

3775:

which has this advice: "If a closely related group already exists, even if it is inactive, you should join that project rather than starting yet another WikiProject. ". Much of what you list will already be under WikiProject Astronomy, or the Solar System project. I see no merit in closing one

4396:

My concerns boil down to 2 main issues. (1) There's a tendency to rely on media coverage as a reliable indicator of discoverers' notability. However, the media is generally a poor judge of what constitutes notability in astronomy. For instance, a non-notable discovery of a variable star might

4390:

lists two additional notability criteria. The one that seems most relevant for discoveries reads as follows: "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field." In the context of astronomical discoveries, this is

3118:

It does not sound a good idea to me. The articles they cover are almost completely disjoint. But it should just be up to the task force members themselves if they want to disband or merge or change their name. It is not really up to WikiProject Astronomy to impose on them unless they have

1769:, which by definition is a complete list of bright naked eye objects, that does appear to be the motive. If "known" is required or desired for clarity it can be included at the top, and this is important for lists like "most distant" which change from year to year. I stumbled upon 3708:

Both groups seem to be more or less defunct, so I'm not sure a merger constitutes a benefit to content in either area. I'd rather suggest that we leave messages on the talk pages of both groups directing traffic here. Alternatively, interested parties might consider contacting

2476:

I agree on adding the category to all non-redirects. I've been doing so myself for the last few months to all edits tagged "overall revision". I wouldn't use that category on redirect (though I might have done so on a few occasions), as there is already a complete list,

4027:, only 92 are minor planets, and are all redirects, so I'll propagate their categories from redirection, if that's what caused the problem. Aside from these 92, the shortlist above, and barring any stray uncategorized pages, I think I've done pretty much all I can. 5533:

Actually, that category was empty an hour ago when I looked. I added Urhixidur and Piazzia :) I really don't see any question about the notability of any of those four. The issue with those pages has more to do with lack of sources and stub length, as discussed at

4951:

in minor planets articles do not make much sense to me. Why not directly list the bodies in the article about the astronomer? This would also simplify the inconsistent sorting-issue of categories, as mentioned above. For example the article about the astronomer

5201:

exception, which these names are not; they are the norm in their number range). This doesn't relate to numbered asteroids, whose sorting proposal I agree with. And even numbered asteroids are not sorted chronologically (they're only "roughly" chronological).

3755:

that covers eclipses, occultations, conjunctions, Great Comets, Great Meteors, syzygies, cosmic reionization, big bang, various outbursts and explosions, impacts; also covering impact craters. ECLIPSES itself could also be a taskforce of said new project. --

3713:

to overhaul the project format and get advice on how to generate new interest. Honestly, I've been a little underwhelmed with that project's results so far, but they are the closest we have to experts on analytics and navigation regarding Wikiprojects.

3637:

I believe you're free to start an entirely new task force. That's a different topic. If you want to cover the topics of Constellations and Eclipses, well that's up to the members. Just don't treat that as consensus to remove the existing task forces.

1388: 6330:, a newly-dubbed hypothetical planet that some guys decided really does exist. With only one paper written (and no physical evidence), does it make sense to keep the new page? Certainly the byline in the Neptune article can be kept (since it 4960:

is incomplete (probably 50% of the bodies are missing). While it's easy to create a new category, it is much harder to make sure all articles are added in the correct sorting order. Maybe that's why there are so many incomplete categories...

5097:

point is why would you not make a category for all objects in a catalog? Why would you even suggest such a thing? Because casual readers aren't going to use them? Really no rights for the editors and contributes to make their lives easier?

4999:

I'm not sure that we can learn a whole lot of useful things about categories from views, just because Knowledge (XXG) categories generally aren't really used by readers. For example, Category:Biology only has about 30-50 views per day:

2894:

Well done. Don't worry about the 201 Redirects still containing the category; I'll do that manually. Also, if you could post on my talk-page these mentioned 200–500 "redirect-worthy" articles, I will go through them as well. -- Cheers,

6565:

It seems that the article alerts for this project aren't being automatically archived. (i.e., there are alerts all the way back to August 2015 still listed on the page.) Is there some specific reason why they aren't being archived??

4803:

I cannot comment on all of the proposals here, but I say "For other astronomical objects" just go with the status quo, categories listed in distances would surely rupture categories listing objects by entries of their catalog (ex.

621:. However, there is no column about the distance. I think we can know the distance in light years by converting the paralax of the star, right? After we do that, we sort and split the list into the desired distance (25-30 ly, i.e) 4460:. All we can do is supplement it. It's important not to conflate what you think is notable to astronomy with how Knowledge (XXG) defines notability; the latter is an independent standard that is less subject to personal opinion. 847:

Can someone tell me what are considered the major geographic divisions on Mars? On Earth, they would be the (12) continents (7) and oceans (5), so if someone could list the various major regions of Mars, that would be nice. --

4075:

The ref did not look like it supported the edit to me, so I reverted and responded at the talk page. I don't have the necessary expertise either, however, and it would be helpful if someone in the know could check it out.

5516: 5462: 3303:

It is appropriate to retain if the members feel it is still useful. That seems to be the case for at least one of them. But I would have no heartburn over the Constellation-related discussions taking place here instead.

2351:

Being numbered is what got the bots to go on article creation sprees as at the time all asteroids were treated as notable. So I kind of think the category is less meaningful as 75% of the category will be re-directs. --

635:

I don't think that listification needs separate articles for each distance regime of every 5ly, instead of a single list for all 0-30ly; it would still be listification, just combining the various templates together. --

3660:'s heading (as do all of those heading's pages) lists "Constellations" (without the "task force" qualifier) between "Astronomical objects" and "Eclipses" (both are projects), implying that all 3 are equal. Furthermore, 4092:

infrared bands for water or carbon monoxide.) Combined with the distance estimate, that data gives them a physical size for the star. The radii are listed in the final sentence of the Results paragraph in the Abstract.

1978:

for edits made by User 148.246.100.138 who was blocked temporarily in the month of November 2015 on my ARV request. Looking at his edits, he is interested in changing the timings of Eclipse events without citations. -

920:

There is a reason I said continents and oceans, as I didn't want all the large regions of Mars. And classical features don't all match up to real ones, which was why I didn't want to use 19th century Mars atlases. --

1792:

This is exactly what I assumed. I've had friends actually think we know the largest stars in the entire Universe, etc. I did make a mistake with brightness though, and I confused it with "luminosity" for a second.

107:

So I enjoy making lists and and organizing catalogs. Right now I have wikified the complete list of all 100,000+ stars in the Hipparcos catalog. Here is a small sample of the list with a reduced number of columns:

4708:

keep in mind wikipedia's entire database, for better or for worse, is driven and only held up through consensus and majority, so none of these suggestions are rules unless the majority of WP:AST should deem it

3809: 2946: 1834:

may include stars that no longer exist, as their remaining lifetime (after the evolutionary stage we observe the star to be in) can be less than the light travel time (some listed stars are at 3 million ly).

2709:

order for each category needs to be established (which is probably obvious, and the prevailing and most intuitive order by just looking at the cat, but I haven't looked at all the various minor planet cats).

4367:

In the case of people famous for one event, the general rule is to write about the person in the event's article instead of writing a separate biographical article, but there are exceptions to this rule

3481:

It doesn't need to have anything to do with eclipses as long as it falls into the domain of the task force. Halley's Comet doesn't have anything to do with black holes but they are still covered by the

3832:

in the near future, so I figured I'd warn everyone. There will invariably be another shortlist of exceptions, but it'll be a lot easier to go through that once the easy-to-fix cases are taken care of.

4746:

For name sorts: The asteroid's name would be included in categories directly relating to the name of the asteroid, such as Category:Asteroids named for people, or Category:Asteroids named for places.

3990: 3018: 4557:

failed to reach consensus. As usual, I haven't read it, nor its nom-failure. I might soon, though, to satisfy my curiosity whether its success/failure hinged on exactly (or party) this divide.

3323: 3088: 5398:

The filename is still slightly misleading, although technically it is morning since it was taken after midnight local time (local at the location being photographed, not on the space station).

1731:

I support the removal of 'known' to keep the titles simple and because it is obvious to many that 'known' is implied. But I can certainly see where those who prefer 'known' are coming from: '

5350: 3872: 5047:

All categories are esoteric to a certain point. Categories may not necessarily be used by casual readers but esoteric categories are not unhelpful or unconstructive as you are suggesting.

1578:, so removing "known" from those lists is the most obvious solution, instead of adding "known" to all lists. Since this is a good time to gauge consensus, what does everyone else think? 4180:

To my knowledge, there isn't a specific notability guideline for discoverers of astronomical phenomena. Have I missed it? If it doesn't exist, is there any interest in establishing one?

2105:

I'll note that even if they're not deleted, as far as the project's maintinance-of-redirects concerns with them are, the project can just "pretend they were deleted" for that purpose. -

2059: 1893: 5483: 4736:

default: sorted by a 0-padded 6-digit Minor Planet Center number (642 Clara would be sorted 000642, 19731 Tochigi would be sorted 019731, and (52430) 1994 PF8 would be sorted 052430).

3828:)) and adds the corresponding YYYYMMDD sortkey, which is the sole sortkey-format I've seen for these categories. I want to run this on all pages contained in the 255 subcategories of 4631:

notable? I am unfamiliar with the nuances of notability for astronomers, and I would be grateful if one or more of your project members would take a look at this article. Thanks.

1415: 1168:, I've standardized everything to m. But since my math fu is weak, someone might want to double-check that table to make sure I didn't drop an order of magnitude somewhere. Cheers - 399:

I'm not sure what you mean by "wikify" since it's a properly formatted wikitable at the moment... I'm also not sure how (or why) you would change the table to obfuscate its origins.

1214:

mentioned on that page. This is not my area of expertise, so a check by more savvy editors may be useful. If anyone has better sources, or I have made any error please let me know.

6135:

posted that category-intersection list. For those numbered over 10,000, it's probably time to #redirect if no reason for notability exists in the articles. I'll do so tomorrow.

710:

which you could bring to articlespace (and update with data from Messenger, New Horizons and Dawn) ; IMO it's currently in a state that is already acceptable for articlespace. --

5470: 1650:

is a known (but misidentified) chemical element. I can't even think of an edge case where the distinction would be helpful. Removing known sounds reasonable across the board. --

3237:

why have any taskforces at all? Why not just ask for help here from other editors interested in astronomy? There are more on this page than on a constellation task force page.

3216:: A merge of that nature has no apparent benefits. The Constellations task force is still doing good work, so I think that should stay in place unless they decide to disband. 2180: 2029: 4023:

hierarchy, only 66 needed the addition; 96 were #redirects, and the other 3,824 were terrestrial objects (recursion often leads you into weird places). Of the 1,969 not in

5564: 5230:

I have started a discussion over at WikiProject Astronomical Objects on the article titles of exoplanets and stars that have been given official, formal names by the IAU.

5190: 4490:

requires more than media coverage by non-scientific publications, but if the consensus is otherwise (as it seems to be), I'll gladly defer to it. I appreciate your input!

4020: 3982: 3978: 3966: 3840: 3829: 3798: 1853:

existed. If they did, then people may expect such stars in the list. But I admit that's not really a problem now as we couldn't see them anyway in the foreseeable future.

5231: 2942:

clean of redirects is not a particularly worthwhile task, especially for those articles bouncing in and out of redirect; it's best just to keep the category on the page.

2192: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 5257: 5253: 3257:

The Constellations task force is inactive as it only has three active members left. Merging The Constellations Task Force is therefore the most applicable thing to do.

2309: 742:

allows us to publish with empty boxes still on the page. Indeed, most stub articles have empty or missing sections, so it is a common occurrence in article space. --

462: 3103:

branch of astronomy so it might be a good idea to include them in a new and broader WikiProject I would like to call WikiProject Celestial mechanics and astrometry.

3354:, working together on articles is fine, but please don't try and boss other people around - your proposal makes no sense and I think you just need to drop it now. 5413: 4669:

is the relevant notability guideline, and it's fairly liberal. This looks like a borderline case - he's written lots of papers, but that doesn't necessarily pass

3989:(though, at most, only 300 are not minor planets), so more maintenance is necessary. This will also help process the minor planet redirects and help populate the 3765: 3095:. Since they only have 4 active members I think that its better if we covered both of their topics in one WikiProject. Also, their topics are both covered by the 4196: 2700:

category has a consistent sorting method for all its children. A variable DEFAULTSORT only adds a layer of complexity to the semi-automated check. Going through

5193:? Turning "1992 QB1" into "1992 Q001B" seems unnecessarily confusing and could easily be done incorrectly. Any category explicitly or implicity sorted by name ( 5069:, I find these categories quite useful, and frequently do category arithmetic while searching for a particular group of articles, or checking for inclusion, or 5028:

more. I think that the categories should be arranged so that it is easy for readers to find articles they want, so they should be ordered by name/designation.

3483: 3184: 2286:

My question would be why add "asteroid re-directs" to such a category? ~15,000 of those ~19,000 numbered asteroids re-direct to very generic list articles. --

1269: 2300:

This would make it useful for someone wanting to process the list of numbered asteroids. Also, asteroid redirects are currently categorized with cats such as

3183:

people. Lastly, the difference of the their respective subject matter are probobly no greater then that of black holes and comets who are both covered by a

461:

I had at some point meant to make a table of the brightest stars (say down to mag 1.5) with their article rating (FA, GA, start, stub etc.) and stick it at

2864:

Unfortunately, there were quite a few more #redirect-worthy minor planets than I expected... I'd say between 200 and 500, while I was expecting maybe 100.

3536:

In what way would merging these two taskforces make it easier than drawing up a list on them separately? What are you trying to solve or facilitate here?

3003:

send me another ping when you're done. I will be going around quite a bit in the next few days and will only be able to check my emails for most of them.

676:

What I would like to see is a list of the 20 brightest red dwarfs. That would be a list a backyard astronomer could use. But it would still be similar to

413:

I mean add wikilinks, mainly. The "origins" are NASA. The same origin of most of the astronomy-related lists. Let's stop getting off topic now? Thank you

4357:

hasn't been especially useful in the context of discoverers of astronomical phenomena. I think that three aspects of that policy are most relevant here.

4784:

I would recommend the exact sort format be provided on each category's page, as the sort format could quickly become quickly confusing and conflicting.

4930: 4809: 4743:

was discovered before 2014 RA1, yet would be sorted after. In this situation, they would be sorted 2014 R000C and 2014 R001A, sorting it appropriately

2861:

201 minor planet redirects already in the cat had their sortkey changed from alphabetic/non-existent to numeric, instead of removing the cat (sorry).

2033: 1419: 1014:. I know NASA websites are not copyrighted, but the fact that it's a perfect match is slightly unsettling. What should be done with these two pages? 5150: 4957: 4750:

would end up in a separation of some objects sorted with a 0 and some with a 1- objects discovered in January to September, and October to December.

1923: 1725: 1600: 299: 4926: 363:

Oh god I completely forgot about that list I made. I intend to wikify it now. I can make it look less of a perfect match if you wish, by the way.

47: 17: 3607:

The combined task force will cover more topics then just eclipses and constellations. My goal is to make the new task force cover all topics in

2745:

an explicit list of cats and their preferred sort order (consensus approved, if currently ambiguous), I would do this. I don't really feel like

6517:

Is the new paper about the same theoretical planet as that described for creating the Kuiper cliff (from several other much older papers) ? --

1813:

I agree that it is very important to have that clarification in the articles. I don't think it is too useful in an article or category name. --

677: 3772: 3653: 1975: 1798: 2099: 5314:

there's enough interest. The pages above get ~1000 views/month (combined), so if whoever's using them would like that, just let me know.

5037: 4805: 1029:

There are some list articles in the DRAFspace astronomy holding area also, and the black hole lists we were discussing earlier in the year

5189:), why are we trying to keep preliminary designations ordered by date of discovery in a non-chronological category? Isn't that the job of 4673:(criterion 1). Similarly its unclear whether his popular writing reaches the required threshold (criterion 7). I think this is one to ask 3666:

Sub-projects of WikiProject Astronomy include WikiProject Astronomical objects, The Constellations Task Force and the WikiProject Eclipses

2188: 2037: 1423: 3953:

without a sortkey, but spot checking a few of these reveals that search is using a non-current database, so these numbers should be less.

3776:

project to start another mixture of semirelated topics. If you are interested in this topic, I suggest that you boost up the content of

2503:

asteroids, usually). If unsuccessful, alphabetically against 'L-A' categories. If still unsuccessful, alphabetically before O-Z cats. If

6518: 3056: 1474:

There was some template vandalism going on - the problem was in transcluded templates, not the page itself. It seems to be fixed now. -

1042: 805: 787: 743: 711: 637: 4486:

Hi Tom.Reding and Praemonitus, thank you both for your thoughts. I guess that I'd contend that reliability for scientific articles per

2321: 6244:

article desperately needs a plot of asteroid size vs. rotation period, but 500h is definitely an outlier) (notability already removed)

6085:

My preference would have been to establish notability per Knowledge (XXG) criteria, but I went looking and found nothing of interest.

1234: 6412: 6263: 6148: 5331: 5277: 5215: 5166: 5138: 5086: 4913: 4883: 4570: 4436: 4339: 4040: 4006: 3888: 3856: 3752: 3686: 3034: 2993: 2881: 2762: 2478: 2453: 2397: 2341: 2247: 2216: 2134: 2094: 1956: 1918: 1720: 1595: 580:

catalog of stars within 25 pc (81 light years). I can sort and select those within that range you mentioned. I'll see what I can do.

5382:

Already solved. Moonrise was captioned as sunrise based on mistake on NASA site, and some admins reverted attempts to correct this.

4257:

It is somewhat dubious that comet discoverers get all their comets named after themselves, where as asteroid discoverers do not. --

3757: 3135:

As a creator of the task force, I just have to declare myself no longer active. The latest changes to the project page were made by

1575: 1532: 1491: 1392: 1349: 1324: 1101: 1078: 1034: 971: 922: 849: 822: 4554: 3092: 1774: 1508:

I purged the page and it appears to be fixed now... Appears to be some organized vandalism as these attacks are being posted on a

1452: 5327: 5273: 3390:

I agree that it makes no sense to merge the eclipses and constellations task forces. What do these things really have in common?

2337: 2243: 2212: 1914: 1883: 1879: 1794: 1762: 1716: 1591: 1567: 1551: 1165: 1158: 1030: 879: 719: 4354: 4323: 3816:, I finally made an AWB rule-set which grabs discovery year, month, and day from the article text or from the infobox parameter 2660:

sortkeys and replacing them with 6-digit ones. There have been 1-to-a-few dozen of these so far, and I'm 1/3 of the way through.

6441: 3868: 1074: 594:

The (minimum) intent is to turn the templates in the mentioned TFD into lists, but if you want to add to that, be my guest! --

6595: 4376:). For astronomical discoveries, this rule seems awkward. For example, if someone discovers a single comet, one could invoke 4114:

Are you talking about the 1988 de Jager paper? If so, I'm not seeing it. In any case, probably best to give your thoughts at

3547: 3472: 3436: 3365: 3248: 3173: 2268: 1007: 519: 476: 388: 342: 5073:

clusion, or looking for accidental exceptions. Indeed, esoteric categories exist, but they have yet to be mentioned here.

2195:(I'm only concerned with point #1 at the moment); the consensus of which was to add a 0-padded 7-digit sort key to the end ( 6555: 1038: 6473: 6437: 4832: 4793: 3008: 759: 3835:

Also, I'm tempted to put a note on this parent-category, and the 255 subcategories, explicitly stating the sortkey format

2305: 345:. The former is unmaintainable (and simply cruft in my opinion) and the latter is a direct copy (with no attribution) of 279:

I intended to create the list article, however, I'm afraid there are way too many redlinks. There are bigger lists, like

6201: 2980:, and several others here to pass judgement. I'll post it here somewhere when I'm done (will likely take a few days). 2301: 1643: 707: 2623:(where W's are upper case word characters), I'm not adding the category since these are still provisionally designated. 1033:(needs cleanup, filling in missing entries, and a low-mass cut-off (the lowest mass ones should not be on this list)), 725:

70.51.202.113: Wow, that's a good draft and is very well referenced. It is definitely worth publishing when it's done.

6189:, which contain text that presumes notability; they just need to be expanded. I removed the notability tag on those 3. 2939: 2850: 2657: 2545: 2408: 2317: 2184: 2164: 1875: 1831: 1571: 967: 5416:. I also asked NASA to correct their mistake, but I doubt that I will be honoured with any response from their side. 4827:

As per said convention, exoplanets discovered in both would be sorted by their Kepler designation or GJ designation.

4218:

to look at the AFD pages more. For some amateur astronomers, there are newspaper or magazine articles about them, so

1606:

My thought on this is everything on Knowledge (XXG) is as "known". Thus the use of "known" seems redundant to me. --

1096:

We currently don't have an article on K2's version of K1's KIC, called EPIC, should this be a new article, or should

4138: 4115: 4060: 2077:, etc., with no space between the number and name, and all corresponding redirects-with-a-space exist. The 18th is 1898: 1887: 1740: 1732: 38: 3710: 2380:

Ok, I thought there was much more support behind this. At the very least, though, I will add this category to all

1566:, which I support. The only lists which had already contained the word "known", prior to kidding me's edits, were 5524: 4990: 4227: 3785: 3124: 2972:

I'm working on making a short-ish list of potential redirects, which will likely need guidance from the likes of

1934: 1665: 1244: 891: 6582: 1384: 1295: 1077:) has been indefinitely blocked. Anything we have been relying on him/her for will no longer be forthcoming. -- 5033: 4828: 4789: 3813: 3445: 3004: 2973: 2172: 2110: 2002: 1479: 617: 739: 4380:

and claim that the person is notable for a single event only, but if that person later finds a second comet,

302:

already list the Hipparcos catalog entries that are of any significance, and they do it in a useful fashion.

6608: 6575: 6551: 6526: 6522: 6506: 6485: 6453: 6431: 6417: 6386: 6362: 6343: 6308: 6268: 6153: 6125: 6094: 6078: 6055: 5576: 5542: 5528: 5477: 5455: 5425: 5407: 5391: 5377: 5362: 5336: 5297: 5282: 5238: 5220: 5171: 5143: 5110: 5091: 5060: 5041: 5015: 4994: 4977: 4942: 4918: 4888: 4865: 4836: 4797: 4685: 4683: 4659: 4640: 4608: 4575: 4530: 4499: 4469: 4441: 4406: 4344: 4311: 4291: 4266: 4252: 4231: 4212: 4189: 4150: 4127: 4108: 4085: 4069: 4045: 4011: 3893: 3861: 3789: 3735: 3691: 3647: 3632: 3602: 3587: 3569: 3551: 3531: 3517: 3495: 3476: 3456: 3440: 3405: 3369: 3339: 3313: 3298: 3280: 3266: 3252: 3225: 3204: 3177: 3156: 3128: 3112: 3071: 3039: 3012: 2998: 2965: 2911: 2886: 2821: 2767: 2497: 2458: 2420: 2402: 2375: 2361: 2346: 2295: 2281: 2252: 2221: 2153: 2139: 2116: 2078: 2044: 2014: 1988: 1961: 1938: 1862: 1844: 1817: 1802: 1781: 1766: 1752: 1689: 1669: 1654: 1635: 1615: 1540: 1524: 1499: 1485: 1468: 1435: 1400: 1372: 1357: 1331: 1192: 1174: 1152: 1128: 1109: 1086: 1050: 1046: 1023: 979: 936: 895: 857: 830: 818: 813: 809: 795: 791: 771: 751: 747: 734: 715: 689: 662: 645: 641: 630: 603: 589: 564: 541: 529: 523: 503: 480: 436: 422: 408: 392: 372: 358: 325: 311: 292: 283:, but most links there are clickable. What do you think? Any idea on what I should do with my list? Thanks. 5473:

and a case could be made that this one rates Mid. This minor planet certainly qualifies as notable, imo. --

4982: 4296:

What's wrong with the general guidance we have now: substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources?

3508:

I see no consensus for action developing here. This should be shelved for a year, then possibly revisited.

2191:

was made shortly after, but never performed. The archived WT:AST discussion we had alongside the botreq is

1620:

I agree with Kheider, Tom, and Graeme. There is no need for "known". How would one list an "unknown" star?

932: 349:. I know NASA websites are not copyrighted, but the fact that it's a perfect match is slightly unsettling. 6469: 6396: 6350: 6323: 6319: 5563:

can do category intersections (including subcategories). Here is a full list of astronomical objects from

5194: 4024: 3986: 3974: 3970: 2055: 1140: 4780:

default: sorted by distance, padded designation if categorized by a non-RADEC catalog, or discovery date?

3560:

applies here. You've received no support for your proposal; the consensus is to do nothing at this time.

6427: 6358: 6090: 5373: 5293: 5104: 5054: 4938: 4819: 4636: 4604: 4465: 4104: 4056: 3777: 3761: 3643: 3598: 3565: 3513: 3309: 3276: 3221: 3067: 2371: 2149: 1685: 1536: 1518: 1495: 1462: 1396: 1353: 1124: 1105: 1082: 975: 926: 853: 826: 307: 280: 5197:, for example, implies sorting by the object's name), the name of the article should be used (with the 5122: 4674: 3806: 3748: 3557: 1677: 3522:

I think we should get some time to come up with a compromise everyone can agree on before doing that.

801: 6408: 6392: 6334:

what they're claiming), I just wonder about (yet another) theory that may or may not ever be proven.

6259: 6144: 6043: 6039: 6034:

for Dec and Jan. I'm trying to start discussions on all their talk pages so they don't drag on, e.g.

5520: 5403: 5323: 5269: 5211: 5162: 5134: 5082: 4986: 4909: 4879: 4566: 4432: 4335: 4223: 4036: 4002: 3884: 3852: 3781: 3682: 3623:. The second problem could be solved by having a section about the its history in the project page. 3120: 3030: 2989: 2877: 2758: 2449: 2393: 2333: 2239: 2208: 2176: 2130: 2090: 1952: 1930: 1910: 1712: 1661: 1587: 1559: 1199: 1164:

As there seemed to be some confusion centered around the use of km s vs m s in the tabulated data in

1116: 1097: 887: 6066: 4925:

I have to wonder how much some of the more esoteric categories are actually being used by visitors.

4491: 4398: 4283: 4181: 1299: 6303: 6228: 6208: 6120: 5417: 5383: 5354: 5121:

mess, we should discuss them individually, preferably on their talk page, but placing a link here (

5029: 4972: 4860: 4495: 4402: 4287: 4203:

It is a little disappointing when Wikipedians that know very little about a topic vote on AfDs. --

4185: 3910:

in this category, ~16,215 of which are #redirects (inoperable due to missing text), leaving ~5,270

3733: 3628: 3608: 3583: 3527: 3491: 3452: 3335: 3294: 3262: 3200: 3188: 3108: 3096: 2960: 2906: 2816: 2492: 2440:

will remain 0-padded 6-digit, and a similar sortkey will be added to the category, if necessary.

2106: 1995: 1850: 1475: 1249: 1068: 767: 730: 626: 585: 537: 499: 418: 368: 321: 288: 6603: 4420: 4387: 2276: 1002:

In the interest of not interfering too much with the above discussion, I'd like to bring light to

6591: 6547: 6502: 6339: 6035: 5722: 5535: 5421: 5387: 5358: 5245: 4777:

For multiple stars (more than 3): The exact number of stars in the star system, it's quite simple

4678: 4655: 3616: 3541: 3466: 3430: 3359: 3242: 3167: 3136: 2264: 2074: 2041: 2010: 1700: 1564:

revert move, no need to include the word "known" Knowledge (XXG) only has known information in it

1368: 1239: 1188: 1148: 1019: 1003: 513: 470: 432: 404: 382: 354: 338: 332: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4369: 4361: 4599:

reliable scholarly sources, even if they don't contain "significant coverage". My $ .02 worth.

235: 211: 187: 163: 139: 6449: 6221: 6178: 6074: 5655: 5412:

Yes. And the category must be changed too. If anybody is interested, discussion on Commons is

4526: 4262: 4208: 3620: 2416: 2357: 2291: 2121:

If not deleted, I'd prefer to strip all categories and identifying features from them, yes.

1858: 1840: 1748: 1611: 1345: 783: 685: 259: 6599: 5306:

modified query from AWB, though, for those that don't have it or don't want to perform it. I

4670: 4666: 2272: 2069:

the first lot gets approved for deletion (it's not looking good). 17 of them follow the form

1696: 1455:

Has recently been vandalized. I tried to revert the edit but it still seems to be messed up?

650: 6543: 6494: 6481: 6423: 6354: 6281: 6186: 6182: 6086: 6051: 5910: 5794: 5699: 5677: 5632: 5508: 5451: 5369: 5289: 5235: 5100: 5065:

Yes, regardless of the need or use of categories by casual readers (though important), as a

5050: 5011: 4953: 4934: 4842: 4815: 4632: 4600: 4461: 4146: 4123: 4100: 4081: 4064: 3639: 3594: 3561: 3509: 3305: 3272: 3217: 3148: 3063: 2367: 2145: 1984: 1681: 1531:

There's very weird wording added about brothers and sisters in the intro on 12 December. --

1514: 1458: 1319: 1120: 757:

I've taken the draft to article mainspace. I believe the draft is good enough. Check it out.

303: 5004: 4487: 4457: 4219: 3661: 3657: 254: 230: 206: 182: 6571: 6404: 6277: 6255: 6140: 6106: 5886: 5862: 5608: 5399: 5319: 5265: 5207: 5186: 5158: 5130: 5078: 4905: 4875: 4562: 4428: 4331: 4032: 3998: 3880: 3848: 3678: 3026: 2985: 2873: 2754: 2445: 2389: 2329: 2235: 2204: 2126: 2086: 1948: 1906: 1708: 1583: 1431: 6065:

asteroid (MBA) numbered above 10,000 does not state what makes it notable and is still a

2144:

It would make sense to only have the categories on one of the redirects for each object.

1554:

moved many lists and their associated talk pages to add the word "known" to them (search

6169:

I struck those on this that I either redirected above 10,000, are already redirects, or

6379: 6294: 6170: 6111: 4963: 4851: 4304: 4245: 4170: 3715: 3624: 3579: 3523: 3487: 3448: 3416: 3398: 3351: 3331: 3290: 3258: 3232: 3196: 3104: 2951: 2897: 2807: 2483: 1628: 1389:

Knowledge (XXG):Wiki Ed/Wright State University/Introduction to Astronomy (Spring 2016)

1064: 1057: 786:

for the Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster, Laniakea would also be in order --

763: 726: 701: 658: 622: 599: 581: 560: 555:, specifically the stars in the range 25-30 ly, since the 20-25 ly range looks A-OK. -- 533: 495: 456: 414: 364: 317: 284: 6391:

Caltech is involved, with publications in AJ and Nature. It's not associated with the

2366:

Does it matter, really? Given the total number, it's not a practical category anyway.

1743:

includes 'known', presumably exactly to avoid the possible the confusion I mentioned.

377:

Some of the variable star types could do with lists - we've been doing some as we go.

6587: 6498: 6335: 6285: 6247: 6174: 5982: 5958: 5770: 5572: 5498: 5493: 5443: 4651: 4647: 4200: 3537: 3462: 3426: 3355: 3319: 3238: 3163: 3140: 2260: 2070: 2006: 1364: 1210:

related pages, regarding its closure back in July 2013 due to lack of funding, which

1184: 1144: 1015: 1010:. The former is a list dump and the latter is a direct copy (with no attribution) of 883: 509: 488: 466: 428: 400: 378: 350: 6445: 6102: 6070: 5746: 5503: 4522: 4258: 4204: 2977: 2412: 2353: 2287: 2001:

WPSS got a note about an interesting query regarding Martian and Earth time at the

1854: 1836: 1744: 1607: 1341: 1219: 1180: 1169: 681: 5001: 1660:

meaning, so we do not need to intensify the fact that it is genuine in the title.

1011: 346: 337:

I concur with Praemonitus on this one. On a related subject, I am concerned about

4677:

about and/or test with an AfD. For now I've rated the article importance as Low.

6477: 6465: 6327: 6047: 5447: 5007: 4142: 4119: 4077: 3144: 1980: 1676:

It looks like the contribution of a pedant. I'd say the Conciseness criteria of

508:

They all have articles, and you'd have to check on the talk pages about status.

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

578: 6567: 6194:

For what it's worth, here's my take on the remainder (all but 1 are notable):

5555: 5539: 5474: 4628: 4166: 3612: 3192: 3100: 2081:, which doesn't require the "(asteroid)" distinction, as far as I can tell. 1814: 1778: 1651: 1449: 1441: 1427: 6476:

should get the same treatment, since it seems to be based on a single paper.

6046:. PLease help resolve these by commenting in these discussions. Best wishes, 4137:

Hey everyone, it'd be really helpful to have more input in the discussion at

6581:

Archive time is set to " |archivetime = 90". Seems like a bug. Report it at

6372: 6197: 6062: 5817: 4297: 4238: 3391: 1621: 1411: 970:

instead, as cartographic divisions instead of geographic or geologic ones--

654: 610: 595: 572: 556: 6349:

It's an unnecessary content fork and should probably be redirected back to

4870:

I agree and would prefer to see each category's sorting done explicitly.

3162:

one day. The subject matter of the two is disparate and not good to merge.

6241: 6217: 6132: 5839: 5568: 2544:(where w's are word characters), I added a 6-digit sortkey at the end of 2411:

only containing numbered asteroids that actually have a wiki-article. --

1770: 1647: 4983:

http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/Category:Exoplanets_in_the_Gliese_Catalog

1270:"Earth at risk after cuts close comet-spotting program, scientists warn" 316:

Well, any idea on some other astronomy-related thing else I could list?

6289: 6237: 6006: 5934: 5517:

Category:Astronomical object articles with topics of unclear notability

5182: 3918:

The shortlist of exceptions found, which should be fixed manually, are:

2436:

Since this won't be as all-encompassing a change as I thought it'd be,

4156:

Notability of discoverers of astronomical objects (including amateurs)

6031: 5439: 4174: 2322:

Knowledge (XXG):Categorizing redirects#Categorization of list entries

2005:, thought I would cross-post here to expand the sphere of influence. 6250:

is the only one on that list with unclear notability as written.

5560: 5519:

but not as complete. I cannot see any others starting from 1 to 9.

4384:

would no longer seem to be an impediment to a biographical article.

3656:) it's clear that a "task force" is a child of "project". However, 6533:

Because you are listed as one of minor planet Sedna's wikiprojects

6497:

if you want to weigh in further (in a more "consensus" capacity).

6030:

Several more asteroids have been tagged for notability and are in

4199:

as I would think Andrew Lowe is well enough known as he does have

4162: 3805:

While working for a while on the minor planet redirects, and with

2025: 158: 134: 1509: 5482:

Thanks to the recent sort order change, most appear under 0 in

3578:

Can someone explain to me how merging would be bad in any way.

2050:

18 useless redirects that I can't speedily delete are up at RfD

5438:

There are a few asteroid pages being tagged for notability in

5003:. Category:World War II has 40-60 with some spikes up to 120: 4141:. It's a tricky question and a highly viewed article. Thanks! 25: 3019:

User:Tom.Reding/Shortlist of minor planet redirect candidates

1453:(See here if fixed although you probably dont want to see it) 762:. If anyone can think of a better name, just rename the page 1830:

Another thing possibly worth mentioning is that a list like

1223:

newspaper. and SEN TV for the exact month the Survey ended.

5349:

Hello. Couldn't you estimate correctness of the caption of

4692:

On a revision of the categorization of astronomical objects

2060:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 8

2032:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 1737:

This is a list of the most-massive stars so far discovered

1703:

in the near future, with a link back to this discussion.

1418:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 1296:"Comet Hunters Warn of Threat to Siding Spring Observatory" 3820:(in that order, and, if both exist, checks for agreement ( 2324:

applies here, but I want to get other people's opinion.

2226:

I would be adding an extra 0 to the front of any existing

804:

for instance, since we have good data for that planet. --

653:

is relevant. Tables are big from an HTML point-of-view. --

552: 5288:

Many of the minor planets are probably redirects by now.

4646:

I have updated the article to add the awards from his CV

3425:

would be considered part of eclipses and constellations.

1699:. I'll remove errant "known"s from list article names in 5567:

that are in one of the unclear notability categories. --

6395:, so it's got that going for it. Agree to subsume into 5484:

Category:All articles with topics of unclear notability

5466: 4391:

sufficiently vague that it could cover almost anything.

3962: 3950: 3924: 3825: 3821: 3347: 2704:

would be a source of error (at least for me). There're

2313: 1555: 6109:

have been revised today. Others will be revised soon.

5442:

Dec 2015; anybody would be welcome to look them over.

3271:

What do you mean by "applicable"? Applicable to what?

2858:~2,100 pages were added (current population = 3,721). 2805:

be meddled with those in the 10,000s and/or 100,000s.

2749:

that list, though, if someone else wants to do that.

1878:

because it's semi-protected, so I made a move-request

1849:

That distinction is also relevant to massive stars if

1777:

but could not find a second object to accompany it. --

4806:

Category:Exoplanets discovered by Kepler (spacecraft)

4419:

Thats the thing though, it's both up to us (i.e. via

1546: 1143:. The article was merged but this has been reverted. 532:

up to mag 2.5. So I guess it can easily be expanded.

6399:, then, if discovered, made into its own article. 4956:already lists his discoveries, while the redundant 1363:Unsurprisingly, this has already been snow closed. 463:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Astronomy/Popular_pages

5565:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 5260:after 5 level-recursions, for those interested. 5191:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 4021:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 3983:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 3979:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 3967:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 3841:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 3830:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 3799:Category:Astronomical objects by year of discovery 886:. Regions are determined by brightness variation. 5177:For the asteroids#1b (and comets#2) proposal for 4197:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Andrew Lowe 1344:has been requested to be renamed by someone, see 1115:I think It should be expanded under The original 2384:-redirects, which is much less controversial. 2310:Category:Astronomical objects discovered in 1982 706:are you interested in the Solar System? There's 3906:needed fixing: ~1,261 edits made to the 21,485 3089:WikiProject Astronomy/Constellations Task Force 3083:INITIAL PROPOSAL: WPECLIPSE and WPCONSTELLATION 615:Oh, I know what you mean. Well, I've created a 5310:make a separate list that excludes redirects, 3965:, leading me to do some cat-arithmetic. Since 3593:has gone away entirely. Does that make sense? 4099:That's my $ .02 interpretation, at any rate. 3991:Shortlist of minor planet redirect candidates 2853:is now completely sterilized (in a good way). 2049: 1775:Category:Astronomical objects of unknown type 1547:Many 'List of...' moved to 'List of known...' 465:. If you could do one there that'd be great. 8: 5368:87%? I'm not quite sure what you're asking. 4841:Thx for addressing these issues. As for the 4650:, that may help in gauging his notability.-- 2507:unsuccessful, then I just put it at the end. 1119:, as it is just a new version of it for K2. 6546:. Please join in if it catches your fancy. 6069:, you can probably safely re-direct it. -- 4718:For minor planets and solar system objects: 3461:What has Aquarius got to do with eclipses? 3330:a member of The Constellations Task Force. 2868:, at least now they're easier to find :) 2656:Finally, I'm also checking for non-numeric 2619:For minor planet article names of the form 2582:For minor planet article names of the form 2540:For minor planet article names of the form 1642:How would one even verify an unknown? Even 1562:promptly reverted one pair with the reason 6422:Yes, some merging of content makes sense. 3940:Discovered by blah blah and ] on 2000/5/05 3927:, as of this post, contain a "?" sortkey: 3187:, they are also both within the domain of 103:List of all stars in the Hipparcos catalog 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Astronomy 5302:Yup, I did most of them! This list is an 4931:Category:Exoplanets in the Gliese Catalog 4810:Category:Exoplanets in the Gliese Catalog 4237:and indiscriminately include everything. 3933:1a. have a dmy in infobox or in body text 3869:Category:Minor planets discovered in 2001 3773:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Guide 3654:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Guide 5151:Category:Potentially hazardous asteroids 4958:Category:Discoveries by Nikolai Chernykh 3780:which I have neglected for a long time. 300:Category:Lists of stars by constellation 110: 4927:Category:Henry Draper Catalogue objects 3839:. How about we come to an agreement on 1260: 1008:List of historic comet close approaches 343:List of historic comet close approaches 5153:, since I created and populated it. 3817: 3665: 3285:Typed the wrong word. I actully meant 2945:Tom, I replied to what you just wrote 2320:any different? Finally, it seems that 1563: 782:I suppose equivalent/similar lists of 678:List of nearest stars and brown dwarfs 553:#Listification of nearby star navboxes 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4761:comet 34D/Gale would be sorted A0034. 4139:Talk:List of largest stars#EV Carinae 4116:Talk:List of largest stars#EV Carinae 4061:Talk:List of largest stars#EV Carinae 1391:for a new education linked effort -- 1039:List of intermediate mass black holes 7: 6284:has been revised four days ago, and 5465:for the others? As I pointed out at 4326:say about it? (I haven't read it) 4201:more than 500 asteroids discoveries. 4118:to keep the discussion centralized. 3741:ALTERNATE PROPOSAL: WPECLIPSE -: --> 3185:sub-project of WikiProject astronomy 1890:already exists as a #REDIRECT, so I 1874:I was able to move all but 2 pages: 1183:, the conversion looks right to me. 4933:? Seriously? How are these useful? 2938:was added to the redirect. Keeping 2306:Category:Asteroids named for people 2054:I found these exceptions buried in 6371:selective merge into that target. 5345:Misinformation on Commons mainpage 4195:I was disappointed when I noticed 3935:1b. have a clean dmy format (i.e. 3931:, which were only touched if they: 3753:WP:WikiProject Astronomical events 3652:When reading Graeme's link below ( 1897:made a speedy deletion request at 1680:justifies removal of the 'known'. 1235:Uppsala Southern Schmidt Telescope 1206:I have updated this SSS page, and 1100:be expanded to cover the K2IC? -- 708:DRAFT:Extremes of the Solar System 694: 24: 5469:"most asteroids" rate Low on the 5252:58,481 mainspace articles listed 5125:) so that all may participate. 4788:I hope others will see this too. 3143:. They may decide instead of me. 1773:: a candidate for a hypothetical 1576:List of most luminous known stars 1490:What template was vandalized? -- 1294:Winder, Jenny (5 November 2014). 1268:Safi, Michael (20 October 2014). 1035:List of least massive black holes 6240:- 500 hour rotation period (the 6177:improved, with the exception of 6160: 5226:New IAU Star and Exoplanet names 4849:using a bot-request. -- Cheers, 3871:(the only category of its kind) 3658:WP:AST#Constellations Task Force 3615:which would include things like 3484:WikiProject Astronomical objects 2844: 2407:I personally prefer the idea of 1884:List of most massive known stars 1763:User:Are you freaking kidding me 1646:is known (but hypothetical) and 1568:List of most massive known stars 1217:My main source is an article in 1166:Standard gravitational parameter 1159:Standard gravitational parameter 1031:List of most massive black holes 880:category:Albedo features on Mars 29: 6464:I support a selective merge of 6442:Hypothetical fifth giant planet 5232:Feel free to share your opinion 5149:As an example, I've done so on 3957:I also found a few pages whose 3727: 3724: 3721: 3718: 1139:There is a merge discussion at 4772:For other astronomical objects 4161:they do not; every year, many 3843:first, then I'll propagate? 2187:(current population = 1,605). 1: 6474:Telisto (hypothetical planet) 6438:Telisto (hypothetical planet) 6131:It's been over 2 weeks since 5543:22:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 5529:21:38, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 5478:21:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 5456:17:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC) 5426:16:57, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 5408:15:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 5392:15:37, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 5378:15:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC) 5363:20:45, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 5337:22:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC) 5298:21:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 5283:17:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 5239:03:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 5061:18:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC) 5042:16:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC) 5016:06:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 4995:04:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 4978:23:31, 16 December 2015 (UTC) 4943:17:50, 16 December 2015 (UTC) 4866:15:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC) 4837:15:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC) 4798:02:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC) 4660:15:12, 28 December 2015 (UTC) 4641:14:30, 28 December 2015 (UTC) 2479:List of minor planets: 1–1000 2253:19:21, 29 December 2015 (UTC) 2222:19:15, 29 December 2015 (UTC) 2171:It's been a few months since 2003:Timekeeping on Mars talk page 1541:07:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 1525:03:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 1500:07:46, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 1486:00:29, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 1469:23:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC) 1373:16:46, 28 November 2015 (UTC) 1358:09:49, 28 November 2015 (UTC) 1332:08:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC) 1193:17:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC) 1175:12:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC) 1063:FYI, active astronomy editor 800:Or extremes on other planets 760:List of solar system extremes 6609:18:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 6576:17:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC) 6556:19:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC) 6532: 6527:06:27, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 6507:01:53, 21 January 2016 (UTC) 6493:There is a merge discussion 6486:19:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 6454:19:20, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 6432:19:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 6418:18:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 6387:18:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 6363:18:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 6344:17:35, 20 January 2016 (UTC) 6309:18:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC) 6269:18:06, 19 January 2016 (UTC) 6154:21:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 5221:16:30, 17 January 2016 (UTC) 5111:04:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC) 4686:13:43, 19 January 2016 (UTC) 4609:00:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC) 4576:21:38, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4531:21:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4500:21:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4470:15:18, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4442:14:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4407:00:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4345:21:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC) 4312:07:49, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4292:00:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4267:22:55, 17 January 2016 (UTC) 4253:22:05, 17 January 2016 (UTC) 4232:21:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC) 4213:21:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC) 4190:21:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC) 4151:00:14, 18 January 2016 (UTC) 4128:21:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC) 4109:21:05, 16 January 2016 (UTC) 4086:07:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC) 4070:06:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC) 4046:22:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC) 4012:18:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC) 3894:14:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3862:05:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3790:08:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3767:07:10, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3736:21:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC) 3692:19:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3648:18:39, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3633:18:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3603:17:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3588:15:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3570:01:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3552:00:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3532:00:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3518:23:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3496:14:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3477:00:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC) 3457:23:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3441:22:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3406:22:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3370:22:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3340:21:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3314:21:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3299:20:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3281:19:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3267:16:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3253:03:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3226:02:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 3205:20:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 3178:08:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 3157:07:13, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 3129:00:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC) 3113:23:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC) 3040:20:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC) 2966:08:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC) 2302:Category:Main-belt asteroids 2030:featured article review here 1644:Vulcan (hypothetical planet) 1436:16:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 1416:featured article review here 1401:05:48, 6 December 2015 (UTC) 1153:11:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC) 1141:Talk:Alpha Centauri Bb#Merge 1129:00:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC) 1110:06:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC) 1087:06:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC) 980:04:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC) 966:Someone suggested using the 937:05:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC) 896:23:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC) 858:13:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC) 831:11:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC) 6542:discussion taking place at 6436:It can also be merged with 6326:led me to the existence of 6126:23:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC) 6095:22:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC) 6079:20:38, 6 January 2016 (UTC) 6056:11:04, 6 January 2016 (UTC) 5583: 5577:22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC) 5172:16:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 5144:16:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 5092:15:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 4919:15:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 4900:majority vote I believe. 4889:15:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 3961:category is this one, i.e. 3195:which I mentoined earlier. 3072:22:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 3013:04:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 2999:04:37, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 2949:on your talk page. Cheers, 2940:Category:Numbered asteroids 2912:04:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 2887:04:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC) 2851:Category:Numbered asteroids 2822:04:07, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 2768:16:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC) 2658:Category:Numbered asteroids 2546:Category:Numbered asteroids 2498:15:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC) 2459:20:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 2421:20:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 2409:Category:Numbered asteroids 2403:19:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 2376:22:15, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 2362:18:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 2347:18:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC) 2318:Category:Numbered asteroids 2296:17:33, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 2282:16:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 2185:Category:Numbered asteroids 2165:Category:Numbered asteroids 2154:22:52, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 2140:20:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 2117:20:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC) 2100:05:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC) 2045:09:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC) 2015:03:17, 8 January 2016 (UTC) 1989:22:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC) 1962:00:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC) 1939:23:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1924:15:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1876:List of largest known stars 1863:15:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1845:15:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1832:List of most luminous stars 1818:04:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1803:01:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1782:00:55, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1753:00:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC) 1726:21:01, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 1690:22:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 1670:20:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 1655:18:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 1636:15:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 1616:15:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 1601:15:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC) 1572:List of largest known stars 1552:Are you freaking kidding me 1379:WikiEd : Intro to astronomy 1051:00:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 1024:03:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 814:04:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC) 796:00:40, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 772:22:05, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 752:03:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 735:00:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 720:00:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 690:19:03, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 663:03:53, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 646:00:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC) 631:18:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 604:17:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 590:17:35, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 577:Ok. So far I've found this 565:13:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 542:03:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 524:03:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 504:03:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 481:03:09, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 437:03:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 427:Fine, I'll bring it below. 423:03:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 409:03:06, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 393:03:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 373:03:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 359:02:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 326:02:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 312:02:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 293:02:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC) 6625: 5446:is included. Best wishes, 3766:_Astronomical_Events": --> 3057:Large category TOC numeric 3052:Adding a template such as 2181:~19,200 numbered asteroids 1899:List of most massive stars 1888:List of most massive stars 1765:edited but did not rename 1741:Largest known prime number 1733:List of most massive stars 618:list of stars within 81 ly 6544:Talk:90377_Sedna#Odd_name 4947:In addition, most of the 2316:as a random example). Is 2062:and will put the rest up 2058:. I put 10 of them up at 2034:featured article criteria 1739:. For broader reference, 1420:featured article criteria 1245:Siding Spring Observatory 6561:Article Alerts archiving 6367:I agree with that, or a 6061:As a general rule, if a 5179:preliminary designations 4063:. Hope anyone responds! 4019:Of the 3,986 not in the 3826:text & infobox wrong 3322:doesn't appear on their 1929:I have moved those two. 695:Sol's Solar System lists 4555:WP:Notability (science) 3421:name one article whose 2230:6-digit entries too. 2079:3962 Valyaev (asteroid) 1767:List of brightest stars 530:List_of_brightest_stars 298:The various entries in 6472:, and also think that 6470:Planets beyond Neptune 6397:Planets beyond Neptune 6351:Planets beyond Neptune 6324:Planets beyond Neptune 6292:will be revised soon. 5195:Category:Minor planets 4985:about 1 view per day. 4355:WP:Notability (people) 4324:WP:Notability (people) 4025:Category:Minor planets 3987:Category:Minor planets 3975:Category:Minor planets 3971:Category:Minor planets 3949:No sortkey: There are 2228:{{DEFAULTSORT:000001}} 2056:Category:Minor planets 1974:Can someone check the 819:Draft:Extremes on Mars 4057:List of largest stars 3981:hierarchy, and 1,969 3944:|discovered=2000/5/05 3778:Time domain astronomy 2183:are not contained in 551:You can follow up on 281:List of minor planets 42:of past discussions. 6540:Sedna (minor planet) 6393:Journal of Cosmology 6044:Talk:10125 Stenkyrka 3093:WikiProject Eclipses 3017:Shortlist posted at 1851:Population III stars 1200:Siding Spring Survey 1117:Kepler Input Catalog 998:Another set of lists 821:has been started -- 680:sorted by apmag. -- 6280:for the follow-up, 5236:Philip Terry Graham 4829:exoplanetaryscience 4790:exoplanetaryscience 4456:We can't go around 3969:should include all 3814:exoplanetaryscience 3751:into a new project 3742:Astronomical Events 3609:Celestial mechanics 3189:Celestial mechanics 3097:Celestial mechanics 3005:exoplanetaryscience 2974:exoplanetaryscience 2173:exoplanetaryscience 1996:Timekeeping on Mars 1695:Good enough; seems 1250:Catalina Sky Survey 1227:Also updated re SSS 6234:should be removed) 6214:should be removed) 6036:Talk:10121 Arzamas 5723:(416151) 2002 RQ25 5536:Talk:501_Urhixidur 5511: 5506: 5501: 5496: 5463:easy way to search 5246:Category:Astronomy 3801:mass-sterilization 3664:'s main page says 3617:natural satellites 2542:(#####) YYYY Wwwww 2075:12820Robinwilliams 1701:Category:Astronomy 1240:Robert H. McNaught 1004:List of exoplanets 339:List of exoplanets 117:Other designation 6539:90377 Sedna : --> 6306: 6179:(32326) 2000 QO62 6123: 6040:Talk:10126 Lärbro 6028: 6027: 5656:(32326) 2000 QO62 5507: 5502: 5497: 5492: 5244:List of pages in 4975: 4863: 4051:New largest star? 3977:pages not in the 3873:for deletion here 3621:Lagrangian points 3062:could be useful. 2963: 2909: 2819: 2495: 2179:that most of the 2024:I have nominated 1976:contribution list 1892:submitted an RfD 1410:I have nominated 1346:talk:Solar System 1328: 1135:Alpha Centauri Bb 784:Extremes on Earth 336: 277: 276: 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6616: 6607: 6416: 6377: 6302: 6300: 6298: 6282:4607 Seilandfarm 6267: 6233: 6227: 6213: 6207: 6187:(386454) 2008 XM 6183:(374158) 2004 UL 6168: 6164: 6163: 6152: 6119: 6117: 6115: 5911:4607 Seilandfarm 5795:19980 Barrysimon 5700:(386454) 2008 XM 5678:(374158) 2004 UL 5633:(12921) 1998 WZ5 5584: 5559: 5509:4607 Seilandfarm 5471:Importance scale 5335: 5281: 5219: 5170: 5142: 5109: 5107: 5103: 5090: 5059: 5057: 5053: 4971: 4969: 4967: 4954:Nikolai Chernykh 4950: 4917: 4887: 4859: 4857: 4855: 4847: 4824: 4822: 4818: 4574: 4440: 4360:The basic rule ( 4343: 4302: 4243: 4044: 4010: 3973:, I found 3,986 3945: 3941: 3930: 3902:24% of existing 3892: 3860: 3837:, before I start 3819: 3729: 3726: 3723: 3720: 3711:WP:Wikiproject X 3690: 3420: 3396: 3236: 3153: 3061: 3055: 3038: 2997: 2959: 2957: 2955: 2905: 2903: 2901: 2885: 2855: 2848: 2847: 2815: 2813: 2811: 2766: 2491: 2489: 2487: 2457: 2439: 2401: 2345: 2280: 2251: 2229: 2220: 2198: 2189:This bot request 2138: 2113: 2098: 1960: 1922: 1724: 1626: 1599: 1523: 1521: 1517: 1482: 1467: 1465: 1461: 1326: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1306: 1291: 1285: 1284: 1282: 1280: 1265: 1172: 968:Mars quadrangles 939: 802:Extremes on Mars 705: 614: 576: 492: 460: 330: 111: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6624: 6623: 6619: 6618: 6617: 6615: 6614: 6613: 6586: 6583:WP:AAlerts/BUGS 6563: 6535: 6403: 6383: 6373: 6316: 6296: 6295: 6254: 6231: 6225: 6220:- the 10,000th 6211: 6205: 6161: 6159: 6139: 6113: 6112: 6107:4348 Poulydamas 5887:4348 Poulydamas 5863:25375 Treenajoi 5609:(12377) 1994 PP 5602:Namespace name 5553: 5521:Graeme Bartlett 5512: 5436: 5347: 5318: 5264: 5250: 5228: 5206: 5187:(3708) 1974 FV1 5157: 5129: 5105: 5099: 5098: 5077: 5055: 5049: 5048: 4987:Graeme Bartlett 4965: 4964: 4948: 4904: 4874: 4853: 4852: 4846:{{DEFAULTSORT}} 4845: 4820: 4814: 4813: 4694: 4625: 4561: 4427: 4330: 4308: 4298: 4249: 4239: 4224:Graeme Bartlett 4222:is applicable. 4158: 4053: 4031: 3997: 3943: 3939: 3928: 3879: 3847: 3803: 3782:Graeme Bartlett 3744: 3677: 3414: 3402: 3392: 3324:membership list 3230: 3149: 3121:Graeme Bartlett 3091:be merged with 3087:I propose that 3085: 3080: 3059: 3053: 3025: 2984: 2953: 2952: 2899: 2898: 2872: 2845: 2843: 2809: 2808: 2753: 2743:If I were given 2485: 2484: 2444: 2438:{{DEFAULTSORT}} 2437: 2388: 2328: 2259: 2234: 2227: 2203: 2196: 2175:brought up the 2169: 2125: 2115: 2111: 2085: 2052: 2022: 1999: 1972: 1947: 1943:Thank you :) 1931:Graeme Bartlett 1905: 1707: 1662:Graeme Bartlett 1632: 1622: 1582: 1560:Graeme Bartlett 1549: 1519: 1513: 1512: 1484: 1480: 1463: 1457: 1456: 1446: 1408: 1381: 1339: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1304: 1302: 1293: 1292: 1288: 1278: 1276: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1204: 1170: 1162: 1137: 1094: 1061: 1000: 930: 888:Graeme Bartlett 699: 697: 608: 570: 486: 454: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6622: 6620: 6612: 6611: 6562: 6559: 6534: 6531: 6530: 6529: 6514: 6513: 6512: 6511: 6510: 6509: 6462: 6461: 6460: 6459: 6458: 6457: 6456: 6381: 6315: 6312: 6307: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6271: 6245: 6235: 6215: 6191: 6190: 6129: 6128: 6124: 6098: 6097: 6082: 6081: 6026: 6025: 6022: 6021:20151230050727 6019: 6016: 6013: 6010: 6002: 6001: 5998: 5997:20151130184743 5995: 5992: 5989: 5986: 5978: 5977: 5974: 5973:20151230191446 5971: 5968: 5965: 5962: 5954: 5953: 5950: 5949:20151212101639 5947: 5944: 5941: 5938: 5930: 5929: 5926: 5925:20151230183858 5923: 5920: 5917: 5914: 5906: 5905: 5902: 5901:20151230161724 5899: 5896: 5893: 5890: 5882: 5881: 5878: 5877:20151212101639 5875: 5872: 5869: 5866: 5858: 5857: 5854: 5853:20151128101354 5851: 5848: 5845: 5842: 5836: 5835: 5832: 5831:20151214052604 5829: 5826: 5823: 5820: 5814: 5813: 5810: 5809:20151130184743 5807: 5804: 5801: 5798: 5790: 5789: 5786: 5785:20151223193710 5783: 5780: 5777: 5774: 5766: 5765: 5762: 5761:20151228195642 5759: 5756: 5753: 5750: 5742: 5741: 5738: 5737:20151227215638 5735: 5732: 5729: 5726: 5718: 5717: 5714: 5713:20151227221529 5711: 5708: 5705: 5702: 5696: 5695: 5692: 5691:20151227222626 5689: 5686: 5683: 5680: 5674: 5673: 5670: 5669:20151214061929 5667: 5664: 5661: 5658: 5652: 5651: 5648: 5647:20151230030949 5645: 5642: 5639: 5636: 5628: 5627: 5624: 5623:20151224105144 5621: 5618: 5615: 5612: 5604: 5603: 5600: 5597: 5594: 5591: 5588: 5582: 5581: 5580: 5579: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5515:There is also 5491: 5490: 5489: 5488: 5487: 5435: 5432: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5396: 5395: 5394: 5346: 5343: 5342: 5341: 5340: 5339: 5249: 5242: 5227: 5224: 5175: 5174: 5118: 5117: 5116: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5030:StringTheory11 5025: 5024: 5023: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 4976: 4922: 4921: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4894: 4893: 4892: 4891: 4864: 4782: 4781: 4778: 4774: 4773: 4769: 4768: 4767: 4766: 4762: 4757: 4756: 4752: 4751: 4747: 4744: 4737: 4731: 4727: 4726: 4725:For asteroids: 4720: 4719: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4693: 4690: 4689: 4688: 4663: 4662: 4627:Is astronomer 4624: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4581: 4580: 4579: 4578: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4509: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4502: 4477: 4476: 4475: 4474: 4473: 4472: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4385: 4365: 4348: 4347: 4320: 4319: 4318: 4317: 4316: 4315: 4314: 4306: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4247: 4234: 4171:variable stars 4157: 4154: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4131: 4130: 4094: 4052: 4049: 3963:170906 Coluche 3955: 3954: 3947: 3934: 3932: 3897: 3896: 3802: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3747:Merge/Convert 3743: 3739: 3703: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3576: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3554: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3498: 3423:subject matter 3409: 3408: 3400: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3326:and therefore 3318:It seems like 3255: 3211: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3207: 3132: 3131: 3084: 3081: 3079: 3078:Merge proposal 3076: 3075: 3074: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2964: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2820: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2771: 2770: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2694:Semi-proposal: 2676: 2675: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2602: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2520: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2496: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2423: 2284: 2168: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2109: 2107:The Bushranger 2051: 2048: 2021: 2018: 1998: 1994:Discussion at 1992: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1784: 1756: 1755: 1693: 1692: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1630: 1558:for "known"). 1548: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1528: 1527: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1478: 1476:The Bushranger 1445: 1439: 1407: 1404: 1380: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1338: 1337:"Solar System" 1335: 1313: 1312: 1300:SEN TV Limited 1286: 1259: 1258: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1247: 1242: 1237: 1231: 1230: 1228: 1203: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1161: 1156: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1093: 1090: 1060: 1058:User:Huritisho 1055: 1054: 1053: 1012:this NASA page 999: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 951: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 941: 940: 935:comment added 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 860: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 740:WP:NOTFINISHED 696: 693: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 452: 451: 450: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 375: 347:this NASA page 328: 275: 274: 271: 268: 265: 262: 257: 251: 250: 247: 244: 241: 238: 233: 227: 226: 223: 220: 217: 214: 209: 203: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 185: 179: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 161: 155: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 137: 131: 130: 127: 124: 121: 118: 115: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6621: 6610: 6605: 6601: 6597: 6593: 6589: 6584: 6580: 6579: 6578: 6577: 6573: 6569: 6560: 6558: 6557: 6553: 6549: 6548:Fyunck(click) 6545: 6541: 6537:Minor planet 6528: 6524: 6520: 6519:70.51.200.135 6516: 6515: 6508: 6504: 6500: 6496: 6492: 6489: 6488: 6487: 6483: 6479: 6475: 6471: 6467: 6463: 6455: 6451: 6447: 6443: 6439: 6435: 6434: 6433: 6429: 6425: 6421: 6420: 6419: 6414: 6410: 6406: 6402: 6398: 6394: 6390: 6389: 6388: 6385: 6384: 6378: 6376: 6370: 6366: 6365: 6364: 6360: 6356: 6352: 6348: 6347: 6346: 6345: 6341: 6337: 6333: 6329: 6325: 6321: 6313: 6311: 6310: 6305: 6301: 6293: 6291: 6287: 6286:666 Desdemona 6283: 6279: 6270: 6265: 6261: 6257: 6253: 6249: 6248:666 Desdemona 6246: 6243: 6239: 6236: 6230: 6223: 6219: 6216: 6210: 6203: 6199: 6196: 6195: 6193: 6192: 6188: 6184: 6180: 6176: 6172: 6167: 6158: 6157: 6156: 6155: 6150: 6146: 6142: 6138: 6134: 6127: 6122: 6118: 6110: 6108: 6104: 6101:The articles 6100: 6099: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6084: 6083: 6080: 6076: 6072: 6068: 6064: 6060: 6059: 6058: 6057: 6053: 6049: 6045: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6023: 6020: 6017: 6014: 6011: 6009: 6008: 6004: 6003: 5999: 5996: 5993: 5990: 5987: 5985: 5984: 5983:9359 Fleringe 5980: 5979: 5975: 5972: 5969: 5966: 5963: 5961: 5960: 5959:666 Desdemona 5956: 5955: 5951: 5948: 5945: 5942: 5939: 5937: 5936: 5932: 5931: 5927: 5924: 5921: 5918: 5915: 5913: 5912: 5908: 5907: 5903: 5900: 5897: 5894: 5891: 5889: 5888: 5884: 5883: 5879: 5876: 5873: 5870: 5867: 5865: 5864: 5860: 5859: 5855: 5852: 5849: 5846: 5843: 5841: 5838: 5837: 5833: 5830: 5827: 5824: 5821: 5819: 5816: 5815: 5811: 5808: 5805: 5802: 5799: 5797: 5796: 5792: 5791: 5787: 5784: 5781: 5778: 5775: 5773: 5772: 5771:15728 Karlmay 5768: 5767: 5763: 5760: 5757: 5754: 5751: 5749: 5748: 5744: 5743: 5739: 5736: 5733: 5730: 5727: 5725: 5724: 5720: 5719: 5715: 5712: 5709: 5706: 5703: 5701: 5698: 5697: 5693: 5690: 5687: 5684: 5681: 5679: 5676: 5675: 5671: 5668: 5665: 5662: 5659: 5657: 5654: 5653: 5649: 5646: 5643: 5640: 5637: 5635: 5634: 5630: 5629: 5625: 5622: 5619: 5616: 5613: 5611: 5610: 5606: 5605: 5601: 5598: 5595: 5592: 5589: 5586: 5585: 5578: 5574: 5570: 5566: 5562: 5557: 5552: 5551: 5550: 5549: 5544: 5541: 5537: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5526: 5522: 5518: 5514: 5513: 5510: 5505: 5500: 5499:666 Desdemona 5495: 5494:501 Urhixidur 5485: 5481: 5480: 5479: 5476: 5472: 5468: 5467:501 Urhixidur 5464: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5453: 5449: 5445: 5444:501 Urhixidur 5441: 5433: 5427: 5423: 5419: 5415: 5411: 5410: 5409: 5405: 5401: 5397: 5393: 5389: 5385: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5375: 5371: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5360: 5356: 5352: 5344: 5338: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5313: 5309: 5305: 5301: 5300: 5299: 5295: 5291: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5279: 5275: 5271: 5267: 5263: 5259: 5255: 5247: 5243: 5241: 5240: 5237: 5233: 5225: 5223: 5222: 5217: 5213: 5209: 5205: 5200: 5196: 5192: 5188: 5184: 5180: 5173: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5124: 5112: 5108: 5102: 5095: 5094: 5093: 5088: 5084: 5080: 5076: 5072: 5068: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5058: 5052: 5046: 5045: 5044: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5017: 5013: 5009: 5005: 5002: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4992: 4988: 4984: 4981: 4980: 4979: 4974: 4970: 4962: 4959: 4955: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4940: 4936: 4932: 4928: 4924: 4923: 4920: 4915: 4911: 4907: 4903: 4898: 4890: 4885: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4868: 4867: 4862: 4858: 4850: 4844: 4840: 4839: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4826: 4825: 4823: 4817: 4811: 4807: 4802: 4801: 4800: 4799: 4795: 4791: 4785: 4779: 4776: 4775: 4771: 4770: 4763: 4759: 4758: 4754: 4753: 4748: 4745: 4741: 4735: 4729: 4728: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4721: 4717: 4716: 4707: 4706: 4705: 4704: 4703: 4702: 4701: 4698: 4691: 4687: 4684: 4682: 4681: 4680:Modest Genius 4676: 4672: 4668: 4665: 4664: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4649: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4622: 4610: 4606: 4602: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4594: 4593: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4589: 4588: 4577: 4572: 4568: 4564: 4560: 4556: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4532: 4528: 4524: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4510: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4485: 4484: 4483: 4482: 4481: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4471: 4467: 4463: 4459: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4443: 4438: 4434: 4430: 4426: 4422: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4408: 4404: 4400: 4395: 4389: 4386: 4383: 4379: 4375: 4371: 4366: 4363: 4359: 4358: 4356: 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4346: 4341: 4337: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4313: 4310: 4309: 4303: 4301: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4280: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4276: 4275: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4251: 4250: 4244: 4242: 4235: 4233: 4229: 4225: 4221: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4210: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4187: 4183: 4178: 4176: 4172: 4168: 4164: 4155: 4153: 4152: 4148: 4144: 4140: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4117: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4097: 4096: 4093: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4083: 4079: 4074: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4068: 4067: 4062: 4058: 4050: 4048: 4047: 4042: 4038: 4034: 4030: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4013: 4008: 4004: 4000: 3996: 3992: 3988: 3984: 3980: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3960: 3952: 3948: 3938: 3926: 3923:sortkey="?": 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3915: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3895: 3890: 3886: 3882: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3833: 3831: 3827: 3823: 3815: 3811: 3808: 3800: 3797: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3779: 3774: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3763: 3759: 3754: 3750: 3746: 3745: 3740: 3738: 3737: 3734: 3732: 3731: 3730: 3712: 3707: 3693: 3688: 3684: 3680: 3676: 3671: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3650: 3649: 3645: 3641: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3600: 3596: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3553: 3549: 3546: 3543: 3539: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3521: 3520: 3519: 3515: 3511: 3507: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3485: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3471: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3459: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3447: 3444: 3443: 3442: 3438: 3435: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3418: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3407: 3404: 3403: 3397: 3395: 3389: 3388: 3371: 3367: 3364: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3320:User:Casliber 3317: 3316: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3302: 3301: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3284: 3283: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3256: 3254: 3250: 3247: 3244: 3240: 3234: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3212: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3175: 3172: 3169: 3165: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3154: 3152: 3146: 3142: 3141:User:Casliber 3138: 3134: 3133: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3119:disappeared. 3117: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3082: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3058: 3051: 3041: 3036: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3010: 3006: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2962: 2958: 2950: 2948: 2944: 2943: 2941: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2913: 2908: 2904: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2862: 2859: 2856: 2854: 2852: 2823: 2818: 2814: 2806: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2769: 2764: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2659: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2622: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2603: 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2566: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2506: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2494: 2490: 2482: 2480: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2399: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2373: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2315: 2314:9005 Sidorova 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2283: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2224: 2223: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2174: 2166: 2163: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2114: 2112:One ping only 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2071:12818Tomhanks 2068: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2047: 2046: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2019: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1997: 1993: 1991: 1990: 1986: 1982: 1977: 1970:Alert message 1969: 1963: 1958: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1936: 1932: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1895: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1833: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1819: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1788: 1783: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1634: 1633: 1627: 1625: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556:contributions 1553: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1516: 1511: 1510:twitter feed. 1507: 1506: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1481:One ping only 1477: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1460: 1454: 1451: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1405: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1336: 1334: 1333: 1330: 1329: 1323: 1322: 1301: 1297: 1290: 1287: 1275: 1271: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1251: 1248: 1246: 1243: 1241: 1238: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1222: 1221: 1215: 1213: 1209: 1201: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1173: 1167: 1160: 1157: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1091: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1066: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043:70.51.202.113 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 997: 981: 977: 973: 969: 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 954: 953: 952: 938: 934: 928: 924: 919: 918: 917: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 897: 893: 889: 885: 884:template:Mars 881: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 869: 868: 859: 855: 851: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 832: 828: 824: 820: 817: 816: 815: 811: 807: 806:70.51.202.113 803: 799: 798: 797: 793: 789: 788:70.51.202.113 785: 781: 780: 773: 769: 765: 761: 758: 755: 754: 753: 749: 745: 744:70.51.202.113 741: 738: 737: 736: 732: 728: 724: 723: 722: 721: 717: 713: 712:70.51.202.113 709: 703: 692: 691: 687: 683: 679: 664: 660: 656: 652: 649: 648: 647: 643: 639: 638:70.51.202.113 634: 633: 632: 628: 624: 620: 619: 612: 607: 606: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 591: 587: 583: 579: 574: 569: 568: 567: 566: 562: 558: 554: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 526: 525: 521: 518: 515: 511: 507: 506: 505: 501: 497: 490: 485: 484: 483: 482: 478: 475: 472: 468: 464: 458: 438: 434: 430: 426: 425: 424: 420: 416: 412: 411: 410: 406: 402: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 390: 387: 384: 380: 376: 374: 370: 366: 362: 361: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 334: 333:edit conflict 329: 327: 323: 319: 315: 314: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 296: 295: 294: 290: 286: 282: 272: 269: 266: 263: 261: 258: 256: 253: 252: 248: 245: 242: 239: 237: 234: 232: 229: 228: 224: 221: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 204: 200: 197: 194: 191: 189: 186: 184: 181: 180: 176: 173: 170: 167: 165: 162: 160: 157: 156: 152: 149: 146: 143: 141: 138: 136: 133: 132: 129:Stellar type 128: 125: 122: 119: 116: 113: 112: 109: 102: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6564: 6538: 6536: 6490: 6400: 6380: 6374: 6368: 6331: 6317: 6314:Planet Nine? 6275: 6251: 6224:discovered ( 6165: 6136: 6130: 6103:1000 Piazzia 6029: 6005: 5981: 5957: 5933: 5909: 5885: 5861: 5793: 5769: 5747:1000 Piazzia 5745: 5721: 5631: 5607: 5596:Size (Bytes) 5504:1000 Piazzia 5461:Is there an 5437: 5348: 5315: 5311: 5307: 5303: 5261: 5251: 5229: 5203: 5198: 5178: 5176: 5154: 5126: 5119: 5074: 5070: 5066: 5026: 4901: 4871: 4786: 4783: 4739: 4733: 4730:For default: 4699: 4695: 4679: 4626: 4558: 4424: 4353:In general, 4327: 4305: 4299: 4246: 4240: 4179: 4159: 4136: 4098: 4095: 4090: 4065: 4054: 4028: 4016: 4015: 3994: 3958: 3956: 3936: 3917: 3916: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3898: 3876: 3867:I've listed 3844: 3836: 3834: 3818:|discovered= 3807:considerable 3804: 3771:Please read 3717: 3716: 3705: 3704: 3674: 3670:pretty close 3669: 3544: 3469: 3433: 3422: 3399: 3393: 3362: 3327: 3286: 3245: 3213: 3170: 3150: 3086: 3022: 2981: 2869: 2865: 2863: 2860: 2857: 2849: 2842: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2693: 2620: 2583: 2541: 2504: 2441: 2435: 2385: 2381: 2325: 2258:Fine by me. 2231: 2225: 2200: 2170: 2122: 2082: 2066: 2063: 2053: 2023: 2000: 1973: 1944: 1902: 1891: 1873: 1736: 1704: 1694: 1629: 1623: 1579: 1550: 1447: 1409: 1382: 1342:Solar System 1340: 1325: 1320: 1317: 1303:. Retrieved 1289: 1277:. Retrieved 1274:The Guardian 1273: 1263: 1255: 1220:The Guardian 1218: 1216: 1211: 1207: 1205: 1163: 1138: 1095: 1071: 1062: 1001: 756: 698: 675: 616: 550: 516: 473: 453: 385: 278: 267:+03 56 47.4 264:00 00 04.35 243:-40 35 28.4 240:00 00 02.39 219:-51 53 36.8 216:00 00 02.01 195:+38 51 33.4 192:00 00 01.20 171:-19 29 55.8 168:00 00 00.91 147:+01 05 20.4 144:00 00 00.22 106: 78: 43: 37: 6466:Planet Nine 6424:Praemonitus 6355:Praemonitus 6328:Planet Nine 6320:recent edit 6087:Praemonitus 5599:Last change 5370:Praemonitus 5290:Praemonitus 5181:only (i.e. 5101:Davidbuddy9 5067:contributor 5051:Davidbuddy9 4935:Praemonitus 4816:Davidbuddy9 4755:For comets: 4740:provisional 4700:PROPOSALS: 4675:WP:ACADEMIC 4633:Dirtlawyer1 4601:Praemonitus 4462:Praemonitus 4282:necessary. 4101:Praemonitus 4066:SkyFlubbler 3758:70.51.44.60 3749:WP:ECLIPSES 3640:Praemonitus 3595:Praemonitus 3562:Praemonitus 3558:WP:SNOWBALL 3510:Praemonitus 3306:Praemonitus 3287:appropriate 3273:Praemonitus 3218:Praemonitus 3137:User:Irockz 3064:Praemonitus 2584:##### Wwwww 2368:Praemonitus 2167:Maintenance 2146:Praemonitus 1761:Given that 1682:Praemonitus 1678:WP:CRITERIA 1533:70.51.44.60 1515:Davidbuddy9 1492:70.51.44.60 1459:Davidbuddy9 1393:70.51.44.60 1350:70.51.44.60 1305:27 November 1279:25 November 1121:Davidbuddy9 1102:70.51.44.60 1092:Kepler EPIC 1079:70.51.44.60 972:70.51.44.60 931:—Preceding 923:70.51.44.60 850:70.51.44.60 823:70.51.44.60 528:There is a 304:Praemonitus 36:This is an 6405:Tom.Reding 6278:Tom.Reding 6256:Tom.Reding 6229:Notability 6209:Notability 6141:Tom.Reding 6067:wp:substub 6024:(Artikel) 6000:(Artikel) 5976:(Artikel) 5952:(Artikel) 5928:(Artikel) 5904:(Artikel) 5880:(Artikel) 5856:(Artikel) 5834:(Artikel) 5812:(Artikel) 5788:(Artikel) 5764:(Artikel) 5740:(Artikel) 5716:(Artikel) 5694:(Artikel) 5672:(Artikel) 5650:(Artikel) 5626:(Artikel) 5434:Notability 5400:Lithopsian 5351:this image 5320:Tom.Reding 5266:Tom.Reding 5208:Tom.Reding 5159:Tom.Reding 5131:Tom.Reding 5079:Tom.Reding 4906:Tom.Reding 4876:Tom.Reding 4843:magic word 4765:D1993F02K. 4629:Adam Frank 4563:Tom.Reding 4553:Note that 4429:Tom.Reding 4332:Tom.Reding 4322:What does 4167:supernovae 4033:Tom.Reding 3999:Tom.Reding 3881:Tom.Reding 3849:Tom.Reding 3822:text wrong 3679:Tom.Reding 3613:astrometry 3193:astrometry 3101:astrometry 3027:Tom.Reding 2986:Tom.Reding 2874:Tom.Reding 2755:Tom.Reding 2446:Tom.Reding 2390:Tom.Reding 2330:Tom.Reding 2236:Tom.Reding 2205:Tom.Reding 2127:Tom.Reding 2087:Tom.Reding 1949:Tom.Reding 1907:Tom.Reding 1709:Tom.Reding 1584:Tom.Reding 1450:Pioneer 11 1442:Pioneer 11 1385:WT:PHYSICS 1256:References 95:Archive 25 90:Archive 24 85:Archive 23 79:Archive 22 73:Archive 21 68:Archive 20 60:Archive 15 6198:2002 LT38 6171:Rfassbind 6063:main-belt 5818:2002 LT38 5593:Namespace 4812:, etc.). 4492:Astro4686 4421:WP:NASTRO 4399:Astro4686 4388:WP:ANYBIO 4284:Astro4686 4182:Astro4686 4017:Update 2: 3706:Comments: 3625:MartinZ02 3580:MartinZ02 3538:Cas Liber 3524:MartinZ02 3488:MartinZ02 3463:Cas Liber 3449:MartinZ02 3427:Cas Liber 3417:MartinZ02 3356:Cas Liber 3352:MartinZ02 3350:. Listen 3332:MartinZ02 3291:MartinZ02 3259:MartinZ02 3239:Cas Liber 3233:MartinZ02 3197:MartinZ02 3164:Cas Liber 3105:MartinZ02 2696:Ideally, 1448:The page 1444:Vandalism 1412:Enceladus 1406:Enceladus 1318:Regards, 1065:Huritisho 764:Huritisho 727:Huritisho 702:Huritisho 623:Huritisho 582:Huritisho 534:Huritisho 510:Cas Liber 496:Huritisho 467:Cas Liber 457:Huritisho 415:Huritisho 379:Cas Liber 365:Huritisho 318:Huritisho 285:Huritisho 236:HD 224705 212:HD 224707 188:HD 224699 164:HD 224690 140:HD 224700 6596:contribs 6588:Headbomb 6499:Primefac 6336:Primefac 6299:fassbind 6242:Asteroid 6218:2013 MZ5 6204:status ( 6175:Huntster 6116:fassbind 6012:48821860 5988:16440830 5940:17239270 5916:16631307 5892:16477144 5868:27865029 5844:39802716 5840:2013 MZ5 5822:32092341 5776:16453366 5728:33375541 5704:42140070 5682:42139260 5660:48579512 5638:33336219 5614:48580415 5328:contribs 5274:contribs 4968:fassbind 4856:fassbind 4738:1b. For 4734:numbered 4732:1a. For 4652:Gronk Oz 4623:Notable? 4382:WP:BLP1E 4378:WP:BLP1E 4374:WP:BLP1E 4370:WP:BIO1E 4362:WP:BASIC 3912:articles 3904:articles 3810:prodding 3668:, which 3556:I think 3548:contribs 3473:contribs 3446:Aquarius 3437:contribs 3366:contribs 3249:contribs 3174:contribs 3147:dixit. ( 2956:fassbind 2902:fassbind 2812:fassbind 2702:manually 2621:##### WW 2488:fassbind 2338:contribs 2269:contribs 2261:Headbomb 2244:contribs 2213:contribs 2064:tomorrow 2007:Primefac 1915:contribs 1886:because 1771:SCP 06F6 1717:contribs 1697:WP:SNOWy 1648:Coronium 1592:contribs 1365:Primefac 1185:Primefac 1145:Fdfexoex 1075:contribs 1016:Primefac 520:contribs 489:Casliber 477:contribs 429:Primefac 401:Primefac 389:contribs 351:Primefac 260:LP 524-8 6600:physics 6446:Kheider 6440:and/or 6290:6498 Ko 6238:6498 Ko 6071:Kheider 6007:U (TNO) 5964:3033052 5935:6498 Ko 5800:6797683 5752:3037590 5590:Page ID 5561:Catscan 5248:updated 5183:1991 BA 4671:WP:PROF 4667:WP:PROF 4523:Geogene 4259:Kheider 4205:Kheider 3985:not in 3900:Update: 2978:Kheider 2924:Thanks! 2413:Kheider 2354:Kheider 2288:Kheider 2273:physics 1855:Gap9551 1837:Gap9551 1745:Gap9551 1608:Kheider 1208:several 1181:Elmidae 1171:Elmidae 933:undated 682:Kheider 651:WP:SIZE 39:archive 6491:Notice 6478:A2soup 6304:– talk 6185:, and 6121:– talk 6048:Boleyn 6032:CAT:NN 5448:Boleyn 5440:CAT:NN 5185:, not 5123:WT:AST 5008:A2soup 4973:– talk 4861:– talk 4488:WP:GNG 4458:WP:GNG 4220:WP:GNG 4175:comets 4143:A2soup 4120:A2soup 4078:A2soup 3662:WP:AST 3348:am now 3214:Oppose 3145:Rursus 2961:– talk 2907:– talk 2817:– talk 2747:making 2493:– talk 2028:for a 1981:Ninney 1882:; and 1574:, and 1414:for a 1212:wasn't 270:12.31 249:G8III 123:DEdms 120:RAhms 6604:books 6568:8bitW 6444:. -- 5587:Title 5556:Mu301 5540:mikeu 5475:mikeu 5308:could 5106:Talk 5056:Talk 4821:Talk 4163:novae 3908:pages 3812:from 2698:every 2505:still 2277:books 2177:point 2026:Venus 2020:Venus 1815:mikeu 1795:AYFKM 1779:mikeu 1652:mikeu 1520:Talk 1464:Talk 1428:DrKay 1202:(SSS) 494:etc. 273:M0V: 255:HIP 6 246:8.55 231:HIP 5 222:8.06 207:HIP 4 198:6.61 183:HIP 3 174:9.27 159:HIP 2 135:HIP 1 126:Vmag 114:Star 16:< 6592:talk 6572:talk 6552:talk 6523:talk 6503:talk 6495:here 6482:talk 6450:talk 6428:talk 6413:dgaf 6409:talk 6375:Reyk 6369:very 6359:talk 6340:talk 6288:and 6276:Thx 6264:dgaf 6260:talk 6166:Done 6149:dgaf 6145:talk 6105:and 6091:talk 6075:talk 6052:talk 6018:1284 5994:1624 5970:1713 5946:3042 5922:2268 5898:3720 5874:1637 5850:1675 5806:2163 5782:1664 5758:3268 5734:3227 5710:2032 5688:2337 5666:2196 5644:1969 5620:2496 5573:talk 5538:. -- 5525:talk 5452:talk 5422:talk 5418:Stas 5414:here 5404:talk 5388:talk 5384:Stas 5374:talk 5359:talk 5355:Stas 5332:dgaf 5324:talk 5294:talk 5278:dgaf 5270:talk 5258:here 5256:and 5254:here 5216:dgaf 5212:talk 5199:rare 5167:dgaf 5163:talk 5139:dgaf 5135:talk 5087:dgaf 5083:talk 5012:talk 4991:talk 4939:talk 4914:dgaf 4910:talk 4884:dgaf 4880:talk 4833:talk 4794:talk 4656:talk 4648:here 4637:talk 4605:talk 4571:dgaf 4567:talk 4527:talk 4496:talk 4466:talk 4437:dgaf 4433:talk 4403:talk 4372:and 4340:dgaf 4336:talk 4300:Reyk 4288:talk 4263:talk 4241:Reyk 4228:talk 4209:talk 4186:talk 4147:talk 4124:talk 4105:talk 4082:talk 4041:dgaf 4037:talk 4007:dgaf 4003:talk 3993:. 3959:only 3889:dgaf 3885:talk 3875:. 3857:dgaf 3853:talk 3786:talk 3762:talk 3687:dgaf 3683:talk 3644:talk 3629:talk 3619:and 3611:and 3599:talk 3584:talk 3566:talk 3542:talk 3528:talk 3514:talk 3492:talk 3467:talk 3453:talk 3431:talk 3394:Reyk 3360:talk 3336:talk 3310:talk 3295:talk 3277:talk 3263:talk 3243:talk 3222:talk 3201:talk 3191:and 3168:talk 3151:bork 3139:and 3125:talk 3109:talk 3099:and 3068:talk 3035:dgaf 3031:talk 3021:. 3009:talk 2994:dgaf 2990:talk 2947:here 2882:dgaf 2878:talk 2763:dgaf 2759:talk 2454:dgaf 2450:talk 2417:talk 2398:dgaf 2394:talk 2372:talk 2358:talk 2342:dgaf 2334:talk 2292:talk 2265:talk 2248:dgaf 2240:talk 2217:dgaf 2209:talk 2193:here 2150:talk 2135:dgaf 2131:talk 2095:dgaf 2091:talk 2042:Anon 2038:here 2011:talk 1985:talk 1957:dgaf 1953:talk 1935:talk 1919:dgaf 1911:talk 1901:. 1894:here 1880:here 1859:talk 1841:talk 1799:talk 1749:talk 1721:dgaf 1713:talk 1686:talk 1666:talk 1624:Reyk 1612:talk 1596:dgaf 1588:talk 1537:talk 1496:talk 1432:talk 1424:here 1397:talk 1387:and 1383:See 1369:talk 1354:talk 1307:2015 1281:2015 1189:talk 1149:talk 1125:talk 1106:talk 1098:K1IC 1083:talk 1069:talk 1047:talk 1020:talk 1006:and 976:talk 927:talk 892:talk 882:and 878:See 854:talk 827:talk 810:talk 792:talk 768:talk 748:talk 731:talk 716:talk 686:talk 659:talk 655:Izno 642:talk 627:talk 611:Izno 600:talk 596:Izno 586:talk 573:Izno 561:talk 557:Izno 538:talk 514:talk 500:talk 471:talk 433:talk 419:talk 405:talk 383:talk 369:talk 355:talk 341:and 322:talk 308:talk 289:talk 225:F0V 177:K3V 150:9.1 6468:to 6382:YO! 6322:to 6222:NEO 6202:PHA 6173:or 6133:mfb 5828:970 5569:mfb 4709:so. 4307:YO! 4248:YO! 4055:At 3951:352 3942:or 3937:not 3925:109 3401:YO! 3328:not 3155:!) 2866:But 2382:non 1631:YO! 1348:-- 1321:220 1041:-- 929:) 201:B9 153:F5 6602:/ 6598:/ 6594:/ 6585:. 6574:) 6554:) 6525:) 6505:) 6484:) 6452:) 6430:) 6361:) 6353:. 6342:) 6332:is 6318:A 6232:}} 6226:{{ 6212:}} 6206:{{ 6200:- 6181:, 6093:) 6077:) 6054:) 6042:, 6038:, 5575:) 5527:) 5454:) 5424:) 5406:) 5390:) 5376:) 5361:) 5353:? 5312:if 5304:un 5296:) 5234:! 5071:ex 5040:) 5036:• 5014:) 5006:. 4993:) 4941:) 4929:? 4835:) 4808:, 4796:) 4658:) 4639:) 4607:) 4529:) 4498:) 4468:) 4405:) 4290:) 4265:) 4230:) 4211:) 4188:) 4173:, 4169:, 4165:, 4149:) 4126:) 4107:) 4084:) 3914:. 3824:, 3788:) 3764:) 3646:) 3631:) 3601:) 3586:) 3568:) 3550:) 3530:) 3516:) 3494:) 3486:. 3475:) 3455:) 3439:) 3368:) 3346:I 3338:) 3312:) 3297:) 3289:. 3279:) 3265:) 3251:) 3224:) 3203:) 3176:) 3127:) 3111:) 3070:) 3060:}} 3054:{{ 3011:) 2976:, 2419:) 2374:) 2360:) 2308:, 2304:, 2294:) 2275:/ 2271:/ 2267:/ 2152:) 2073:, 2067:if 2040:. 2013:) 1987:) 1937:) 1861:) 1843:) 1801:) 1793:-- 1751:) 1688:) 1668:) 1614:) 1570:, 1539:) 1498:) 1434:) 1426:. 1399:) 1371:) 1356:) 1327:of 1298:. 1272:. 1191:) 1151:) 1127:) 1108:) 1085:) 1049:) 1037:, 1022:) 978:) 894:) 856:) 829:) 812:) 794:) 770:) 750:) 733:) 718:) 688:) 661:) 644:) 629:) 602:) 588:) 563:) 540:) 522:) 502:) 479:) 435:) 421:) 407:) 391:) 371:) 357:) 324:) 310:) 291:) 64:← 6606:} 6590:{ 6570:( 6550:( 6521:( 6501:( 6480:( 6448:( 6426:( 6415:) 6411:⋅ 6407:( 6401:~ 6357:( 6338:( 6297:R 6266:) 6262:⋅ 6258:( 6252:~ 6151:) 6147:⋅ 6143:( 6137:~ 6114:R 6089:( 6073:( 6050:( 6015:0 5991:0 5967:0 5943:0 5919:0 5895:0 5871:0 5847:0 5825:0 5803:0 5779:0 5755:0 5731:0 5707:0 5685:0 5663:0 5641:0 5617:0 5571:( 5558:: 5554:@ 5523:( 5486:. 5450:( 5420:( 5402:( 5386:( 5372:( 5357:( 5334:) 5330:⋅ 5326:⋅ 5322:( 5316:~ 5292:( 5280:) 5276:⋅ 5272:⋅ 5268:( 5262:~ 5218:) 5214:⋅ 5210:( 5204:~ 5169:) 5165:⋅ 5161:( 5155:~ 5141:) 5137:⋅ 5133:( 5127:~ 5089:) 5085:⋅ 5081:( 5075:~ 5038:c 5034:t 5032:( 5010:( 4989:( 4966:R 4949:] 4937:( 4916:) 4912:⋅ 4908:( 4902:~ 4886:) 4882:⋅ 4878:( 4872:~ 4854:R 4831:( 4792:( 4654:( 4635:( 4603:( 4573:) 4569:⋅ 4565:( 4559:~ 4525:( 4494:( 4464:( 4439:) 4435:⋅ 4431:( 4425:~ 4401:( 4368:( 4342:) 4338:⋅ 4334:( 4328:~ 4286:( 4261:( 4226:( 4207:( 4184:( 4145:( 4122:( 4103:( 4080:( 4043:) 4039:⋅ 4035:( 4029:~ 4009:) 4005:⋅ 4001:( 3995:~ 3946:) 3929:] 3891:) 3887:⋅ 3883:( 3877:~ 3859:) 3855:⋅ 3851:( 3845:~ 3784:( 3760:( 3728:w 3725:o 3722:n 3719:S 3689:) 3685:⋅ 3681:( 3675:~ 3642:( 3627:( 3597:( 3582:( 3564:( 3545:· 3540:( 3526:( 3512:( 3490:( 3470:· 3465:( 3451:( 3434:· 3429:( 3419:: 3415:@ 3363:· 3358:( 3334:( 3308:( 3293:( 3275:( 3261:( 3246:· 3241:( 3235:: 3231:@ 3220:( 3199:( 3171:· 3166:( 3123:( 3107:( 3066:( 3037:) 3033:⋅ 3029:( 3023:~ 3007:( 2996:) 2992:⋅ 2988:( 2982:~ 2954:R 2900:R 2884:) 2880:⋅ 2876:( 2870:~ 2810:R 2765:) 2761:⋅ 2757:( 2751:~ 2706:2 2486:R 2456:) 2452:⋅ 2448:( 2442:~ 2415:( 2400:) 2396:⋅ 2392:( 2386:~ 2370:( 2356:( 2344:) 2340:⋅ 2336:⋅ 2332:( 2326:~ 2312:( 2290:( 2279:} 2263:{ 2250:) 2246:⋅ 2242:⋅ 2238:( 2232:~ 2219:) 2215:⋅ 2211:⋅ 2207:( 2201:~ 2197:] 2148:( 2137:) 2133:⋅ 2129:( 2123:~ 2097:) 2093:⋅ 2089:( 2083:~ 2009:( 1983:( 1959:) 1955:⋅ 1951:( 1945:~ 1933:( 1921:) 1917:⋅ 1913:⋅ 1909:( 1903:~ 1857:( 1839:( 1797:( 1747:( 1723:) 1719:⋅ 1715:⋅ 1711:( 1705:~ 1684:( 1664:( 1610:( 1598:) 1594:⋅ 1590:⋅ 1586:( 1580:~ 1535:( 1494:( 1430:( 1395:( 1367:( 1352:( 1309:. 1283:. 1187:( 1147:( 1123:( 1104:( 1081:( 1072:· 1067:( 1045:( 1018:( 974:( 925:( 890:( 852:( 825:( 808:( 790:( 766:( 746:( 729:( 714:( 704:: 700:@ 684:( 657:( 640:( 625:( 613:: 609:@ 598:( 584:( 575:: 571:@ 559:( 536:( 517:· 512:( 498:( 491:: 487:@ 474:· 469:( 459:: 455:@ 431:( 417:( 403:( 386:· 381:( 367:( 353:( 335:) 331:( 320:( 306:( 287:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Archive 22 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index