685:
692:
158:
728:
125:
251:. It would be much better if there are other people updating the list, rather than myself doing a task that is meant for many editors to do, since having a single person updating the list will actually defeat the purpose of this project. In fact, this very talk page was not modified for three years straight!
815:
Furthermore, extra due diligence is necessary since if I remembered correctly, the edit war instigator and their cohort may had the ability to compromise the VPN networks of some users who were defending the preservation of the content and impersonate them in order to revert their changes and further
319:
Yup, it would definitely take more than one or two people. And even in good situations I expect there is always some bias and blindness in any group. I'm just hoping to get things to the point where the out-of-date template can be removed from the top of the page. That template message and the notice
633:
are considered to be among the topics where we lack proper coverage. Surely our systemic biases fail nonwhites, non-English-speakers, and those outside the hard-sciences interests of our typical young male geek anglophone editoriat? Whatever next - is somebody going to add a videogame or a rifle to
792:
had been restored, however since the instigator of the removals and the whole larger incident is back after months of inactivity, it’s requested that you keep tab on the article for the time being. If any untoward incidents occur please either revert the changes or report it to the admins straight
352:
I took the "needs updating" tag off the task page because updating the whole page at once is a huge task. Instead I changed it so each section lists when the articles in it were last checked to see if the assessments still stand. I had checked some sections back in May and some other sections had
541:
Thank you DS Belgium. I know that one person cannot maintain the list, but one person maintaining the list is better than having the page collect dust. This is why more people should notice the Open Tasks page, which unfortunately is neglected and has a self-fulfilled prophecy of systemic bias
800:
team may need to be pinged too as the instigator and their cohorts were spotted putting up gaming/abusing legitimate on-wiki processes to put up doxxing/outing/smearing page(s) making personal attacks against the defenders back in 2022 immediately after they were exposed by news media, just in
782:
485:
With 35 sections on this talk page, more than half the space is taken by only one of them, and that's a discussion on whether to use the term "progressive" or "reform". Could the systemic bias on wikipedia be illustrated more clearly than that?
49:
816:
smearing their character through joe-jobbing. A red flag to look for is if an IP (including mine!) had a “sudden change of mind” and go over to the instigator’s side by reverting changes made prior by people who were inhibiting the instigator.
337:
I wonder if checking items on the task list to see if they still need work could be added to the main page's list of suggested ways to help out? I haven't read the archived main page discussions so I don't know if that's ever been discussed.
227:
Is anybody currently using or updating the task list? It looks like many tasks were added a long time ago. I noticed some people signed & dated their additions. Is there any agreement as to whether dating all requests would be helpful?
320:
on the main page that you were the only person updating the list made me hesitate. I almost didn't read further when I saw those and I'm hoping that doing enough work to remove both of them might encourage other people to stop by more.
353:
already been marked as last checked in July 2009. Undated sections that could use checking over are tagged with the update template. If you check a section over and re-assess the articles in it, please note the date you checked it.
179:
174:
112:
108:
292:
We might even need more people to do this task, as two is definitely not enough (despite the fact that a single person (me) had been updating the list for the past few years). No wonder why such systematic bias exist.
248:
277:
Yes, I can see how one person could never do this kind of task. Kudos for sticking with it. I'm working through the list to see what the current condition of all the articles is so I can help update the list.
374:
I'm committing to stopping back periodically to check some of the sections, but I hope other people do too. I'm not comfortable checking linguistics or economics so I'm leaving those sections alone.
435:
34:
501:
Yes, the systematic bias needs to be more clearly illustrated. Unfortunately, I had been the only contributor of this WikiProject for so many years, despite not being a founding member.
249:
http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Contributors.php?wikilang=en&wikifam=.wikipedia.org&grouped=on&page=Knowledge:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/open_tasks
17:
116:
431:
744:
714:
710:
388:
Definitely more people are needed to check the sections. I cannot be the only one (or very few others) who maintains the list, as more are much needed.
84:
740:
90:
817:
802:
722:
604:
It is very unfortunate that I am the most active person on this WikiProject. It would be better if more people can take part in it.
825:
810:
758:
667:
643:
623:
594:
563:
536:
522:
495:
474:
447:
409:
383:
347:
314:
287:
272:
237:
662:
618:
589:
558:
517:
469:
404:
309:
267:
30:
573:
It seems that once again, I am the only person maintaining the list. There should be more people contributing to the list.
79:
212:
70:
195:
139:
124:
103:
684:
191:
135:
434:
from the task list. It was oddly listed as non
English literature that needed expansion, plus it seemed to be
821:
806:
777:
691:
532:
491:
443:
379:
343:
283:
243:
I am the primary updater of tasks during the past few years. Please look at my contributions to the
233:
658:
639:
614:
585:
554:
513:
465:
400:
305:
263:
60:
197:
140:
75:
754:
56:
193:
157:
137:
528:
487:
439:
375:
339:
279:
247:. Here is more evidence that I am generally the sole contributor for the past few years:
229:
650:
635:
606:
576:
545:
504:
456:
391:
296:
254:
797:
789:
750:
772:
727:
676:
Invitation to Women in
Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons
527:
You have my sympathy. I couldn't do it, nice to see someone still cares.
764:
Please keep tab on an article just in case there are untoward incidents
793:
away where you can let them know about the news articles as well.
198:
151:
141:
25:
726:
690:
683:
630:
244:
453:
It seemed that nobody noticed it for so many years.
18:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject
Countering systemic bias
432:Pro se legal representation in the United States
35:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/open tasks
206:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
600:Need more people to go through the page
216:when more than 5 sections are present.
7:
426:Removed from task list (misplaced?)
33:for discussing improvements to the
223:Updating Tasks and Dating Requests
24:
210:may be automatically archived by
629:I am slightly disappointed that
156:
123:
50:Click here to start a new topic.
759:15:22, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
564:22:50, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
537:17:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
523:15:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
496:13:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
438:by the person that posted it.
436:part of a sock puppet edit war
384:05:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
595:03:09, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
410:03:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
47:Put new text under old text.
668:00:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
644:20:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
542:being completely unchecked.
631:white anglophone scientists
55:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
841:
788:As of now the contents at
826:10:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
811:09:46, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
745:Women in Red/Opt-out list
682:
624:02:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
85:Be welcoming to newcomers
741:Women in Red/Invite list
634:the list of open tasks?
475:01:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
448:22:13, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
348:03:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
315:21:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
288:15:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
273:15:42, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
238:05:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
731:
695:
688:
213:Lowercase sigmabot III
80:avoid personal attacks
730:
711:Women in Architecture
694:
687:
117:Auto-archiving period
715:Women in Archaeology
798:Knowledge Oversight
245:history of the page
732:
696:
689:
481:Systemic bias here
91:dispute resolution
52:
748:
736:
735:
648:How unfortunate.
220:
219:
185:
184:
148:
147:
71:Assume good faith
48:
832:
738:
680:
679:
655:
653:
611:
609:
581:
579:
550:
548:
509:
507:
461:
459:
396:
394:
301:
299:
259:
257:
215:
199:
171:
170:
160:
152:
142:
128:
127:
118:
26:
840:
839:
835:
834:
833:
831:
830:
829:
766:
743:. Unsubscribe,
739:(To subscribe,
719:
678:
666:
651:
649:
622:
607:
605:
602:
593:
582:
577:
575:
562:
551:
546:
544:
521:
510:
505:
503:
483:
473:
462:
457:
455:
428:
408:
397:
392:
390:
313:
302:
297:
295:
271:
260:
255:
253:
225:
211:
200:
194:
165:
144:
143:
138:
115:
97:
96:
66:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
838:
836:
786:
785:
780:
775:
765:
762:
734:
733:
721:Faciliated by
720:
708:
705:
702:
701:
698:
677:
674:
673:
672:
671:
670:
656:
612:
601:
598:
583:
574:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
552:
543:
511:
502:
482:
479:
478:
477:
463:
454:
427:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
413:
412:
398:
389:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
328:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
303:
294:
261:
252:
224:
221:
218:
217:
205:
202:
201:
196:
192:
190:
187:
186:
183:
182:
177:
167:
166:
161:
155:
146:
145:
136:
134:
133:
130:
129:
99:
98:
95:
94:
87:
82:
73:
67:
65:
64:
53:
44:
43:
40:
39:
38:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
837:
828:
827:
823:
819:
813:
812:
808:
804:
799:
794:
791:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
770:
769:
768:For context:
763:
761:
760:
756:
752:
746:
742:
729:
725:
724:
718:
716:
712:
706:
704:
703:
700:
699:October 2016
693:
686:
681:
675:
669:
664:
663:contributions
660:
654:
647:
646:
645:
641:
637:
632:
628:
627:
626:
625:
620:
619:contributions
616:
610:
599:
597:
596:
591:
590:contributions
587:
580:
565:
560:
559:contributions
556:
549:
540:
539:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:
524:
519:
518:contributions
515:
508:
500:
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
480:
476:
471:
470:contributions
467:
460:
452:
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
425:
411:
406:
405:contributions
402:
395:
387:
386:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
365:
364:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
318:
317:
316:
311:
310:contributions
307:
300:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
276:
275:
274:
269:
268:contributions
265:
258:
250:
246:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
222:
214:
209:
204:
203:
189:
188:
181:
178:
176:
173:
172:
169:
168:
164:
159:
154:
153:
150:
132:
131:
126:
122:
114:
110:
107:
105:
101:
100:
92:
88:
86:
83:
81:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
62:
58:
57:Learn to edit
54:
51:
46:
45:
42:
41:
36:
32:
28:
27:
19:
818:38.99.82.242
814:
803:38.99.82.242
795:
790:Cyber Anakin
787:
767:
737:
723:Women in Red
709:
707:
697:
603:
572:
484:
429:
226:
207:
162:
149:
120:
102:
29:This is the
717:editathons
529:DS Belgium
488:DS Belgium
440:Cloveapple
430:I removed
376:Cloveapple
340:Cloveapple
280:Cloveapple
230:Cloveapple
652:Johnny Au
636:bobrayner
608:Johnny Au
578:Johnny Au
547:Johnny Au
506:Johnny Au
458:Johnny Au
393:Johnny Au
298:Johnny Au
256:Johnny Au
180:Archive 2
175:Archive 1
93:if needed
76:Be polite
31:talk page
208:120 days
163:Archives
121:120Â days
104:Archives
61:get help
751:Ipigott
713:&
801:case.
89:Seek
37:page.
16:<
822:talk
807:talk
796:The
755:talk
659:talk
640:talk
615:talk
586:talk
555:talk
533:talk
514:talk
492:talk
466:talk
444:talk
401:talk
380:talk
344:talk
306:talk
284:talk
264:talk
234:talk
78:and
824:)
809:)
757:)
749:--
642:)
535:)
494:)
446:)
382:)
346:)
286:)
236:)
119::
111:,
59:;
820:(
805:(
783:3
778:2
773:1
753:(
747:)
665:)
661:/
657:(
638:(
621:)
617:/
613:(
592:)
588:/
584:(
561:)
557:/
553:(
531:(
520:)
516:/
512:(
490:(
472:)
468:/
464:(
442:(
407:)
403:/
399:(
378:(
342:(
312:)
308:/
304:(
282:(
270:)
266:/
262:(
232:(
113:2
109:1
106::
63:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
