Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 32

2329:

years ago and they have now been deleted, one rightly so, the other not so much. The article mentioned above is one of about thirty being claimed as problematic for no reason except that I touched them at some point. The claims are generally laughable but go ahead and encourage the villagers to chase a monster that never existed. Shoveling bad faith at other editors is forbidden not only because it's a form of harassment but because it deteriorates the consensus-building we use to build quality content. Moni3 I very much appreciate the articles you write but even with the higher level of writing and sourcing you still see the level of generalized homophobia and other nonsense. My only experiences with Cameron Scott on LGBT articles has been them deleting and arguing to delete content no matter the level of notability and sourcing. Your experience with them may differ. I have been publicly harassed and editors such as Cameron Scott have gone out of their way to ensure a wide audience is alerted to their "concern" despite any COI concerns with the article content itself. The most telling cases of this, IMHO, are

1625:

against it, but I don't think the Constitution prohibits it." Justice Scalia wrote a long, angry dissent in which he made it very clear he thought it was a perfectly good law and that, in fact, homosexuals, as he refers to us, are bad people, and the notion that there ought to be any kind of legal protections is a mistake. In an earlier case in Colorado, in which he again vigorously denounced the majority in the court for finding that it was unconstitutional to discriminate against people, again, not in marriage but a basis of their political rights, he said, "Well, of course, we disapprove this. We often disapprove of things like murder." I mean, literally, when he was looking for comparisons to the public disapproval of homosexuality, the first thing he said was murder. So unlike many people who have different legitimate views on this, I urge people to read those two opinions in the Colorado case, the Romer case and the Lawrence case. And, again, there is just no question about his absolute view that ... homosexuals are bad people that shouldn't be treated equally.

2423:

my general direction. No one was adding anything onto a BLP that in any way was considered defamitory. Instead the anon, now aided by Cameron Scott, was working to remove content that goes to the subject's notability. No worries, it will all be undone and the ongoing harassment will eventually end one way or another. I've been harassed many times before and subsequently every article caught in the crosshairs of this nonsense indeed improves. Let them have their despicable day but don't pretend it's an actual concern that we have false information. Similar to the "citation-needed" bombing on dozens of articles by another of my wikihounders, I've yet to see one item that wasn't easily verifiable. In the end we end up adding sourcing on LGBT articles that need them so even though it's annoying and dubiously motivated the end result is more attention to LGBT articles.

2398:

processes to come to consensus, rather than focussing on who has has created the articles or who nominated them for deletion. I'm glad Camaron is looking over articles that other editors have questioned (as they are out of my interest scope), and his initial post here makes no mention specific editors, so should be taken on face value of requesting input. We all have to deal with enough personality clashes on LGBT articles, let's use the project talk page to discuss articles rather than editors. Any stubbing or deletion can easily be reversed if and when sourcing if brought up to scratch according to consensus, so that should be the aim rather than resisting the removal of poorly sourced info, espeically from BLPs.

2472:

only common sense and civility seems to stop most of us from acting in such a way. Several of these editors are treating thses LGBT articles like a battlegroun and that's unfortunate. If your lucky none of your articles will ever be "helped" in this manner. Out of the thousands of articles within the LGBT project very few are GA or FA and I imagine even less have a sourced for every single sentence as they likely don't need that. As I stated, the ones I catch I'm simply adding the sources as I go along. They seem to want to harass me but apparently their plan isn't working, instead one by one they are heading for blocks or bans.

2380:. Moni adds well-sourced, well-written content - so I don't touch it, other editors such as Mish-Mash add well-sourced, well-written content, so I don't touch it - in most cases, I don't even read it because after watching a pattern of edits you get a feel for an editor. you tend to write largely rah-rah promotional material using paper-thin laughable sources (and that without getting into your COI) and I stub or delete it as needed because I see a pattern of edits that require careful watching. You start writing to the basic standards that we expect at wikipedia and your edits become untouchable and uninteresting to me. -- 2569:

as what started this all - a witch-hunt in an effort to harass. You wikihounded me and continue to lob personal attacks at me. But it's all recorded now whereas Knowledge Review has, apparently, no community standards. If you work for the CIA or anyone else I could care less - but when you harass it becomes everyone's business as you have shown a willingness, nay eagerness to assume bad faith and toss consensus out the door resulting in the degrading of both articles and community consensus processes.

601:- Same-sex marriage is not equivalent to marriage equality in all contexts, such as the article "Same-sex marriage in the United States". However, the content of that article is so narrow as to exclude anything but the modern political movement to make marriage laws gender neutral, so it can be renamed to that, and would be more accurate if done so. Remember, marriage equality does not "describe same-sex marriage", it describes a goal of a political movement, such as "age of consent equalization". 698:

uses a term to bestow rights upon its citizens, that term is what is used to describe that set of benefits. So the argument is whether there will be equal rights under the law as it regards "marriage" as a civil institution. Most people who are are against LGBT marriages are also against LGBT civil unions, so the semantic argument breaks down at that point and usually shows this to be a political equality issue for rights. TheHomosexualist makes this argument above. --

1613:

people from countries in the region were generally less comfortable with having a homosexual as a neighbour, for example. Only three EU states -- Belgium, the Netherlands and Spain -- gave full marriage rights to lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, transsexuals and transgender people, while most of the other countries do not award any rights at all. In the Netherlands 82 percent were in favour of same-sex marriage versus 11 percent in Romania and 12 percent in Latvia.

31: 1559:. There seems to be a couple of editors who do not want "homophobia" as a reason why people would be against gay marriage. I know it sounds like a real stretch that not liking gay people might be the reason one opposes them having equal rights, but apparently it has been written about a great deal. This small group of editors put a CITE tag in the intro after “homophobia” so I spent thirty seconds of digging and found these five sources: 770:. Same-sex still seems like the best choice for now. "Marriage equality" has a lot of connotations, just ask those who fought for marriage equality for mixed-race couples and seek similar equal marriage rights for binational couples or for people who are mentally challenged who seek to marry. No, "marriage equality", is a broader concept applied to all sorts of people who are not part of the current same-sex marriage issues and debates. 2338:

gender, my sexuality - whatever. It's actually none of their business. I hope you remember this next time you see someone harassed for simply working on wikipedia. Good lord, if someone thinks I was actually promoting any of those subjects they weren't reading very well. I gave up on re-writing the Sisters group article because it was a culture-war magnet.

1254:. I suspect that the edits and the call for deletion were not made in good faith and that they reflect some anti-gay bias on the editor's part. I have tried to address the legitimate need for more references on the site and I have removed the PROD tag, but I'd like to have more people looking over the edits and weighing in on the Talk page. Thanks. 3952:, click on a page number that has a pink background, and proofread the page you end up at. (At least I think they're pink, I'm partially colorblind so I can't quite tell for sure.) After reading through it edit the page, fix any errors, and then there's a Wikisource-custom button you can click to mark the page as proofread. Thanks! -- 1290:. I wonder how plausible the claim is that this particular editor has some problem with GLBTs -- her/his edits come off as disrespectful of the community, as though s/he is not editing in good faith. So I have a leg to stand on, either that Love has been a significant figure and/or that the call for deletion is on suspicious grounds? 1679:. I disagree, as noted on the article's Talk page. I fail to see how synthesis can occur, when a published article's claims are simply restated on the page. No conclusion is drawn by me; conclusions are those of the cited authors, not this contributor. Nontheless, I would appreciate someone else taking a look at the section. - 2862:

the encyclopedia is reflective of the 'real world' in this respect. In academia (psychology for example) bisexuality is often a footnote to a footnote about homosexuality, and even in LGBT studies it is often neglected. But, that is changing, and we need to work on what information is available. Welcome.

1334:! Am I over-reacting to suspect that the editor is in fact removing this article more out of an religious agenda than out of sincere concern for Wikipedic quality? (How many folks propose articles for deletion on their first day as a user? Or could this editor have been editing anonymously for a long time?) 237:- "traditional marriage" was allowed for a long time on Knowledge before a long AfD finally killed it. There are much more problems with "traditional marriage" because it's not only a slanted term, it's a historical assertion that can definitely be disproved, but that proponents will never accept, like 2657:..... They all have lots of relavant sources online from which to write good articles (I prefer google books for source searching, and it causes fewer arguments about source quality, especially for controversial topics). Just get stuck in and leave a note here if you run into problems or disagreements. 2632:

Welcome to the project! There is always lots to do, depending on your interests. At the top of the page we have the "article alerts" and "articles needing cleanup" links. If you have time to search for sources or even just copyediting or cleanup, we have many bisexuality articles needing a determined

2568:

Actually no COI has been shown, just an unhealthy interest on your part to remove information about a subject; not because it's untrue, presented unduely or otherwise problematic. No worries, it will all be restored by someone who wants to actually improve the article. Your accusations remain as pure

2341:

What it comes down to - do you want to encourage on-wiki harassment based on offsite accusations, by banned users no less? Or do you want to see issues civilly addressed in a manner befitting an encyclopedia? It's your community, you decide how you want editors treated. The anon who'se stirring drama

618:

Same-sex marriage is the standard term, and should be used for all the articles that discuss the provision or lack thereof of marriage for same-sex couples. "Marriage equality" isn't near as often used and is so ambiguous as to be deceptive. If it only used to mean equality in marriage for any gender

3093:

I have been approached to rewrite the article by myself, but I do not wish to do that. I already wrote the Lesbian article and several other high-profile LGBT articles. I do not wish to write the core article on LGBT issues using my perceptions of what should be in this one. Knowledge is a community

2974:

The article will eventually fall of the list as other new articles appear (tomorrow is the full week). I would not advise removing it manually - the list is for the projects use, and it does not seem to be of any benefit to remove articles from the list. Many article appear there that have little or

2861:

Believe it or not, you don't even have to be LGBT to work on this project. We don't exclude people on the basis of sexual orientation. But, you are right about the articles. There are huge gaps when it comes to bisexuality, but that entails people willing to work on those aspects. Unfortunately,

2471:

I have, at this point, 4,361 pages on my watchlist (excluding talk pages). Some I wrote myself or greatly improved, others I simply rolled back vandalism. If an editor, for whatever reason, wishes to harass another by simply asking for each sentence to have a cite they can do so. It's despicable but

2422:

this seems like an actual concern for some support on a BLP article but it's not. The anon who has been harassing me , and by the looks of things other editors prior, has been told to move on. Cameron Scott however acts as their meatpuppet here while ensuring a little public humiliation is thrown in

2337:

which has been "cleaned" so it's now one sentence. But of course that sentence must also be COI, right? You tend to focus on a few articles and systematically build them up. I have roughly 3000 on my watchlist and simply try to keep the nonsense to a low roar; people assume they know my identity, my

2308:

The commentary directed at Cameron Scott is unnecessary. I would have thought it a cause-and-effect relationship that once you deliberately obfuscate information, such as the separation of a single entity into two articles that withholds information linking two subjects as the same person, that your

1631:

There’s many, many more, yet I keep getting reverted so that the CITE tag remains, which hurts the encyclopedia when there are plenty of citations out there (particularly after Proposition 8), but someone has a POV and wants to deny that homophobia is one reason why people are against gay marriage.

1624:

A few years ago, the state of Texas tried to send to prison two men who had private, consenting sex in their own bedroom. And the majority on the court said, "That's unconstitutional. That's an invasion of privacy." Justice (Clarence) Thomas said, "Well, I think it's a silly law. I would have voted

453:

of grey area we as an encyclopedia cannot define ourselves. We must use proper naming conventions, which in this case as reported by mainstream media is Same-sex marriage or gay marriage. Any ambiguity about the subject, such as where transgender or intersex relationships are legally defined, should

304:

Hang on, I thought you were arguing for replacing "same-sex marriage" with "marriage equality". I don't know of any title that's currently at "marriage equality" that anyone is proposing moving to "same-sex marriage". You seem to agree with me that they're not interchangeable. So what exactly are

3219:

I looked at it, but it really doesn't seem worth commenting there. Anti-non-LGBT violence is a different topic altogether, and i strongly doubt the suggester would ever actually put in the work in to source and write anything, whether for section in this article or for another page. Unless sources

3116:

After Wednesday, I will have a hella of a more time on my hands due to the completion of a major project. however, I am a lousy writer :-(, I am however a pretty good researcher :-), so if people want to tap me up to find sources for sections, I'll be happy to act as a research assistant or provide

2397:

We all aim to write the best articles possible, and should welcome scrutiny of sourcing. Past mistakes have been made and been admited to, and i think it is time to move on from any finger pointing. Article improvment includes checking articles that may have sourcing problems, and allowing deletion

2269:

No lecturing was intended, our civility policies are non-negotiable. Your actions on LGBT articles has been mentioned to you directly many times. That you are able to step within the letter of wiki rules does not negate that your track record shows a disappointing and consistent degradation of LGBT

2197:

Your keen attention to "fixing" LGBT articles has been noticed many times now, that you are enabling a sock seems to simply make you a meat puppet and that you care not about improving any of the many LGBT articles but simply targeting material to delete from them suggests your interest is not abut

2123:

IP = IP Editor, you know the people who edit without an account - it's the bottom section on the talkpage, they have a list of problem with the sources , I checked one of them and the complaint was correct(as I have noted on the page and in my edit summary)), I wanted people to have a look at their

1888:

Higher rates of family rejection were significantly associated with poorer health outcomes. On the basis of odds ratios, lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults who reported higher levels of family rejection during adolescence were 8.4 times more likely to report having attempted suicide, 5.9 times

1812:

OK, but i couldn't find it by scanning the talk page or by searching "gay" or "homo*". There are no archives, so if there was any disagreement, no-one bothered to discuss it. I would suggest starting a discussion on the talk page, with an example of what you think should be included, as the editors

1612:

The report, which brought together research from 27 countries, said over half of EU citizens thought discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation was widespread in their country. Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Poland and Romania were singled out for being hostile towards "gay pride" rallies and

650:

were struck down so that those couples could have a traditional marriage opportunity like everyone else. At the time, "Interracial marriage" was seen as something separate and "other" than traditional marriage; now we find that laughable. It would seem that previous 'marriage battles' always went

3473:

is a similar article that would have fallen under this category, and I am sure there must be a few others around (hard to know, without the category anymore). This stuff is clearly POV pushing misinformation that there is some conspiracy, yet needs to be documented, and established within a clear

2328:

the topic of this thread - I looked to see what if any reliable, and even some wobbly sourcing had to say on it. It was weaker then and certainly nothing that would hold up for our purposes at all. This is rather beside the point as has been pointed out a few times. I wrote two poor articles three

1368:

The problem is this - regardless of his motivations, the nom is actually good. I cannot find any decent sources for this person (anyone?). Regardless of their motivation, at it currently stands the article should be deleted. I'm not going to vote in the AFD but have added the article canvass squad

177:

Marriage equality IS a political issue. Same-sex marriage is not. Same-sex marriage ≠ marriage equality. Articles about same-sex marriage should describe religious (and maybe civil) same-sex marriages, and their history and traditions. Articles about marriage equality should describe the political

2456:

It seems to me that it's up to YOU to demonstrate the verifiability. If the articles are easy to verify, then why are they not being sourced earlier on in the process? Why not simply head off the problem by including sources from the start? Then the articles are improved AND the harassment should

697:

I agree that religion's role in marriage can't be disregarded as an academic topic. However, in the United States marriage is both a religious and civil institution. It is accorded civil benefits and rights, and the question you raise is more framed in the light of semantics. Once a government

1746:

Anything stated by a reliable source should be there if it meets due weight. If necessary, it can be qualified as being only the view of the source. We shouldn't be stating things as fact if it's not clear, but neither should we exclude views from reliable sources from the article without a good

3089:

Is it about time to rewrite this article to conform to MOS and concentrate on accuracy, neutrality, comprehensiveness, and the best quality sources? Is it possible in an article of such controversy? I tend to hope a rewrite can be accomplished without the fuss of ArbCom, possibly as a model for

1593:

But the roots of our discomfort, I think, go deeper. Sadly, some African-Americans believe that it is only we who should benefit from the gains achieved by the civil rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s. They fear that to allow the gay community to enter the doors of opportunity opened by our

3941:

Hello, I recently finished transcribing this Canadian research paper, a scientific literature review of studies comparing the children of same-sex marriages with the children of heterosexual marriages. I'm posting about it here because I thought it might serve as a useful source for Knowledge

1588:

As an African-American lesbian who has been in a loving relationship for over two decades, I have been made well aware of the black community's discomfort with things gay. Our long and courageous history in the forefront of the struggle for civil rights notwithstanding, the leadership of black

1754:

I could find no problem concerning his LGBT status on the talk page. What is the issue here? The article makes non-sensationalist mention of his admited same-sex encounters, and i the same paragraph mentions his opposite-sex affairs, and elsewhere in the section that he gave up all homosexual

1198:

The sources are shit and the only decent ones are used to provided contextual background information about queer concepts and say nothing about the subject of the article. The pattern of editing by certain departed editors is becoming sadly very clear, we have a raft of articles that has been

3991:

I didn't do any research on this, but i would be wary of accepting anything Tatchell writes at face value, or using it without corroborating sources. Tatchell does some great work for LGBT rights, but his expertise is in getting attention on issues that need debating, not necessarily on NPOV

154:

Seems to politicize the issue. It also blurs the main point, that it really IS a matter involving individuals of the same sex. It is a bit like the anti-abortionists calling themselves "pro-life." It is a polemical weasel. And yes. I know there is a Knowledge article on the "pro-lifers."

676:

But UK Civil partnerships differ from marriages essentially only in the religious component (then cannot be performed by clergy or in churches). The sources and wikipedia differentiate this from marriage, and i think mst LGBT people do to, hence the religious importance cannot simply be

3173:

Can we get this to be the focus of a (hopefully soon coming?) LGBT newsletter? Or just use the project member list for a more penetrative advert? or even add something to the project banner for a short time, like other projects have done for elections etc? Who deals with these things

619:(rather than number of partners, age, etc) then same-sex marriage is a better descriptor. As one of the arguements against same-sex marriage is explicitly that such an arrangment is not or can never be equal to opposite-sex marriage, claiming it to be "marriage equality" is also NPOV. 579:

I agree that "same-sex marriage" is a neutral, broadly used term compared to "marriage equality" which, I think, is a POV term at this time. Although it technically may exclude transgender people, as Bookkeeperoftheoccult says, those issues can be (and are) addressed in the article.

1035:) and a political activist. He was also apparently prominent in gay history during the 1970s and 1980s in California. I have been contacted by Mr. Rocco who requested an article be added about him. There seem to be numerous sources available on Google News and Google Web. Thanks. 727:. The articles address specific social constructs - not broad ideological concepts. As an encyclopedia you can have an article on all three without ever mentioning the phrase "marriage quality" but you can't do it the other way around. The concept of "marriage equality" can be 2219:

Yeah whatever, we can't all be engaged in constant self-promotion and adding worthless sources to articles to give them the superficial look of being well referenced. I think LGBT articles make up about 5% of my edits - wow what a self-hating member of the community I am.

486:

Can you give any examples of 'marriage equality' being used for anything other than gender-neutral marriage laws? Like, for the legal equality of the sexes in an opposite-sex marriage? While you can describe that as marriage equality, I don't think that term was used then.

2549:

Oh please, the COI highlighted there was a problem - this in turn make clearer than you have a practice of adding literally *anything* to an article as a source, a link to a flyer, a press release, literally anything to create a superficial appearance of good sourcing.

290:"Marriage equality" is not a term for two people of the same-sex getting married. Therefore, replacing "marriage equality" with "same-sex marriage" is not an exact fit, and makes a title inaccurate, and sometimes ungrammatical to bend over backwards for "neutrality". 1889:

more likely to report high levels of depression, 3.4 times more likely to use illegal drugs, and 3.4 times more likely to report having engaged in unprotected sexual intercourse compared with peers from families that reported no or low levels of family rejection.

3706:

I don't see a controdiction either. Anything in the ICD should have more than enough sources about it to write an article, as they don't just get added on a whim. Expansion with such sources would be an improvment, but it is no more a problem than for all other

2810:

articles are awesome (good work btw guys) and us bisexuals get left out in the cold Im Sick of people who questions us gays bisexuals lesbians for wanting our own sex what do they have aganist us? do they think it breaks the cycle of nature? my self have had

960:. There really aren't any analogies of economy and "minority" topics - surprisingly - there isn't even an article on African American owned businesses, it's hardly even mentioned in articles on Marcus Garvey, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Dubois. There is 1007:

I second this call. There is a series of ongoing disputes at this article. Discussion on the talk page is not resulting on agreement or consensus about any of them. It would be helpful if editors not involved in the disputes could comment on the talk page.

2457:

stop (unless the sources are unreliable--but then it wouldn't be harassment). I require my English students to cite their sources, provide quotations and references, etc.--isn't this practice standard for intellectual pursuits, including encyclopedias?

2350:

enablers. When they first started harassing me on another article a quick look at their edit history was obviously filled with socking and harassment of other editors. But whatever you feel is the best way forward will have to carry the day here.

1529:(scroll down a bit) to try to formulate a DYK hook for the triple nomination I made a couple of days ago, please do. My proposed hook, dealing as it does with three fictional characters, has engendered accusations that it possibly implicates 3571:

Another highly placed Obama appointee being smeared by some rather unreliable sources. I've gone through the two "scandals" and cleaned up the whole article. More eyes appreciated as the anti-LGBT rhetoric seems rather heavily spread.

4016:, which is a featured article. So if Tatchell's description of its contents is accurate, it shouldn't be an issue of the facts per se, but even Tatchell describes the coverage of his sexuality as "a very minor aspect", so it may be a 1395:

Will you come and look at her/his edits and see which ones can reasonably be reverted -- he's blanking whole paragraphs because they are sourced from the church's website! And s/he has posted several ominous comments on my User Page.

2840:, male bisexuals are often the most discriminated against, seen as only good for a lay (by gay men) and to be avoided (by straight women). It's a sad state of affairs; glad that you found what sounds like your place in the world. -- 2613:

with one but im happpily married to my wife kristina and our 3 kids i thought about joining the project as a little hobby since i have first hand experiance with man sex but for some reason i cant i dont know why anything i can do?

1285:

I'm working on that. The woman spent the past several years as basically the 2nd-in-command of an international denomination, so it may be hard to find info on her outside of the church's materials. Anyway, the editor has put up

522:

The pro-choice/pro-life example is an argument for letting the sides choose their terminology, not using what Knowledge editors think is "neutral" (which ends up, in this case, making titles and ledes inaccurate and confusing).

2946:

It's listed in the "New articles with LGBT keywords" list that appears in the {{Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies/LGBT article alerts}} thing, which explains why so many user pages link to it. It seems like the inclusion of

508:- You can't pick the terminology and framing of one side and use it as the basis behind an article that deals with a political controversy. The pro-life/pro-choice framing issue is a good example of neutrality to follow. 794:. "Marriage equality", while accurate in my point of view, is quite weighted; it's not even pejorative in the way "reparative therapy" and "gay agenda" article titles are. Same-sex marriage is a factual and NPOV title.~ 136:— I support it. It's more neutral, I think, and maybe it will help with the title polarization: ie - Supporters/Opposers of same sex/traditional marriage. Maybe they can be merged and therefore provide more balance. — 1727:

Apparently, some sources have alleged a homosexual relationship between him and Hiss. Other sources have quoted him as saying that he did have numerous relationships with men while he was in the communist underground.

1575:

Gay appointees and their partners are treated as married people at official ceremonies and social gatherings. Then whenever an election rolls around, the whole team pretends it’s on a mission to save America from gay

1221:

The butchandfemme.com site was leaned on too much as an authority but there's nothing to suggest the information is false in any way. I still think a merge is the best way to go there but hysteria must have it's day.

3949: 3809:

to find the LGBT stubs, but couldn't find them under any of the categories that I thought would make sense. Are they not on that page? If they aren't on that page, should they be added? (I finally found them at the

3220:

appear, it is a non-issue. However, i think other improvments are urgently needed there, such as widening the scope to cover other forms of violence, and subarticling the long list. So input there would be good to.

1030:

Hi, sorry if I am posting here when there would be a better place for it, but I just wanted to ask if anyone was up to creating an article for Pat Rocco. He is a gay filmmaker (already mentioned in our article on

3380: 3133:

You mention accuracy, neutrality, and comprehensiveness, so i'm betting you want to push it to FA. If so, I'm willing to collaborate with you on the article. The article is far too important not to be an FA.

1070:

A template that is in my opinion of importance to the LGBT wikiproject is in need of attention from editors of this particular subject matter. Your opinion can add value to the resolution of the discussion

3201:

I'm in and out this evening but the discussion at the part of the talkpage caught my eye. There are some (AGF) em.. "interesting" suggestions for changes to the article that need some more eyes and input.

1554:

This is arguably this project's most important article, and by far the biggest civil rights issue facing the LGBT community in all but a handful of places, yet there is a ridiculous revert war going on at

1477:

I agree with Cameron Scott. Requesting help to find sources, or in improving an article, or asking for additional eyes in a neutral way at the relevant wikiproject is clearly not canvassing. Inappropriate

2743:

i read that article and its a insult to bisexuals everywhere which lead me to the project i would be happy to work on it with anyone and make it a ga but lets do it on the weekends when i have more time

1696:

I added my opinion on (the lack of) synthesis and undue weight. I also added to the assesment section of the article, which will hopefully curtail further disagreement about relying too much on the Augh

964:, but that is rather buried and underpopulated. There are a series of categories on the environment and the economy that came closest, but the all linked up to energy economics or something like that. 437:

Transgender individuals such as myself are a part of the issue regardless. "Sex" in psychology and sociology refers to one's biological make-up (XX, XY or intersex), while "gender" typically refers to

2815:

with man mutilple times but that is before i met my kristina who by the way edits on my account some times and is ok herself and my wife is bisexual herself to and has had sex with a women and her --

2093:

Can someone take a look at the IP complaints about this article on the talkpage, I've had a quick look and they seem to have merit, however me dealing with them is likely to be counter-productive. --

3680:

This strikes me as possibly being more appropriate for a dictionary entry. I may be wrong, but the article looks as though it is padded with sources that aren't strictly relevant to its main topic.

1533:(as statements about those who are neither real nor persons so often do). Since I'm also being accused of making personal attacks (by the person who, er, personally attacked me) I've lost interest. 1457:

How? Canvass is going to individual pages and asking for support? I can't see how coming to a wikiproject that the article falls under and asking for help in finding sources is covered by that? --

3934: 1155: 861:

Of course the criteria would also be that it had to be a company that targeted the LGBT audiences and not a company that merely had LGBT ownership (thought that could be a different category.

3974:

and then went to our article and can't find any mention of him being bi or any indication, this project has been working on it. Anyone familiar with those claims? Can they sourced to RS? --

260:- "Same-sex marriage" is a neutral term for two people of the same sex getting married. "Marriage equality" is a POV term for legal recognition of same-sex marriages. It happens to match 3446: 3064: 3633:

would be appreciated. A perennially controversial category that has survived multiple CfDs, it's currently being attacked from every imaginable angle (and some I couldn't have imagined).

2931:. It may be because the word 'dyke' appears in it; 'Bette Bourne' appears in a couple of articles I edited/created (and in a sandbox). Is there anything that can be done about this? 1594:

struggle, to permit gays and lesbians to share in the fruits of that movement, will diminish those benefits for the black community. Truth is, there is more than enough to go around.

559:

It's not original research because the term was not invented by Knowledge. You object to the word 'equality' because you object to gay rights, but you can have an article describing

3992:

historical analysis. If he writes it, i am sure there are sources discussing it, but we should be very careful before adding anything to an article (even if not a living person).

3830: 2324:

Actually, no. We don't pillory and harass anyone; we act civilly and focus on content. When it was originally suggested that the DJ and Catalyst were the same person - mind you,

1786:

My understanding is that there was some prior disagreement among editors there (which was not recent, but a while ago), and I thusly wanted to get a fresh, outsider perspective.

4012:

I did a quick check, and Tatchell refers to the biography Malcolm – The Life of a Man Who Changed Black America by Bruce Perry, which is already used extensively as a source at

3449:

Is there any value in creating something else to tag such articles? Anti-gay misinformation or Homosexual conspiracy theories or something? from the increase in discussion on

1199:

superficially sourced with crap, on (what appears to me) the grounds that most people will simply look at the number and the names and never check what they actually say. --

1096:

This article needs checking over because of the recent revelations that one of the editors working on it has a serious COI. I'll take a look now but more eyes are needed --

3341: 94: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 3474:

category, rather than being some kind of truth - i.e. that there is (or has been) such a conspiracy. Maybe if there is no definitive category, it can all be cleansed as

1755:

activity and married. Seems factual and balanced, and no-one is disagreeing. No good reason has been given why one particular affair should be discussed in more detail.

3960: 3806: 3244: 1177: 3374: 3945:

Also, in case anyone ends up reading through the paper, it needs to be proofread (which has to be done by a user other than me) if you'd like to help out with that.

2769:

to work on bisexuality topics if you don't wish to do so. Simply having a 'bisexual voice' in discussions will be very good for us, so I'm glad you're joining. --

3654:

Oh boy, yet another unique and interesting term. Note that the title states it's a disorder and the content disputes this. Anyone want to untangle this and the

1884:

A 2008 study showed a correlation between the degree of rejecting behavior by parents of LGB adolescents and negative health problems in the teenagers studied:

1877:

I found a study published in PEDIATRICS about the effect of parental rejection on health of LGB adolescents. I've inserted it into the appropriate section of

1621:

citing Scalia’s homophobia as why it would be bad for gay marriage to go before the Supreme Court, with examples (such as Scalia comparing gays to murderers):

3599: 2820:

but we both seddeld down she even cheated on me with women sometimes but we got over it so she is gonna help edit some here to not just me but its mostly me

1158:. From the history, it looks like Banjiboi did a ton of work to get it up to encyclopedic standards, so not sure if something has changed in the article. 811:

As a serial categorizer, I've noticed a need for a category on LGBT businesses, but not sure what to call it. To follow other structures, there would be

1287: 3465:. These would have all fallen under the now deleted category, and I doubt they can be sustained simply under the Category:Homophobia unless there are 3453:

since the discussion for the deleted category ended, my guess is that will be the next target. There was an article created at the same time called

2728:' in particular needs severe and drastic clean-up and reorganization. It has had glaring problems for a long time and I find it a bit embarrassing. 932: 3786:

This article has been passed as a GA. Please review your article rating -- it is currently listed as "C-Class". This should probably be changed. --

1176:

Looks like someone went through all the sources and found some problems in a good article reassessment and that is why it's being listed for AfD.

1569:

All this is, as everyone knows, just a show for rousing the base. If the last month has taught us anything about the Republican Party, it is that

220:- "marriage equality" is a POV propaganda term, just like "traditional marriage" is on the other side. "Same-sex marriage" is completely neutral. 47: 17: 2255:

What a laugh, don't lecture me about civility when in your previous post you accuse me (out of the side of your mouth) of being a homophobe. --

1609:" - Reuters – A European Union study specifically citing homophobia as part of the reason more European countries haven’t adopted gay marriage: 112: 2309:

previous and further edits are called into question. This is not an issue of homophobia, but dealing with the consequences of your actions. --

3117:

feedback and copy-editing of sections. I have access to various academic databases via my university work so can also assist in that way. --

2108:

What's an IP complaint? Intellectual property? Internet protocol? Which section on the Talk page? Specifically want do you want reviewed? --

1991: 1589:

America -- politicians, ministers, business leaders -- has not been as outspoken as it could be and should be on the issue of gay rights.

3753: 2827: 2754: 2715: 2621: 3851:

Sheesh! I even looked under the culture link and didn't see it -- but now I do. Thanks! (Should it be moved someplace easier to find?)

1482:

would be asking for votes to support one side or the other, however it's done. Also, please lets assume good faith about ARS voting. —

1502:

Given the somewhat reasonable argument that the Cindi Love article didn't have enough sources, how many of the MCC articles linked at

238: 2183:

They could be rogering puppies with a rhinestone dildo for all I care - since nobody else wants to take a look, I'll deal with it. --

1573:

Congressmen who trust their careers to gay staffers vote for laws to enshrine second-class citizenship for gays in the Constitution.

3901: 2884:

Hello, and welcome to the project!! Please try and check spelling grammar before posting, however. It makes everyone's life easier.~

1506:

would have the same problem? And without breaking the Canvassing rule, what's the best way to get help in boosting them up? Thanks.

2708:

this account kinda so i and my wife will help the project with hand on experiance with having sex with there own sex see ya around

3971: 1602:: Al Sharpton and other black leaders specifically citing homophobia as a reason for African-American opposition to gay marriage. 3009:

I wrote the editor who runs the bot, and he's taken the link off the page. Is it still showing up on the "what links here" page?

2071:

It's my birthday too! But my partner bought the beer for himself, since I don't touch the stuff. Anyway, happy mutual birthday!

931:

Ok I'm starting a user page on this. Come on over and see what's out there and help me come up with a good category structure.

3314: 3309: 1090: 741: 464: 336: 3762: 3318: 409:

Who uses the term 'LGT marriage'? Switching to that seems problematic since you're not going to find it in reliable sources.

449:

who is married to a man may still be defined as being in a same-sex marriage even if they both identify as straight. That's

1414:

His comments are (if I am being charitable) strange, if I'm being less charitable... I'll take a look at the paragraphs. --

3395: 2924:

An editor has approached me asking why a number of pages I am involved with (including my own page) link to this article:

1503: 957: 1907:"Family Rejection as a Predictor of Negative Health Outcomes in White and Latino Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Young Adults" 856: 3953: 3362: 3301: 3195: 1731:

The former allegation is not in the article but the latter is. I'm wondering what other editors think about the issue.

896: 1435:

While I agree with OP's positions about the article, isn't everything that they've said here an explicit violation of

1271:

The sources are their official page and their blog - fails WP:BIO by a mile currently, are there no better sources? --

606: 568: 528: 492: 295: 246: 183: 961: 1072: 3648: 3458: 1526: 732: 455: 327: 38: 3094:

effort, and there is no reason why this article cannot be constructed by many of us with the same goals in mind.

2693: 2646: 4029: 4007: 3983: 3927: 3890: 3860: 3842: 3823: 3795: 3781: 3756: 3722: 3701: 3687: 3674: 3642: 3618: 3588: 3558: 3535: 3502: 3487: 3435: 3421: 3281: 3259: 3235: 3211: 3189: 3165: 3145: 3126: 3110: 3076: 3040: 3018: 3004: 2990: 2969: 2955: 2940: 2907: 2890: 2871: 2852: 2830: 2781: 2757: 2737: 2718: 2672: 2624: 2563: 2522: 2488: 2466: 2439: 2413: 2389: 2367: 2318: 2286: 2264: 2250: 2229: 2214: 2192: 2166: 2133: 2114: 2102: 2080: 2064: 2049: 2035: 2007: 1980: 1858: 1828: 1795: 1770: 1740: 1712: 1688: 1652: 1542: 1515: 1491: 1466: 1448: 1423: 1405: 1378: 1343: 1325: 1299: 1280: 1263: 1208: 1189: 1167: 1120: 1105: 1084: 1059: 1044: 1017: 1001: 973: 943: 915: 873: 847: 800: 786: 754: 710: 692: 667: 634: 610: 591: 572: 554: 532: 517: 496: 477: 432: 418: 398: 373: 349: 314: 299: 285: 250: 229: 204: 187: 164: 145: 127: 3886: 3856: 3838: 3819: 3697: 3630: 3014: 2965: 2518: 2462: 2076: 2045: 2031: 1987: 1671: 1663: 1511: 1401: 1339: 1295: 1259: 1080: 442: 310: 281: 1585:– An African-American lesbian talks about homophobia, Proposition 8 and African Americans, October 28, 2008: 3356: 853: 3979: 3750: 3612: 3207: 3122: 2824: 2751: 2712: 2618: 2559: 2385: 2260: 2225: 2188: 2129: 2098: 1462: 1419: 1374: 1321: 1276: 1204: 1101: 647: 643: 1369:

notice, they will likely come and mass-vote keep. I suggest you concentrate on finding reliable sources. --

812: 2234:

Please stop all personal attacks. They violate our civility policies and you have been warned about this.

602: 586: 564: 524: 488: 291: 242: 179: 3811: 3554: 3531: 2026:

i registered my own account and have joined i wont be on all the time but when i am on i will contribute

823:

have a place in LGBT related media, but I've found others that could use an LGBT business category like:

3454: 3415:. The books don't appear to be notable and while nominated for an award, no major awards have been won. 3352: 2733: 1918: 1854: 1791: 1736: 1444: 1127:

Despite the witch-hunt those remain accusations and insinuations, not revelations. Please don't confuse

903: 513: 428: 414: 2704:

all of those and my wife is also a bisexual chic and had sex with a women so we can both help we both

1599: 3638: 3416: 2901: 2846: 2775: 2112: 1646: 1185: 1163: 969: 939: 911: 869: 716: 704: 661: 367: 198: 121: 3550: 3527: 2929: 2374:

has been them deleting and arguing to delete content no matter the level of notability and sourcing.

816: 3882: 3852: 3834: 3815: 3791: 3777: 3693: 3450: 3431: 3402: 3388: 3010: 2961: 2925: 2514: 2458: 2150:. Ignore unless you have a shovel for all the bad faith accusations throw in my general direction. 2072: 2041: 2027: 1906: 1507: 1397: 1335: 1291: 1255: 1076: 1040: 306: 277: 107:

Is there any support on the project for renaming the same-sex marriage articles to use the phrase "

3769: 3975: 3912: 3908: 3747: 3684: 3659: 3604: 3573: 3513: 3483: 3266: 3203: 3118: 3098: 3072: 3000: 2936: 2867: 2821: 2748: 2709: 2615: 2570: 2555: 2473: 2424: 2381: 2352: 2271: 2256: 2235: 2221: 2199: 2184: 2151: 2125: 2124:

specific problems and see if they are correct. I can do it if nobody has the time or the will. --

2094: 2019: 1986:

I found a few articles where it could be added, but I don't have time to do so myself right now:

1721: 1618: 1582: 1538: 1487: 1458: 1415: 1370: 1317: 1272: 1223: 1200: 1132: 1097: 1013: 997: 989: 890: 771: 383: 225: 141: 2724:

I hope that this is not interpreted as a insult to any editors and their work, but the article '

3829:

That page is broken into sections because it's so large. LGBT stubs are listed under Culture:

3265:

It's certainly notable but the article was poorly written and sourced, could you userfy to me?

1881:, but if you guys can think of anywhere else it would be a good addition, feel free to use it: 1024: 922: 839: 4025: 3542: 3462: 3255: 2343: 2143: 2138:

This is yet another personal jab at me based on the ongoing harassment campaign that tried to

2060: 2023: 2003: 1684: 1556: 1548: 1479: 1436: 1250:

Please take a look at the recent edits and call for deletion of former MCC executive Rev. Dr.

1116: 1055: 833: 720: 581: 551: 265: 108: 1563: 4017: 4000: 3715: 3524: 3498: 3475: 3412: 3305: 3228: 3182: 3158: 3033: 2983: 2729: 2689: 2665: 2642: 2406: 2347: 2147: 2139: 1850: 1821: 1787: 1763: 1732: 1705: 1440: 1128: 685: 627: 509: 424: 410: 160: 1606: 454:

be addressed in the article, so long as it is also receiving coverage by reliable sources.

3692:

I added the Contradition tag (though I'm not seeing the contradiction) and the LGBT stub.

3634: 3106: 2960:

So how do we get this article off that list? Can I simply edit the raw list to remove it?

2314: 2109: 2087: 1959: 1947: 1931: 1676: 1659: 1181: 1159: 1032: 965: 935: 907: 865: 651:

along the same lines of reasoning and justifications, when the only thing people want is "

560: 547: 438: 423:

And aren't you missing a letter? Why can't bisexuals get married to same gender partners?

3368: 2975:

no LGBT content, but they still need to be checked as to why they are using the keywords.

1632:

The above five citations, whether we agree with them or not, are perfectly in line with

3878: 3787: 3773: 3565: 3509: 3427: 3136: 1971: 1036: 884: 827: 724: 2792:

yeah thanks man i didnt even know about the project till i looked at the talk page of

3874: 3681: 3479: 3083: 3068: 2996: 2932: 2863: 2701: 2654: 2334: 1878: 1534: 1530: 1483: 1009: 993: 655:", particularly since it is a civil institution (regardless of religious history). -- 221: 137: 2818:

Parents grounded her for having sex with a women cause it breaks the cycle of nature

4021: 3873:

I'm not sure where it could be moved. In any case, that decision would be made by

3466: 3251: 2952: 2837: 2056: 1999: 1680: 1637: 1112: 1051: 820: 543: 264:

POV, but that doesn't mean Knowledge should use it. Also, we have articles on the

3335: 2554:*yawn*, yesterday I was working for wikipedia review, what's it today? The CIA? -- 2513:

My mistake. I thought you were being harassed on articles you started. Apologies.

2333:

which was re-written top-down from another anon's spurious deletion attempts and

3993: 3734: 3708: 3546: 3494: 3297: 3288: 3221: 3175: 3151: 3026: 2976: 2793: 2725: 2681: 2658: 2634: 2399: 2330: 1814: 1756: 1698: 1633: 678: 620: 358: 156: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3447:

WP:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 September 23#Category:Anti-gay propaganda

3768:

This article has been nominated for GA. Please comment on the GA review page [

3102: 2885: 2310: 1995: 1251: 795: 446: 269: 1669:

A contributor has made the claim that an "Assessment" section in the article

550:

for example is not seriously disputable now, while the same-sex marriage is.

4013: 3470: 2697: 2650: 906:

listings are companies that have no LGBT-company related category to them.

3025:

There was no point. The links had already gone, as they only last one week.

3932: 2765:

We're very happy to have bisexuals join the project - welcome! You don't

1591:

Homophobia and traditional religious teachings play a role in our silence.

2685: 2638: 2606: 652: 273: 3948:

Wikisource proofreading is done page-by-page. To do it you would start

1849:

Alright. Thank you for your comments and for your advice, all the same.

3520: 2807: 848:

this discussion of improving coverage of LGBT businesses and companies

2836:

Interesting history. Unfortunately, even though much of humanity is

2198:

building an encyclopedia but about eliminating LGBT culture from it.

731:

these articles but cannot replace their core linguistic definitions.

3907:

Another in a series of interesting articles. Merge discussion with

3831:

Knowledge:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types/Culture#Other culture

3067:

to redistribute content from one trans-category into three others.

715:

Regardless, there is still an article on the definition/meaning of

1331: 3541:

and here are two more openly homosexual MP in German Bundestag:

3935:

Children's Development of Social Competence Across Family Types

3090:

Wikipedians working together from vastly different approaches.

3150:

Unfortunately, Even GA would be an improrovment at this stage!

2803: 2680:

Alright man ill add my name to the project list i can work on

2610: 25: 887:(which only has a category of Sexual orientation and society! 1156:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Slut Night (2nd nomination)

646:, amongst others--for people of different races to marry. 2342:

and Cameron Scott is now acting in concert with is likely

3746:

i mostly do typos and rephraseing so you can do the rest

3457:, on which was placed a speedy delete tag, and it was to 2609:

myself and had a few Relationships with men i even i had

2142:

and now is manifested as an anon - most likely a sock of

3655: 3331: 3327: 3323: 2552:

instead one by one they are heading for blocks or bans.

2377: 1330:

New editor just posted his User Page -- it's a link to

3387: 2796:

the article it self is horrible and needs alot of work

3740:

i can help with this but i need some help with it to

1246:

Need help arguing against a PROD for Rev. Cindi Love

2040:Oh yeah its my BIRTHDAY i can drink beer now YEAH 807:Category for LGBT companies, products or marketing 563:(socialism), for example, while not endorsing it. 3461:by the proposer, and then changed to redirect to 992:please. I know its a pain, but it is necessary. 357:an argument is that "Same-sex marriage" excludes 326:"Same-Sex marriage" is as neutral as it can get. 3807:Knowledge:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/List_of_stubs 3245:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Guerilla Gay Bar 1607:Homophobia damaging lives across Europe-EU study 1571:homophobia is campaign strategy, not conviction. 1178:Knowledge:Good article reassessment/Slut Night/1 3426:If you disagree, please join the discussion. -- 1992:Teenage suicide in the United States#LGBT youth 1886: 3401: 1316:Give me ten minutes to look for sources... -- 925:- dolls the represent alternative lifestyles 8: 3743:anyone wanna help me clean up this article? 3600:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Spermophagia 2895:That's not a very welcoming thing to say. -- 1504:Metropolitan Community Church#Notable clergy 846:For some past discussions on the topic see 642:- it used to be against the law--justified 1288:Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Cindi_Love 2928:on the links to the left of the article: 2601:um hello should i join im bisexual myself 1747:reason. BG 05:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 2802:me as a bisexual it sickens me that the 2747:and are most members here gay/lesbian? 933:User:Scarykitty/LGBT Business Categories 3942:articles relating to this Wikiproject. 1897: 276:is not named after either of those. -- 103:Same-sex marriage or marriage equality? 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies 2055:I do tip my hat to you upon this day. 1955: 1943: 1939: 1927: 1916: 113:Marriage equality in the United States 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3493:How about "Category: Urban Legends"? 842:- nightclub promotion company in L.A. 7: 1525:If anyone would care to cast an eye 893:- no LGBT categories (but yes a tag) 111:" instead of "same-sex marriage"? " 3291:proposed for deletion, LGBT tagged. 2270:articles you come in contact with. 857:Category:LGBT products and services 3911:as a possible target is underway. 3250:What do you think? I'm not sure. 1996:Homophobia#Internalized homophobia 1564:The New York Times editorial board 956:I'm leaning towards starting with 382:is too broad, maybe LGT marriage? 361:, who are a part of the issue. -- 24: 3902:Sexual orientation change efforts 3099:Talk:Homosexuality#Rewrite_agenda 897:Witeck-Combs Communications, Inc. 836:- drink marketed to gay community 719:, just as there is an article on 3801:Where is the list of LGBT stubs? 3519:Two more new LGBT articles from 1813:there will be more knowledgable. 1722:Whittaker_Chambers#Personal_life 29: 3059:Trans category under discussion 1091:Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence 962:Category:Women-owned businesses 879:Other stuff to be put together: 3763:LGBT themes in Hindu mythology 3260:00:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 3236:11:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 3212:16:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 3190:11:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 3166:12:04, 29 September 2009 (UTC) 3146:21:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 3127:18:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 3111:16:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 3077:18:44, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 3041:14:10, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 3019:04:28, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 3005:20:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 2991:15:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 2970:23:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 2956:19:02, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 2941:18:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 2908:11:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 2891:11:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 2872:22:51, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2853:20:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2831:20:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2782:20:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2758:20:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2738:19:57, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2719:19:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2673:10:00, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2625:23:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 2564:06:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 2523:04:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 2489:01:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 2467:17:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 2440:07:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 2414:10:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2390:11:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 2368:11:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 2319:18:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 2287:13:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2265:12:46, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2251:12:43, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2230:12:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2215:12:36, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2193:12:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2167:12:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2134:20:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 2115:19:06, 17 September 2009 (UTC) 2103:20:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 2081:23:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 2065:21:04, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 2050:20:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 2036:20:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 2008:15:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 1981:15:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 1859:19:29, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 1829:18:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 1796:17:31, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 1771:17:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 1741:20:13, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 1713:16:49, 21 September 2009 (UTC) 1689:18:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC) 1653:20:06, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 1516:02:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 819:etc. The media companies like 815:and then other stuff under it 1: 3143:(formerly known as Firestorm) 2838:likely bisexual on some level 1978:(formerly known as Firestorm) 1543:14:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1492:18:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1467:16:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1449:16:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1424:09:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1406:09:10, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1379:08:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1344:08:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1326:08:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1300:08:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1281:07:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1264:07:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 1209:14:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1190:12:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1168:12:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 1121:19:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1106:07:58, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 1085:22:04, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 1060:17:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1045:09:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 1018:21:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 1002:21:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 984:Conversion Therapy (again...) 974:15:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 958:Category:LGBT and the economy 944:23:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 916:15:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 874:15:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 801:18:57, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 787:19:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 755:20:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 711:16:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 693:16:13, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 668:15:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 635:15:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 611:14:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 592:11:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 573:14:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 555:07:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 533:14:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 518:05:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 497:14:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 478:08:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 433:05:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 419:05:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 399:02:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 374:01:32, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 350:00:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 315:12:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC) 300:14:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 286:23:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 251:14:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 230:22:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 205:15:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 188:14:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) 165:21:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 146:19:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 128:19:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 4030:20:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC) 4020:issue for the article here. 4008:20:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 3984:20:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 3961:10:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC) 3928:09:53, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 3891:13:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC) 3796:13:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 3757:17:51, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 3723:10:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 3643:16:44, 10 October 2009 (UTC) 3196:Violence against LGBT people 192:That's a decent argument. -- 3861:23:42, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 3843:13:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 3824:21:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 3782:18:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 3702:21:38, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 3688:21:22, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 3675:06:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 3619:18:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC) 3589:09:06, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 3559:17:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 3536:12:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 3503:01:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC) 3488:23:56, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 3445:This has been deleted now: 3436:11:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 3422:03:19, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 3282:00:04, 4 October 2009 (UTC) 1675:constitutes a violation of 1151:Slut Night up again for AfD 4050: 3649:sexual maturation disorder 3459:Promotion of homosexuality 2146:or one of his enablers at 115:" would be an example. -- 3523:. both persons are MP in 2694:Men who have sex with men 2647:Men who have sex with men 1913:(1). PEDIATRICS: 346=352. 988:Can we have some eyes on 830:- lesbian/women's cruises 546:at this moment: the term 542:. The word 'equality' is 239:Archaeology and Mormonism 3594:AfD of possible interest 1988:Suicide among LGBT youth 1672:The Surprise of a Knight 1664:The Surprise of a Knight 443:sex reassignment surgery 378:That's a good point but 2022:Wife after learning of 1111:Added to my watchlist. 854:Category:LGBT companies 648:Anti-miscegenation laws 2951:would be the trigger. 1926:Cite journal requires 1905:Ryan, Caitlin (2009). 1891: 1627: 1615: 1596: 1579: 3455:Homosexual propaganda 1784:no-one is disagreeing 1622: 1610: 1586: 1567: 1566:, October 28, 2006: 904:Category:LGBT tourism 813:Category:LGBT Economy 644:for religious reasons 272:, but the article on 42:of past discussions. 717:Interracial marriage 3812:Category:LGBT_stubs 3625:Category:Homophobia 3451:Category:Homophobia 3441:Anti-gay propaganda 2926:Bourne-Morton Canal 2020:User:BigPadresDUDEs 1873:New LGB youth study 1619:Barney Frank on CNN 1521:Triple DYK LGBT nom 1066:Template discussion 899:- only one category 864:Thoughts, please! 852:Possibilities are: 3909:conversion therapy 3514:Bettina Herlitzius 2140:reveal my identity 1954:Unknown parameter 1938:Unknown parameter 990:Conversion therapy 891:Out Now Consulting 603:—the Homosexualist 565:—the Homosexualist 525:—the Homosexualist 489:—the Homosexualist 292:—the Homosexualist 243:—the Homosexualist 180:—the Homosexualist 3933:Wikisource work " 3463:Homosexual agenda 2344:User:Peter Damian 2144:User:Peter Damian 1557:Same-sex marriage 1549:Same-sex marriage 752: 721:Same-sex marriage 475: 380:marriage equality 347: 305:you proposing? -- 266:Pro-life movement 109:marriage equality 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4041: 4004: 3997: 3924: 3918: 3719: 3712: 3671: 3665: 3617: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3585: 3579: 3525:German Bundestag 3419: 3411:Appears to fail 3406: 3405: 3391: 3339: 3321: 3278: 3272: 3232: 3225: 3186: 3179: 3162: 3155: 3141: 3037: 3030: 2987: 2980: 2904: 2899: 2849: 2844: 2819: 2778: 2773: 2690:Bisexual erasure 2669: 2662: 2643:Bisexual erasure 2582: 2576: 2485: 2479: 2436: 2430: 2410: 2403: 2364: 2358: 2348:Knowledge Review 2283: 2277: 2247: 2241: 2211: 2205: 2163: 2157: 2148:Knowledge Review 1994:, possibly also 1976: 1964: 1963: 1957: 1951: 1945: 1941: 1935: 1929: 1924: 1922: 1914: 1902: 1825: 1818: 1767: 1760: 1709: 1702: 1649: 1644: 1235: 1229: 1144: 1138: 1129:Knowledge Review 783: 777: 751: 742: 739: 723:and also one on 707: 702: 689: 682: 664: 659: 631: 624: 589: 584: 474: 465: 462: 395: 389: 370: 365: 346: 337: 334: 201: 196: 124: 119: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4049: 4048: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4002: 3995: 3968: 3939: 3922: 3916: 3905: 3803: 3766: 3738: 3717: 3710: 3669: 3663: 3652: 3627: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3603: 3596: 3583: 3577: 3569: 3517: 3478:or something? 3443: 3417: 3348: 3312: 3296: 3293: 3276: 3270: 3248: 3230: 3223: 3199: 3184: 3177: 3160: 3153: 3144: 3135: 3087: 3061: 3035: 3028: 2985: 2978: 2922: 2902: 2896: 2847: 2841: 2816: 2776: 2770: 2667: 2660: 2603: 2580: 2574: 2483: 2477: 2434: 2428: 2408: 2401: 2362: 2356: 2281: 2275: 2245: 2239: 2209: 2203: 2161: 2155: 2091: 2088:Fudgie Frottage 2016: 1979: 1970: 1967: 1953: 1937: 1925: 1915: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1875: 1823: 1816: 1765: 1758: 1725: 1707: 1700: 1667: 1647: 1641: 1552: 1523: 1248: 1233: 1227: 1153: 1142: 1136: 1094: 1068: 1033:gay pornography 1028: 986: 921:Here's another 809: 781: 775: 743: 733: 705: 699: 687: 680: 662: 656: 629: 622: 587: 582: 561:income equality 548:racial equality 466: 456: 441:- so even post 439:gender identity 393: 387: 368: 362: 338: 328: 199: 193: 122: 116: 105: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4047: 4045: 4037: 4036: 4035: 4034: 4033: 4032: 3970:I was reading 3967: 3964: 3938: 3931: 3904: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3853:Aristophanes68 3846: 3845: 3816:Aristophanes68 3802: 3799: 3765: 3760: 3737: 3731: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3694:Aristophanes68 3658:linked to it? 3651: 3646: 3626: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3595: 3592: 3568: 3566:Kevin Jennings 3563: 3562: 3561: 3543:Jörg van Essen 3516: 3510:Gerhard Schick 3507: 3506: 3505: 3442: 3439: 3409: 3408: 3345: 3292: 3286: 3285: 3284: 3247: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3198: 3193: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3142: 3130: 3129: 3086: 3080: 3060: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3011:Aristophanes68 2962:Aristophanes68 2921: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2856: 2855: 2800: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2741: 2740: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2675: 2602: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2525: 2515:Aristophanes68 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2459:Aristophanes68 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2371: 2370: 2346:or one of his 2340: 2339: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2118: 2117: 2090: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2073:Aristophanes68 2068: 2067: 2042:KristinaPadres 2028:KristinaPadres 2015: 2012: 2011: 2010: 1977: 1966: 1965: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1874: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1749: 1748: 1724: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1666: 1656: 1629: 1628: 1616: 1603: 1600:Southern Voice 1597: 1580: 1551: 1546: 1522: 1519: 1508:Aristophanes68 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1452: 1451: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1409: 1408: 1398:Aristophanes68 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1336:Aristophanes68 1307: 1306: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1292:Aristophanes68 1256:Aristophanes68 1247: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1193: 1192: 1172: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1131:with reality. 1124: 1123: 1093: 1088: 1077:Camilo Sanchez 1067: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1027: 1022: 1021: 1020: 985: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 949: 948: 947: 946: 919: 918: 900: 894: 888: 885:LGBT marketing 881: 880: 844: 843: 837: 831: 828:Olivia Cruises 817:LGBT Companies 808: 805: 804: 803: 789: 764: 763: 762: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 736:The Bookkeeper 725:Group marriage 671: 670: 637: 613: 595: 594: 577: 576: 575: 537: 536: 535: 502: 501: 500: 499: 484: 483: 482: 481: 480: 459:The Bookkeeper 404: 403: 402: 401: 352: 331:The Bookkeeper 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 255: 254: 253: 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 207: 170: 169: 168: 167: 149: 148: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4046: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4015: 4011: 4010: 4009: 4006: 4005: 3999: 3998: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3981: 3977: 3976:Cameron Scott 3973: 3965: 3963: 3962: 3959: 3957: 3951: 3946: 3943: 3936: 3930: 3929: 3926: 3925: 3919: 3910: 3903: 3900: 3892: 3888: 3884: 3880: 3876: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3862: 3858: 3854: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3847: 3844: 3840: 3836: 3832: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3808: 3800: 3798: 3797: 3793: 3789: 3784: 3783: 3779: 3775: 3771: 3764: 3761: 3759: 3758: 3755: 3752: 3749: 3744: 3741: 3736: 3732: 3724: 3721: 3720: 3714: 3713: 3705: 3704: 3703: 3699: 3695: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3686: 3683: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3673: 3672: 3666: 3657: 3656:100+ articles 3650: 3647: 3645: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3632: 3624: 3620: 3616: 3608: 3601: 3598: 3597: 3593: 3591: 3590: 3587: 3586: 3580: 3567: 3564: 3560: 3556: 3552: 3548: 3544: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3526: 3522: 3515: 3511: 3508: 3504: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3485: 3481: 3477: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3440: 3438: 3437: 3433: 3429: 3424: 3423: 3420: 3414: 3404: 3400: 3397: 3394: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3379: 3376: 3373: 3370: 3367: 3364: 3361: 3358: 3354: 3351: 3350:Find sources: 3346: 3343: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3325: 3320: 3316: 3311: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3294: 3290: 3287: 3283: 3280: 3279: 3273: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3246: 3243: 3237: 3234: 3233: 3227: 3226: 3218: 3217: 3216: 3215: 3214: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3204:Cameron Scott 3197: 3194: 3192: 3191: 3188: 3187: 3181: 3180: 3167: 3164: 3163: 3157: 3156: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3140: 3139: 3138:The Wordsmith 3132: 3131: 3128: 3124: 3120: 3119:Cameron Scott 3115: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3095: 3091: 3085: 3084:Homosexuality 3081: 3079: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3066: 3058: 3042: 3039: 3038: 3032: 3031: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2989: 2988: 2982: 2981: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2954: 2950: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2927: 2919: 2909: 2906: 2905: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2889: 2888: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2814: 2809: 2805: 2795: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2783: 2780: 2779: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2756: 2753: 2750: 2745: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2707: 2703: 2702:Bisexual chic 2699: 2695: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2674: 2671: 2670: 2664: 2663: 2656: 2655:Bisexual chic 2652: 2648: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2623: 2620: 2617: 2612: 2608: 2600: 2584: 2583: 2577: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556:Cameron Scott 2553: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2524: 2520: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2490: 2487: 2486: 2480: 2470: 2469: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2441: 2438: 2437: 2431: 2421: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2405: 2404: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2382:Cameron Scott 2379: 2376:- yeah, like 2375: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2359: 2349: 2345: 2336: 2335:Pink Saturday 2332: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2316: 2312: 2288: 2285: 2284: 2278: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2257:Cameron Scott 2254: 2253: 2252: 2249: 2248: 2242: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2222:Cameron Scott 2218: 2217: 2216: 2213: 2212: 2206: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2185:Cameron Scott 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2168: 2165: 2164: 2158: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2126:Cameron Scott 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2116: 2113: 2111: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2095:Cameron Scott 2089: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2074: 2070: 2069: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2038: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2025: 2021: 2013: 2009: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1975: 1974: 1973:The Wordsmith 1961: 1949: 1933: 1920: 1912: 1908: 1901: 1898: 1893: 1892: 1890: 1885: 1882: 1880: 1879:Homosexuality 1872: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1820: 1819: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1772: 1769: 1768: 1762: 1761: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1729: 1723: 1720: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1704: 1703: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1650: 1639: 1635: 1626: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1608: 1604: 1601: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1577: 1572: 1565: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1558: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1520: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459:Cameron Scott 1456: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1431: 1430: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416:Cameron Scott 1413: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1394: 1393: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1371:Cameron Scott 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318:Cameron Scott 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1278: 1274: 1273:Cameron Scott 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1245: 1237: 1236: 1230: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1210: 1206: 1202: 1201:Cameron Scott 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1150: 1146: 1145: 1139: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1098:Cameron Scott 1092: 1089: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1050:Let's do it. 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 983: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 955: 954: 953: 952: 951: 950: 945: 941: 937: 934: 930: 929: 928: 927: 926: 924: 917: 913: 909: 905: 901: 898: 895: 892: 889: 886: 883: 882: 878: 877: 876: 875: 871: 867: 862: 859: 858: 855: 850: 849: 841: 838: 835: 832: 829: 826: 825: 824: 822: 818: 814: 806: 802: 799: 798: 793: 790: 788: 785: 784: 778: 769: 766: 765: 756: 753: 749: 748: 747:of the Occult 740: 738: 737: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 713: 712: 709: 708: 696: 695: 694: 691: 690: 684: 683: 675: 674: 673: 672: 669: 666: 665: 654: 649: 645: 641: 638: 636: 633: 632: 626: 625: 617: 614: 612: 608: 604: 600: 597: 596: 593: 590: 585: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 553: 549: 545: 541: 538: 534: 530: 526: 521: 520: 519: 515: 511: 507: 504: 503: 498: 494: 490: 485: 479: 476: 472: 471: 470:of the Occult 463: 461: 460: 452: 448: 444: 440: 436: 435: 434: 430: 426: 422: 421: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 406: 405: 400: 397: 396: 390: 381: 377: 376: 375: 372: 371: 360: 356: 353: 351: 348: 344: 343: 342:of the Occult 335: 333: 332: 325: 322: 316: 312: 308: 303: 302: 301: 297: 293: 289: 288: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 236: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 219: 216: 215: 206: 203: 202: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 171: 166: 162: 158: 153: 152: 151: 150: 147: 143: 139: 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 126: 125: 114: 110: 102: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4001: 3994: 3969: 3958:andersnatch❩ 3955: 3954:❨Ṩtruthious 3947: 3944: 3940: 3920: 3914: 3906: 3804: 3785: 3772:. Thanks. -- 3767: 3745: 3742: 3739: 3733:Clean Up Of 3716: 3709: 3667: 3661: 3653: 3628: 3581: 3575: 3570: 3518: 3444: 3425: 3410: 3398: 3392: 3384: 3377: 3371: 3365: 3359: 3349: 3274: 3268: 3249: 3229: 3222: 3200: 3183: 3176: 3172: 3159: 3152: 3137: 3101:. Thanks. -- 3097:Please see: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3082:Rewrite for 3062: 3034: 3027: 2984: 2977: 2948: 2923: 2920:Link problem 2900: 2886: 2845: 2812: 2801: 2774: 2766: 2746: 2742: 2705: 2679: 2666: 2659: 2604: 2578: 2572: 2551: 2481: 2475: 2432: 2426: 2419: 2418:Yes, on the 2407: 2400: 2373: 2372: 2360: 2354: 2325: 2307: 2279: 2273: 2243: 2237: 2207: 2201: 2159: 2153: 2092: 2039: 2018:hey this is 2017: 1972: 1968: 1946:suggested) ( 1919:cite journal 1910: 1900: 1887: 1883: 1876: 1822: 1815: 1783: 1764: 1757: 1730: 1726: 1706: 1699: 1670: 1668: 1645: 1630: 1623: 1611: 1590: 1587: 1574: 1570: 1568: 1553: 1524: 1499: 1498: 1432: 1249: 1231: 1225: 1171: 1154: 1140: 1134: 1095: 1069: 1029: 987: 920: 863: 860: 851: 845: 821:The Advocate 810: 796: 791: 779: 773: 767: 746: 745: 735: 734: 728: 703: 686: 679: 677:disregarded. 660: 639: 628: 621: 615: 598: 539: 505: 469: 468: 458: 457: 450: 391: 385: 379: 366: 354: 341: 340: 330: 329: 323: 261: 257: 234: 217: 197: 133: 120: 106: 78: 43: 37: 3735:Bisexuality 3547:Kai Gehring 3375:free images 3298:Tamara Bach 3289:Tamara Bach 2794:Bisexuality 2730:The Squicks 2726:Bisexuality 2682:Bisexuality 2635:Bisexuality 2331:Sister Roma 1940:|coauthors= 1851:The Squicks 1788:The Squicks 1733:The Squicks 1441:The Squicks 510:The Squicks 425:The Squicks 411:The Squicks 359:transgender 36:This is an 3805:I went to 3635:Rivertorch 3629:More eyes 3174:generally? 2110:Tiger Marc 2024:WP:NOSHARE 1990:and maybe 1480:canvassing 1437:WP:CANVASS 1252:Cindi Love 1182:Scarykitty 1160:Scarykitty 966:Scarykitty 936:Scarykitty 908:Scarykitty 866:Scarykitty 447:transwoman 270:Pro-choice 178:movement. 95:Archive 35 90:Archive 34 85:Archive 33 79:Archive 32 73:Archive 31 68:Archive 30 60:Archive 25 4014:Malcolm X 3788:Nemonoman 3774:Nemonoman 3551:GLGermann 3528:GLGermann 3476:WP:FRINGE 3471:Homintern 3428:DThomsen8 3413:WP:AUTHOR 3063:Proposal 2903:Shankbone 2848:Shankbone 2777:Shankbone 2698:Bicurious 2651:Bicurious 1958:ignored ( 1942:ignored ( 1928:|journal= 1658:Claim of 1648:Shankbone 1583:Salon.com 1576:marriage. 1500:Question: 1332:Theopedia 1075:Thanks -- 1037:J Milburn 1025:Pat Rocco 923:Dykedolls 840:TigerHeat 706:Shankbone 663:Shankbone 369:Shankbone 200:Shankbone 123:Shankbone 3966:Malcom X 3342:View log 3069:Otto4711 2995:Thanks. 2686:Biphobia 2639:Biphobia 2607:Bisexual 1969:Thanks, 1944:|author= 1677:WP:SYNTH 1660:WP:SYNTH 1535:Otto4711 1484:Becksguy 1010:Born Gay 834:Gay Fuel 653:marriage 274:abortion 222:Otto4711 138:Becksguy 4022:Siawase 3879:WP:LGBT 3814:page.) 3614:Shalott 3521:Germany 3381:WP refs 3369:scholar 3315:protect 3310:history 3252:Bearian 2953:Esrever 2808:Lesbian 2633:input: 2420:surface 2057:Zazaban 2000:Siawase 1956:|month= 1697:source. 1681:Tim1965 1433:Comment 1113:Zazaban 1052:Zazaban 640:Comment 599:Support 583:Beloved 355:Comment 235:Comment 134:Support 39:archive 4018:weight 3883:Alynna 3877:, not 3875:WP:WSS 3835:Alynna 3751:Padres 3707:stubs. 3495:Haiduc 3353:Google 3319:delete 2825:Padres 2752:Padres 2713:Padres 2619:Padres 2014:Notice 1531:WP:BLP 792:Oppose 768:Oppose 729:within 616:Oppose 540:Oppose 506:Oppose 324:Oppose 307:Alynna 278:Alynna 258:Oppose 218:Oppose 157:Haiduc 3467:WP:RS 3396:JSTOR 3357:books 3336:views 3328:watch 3324:links 3103:Moni3 2898:David 2897:: --> 2887:Zythe 2843:David 2842:: --> 2817:: --> 2772:David 2771:: --> 2706:share 2311:Moni3 1643:David 1642:: --> 1640:. -- 1638:WP:RS 902:most 797:Zythe 701:David 700:: --> 658:David 657:: --> 588:Freak 552:Brand 544:ORish 451:a lot 445:a XY 364:David 363:: --> 195:David 194:: --> 118:David 117:: --> 16:< 4026:talk 3980:talk 3972:this 3950:here 3915:Banj 3887:talk 3881:. -- 3857:talk 3839:talk 3820:talk 3792:talk 3778:talk 3770:here 3754:Dude 3698:talk 3685:talk 3662:Banj 3639:talk 3631:here 3606:Lady 3576:Banj 3555:talk 3545:and 3532:talk 3512:and 3499:talk 3484:talk 3480:Mish 3432:talk 3418:Lara 3389:FENS 3363:news 3332:logs 3306:talk 3302:edit 3269:Banj 3256:talk 3208:talk 3123:talk 3107:talk 3073:talk 3065:here 3015:talk 3001:talk 2997:Mish 2966:talk 2949:dyke 2937:talk 2933:Mish 2868:talk 2864:Mish 2828:Dude 2806:And 2767:need 2755:Dude 2734:talk 2716:Dude 2622:Dude 2573:Banj 2560:talk 2519:talk 2476:Banj 2463:talk 2427:Banj 2386:talk 2378:this 2355:Banj 2315:talk 2274:Banj 2261:talk 2238:Banj 2226:talk 2202:Banj 2189:talk 2154:Banj 2130:talk 2099:talk 2077:talk 2061:talk 2046:talk 2032:talk 2004:talk 1960:help 1948:help 1932:help 1855:talk 1792:talk 1737:talk 1685:talk 1636:and 1634:WP:V 1539:talk 1527:here 1512:talk 1488:talk 1463:talk 1445:talk 1420:talk 1402:talk 1375:talk 1340:talk 1322:talk 1296:talk 1277:talk 1260:talk 1226:Banj 1205:talk 1186:talk 1164:talk 1135:Banj 1117:talk 1102:talk 1081:talk 1073:here 1056:talk 1041:talk 1014:talk 998:talk 994:Mish 970:talk 940:talk 912:talk 870:talk 774:Banj 607:talk 569:talk 529:talk 514:talk 493:talk 429:talk 415:talk 386:Banj 311:talk 296:talk 282:talk 268:and 247:talk 226:talk 184:talk 161:talk 142:talk 4003:Mod 3996:Yob 3913:-- 3748:Big 3718:Mod 3711:Yob 3660:-- 3574:-- 3469:. 3403:TWL 3340:– ( 3267:-- 3231:Mod 3224:Yob 3185:Mod 3178:Yob 3161:Mod 3154:Yob 3036:Mod 3029:Yob 2986:Mod 2979:Yob 2822:Big 2813:sex 2804:Gay 2749:Big 2710:Big 2668:Mod 2661:Yob 2616:Big 2611:sex 2605:Im 2571:-- 2474:-- 2425:-- 2409:Mod 2402:Yob 2353:-- 2326:not 2272:-- 2236:-- 2200:-- 2152:-- 1911:123 1824:Mod 1817:Yob 1766:Mod 1759:Yob 1708:Mod 1701:Yob 1662:on 1224:-- 1180:. 1133:-- 772:-- 688:Mod 681:Yob 630:Mod 623:Yob 384:-- 4028:) 3982:) 3923:oi 3889:) 3859:) 3841:) 3833:-- 3822:) 3794:) 3780:) 3700:) 3682:BG 3670:oi 3641:) 3610:of 3584:oi 3557:) 3549:. 3534:) 3501:) 3486:) 3434:) 3383:) 3334:| 3330:| 3326:| 3322:| 3317:| 3313:| 3308:| 3304:| 3277:oi 3258:) 3210:) 3202:-- 3125:) 3109:) 3075:) 3017:) 3003:) 2968:) 2939:) 2870:) 2736:) 2700:, 2696:, 2692:, 2688:, 2684:, 2653:, 2649:, 2645:, 2641:, 2637:, 2581:oi 2562:) 2521:) 2484:oi 2465:) 2435:oi 2388:) 2363:oi 2317:) 2282:oi 2263:) 2246:oi 2228:) 2220:-- 2210:oi 2191:) 2162:oi 2132:) 2101:) 2079:) 2063:) 2048:) 2034:) 2006:) 1998:. 1952:; 1936:; 1923:: 1921:}} 1917:{{ 1909:. 1857:) 1794:) 1739:) 1687:) 1541:) 1514:) 1490:) 1465:) 1447:) 1439:? 1422:) 1404:) 1377:) 1342:) 1324:) 1298:) 1279:) 1262:) 1234:oi 1207:) 1188:) 1166:) 1143:oi 1119:) 1104:) 1083:) 1058:) 1043:) 1016:) 1000:) 972:) 942:) 914:) 872:) 782:oi 609:) 580:-- 571:) 531:) 516:) 495:) 431:) 417:) 394:oi 313:) 298:) 284:) 262:my 249:) 241:. 228:) 186:) 163:) 144:) 64:← 4024:( 3978:( 3956:ℬ 3937:" 3921:b 3917:e 3885:( 3855:( 3837:( 3818:( 3790:( 3776:( 3696:( 3668:b 3664:e 3637:( 3602:- 3582:b 3578:e 3553:( 3530:( 3497:( 3482:( 3430:( 3407:) 3399:· 3393:· 3385:· 3378:· 3372:· 3366:· 3360:· 3355:( 3347:( 3344:) 3338:) 3300:( 3275:b 3271:e 3254:( 3206:( 3121:( 3105:( 3071:( 3013:( 2999:( 2964:( 2935:( 2866:( 2732:( 2579:b 2575:e 2558:( 2517:( 2482:b 2478:e 2461:( 2433:b 2429:e 2384:( 2361:b 2357:e 2313:( 2280:b 2276:e 2259:( 2244:b 2240:e 2224:( 2208:b 2204:e 2187:( 2160:b 2156:e 2128:( 2097:( 2075:( 2059:( 2044:( 2030:( 2002:( 1962:) 1950:) 1934:) 1930:( 1853:( 1790:( 1735:( 1683:( 1605:" 1537:( 1510:( 1486:( 1461:( 1443:( 1418:( 1400:( 1373:( 1338:( 1320:( 1294:( 1275:( 1258:( 1232:b 1228:e 1203:( 1184:( 1162:( 1141:b 1137:e 1115:( 1100:( 1079:( 1054:( 1039:( 1012:( 996:( 968:( 938:( 910:( 868:( 780:b 776:e 750:) 744:( 605:( 567:( 527:( 512:( 491:( 473:) 467:( 427:( 413:( 392:b 388:e 345:) 339:( 309:( 294:( 280:( 245:( 224:( 182:( 159:( 140:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 32 - Knowledge

Index