81:
63:
183:
32:
91:
633:
I am not critisising the good intentions but really, I think that RGTC is a unique technical achievement for its time and therefore actually of notable "importance" (as would be the first outside broadcast for example - although of a higher level when taken into historical technological perspective).
687:
Hi, I have mentioned this elsewhere, but could an assessment criteria of specific people within the organisation be drawn up. For example, where do news readers or notable news editors (thinking Nick
Robinson here) fit into the big scheme of things? The presenter of a popular programme then and now?
533:
I think that basicly all articles that are part of the project have been assessed now (Mostly by TheIslander) . The main problem I am seeing is that there are hundreds of articles that have not been added into the project! I think that when people come to look at this page to help assess pages, they
574:
Well, I had a bit of an empty day, so I've gone through the entire list and assessed everything that wasn't assessed, so we now have a completely assessed project. Not only that, but I found a way of kick-starting the bot to re-calculate everything right now, so what you see in front of you are the
629:
I think the reasons for this are clear. The subjective views of "someone who happens to think something" ... are exactly what we want to avoid in
Knowledge (XXG). In fact what is labelled as important is actually "currently high profile in the entertainment industry as relates to the BBC." I will
403:
I believe that there is an error in the template. Should there not be an 'importance' parameter? It worked when I added it, but I have not saved the changes as I don't know weather it is right or not....
548:
I'm not sure, I've got a feeling that's covered by the project's main page already - this page is just for assessment really, not for adding new topics. Others might disagree, though.
505:
Oh of course some of them won't apply, but some will; for instance, a channel needs a channel infobox. I've looked through the coding of the template, but I can't find the answer...
630:
therefore remove the template in the above mentioned page soon - although I am happy to enter into discussion about this and hope you can persuade me otherwise.
651:
328:
655:
263:
716:
711:
634:
I am not asking for it to be regraded, promoted or anything. Simply remove the banner until you achieve either of the objectives above.
289:
721:
17:
688:
At the moment the lines are unclear and a quite diverse array of importance has occured. Can something be drawn up and agreed on?
313:
626:
A. Have objective criteria for importance. OR B. Change your labelling system to reflect what exactly is meant by "importance".
534:
will look for the unassessed articles, see they are all assessed and go and do somethine elce! Maybe a big notice might help :P
195:
43:
597:
246:
274:
238:
145:
113:
104:
68:
357:
299:
282:
49:
345:
488:
Good question :P Are BBC articles even required to have info boxes? Some of the parameters may not apply.
341:
206:
576:
549:
506:
468:
419:
620:
602:
536:
490:
406:
295:
697:
676:
641:
608:
590:
563:
542:
520:
496:
482:
433:
412:
224:
693:
234:
256:
467:
For example, say an article needs an infobox, how do I put that in? Neither "yes" nor "y" work.
307:
361:
648:
660:
638:
444:
OK, I feel really stupid asking this, but how exactly do I use the following parameters?
689:
182:
80:
62:
705:
278:
230:
418:
I've just added the importance parameter - you're quite right, it should be there.
352:
117:
96:
86:
658:. Any more questions, feel free to add them below. Sorry for any confusion.
270:
252:
210:
337:
108:, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the
623:. I would suggest you remove this until you do the following:
368:
202:
109:
25:
647:
The assessment refers to the imortance of the program within
333:
Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
213:
to Good
Article status following previous reviews, create
116:
where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the
596:
Great work! I have been through all of the articles on
215:
171:
166:
161:
156:
269:
Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance:
112:. If you would like to participate, please visit the
619:I see that a low importance has been applied to
42:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
219:(in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
190:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
141:
57:
654:. The assessment criteria can be found
59:
7:
600:list and added and assessed them :)
31:
29:
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject BBC
233:- references and general clean-up,
48:It is of interest to the following
575:correct stats as of this message.
371:following improvements to article.
102:This page is within the scope of
24:
181:
89:
79:
61:
30:
126:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject BBC
683:Assessment criteria for People
329:BBC articles without infoboxes
1:
698:22:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
677:19:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
642:15:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
570:Assessment backlog dealt with
216:BBC Computer Literacy Project
275:BBC World Service Television
241:- unreferenced and confusing
239:BBC World Service Television
609:21:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
591:20:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
564:20:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
543:19:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
521:21:36, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
497:21:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
483:20:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
434:18:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
413:13:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
738:
717:NA-importance BBC articles
712:Project-Class BBC articles
324:*Restructure the category
237:- over-detailed and long,
140:
74:
56:
722:WikiProject BBC articles
283:BBC Two Northern Ireland
129:Template:WikiProject BBC
451:collaboration-candidate
346:Coat of arms of the BBC
314:Stub-Class BBC articles
440:How to work Parameters
615:Subjective Assessment
327:Add infoboxes to the
207:BBC News (TV channel)
637:I await your input.
621:Rock Goes To College
296:Criticism of the BBC
148:for WikiProject BBC:
235:Pebble Mill Studios
454:past-collaboration
336:Add references to
257:Broadcasting House
44:content assessment
396:
395:
392:
391:
388:
387:
384:
383:
380:
379:
729:
675:
672:
669:
665:
605:
588:
582:
561:
555:
539:
518:
512:
493:
480:
474:
431:
425:
409:
218:
196:Article requests
185:
178:
177:
142:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
99:
94:
93:
92:
83:
76:
75:
65:
58:
35:
34:
33:
26:
737:
736:
732:
731:
730:
728:
727:
726:
702:
701:
685:
670:
667:
661:
659:
617:
603:
584:
583:
578:
572:
557:
556:
551:
537:
531:
514:
513:
508:
491:
476:
475:
470:
460:old-peer-review
442:
427:
426:
421:
407:
401:
376:
214:
176:
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
105:WikiProject BBC
95:
90:
88:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
735:
733:
725:
724:
719:
714:
704:
703:
684:
681:
680:
679:
616:
613:
612:
611:
577:
571:
568:
567:
566:
550:
530:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
507:
500:
499:
469:
465:
464:
461:
458:
455:
452:
449:
441:
438:
437:
436:
420:
400:
399:Template Error
397:
394:
393:
390:
389:
386:
385:
382:
381:
378:
377:
375:
374:
373:
372:
365:
348:
334:
331:
316:
303:
285:
259:
242:
220:
189:
187:
186:
175:
174:
169:
164:
159:
153:
150:
149:
138:
137:
135:
101:
100:
84:
72:
71:
66:
54:
53:
47:
36:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
734:
723:
720:
718:
715:
713:
710:
709:
707:
700:
699:
695:
691:
682:
678:
674:
673:
664:
657:
653:
650:
646:
645:
644:
643:
640:
635:
631:
627:
624:
622:
614:
610:
607:
606:
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
589:
587:
581:
569:
565:
562:
560:
554:
547:
546:
545:
544:
541:
540:
528:
522:
519:
517:
511:
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
495:
494:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
479:
473:
463:needs-infobox
462:
459:
456:
453:
450:
447:
446:
445:
439:
435:
432:
430:
424:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
410:
398:
370:
366:
363:
359:
355:
354:
349:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
330:
326:
325:
323:
321:
317:
315:
312:
310:
309:
304:
301:
297:
294:
292:
291:
286:
284:
280:
279:BBC Lifestyle
276:
272:
268:
266:
265:
260:
258:
254:
251:
249:
248:
243:
240:
236:
232:
231:Chucklevision
229:
227:
226:
221:
217:
212:
208:
204:
200:
198:
197:
192:
191:
188:
184:
180:
179:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
154:
152:
151:
147:
144:
143:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
107:
106:
98:
87:
85:
82:
78:
77:
73:
70:
67:
64:
60:
55:
51:
45:
41:
37:
28:
27:
19:
686:
666:
662:
636:
632:
628:
625:
618:
601:
585:
579:
573:
558:
552:
535:
532:
515:
509:
489:
477:
471:
466:
443:
428:
422:
405:
402:
362:See comments
358:Good article
351:
319:
318:
306:
305:
300:See comments
288:
287:
262:
261:
245:
244:
223:
222:
194:
193:
132:BBC articles
114:project page
103:
50:WikiProjects
40:project page
39:
652:Wikiproject
604:Tiddly Tom
538:Tiddly Tom
492:Tiddly Tom
457:peer-review
408:Tiddly Tom
706:Categories
353:Dad's Army
342:assessment
118:BBC Portal
97:BBC portal
690:Rafmarham
448:attention
367:Reassess
271:BBC Japan
586:Islander
559:Islander
529:Problem!
516:Islander
478:Islander
429:Islander
253:BBC News
247:Copyedit
211:BBC News
201:Improve
350:Return
338:Goa Mix
225:Cleanup
162:history
663:Tiddly
344:) and
264:Expand
46:scale.
639:Candy
356:to a
340:(see
320:Other
308:Stubs
172:purge
167:watch
146:Tasks
38:This
16:<
694:talk
656:here
649:this
598:this
290:NPOV
209:and
157:edit
671:Tom
580:The
553:The
510:The
472:The
423:The
369:BBC
360:. (
203:BBC
123:BBC
110:BBC
69:BBC
708::
696:)
281:,
277:,
273:,
255:,
205:,
692:(
668:-
364:)
322::
311::
302:)
298:(
293::
267::
250::
228::
199::
120:.
52::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
