577:, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by
152:
127:
701:
745:). The bio mostly just repeats claims from the book article (but with barely any hint of controversy or challenge, and strong suggestions of influence), while the book article is mostly just repetition of what is said at the hypothesis article (but without much of the critical material from the latter).
722:
Summary: Aspects of his hypothesis having "inspired" some later research doesn't equate to his work being proven correct, and cognitive science, evolutionary psychology, and related displines decreasingly support it, most especially his central notion that consciousness only arose a few millennia
204:
The two articles need some work, especially the one on cognition. A systematic perspective is lacking, especially the lead section deserves attention and e.g. a thorough definition. Most basic facts are underrepresented in favour of very specific theoretical assumptions that may presently remain
748:
It is thus proposed to merge these into a single article on the hypothesis, the book it came from, and who wrote it, with all the critical material present, and expanded by more recent work on consciousness and cognitition. Even if they were not merged, they have to stop viewpoint-forking (and
548:
I think they are (roughly) the same. Some authors use the term "relevance problem". Some authors consider the terms synonymous, too. Personally and in the most general sense, i would speak of the frame problem. Btw, maybe you have noticed my suggestion to merge
680:. The idea would be to help coordinate, collaborate and network cross-subject, cross-wiki and cross-language to share experience and resources that may be valuable to the relevant wikiprojects. Current discussion includes preferred scope and structure.
205:
speculative. Differences between CogSci and other approaches to the subject should be clearly reflected (not necessarily explicated). The CogSci perspective should be elaborated on grounds of considerate literature. Please refer to the list of
346:
should see some clean up to distinguish the specific use in behavioural and cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience from applications of the term in environmental psychology (resp. geography, architecture, education etc.).
463:
As I commented, I think it is preferable to turn the redirect into a stub rather than deleting it. You could probably write a better one than me, but I'm willing to do it if you prefer. My thought is to write something like
737:
723:
ago. Furthermore, it was proposed at that article to move it and reshape it into an article on the book, since the person is not notable for anything other than one book. Instead, the subject has been
39:
487:
makes it impossible to represent all possible combinations explicitly. The problem is to devise a scheme that only explicitly represents a subset of feature-combinations that are most "relevant".
625:
98:
340:
ist really vague, in need of a decent lead and definition β pieces of descriptive and explanatory aspects are mixed together (even tough sections of the article might be very specific).
573:
Cognitive science has a broad scope, as the project page section about this project makes clear. You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of
423:
578:
74:
574:
647:
There are two categories that are very similar - maybe they should be merged but maybe they're different enough so I thought I'd see what others thing.
483:. Intelligent behavior requires an ability to learn to respond to arbitrary combinations of features of a situation, but if there are many features, a
158:
132:
24:
80:
303:
could be expanded to reflect the more scientific aspects. On the other hand, the definition is quite specific to CS and might be widened a bit.
763:
20:
69:
681:
498:
That would need some editing and sourcing, of course, but comments on whether it goes in the right direction would be welcome.
422:
on 14 April. After a week of no input it has been relisted, so your comments regarding this redirect would be very welcome at
252:
A number of articles are concerned with a similar or seemingly similar subject matter (remarks/respective scope in brackets):
581:
through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the
60:
594:
694:
Julian Jaynes and his "bicameral mind" hypothesis that consciousness arose only about 4,000 years ago β 3-way POVFORK
590:
388:
Lova Falk has been doing some recent work on this article already, please help if you like. You can take a look at
93:
107:
677:
662:
484:
480:
442:
415:
163:
137:
628:, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated.
111:
50:
768:
760:
688:
666:
637:
613:
598:
586:
562:
541:
527:
507:
458:
435:
401:
376:
358:
331:
300:
262:
241:
218:
411:
65:
604:
Thank you very much; I have listed this in the literature section of our project page. Kind regards,
389:
728:
742:
658:
532:
Could you give me a pointer to a source that defines the relevance problem as you have it in mind?
446:
431:
206:
752:
Anyway, please follow up at the Talk:Julian_Jaynes discussion thread, so this stays centralized.
715:
633:
537:
503:
112:
724:
582:
194:
46:
755:
306:
268:
109:
609:
558:
523:
454:
419:
397:
372:
354:
327:
237:
214:
382:
294:
256:
716:
Talk:Julian Jaynes#It needs to be made clearer that his overall hypothesis is WP:FRINGE
427:
312:
274:
229:
629:
550:
533:
515:
499:
343:
286:
337:
280:
605:
554:
519:
450:
393:
368:
350:
323:
233:
210:
151:
126:
364:
271:(partially very specific to conceptual modelling, partially immensely general)
583:
Knowledge (XXG) standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles
424:
Knowledge (XXG):Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 22#Relevance problem
225:
198:
585:, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. --
315:
might be renamed »Internal model (motor control)« to reflect its scope.
738:
The Origin of
Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
676:
There's a discussion about a possible User Group for STEM over at
309:
needs some cleanup, material could be used in the other articles.
289:((cognitive) neuroscience, psychology, environmental psychology)
704:
113:
15:
265:(vague, philosophy, mostly on representationalism in general)
626:
Category:Cognitive science articles needing expert attention
749:
coatracking of the hypothesis across all three articles).
248:
Models, representations, maps β a quick review of articles
479:is a problem that arises in attempts to implement
390:Talk:Binding problem#Focus of the article and lead
283:(cognitive psychology, cognitive science, vague)
228:in the course of an educational assignment. See
161:, a project which is currently considered to be
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
173:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Cognitive science
8:
710:Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.
121:
224:There have been some productive edits to
123:
176:Template:WikiProject Cognitive science
7:
569:Source list helpful for this project
672:A possible Science/STEM User Group
297:is specific to its meaning in CS.
14:
157:This page is within the scope of
45:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
699:
418:, was nominated for deletion at
150:
125:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
678:Meta:Talk:STEM_Wiki_User_Group
614:14:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
599:15:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
1:
753:
259:(specific: cognitive science)
219:11:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
159:WikiProject Cognitive science
37:Put new text under old text.
25:WikiProject Cognitive science
667:23:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
638:16:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
643:two very similar categories
784:
769:14:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
697:
563:01:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
542:16:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
528:18:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
508:15:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
459:14:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
441:As are the article itself
436:02:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
414:, currently a redirect to
402:11:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
377:09:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
332:10:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
242:13:13, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
179:Cognitive science articles
449:. Thanks for the notice!
359:12:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
322:That move has been done.
277:(specific: motor control)
145:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
689:02:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
624:This is a notice about
485:combinatorial explosion
481:artificial intelligence
363:I just found one more:
579:suggesting new sources
575:Intelligence Citations
553:. Thanks and regards!
70:avoid personal attacks
443:Relevance realization
416:Relevance realization
301:Mental representation
263:Mental representation
743:bicameral mentality
735:further articles (
81:dispute resolution
42:
685:
477:relevance problem
412:Relevance problem
407:Relevance problem
207:useful literature
195:Cognitive science
191:
190:
187:
186:
170:Cognitive science
133:Cognitive science
120:
119:
61:Assume good faith
38:
775:
767:
711:
703:
702:
683:
620:Expert attention
587:WeijiBaikeBianji
307:Conceptual model
269:Conceptual model
181:
180:
177:
174:
171:
154:
147:
146:
141:
129:
122:
114:
16:
783:
782:
778:
777:
776:
774:
773:
772:
712:
709:
707:
700:
696:
674:
645:
622:
571:
514:Isn't that the
409:
386:
383:Binding problem
295:cognitive model
257:Cognitive model
250:
202:
178:
175:
172:
169:
168:
135:
116:
115:
110:
87:
86:
56:
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
781:
779:
734:
719:
698:
695:
692:
673:
670:
659:CodeCurmudgeon
656:
655:
652:
644:
641:
621:
618:
617:
616:
570:
567:
566:
565:
546:
545:
544:
512:
511:
510:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
468:
467:
466:
465:
408:
405:
385:
380:
335:
334:
313:Internal model
291:
290:
284:
278:
275:Internal model
272:
266:
260:
249:
246:
245:
244:
230:Talk:Cognition
201:
192:
189:
188:
185:
184:
182:
155:
143:
142:
130:
118:
117:
108:
106:
105:
102:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
780:
771:
770:
765:
762:
759:
758:
750:
746:
744:
740:
739:
732:
730:
726:
720:
717:
706:
693:
691:
690:
687:
679:
671:
669:
668:
664:
660:
653:
650:
649:
648:
642:
640:
639:
635:
631:
627:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:User:γ - (pi)
603:
602:
601:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:Frame problem
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
530:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:Frame problem
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
462:
461:
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:John Vervaeke
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
406:
404:
403:
399:
395:
391:
384:
381:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:Cognitive map
341:
339:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
317:
316:
314:
310:
308:
304:
302:
298:
296:
288:
287:Cognitive map
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
255:
254:
253:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
200:
196:
193:
183:
166:
165:
160:
156:
153:
149:
148:
144:
139:
134:
131:
128:
124:
104:
103:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
756:
751:
747:
736:
729:WP:POVFORKed
721:
714:Please see:
713:
682:T.Shafee(Evo
675:
657:
646:
623:
572:
476:
410:
387:
362:
349:
342:
338:Mental model
336:
319:
311:
305:
299:
293:Thankfully,
292:
281:Mental model
251:
203:
162:
92:
19:This is the
757:SMcCandlish
518:? Regards,
445:as well as
727:(arguably
725:WP:CFORKed
595:how I edit
426:. Thanks,
365:Mental map
428:Thryduulf
226:Cognition
199:Cognition
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
630:Iceblock
534:Looie496
500:Looie496
392:Kindly,
320:Comment:
164:inactive
138:inactive
94:Archives
51:get help
731:) into
741:, and
420:WP:RfD
684:&
464:this:
79:Seek
686:Evo)
663:talk
634:talk
610:talk
591:talk
559:talk
538:talk
524:talk
504:talk
475:The
455:talk
432:talk
398:talk
373:talk
355:talk
328:talk
238:talk
215:talk
68:and
766:πΌ
733:two
705:FYI
754:β
708:β
665:)
636:)
612:)
597:)
593:,
561:)
540:)
526:)
506:)
457:)
434:)
400:)
375:)
367:.
357:)
330:)
240:)
232:.
217:)
209:.
197:/
49:;
764:Β’
761:β
718:.
661:(
654:]
651:]
632:(
608:(
589:(
557:(
555:γ
536:(
522:(
520:γ
502:(
453:(
451:γ
430:(
396:(
394:γ
371:(
369:γ
353:(
351:γ
326:(
324:γ
236:(
234:γ
213:(
211:γ
167:.
140:)
136:(
99:1
96::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
