462:
444:
87:
854:, you could ask on each talk page. I'd suggest recommending one over the other (not necessarily the same for every group), but if anyone responds, their preferences should be taken into account. I think I lean towards the individual country when that is a large or very active group, but WikiProject History when the country-specific group is small. The potential targets could be notified in a "Help us make a decision about merging here vs the other option" way.
1805:, I agree with taking the group of interested editors and holding discussions on a related WikiProject talk page. After some months you can assess the effectiveness: having a broader audience for your discussions can be very helpful, but in some cases, the discussions may prove to be cumbersome to those not interested. You can create any guidance pages as needed. Grouping them as subpages under the WikiProject in question is helpful for organizational purposes.
238:
51:
2585:
516:
413:
2847:. And of course, discussion about it would happen somewhere (likely on its own talk page, but certainly this talk page can be regularly directed to it). It would cover the various technical approaches that can be employed by WikiProjects, whether traditional or experimental, particularly looking at layout, navigation and data-driven aspects, such as reports, alerts and milestones, and possibly more.
2111:
2806:
generate particular reports for their WikiProjects, as one example. From my own perspective, I sometimes feel like I want to share what I've done (as I can see potentially widespread benefits to some things I've conjured up), or alternatively thirst to see what others and other WikiProjects have done. What would be everyone's feel for a spot for WikiProjects sharing technical ideas?
21:
1606:
Idk I think it has a good chance of being sustainable, enough people have passion for it and it's something that's on the up. I think it's quite attractive for new users, and we should be getting more users from sub-Saharan Africa in the coming years. It features in pretty much all countries and most
2538:
It's possible that this particular group will have intermittent activity (e.g., during the
Olympics). I do think that merging it as a task force has significant possibilities. In particular, that would maintain separate 1.0 stats for anyone who uses that to choose subject areas (though independent
2036:
I do think it'd be great to build the proposal process around task forces, as I imagine it's rare for someone to have an idea about a new viable wikiproject. Btw, I've found most editors through messaging large contributors of pages involving oral tradition (just going through the pages that link to
1850:
are still actively editing) and an existing set of articles rather than starting from scratch, while still using all the useful gadgets available for WikiProjects. Conversations relating to a task force usually take place on the parent WikiProject talk page too, unless it gets very big, which brings
1318:
That is useful, but very few
Wikiprojects will have the ability to maintain such a list. Could a bot maintain such a list based on word recognition? Sounds like a lot of computation. Could a tag similar to a taskforce tag be used without creating a taskforce page? It's really an interesting problem,
205:
ask the people who belong to those groups, even if the groups appear to be inactive. It's okay for different groups of people to be working on similar articles. WikiProjects are people, not lists of articles. If you identify and explain clear, practical benefits of a merger to all of the affected
2805:
Through my own WikiProject work and observing of others working in different WikiProjects, I've wondered why there doesn't seem to be a dedicated spot for us to share our technical ideas about how to better operate the WikiProjects. In more general venues, I see people asking questions about how to
2433:
The
Campaigns Product and Programs Teams at the Wikimedia Foundation wants to learn more about WikiProjects and other on-wiki collaborations work. We would like to do more work that improves the quality of collaborations onwiki. We especially need examples of WikiProjects and other collaborations
790:
Question 6 above in the header of this page. But there are probably a heap of caveats that as a long term talk page tagger would in turn ask of the proposer for merges etc. A large amount. As for sense in merging proposals, it would be very useful to look at the history of the processes of the
1702:
I agree that’s problematic. I intend to have resources on the main page for people that are intrigued and want to learn about it. The timing could be a bit better for me, and I’m not exactly the most competent person. I’ll get more familiar with wiki projects before starting it and have specific
2517:
are struggling to maintain activity levels and could benefit from being consolidated into a less niche group. Perhaps WiR, as one of the stand-out examples of a successful wikiproject, could be a focus point for this? Preserving the merged wikiprojects as task force would mean their tagging and
2509:
that you said you use it reviewing and assessing articles and that its template is used on many articles. I'm not sure that translates to widely-used and highly active. The purpose of a wikiproject is to facilitate a group of people engaging in collaborative editing; the system of tagging and
1428:
and getting help from other projects when struggling to find sources would be tremendously improved by those projects actually being active and useful as resources. The last major update from WikiProject X was in 2015 - I think we're at a very different place in the project's development and
2249:
A lot of WikiProjects don't have specific co-ordinators. The WikiProject talk page provides a place to hold discussions to generate consensus agreements on guidance, and the main project page points interested editors to that guidance and any initiatives, which can be driven by anyone.
1647:
Creating the group requires work for you (I'd guess 5–50 hours), plus, if you want to succeed, several hours a month in finding and recruiting new editors for the next two years. Failure creates a couple of hours' work for other people (e.g., to merge it up to the anthro project).
170:
has tagged about 2.05 million articles, which is more than three times the size of the second largest number of pages tagged by a WikiProject. About ten groups have tagged more than 100,000 articles. You can see a list of projects and the number of articles they have assessed
1643:
is the only editor who is interested and has more experience than you, and that's not a recipe for success. I'm not saying the group is doomed, because I do think it has a chance at success, but it also looks like a bigger chance for being inactive in a year or two than being
2278:
Please do continue to look for interested editors, and point them to, say, the
Anthropology WikiProject talk page for related discussions on initiatives or to develop guidance! Collaborating with other passionate editors is a good way for everyone involved to be motivated.
1353:
1851:
extra visibility. The advantage for others is that it channels activity back to the parent wikiproject and, should the task force becoming inactive, it's easier to fold it back into that wikiproject by simply redirecting the pages and deprecating the banner parameter. –
1327:
does seem like what we might be looking for, creating a parallel system rather than grafting something on the existing one (not stuck on the same fitness landscape mountain). I'll have to read it more closely another time to see how responsiveness is being considered.
2245:
Having a lot of people actively participating doesn't mean they need to have a separate WikiProject page. My suggestion is to focus on getting content written and building up the roster of active editors. Creating a taskforce is mainly useful to have separate article
1746:
75%) become inactive, even when people sign up to them, and the profusion of inactive wikiprojects makes it harder for new editors to find active groups that they can join. On the other hand, I think this could be a great opportunity to inject some new life into
1285:
2407:
If you don't think it's a good idea, we can keep it as a taskforce, think it'd be easy in the future to turn it into a WikiProject if necessary using the Find and replace feature on AWB. I'll comment at WP:Anthro about this to see if they're okay with it
2697:
221:
No, there are no requirements. However, new WikiProjects, especially new groups that are proposed by new editors, rarely remain active for longer than a few months unless there are at least six or eight active editors involved at the time of
1319:
that the social function of
Knowledge (XXG) developed fast enough that functionality began to depend on it, and now that that social element has decreased, or at least changed, the functionality is stuck. We're on a particular mountain in a
2504:
a few weeks ago, based primarily on the fact that there hasn't been a substantial discussion on its talk page for over a year and that participants do not appear to be coordinated collaborative efforts in any other ways. I can see from the
1048:
1038:
1090:. I thought it would merit mention in this section because I find no evidence that the council was consulted on its creation. It appears to be yet another knee-jerk reaction to news headlines, destined to enjoy a short shelf life.
1956:
1185:
1162:
206:
groups, they are likely to agree to combining into a larger group. However, if they object, then you may not merge the pages. For less-active groups, you may need to wait a month or more to make sure that no one objects.
1906:
has made greater use of task forces than any other group, so I think you should poke around in their pages to get some ideas. Some of theirs are subject-focused and others are procedural (e.g., A-class article review).
2731:
151:
Nobody knows, because not all participants add their names to a membership list, and membership lists are almost always out of date. You can find out which projects' main pages are being watched by the most users at
1836:
1053:
1043:
1058:
1772:
focussed on oral tradition and still have the same templates as a WP? I just think these would be really useful and oral tradition is quite a logical split as it’s segregated from other forms of literature
2915:
1063:
990:
534:
60:
829:
2485:
Women's sport has been discussed on the talk page of WP Women in Red. It has been suggested that the project is widely used and highly active. It should therefore no longer be listed as "inactive".--
2022:
There's no need to apologize. You're doing most of the work yourself, and you're also presenting a great reminder of what we want to accomplish, as we think about how to fix the proposal process.
2189:
697:
936:
615:
932:
656:
186:
That is the exclusive right of the participants of the WikiProject. Editors at an article may neither force the group to tag an article nor refuse to permit them to tag an article. See
1607:
people wouldn't do anything general, but focus on specific regions they're interested in. I have 5 definites atm, would it be possible to give it a go and start it, and then merge into
958:
1881:
Would it be possible to have pages also tagged by region, as I imagine a lot of editors will only be interested in a particular region. Maybe we could just group the WP country tags?
2891:
589:
1222:
from is that mainspace categories are highly nested, so you have to be really careful how you specify the scope or you'll get all sorts of tangential stuff included. For example
1392:
1847:
577:
573:
153:
2599:
2293:
spamming
African history editors now lol, people seem to really appreciate the notification, although that may be availability bias since the ones that don't ignore it
2755:
1802:
649:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
2440:
Never participated in a WikiProject or other collaborations, but have ideas on how we could make collaboration better? You can also share feedback on the talk page:
2446:
Please share the survey with anyone you think would help us have valuable insights, we are particularly looking for successful collaborations on non-English wikis.
1231:
2774:
2634:
1451:
584:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
2977:
would like your help prioritizing problems and features that would help these collaborations work better. If you have about 10 minutes, please take this survey:
1425:
747:
1246:
into it. The major downside of course is that these lists must be manually generated and maintained and quickly deteriorate if the wikiproject becomes inactive.
2352:, so it seems we're bloating their articles with ones outside their scope. We've got a lot of editors, although I'm unsure of how it's going to come to life
2368:
1751:, which is something I've been wanting to do for a while. If you'd consider starting an oral tradition task force of WPAnthro, I'd be very happy to help. –
1257:, a way of creating automatically updated flat lists of articles. There's a great explanation of how these could fit into a revitalised wikiproject system
2778:
825:
705:
642:
1400:
2676:
2613:
2506:
1936:
1820:
733:
712:
610:
605:
212:
2641:
2513:
You can change it back to active if you want, but I don't think that will change anything about the reality. It seems to me that this and most of the
2367:
Are you sure that these articles are "outside their scope", and not merely "accidentally overlooked"? Occasionally, a group will have a page such as
766:
2683:
2592:
1903:
91:
2627:
1384:
1158:
740:
726:
2978:
2748:
2722:
2690:
2669:
2648:
1745:
I think you're off to a great start by contacting other wikiprojects and gathering a group, but I share WAID's concerns. Most wikiprojects (: -->
1258:
719:
366:
362:
358:
354:
1243:
2941:
2704:
2662:
2606:
2539:
means would be better), and the talk page could be redirected to the main page, so that people asking for help would actually get responses.
2522:
a better long term solution would be to develop categorisation and monitoring tools that don't depend on an otherwise moribund wikiproject. –
1896:
1087:
966:
891:
566:
118:
2554:. With the switch to sitewide assessment, it's become irrelevant. Articles get assessed regardless of whether the group is assessing them.
2952:
2713:
2655:
2544:
2183:
1748:
1585:
1154:
970:
801:
2843:
I was thinking in terms of an organized resource that can be cooperatively built, not unlike other technology resources we have, such as
1383:. Sadly the project was under-resourced and never finished, leaving its work either in a prototype stage (the WPX UI, trialled e.g. at
3003:
2741:
1388:
1150:
759:
167:
2346:
1935:
In theory, you should talk to the hosting WikiProject first. This does not need to be a big discussion; just add a quick update to
1826:
962:
137:
67:
2620:
2162:
Of course this pretty strongly discourages actually creating any new wikiprojects. But at this point I think that's appropriate. –
1581:
27:
1227:
2948:
2195:
1846:
The advantage of this approach for you is that you can build on an existing group of people (though WP:ANTHRO is not so active,
755:
552:
523:
515:
469:
449:
35:
2551:
1103:
791:
council in the last 18 years or so, and where some over time merges/changes might be looked at for the efficacy of such moves.
1010:
It looks like this proposal is not welcomed by the people most affected by it, and therefore should not proceed at this time.
424:
1239:
2576:
2540:
2465:
could offer useful background on Women in Red and its non-English extensions, and perhaps other collaborative initiatives.--
770:
2231:
That’s an issue I’m running into atm, lots of people are happy to join but I’m struggling to see who would be coordinators
1787:
Specifically an article template with all the oral tradition articles would be very helpful, the vast majority are stubs
696:
to merge inactive projects in the history topic was well received, I'm now looking to the remaining inactive projects in
31:
461:
443:
133:
1290:
395:
1832:
868:
i appreciate the ideas for adding some of these to WikiProject
History. if i can assist, please let me know. thanks!
1189:
2928:
1840:
1555:
It's very broad and trendy at the moment (as it's only starting to become respected in academia), and could absorb
1381:
increase the activity WikiProjects and make WikiProjects more central to the experience of editing
Knowledge (XXG)
1361:
2867:
1823:). You then add a new parameter to the WikiProject's banner which marks it as of interest to the task force, e.g.
1376:
1242:
contains articles about Joe Biden and nothing else, and you can rest assured that nobody is likely to drop all of
2942:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
Climbing#Suggesting a change of WP:WikiProject Climbing/Article recommendations
2844:
2385:
Yeah most of the pages are pieces of literature, which isn’t really anything to do with anthropology. It’s only
1769:
1608:
625:
375:
2985:
2451:
2894:
could use some attention, and it would be an appropriate place to leave notes about scripts that are working.
1494:
1114:
773:, which is more active and organised at the moment. Where's the best place to discuss these kind of issues? –
539:
474:
430:
1525:
Making a proposal will not find you any more editors. Nobody watches those pages. What's your subject area?
2875:
2786:
1333:
1201:
837:
2899:
2559:
2376:
2208:
2096:
2027:
1985:
1944:
1912:
1679:
1653:
1597:
1530:
1502:
1403:
for the WMF to see if they can equip someone to pick it up. Please comment there if you are interested. –
1309:
1138:
1015:
916:
859:
187:
2921:
2434:
that have worked on different
Wikimedia projects. Please help us by filling out a short survey on Meta:
1357:
1238:
of stuff not related to Joe Biden. What makes WikiProject categories attractive is that they're 'flat':
911:
This proposal was made more than 30 days ago, and anything that was agreed to could be implemented now.
2148:
I think that's a good idea. Building on the above discussion, a new proposals process could look like:
1556:
1324:
1254:
670:
2966:
About a month ago, I shared a consultation where we are looking at successful on wiki collaborations:
2514:
2981:
2790:
2494:
2447:
2413:
2394:
2357:
2298:
2269:
2236:
2222:
2082:
2068:
2050:
2045:
next). Messaging wikiprojects has attracted practically no-one but I could've done better messages
2013:
1999:
1963:
1926:
1886:
1872:
1792:
1778:
1708:
1693:
1630:
1616:
1571:
1559:. Personally my interest is just in traditional oral history, and institutionalised instances like
1546:
1516:
1483:
1097:
1980:
that out of the Draft: namespace. There is no need to use the Draft: namespace for non-articles.
1589:
2871:
2782:
2280:
2251:
2091:
If you make a list of pages or categories, then it's possible to use AWB or a bot to tag them.
1806:
1434:
1354:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Television/The West Wing task force
1329:
1278:
1223:
1212:
1197:
1193:
833:
700:(i.e. almost all of them!) There is a subset that are about the history of modern nation states:
380:
1219:
2059:
hi, I’m a little confused as to what to do with the categories. Do I start tagging pages using
379:
2895:
2555:
2528:
2490:
2470:
2404:
2372:
2204:
2168:
2092:
2023:
1981:
1940:
1908:
1857:
1757:
1675:
1649:
1593:
1526:
1498:
1460:
1409:
1320:
1305:
1267:
1171:
1134:
1123:
1117:, i.e. to say "don't create a new wikiproject, look for an existing one to join or revive". –
1075:
1011:
979:
912:
900:
855:
814:
779:
2312:
1977:
2920:
Inviting others to join or otherwise help improve this project's infrastructure. Thanks! ---
2848:
2807:
2342:
Can we move it to its own WikiProject? Out of all the articles tagged, practically none had
2320:
2284:
2255:
2122:
1810:
873:
627:
377:
237:
2989:
2956:
2935:
2903:
2879:
2861:
2838:
2820:
2563:
2533:
2474:
2455:
2417:
2398:
2380:
2361:
2324:
2302:
2288:
2273:
2259:
2240:
2226:
2212:
2173:
2126:
2100:
2086:
2072:
2060:
2054:
2031:
2017:
2003:
1989:
1967:
1948:
1930:
1916:
1890:
1876:
1862:
1814:
1796:
1782:
1762:
1712:
1697:
1683:
1657:
1634:
1620:
1601:
1575:
1550:
1534:
1520:
1506:
1487:
1465:
1438:
1414:
1365:
1337:
1313:
1286:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine/Lists of pages/Top-, High-importance medicine articles
1272:
1205:
1176:
1142:
1128:
1108:
1080:
1019:
1005:
984:
951:
920:
905:
877:
863:
841:
819:
795:
784:
1671:
1564:
792:
991:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America#Related WikiProjects
1580:
That sounds too narrow to be sustainable. What do you think about merging the inactive
1511:
I have a few, but I'd like to make a proposal to see whether others would be interested
631:
2833:
2584:
2462:
2409:
2390:
2386:
2353:
2308:
2294:
2265:
2232:
2218:
2078:
2064:
2046:
2038:
2009:
1995:
1973:
1959:
1922:
1882:
1868:
1788:
1774:
1740:
1704:
1689:
1640:
1626:
1612:
1567:
1542:
1539:
1512:
1479:
1215:. It has come up a few times when I've been proposing wikiproject merges and deletions.
1091:
1000:
946:
892:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Business#Merge of business and companies WikiProjects
50:
2997:
1663:
1445:
1430:
172:
2158:
If the task force eventually outgrows its parent, spin it off to its own wikiproject
2974:
2523:
2486:
2466:
2163:
1852:
1752:
1455:
1421:
1404:
1262:
1166:
1118:
1070:
974:
895:
851:
809:
774:
20:
1294:
1049:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Major League Cricket
1039:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject SZA (2nd nomination)
832:; as broad as country wikiprojects can be they're less broad than all of history.
2519:
1819:
Yes, a task force is usually structured as a subpage of the parent project (e.g.
961:, and none of the three are particularly active. I'd suggest merging them all to
629:
2316:
2118:
1667:
869:
1281:, you can set up a 'watchlist' with any arbitrary list of pages. For example:
161:
Q4: Which WikiProject has tagged the most articles as being within their scope?
1250:
2550:
I have removed the idea of assessment as an indicator of group activity from
2510:
assessing articles is supposed to be a means to an end, not an end in itself.
2117:
with comment above by user Whatamidoing, to encourage these helpful efforts.
1397:
any full properly equipped team could pick this project up and see it through
2870:, although dividing discussion into more places doesn't feel the best idea.
2829:
1639:
I can't actually stop you. But purely as a practical matter, it looks like
996:
942:
180:
Q5: Who gets to decide whether a WikiProject is permitted to tag an article?
1937:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Anthropology#WP:WikiProject Oral tradition
1478:
Hi, does anyone know how long it'll be before we can make proposals again?
1186:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Kamala Harris
1163:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Kamala Harris
2441:
2371:
that explains what's in/out of scope, but I don't see one for that group.
1429:
hopefully it could be revitalized. Thanks for kicking off the discussion!
2042:
698:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Council/Directory/History_and_society#History
2947:
Discussion on a project guideline, if you have an opinion, please join.
2426:
Share examples of WikiProjects or collaborations that you have worked on
1957:
Draft:Knowledge (XXG): WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce
140:); many of these have one or more subsidiary task forces or work groups.
2217:
I’d place emphasis on whether the WP develops with lots of core people
2194:
If that's not enough, and you've got lots of people, move that page to
1837:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Archaeology/Women in archaeology task force
1304:" on it, but it would let you find all the edits nominating the pages.
1054:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Dardistan
1044:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Jerusalem
2826:
Yes please. That's exactly what this page should be used for — Martin
1493:
We don't have a timeline. Do you already have a group of editors? A
1059:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Wolf
2967:
2435:
1454:, it'll be more visible to the people making the decision there :) –
211:
Q7: I want to start a WikiProject. Am I required to advertise it at
195:
Q6: I think a couple of WikiProjects should be merged. Is that okay?
113:
A WikiProject is a group of people who want to work together. It is
2916:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Food and drink/Michelin Guide task force
2152:
Find the closest wikiproject(s) and suggest working on the new topic
1064:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Ledisi
693:
1821:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition task force
1560:
1196:, and if the functions of the first can be shifted to the second.
830:
Knowledge (XXG):Tambayan Philippines/Philippine history task force
2190:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anthropology/Oral tradition taskforce
800:
I will of course propose the merge to the affected wikiprojects;
86:
2518:
assessment functions would remain essentially unchanged, though
2264:
Think I need to take a step back and let it develop organically
1703:
objectives. I’m going to try to get 10 or 15 before starting it
1184:
Noting the utility of the Wikiproject categories was raised at
758:, or to the respective countries (e.g. Australian history into
477:
in general. If you would like to participate, please visit the
2515:~20 other projects on specific subsets of biographies of women
1115:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject#Creating and maintaining a project
632:
406:
381:
231:
76:
45:
15:
117:
a subject area, a collection of pages, or a list of articles
1030:
Several recently-created WikiProjects nominated for deletion
2547:, since it is more generic (though distinctly less active).
804:
with the last batch. What I'm asking for here is input on
2892:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Guide/Technical notes
2866:
Might be something that can be taken from the remains of
2781:
show more than one reply in the past few years, if that.
2155:
If there's enough interest, propose creating a task force
1086:
I'm seeing a post elsewhere about the recent creation of
2888:
I don't think very many people are working in that area.
2773:
Out of all the projects listed in the WiR sidebar, only
1452:
meta:Talk:Community Wishlist/Wishes/Finish WikiProject X
1113:
I suspect so. Maybe it's time to revise the guidance in
2501:
754:
Would it make more sense to propose merging these into
678:
544:
97:
2442:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/Talk:Campaigns/WikiProjects
769:, which I can see fitting into history, but also into
1895:
If they're already tagged by country projects (e.g.,
993:
because that has generated some discussion? — Martin
154:
Knowledge (XXG):Database reports/WikiProject watchers
136:), and 243 WikiProjects tagged as "Semi-active" (see
1218:
I think the major obstacle to decoupling tools like
931:
I was surprised that we have two separate projects:
215:
and/or have a specific number of editors support it?
1843:
is an example of a page using the banner parameter.
132:There are 917 WikiProjects tagged as "Active" (see
2775:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Women in Religion
2008:Sorry, I know I'm just creating work for you guys
1149:Turns out it's a pattern; the same editor created
2975:Campaign Product team at the Wikimedia Foundation
2968:https://meta.wikimedia.org/Campaigns/WikiProjects
2436:https://meta.wikimedia.org/Campaigns/WikiProjects
1450:Great! If you don't mind voicing your support at
1424:- I'm interested! I have done a lot of work with
1371:Finishing WikiProject X on the community wishlist
939:. Perhaps these would be better merged? — Martin
1253:is working on an solution to this very problem:
2369:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Medicine/Assessment
1232:Category:COVID-19 pandemic in the United States
937:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America
423:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
2779:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Women Do News
2311:, if you want, feel free to invite editors at
1662:Also, I suspect that you will want to talk to
1133:I've copied the text from the proposals page.
933:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas
826:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philippine History
30:discussions and keep related topics together,
2749:
1921:Would it be possible to create the page now?
650:
389:This page has archives. Sections older than
213:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council/Proposals
8:
1904:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1839:for an example of how it works in practice;
886:Merge of business and companies WikiProjects
2962:Followup survey on why collaborations work!
1159:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Hillary Clinton
959:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia
767:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women's History
2973:We are doing a followup survey, where the
2756:
2742:
2570:
2196:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Oral tradition
1688:Thank you for your help, have a great day
1385:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women's Health
1161:. I've nominated all four for deletion at
657:
643:
510:
438:
355:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject/Archive 1
1899:), then that could probably be automated.
1897:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1835:for only those articles. You can look at
1249:But as it happens I've just learned that
1088:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Kamala Harris
2545:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women in Red
2184:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anthropology
1586:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Anthropology
1188:. Broadly, the question here is how/why
1155:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Donald Trump
2970:. You can still share examples there!
2728:
2719:
2710:
2703:
2696:
2689:
2682:
2675:
2668:
2661:
2654:
2647:
2640:
2633:
2626:
2619:
2612:
2605:
2598:
2591:
2573:
2179:That sounds appropriate. For example:
1831:. This allows you to set up tools like
1240:Category:WikiProject Joe Biden articles
597:
558:
522:
440:
1955:Is this the right way to go about it?
1396:
1395:, the WikiProject X team did say that
1380:
1244:Category:WikiProject COVID-19 articles
2077:Do I do it all manually or use bots?
1867:That sounds great, I like that a lot
1497:is the people, not the subject area.
1151:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Joe Biden
7:
2543:might be a more willing target than
1582:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Folklore
412:
410:
126:Q2: How many WikiProjects are there?
487:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council
473:, a collaborative effort regarding
429:It is of interest to the following
145:Q3: What's the biggest WikiProject?
36:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Council
1375:I imagine many here will remember
1352:You are invited to participate at
1300:That won't sort a list that says "
965:, if not an even broader project (
688:Inactive national history projects
34:and all talk pages of subpages of
14:
2541:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women
1426:WikiProject Unreferenced articles
1401:request on the community wishlist
1387:) or unmaintained (the automated
771:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women
748:WikiProject United States History
393:may be automatically archived by
138:Category:Semi-active WikiProjects
2583:
2109:
1228:Category:Presidency of Joe Biden
514:
460:
442:
411:
236:
85:
49:
32:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject
19:
2720:Article improvement department:
2552:Template:WikiProject status/doc
1034:Please see the discussions at:
2418:18:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
2315:, as well. totally up to you.
1190:Category:WikiProject Joe Biden
963:WikiProject Indigenous peoples
706:WikiProject Australian history
1:
2990:17:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2868:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject X
2399:07:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
2381:23:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
2362:20:38, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
2203:Does that sound about right?
890:Please see the discussion at
808:projects to propose it to. –
734:WikiProject Pakistani history
713:WikiProject History of Canada
2845:Knowledge (XXG):User scripts
2801:WikiProject technology share
2711:Missing articles department:
1348:The West Wing task force MfD
490:Template:WikiProject Council
134:Category:Active WikiProjects
2957:10:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
2936:23:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
2904:18:58, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
2880:10:05, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
2862:08:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
2839:07:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
2821:00:14, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
2325:19:30, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
2188:If that's not enough, make
2127:19:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
1291:Special:RecentChangesLinked
989:Yes maybe. Can you post at
741:WikiProject Russian history
727:WikiProject Chinese history
3020:
2791:01:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
2564:20:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2534:12:18, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2495:10:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2475:10:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1841:Talk:Margaret Ursula Jones
1399:. To that end I've made a
921:02:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
720:WikiProject Indian history
668:
102:Frequently asked questions
3004:WikiProject Council pages
2914:A few of us have created
2910:Michelin Guide task force
2777:and the recently created
2600:Architecture & design
2481:WikiProject Women's sport
2456:20:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2303:17:31, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2289:17:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2274:17:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2260:17:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2241:06:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2227:06:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2213:01:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2174:22:04, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
2101:01:34, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2087:17:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
2073:07:28, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
2055:19:32, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2032:17:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2018:17:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2004:17:37, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1990:17:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1968:17:26, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1949:17:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1931:16:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
1917:16:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1891:16:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1877:15:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1863:15:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1815:14:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1797:12:23, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1783:12:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1768:Could we do a section in
1763:11:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1713:21:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1698:21:43, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1684:21:38, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1658:21:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1635:20:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1621:20:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1602:20:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1576:19:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1551:19:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1535:19:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1521:18:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1507:18:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1488:17:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1466:11:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1439:13:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1415:13:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1379:, a WMF-funded effort to
1366:18:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1338:16:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1314:15:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1302:Categories for discussion
1273:11:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1206:10:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1177:15:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1143:23:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1129:10:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1109:01:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1081:15:09, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
1020:22:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
1006:12:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
985:11:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
967:WikiProject Ethnic groups
952:08:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
878:13:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
864:22:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
467:This page relates to the
455:
437:
387:
353:See earlier archives at:
234:
107:Q1: What's a WikiProject?
2347:WikiProject Anthropology
1827:WikiProject Anthropology
1749:WikiProject Anthropology
1611:if it becomes inactive?
1325:Knowledge (XXG):Pagesets
1255:Knowledge (XXG):Pagesets
971:WikiProject Anthropology
906:18:20, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
842:08:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
820:08:36, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
796:02:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
785:13:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
1848:nineteen of its members
1211:Thanks for noting this
824:I previously converted
479:project discussion page
2698:Warfare & military
396:Lowercase sigmabot III
2732:Gender gap task force
2649:History Month (March)
2502:marked it as inactive
2480:
2389:that had the banner.
1829:|oral-tradition=yes}}
1588:, and then trying to
1584:into the semi-active
1389:WikiProject Directory
760:WikiProject Australia
168:WikiProject Biography
2507:WT:WOMRED discussion
1592:the anthro project?
1391:). However in their
1234:which contains... a
62:a WikiProject Report
2313:WikiProject History
765:Similarly, there's
756:Wikiproject History
525:WikiProject Council
470:WikiProject Council
57:WikiProject Council
2949:GrĂĄbergs GrĂĄa SĂĄng
2520:as discussed above
1224:Category:Joe Biden
1194:Category:Joe Biden
1099:Talk to me, Billy
927:Indigenous peoples
425:content assessment
2855:s among the rest!
2837:
2814:s among the rest!
2766:
2765:
2577:WikiProject Women
2532:
2430:Hi Wikimedians!
2172:
1861:
1803:previous comments
1761:
1464:
1413:
1321:fitness landscape
1271:
1175:
1127:
1079:
1004:
983:
950:
904:
818:
783:
667:
666:
581:
509:
508:
505:
504:
501:
500:
403:
402:
230:
229:
100:
75:
74:
71:on 18 April 2011.
42:
41:
3011:
2931:
2924:
2923:Another Believer
2859:
2857:
2827:
2818:
2816:
2758:
2751:
2744:
2587:
2571:
2526:
2351:
2345:
2166:
2113:
2112:
1855:
1830:
1755:
1744:
1458:
1449:
1407:
1358:theleekycauldron
1265:
1169:
1121:
1106:
1100:
1094:
1073:
994:
977:
940:
898:
812:
777:
681:
659:
652:
645:
633:
571:
526:
518:
511:
495:
494:
493:Council articles
491:
488:
485:
464:
457:
456:
446:
439:
416:
415:
414:
407:
398:
382:
240:
232:
188:WP:PROJGUIDE#OWN
90:
89:
77:
59:was featured in
53:
46:
23:
16:
3019:
3018:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3010:
3009:
3008:
2994:
2993:
2964:
2945:
2934:
2929:
2922:
2912:
2856:
2852:
2849:
2815:
2811:
2808:
2803:
2762:
2483:
2428:
2349:
2343:
2110:
1824:
1770:WP:Anthropology
1738:
1609:WP:Anthropology
1565:Kouroukan Fouga
1476:
1443:
1373:
1350:
1230:which contains
1104:
1098:
1092:
1032:
929:
888:
690:
685:
684:
677:
673:
663:
634:
628:
590:Technical notes
551:
550:
538:
537:
524:
492:
489:
486:
483:
482:
394:
383:
378:
226:
225:
224:
223:
216:
208:
207:
196:
192:
191:
181:
177:
176:
162:
158:
157:
146:
142:
141:
127:
123:
122:
108:
103:
101:
12:
11:
5:
3017:
3015:
3007:
3006:
2996:
2995:
2982:Astinson (WMF)
2979:on Google Docs
2963:
2960:
2944:
2939:
2926:
2911:
2908:
2907:
2906:
2889:
2886:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2882:
2854:
2813:
2802:
2799:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2794:
2793:
2764:
2763:
2761:
2760:
2753:
2746:
2738:
2735:
2734:
2730:
2726:
2725:
2723:Women in Green
2721:
2717:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2707:
2701:
2700:
2694:
2693:
2687:
2686:
2680:
2679:
2673:
2672:
2666:
2665:
2659:
2658:
2652:
2651:
2645:
2644:
2638:
2637:
2631:
2630:
2624:
2623:
2617:
2616:
2610:
2609:
2603:
2602:
2596:
2595:
2589:
2588:
2580:
2579:
2575:
2574:Affiliates of
2569:
2568:
2567:
2566:
2548:
2511:
2482:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2448:Astinson (WMF)
2427:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2401:
2387:oral tradition
2340:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2247:
2243:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2192:
2186:
2160:
2159:
2156:
2153:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2057:
2039:oral tradition
2006:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1900:
1879:
1844:
1833:article alerts
1817:
1785:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1645:
1553:
1540:Oral tradition
1495:WP:WikiProject
1475:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1372:
1369:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1288:
1247:
1220:article alerts
1216:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1105:Transmissions
1067:
1066:
1061:
1056:
1051:
1046:
1041:
1031:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
928:
925:
924:
923:
887:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
752:
751:
744:
737:
730:
723:
716:
709:
689:
686:
683:
682:
674:
669:
665:
664:
662:
661:
654:
647:
639:
636:
635:
630:
626:
624:
621:
620:
619:
618:
613:
608:
600:
599:
595:
594:
593:
592:
587:
585:Assessment FAQ
582:
569:
561:
560:
556:
555:
543:
542:
533:
532:
529:
528:
520:
519:
507:
506:
503:
502:
499:
498:
496:
465:
453:
452:
447:
435:
434:
428:
417:
405:
401:
400:
388:
385:
384:
376:
374:
371:
370:
349:
348:
242:
228:
227:
217:
210:
209:
197:
194:
193:
182:
179:
178:
163:
160:
159:
147:
144:
143:
128:
125:
124:
109:
106:
105:
104:
84:
83:
82:
80:
73:
72:
54:
40:
39:
38:redirect here.
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3016:
3005:
3002:
3001:
2999:
2992:
2991:
2987:
2983:
2980:
2976:
2971:
2969:
2961:
2959:
2958:
2954:
2950:
2943:
2940:
2938:
2937:
2932:
2925:
2918:
2917:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2897:
2893:
2890:
2887:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2864:
2863:
2860:
2858:
2846:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2835:
2831:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2800:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2772:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2759:
2754:
2752:
2747:
2745:
2740:
2739:
2737:
2736:
2733:
2727:
2724:
2718:
2715:
2709:
2706:
2702:
2699:
2695:
2692:
2688:
2685:
2681:
2678:
2674:
2671:
2667:
2664:
2660:
2657:
2653:
2650:
2646:
2643:
2639:
2636:
2635:Hip hop music
2632:
2629:
2625:
2622:
2618:
2615:
2611:
2608:
2604:
2601:
2597:
2594:
2593:African women
2590:
2586:
2582:
2581:
2578:
2572:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2546:
2542:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2521:
2516:
2512:
2508:
2503:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2476:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2444:
2443:
2438:
2437:
2431:
2425:
2419:
2415:
2411:
2406:
2402:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2348:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2286:
2282:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2248:
2244:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2215:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2197:
2193:
2191:
2187:
2185:
2181:
2180:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2170:
2165:
2157:
2154:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2108:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1914:
1910:
1905:
1901:
1898:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1859:
1854:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1828:
1822:
1818:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1759:
1754:
1750:
1742:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1599:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1541:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1528:
1524:
1523:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1474:New proposals
1473:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1453:
1447:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1377:WikiProject X
1370:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1347:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1326:
1322:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1283:
1282:
1280:
1279:Chipmunkdavis
1276:
1275:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1214:
1213:Chipmunkdavis
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1192:differs from
1191:
1187:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1136:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1101:
1095:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1077:
1072:
1065:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1055:
1052:
1050:
1047:
1045:
1042:
1040:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1029:
1021:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1002:
998:
992:
988:
987:
986:
981:
976:
972:
968:
964:
960:
957:There's also
956:
955:
954:
953:
948:
944:
938:
934:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
909:
908:
907:
902:
897:
893:
885:
879:
875:
871:
867:
866:
865:
861:
857:
853:
849:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
822:
821:
816:
811:
807:
803:
799:
798:
797:
794:
789:
788:
787:
786:
781:
776:
772:
768:
763:
761:
757:
750:
749:
745:
743:
742:
738:
736:
735:
731:
729:
728:
724:
722:
721:
717:
715:
714:
710:
708:
707:
703:
702:
701:
699:
695:
694:first attempt
687:
680:
676:
675:
672:
660:
655:
653:
648:
646:
641:
640:
638:
637:
623:
622:
617:
614:
612:
609:
607:
604:
603:
602:
601:
596:
591:
588:
586:
583:
579:
575:
570:
568:
565:
564:
563:
562:
557:
554:
549:
546:
541:
536:
531:
530:
527:
521:
517:
513:
512:
497:
480:
476:
472:
471:
466:
463:
459:
458:
454:
451:
448:
445:
441:
436:
432:
426:
422:
418:
409:
408:
404:
397:
392:
386:
373:
372:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
351:
350:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
241:
239:
233:
220:
214:
204:
200:
189:
185:
174:
169:
166:
155:
150:
139:
135:
131:
121:by the group.
120:
116:
112:
99:
96:
93:
88:
81:
79:
78:
70:
69:
64:
63:
58:
55:
52:
48:
47:
44:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2972:
2965:
2946:
2919:
2913:
2896:WhatamIdoing
2850:
2809:
2804:
2714:Women in Red
2656:Jewish women
2556:WhatamIdoing
2484:
2445:
2439:
2432:
2429:
2405:WhatamIdoing
2373:WhatamIdoing
2341:
2205:WhatamIdoing
2161:
2147:
2114:
2093:WhatamIdoing
2024:WhatamIdoing
1982:WhatamIdoing
1941:WhatamIdoing
1909:WhatamIdoing
1737:
1676:WhatamIdoing
1650:WhatamIdoing
1594:WhatamIdoing
1527:WhatamIdoing
1499:WhatamIdoing
1477:
1393:final report
1374:
1351:
1306:WhatamIdoing
1301:
1235:
1183:
1135:WhatamIdoing
1068:
1033:
1012:WhatamIdoing
930:
913:WhatamIdoing
889:
856:WhatamIdoing
805:
764:
753:
746:
739:
732:
725:
718:
711:
704:
691:
606:WikiProjects
574:WikiProjects
559:Coordination
553:Council page
547:
478:
475:WikiProjects
468:
431:WikiProjects
421:project page
420:
390:
352:
235:
218:
202:
198:
183:
164:
148:
129:
114:
110:
94:
66:
61:
56:
43:
1557:WP:Folklore
1364:• she/her)
1293:for that:
1259:on his blog
598:Directories
578:Task forces
2684:Scientists
2663:Journalism
2461:I believe
2041:, I'll do
1801:As per my
1672:JarrahTree
1093:RadioKAOS
793:JarrahTree
679:WT:COUNCIL
567:Guidelines
244:Archives:
28:centralise
2729:See also:
2463:Rosiestep
2410:Kowal2701
2391:Kowal2701
2354:Kowal2701
2309:Kowal2701
2295:Kowal2701
2266:Kowal2701
2233:Kowal2701
2219:Kowal2701
2079:Kowal2701
2065:Kowal2701
2047:Kowal2701
2010:Kowal2701
1996:Kowal2701
1976:, please
1974:Kowal2701
1960:Kowal2701
1923:Kowal2701
1883:Kowal2701
1869:Kowal2701
1789:Kowal2701
1775:Kowal2701
1741:Kowal2701
1705:Kowal2701
1690:Kowal2701
1641:Bloodofox
1627:Kowal2701
1613:Kowal2701
1590:WP:REVIVE
1568:Kowal2701
1543:Kowal2701
1513:Kowal2701
1480:Kowal2701
1226:contains
692:Since my
611:Proposals
367:Archive 4
363:Archive 3
359:Archive 2
222:creation.
2998:Category
2677:Religion
2621:Feminism
2614:Business
2043:folklore
1664:Pgallert
1446:Kazamzam
1431:Kazamzam
802:as I did
671:Shortcut
616:Signpost
540:Overview
68:Signpost
26:To help
2851:Stefen
2810:Stefen
2705:Writers
2642:History
2487:Ipigott
2467:Ipigott
2246:alerts.
1978:WP:MOVE
1644:active.
1422:Joe Roe
1284:List:
852:Joe Roe
484:Council
450:Council
391:60 days
65:in the
2853:đť•‹ower
2812:đť•‹ower
2628:Health
2317:Sm8900
2281:isaacl
2252:isaacl
2119:Sm8900
2061:WP:AWB
1807:isaacl
1670:, and
1668:Pharos
1625:6 now
870:Sm8900
427:scale.
119:tagged
2691:Sport
2670:Music
2182:Join
2115:Agree
1994:done
1902:BTW,
1561:Griot
1251:Harej
973:?) –
828:into
806:which
419:This
2986:talk
2953:talk
2930:Talk
2900:talk
2876:talk
2834:talk
2830:MSGJ
2787:talk
2560:talk
2529:talk
2491:talk
2471:talk
2452:talk
2414:talk
2395:talk
2377:talk
2358:talk
2321:talk
2299:talk
2285:talk
2270:talk
2256:talk
2237:talk
2223:talk
2209:talk
2169:talk
2123:talk
2097:talk
2083:talk
2069:talk
2051:talk
2028:talk
2014:talk
2000:talk
1986:talk
1964:talk
1945:talk
1927:talk
1913:talk
1887:talk
1873:talk
1858:talk
1811:talk
1793:talk
1779:talk
1758:talk
1709:talk
1694:talk
1680:talk
1654:talk
1631:talk
1617:talk
1598:talk
1572:talk
1563:and
1547:talk
1531:talk
1517:talk
1503:talk
1484:talk
1461:talk
1435:talk
1410:talk
1362:talk
1334:talk
1310:talk
1268:talk
1261:. –
1202:talk
1172:talk
1165:. –
1157:and
1139:talk
1124:talk
1076:talk
1016:talk
1001:talk
997:MSGJ
980:talk
947:talk
943:MSGJ
935:and
917:talk
901:talk
894:. –
874:talk
860:talk
838:talk
815:talk
780:talk
548:talk
535:FAQs
203:must
201:You
173:here
98:edit
92:view
2872:CMD
2783:CMD
2607:Art
2524:Joe
2164:Joe
1853:Joe
1753:Joe
1456:Joe
1405:Joe
1356::)
1330:CMD
1263:Joe
1236:lot
1198:CMD
1167:Joe
1119:Joe
1071:Joe
975:Joe
969:?
896:Joe
834:CMD
810:Joe
775:Joe
762:)?
219:A7:
199:A6:
184:A5:
165:A4:
149:A3:
130:A2:
115:not
111:A1:
3000::
2988:)
2955:)
2902:)
2878:)
2832:·
2789:)
2562:)
2500:I
2493:)
2473:)
2454:)
2416:)
2397:)
2379:)
2360:)
2350:}}
2344:{{
2323:)
2301:)
2287:)
2272:)
2258:)
2239:)
2225:)
2211:)
2125:)
2099:)
2085:)
2071:)
2063:?
2053:)
2030:)
2016:)
2002:)
1988:)
1966:)
1947:)
1939:.
1929:)
1915:)
1889:)
1875:)
1825:{{
1813:)
1795:)
1781:)
1711:)
1696:)
1682:)
1674:.
1666:,
1656:)
1633:)
1619:)
1600:)
1574:)
1549:)
1533:)
1519:)
1505:)
1486:)
1437:)
1336:)
1323:.
1312:)
1204:)
1153:,
1141:)
1069:–
1018:)
999:·
945:·
919:)
876:)
862:)
840:)
576:-
365:,
361:,
357:,
346:26
344:,
342:25
340:,
338:24
336:,
334:23
332:,
330:22
328:,
326:21
324:,
322:20
320:,
318:19
316:,
314:18
312:,
310:17
308:,
306:16
304:,
302:15
300:,
298:14
296:,
294:13
292:,
290:12
288:,
286:11
284:,
282:10
280:,
276:,
272:,
268:,
264:,
260:,
256:,
252:,
248:,
2984:(
2951:(
2933:)
2927:(
2898:(
2874:(
2836:)
2828:(
2785:(
2757:e
2750:t
2743:v
2558:(
2531:)
2527:(
2489:(
2469:(
2450:(
2412:(
2403:@
2393:(
2375:(
2356:(
2319:(
2307:@
2297:(
2283:(
2268:(
2254:(
2235:(
2221:(
2207:(
2198:.
2171:)
2167:(
2121:(
2095:(
2081:(
2067:(
2049:(
2026:(
2012:(
1998:(
1984:(
1972:@
1962:(
1943:(
1925:(
1911:(
1885:(
1871:(
1860:)
1856:(
1809:(
1791:(
1777:(
1760:)
1756:(
1743::
1739:@
1707:(
1692:(
1678:(
1652:(
1629:(
1615:(
1596:(
1570:(
1545:(
1529:(
1515:(
1501:(
1482:(
1463:)
1459:(
1448::
1444:@
1433:(
1420:@
1412:)
1408:(
1360:(
1332:(
1308:(
1277:@
1270:)
1266:(
1200:(
1174:)
1170:(
1137:(
1126:)
1122:(
1102:/
1096:/
1078:)
1074:(
1014:(
1003:)
995:(
982:)
978:(
949:)
941:(
915:(
903:)
899:(
872:(
858:(
850:@
836:(
817:)
813:(
782:)
778:(
658:e
651:t
644:v
580:)
572:(
545:+
481:.
433::
399:.
278:9
274:8
270:7
266:6
262:5
258:4
254:3
250:2
246:1
190:.
175:.
156:.
95:·
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
