Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 41

2205:

reliable, scholarly, neutral, modern-day - identify the individuals as LGBT according to modern understanding. If we cannot agree to categorize people like James VI/I and Edward II as absolutely LGBT (although I think we should; their relationships are very well documented), we should be able to create some sort of "Possibly LGBT people" category that would include only deceased people (probably with some date cutoff, so as not to catch the recently dead that users might speculate about) and for which inclusion would be determined based on an assessment of sources. This would allow us to recognize the work done by historical scholars on these individuals' personal relationships and avoid arbitrarily weighting the views of some scholars (the ones who say they're straight) over others, while avoiding taking a position if the matter is debated. –

1039:

phsycological studies and theories. Ranging between what was "wrong" with those with alternative gender identifications or sexual preferences to what is "wrong" with those who would repress, deny, or otherwise dishonor their own sexual desires. Being of an alternative gender identification or sexual orientation can provide difficult circumstances for personal growth, sexual coupling, or simply societal functioning. Historically in Native American and other indigenous tribal cultures, there were those who were simulaneously a male and a female presence. Although these indidviduals were often intuitive and held places such as medicine men and women and tribal councellors, their connection to the devine left them as targets for retribution or sacrifice when the gods didn't bless the community with a healthy crop or disfortunes of the like.

2761:" but i can't be 100% on that. This might be like the LGBT debaccle again to an extent. If something discusses a specific wording then point out the preferred wording but don't misattribute. I intend to actually have a bit of this kinda stuff in my workload eventually as the UK parliamentary committee report into the press was presented a lot of examples of the press trying to whip up hate against transgenders by using the unpolitically correct terms on many occasions. And i actually saw one today from the Daily Mail (hardly surprizing) about the cross-dressing "doctor" giving the illegal bum implants. What can you expect when the papers regulate themselves? Thanks 2988:

exclusivity of male and female sexes, particularly the idea of such a divide being "natural". Some intersex people may view themselves as genderless, or view themselves as between sexes, but it's common for intersex people to identify within the traditional male/female binary. Generally, those who identify as genderless would be genderqueer or similar. It's complex, and human diversity apparently has no conceivable end, as everything breaks down into different little things and people are all different in how they approach their identities. Diversity ad absurdum. --

1147: 3610: 31: 431: 785:" to "a person's history of same-sex sexual contact or transgender practices" which seems particularly dehumanizing. I've changed it back to the stable version and asked that they gain consensus before redefining the opening sentence like this. I've also asked for reliable sources that support such a change. I've seem their work on a few article so I would like other people's opinions at the article talkpage on what you think. 1266:, except at Tom Cruise we also get to claim that there are serious BLP issues in having the LGBT studies WikiProject banner on the page. In case you were wondering, this problem does affect other WikiProjects, but usually with less impersonal vitriol (and sometimes more personal vitriol, when we have two WikiProjects whose members dislike each other and believe that the other group is engaged in a hostile takeover). 2925: 1789:

aspects of the Chinese laws regarding transsexuals through English versions of Chinese newspapers (things like you must wait five years for surgery, and can change your identification at a police station, but you must be single and must have had surgery). Are these valid sources for asserting what the legal position is, or must I find copies of the actual laws? Also, can I join this project? --

2436:. I think some of the suggestions being made are far too wordy; to me, "possibly" is sufficient in the category name, while the category description could elaborate on what determines inclusion. The other issue is that pre-19th-century doesn't currently split by occupation, nor do any of the proposals made here including mine; this obviously doesn't help us with the problem at hand of 3141:. This creates a perplexing zone of confusion in discussions about the relationships between sex, gender and gender identity, pre- and postnatal hormonal influences on gender identity, socialization, etc., which confusion is by now IMO almost impossible to overcome, since there is no authority in the English language to enforce a standard (unlike say, France, or Israel? ;-). 1737:

should be made to include a section on transgender rights (or the lack of) in every article, regardless of how brief. Otherwise, it's just LGB. Incidentally, I've also noticed a tendency to focus on gay men, with lesbians frequently receiving little to no attention; this is also something which needs to be assessed, but it's much less prevalent than the trans problem. --

2790:"Gender reassignment surgery" is meaningless; sexual reassignment surgery is the surgical alteration of sexual characteristics to align them with a person's gender identity. When described in terms of gender, which is often in a broader context than just surgery, it's referred to as "gender affirmation". I'm 3195:

I'm not sure how to make the change myself (I haven't edited Knowledge before), but the section of the LGBT rights in Rhode Island page which states that "Rhode Island has a criminal statute covering acts of violence motivated by both sexual orientation and gender identity/expression" is not correct.

2987:

is a grouping of medical conditions which are present in 1-2% of the population wherein people have sexual characteristics which normally appear in the other sex. Specific features are very, very varied, but the importance of such conditions with regards to LGBT issues is in the way it challenges the

2822:

That's the Daily Mail for you. Apparently, many other newspapers are making the same error in describing Garner as a cross-dresser. Huffington Post (which, despite its attempts at being a liberal paper, is generally abysmal with trans issues), gives us the following: "The suspect – who police say was

1852:

for these individuals to be declared gay simply because they had sexual relations with people of the same sex and then reverted my reverts. Apparently, his grandfather was baptised by one of the royals whom he has decided is not gay enough to be labeled LGBT (which he views as a "political" term) so

1579:

Mind One: We are not labeling persons when we use a project tag. We are stating our interests. Need we list the homophobes and homophobic organizations we tag as obvious evidence of that? We could discuss someone's sexual orientation ad nauseam on a Talk page without being challenged, but the rainbow

1236:

section on scholarly interpretation of Batman as a gay figure rabble rabble" rant; I really am getting to the point where I'm liable to start responding with nothing of value beyond vitriol. Any of you guys maybe want to watchlist the page in case you could add something now or in the future? Current

465:

Yeah, I'm not sure where the best place would be as I'm not sure Regnerus is notable enough for an article. However, we should certainly refer to sources about the severe flaws in the study in articles where the study is mentioned, like the Witherspoon article, lest we provide misleading information.

2204:

As you go back into history it gets more difficult because we don't have people self-identifying as LGBT the way they do today - because of legal and social penalties, or because the language and concepts simply did not exist. It is undoubted that in many of these cases, reliable sources - multiple,

1502:

is being added to any article that has some interest to members of this project. It has been argued (and I agree) that when added to the talk page of a biography of a living person, it has problematic BLP implications. But there's also a widespread view that WikiProjects should have the right to tag

1407:

I support a redirect without transclusion and leaving the history and archives there. To make people aware of the existence of the archives we just link to it. I confirm that the notice board has never been popular and has received fewer than ten posts in the past few years and that this page is the

944:

about whether the article should be in this Wikiproject or not. As far as I can tell, the only link he has to LGBT is that he has a history of suing people who say he's gay. The concern that apparently sparked the discussion was that he could sue Knowledge for putting him in the LGBT project/putting

655:

Actually, it doesn't. It has a bibliography but no references. There is a difference. One is a list of overall resources used whether cited or not in the article and references are a list of cited sources for the information being used. The section entitlted "Citation information" is information for

3539:

I'm walking away from this situation, but I would encourage editors not to "lie down and take it", there are a number of sources and entirely policy-compliant arguments for keep in many of these cases. Apply Google Books, Google Scholar, and Google News Archives. Most of this will sort itself out

3355:

Also, I'm about to be away on Wikibreak, but most of the articles that got PROD'd, not all, were from one editor, who is understandably very unhappy. If someone were open to reaching out with a helping hand there, it could make a lot of difference. (I'd do it myself, but it's silly to do that and

3007:

via surgery would be that of surgically altering whatever aspect of a person's brain that creates gender dysphoria, so that their gender identity aligned with their assigned sex. "Gender reassignment surgery" is opposite in meaning to "sex reassignment surgery", which is altering the body such that

2417:

I was responding based on Roscelese's original comment about "scholars" and "going back in history". In the case of a BLP like Travolta (or even Cher, Midler and Madonna), I don't think there's a need to categorize the individuals themselves as "Person of LGBT interest"; it's sufficient to indicate

1663:

Judging from the other comments, this doesn't seem to be generally considered a problem needing a specific disclaimer. Fair enough, I was probably being a bit oversensitive in suggesting it. It's also true that this is far from the worst template when it comes to implicitly making allegations about

969:

has since morphed into something rather more significant: whether this WikiProject can be prohibited by outside editors from adding articles to its scope due to concerns that the project tag might be misconstrued. WikiProject members may wish to visit the above discussion, or the related posting on

189:

she commented, "I just embrace all people of all lifestyles and I don’t tell them they are bad people. And I say girls are beautiful and girls are sexy and they need to be told that, and if they don’t have anyone to tell them that and mean it, I’m gonna tell them that. But I feel like people always

112:

Hi, folks. I happened by this article and I think there's some discrimination going on with attacks on it. There are unreasonable challenges to properly cited information and some discussion that belittles the subject and calls for deletion. I'm attempting to add to the article but I'm encountering

3203:

The whole thing is a bit of a mess, but the take away is that when a criminal selects their victim because of the victim's gender identity or expression the person has committed a hate crime as defined by the hate crime monitoring statute (R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-28-46), but their sentence will not be

2920:

Basically, there is a difference in saying "I'm gay" and "I'm a gay": "I'm a gay" is not correct. similarly I can describe myself as transgender, "I am transgender" but I can't say "I'm a transgender." It's just a matter of linguistics. Referring to transgender individuals as "transgenders" is not

1788:

Hi, I'm the IP above. I've been curious about transgender issues in countries like China for a while, because the information isn't available on Knowledge and I wouldn't know where to look for legal information (which, really, is the content I'm after for these articles). I've found out about some

1736:

As someone who is interested in differences in LGBT rights in different countries, I have frequently been disappointed to find that in many of the "LGBT rights in *country*" articles, the rights of transgender people are never discussed. This is a huge problem, and I think that a systematic effort

626:

Unfortunately, the site itself didn't pass verifiability with no references as an encyclopedia. While it has many things we would assume make it reliable, it has some issues in regard to circular referencing and text matching wikipedia as well. I am sure there are stronger sources to use for this.

229:

interview I'm not sure what to make of. They call her "openly bisexual" which is clearly not true since she doesn't identify as bisexual. The other stuff, the direct quotes from her, look fine policy wise, but it's perhaps a bit too long. Maybe trim down the quotes to the essentials or skip one of

3559:

This sort of thing happened several years ago, and we did lose some articles despite ample reliable sourcing. Notability is always a judgment call, but I found it difficult to continue to AGF when multiple articles dealing with a very specific subject were being targeted using a narrow reading of

2738:

in Hong Kong's LGBT rights page. I have a style question, though: In the example shown, I changed "has had a sex change operation" to "has undergone sex reassignment surgery". "Undergo" is frequently used in reference to surgery and medical treatments, especially significant ones, but I'm curious

2599:

Yeah, grammatically that's right. I think my reaction may be based on a tendency to look at the beginning adverb and read it with an implied "People who are...", which results in the ambiguity. (I didn't realize I had that reaction while we were only discussing "people", just when I substituted a

1807:

if you want. Newspaper coverage (from reliable newspapers) is in some ways actually preferred on Knowledge to primary sources: reading the actual laws can be error-prone, newspaper coverage tends towards at least "big-picture" accuracy. Primary sources (the laws themselves) can be used, but are

856:

Upon moving the content to its own article, another user objected to the change for a variety of reasons, and has tagged the new page with a deletion request. We have been discussing the matter in attempts to resolve it but do not appear to be getting anywhere. As a result, I would like to invite

3002:

Bookkeeper: "Gender reassignment surgery" implies that a person's gender/gender identity is altered via surgery. Depending on how you interpret this, there are separate problems. Suggesting that someone's gender expression/gender role is altered by surgery is of course absurd, and the concept of

3199:

A 2012 law (2012 Rhode Island Laws Ch. 12-124 (12-S 2488) (effective May 30, 2012)) amended the definition of “Hate Crimes” in the hate crime monitoring and reporting law (R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-28-46) to include gender identity and expression, but this law explicitly does NOT affect the sentence

1767:

The bias is in the publishing and sources. There are not many members of the transgender community in publishing, academia, or media, and so not much content exists to be cited. If you are sensitive to this issue and have access to media on the international transgender community then consider

717:? I'm uncomfortable with the vast re-interpretation of transgender people as having "conflicted gender identity" as well as the other sweeping changes. More eyes would be appreciated and I'm already dealing with some hate crime organizations so I'd rather not take on a new project right now. 608:

counts as a reliable source, especially regarding this current blockquote: "Throughout their history, tomboys have had to contend with the stigma of presumed lesbianism or the accusation of wanting to be male. Both assumptions were categorically refuted by twentieth-century psychology, which

3853:

which is at deletion. I think it's history, including the one of the worst LGBT arson attacks, the last major LGBT event ignored by national media, and the first LGBT national fundraiser (all in the US and tied to the 1973 fire) help add to the notability. I'm still adding sources but would

2458:

I still prefer something a bit more definitive, like "widely viewed as", but have to admit it's a little wordy, especially if, as it seems, you're thinking of baseline phrasing for a number of categories like occupation. Could you at least live with narrowing the field a bit by substituting

1038:

There can be no denial of the fact that as humanity evolves so too does our sexuality. It would be ignornat to assume otherwise. What is considered to be an evolved sense of sexuality or of gender identification? That is a question that is not asked enough. There are many clinical and

3204:

enhanced by the state's Hate Crime Sentencing Act (R.I. GEN. LAWS § 12-19-38). In other words, the state tracks crimes motivated by bias against gender identity or expression, but it does not have a has a criminal statute covering acts of violence motivated by gender identity/expression.

3152:

time, told me recently: "You're transgender. You definitely qualify for surgery." So: there you go: she's not using "transgender" as an umbrella term here, contrary to the current popular usage. She even corrected me once when I referred to myself as a "transsexual" and said "You're

3022:

By the same token, "sex reassignment surgery" has often been thought of as an attempt to alter a person's sex, in the genetic sense of the term (meaning xy to xx or xx to xy which is, as of yet, a medical impossibility). While you an I may understand the term implies altering the sexual

2103:

May I express my extreme disappointment in this discussion? When I saw this section header pop up in my watchlist, I thought it was going to be about homosexual felines who were fans of deceased monarchs. Perhaps not nearly so necessary a discussion, but one with more inherent interest.

3677:

articles... They are covering the same topic and therefore need to be merged...with one redirecting to the other. The former is used more commonly in everyday usage. And having studied the topic extensively, I know that the former is also used more than the latter in sources concerning

1119:) and appears in various dictionaries of slang, but perhaps should only be considered a dictionary definition. If the concept is notable, then there ought to be a Knowledge article on it, but I am not sure that notability can be proven. I have submitted the definition to Wiktionary. 3099:

Those like myself, who try to maintain the distinction between "sex" (as reproductive anatomy, also usually identified with the secondary sex characteristics of a person) and "gender" (as a socio-psychological manifestation of the self, and sometimes, brain-sex), tend to prefer

2491:

Heh. Well, technically it's not, of course. Otherwise there would be no need for it. But as a practical matter, for the new cat(s) to be at all useful, yes, it would have to. (Unless, of course, you want to follow the "tail wagging the dog" principle used where, e.g.,

1365:

here. No one uses it, and people wanting to post a heads-up should be coming to the talk page. What I'm not sure how to handle is integrating that page's history/archives into the talk page's history/archives, so people are aware that the material is there to be read.

2854:

As a final aside, "transgenders" isn't an appropriate term, since transgender isn't a noun - it's an adjective, so it has to be used in conjunction with something else. "Transgender people/folk/men/women/whatever" would be correct. ("Trans" is used in the same way.)

1393:. This would obviate any complications over page histories and the existing archives. I'm not sure if there are other implications, either theoretical (e.g., project page content duplicated on a talk page) or logistical (the possibility of new duplicate archives). 2898:"Gay", "lesbian" and "transgender" are different words. "Gay" and "lesbian" are both nouns and adjectives, "transgender" is an adjective only. Furthermore, I'm trans, and I'm quite definitely not behind the times. Using transgender as a noun is incorrect, and as 3649:

Hello, everyone. I'm mentioning the "Most Lesbians Have Sex With Men" discussion here because one or more of you may have something to state about it. I've already commented on the matter on the article's talk page, especially since the main contributor of the

2252:"Possibly LGBT" is just too broad. Debates will arise whether an unsubstantiated rumour is enough to be included in that category. Maybe it could be created if the guidelines for that category says it should only be applied when there is substantial evidence. 1602:

Well it does say "WikiProject LGBT studies" and the rainbow (flag) is the international symbol of LGBTQQI, etc inclusiveness. Anyone actually upset by that probably is upset about lots of things that we aren't about to change, about ourselves or the project.

2844:

As for the topic itself, though, I was just asking whether "undergone" was inappropriate. With regards to misattribution, the example shown, the source itself used "sex reassignment surgery", whereas the editor who wrote it up had used the term "sex change

1518:

I think we should do something similar with the template. This isn't a matter of 'protecting us from getting sued', it's simply a matter of basic decency, and not making potentially offensive implications about living people. What does everyone else think?

2302:

don't examine primary documents and decide if the language used between two men is romantic enough to be "substantial evidence" - we read historians who have analyzed the documents and so on, and go with what they say about the individuals' relationships.

2012:‎ (Not a substantiate fact. Sexuality "labels" in history are not only misleading, highly controversial or manipulated evidence but especially anachronistical when applied throughout history with there own and differentiated concept of sex and sexuality.) 3666:) and cannot be reached through email. It's also because of this that more eyes on this article from members of this project would be beneficial to it. Moni3 used to keep it well-policed. And now that she's gone, it seems that role now defaults to me. 3752:

Note: I reverted the editor and explained matters on his talk page, right after Wikiwind and another editor commented there (I assume that the user is a he, going by the user name). The editor has started a discussion on the topic at the talk page:

2872:

As for "transgenders", i've seen "gays", "lesbians" etc used that way tonnes of times so i believe you're a bit behind the times on that one. Using it without the words "folk", "peoples" or what-have-you is the most common phrasing. Thanks

1966:‎ (Saint-Simon lui reprochera surtout d'être adonné au « vice » des « habitants de Sodome » from fr.wikipedia.org/Louis-Joseph_de_Vend%C3%B4me. i.e. has been criticized for alleged homosexuality - removing categorization until more sources) 1007: 2739:

whether the term could be construed as non-neutral. I don't want to say "had sex reassignment surgery" because it sounds stupid and reads badly, but at the same time I don't want to introduce new issues into pages whilst updating terms.

1944:‎ ("According to biographer Jonathan Petropoulos, Philipp was probably bisexual" this does not mean that Philipp, Landgrave of Hesse can be automatically placed in Category:LGBT royalty, Category:LGBT people from Germanyetc. removing) 518:

These two articles need their information to be segregated from each other. One is the organization, the other the event, but both seem to be about both topics, and should instead be separated to clearly be about one or the other. --

405:

titled "How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study". I understand that it is not a study of "gay parenting" and has been excluded from the entry on

1976:...) Ludwig II of Bavaria ‎ (Ludwig is best known as an eccentric and at best a latent homosexual. A long-time and very close and personal relationship with Richard Wagner did exist but does that also make Wagner a LGBT candidate?) 920:

consistently cites her as "he" despite identifying as a woman. I do not believe this is accurate protocol but am not entirely sure so would rather leave it/bring it to the attention of people who deal with this topic. Thank you.

3444:

because of lack of significant coverage any amount of time after the fact or any individual impact, but if deletion discussions about attacks on Israelis are any indication, Knowledge simply doesn't care about WP:EVENT anymore.

3477: 736:

and everything seems cool except for that strange description of transgender people. I do not want to comment on that article's talk page. It seems like the user who posted that is new and already involved in controversies.

3031:, to use your own words, not the other way around. Technically, both terms have flaws, but both are acceptable by academic and medical standards. I personally use SRS rather than GRS, but I understand its intended meaning. 3560:

notability guidelines that those pursuing a deletion agenda were quite unable to defend. That's why I walked away then, and that's why, beyond perhaps adding a source here and casting a !vote there, it's sometimes useless

3196:

Rhode Island does have a statute providing for penalty enhancement for crimes motivated by, among other things, sexual orientation (R.I. GEN. LAWS § 12-19-38), but the statute does not cover gender identity or expression.

2000:‎ (The LGBT category- No corroborating facts. Italian and German language Knowledge has only; Ferdinando II sposò Vittoria Della Rovere. Discendenza: Cosimo (*/† 1639), Cosimo III.(1642–1723), Francesco Maria (1660–1711).) 3008:

it is congruent with a person's gender identity. That's why I said the term was meaningless. The purpose of surgery is to bring the body into cohesion with the brain, not to bring the brain into cohesion with the body. --

429:

being one of the more recent accessible things I've seen about the quality of the study. Google Scholar only has the paper cited by two other resources, neither of which looks very helpful. There's probably more

3200:

enhancement statute ("This section shall not be construed to increase or enhance the penalties against the perpetrators of hate crimes as defined in this section, unless provided for by any other section of law")

1994:‎ (Alleged homosexuality...hat his supposed homosexuality was based on his dislike of war and hunting being interpreted as effeminate, an image cultivated by political opponents. Removing "presumptive" categories) 1408:

de facto noticeboard. It might be possible to re-institute the noticeboard in a few years if more people participate in LGBT community development, but right now there is no need for that board and this one both.

248:

My main problem was with the first sentence and how much it used weasel words. I've re-worded the section to refer to her use of sexual identities in music and made it shorter. Thank you very much for your help!

1768:

posting your sources to the respective talk pages of each country's LGBT rights article. Without sources this content will never be included, and I fear that for many places there just are no sources to cite.

1468:

I'm concerned that this article may not be NPOV but would prefer other editors to take a look. Primarily it seems to be yet another article legitimizing Blanchard's work which has been seen as controversial.

220:

source, which, if I'm reading it correctly at a quick glance, talks about how she plays with several different sexual identities in her work (which should be fine to include, but I'd attribute it in-text to

3404: 194:, saying: "The point is, everyone is not black and white. There are so many shades in the middle, and you’ve got to let people feel comfortable with saying what they want to say when they want to say it." 1534:

No. No more than every other Wikiproject tag needs a disclaimer. We shouldn't bow to what feels like hysteria and homophobia. The current guidelines noted in the discussion amply cover the situation.

3118:

is the term which used to be predominant, but its use seems to be on the wane. "SRS" still seems to be quite commonly used, since "GRS" doesn't seem to have as much standing as a well-known acronym.

2081:

that cites no page. Same for the "some suggestion" citation of Lucy Moore's work. "reportedly blackmailed" with no citation at all. The most specific bits cite Picknett, Prince, Prior & Brydon's

1982:‎ (Queens uncle Prince George was only reputed to have had sexual liaisons with maybe a man or two. Does that justify categorizing as Category:LGBT royalty or Category:LGBT people from England) 1386: 3790: 2497: 2835:

Terms like "sex swap" are banned by the PCC in the UK, and (as far as I'm aware) terms like "sex change" are discouraged. The PCC, however, is utterly useless, so these rules get ignored.

2812: 3342:

needs a thorough rewrite, I took it from 2 to nearly 20 sources and tossed the PROD. Nothing simplifies a notability discussion like a broad, well-distributed bucketload of sources. --

3482: 3419: 1440: 2072: 609:

established the normality of the tomboy experience among girls of all identities. However, for many, the tomboy stage is the first manifestation of a gender-fluid life journey."

2136: 3788:, which are within the scope of this WikiProject, have been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 3472: 3414: 2574:

Maybe this is a regional difference? "Probably LGBT people" seems a lot more correct to me than "Probable LGBT people" (the "probably" modifying the adjective, not the noun). –

3071:). On the subject of terminology, my personal preference is "genital reconstruction surgery", but any contemporary term should be accepted, and definitely over "sex change". 2006:‎ (rumoured to have been either homosexual or bisexual i.e. not established fact. Rumoured to have been a clown or had Abasiophilia does not count as reason for Category mark) 1626:, though it seems a little legal-y to me. Changes to that template should be discussed at the village pump first since it they would impact virtually every article talk page. 1583:

Mind Two: I'd be happy with language that says that "this entry is of interest to participants in the LGBT Project". I'd have serious problems with anything that smacked of a

1314:

on a similar tangent. Should these problems be explicitly noted? I've seen on several pages where the source's description is preferred over the person's self description.

1310:

is a good read about how the journalistic community, despite their standards of practice, are often terrible when it comes to reporting of trans issues. It's nothing new;

3285: 202:

guidelines? Is it too speculative? Should it be re-worded? Or is it okay? I would be grateful for your opinion on this issue as I am struggling on how to word it. Thanks!

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 807:

Possibly not the best place to put this, but the category for gay wikipedians is currently undergoing deletion review, so anyone interested in weighing in, please do so

2030: 1867: 1997: 1988:‎ (No sources for Category:LGBT royalty. Knowledge articles in German, French, Italian does not mention this LGBT claim. A claim is not enough -only facts. Thank you) 1972:‎ (Man kann natürlich fragen: Ist es überhaupt von Bedeutung, zu wissen, welche sexuellen Probleme Ludwig II. hatte oder ob Ludwig II. homosexuell war oder nicht? 2705: 1693: 1362: 339: 216:

The wording "While some songs and interviews have implied that Minaj is bisexual" is a bit vague and kind of weasely. I'd replace it with a better summary of the

446:

Sorry. I know sources are widely available. I'm looking for it on Knowledge. Even as bad science it merits some discussion. I see it mentioned/misrepresented at

3492: 3409: 656:

citing the author/publication not for the references the author used. The threshold for inclusion on Knowledge is verifiablity. This source is not verifiable.--

1950:‎ ("Prince Pierre's homosexuality, according to his friend, British writer James Lees-Milne" i.e. claim not conducive evidence. Removing Category:LGBT royalty) 1503:

articles as part of their scope. So, here's a possible solution to this dilemma: should the template include a short disclaimer, something alone the lines of

3497: 3487: 1444: 808: 512: 2016:

I am not saying any of these people are/are not GLBT. I am struck by the standard PGarret is using to determine who is gay enough to warrant the category.

1237:

fella is literally arguing that an author is not a good source for his own intent, just to give you a taster. Thanks for any help you might be able to add.

3449:

think it's a good guideline, but I'm not sure it's community consensus anymore since it always gets trodden into the dirt whenever the victim is Israeli. –

2794:

you got the term "gender reassignment surgery" from that Daily Mail article, which is a mistake, as the Mail doesn't even try to get their facts straight.

1804: 1674:

are much more serious. That template seems to do without a disclaimer, and just expects people to use it with caution; I suppose the same applies here.

426: 1953: 2560:

Getting back to the original point, "Probably LGBT royalty" seems awkward or ambiguous. "Probable LGBT royalty" or "Royalty who were probably LGBT"?

1115:(the term refers to a lesbian who has never had sex with a man) has been deleted as non-notable. The term has been used in scholarly articles (see 3705:). In my opinion his edits are against policy, perhaps even vandalism, but I will not edit war. Can someone look into his edits in this article?-- 1668: 1018:. But SV's coments have reminded me that your assessment cats could have a more verbose name, like "B-class WikiProject LGBT studies articles". 47: 17: 1201: 1163: 1307: 1116: 641:

It has references, Amadscientist. But I had already agreed that there are better sources for this content. And, again, thank you for your help.

3850: 3842: 1618:

I think that an even handed approach is much more palatable than one that targets just this project. I would not be opposed to modification of

1327: 1151: 594: 486: 1282:

I think Batman talk page should benefit from a FAQ at the top specifically addressing the issue. Also there's a repeated topics template, see

3810: 2150: 2113: 2098: 2049: 1894: 580: 1220:

Forgive me the catchy header, just hoped to draw another eye or two. For what, by my count, is the fourth time in about two months or less,

1938:‎ ("have suggested Marie Joséphine's possible lesbian relationship with a lady-in-waiting" not sufficient for placing in any LGBT category) 2921:

correct, you have to attach a noun: "Transgender people", "transgender individuals", "Transgender man/men", "transgender woman/women" etc.

2493: 1956:‎ (Removing Category:LGBT. Sources weak. (rumoured to have been a homosexual). A reactionary even by contemporary conservative standards 3795: 2712: 1718: 1074: 642: 610: 520: 1885:

is usually debatable. The best solution is follow to the sources. You don't tell us where that's been an issue. It would help to know.

1752:

It's probably indicative of the situation with RSes and even LGB charities in those countries. Very often, the "T" is an afterthought.

3233:

Is there a collapsible version of the project template? I'd like to add it to articles, but it feels really intrusive at full size. --

3214: 1947: 1900: 1738: 1046: 692: 318: 3252: 945:

the template on his talk page. I don't have strong opinions on the matter myself, but I thought I'd notify interested editors here.

880: 410:. Can someone point me in the right direction? It has just been cited (ignorantly) for the first time in a federal court decision. 1311: 3821: 3621: 3617: 2058:‎who has repeated documented liaisons with men and women. If that's not bisexual, what is? And the B in LGBT is for bisexual... 1963: 861: 3458: 3262: 3112:- is "confirmed" through surgery bringing the genitalia and secondary sex characteristics more in line with that sense of self. 3041: 2938: 2583: 2523: 2482: 2449: 2312: 2275: 2214: 1375: 475: 230:

the two quotes that essentially say the same thing (that she doesn't want to be defined.) Good luck getting the article to GA!

3389:

All the articles are in the same category, it's the only context I can see. Now they are all being sent for deletion by AfD.

2392:

Mines a suggestion for all circumstances where the tagging could be controvertial, such as John Travolta for example. Thanks

1462: 1130: 434:, but a lot of the most relevant stuff looks to use the link above (or the audit itself) as it's eventual source. Cheers, -- 1973: 3108:, since that stresses that the internal sense of gender - usually after being reinforced by a successful experience during 2433: 1899:

Changing gay to homosexual is reminiscent of organizations that replace the word gay with homosexual to hilarious results (

1510:

We already take a similar approach with potentially contentious categories - as I'm sure this project's members are aware,

2418:

that the article itself is of LGBT interest by use of the project template and the categories it generates on talk pages.

3292:

So far I've found seven with plenty of reliable sources being prodded. More eyes on these articles would be appreciated.

1642: 1587:. As usual, it's all in the details. Maybe we need to subtract the "LGBT-related" language. Of interest shoudl suffice. 683: 2500:

and make "Probable LGBT people" the overall parent, but that's always seemed a bit weird and counter-intuitive to me.)

113:

quite a bit of resistance. Could I get some folks to review the history and provide opinions on the talk page? Thanks.

3674: 3642: 2055: 1979: 1941: 865: 846: 827: 2903: 1935: 1929: 1756:, for instance, have come into a lot of flack for not just ignoring, but actively harming the trans rights movement. 1197: 1159: 3785: 1646: 3032: 2929: 2009: 1985: 1841: 38: 1700: 3806: 3618:

Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles?

3329: 3238: 3013: 2993: 2911: 2860: 2824: 2747: 1794: 1496: 3863: 3854:

appreciate other eyes looking at the discussion and article since it's being written under the deadline of AfD.

3836: 3815: 3766: 3747: 3720: 3687: 3628: 3591: 3573: 3546: 3530: 3518: 3462: 3434: 3398: 3373: 3362: 3348: 3333: 3316: 3301: 3277: 3242: 3222: 3176: 3096:

The phrases "sex change", "sex change operation", and "sex change surgery" are deprecated, and definitely passé.

3077: 3054: 3017: 2997: 2979: 2951: 2915: 2893: 2864: 2781: 2751: 2720: 2679: 2657: 2609: 2587: 2569: 2527: 2509: 2486: 2468: 2453: 2427: 2412: 2387: 2373: 2358: 2316: 2293: 2279: 2261: 2247: 2218: 2198: 2189:

All very funny were we not still reeling from the death of Her Majesty's corgi. Dogs are people too, my friend.

2173: 1814: 1798: 1783: 1762: 1746: 1726: 1712: 1683: 1658: 1635: 1612: 1596: 1568: 1543: 1528: 1478: 1456: 1423: 1402: 1379: 1350: 1320: 1295: 1275: 1256: 1205: 1167: 1136: 1101: 1082: 1054: 1027: 997: 983: 959: 930: 906: 884: 820: 794: 752: 726: 700: 682:

Impact/evolution of TV shows featuring LGBT content; don't know which article fits the best so here's the link:

665: 650: 636: 618: 588: 557: 543: 528: 502: 479: 459: 440: 419: 271: 257: 239: 210: 190:

wanna define me and I don’t wanna be defined." She reiterated her dislike of being labeled in an interview with

148: 122: 3109: 2731: 1436: 1097: 584: 576: 2089:, "a writer, researcher, and lecturer on the paranormal, the occult, and historical and religious mysteries." 853:. In addition, since doing so, I have significantly expanded upon and rewritten most of the original content. 3780: 1176:

07:00, 4 September 2012 SemperBlotto (Talk | contribs) deleted page gold star lesbian (Creative invention or

3218: 2716: 2118:

My great-aunt Mildred had a cat that she swore was gay, but alas, Mildred wasn't royalty and the cat failed

1742: 1722: 1717:

And your ideas about how to improve that woeful and bloated article would also be useful and welcome there.

1078: 1050: 661: 646: 632: 614: 524: 1832:

has recently been removing the Category:LGBT Royalty from a number of gay and lesbian dead royals, such as

1190: 876: 296: 3312: 2675: 2605: 2565: 2505: 2464: 2423: 2369: 2194: 2169: 2094: 2045: 1923: 1890: 1776: 1592: 1416: 1271: 1023: 902: 745: 696: 553: 539: 498: 455: 415: 3148:

as a pre-op transsexual. My therapist, who is reasonably expert and has been doing gender therapy for a

3067:

On the subject of the PCC, it's toothless and newspapers still use those terms (see the above section on

1193: 1155: 1092:

The new binarism article could use some help getting off its feet. All help will be greatly appreciated.-

988:

I'll just add that "prohibition" isn't the goal and agreement by editors part of this project is sought.

3207:

If someone could figure out how to format this into an accurate/succinct edit it would be appreciated.

3172: 2956:

I stand corrected then. Thanks for the link, i don't see me using it very often but it's useful to know.

2437: 2289: 2257: 2146: 1844:. He has also in at least one instance replaced "gay" with "homosexual" which may be indicative of his 1619: 993: 841:

Several days ago or so I went ahead and moved the prior content of the Real-Life Experience subsection (

447: 3757:. I commented there as well, but it may be best that one or more editors from here also comment there. 3144:

To give you some idea of how confusing the terminological chaos re: "things trans" can be… I identify

3023:

characteristics of genitalia, it is not always seen that way. Gender Reassignment surgery as a term is

2378:"Deceased royalty who engaged in same-sex sexual relations"? Avoids the modern category terminology. -- 1907:

has provided his list of unsourced or not sufficiently gay people to warrant the GLBT cat. It is here:

1649:

if this is that big an issue? There must be other issues on talk pages we might need a disclaimer for?

1580:

is too much? And I don't think a comparing Talk page material with entry page material is appropriate.

3582:

guideline is all that's needed. No need to prove that each hate-crime was particularly gruesome, etc.

2131: 2067: 2025: 1862: 1624:

The presence of this banner does not constitute a material statement about the subject of this article

872: 425:

I'm not sure precisely what sort of coverage you're looking for, but there's a few things out there.

3799: 3569: 3544: 3528: 3360: 3346: 3325: 3268:

if there are three or more project banners on the same talk page; then it collapses automatically. -

3234: 3210: 3157: 3126: 3009: 2989: 2907: 2856: 2743: 2653: 2383: 2119: 2109: 2003: 1969: 1957: 1833: 1812: 1790: 1511: 1398: 1042: 850: 831: 688: 485:

Thanks. I've just noted the case as the first to cite Regnerus where the court decision is listed in

438: 3859: 3587: 3454: 3430: 3394: 3297: 2648:"Probable" makes it sounds like we have mathematical odds calculated. "Suspected" or "believed"? -- 2579: 2519: 2478: 2445: 2308: 2271: 2210: 2037: 1991: 1837: 1608: 1539: 1474: 1452: 1371: 1291: 1247: 1093: 1011: 954: 926: 895: 816: 790: 722: 569: 490: 471: 385: 254: 207: 3754: 3713: 3524:

Oh, FFS. The editor nom'd someone whose murder had two books written about it? *shakes head* --

3511: 2973: 2887: 2775: 2711:

A request for comment about this article is now pending. You are invited to join the discussion.

2594: 2406: 2352: 2241: 1803:

Hi Poppy, First, yes, you can join this project! Welcome! You can list yourself as a member

1708: 1679: 1562: 1524: 1344: 1126: 1015: 778: 657: 628: 857:

others involved in WikiProject LGBT to the discussion to help us reach a consensus/resolution.

3832: 3762: 3743: 3683: 3678:

heterosexuality and LGBT topics. Therefore, I suggest that the latter redirect to the former.

3308: 2730:

So, I'm looking to replace terms like "sex change operation" with more appropriate ones like "

2671: 2601: 2561: 2501: 2460: 2419: 2365: 2190: 2165: 2090: 2041: 1886: 1769: 1588: 1409: 1385:

Another possibility might be to transclude noticeboard posts onto this page, much as posts to

1267: 1143: 1112: 1019: 979: 898: 738: 627:(disclaimer, I am a involved editor at the discussion and a member of this project). Thanks!-- 549: 535: 494: 451: 411: 267: 235: 177:, she has said that she does not date nor have sex with women, but added in an interview with 144: 3168: 2285: 2253: 2142: 1654: 1631: 989: 508: 132: 118: 1010:, when we agreed that this group can tag any article they want? Remember the guideline at 3727: 3670: 3663: 3638: 3565: 3541: 3525: 3441: 3357: 3343: 3273: 2649: 2379: 2123: 2105: 2059: 2017: 1854: 1848:. I started a conversation on his talk page and he simply reiterated his view that it is 1809: 1489: 1394: 1283: 1263: 1233: 966: 941: 782: 435: 185: 106: 2473:

I think that would be fine. Would you agree that it would be a subcat of "LGBT people"? –

1974:

http://www.sgipt.org/medppp/zwang/ludwig2/frauen.htm#Ludwig%20II.%20und%20die%20Sexualit%

1177: 3855: 3583: 3450: 3426: 3390: 3321: 3293: 3161: 2899: 2575: 2515: 2474: 2441: 2304: 2267: 2206: 2077:"documented liaisons with men and women" -- some fuzzy wording with a citation to the 1753: 1604: 1535: 1470: 1448: 1367: 1287: 1238: 971: 948: 922: 812: 786: 718: 467: 407: 363: 250: 203: 179: 3708: 3698: 3579: 3506: 3339: 2961: 2875: 2763: 2394: 2340: 2229: 2158: 2086: 1845: 1704: 1675: 1550: 1520: 1332: 1122: 684:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/business/media/gay-on-tv-its-all-in-the-family.html

3828: 3758: 3739: 3731: 3679: 3659: 3634: 3369: 3073: 2803:

From the article which I believe you're referencing: "Morris Garner, a man who has

1917: 1904: 1849: 1829: 1758: 1390: 1316: 1229: 975: 263: 231: 199: 140: 169:

section and saw this paragraph on her sexuality (or, rather, alleged sexuality):

1926:‎ (No source. Absolutely no conclusive evidence, removing Category:LGBT royalty) 1650: 1627: 1221: 770: 766: 401:

I'm having trouble finding coverage of the much disputed Mark Regnerus paper in

358: 162: 136: 114: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2298:

Like I said - we would go with reliable sources, because this is how WP works.

1008:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Wikiproject tags on biographies of living people

139:'s stance on gay and lesbian issues should be removed from his article or not. 3726:

Changing the pronouns to pronouns that are in direct conflict with a person's

3655: 3269: 1070: 917: 565: 3191:

LGBT rights in Rhode Island page is inaccurate, Gender Identity not protected

2284:

Okay, but it needs to be substantial evidence. "Possibly" is much too broad.

3735: 2266:

It seems obvious to me that we would use the judgment of reliable sources. –

1505:

The use of this template does not necessarily imply that the subject is LGBT

1492:

brought an issue to my attention which should be discussed here. Currently,

605: 1146:. I doubt the concept is independently notable, but I may be mistaken, see 3440:

I'm conflicted about what to do here. There is an argument that they fail

3160:- "Diversity ad absurdum" … "Nature loves diversity; society hates it." - 2085:, which you really don't want to be using as a source. The lead author is 3625: 3478:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Murder of Gary Matson and Winfield Mowder

2984: 174: 1185: 1181: 3651: 762: 1213: 1154:. I have no objections to expansion or improvement of the article. -- 714: 707: 601: 1853:

it is also somewhat personal to him. Please feel free to weigh in.

604:

article and I am in a dispute with an editor who doesn't think that

1958:

http://pages.rediff.com/grand-duke-sergei-alexandrovich-of-russia/

1808:

best used cautiously, or in addition to newspapers, books, etc. --

3405:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Roxanne Ellis and Michelle Abdill

1514:

and its subcategories have a clear disclaimer at the top stating

1014:, which says you can tag any article you want? Well, apparently 600:

Will some of you comment on this? The article in question is the

577:

Talk:List of paraphilias#Homosexuality should not be on this list

1903:. But I take your point that it is not the central focus here. 1488:

I'm not a member of this project, but the ongoing discussion at

1066: 774: 3822:

Template talk:Sexual orientation#Pansexuality and polysexuality

3734:

guideline. Every now and then, people do the same thing at the

2600:

more specific noun, whether royalty, writers, or carpenters.)

758: 713:

Could other editors please look at the recent changes made to

25: 3755:

Talk:Brandon Teena#Definitively settling the issue of pronoun

2811:, faces a life sentence for the death of one of his patients" 3827:

Input is needed with regard to the above linked discussion.

595:

Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#glbtq.com as a source

2928:, as it is increasingly used in academic and medical text. 1312:

Trans Media Watch submitted evidence to the Leveson Inquiry

173:

While some songs and interviews have implied that Minaj is

1387:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure

183:

magazine, "I don’t date men either." In an interview with

2498:

Category:Whig Party (United States) presidential nominees

2040:. And there really isn't enough to justify the category. 1228:

wall-of-text "rabble rabble Batman's not gay remove your

849:

article to its own article, which can now be found here:

3483:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Murder of Paul Broussard

3420:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Murder of Glenn Kopitske

2826:

Garner isn't a cross-dresser, she's a transgender woman.

894:

Please consider this Request for Comment re notability.

3849:

Hi, I've been working on adding context and sources to

3702: 3068: 2735: 842: 826:

Need assistance with resolving a dispute involving the

733: 2364:"Pre–20th century people widely described as LGBT"? 3139:

experts are using the term "gender" to refer to "sex"

1932:‎ (Category:Lesbians no conducive evidence. removing) 1326:

Thanks for those, i'll add them to what i'm doing on

3473:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Murder of Jason Gage

3415:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Guin Richie Phillips

534:

The former should likely be merged into the latter.

2494:

Category:Whig Party Presidents of the United States

319:"Nicki Minaj: Hip-Hop's Hottest Sidekick Goes Solo" 3286:Category:American victims of anti-LGBT hate crimes 2902:notes, offensive. You may find it helpful to read 352: 350: 3662:status, is currently retired from Knowledge (see 3258:template? The usual practise is to put it inside 732:Thanks for bringing attention to this. I checked 1516:This category may inappropriately label persons. 1484:Does the WikiProject Template need a disclaimer? 1174:The entry has been deleted from Wiktionary. See 1998:Ferdinando II de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany 1262:It's fundamentally part of the same mess as at 487:Same-sex marriage in the United States#Case law 3356:then to not answer emails for ten days...) -- 2706:Same-sex marriage legislation around the world 1694:Same-sex marriage legislation around the world 1447:. Please feel free to participate. Thank you! 262:Happy to help, it looks much improved now. ^^ 3493:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Wight 3410:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Arthur Warren 548:As it now has been, with suitable redirects. 8: 3635:Talk:Lesbian#Most Lesbians Have Sex With Men 3498:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Nizah Morris 3488:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Paris 3153:transgender". (Was I confused? YUP.) ???? 2869:"sex reassignment surgery" - I was close! =D 2805:undergone some gender reassignment surgeries 1873:The use of and/or substitution of the terms 757:They're still at it. Changing "disclosing a 513:North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance 2924:Also, "Gender reassignment surgery" is not 2662:I find that objection more true of "probabl 860:The discussion for the matter can be found 3697:A user is trying to ″correct″ pronouns in 3367:Is there any context to all of the PRODs? 1142:I redirected ther page to Wiktionary, see 1954:Grand Duke Sergei Alexandrovich of Russia 868:article. Any input would be appreciated. 678:Impact of TV shows featuring LGBT content 2726:"Sex change operation" and similar terms 2036:I decided to look at just one of these, 1920:‎ (Category:LGBT royalty proper source?) 165:to GA status and I was looking over her 2227:I would like to second this suggestion 2164:. There's a template for everything. 2141:I wish that comment had a like button. 2054:I don't disagree, but I take a look at 1361:Hello - I think we should redirect the 386:"EXTRA, EXTRA: Lost Nicki Minaj Quotes" 338:was invoked but never defined (see the 287: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject LGBT studies 3851:Big Easy Metropolitan Community Church 3843:Big Easy Metropolitan Community Church 1692:Use of flag icons and improvements to 1328:User:Jenova20/Transphobia in the media 575:Hi, all. Please comment about this at 491:Talk:LGBT parenting#Regnerus follow up 135:about whether a controversy involving 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 3622:Southern Poverty Law Center talk page 3029:the body into cohesion with the brain 2959:Intersex is genderless right? Thanks 2823:born a man and identifies as a woman" 2434:Category:Pre-19th century LGBT people 1641:Why don't we simply add something to 7: 3624:. Your participation is welcomed. – 330: 1948:Prince Pierre, Duke of Valentinois 1302:Transgender reporting in the media 295:Jonah Weiner (February 22, 2010). 24: 2757:I believe the preferred term is " 359:"The Curious Case of Nicki Minaj" 357:Ganz, Caryn (10 September 2010). 3608: 489:. I've also posed a question on 29: 3121:Referring to such surgeries as 2338:? Or is that too broad? Thanks 1732:LGBT rights in *country* series 450:, and that's just a one-liner. 3837:18:48, 30 September 2012 (UTC) 3816:21:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC) 3786:Category:LGBT German neo-Nazis 3767:20:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 3748:19:55, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 3721:19:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC) 3688:20:47, 25 September 2012 (UTC) 3629:14:27, 21 September 2012 (UTC) 3592:00:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC) 3574:19:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3547:17:09, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3531:16:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3519:16:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3463:15:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3435:12:50, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3399:12:46, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3374:03:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3363:02:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3349:01:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3334:01:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3317:00:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3302:00:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3278:23:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 3243:22:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC) 3223:02:05, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 3177:00:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 3078:23:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC) 3055:00:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC) 3027:to imply surgery which brings 3018:22:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2998:22:04, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2980:21:19, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2952:21:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2916:20:00, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2894:19:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2865:19:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2782:18:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2752:17:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2721:16:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2680:06:25, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2658:06:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2610:06:25, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2588:05:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2570:05:15, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2528:05:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2510:05:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2487:04:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2469:04:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2454:02:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC) 2428:22:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2413:21:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2388:21:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2374:21:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2359:20:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2317:17:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2294:17:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2280:16:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2262:16:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2248:15:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2219:00:42, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 2199:23:41, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2174:23:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2151:22:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2137:21:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2114:21:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2099:23:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2073:21:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2050:20:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 2031:19:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1895:18:53, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1868:18:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1815:14:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1799:14:20, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1784:15:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1763:14:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1747:05:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1727:07:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC) 1713:00:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC) 1669:WikiProject Criminal Biography 1647:Knowledge:Talk page disclaimer 1463:Classification of transsexuals 1308:the Independent's blog network 1: 3425:These are the first four ... 3229:Collapsible project template? 3123:"Gender Reassignment Surgery" 3106:"Gender Confirmation Surgery" 1964:Louis Joseph, Duke of Vendôme 1699:Could you give your opinions 1684:23:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC) 1659:09:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 1636:02:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC) 1613:22:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1597:20:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1569:20:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1544:19:25, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1529:19:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1479:22:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1457:17:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1424:12:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1403:23:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1380:20:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1351:14:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC) 1306:Paris Lee's latest piece for 1296:23:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1276:21:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1257:08:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1206:07:29, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1168:06:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1137:06:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1102:04:51, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 1083:04:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC) 3133:, you need to be aware that 3125:leads to confusions such as 3102:"Gender Recognition Surgery" 3069:trans reporting in the media 1643:Knowledge:General disclaimer 1069:" is up for discussion, see 967:Talk:Tom Cruise#LGBT Project 942:Talk:Tom Cruise#LGBT Project 3864:06:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC) 3675:Sexual orientation identity 3643:Sexual orientation identity 3564:to "lie down and take it". 2759:Gender reassignment surgery 2056:Prince George, Duke of Kent 1980:Prince George, Duke of Kent 1942:Philipp, Landgrave of Hesse 1321:12:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 1212:Seduction of the innocent ( 1055:20:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 1028:18:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 998:05:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 984:02:40, 29 August 2012 (UTC) 960:01:50, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 931:21:34, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 907:19:45, 28 August 2012 (UTC) 885:20:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 866:transitioning (transgender) 847:transitioning (transgender) 828:transitioning (transgender) 821:13:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC) 795:23:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC) 753:16:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC) 727:23:00, 25 August 2012 (UTC) 701:14:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 666:02:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 651:01:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 637:01:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 619:00:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC) 589:23:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 558:13:34, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 544:02:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 529:01:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC) 503:17:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC) 272:22:31, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 258:21:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 240:20:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 211:20:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC) 149:17:56, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 3879: 3116:"Sex Reassignment Surgery" 2734:" after noticing it being 2704:Request for comment about 2010:Christina, Queen of Sweden 1986:Princess Isabella of Parma 1842:Princess Isabella of Parma 1825:LGBT cats for dead royalty 1445:deletion review discussion 1117:this Google Scholar search 564:Homosexuality listed as a 480:20:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 460:20:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 441:19:47, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 420:19:35, 9 August 2012 (UTC) 123:03:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC) 3796:Categories for discussion 2807:and refers to himself as 1016:not everyone remembers it 843:link to pre-modified page 803:Category: Gay Wikipedians 198:Does this paragraph meet 3253:WikiProject LGBT studies 3110:Transition (transgender) 2906:, which is very good. -- 2732:sex reassignment surgery 2122:. Sorry to disappoint! 1936:Marie Joséphine of Savoy 1930:Marie Joséphine of Savoy 1437:Category:Gay Wikipedians 940:There's a discussion at 864:on the talk page of the 3781:Category:LGBT neo-Nazis 3775:Category:LGBT neo-Nazis 3730:is in violation of the 3620:has been posted at the 3540:in the end. Cheers, -- 2336:Person of LGBT interest 1664:someone - the likes of 1432:Category for Discussion 1034:Modern two spiritulasim 403:Social Science Research 161:I am trying to promote 128:Rob Portman controversy 3263:WikiProjectBannerShell 2079:Letters of Noel Coward 1924:Franz, Duke of Bavaria 1234:appropriately-weighted 3784:and its sub-category 2438:Category:LGBT royalty 1620:Template:WPBannerMeta 1441:proposed for deletion 838:Hi WikiProject LGBT, 448:Witherspoon Institute 388:. VIBE. July 6, 2010. 42:of past discussions. 3791:the category's entry 3703:see revision history 3158:User:Poppy Appletree 3127:User:Poppy Appletree 2004:Edward II of England 1970:Ludwig II of Bavaria 1834:Edward II of England 1512:Category:LGBT people 1148:Google News archives 851:Real-Life Experience 832:Real-Life Experience 334:The named reference 282:References for above 3798:page. Thank you. -- 3003:changing someone's 2083:War of the Windsors 2038:Henry III of France 1992:Henry III of France 1838:Henry III of France 1389:are transcluded to 1363:project noticeboard 570:List of paraphilias 2809:Tracey Lynn Garner 2666:" than of "probabl 1576:I'm of two minds. 1443:after the earlier 965:The discussion at 779:sexual orientation 297:"Who's That Girl?" 3814: 3213:comment added by 3052: 2949: 2598: 1657: 1622:to the effect of 1253: 1244: 1144:Gold star lesbian 1113:Gold star lesbian 1107:Gold star lesbian 1045:comment added by 691:comment added by 432:in here somewhere 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3870: 3805: 3802: 3718: 3716: 3711: 3658:, who got it to 3615: 3612: 3611: 3516: 3514: 3509: 3267: 3261: 3257: 3251: 3225: 3051: 3042: 3039: 2976: 2971: 2970: 2967: 2948: 2939: 2936: 2890: 2885: 2884: 2881: 2778: 2773: 2772: 2769: 2592: 2409: 2404: 2403: 2400: 2355: 2350: 2349: 2346: 2244: 2239: 2238: 2235: 2163: 2157: 2134: 2129: 2126: 2070: 2065: 2062: 2028: 2023: 2020: 1865: 1860: 1857: 1781: 1780: 1774: 1673: 1667: 1653: 1565: 1560: 1559: 1556: 1501: 1497:WikiProject LGBT 1495: 1421: 1420: 1414: 1347: 1342: 1341: 1338: 1254: 1249: 1245: 1240: 1230:reliably-sourced 1135: 1057: 1012:WP:PROJGUIDE#OWN 958: 951: 750: 749: 743: 703: 509:Gay World Series 390: 389: 382: 376: 375: 373: 371: 354: 345: 344: 343: 337: 329: 323: 322: 315: 309: 308: 306: 304: 292: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 3878: 3877: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3847: 3845:up for deletion 3825: 3800: 3777: 3728:gender identity 3714: 3709: 3707: 3695: 3671:Sexual identity 3664:User talk:Moni3 3647: 3639:Sexual identity 3613: 3609: 3606: 3512: 3507: 3505: 3468:A couple more: 3326:Poppy Appletree 3290: 3265: 3259: 3255: 3249: 3235:Poppy Appletree 3231: 3208: 3193: 3043: 3033: 3010:Poppy Appletree 3005:gender identity 2990:Poppy Appletree 2974: 2968: 2965: 2963: 2940: 2930: 2908:Poppy Appletree 2888: 2882: 2879: 2877: 2857:Poppy Appletree 2776: 2770: 2767: 2765: 2744:Poppy Appletree 2728: 2709: 2407: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2353: 2347: 2344: 2342: 2242: 2236: 2233: 2231: 2161: 2155: 2132: 2127: 2124: 2068: 2063: 2060: 2026: 2021: 2018: 1863: 1858: 1855: 1827: 1791:Poppy Appletree 1778: 1777: 1770: 1734: 1697: 1671: 1665: 1563: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1499: 1493: 1490:Talk:Tom Cruise 1486: 1466: 1434: 1418: 1417: 1410: 1359: 1345: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1304: 1284:Talk:Homophobia 1264:Talk:Tom Cruise 1248: 1239: 1218: 1120: 1109: 1090: 1063: 1040: 1036: 952: 946: 938: 916:The article on 914: 892: 836: 805: 783:gender identity 747: 746: 739: 711: 686: 680: 598: 581:109.123.127.204 573: 516: 399: 394: 393: 384: 383: 379: 369: 367: 356: 355: 348: 335: 333: 331: 326: 317: 316: 312: 302: 300: 294: 293: 289: 284: 156: 130: 110: 107:Stephanie Adams 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3876: 3874: 3846: 3840: 3824: 3819: 3776: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3694: 3691: 3646: 3632: 3605: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3534: 3533: 3501: 3500: 3495: 3490: 3485: 3480: 3475: 3466: 3465: 3423: 3422: 3417: 3412: 3407: 3387: 3386: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3289: 3288:being targeted 3282: 3281: 3280: 3230: 3227: 3192: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3165: 3162:Milton Diamond 3154: 3142: 3119: 3113: 3097: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3080: 3065: 3064: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3036:The Bookkeeper 3000: 2957: 2933:The Bookkeeper 2922: 2918: 2870: 2849: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2814: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2785: 2784: 2727: 2724: 2708: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2625: 2624: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2514:Pretty much. – 2390: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2250: 2222: 2221: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2101: 2014: 2013: 2007: 2001: 1995: 1989: 1983: 1977: 1967: 1961: 1951: 1945: 1939: 1933: 1927: 1921: 1913: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1772:Blue Rasberry 1765: 1733: 1730: 1696: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1616: 1615: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1485: 1482: 1465: 1460: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1412:Blue Rasberry 1358: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1303: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1279: 1278: 1217: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1171: 1170: 1108: 1105: 1094:Rainbowofpeace 1089: 1086: 1065:The usage of " 1062: 1059: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1003: 1002: 1001: 1000: 937: 934: 913: 910: 896:Fight OUT Loud 891: 890:Fight OUT Loud 888: 835: 824: 804: 801: 800: 799: 798: 797: 741:Blue Rasberry 710: 705: 679: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 669: 668: 597: 592: 572: 562: 561: 560: 546: 515: 506: 483: 482: 444: 443: 408:LGBT parenting 398: 395: 392: 391: 377: 346: 324: 310: 286: 285: 283: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 243: 242: 196: 195: 155: 152: 129: 126: 109: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3875: 3866: 3865: 3861: 3857: 3852: 3844: 3841: 3839: 3838: 3834: 3830: 3823: 3820: 3818: 3817: 3812: 3808: 3804: 3797: 3793: 3792: 3787: 3783: 3782: 3774: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3719: 3717: 3712: 3704: 3701:article (see 3700: 3699:Brandon Teena 3693:Brandon Teena 3692: 3690: 3689: 3685: 3681: 3676: 3672: 3667: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3653: 3644: 3640: 3636: 3633: 3631: 3630: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3603: 3593: 3589: 3585: 3581: 3577: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3567: 3563: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3548: 3545: 3543: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3532: 3529: 3527: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3520: 3517: 3515: 3510: 3499: 3496: 3494: 3491: 3489: 3486: 3484: 3481: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3443: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3421: 3418: 3416: 3413: 3411: 3408: 3406: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3375: 3372: 3371: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3361: 3359: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3347: 3345: 3341: 3340:Rebecca Wight 3337: 3336: 3335: 3331: 3327: 3323: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3314: 3310: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3299: 3295: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3271: 3264: 3254: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3228: 3226: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3205: 3201: 3197: 3190: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3166: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3140: 3138: 3132: 3129:notes above… 3128: 3124: 3120: 3117: 3114: 3111: 3107: 3103: 3098: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3086: 3079: 3076: 3075: 3070: 3066: 3056: 3053: 3049: 3048: 3047:of the Occult 3040: 3038: 3037: 3030: 3026: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3006: 3001: 2999: 2995: 2991: 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2978: 2977: 2972: 2958: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2950: 2946: 2945: 2944:of the Occult 2937: 2935: 2934: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2892: 2891: 2886: 2871: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2825: 2821: 2820: 2819: 2818: 2813: 2810: 2806: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2783: 2780: 2779: 2774: 2760: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2725: 2723: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2713:70.253.91.210 2707: 2703: 2681: 2677: 2673: 2672:Fat&Happy 2669: 2665: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2602:Fat&Happy 2596: 2595:edit conflict 2591: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2562:Fat&Happy 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2502:Fat&Happy 2499: 2495: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2461:Fat&Happy 2457: 2456: 2455: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2420:Fat&Happy 2416: 2415: 2414: 2411: 2410: 2405: 2391: 2389: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366:Fat&Happy 2363: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2351: 2337: 2333: 2332:LGBT interest 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2301: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2249: 2246: 2245: 2240: 2226: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2160: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2135: 2130: 2121: 2120:WP:Notability 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2102: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2087:Lynn Picknett 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2071: 2066: 2057: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2035: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2029: 2024: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2002: 1999: 1996: 1993: 1990: 1987: 1984: 1981: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1968: 1965: 1962: 1959: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1925: 1922: 1919: 1916: 1915: 1914: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1892: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1866: 1861: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1835: 1831: 1824: 1816: 1813: 1811: 1806: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1787: 1786: 1785: 1782: 1775: 1773: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1760: 1755: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1731: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1719:70.253.91.210 1715: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1695: 1691: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1670: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1586: 1581: 1577: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1561: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1517: 1513: 1508: 1506: 1498: 1491: 1483: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1464: 1461: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1431: 1425: 1422: 1415: 1413: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1364: 1356: 1352: 1349: 1348: 1343: 1329: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1319: 1318: 1313: 1309: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1252: 1246: 1243: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1189: 1187: 1183: 1180:: please see 1179: 1173: 1172: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1134: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1118: 1114: 1106: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1087: 1085: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1075:76.65.128.252 1072: 1068: 1060: 1058: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1004: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 981: 977: 973: 968: 964: 963: 962: 961: 956: 950: 943: 935: 933: 932: 928: 924: 919: 911: 909: 908: 904: 900: 897: 889: 887: 886: 882: 878: 874: 869: 867: 863: 858: 854: 852: 848: 844: 839: 833: 829: 825: 823: 822: 818: 814: 810: 802: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 756: 755: 754: 751: 744: 742: 735: 734:these changes 731: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 709: 706: 704: 702: 698: 694: 690: 685: 677: 667: 663: 659: 658:Amadscientist 654: 653: 652: 648: 644: 643:66.85.128.186 640: 639: 638: 634: 630: 629:Amadscientist 625: 624: 623: 622: 621: 620: 616: 612: 611:66.85.128.186 607: 603: 596: 593: 591: 590: 586: 582: 578: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 551: 547: 545: 541: 537: 533: 532: 531: 530: 526: 522: 521:70.24.247.242 514: 510: 507: 505: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 481: 477: 473: 469: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 449: 442: 439: 437: 433: 428: 424: 423: 422: 421: 417: 413: 409: 404: 396: 387: 381: 378: 370:September 19, 366: 365: 360: 353: 351: 347: 341: 328: 325: 320: 314: 311: 298: 291: 288: 281: 273: 269: 265: 261: 260: 259: 256: 252: 247: 246: 245: 244: 241: 237: 233: 228: 224: 219: 215: 214: 213: 212: 209: 205: 201: 193: 188: 187: 182: 181: 176: 172: 171: 170: 168: 167:Personal Life 164: 159: 153: 151: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 127: 125: 124: 120: 116: 108: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3848: 3826: 3789: 3779: 3778: 3732:MOS:IDENTITY 3706: 3696: 3668: 3648: 3607: 3578:I think the 3561: 3504: 3502: 3467: 3446: 3424: 3388: 3368: 3309:Bmclaughlin9 3291: 3284:articles in 3232: 3215:67.171.0.100 3209:— Preceding 3206: 3202: 3198: 3194: 3149: 3145: 3136: 3135:many people 3134: 3130: 3122: 3115: 3105: 3101: 3072: 3046: 3045: 3035: 3034: 3028: 3024: 3004: 2960: 2943: 2942: 2932: 2931: 2874: 2808: 2804: 2791: 2762: 2758: 2742:Thoughts? -- 2741: 2729: 2710: 2667: 2663: 2496:is a sub of 2459:"Probably"? 2393: 2339: 2335: 2331: 2329: 2299: 2228: 2191:Bmclaughlin9 2188: 2166:WhatamIdoing 2091:Bmclaughlin9 2082: 2078: 2042:Bmclaughlin9 2015: 1918:James Brooke 1912: 1905:User:Pgarret 1887:Bmclaughlin9 1882: 1878: 1874: 1830:User:Pgarret 1828: 1771: 1757: 1739:92.39.193.94 1735: 1716: 1698: 1623: 1617: 1589:Bmclaughlin9 1584: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1549: 1515: 1509: 1504: 1487: 1467: 1435: 1411: 1360: 1357:Notice Board 1331: 1315: 1305: 1268:WhatamIdoing 1250: 1241: 1225: 1219: 1175: 1152:Google Books 1121: 1111:The article 1110: 1091: 1064: 1047:24.67.204.60 1041:— Preceding 1037: 1020:WhatamIdoing 939: 915: 899:Bmclaughlin9 893: 870: 859: 855: 840: 837: 806: 740: 712: 693:83.134.49.47 687:— Preceding 681: 599: 574: 550:Bmclaughlin9 536:Bmclaughlin9 517: 495:Bmclaughlin9 484: 452:Bmclaughlin9 445: 412:Bmclaughlin9 402: 400: 380: 368:. Retrieved 362: 332:Cite error: 327: 313: 301:. Retrieved 290: 226: 222: 217: 200:MOS:IDENTITY 197: 191: 184: 178: 166: 160: 157: 131: 111: 78: 43: 37: 3669:As for the 3169:bonze blayk 2926:meaningless 2845:operation". 2650:Nat Gertler 2432:We do have 2380:Nat Gertler 2330:What about 2286:Acoma Magic 2254:Acoma Magic 2143:Acoma Magic 2106:Nat Gertler 1222:Talk:Batman 1194:Vejvančický 1178:protologism 1156:Vejvančický 990:Acoma Magic 873:el3ctr0nika 777:) person's 771:transgender 163:Nicki Minaj 154:Nicki Minaj 137:Rob Portman 36:This is an 3803:HairedGirl 3566:Rivertorch 3542:j⚛e decker 3526:j⚛e decker 3358:j⚛e decker 3344:j⚛e decker 3167:thanks, - 2900:Wiktionary 1879:homosexual 1810:j⚛e decker 1645:or create 1585:disclaimer 1395:Rivertorch 1224:is seeing 1071:Talk:Levee 936:Tom Cruise 918:Kim Petras 912:Kim Petras 871:Thanks. — 811:. Thanks. 566:paraphilia 436:j⚛e decker 321:. Details. 133:Discussion 98:Archive 45 90:Archive 43 85:Archive 42 79:Archive 41 73:Archive 40 68:Archive 39 60:Archive 35 3856:Insomesia 3738:article. 3736:Chaz Bono 3654:article, 3584:Insomesia 3451:Roscelese 3427:Insomesia 3391:Insomesia 3307:Prodded? 3294:Insomesia 3137:including 2576:Roscelese 2516:Roscelese 2475:Roscelese 2442:Roscelese 2305:Roscelese 2268:Roscelese 2207:Roscelese 1754:Stonewall 1605:Insomesia 1536:Insomesia 1471:Insomesia 1449:Ncboy2010 1439:is being 1368:Roscelese 1288:Insomesia 1006:Remember 949:Adjwilley 923:Wherschel 845:) of the 813:Ncboy2010 787:Insomesia 719:Insomesia 606:glbtq.com 468:Roscelese 340:help page 3811:contribs 3645:articles 3637:and the 3616:An RfC: 3459:contribs 3442:WP:EVENT 3211:unsigned 2985:Intersex 2792:guessing 2584:contribs 2524:contribs 2483:contribs 2450:contribs 2313:contribs 2276:contribs 2215:contribs 1705:Ron 1987 1676:Robofish 1521:Robofish 1376:contribs 1202:contribs 1164:contribs 1131:contribs 1123:Eastmain 1088:Binarism 1043:unsigned 881:Contribs 834:articles 767:bisexual 689:unsigned 476:contribs 397:Regnerus 303:July 24, 175:bisexual 3829:Flyer22 3794:on the 3759:Flyer22 3740:Flyer22 3710:В и к и 3680:Flyer22 3652:Lesbian 3508:В и к и 3370:Sceptre 3322:WP:PROD 3131:however 3074:Sceptre 1883:lesbian 1759:Sceptre 1548:Agreed 1317:Sceptre 1242:GRAPPLE 1226:another 976:Trystan 972:WP:BLPN 763:lesbian 511:& 299:. Slate 264:Siawase 232:Siawase 227:Details 225:.) The 158:Hello, 141:Kaldari 39:archive 3807:(talk) 3580:WP:GNG 3338:While 3156:PS to 3146:myself 1846:WP:POV 1779:(talk) 1651:Hiding 1628:VQuakr 1419:(talk) 1214:Batman 1186:WT:LOP 1184:; use 1182:WT:CFI 1061:"Dyke" 748:(talk) 715:Outing 708:Outing 602:Tomboy 251:Jennie 204:Jennie 115:Pkeets 3801:Brown 3660:WP:GA 3656:Moni3 3270:htonl 3025:meant 2125:Argos 2061:Argos 2019:Argos 1856:Argos 1850:WP:OR 1391:WP:AN 223:Slate 218:Slate 16:< 3860:talk 3833:talk 3763:talk 3744:talk 3684:talk 3673:and 3588:talk 3570:talk 3455:talk 3431:talk 3395:talk 3330:talk 3313:talk 3298:talk 3274:talk 3248:The 3239:talk 3219:talk 3173:talk 3150:long 3014:talk 2994:talk 2912:talk 2904:this 2861:talk 2748:talk 2736:used 2717:talk 2676:talk 2654:talk 2606:talk 2580:talk 2566:talk 2520:talk 2506:talk 2479:talk 2465:talk 2446:talk 2424:talk 2384:talk 2370:talk 2309:talk 2290:talk 2272:talk 2258:talk 2211:talk 2195:talk 2170:talk 2159:Like 2147:talk 2110:talk 2095:talk 2046:talk 1901:here 1891:talk 1881:and 1877:and 1840:and 1805:here 1795:talk 1743:talk 1723:talk 1709:talk 1701:here 1680:talk 1632:talk 1609:talk 1593:talk 1540:talk 1525:talk 1475:talk 1453:talk 1399:talk 1372:talk 1292:talk 1272:talk 1232:and 1198:talk 1192:. -- 1160:talk 1150:and 1127:talk 1098:talk 1079:talk 1067:dyke 1051:talk 1024:talk 994:talk 980:talk 955:talk 927:talk 903:talk 877:Talk 862:here 830:and 817:talk 809:here 791:talk 775:LGBT 723:talk 697:talk 662:talk 647:talk 633:talk 615:talk 585:talk 554:talk 540:talk 525:talk 499:talk 472:talk 456:talk 427:This 416:talk 372:2010 336:vibe 305:2012 268:talk 236:talk 186:Vibe 145:talk 119:talk 3809:• ( 3626:MrX 3604:RfC 3562:not 3164:.-) 3104:or 2670:". 2440:. – 2334:or 2133:Dad 2069:Dad 2027:Dad 1875:gay 1864:Dad 1073:-- 974:.-- 781:or 769:or 759:gay 568:at 364:Out 192:Out 180:Out 3862:) 3835:) 3765:) 3746:) 3715:T 3686:) 3590:) 3572:) 3513:T 3503:-- 3461:) 3457:⋅ 3433:) 3397:) 3332:) 3324:-- 3315:) 3300:) 3276:) 3266:}} 3260:{{ 3256:}} 3250:{{ 3241:) 3221:) 3175:) 3016:) 2996:) 2975:20 2969:va 2966:no 2964:Je 2962:ツ 2914:) 2889:20 2883:va 2880:no 2878:Je 2876:ツ 2863:) 2855:-- 2777:20 2771:va 2768:no 2766:Je 2764:ツ 2750:) 2719:) 2678:) 2656:) 2608:) 2586:) 2582:⋅ 2568:) 2526:) 2522:⋅ 2508:) 2485:) 2481:⋅ 2467:) 2452:) 2448:⋅ 2426:) 2408:20 2402:va 2399:no 2397:Je 2395:ツ 2386:) 2372:) 2354:20 2348:va 2345:no 2343:Je 2341:ツ 2315:) 2311:⋅ 2300:We 2292:) 2278:) 2274:⋅ 2260:) 2243:20 2237:va 2234:no 2232:Je 2230:ツ 2217:) 2213:⋅ 2197:) 2172:) 2162:}} 2156:{{ 2149:) 2112:) 2104:-- 2097:) 2048:) 1893:) 1836:, 1797:) 1745:) 1725:) 1711:) 1703:? 1682:) 1672:}} 1666:{{ 1634:) 1611:) 1595:) 1564:20 1558:va 1555:no 1553:Je 1551:ツ 1542:) 1527:) 1507:? 1500:}} 1494:{{ 1477:) 1455:) 1401:) 1378:) 1374:⋅ 1346:20 1340:va 1337:no 1335:Je 1333:ツ 1330:! 1294:) 1286:. 1274:) 1204:) 1200:| 1166:) 1162:| 1129:• 1100:) 1081:) 1053:) 1026:) 996:) 982:) 929:) 905:) 883:) 879:| 819:) 793:) 765:, 761:, 725:) 699:) 664:) 649:) 635:) 617:) 587:) 579:. 556:) 542:) 527:) 501:) 493:. 478:) 474:⋅ 458:) 418:) 361:. 349:^ 342:). 270:) 253:| 238:) 206:| 147:) 121:) 94:→ 64:← 3858:( 3831:( 3813:) 3761:( 3742:( 3682:( 3641:/ 3614:B 3586:( 3568:( 3453:( 3447:I 3429:( 3393:( 3328:( 3311:( 3296:( 3272:( 3237:( 3217:( 3171:( 3050:) 3044:( 3012:( 2992:( 2947:) 2941:( 2910:( 2859:( 2746:( 2715:( 2674:( 2668:y 2664:e 2652:( 2604:( 2597:) 2593:( 2578:( 2564:( 2518:( 2504:( 2477:( 2463:( 2444:( 2422:( 2382:( 2368:( 2307:( 2303:– 2288:( 2270:( 2256:( 2209:( 2193:( 2168:( 2145:( 2128:' 2108:( 2093:( 2064:' 2044:( 2022:' 1960:) 1889:( 1859:' 1793:( 1741:( 1721:( 1707:( 1678:( 1655:T 1630:( 1607:( 1591:( 1538:( 1523:( 1473:( 1451:( 1397:( 1370:( 1366:– 1290:( 1270:( 1251:X 1216:) 1196:( 1188:) 1158:( 1133:) 1125:( 1096:( 1077:( 1049:( 1022:( 992:( 978:( 957:) 953:( 947:~ 925:( 901:( 875:( 815:( 789:( 773:( 721:( 695:( 660:( 645:( 631:( 613:( 583:( 552:( 538:( 523:( 497:( 470:( 466:– 454:( 414:( 374:. 307:. 266:( 255:☎ 234:( 208:☎ 143:( 117:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject LGBT studies/Archive 41 - Knowledge

Index