1481:
self-identified as gay, lesbian or bisexual and/or were not identified by others in the series or film that way. Xena and
Gabrielle never identified as heterosexual either, partly because such sexual identities did not exist at that time, and partly because the creators of the show intentionally left hints (many, not just a few, hints) that Xena and Gabrielle are romantically/sexually involved. And no one argued that Xena and Gabrielle should be placed in Category:Fictional LGBT characters because "hey look like lesbians"; I fail to see how "hey look like lesbians"; if you are referring to the "Xena and Gabrielle conform, in some respects, to a stereotypical 'butch and femme' model of lesbian." commentary from one of the noted sources above, that is simply the source opining a stereotypical model that the source happens to feel fits Xena and Gabrielle.
1878:
advocacy and industry leadership. But he is proudest of his work as editor-in-chief for a dozen years of the worldās most authoritative gay travel magazines and websites, including OUT&ABOUT, Out
Traveler, PlanetOut Travel, Advocate Travel and Gay.com Travel. To the surprise of many who only know him as a writer (and who watch him use his calculator app for the most basic math), Ed graduated from Harvard College with a degree in mathematics and economics and received his MBA from Northeastern University in marketing research. Heās visited 50 countries 6 continents and laid his head in more beds than you can possibly imagine. Follow Ed on Twitter @edsalvato Connect with Ed at edsalvato.com and follow his travels visually on Instagram @manaboutworld.
1597:
on this topic or you were requesting that sources state that Xena and
Gabrielle self-identify within the series as lesbian or bisexual. Either that, or you want a source that specifically states "Xena and Gabrielle are LGBT characters"; sources like those exist as well. Whatever the case, like I stated, such self-identities did not exist back then (the time frame that the series takes place in). Neither did the heterosexual identity. And while the series took liberties with history and sometimes infused modern aspects, the aforementioned sexual identity labels are one aspect they didn't infuse. So any source stating what Xena and Gabrielle personally identified as, sexual orientation-wise, would not at all be accurate.
1770:? The article was created, then deleted, then re-created, then (after answering a confusing {{help me}} request), I nominated it for deletion again because the subject as presented seemed unremarkable as there was only one reference. The article came across as a kid standing up to "the man" at his school and that was all. The article was eventually moved into draft space. There is a strong push by users/sockpuppets/meatpuppets "Workingharderthanever" and IP 99.228.99.46 to restore and keep the article alive, but rather than fight with them, I thought I should float a request for help toward this WikiProject in case y'all have a different take on the kid's notability. I appreciate any extra eyes you can donate!
2712:
into this a bit, I see that this has been replicated on some (but not all) other biographies. There are editors, who believe that it is important to explain the birth name of transgender people. I believe they do it in good faith, but I think they may be doing transgender people a disservice. (I am also concerned that some transgender people seem to be getting added to categories that specify that they are transgender. I would not be concerned with categories that identify people as "transgender rights campaigners", but if someone is transgender and does not make a big deal out of it, I'm not sure it is notable enough to warrant them being categorised.)
175:. Sportfan, I don't see how this title listed should be regarded as "offensive," as it does not use inappropriate language or slang, and rather uses pretty standard terms like "homosexual" and "guidelines" and "policies." Hton, I do not agree that containing all meta-discussion within the confines of a particular WikiProject is the right thing to do for any area where editorial policy needs to be discussed. In all but the most general cases editorial policy needs to be discussed with a broader audience, in the spirit of inclusiveness. I am crossposting this comment at the above
1188:), would it be good to use "homosexual" in that way? Maybe using a "Gay men in sports" (or "Gay and bisexual men in sports"), "Lesbian women in sports" (or "Lesbian and bisexual women in sports") or "Gay men and lesbian women in sports" title would be better? Or even "LGB people in sports" (meaning without the T until the T is also covered)? Either way, with regard to my title suggestions, there isn't yet any need to have separate articles about gay and/or bisexual men in sports and lesbian women in sports; those aspects can and should be covered in one article until a
1329:
should be placed in the LGBT category because they are identified by media as either LGBT icons or simply as LGBT characters (as in, what one of my bothers would say, representing an aspect of LGBT). Some of the media have also identified them as either lesbian or bisexual, but they usually do not; if discussing the characters' sexual orientations, they usually debate what their sexual orientations are, not definitively state that they are lesbian or bisexual. And even if they were to do that, it would be dubious to label Xena and
Gabrielle as such when the series
1052:(etc.) that cover both issues related to LGB people and issues related to gender identity and to transgender people (like, say, non-discrimination, access to gender transition health services, ability to change legal documentation and so on). If it covers both, then lean towards LGBT. If it only covers LGB, lean towards "sexual orientation" so as not to conflate bisexuality with homosexuality. There may be reasons to title articles "Homosexuality and X", but we should consider "Sexual orientation and X": it may fit better in some cases, in others it might not. ā
1333:(unless you count Xena quite clearly seeming to have been sexually attracted to men and women). It is common that Knowledge places fictional characters in the LGBT category when those characters' sexual orientations are highly speculated and/or debated as gay, lesbian or bisexual. Until someone changes it, Category:Fictional LGBT characters states, "A category of fictional LGBT-identified characters appearing in films, television, shows, theater, books, comics, music, and video games." Notice "LGBT-identified," not "self-identified as LGBT."
1433:
The characters never verbally identified as anything other than heterosexual or as explicitly romantically or sexually interested in each other or any other woman. The characters were never explicitly shown as being sexually or romantically involved with anyone other than men. That AfterEllen or whoever called the characters lesbian icons or whatever would be great material for a section in their articles discussing their impact on LGBT or specifically lesbian culture, or even a
2393:
couples for billboards captioned "Love is not a crime." The government of Buenos Aires unveiled an interactive site called #ChauTabĆŗ (Ciao Taboo), geared towards young people, focusing on sexual health through videos and offering online doctor consultations. The
Venezuelan film Pelo Malo (Bad Hair), a film about a mother's homophobic reaction to her son's hairstyle, won the highest prize of the San SebastiƔn International Film Festival and gave much to talk about in Venezuela.
2384:
the 35 countries in the
Americas criminalize homosexual relationsBut not everything is advancing in a positive direction. Almost a third of the 35 countries in the Americas criminalize homosexual relationsViolence and bullying against LGBT persons remain both too common and largely unpunished, even in those countries with otherwise progressive legal environmentsThis is our pick for the top LGBT stories - both positive and negative - from the Americas in 2013
2727:"transignorance" rather than transphobia (and I'm assuming good faith in the editors working on the article I am concerned about), but I am aware enough to realise that discussion of the former gender of transexual people is something that can cause offence and distress both to those people and other transgender people. I know that I am way out of my depth with this issue and that I need to call upon experts that can give it the attention that it needs.
1305:. If VoluntarySlave had not recently stopped the edit war, they could have been blocked for WP:Edit warring at any moment. Jerry Pepsi's argument is that Gabrielle should not be placed in the LGBT category because the character never identified as lesbian or bisexual. VoluntarySlave's argument is that she should be placed in the LGBT category because she is identified as a LGBT character by media sources. This matter has also been discussed before; see
1011:, but guess what? Animals do exhibit transgender and bisexual behaviors. I guess I support moving many of these articles but if Pass A Method is doing this in mass quantities perhaps they could be encouraged to instead do smaller groups at a time and maybe post to this page first to see if there is any cause for concern. I think that might address the dual concerns of letting them be "bold" and also making sure more people are aware of the change(s).
31:
2695:. I looked at MOS:IDENTITY and it was not totally clear on this, but I did point out that the old name redirects to the current article and that the old name was already mentioned elsewhere in the article. I now think that mentioning birth names in the lead section emphasises the "difference" transgender people have to people who stick with their birth name and goes against the "spirit" of MOS:IDENTITY.
402:ā³Welcome to WikiProject LGBT studies! We're a group of editors who aim to improve Knowledge's coverage of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) and Queer studies topics. WikiProject LGBT studies brings Knowledge users of various sexual orientations, gender identities, geographic locations, and personal backgrounds together to discuss and collaborate on coverage of LGBT content across Knowledgeā³
382:). "Homosexual" as a person or behaviour refers to only 2 or 3 of those groups, and it's clinical, somewhat pejorative, and dated. I don't regard LGBT as in any way a perfect term, it's an ugly portmanteau, and its replacements are little better, but it at least signifies what it means: issues relevant to lesbians, gay men, bisexual and trans people. What
995:: There seems to be a lot of "Homosexuality in" articles that would be better if they were more inclusive. Generally trans, bisexual, and interest issues, are often conflated to being homosexual ones when they are more accurately just related. But for many subject areas it would be more informative to have, for instance,
2489:
There is no WP policy preferring "gay" over "homosexual". My view is that non-English speaker does not treat "homosexual" pejorative as
Americans do. They (including me) tend to believe "gay" to be too colloquial for an encyclopedic article. If the source does use "homosexual" due to being translated
2300:
material to the article, among other problematic things. Those who are not familiar with Mark
Regnerus, read the Knowledge article about him (note: the Mark Regnerus link is a redirect); that article will show you why many would not consider Regnerus a good source regarding homosexuality topics. I am
1705:
in this scene, but only the side of his head/body are shown, with a very minimal view of his face; because he has long hair, some people, including lesbian and bisexual women, thought it was a woman and that Xena might have female lovers. This helped spawn a large lesbian fanbase, and the creators of
1596:
that sources be added to support
Gabrielle as LGBT before she is listed in the LGBT category at the Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess) article. And now that sources have been provided (and pointed to) on that matter, the sources are not enough for you; so either you never cared what the sources state
1432:
I truly do not understand how "don't put characters that aren't identified in their fiction as LGBT in an 'LGBT characters' category" is in any way controversial or ambiguous. And the cases of Xena and
Gabrielle are no more complicated just because the TV people did some fanservice in a few episodes.
312:
I'm sorry but I don't see the benefit of such a page, especially given the 1950s name, narrow scope and very unclear reasoning. No offense, but your post at the village pump makes very little sense. What problem is it that you are trying to solve that is not already addressed with this project, or in
1554:
Oh Jesus, what a load of crap. Did Xena and Gabrielle ever fuck a chick? No. Did Xena and Gabrielle ever express interest in fucking a chick? No. XENA AND GABRIELLE ARE NOT LESBIANS. All the grad students in all the world debating how many lesbian angels can dance on the head of a pin doesn't change
1210:
Moves of this sort need to be considered on a case-by-case basis. One size does not fit all when it comes to such terminology; much depends on the focus of each individual article. Ideally, retitling would be proposed on each article's talk page first so that the editors most familiar with the topic
2726:
section of the talk page on the Jennell Jaquays article, highlighted four editors that thought that "he" should be used for all events before the transition of a transwoman, so I think that they were not aware of how MOS:IDENTITY works and were less able to find guidance than I was. I think this is
1650:
I couldn't remember what episode it is that Xena and Gabrielle are married in, so I researched it. The sourcing in the Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess) article needs fixing on this matter, because it's not "The Xena Scrolls" episode that the marriage happens in (someone must have added on to what
1583:
You asked, "Did Xena and Gabrielle ever fuck a chick? Did Xena and Gabrielle ever express interest in fucking a chick?" My answer to that is: According to various reliable sources noting the lesbian subtext between Xena and Gabrielle, they have expressed interest in having sex with each other...and
1043:
I think a lot of the "Homosexuality in X"/"Homosexuality and X" articles would probably be better named "Sexual orientation and X". I agree with Sceptre though: we shouldn't be using "LGBT" if the topic of the article is just about sexual orientation. We do have a lot of articles titled things like
2706:
Is it important/acceptable for infoboxes on the right side of articles to have special emphasis to show the birth name of transsexual people? In the article I was looking at, this means that both the top left and top right hand side of the page have emphasis on the name that Jennell had before her
2667:
Hi. I'm not in this WikiProject, but hope you are able to help me. I'm male and cisgender and although I'm friendly towards transgender people, I'm not too good with gender politics. I'm really just interested in being friends with people regardless of their gender, rather than getting involved in
2412:
It appears that the history has been somewhat pushed under the rug by the more conservative Christian Hawaiians and missionaries but the history is still there and while some recall the practice in horror, other sources simply discuss the situation as "matter of fact". There is even a King, Liloa,
2392:
media strategies to raise LGBT awareness continued to emerge 2013. In January, activists launched "We are Jamaicans," a video series claiming that queer issues are part of the island's national identity. Some of Peru's most famous straight celebrities from sports, TV and politics posed as same-sex
2383:
Our hemisphere is quickly becoming one of the most gay-friendly territories in the world. It has far and beyond the most people living with access to marriage equality, not to mention the largest pride celebration on Earth. But not everything is advancing in a positive direction. Almost a third of
2366:
Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Knowledge community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop,
1832:
invoked to "protect" public officials by omitting from their articles mention of notable reports made by multiple reliable sources across the Internet, TV, radio, and print media . . . if you've seen one such RfC, you've seen 'em all. The specifics vary but the dispute is an old one that has never
1445:
they appear in makes them gay. "They look like lesbians" is not simply a faulty basis for categorizing, it is an insulting one based on stereotypes. Again, the dividing line seems pretty clear. If the fiction states they are LGBT, they go in the category. If it doesn't, they don't. Not at all sure
1377:
I'm not sure where to centralize this discussion (by that, I mean that it concerns two articles and it's not ideal to have the same discussion on two talk pages), so I brought it here for that and to finally get this matter settled. I would directly involve myself in these articles, but my brother
134:
I don't understand the point of this. What is wrong with this talk page here as the central place for discussing LGBTetc issues? Also, "homosexual and related" seems like a bad choice of name, potentially offensive to bi and trans people. "LGBT" as the general acronym is pretty well-established on
2711:
I do agree that readers searching for the old name need to find the article. The old name is important, because it was used on a lot of her work, but it seems to me that maybe we could have one mention of her old name, rather than lots of different hints that she is transgender. And having looked
2416:
The Hawaiian "aikane " relationship is well documented. Many of the male royals had male Hawaiian aikane friendships even if they had several wives, but one King, Kamehameha III, had an Hawaiian aikane relationship that he briefly shared his rule with and never married another, male of female. He
2059:
that stalled out in April, and was recently re-submitted by another IP with no real improvement. It's a great topic and should be published, but I'm not sure we're going to get any further improvements by the originator anytime soon, so this draft could lapse back into inactivity and deletion. If
1149:
is not at all the right word to set out that scope. We aren't talking about "same-sex attraction and sexual behaviour in sports"; while I'm sure that topic would make for a salacious read, it would not likely be an encyclopedic article. It sounds very odd to talk about the personal characteristic
2700:
Is it important/acceptable to have the phrase "assigned male at birth" or "assigned female at birth", in the part of an article that discusses when a transgender person was born and have that link over to an article on sex assignment? That seems a bit clinical and mechanical to me. Surely, if an
2617:
is too colloquial for an encyclopedic article. It's found, usually as the preferred term, throughout both the academic and popular literature. It's not listed as current slang in either the OED or Webster's. It's the preferred subject heading under the internationally-applied Library of Congress
1505:
That takes a rather narrow view of both the nature of fictional characters and the purpose of categories. There is no objective reality to fictional characters, they exist at some point between portrayal and interpretation. We need to look at both in order to write an article about them. In this
925:
and realize that there is no L, no B, and no T currently in the article, and given what I believe is the complete lack of any female professional American football players in history, there aren't likely to be any L issues in the foreseeable future. Such moves need to have the individual article
920:
I think that it's trying to put a larger blanket term in places where they do not belong. Despite the fact that the Ls, the Gs, the Bs and the Ts have many concerns in common, that does not make them a single group, and attempts to place them as one can be ill-fitting. Just as we wouldn't change
1877:
Known as a āglobal LGBT travel expert,ā Ed Salvato has spent the last 14 years in the world of LGBT travel and tourism on just about every angle you can imagine: editorial, marketing, communications, product development, sponsorships, events and more. He is widely regarded both for his consumer
1328:
That stated, I am in agreement with VoluntarySlave that while Xena and Gabrielle should not be placed in the lesbian or bisexual category since their characters were not (never) established in the series as lesbian or bisexual and since there is much debate about their sexual orientations, they
2737:
But that would just fix one article, and not stop the same thing happening on other biographies. Is there any way that Knowledge could have some sort of process to discuss issues caused by biographies having multiple sentences that remind us that a person happens to be transgender? Would it be
1480:
As has been explained to you, a character does not need to have been identified in their fiction as LGBT to be placed in Category:Fictional LGBT characters. And we have enough fictional characters that are placed in gay, lesbian or bisexual categories simply based on behavior when they never
2647:
is "gay", "lesbian", "bisexual", "transgender", "queer", etc., and the community as a whole is properly "LGBT" (or one of its permutations); "gay" isn't really encouraged in this context anymore, because it may be perceived as referring to gay men only, but it's not absolutely wrong per se.
114:
It's important to centralize these kinds of discussions in order for us to have a clear understanding of the overall plan for WPs way of editing, and to generalize these discussions rather than have them be localized to areas of "LGBT studies," which ostensibly includes just Gays, Lesbians,
838:
I'm not really a sports follower, so someone else might have to tell me if this is a valid concern or not - it seems that there is a lot of news when an athlete comes out as gay, but does it also happen if an athlete comes out as bisexual? If so, "LGBT issues" may be a better title word.
666:
You're correct, the notability rules for politicians are that any past or present member of a federal, state or provincial legislature is a valid article topic. I don't know enough about him to really contribute much, but he is indeed notable enough for an article regardless of the whole
213:
isn't very clear to me. Also, "male/female name changes" are a trans-related issue rather than a homosexual-related issue. The conflation of questions of gender identity and questions of sexual orientation/identity has long been a source of confusion for people: let's not add to that.
743:
Since Pass a Method is still making article moves such as these, and without discussion, I have brought this matter up here for this WikiProject to assess whether or not intervention is needed on this matter and/or whether or not any of these latest article moves are appropriate.
1344:
2805:
My personal take on that specific issue is that the former name is worth mentioning if the person was notable while living and working under that name. If the person was not notable before transition, then the old name essentially refers to a non-notable person and as such
951:
only discusses gay players, and not trans players. And there is scope for discussion of trans players; for example, there was coverage regarding the amateur women's player Aeris Houlihan, who was banned from playing based on advice that even the FA admitted was outdated.
293:
I'm going to walk away from this for a while, I fail to see what is broken and needs to be fixed/why a new page is needed at all. I also don't understand why there is two conversations about the same thing at two different spots. And I certainly don't understand why
1112:
Each article must be treated on its merits. The title must reflect the content. It would be ludicrous to have an article about homosexuality in a male only sport with an LGBT title. There is no one size fits all answer. Political correctness does not trump wisdom.
360:
2701:
article mentions that someone is transgender, the reader can follow the link and read what that means in another article. Do we need to be explaining the sexual development of people in minority groups, when that is not done for biographies of cisgender people?
1089:
covers bisexuality; it covers any same-sex romance and/or same-sex sexual activity. To use "sexual orientation" in place of "homosexuality" is not a good suggestion if the article is only about same-sex romantic and/or sexual attraction. Furthermore, the term
650:
controversy. Would any of you like to help me expand his page, by adding more info and then perhaps creating a sub-section about the Duck Dynasty fiasco? Btw most state senators have their own page, so it makes sense for him to have one, regardless of the
1555:
that simple fact. And facts are supposed to matter to an encyclopedia. Facts, not wishes, not fanservice, not "hints", not "Fantasizing about getting banged by Xena gets me wet". Facts. And the simple fact is that the characters are not LGBT. Full stop.
1409:
for some members here or no one other than the ones already involved in this topic are interested in it. Or both. Either way, if the edit warring between Jerry Pepsi and VoluntarySlave continues at the Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess) article and
1386:, for example, and note that he is the one I was referring to in my second paragraph above), so it would not be wise that I get involved in that way (though I have edited one or more of these articles -- Xena, Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess) and
2682:
and it is good at telling people to avoid using incorrect pronouns or job titles that indicate sex, but there seem to be a couple of loopholes that seem to be encouraging articles to stress the original gender of transgender people multiple times.
740:, where editors stated that using "LGBT" in place of "homosexuality" in the article title is sometimes okay, but other times it is not, and that these types of moves should be discussed first. Going by what the sources state was also mentioned.
404:. I don't see how this excludes non-LGBT people - this project isn't for LGBT folks only, its for everyone to talk about LGBT issues and improve coverage: exactly what you suggest is needed. Therefore why not bring up any issues you have here?
1611:
I don't greatly care about this issue, but I think it's not unreasonable to include the LGBT categories. The Gabrielle article states that, "Xena and Gabrielle's reincarnations get married" in one episode, which sounds lesbian enough to me.
1362:(page 111) states, "Xena and Gabrielle conform, in some respects, to a stereotypical 'butch and femme' model of lesbian. Xena is tall, athletic, taciturn and ... Often, the storyline itself entails that the characters be read as queer." And
801:
process. This says "If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page." If the mover has been informed that such moves are controversial, he should use the process, and be sanctioned if he refuses to do
445:
The category has an overly complicated title, and has subcategories which seem to have little or nothing to do with that title. For instance, how is "transsexual" a sexual behaviour? I suggest the category be replaced with something like
1359:
2417:
continued to meet with his friend even after he was exiled (the aikane lover) all the way to that persons death. I find a lot of good sources and wondered if this might gain some contributions from other interested project members?--
2056:
2048:
267:) the obvious parallel is that we would not entitle an internal page under other offensive terms (fill in your own offensive examples here). We do use those terms on Knowledge in limited ways to show how culture has evolved, and
2367:
web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page (
2087:
article shouldn't it state "he" when referring him to Willam himself, and not his female persona? He's not transgender and identifying as a woman as far as i know. I haven't reverted the edit above due to my uncertainty. Thanks
1671:," partly set in the modern world, they are married and Xena is eventually returned to her correct body (though Xena and Gabrielle's romantic/sexual involvement as a female-female couple is still not physically shown onscreen).
2678:, who just happens to be a transgender female. I've been trying to help find information to update her article, but the policies on biographies of transgender people are not as clear as I think they need to be. I've looked at
1357:
source (page 91) states: "The show's producers have stated that they do intend to 'blur the lines' of the characters' sexuality ... it is hard to reach any other conclusion than that Xena and Gabrielle are a lesbian couple."
1696:
On a side note, just to put the lesbian subtext matter into better context, Xena and Gabrielle never would have been portrayed as romantically and/or sexually involved with each other in any way if it hadn't been for the
478:
Someone needs to urgently put this up for CFD, as it is frankly extremely offensive and wrong-headed in its various tacit assumptions. It's trying to reposition categories about LGBT identities as categories about sexual
2469:
changes? As far as I can see the vast majority of sources regarding Russia's 2013 law have referred to it as a "gay propaganda" issue, and have not dwelled on it being about protecting minors. Additionally I think using
1558:
If other fictional characters are classed as LGBT without supporting evidence in the fiction, they should be removed from the categories. Error should be corrected, not compounded, and one mistake cannot justify another
1746:
It appears to me that the background info on the game acrophobia is dealing with a trans woman in a way that seems to me to be inappropriate. Would someone with experience in trans issues please have a look? Thanks.
1532:. We mustn't lose sight of the purpose of these categories (or even the ones identifying historical figures who existed before modern concepts of sexual orientation developed) for the navigational use of readers. ā
2261:
2246:
204:
has never been specifically for LGBT people (just as WikiProject Christianity isn't just for Christians, WikiProject Judaism isn't just for Jews, etc. etc.). Quite how someone would find it difficult to post on
2828:
have to mention their birth name, because they were already notable under that name before transitioning, and thus it would misrepresent the context of their notability to suppress it. (Some examples include
2690:
Is it important/acceptable to have the birth name of a transgender person in the lead section (when transition is already covered later in the article)? Somebody brought this up on the article's talk page:
271:
is an antiquated term when referring to people as a general rule. You'll find that most newer generations use a variety of self-descriptor terms but generally LGBT is an acceptable non-offensive catch-all.
1351:
378:
as someone who doesn't identify with either LGBT nor homosexual (but is also not heterosexual), I see the premise as misguided and I don't agree that LGBT excludes non-LGBT people from contributing (
1514:
article to see how she has been interpreted and portrayed as a lesbian character. Much more likely than a character with a less ambiguous but also less social significance as a lesbian character.--
111:
Started a WP page where we can talk about homosexual related issues. This came to mind with regard to recent discussion about male/female name changes. There are other issues to discuss I'm sure.
1588:
would surely factor into this. People in this discussion are arguing why Xena and Gabrielle fit in Category:Fictional LGBT characters; you clearly disagree with that view. However, you suggested
237:
is really only non-derogatory/pejorative when used in a scientific sense - homosexual behavior in animals, or referring to the times before contemporary terms like gay and lesbian came into use.
2518:
If the source straightly uses "gay" then there is no question needed at all. Maybe a heartfelt notice to the editor reverted by you. P.S. some source URLs regarding anti-gay issue are dead. --
426:
This category seems designed to associate LGBT characters with sexual behaviors like pedophilia, rape and incest. I've twice removed content on fictional intersex characters from the category (
1506:
case, there is no single, unambiguous portrayal or interpretation one way or the other. But the mere fact that this is discussed so much in analyses of the show means that anyone looking for
2730:
I tried to make an edit, to remove one of the mentions of her former name and another editor reverted my work. I've put back my original edit and created a section in the talk page called:
2719:
So, although I'm more interested in improving the coverage of her art and game design, I am very concerned that, as a community of editors, we are not handling this LGBT issue very well.
1390:-- before he began editing Knowledge). So if any of you at this WikiProject weigh in on this matter, would you be so kind as to link to this discussion there at the character talk pages?
1321:
that VoluntarySlave added, I'm not sure what sources VoluntarySlave is referring to with regard to the article supporting Gabrielle as LGBT. The significant majority of those sources are
2504:
That's fine if we were using just one source, or just quoting the law itself. Instead we have hundreds of media articles and the vast majority of English ones avoid using "homosexual."
2001:
1646:
That's a good point about the marriage, because it's an episode that directly portrays Xena and Gabrielle as romantically involved. FreeKnowledgeCreator is referring to what is stated
1343:
and notes what is called "the lesbian subtext" of the show (the creators of the series intentionally leaving hints that Xena and Gabrielle are romantically/sexually involved). So does
2958:
1955:
325:
I also don't see the difference in the purpose of your new page as opposed to this one. "Homosexual and related guidelines" also doesn't sound proper. It's unnecessary in my opinion.
564:
969:
1145:
I agree that each title needs to be considered separately, considering the scope of the article and which aspects of LGBT actually apply to it. In the examples given above,
2541:
1663:'s body"; Gabrielle was reincarnated in her "original body" (the body she had when she met Xena on the series). At the end of this episode, it is reaffirmed that they are
1185:
737:
94:
89:
84:
72:
67:
59:
865:
Flyer22 nails it exactly: "The discussions concern replacing 'homosexuality' with 'LGBT"' in article titles in general, no matter what your topic focus was at the time."
2734:. I'm hoping that will avoid an edit war over this, but if experts can step in and find the most acceptable way to get the information across, I would be very grateful.
2648:"Homosexual" is never appropriate usage in either context; Sportfan5000 is correct that virtually the only sources that still use it that way are doing so pejoratively.
2935:
when they get a chance, as it is a pending bill in Kansas that would allow for the unilateral discrimination of LGBTQ couples under the guise of religion. Thanks!
2401:
Been doing a great deal of research on Hawaiian culture, history, genealogy and...well just about everything Hawaiian. After much time, I wonder if an article on "
2906:
386:
does a policy on homosexuality have to do with a discussion on male/female name changes, unless one is assuming that trans people are intrinsically homosexual?
2738:
possible to invite the opinions of transgender people (or groups of transgender people) just to ensure that Knowledge is not being written off as "transphobic"?
2132:
I'm aware they're men, but in character he refers to himself as a woman. Do i revert all instances or leave the sections in character as "her" and "she". Thanks
230:
562:, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at
2671:
I've struggled to find the right place to turn to for help, so I'm really hoping that you can help me, or that you can point me at a group that can help me.
703:
173:
Knowledge:Village_pump_(policy)#Knowledge:Homosexual_and_related_guidelines_and_policies_-_meta_page_for_stating_site-wide_consensus_on_GL_and_related_issues
430:
is more a matter of biology), but I was wondering how others felt about the category and the associations it promotes? I'm not comfortable with it myself.
809:
of homosexuality in sports, with individuals used as examples. These should be reverted and the mover told to use the process, this is in accordance with
2402:
1441:
important to them, doesn't make the characters lesbians, any more than the reams of slash or around every pair of male characters in popular culture or
600:
2405:" could be a decent addition to the project scope? It appears that we do not cover the history prior to 19th century. This could be a good addition to
759:
The difference between the previous discussion and the present one is the previous ones were religion-related. the current ones are related to sports.
1833:
been satisfactorily resolved and probably won't beāat least not until some more years pass and there's significant turnover among WP's editor corps.
1916:
Heterosexual men's anger in response to male homosexuality: effects of erotic and non-erotic depictions of male-male intimacy and sexual prejudice.
2326:
Recent editing compelled me into starting a new discussion about a matter that has been previously discussed. State your comments in talk page. --
1310:
558:
420:
47:
17:
972:
is probably the most logical place for information on trans and other non-LGB members of LGBT communities in the Australian Defence Force, like
1297:
at the Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess) article about whether or not to place Gabrielle in the LGBT category; see the start of that edit war
210:
779:
The discussions concern replacing "homosexuality" with "LGBT" in article titles in general, no matter what your topic focus was at the time.
715:
2668:
politics, but I seem to have stumbled into a political issue, where it looks like Knowledge may be causing problems for transgender people.
2639:
term, not appropriate for use when labelling individual people or the LGBT community in daily real-world contexts; in reality, it's almost
1892:
447:
2439:
2432:
1853:
Hello -- I'm the editor in chief of ManABoutWorld, the #1 gay travel magazine for iPad only. My current Knowledge entry is out of date.
1785:
There does seem to be a lot of sources about the incident, I think I would focus on just that first and see if can work in a biography.
948:
569:
450:, and the subcategories which aren't unambiguously sexual orientations should be removed or moved elsewhere in the category hierarchy. ā
2288:
More eyes from this WikiProject, meaning other than mine, are needed on the Homosexuality and psychology article. I state that because
1507:
1279:
1275:
922:
709:
532:
496:
2757:. Any questions in that essay that you disagree with the answers the essay mentions?? Feel free to explain whatever way you can why.
2156:
William Belli is clearly male and Cherry Peck is female. Each should be referred to by the appropriate pronouns. A decent example is
1180:, what you propose comes down to use of something like "Homosexual people in sports." However, considering what was discussed in the
1701:
showing a moment that can be interpreted as Xena being sexually intimate with a woman; she is actually being sexually intimate with
1337:
1045:
1767:
1406:
816:
The other two moves may even be an improvement, as those articles consist of bigraphical summaries of relevant players. The mover
2707:
transition. That does not seem to be against the "law" of MOS:IDENTITY, but it all adds up to be against the spirit of that rule.
820:
have followed the process here too, but my guess is there is no point in these cases of making a fuss just for the sake of it. --
736:
doing the advising. There was also an extensive discussion about these types of moves, which took place at this WikiProject; see
188:
124:
1859:
I can't update it myself. Can you help? Another wikipedia rep suggested I reach out to you since I 'may be prominent enough'Ā :)
1706:
the series started intentionally infusing lesbian subtext into the show to cater to/hold on to that fanbase. And this is not my
2451:
1541:
848:
172:
2564:
is still quite accepted as a noun, including in America. It may be, however, that America is especially sensitive to the term
2884:
2025:
1617:
1082:
1032:
896:
2548:
to be pejorative when used as a noun and sometimes when used in other ways, and there are style guides that recommend using
1363:
1584:
have had sex with each other. No one in this discussion is arguing that Xena and Gabrielle are lesbians. If we were, then
2982:
2281:
921:
every article about Jews or about Sikhs to being labeled about "religious minorities", so we should look at the article
2931:
Since I am neither highly knowledgeable in bill-writing or LGBT-related articles, would some people be able to improve
2345:
I've archived an inactive thread to a subsection which was a notification about a discussion that was since closed. ā
1970:
1965:
1707:
1585:
1382:) has recently edited them and he has the same aforementioned view about categorizing these characters that I do (see
1565:
But of course TRUTH makes no difference in Knowledge when there's more than one person who wants to service the lie.
1325:
sources, and WP:Primary sources should not be used to draw a conclusion not clearly supported by such sources.
38:
1094:
is taken to mean a deep-rooted sexual attraction significantly more than it is taken to apply to sexual behavior.
2754:
2743:
798:
2970:
2944:
2921:
2895:
2866:
2819:
2792:
2766:
2747:
2663:
Biographies of transgender people having excessive mentions of former names and links to sex assignment articles
2657:
2627:
2602:
2576:
2527:
2513:
2499:
2483:
2455:
2426:
2380:
2356:
2335:
2314:
2275:
2230:
2198:
2173:
2148:
2123:
2104:
2069:
2041:
1900:
1842:
1822:
1794:
1779:
1756:
1723:
1621:
1606:
1574:
1545:
1523:
1490:
1455:
1427:
1399:
1264:
1243:
1220:
1201:
1167:
1138:
1124:
1103:
1061:
1036:
1020:
985:
958:
935:
915:
900:
881:
852:
829:
788:
770:
753:
680:
660:
630:
581:
548:
526:
508:
488:
473:
459:
439:
413:
395:
370:
351:
320:
307:
281:
250:
223:
192:
158:
144:
128:
2065:
1920:
1896:
1613:
1028:
892:
339:
135:
Knowledge and in the wider world. And this WikiProject is open to everyone; it's not limited to LGBT people. -
1150:
generally when what we are referring to is participation by people with that characteristic; we wouldn't have
2083:
edit. Willam Belli is male and identifies as such. His drag persona is female and identifies as such. In the
2320:
2253:
2241:
1131:
The page moves were extremely poor - undiscussed, controversial, and not reflective of the article content.
875:
765:
697:
2389:
1869:
1311:
Talk:Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess)#Category:Fictional bisexuals or Category:Fictional LGBT characters?
2932:
2917:
2788:
2598:
2509:
2479:
2406:
2169:
1915:
1790:
1434:
1387:
1249:
1135:
1016:
577:
513:
I'll nominate this for deletion. Thanks for the feedback; it looks like there's a common view so far. Ah,
469:
303:
277:
246:
154:
2762:
2422:
2119:
2037:
2012:
1775:
1570:
1451:
1331:
intentionally toyed around with their sexual orientations/sexualities but never established them as fact
1290:
1049:
805:
In this case, it looks as if the first two moves were clearly inappropriate as the articles discuss the
626:
2715:
Jennell has actually complained about the editing we are doing on her Knowledge page on Facebook. See:
2912:
Discussion has started on a possible title change for the article, any guidance would be appreciated.
2775:"..some sort of process to discuss issues caused by biographies..." - the usual process is to post at
1340:
464:
I would nominate for deletion/renaming. Those discussions usually have good outcomes and suggestions.
2850:
2845:.) But if a person's notability is tied exclusively to their post-transition name, and thus it isn't
2739:
2731:
2723:
2692:
1838:
1216:
1057:
931:
906:
While I think all of the moves are improvements, they should have been done through the RM process.--
614:
455:
219:
184:
120:
499:
as a parent to the relevant categories, so I would suggest that this one should be simply deleted.--
2447:
2331:
2061:
1966:
Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis
1818:
1810:
1537:
1294:
1260:
976:, particularly given the interrelationships between LGB and T in the relevant staff association, .
844:
656:
104:
2542:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 46#Guidelines regarding gay/lesbian vs. homosexual
2474:
to refer to gay and lesbian people is largely considered pejorative. Any guidance is appreciated.
2716:
2523:
2495:
2376:
2302:
2192:
2142:
2098:
1371:
1286:
1119:
867:
825:
760:
729:
725:
691:
176:
2643:
appropriate for use in any context in which it doesn't have the "-ity" suffix attached to it. A
1027:
I agree with NatGertler that article titles should reflect the contents of individual articles.
1997:
1348:
The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Themes, Works, and Wonders, Volume 3
617:
already notes the Guardian article as one of the media organization articles that mentions the
2966:
2913:
2891:
2862:
2815:
2807:
2784:
2653:
2623:
2594:
2572:
2505:
2475:
2310:
2226:
2165:
1975:
1937:
1786:
1740:
1719:
1602:
1519:
1486:
1423:
1395:
1322:
1239:
1197:
1163:
1132:
1099:
1070:
1012:
981:
911:
784:
749:
676:
643:
636:
573:
544:
536:
522:
514:
504:
465:
435:
391:
299:
273:
242:
150:
1964:
Chivers, Meredith L., Michael C. Seto, Martin L. LalumiĆØre, Ellen Laan, and Teresa Grimbos. "
1659:," which is set in modern day, it is eventually revealed that Xena has been reincarnated in "
2940:
2838:
2758:
2418:
2115:
2033:
1982:
1944:
1925:
1771:
1752:
1655:
section in that article states, "their souls are together throughout time." In the episode "
1566:
1447:
622:
409:
263:, all world-wide used acronym, suggests a troubling agenda, (note: this was in response to
2830:
2675:
2289:
2016:
1989:
1834:
1464:
And I truly don't understand your argument on this matter, not fully anyway; neither does
1379:
1212:
1189:
1074:
1053:
927:
618:
592:
484:
451:
361:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Homosexual and related guidelines and policies
215:
180:
140:
116:
531:
Actually, the nomination made is problematic, as it doesn't take account of the existing
1985:
1947:
1866:
1813:
are under discussion in talk pages. Find RFC tags, so you will be at the right place. --
2780:
2776:
2443:
2352:
2327:
2271:
2157:
1814:
1766:
Greetings WikiProject LGBT studies! May I please request some experienced eyes over at
1533:
1256:
1186:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 43#Style guideline of gay vs homosexual
840:
733:
652:
379:
206:
201:
2983:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/javier-corrales/the-top-2013-lgbt-stories_b_4479986.html
947:: We shouldn't be waving a flag of inclusivity when our articles aren't. For example,
2589:
in sources that are disparaging of LGBT people. In this case most of the sources use
2544:
before this latest discussion. Some Americans and people of other countries consider
2519:
2491:
2372:
2297:
2257:
2184:
2134:
2090:
1829:
1562:
Readers are not served by putting lies in categories. Shame on you for suggesting it.
1415:
1114:
973:
821:
810:
367:
317:
535:. In my experience, this reduces the possibility of consensus. I'd appreciate it if
2962:
2887:
2858:
2811:
2679:
2649:
2619:
2568:
2442:. Recent edits to the lede are being discussed and more input is desired. Thanks, ā
2371:). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at
2306:
2222:
2084:
1806:
1715:
1711:
1702:
1656:
1598:
1529:
1515:
1482:
1465:
1442:
1419:
1391:
1367:
1317:
about this at the Gabrielle (Xena: Warrior Princess) talk page, though, except for
1235:
1193:
1177:
1159:
1095:
977:
954:
907:
780:
745:
721:
672:
647:
605:
540:
518:
500:
431:
387:
2849:
for us to mention their former name, then the former name should be suppressed on
1929:
2936:
2854:
2842:
1748:
738:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 40#LGBT instead of homosexuality
405:
326:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2613:
I really don't think there is much of a basis on which one could conclude that
1158:. A discussion of each article individually is needed to find the best title.--
2368:
2218:
2060:
anyone wants to do a quick cleanup and footnoting, we can get this published.
1993:
1959:
1951:
1862:
This information was accurate several years ago. It has changed considerably.
1698:
480:
136:
2160:, the creation of Clinton Leupp, with the interesting difference that the WP
1865:
After PlanetOut I was editor in chief of ManAboutWorld till 2009. citations:
1307:
Talk:Xena#Category:Fictional bisexuals or Category:Fictional LGBT characters?
2834:
2717:
And please, while you're at it, fix the rampant transphobia as well. Thanks!
2490:
from foreign language, there is no ground to cure this usage with "gay". --
2347:
2266:
1668:
1306:
2114:
women or even trans women; they are men and must be referred to as he/him.
1978:
1940:
1914:
Hudepohl, Adam D., BA, Dominic J. Parrott, PhD, and Amos Zeichner, PhD. "
1664:
427:
364:
314:
2732:
Complaint of excessive focus on former gender by subject of this article
2390:
http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/LGBT%20flag%20sunlight.Innovative
1910:
If anyone wants some sources to use, I found some that could be useful:
1870:
http://www.travelandleisure.com/articles/best-gay-honeymoon-destinations
1293:(linked his user talk page because he doesn't yet have a user page) and
891:
I have reverted the first two article moves, per Mirokado's suggestion.
2950:
2885:
Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#Gender_Identity_-_proposal_on_names_used
2057:
Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/Meghdhanushya ā The Colour of Life
2049:
Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/Meghdhanushya ā The Colour of Life
2020:
2005:
797:
Generally, any move which might be controversial should go through the
1255:
This article needs fixing; I brought this up recently in talk page. --
2824:
That is essentially the rule, yes. There are some people for whom we
1933:
298:
is now not considered an acceptable title term for an internal page.
2674:
I've been following the work of an artist and game designer, called
1667:, they reminisce and begin kissing. In the sequel to this episode, "
1181:
2693:
Shouldn't the lead at least *mention* the name she's best known by?
2262:
Knowledge:Featured list candidates/Dan Savage bibliography/archive1
2247:
Knowledge:Featured list candidates/Dan Savage bibliography/archive1
601:
Chelsea Manning name row: Knowledge editors banned from trans pages
2206:
1660:
2164:
is for the drag character to which the creator's name redirects.
233:
already exists, and it's already summarized on the project page.
1882:
1511:
1271:
1184:
section above and what has been discussed before on that topic (
260:
238:
2959:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 February 18#Agender
2853:
grounds even if it can be sourced (and should be suppressed as
1232:
Can someone please add a ref and revert this ridiculous removal
25:
2686:
I've got some questions that I need experts to help me with:
2179:
As i assumed =D (Cherry Peck is Willam's drag persona right?)
2011:
Adams, Henry E., Lester W. Wright, Jr., and Bethany A. Lohr (
1437:
article, but being important to lesbians, even being really,
1355:
Globalization, Cultural Identities, and Media Representations
2857:
if it's sourced only to people claiming insider knowledge.)
1510:
is very likely going to want to look at that section in the
559:
Category:Fictional characters by sexual behavioral attribute
421:
Category:Fictional characters by sexual behavioral attribute
179:
talk page thread, where I will elucidate further. Regards, -
1854:
587:
Chelsea Manning Knowledge article and Arbitration committee
1699:
coming-on theme (opening credits, 0:41/42 seconds into it)
1336:
Here are sources that support Xena and Gabrielle as LGBT:
724:, he was advised against doing these types of moves, with
103:
Knowledge:Homosexual and related guidelines and policies (
2369:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/Research:Finding_a_Collaborator
646:'s page. Of course I only heard about him because of the
687:
Replacing "homosexuality" with "LGBT" in article titles
211:
Knowledge:Homosexual and related guidelines and policies
2466:
2293:
2214:
2080:
1647:
1593:
1589:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1411:
1383:
1330:
1318:
1314:
1302:
1298:
1231:
1078:
264:
2413:
who is attributed to making the practice acceptable.
1867:
http://nytravfest.com/2013/02/27/speakers-ed-salvato/
2540:
a few times at this WikiProject now, as recently as
115:
Bisexuals, Transgenders, and no one else. Regards, -
2219:
Talk:Queer#Controversial nature of the term section
1418:(in far less words while linking to this section).
970:
Sexual orientation and the Australian Defence Force
448:
Category:Fictional characters by sexual orientation
1762:Draft talk:Articles for Creation/Christopher Karas
1414:at the Xena article, I will likely report this at
2461:Homosexual versus gay, and Russian propaganda law
2017:Is Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal?
1651:was already sourced in that paragraph). Like the
1714:, and a few other reliable-source commentators.
1182:#Guidelines regarding gay/lesbian vs. homosexual
2029:. 1996, Vol. 105, No. 3, p. 440-445. 0021-843X.
313:our various content policies and guidelines? -
2907:Talk:Olympic protests of Russian anti-gay laws
2205:"Controversial nature of the term" section at
2051:(first film in Gujarat, India, on LGBT issues)
1974:(Arch Sex Behav). 2010 February; 39(1): 5ā56.
1370:once you get past the citations to Knowledge (
1301:and the latest edit involved in that edit war
706:to LGBT people in sports in the United States
2957:The Agender redirect is being discussed; see
1768:Draft:Articles for Creation/Christopher Karas
259:(comment from Village pump thread) Rejecting
231:Knowledge:WikiProject LGBT studies/Guidelines
8:
704:Homosexuality in sports in the United States
400:The introduction to this project page says
171:Note that I've started a comment thread at
2438:An article of interest to this project is
2403:Homosexuality in historic Hawaiian culture
1001:Homosexual themes in children's literature
2260:consideration, the discussion page is at
1364:there are more sources noting such things
591:This article discusses the rename of the
694:recently moved the following articles:
2975:
2386:
718:to LGBT people in association football
595:article and the Arbitration committee:
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies
2305:with this IP, at least not by myself.
1007:, it would seem unnatural to title it
1003:. Of course when you have an article,
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1885:?portfolio=ed-salvatoeditor-in-chief
1710:; it was stated by Xena's portrayer,
716:Homosexuality in association football
7:
2779:with your concerns. (And preferably
997:LGBT themes in children's literature
712:to LGBT people in American football
2465:Could others please have a look at
2440:Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism
2433:Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism
2075:How do we refer to drag performers?
949:LGBT people in association football
2593:so I find the blowback misplaced.
1855:http://en.wikipedia.org/Ed_Salvato
1280:Category:Fictional LGBT characters
1081:(though mostly indirectly) at the
923:Homosexuality in American football
710:Homosexuality in American football
533:Category:Fictional LGBT characters
497:Category:Fictional LGBT characters
265:this version of the above comments
24:
2296:in a deceptive way and has added
1924:(J Homosex). 2010;57(8):1022-38.
1046:LGBT rights in the United Kingdom
149:I agree, the title is offensive.
1906:Possible studies/Journal sources
1227:Cultural_history_of_the_buttocks
556:Thanks to the Twinkle function!
29:
2236:Dan Savage bibliography for FLC
2252:I've gone ahead and nominated
2026:Journal of Abnormal Psychology
1156:Canadian citizenship in sports
1083:Homosexual behavior in animals
1005:Homosexual behavior in animals
209:but would be happy to post on
1:
2971:21:29, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
2945:04:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
2922:23:29, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
2896:07:06, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
2867:20:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
2820:06:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
2658:20:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
2635:As a rule, "homosexual" is a
1883:http://www.manaboutworld.com/
1849:How can I get my page updated
631:19:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
613:It could be a useful source.
414:10:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
396:05:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
371:04:46, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
352:04:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
321:04:19, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
308:03:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
282:03:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
251:02:51, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
224:14:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
193:02:42, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
159:02:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
145:23:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
129:21:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
2793:23:44, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
2767:23:35, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
2748:22:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
2628:18:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
2603:05:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
2577:05:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
2528:05:00, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
2514:04:48, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
2500:04:37, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
2484:04:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
2456:17:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
2427:14:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
2381:18:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
2357:21:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
2336:02:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
2315:01:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
2282:Homosexuality and psychology
2276:12:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2231:00:32, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
2199:16:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
2174:16:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
2149:16:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
2124:15:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
2105:15:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
2070:18:39, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
2042:03:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
1956:Taylor and Francis info page
1930:10.1080/00918369.2010.503511
1741:Acrophobia (game)#Background
999:instead of the more narrow,
2581:Perhaps, I almost only see
1971:Archives of Sexual Behavior
1901:20:40, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1888:Can you help me update it
1843:16:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1823:09:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1795:10:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1780:07:11, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1757:08:50, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
1724:23:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1622:19:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1607:14:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1586:Category:Fictional lesbians
1575:13:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1546:03:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1524:03:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1491:03:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1456:03:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1428:01:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1405:Either my above comment is
1400:16:38, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
1265:07:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
1244:01:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
1221:22:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1202:20:38, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1168:16:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1139:10:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1125:10:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1104:14:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1062:09:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1037:06:35, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
1021:02:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
986:02:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
959:01:26, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
936:22:52, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
916:21:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
901:20:32, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
882:17:39, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
853:17:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
830:16:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
789:16:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
771:16:17, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
754:15:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
681:18:47, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
661:04:24, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
582:01:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
549:01:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
527:00:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
509:00:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
489:00:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
474:00:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
460:21:19, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
440:21:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
357:Nominated for deletion here
3001:
1881:This info is on our blog:
1801:Two articles under dispute
539:could amend the proposal.
2755:Knowledge:Gender identity
1998:Info page at SpringerLink
1988:. Published online 2010.
1653:Battling Bard of Potidaea
1508:fictional LGBT characters
1270:Whether or not to place
700:to LGBT people in sports
570:Categories for discussion
2560:as a noun, but the term
2397:Hawaiian culture article
2362:Invitation to User Study
2341:Archived inactive thread
1921:Journal of Homosexuality
1446:where the breakdown is.
1407:WP:Too long, didn't read
1350:source (page 1356). And
1341:calls them lesbian icons
1315:started a new discussion
1009:LGBT behavior in animals
722:On his talk page in 2012
2321:Talk:David Ogden Stiers
2254:Dan Savage bibliography
2242:Dan Savage bibliography
2213:Comments are needed on
698:Homosexuality in sports
2927:Kansas House Bill 2453
2556:as a noun in place of
2407:LGBT history in Hawaii
1960:Document at PubMed PMC
1657:Deja Vu All Over Again
1388:Xena: Warrior Princess
1313:. And Jerry Pepsi has
1250:Homosexuality in Macau
642:Hi. I've just created
2294:tampered with a quote
2047:Novice needs help at
2013:University of Georgia
1809:and main subjects of
1050:LGBT rights in Europe
380:rationale stated here
42:of past discussions.
1805:Adding rumors about
1708:WP:Original research
1614:FreeKnowledgeCreator
1468:apparently, as seen
1435:Xena as lesbian icon
1152:Femaleness in sports
1085:talk page, the term
1029:FreeKnowledgeCreator
893:FreeKnowledgeCreator
615:Talk:Chelsea_Manning
565:the category's entry
2953:redirect discussion
2883:Please weigh in on
2618:Subject Headings.--
2409:as a stand alone.
2301:not in the mood to
2055:There's a draft at
2002:PDF at SpringerLink
1811:Outrage (2009 film)
609:. October 24, 2013.
1092:sexual orientation
799:WP:Requested moves
1289:going on between
966:On the other hand
644:Jerry L. Fielding
637:Jerry L. Fielding
517:got there first.
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2992:
2985:
2980:
2937:Kevin Rutherford
2839:Laura Jane Grace
2532:We've been over
2195:
2190:
2189:
2145:
2140:
2139:
2110:Drag queens are
2101:
2096:
2095:
1994:Info page at NIH
1952:Info page at NIH
1828:Let's see , , ,
1648:in this section.
1443:Shipping Reports
1122:
1117:
880:
878:
874:
870:
768:
763:
350:
349:
346:
333:
81:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
3000:
2999:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2991:
2990:
2989:
2988:
2981:
2977:
2955:
2929:
2910:
2831:Chelsea Manning
2676:Jennell Jaquays
2665:
2463:
2436:
2399:
2364:
2343:
2324:
2286:
2238:
2211:
2193:
2187:
2186:
2143:
2137:
2136:
2099:
2093:
2092:
2077:
2053:
1908:
1889:
1851:
1803:
1764:
1744:
1669:Soul Possession
1283:
1253:
1229:
1120:
1115:
876:
872:
868:
866:
766:
761:
689:
640:
619:Chelsea Manning
593:Chelsea Manning
589:
424:
348:
340:
336:
335:
327:
241:has a summary.
109:
77:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2998:
2996:
2987:
2986:
2974:
2954:
2948:
2928:
2925:
2909:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2901:
2900:
2899:
2898:
2876:
2875:
2874:
2873:
2872:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2770:
2769:
2709:
2708:
2703:
2702:
2697:
2696:
2664:
2661:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2585:, in place of
2462:
2459:
2435:
2430:
2398:
2395:
2387:
2363:
2360:
2342:
2339:
2323:
2318:
2290:IP 203.26.73.5
2285:
2279:
2250:
2249:
2244:
2237:
2234:
2210:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2180:
2158:Miss Coco Peru
2154:
2153:
2152:
2151:
2127:
2126:
2076:
2073:
2062:MatthewVanitas
2052:
2045:
2031:
2030:
2009:
1962:
1907:
1904:
1893:208.39.146.133
1887:
1850:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1802:
1799:
1798:
1797:
1763:
1760:
1743:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1578:
1577:
1563:
1560:
1556:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1493:
1459:
1458:
1338:AfterEllen.com
1295:VoluntarySlave
1282:
1268:
1252:
1247:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1211:can weigh in.
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1171:
1170:
1142:
1141:
1128:
1127:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1065:
1064:
1040:
1039:
1024:
1023:
989:
988:
962:
961:
941:
940:
939:
938:
926:considered. --
889:
888:
887:
886:
885:
884:
858:
857:
856:
855:
833:
832:
814:
803:
794:
793:
792:
791:
774:
773:
688:
685:
684:
683:
639:
634:
611:
610:
588:
585:
554:
553:
552:
551:
529:
493:
492:
491:
462:
423:
418:
417:
416:
398:
373:
354:
338:
337:
323:
310:
287:
286:
285:
284:
254:
253:
227:
226:
199:
198:
197:
196:
195:
164:
163:
162:
161:
108:
101:
98:
97:
92:
87:
82:
75:
70:
65:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2997:
2984:
2979:
2976:
2973:
2972:
2968:
2964:
2960:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2946:
2942:
2938:
2934:
2926:
2924:
2923:
2919:
2915:
2908:
2905:
2897:
2893:
2889:
2886:
2882:
2881:
2880:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2868:
2864:
2860:
2856:
2852:
2851:WP:BLPPRIVACY
2848:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2827:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2817:
2813:
2809:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2799:
2794:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2773:
2772:
2771:
2768:
2764:
2760:
2756:
2752:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2735:
2733:
2728:
2725:
2720:
2718:
2713:
2705:
2704:
2699:
2698:
2694:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2684:
2681:
2677:
2672:
2669:
2662:
2660:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2646:
2642:
2638:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2616:
2612:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2588:
2584:
2580:
2579:
2578:
2574:
2570:
2567:
2563:
2559:
2555:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2535:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2520:Sameboat - åč
2517:
2516:
2515:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2492:Sameboat - åč
2488:
2487:
2486:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2468:
2460:
2458:
2457:
2453:
2449:
2445:
2441:
2434:
2431:
2429:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2414:
2410:
2408:
2404:
2396:
2394:
2391:
2385:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2361:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2349:
2340:
2338:
2337:
2333:
2329:
2322:
2319:
2317:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2299:
2298:Mark Regnerus
2295:
2291:
2283:
2280:
2278:
2277:
2273:
2269:
2268:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2248:
2245:
2243:
2240:
2239:
2235:
2233:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2197:
2196:
2191:
2181:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2150:
2147:
2146:
2141:
2131:
2130:
2129:
2128:
2125:
2121:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2103:
2102:
2097:
2086:
2082:
2074:
2072:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2058:
2050:
2046:
2044:
2043:
2039:
2035:
2028:
2027:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1984:
1980:
1977:
1973:
1972:
1967:
1963:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1946:
1942:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1922:
1917:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1905:
1903:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1886:
1884:
1879:
1875:
1872:
1871:
1868:
1863:
1860:
1857:
1856:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1831:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1761:
1759:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1742:
1739:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1704:
1700:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1685:
1684:
1670:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1649:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1623:
1619:
1615:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1552:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1504:
1503:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1375:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1334:
1332:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1148:
1147:Homosexuality
1144:
1143:
1140:
1137:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1118:
1111:
1110:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:homosexuality
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
991:
990:
987:
983:
979:
975:
974:Cate McGregor
971:
967:
964:
963:
960:
957:
956:
950:
946:
943:
942:
937:
933:
929:
924:
919:
918:
917:
913:
909:
905:
904:
903:
902:
898:
894:
883:
879:
871:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
854:
850:
846:
842:
837:
836:
835:
834:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
812:
808:
804:
800:
796:
795:
790:
786:
782:
778:
777:
776:
775:
772:
769:
764:
762:Pass a Method
758:
757:
756:
755:
751:
747:
741:
739:
735:
731:
730:LadyofShalott
727:
726:SarekOfVulcan
723:
719:
717:
713:
711:
707:
705:
701:
699:
695:
693:
692:Pass a Method
686:
682:
678:
674:
670:
665:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
649:
645:
638:
635:
633:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
608:
607:
602:
599:Hern, Alex. "
598:
597:
596:
594:
586:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
566:
561:
560:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
477:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
461:
457:
453:
449:
444:
443:
442:
441:
437:
433:
429:
422:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
372:
369:
366:
362:
358:
355:
353:
347:
345:
344:
334:
332:
331:
324:
322:
319:
316:
311:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
289:
288:
283:
279:
275:
270:
266:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
228:
225:
221:
217:
212:
208:
203:
200:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
160:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
142:
138:
133:
132:
131:
130:
126:
122:
118:
112:
106:
102:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
80:
76:
74:
71:
69:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2978:
2956:
2933:this article
2930:
2914:Sportfan5000
2911:
2855:unverifiable
2846:
2825:
2785:Demiurge1000
2753:Please read
2736:
2729:
2721:
2714:
2710:
2685:
2680:MOS:IDENTITY
2673:
2670:
2666:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2634:
2614:
2595:Sportfan5000
2590:
2586:
2582:
2565:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2537:
2533:
2506:Sportfan5000
2476:Sportfan5000
2471:
2464:
2437:
2415:
2411:
2400:
2388:
2365:
2346:
2344:
2325:
2287:
2265:
2251:
2212:
2183:
2166:Bmclaughlin9
2161:
2155:
2133:
2111:
2089:
2085:Willam Belli
2078:
2054:
2032:
2024:
1969:
1919:
1909:
1891:Jan 9, 2014
1890:
1880:
1876:
1873:
1864:
1861:
1858:
1852:
1807:Aaron Schock
1804:
1787:Sportfan5000
1765:
1745:
1712:Lucy Lawless
1652:
1438:
1376:
1368:Google Books
1354:
1347:
1335:
1327:
1284:
1254:
1230:
1155:
1151:
1146:
1091:
1086:
1071:Sportfan5000
1013:Sportfan5000
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
965:
953:
944:
890:
817:
806:
742:
720:
714:
708:
702:
696:
690:
669:Duck Dynasty
668:
648:Duck Dynasty
641:
612:
606:The Guardian
604:
590:
574:Sportfan5000
563:
557:
555:
537:Sportfan5000
515:Sportfan5000
466:Sportfan5000
425:
401:
383:
375:
356:
342:
341:
329:
328:
300:Sportfan5000
295:
290:
274:Sportfan5000
268:
243:Sportfan5000
234:
191:, ed. 2002)
151:Sportfan5000
127:, ed. 2002)
113:
110:
78:
43:
37:
2843:Alec Butler
2759:Georgia guy
2566:homosexual.
2419:Mark Miller
2303:WP:Edit war
2215:this matter
2116:Georgia guy
2034:WhisperToMe
1874:Currently:
1772:Cyphoidbomb
1567:Jerry Pepsi
1528:Well said,
1448:Jerry Pepsi
1372:WP:Circular
1360:This source
1319:this source
1291:Jerry Pepsi
1287:WP:Edit war
1285:There is a
1192:is needed.
1077:, as noted
928:Nat Gertler
623:WhisperToMe
479:deviancies.
36:This is an
2808:WP:Notable
2583:homosexual
2562:homosexual
2558:homosexual
2546:homosexual
2538:homosexual
2472:homosexual
2079:Regarding
1835:Rivertorch
1380:Halo Jerk1
1323:WP:Primary
1213:Rivertorch
1075:Tom Morris
1054:Tom Morris
452:Psychonaut
269:homosexual
235:Homosexual
216:Tom Morris
181:Stevertigo
117:Stevertigo
95:ArchiveĀ 50
90:ArchiveĀ 49
85:ArchiveĀ 48
79:ArchiveĀ 47
73:ArchiveĀ 46
68:ArchiveĀ 45
60:ArchiveĀ 40
2847:essential
2835:Chaz Bono
2810:applies.
2444:Roscelese
2328:George Ho
1815:George Ho
1665:soulmates
1534:Roscelese
1412:starts up
1276:Gabrielle
1257:George Ho
841:Roscelese
734:Adjwilley
653:Zigzig20s
651:incident.
621:article.
2781:WP:DIFFs
2724:Pronouns
2637:clinical
2452:contribs
2373:Wkmaster
1990:PMC Link
1979:20049519
1941:20818528
1559:mistake.
1542:contribs
1190:WP:Split
849:contribs
822:Mirokado
495:We have
428:intersex
384:actually
2963:Flyer22
2951:Agender
2888:Rhialto
2859:Bearcat
2812:Rhialto
2777:WP:BLPN
2740:Big Mac
2650:Bearcat
2620:Trystan
2569:Flyer22
2554:lesbian
2307:Flyer22
2284:article
2223:Flyer22
2209:article
2182:Thanks
2021:Archive
2006:Archive
1986:2811244
1948:2936486
1716:Flyer22
1599:Flyer22
1530:Trystan
1516:Trystan
1483:Flyer22
1466:Trystan
1420:Flyer22
1392:Flyer22
1236:Johnbod
1194:Flyer22
1178:Trystan
1160:Trystan
1136:Snowman
1096:Flyer22
993:Comment
978:Nsw2042
955:Sceptre
945:Comment
908:Trystan
877:Shalott
781:Flyer22
746:Flyer22
673:Bearcat
671:thing.
568:on the
541:Nsw2042
519:Nsw2042
501:Trystan
432:Nsw2042
388:Nsw2042
376:Comment
291:Comment
207:WP:LGBT
202:WP:LGBT
39:archive
2645:person
2258:WP:FLC
2188:Jenova
2138:Jenova
2094:Jenova
1934:PubMed
1830:WP:BLP
1749:EdChem
1439:really
1416:WP:ANI
1121:Faddle
1116:Fiddle
818:should
811:WP:BRD
572:page.
406:Acb314
330:Teammm
177:WT:VPP
105:WP:HGI
2783:.) --
2641:never
2467:these
2207:Queer
2162:entry
1932:. At
1703:Draco
1661:Joxer
1478:here.
1176:Yes,
1133:Giant
807:issue
481:Zythe
343:email
137:htonl
16:<
2967:talk
2941:talk
2918:talk
2892:talk
2863:talk
2841:and
2816:talk
2789:talk
2763:talk
2744:talk
2722:The
2654:talk
2624:talk
2599:talk
2573:talk
2536:vs.
2524:talk
2510:talk
2496:talk
2480:talk
2448:talk
2423:talk
2377:talk
2353:talk
2348:Cirt
2332:talk
2311:talk
2292:has
2272:talk
2267:Cirt
2264:. ā
2256:for
2227:talk
2170:talk
2120:talk
2081:this
2066:talk
2038:talk
2015:). "
1976:PMID
1950:. -
1938:PMID
1897:talk
1839:talk
1819:talk
1791:talk
1776:talk
1753:talk
1720:talk
1618:talk
1603:talk
1594:here
1592:and
1590:here
1571:talk
1538:talk
1520:talk
1512:Xena
1487:talk
1476:and
1474:here
1470:here
1452:talk
1424:talk
1396:talk
1384:here
1352:this
1345:this
1309:and
1303:here
1299:here
1274:and
1272:Xena
1261:talk
1240:talk
1217:talk
1198:talk
1164:talk
1100:talk
1079:here
1073:and
1058:talk
1033:talk
1017:talk
982:talk
932:talk
912:talk
897:talk
869:Lady
845:talk
826:talk
785:talk
767:talk
750:talk
732:and
677:talk
657:talk
627:talk
578:talk
545:talk
523:talk
505:talk
485:talk
470:talk
456:talk
436:talk
410:talk
392:talk
304:talk
296:LGBT
278:talk
261:LGBT
247:talk
239:LGBT
220:talk
155:talk
141:talk
2615:gay
2591:gay
2587:gay
2552:or
2550:gay
2534:gay
2112:not
2019:" (
1983:PMC
1968:."
1945:PMC
1926:doi
1374:).
1366:on
1278:in
1154:or
802:so.
603:."
363:.-
2969:)
2961:.
2943:)
2920:)
2894:)
2865:)
2837:,
2833:,
2826:do
2818:)
2791:)
2765:)
2746:)
2656:)
2626:)
2601:)
2575:)
2526:)
2512:)
2498:)
2482:)
2454:)
2450:ā
2425:)
2379:)
2355:)
2334:)
2313:)
2274:)
2229:)
2221:.
2217::
2194:20
2185:ć
2172:)
2144:20
2135:ć
2122:)
2100:20
2091:ć
2068:)
2040:)
2023:)
2000:,
1996:,
1992:,
1981:,
1958:,
1954:,
1943:,
1936:.
1918:"
1899:)
1841:)
1821:)
1793:)
1778:)
1755:)
1722:)
1620:)
1605:)
1573:)
1544:)
1540:ā
1522:)
1489:)
1472:,
1454:)
1426:)
1398:)
1263:)
1242:)
1234:.
1219:)
1200:)
1166:)
1102:)
1060:)
1048:,
1035:)
1019:)
984:)
968:,
934:)
914:)
899:)
873:of
851:)
847:ā
828:)
787:)
752:)
728:,
679:)
659:)
629:)
580:)
547:)
525:)
507:)
487:)
472:)
458:)
438:)
412:)
394:)
365:Mr
359::
315:Mr
306:)
280:)
249:)
222:)
187:|
157:)
143:)
123:|
64:ā
2965:(
2939:(
2916:(
2890:(
2861:(
2814:(
2787:(
2761:(
2742:(
2652:(
2622:(
2597:(
2571:(
2522:(
2508:(
2494:(
2478:(
2446:(
2421:(
2375:(
2351:(
2330:(
2309:(
2270:(
2225:(
2168:(
2118:(
2064:(
2036:(
2008:)
2004:(
1928::
1895:(
1837:(
1817:(
1789:(
1774:(
1751:(
1718:(
1616:(
1601:(
1569:(
1536:(
1518:(
1485:(
1450:(
1422:(
1394:(
1378:(
1259:(
1238:(
1215:(
1196:(
1162:(
1098:(
1056:(
1031:(
1015:(
980:(
930:(
910:(
895:(
843:(
839:ā
824:(
813:.
783:(
748:(
675:(
655:(
625:(
576:(
543:(
521:(
503:(
483:(
468:(
454:(
434:(
408:(
390:(
368:X
318:X
302:(
276:(
245:(
218:(
214:ā
189:c
185:t
183:(
153:(
139:(
125:c
121:t
119:(
107:)
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.