Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Cricket/Archive 41

726:

career figures for players who appeared in the previous English season, which is helpful, but how many people have access to a complete run of Playfair? Almost all Wiki player biographies quote CricketArchive or Cricinfo (and hence ultimately ACS) statistics, and in most cases there is no practical alternative if statistics are to be given at all. I hope no-one will say that websites cannot be authoritative sources, since Knowledge (XXG) is itself a website and we are all striving to make it authoritative. The differences in career totals arise through a different in opinion on the first-call status of a handful of matches. There will always be a degree of subjectivity in this for matches in the days before the governing bodies started laying down rigorous definitions of what was f-c. JH (

842:. We already have with a couple of counties separate articles that deal with the county records; in other cases the records and statistical stuff is inside the article on the county club. I'd support any move to standardise on a particular format, but I think the information in this one has value and adds to Knowledge (XXG)'s usefulness. I'd like to see a similar article for other counties. Conversely, I have less attachment to the "xxxshire in 19xx" seasonal articles unless there is a particular notability to the county's deeds in that season, though I wouldn't go so far as to delete them once created. In fact, I think we're in danger of getting too deletionist around here: as Bobo says, what harm are these articles doing? 683:

hence have come up with different career totals for some players, one can't ignore that their figures have been adopted by many authorities. Both of the major online cricket sites, CricketArchive and Cricinfo, use their figures, and most Wiki player biographies take their statistics from one or other of those sites. Like it or not, ACS are far more than a "fringe group". The article is I think useful, factual and does not push a particular POV. I can't see any promotion of the ACS in it. I should add that I am not an ACS member and have no personal axe to grind. (In fact Wisden did use the ACS figures for several years before, with a change of editor I think, they had second thoughts.) JH (

893:

the ICC General Manager David Richardson the ACS "performs an essential role in the cricket world.". The ACS has never claimed that its list of first class is 'correct', it just provides a list so that statisticians can produce a consistent set of data. Currently this is more that Knowledge (XXG) can achieve. We have (since 13 Aug) WGs figures including the matches v Somerset in 1879 and 1881 and the Somerset CCC page having the statement "Somerset CCC played its initial first-class match versus Lancashire CCC at Old Trafford on 8, 9 and 10 June 1882". This is just the sort of inconsistency the ACS list was intended to avoid. (Bangs head against wall!) Nigej 14:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

925:

anyone know of earlier publications?). After him came Frindall. Webber and Frindall are both more notable subjects than anyone in the ACS. Frindall is easily the most famous and most distinguished cricket statistician around and he was in actual fact Webber's successor to this mantle. Why then, does this article relegate Webber and Frindall to the bottom of some sub-section instead of placing them in the van of dissension where they belong? The answer is that the article was written by an ACS apologist who invariably, browsing some of his contributions, quotes the ACS as his source even when it is only a tertiary source like Knowledge (XXG) itself.

885:

class matches which starts in 1882 (as per the ACS list of first class matches). Are we to tell the editor of the Yearbook that he's completely wrong and that he should be including the additional matches. At the same we can tell Peter Roebuck he got it all wrong too in his history of Somerset CCC. Indeed I can't find a single publication about Somerset CCC which includes the 1879 and 1881 in its stats about Somerset ever. And I mean ever. I'd be interested to hear of one. Are all these publication wrong. No. The list of matches is not set in stone. Different authors use different lists.

881:- Fiddlers Threes main point seems to be that the ACS has no more authority that anyone else and that Wisden/Playfair figures are somehow nearly universally accepted. It is simply not the case that Wisden has more authority that the ACS or anyone else. There is no authoritative list of first class matches before 1947. All lists are in a sense equally valid. However there are, to all intents and purposes, just two lists. The purpose of the article is to explain this and the historical reasons. 3322:, but "Muralitharan" is by far the most popular name, so the question is, do we follow wiki policy and go with the incorrect but most widely used name, or switch to the spelling he prefers, which very few people use. I'm leaning towards "Muralitharan", because in similar cases that's probably what's been done on Knowledge (XXG), (a notable exception would be the renaming of Myanmar to Burma) but there is the argument that just because most people get it wrong, we don't have to. -- 1391:

claimed. If we must have references for scores, then online references from a respected site such as CricketArchive, that anyone is in a position to check, seem to me to be preferable. I appreciate that we can't go against Knowledge (XXG) guidelines on citations, if we want to retain FA status, but these are two related points that have been bothering me for a long time, so I thought that this was as good an excuse as any to vent on the subject. :) JH (

31: 1761: 1581:

read, differences between stats in published accounts are "discrepancies", and there is no POV or implication of correctness on one side or the other in this. I'll not now change this back, but it doesn't leave a pleasant taste with me: I'd hoped that some work by some of us without a particular axe to grind in this area might sort this out in the spirit of collaboration. Obviously I was too naive.

3366:

be called. Cities, countries etc. have alternate names in different languages, so the native name isn't always what is followed on Knowledge (XXG). But you can't just start calling people all sorts of wrong names. If it was spelt wrong to start off with and continues to be spelt wrong in the media, doesn't mean we have to follow suit. I believe that's why

1091:

cricketer of that name, not the player that I'm after. In a situation like that, it's very useful to be able to look at all the players in the "New Zealand cricketers" category and find him that way. (Ideally of course, any entries for other Joe Bloggs would contain appropriate disambiguation pointers, but in practice that often is lacking.) JH (

2439: 1554:

miscalculates a total in his chosen version; but his choice of version is not necessarily wrong. The article should not use terms like traditional or revisionist either. I would call it Variations in First-class Cricket Statistics. This discussion should have been left on here for longer than two days before changing the title. --

995:

counties, identifying where there is debate about the first-class status of some matches. And I would regard the departure of a respected editor such as Nigej in the face of an anti-ACS campaign by a couple of closely associated editors as to be very much regretted and against what we are trying to achieve here. Now I am away again.

3263:

how it is spelt, as long as it is pronounced (moor-allee-DOOR-an). As in saying the nickname, Murali, and then adding DURAN on the end. I was the guy who moved the page to "Mutiah Muralidaran," and changed on the "Muralitharans" to "Muralidarans." Feel free to post back on my talkpage with thoughts on how to do this. thanks

3365:

I pretty much okay with sticking to "Muralitharan", cos it isn't that much of an issue and that's what explicit Knowledge (XXG) policy states, but I disagree with what you've said there. It's not up to Wisden or Cricinfo or "other RS" to decide what someones name is. It's up to them what they want to

1543:, following Stephen's suggestion. I have also amended references in the Grace, Hobbs, Jack Newman and Somerset CCC First-Class Matches articles to point to this article as providing an explanation for the divergences in published stats. The article itself could still do with some work on it, I think. 1016:

There seems to be something of witch hunt against me simply because I choose to exclude (in my articles about Somerset CCC) some early matches in which WG Grace played and to provide a discussion about career figures. I'm happy to leave Knowledge (XXG) to its own devices but to hound out well meaning

905:

I have been very interested in the views expressed by several people and I have revised my opinion about the article. I do not think, as some have suggested, that it should be merged into the main ACS article. I believe it should retitled and restructured but, in essence, retained. It is true that

3386:

Various responses - our article about Germany is not at Deutschland. I presume Murali's name is a transliteration, not spelled originally in English characters. Knowledge (XXG) is a mirror... it's not for us to decide the rights and wrongs of spelling... we reflect the world as portrayed by WP:V and

3262:

He says that he wants to be known as Muttiah Muralidaran, not Muralitharan. I don't know how old the article is, but it seems he still feels the same way about his name. On the Channel 9 coverage of the Australia-Sri Lanka Test match, in an interview with the team he said that he doesn't really care

2331:

Yuvraj of Patiala was moved to Maharaja Yadavindra Singh last night by Trv93. He copied the text and pasted it onto the new article this means the history was destroyed. I googled both names and Yuvraj of Patiala won by 45,900 to 1,160. Can one of the admins who has knowledge of India take a look at

1461:

The consensus on this article when it was up for deletion was not entirely clear: it has, however, been kept and a lot of contributors to that deliberation (including me) felt that the title needed to be changed. Rather than let this languish, can we have a debate here about a new title for this, as

1041:

No witch hunt or anything personal from me. In fact I'm going to withdraw from all discussions about that article and remove my last post on this page because I did promise myself when I returned to WP recently that I would not get involved in anything to do with ACS and here I am getting sucked in

975:

You're missing the point regarding the ACS list. It is simply a list. I don't care which list is used but I do think it would be better to use a list and not provide inconsistent data. Use a different list by all means, the 'Traditionalist' one would be quite appropriate. All I ask is that a list is

956:

I have never claimed that the article is correctly or well written. Indeed my first comment in the talk page of Traditional career totals quite clearly says "I'm fully aware that the style of the article might not be suitable for Wikpedia, although I had fun writing it. If anyone wants to rewrite it

814:

I don't think club reviews by season should be classified as a statistical compilation, though obviously care is needed by the author. But I agree with Stephen about the Somerset one because that is purely a list of stats and they mean very little. A new user has just produced one for Yorkshire in

659:

It does not matter what the ACS thinks about Grace's record any more than what Fred Bloggs thinks or what I think. The fact is that Wisden is THE authoritative source for cricket statistics and remains the one that must be quoted. Playfair is a good secondary source, especially for its biographies

2608:

You've lost me. I know of no controversy about the County Championship unless you mean the different lists in use between 1864 and 1889? I have used Grace's list as a default, but that is not controversial, especially as I have stated where a strong alternative claim exists. There is controversy

2593:

I think the articles should remain separate with clear cross-refs between them. The County Championship is a formal competition that did not start until 1890; the informal and unofficial rankings before that are clearly part of the background that led to the establishment of the formal competition,

2545:

I believe a merged article would have a good chance of elevation to good or even featured article status. At present, it is a house divided. The former article describes the origin of the championship in conceptual terms and the latter is specific to the official competition that evolved from the

1889:

wikilinked date will be shown according to your preferences. If however, you are not logged in, or have no date preference set, then they will be shown as entered, so it is better to enter them in the format best suited to the article. The template currently uses the "US" format, meaning anyone not

1566:

I've made a start on improving the article but am nowhere near finished as the chapters about Grace and Hobbs need revision. I've given it a meaningful intro and improved the tail-end chapter about other cricketers. I've also tidied up some of the linkages and added some additional sources. I'll

1438:

I would remove all match and series descriptions and only refer to matches and series in terms of their impact on the legend or their association with the introduction of the recent replica trophies. So I would talk about how the Demon's performance in 1882 gave rise to the obituary; about how the

892:

Regarding the ACS it is worth noting that ACS is now regularly consulted about statistical matters by the ICC. The classification of List 'A' matches has now officially been transferred from the ACS to the ICC but with the ACS continuing to provide advice and maintaining the official list. To quote

884:

The example quoted about Somerset is a useful example. The 'Traditional' figures for WG include matches played by Gloucestershire against Somerset in 1879 and 1881. However a look at the Somerset Yearbook 2007 (a publication which has no allegiance at all to the ACS) has a summary of Somerset first

430:

I think your new article should focus on Derbyshire in the 1895 County Championship but include a sub-section about other first-class matches played that season (I haven't checked who they did play that year). I think a separate article about the origins of Derbyshire CCC and covering its first 25

412:

Whether it should focus on Derbyshire in the County Championship or Derbyshire in first-class cricket (from their debut first-class appearance in 1870) I am undecided, but since there were so few matches in those first twenty-five seasons, I see this as having less of a point to it than focusing on

2507:

I was planning to use AWB to change all links from ] to ]er but it was being uncooperative and kept crashing so I didn't get anyway. If I get it working, I'll try and check for ] player as well. It will be more obvious to editors what the correct form is. I'll mention it on the project style guide

2062:

who was both a cricketer with Hampshire and a footballer with Southampton. As my cricket knowledge is fairly limited, I was wondering if someone could have a look at the article and possibly tidy up, improve or expand the cricket sections. I was deliberating whether to title the article as "Arthur

1610:

Discrepancy is a synonym of error and in common usage it signifies an error of detail. There are no errors of detail in the Wisden version of these stats and none in the CricketArchive version either: they are simply two alternative versions. I am very interested in the article because I can see

924:

Now we come to the crux of the matter. Instead of loudly proclaiming the part of the ACS in all this, the article must examine the origin of dissent. I doubt if Webber was the first to question WG's totals but he was probably the first to publish a significant work that asked that question (does

3341:

Outside of BLP issues, the subject's preferences are not our prime concern. RS are. This is the English language Knowledge (XXG). As he is universally known in English media/books as Muralitharan, that is how we should refer to him. Should the leading RS (Wisden, Cricinfo etc) start moving to the

1434:

That is better than now but it still needs to be trimmed back because of imbalance. England v. Australia was until about 1975 the virtual Cricket World Championship. By the time of the overrated 1981 series, it was an also-ran contest between two very ordinary teams who just happened to produce

888:

While we're about it why don't we tell all those statisticians in India and authors of publications about Indian first class cricket that there all wrong too by including the disputed tour in which Jack Hobbs played. I'm sure a load of Englishmen telling them the error of their ways would go down

2262:

Please can people lend their support to the above FAC. The article is good enough for FA but the last FAC was closed unsuccessfully simply because hardly anyone commented, and those who did didn't go back and lend their support once we addressed their points. Please lets not let that happen this

2245:

2093:

article, and have come across a discrepancy in his ListA runs. Currently Cricinfo and Cricketarchive have the figure at 2210, but other sources and biographical articles (not necessarily cricket related) have this at 2269. I have gone with the reliable figures, but was wondering if the incorrect

1674:

It is pointless pedantic discussion that fails to address the real issue. We have far too many stubs. I see a figure of 5600 quoted and that was six months ago so there must be well over 6000 by now. What is needed is a concerted effort to expand the articles or to utilise the {{notstub}} tag

1580:

How interesting that two days with three fairly experienced editors pretty much in agreement is too short a time to make a change, when just a couple of hours is enough for one person to override that view. From a reader's viewpoint, which is the one that matters in a work that is intended to be

682:

I strongly disagree. I see the Traditional Career Totals srticle has now been proposed for deletion, which I think is a pity. I'll repeat what I said in the deletion debate. Whilst I think that it is a pity that ACS have gone against tradition as to which matches are accepted as first-class, and

655:

I'm not sure of all the WP guidelines and policies but I know there is one about notability. The notability of Wisden and, to a lesser extent, Playfair is in no doubt; but the notability of the ACS is questionable. It does not represent anyone or anything except its own members, one of whom is

448:

Thank you for your reply, BlackJack. The only other first-class match Derbyshire played in the 1895 season was a match against Marylebone Cricket Club. I was really talking about the period pre-1895 when they were already playing first-class cricket, but were not in the County Championship - for

1785:

As the quality of articles on modern Test cricketers is generally high and the research has become very detailed, I have noticed that the number of items in the list of references (footnotes) has become quite large. I have started to include scroll bars and panels on those cricketers with very

1390:

That has a citation of the relevant part of Harte's book. But something as straightforward as a scorecard could be easily looked up by anyone interested online by anyone with any Googling skills. Few people will have access to the Harte book in any case, to check that it really does say what is

960:

It would indeed be interesting to have a fuller history but this may overdoing it for Knowledge (XXG). The article is inappropriately large anyway. I'm not overkeen on the Frindall worship. He's an important figure but no more. He is also something of a late convert to the ardent 'Tradionalist'

725:

Another point is that Wisden routinely publishes f-c career records only for batsmen who have scored more than 25,000 runs and bowlers who have taken more than 1,500 wickets. Career figures are sometimes included in obituaries, but for relatively minor players by no means always. Playfair gives

1472:

I've been thinking about this. It's hard to come up with a more descriptive title whilst keeping it reasonably short and neutral in tone. I think that the word "cricket" definitely ought to be in there somewhere. Maybe something like "Cricketers' career totals: traditional and revisionist". JH

1421:

was what the article looked like just after the 2005 series. I think the section on matches should go back to this, with the recent series compressed into one section. The "legend of the ashes" now contains too many details and quotes. Except the main quote (Sporting times), the rest should be

1133:

I think previous replies are answering the wrong question. NSW cricketers isn't a subcat of Australian cricketers, so you can't remove the latter category because someone is in the former. However, if someone is an Australian Test cricketer, they don't also need to be in Australian cricketers.

994:

I'm away at present, but I can't let Fiddlers Three's comment about my "denunciation" of the Traditional Totals article title stand without adding that I also said that the article should be retained. I also am of the opinion that Nigej's Somerset article would usefully be replicated for other

901:

hit the nail on the head when he denounced the title of this article on the deletion page. The title is meaningless in the context of Knowledge (XXG) and absolutely useless to all readers, including those interested in cricket. The title is pure ACS-speak and would be typical of the "Cricket

1311:

failed, but no real reason why. All of the comments were addressed/discussed, and there was certainly no objections. Can anyone suggest the way forward? Does it need any more work before re-nominating? Could a couple of you with FAC experience (or with lots of promotions) have a look please?

1090:

I would say leave it. Suppose I want to look up Joe Bloggs, knowing that he is a cricketer from New Zealand but not knowing which province he played for. I try looking up "Joe Bloggs", but the entry for that name turns out to be some rock musician. "Joe Bloggs (cricketer)" turns up an English

3202:

The article says that Murali prefers the changed name, but doesn't reference it. The article further says that even Sri Lankan cricket use the Anglicized version that we are used to and all the cricket websites uses. Further, I have never (in England - this is the English WP) seen it printed

1385:

I have to admit that I haven't done very much recently. Also I must confess that - though I of course accept that all potentially contentious statements should have citations to support them - I am rather ambivalent about the level of citing that a Featured Article appears to require. Having

645:

played a number of matches for Gloucestershire against Somerset between 1879 and 1885. Wisden and Playfair recognise all of these as first-class and they are included in Grace's career figures. However, the ACS regards only those matches played between 1882 and 1885 as first-class. For more

1553:

They are not discrepancies. That is a POV word and is inappropriate because it suggests Webber & Co. are correct when in fact that is extremely arguable. The article is about differences or variations between alternative versions of cricket statistics. A discrepancy is when someone

2114:

Do the sources agree on his catches and stumpings? If so, then it is probably an error in calculation rather than whether some match had List A status. I see that his last List A match was in 2001. Playfair 2002 gives his List A runs as 2210 in 221 matches, ie it agrees with Cricinfo and

1181:, I think that such an article would have lots of potential. I also recall and Eng vs WI series stirring up racism, where according to memory, the English players refused to play with a black team. If anybody has any spare time and don't how to spend it, may I suggest writing this! 1767:

I found this lovely image (in a theatrical journal of all things), and thought it might be useful, but am not enough of an expert on cricket to put it properly in context. I know there was a debate on paying cricketers in the 19th century, but can't remember the details.

1241:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are 3282:. Having looked at that reference, it seems it was taken from a press conference or similar, and is therefore a transcription of speech. This does not give any indication of spelling, merely of pronunciation. In which case, I propose that the article is named and spelt 1435:

some exciting finishes. If Bofum is going to be in there, then Trumper in 1902, Rhodes in 1926, Bradman in 1930, Hutton, Frank Tyson, John Snow and a host of others must be in as well. That is why the match series section started being expanded in the first place.

942:

I recommend that someone retitles and restructures the article along those lines so that it presents an overall and sequential view of the events that have led to the present unsatisfactory situation whereby the sport's greatest player has alternate career totals.

906:

a divergence in a certain area of cricket statistics has arisen and the issue should be addressed here to try and counter any possible confusion that, as one person said, might arise if someone reads WG's figures here and then sees an alternative version elsewhere.

3417:, which in addition to detailing chronology of the apparently variable etymology, has also cited (1) what Muralidaran has himself provided, (2) what his name has been recorded as, and (3) what he wears on his own jumper. The spelling given is Muthiah Muralidaran. 1849:

the |df=y line puts the date in the correct British format. It is also used for many other British people, to ensure that there is no American English in their infobox. Could someone possibly update the format of the cricketer infobox to incorporate this feature?

1284:. Since this is a much higher level, and discrepancies in younger Namibian players can be found in three or four places in Cricket Archive, this seems like this would be the more likely way to spell his name. Just to check whether you guys think this is sensible. 1611:

greater potential for it than it has had previously. Differences in cricket statistics go right back to the 18th century and the first person to really highlight the fact was not Webber but Haygarth, as I shall show. As for collaboration, you need to read what

656:

responsible for this article and the other one it refers to. It seems to me that this person is using Knowledge (XXG) to try and promote the notability of the ACS. As I understand the notability concept, a subject should have notability in its own right.

701:

says: "The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth." To my knowledge, Wisden has NEVER published a complete list of matches it considers to be first-class. Indeed the only authority to do this is the ACS. The only way we can

1386:

seemingly almost every statement with a footnote attached IMO makes an article look unattractive. I don't think that most printed encyclopaedias go in for citing to such an extreme degree. As an example of what I think is excessive citing consider:

798:'s, and others' articles which are similar but for a different sport. These seem to have the blessing of the football community, and since these had started being introduced for cricket – and not by myself – I don't see the harm they are doing. 1905:

For clarification, I assume the US format is November 9, 2007, and the UK format 9 November 2007? I may have changed the template's default behaviour, but would have to change my preferences to confirm. Can anyone else have a look please?

1696:

article, I noted that he was only 23 when he captained South Africa. I know that Taibu was younger when he captained Zimbabwe but has anyone else captained a Test side younger than Bisset? And can anyon recommend reference for this fact?

976:

used and that there are some remarks about which list is used. We mustn't get bogged down in dicussions about which is 'correct' and which is 'incorrect'. Such a discussion about completely trivial matches is a complete waste of time.

1982:

A bunch of workshy communists they may be, but the Guardian is offering a free 24 hour pass to its archives at the moment. This could be a great source of material for articles here, match reports, obituaries etc. Just a thought.

521:, and, although this template is unneeded for the 2005 season, as all teams have articles dedicated to them based on this season, it would be useful to have templates for all other seasons when such articles are created. Thoughts? 3286:(you indicate that it is the pronunciation and not the spelling that bothers him as such), with a mention in the lead of how to pronouce it: (Ipa and/or 'Murali-duran'). This would leave all other instances of spelling as 957:

I'd be delighted although I'd like to remain the detail, which I feel is important (although others might disagree) since it's an area that people comment on without really understanding the issues". I still stand by this.

2964: 1462:

a starting point for improving this article and then making links to it from other articles where the subjects are involved in the controversy or affected by different interpretations of what is a first-class match?

856:

I am deprodding them all. Performance over a season or overall is best expressed in statistics and I can't see anything "indiscriminate" about stats predominating those articles. This is true whether it is cricket,

515:", based on the teams in the County Championship in each year, through expansions in 1894, 1897, Worcestershire's absence in the championship in 1919 and return in 1920, and Durham's introduction in 1992. These are 2094:

figure stems from Playfair, or Who's Who or a Hampshire Yearbook or anything. If anybody has any of those resources from 2002/3 it might be interesting to find where the 59 runs came from. Just a thought anyway!

1841:

At present the cricketer infobox presents dates of birth in American English. This is totally inappropriate. The golfer infobox allows them to be presented either way. Eg the relevant entry for Darren Clarke is:

1308: 2968: 2356:

died. If you look at the big picture, playing one cricket Test match was among the least of his achievements. He was the pro-chancellor the Indian chamber of princes (an association of 550+ princely states),

449:

example, in 1871, they played just two first-class matches. In fact, in the 24 seasons between 1871 and 1894, they played only 141 matches - including zero in the period between September 1887 and May 1894.

1524:

That's pretty good: I reckon it doesn't need to be catchy, because in most cases readers are likely to get to it through a link from elsewhere – one of the players whose career figures are affected, or the

2594:

but once you've said that in the Championship article, the details of pre-1890 machinations are better covered, in my view, with all their attendant ACS-related controversies, in a different article.

2063:

Holt (cricketer)" or "Arthur Holt (footballer)" and decided that he was probably better known as a cricketer and his shop definitely specialised in cricket. Thanks in anticipation of your help. --

979:

I agree that my remark about the ACS think it is "correcting long-standing mistakes" was wrong. Perhaps "providing a consistent approach" would have been better.Nigej 13:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

745: 1442:

The article has failed because it has gone out of scope and lost focus. The match and series descriptions are in the tour articles elsewhere and don't belong in an article about the prize. --

3001:

which has expand and improve tags in it. The others are all equipment and terminology articles that lack sources. If anyone can find any suitable sources for these it would be a great help.

2645:(CricketArchive just says "ODI"). Our style guide still says "One-day International" which contradicts the current article name. There's lots of articles which link to each of the variants. 2256: 2239: 112: 1592:

I agree with Johnlp. To me, "discrepancies" doesn't have the connotation that BlackJack claims, though the new title is fine too. I think BlackJack is just over-sensitive about this topic.

1105:

I've started on the New Zealand players most seem to have the FC team as categories already. I've found some possible moves, wasn't sure whether to do them without checking here first. --

2752:

Agree with Stephen, grammatically the current style guide usage seems correct, but if the wider cricketing world suggests otherwise, should we bow to their (possible) incorrectness?! –

2575:

You are right about length. The optimum could be to have two articles after all, one about the concept and one about the history. Leave it with me and I will see what I can do. --

2792: 2213: 1021:

I agree Nigej - it all seems to have got out of proportion. I'm sure we'd all hate to lose an editor over it (I've stayed out of the discussion all together!). Stick it out mate. –

1388:

Australia went two-nil up after three Tests, but England won the fourth Test by 3 runs (after a 70-run last wicket stand) to set up the final decider. However, the game was drawn.

2279:

Presumably as a result if his arrest a couple of days ago, this article is taking a hammering with vandalism and POV edits. Please add it to you watchlists if its not already. —

2696:(LOI) because such games are not necessarily of a single day's duration but they are all subject to limited overs. Having said that, of the above list I definitely prefer #1 – 815:

2007 and it's fine (except that he hasn't quoted his sources). I would support deletion of the Somerset stats but keep the Gloucester, Derby, Yorkshire and Liverpool reviews.

1332:

I dunno. Some FACs with majority support but without consensus, have been archived quickly recently. Hmm, I think asking Raul for clarification might be useful in this case.

1926:

Yes, that's what's meant, even though it's not true that either format is universally used in either country. I checked simply by logging out, and it seems to be right now.

961:

viewpoint, being happy to use two sets of figures in at least one of his early publications: "Kaye book of Cricket Records" (from memory).Nigej 13:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

1215:

There are no rules on neutral umpires for Twenty20 Internationals. Outside the World Championship, they're treated by the ICC as (essentially) glorified exhibition games.

2030:

I'm a little bit uncertain as to whether we can use the East African flag though. I've done it because the ECACC is defunct and there is no one left to claim copyright.

1881:

uses the date and time preferences set in your "my preferences/date and time" formats, and mine is set to the above format. If this is not the case, feel free to reply...

595:, not so much those for the later seasons, as information in those is covered, particularly for the 2005 season, in great detail, but certainly those for the early years. 1065:

Greater forces than me have tried to gain concensus on this issue but I might as well try. I've recently added FC teams to all Australian International cricketers, e.g.

921:

total of centuries. As someone said earlier, this is the point at which the Somerset figures became not so much "something in a book" as a part of the sport's history.

2380:

Looking for some variety in those match descriptions? Can't quite find a new turn of phrase that will make your prose engaging, nay brilliant? Try this for inspiration

752: 634: 576:

I'm getting slightly confused here. So here are my immediate plans as regards cricket clubs by season, summarized easy enough so that I can understand what I'm doing.

556:, where the bottom infobox covers the 2005 season with a greater number of teams than any of my templates, with me still only using the 18 in the County Championship. 513:

Another thing I worked on this afternoon is a bunch of first-class cricket teams by season templates, from 2007 back to 1890, each one of which links to "<team: -->

2636: 619:

Why is there a disambiguation page, one of them doesn't even have an article, one has barely enough text to fill a square of bog roll and then there's the cricketer.

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2680:

I agree that changing existing links should not be an obstacle to making the right decision, but in the interests of consistency which one shall we use? I say #1. —

928:

Certainly the ACS should be mentioned in the revised article but in its proper sequential place, as must CricInfo, CricketArchive and the other sources mentioned by

2563:, so long as it didn't mean that the combined article would be so long that there would be pressure to cut it to keep it within Wkipedia guidelines on length. JH ( 1376:

Honourable exceptions, of course, are Tintin, JHall and Blnguyen who're active at the article, fixing it and BlackJack who made a great suggestion at the FAR. --

1356: 1246: 3031:), but have just noticed the following (which are effectively orphaned as they only link to each other). Could these be combined into one article, for example 294:

Thank you for your feedback, Stephen. The next thing I am curious as to whether it is needed, is either of two boxes at the bottom of the article, one reading:

2044:

Thanks for fixing it. With East Africa we could always just use the flag of the country the player was from, eg Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya or Zambia. Thoughts?

1540: 2991: 1826:

for details. In addition, it doesn't matter if a particular reference section is too long; it appears at the end of the article in any case. Best regards,

760: 756: 548:

I mean that the template doesn't need to be used in 2005 because there is already a template used: see for example the English cricket season articles on

534:

I don't quite understand why you say the template is unneeded in 2005, where there are actually articles that the navigation template would be used in.

1238: 465:

I think BlackJack had the right idea in suggesting that the earlier history of the club be covered in a single article, rather than season by season.

1439:

Hon. Ivo "recovered those Ashes"; how Plum resurrected the legend and brief mentions of the replica trophies. I would not even mention Bodyline.

1997:

These new infoboxes which have been implemented have caused a problem for a couple of former ODI playing countries. All players from the UAE (see

939:, continue to feature the MCC v Reef fiasco and explain the circumstances of the Vizzy tour given its impact on the totals of Hobbs and Sutcliffe. 2341: 483:

Certainly — this would be the period of 1871 to 1894, in a single article. So we're looking for two separate articles, as per the soccer clubs:

783: 549: 492: 488: 347: 236: 917:). Then, the article must focus on the Jack Hobbs situation and the celebrations that followed his feat in catching and then overtaking WG's 862: 795: 225: 47: 17: 2019: 1878: 1487:"Revisionist" sounds very negative to me. How about something like "First-class cricket statistics discrepancies"? Not very catchy, but... 484: 1662: 1242: 1234: 252:

Ah. Having read the previous section, I now see that Stephen is prodding these. Great timing from me – but never mind, it's worth a shot.

1045:

I hope Nigel will reconsider. I've had my problems with the site before now and the thing to do is put it behind you and move forward.

1539:

In the absence of other suggestions (and wanting to act while the issue was still fresh in collective minds) I've moved this article to

1066: 790:, of which I did the bulk of the work this morning, I did so on the basis that these articles already exist for football seasons – see 553: 3220:

I'd go with Muralitharan, it's the one that's overwhelmingly been used throughout his career both in print and by cricket watchers.

1567:

continue over the weekend but won't have any more time for it today. Oh, and I've changed the name to remove "discrepancies". --

3115:

and should go regardless. The others are stubby and really only one or two line definitions. Perhaps merge anything useful into

379: 355: 1148:

With regard to possible moves, certainly Chris Cairns and Stewie Dempster were how those two cricketers were usually known. JH (

371: 3418: 1077: 2361:

of Patiala after 1947, represented India in the UN on several occasions, was the ambassador in Italy and Switzerland etc. See

667:

article should be deleted. There is no "issue" about Grace's totals: there is simply Grace's record as published by Wisden.

395: 869:. Of course, anyone can take it to AfD. On a related topic, what are this sudden waves of destruction in WP:CRIC all about ? 1080:

it's already been done to all Australian Test/ODI/T20 cricketers and seems obvious to have the same rule for all nations. --

909:

The article needs to be written chronologically beginning with the inclusion of Grace's Somerset figures in what became his

367: 1739:

has been put up for speedy deletion even though he is notable any help given by this project would be greatly appreciated.

399: 375: 359: 3192: 1786:

lengthy (and somewhat distracting) lists of references in order to improve readability. Does this make sense? Check out

791: 383: 391: 387: 351: 2693: 2349: 1529:

article, or the ACS article. "Discrepancies" is better than "anomalies" or "divergences" or "controversies", I think.

1401:

Glad you vented. First, because you did it so well. And secondly, because I was beginning to get quite lonely here. --

363: 272:; it's the ones that are just lists of results that I don't think belong here. I welcome discussion on it, of course. 145:

Can somebody jog my memory: A man-of-the-match winner in a Lord's final without taking a wicket or scoring a run...

2455: 2353: 1277: 1178: 866: 858: 38: 2853:

article seems to be attracting an awful lot of vandalism recently. Time to give it some sort of protected status?

2546:

concept. To present a complete study, I believe the essential scope of the article must be the full evolution.

3426: 2325: 1455: 1237:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 741: 664: 647: 2153: 3072: 2743: 2490: 2296: 2194: 1597: 1492: 1139: 772: 277: 2609:

about the status of matches before 1895 but that does not impact the championship, official or unofficial. --

2125:

Yes, I think so. Thanks for looking anyway, I'll stick to the archive. Perhaps I'll put a note in somewhere. –

589:

Secondly, can someone give me a yea or nay as per the early cricket seasons by team templates, which are all

2639:

but a consensus is not apparent. All three words capitalised with no hyphen does seem to be the ICC standard

3442: 3304: 3254: 3241: 3209: 3090: 3027: 2758: 2514: 2424: 2178: 2131: 2103: 2059: 1950: 1912: 1321: 1166: 1027: 712:. Nobody (but Wisden themselves) knows the data Wisden uses to generate it's statistics, we do for the ACS. 202: 154: 787: 591: 582: 517: 269: 221: 3447: 3430: 3400: 3381: 3359: 3333: 3309: 3272: 3246: 3229: 3225: 3214: 3196: 3166: 3125: 3095: 3042: 3011: 2980: 2885: 2862: 2858: 2835: 2812: 2778: 2763: 2747: 2729: 2709: 2686: 2618: 2603: 2584: 2568: 2553: 2519: 2494: 2472: 2429: 2392: 2369: 2315: 2300: 2285: 2267: 2250: 2233: 2198: 2183: 2159: 2136: 2120: 2108: 2076: 2067: 2064: 2048: 2038: 2009: 1987: 1972: 1955: 1935: 1917: 1899: 1863: 1854: 1830: 1815: 1772: 1743: 1724: 1714: 1701: 1682: 1669: 1648: 1630: 1619:. I never wait for collaborators: if I'm interested enough to make major changes I get on with it as per 1601: 1585: 1574: 1561: 1547: 1533: 1514: 1496: 1478: 1466: 1449: 1426: 1405: 1396: 1380: 1370: 1349: 1326: 1291: 1266: 1219: 1209: 1191: 1153: 1143: 1109: 1096: 1084: 1052: 1032: 999: 947: 873: 846: 825: 805: 776: 731: 716: 688: 671: 623: 609: 563: 543: 528: 502: 474: 456: 442: 420: 281: 259: 246: 207: 188: 172: 159: 132: 2352:(not the current title) would be quite fine. He ceased to be the Yuvraj (prince) in 1938 when his father 620: 3235:

I've reverted this for the time being, and asked for some references, and a discussion here if needed. –

3159: 3116: 2921: 2878: 2828: 2805: 2717: 2697: 2673: 2667: 2661: 2655: 2649: 2628: 2226: 1342: 1259: 125: 3032: 2348:

I don't know enough about the non-cricketing side to make a confident comment about this, but I think

3422: 3283: 3268: 2366: 1822:

Please don't do that. Scrolling lists should not be used due to readability concerns. Please see the

1803: 1736: 1423: 870: 3151: 2870: 2820: 2797: 2739: 2539: 2486: 2388: 2292: 2218: 2190: 2035: 1593: 1526: 1488: 1334: 1251: 1202: 1135: 944: 768: 668: 273: 117: 2381: 1675:

where an article is necessarily small. And, yes, I am doing the tour and season articles now. --

1280:, who had been an Under-19 Namibian cricketer, has a new Cricket Archive entry, spelling his name 3437: 3299: 3236: 3204: 3173: 3142: 3120: 3104: 3085: 3067: 3052: 3018: 3006: 2976: 2753: 2724: 2705: 2681: 2614: 2580: 2509: 2467: 2419: 2337: 2310: 2280: 2173: 2126: 2098: 2045: 2006: 1945: 1907: 1890:

logged in will see the "US" version, rather than the format more common in cricketing countries.

1316: 1305: 1022: 902:

Statistician". It fails to acknowledge that Knowledge (XXG)'s intended audience is Planet Earth.

663:

In my opinion, any references to ACS views about cricket statistics should be edited out and the

197: 181: 149: 106: 2640: 3203:

Muralidaran, so my view is to revert it (until a Murali reference perhaps dictates otherwise).–

2005:) have the flag template in the infobox appear as a redlink. Any idea how to fix this? Cheers. 602:

Tell me what else you want doing to the article - I'll probably do another one this afternoon.

3396: 3355: 3221: 3188: 3183:- I'm sure we had a consensus not to move it in a previous discussion (unless I imagined it)? 3108: 3062: 3022: 2954: 2854: 2721: 2073: 1984: 1967: 1860: 1827: 1809: 1769: 1711: 1288: 1216: 1188: 1159: 802: 713: 606: 560: 525: 499: 453: 417: 256: 243: 169: 1823: 1620: 838:

I think the Somerset article has merit if you regard it as an adjunct to the main article on

749: 3047: 2599: 2564: 2116: 1795: 1510: 1474: 1392: 1149: 1092: 1073:

and I'm about to undertake a similar process with all New Zealand International cricketers.

727: 684: 3367: 3260: 1707: 764: 3279: 3264: 3180: 3057: 3004:

Don't forget to remove the "attention=yes" tag on the talk page if you fix an article. --

2943: 2535: 1760: 1281: 709: 228:

having been written, but I just never got around to writing any for Derbyshire until now.

3112: 2643: 3371: 3323: 2773: 2415: 2384: 2156: 2031: 1787: 1740: 1721: 1698: 1677: 1643: 1625: 1623:. If anyone else wants to help out, they're welcome – but it doesn't often happen. -- 1569: 1556: 1444: 1047: 820: 437: 432: 2169: 698: 3146: 2972: 2784: 2738:

Omitting the hyphen looks like bad grammar to me, though maybe I'm just out of date.

2701: 2610: 2576: 2550: 2458:

lists the multiple meanings. The alternative is to change ~1600 pages which link to

2333: 2205: 1931: 1895: 1870: 1851: 1693: 1666: 1206: 1106: 1081: 539: 470: 185: 165: 2362: 1362:

There's been an astonishing lack of interest in the FAR page. Are we content to let

3392: 3387:

WP:RS. And finally, throwing IAR into the mix is just silly - that is definitively

3351: 3319: 3184: 3138: 2145: 2090: 2082: 2002: 1998: 1962: 1874: 1799: 1612: 1402: 1377: 1367: 1285: 1182: 839: 799: 603: 557: 522: 496: 450: 414: 253: 240: 2967:

maybe there might be a place for a link to it on the WP:Cricket frontpage. Also

2595: 2152:

I have just nominated Ian Chappell for FAC. Would appreciate some comments here

1791: 1749: 1582: 1544: 1530: 1463: 1070: 996: 929: 898: 843: 598:

More of the same in terms of prose descriptions of early County cricket seasons?

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3017:

Many of these, as mentioned, are brief one-liners. I have suggested a merge of

2411:? It is linked to a few player articles, but most biographies tend to use ]er. 1422:

removed, or if someone really wants to retain it, pushed to the notes section.

586:. Do you want anything else covered? An infobox of some kind? A list of debuts? 2932: 2358: 2273: 1753: 2998: 2910: 2447: 2408: 2398: 2264: 2247: 1616: 1363: 1230: 1174: 642: 2818:

Need some help with some complaints about the article being too technical.

660:

and career records of contemporary players, which Wisden does not include.

2965:

Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Cricket articles by quality log

1720:

I can't believe I managed to miss 4 captains. Thanks for the reference. --

431:

years would be great: there is already some bits about the early years in

2902:

This goes against the format for all other countries. Discussion needed?

1927: 1891: 535: 466: 224:

on my sandbox, basically I wrote it as a response to the fact that I saw

3342:

amended spelling, then we would have a dilemma. Cf our article on, say,

1885:

This is why most people don't notice. If your preferences are set, then

3347: 3343: 2850: 2842: 2482: 2451: 1017:

people seems undesirable to me. Bye Nigej 13:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

2365:

for a big list. I'll also post a message in the India notice board.

3290:. On an aside point, the fansite you link to keeps his forename as 2559:

I would be in favourr of a merged article under some such title as

495:. Easy job, just gotta get into writing an essay a day, I suppose. 1961:

The MM/DD style dates should be retained for American cricketers.

1845:| '''Birth''' || {{birth date and age|1968|8|14|df=y}} <br: --> 1170: 765:

Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of statistics

580:

Firstly, can someone please give the thumbs up or thumbs down to

3259:

I have a reference for Murali spelling his name "Muralidaran".

2481:

What I really hate is biographies which use the phrase "X is a

2309:

I don't think its there just yet, but will if gets any worse. —

1859:

Well spotted. It should definitely be the British way around.

2257:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Marcus Trescothick

2240:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Marcus Trescothick

113:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Marcus Trescothick

25: 1877:

as "September 18, 1970 (age 37)". This might be because the

168:

of Lancashire, won it for his captaincy. I forget the year.

220:

In the three hours I spent awake this morning I hashed out

2793:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured_article_candidates/Arthur Morris

2214:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured_article_candidates/Arthur Morris

1127:

Henry Foley (cricketer), Brian Hastings (cricketer) : -->

231:

Please offer your opinions - but as I say, be gentle, it

2485:

player". I can only assume it's by analogy to baseball.

1366:

lose its Featured status without fighting to keep it? --

1201:

It seems the rules on neutral umpires have gone out the

1418: 1165:

In light of the recent Australian tour of India, this

708:

what is and isn't first-class is from the ACS data on

2015:

Fixed now. (Needed to add alternate country names to

782:

When I wrote the content for what I hope will become

485:

History of Derbyshire County Cricket Club (1871–1894)

2089:

I've been expanding and re-writing the Hampshire WK

235:

1am. Obviously the article, when it exists, will be

2994:which is now top priority in the to-do list above. 2898:

List of One-Day International cricketers from India

913:career totals and how this happened (Ashley-Cooper 818:Oh, all right then, I'd keep the MUFC review too. 268:I don't object to the narrative ones, such as your 3436:Are we anywhere close to making a decision here? – 1123:Bert Hopkins, Mark Burgess (cricket player) : --> 2414:I just thought it might be worth revisiting the 753:Somerset County Cricket Club First Class Matches 635:Somerset County Cricket Club First Class Matches 329:And the other being some kind of box as follows: 2916:No discussion at any stage. Discussion needed? 2189:Surely it looks more real than the white ones! 1869:They both display the same to me, for example: 435:as there is for all the counties. Good work. 932:which are not presently in the article at all. 2791:I have just nominated Arthur Morris for FAC. 2212:I have just nominated Arthur Morris for FAC. 1124:Mark Burgess (cricketer), Matthew Horne : --> 629:Why is so much attention being drawn to this? 8: 1541:First-Class Cricket Statistics Discrepancies 757:Gloucestershire County Cricket Club in 2004‎ 2992:Category:Cricket articles needing attention 2642:, but Cricinfo uses "One-Day International" 761:Gloucestershire County Cricket Club in 2006 213:I guess I should ask for an opinion on this 2418:debate about turning it into a dab page. – 3179:Muralitharan's article has been moved by 2795:. First step towards the Invincibles FT. 2383:. It's all theatre for the Americans.... 2216:. First step towards the Invincibles FT. 2072:It looks a very good article, well done. 2058:I have recently created an article about 346: 1759: 305: 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Cricket 2771:One Day International per Moondyne. -- 1076:So as I add categories should I delete 3111:are unreferenced and have elements of 1129:Stewie Dempster, Terrence Jarvis : --> 1128:Brian Hastings, Charles Dempster : --> 784:Derbyshire County Cricket Club in 1895 740:Whatever the rights and wrongs of the 633:There is a statistical article called 493:Derbyshire County Cricket Club in 2007 489:Derbyshire County Cricket Club in 1895 306:Derbyshire in the County Championship 270:Derbyshire County Cricket Club in 1895 237:Derbyshire County Cricket Club in 1895 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1873:displays "August 14, 1968 (age 39)", 744:article, which we can argue about in 226:Yorkshire County Cricket Club in 2007 7: 1879:Template:Infobox cricketer biography 697:The other thing to consider is what 514:County Cricket Club in <year: --> 336: 2897:List of Indian ODI cricketers : --> 1661:Cricket stubs are being discussed 1067:Category:New South Wales cricketers 646:information about this issue, see: 3035:, or perhaps better still deleted: 2986:Cricket articles needing attention 2561:History of the County Championship 1509:Yes, that sounds pretty good. JH ( 1122:Chris Cairns, Albert Hopkins : --> 1121:Les Watt, Christopher Cairns : --> 24: 2291:Maybe it's worth sprotecting it? 1731:notable cricketer up for deletion 1119:Harry Moses, Bradley Haddin : --> 413:the County Championship seasons. 2437: 2342:_Maharaja_Yadavindra_Singh": --> 29: 2549:Please discuss. Thank you. -- 1078:Category:New Zealand cricketers 637:which includes this paragraph: 2960:No discussion, fair move IMO. 2949:No discussion, fair move IMO. 2938:No discussion, fair move IMO. 2927:No discussion, fair move IMO. 2908:Shanthakumaran Sreesanth : --> 2906:Shanthakumaran Sreesanth : --> 2635:This was discussed previously 1781:Footnoting and reference lists 1120:Brad Haddin, Leslie Watt : --> 1118:Bill Howell, Henry Moses : --> 1: 3448:11:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3431:02:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC) 3401:22:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3382:16:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3360:13:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3334:16:46, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 3310:12:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 3273:22:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 3247:13:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 3230:14:29, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 3215:11:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 3197:10:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 3167:23:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 3126:01:35, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3096:00:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC) 3012:17:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 2981:21:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 2886:07:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 2863:06:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 2836:01:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC) 2813:01:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2779:19:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2764:11:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2748:08:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2730:07:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2710:07:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2687:01:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2619:07:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC) 2604:10:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2585:06:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2569:19:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 2554:19:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 2520:23:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2495:19:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2473:13:02, 19 November 2007 (UTC) 2430:21:34, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2393:11:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2370:15:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2343:11:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC) 2316:14:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2301:10:52, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2286:08:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC) 2268:10:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2251:10:14, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2234:01:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC) 2199:15:14, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2184:12:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 2160:17:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC) 2137:21:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2121:20:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2109:20:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2077:10:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 2068:10:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 2049:11:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 2039:10:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 2010:08:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1973:04:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 1615:is saying on this page about 1125:Matt Horne, Cecil Burke : --> 2920:Leslie Fleetwood-Smith : --> 1988:11:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1956:18:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1936:18:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1918:15:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1900:14:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 1864:02:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 1855:22:56, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 1837:Use of American date formats 1831:13:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 1816:10:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC) 1773:09:13, 30 October 2007 (UTC) 1744:09:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC) 1725:12:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1715:12:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1702:12:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1683:04:34, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1670:15:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1649:21:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1631:18:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1602:16:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1586:11:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1575:06:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1562:04:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1548:20:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1534:23:12, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1515:08:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 1497:21:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1479:20:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1467:20:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1450:04:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC) 1427:05:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC) 1406:20:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 1397:20:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 1381:10:27, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 1371:10:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 1350:01:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC) 1327:10:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC) 1292:04:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1267:04:16, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 1220:18:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1210:18:22, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1192:08:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1154:16:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1144:22:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 1126:Ces Burke, Harry Foley : --> 1110:15:02, 20 October 2007 (UTC) 1097:20:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 1085:20:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 1053:18:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 1033:14:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC) 1000:20:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 948:06:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 935:Naturally the article must, 874:06:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC) 847:20:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 826:18:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 806:12:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 777:03:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 732:12:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 717:10:19, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 689:08:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 672:07:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC) 624:15:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 610:15:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 564:17:21, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 544:17:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 529:19:15, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 503:14:48, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 475:09:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC) 457:18:52, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 443:18:27, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 421:16:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 282:15:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 260:12:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 247:12:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC) 208:11:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 189:11:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 173:11:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 160:10:44, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 133:07:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC) 2694:Limited Overs International 2350:Yadavindra Singh of Patiala 2020:Infobox cricketer biography 1276:The article, previously at 1173:and knowing the impact the 3463: 3119:and change to redirects. — 2456:cricketer (disambiguation) 2354:Bhupinder Singh of Patiala 1278:Michael Durant (cricketer) 1245:. Reviewers' concerns are 1179:South African cricket team 339: 2990:There are 22 articles in 2892:Other recent name changes 2716:The BBC appear to use #1 2407:Do we need this article: 2326:Maharaja Yadavindra Singh 1456:Traditional career totals 1233:has been nominated for a 742:Traditional career totals 665:Traditional career totals 648:Traditional career totals 3413:): ::::::Reference from 3073:Follow through (cricket) 2942:Ebrahim Essop-Adam : --> 2534:Should the two articles 1806:to see some examples. -- 1756:, and history of cricket 1297:Trescothick FAC...update 341:County Championship 1895 138:Unusual Man-of-the-match 3255:User talk:Mdcollins1984 3172:Muttiah Muralitharan → 2435:Agreed, being bold and 2324:Yuvraj of Patiala : --> 2054:Arthur Holt (cricketer) 2001:) and East Africa (see 1235:featured article review 3043:Grip (cricket bowling) 2172:. Sounds fun though! – 1764: 1688:Youngest Test captains 1641:Rewrite completed. -- 879:Comments by the Author 763:, on the grounds that 311:Previous season: None 217:Be gentle, please. :) 3117:List of cricket terms 2922:Chuck Fleetwood-Smith 2718:One Day International 2698:One Day International 2674:One-day international 2668:One-day International 2662:One day international 2656:One-Day International 2650:One Day International 2629:One Day International 2450:is now a redirect to 1993:Broken flag templates 1763: 42:of past discussions. 3284:Muttiah Muralitharan 3134:Three FAs this month 2953:Pommie Mbangwa : --> 2115:CricketArchive. JH ( 1804:Muttiah Muralitharan 1117:William Howell : --> 3318:I think he prefers 2540:County Championship 1824:citation guidelines 1735:A cricketer called 1527:first-class cricket 3391:why IAR exists. -- 3174:Mutiah Muralidaran 3143:Marcus Trescothick 3105:Approach (cricket) 3068:Front foot contact 3053:Approach (cricket) 3019:Chest on (cricket) 2931:Vincent Hogg : --> 2909:S. Sreesanth : --> 2627:Capitalisation of 2165:Pink cricket balls 1765: 1306:Marcus Trescothick 1012:Witch hunt on me ? 322: 317:Next season: 1896 314:This season: 1895 182:1984 B & H Cup 107:Marcus Trescothick 3411:From MM talk page 3149:. Thanks to all. 3109:Back foot contact 3063:Back foot contact 3033:Bowling technique 3023:Side on (cricket) 2955:Mpumelelo Mbangwa 2065:Daemonic Kangaroo 1692:In expanding the 1160:Racism in cricket 796:Manchester United 405: 404: 321: 320: 301: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3454: 3378: 3377: 3330: 3329: 3278:Thanks for that 3162: 3154: 3048:Point of release 2997:One of these is 2881: 2873: 2831: 2823: 2808: 2800: 2465: 2461: 2445: 2441: 2440: 2229: 2221: 2024: 2018: 1978:Guardian Archive 1970: 1965: 1812: 1796:Sachin Tendulkar 1345: 1337: 1262: 1254: 1239:featured quality 1167:Cricinfo article 1042:again. No more. 337: 303: 302: 128: 120: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3462: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3423:Cyril Washbrook 3375: 3373: 3327: 3325: 3280:User:Gibbsyspin 3257:for reference): 3181:User:Gibbsyspin 3177: 3160: 3152: 3136: 3058:Bound (cricket) 2988: 2963:Found these on 2944:Eboo Essop-Adam 2907:Sreesanth : --> 2894: 2879: 2871: 2847: 2829: 2821: 2806: 2798: 2789: 2692:I would prefer 2633: 2536:Champion County 2532: 2463: 2459: 2438: 2436: 2402: 2378: 2329: 2277: 2260: 2243: 2227: 2219: 2210: 2167: 2150: 2087: 2056: 2022: 2016: 1995: 1980: 1968: 1963: 1839: 1810: 1783: 1758: 1737:Morshed Hossain 1733: 1690: 1659: 1459: 1360: 1343: 1335: 1299: 1282:Michael Durandt 1274: 1272:Michael Durandt 1260: 1252: 1228: 1199: 1197:Latest Twenty20 1163: 1063: 1014: 710:Cricket Archive 631: 617: 574: 511: 380:Nottinghamshire 356:Gloucestershire 215: 140: 126: 118: 110: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3460: 3458: 3434: 3433: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3346:, rather than 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3313: 3312: 3250: 3249: 3218: 3217: 3176: 3170: 3135: 3132: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3128: 3099: 3098: 3082: 3078: 3077: 3076: 3075: 3070: 3065: 3060: 3055: 3050: 3045: 3037: 3036: 2987: 2984: 2958: 2957: 2947: 2946: 2936: 2935: 2925: 2924: 2914: 2913: 2900: 2899: 2893: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2846: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2788: 2782: 2769: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2750: 2740:Stephen Turner 2733: 2732: 2713: 2712: 2678: 2677: 2671: 2665: 2659: 2653: 2632: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2606: 2588: 2587: 2572: 2571: 2531: 2530:County Cricket 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2487:Stephen Turner 2476: 2475: 2401: 2396: 2377: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2328: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2304: 2303: 2293:Stephen Turner 2276: 2271: 2263:time! Cheers, 2259: 2254: 2246:time! Cheers, 2242: 2237: 2209: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2191:Stephen Turner 2166: 2163: 2149: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2086: 2080: 2055: 2052: 2042: 2041: 2027: 2026: 1994: 1991: 1979: 1976: 1959: 1958: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1921: 1920: 1883: 1882: 1838: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1788:Adam Gilchrist 1782: 1779: 1777: 1757: 1747: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1689: 1686: 1658: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1605: 1604: 1594:Stephen Turner 1589: 1588: 1551: 1550: 1522: 1521: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1489:Stephen Turner 1482: 1481: 1458: 1453: 1432: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1359: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1315:Thanks guys, – 1298: 1295: 1273: 1270: 1227: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1198: 1195: 1162: 1157: 1136:Stephen Turner 1130:Terry Jarvis. 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1100: 1099: 1062: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1043: 1036: 1035: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 985: 984: 983: 982: 981: 980: 977: 967: 965: 964: 963: 962: 958: 951: 950: 945:Fiddlers Three 940: 933: 926: 922: 907: 903: 854: 853: 852: 851: 850: 849: 831: 830: 829: 828: 816: 809: 808: 769:Stephen Turner 739: 737: 736: 735: 734: 720: 719: 694: 693: 692: 691: 676: 669:Fiddlers Three 653: 652: 630: 627: 621:86.128.110.219 616: 613: 600: 599: 596: 587: 573: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 510: 507: 506: 505: 480: 479: 478: 477: 460: 459: 433:Derbyshire CCC 428: 427: 426: 425: 424: 423: 403: 402: 372:Leicestershire 344: 343: 335: 334: 333: 332: 331: 330: 319: 318: 315: 312: 308: 307: 300: 299: 298: 297: 296: 295: 287: 286: 285: 284: 274:Stephen Turner 263: 262: 214: 211: 196:Thanks guys. – 194: 193: 192: 191: 176: 175: 139: 136: 109: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3459: 3450: 3449: 3445: 3444: 3439: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3420: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3407: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3380: 3379: 3369: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3345: 3335: 3332: 3331: 3321: 3320:"Muralidaran" 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3311: 3307: 3306: 3301: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3281: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3253:(Copied from 3248: 3244: 3243: 3238: 3234: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3227: 3223: 3216: 3212: 3211: 3206: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3182: 3175: 3171: 3169: 3168: 3164: 3163: 3156: 3155: 3148: 3147:Arthur Morris 3144: 3140: 3133: 3127: 3124: 3123: 3118: 3114: 3110: 3106: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3100: 3097: 3093: 3092: 3087: 3083: 3081:Any thoughts? 3080: 3079: 3074: 3071: 3069: 3066: 3064: 3061: 3059: 3056: 3054: 3051: 3049: 3046: 3044: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3029: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3010: 3008: 3002: 3000: 2995: 2993: 2985: 2983: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2966: 2961: 2956: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2945: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2934: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2923: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2912: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2896: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2882: 2875: 2874: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2844: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2825: 2824: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2810: 2809: 2802: 2801: 2794: 2786: 2785:Arthur Morris 2783: 2781: 2780: 2777: 2775: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2755: 2751: 2749: 2745: 2741: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2727: 2722: 2719: 2715: 2714: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2685: 2684: 2675: 2672: 2669: 2666: 2663: 2660: 2657: 2654: 2651: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2630: 2626: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2607: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2547: 2543: 2541: 2537: 2529: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2511: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2470: 2457: 2453: 2449: 2444: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2421: 2417: 2412: 2410: 2405: 2400: 2397: 2395: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2382: 2375: 2371: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2339: 2335: 2327: 2323: 2317: 2314: 2313: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2284: 2283: 2275: 2272: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2258: 2255: 2253: 2252: 2249: 2241: 2238: 2236: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2223: 2222: 2215: 2207: 2206:Arthur Morris 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2181: 2180: 2175: 2171: 2170:Whatever next 2164: 2162: 2161: 2158: 2154: 2147: 2144: 2138: 2134: 2133: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2118: 2113: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2100: 2095: 2092: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2078: 2075: 2070: 2069: 2066: 2061: 2053: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2046:Crickettragic 2040: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2021: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2008: 2007:Crickettragic 2004: 2000: 1992: 1990: 1989: 1986: 1977: 1975: 1974: 1971: 1966: 1957: 1953: 1952: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1937: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1914: 1909: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1897: 1893: 1888: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871:Darren Clarke 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1862: 1857: 1856: 1853: 1847: 1843: 1836: 1832: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1814: 1813: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1780: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1771: 1762: 1755: 1751: 1748: 1746: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1730: 1726: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1709: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1695: 1694:Murray Bisset 1687: 1685: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1672: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1657:Cricket Stubs 1656: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1632: 1629: 1627: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1590: 1587: 1584: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1571: 1564: 1563: 1560: 1558: 1549: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1465: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1440: 1436: 1428: 1425: 1420: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1407: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1379: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1365: 1358: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1346: 1339: 1338: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1318: 1313: 1310: 1307: 1302: 1296: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1271: 1269: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1256: 1255: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1225: 1221: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1208: 1204: 1196: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1155: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1131: 1111: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1098: 1094: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1083: 1079: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1060: 1054: 1051: 1049: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1011: 1001: 998: 993: 992: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 978: 974: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 959: 955: 954: 953: 952: 949: 946: 941: 938: 934: 931: 927: 923: 920: 916: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 895: 894: 890: 886: 882: 880: 876: 875: 872: 868: 867:or basketball 864: 860: 848: 845: 841: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 827: 824: 822: 817: 813: 812: 811: 810: 807: 804: 801: 797: 793: 789: 785: 781: 780: 779: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 755:, along with 754: 751: 747: 743: 733: 729: 724: 723: 722: 721: 718: 715: 711: 707: 706: 700: 696: 695: 690: 686: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 674: 673: 670: 666: 661: 657: 650: 649: 644: 640: 639: 638: 636: 628: 626: 625: 622: 614: 612: 611: 608: 605: 597: 594: 593: 588: 585: 584: 579: 578: 577: 571: 565: 562: 559: 555: 551: 547: 546: 545: 541: 537: 533: 532: 531: 530: 527: 524: 520: 519: 508: 504: 501: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 481: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 458: 455: 452: 447: 446: 445: 444: 441: 439: 434: 422: 419: 416: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 342: 338: 328: 327: 326: 325: 324: 323: 316: 313: 310: 309: 304: 293: 292: 291: 290: 289: 288: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 258: 255: 251: 250: 249: 248: 245: 242: 238: 234: 229: 227: 223: 218: 212: 210: 209: 205: 204: 199: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179: 178: 177: 174: 171: 167: 166:John Abrahams 164: 163: 162: 161: 157: 156: 151: 146: 143: 137: 135: 134: 130: 129: 122: 121: 114: 108: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3441: 3435: 3414: 3410: 3388: 3372: 3340: 3324: 3303: 3295: 3291: 3288:Muralitharan 3287: 3252: 3251: 3240: 3222:Nick mallory 3219: 3208: 3178: 3161:bananabucket 3158: 3150: 3139:Ian Chappell 3137: 3121: 3089: 3026: 3005: 3003: 2996: 2989: 2962: 2959: 2948: 2937: 2926: 2915: 2901: 2880:bananabucket 2877: 2869: 2855:Andrew nixon 2848: 2830:bananabucket 2827: 2819: 2807:bananabucket 2804: 2796: 2790: 2772: 2770: 2757: 2725: 2682: 2679: 2634: 2560: 2548: 2544: 2533: 2513: 2468: 2442: 2423: 2413: 2406: 2403: 2379: 2330: 2311: 2281: 2278: 2261: 2244: 2228:bananabucket 2225: 2217: 2211: 2177: 2168: 2151: 2146:Ian Chappell 2130: 2102: 2096: 2088: 2083:Adrian Aymes 2074:Nick mallory 2071: 2057: 2043: 2003:Shiraz Sumar 1999:Khurram Khan 1996: 1985:Nick mallory 1981: 1960: 1949: 1911: 1886: 1884: 1875:Darren Gough 1861:Nick mallory 1858: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1828:Liquidfinale 1811:Calabraxthis 1808: 1807: 1800:Rahul Dravid 1784: 1776: 1770:Adam Cuerden 1766: 1734: 1712:Andrew nixon 1705: 1691: 1676: 1673: 1660: 1642: 1624: 1568: 1565: 1555: 1552: 1523: 1460: 1443: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1387: 1361: 1344:bananabucket 1341: 1333: 1320: 1314: 1303: 1300: 1275: 1261:bananabucket 1258: 1250: 1229: 1217:Andrew nixon 1200: 1187: 1183: 1164: 1147: 1132: 1116: 1075: 1064: 1046: 1026: 1015: 966: 936: 918: 914: 910: 891: 887: 883: 878: 877: 855: 840:Somerset CCC 819: 738: 714:Andrew nixon 704: 703: 675: 662: 658: 654: 641: 632: 618: 601: 590: 581: 575: 516: 512: 436: 429: 396:Warwickshire 340: 232: 230: 219: 216: 201: 195: 170:Andrew nixon 153: 147: 144: 141: 127:bananabucket 124: 116: 111: 78: 43: 37: 2845:protection? 2631:(revisited) 2542:be merged? 2085:ListA stats 2060:Arthur Holt 1792:Shane Warne 1750:W. G. Grace 1177:had on the 1071:John Benaud 36:This is an 3370:exists. -- 3265:Gibbsyspin 3028:discussion 2933:Vince Hogg 2359:Rajpramukh 2274:Imran Khan 2036:Address me 1754:Bobby Abel 1061:Categories 937:inter alia 897:I believe 550:Derbyshire 491:... up to 368:Lancashire 348:Derbyshire 98:Archive 45 90:Archive 43 85:Archive 42 79:Archive 41 73:Archive 40 68:Archive 39 60:Archive 35 3438:MDCollins 3419:Link here 3300:MDCollins 3237:MDCollins 3205:MDCollins 3086:MDCollins 2999:The Ashes 2911:Sreesanth 2774:BlackJack 2754:MDCollins 2565:talk page 2510:MDCollins 2448:cricketer 2420:MDCollins 2416:talk-page 2409:cricketer 2399:Cricketer 2385:Phanto282 2363:this link 2174:MDCollins 2157:Phanto282 2155:. Cheers 2127:MDCollins 2117:talk page 2099:MDCollins 2091:Adi Aymes 2032:Sam Vimes 1946:MDCollins 1908:MDCollins 1741:02blythed 1722:Roisterer 1699:Roisterer 1678:BlackJack 1644:BlackJack 1626:BlackJack 1617:The Ashes 1570:BlackJack 1557:BlackJack 1511:talk page 1475:talk page 1445:BlackJack 1393:talk page 1364:The Ashes 1357:Ashes FAR 1317:MDCollins 1231:The Ashes 1226:The Ashes 1175:apartheid 1150:talk page 1093:talk page 1048:BlackJack 1023:MDCollins 821:BlackJack 792:Liverpool 728:talk page 685:talk page 643:W G Grace 509:Templates 438:BlackJack 400:Yorkshire 376:Middlesex 360:Hampshire 198:MDCollins 150:MDCollins 3193:contribs 3153:Blnguyen 3122:Moondyne 2973:Jpeeling 2872:Blnguyen 2822:Blnguyen 2799:Blnguyen 2726:Moondyne 2702:AlbertMW 2683:Moondyne 2611:AlbertMW 2577:AlbertMW 2551:AlbertMW 2469:Moondyne 2404:Hi all, 2334:Jpeeling 2312:Moondyne 2282:Moondyne 2220:Blnguyen 1964:=Nichalp 1852:Mowsbury 1846:], ] |- 1667:Jpeeling 1336:Blnguyen 1301:Hi all, 1253:Blnguyen 1207:Jpeeling 1107:Jpeeling 1082:Jpeeling 919:accepted 911:accepted 863:football 859:baseball 615:Ian Bell 384:Somerset 186:Jpeeling 148:Cheers – 119:Blnguyen 3415:The Age 3393:Dweller 3374:snowolf 3352:Dweller 3344:Cologne 3326:snowolf 3292:Muttaih 3185:AMBerry 2851:Cricket 2843:Cricket 2483:cricket 2452:cricket 2376:Variety 1969:«Talk»= 1944:Good! – 1621:WP:BOLD 1613:Dweller 1403:Dweller 1378:Dweller 1368:Dweller 750:prodded 748:, I've 746:its AfD 39:archive 3368:WP:IAR 3296:Mutiah 3294:, not 2868:Done, 2596:Johnlp 2508:too. – 2454:, and 2367:Tintin 2332:it. -- 1583:Johnlp 1545:Johnlp 1531:Johnlp 1464:Johnlp 1424:Tintin 1203:window 1169:about 997:Johnlp 930:Tintin 899:johnlp 889:well. 871:Tintin 844:Johnlp 705:verify 554:Durham 392:Sussex 388:Surrey 3113:WP:OR 3021:with 2700:. -- 1184:Gizza 1171:Ranji 915:et al 572:To do 352:Essex 16:< 3443:talk 3427:talk 3397:talk 3356:talk 3348:Köln 3305:talk 3269:talk 3242:talk 3226:talk 3210:talk 3189:talk 3107:and 3091:talk 3007:Bart 2977:talk 2971:. -- 2969:this 2859:talk 2849:The 2759:talk 2744:Talk 2720:also 2706:talk 2676:~617 2670:~930 2664:~126 2658:~522 2652:~180 2637:here 2615:talk 2600:talk 2581:talk 2538:and 2515:talk 2491:Talk 2466:. — 2443:Done 2425:talk 2389:talk 2338:talk 2297:Talk 2265:SGGH 2248:SGGH 2195:Talk 2179:talk 2132:talk 2104:talk 1951:talk 1932:talk 1913:talk 1896:talk 1802:and 1708:here 1706:See 1665:. -- 1663:here 1598:Talk 1493:Talk 1419:This 1322:talk 1304:The 1286:Bobo 1247:here 1243:here 1205:. -- 1140:Talk 1028:talk 800:Bobo 794:'s, 788:here 773:Talk 759:and 699:WP:V 604:Bobo 592:here 583:this 558:Bobo 540:talk 523:Bobo 518:here 497:Bobo 487:and 471:talk 451:Bobo 415:Bobo 364:Kent 278:Talk 254:Bobo 241:Bobo 222:this 203:talk 155:talk 142:Hi, 3389:not 3350:.-- 3298:. – 2787:FAC 2723:. — 2464:]er 2462:to 2208:FAC 2148:FAC 1928:JPD 1892:JPD 1887:any 1309:FAC 1069:to 552:or 536:JPD 467:JPD 233:was 3446:) 3429:) 3421:. 3399:) 3376:D4 3358:) 3328:D4 3308:) 3271:) 3245:) 3228:) 3213:) 3195:) 3191:| 3165:) 3145:, 3141:, 3094:) 3009:| 2979:) 2884:) 2861:) 2834:) 2811:) 2776:| 2762:) 2746:) 2708:) 2617:) 2602:) 2583:) 2567:) 2518:) 2493:) 2446:. 2428:) 2391:) 2340:) 2299:) 2232:) 2197:) 2182:) 2135:) 2119:) 2107:) 2034:| 2023:}} 2017:{{ 1954:) 1934:) 1916:) 1898:) 1798:, 1794:, 1790:, 1752:, 1710:. 1697:-- 1680:| 1646:| 1628:| 1600:) 1572:| 1559:| 1513:) 1495:) 1477:) 1447:| 1395:) 1348:) 1325:) 1265:) 1152:) 1142:) 1095:) 1050:| 1031:) 865:, 861:, 823:| 786:, 775:) 767:. 730:) 687:) 542:) 473:) 440:| 398:| 394:| 390:| 386:| 382:| 378:| 374:| 370:| 366:| 362:| 358:| 354:| 350:| 280:) 239:. 206:) 184:-- 158:) 131:) 94:→ 64:← 3440:( 3425:( 3409:( 3395:( 3354:( 3302:( 3267:( 3239:( 3224:( 3207:( 3187:( 3157:( 3088:( 3084:– 3025:( 2975:( 2876:( 2857:( 2826:( 2803:( 2756:( 2742:( 2704:( 2613:( 2598:( 2579:( 2512:( 2489:( 2460:] 2422:( 2387:( 2336:( 2295:( 2224:( 2193:( 2176:( 2129:( 2101:( 2097:– 2025:) 1948:( 1930:( 1910:( 1906:– 1894:( 1596:( 1491:( 1473:( 1340:( 1319:( 1289:. 1257:( 1249:. 1138:( 1025:( 803:. 771:( 651:. 607:. 561:. 538:( 526:. 500:. 469:( 454:. 418:. 276:( 257:. 244:. 200:( 152:( 123:( 115:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Cricket/Archive 41 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index