Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Biography/Military/Archive 1

2120:. First off, you can do one search and net both recommendations and actual awards in one go, rather than search for awards in one spot and recommendations in another. I find this a time saver. In one way, however, the results aren't quite as friendly and may result in broken links in some articles. You used to be able to get on one page each award for a particular person and all the details associated with those awards. With this new search engine you can still get a list of all the awards but you then have to enter each record to see all the details that you used to get for all awards on the one page. For those of us who have included links to such pages in WP articles, the link will now simply take you to the search engine. I don't think this is a disaster by any means, as most people link to the London Gazette for each award citation, but it's as well to be aware. The good news is that links to AWM recommendation PDFs still appear to work as before. Cheers, 1421:"As part of a larger project on WW1 Aces, I am gradually populating the UK list with additional names. In terms of notability, not every ace will justify a future article of their own (discussed at WP Military History Talk Pages), so these additions will not always have a Wiki-Link. I propose also to break the Wiki-Links for existing names where it appears that the individual concerned MAY not merit a full article in their own right. The link can always easily be re-established and the effect on the table hopefully will be to tidy it up a bit. Happy to listen to any comments anybody wants to make on this. Scoop100 13:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC) 1402:

in a previous incarnation as a list. Somebody somewhere combined it and, IMO, created the types of problems that you have now identified. That's not to say that the list before being combined was perfect - I don't think it was. I have taken the liberty of copying messages which I left on the talk page of the previous WWI flying ace list. I had a helpful response from Panth at the time, so left things 'on hold' for a while. Not long after that, the whole thing got changed.

1915:

was battlefield commissioned. This latter alone makes him unusual, and is probably connected to some major bravery in battle, of course. Also, because the war crimes were never tried, it makes knowledge of him even less of a notable event, as you point out, making merging into the main article seem more usable. However, as the acting task force leader and battlefield commissioned, he should be individually be mentioned in the Tiger Force article. --

1475:

Cockade', which specialises in WWI aviation, is continuously publishing new material as sources come to light. In that sense, the lack of available documentation for the 'lesser' Aces as of now doesn't mean that that will always be the case. Who knows, in years to come there could be resources coming available which may throw further light on any or all of these guys. But, its still sensible at this juncture to have the cut-off at 20, I think.

35: 64: 2036:). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found 999:

that were used in formulating an article, and therefore, an editor who "fact checked" by finding a corollary source or who read material from that source in order to better understand the topic, can list that source as useful. The particular deletions of reference sources added by a very experienced editor, and a reputable researcher and contributor to the aviation project group, is also problematic. What do you think? FWiW

430:

consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.

2929: 1487:

opinion therefore was that it wasn't worth pursuing expansion of the list. Different people, different opinions – the best people really to make the judgements are those who are close to the action on the particular subject. None better than your good self, on this one. I'm therefore not proposing to leave messages for the other people you sent to – but it'll be good to see what they come up with.

663:

on providing decoration in an infobox where discussion by other users and editors have concluded that it is inappropriate, you are acting in contravention of the group's wishes. As you have already concluded, Knowledge (XXG) does not have "hard-and-fast" rules but it does have a standard of conduct. If you noted that flagcruft was an issue already from other edits, why add it again? IMHO

779:

file so that I could add the info from these sources to the Burbeck page. I do have an image of his signature from the web and I don't think signatures are copywritten, but I am unsure. I would like to add it to the page. Could someone advise me? Also, I would like to make this an A class article can someone tell me what changes I could make to get it to that point.

1479:

WP lose the opportunity, one day in the future, to have an article if and when the supporting documentation becomes available. That's just my particular hobby-horse; I realise that what you're suggesting doesn't mean any loss of what's already there. We just have to be practical at the moment and I think that's what your suggestions certainly are.

742:. There is some serious problem with some IPs trying to vandalize the articles as they say it is all fiction. I have placed references on the talkpage that were previously deleted by the same IPs elsewhere. The article appears notable and can be sourced with these articles but you might have access to other sources shedding more light on the issue. 537: 512: 491: 470: 51: 2252:. Since the article falls under the scope of this project, I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! 1272:. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 Editorial team, 1164:

credit yourself with 'This user helped promote the article -- to good article status' template if the article does go up to GA status. Please try to get this information down before 7 days from now, as that is when the GA review will probably be closed. Thank you in advance. More details can be found at

2726:(UBLPs) aims to reduce the number of unreferenced biographical articles to under 30,000 by June 1, primarily by enabling WikiProjects to easily identify UBLP articles in their project's scope. There were over 52,000 unreferenced BLPs in January 2010 and this has been reduced to 35,715 as of May 1. A 2675:

listed, most articles did not exist a couple of days ago, and one that did was a stub... so I've filled in the gaps, and tried to get everything at least past "stub" (to "start") class, expanding or enhancing or tidying up some of the rest along the way, for instance creating disambiguation pages for

1482:

3.I'm afraid I wouldn't really have the skills or know-how to do the splitting of the lists. You could leave a message on the Talk page of the WikiProject Military history/Military aviation task force; or maybe talk to one of the Administrators again who could put you in touch with an expert in that

1020:

An ==External links== or ==Further reading== or ==Bibliography== section is placed near the end of an article and offers books, articles, and links to websites related to the topic that might be of interest to the reader. The section "Further reading" may include both online material and material not

1914:

would probably suffice. The article needed something done with it, but I don't mind what more experienced editors working in this area do with it. The information I added is sourced and directly related to him as the acting platoon leader, I cleared up his rank, and included the information the he

1486:

4. Just on the role of the Adminstrators/Co-ordinaors, some time ago I asked a related question on the Talk Pages of the Miltary Aviation Project (I'm afraid I haven't been able to find it again, to show you); at that stage, the Project Co-ordinator thought that not all Aces would be notable and his

1474:

1.The cut-off point at 20 victories is good – at present. I think you're right about availability of documentary evidence being a problem for Aces below that number. Having said that, it seems to me that there is more and more documentation surfacing in this field. The UK publication 'Cross &

1478:

2.I agree with Trevor MacInnis, that in a sense all of the WWI Aces are notable. When one looks at all the (IMO) trivial other bios on WP, any recognised WWI Flying Ace, it seems to me, potentially justifies a WP article. OK, there may not be enough material at present, but I wouldn't like to see

1401:

Thanks for including me amongst the recipients of your messages about changing the list a bit. I'm OK with all that you say, in terms of splitting the list up. It will (already has?) become quite unwieldy, so splitting by nationality is fine by me. The only thing is: it was split similar to that

998:

does not make this distinction although I do know that a number of editors firmly believe that if a reference source was not used in a citation then it should be eliminated, or failing that, put in a "for further reading" section. Bibliographies are intended to be a listing of all reference sources

662:

My comment: "Removed flag icons as per WP:FLAGCRUFT; please do not revert, adding flagcruft is considered vandalism" probably should have been succinctly written as "may be considered vandalism". Moreover, since this is not the first time that you have been informed of flagcruft and your insistence

1490:

5.As regards the contributions I left at the Talk page for the 'old' list, I'm again not too sure how you get back to there. I can only suggest following the link at the bottom of the last message I sent to you – hopefully you'll get back to where the 'Redirect' comes from; then click the tab for

1426:

Further to comment as above, some of the Aces listed for other nations are also presently wikilinked but similarly may not eventually merit a full article, in terms of their notability. Again I'd propose to break the wikilinks as necessary and work towards tidying the whole list up. Still happy to

1362:

It can be seen that all the nationalities that had fighter aces are represented. Most list between 10% and 20% of their aces as scoring 20 or more victories. Those that don’t show the weakness of their air effort—the Russian and Austro-Hungarian air forces were mal-organized and the Americans were

1304:

I believe some version of the present list should be preserved, even if it is presently large enough to be slow loading on dialup connections and on older servers. However, I do think the list could be trimmed to a shorter, quicker loading version than the present one without damaging its value. I

851:

useful if they have need of making a reference to the London Gazette. It will help to present such references in a uniform style, and consitent use will also make it easier to maintain these references in future (we currently have the situation where a website upgrade a couple of months ago broke

778:

Is it possible for one of this project's leaders to visit Henry Burbeck's page. That is the first Knowledge (XXG) page I have done or should say carried the torch on. I added substantial information there and references. Also, can someone tell me how to properly cite a letter and also a pension

1676:

3) We already have some national lists, such as the Canadian list, so any nationalities not yet covered should be split out for equity's sake. And I am not suggesting splitting out the Prussians or the Austrians or the Irish, for cripes sake. And again, links from the retitled root article to the

722:

The question is are flags part of the infobox or not? In the category of Canadian Prime Ministers, I went through all of the Prime Ministers of Canada and there are no other flags in any of the infoboxes, except in the Pearson article. The aforementioned editor has now reverted the changes in the

1292:

Site at present is 644 names loading as 96 kilobytes, with the present cutoff point being 10 or more victories (with a few listings for lower scores). This is approximately a third of the total 1861 World War I aces. It becomes apparent that Trevor MacInnis’s concept of listing all the aces in a

1163:

is currently on GA hold. The article requires more information about Nivelle's life, especially concerning his legacy, and his pre-WW1 service, before it can become GA-class. I would like to request that people work on addressing this issue. Your help would be greatly appreciated, and you can

429:

are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please

760:

comments about flags in the info boxes. In particular they add little to military (and other) biographies and are often misleading, historically inaccurate, or even ideologically motivated. For example, most RN officers have had these national flags added to the extent that anglo-irish have the

1769:

Not as far as I am aware, unless you picked an article that only needed an infobox. That is not to say that this work is not valuable, it is just not covered by the contest department which is about rewarding article development. You would probably get a barnstar off me for doing it though! ;)

1609:

When I listed out the nationalities list above, I did not realize it would be taken as an attempt to break up the United Kingdom list. The purpose of the list was to insure that persons of certain ethnic backgrounds (Scots, Irish, Welsh, Canadian, South African, New Zealanders) could see that

1982:

His American Civil War service seems reasonably-well documented (there's more that I haven't yet added), but all I can find for his War of 1812 service is that he attained the rank of brigadier general during that war; nothing about what campaigns or battles he was involved in, what units he

1623:

And I am not breaking the list up. Even if I had the technical skill, I would still be here asking for suggestions. Seems to me Knowledge (XXG) works by the principle that a roomful of ordinary folks are collectively smarter than Einstein. I am honoring that principle. (And I do believe that

1452:

In the second category, there could be the facility to record a few details of the Ace, if these are available. But principally the purpose would be just to retain a list by nationality with the bare bones of name, Unit no., and number of victories. If ever the decision is made that there is

1300:

I believe the list as constituted has a very real value. Scanning it gives an idea of the contribution of each nation’s fighter pilots. It also gives an idea of the relative strengths or weaknesses of the air services of the various nations. Other concepts, such as the contributions of the

2279:, I've created the article, but I'm WikiProject Rugby Union, not military, so the article may need work. I'm looking for information on why he was awarded the Military Cross, and his second Bar on his DSO, when he took control of the tanks during the Battle of Arnhem. Thanks in advance. 1373:

England, with 595 aces, comprises a complete list near the size of the one we now have. However, without the Country column with its graphics, I intuit the site size would be tolerable. (Your opinion on this would be most welcome; you are probably more knowledgeable than I on this.)

1432:

Regarding the merger of these two lists, I’m wondering if in doing that, we could actually at the same time introduce some changes. Not all Aces, in truth, would justify a full WP article either from the point of view of notability or the availability of sufficient information.

1125:

with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 scheme! For the

1862:? I have objected to destructive editing by a bot which is deleting all the BD templates and providing birthdate, and death date categories with defaultsort without any discussion. (Note I am not a member of this project). Peterkingiron (talk) 23:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1054:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are 970:

came to the throne AFAICT there would be a royal army for campaigns financed by the English Parliament, but did he and the rest of the Stuarts have Royal armies and navies or different ones for different nations? If they were not national based then what were they?

197: 1293:

single table is impossible, as site size will burgeon to about 250 KB. I have halted expansion of the list and previously discussed this with him, and he suggested breaking out the list by nationalities, or by listing them alphabetically by last name. (Details on

1929:

I agree completely with that. Merging would be the best option. It would be appropriate to mention Mr Hawkins by name in that article as he's mentioned in the book and provide any background on him which is appropriate, but he shouldn't have his own article.

2338:

This includes a page to view the results for projects, including the in-progress results from the current month. Currently this can only show the results from a single project in one month. Features to see multiple projects or multiple months may be added

312:

is an excellent idea, but only for formal military organizations and particularly those in the West? Aside from a lack of data, it is very common in my area of expertise (China) to have no clear answers to just about every one of the items in the infobox.

201: 1197:, which, per a talk page template, falls under this Wikiproject; while we will certainly not be the only ones editing the article during this time, if anyone here is interested in the article and would like to join our effort, we use the IRC room 1530:

I think it is worth a try George creating the national index and changing this to a 20 or more it would not cause any problems (although I still have an issue with splitting out England/Wales/Scotland/Ireland when they are really one country!) .

618:, there are flag icons placed in the infobox. In the WikiAircraft Project Group, wherein I have made the majority of my contributions, there was a consensus that the infobox was not to include the flag symbols to portray country status/origins. 1405:

As you're doing such fantastic work on the list, its obviously in very good hands, and I'm happy with however you'd wish to proceed. I'm happy to help in whatever way you'd like. Meanwhile - here's the text of the messages referred to above.

193: 1958:

who served during the American Revolutionary War. I've got a handful of sources that each provide a little bit of information, but I need some help fleshing it all out into something truly worth reading about. Any help is appreciated!

1575:

The article is already three times the Knowledge (XXG) recommended size, and it is only a third done. There are about 1150 names still to be listed to complete the list. If all the names are added, it will become largely inaccessible.

673:

Why add it again? Probably because people are removing it based on a nonexistent policy. Removing flags because you think they're cruft is akin to moving article names to the British or American spelling because you like it better.

1549:

I would urge you not to change the cutoff to 20 victories. Yes the page is big but not intolerably so, even on a dialup. Besides, what list titled "List of World War I Flying Aces" would leave out Luke, Immelmann and Lufbery? :)

881:, a prolific designer of flags, heraldry and insignia for the US military. I call attention to it here so that he can get some help getting it more into line with the MOS. He's a first-time editor, so be gentle. Thanks. -- 1305:

also believe the complete listing envisioned by Trevor is of historic value. We are on the brink of becoming the most complete archive extant on this subject; www.theaerodrome.com is presently pre-eminent, in my estimation.

1690:

And, I am realizing in this process of thinking out loud, that the present list might have to be filled out and promptly split. However, some more technically advanced person probably has a better perspective on that than

336: 2900: 2738: 1893:? (the most recent biography in your edit history). If he's only known for unproven allegations(?) of war crimes then he should probably be covered in an article on those war crimes rather than have an article - see: 613:

I posted in the Biography" Politics an government workgroup but received no responses to my question so I am positn here as the historical figure in question does have a military background. In the biography article,

994:, with the edit notes that the additions were made by a non-contributing editor. The main contention was that the reference source had not appeared in the "notes" section and therefore was automatically suspect. 1582:

Luke, Immelman, and Lufbery would still be listed; in fact, Lufbery would probably be listed twice, in both the French and American air services. And certainly all three are notable enough to rate a biography.

1103: 1096: 1369:

If the entire list of 1861 aces was also broken down into separate national lists by the above nationalities, they would also be small, easily loadable pages with two possible exceptions: England and Germany.

1257:, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with 688:"It may be tempting to use flag icons in the birth/death information in a biographical article's introduction and/or infobox, but this is strongly deprecated." "Not intended" is pretty clear as policy. 3056: 290:

to priority=Top. He's not on the core bios list but that doesn't matter, as the priority is only for the workgroups and Lennon is no doubt top priority/importance in the arts & entertainment field.

2684:". More eyes are always welcome. Please check my work, spot errors, find areas for improvement, etc. These are still woefully short articles. Can we find more details? Illustrations? Other features? 2059:, which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the 1754:

I'm going to focus on systematically adding Military Person Infoboxes to bio articles that lack them. Would this work be eligible for the Contest Department? I'm unclear how that would be scored. --

1242:. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at 1663:

2) Have links on that retitled list to complete lists of aces of the various flying services: British, German, Austro-Hungarian, Australian Flying Corps, Italian, Belgian, French, and American.

2734:

and have been tagged by a WikiProject. Note that the bot does NOT place unreferenced tags or assign articles to projects - this has been done by others previously - it just compiles a list.

1859: 3086: 2345:

There is also a form to request a change to the configuration for a project. Currently the configurable options are the size of the on-wiki list and the project subpage used for the list.

2404:. HMSO. 1879. Apparently, Elizabeth Willan had attempted to serve Temple with two writs in connection with a bond for £400. He "threw them on the ground and spurned them with his foot". 2840: 1114:. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. 1258: 1874:

tooth comb, add references, also, if possible. I don't know if he's living, just read part of the book at VA, but assume he is, and that it requires high level of check. Thanks. --

1077: 1122: 1264:

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at

1579:

I do not propose to eliminate any possible biographies, regardless of an ace's victory total. Others are suggesting non-coverage of some aces because of non-notability; I am not.

1910:

Minor detail. You read minds it seems, so why bother telling you what article.... Thanks for looking and figuring it out. Yes, merging the information into the article about

1080:, we at the Knowledge (XXG) 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at 2880:. I have tried, and failed, to come up with any reliable third party references to support the text. As a Chief of Staff in the Somali Army, I believe he should meet the 2220: 1987:, but I don't normally deal that much with military history and I'm just not sure where to look. Can anyone recommend some possible sources for such information? Thanks, 1081: 2052: 1059: 21: 527:(Caption reads: This user will dine on MREs as soon as they offer varieties such as "Foie gras de canard aux truffes".) Code: {{User:EReference/Userbox MRE French}} 2067:

to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Knowledge (XXG):PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at

548:(Caption reads: This user knows that MREs owe their famed longevity to the fact that even bacteria will not touch the stuff.) Code: {{User:EReference/Userbox MRE}} 417:, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding 1791: 1115: 2843:

is not heavily populated, and wondered whether someone with military history expertise might like to see if that section of the article could be expanded? --

723:

infobox a number of times so he may be trying to make a point, but I would like to hear some comments from other editors versed in the biography format. IMHO

941: 561:, has been nominated for deletion. Is there a location that this should be listed, to draw the attention of the WikiProject participants to the debate? -- 2752:

Your assistance in reviewing and referencing these articles is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please don't hestitate to ask either at

441: 361:. These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages: 358: 274:

Importance params should be removed (not an urgent task, just don't use importance= from now and on change any you see to priority= if you feel like it)

1051: 2994: 42: 1194: 1247: 2397:

up to good article standard. As part of this I need page numbers for references to a couple of publications to which I do not have ready access.

459:

The editors here might be interested in several new userboxes devoted to the glories of the U.S. military's finest culinary achievement, the MRE:

1228: 1127: 295: 261: 80: 17: 2884:

but this is not my area of expertise. I'm posting here in the hope that someone in this project might like to take an interest in the article.--

2246:

for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed

810: 2697: 2540: 1453:

sufficient information, and notability is established clearly enough, to transfer across to the first list, then that wouldn’t be a problem."

1380:

Consider it an unsolicited staff study with recommendations for a solution. In other words, there may be some more improving ideas out there.

2855: 1092:

represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.

395: 2524: 2056: 2048: 908: 2602: 2516: 1055: 1047: 426: 377: 3028:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments

2714:

Would someone take a quick look at this one please and in particular the question I posed on the talk page re the merchant navy? Thanks.

2742: 2457: 2194: 1521: 332: 157: 122: 110:

Just a note so everyone is aware: the category structure and naming conventions have been the subject of much discussion (most recently

2802:. The article's a bit stubby (just what I could cull from a couple of obits), so any help expanding it would be very much appreciated. 1023:

so they do not have to be used as sources in the writing to be added to Bibliography just that the might be of interest to the reader.

170:

This scheme is, however, open to further discussion; anyone who has some ideas is encouraged to start up a comprehensive discussion at

2783: 2493: 937: 821: 401: 277:

importance/priority is no longer assessed on a Project scale, except for the ~200 top core articles which use a new parameter core=yes

2998: 2021: 1311:

If the cutoff point is 20 victories or more, and the list is truncated, then the various nationalities of aces are represented thus:

1227:

is a collection of English Knowledge (XXG) articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The

502:(Caption reads: This user has eaten MREs and earned a Purple Heart as a consequence.) Code: {{User:EReference/Userbox MRE Survivor2}} 2636: 2261: 921: 422: 192:, we now have the assessments split into work groups to make things easier to digest! What does this mean? Well, now we have a nice 2025: 1858:

I suspect that many of those who use this page are writing or editing biographical articles. Could I encourage peopel to look at

196:

that shows not only the quality scale, but also any comments left in the project banner template. Also, you'll notice we now have

167:

There will then be a large number of intersecting sub-categories, primarily of the form "Military personnel of X in the Y War".

418: 2219:, who is a retired US Army Command Sergeant Major, is currently split down the middle. Editors who wish to comment can do so at 2068: 2651: 2453: 1308:

I have been mulling this over for some time (obviously), and fiddling with figures. Here is what I have come up with thus far.

1283: 945: 794: 389: 264:

the importance= field has been changed on the Project template. The changes and how they affect this workgroup are as follows:

2188: 2731: 2660: 2645: 2594: 2585: 2576: 2567: 2093: 1063: 976: 357:

is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing

2986: 2940: 2918: 2876:

has been tagged as an "unreferenced BLP" since May 2008. I came across the article as May 2008 is the current focus for the

1979: 371: 214:

How come only 1 FA is listed in the work list when there are six more on the main work-group page? And where are the GAs? --

142: 2899:

This book appears to have a chapter on the subject, but unfortunately it is not available in preview view on Google books:

644:

As an argument it carries much more weight than simply putting flag icons for the heck of it. It's worth a read for sure.--

2677: 2627: 2618: 2610: 761:

Republic's flag. Similarly colonial officers sometimes will have the US flag, and British officerds the wrong union flag.

407: 365: 2990: 2176: 1243: 383: 152: 118:

will probably attempt a comprehensive standardization of names in the near future. The expected structure is, broadly:

3072: 3041: 3014: 2911: 2893: 2860: 2811: 2765: 2701: 2544: 2505: 2465: 2441: 2426: 2383: 2311: 2288: 2265: 2232: 2202: 2166: 2129: 1996: 1968: 1939: 1924: 1905: 1883: 1848: 1824: 1809: 1779: 1763: 1744: 1722: 1707: 1594: 1559: 1540: 1503: 1415: 1391: 1276: 1224: 1214: 1177: 1149: 1066: 1032: 1008: 980: 926: 891: 865: 831: 768: 746: 727: 702: 692: 678: 667: 657: 648: 639: 629: 603: 565: 448: 434: 343: 322: 302: 236: 227: 218: 208: 178: 2681: 2559: 2157:

in WW2, little is known on his post-WW2 years - not even a reliable year of death. Please help with RS on the latter!

1239: 137: 3032:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. 2037: 2033: 2011: 2002: 1794:, a great many of them within the scope of this task force. If you have a little free time, could help out please? -- 1016: 995: 481:(Caption reads: This user has eaten MREs and lived to tell the tale.) Code: {{User:EReference/Userbox MRE Survivor}} 2907: 2693: 2536: 2414:

Is there some kind soul who has ready access to either of these publications who can let me know the page numbers?

2276: 2180: 1198: 592: 71: 2109:

Guys, this will primarily be of interest to those working on biographical articles of Australian service folk...

2020:

subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering

1460: 2851: 2746: 2523:" (of which title each holder has been addressed as "Lord Byron" in his own turn)? Currently under discussion at 2437: 2422: 1713:

Dont have a problem with your proposal of a 20 limit and I think that lists by the flying services is good idea.

1265: 1111: 1050:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 972: 440:

Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now moved the new draft in the old

1610:

representation was still maintained even though the list was bobbed. I made nice, and it has backfired slightly.

599:, who were imprisoned there. Feel free to check it out and if you want to help out, I will be most grateful! -- 413:

and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at

171: 111: 3029: 2829: 2527:. Many of the other Lords Byron were military or naval officers and are also under this work-group's topic. 2029: 2496:

for full instructions on how to use the banner, or feel free to ask any questions on the banner's talk page.

271:

priority= is the same as importance, it's just a friendlier word. The meanings of the grades haven't changed.

46:

page is an archive, log collection, or currently inactive page; it is kept primarily for historical interest.

2461: 2248: 2198: 1836: 1740: 1703: 1590: 1517: 1387: 1294: 542:

This user knows that MREs owe their famed longevity to the fact that even bacteria will not touch the stuff.

233: 215: 2753: 1509: 782: 764:

For example, why should there be flags in the info box for Nelson? I would like to see a consensus on this

2184: 1208: 845: 127: 3002: 1190: 622: 445: 431: 3063:

is now open; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks!

2903: 2791: 2741:. Currently you have approximately 237 articles to be referenced. Other project lists can be found at 2325:

The "importance" ranking (for projects that use it) will be included in the lists along with assessment.

2307: 2284: 2257: 2141: 1718: 1536: 1269: 1173: 1028: 917: 824: 2687: 2555:

And again mentioning assorted officers among these (Admiral, General, Lt.Col. with DSO, Captain, Lt.):

2530: 1894: 1203: 2363:

Bugs and feature requests should be reported using the Toolserver's bug tracker for "alexz's tools" -

1366:

At any rate, the 187 aces that scored 20 or more victories would thus comprise a list of about 28 KB.

1169: 414: 3010: 2973: 2844: 2807: 2787: 2486: 2472: 2433: 2418: 2299: 2216: 2209: 2154: 1491:

the 'History' of the 'redirected' page & that should show the contributions I, and others, made.

1183: 853: 251: 2873: 2866: 1021:

available online. If all recommended material is online, the section may be titled "External links".

786: 576: 354: 115: 3037: 2350:

The on-wiki list should be generated and posted in a more timely and consistent manner than before.

2146: 1964: 1920: 1879: 1759: 1165: 861: 790: 175: 2877: 3068: 2761: 2374: 2125: 1736: 1699: 1586: 1513: 1499: 1411: 1383: 952: 889: 444:

pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you.

318: 2948: 2881: 2723: 339:. Please leave your comments and help us address and maintain this article's featured quality. 2778:

Hi, I've just written a new article which may be of interest to members of this project. It is

1572:

Please take the time to read my proposal thoroughly. You are missing several important points:

2969: 2833: 2708: 2411:

which records the knighting of Temples father (Sir Alexander Temple) at Tower Hill in 1603/4.

1992: 1795: 1273: 1141: 956: 739: 615: 2727: 2098: 2017: 911:. all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks!-- 2825: 2817: 2303: 2280: 2253: 2228: 2117: 2080: 1935: 1901: 1714: 1650:

1) Keep the present list down to the 20 victory mark. Retitle it to reflect its new reality.

1555: 1532: 1024: 991: 955:

are there categories for England Scotland Wales and Ireland, it does not make sense to have

913: 765: 2956: 2153:) and while there are tons of resources on his stunts of 1930s, and some on his command of 3025: 3006: 2936: 2922: 2889: 2803: 1820: 1775: 1232: 743: 621:

When the flags were removed in the Pearson article, it triggered the following exchange:

584: 340: 806:

Is there a military web site where I can search for an officer's awards and decorations?

3033: 2955:

While all contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

2501: 2243: 1960: 1955: 1916: 1875: 1755: 1160: 1155:

Article on Robert Nivelle on GA hold: Needs expansion before it can become GA standard.

1004: 960: 878: 871: 857: 828: 580: 2456:

is under a rename discussion to pick the best article name for Admiral Jackie Fisher.

1289:(Being an attempt to have our cake, eat it also, and maybe get a little extra icing.) 3080: 3064: 3060: 3048: 2757: 2478:

Please note that priority assessments for this work group are now added by using the

2371: 2162: 2121: 2088: 2079:

to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome

1890: 1889:

I think that you forgot to include a link to the article you're referring to - is it

1844: 1495: 1407: 1099:, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects. 990:

Recently, an editor has been removing reference notes in the bibliography section of

963:

as military stubs of the UK. Are there are such stub templates for the England, etc?

882: 807: 699: 675: 654: 636: 314: 299: 280:

this means that the priority= ratings are now for the exclusive use of the workgroups

189: 1449:

In the first category, every named Ace would have a wiki-link to their own article.

1246:. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at 2795: 2779: 2771: 2394: 2342:

This includes a new interface for making requests to add a new project to the list.

1988: 1131: 698:

That's a quote from WP:FLAGCRUFT. It is not a quote from Knowledge (XXG) policy.

588: 558: 1254: 1443:

World War 1 Flying Aces – Not Listed as Principal Combatant or Otherwise Notable

2671: 2520: 2321:

There are a few important changes to the popular pages system. A quick summary:

2224: 2076: 1931: 1911: 1897: 1551: 1043: 645: 626: 600: 562: 287: 224: 205: 79:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2302:

and am soliciting other editors' input, edits, and corrections to the article.

591:. This project aims to cover the castle and all the notable prisoners, such as 200:

for this workgroup displayed on the workgroup page, and you also now have your

2885: 2150: 1816: 1771: 2979:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2824:

I have just finished shortish starter article on the British Labour Party MP

940:

is for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland , what about

284:

The workgroups are free to work out their own "importance" (priority) ratings

2497: 2402:

Appendix to the 7th Report of the Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts

1733:

The above list is now populated with all 1,861 known aces from World War I.

1000: 967: 820:

There is a proposal at Wikiproject stub sorting about the best way to split

757: 724: 689: 664: 398:, (note: This page will be retitled to more accurately reflect its contents) 2364: 1461:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:List_of_World_War_I_flying_aces_by_nationality

2739:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography/Military biography/Unreferenced BLPs

2332: 1363:

latecomers. The other exception, the English, still have a large listing.

2799: 2158: 1840: 1261:, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 877:

Greetings. A great-great-nephew has posted a long biographical essay on

596: 2730:

is now running daily to compile a list of all articles that are in both

1637:

Let me see if I can clarify my proposed solution to this oversized list:

1220:

Knowledge (XXG) 0.7 articles have been selected for Biography (military)

286:. priority=Top is no longer off limits. So, for example, I've upgraded 1983:

commanded, etc. At that rank, it certainly seems like there should be

1427:

listen to any comments from anybody. Scoop100 10:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

536: 511: 490: 469: 114:, but there are a number of earlier discussions in the archives), and 1446:

Under both categories, I’d propose then to list Aces by Nationality.

1095:

The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of

948:? I would not bother to make this distinction but has it been made? 517:

This user will dine on MREs as soon as they offer varieties such as "

2360:

be the same. Please report any apparent inconsistencies (see below).

2116:

has changed its search and presentation of honours and awards - see

496:

This user has eaten MREs and earned a Purple Heart as a consequence.

335:

is up for a featured article review. Detailed concerns may be found

2551:

Have now "closed up the gap with our English (and Australian) dead"

1440:

World War 1 Flying Aces – Principal Combatant or Otherwise Notable

852:

all older references to individual gazettes. (originally posted by

2328:

The default list size has been lowered to 500 entries (from 1000)

2331:

I've set up a project on the Toolserver for the popular pages -

1377:

Germany is a lesser version of the same problem, with 393 aces.

1978:

I'm working in my sandbox on a biography for Brigadier General

1110:

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at

1102:

A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as

557:

Hiya, an article that is within the scope of this WikiProject,

2356:

The script used to generate the pages has changed. The output

898: 58: 29: 2828:, who turns out to have been decorated for his role with the 1870:

Someone got a minute, they could run through this BLP with a

1860:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 November 22

2927: 685:

Quote from WP:Flagcruft:"Not intended for birth/date places"

635:

It's not policy, so it doesn't carry much weight, if any.

2105:

Changes to Honours & Awards at Australian War Memorial

1456:

Any comments?Scoop100 (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

2841:

Category:British Army personnel of the Russian Civil War

2113: 2997:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

1301:

Commonwealth to Britain’s cause, also become apparent.

396:

User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory/United States

268:

importance= has been deprecated in favour of priority=.

2962:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2724:

WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons

2786:, also GOC Singapore District, and Controller of the 2221:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Barney B. Rasor

856:

on the main page. Thought it should be here as well.

1437:

I’d like to propose a re-categorisation as follows:

653:No one's putting flag icons in for the heck of it. 475:

This user has eaten MREs and lived to tell the tale.

378:

User:Badbilltucker/Philosophy and religion Directory

3024:An article that you have been involved in editing, 2525:

Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion#Lord Byron

1790:There's a backlog of nearly a hundred articles at 1118:is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 2836:. (He appears to have been a Lt acting as Major) 1471:Thanks for your message. I'd advise as follows: 802:Searching for an officer's awards and decorations 3087:WikiProject Military history discussion archives 2637:Frederick Ernest Charles Byron, 10th Baron Byron 938:Category:United Kingdom military personnel stubs 822:Category:United Kingdom military personnel stubs 402:User:Badbilltucker/History and society directory 147:Categories of the form "Military personnel of X" 2652:Richard Geoffrey Gordon Byron, 12th Baron Byron 2646:Rupert Frederick George Byron, 11th Baron Byron 2628:George Frederick William Byron, 9th Baron Byron 2055:. We are also in the process of implementing a 1233:automated selection of articles for Version 0.7 2820:: UK artilery officer in the Russian Civil War 2189:Category talk:Panzer commanders and aces#Split 1792:Category:Unassessed military history articles 359:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Directory 8: 1954:I'm currently working on an article for COL 132:Categories of the form "People of the X War" 1255:list of selected articles with cleanup tags 1248:Knowledge (XXG):Release Version Nominations 942:United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland 2718:Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons 1815:All done, thanks to those who helped out. 1229:Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team 296:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Biography 262:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Biography 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Biography 1839:for your workgroup, hope that's right! - 1624:Wikipedians are actually above ordinary.) 1568:Splitting The Aces List (Reply to Nibios) 390:User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory 2393:I am attempting to bring the article on 1195:Gilbert du Motier, marquis de La Fayette 204:of changes to quality and importance... 2968:notice, but please explain why in your 2215:The article for deletion discussion of 2008:This is a notice to let you know about 1238:We would like to ask you to review the 1072:Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme 932:United Kingdom military personnel stubs 2882:Military History Notability Guidelines 2479: 2353:The data is now retained indefinitely. 1193:is going to be working on the article 801: 372:User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 2 223:Because no one's tagged those yet :-) 143:Category:Military personnel by country 77:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2298:I have completed a major re-write of 1314:Nationality Aces listed/total aces 966:A further complication is that after 7: 2737:Your Project's list can be found at 2661:Robert James Byron, 13th Baron Byron 2603:George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron 2517:George Gordon Byron, 6th Baron Byron 625:Just thought you'd like to know...-- 531: 506: 485: 464: 408:User:Badbilltucker/Science directory 366:User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 260:Dear workgroup, After discussion at 2743:User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects/Templates 2619:George Anson Byron, 8th Baron Byron 2611:George Anson Byron, 7th Baron Byron 2511:Where should "Lord Byron" redirect? 2179:has been proposed to be split into 2177:Category:Panzer commanders and aces 2172:Category:Panzer commanders and aces 2069:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Article alerts 1317:Australia 8 aces out of 75 total 1240:articles selected from this project 738:Can you guys please take a look at 583:and, in particular, it's role as a 384:User:Badbilltucker/Sports Directory 333:Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson 328:Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson 184:1.0 assessments and this work group 158:Category:Military personnel by rank 153:Category:Military personnel by type 123:Category:People associated with war 2957:deleted for any of several reasons 2943:because of the following concern: 2676:common names in the family, like " 2494:Template:WikiProject Biography/doc 609:Question about infobox information 294:Hope that helps. Any questions to 28: 2784:Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry 2238:George W. Bush GA Sweeps: On Hold 2043:If you are already subscribed to 841:Members of this project may find 232:.....that explains everything! -- 2492:project banner. Please refer to 1600:Continued discussion post-Nibios 1244:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Version 0.7 1189:Just to let everyone here know, 535: 510: 489: 468: 62: 49: 33: 3047:Featured Article Candidacy for 2878:Unreferenced BLP Rescue Project 2454:Jackie Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher 2448:Jackie Fisher, 1st Baron Fisher 2112:For those who haven't noticed, 1494:Hope this helps, in some way. 1284:List of World War I flying aces 946:United Kingdom of Great Britain 519:Foie gras de canard aux truffes 3030:good article reassessment page 2872:The article on Somali General 2732:Category:All unreferenced BLPs 2595:William Byron, 5th Baron Byron 2586:William Byron, 4th Baron Byron 2577:William Byron, 3rd Baron Byron 2568:Richard Byron, 2nd Baron Byron 2317:Changes to popular pages lists 2145:for the biography of USN VADM 2101:} 08:52, 15 March, 2009 (UTC) 1320:Austria-Hungary 4/49 1277:23:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 996:Knowledge (XXG):Citing sources 837:Referencing the London Gazette 797:) 17:30, August 27, 2007 (UTC) 1: 3015:22:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC) 2912:22:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 2894:21:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC) 2756:or at my talk page. Thanks, 2702:06:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 2545:06:07, 29 November 2009 (UTC) 1969:14:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 1849:21:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1825:11:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1810:04:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1780:11:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC) 1764:15:45, 14 November 2008 (UTC) 1745:07:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 1723:17:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 1708:05:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1595:05:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1560:01:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 1541:12:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1504:23:18, 12 November 2008 (UTC) 1416:22:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC) 892:19:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 866:21:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 827:any views would be grateful. 566:20:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC) 2506:10:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 2442:08:57, 8 December 2009 (UTC) 2149:(better known as balloonist 1729:WWI flying ace list complete 1392:23:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC) 832:17:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 604:09:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 579:to cover articles regarding 449:14:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 435:22:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 344:03:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 43:Military history WikiProject 3001:allows discussion to reach 2982:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2965:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 2560:John Byron, 1st Baron Byron 2466:05:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 2427:07:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC) 2389:Help needed with references 1950:Help Wanted: Moses Rawlings 1940:11:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 1925:08:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 1906:10:54, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 1884:09:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 951:Also what about before the 909:nominated as a good article 811:00:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC) 303:09:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 237:07:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 228:07:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 219:06:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 209:05:18, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 179:03:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 138:Category:Military personnel 3103: 3073:06:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC) 3042:18:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC) 2277:Hugh Llewellyn Glyn Hughes 2271:Hugh Llewellyn Glyn Hughes 2203:11:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC) 2181:Category:Panzer commanders 2167:07:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 2130:23:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC) 1215:18:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 1058:. Reviewers' concerns are 927:06:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2987:proposed deletion process 2861:15:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 2747:User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects 2384:00:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 2312:17:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC) 2063:parameter, but forget to 1997:15:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1854:BD and lifetime templates 1335:Germany 74/393 1191:Knowledge (XXG):Spotlight 1178:14:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC) 1112:Category:C-Class_articles 1046:has been nominated for a 769:09:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 747:16:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 323:10:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 308:May I point out that the 2830:Royal Garrison Artillery 2812:13:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC) 2648:(1903–1983) —former stub 2289:21:41, 6 June 2009 (UTC) 2266:22:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC) 2233:08:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC) 1980:Littleberry C. Mosby Jr. 1150:22:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 1067:19:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC) 728:03:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC) 106:Category standardization 2974:the article's talk page 2766:17:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC) 2135:Help wanted: Tex Settle 1837:John Luttrell (soldier) 1048:featured article review 1033:12:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 1009:12:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC) 981:10:13, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 897:Good article review of 703:01:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 693:17:13, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 679:13:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 668:12:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC) 658:18:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 649:17:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 640:16:48, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 630:14:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC) 575:I have just started up 310:Military person infobox 2932: 2047:, it is now easier to 1266:this project's subpage 128:Category:People by war 2999:articles for deletion 2941:proposed for deletion 2931: 2407:The second is Shaw's 2032:and other workflows ( 2022:Articles for deletion 1270:User:SelectionBot/0.7 553:Articles for deletion 455:MRE-related Userboxes 75:of past discussions. 2794:, and in Burma with 2788:Army Benevolent Fund 2473:Template:WPBiography 2300:Francis Amasa Walker 2294:Francis Amasa Walker 2185:Category:Panzer aces 2155:USS Portland (CA-33) 2053:request new features 2026:Requests for comment 1974:Seeking help/sources 1353:South Africa 7/46 1259:copyediting requests 1199:#wikipedia-spotlight 1184:Marquis de Lafayette 973:Philip Baird Shearer 2480:|military-priority= 2432:Now done - thanks. 2147:Thomas G. W. Settle 1344:New Zealand 2/13 1225:Knowledge (XXG) 0.7 1166:Talk:Robert Nivelle 752:Flags in Info Boxes 577:WikiProject Colditz 355:WikiProject Council 2991:deletion processes 2933: 2409:Kinghts of England 2142:collecting sources 1786:Assessment backlog 1329:England 34/595 1128:1.0 Editorial Team 953:Acts of Union 1707 756:I wish to support 234:Laserbeamcrossfire 216:Laserbeamcrossfire 2919:Proposed deletion 2859: 2834:Russian Civil War 2782:- last CO of the 2709:Reginald Earnshaw 2704: 2547: 2482:parameter in the 2452:FYI, the article 2400:The first is the 2333:tools:~alexz/pop/ 2084: 1805: 1801: 1526: 1512:comment added by 1332:France 14/182 1326:Canada 24/192 1282:Splitting up the 1213: 1147: 986:Use of references 798: 785:comment added by 740:Heinrich Severloh 734:Heinrich Severloh 616:Lester B. Pearson 546: 545: 525: 524: 500: 499: 479: 478: 349:Project Directory 100: 99: 87: 86: 81:current talk page 57: 56: 3094: 2984: 2983: 2967: 2966: 2930: 2904:AustralianRupert 2850: 2847: 2826:Archibald Church 2818:Archibald Church 2685: 2528: 2519:" alone? Or to " 2491: 2485: 2481: 2382: 2275:Seeking help on 2242:I have reviewed 2075:Message sent by 2074: 2062: 1961:Jeremiah McGowan 1807: 1803: 1799: 1525: 1506: 1459:Retrieved from " 1397:Flying Aces List 1350:Scotland 6/67 1338:Ireland 2/33 1211: 1206: 1202: 1144: 1139: 1136: 1052:featured quality 992:Polikarpov I-180 959:soldiers in the 925: 887: 850: 844: 780: 593:Michael Sinclair 539: 532: 514: 507: 493: 486: 472: 465: 415:User:B2T2/Portal 256: 250: 96: 89: 88: 66: 65: 59: 53: 52: 37: 36: 30: 3102: 3101: 3097: 3096: 3095: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3077: 3076: 3053: 3026:Oliver Cromwell 3022: 3020:Oliver Cromwell 3005:for deletion.-- 2995:speedy deletion 2981: 2980: 2964: 2963: 2937:Kevin Benderman 2928: 2926: 2923:Kevin Benderman 2870: 2845: 2839:I noticed that 2822: 2776: 2720: 2712: 2553: 2513: 2489: 2483: 2476: 2450: 2434:Rjm at sleepers 2419:Rjm at sleepers 2391: 2370: 2319: 2296: 2273: 2240: 2217:Barney B. Rasor 2213: 2210:Barney B. Rasor 2174: 2137: 2118:new search page 2107: 2096: 2060: 2018:fully-automated 2006: 1976: 1952: 1868: 1856: 1833: 1796: 1788: 1752: 1731: 1677:national lists. 1602: 1570: 1507: 1483:sort of thing. 1399: 1347:Russia 1/15 1323:Belgium 1/6 1287: 1222: 1209: 1204: 1187: 1159:The article on 1157: 1142: 1132: 1123:leave a message 1074: 1041: 988: 934: 912: 902: 883: 875: 854:David Underdown 848: 842: 839: 818: 804: 776: 754: 736: 611: 585:Prisoner of War 573: 555: 547: 526: 501: 480: 457: 351: 330: 258: 254: 248: 186: 108: 92: 63: 50: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 3100: 3098: 3090: 3089: 3079: 3078: 3052: 3045: 3021: 3018: 2985:will stop the 2953: 2952: 2925: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2874:Hussein Shuqul 2869: 2867:Hussein Shuqul 2864: 2821: 2815: 2775: 2769: 2719: 2716: 2711: 2706: 2667: 2666: 2658: 2649: 2643: 2634: 2625: 2616: 2608: 2600: 2592: 2583: 2574: 2565: 2552: 2549: 2512: 2509: 2475: 2469: 2449: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2390: 2387: 2367: 2366: 2361: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2343: 2340: 2329: 2326: 2318: 2315: 2295: 2292: 2272: 2269: 2244:George W. Bush 2239: 2236: 2212: 2206: 2173: 2170: 2136: 2133: 2106: 2103: 2092: 2045:Article Alerts 2012:Article alerts 2005: 2003:Article alerts 2000: 1975: 1972: 1956:Moses Rawlings 1951: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1867: 1864: 1855: 1852: 1832: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1787: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1751: 1748: 1730: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1601: 1598: 1569: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1544: 1543: 1469: 1468: 1398: 1395: 1359:Wales 3/23 1341:Italy 5/45 1286: 1280: 1221: 1218: 1186: 1181: 1161:Robert Nivelle 1156: 1153: 1108: 1107: 1104:described here 1100: 1093: 1078:may have heard 1073: 1070: 1040: 1037: 1036: 1035: 987: 984: 961:New Model Army 933: 930: 901: 895: 879:Edward C. Kuhn 874: 872:Edward C. Kuhn 869: 838: 835: 817: 814: 803: 800: 775: 772: 753: 750: 735: 732: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 712: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 686: 610: 607: 581:Colditz Castle 572: 569: 554: 551: 550: 549: 544: 543: 540: 530: 528: 523: 522: 515: 505: 503: 498: 497: 494: 484: 482: 477: 476: 473: 463: 456: 453: 452: 451: 411: 410: 405: 399: 393: 387: 381: 375: 369: 350: 347: 329: 326: 306: 292: 291: 281: 278: 275: 272: 269: 257: 245: 244: 243: 242: 241: 240: 239: 185: 182: 176:Kirill Lokshin 165: 164: 163: 162: 161: 160: 155: 150: 149: 148: 135: 134: 133: 107: 104: 102: 98: 97: 85: 84: 67: 55: 54: 47: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3099: 3088: 3085: 3084: 3082: 3075: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3062: 3061:William Brill 3058: 3050: 3049:William Brill 3046: 3044: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3019: 3017: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2988: 2977: 2975: 2971: 2960: 2958: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2942: 2938: 2924: 2920: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2868: 2865: 2863: 2862: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2842: 2837: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2819: 2816: 2814: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2781: 2774:- new article 2773: 2770: 2768: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2750: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2717: 2715: 2710: 2707: 2705: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2690: 2689:Sizzle Flambé 2683: 2679: 2674: 2673: 2665: 2662: 2659: 2657: 2654:(1899–1989) — 2653: 2650: 2647: 2644: 2642: 2639:(1861–1949) — 2638: 2635: 2633: 2630:(1855–1917) — 2629: 2626: 2624: 2621:(1818–1870) — 2620: 2617: 2615: 2613:(1789–1868) — 2612: 2609: 2607: 2605:(1788–1824) — 2604: 2601: 2599: 2597:(1722–1798) — 2596: 2593: 2591: 2588:(1669–1736) — 2587: 2584: 2582: 2579:(1636–1695) — 2578: 2575: 2573: 2570:(1606–1679) — 2569: 2566: 2564: 2562:(1599–1652) — 2561: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2550: 2548: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2534: 2533: 2532:Sizzle Flambé 2526: 2522: 2518: 2515:To the poet " 2510: 2508: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2488: 2474: 2470: 2468: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2458:76.66.192.144 2455: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2417:Many thanks, 2415: 2412: 2410: 2405: 2403: 2398: 2396: 2388: 2386: 2385: 2381: 2380: 2378: 2373: 2365: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2344: 2341: 2337: 2336: 2334: 2330: 2327: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2316: 2314: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2293: 2291: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2270: 2268: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2250: 2245: 2237: 2235: 2234: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2211: 2207: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195:76.66.196.218 2192: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2171: 2169: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2134: 2132: 2131: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2110: 2104: 2102: 2100: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2082: 2078: 2072: 2070: 2066: 2058: 2057:"news system" 2054: 2050: 2046: 2041: 2039: 2035: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2004: 2001: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1981: 1973: 1971: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1949: 1941: 1937: 1933: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1913: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1892: 1891:James Hawkins 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1865: 1863: 1861: 1853: 1851: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1831:John Luttrell 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1793: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1749: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1737:Georgejdorner 1734: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700:Georgejdorner 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1588: 1587:Georgejdorner 1584: 1580: 1577: 1573: 1567: 1561: 1557: 1553: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1514:Georgejdorner 1511: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1447: 1444: 1441: 1438: 1435: 1434: 1429: 1428: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1403: 1396: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1384:Georgejdorner 1381: 1378: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1356:USA 2/123 1354: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1333: 1330: 1327: 1324: 1321: 1318: 1315: 1312: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1296: 1290: 1285: 1281: 1279: 1278: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1262: 1260: 1256: 1251: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1236: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1212: 1207: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1154: 1152: 1151: 1148: 1145: 1137: 1135: 1129: 1124: 1119: 1117: 1113: 1105: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1091: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1083: 1079: 1071: 1069: 1068: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1015:According to 1014: 1013: 1012: 1010: 1006: 1002: 997: 993: 985: 983: 982: 978: 974: 969: 964: 962: 958: 954: 949: 947: 943: 939: 931: 929: 928: 923: 919: 915: 910: 906: 900: 896: 894: 893: 890: 888: 886: 880: 873: 870: 868: 867: 863: 859: 855: 847: 846:LondonGazette 836: 834: 833: 830: 826: 823: 815: 813: 812: 809: 799: 796: 792: 788: 784: 774:Henry Burbeck 773: 771: 770: 767: 762: 759: 751: 749: 748: 745: 741: 733: 731: 729: 726: 704: 701: 697: 696: 694: 691: 687: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 677: 672: 671: 669: 666: 661: 660: 659: 656: 652: 651: 650: 647: 643: 642: 641: 638: 634: 633: 632: 631: 628: 624: 619: 617: 608: 606: 605: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 570: 568: 567: 564: 560: 552: 541: 538: 534: 533: 529: 520: 516: 513: 509: 508: 504: 495: 492: 488: 487: 483: 474: 471: 467: 466: 462: 461: 460: 454: 450: 447: 443: 439: 438: 437: 436: 433: 428: 427:collaboration 424: 420: 416: 409: 406: 403: 400: 397: 394: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 373: 370: 367: 364: 363: 362: 360: 356: 348: 346: 345: 342: 338: 334: 327: 325: 324: 320: 316: 311: 305: 304: 301: 297: 289: 285: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 266: 265: 263: 253: 246: 238: 235: 231: 230: 229: 226: 222: 221: 220: 217: 213: 212: 211: 210: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 183: 181: 180: 177: 173: 168: 159: 156: 154: 151: 146: 145: 144: 141: 140: 139: 136: 131: 130: 129: 126: 125: 124: 121: 120: 119: 117: 113: 105: 103: 95: 91: 90: 82: 78: 74: 73: 68: 61: 60: 48: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 3054: 3023: 2993:exist. The 2989:, but other 2978: 2970:edit summary 2961: 2954: 2947: 2935:The article 2934: 2871: 2838: 2823: 2796:Orde Wingate 2790:. He was at 2780:David Tyacke 2777: 2772:David Tyacke 2751: 2736: 2721: 2713: 2688: 2678:George Byron 2672:Barons Byron 2670: 2668: 2664: 2655: 2640: 2631: 2622: 2614: 2606: 2598: 2589: 2580: 2571: 2563: 2554: 2531: 2514: 2477: 2451: 2416: 2413: 2408: 2406: 2401: 2399: 2395:James Temple 2392: 2376: 2375: 2368: 2357: 2320: 2297: 2274: 2247: 2241: 2214: 2193: 2175: 2140: 2138: 2111: 2108: 2086: 2073: 2064: 2061:display=none 2044: 2042: 2010: 2009: 2007: 1984: 1977: 1953: 1871: 1869: 1857: 1835:I've tagged 1834: 1797: 1789: 1753: 1735: 1732: 1698: 1585: 1581: 1578: 1574: 1571: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1457: 1455: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1431: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1404: 1400: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1365: 1361: 1358: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1346: 1343: 1340: 1337: 1334: 1331: 1328: 1325: 1322: 1319: 1316: 1313: 1310: 1307: 1303: 1299: 1295:my talk page 1291: 1288: 1274:SelectionBot 1263: 1252: 1237: 1231:has made an 1223: 1188: 1158: 1138: 1133: 1120: 1109: 1089: 1075: 1042: 1019: 989: 965: 950: 935: 904: 903: 884: 876: 840: 819: 805: 777: 763: 755: 737: 721: 623:WP:FLAGCRUFT 620: 612: 574: 559:Antoni Dunin 556: 518: 458: 412: 352: 331: 309: 307: 293: 283: 259: 187: 169: 166: 109: 101: 93: 76: 70: 41: 2663:(b. 1950) — 2521:Baron Byron 2487:WPBiography 2304:Madcoverboy 2281:FruitMonkey 2254:Nehrams2020 2077:User:Addbot 2065:give a link 2049:report bugs 2030:Peer review 1912:Tiger Force 1895:WP:ONEEVENT 1715:MilborneOne 1533:MilborneOne 1508:—Preceding 1201:. Thanks!-- 1170:EasyPeasy21 1090:new C-Class 1044:Isaac Brock 1039:Isaac Brock 1025:MilborneOne 781:—Preceding 766:Sic Transit 571:New Project 423:peer review 353:Hello. The 288:John Lennon 252:WPBiography 247:Changes to 174:. Thanks! 69:This is an 2848:HairedGirl 2804:DuncanHill 2682:John Byron 2471:Update to 2151:Tex Settle 2099:WP Physics 2087:Thanks. — 1872:ultra fine 744:Agathoclea 419:assessment 341:Hbdragon88 298:please. -- 188:Thanks to 172:WT:MILHIST 116:WP:MILHIST 3034:Ironholds 3003:consensus 2939:has been 2034:full list 1985:something 1917:KP Botany 1876:KP Botany 1866:BLP check 1770:Regards. 1756:Rosiestep 1467:Hi George 1082:WP:ASSESS 1017:Footnotes 968:James VII 957:civil war 858:Woodym555 829:Waacstats 787:WYATTKOPP 442:directory 194:work list 94:Archive 1 3081:Category 3065:Ian Rose 3051:now open 2949:WP:BLP1E 2856:contribs 2800:Chindits 2798:and his 2758:The-Pope 2754:WT:URBLP 2208:AfD for 2122:Ian Rose 2094:κοντριβς 2089:Headbomb 1522:contribs 1510:unsigned 1496:Scoop100 1408:Scoop100 1097:a rubric 885:Finngall 808:Sbowers3 795:contribs 783:unsigned 700:dcandeto 676:dcandeto 655:dcandeto 637:dcandeto 597:Pat Reid 587:camp in 315:DOR (HK) 300:kingboyk 190:kingboyk 22:Military 20:‎ | 3007:S. Rich 2832:in the 2792:Dunkirk 2680:" and " 2669:Of the 2262:contrib 1989:cmadler 1750:Infobox 1143:Disable 1134:§hepBot 1121:Please 1116:The bot 1076:As you 202:own log 72:archive 2972:or on 2852:(talk) 2358:should 2339:later. 2225:Nick-D 2187:. See 1932:Nick-D 1898:Nick-D 1552:Nibios 1210:folsom 1205:daniel 1064:Ultra! 914:Seyyed 646:Boffob 627:Boffob 601:Qarnos 563:Elonka 425:, and 225:plange 206:plange 2886:Plad2 2846:Brown 1817:Woody 1804:AVIES 1772:Woody 816:Stubs 404:, and 198:stats 40:This 16:< 3069:talk 3059:for 3055:The 3038:talk 3011:talk 2908:talk 2890:talk 2808:talk 2762:talk 2745:and 2722:The 2502:talk 2498:PC78 2462:talk 2438:talk 2423:talk 2308:talk 2285:talk 2258:talk 2249:here 2229:talk 2199:talk 2183:and 2163:talk 2139:I'm 2126:talk 2081:here 2051:and 2038:here 2016:, a 1993:talk 1965:talk 1936:talk 1921:talk 1902:talk 1880:talk 1845:talk 1821:talk 1800:OGER 1776:talk 1760:talk 1741:talk 1719:talk 1704:talk 1591:talk 1556:talk 1537:talk 1518:talk 1500:talk 1412:talk 1388:talk 1174:talk 1088:The 1060:here 1056:here 1029:talk 1005:talk 1001:Bzuk 977:talk 862:talk 825:here 791:talk 758:Bzuk 725:Bzuk 690:Bzuk 665:Bzuk 595:and 589:WWII 446:B2T2 432:B2T2 337:here 319:talk 112:here 3057:FAC 2921:of 2854:• ( 2749:. 2728:bot 2656:NEW 2641:NEW 2632:NEW 2623:NEW 2590:NEW 2581:NEW 2572:NEW 2379:man 2372:Mr. 2369:-- 2159:NVO 2114:AWM 1841:PKM 1297:.) 1268:of 1250:. 1168:. 936:If 907:is 905:Ali 899:Ali 3083:: 3071:) 3040:) 3013:) 2976:. 2959:. 2910:) 2902:. 2892:) 2810:) 2764:) 2700:) 2686:— 2543:) 2529:— 2504:) 2490:}} 2484:{{ 2464:) 2440:) 2425:) 2377:Z- 2335:. 2310:) 2287:) 2264:) 2260:• 2231:) 2223:. 2201:) 2191:. 2165:) 2128:) 2097:– 2071:. 2040:. 2028:, 2024:, 1995:) 1967:) 1938:) 1923:) 1904:) 1882:) 1847:) 1823:) 1778:) 1762:) 1743:) 1721:) 1706:) 1691:I. 1593:) 1558:) 1539:) 1524:) 1520:• 1502:) 1463:" 1414:) 1390:) 1253:A 1235:. 1176:) 1130:, 1084:. 1062:. 1031:) 1011:. 1007:) 979:) 971:-- 944:, 864:) 849:}} 843:{{ 793:• 730:. 695:. 670:. 521:". 421:, 321:) 255:}} 249:{{ 3067:( 3036:( 3009:( 2906:( 2888:( 2858:) 2806:( 2760:( 2698:✍ 2696:/ 2694:☎ 2692:( 2541:✍ 2539:/ 2537:☎ 2535:( 2500:( 2460:( 2436:( 2421:( 2306:( 2283:( 2256:( 2227:( 2197:( 2161:( 2124:( 2091:{ 2083:. 1991:( 1963:( 1934:( 1919:( 1900:( 1878:( 1843:( 1819:( 1802:D 1798:R 1774:( 1758:( 1739:( 1717:( 1702:( 1589:( 1554:( 1535:( 1516:( 1498:( 1410:( 1386:( 1172:( 1146:) 1140:( 1106:. 1027:( 1003:( 975:( 924:) 922:c 920:- 918:t 916:( 860:( 789:( 392:, 386:, 380:, 374:, 368:, 317:( 83:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Biography/Military/Archive 1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index