Knowledge talk:WikiProject Days of the year/Archive 6

1548:. Hopefully we can get some agreement and make this into a guideline. Recent events (within the last 10-15 years) pose some difficulty as everyone remembers them but the notability of those events is questionable. Because people remember them they think that means they are notable, and therefore can create a lot of discussion. Sometime we just have to let things and come back to them in a year or two. As for citing on the Days of the Year pages I would have to argue against it. I would like to see the pages as brief overviews of those days listing the major historical events. Adding cite references to each event would make the pages too long and rather ugly. As long as the main article is well sources then we only need a brief description on the Days of the Year pages. 160:

articles with the ultimate goal being a guideline or policy. Once that's done, this idea can plug right into that as a way to deal with all of the stuff that is not considered notable enough for "front page" inclusion. All of the previous discussions need to be summarized and another pass needs to be made to get a policy. The problem with that is that not many people are willing to contribute to these discussions. Where that leaves us, I'm not sure. A good start might be to archive this whole talk page and start discussion on the gray areas that always end up causing conflict while using the archive for reference and precedent. So, in closing, I think

1748:. Adding the link would give the impression that Black History is distinct and separate from all other history. History is history. Adding a link specifically for black history seems redundant because if the events are worth remembering, they'd be covered in the other links. The content also seems to be mostly lists of births which are covered in the Births section. Events such as first black ... are covered in Events. Incidentally, just to head off an argument that the other links are redundant, I would support reducing the links to one, but consensus exists for the three. -- 1212:

this. It's also possible to detect entries linked to pages that don't mention the year in question, or to tagged disambiguation pages, though I'd like some guidance on what people think should be done in those cases. I'd also like some help developing a friendly and informative message that will explain what's going on, since I think a lot of the people adding their own birthdays to the list really don't get why this is not a sensible idea. I can post my drafts here if that'll help.

31: 365:

article is only a minimum requirement for inclusion in a Wikicalendar article. Not all people meet the more stringent notability requirements for Wikicalendar articles" in the same section that you quoted from "ON THIS VERY PAGE". I know what the intent behind the guidelines is and how they are applied. If you feel that the guidelines should be changed, please make a proposal to change them. As you likely know, consensus can change. --

1767:

community. Canada is given its own section in the external links? Isn't Canadian history also history? Canadians would like to be able to refer specifically and directly to their own history and so would blacks. There is no-one better to tell your story than yourself. If Knowledge is truly reflective of the World we live in, we should give everyone the opportunity to tell to access content that is important and relevant to them.

1926:

that it will only take 12 edits to the {{JanuaryCalendar}} templates to make the change. I'm also thinking that with just a little more work, I could turn the 12 templates into one. I also noticed that the MonthStartTue templates use Monday as the first day of the week. That can be fixed very simply with a new version of those templates if the existing ones cannot be changed (I already have new versions written). --

1946:, and maybe making the days of the week a slightly different colour to make it a little easier to read. I would like to see the week start on Sunday, but that just what I'm use to using, it should probably follow the international standard (if there is one for the start of the week). Also I noticed you didn't wikilink the days of the week in your new version, any reason for that? 848:- Management of a system of so many subheadings would be a nightmare. It also makes the pages longer. It would be nearly impossible to keep all of the date articles' format consistent. Some years don't have anything listed - would the headings be there anyway? As you can see just from this talk page, the format would make the TOC extremely long (like several pages). -- 2339: 139:

category would require categorizing a year article in these categories. It might be odd to have 366 categories for each actual year article, so we could potentially create a redirect for each year (something like "2007_") and categorize the redirects. Or just let the categories be alphabetically sorted and lose the by-year sorting.

313:

to run an automated bot that culls birth and death dates from biography entries and generates a list that, once reviewed, can be merged by another program bot into existed days of the year lists. Still, this procedure would be prone to error. Can we somehow get the process started for birth/death date categories? (

391:

that the date of the patent is particularly notable compared to the date of invention. I understand that dates of invention might be a little illusive compared to patent dates. I suggest the removal of the obviously non-notable patent dates and invite further discussion on removal of all patent dates. --

888:

My point is not about the use of headings but the fact that in the current format for days of the year pages, each year is repeated multiple times. That's a waste of space and effort. Fast forward a few years and you could have hundreds of rows of date entries, each one beginning with, for example,

407:

1- as long as there is no certain date of invention, date of patent is all we have got about inventions for sure. 2- why patent of for example chewing gum is not globally notable? because it did not change any lives on a large scale? true but appearance of things such as chewing gums always indicates

1782:

By your argument we should include links for Jewish, Chinese, Left-handed, Bipolar, Dyslexic, and so on. That would be grossly unmanageable and highly redundant. Any notable event that would be listed on any of those would be listed in a general listing. Why does black history deserve recognition

1211:

for a permit to run a bot to check new additions to Births and Deaths, and revert those that don't have a link to a page, or have a "redlink" to a page that doesn't exist yet (possibly only in the case of users with only a few good edits). Feel free to comment there if you have any suggestions about

159:

This idea is certainly worth exploring. I don't know how all the background voodoo would work to make everything pretty and the complexity might cause a problem. One task that I think needs attention before this discussion can go very far is a detailed discussion on notability for the Wikicalendar

110:

I think the only currently enforced qualification for listing in the birth/death lists is that an article exist. We have on the order of 100,000 articles on living people (and a fair number of articles on people who have already died) which I think means we're headed for 300 or more entries per day

1674:

These entries are not all that different from any of the others. Musicians usually get listed with their band because often musicians names are obscure and people wouldn't recognize them without the band and usually, they haven't been members of that many bands. I wouldn't be opposed to including

348:

Actually, per existing rules that are established ON THIS VERY PAGE, "Only the births and deaths of people who are themselves subjects of Knowledge articles should be listed." So I'm afraid you're the one who has misunderstood; indeed as currently stands "all of the births and deaths" of people in

312:

and came across severak with birth/death dates that weren't listed on the days of the year. As I started adding them I ran into more and more biographies with the same problem. Categories seem to me to be the best way to go, since they are updated automatically. The only alternative I can see is

260:

I suspect that your average editor is more likely to add names to a list than hunt down an article and add a category to it. I'm trying to think what will be the easiest to implement and the most idiot proof. For example: if I look at an article that has 50 names listed but 10 are incorrect (wrong

243:

add a non-existent article to a category. People would no doubt screw up the category sort key (so it wouldn't be an entirely maintenance free solution), but I think the advantage of doing away with links to non-existent articles would be huge. An article per day could work, but I don't see it as

192:

uses sort key voodoo to show numbers starting with the same digit in numerical order - doing something like this for by-day birth/death categories would be as complicated but would affect far more articles). There is a potential for ongoing bot-assistance (the sort key for all articles categorized

1925:

set of templates (one for each day of the week). The new version calculates what day the first of the month is and then uses that to create the calendar. It should be maintenance free. I'd like to get some input on it before I replace the templates. Another great feature of the way I did it is

1609:

recently I had troubles about what should be listed for births and deaths and i also made troubles for others. I listed names of famous films of filmmakers and I listed famous inventions of scientists and inventors. almost all I did in this regard was reverted. I did not expect revertion because I

1491:

The date articles don't play by the same rules as most articles. They are really just lists. The source information for the entries must be located in a linked article. The entries act primarily as "teasers" and people who are interested in learning more about the topic are able to find more in

390:

There are many patent dates listed in the date articles. I don't think that the patent of Portland Cement, Corn Flakes or Chewing Gum are globally notable. None of those changed any lives on a large scale. Things like the electric light bulb or the telegraph might qualify but I don't even think

1641:

The idea is to keep the entries short and sweet. Any additional information can be found in the linked articles. Redlinks are not useful in the calendar articles. The quote about presidents, etc. is not totally accurate and I'd like to see the context in which the statement was made - I'm sure

1766:

Black History deserves recognition and that is why there is a Black History Month in the United States. While Black History may not be distinct or separate from all other history it often gets lost or distorted. What others may deem not "worth remembering" may be of signifcant value to the black

1376:

This is similar to the proposal above and I oppose it for pretty much the same reasons. Primarily because it makes the TOC almost a whole page long. But I will say that I dislike this proposal less than the previous one. If it were agreed to be changed, we would get a bot to do it anyway. It

364:

I'd be glad to discuss this further with you. If you will take the time to read the many archives of this talk page, you will see all of the past discussions that have gone into the development of the guidelines for the date pages. Notably you will see "Also, being the subject of a Knowledge

138:

One issue with this approach is that categories are sorted alphabetically, while the current lists are sorted by year. We could add the year as a leading component in a sort key, which accomplishes the sort aspect but without displaying the year. To get the years displayed in a births-by-day

1460:

I notice that most of the events on Days of the Year pages are very poorly sourced -- only generic links to a couple news sites' "on this day" sites, and almost no footnotes. I would like to propose a new task for the group of bringing the Days of the Year into compliance with the

183:

If folks would like to see an example, I could create a by-day birth category and categorize some articles into it (actually, it'd probably be essentially trivial for somebody who runs AWB to do this). With no sort key, a by-day category would look sort of like

1800:

No thanks. These are top-level overview articles and should contain only links which cast the net widely, both culturally and geographically. Sympatico.ca should go, BBC "on this day" is more the sort of thing we need. External links are not for advocacy.

215:

article for all of the birth dates (an article for deaths too) and then set some objective criteria for inclusion of names under the sections in the date articles. The new article would have as its only requirement that the subject have an article. --

931:

That's possibly true of my first attempt but my second attempt (below) isn't really any more difficult to keep consistent than the original format. And it has the advantage of not having to keep entering the year whenever a new entry has to be

1589:

better be mentioned in newstyle unless there is an annual global event for him on the oldstyle date. but it is irreasonable to mention an event like Russia october revolution on its newstyle date because it would not be on october anymore !

1675:

one film with a filmmaker if it was a film that was widely known and had received a major award and the filmmaker was known particularly from that film. The film would also have to have an article dedicated to the topic. --

1717:

Not only is this site a comprehensive resource for the African American community; there is a also static page for every day of the year which makes it relevant and applicable to all of the articles in Days of the year.

1962:: I think you might have been looking at a different version of the old calendar. A user had made a change to it between the time I posted my new one and the time you left your comment. I've since reverted it. -- 188:(long list of names, arranged alphabetically, no indication of birth year). With a sort key, we could work out a scheme where folks are arranged by birth year - but it would be effectively voodoo to most people ( 1358:

Of course, I'd personally go through and do it all myself, but it's somewhat cumbersome to go through a thousand lines of text. In addition, my section divisions aren't that space-consuming, and they help a lot.

953:

No, you'd only have a year heading for dates in those years. You can see an example of this in my suggested format: there is no 1974. Of course, over time I would expect every year to be listed eventually.

1620:

leaded by Fabricationary and I just made this number 2 post to see if these current conventions are temporarily agreed upon. if anybody remember anything else beside what I have mentioned then please write.

1256:

Can it detect certain key terms (Girl, Boy, Pimp, Legend, Hero, Icon, Citizen, Average, Random, Cool, Great guy, Amazing, Beautiful, Special, Sexiest, Hottest, and the interestingly common Badass)?

1569:

are used for entries in Wikicalendar articles but I think it would be good to add that fact to the style guide. In rare instances, entries are listed on both the new and old style dates. --

1840:

will be the main project page and it will contain a style guide for how the Wikicalendar articles should look. This includes the template and general format of how entries should be crafted.

2180:

Something needs to be ironed out before I implement my templates - that is whether the week should start on Sunday or Monday. The most constructive discussion on the topic is taking place

1423:

A little more on the behemoth status of the sections: Most of the sections are not that large. But all of the sections are bloated with pseudo-notable events and births and deaths. See

97: 1617: 1545: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 277: 672:

which has the issue of years being repeated, some with links some without (why are some years un-linked anyway?), would it not make more sense to group dates by year, eg:

1728:

This addition to the day of the year will add diversity to the days of the year, the black community makes up over 12% of the U.S. population. I look forward to a reply.

209:

I've noticed lately that there are a few editors who are just piling birth and death dates into the articles. What if, instead of using categories, we just created a

2160:

parameters so it mimics the elements of the old templates. And we could also add other optional parameters for different CSS and style changes just like the ones on

1287: 1208: 1883:

I've rewritten the template for the calendar that is on all of the Wikicalendar articles. The old one is {{JanuaryCalendar}} and the new one is temporarily at

1314:

Yes, I was going to put it there, but I thought the details might be better hammered out here (input-wise). I didn't want to clutter up the proposal page. --

408:

and indexes a change in the way people live. they are about a change in people habbits. is not Portland Cement important enough to be listed by its patent day?

2056:

Personally I don't like the size difference, I think that the color and format is nice but the size (how skinny it is) looks a bit odd Otherwise nice job! . --

1846:(or whatever we end up calling it) will be the page that lays out the true guideline on what should and should not be included in the Wikicalendar articles. 1172:

Some are not linked since once one has been linked the others do not need to be. AS for the new style I like the idea however it wouldn be a HUGE change.

47: 17: 1290:

to answer, since the Bot Approval people will want to have any ideas run by them (and for the last one, would be able to give a more definitive answer) .

142:

Manually maintaining these lists grows tiresome. If they're really going to become inclusive of all articles, I think categories are the way to go. --

2318:

I've put the January version in place. I'll wait a couple of days to see if there are any issues discovered before putting the others in place. --

2303:

Good work Mufka! Put them in whenever your ready. I'd offer my help but I don't know enough about templates and would probably mess them up. :)

1229:

This is a great idea. I have a lot of ideas on what a bot could do, and some might be beyond the scope for your bot. I'll put my questions here:

1721:

I have been looking for information on how to create a template similar to the New York Times daily update. The naming protocol on our site is

1623: 193:

in any of these articles could be periodically automatically corrected by a bot). If anyone would like to see an actual example, speak up. --

1237:

Can it detect entries where the name links to another person's article? I don't mean disambiguation, but often editors will add their friend

1987:

I got distracted while writing that comment and didn't properly look at everything before saving my comment. I retract my squishy comment.

1544:

You are right Mareino; the some of the Days of the Year pages are sloppy and have non-notable events listed. Notability is being discussed

280:

which relates to categorization in dates. It looks like the category idea wouldn't gain support. But I'd still like to investigate the

524: 1642:

there's more to it. There's only so much that can reasonably be added to an entry. The standard presidential entry is something like

1339:

I propose a minor classification system in the ordering of dates in the "Events", "Births", and "Deaths" section of the date articles.

1616:

is it right ? is it the current convention ? anybody else beside athletes and their medals ? ok. I saw discussions on this issue on

164:'s idea is good and is worth discussing but it represents something to work toward but much needs to be done to prepare for it. -- 1517:, and have pointed out that roughly 1/3 of the entries under August 11 are either poorly sourced or of questionable notability. -- 239:

The beauty of using a category for this instead of an article is that it would nearly eliminate the need for any maintenance. You

1187: 333:. It's important to note that all of the births and deaths should not be on the date pages. That is not widely understood. -- 2082:

Yes, I will work on the size. It is important to note here that there are some rumblings that the calendar on the date pages

1650: 1253:

Can it detect changes to the established template? By that I mean new headings, comment changes/deletions, linked templates.

476: 1913:

Slight coloring and size difference can be fixed if needed. The reason for doing this is that the old one is dependent on

1585:

I agree. new style must be the rule and old style must be kept for exceptions. in wikicalendar, birth date of someone like

1566: 1529: 1477: 2141: 2137: 2086:

be an actual calendar for the current year. I am strongly against this. I'm starting a new section on this below. --

1918: 129: 2377: 2354: 2326: 2295: 2192: 2121: 2094: 2037: 2014: 1970: 1934: 1906: 1858: 1791: 1756: 1683: 1577: 1500: 1447: 1385: 1322: 1275: 856: 535: 502: 487: 461:) it says what day of the week it is for the past few years. This has not been updated (as far as I know) for 2008. -- 450: 399: 373: 341: 294: 269: 224: 172: 1922: 2379: 2356: 2328: 2309: 2297: 2194: 2171: 2123: 2096: 2065: 2039: 2016: 1993: 1972: 1952: 1936: 1908: 1872: 1860: 1814: 1793: 1776: 1758: 1737: 1704: 1685: 1635: 1599: 1579: 1554: 1537: 1502: 1485: 1449: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1414: 1401: 1387: 1370: 1324: 1301: 1277: 1223: 1191: 1155: 858: 838: 537: 518: 504: 489: 470: 452: 436: 417: 401: 375: 358: 343: 322: 296: 271: 255: 226: 204: 174: 153: 118:

add the appropriate by-day categories (by bot) to all articles currently in the by-year births and deaths categories

2184:. I don't want to create a new set of templates to support my templates when the goal is to reduce templates. -- 38: 2263: 2006:

As far as linking the days of the week, I missed that and I'll do it. I will also make Sunday the first day. --

1914: 2278: 2273: 2224: 1700: 1666: 1631: 1595: 413: 309: 2268: 2219: 1884: 2256: 1614::"It's the current convention that Presidents, royalty, nobel laureates, and musicians are further identified." 1462: 2234: 2229: 282: 211: 2251: 2246: 2207:

I've got all of the self-maintaning templates created. They are ready to be put in place. Here they all are:

2149: 1626:

according to what should be listed for births and death. that would reduce confusions for newcomers like me.

124:

prune the birth/death lists, replacing the bulk of the entries with a link to the appropriate category, e.g.

2241: 1008: 688: 566: 964:

As you can see just from this talk page, the format would make the TOC extremely long (like several pages).

261:

date), I can just edit the article to fix it rather than going to the 10 articles to fix the category. --

121:

institute highly restrictive guidelines for explicit inclusion in the birth/death lists in the day articles

1772: 1733: 1692: 1411: 1392:

I like the idea, as a thought could you have the "present" be auto updated to whatever year it is now? --

1151: 832: 1296: 1234:

Will it just do Births and Deaths, or can it do Events, Holidays and observances and External links too?

1218: 1768: 1729: 1610:

saw the same pattern for Guitarists for example. atlast I reached to this sentence presented to me by

2161: 2061: 1696: 1627: 1591: 1397: 1366: 1183: 1175: 889:"1976". That seems a very inelegant way to list dates to me. Surely they should be grouped by year? 514: 466: 432: 409: 250: 199: 185: 148: 879:

They don't need to be sub-headings - that was an error on my part. See below for a simpler version.

330: 350: 314: 354: 318: 974:

That's a fair point and I hadn't taken that into account. The years don't have to be headings.

2168: 1714:

Please consider BlackHistoryDaily.com for the External Links section of the Days of the year.

1611: 1521: 1469: 1407: 189: 1722: 1509:

That works fine in theory, but in practice it is leading to extremely sloppy articles. See

1291: 1213: 1092: 783: 638: 2375: 2352: 2324: 2293: 2190: 2119: 2092: 2057: 2035: 2012: 1968: 1932: 1904: 1856: 1789: 1754: 1681: 1646: 1575: 1498: 1445: 1393: 1383: 1362: 1320: 1273: 1179: 1081: 1077: 854: 771: 767: 624: 620: 533: 510: 500: 485: 462: 448: 428: 397: 371: 339: 292: 267: 245: 222: 194: 170: 161: 143: 1515:

arguing for the inclusion of a well-sourced event that played a major role in US politics

2145: 1837: 1826: 1514: 1244:

Can it detect an event that doesn't link to an article that includes the specific date?

1147: 1143: 1106: 1025: 910:

I've amended my suggested format so that it doesn't take up any more space - see below.

827: 798: 707: 648: 580: 2181: 1843: 1830: 1809: 1803: 1662: 1586: 1064: 752: 610: 1921:

and these need to be created each year. The version that I've written use only the

2165: 1833:

pages will be so that they can be crafted accordingly. I propose the following:

1691:

you may find the context - sure not the full context - at the bottom of this page:

1534: 1526: 1518: 1482: 1474: 1466: 1377:

isn't a reasonable workload to have one editor change the format on 366 pages. --

558:

Rather than having each year on a separate row like this (from the March_30 page):

921:

It would be nearly impossible to keep all of the date articles' format consistent.

475:

I get it. I don't know how to fix it, but that won't stop me from trying. It's

1125: 1119: 1038: 819: 813: 722: 665: 658: 590: 427:

I just noticed that none of the days in any months say when it is in 2008.... --

111:

for the birth lists (and ultimately as many on the death lists). I suggest we:

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2373: 2350: 2322: 2305: 2291: 2188: 2153: 2117: 2090: 2033: 2010: 1989: 1966: 1948: 1930: 1902: 1868: 1854: 1787: 1752: 1679: 1573: 1550: 1496: 1443: 1381: 1318: 1271: 1238: 1087: 1051: 852: 777: 737: 631: 600: 531: 498: 483: 446: 442:

I might be a little thick, but can you rephrase that, I don't understand. --

395: 369: 337: 290: 265: 220: 168: 1250:

Can it detect entries that link to pages that are tagged for speedy deletion?

286:

article idea. Maybe we could put together a proposal and get some input. --

1510: 2029:

I fixed the color and the Sunday first. It does look a little narrow. --

1406:

I dislike the proposal, as well, but concur it should be done by a bot. —

943:

Some years don't have anything listed - would the headings be there anyway?

2144:, etc. system needs to be replaced because they were created before the 458: 2136:

It may be outside of the scope of this WikiProject, but in fact the

1944:

I would suggest making it a bit wider as it looks a little squished

1354:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=January_1&oldid=187783838

1346:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=January_1&oldid=187783938

869:

Management of a system of so many subheadings would be a nightmare.

2369:

I deleted all of the test templates, thus the redlinks above. --

1887:. Here they are side by side for comparison (old on the right) 1114: 1101: 1072: 1059: 1046: 1033: 1020: 1012: 1003: 806: 791: 760: 745: 730: 715: 700: 692: 681: 654: 644: 616: 606: 596: 586: 576: 570: 562: 244:

being any less maintenance heavy than the current system. --

25: 494:

I think I fixed it. I'm sure I'll find out if I didn't. --

2113:

I think I got the look almost identical to the old one. --

1262:

Would it conflict with other bots like ClueBot on vandalism?

1723:

http://www.blackhistorydaily.com/on_this_day/February_19/

1622:

I suggest a guideline added to wikicalendar guidlines in

2346:: All of the calendar templates have been updated. -- 1825:

I think it is important to settle what the roles of the

2148:

were implemented. We can have something generally like

1353: 1345: 1286:

Thanks for this list. If it's OK with you I'll copy it

523:

I put a note on how to do it on the template talk page

115:

create "born on" and "died on" categories for each day

1618:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Days of the year/Archive 4

1891:{{JanuaryCalendar}} {{User:Mufka/JanuaryCalendar}} 1203:Days-of-year-checking bot - community input wanted 308:I was just cleaning up some biography entries for 1427:for ongoing discussion on that issue. Also, see 276:I was doing some poking around and I came across 1350:And here's what I propose to make it look like: 1605:what should be listed for births and deaths (2) 509:Yup, I think it's fixed, how did you do it? -- 1439:for previous discussions on subheadings. -- 8: 106:Move most birth/death entries to categories? 457:Sure, in each day of the year (For example 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Days of the year 1893:Removed because they are both the same now 1259:Can it detect completely unlinked entries? 1725:(The monthname underscore day of month) 992: 349:Knowledge should be on the date pages. ( 1665:, French philosopher, recipient of the 1624:Knowledge:WikiProject Days of the year 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1658:A nobel prize winner would look like 7: 329:This discussion is being continued 2142:Template:JanuaryCalendar2009Source 2138:Template:JanuaryCalendar2008Source 1942:Nicely done! Looks much better. 1919:Template:JanuaryCalendar2008Source 24: 2337: 1783:anymore than human history? -- 1247:Can it remove all future events? 29: 1923:Template:Calendar/MonthStartTue 1465:style guideline. Comments? -- 1342:Here's what it looks like now: 900:It also makes the pages longer. 1651:President of the United States 477:Template:ThisDateInRecentYears 1: 2195:17:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 2172:05:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 2156:'s new version, and copy the 2124:04:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 2097:21:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 2066:21:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 2040:17:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 2017:16:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1994:16:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1973:16:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1953:14:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1937:05:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1873:14:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 1861:18:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC) 1815:22:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1794:23:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1777:22:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1759:16:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1738:16:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 1705:04:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 1686:04:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 1636:03:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 1600:02:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 1580:02:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 1561:Old style vs. new style dates 1122:, American singer and pianist 816:, American singer and pianist 661:, American singer and pianist 418:02:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 297:04:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC) 205:05:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 175:03:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 154:03:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 2264:User:Mufka/SeptemberCalendar 1915:Template:JanuaryCalendar2008 1555:17:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 1538:15:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC) 1503:22:46, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 1486:22:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 1450:17:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1415:02:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1402:01:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC) 1388:23:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1371:21:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1325:18:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1302:17:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1278:16:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1224:09:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC) 1192:22:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC) 1156:23:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC) 1090:, American ice hockey player 859:16:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 839:12:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC) 780:, American ice hockey player 634:, American ice hockey player 479:that needs to be fixed. -- 402:17:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 376:20:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 359:11:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC) 344:18:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 323:11:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 272:20:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC) 256:01:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC) 2279:User:Mufka/DecemberCalendar 2274:User:Mufka/NovemberCalendar 2225:User:Mufka/FebruaryCalendar 1335:Splitting behemoth sections 1080:, Northern Irish musician ( 1041:, Israeli-American actress 770:, Northern Irish musician ( 623:, Northern Irish musician ( 538:00:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC) 519:23:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 505:22:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 490:22:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 471:21:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 453:21:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 437:21:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 227:01:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC) 2400: 2380:22:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC) 2269:User:Mufka/OctoberCalendar 2220:User:Mufka/JanuaryCalendar 1885:User:Mufka/JanuaryCalendar 1112: 1099: 1070: 1057: 1044: 1031: 1018: 1001: 994: 725:, Israeli-American actress 593:, Israeli-American actress 2357:17:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 2329:18:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 2310:19:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 2298:05:21, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 2257:User:Mufka/AugustCalendar 1909:18:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC) 1667:Nobel Prize in Literature 1492:the linked articles. -- 1011:, American racehorse (d. 691:, American racehorse (d. 569:, American racehorse (d. 310:Franklin County, Missouri 128:For a complete list, see 2235:User:Mufka/AprilCalendar 2230:User:Mufka/MarchCalendar 1463:Knowledge:Citing sources 1109:, Scottish rugby player 283:People born on January 1 212:People born on January 1 130:People born on January 1 2252:User:Mufka/JulyCalendar 2247:User:Mufka/JuneCalendar 2150:Template:CalendarSingle 1207:I'm currently applying 801:, Scottish rugby player 651:, Scottish rugby player 2242:User:Mufka/MayCalendar 1693:User talk:Arthur Rubin 1241:born January 29, 1992. 554:Grouping dates by year 1879:New calendar template 42:of past discussions. 1866:Sounds good to me. 1095:, Barbadian athlete 1067:, American actress 1054:, Czech footballer 786:, Barbadian athlete 641:, Barbadian athlete 2285: 2058:Talk to Stealth500 1821:Project page roles 1394:Talk to Stealth500 755:, American actress 740:, Czech footballer 613:, American actress 603:, Czech footballer 511:Talk to Stealth500 463:Talk to Stealth500 429:Talk to Stealth500 2284: 2283: 2214: 2146:m:parserfunctions 1813: 1710:New External Link 1612:user:Arthur Rubin 1194: 1178:comment added by 1133: 1132: 1128:, English singer 1028:, American actor 836: 254: 203: 190:Category:Integers 152: 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2391: 2372: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2321: 2290: 2216: 2215: 2187: 2116: 2089: 2032: 2009: 1965: 1929: 1901: 1853: 1807: 1786: 1751: 1678: 1572: 1532: 1524: 1495: 1480: 1472: 1442: 1380: 1317: 1270: 1173: 1093:Obadele Thompson 993: 851: 830: 822:, English singer 784:Obadele Thompson 710:, American actor 668:, English singer 639:Obadele Thompson 583:, American actor 530: 497: 482: 445: 394: 368: 336: 289: 264: 248: 219: 197: 167: 146: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 2399: 2398: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2370: 2347: 2338: 2336: 2319: 2288: 2185: 2162:Template:Month3 2114: 2087: 2030: 2007: 1963: 1927: 1899: 1881: 1851: 1823: 1784: 1749: 1712: 1697:Lenin1870to1924 1676: 1647:Harry S. Truman 1628:Lenin1870to1924 1607: 1592:Lenin1870to1924 1570: 1567:new style dates 1565:Generally, the 1563: 1530: 1522: 1493: 1478: 1470: 1458: 1440: 1378: 1356: 1348: 1337: 1315: 1300: 1268: 1222: 1205: 1078:Mark McClelland 983:How about this: 849: 810: 795: 768:Mark McClelland 764: 749: 734: 719: 704: 685: 678: 621:Mark McClelland 556: 528: 495: 480: 443: 425: 410:Lenin1870to1924 392: 388: 366: 334: 287: 278:this discussion 262: 217: 165: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2397: 2395: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2313: 2312: 2282: 2281: 2276: 2271: 2266: 2260: 2259: 2254: 2249: 2244: 2238: 2237: 2232: 2227: 2222: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2175: 2174: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2001: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1880: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1848: 1847: 1841: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1797: 1796: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1711: 1708: 1695: 1689: 1688: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1621: 1615: 1606: 1603: 1584: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1557: 1541: 1540: 1506: 1505: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1352: 1344: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1294: 1281: 1280: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1216: 1204: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1164: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1130: 1123: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1107:Chris Paterson 1104: 1098: 1097: 1091: 1085: 1075: 1069: 1068: 1062: 1056: 1055: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1036: 1030: 1029: 1026:Mark Consuelos 1023: 1017: 1016: 1006: 1000: 999: 987: 986: 985: 984: 978: 977: 976: 975: 969: 968: 967: 966: 957: 956: 955: 954: 948: 947: 946: 945: 936: 935: 934: 933: 926: 925: 924: 923: 914: 913: 912: 911: 905: 904: 903: 902: 893: 892: 891: 890: 883: 882: 881: 880: 874: 873: 872: 871: 862: 861: 824: 823: 817: 809: 804: 803: 802: 799:Chris Paterson 794: 789: 788: 787: 781: 775: 763: 758: 757: 756: 748: 743: 742: 741: 733: 728: 727: 726: 718: 713: 712: 711: 708:Mark Consuelos 703: 698: 697: 696: 684: 679: 677: 674: 670: 669: 662: 652: 649:Chris Paterson 642: 635: 628: 614: 604: 594: 584: 581:Mark Consuelos 574: 555: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 424: 421: 406: 387: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 299: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 178: 177: 136: 135: 134: 133: 122: 119: 116: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2396: 2381: 2378: 2376: 2374: 2368: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2355: 2353: 2351: 2344: 2330: 2327: 2325: 2323: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2296: 2294: 2292: 2280: 2277: 2275: 2272: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2262: 2261: 2258: 2255: 2253: 2250: 2248: 2245: 2243: 2240: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2228: 2226: 2223: 2221: 2218: 2217: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2196: 2193: 2191: 2189: 2183: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2173: 2170: 2167: 2163: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2134: 2125: 2122: 2120: 2118: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2098: 2095: 2093: 2091: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2041: 2038: 2036: 2034: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2015: 2013: 2011: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1995: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1967: 1961: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1951: 1950: 1945: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1931: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1907: 1905: 1903: 1897: 1894: 1890: 1886: 1878: 1874: 1871: 1870: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1859: 1857: 1855: 1845: 1842: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1832: 1828: 1820: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1805: 1799: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1790: 1788: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1760: 1757: 1755: 1753: 1747: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1726: 1724: 1719: 1715: 1709: 1707: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1687: 1684: 1682: 1680: 1673: 1668: 1664: 1663:Henri Bergson 1660: 1659: 1657: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1619: 1613: 1604: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1587:Anton Chekhov 1582: 1581: 1578: 1576: 1574: 1568: 1560: 1556: 1553: 1552: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1536: 1533: 1528: 1525: 1520: 1516: 1513:, where I am 1512: 1508: 1507: 1504: 1501: 1499: 1497: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1476: 1473: 1468: 1464: 1455: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1444: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1416: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1386: 1384: 1382: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1360: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1340: 1334: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1319: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1272: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1258: 1255: 1252: 1249: 1246: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1202: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1129: 1127: 1121: 1118: 1116: 1113: 1108: 1105: 1103: 1100: 1096: 1094: 1089: 1083: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1066: 1065:Bahar Soomekh 1063: 1061: 1058: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1040: 1037: 1035: 1032: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1014: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1002: 998: 995: 991: 990: 989: 988: 982: 981: 980: 979: 973: 972: 971: 970: 965: 961: 960: 959: 958: 952: 951: 950: 949: 944: 940: 939: 938: 937: 930: 929: 928: 927: 922: 918: 917: 916: 915: 909: 908: 907: 906: 901: 897: 896: 895: 894: 887: 886: 885: 884: 878: 877: 876: 875: 870: 866: 865: 864: 863: 860: 857: 855: 853: 847: 846:Strong Oppose 844: 843: 842: 840: 834: 829: 821: 818: 815: 812: 811: 808: 805: 800: 797: 796: 793: 790: 785: 782: 779: 776: 773: 769: 766: 765: 762: 759: 754: 753:Bahar Soomekh 751: 750: 747: 744: 739: 736: 735: 732: 729: 724: 721: 720: 717: 714: 709: 706: 705: 702: 699: 694: 690: 687: 686: 683: 680: 675: 673: 667: 663: 660: 656: 653: 650: 646: 643: 640: 636: 633: 629: 626: 622: 618: 615: 612: 611:Bahar Soomekh 608: 605: 602: 598: 595: 592: 588: 585: 582: 578: 575: 572: 568: 564: 561: 560: 559: 553: 539: 536: 534: 532: 526: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 507: 506: 503: 501: 499: 493: 492: 491: 488: 486: 484: 478: 474: 473: 472: 468: 464: 460: 456: 455: 454: 451: 449: 447: 441: 440: 439: 438: 434: 430: 422: 420: 419: 415: 411: 404: 403: 400: 398: 396: 385: 377: 374: 372: 370: 363: 362: 360: 356: 352: 347: 346: 345: 342: 340: 338: 332: 328: 327: 326: 324: 320: 316: 311: 298: 295: 293: 291: 285: 284: 279: 275: 274: 273: 270: 268: 266: 259: 258: 257: 252: 247: 242: 238: 237: 236: 235: 228: 225: 223: 221: 214: 213: 208: 207: 206: 201: 196: 191: 187: 182: 181: 180: 179: 176: 173: 171: 169: 163: 158: 157: 156: 155: 150: 145: 140: 132: 131: 126: 125: 123: 120: 117: 114: 113: 112: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2366: 2342: 2335: 2304: 2286: 2157: 2083: 1988: 1959: 1947: 1943: 1912: 1895: 1892: 1888: 1882: 1867: 1849: 1824: 1802: 1769:Bradhemmings 1765: 1745: 1730:Bradhemmings 1727: 1720: 1716: 1713: 1690: 1608: 1583: 1564: 1549: 1459: 1408:Arthur Rubin 1361: 1357: 1349: 1341: 1338: 1206: 1163: 1124: 1086: 996: 963: 942: 920: 899: 868: 845: 825: 671: 557: 426: 405: 389: 386:Patent dates 307: 281: 240: 210: 141: 137: 127: 109: 78: 43: 37: 1292:Pseudomonas 1214:Pseudomonas 1174:—Preceding 1126:Simon Webbe 1120:Norah Jones 1039:Mili Avital 1009:Secretariat 820:Simon Webbe 814:Norah Jones 723:Mili Avital 689:Secretariat 666:Simon Webbe 659:Norah Jones 591:Mili Avital 567:Secretariat 36:This is an 2154:User:Mufka 2084:should not 1363:Lumberjake 1239:John Smith 1180:Stealth500 1088:Ty Conklin 1052:Jan Koller 778:Ty Conklin 738:Jan Koller 632:Ty Conklin 601:Jan Koller 246:Rick Block 195:Rick Block 162:Rick Block 144:Rick Block 98:Archive 10 1669:(d. 1941) 1653:(d. 1972) 1511:August 11 1288:over here 1148:Runsninth 828:Runsninth 664:1979 - 637:1976 - 630:1976 - 90:Archive 8 85:Archive 7 79:Archive 6 73:Archive 5 68:Archive 4 60:Archive 1 2158:optional 1896:End Edit 1829:and the 1456:sourcing 1188:contribs 1176:unsigned 1082:Degrassi 826:Robbie ( 772:Degrassi 625:Degrassi 351:SirBruce 315:SirBruce 2166:Zzyzx11 1889:Edited: 1838:WP:DAYS 1827:WP:DAYS 1661:1859 - 1645:1884 - 39:archive 2169:(Talk) 1898:. -- 1844:WP:NGS 1831:WP:NGS 1746:Oppose 1412:(talk) 1144:Robbie 932:added. 459:May 15 2371:Mufka 2367:Note: 2348:Mufka 2320:Mufka 2306:Grouf 2289:Mufka 2186:Mufka 2115:Mufka 2088:Mufka 2031:Mufka 2008:Mufka 1990:Grouf 1964:Mufka 1949:Grouf 1928:Mufka 1900:Mufka 1869:Grouf 1852:Mufka 1810:Help! 1785:Mufka 1750:Mufka 1677:Mufka 1571:Mufka 1551:Grouf 1494:Mufka 1441:Mufka 1379:Mufka 1316:Mufka 1269:Mufka 997:1970s 962:: --> 941:: --> 919:: --> 898:: --> 867:: --> 850:Mufka 676:1970s 529:Mufka 496:Mufka 481:Mufka 444:Mufka 393:Mufka 367:Mufka 335:Mufka 288:Mufka 263:Mufka 241:can't 218:Mufka 166:Mufka 16:< 2343:Done 2182:here 2062:talk 1960:Note 1917:and 1773:talk 1734:talk 1701:talk 1632:talk 1596:talk 1546:here 1437:this 1435:and 1433:this 1431:and 1429:this 1425:this 1398:talk 1367:talk 1297:talk 1219:talk 1209:here 1184:talk 1152:talk 1115:1979 1102:1978 1073:1976 1060:1975 1047:1973 1034:1972 1021:1971 1013:1989 1004:1970 833:talk 807:1979 792:1978 761:1976 746:1975 731:1973 716:1972 701:1971 693:1989 682:1970 655:1979 645:1978 617:1976 607:1975 597:1973 587:1972 577:1971 571:1989 563:1970 525:here 515:talk 467:talk 433:talk 423:2008 414:talk 355:talk 331:here 319:talk 251:talk 200:talk 186:this 149:talk 2287:-- 2152:or 1850:-- 1804:Guy 1535:ino 1483:ino 1410:| 1267:-- 1142:-- 527:-- 2164:. 2140:, 2064:) 1775:) 1736:) 1703:) 1649:, 1634:) 1598:) 1400:) 1369:) 1190:) 1186:• 1154:) 1015:) 841:) 837:) 657:- 647:- 619:- 609:- 599:- 589:- 579:- 565:- 517:) 469:) 435:) 416:) 361:) 357:) 325:) 321:) 94:→ 64:← 2060:( 1812:) 1808:( 1771:( 1732:( 1699:( 1630:( 1594:( 1531:ē 1527:r 1523:@ 1519:M 1479:ē 1475:r 1471:@ 1467:M 1396:( 1365:( 1299:) 1295:( 1221:) 1217:( 1182:( 1158:) 1150:( 1146:( 1084:) 835:) 831:( 774:) 695:) 627:) 573:) 513:( 465:( 431:( 412:( 353:( 317:( 253:) 249:( 202:) 198:( 151:) 147:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Days of the year/Archive 6 - Knowledge

Index