Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 3

5318:"I put your stuff from Raystorm's article into a template, and was going through some of the other articles to add it, and found a lot of layout issues - external links in strange places, lots of See also stuff in infoboxes, etc. My concern is actually more of a general one - that gynormous infoboxes and See also templates are taking over Wiki, contributing to load-time issues - Projects should keep a close eye on that, and keep tight standards about infoboxes. I was surprised that Raystorm had been told to add that info per aesthetics - yes, aesthetics matter, but GTL and other guidelines matter more; See also should stay See also. I'm not sure what standards exist for infoboxes, but I should spend some time investigating - the gynormous ones taking over Wiki are a concern. We focus on how prose size affects load time, but some template creep is getting out of control (more so on other Projects than LGBT). I also found a LGBT portal in one article - there's some instruction somewhere about Wiki meta info belonging on talk pages only - again, I don't know where to find this info, though. I've got to figure out what standards exist, since too many articles are really getting cluttered." Personally, I think this is a matter of personal preferences rather than a guideline issue (which are, after all, only guidelines) and I certainly find those templates most helpful when I'm reading articles. 3894:

Wikiprojects, as well as tagging over three thousand articles. I see next month as a consolidation of what we have achieved so far - we acquired more than half our members in the last month, and they have not yet received a newsletter and many have had limited contact with the Wikiproject so far, so we need to start encouraging people to use the processes that we have established in the past two months. I think it is fantastic that we currently have two FACs going through at the moment. February seems like a time for tweaking, for developing our community building processes, such the quilt and the getting involved page, for welding the community that has formed together so LGBT articles are the better improved for it. We have a long way to go (I, personally, will not be resting until we have beaten MILHIST in member numbers and FAs), but I think the achievements of the past two months is something to be justifiably proud of, and I look forward to our future.

4306:

most done by well meaning Christians! This is just a more transparent effort, though I must say, it was a good try. Secondly, I do not need to be converted or whatnot, as I'm not a homophobe as such. I would just like to outline that I have a distaste for LGBT Culture and its propagation. I have no issue with people who are homosexuals, though I will admit I find the homosexual aspect to be physically unappealing, to say the least. My distaste for LGBT culture has nothing to do with my Religious beliefs, but rather stems from my abhor for promiscuity (Like it or not, the sexual revolution and LGBT emergence go hand in hand). Thirdly, I am willing to concede that I erred on the issue of deleting banners relating to LGBT, though I do think that it is innappropriatly displayed on a number of articles, and there are a number of articles that ought have the banner.

3427:

it would be a bit silly to simply send it to people like you, me, Satyr, Jeff, Coel, etc. because we're happy to post on the talkpage until the cows come home. It would be more for the members who edit and rarely post here but could do with some different form of support that we don't know about. I'm kinda concerned that we may not having as much effect as we could when it comes to improving LGBT articles and if we aren't, I want to know, and I want to know how we could fix that. It would be optional, so I don't think distracting from our goal would be a problem.

4262:'s talk page and I couldn't help but detect that he still has a strong sense of belligerence in his response to the rebuke. To me he is another person who doesn't understand or even cares to broaden his understanding of LGBT issues. I have seen his type before and most them are collected in the more fundamentalist wings of Christianity, where lies the strongest opposition to LGBT's receiving the same rights as everyone else. In the hopes of shedding some light and truth as to what the Bible really says about homosexuality I created 2337:. Satyr therefore welcomed a non-existent user by following the talkpage link (I've now welcomed the right user). Realistically any system we come up with needs us to keep an eye on it and make sure we sort out attempts to sign up that don't quite work. Satyr: where's the third place to sign up? I like having the table as I'd like to have the full list on the main page for as long as possible but don't have a strong view on the setup of the subpage (though I like the idea of it being a space for more infortmation to be given). 4316:"Assuming religious beliefs"? You have Catholic userboxes on your userpage and a sentence that says you are against "LGBT issues". There seem little assumptions to be made. I don't appreciate the promiscuity that accompanies much of LGBT culture, but you have a clear abhorrence for all things LGBT, not just our alleged sexual liberation. Having said that, I appreciate your confessing to your mistake and hope we can all work productively together in the future. 31: 2101:. Guys this article was always going to be kept. There was no need for a lot of people from the project to jump into the AfD. There has been a view developing that posting that AfDs are occuring to Wikiprojects is an example of trying to vote-stack and disrupts the deletion process because projects are inherently likely to wish to expand their coverage at the expense of policy. At the moment the relevant guideline is the shiny new 3374:

some high quality LGBT articles it's meaningless, right? Potential questions could include: Have you used any WP:LGBT processes? Have you found them useful? Are there any aspects of WP:LGBT which you feel particularly help Knowledge? Are there any we need to improve on? Do you have any new ideas for how WP:LGBT can further contribute to Knowledge? Overall, do you feel WP:LGBT is successful in improving articles within its scope?

3951:, who is removing the WikiProject tag on the grounds that everyone knows that Tipton was straight. I checked her contributions, and she seems to be removing WikiProject LGBT studies tags from quite a few articles. She has a userbox that says "This user is against LGBT issues and Queer Theory," so I think that she may be influenced by some personal bias. Anyone want to help clean up after her? - 5549: 3981:

relevance to LGBT issues. Members of the Greek Divine Pantheon were on the list of LGBT for goodness' sake! They have no relevance to LGBT issues, even if they had relationships with members of the same sex. There should be a greater amount of dicretion on the part of LGBT Project members to avoid further mistakes regarding labelling of articles.

1550: 1218:"LGBT culture in foo". LGBT culture should be subcategorized by country, but most other categories should not. Some need subcategories for L,G,B and T. I also think that many of the LGBT profession categories should be converted to lists. Especially the Actors. A list can annotate and explain things that a category cannot. -- 3652:

real world (as some gay characters are apt to do), deserve a separate article. (now stepping off my soapbox) Ok, as for the issue at hand, I would suggest that this category not be broken down any further, indeed, categories such as fictional bisexuals and lesbians should be upmerged here. Just my 2 cents.

4806:

article about same sex marriage which was in my view dubious and unverifiable. The user who posted it claims that Same Sex marriage would be mainly funded by straight men - he is the writer who published this material and therefore claims it is factual. I am being attacked because I questioned its

4330:

You assumed my distaste for LGBT culture because of religion, which another user called "the more fundamentalist wings of Christianity". The Catholic Church is not a fundimentalist wing of Christianity! Excluding the esoteric Christian churches, it is perhaps one of the least Fundimental Churches, if

3810:

lately, via peer review or directly editing the page. The article looks really good now, and that's thanks to you all. I've sent it off to FAC now, and who knows what will happen there, but I just wanted to take a minute to thank the people that have made it possible that this article stands a chance

3426:

I was going to create an inactive members list when I send out the February newsletter (you can easily tell because the newsletters pile up next to each other), which is defined as someone who hasn't edited for three months at all. That was what I meant by sending it out to active members - obviously

2751:

It seems to me that we now have at least ten active members, so it might be worthwhile revisiting the idea of a peer review. Would anyone be interested in peer reviewing LGBT articles? I ask because I don't want us to set it up and then people be disappointed with no reviews like they are on the main

1263:

I'll reserve judgment on actors, then. But for other categories I think the lists would be useful, and would avoid constant CFD discussions that say "irrelevant intersection". Lists would also help solve the problem, w/r/t a lot of the academic and literary cats, of whether they are LGBT people who

4744:

I believe I have some notes that could help for the potential 'homosexuality and genetics' article. I had to do a revision of the different studies on homosexuality (including genetics) for an oral presentation at my university. I'll have to dig them out (I did it two, almost three years ago), but I

4383:

I am already a member of the Kindness Campaign. Quite frankly, we are holding this discussion on the LGBT talkpage, not your talkpage, and thus you evidently do care about what I am saying or you wouldn't keep coming back. "Well, see if I care" is horribly immature, btw. If you don't want me to "say

3980:

I am a male. Thank you for assuming my gender, FisherQueen and Jeffpw. How ironic eh? I am not against you for personal bias, and I would appreciate you not to label attacks at me. What I am against is the blatantly liberal way in which the LGBT Banner is posted on top of many articles which bear no

3707:

and discussions with another editor, it appears there is no article which covers discrimination LGBT people generally encounter, presently or historically. I mean in terms of housing, employment, welfare support. It seems like an important topic. Has anyone seen it and I simply failed to find it? If

2858:

Yep, we need to do it. :) As it is, the protocol is a list of ten articles, with your removing one from the top for each one you add at the bottom. Since articles can sometimes be added in such large numbers, I've wondered if ten is a long enough list to keep things from being deleted right away.

4763:

BTW, I want to propose a new department, that of "Community". It would function rather like other WikiProjects' Outreach departments, so with the newsletter and how to recruit, but also with the quilt and other potential community-building activities (as long as they also contribute to the wiki, we

4663:

The article does seem overly broad, and includes items not really relating to the title (eg: hospital visitation). It could do with a rewrite, or a merge of content into appropriate articles, and then a deletion. It also needs citations. It currently has none, which is worrisome for an article that

3651:

Adhering to this guideline, most of these articles should not exist. Looking through the articles, you'll find that most simply provide the story behind the character, rarely do they break out of the fictional universe of the story. Those that do, especially in regard to stirring controversy in the

3324:

I'd really like it if sexual IDENTITY - or self-identity - could be explored more. Especially for a bisexual person, the terms 'sexuality', 'sexual orientation' and 'sexual identity' are problematic - since bisexuality is, in language and many people's understanding, simply an orientation and a set

2441:

I've changed the members list again:I copied another WikiProject's idea and added my own variation - now we can see all the active members, and the main membership list can be used for perusal, AWB, and an inactive member section. We then don't need to worry about this again until we have about 120

726:

More importantly, I think mass deletion is the only way to go for the categories. Most have only 4 or 5 entries, and while I see the wisdom of waiting for cats like "LGBT people from Poland" to fill up, "Bisexual Canadian actors" is gonna be a long time coming. I'm gonna start noting down cats for

253:

The structure of the LGBT categories really need sorting and rearranging. I believe that some renames are in order, and some rationalisation of what categories some of the categories are in would be a start. Right now, I just don't have the time and patience to sort this, but it really needs doing!

5812:

also made FA. Congratulations to you, too, Celithemis! Ouyr project is really racking up the awards now. And Raystorm, after an article I wrote got an FA, I was too exhausted by the whole business to really enjoy it. I may write another article, but I will leave it to others to nominate it if they

4961:

This has me reeling. Is this true? Have I inadvertedly been using a pejorative term throughout the entire article? Should I use 'homosexual associations' instead of 'gay associations', for example? I wanted to ask here before changing the article further or reverting the previous edit, because I'm

4281:

to my way of thinking, on this or any other question. Sure, I'd like it if there were fewer homophobes in the world, but he doesn't have to join PFLAG to edit Knowledge, or even change his beliefs on the subject of gay people. He just has to follow the rules, like the rest of us. I have equally

3442:

I meant off-Wiki but don't let my dislike of questioannaires put you off! Besides, when expressed that way I do see some merit in the idea. As for improving articles I take your point, but a lot of our energy has being going into fixing things with the project, working on the portal etc. Those are

3264:

to the list. They're just as significant--if not more so, taking the long view--than Andy Warhol. I realize that the project mentions "core biographies"as listed on Knowledge 1.0, but I feel we as members of this project need to define what we think of as important people in LGBT history, and make

2755:

Additionally, somewhere up above I suggested an article watchlist. I was looking through the List of controversial issues yesterday and noticed there were a lot of LGBT articles on it. Might it be worth setting one of these up? Members can then add heavily vandalised articles or articles with edit

2696:

It is pleasingly colourful :). If this template is going to be used might it need updating a little? It lists the activities of the project as categorising and indentifying topics/problems, it doesn't say anything about actually improving the quality of articles relevant to the LGBT community. And

2227:

Um, can we have a boring normal list as well, please? I don't want to scare people off because the joining instructions are too complicated, and also I can't pull up a membership list using AWB with the list as it is. I think the WJBscribe list is great, particularly if we possibly changed it to a

2150:. Without the inclusion of diverse views, many good articles have been deleted simply because of the limited scope they were evaluated in. There needs to be a middle ground where Projects are actively invited to participate in these types of discussions but without the appearance of vote stacking. 2145:

You know, I agree with the idea against vote stacking but I don't think eliminating Project noticeboards are a good idea. A dreadful flaw of AfD is that is not really a microcosm of the Knowledge community but rather a clique of regular who (like any group) are limited in their own perspective and

2010:

That article is a mess. I slapped a {{world}} tag on it, since it seems overly biased towards American examples, with a few obvious British ones thrown in. It also seems fairly listy. Another criticism I have is that it doesn't spend much time developing the definition of Gay Icon, and tracing its

1674:

Yes it prob does deserve an article. But I disagree as to use. Given the nature of the original medal I feel it inappropriate for us to use it. Given the Vatican's present stance on homosexuality, it can only serve to potentially anger Catholic editors. As we are not here to crusade for gay rights

1217:

After looking over the modified list of categories, I think most of our categories need reorganizating. This can just be undertaken by anyone who wants to help. There are some big questions to be discussed: Do we want categorys about "LGBT culture in foo" or "LGBT in foo". I think it should be

4852:

applies and there aren't enough references available. All I can find are from gay media groups. Given the PM's stance one would expect international news sources to have reported on it if it was clear cut. Absent of that, I don't think we're on strong enough ground to decide he's gay. He has been

4305:

Thank you for the mixed reactions, ranging from patronising to assuming religious beliefs. Firstly, I would like to add that the link regarding Bible and the Homosexuality really is a manipulation on the Bible. Despite being a Catholic, I'm ready to admit that lots of people manipulate the bible;

3626:

which recently was given bisexual, lesbian and transgender subcategories. I fought to have them upmerged but that failed since people didn't understand the difficulty in defining specific orientation and some of the difficulties it might create. Now, as it stands, gay men are unrepresented by the

3373:

A Quarterly Evaluation - Every three months we could send out a questionnaire (attach a collapsible link to the bottom of our newsletter or something) to our active members to get some ideas of how we're doing in our goals. It's all very well building up the project but if it doesn't translate to

2937:

and filled it with a few articles I found at the list of controversial issues and the relevant category - anyone who wants to add/remove articles is welcome. What occurred to me is with the shift from th enoticeboard to an open tasks template on the horizon, it might be more helpful to people who

2779:

I am willing to commit to Peer reviewing any and all articles submitted to this project for review. I think that's an essential part of any WikiProject. I do it to some degree at WikiProject Biography, but would prefer to focus more of my time and efforts here, since Biography already has so many

2767:

If I understand correctly, the second idea would be to keep an eye specifically on articles that are frequently vandalised, and to have a list of these so that we all can know what those are? I'd help with that, certainly. As for the peer review, I'd do some, but how much would honestly probably

2639:

SatyrTN has one, I'm sure he'll link to it. Personally, I prefer leaving notes on talkpages. It has a more friendly feel, I reckon. Even when I'm mass inviting with AWB I try to use a form message rather than a template. It seems to work, at least 14 users have joined the WikiProject at my direct

5447:

Raystorm, I checked with someone far more knowledgeable than I on Wiki guidelines, and there is no specific policy against using navigational templates at the top of the article. I still believe the way the article is currently structured is better (infobox at top, navigation of See also article

4368:

I am against Queer Theory. So what? I'll change it so it says theory, issues and culture. It also says I am an ageless immortal, do you believe that? If you want to call me a homophobe, I don't care. Stop using weasal words like "you are very clearly". It is tiresome and overemphatic. If you are

2495:

If we're going to have a list on the main page, could we perhaps move it to the bottom? The way it is now, it is very unwieldy, and requires one to do much scrolling to see the rest of the page content. Another idea which might make navigation of this, the notice-board, etc. easier is to use a

2416:

Well I still think its worth keeping the table so everyone's on the main project page as long as possible. Its just a question of keeping a little watch on the table and the list and copying any that only sign in one place. But obviously if I'm in a minority here we can easily lose the table and

2318:

In the cold light of day, I still want a normal list. I think many newbies would be bewildered by the current list we have, and I want to start an Inactive members section when I send out next month's newsletter. However, if everyone else wants it as it stands, I'm happy to maintain a list in my

471:

Ok, my idea for a meta project went down like a house on TNT, but the idea of cross-collaboration lives on. One of our aims is to collate information suitable for transwikiing - so does anyone have any ideas for useful textbooks to do with LGBT that we could consider? Doesn't matter how dumb you

415:

However, MILHIST's ratio of stubs to FAs is currently 1%. Ours is 0.001%, and largely because I went through the FA list and tagged LGBT people. We can improve this, either by writing more FAs (a skill which takes time to acquire), or by improving more stubs (a skill which doesn't). You may have

4167:

I've seen his comments about Pedophilia and the LGBT project at his talk page (and a few of his other contribs). *Shakes head* Do you think he'll do as advised and stay away from those articles (i.e, LGBTproject-related) in which he is clearly unable to stay NPOV once he returns from the block?

3893:

I just wanted to conratulate everybody on the current success of the project. We've gone from being a moribund organisation that only really started back in November, and since then we have more than quadrupled our membership and acquired more infrastructure than many much older and experienced

3362:

Also, as I'm sure many of you are aware, I regularly trawl other WikiProjects looking for new ideas we can use or adapt ourselves. I maintain a list of possible ideas as well as initiatives of my own that I'm mulling over until I have a workable proposal. I have two new ideas to present to you:

693:

Hi, Celithemis! I don't think we have a Peer Review system set up yet - this project is still a bit of a fledgling one :) And that was my Bot, but we sorta decided that if the project didn't have a hand in making an article FA, then we shouldn't take credit. But Congrats - to you and all the

2020:

OK, I have spent hours improving this article (though I don't know why, since it is such a silly article). I had to render the criticism section invisible, as it was added by an anon IP and I can't find a single ref to support it. The rest is basically ref'd now, and I added some more info and

1871:

True, it isn't an appropriate symbol and I don't think any of us really thought it should be used. Much as I enjoy the idea of using words/symbols formerly used for oppression for purposes contrary to that oppression, Jeff's comment is a valid reminder of the feelings still engendered by those

5141:

How do I convert the LGBT template in Same-sex marriage in Spain (you know, the rainbow-coloured one with the links to other same-sex marriage in other countries' articles)? I need to make it horizontal instead of vertical. I have no idea how to do this. I also have to reduce the width in the

4995:

I saw those edits and I think the editor explained himself very badly. Gay is in no way pejorative, but it is more informal than homosexual. So referring to "a gay" is more informal than "a homosexual". That's what I think he meant when he said encyclopedic and that's why I didn't revert him.

4979:

accepted term that is used in the English language. It is in no way pejorative that I have ever heard. Language changes, obviously, but if this has changed, I have not heard of a more acceptable word that is used. And his comparison was strange, too. Africans refers to a person based on their

3370:- I was already thinking about constructing an accessible page like this to provide helpful info for newbies or hesitant editors, but this is marvellous. While inviting others, I've had several users unsure of what they can do to contribute, so a page like this would probably be quite helpful. 4337:

As for this clear abhorrence to all things LGBT, where did you obtain this information? How do you know my position on ALL things LGBT? What are "all" things LGBT? That's a wide base of things to abhor, you must agree? Accept that the various positions on all things LGBT are not dichotomous!

2941:

Also, I want to create a userbox similar to the PAW one, but with a few changes. So, can anyone create an image using Image:Closeup of an blue-green human eye.jpeg to have the rainbow colours on it somehow (maybe washed over the top, or colouring the iris, I don't know)? I would be grateful.

291:

I'm worried about the direction this article is going in. One of the biggest problems with the state of it prior to AfD was that it was totally unsupported by reliable references. Although the additions to it seems all right, we risk building up this page into a list of things that have been

3727:

exists, but it could probably do with splitting into "Historical societal attitudes towards homosexuality" and "Current societal attitudes towards homosexuality". Great work on the template, btw. I've added it to the Portal and it don't half look pretty. Wanna reply to my proposals above?

3405:

are and excluding others. And I guess I always see these sorts of questionnaires as more of a chore than actually being productive. There are many talkpages were people can raise concerns. The evaluation seems a bit bureacratic to me and may distract from actually improving LGBT articles.

2261:

OK, I've set up the pages as I proposed so people can have a look and see how it works. Satyr set up an alternative whereby the list is moved to a sub page and the last 10 people to join are reproduced on the main page. We can easily revert to that if it is prefered. What do people think?

3825:

I've become aware of a slight problem with our project tag for talk pages. Most talkpage tags (including project ones) have a parametre to turn it into a small version on the right side of the page. Which helps when talk pages have vast numbers of tags. This should be activated by using:

4833:

Another person just undid my edit (edit summary "they are not allegations. The Polish secret service says he's gay, and Lech Wałęsa has mentioned it twice, and janaslaw has never denied it, even though every newspaper makes jokes about it. He's gay!") with ".no, you are". Delightful.

5838:

Haha, I must admit a similar thought crossed my mind at one point, writing an article and letting someone else go through the FAC process. :P But I don't know, can it actually get any worse than what I had to hear (or read) at the SSM in Spain one? (Please don't say yes!). :D Cheers

3167:

Hi, All! I've just finished a bot that will help update our "To-Do" list at the top of this page. It reviews all articles that have our "LGBTProject" tag on their talk page, and if they have any cleanup tags on them (Thanks, Dev!), it makes a note of them and organizes them on the

5045:

Personally, I find "a gay" (as a noun) to be totally wrong. But not because it's pejorative (though as Dev says, it is less formal), but because it irks me grammatically. Gay is foremost an adjective - using it as a noun rubs my fur the wrong way. But that's just my $ 0.02US. --

4227:

Me, too. I think this guy has the ability to learn to be a useful editor, and the potential to be useful, if he uses this week to lurk a bit and read some policy. I kind of hope he'll come back and contribute productively. If he doesn't, of course, he can always be permablocked.

5126:

Just to add — in discussions of marriage and adoption, "same-sex couple" is generally more accurate than "gay couple," "homosexuals, "gays," etc., since it does not indicate sexual orientation (i.e. bisexuals are not homosexual but may have relationships with the same sex).

3648:

Major characters (and places, concepts, etc.) in a work of fiction should be covered within the article on that work of fiction. If an encyclopedic treatment of such a character causes the article on the work itself to become long, then that character can be given a separate

1608:

It appears to be a papal medal. If you look at the high res version, the W in the middle is covering a papal coat of arms. The writing on the edge says Ecclesiastica. When I saw it on the Commons, its description was in French, so I assumed a French user uploaded it. My bad.

2105:. It seems to me a bad idea to create examples of occasions where a project has rallied its members to oppose an AfD (especially as in this case I don't think it was needed). Just wanted to advise caution in future- much stricter canvassing rules may be round the corner... 4923:

or the BBC. Second, I do not at all dabble in politics, except for my deep belief that all politicians should be murder victims. This issue is quite controversial and it is not an easy thing finding sources that'd be (semi) impartial or objective, but I'll see what I can

4068:

So you did. I hadn't seen that bit of discussion. Oh well, another try won't hurt. The problem seems to be that he assumes we make articles we edit pro-LGBT, which isn't true. And is actually a pretty strong accusation given the number of people about whom he's assuming

5614:. Barnstars are "appreciation awards" spontaneously given out from one editor to another for especially helpful work. Some people display their barnstars on their user page, and when someone has a lot of them, they may replace them with ribbons to take up less space. — 4542:

on HIV/AIDS and related topics within the LGBT project. My personal view is that although articles which specifically cover the incidence and effect of HIV/AIDS on the gay Community are within the scope of the project, those articles etc. on the illness itself are not.

1342:

Well, I see them as two completely different articles. Gay rights would be about homosexuality and the law while Homosexuality in France (perhaps renamed LGBT life in France or something along those lines) would address the overall view of LGBT people in that country.

5747:

Thanks guys/gals! :-) I'm exhausted after mindlessly formatting refs left to right (among other funny mind-numbing chores at FAC), I can't wait to start writing again an article (any article) and doing research for it, which is what I really love doing! Cheers! :-)

1486:*Grin* Thanks, I will! I'm gonna rest a bit for now (you know, recharge my batteries after obsessing for a month with trying to get the article to GA status!), and afterwards I'll proceed with the peer review and see what needs to be done to get it to FA. Cheers 4415:

I agree with CaveatLector. Let's ignore him, even if it means he'll get the last word here (so what?). We'll just check his contribs so he doesn't pull another Pedophilia stunt, and that's it. No sense in discussing if he's a homophobe or not here. Cheers

2569:

a Featured Portal, but one of the requirements is a list of categories, and I can't create a list if half of it will be deleted! This is an issue we just need to push on and resolve and once we've cleaned out the cobwebs it'll be so much easier to use.

3119:

May I suggest that you poach the parent topics from the London list and other portals? The headings on the London portal contain many that would apply just as well here,a and other portals probably have a simliar wealth of topic headers we can use.

1812:

that we could use, to no avail. That would be my first choice :) Other than that, I like the Nijmegan, but I wonder if we couldn't find a 6 rayed star for the rainbow colors? Or, perhaps, go with the Nazi one (minus the swastika) and with the

5331:

Yeah, unless Sandy establishes a concensus to support his view, I don't think he should remove them from articles and its inappropriate to hold it against an FA nom. If his view becomes policy- fine. But to my knowledge it is not at the moment.

3358:

Can we change the members section so that the main list transcludes onto the main page? I've tried it myself but it keeps bringing the blurb and navigation box with it. And congratulations to us for near doubling the membership in a month!

2793:

Well, I'm happy to build the peer review, but I'm slightly concerned that only three people have expressed an interest in reviewing articles - is anyone else interested? I just don't want to disappoint anyone if they sign up with our PR.

4217:

He's a very new user who apparently didn't understand how Knowledge works. The admin who gave him the block emphasised that if he disrupts again the block will be extended indefinitely. I, at least, am assuming good faith on the part of

4017:"They have no relevance to LGBT issues, even if they had relationships with members of the same sex." If they had relationships with the same sex, then they are covered by us. They don't have to be LGBT activists to be under our banner. 1981:

is already on the to-do list, and I've just added it to the noticeboard, but that section of the noticeboard doesn't seem to have a very high turnover rate (some listings approaching a year old). So I'm letting everyone know here... the

3244:

They're all male because all the LGBT core biographies were male. Not to denigrate my own sex or anything, but I suspect it's because women didn't really make earth-shattering achievements that revolutionised their time until recently.

5023:

Well I saw the edits he did and they weren't bad. I was just worried about having to take out the words 'gay and lesbian' from the entire article. 'Informal' I can understand, but when I read that edit summary, I did get concerned. :)

4900:

Let me just voice my opinion here, since the person in question unfortunately comes from my country. I would not, ever, absolutely, categorise him as an LGBT person. His comments aside, he clearly has nothing to do with the movement.

2296:, it still works okay and doesn't overcrowd the main page. While the new table is smaller and better, won't it still (hopefully) get longer and eventually be too big? Just my thoughts, but very interested in what others think... -- 2377:

I thought the point of that list was for people who wanted to express an interest in the subject area but didn't want to actually join the project. Though I see some project members are also on that list. Mmm- I see the difficulty.

1570:

Actually Dev, it was uploaded by an Italian user. According to CheckUsage, it has been used on one talk page on Italian Knowledge and on a talk page on French Knowledge. So only 5 times in total including here and on Commons.

411:

is improving immensely since its listing as COTM, so well done there. And the assessments have been going a month and our log has over 1300 articles, so that's excellent. Do keep on tagging as you come across LGBT articles.

1173:

Well, I was kinda assuming that articles that found themselves in deleted categories would simply be appropriately categorised under categories we DO have. Upmerging would be to leave a redirect behind, and why do that?

1111:

Merging is one thing, deleting is another. I assuming (and hoping) that for most of this you are suggesting they be merged into their parents. Please be clearer. Off-hand there seems to be just a very few deletes. --

4481:? Personally, I feel like it should, but I realize HIV/AIDS isn't solely an LGBT issue, and I realize some people have strong feelings on the subject. So is there any opposition to doing that? Or any suggestions? -- 512:

is now online, or should I say, on-wiki. I hadn't heard of it before, but should be a good resource for us. Check it out (and read the article at the top of the start page, "Why the encyclopedia went out of print"):

2212:

True, but we can easily transcribe across. The main list (names only) would be the main one. Anyone on that page gets listed on the subpage and its up to them if they give details of interests there? Would that work?

1860:

I don't have a problem with military symbols: however, on looking closer at the nazi medal, there are six eagles and another swastika (near the top) on it. If we removed all of them, we wouldn't be left with a lot.

722:

Ok, I just finished cataloguing every article we have in the LGBT cats using AWB. Looks like we have our work cut out, guys, cos I just found over 6711 articles tucked away in there (and I didn't count BDSM stuff).

599:

On the one hand, that might get some more editors interested in joining the project. But on the other, even though it was CotM, it was only sorta. And it feels like giving up :) But that's just my $ US0.02... --

2829:

OK, I'll get on with constructing both of those then. It also occurred to me that we should peer review our COTM a day before before it gets put up, it would probably help give people ideas of what to do with it.

3826:{{LGBTProject|class=B|small=yes}} but our template doesn't have a smaller version. I haven't been able to figure out how to adapt the template myself. Is anyone else able to do this? Would be much appreciated... 1589:

Does anyone know what the medal is? I note that the original version oft his file (before rainbows were added) was used as a Wikiaward for people who contributed to ecclesiastical topics on Dutch wikipedia (see

5504:

I just looked at the Imperial Court article (loved it, by the way), and see the references need expanding. If you have trouble doing it, let me know and I will assist you. I find working on refs....relaxing.

3343:

article has some serious NPOV issues. I realise that it's struggling against modern western culture's rereading of pederastic relationships as necessarily abusive, but right now it reads like a NAMBLA flyer.

2120:

Thanks for the warning, WJBscribe. The article wasn't always going to be kept, which is why I mentioned here that it needed help, but after Jeffpw got through with it, yeah, there was no chance of deletion.

4352:

Your userpage says "this user is against LGBT issues and queer theory", it does not say "LGBT culture" - you are very clearly trying to get out of being pinned with a label you yourself have put out there.

1404:

Hello all - I'm really sorry for not having followed protocol -- now that I made a mistake I will try to learn more before making changes. I'm new here and didn't mean any harm and really appreciate your

1898:

See an example on my talk page of the template used by the 'countering systemic bias' wikiproject...is there one of these for LGBT studies? Or is there someone here that knows how to create one? Thanks,

3021:

going through at the moment: shall I relist it here as well (it's a bit of a car crash at the moment, with tenses and standards everwhere - I need to seriously work it), to give our peer review a go?

5358:

Hm. Actually, I'm not in favor of "see also" type templates on article pages. If the article contains information about something, it'll be a wikilink - if not, it's distracting. As an example, I

5253:

issues throughout the articles, and grew tired - aesthetics are important, but they don't trump GTL - maybe you can get them to work on those issues? I created the See also template for your article.

4927:

Dev, regarding your question from my talk page, he's definitely homophobic, the other one I'm not sure and for myself I do not really care, however I will try to look up some sources for you guys. --

3108:, but I just opened all the windows and everything and just realised I have absolutely no idea what to put in it. I don't know how to group the topics. What do you think should be the parent topics? 1675:

but promote in depth coverage of GLBT topics in a neutral manner, I think we should stick to the present LGBT barnstar. Otherwise we risk opening a can of worm. Shame though, it looks rather good.

2175:

What about having a table of users on the main page split into columns (names only) and then a list on a subpage where users can write a more detailed description of their interests/involvements?

1151:

be upmerged - Bisexual Venezuelan actors, for instance, to Bisexual actors. I'm against just deleting them, since that leaves the articles out in the cold and not necessarily part of WP:LGBT. --

4873:

WJB, even disregarding whether he is gay or not, his stance on homosexuality, ands the statements he has made about gay rights, is enough to qualify him, as a person of interest for our project.

4529:

Definitely needs to be included somewhere in our project. It had an enormous impact on the LGBT community, not only as a society in generally,but also as an instrument of political re-awakening.

444:

is currently rated a Stub - it only has five paragraphs of text, though it has a list of works, etc, that counts close to 100 entries. Kushner should be easy for someone to jump to B level. --

5677:

I see that people have added templates, images, categories, etc. to the article. I'll assume it was people from here — thank you! I've expanded the text, and now it looks like a real article!

1658:

The award shown above, however, is the obverse side (the back) and it appears the medal has undergone numerous redesigns from a cursory inspection of Google images. We probably could use it.

3469:- I am not convinced by the colour scheme and there's an irritating line down the right hand side that I can't fix, but we have a template. Thoughts? Should anything be added? Removed? 3169: 4818:

The Prime Minister of Poland was recently outed as a homosexual - but given that both he and Poland for that matter are deeply anti-gay, it's not surprising that there is a user at

1851:, another symbol of german military oppression. Where some see "irony" in the use of this medal for our purposes here on Knowledge, I see only insensitivity and supreme bad taste. 1635:

Actually, it's a Latin inscription "pro ecclesia et pontifixx" (I can't make out these letters), which means "for the church and the Pope/papacy (depending on those two letters)".

2711:

Totally agree! I created it to spur activity in the WikiProject - to great success, I might add :) - but it was really created on-the-moment, so it definitely needs updating. --

1469:

I am very happy for you, Raystorm! I know how much work it takes to get an article so far. Best of luck with bringing it to FA, and if you need any help, feel free to call on me.

4910:

Ouro, can you pull up some Polish newspaper articles about the controversy surrounding his sexuality? It would be helpful to have Polish sources for that section of the article.

3265:

them our core biographies. If anyone disagrees, feel free to discuss this or even revert my change, but I have to agree the list as it stands seems both sexist and exclusionary.

660: 1284: 739: 4822:

who really doesn't want me to add the LGBT people from Poland category. I'm getting close to 3RR, so I'm going to stop now, but someone else might want to go reason with him.

3759:

Eh. I'm ambivalent about that. IMHO, time creating country-specific LGBT templates and then tagging articles could be better spent. But I wouldn't oppose creating them. --

2629:

Do we have an invitation template to invite prospective members to our project? Several other projects have it, and it might be useful if we created one, too. Just a thought.

1133:

Ok, I split the list for ones that should be upmerged. The bisexual actor categories would need renaming to "bisexual actors from..." so they may as well be deleted outright.

358:

in order to get some co-ordination going. Please add your name if you think you can change an article, a picture, or a biography once a week, add some news occasionally etc.

3004:

It is easy to overlook things on a watchlist. So if those interested in Peer Reviewing happened to miss the listing, the nominator could just message them (can you tell I

2938:

want to list article disputes to add them to the watchlist with a brief note about the nature of the dispute. That way everyone can keep an eye on it. Does this sound OK?

2877:

If the list is being updated so much, maybe editors adding to it should limit it to one or two article that they really like and would appreciate it being given some TLC.

1507:

Can someone revisit the assessment on this article? I've spent a while on it to get it up to scratch so it doesn't get deleted (yet it's still rated as stub class, grr).

89: 3966:

I'll spend a little time doing it. I have an hour or so before I have to go to work. May I suggest leaving a message on her talk page,and also possibly reporting this on

2500:

have with the tabs. It is very easy to use and makes things neater, IMO. I actually would like this better than having the members list right on the front page at all.

416:

realised this paragraph is a overt attempt to promote Jumpaclass - so sign up! Tidy up our stubs, and lets become the first WikiProject with more starts than stubs! Yay!

81: 76: 64: 59: 4980:

geographic location. Negro refers to a race. Further, doing a major copyedit without discussion is always frowned upon, especially while it is under consideration as a

5494:

I upgraded them all to B on the basis of their length, images, and references. I definitely think you should consider going for GA if posssble. Keep up the good work!

624: 3073:

Shouldn't we include the Peer review area in our "list of departments" on the main project page? I was looking for it and couldn't find it without coming here first.

2663:. You can transclude it using {{User:SatyrTN/Template/LGBT Studies Invite}} and it will figure out their username, etc, so it's at least a little personalized. -- 2352: 768:

is full of programs that had one gay character in them, and has thus been lebelled LGBT related. Someone might want to take programs like Buffy and South Park out.

547: 5076:

etc. It is acceptable to use it encyclopedicly because that is the term gay people often use to describe themselves. It doesn't sound right as a noun though e.g.

2969: 400: 5404:

I guess I'm somewhere in a middle ground. I like having them to a certain extent, but also think they can get out-of-hand. I completely agree with Satyt about

2518:. I'd like to add some wikilinks to the article, but would prefer that the spelling of the title be changed first. Specifically, I want to move the article to 2011:

roots/history. All in all, quite a problematic article. I don't think it should be speedied, but it does need a major face-lift. I will try to work on it today.

4520:

I agree. There are other categories that it can be claced into as well. It's not as if including it in the LGBT cat means that's the only place it can be. :)

3944: 3367: 1703:

It is pretty. I really like the ribbon. We could loose the controversial medal bit. What if I edit it to keep the ribbon and replace the medal with a barnstar?

670:

for the project. It was promoted on October 23 -- does that really make it the first LGBT-related FA? Still a pioneer more than a century after she came out!

518:

Also, check out the too-funny autobiography of William A. Percy, who seems to have his own web page over there (now how do you get to do that on Knowledge??):

437: 404: 197: 2164:

While I am obviously absolutely delighted we now have over 60 members, our membership list is now somewhat unwieldy. Shall we split it off to a separate page?

2768:

vary with how much I felt like doing it at any time. I think it would be good to do; I'm just being honest about my probable commitment to such an endeavor.

2934: 2228:

sort of questionnaire (How did you find out about the project? What do you do on Knowledge? etc.), but we need a conventional list as well for convenience.

5484:

Does anyone want to take a look and rate them? The SatyrBot has listed them all as start class but they are, at least I think, pretty thorough. Thanks.

5448:

links horizontally at bottom), but that is not the basis for an object, since there is no policy - just wanted to let you know so you could choose. Regards

2813:

I'd also help out. I spent some time over at the GA Review till I got burnt with some of the wiki-drama. I think my time would be more valuable over here.

118: 4962:

the first to admit I don't know the full story about how those two terms came to use. Maybe they did had negative connotations at the beginning, but now?

782:(post has been changed twice) Samuel has now explained the difference to me between merge and delete for articles and categories, I've rewritten the post: 399:

The infrastructure for a successful WikiProject has now been largely built. Now we've all got to start using it! I've listed a fair number of articles at

4370: 3315:

are not interchangeable. Could we add this to something that we should be aware of when reading, writing, and editing LGBT-related articles? Thank you. -

2293: 361:

We only need to demonstrate consistent updating for a month in order to achieve Featured Portal status (and obviously, consistent updating as long as it

4996:

Incidentally "gay association" is fine because it's an accepted phrase, but "gays and lesbians adopting" was rightly changed to "homosexuals adopting".

4031:. I wonder if Eedo Bee misunderstands what project tagging means? I've left a note on his talk page explaining that project tagging doesn't mean people 1184:

Merging and leaving a redirect is a rare event, and would not normally happen if the category is merged into a parent. So can we start with two lists:

292:

associated with various sexual orientations as they occur to individual editors. Any thoughts as to how no made this article more (how can I put it...)

3642:

This category bothers me. Not the gay aspect, but the idea of creating separate articles for fictional characters. The notabilty guideline for fiction

176:

Yeah, I saw those and they're nice. Unfortunately, none really apply to me. :( Thanks anyway, though. know this isn't the right place to ask for that.

3178:

I'll be running the bot and updating the list about once a week, and if it works correctly, I'll probably automate it to run without my intervention.

2660: 765: 5708:

My sincere congratulations, Raystorm. You worked very hard on this article, had a difficult time during the nomination process, and deserve the FA.

5288:

From his edits, Sandy is objecting to portal-style templates like {{LGBT}} being on the mainpage of articles. I can't find a rule against this in

3724: 1649:

in 1888 in memory of his golden jubilee. It is the highest honour a non-priest can recieve. I'm surprised it doesn't have its own Knowledge article.

4054:

I think you may be right. I tried to explain it to him when we were talking about the problem on my talk page, but I'm not sure that he got it. -

2405:

It seems this has just happened, with two people adding themselves to the quilt and another to the main list. I don't think this is going to work.

4598:

which seem like topics we should cover. I'd rather we had coverage of LGBT issues of HIV/AIDS than simply tagged all HIV/AIDS related articles...

4373:. Go on wikiproject kindness man, give it a go. I really don't care if you are going to call me whatever you think I am. Just don't say it to me. 1612: 1594:). I'm slightly concerned that if the medal has religious symbolism it may cause unnecessary controversy to use it with regards to LGBT topics... 47: 17: 3687:) has created the gay men category. I will populate it and consider nominating all of the LGBT by specific orientation subcategories for merger.~ 2457:'s userpage. Every active member gets a patch in which to put whatever they want - it might be a helpful community-building exercise. Thoughts? 3530:

I couldn't directly transclude the requested articles section, because it's set out too far, so you do have to add requested articles by hand.

2983:

What do you think about adding a section listing active Peer Reviewers? That way, nominators could message reviewers directly. Just a thought.

1331:

with apparently no consensus whatsoever. Did anyone agree on this anywhere or is he just breaking general guidelines and needs to be reverted?

1014: 5563:

Doesn't that have too many stripes? What about having it which the usual 6 stripes used for the flag since 1979- perhaps horizonally as well?

4142:

as within this project's scope. I warned him against continuing in this vain but he chose to disregard my warning. He has now been blocked by

2525:

while an extra "e" yields 798. Because I've only just registered my account, I can't move the page. Could someone please help me with this?

4919:

Let me tell you a bit about myself. I do not trust the polish newspapers and do not read them, I much rather prefer to pull my news from the

1986:

article was recently targetted for speedy deletion (unexplained, tag removed by admin) and will probably come up for AFD soon. Heads up. —

4760:

I've rearranged the sections on the mainpage in accordance with Aleta's suggestion above. Anyone is welcome to revert if they don't like.

2522:, the spelling used in the bulk of the professional literature on the subject. A Google search for "homovestism" brings up only 183 hits 2417:

either just have the main list and have the last 10 people to join appear automatically on the mainpage as Satyr previously set it up...

2279:

I like it... I mean, it's not ridiculously long and I think that having all the members in one spots promotes people working together. -

4406:

as within the project's scope). At this point, it's clear that continuing conversation with him will have little to know real effect.

3493:

In fact I think all the discussion have now closed. Wow, we're gonna need Co-ordinators soon if this daily check list keeps growing...

5408:- it's way to cluttered with the boxes. I guess I'd want to limit (as a rule of thumb, not a Rule) them to one on a page, generally. 3623: 2605:

I went ahead and added a link to the page from the portal. Perhaps now we can redirect our discussion of cats to the talk page there?

928: 5115:" explains that people are taught to say gay and not homosexual because homosexual is too clinical. Gay is the better, simpler word.~ 4402:) and just watch carefully to make sure he doesn't disrupt any more of the LGBT articles (or, for that matter, tagging articles like 1747:- Nijmegan medal, utterly beautiful, and given out to those who complete a gruelling 4 day 150km trek with full pack - when I was an 4702: 3906: 3133:. I suggest brainstorming headings and articles that come under them. Then we can format the page once we're happy with contents... 1744: 5366:. Infoboxes that contain a synopsis of the information that's on the page (like Infobox Biography) I can deal with - it gives me a 3398:

page, with many new users joining it would be good to harness to provide more explanation. We should start work on our own version.

2044:. It is now up for Afd, with no reason given. Please check out my improvements to it, and weigh in on the AFD discussion. Regards, 1228:

I don't know about "especially" the actors, but lists would certainly be good for some of the smaller LGBT occupational subcats. --

2687:

Thanks Satyr. And intimidating? What could be intimidating about a bright cheerful Rainbow flag popping up on your talk page?????

2292:

spots potential new users might sign up (including the notice_board, which might go away). While I don't like the coding on the

1100:

I thought we might need to discuss some of them before I started listing at CfD. Anyone want to remove/add anything to the list?

4190:

A block prevents a user from editing any page on Knowledge except their own talkpage. In this case, the block was for one week.

3175:

If you want to put our To-Do box on your own page, you can use the syntax {{Todo-Named | WikiProject LGBT studies| Knowledge}}.

4882:

You're right Jeff. He's clearly within the scope of the project. Its the categorising him as an LGBT person which concerns me.

4573: 2565:

Can we please continue the discussion on categories? This becoming an issue of some importance as I want to get on with making

2497: 1076: 1036: 1032: 1027: 2650:

Well, that's what I did, actually. Left a nice note one a potential new member's talk page. We'll see if it has any effect....

4110:

has 200,081 articles - statistically speaking, that means there are 12,005 LGBT people out there that I expect us to tag. :)

3997: 3684: 1717:

We already have a barnstar. Let me see if I can find a pretty medal that doesn't have religious homosexual-hating overtones.

1041: 659:

I didn't see a specific place for listing articles in Peer Review -- sorry if I missed it -- but I wanted to point out the

4705:. I suggest that instead of trying to recreate a sourced version of this article, it be split into the following articles: 2471:

list on the noticeboard which is also getting a bit long? The quilt idea seems like a good one too. Bit of harmless fun...

1790:

I love the second one- great irony. Might Jewish contributors mind? What does the gold medal from the Gay Games look like?

5780: 5728: 5525: 5381: 5277: 5201: 5057: 4492: 3920: 3858: 3770: 3232: 3192: 2722: 2674: 2366: 2307: 1955: 1828: 1383: 1252: 1162: 816: 753: 705: 611: 455: 161: 4263: 1779:

Personally, I like the Nijmegan one. Might need a bit more customising, but you have to admit, it is fabulous, isn't it?

996: 861: 3481: 1624: 960: 852: 4719: 4618: 1121:

The category itself should be deleted, but in most cases, yes, the articles would just be upmerged. Is that not right?

978: 888: 879: 870: 141: 2909: 1082: 969: 906: 798: 642: 285: 145: 5370:

view and I can read more if I want to. But then again, I don't go around removing the "see-also" ones from pages. --

4853:

strongly accused of that, which is reported in the article. But I don't think we can say the evidence is conclusive.

1555:

I'm guessing from the information given it's used on the French Knowledge. Reckon we ought to add it to our arsenal?

987: 942: 933: 5581:

Vertically is the standard for barnstar ribbons, and if you really want six stripes, you need to go take it up with

951: 897: 5695: 5225: 4952: 3807: 3643: 3628: 3627:

category system and it makes some sort of statement that only the ambiguous and gay count as true "LGBT". Should a

3041: 2868:

Thanks, Aleta. I will start being more conscientious about that protocol, and will look for the articles I tagged.

2582: 1764: 1429: 1064: 1023: 332: 222: 177: 103: 38: 4568:

So to clarify, WJBscribe, you're saying that we should make our own AIDS category, and only include articles like

4538:

I don't think this a huge issue either way. But I would note that our practice has previously been not to include

2845:

When tagging articles as related to this project, do we need to manually ad them to the list on the project page?

2053:

Oh, that's ridiculous. That is a well-written article, and Jeff has done a marvellous job on it. I've voted keep.

1909:

It's at the top of this page. I was thinking we need to do something with it though, because no-one is using it.

1054: 1050: 1005: 919: 915: 4714: 1070: 820: 811: 802: 793: 5874: 5852: 5843: 5817: 5803: 5786: 5752: 5734: 5712: 5702: 5684: 5672: 5641: 5632: 5601: 5590: 5576: 5557: 5531: 5509: 5499: 5488: 5455: 5429: 5412: 5387: 5345: 5323: 5305: 5283: 5260: 5232: 5207: 5177: 5164: 5149: 5131: 5121: 5097: 5063: 5028: 5010: 5001: 4988: 4969: 4931: 4914: 4905: 4895: 4877: 4866: 4839: 4827: 4783: 4773: 4749: 4738: 4695: 4668: 4658: 4611: 4595: 4584: 4569: 4556: 4533: 4524: 4515: 4504:

As it has much significance to the community and was originally known as the "Gay Plague", I'd say include it.

4498: 4462: 4444: 4432: 4420: 4410: 4389: 4377: 4358: 4342: 4321: 4310: 4295: 4270: 4237: 4222: 4212: 4203: 4185: 4172: 4159: 4125: 4115: 4096: 4086: 4063: 4048: 4022: 4010: 3974: 3960: 3926: 3899: 3880: 3864: 3837: 3815: 3792: 3781:

I agree with Satyr. I think it's a little much. We already have too many tags cluttering up articles as it is.

3776: 3753: 3733: 3717: 3693: 3663: 3637: 3613: 3587: 3577: 3558: 3535: 3524: 3498: 3488: 3474: 3466: 3454: 3436: 3417: 3383: 3348: 3329: 3319: 3294: 3285: 3269: 3250: 3238: 3215: 3198: 3152: 3142: 3124: 3113: 3089: 3077: 3058: 3048: 3035: 3026: 3012: 2999: 2987: 2977: 2957: 2947: 2923: 2897: 2882: 2872: 2863: 2852: 2835: 2817: 2808: 2799: 2784: 2772: 2761: 2728: 2706: 2691: 2680: 2654: 2645: 2633: 2616: 2600: 2575: 2550: 2541: 2529: 2504: 2480: 2462: 2436: 2426: 2410: 2387: 2372: 2346: 2324: 2313: 2283: 2271: 2247: 2233: 2222: 2207: 2184: 2169: 2154: 2139: 2114: 2093: 2070: 2058: 2048: 2035: 2025: 2015: 2004: 1961: 1924: 1914: 1903: 1881: 1866: 1855: 1834: 1799: 1784: 1722: 1712: 1698: 1684: 1663: 1640: 1628: 1603: 1580: 1560: 1534: 1523: 1490: 1473: 1464: 1451: 1440: 1409: 1399: 1389: 1364: 1354: 1336: 1313: 1308:

Congratulations, we've just broken 50 members! Yay us! Now if only some of you would sign up for Jumpaclass...

1298: 1268: 1258: 1232: 1222: 1201: 1179: 1168: 1138: 1126: 1116: 1105: 1094: 1000: 991: 982: 973: 964: 955: 946: 937: 910: 901: 892: 883: 874: 865: 856: 789: 773: 759: 732: 711: 687: 649: 631: 617: 593: 567: 554: 540: 524: 496: 477: 461: 421: 388: 377: 344: 305: 278: 269: 258: 225: 204: 180: 167: 106: 5813:

wish, and will not take part in the process. I agree that writing and researching is the most enjoyable part.

4819: 3391:

either side of the bits you don't want to include when its reproduced on another page. To address your ideas:

3290:

Makes sense to me. We could always designate it as WP core bios and others deemed top priority by our project.

2586: 2288:

Hm. See, the thing is, if the table is one place to sign up, and the separate page is another, we now have

1328: 924: 843: 807: 667: 4709: 3592:

What about works by gay creators (literature, art, etc.) that does not have a gay bent to it? For example,

829: 5809: 5766: 5190:

If you need any help, let me know. I've become something of a not-quite-expert in coding templates :) --

4957:("gays" is unencyclopedic, and every case of it should be deleted. it's like saying "negro" for africans.) 4035:

articles and to explain the rationale behind project tagging. Maybe that will calm things down in future.

3704: 3598: 3130: 3105: 2431:

Well, it's only been two days. I think it's fair to give it a little while longer before just dumping it.

1772: 243: 5485: 3389:

OK. I've sorted the member lit so it transcludes. For future ref, you need to include <noinclude: -->

2355:. We don't view that as a membership list, but I bet a newbie wouldn't know there was a distinction. -- 2334: 1009: 834: 646: 5479: 4641:

Surely we should have separate articles on the topics rather than connect them because they all involve

4291: 4233: 4059: 3956: 3745: 2453:

I also had this idea of adapting WJBScribe's table idea and turning it into a "quilt", in the manner of

1756: 1241:

Lists have to be kept up to date, though. That would be difficult with the bigger ones like actors. --

847: 825: 5249:

I'm also troubled that the LGBT Project doesn't seem to be up on Wiki guidelines - I started adjusting

2075:

It all happened so fast, I slept through it. Now the article looks great too! Fantastic work, Jeff. —

738:

Awesome! Please let us know when you do, and what cats. Thanks!!! Oh, and there was a little bit of

5866: 4283: 4266:; I thought about maybe directing his attention here, but decided such an attempt would be futile. -- 4181:

When you say this guy is being blocked, does that mean he is being denied access to edit the wiki? --

3985: 3280:

though, since that's where I made the list from. It was only to give people some ideas to work from.

1324: 1045: 1018: 679: 264:

I'm totally with you on this one. Do you want to try and sort it out on the Category:LGBT talk page?

132: 125: 4768:

badly). Also, an IRC channel similar to that of the Tropical Cyclones WikiProject might be an idea.

5681: 5669: 5607: 5570: 5339: 5299: 5128: 5091: 4920: 4889: 4860: 4732: 4689: 4652: 4605: 4550: 4459: 4374: 4339: 4307: 4278: 4259: 4197: 4153: 4135: 4107: 4080: 4042: 3989: 3948: 3933: 3875: 3832: 3484:(2nd nomination) from Deletion Discussions. Seems the discussion is over (result was keep). Cheers 3449: 3412: 3316: 3212: 2893:

I also thought a bot did this for us! Thanks for asking that not-at-all stupid question Jeffpw! :)

2547: 2526: 2330: 838: 5582: 4458:

I think I should be allowed to have my say without it being removed, deleted, altered or changed.

3104:

before submitting it to review, but I've got a bit stuck. I need to create a topics sections a la

5622: 5422: 4808: 4679: 4512: 3993: 3789: 3678: 3660: 3610: 3548: 3514: 3312: 3018: 2920: 2613: 2597: 2515: 2197: 2129: 2083: 1994: 1351: 1295: 1219: 1198: 1113: 551: 275: 255: 5597:

That is so pretty, I love it. Don't hit the newbie around here, but what might we use it for?

407:

is languishing unloved and unwanted, so sign up there if you're interested. On the bright side,

5776: 5724: 5611: 5521: 5421:. I took off the "Sexual Orientation" one, and started a section about "too many boxes" that 5377: 5273: 5197: 5053: 4807:

inclusion and verifiability. If any one has any views or would like to comment the dispute is

4488: 4471: 4407: 3916: 3854: 3766: 3277: 3228: 3188: 2718: 2670: 2362: 2303: 1951: 1920:

Can I put that one on my talk page and it will update when the main one is updated? Thanks...

1824: 1759:- This is lovely, as long as we um, get rid of that, um, Swastika in the middle it'll be fine. 1591: 1379: 1248: 1158: 749: 701: 607: 451: 157: 1264:

are those occupations, or whether they are straight people involved in LGBT/queer studies. --

5664: 5289: 5250: 5156: 4287: 4229: 4055: 3952: 3844: 3345: 3326: 2102: 1620: 1501: 408: 355: 3811:

at FAC. You know who you are. I alone wouldn't have succeeded. Cheers and kudos to all! :)

2329:

Well some newbies were having problem with the simple list. I noticed when sorting it that

5861: 2659:

And if you or anyone wants it, the invite (which could be, I suppose, intimidating) is at

1517: 674: 3221:

Only that the project is still very young and needs input :) By all means, be bold :) --

4844:

I left a note about personal attacks in my edit summary. But I'm not convinced this one

4745:

think they could be of use. They're referenced and all, which is a biggie right? Cheers

3869:

Oops, OK. Dunno why that didn't work for me. Never mind, glad to know it works. Cheers,

5565: 5334: 5294: 5145:

I swear I'll cover in barnstars to whoever can do these things for me. Really. Please!

5086: 4884: 4855: 4727: 4684: 4647: 4600: 4545: 4192: 4148: 4075: 4037: 3870: 3827: 3709: 3444: 3443:

one off jobs and once done should free us up to get more involved in article contribs.

3431:

You say you see these sorts of questionnaires - do you mean on Knowledge, or off-wiki?

3407: 3261: 3257: 3134: 2994:

Sounds like a good idea, though I'm not sure what they would need to message them for.

2698: 2538: 2523: 2472: 2418: 2379: 2338: 2280: 2263: 2239: 2214: 2176: 2147: 2106: 1873: 1791: 1704: 1676: 1595: 1572: 1406: 584:

asking for FA writers interested in LGBT issues to join the project, and was told that

564: 537: 506:

Hey folks, just by chance I've stumbled across something very interesting: the entire

336: 297: 3571:

Is the portrayal of LGBT characters in fiction within the scope of this Wikiproject? ~

5849: 5840: 5800: 5749: 5699: 5638: 5615: 5598: 5452: 5418: 5405: 5363: 5266:

Think you could get Sandy to explain a little bit? I totally don't understand... --

5257: 5229: 5174: 5146: 5025: 4981: 4966: 4849: 4803: 4746: 4505: 4478: 4429: 4417: 4169: 4122: 4070: 4032: 3967: 3812: 3782: 3674: 3653: 3603: 3584: 3541: 3507: 3485: 3045: 2972:. If anyone was planning a peer review, it would be good if we could road test this. 2913: 2894: 2805: 2606: 2590: 2454: 2190: 2122: 2076: 1987: 1487: 1461: 1437: 1344: 1288: 1265: 1229: 585: 521: 369: 315:

I've also made some comments on the talk page re: the rename (article was previously

247: 201: 2697:

should it (if Satyr doesn't mind) be moved from his userspace to projectspace here?

1690: 1645:

Ok, I've tracked it down. It's the "Pro Ecclesia Et Pontifice" medal, instituted by

5771: 5719: 5659: 5516: 5467: 5372: 5268: 5192: 5048: 4799: 4675: 4483: 4267: 4209: 4182: 4143: 3940: 3911: 3849: 3761: 3223: 3183: 2713: 2665: 2585:

has a section that is part of the portal where the subject has been discussed. See

2519: 2357: 2298: 1946: 1819: 1814: 1433: 1374: 1243: 1153: 744: 696: 602: 588:

really needs cleaning. Would it therefore be a good idea to nominate it at ARCAID?

581: 446: 441: 427: 152: 5799:

Ditto congrats, Celithemis! :-) Exhausting business, isn't it? But what a reward!

2189:

I expect you'd be likely to get plenty of people only signing one or the other. —

4138:

decided to delete the various bits of advice on his talkpage and tag the article

3307:

This has been driving me crazy for the longest time. Contrary to popular belief,

3172:. Then it takes a random sampling of 20 pages and puts them in the "To-Do" box. 2804:

I would be happy to help out with both the Peer Review and the Article Watchlist.

5814: 5709: 5586: 5553: 5506: 5495: 5319: 5224:

Really? Well, I've been asked to reduce the width in the legislation infobox in

5160: 5007: 4997: 4985: 4911: 4874: 4835: 4823: 4795: 4769: 4665: 4581: 4530: 4440: 4397: 4385: 4354: 4317: 4219: 4111: 4092: 4018: 4007: 3971: 3895: 3749: 3729: 3593: 3531: 3494: 3470: 3432: 3379: 3281: 3266: 3246: 3148: 3121: 3109: 3101: 3085: 3074: 3054: 3032: 3022: 3009: 2995: 2984: 2973: 2943: 2878: 2869: 2849: 2831: 2814: 2795: 2781: 2757: 2688: 2651: 2641: 2630: 2571: 2566: 2458: 2432: 2406: 2320: 2229: 2165: 2151: 2067: 2054: 2045: 2032: 2022: 2012: 1910: 1862: 1852: 1809: 1780: 1718: 1694: 1659: 1636: 1616: 1556: 1530: 1470: 1447: 1395: 1360: 1332: 1309: 1175: 1134: 1122: 1101: 1090: 769: 728: 589: 492: 473: 417: 384: 383:

Ok, SatyrTN has signed up for biography, can other people sign up for the rest?

373: 265: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

5068:

I tend to agree with Satyr on this one. I much prefer gay as an adjective e.g.

3401:

I'm not overly excited by the evaluation. For one it involves deciding who the

487:

I'm working on a series of how tos on how to write articles, which you can see

5426: 5409: 5116: 4780: 4624: 4591: 4590:

Pretty much yes. And I was wondering if there were particular articles on the

4521: 4403: 4139: 3688: 3632: 3572: 3291: 2954: 2860: 2769: 2501: 1921: 1900: 1848: 1508: 628: 5637:

Thanks for your help. Will have to try and do something worthy of one now!

3506:

Do new article requests just go directly into the open tasks template now? —

5367: 4928: 4902: 3340: 3308: 2238:

Is the list now on the main page (the table) OK. Or do we need another one?

1748: 5417:

OK, this discussion has prompted me to go and remove one of the boxes from

1549: 1436:!!! :D Wanted to share the news, please bear with me hehe! Next stop, FAC! 4965:

If anyone can shed any light on this, it'd be much appreciated. :) Cheers

2953:

Yay, Dev! I'll make sure to put any I'm not already watching on my list.

4091:

Yep. 91 and counting! We'll be in triple figures this month I reckon. :D

3723:

I think the information is there, but it needs gathering into one place.

1983: 1978: 1970: 1844: 1646: 1529:

Done. Bloody well done. I need to nominate more stubs for deletion... :)

5548: 5245:

Passing along a comment (at my talkpage) from one of my FAC reviewers:

4580:

would not be included in the category? If so, that makes sense, to me.

4701:

Following the nomination of this article at AfD, it has been moved to

4425:

PS:Dev, remember that imitation is the best kind of flattery hehe. ;)

2467:

Present form of list works fine for me. Should we do the same for the

488: 5473: 5668:; if anyone would like to contribute it would be much appreciated. - 3708:

not, do others agree its a fairly significant gulf in our coverage?

3084:

Yeah, I simply haven't added it to all the places I should yet. :)

623:

Just in case anyone besides myself doesn't know the acronym, it is

368:

Also, any ideas for new things to add to the Portal would be good.

4208:

Is a week long prohibition against this guy really long enough? --

3631:

category be made, because I'm sort of worried about the wording.~

5142:

legislation infobox, and again, I'm at a loss on how to do this.

4286:, but I follow the rules and don't put my rage in the article. - 1283:

Just a note, there is a disucssion on LGBT writers categories at

3031:

Great! I am off to bed now, but I will give it a look tomorrow.

4764:

don't want a gay Esperanza on our hands - pink and green clash

2968:

I have created all the peer review stuff, and the main page is

2581:

Might I suggest we have a centralized area for categorization?

5546:

Btw, we now have a Barnstar ribbon, for anyone who uses them:

5112: 5111:

The person who said that is simply incorrect. The article on "

4627:

redirects to this bizarre article. At the moment it includes:

4577: 1190:

Categories that should be merged with their parent categories.

25: 4369:

going to make accusations, back it up with citations. So have

3602:, while not addressing gay themes, it's by a gay playwright. 1394:

Done. Anyone want to comment on the category proposal above?

372:

has buckets of unique stuff, it would be cool if we did too.

1187:

Categories that should not exist, and should not be merged.

102:

is there a userbox for those of us who like to genderfuck?

2847:

I haven't been doing that. I thought a bot did that for us

2514:

Hello Wikipedians, I've been editing the orphaned article

5292:, does anyone know where it says we shouldn't have them. 3806:

I want to thank all the people who have helped improving

3465:

I've completed an early draft of our open tasks template

5698:

is a FA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! X-D *Crying* My very first FA...

3843:

That functionality is already built in. Take a look at

4426: 1843:

to the use of the nazi medal. Even with the removal of

323:

and probably also all other sexualities under the sun:

319:). The scope now seems very wide- it must surely cover 4477:

Question... Should Category:HIV/AIDS be placed under

3208:

Pity they're all male. Is there any reason for that?

1872:

symbols after their corruption by that awful regime.

4848:

categorised as LGBT. Given the controversial claim,

4678:

started the article in March 2003, called and about

4664:

purports to be a scholarly overview of the subject.

4394:

I think it's time we should stop feeding the troll (

3378:

Any thoughts and/or criticism would be appreciated.

1285:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Notice board

5228:. If you could do that, I'd be really grateful! :) 4682:and it has since evolved into the present mess... 3044:to the PR request list, if that's okay. :) Cheers 1938:{{Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/to do}} 4789: 645:. Please add your thoughts. Whatever they maybe. 5857:Thanks everyone, and congratulations, Raystorm! 625:Knowledge:Article Creation and Improvement Drive 534:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Erotic spanking 5362:having three "see also" templates that clutter 2589:. This section is also linked from the Portal. 5717:Ditto the Congrats, Raystorm! Nice Job!!! -- 5585:. Personally, I'm happy with the current one. 4703:User:John254/Homosexuality and medical science 3211:And Francis Bacon? I'd never heard that one. - 2491:Check out what WikiProject Mythology has done. 5006:The editor replied about it on my talk page. 3368:Knowledge:WikiProject Comics/Getting Involved 1751:, people who completed Nijmegan were as gods. 198:User:Crimsone/template/User_transcends_gender 8: 2031:WOW...what an improvement! Great work Jeff. 4802:. I recently came across a section of the 2908:Discussion of LGBT categories has begun on 119:User:Crimsone/template/User no sexual lable 5769:too!!! Congratulations, Celithemis!!! -- 5314:I asked Sandy about it and got this back: 5084:. Here homosexuals reads better to me... 3748:. Should we do this for other countries? 2661:User:SatyrTN/Template/LGBT Studies Invite 766:Category:LGBT-related television programs 637:GLBT related page move for gay porn stars 472:think your ideas are, we can discuss it. 335:as a narrower and more manageable scope? 5514:Okay - that's just weird. IMNSHO. :) -- 4277:I don't think it's necessary to convert 3725:Societal attitudes towards homosexuality 3100:I'm on the final leg of sprucing up the 1808:Well, I tried to find a good image of a 1446:Well done Raystorm! Good luck with FAC! 4790:Men's Rights page and Same Sex marriage 3008:want to do some Peer Reviewing here?). 1775:- And it's even shaped like a barnstar. 1545:Hey, I just found this on the Commons: 1359:Yeah. I'd better go move it back then. 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies 4951:Hi there. I got a curious edit in the 1841:object in the strongest possible terms 1015:Category:American female impersonators 491:. Your feedback would be appreciated. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4779:I like the reorganization, Dev! :) 200:}} (just looking to be inclusive! :) 7: 5465:Hi gang. I've created articles for 4631:Is homosexuality genetically caused? 727:deleting and make mass noms at CfD. 5477:and have much-expanded the article 3905:Yaaay us! By the way, where's our 997:Category:Bisexual Venezuelan actors 862:Category:Bisexual Australian actors 663:, which I'm hoping to raise to FA. 4258:I just read the Admin's rebuke on 3699:Discrimination against LGBT people 3624:Category:Fictional LGBT characters 3147:Thanks man, I needed that push... 2319:userspace. Should we have a vote? 1767:- NATO medal. Not so keen on that. 1745:Image:Goudenkruis vierdaagse14.jpg 1323:Scotteaux has just randomly moved 961:Category:Bisexual Hong Kong actors 929:Category:LGBT sports organizations 853:Category:Bisexual Brazilian actors 24: 5848:Congrats Raystorm and Celithemis! 5658:I just created an article on the 5070:gay or lesbian people oppose this 4720:Reproduction for same-sex couples 4637:Reproduction for same-sex couples 4619:Homosexuality and medical science 4121:Ma'am, yes ma'am! Right away! :) 2912:. Please join in the discussion. 979:Category:Bisexual Japanese actors 889:Category:Bisexual Canadian actors 880:Category:Bisexual Scottish actors 871:Category:Bisexual Austrian actors 246:to the category structure within 142:User:MiraLuka/Userboxes/Sexuality 5547: 4955:article. It's edit summary was: 4371:A nice cup of tea and a sit down 4006:I have reported this at WP:ANI. 3847:'s talk page for an example. -- 3303:Sexuality vs. sexual orientation 2469:People interested in LGBT issues 1894:Is there an open tasks template? 1548: 1083:Category:Greenwich Village scene 970:Category:Bisexual Italian actors 907:Category:Bisexual British actors 799:Category:LGBT in the Middle East 29: 4947:Gay and lesbian are pejorative? 3622:Good! Then what do we think of 3335:Possible addition to task list? 3017:A bit. I have a peer review of 1077:Category:Homosexuality in India 1037:Category:LGBT culture in Canada 1033:Category:LGBT theatre in Canada 1028:Category:LGBT culture in Canada 988:Category:Bisexual Slovak actors 943:Category:Bisexual German actors 934:Category:Bisexual French actors 365:FP). Let's make that our goal. 1042:Category:LGBT events in Canada 952:Category:Bisexual Greek actors 898:Category:Bisexual Dutch actors 718:Category and assessment point. 666:Also, I noticed a bot tagging 242:I started trying to match the 1: 5642:11:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 5633:20:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 5602:09:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 5078:gays and lesbians oppose this 4463:05:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC) 4445:16:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4433:15:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4421:15:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4411:14:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4390:12:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4378:12:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4359:11:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4343:03:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC) 4322:17:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 4311:16:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC) 3644:Knowledge:Notabilty (fiction) 3540:No problem. Just checking. — 3053:Yep, I've given it a review. 2539:FateSmiled&DestinyLaughed 2442:members. How does that sound? 2281:FateSmiled&DestinyLaughed 1065:Category:LGBT music in Canada 1024:Category:LGBT media in Canada 817:Category:LGBT rights movement 661:PR for The Well of Loneliness 530:Should anyone care to comment 509:Encyclopedia of Homosexuality 502:Encyclopedia of Homosexuality 193:Is this one any good for you? 5875:23:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5853:20:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5844:19:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5818:14:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5804:14:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5787:14:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5753:14:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5735:14:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5713:11:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5703:10:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5685:02:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 5673:03:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5591:16:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5577:12:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5558:08:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 5532:02:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5510:23:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5500:22:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5489:22:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5456:09:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 5430:00:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 5413:00:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC) 5388:19:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5346:18:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5324:18:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5306:18:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5284:18:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5261:17:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5233:22:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5208:22:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5178:22:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5165:21:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5150:20:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5132:03:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 5122:15:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5098:13:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 5064:22:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5029:21:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5011:21:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 5002:21:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4989:20:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4970:20:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4932:16:56, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4915:16:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4906:16:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4896:15:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4878:15:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4867:15:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4840:13:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4828:11:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4814:Dispute over Polish article. 4784:04:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 4774:00:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 4750:15:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC) 4739:04:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 4696:11:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4669:11:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4659:11:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4612:11:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4585:11:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4557:10:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4534:08:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4525:03:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4516:01:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4499:01:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 4384:it to " then leave. Simple. 4331:not religions, in the world. 4296:16:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 4271:15:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 4238:11:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 4223:11:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 4213:11:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 4204:07:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 4186:07:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 4173:12:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 4160:02:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 4126:20:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 4116:19:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 4097:15:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 4087:15:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 4064:15:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 4049:15:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 4023:14:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 4011:12:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 3975:11:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 3961:11:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 3927:02:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 3900:00:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 3881:14:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3865:14:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3838:13:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3816:20:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3793:20:23, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3777:19:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3754:17:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 3744:I just found this template: 3734:16:39, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3718:15:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3694:15:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC) 3664:14:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3638:12:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3614:03:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3588:01:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3578:00:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3559:21:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3536:20:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3525:20:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 3499:16:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3489:00:21, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3482:Sexuality of Abraham Lincoln 3475:21:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3455:20:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3437:18:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3418:17:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 3384:15:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3349:09:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3330:09:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3320:06:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3295:16:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3286:16:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3270:15:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3251:15:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3239:05:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3216:05:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3199:01:37, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3153:15:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3143:14:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 3125:23:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3114:22:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3090:16:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3078:16:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3059:12:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3049:11:33, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3036:00:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3027:00:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 3013:23:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 3000:23:43, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2988:23:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2978:23:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2958:22:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2948:18:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2933:Ok, I created the watchlist 2924:20:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2898:15:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2883:10:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2873:09:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2864:09:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2853:09:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2836:10:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2818:05:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2809:05:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 2800:22:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 2785:09:43, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2773:09:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2762:09:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2729:07:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 2707:06:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 2692:23:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2681:23:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2655:23:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2646:22:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2634:20:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2617:17:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 2601:17:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 2576:16:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2551:00:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2542:00:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2530:00:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2505:08:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 2481:08:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 2463:15:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 2437:22:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 2427:16:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 2411:08:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 2388:17:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2373:17:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2347:16:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2325:16:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2314:05:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2284:00:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2272:00:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2248:00:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2234:23:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2223:22:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2208:22:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2185:22:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2170:21:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2155:22:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 2140:22:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2115:22:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2094:20:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2071:16:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2059:15:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2049:15:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2036:14:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2026:14:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2016:09:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2005:08:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1962:03:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1925:23:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1915:22:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1904:22:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1882:03:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1867:11:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1856:10:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1835:03:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1800:01:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1785:01:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1723:00:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1713:00:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1699:00:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1685:00:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1664:00:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1641:00:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1629:00:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 1604:23:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1581:23:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1561:23:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1535:21:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1524:21:40, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1491:12:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1474:20:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1465:18:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1452:18:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1441:17:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1410:23:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 1400:21:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 1390:21:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 1365:19:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 1355:17:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 1337:16:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 1319:Gay rights or homosexuality? 1314:16:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1299:15:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1269:16:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1259:16:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1233:15:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1223:09:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1202:21:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1180:16:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1169:13:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1139:11:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1127:09:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1117:09:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1106:09:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1095:22:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 774:08:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 760:01:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 733:23:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 395:Jumpaclass and other musings 354:I've added a update rota to 321:stereotypes of heterosexuals 140:Or in fact any of dozens on 4756:mainpage and new department 3276:Sure. Best take it up with 2910:Portal talk:LGBT/Categories 1765:Image:Natomedaille.KFOR.jpg 1693:. Shame, it's very pretty. 1060:And for outright deletion: 1055:Category:Bisexual community 1051:Category:Bisexual magazines 1006:Category:LGBT record labels 920:Category:Bisexual community 712:05:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 688:05:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 650:03:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 643:Talk:List of gay porn stars 632:03:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 618:02:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 594:00:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 580:I recently added a note to 568:13:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 555:01:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 541:00:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 525:23:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 497:17:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 478:14:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 462:01:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 422:01:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 389:01:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 378:18:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 345:02:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 311:Further thoughts re: rename 306:02:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 286:Sexuality-based stereotypes 279:20:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 270:17:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 259:02:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 244:category list in the portal 226:22:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 205:03:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 181:22:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 168:04:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 146:User:Xaosflux/UBX/Sexuality 107:02:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 5903: 5696:Same-sex marriage in Spain 5226:Same-sex marriage in Spain 4953:Same-sex marriage in Spain 4715:Homosexuality and genetics 3808:Same-sex marriage in Spain 3629:Category:Fictional gay men 3480:I think you should remove 3042:Same-sex marriage in Spain 2841:Stupid question of the day 1944:and that should do it. -- 1430:Same-sex marriage in Spain 1071:Category:Bisexual speakers 821:Category:LGBT civil rights 812:Category:LGBT civil rights 803:Category:LGBT civil rights 794:Category:LGBT civil rights 333:Stereotypes of LGBT people 250:and gave up very quickly! 5173:I love it. THANK YOU! :D 4634:HIV/AIDS as "gay disease" 4596:HIV and the gay community 4282:passionate antipathy for 2756:wars. What do you think? 2066:It's been speedy closed. 916:Category:Bisexual culture 790:Category:GLBT New Zealand 694:contributing editors! -- 5074:John Smith is openly gay 1932:Yep. Just add the code: 1001:Category:Bisexual actors 992:Category:Bisexual actors 983:Category:Bisexual actors 974:Category:Bisexual actors 965:Category:Bisexual actors 956:Category:Bisexual actors 947:Category:Bisexual actors 938:Category:Bisexual actors 911:Category:Bisexual actors 902:Category:Bisexual actors 893:Category:Bisexual actors 884:Category:Bisexual actors 875:Category:Bisexual actors 866:Category:Bisexual actors 857:Category:Bisexual actors 546:This is why we have the 221:That's fabulous! Thanx! 4570:Gay Men's Health Crisis 3394:I like the idea of the 3390:and </noinclude: --> 1329:Homosexuality in France 925:Category:World Outgames 808:Category:LGBT in Taiwan 742:about part of that. -- 668:Natalie Clifford Barney 238:LGBT category structure 5810:The Well of Loneliness 5767:The Well of Loneliness 4800:Project Gender Studies 3325:of sexual behaviours. 3106:Template:London topics 2587:Portal:Arts/Categories 1847:it still contains the 1757:Image:Germanorder.jpeg 844:Category:Queer studies 467:Information collating? 440:article to work with, 5480:Imperial Court System 4710:Homosexuality and HIV 4439:laughs at silliness* 3746:Template:LGBT Romania 3599:Lady Windermere's Fan 3354:Members and new ideas 3129:I'll make a start at 2498:WikiProject Mythology 2294:separate members page 1773:Image:Orden-slavy.jpg 1615:comment was added by 1372:moving it back :) -- 848:Category:Queer theory 830:Category:LGBT culture 826:Category:LGBT tourism 403:that need doing, and 331:etc. Might I suggest 223:Danscobanditcommander 178:Danscobanditcommander 104:Danscobanditcommander 42:of past discussions. 4284:Exodus International 3889:A bit of a pep talk. 3705:Template:LGBT topics 3131:Template:LGBT topics 1325:Gay rights in France 1046:Category:LGBT events 1019:Category:Drag queens 274:Yes it's a mess. -- 133:User:UBX/intersexual 126:User:UBX/genderqueer 5608:Knowledge:Barnstars 5589:(Have a nice day!) 5556:(Have a nice day!) 5498:(Have a nice day!) 5322:(Have a nice day!) 5163:(Have a nice day!) 5137:Help! LGBT Template 5082:John Smith is a gay 5000:(Have a nice day!) 4921:Polish Press Agency 4838:(Have a nice day!) 4826:(Have a nice day!) 4798:and I work over on 4772:(Have a nice day!) 4443:(Have a nice day!) 4396:Comment removed by 4388:(Have a nice day!) 4357:(Have a nice day!) 4320:(Have a nice day!) 4114:(Have a nice day!) 4095:(Have a nice day!) 4021:(Have a nice day!) 3898:(Have a nice day!) 3752:(Have a nice day!) 3740:Gay topics template 3732:(Have a nice day!) 3534:(Have a nice day!) 3497:(Have a nice day!) 3473:(Have a nice day!) 3461:Open tasks template 3435:(Have a nice day!) 3403:active contributors 3382:(Have a nice day!) 3284:(Have a nice day!) 3249:(Have a nice day!) 3151:(Have a nice day!) 3112:(Have a nice day!) 3088:(Have a nice day!) 3057:(Have a nice day!) 3025:(Have a nice day!) 2998:(Have a nice day!) 2976:(Have a nice day!) 2946:(Have a nice day!) 2904:Category discussion 2881:(Have a nice day!) 2834:(Have a nice day!) 2798:(Have a nice day!) 2760:(Have a nice day!) 2747:Two new(ish) ideas. 2644:(Have a nice day!) 2625:Invitation Template 2574:(Have a nice day!) 2461:(Have a nice day!) 2435:(Have a nice day!) 2409:(Have a nice day!) 2335:User:ForsakenDAemon 2333:signed the list as 2331:User:Forsakendaemon 2323:(Have a nice day!) 2232:(Have a nice day!) 2168:(Have a nice day!) 2057:(Have a nice day!) 1913:(Have a nice day!) 1865:(Have a nice day!) 1783:(Have a nice day!) 1739:Ok, fashion parade: 1721:(Have a nice day!) 1697:(Have a nice day!) 1662:(Have a nice day!) 1639:(Have a nice day!) 1559:(Have a nice day!) 1533:(Have a nice day!) 1450:(Have a nice day!) 1398:(Have a nice day!) 1363:(Have a nice day!) 1335:(Have a nice day!) 1312:(Have a nice day!) 1178:(Have a nice day!) 1137:(Have a nice day!) 1125:(Have a nice day!) 1104:(Have a nice day!) 1093:(Have a nice day!) 1010:Category:LGBT music 839:Category:LGBT terms 835:Category:LGBT argot 772:(Have a nice day!) 731:(Have a nice day!) 592:(Have a nice day!) 495:(Have a nice day!) 476:(Have a nice day!) 433:If anyone wants an 420:(Have a nice day!) 387:(Have a nice day!) 376:(Have a nice day!) 268:(Have a nice day!) 98:looking for userbox 5159:, which may help. 4820:Jarosław Kaczyński 3947:, and encountered 3313:sexual orientation 3019:Andrew Van de Kamp 2546:Thanks very much! 1592:Image:Wiklesia.jpg 1279:Writers categories 764:Sure, one point - 294:academically valid 5612:Knowledge:Ribbons 5443:I got this back: 4472:Category:HIV/AIDS 4264:this user subpage 4002: 3988:comment added by 3821:Talkpage template 2848: 1632: 1522: 1147:I recommend they 95: 94: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5894: 5873: 5869: 5864: 5785: 5784: 5733: 5732: 5629: 5625: 5619: 5575: 5551: 5530: 5529: 5486:House of Scandal 5386: 5385: 5344: 5304: 5282: 5281: 5206: 5205: 5157:Template:SSMflat 5096: 5062: 5061: 4894: 4865: 4846:can be tagged or 4737: 4694: 4657: 4610: 4555: 4497: 4496: 4202: 4158: 4085: 4047: 4001: 3982: 3925: 3924: 3863: 3862: 3775: 3774: 3703:From my work on 3555: 3551: 3545: 3521: 3517: 3511: 3396:Getting Involved 3237: 3236: 3204:Core Biographies 3197: 3196: 2846: 2780:active members. 2727: 2726: 2679: 2678: 2583:WikiProject Arts 2496:model like what 2371: 2370: 2312: 2311: 2204: 2200: 2194: 2136: 2132: 2126: 2090: 2086: 2080: 2001: 1997: 1991: 1960: 1959: 1833: 1832: 1610: 1552: 1520: 1516: 1511: 1502:Mr. Lady Records 1388: 1387: 1257: 1256: 1167: 1166: 758: 757: 710: 709: 686: 682: 677: 616: 615: 563:Thank you much! 460: 459: 409:Gay stereotyping 356:Portal talk:LGBT 350:Portal talk:LGBT 317:Gay stereotyping 166: 165: 73: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5902: 5901: 5897: 5896: 5895: 5893: 5892: 5891: 5867: 5862: 5858: 5808:I just noticed 5774: 5770: 5722: 5718: 5692: 5656: 5627: 5623: 5617: 5564: 5544: 5542:Barnstar ribbon 5519: 5515: 5463: 5375: 5371: 5333: 5293: 5271: 5267: 5195: 5191: 5139: 5085: 5051: 5047: 4949: 4883: 4854: 4816: 4792: 4758: 4726: 4683: 4646: 4622: 4599: 4544: 4486: 4482: 4475: 4400:as potential PA 4191: 4147: 4074: 4036: 3983: 3939:I'm working on 3937: 3914: 3910: 3891: 3852: 3848: 3823: 3804: 3764: 3760: 3742: 3701: 3569: 3553: 3549: 3543: 3519: 3515: 3509: 3463: 3356: 3337: 3305: 3226: 3222: 3206: 3186: 3182: 3170:full to-do list 3165: 3098: 2966: 2931: 2906: 2843: 2749: 2716: 2712: 2668: 2664: 2640:invitation. :) 2627: 2563: 2512: 2493: 2360: 2356: 2301: 2297: 2202: 2198: 2192: 2162: 2148:systematic bias 2134: 2130: 2124: 2088: 2084: 2078: 1999: 1995: 1989: 1975: 1949: 1945: 1939: 1896: 1822: 1818: 1691:clearer version 1611:—The preceding 1543: 1518: 1509: 1505: 1426: 1377: 1373: 1321: 1306: 1281: 1246: 1242: 1156: 1152: 747: 743: 720: 699: 695: 680: 675: 671: 657: 639: 605: 601: 578: 532: 504: 485: 469: 449: 445: 431: 397: 352: 313: 289: 240: 155: 151: 100: 69: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5900: 5898: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5886: 5885: 5884: 5883: 5882: 5881: 5880: 5879: 5878: 5877: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5821: 5820: 5792: 5791: 5790: 5789: 5760: 5759: 5758: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5740: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5691: 5688: 5682:Emiellaiendiay 5670:Emiellaiendiay 5655: 5650: 5649: 5648: 5647: 5646: 5645: 5644: 5595: 5594: 5593: 5543: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5462: 5459: 5441: 5440: 5439: 5438: 5437: 5436: 5435: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5360:really dislike 5351: 5350: 5349: 5348: 5316: 5315: 5311: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5244: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5235: 5215: 5214: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5183: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5168: 5167: 5138: 5135: 5129:Emiellaiendiay 5109: 5108: 5107: 5106: 5105: 5104: 5103: 5102: 5101: 5100: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5031: 5016: 5015: 5014: 5013: 4992: 4991: 4948: 4945: 4943: 4941: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4934: 4925: 4908: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4815: 4812: 4791: 4788: 4787: 4786: 4757: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4725:Any thoughts? 4723: 4722: 4717: 4712: 4699: 4698: 4639: 4638: 4635: 4632: 4621: 4616: 4615: 4614: 4566: 4565: 4564: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4559: 4474: 4469: 4467: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4452: 4451: 4450: 4449: 4448: 4447: 4423: 4366: 4365: 4364: 4363: 4362: 4361: 4335: 4334: 4333: 4332: 4325: 4324: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4299: 4298: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4249: 4248: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4244: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4129: 4128: 4104: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4026: 4025: 4014: 4013: 3978: 3977: 3936: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3890: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3822: 3819: 3803: 3800: 3798: 3796: 3795: 3779: 3741: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3700: 3697: 3673:It would seem 3671: 3670: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3666: 3617: 3616: 3590: 3568: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3462: 3459: 3458: 3457: 3429: 3428: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3399: 3376: 3375: 3371: 3355: 3352: 3336: 3333: 3317:Emiellaiendiay 3304: 3301: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3273: 3272: 3262:Virginia Woolf 3258:Gertrude Stein 3242: 3241: 3213:Emiellaiendiay 3205: 3202: 3164: 3161: 3160: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3097: 3096:Portal issues. 3094: 3093: 3092: 3081: 3080: 3070: 3069: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3029: 2991: 2990: 2965: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2930: 2927: 2905: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2842: 2839: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2820: 2788: 2787: 2776: 2775: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2626: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2511: 2508: 2492: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2259: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2161: 2160:Separate page? 2158: 2143: 2142: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2029: 2028: 2018: 1974: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1918: 1917: 1895: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1837: 1803: 1802: 1777: 1776: 1769: 1768: 1761: 1760: 1753: 1752: 1741: 1740: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1687: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1504: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1467: 1455: 1454: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1320: 1317: 1305: 1302: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1236: 1235: 1220:Samuel Wantman 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1199:Samuel Wantman 1192: 1191: 1188: 1142: 1141: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1114:Samuel Wantman 1099: 1087: 1086: 1080: 1074: 1068: 1058: 1057: 1048: 1039: 1030: 1021: 1012: 1003: 994: 985: 976: 967: 958: 949: 940: 931: 922: 913: 904: 895: 886: 877: 868: 859: 850: 841: 832: 823: 814: 805: 796: 786: 785: 784: 783: 777: 776: 762: 719: 716: 715: 714: 656: 653: 647:205.157.110.11 638: 635: 621: 620: 577: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 558: 557: 552:Samuel Wantman 531: 528: 503: 500: 484: 481: 468: 465: 430: 425: 396: 393: 392: 391: 351: 348: 312: 309: 288: 283: 282: 281: 276:Samuel Wantman 272: 239: 236: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 194: 186: 185: 184: 183: 171: 170: 148: 137: 136: 129: 122: 114: 113: 99: 96: 93: 92: 87: 84: 79: 74: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5899: 5876: 5872: 5871: 5870: 5865: 5856: 5855: 5854: 5851: 5847: 5846: 5845: 5842: 5837: 5836: 5835: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5828: 5819: 5816: 5811: 5807: 5806: 5805: 5802: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5788: 5782: 5778: 5773: 5768: 5764: 5763: 5762: 5761: 5754: 5751: 5746: 5745: 5744: 5743: 5742: 5741: 5736: 5730: 5726: 5721: 5716: 5715: 5714: 5711: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5704: 5701: 5697: 5689: 5687: 5686: 5683: 5678: 5675: 5674: 5671: 5667: 5666: 5661: 5654: 5651: 5643: 5640: 5636: 5635: 5634: 5630: 5621: 5613: 5609: 5605: 5604: 5603: 5600: 5596: 5592: 5588: 5584: 5580: 5579: 5578: 5574: 5573: 5569: 5568: 5562: 5561: 5560: 5559: 5555: 5550: 5541: 5533: 5527: 5523: 5518: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5508: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5497: 5493: 5492: 5491: 5490: 5487: 5483: 5481: 5476: 5475: 5470: 5469: 5460: 5458: 5457: 5454: 5450: 5449: 5444: 5431: 5428: 5424: 5420: 5419:Homosexuality 5416: 5415: 5414: 5411: 5407: 5406:Homosexuality 5403: 5402: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5389: 5383: 5379: 5374: 5369: 5365: 5364:Homosexuality 5361: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5352: 5347: 5343: 5342: 5338: 5337: 5330: 5329: 5328: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5321: 5313: 5312: 5307: 5303: 5302: 5298: 5297: 5291: 5287: 5286: 5285: 5279: 5275: 5270: 5265: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5259: 5255: 5254: 5252: 5246: 5234: 5231: 5227: 5223: 5222: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5218: 5217: 5216: 5209: 5203: 5199: 5194: 5189: 5188: 5187: 5186: 5185: 5184: 5179: 5176: 5172: 5171: 5170: 5169: 5166: 5162: 5158: 5155:I've created 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5148: 5143: 5136: 5134: 5133: 5130: 5124: 5123: 5120: 5119: 5114: 5099: 5095: 5094: 5090: 5089: 5083: 5079: 5075: 5071: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5059: 5055: 5050: 5044: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5030: 5027: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5019: 5018: 5017: 5012: 5009: 5005: 5004: 5003: 4999: 4994: 4993: 4990: 4987: 4983: 4978: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4971: 4968: 4963: 4959: 4958: 4954: 4946: 4944: 4933: 4930: 4926: 4922: 4918: 4917: 4916: 4913: 4909: 4907: 4904: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4893: 4892: 4888: 4887: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4876: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4863: 4859: 4858: 4851: 4847: 4843: 4842: 4841: 4837: 4832: 4831: 4830: 4829: 4825: 4821: 4813: 4811: 4810: 4805: 4801: 4797: 4785: 4782: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4771: 4767: 4761: 4755: 4751: 4748: 4743: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4736: 4735: 4731: 4730: 4721: 4718: 4716: 4713: 4711: 4708: 4707: 4706: 4704: 4697: 4693: 4692: 4688: 4687: 4681: 4677: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4667: 4661: 4660: 4656: 4655: 4651: 4650: 4644: 4636: 4633: 4630: 4629: 4628: 4626: 4620: 4617: 4613: 4609: 4608: 4604: 4603: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4586: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4571: 4558: 4554: 4553: 4549: 4548: 4541: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4532: 4528: 4527: 4526: 4523: 4519: 4518: 4517: 4514: 4510: 4508: 4503: 4502: 4501: 4500: 4494: 4490: 4485: 4480: 4479:Category:LGBT 4473: 4470: 4468: 4465: 4464: 4461: 4446: 4442: 4438: 4437: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4431: 4427: 4424: 4422: 4419: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4409: 4405: 4401: 4399: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4387: 4382: 4381: 4380: 4379: 4376: 4372: 4360: 4356: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4345: 4344: 4341: 4329: 4328: 4327: 4326: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4314: 4313: 4312: 4309: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4280: 4276: 4272: 4269: 4265: 4261: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4254: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4250: 4239: 4235: 4231: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4221: 4216: 4215: 4214: 4211: 4207: 4206: 4205: 4201: 4200: 4196: 4195: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4184: 4180: 4179: 4174: 4171: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4157: 4156: 4152: 4151: 4145: 4141: 4137: 4136:User:Eedo Bee 4133: 4127: 4124: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4113: 4109: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4089: 4088: 4084: 4083: 4079: 4078: 4072: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4052: 4051: 4050: 4046: 4045: 4041: 4040: 4034: 4030: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4015: 4012: 4009: 4005: 4004: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3991: 3987: 3976: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3962: 3958: 3954: 3950: 3946: 3942: 3935: 3934:User:Eedo Bee 3932: 3928: 3922: 3918: 3913: 3908: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3897: 3888: 3882: 3879: 3878: 3874: 3873: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3860: 3856: 3851: 3846: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3836: 3835: 3831: 3830: 3820: 3818: 3817: 3814: 3809: 3801: 3799: 3794: 3791: 3787: 3785: 3780: 3778: 3772: 3768: 3763: 3758: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3726: 3722: 3721: 3720: 3719: 3716: 3715: 3712: 3706: 3698: 3696: 3695: 3692: 3691: 3686: 3683: 3680: 3676: 3665: 3662: 3658: 3656: 3650: 3645: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3636: 3635: 3630: 3625: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3615: 3612: 3608: 3606: 3601: 3600: 3595: 3591: 3589: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3566: 3560: 3556: 3547: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3526: 3522: 3513: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3487: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3460: 3456: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3447: 3441: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3434: 3425: 3424: 3419: 3416: 3415: 3411: 3410: 3404: 3400: 3397: 3393: 3392: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3381: 3372: 3369: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3360: 3353: 3351: 3350: 3347: 3342: 3334: 3332: 3331: 3328: 3322: 3321: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3302: 3296: 3293: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3274: 3271: 3268: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3252: 3248: 3240: 3234: 3230: 3225: 3220: 3219: 3218: 3217: 3214: 3209: 3203: 3201: 3200: 3194: 3190: 3185: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3171: 3162: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3141: 3140: 3137: 3132: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3123: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3095: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3082: 3079: 3076: 3072: 3071: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3034: 3030: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3011: 3007: 3003: 3002: 3001: 2997: 2993: 2992: 2989: 2986: 2982: 2981: 2980: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2963: 2959: 2956: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2945: 2939: 2936: 2928: 2926: 2925: 2922: 2918: 2916: 2911: 2903: 2899: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2840: 2838: 2837: 2833: 2819: 2816: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2807: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2786: 2783: 2778: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2766: 2765: 2764: 2763: 2759: 2753: 2752:peer review. 2746: 2730: 2724: 2720: 2715: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2705: 2704: 2701: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2676: 2672: 2667: 2662: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2653: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2643: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2632: 2624: 2618: 2615: 2611: 2609: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2599: 2595: 2593: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2579: 2578: 2577: 2573: 2568: 2560: 2552: 2549: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2528: 2524: 2521: 2517: 2509: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2499: 2490: 2482: 2479: 2478: 2475: 2470: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2425: 2424: 2421: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2408: 2389: 2386: 2385: 2382: 2376: 2375: 2374: 2368: 2364: 2359: 2354: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2345: 2344: 2341: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2322: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2309: 2305: 2300: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2282: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2269: 2266: 2249: 2246: 2245: 2242: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2231: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2217: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2196: 2188: 2187: 2186: 2183: 2182: 2179: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2167: 2159: 2157: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2141: 2137: 2128: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2113: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2095: 2091: 2082: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2042:GRRRRRRRRRRRR 2040: 2039: 2038: 2037: 2034: 2027: 2024: 2019: 2017: 2014: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1993: 1985: 1980: 1972: 1969: 1963: 1957: 1953: 1948: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1923: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1902: 1893: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1876: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1864: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1836: 1830: 1826: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1789: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1782: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1763: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1754: 1750: 1746: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1686: 1683: 1682: 1679: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1601: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1582: 1579: 1578: 1575: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1558: 1553: 1551: 1546: 1541:Ooh, shiny... 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1521: 1515: 1512: 1503: 1500: 1492: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1475: 1472: 1468: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1439: 1435: 1434:Great Article 1431: 1428:As of today, 1423: 1411: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1385: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1349: 1347: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1318: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1303: 1301: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1291: 1286: 1278: 1270: 1267: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1254: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1203: 1200: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1189: 1186: 1185: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1164: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1115: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1089:This better? 1084: 1081: 1078: 1075: 1072: 1069: 1066: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1047: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1025: 1022: 1020: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1002: 998: 995: 993: 989: 986: 984: 980: 977: 975: 971: 968: 966: 962: 959: 957: 953: 950: 948: 944: 941: 939: 935: 932: 930: 926: 923: 921: 917: 914: 912: 908: 905: 903: 899: 896: 894: 890: 887: 885: 881: 878: 876: 872: 869: 867: 863: 860: 858: 854: 851: 849: 845: 842: 840: 836: 833: 831: 827: 824: 822: 818: 815: 813: 809: 806: 804: 800: 797: 795: 791: 788: 787: 781: 780: 779: 778: 775: 771: 767: 763: 761: 755: 751: 746: 741: 737: 736: 735: 734: 730: 724: 717: 713: 707: 703: 698: 692: 691: 690: 689: 685: 684: 683: 678: 669: 664: 662: 654: 652: 651: 648: 644: 636: 634: 633: 630: 626: 619: 613: 609: 604: 598: 597: 596: 595: 591: 587: 586:homosexuality 583: 575: 569: 566: 562: 561: 560: 559: 556: 553: 549: 545: 544: 543: 542: 539: 535: 529: 527: 526: 523: 519: 516: 514: 511: 510: 501: 499: 498: 494: 490: 482: 480: 479: 475: 466: 464: 463: 457: 453: 448: 443: 439: 436: 429: 426: 424: 423: 419: 413: 410: 406: 402: 394: 390: 386: 382: 381: 380: 379: 375: 371: 370:Portal:London 366: 364: 359: 357: 349: 347: 346: 343: 342: 339: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 310: 308: 307: 304: 303: 300: 295: 287: 284: 280: 277: 273: 271: 267: 263: 262: 261: 260: 257: 256:AliceJMarkham 251: 249: 248:Category:LGBT 245: 237: 227: 224: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 206: 203: 199: 195: 192: 191: 190: 189: 188: 187: 182: 179: 175: 174: 173: 172: 169: 163: 159: 154: 149: 147: 143: 139: 138: 134: 130: 127: 123: 120: 116: 115: 111: 110: 109: 108: 105: 97: 91: 88: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 72: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5860: 5859: 5693: 5679: 5676: 5663: 5660:Sarah Waters 5657: 5652: 5571: 5566: 5545: 5478: 5472: 5468:ball culture 5466: 5464: 5451: 5446: 5445: 5442: 5359: 5340: 5335: 5317: 5300: 5295: 5256: 5248: 5247: 5243: 5144: 5140: 5125: 5117: 5110: 5092: 5087: 5081: 5077: 5073: 5069: 4976: 4964: 4960: 4956: 4950: 4942: 4890: 4885: 4861: 4856: 4845: 4817: 4804:Men's Rights 4793: 4765: 4762: 4759: 4733: 4728: 4724: 4700: 4690: 4685: 4662: 4653: 4648: 4642: 4640: 4623: 4606: 4601: 4567: 4551: 4546: 4539: 4506: 4476: 4466: 4457: 4408:CaveatLector 4395: 4367: 4336: 4304: 4198: 4193: 4154: 4149: 4131: 4130: 4108:WP:BIOGRAPHY 4105: 4081: 4076: 4043: 4038: 4028: 4027: 3984:— Preceding 3979: 3941:Billy Tipton 3938: 3892: 3876: 3871: 3833: 3828: 3824: 3805: 3797: 3783: 3743: 3713: 3710: 3702: 3689: 3681: 3672: 3654: 3647: 3633: 3604: 3597: 3573: 3570: 3505: 3464: 3450: 3445: 3430: 3413: 3408: 3402: 3395: 3377: 3361: 3357: 3338: 3323: 3306: 3243: 3210: 3207: 3180: 3177: 3174: 3166: 3138: 3135: 3099: 3005: 2967: 2940: 2932: 2914: 2907: 2844: 2828: 2754: 2750: 2702: 2699: 2628: 2607: 2591: 2564: 2520:Homeovestism 2513: 2494: 2476: 2473: 2468: 2422: 2419: 2404: 2383: 2380: 2353:notice board 2342: 2339: 2289: 2267: 2264: 2260: 2243: 2240: 2218: 2215: 2180: 2177: 2163: 2144: 2110: 2107: 2098: 2097: 2074: 2065: 2041: 2030: 1976: 1919: 1897: 1877: 1874: 1840: 1815:eight colors 1795: 1792: 1778: 1708: 1705: 1680: 1677: 1599: 1596: 1576: 1573: 1554: 1547: 1544: 1513: 1506: 1427: 1369: 1345: 1322: 1307: 1289: 1282: 1216: 1148: 1098: 1088: 1059: 725: 721: 673: 672: 665: 658: 640: 622: 579: 548:Notice board 536: 533: 517: 508: 507: 505: 486: 470: 442:Tony Kushner 438:Jump-A-Class 434: 432: 428:Tony Kushner 414: 398: 367: 362: 360: 353: 340: 337: 328: 324: 320: 316: 314: 301: 298: 293: 290: 252: 241: 112:Hmmm... Try: 101: 70: 43: 37: 4975:Gay is the 4680:Gay disease 4576:, and that 4398:User:Agne27 4288:FisherQueen 4230:FisherQueen 4056:FisherQueen 3953:FisherQueen 3845:Alan Turing 3594:Oscar Wilde 3346:White hotel 3327:White hotel 3256:I'm adding 3040:I've added 2964:Peer review 2567:Portal:LGBT 2516:Homovestism 2510:Homovestism 1977:I see that 1810:Papal tiara 1460:Thanks! :) 655:Peer Review 483:New how to. 401:translation 325:paedophilia 36:This is an 5765:And WOW - 4625:Gay plague 4592:Gay plague 4404:Pedophilia 4140:Pedophilia 3945:Jumpaclass 3278:WP:COREBIO 3181:Enjoy! -- 3163:To Do List 2146:their own 1849:iron cross 740:discussion 565:Nina Odell 538:Nina Odell 405:Jumpaclass 90:Archive 10 5610:and then 5423:talk page 5368:USA Today 5290:WP:LAYOUT 5251:WP:LAYOUT 4977:currently 4674:It seems 4513:Dialogue? 4071:bad faith 3790:Dialogue? 3661:Dialogue? 3611:Dialogue? 3341:pederasty 3309:sexuality 2929:Watchlist 2921:Dialogue? 2614:Dialogue? 2598:Dialogue? 2103:WP:CANVAS 1973:targetted 1749:Air Cadet 1689:Here's a 1407:Scotteaux 1405:patience. 1352:Dialogue? 1296:Dialogue? 329:zoophilia 82:Archive 5 77:Archive 4 71:Archive 3 65:Archive 2 60:Archive 1 5850:Parammon 5841:Raystorm 5801:Raystorm 5781:contribs 5750:Raystorm 5729:contribs 5700:Raystorm 5665:Affinity 5653:Affinity 5639:Psicorps 5599:Psicorps 5526:contribs 5453:Raystorm 5382:contribs 5278:contribs 5258:Raystorm 5230:Raystorm 5202:contribs 5175:Raystorm 5147:Raystorm 5058:contribs 5026:Raystorm 4967:Raystorm 4794:Hi, I'm 4747:Raystorm 4643:medicine 4540:articles 4509:Ganymead 4507:*Exeunt* 4493:contribs 4460:Eedo Bee 4430:Raystorm 4418:Raystorm 4375:Eedo Bee 4340:Eedo Bee 4308:Eedo Bee 4279:Eedo Bee 4260:Eedo Bee 4218:EedoBee. 4170:Raystorm 4123:Raystorm 3998:contribs 3990:Eedo Bee 3986:unsigned 3949:Eedo Bee 3921:contribs 3859:contribs 3813:Raystorm 3786:Ganymead 3784:*Exeunt* 3771:contribs 3685:contribs 3675:Treybien 3657:Ganymead 3655:*Exeunt* 3649:article. 3646:states, 3607:Ganymead 3605:*Exeunt* 3596:'s play 3585:Raystorm 3486:Raystorm 3233:contribs 3193:contribs 3046:Raystorm 2917:Ganymead 2915:*Exeunt* 2895:Raystorm 2806:Parammon 2723:contribs 2675:contribs 2610:Ganymead 2608:*Exeunt* 2594:Ganymead 2592:*Exeunt* 2548:Abendrot 2527:Abendrot 2367:contribs 2308:contribs 2021:images. 1984:gay icon 1979:gay icon 1971:gay icon 1956:contribs 1845:swastika 1829:contribs 1647:Leo XIII 1625:contribs 1613:unsigned 1488:Raystorm 1462:Raystorm 1438:Raystorm 1384:contribs 1348:Ganymead 1346:*Exeunt* 1292:Ganymead 1290:*Exeunt* 1266:lquilter 1253:contribs 1230:lquilter 1163:contribs 1085:- delete 1079:- delete 1073:- delete 1067:- delete 754:contribs 706:contribs 612:contribs 522:Textorus 456:contribs 202:Crimsone 162:contribs 5868:ithemis 5772:SatyrTN 5720:SatyrTN 5583:Azatoth 5517:SatyrTN 5373:SatyrTN 5269:SatyrTN 5193:SatyrTN 5049:SatyrTN 4676:Ed Poor 4484:SatyrTN 4428:Cheers 4144:Gwernol 4029:Comment 3912:SatyrTN 3850:SatyrTN 3762:SatyrTN 3567:Fiction 3224:SatyrTN 3184:SatyrTN 2714:SatyrTN 2666:SatyrTN 2455:Radiant 2358:SatyrTN 2351:On the 2299:SatyrTN 2099:Comment 1947:SatyrTN 1820:SatyrTN 1375:SatyrTN 1370:Support 1304:YAY US! 1244:SatyrTN 1154:SatyrTN 745:SatyrTN 697:SatyrTN 681:ithemis 603:SatyrTN 447:SatyrTN 153:SatyrTN 39:archive 5815:Jeffpw 5710:Jeffpw 5690:FA!!!! 5662:novel 5587:Dev920 5572:scribe 5554:Dev920 5507:Jeffpw 5496:Dev920 5474:banjee 5461:Rating 5341:scribe 5320:Dev920 5301:scribe 5161:Dev920 5093:scribe 5008:Jeffpw 4998:Dev920 4986:Jeffpw 4982:WP:FAC 4912:Jeffpw 4891:scribe 4875:Jeffpw 4862:scribe 4850:WP:BLP 4836:Dev920 4824:Dev920 4796:Cailil 4770:Dev920 4734:scribe 4691:scribe 4666:Jeffpw 4654:scribe 4607:scribe 4582:Jeffpw 4552:scribe 4531:Jeffpw 4441:Dev920 4386:Dev920 4355:Dev920 4318:Dev920 4220:Jeffpw 4199:scribe 4155:scribe 4132:Update 4112:Dev920 4093:Dev920 4082:scribe 4044:scribe 4019:Dev920 4008:Jeffpw 3972:Jeffpw 3968:WP:ANI 3896:Dev920 3877:scribe 3834:scribe 3802:Thanks 3750:Dev920 3730:Dev920 3714:scribe 3532:Dev920 3495:Dev920 3471:Dev920 3451:scribe 3433:Dev920 3414:scribe 3380:Dev920 3282:Dev920 3267:Jeffpw 3247:Dev920 3149:Dev920 3139:scribe 3122:Jeffpw 3110:Dev920 3102:Portal 3086:Dev920 3075:Jeffpw 3055:Dev920 3033:Jeffpw 3023:Dev920 3010:Jeffpw 3006:really 2996:Dev920 2985:Jeffpw 2974:Dev920 2944:Dev920 2879:Dev920 2870:Jeffpw 2850:Jeffpw 2832:Dev920 2796:Dev920 2782:Jeffpw 2758:Dev920 2703:scribe 2689:Jeffpw 2652:Jeffpw 2642:Dev920 2631:Jeffpw 2572:Dev920 2477:scribe 2459:Dev920 2433:Dev920 2423:scribe 2407:Dev920 2384:scribe 2343:scribe 2321:Dev920 2268:scribe 2244:scribe 2230:Dev920 2219:scribe 2181:scribe 2166:Dev920 2111:scribe 2068:Koweja 2055:Dev920 2046:Jeffpw 2023:Jeffpw 2013:Jeffpw 1911:Dev920 1878:scribe 1863:Dev920 1853:Jeffpw 1796:scribe 1781:Dev920 1719:Dev920 1709:scribe 1695:Dev920 1681:scribe 1660:Dev920 1637:Dev920 1617:Dev920 1600:scribe 1577:scribe 1557:Dev920 1531:Dev920 1471:Jeffpw 1448:Dev920 1396:Dev920 1361:Dev920 1333:Dev920 1310:Dev920 1176:Dev920 1135:Dev920 1123:Dev920 1102:Dev920 1091:Dev920 770:Dev920 729:Dev920 590:Dev920 576:ARCAID 493:Dev920 474:Dev920 418:Dev920 385:Dev920 374:Dev920 341:scribe 302:scribe 266:Dev920 5694:OMG, 5427:Aleta 5410:Aleta 5118:Zythe 4781:Aleta 4574:ACTUP 4522:Aleta 4106:Btw, 3909:? -- 3907:quilt 3690:Zythe 3634:Zythe 3583:Yep. 3574:Zythe 3292:Aleta 2955:Aleta 2861:Aleta 2770:Aleta 2537:Done- 2502:Aleta 2290:three 1922:bcatt 1901:bcatt 1817:? -- 1510:Proto 1432:is a 1424:GA!!! 629:Aleta 582:WP:FA 520:] -- 515:]. 16:< 5863:—Cel 5777:talk 5725:talk 5620:acan 5606:See 5522:talk 5471:and 5378:talk 5274:talk 5198:talk 5054:talk 4929:Ouro 4903:Ouro 4809:here 4766:sooo 4572:and 4489:talk 4292:Talk 4268:Clay 4234:Talk 4210:Clay 4183:Clay 4146:... 4060:Talk 3994:talk 3957:Talk 3943:for 3917:talk 3855:talk 3767:talk 3679:talk 3546:acan 3512:acan 3467:here 3339:The 3311:and 3260:and 3229:talk 3189:talk 2970:here 2935:here 2815:Agne 2719:talk 2671:talk 2561:Cats 2363:talk 2304:talk 2195:acan 2152:Agne 2127:acan 2081:acan 2033:Agne 1992:acan 1952:talk 1825:talk 1621:talk 1380:talk 1249:talk 1159:talk 750:talk 702:talk 676:—Cel 641:See 608:talk 550:. -- 489:here 452:talk 435:easy 158:talk 144:and 5616:coe 5567:WJB 5336:WJB 5296:WJB 5113:gay 5088:WJB 5080:or 5072:or 4924:do. 4886:WJB 4857:WJB 4729:WJB 4686:WJB 4649:WJB 4602:WJB 4594:or 4578:AZT 4547:WJB 4194:WjB 4150:WJB 4077:WJB 4039:WJB 4033:own 3872:WJB 3829:WJB 3711:WJB 3542:coe 3508:coe 3446:WJB 3409:WJB 3136:WJB 2700:WJB 2474:WJB 2420:WJB 2381:WJB 2340:WJB 2265:WJB 2241:WJB 2216:WJB 2191:coe 2178:WJB 2123:coe 2108:WJB 2077:coe 1988:coe 1875:WJB 1793:WJB 1706:WJB 1678:WJB 1597:WJB 1574:WJB 1327:to 1197:-- 1149:all 1053:to 1044:to 1035:to 1026:to 1017:to 1008:to 999:to 990:to 981:to 972:to 963:to 954:to 945:to 936:to 927:to 918:to 909:to 900:to 891:to 882:to 873:to 864:to 855:to 846:to 837:to 828:to 819:to 810:to 801:to 792:to 627:. 338:WJB 299:WJB 150:-- 5779:| 5727:| 5631:— 5628:lk 5552:. 5524:| 5425:. 5380:| 5276:| 5200:| 5056:| 4984:. 4901:-- 4645:? 4511:| 4491:| 4294:) 4236:) 4134:. 4073:. 4062:) 4000:) 3996:• 3970:? 3959:) 3919:| 3857:| 3788:| 3769:| 3659:| 3609:| 3557:— 3554:lk 3523:— 3520:lk 3231:| 3191:| 2919:| 2721:| 2673:| 2612:| 2596:| 2365:| 2306:| 2206:— 2203:lk 2138:— 2135:lk 2121:— 2092:— 2089:lk 2003:— 2000:lk 1954:| 1839:I 1827:| 1627:) 1623:• 1514::: 1382:| 1350:| 1294:| 1287:. 1251:| 1161:| 752:| 704:| 610:| 454:| 363:is 327:, 296:? 254:-- 196:{{ 160:| 135:}} 131:{{ 128:}} 124:{{ 121:}} 117:{{ 86:→ 5783:) 5775:( 5731:) 5723:( 5680:- 5626:a 5624:t 5618:l 5528:) 5520:( 5482:. 5384:) 5376:( 5280:) 5272:( 5204:) 5196:( 5127:- 5060:) 5052:( 4495:) 4487:( 4290:( 4232:( 4228:- 4058:( 3992:( 3955:( 3923:) 3915:( 3861:) 3853:( 3773:) 3765:( 3682:· 3677:( 3552:a 3550:t 3544:l 3518:a 3516:t 3510:l 3235:) 3227:( 3195:) 3187:( 2725:) 2717:( 2677:) 2669:( 2369:) 2361:( 2310:) 2302:( 2201:a 2199:t 2193:l 2133:a 2131:t 2125:l 2087:a 2085:t 2079:l 1998:a 1996:t 1990:l 1958:) 1950:( 1831:) 1823:( 1631:. 1619:( 1519:► 1386:) 1378:( 1255:) 1247:( 1165:) 1157:( 756:) 748:( 708:) 700:( 614:) 606:( 458:) 450:( 164:) 156:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 3 - Knowledge

Index