149:
2072:
separated by nice pale blue boxes, others indent, others italicize, and so on. And the same goes for templates! We can't even seem to decide on a default color scheme to keep people's eyes from going mad! I'm thinking that maybe there should be some discussion here about what standards to use when, at the very least for tables, inline quotes, templates, images (size and placement),and how to use things like boldface and italics. Of course, for you fans of natural language philosophy out there, these don't have to be strict rules, but rather guidelines to throw away when they would interfere with readability, but considering the
260:. If search for Global Justice you'll be taken to a stub which claims that global justice is an anti-capitalism thing. Anyone with much contact with political philosophy will know that that's not completely accurate. I'm thinking it would be good to perhaps set up a disambiguation page of some sort and create a Global Justice (Political Philosophy) article. There are a number of philosophers that have written on the topic in the wikipedia, and a few of them are stubs. It would be good to create a project to expand on them as well (I mean, the article on
313:
974:. It is perfect to use for this new template - it has the usual name, birthdate/deathdate, birthplace/deathplace, major works, in addition to "main interests" and "influences/influenced", and a short summary of their philosophy. Some thinkers even have an "in a nutshell" section. I've edited the template again based on these ideas, plus some of the good criticism that you guys offered above (i.e. modifying Philosophers by Era). This is gonna be fun to implement.
31:
1406:
current page's listing will be listed in itself -- I've had to include a special message to prevent users from deleting the links to the current page (which are bolded and inactive when on that page but disappears from every page when deleted from any), and if users erase the dead link on every page the template is displayed, they will erase the entire list of lists!
1124:
characterises post-analytic philosophy, in particular, as opposed to analytic and
Continental philosophy (it's not JUST a combination of the two). So the resurgence of pragmatism, interest in later Wittgenstein, interdisciplinary approaches, greater historical and global awareness, etc. Also, notable writers: Rorty, Putnam, Cavell, Taylor, etc. Thoughts? ---
120:
1018:
whether that is a "Most Known Idea" or "Summary" or "Quote" or whatever. I like your idea for negative influences. If we really wanted to be terse it could just be something like "Hume (contra.)". The convention being that the philosophers were mostly in agreement with each other unless otherwise indicated. ---
2213:
There's no way to directly edit the list - adding category tags to articles is the only way to do it. But! There are bots that can convert lists (as in, the "List of..." articles on
Knowledge) to categories. There's got to be some page or other that you can request that sort of thing, if you've got
2138:
I'd like to see, for starters, three colors maximum used for elements on a page (not including black text, hyperlinks, and images). These three colors (or fewer if we can get away with it) should be non-intrusive and the same for similar elements (a nice pale blue or green or yellow, maybe), so, for
1578:
yes; we are a project, not a team. The notion of "team" implies a common purpose and method that simply aren't present - and I would argue aren't desirable. Editors looking for support in philosophy tasks will work through the
Wipiprojects pages to find us. Also, the philosophy project already has a
1464:
I've found the
Category system much too tedious to build a significant structure, and I've found that other users rake over whatever garden I've tended in short order. The link system outlined above, by contrast, has so far shown itself to be quite stable (though the verdict is still out on the "See
1405:
This is a double-edged sword, and I'm still learning the in's and outs of this useful trick. One problem is that in order to make shared "See also" lists worthwhile, such as a standard reference list of lists to be displayed at the end of each list, all the lists need to be included, which means the
689:
I have to agree that this is a great idea. Does anyone know if there is a list of different philosophical 'schools' anywhere--perhaps this information could be included in the box if it is available? Not academic schools, but groups of like-minded philosophers, such as empiricists, existentialists,
1964:
Here's my second call: If you can think of a good graphical way to show what some bit of philosophy is all about (like the duckrabbit! Ooh! I wonder if that's lying around the wiki!), draw it up, or leave me a message on my talk page explaining what its all about, and I'll try to draw it up! Then
1433:
Philosophy Quick Topic Guide (template) - it's fairly well refined, but runs the risk of growing too large. Our job will be to keep it streamlined. It needs to be kept to a maximum number of lines, standardized to a specific screen resolution. In the early stages of development of this template,
739:
Thanks for the comments everyone - I hope we can use this. The philosophical schools and traditions aren't really well-defined sometimes. I think we should just have an area in the box that says "Philosphical tradition/school" so it will be easier to decide what goes in that box and what doesn't.
1501:
Build an integrated system of navigation templates and portals, in successive tiers, making use of existing templates and portals as appropriate so as not to duplicate efforts. I still don't know how this will all fit together. It looks likely that the templates will be the glue for articles, and
1468:
I've been linking these all together in various ways, and I'm currently in the process of hooking them into the top of the philosophy article hierarchy (Portal:Philosophy, Philosophy main article, other general philosophy articles, the general philosophy lists, etc.) I'm almost done, and just have
1027:
I see what you mean about the summary - it is kind of awkward. I think you're right that the other fields give enough of a clue of what he's about, so I took it out. The negative influences part sounds good. I'm going to paste
Aquinas's info into his main page, and I'll make the generic template
1017:
Well, as it stands, what is entered under "Summary" isn't really a summary. The entries for Areas of
Interest and influences give a much better summary of the work of the philosopher. Maybe there could be a generic entry which is basically a statement of (one of) the philosopher's famous doctrines,
2099:
Yeah, I know there are a lot of articles to work on, and I dunno, maybe we could write a robot, but I'm thinking that a good start would be to have some idea as to what we want to be the standard. That way, new articles could be standardized, and when editors are working on articles they might be
1796:
Hi, I created the
Philosophy (navigation) template, and I voted for saving it too (as an IP). However, when I duplicated the template to adopt a new tag name, Infinity0 had a cow. We've been in an edit war since I started the template, and we escalated our battle to TfD, which was a big mistake,
1123:
There's been a number of trends in recent
American philosophy which have been loosely grouped under the rubric of "Post-analytic philosophy". Perhaps this is just an empty buzzword, but it is gaining some currency so perhaps it'd be worthwhile starting an article on it. Content could include: what
2071:
So while I was working on setting up the two categories mentioned immediately above, I noticed that the philosophy articles have wildly varying formatting: Some will have fancy colored tables, others the old-school default beveled black-and-white ones; some articles have large quotes in the text
1937:
While I was waking up today with my cup of coffee, before my brain started working well enough to really type sentences, I noticed that most of the philosophy articles have no images. I thought to myself in the old
Cartesian way, "hey, self (if you exist - of course you exist, I'm thinking, and
1379:
I've tried to find the links from all those articles, and I couldn't. The links are hidden/imbedded somewhere -- it seems to have something to do with Plato's picture. I'd like to disconnect those links to make "What links to here" a better tracking tool. Right now it tells us almost nothing,
1291:
Whoever thought of redirecting Portal:Philosophy to the category is a genius. This will allow us to set up any kind of directory system we want (above the actual
Category) and head wayward readers off at the pass. As you are no doubt alertly aware, the category system in Knowledge is extremely
1810:
Both templates are identical, as changes are ported after each round of disputes, to keep them that way. We've nearly come to a compromise on the few edits that we are still at odds over, but Infinity0 is one stubborn kid. Our competition has improved the template continuously, which is a good
983:
In regard to influences, would it be worthwhile splitting it up into positive and negative influences? For example, the difference between Newton and Hume in their influence on Kant. Also listing the influenced as "all who came after" isn't of much help. I've made a small edit in that regard.
1797:
for now the whole project (both templates) is at risk because some people are voting to delete both. Meanwhile Infinity0 and I are voting to delete each other's TfD candidates, ironically pushing the delete votes for both templates into the majority. We need your help. Neither of us want
1409:
I've found a couple ways to disable this feature while still using the subheadings, but they only work well in specific situations. Check out the See also sections in the Philosophy main article and in all the lists listed therein to get a gander at the new system. I plan to write up some
228:
I think the idea is wonderful, and the several symbols shown are fine. I myself wish there were something with a good representation of Socrates, since I would imagine admiration for him as the archetypical philosopher is widespread. Really, Banno, I think you're providing some much needed
612:
The areas for "Directly Influenced by" and "Directly Influenced" are less controversial, but still more controversial to include than things like Name or Date. Just for quick reference, it would be very useful to be able to see which thinkers influenced a particular philosopher, and which
1273:
Has anyone heard of this guy? Should the page go to AfD as being about a non-notable philosophaster? Do any recognized philosophers take him seriously? (If not, he could still be notable as a social phenomenon, if enough New Yorkers recognize him, but the article would need a rewrite.)
1990:
Bloody brilliant! One reason that there are few philosophy feature articles is lack of images - sometimes I wonder if this is a sort of systemic bias against us - so anything that can help to avoid every philosophy page having a picture of Socrates or Plato is certainly welcome!
1589:
I understand and agree. I'm still interested in the functionality of the program. Do WikiProject pages have any functionality that other pages on Knowledge don't have? (For example, Category pages display a category list automatically. Do WikiPorject pages have any special
169:
640:
Also a little note - there needs to be a separate section for Modernist Philosophy. As it is now, the page for Modernism is focused mainly on the art and culture aspect. However, there is NO mention of Descartes, who was the start of the Modernist philosophical movement.
1156:
I took your point on Rorty, and I've been going back through some of his stuff in order to fix up that article. But just on this topic: I think it was in Truth and Progress where he mentions "post-positivistic analytic philosophy". Perhaps it'd be worthwhile updating the
609:
The data most in question are the last three, but most notably "Most known for". My idea is to have some major features of their thought here. It could be a quote, a book, or an idea. For instance, Descartes could have "I think, therefore I am" AND/OR Cartesianism.
1292:
cumbersome, easily corrupted, and not so easily repaired/maintained/updated. The portal, on the other hand, which sits directly above the category, can be used to provide a centralized replacement article directory system, or at least serve as the front door to one.
666:
Ah yes, good idea. I knew I was forgetting something Ā :). I just added Place of Birth and Death. Date was already on there, but it can be expanded into "Date of Birth" and "Date of Death" if that looks better. Feel free to play around with that template.
1138:, obviously, but we need more than just his work to develop the theme. Might it be better to work on the Rorty article first? It is far too brief. But, if you find the itch irresistible, go ahead and start the article. I'll have a go at helping where I can.
130:) specifically for excellence in writing or editing of a philosophy-related article. I thought about using this picture of Sophia surrounded by the Arts, but... now I'm hoping that someone with a bent to graphic design might come up with something better.
1002:
Thanks for your input on this! Maybe instead of splitting it up into positive/negative influences, people who had a negative influence on a particular thinker can be listed, for example, as this: David Hume (negative influence). Or something to that
606:
Name, Date (born, died), Philosophical Era (see below), Famous Works, Directly Influenced by (philosophers who contributed to their thinking), Directly influenced (philosophers that were influenced by this philosopher), Most Known Ideas.
1892:. The categories are potentially all the navigation support we need. Furthermore, the list will grow rather than shrink as advocates place their favourite cogitation into the list. Delete them both and get the categories right.
1344:
This would be even better. It would serve as a tool to help find new philosophy articles that we could then include in our linking structure (imbedded article links, see alsos, topic lists, categories, and templates).
1883:
The lesson here is to talk with each other and compromise. For my money, having a half-page template on the bottom of every philosophy article is a silly idea. It will be longer than some articles!If I'm looking for
1007:
Also, I think that a quote section is a good idea, but I'm not sure a short summary quote can be found for everyone. Maybe we can keep the summary section (or delete?) and add the quote section to be separate?
1663:
Since someone roughly doubled the length of the TOC after I asked my question last night, let me ask it again: Has anyone heard of Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo? Should his page be deleted? See discussion above at
255:
Hey there folks, I've just put my name on the board to help out with the WikiProject and I've been looking for an area where I could help out. I suppose the main area would be the area of my thesis, being
1828:
Since the content of the templates are identical, and the fact that jousting will continue on whichever template wins, it makes sense to vote for the one that maintains the project's presence on Knowledge.
2194:
It's rather cumbersome to place pointers at the bottom of articles, so that they are listed in categories. It would be faster if one could just edit a category's list. Is there any way to do this?
2142:
Next, just so it has been said, we should follow the by now standard practice of bolding only the article title, and only the first time it occurs. Italics, not bolding, should be used for emphasis.
1193:
1183:
701:
I don't know if there's one document that has them all as a list, but if one looks through almost any good history of philosophy or dictionary of philosophy, one can find the main ones listed there.
1498:
Implement a more explicit uplink strategy than "What links here" and categories. That is, a better way for users to get to parent topics, without having to wade through the article's text to do it.
588:
Please note that I have seen a "Philosophy" template floating around somewhere that didn't specifically address philosophers. If someone could point me in the direction of this I'd appraciate it.
971:
1976:
from time to time - it may end up having that image which perfectly explains what, for whatever reason, a blurb of text just can't! And for all your images-of-philosophers needs, check out
2139:
example, if we decide to adopt the practice of adding boxes around inline quotes (I wish I could find the article where I saw that!), the box should be the same color as any template boxes.
2045:
gets added with a template which includes a nice legal notice, I thought it would be a good idea to go ahead and ignore Knowledge convention on this one, and use both the parent category (
1429:
I've been building a nav system (started it even before I got my username) to see and traverse the structure of philosophy articles on Knowledge. So far, it has the following components:
993:
Oh, and perhaps "Summary" should be retitled as "Quote" or something like that? So examples could be things like "I think, therefore I am", and "There is no such thing as a language". ---
1460:
and a list of general (top of the hierarchy) topics. So far, I've placed these templates in the Philosophy main article, and on all the general philosophy topic lists that I could find.
217:
Those who get over some minimum (say, 5?) number of votes receive the award, and will have the star placed on their user page, and their names recorded for eternity on the Project page.
1316:. And I'd really appreciate some help on this question. I'm trying to learn my way around the WikiProject Philosophy, and any help you could provide would sure make my day. Thanks.
1823:
It's discussion page link sits on a bunch of users' talk pages, and that's about it. And since I placed most of the old tags, it didn't seem out of place for me to upgrade them.
1679:
107:
Now that I've messed up the participants section, someone might like to fix it. I guess the easiest thing to do would be to cut it to a sub-page - any problems with doing that?
602:
page, you will notice that all of the values are nicely organized, so the only thing the user has to do is fill in variables (i.e. role = reconnaisance, first_flight = 1914).
1222:, and we are looking for A-Class and good B-Class articles, with no POV or copyright problems. Can you recommend any articles on philosophy? We are also looking for FAs like
1492:
Gather all the names of all the philosophy-related topics in one place. As complete as the philosophy topics list is, it still doesn't list them all. How can we fix this?
1248:
page, mostly because they struck me (and other visitors) to be disorganized to an extreme, but I lack the subject expertise needed to take the task any further. Regards
714:
Thanks. I meant is there such a list anywhere in Knowledge? To me, this seems to be an important way to categorize philosophy, or at least the history of philosophy.
159:
Hi, cool idea. When I was putting together the Philosopher template (below), I found this alternate graphic - if you download it you can get it in quite good quality.
1875:
I created both "versions", and worked on both versions after the split, so I guess that makes both versions "mine". The only significant difference was the tag names.
655:
Seems like a good idea, time to replace the generic infoboxes with philosophical infoboxes. Could also include Date and Place of Birth and Death for easy reference. -
312:
94:
1434:
it got included in far too many articles, but will suffice until more refined templates are designed to take its place in the lower tiers of the philosophy hierarchy.
1219:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
1489:
Improve the presence of WikiProject Philosophy throughout the subject of philosophy, to get more people cooperating in an organized way on well-organized projects.
271:
I haven't posted this on the Open Tasks, as I wanted to get some feedback on approaching it first and to see if anyone else was interested in pursuing it with me.
2171:
This sounds excellent, Seth - please, write this up and put it into the project page. Goforit! is quite correct that we need to be bold in putting forward ideas.
1646:
212:
1327:
Searching through a long article for all the outgoing links is time consuming. Is there a command or quick procedure for getting a listing of such links?
586:
Hi all - I propose a Philosopher Template to be added to all Philosophers. This will GREATLY improve our organization of the philosophy pages as a whole.
1453:, and have been gathering (into the other parts of this nav system) all the general philosophy topic lists. Please let me know if there are any I missed.
1068:
and someone edited it to make it a bit thinner (35% instead of 40%). I think it looks better. I've edited it here accordingly. What do people think? ---
1495:
Develop and man a system to find new philosophy articles as they are created. In order to hook them into our nav system, we need to know what they are.
1938:
you're me)! Maybe it would help us all to have a central repository for philosophy-related images!" So I dutifully cut-and-pasted the brand new tag
1402:
When templates include subheadings, those templates can be updated by editing the subheading section in any of the articles that the template is in!
1753:
covers a broad range of fields and approaches to knowledge and is not really the right article for this project. Please change it on your lists to
148:
638:
There are definitely problems with the terminologies here, please especially focus on the titles for "Philosophers By Era" and make corrections.
604:
I would like to make a template for all the philosophers, and it would have this basic information (all of which is free to debate, of course!):
134:
1134:
An interesting notion. Perhaps it would be a good article to include, although I don't care for the term much myself. What would you include?
47:
17:
680:
This is a quite excellent idea - my only change would be to match the eras used with "Category:Philosophy by era", which itself needs work.
1697:
1215:
1099:
1861:
The old tag has no placement in any Knowledge articles because you've changed it all to your version. I don't know which articles you put
2155:
All of these styles, however we decide to work them, should be consistent across all philosophy pages (as an ideal! I know there are a
191:
1440:
1218:, which is looking to identify quality articles in Knowledge for future publication on CD or paper. We recently began assessing using
1106:
690:
sophists, etc. I have seen category breakdowns into metaphysics, logic, etc.. but not so much information on this sort of a split.
1380:
because it tells us too much. All those stub articles can be tracked from the stub's template page. Can anyone help me out here?
636:
In the end, the completed template would look something like this (remember, it appears to the right of the philosopher article):
2086:
There's far too many articles to carry out a wide-scale format standardisation. Of course, someone could write a robot to do it.
1833:
1776:
127:
1837:
1619:
There are color codes sprinkled throughout Knowledge's source pages. How does one find out what colors belong to what numbers?
1977:
1958:
1943:
1817:
The new tag has placement in Knowledge articles. It is hooked in to the top level of the Philosophy hierarchy, and then some.
1728:
article, on the grounds that it is a great unwieldly thing inappropriate to a topic with major interdisciplinary aspects. ---
1189:
1718:
595:
1038:
2054:
2034:
2030:
840:
896:
727:
1179:
723:
2146:
2026:
1973:
1966:
1954:
1939:
1862:
1448:
38:
1946:
to all the images of philosophers I felt like looking at. There are, I'm sure, plenty still which are untagged.
740:
I've started a list, but it probably has things that shouldn't be there. Anyhow, hopefully this will be useful:
2076:
underseas adventure-like variety of formatting styles, having some fairly standard set might be a good idea. -
1885:
1244:
page needs a cleanup from somebody familiar with philosophy. I've tried to clean up this page and sort out the
477:
2218:
2207:
2198:
2175:
2166:
2152:
Tables should have a thin, non-beveled border, and should use the same colors as other elements in the page.
2121:
2104:
2090:
2080:
2061:
2019:
2005:
1995:
1984:
1942:
to all three philosophy images I could find (hopefully there are more out there). I also added the new tag
1922:
1913:
1896:
1869:
1855:
1845:
1783:
1771:
1761:
1732:
1707:
1690:
1672:
1653:
1631:
1608:
1594:
1583:
1572:
1555:
1542:
1526:
1511:
1475:
1416:
1386:
1366:
1349:
1331:
1313:
1296:
1278:
1252:
1230:
1204:
1165:
1147:
1128:
1113:
1092:
1083:
1072:
1045:
1032:
1022:
1012:
997:
988:
978:
959:
784:
734:
718:
705:
694:
671:
649:
577:
568:
564:
560:
556:
540:
288:
having inadequate cover. Just jump in and start writing, I'm sure you will find folk to discuss this issue.
278:
242:
208:
163:
2145:
Images that have charts should have some sort of standard appearance. We already have a couple of them in
1263:
1161:
article to include analytic philosophers who have pursued this trend towards a more holistic approach. ---
2046:
2042:
2038:
780:
552:
2203:
Or perhaps there is a bot that can take a list of topics and add category names to them automatically?
1549:
1241:
573:
425:
1517:
This of course will take more than one person to implement, and depends upon you to adopt the project.
1865:
in, so I can't edit them back. Duh. It's not as if people are overwhelmingly supporting your version.
1949:
So here's my first call to everyone: If you happen to notice an image in a philosophy article that's
880:
768:
503:
459:
2012:
1410:
instructions once I've learned more about the benefits, applications, and limitations of this tool.
1158:
756:
548:
1852:
1650:
948:
916:
904:
848:
804:
752:
748:
544:
1362:
I touched up the portal a bit. Needs more work, but it's a start. Let me know what you think.
1266:
needs to be looked at; it largely seems to take FenyƓ's claims at face value. See his website,
1906:
936:
796:
511:
238:
It'd be easy to take a generic barnstar and photoshop a bust of Socrates onto the middle. ---
1682:. Please contribute if you have any information. (I nominated it with an abstention; I'm not
2215:
2190:
Is there a way to directly edit the categories? Or a fast way to add the cat links to files?
2163:
2101:
2077:
2073:
2058:
1981:
1918:
But the portal also lists the categories - very confusing. Much better to work on the cats.
1605:
1399:
I don't know is this is a commonly known feature, but it sure shocked the hell out of me...
1080:
1029:
1009:
975:
956:
828:
668:
656:
646:
521:
507:
421:
275:
160:
2149:, so maybe we should just start with them and try to make new images similar in appearance.
1520:
Your input on these goals and how best to clarify and implement them is heartily welcomed.
1469:
the "See also" templates to hook-in to the Portal (with some added formatting, of course).
1375:
How exactly do all those links (in "What links to here") connect to WikiProject Philosophy?
2204:
2195:
1889:
1842:
1780:
1758:
1628:
1591:
1569:
1539:
1523:
1472:
1413:
1383:
1363:
1346:
1328:
1310:
1293:
940:
912:
792:
168:
643:
It would also be cool to have each philosophical era have their own template background!
300:
2087:
2016:
1910:
1866:
1687:
1669:
1275:
824:
820:
702:
348:
332:
321:
285:
257:
1642:
1162:
1135:
1125:
1069:
1042:
1019:
994:
985:
944:
900:
872:
868:
776:
499:
411:
239:
230:
1754:
1743:
1686:
it needs to be deleted but think the case for his notability has not been made.) --
1201:
856:
844:
832:
816:
451:
261:
200:
I suggest we use this to acknowledge good work in the area of philosophy. Perhaps:
1713:
There have been some tricky issues of formulating philosophical concepts raised...
1729:
1704:
1601:
1249:
1227:
1089:
892:
884:
864:
772:
744:
715:
691:
435:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2172:
2118:
2002:
1992:
1919:
1893:
1768:
1625:
Then we can make sure all our project members have easy access to it as well.
1580:
1552:
1508:
1144:
1065:
972:"One Hundred Philosophers: The Life and Work of the World's Greatest Thinkers"
920:
888:
876:
812:
731:
681:
489:
289:
222:
138:
108:
1750:
1739:
1590:
programmed/scripted/built-in features, commands, controls, aspects, etc.?)
1267:
1223:
924:
860:
852:
788:
760:
469:
190:
2025:
Sweet! Its moving right along! I also noticed somebody added an image to
2057:) on this one, so as to make sure the notice is up to date and whatnot. -
1305:
How can I get a listing of all subpages, including an entire subpage tree?
2033:, since there seem to be several of those. One thing, for now at least:
1245:
1110:
932:
836:
485:
473:
439:
119:
2214:
a list in mind. Otherwise, AFAIK, doing it by hand is the only way. -
1806:
Here are the reasons to choose the "Philosophy Quick Topic Guide" tag:
928:
908:
764:
599:
591:
393:
363:
2029:! Thanks! In other news, I went ahead and created a third category:
1287:
Combining the Portal:Philosophy and Category:Philosophy was brilliant!
1579:
large presence across the Wiki, a change of name would be confusing.
808:
481:
455:
378:
197:(hey, I'm no graphic artist - you are welcome to have a go yourself)
1757:
which IS the best article for the philosophical study of knowledge.
1395:
UNEXPECTED DISCOVERY: Templates can be made to update from any page!
590:
If you are unsure of what a template is, take a look at this page:
1909:? Having it in the Portal source-code makes it unwieldly to edit.
1725:
800:
443:
397:
382:
189:
167:
147:
118:
1821:
The old tag has virtually no placement in any Knowledge articles.
594:. The idea is that a general template is made, which resides at
613:
philosophers were influenced by them. Here's a little example:
447:
367:
359:
265:
211:
are eligible to vote (ie, those who have their names listed at
2117:
Good point - so I added section on format - now, suggestions?
1200:
The aforementioned articles have been nominated for deletion.
25:
2159:
of philosophy articles, and we're not likely to achieve it!).
311:
1814:
The conversion of the old tag to the new tag is complete.
303:
1957:
to it! And likewise with images of philosophers and the
1028:
this weekend, so hopefully it can start getting used Ā :)
1905:
How about keeping the template, but only to insert into
1566:
Would renaming the page have any detrimental effects?
1562:
Does a "WikiProject" page have any special properties?
1680:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo
1622:
Is there a list or tool that you could direct me to?
1226:
as well. Please post your suggestions here. Cheers!--
984:
Aquinas' work on theology should be highlighted. ---
2100:
inclined to do a little standardization, and etc. -
1425:
Project: Integrated Navigation System for Philosophy
1105:
Hello, Please notice this project. I hope that the
1358:
I gave the portal a face lift. How do you like it?
1724:I've rv'ed the application of the template to the
1109:will be adopted by the philosophy porject. Thanks,
229:leadership here, and you are to be congratulated.
133:If others think it worthwhile, I'll propose it at
617:Directly Influenced by = Pre-Socratics, Sophists
598:. If you take a look at the source code of the
1323:Is there a way to get a list of outgoing links?
1143:Welcome, and nice work on Davidson, well done.
284:Welcome, Shanon. You are certainly right about
1340:Is there a way to get an outgoing links tree?
213:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy/participants
8:
1507:All of which is the task of the categories.
2162:Okay, that's all I can think of for now. -
534:
403:
339:
1665:
175:Alternately, we could just commandeer the
1268:http://www.infinitysociety.org/index.html
204:Set up a page for nominations and voting.
1502:articles will be the glue for templates.
539:
310:
1703:Your participation is appreciated. ---
1456:"See also" templates - these include a
970:I just picked up this very cool book -
1210:Articles for the Knowledge 1.0 project
135:Knowledge:Barnstar and award proposals
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1779:... it's been changed already though
1719:Template:Philosophy Quick Topic Guide
1615:Where are the color code definitions?
596:Template:Infobox_WWIAircraft_Standard
347:
327:Depiction of St. Thomas Aquinas from
316:Depiction of St. Thomas Aquinas from
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Philosophy
7:
2001:(You found three images! well done!)
1698:Knowledge:Peer review/Logic/archive1
1216:Knowledge:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team
633:Directly Influenced = Thomas Aquinas
2055:Category:Images of philosophy books
2035:Category:Images of philosophy books
2031:Category:Images of philosophy books
1485:The goals of this project include:
126:I'd like to set up a barnstar (see
1832:Please vote to save the template:
1548:A Wikiproject is what we are. See
1441:List of basic philosophical topics
1107:List of publications in philosophy
1037:I've made use of the template for
24:
897:Religious philosophy and doctrine
624:Directly Influenced by = Socrates
1888:, I don't need a direct link to
1777:Template:Philosophy_(navigation)
1678:I've put the article on AfD, at
728:Category:Philosophy by tradition
225:02:38, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
128:Knowledge:Barnstars on Knowledge
29:
1978:Category:Images of philosophers
1959:Category:Images of philosophers
1944:Category:Images of philosophers
1174:Articles nominated for deletion
626:Directly Influenced = Aristotle
522:Five Proofs For God's Existence
141:21:02, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
111:21:26, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
1953:of a philosopher, add the tag
1270:, for background information.
1190:Indefinability theory of truth
1180:Indefinability Theory of Truth
1166:14:38, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
1148:05:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
1129:04:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
1114:06:18, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
1093:03:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
1084:09:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1073:07:32, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
1046:04:02, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
1033:08:41, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
1023:08:24, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
1013:08:12, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
998:05:43, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
989:05:34, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
979:04:54, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
960:03:27, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
735:09:12, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
730:, although both are scratchy.
724:Category:Philosophical schools
719:03:47, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
706:08:03, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
695:04:06, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
684:20:38, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
631:Directly Influenced by = Plato
292:21:37, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
243:05:50, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
1:
2208:00:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
2199:00:15, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
2167:23:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2122:23:03, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2105:22:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2091:22:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2081:22:05, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2062:22:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2020:22:04, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
2006:22:00, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1996:21:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1985:21:42, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1923:20:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
1914:22:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1897:20:22, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1870:11:28, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1856:10:49, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1846:03:57, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1784:01:04, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
1772:20:37, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1762:01:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1733:00:33, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
1708:20:09, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1691:20:25, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1673:16:37, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1654:14:21, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1632:12:06, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1595:20:31, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
1584:20:35, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1573:09:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1556:20:31, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1543:09:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1527:09:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1512:20:29, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
1476:09:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1417:09:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1387:09:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1367:06:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1350:06:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1332:06:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1314:06:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1297:06:30, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1279:02:55, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
1253:03:33, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
1231:06:24, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
672:03:17, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
659:03:08, 2005 September 7 (UTC)
650:03:00, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
279:21:28, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
164:03:06, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
2219:17:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
2176:07:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
1609:06:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
1205:00:08, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
841:Integral theory (philosophy)
645:Sorry this post is so long!
1536:We're actually a WikiTeam.
1481:Integrated Nav System Goals
1458:list of philosophical lists
1064:I entered the template for
619:Directly Influenced = Plato
377:Castle of Roccasecca, near
2235:
2147:Category:Philosophy images
2027:Category:Philosophy images
1974:Category:Philosophy images
1967:Category:Philosophy images
1955:Category:Philosophy images
1940:Category:Philosophy images
1863:Template:Philosophy topics
1851:What a funny situationĀ :)
1836:. For further discussions
1659:Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo, bis
1449:List of philosophical isms
657:Yorick, Jester of Elsinore
1972:And my final call: Check
1749:Hi there. The article on
1532:WikiProject is a misnomer
1437:Lists - I've created the
391:
376:
357:
1886:philosophy of literature
1214:Hi, I'm a member of the
1119:Post-analytic Philosophy
392:Monastery of Fossanova,
177:Barnstar of High Culture
785:Continental rationalism
578:Contemporary philosophy
329:The Demidoff Altarpiece
318:The Demidoff Altarpiece
1666:#Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo
781:Continental philosophy
324:
209:WikiProject Philosophy
194:
172:
152:
123:
1980:! Okay, I'm done. -
1792:Urgent deletion issue
1637:Ionian school dilemna
1550:Knowledge:WikiProject
1264:Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo
1258:Jean-Pierre Ady Fenyo
1242:Identity (philosophy)
1236:Identity (philosophy)
574:Postmodern philosophy
426:Summa contra Gentiles
315:
207:Only participants in
193:
171:
151:
122:
42:of past discussions.
2053:the child category (
2047:Category:Book covers
2043:Category:Book covers
2039:Category:Book covers
1079:Sounds good to me!
881:psychological egoism
769:Cambridge Platonists
535:Philosophers By Era
504:Godfrey of Fontaines
349:Saint Thomas Aquinas
306:Medieval Philosophy
304:Western Philosophers
297:Philosopher Template
1159:Analytic philosophy
757:Analytic philosophy
1803:templates to die.
1767:where? Which list?
1465:also" templates).
949:Western philosophy
917:Situational ethics
905:School of Brentano
849:Marxist philosophy
805:Eastern philosophy
753:Alexandrian school
749:African philosophy
340:Basic Information
325:
195:
173:
153:
124:
1933:Philosophy images
1907:Portal:Philosophy
937:Transcendentalism
797:Deconstructionism
703:Jeremy J. Shapiro
584:
583:
512:G. E. M. Anscombe
187:What about this?
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2226:
2074:Jacques Cousteau
1645:and the related
829:Frankfurt School
629:Name = Aristotle
508:Jacques Maritain
422:Summa Theologica
408:School/Tradition
335:
301:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
2234:
2233:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2225:
2224:
2223:
2192:
2069:
2013:Image:Kmarx.jpg
1935:
1890:integral theory
1794:
1747:
1730:Charles Stewart
1722:
1705:Charles Stewart
1701:
1661:
1639:
1617:
1564:
1534:
1483:
1427:
1397:
1377:
1360:
1342:
1325:
1307:
1289:
1260:
1238:
1212:
1176:
1121:
1103:
1039:Donald Davidson
941:Young Hegelians
913:Situated ethics
793:Critical theory
615:Name = Socrates
326:
299:
253:
185:
117:
105:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2232:
2230:
2222:
2221:
2191:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2160:
2153:
2150:
2143:
2140:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2094:
2093:
2068:
2065:
2037:is a child of
2023:
2022:
1999:
1998:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1927:
1926:
1925:
1900:
1899:
1879:
1877:
1876:
1859:
1858:
1830:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1818:
1812:
1793:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1746:
1738:Please change
1736:
1721:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1700:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1660:
1657:
1638:
1635:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1587:
1586:
1563:
1560:
1559:
1558:
1533:
1530:
1515:
1514:
1504:
1503:
1499:
1496:
1493:
1490:
1482:
1479:
1462:
1461:
1454:
1435:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1396:
1393:
1391:
1376:
1373:
1371:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1341:
1338:
1336:
1324:
1321:
1319:
1306:
1303:
1301:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1259:
1256:
1237:
1234:
1220:these criteria
1211:
1208:
1198:
1197:
1194:AfD discussion
1187:
1184:AfD discussion
1175:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1151:
1150:
1140:
1139:
1120:
1117:
1102:
1100:Science pearls
1097:
1096:
1095:
1088:Looks great!
1086:
1076:
1075:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1005:
1004:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
953:
952:
951:
825:Existentialism
821:Ethical egoism
742:
741:
709:
708:
698:
697:
686:
685:
677:
676:
675:
674:
661:
660:
644:
642:
639:
637:
635:
634:
632:
630:
628:
627:
625:
623:
621:
620:
618:
616:
614:
611:
608:
605:
603:
589:
587:
582:
581:
571:
555:
537:
536:
532:
531:
529:
525:
524:
519:
515:
514:
497:
493:
492:
467:
463:
462:
433:
432:Main Interests
429:
428:
419:
415:
414:
409:
405:
404:
401:
400:
390:
389:Place of Death
386:
385:
375:
374:Place of Birth
371:
370:
356:
352:
351:
346:
342:
341:
337:
336:
333:Carlo Crivelli
322:Carlo Crivelli
308:
307:
305:
298:
295:
294:
293:
286:global justice
258:global justice
252:
251:Global Justice
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
219:
218:
215:
205:
184:
183:Star of Sophia
181:
157:
156:
155:
154:
116:
113:
104:
103:Participants -
101:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2231:
2220:
2217:
2212:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2206:
2201:
2200:
2197:
2189:
2177:
2174:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2165:
2161:
2158:
2154:
2151:
2148:
2144:
2141:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2130:
2123:
2120:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2106:
2103:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2092:
2089:
2085:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2079:
2075:
2066:
2064:
2063:
2060:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2028:
2021:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2004:
1997:
1994:
1989:
1988:
1987:
1986:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1970:
1968:
1962:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1947:
1945:
1941:
1932:
1924:
1921:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1898:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1868:
1864:
1857:
1854:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1827:
1822:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1813:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1804:
1802:
1801:
1791:
1785:
1782:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1770:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1735:
1734:
1731:
1727:
1720:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1706:
1699:
1696:
1692:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1671:
1667:
1658:
1656:
1655:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1643:Ionian School
1636:
1634:
1633:
1630:
1626:
1623:
1620:
1614:
1610:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1593:
1585:
1582:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1571:
1567:
1561:
1557:
1554:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1541:
1537:
1531:
1529:
1528:
1525:
1521:
1518:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1500:
1497:
1494:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1480:
1478:
1477:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1459:
1455:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1436:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1418:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1403:
1400:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1388:
1385:
1381:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1365:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1351:
1348:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1333:
1330:
1322:
1320:
1317:
1315:
1312:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1277:
1271:
1269:
1265:
1257:
1255:
1254:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1235:
1233:
1232:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1217:
1209:
1207:
1206:
1203:
1195:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1173:
1167:
1164:
1160:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1137:
1136:Richard Rorty
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1118:
1116:
1115:
1112:
1108:
1101:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1011:
1006:
1001:
1000:
999:
996:
992:
991:
990:
987:
982:
981:
980:
977:
973:
969:
961:
958:
954:
950:
946:
945:Vienna Circle
942:
938:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
906:
902:
901:Scholasticism
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
873:Postmodernism
870:
869:Phenomenalism
866:
862:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
777:Contextualism
774:
770:
766:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
743:
738:
737:
736:
733:
729:
725:
722:
721:
720:
717:
713:
712:
711:
710:
707:
704:
700:
699:
696:
693:
688:
687:
683:
679:
678:
673:
670:
665:
664:
663:
662:
658:
654:
653:
652:
651:
648:
601:
597:
593:
580:
579:
575:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
533:
530:
527:
526:
523:
520:
517:
516:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:Giles of Rome
498:
495:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
471:
468:
465:
464:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
431:
430:
427:
423:
420:
417:
416:
413:
412:Scholasticism
410:
407:
406:
402:
399:
395:
388:
387:
384:
380:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
354:
353:
350:
344:
343:
338:
334:
330:
323:
319:
314:
309:
302:
296:
291:
287:
283:
282:
281:
280:
277:
272:
269:
267:
263:
259:
250:
244:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
226:
224:
216:
214:
210:
206:
203:
202:
201:
198:
192:
188:
182:
180:
178:
170:
166:
165:
162:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
142:
140:
136:
131:
129:
121:
114:
112:
110:
102:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2216:Seth Mahoney
2202:
2193:
2164:Seth Mahoney
2156:
2102:Seth Mahoney
2078:Seth Mahoney
2070:
2059:Seth Mahoney
2050:
2041:, and since
2024:
2000:
1982:Seth Mahoney
1971:
1965:add the tag
1963:
1950:
1948:
1936:
1878:
1860:
1841:
1831:
1820:
1805:
1799:
1798:
1795:
1755:epistemology
1748:
1744:epistemology
1723:
1702:
1683:
1662:
1640:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1618:
1588:
1568:
1565:
1538:
1535:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1484:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1457:
1447:
1446:
1439:
1438:
1428:
1420:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1390:
1382:
1378:
1370:
1361:
1353:
1343:
1335:
1326:
1318:
1308:
1300:
1290:
1282:
1272:
1261:
1239:
1213:
1199:
1122:
1104:
857:Neoplatonism
845:Kyoto School
833:Hermeneutics
817:Epicureanism
622:Name = Plato
585:
572:
541:Pre-Socratic
518:Famous Ideas
452:Epistemology
328:
317:
273:
270:
262:Thomas Pogge
254:
227:
220:
199:
196:
186:
176:
174:
158:
132:
125:
106:
75:
43:
37:
1641:Please see
1081:FranksValli
1030:FranksValli
1010:FranksValli
976:FranksValli
957:FranksValli
893:Reliabilism
885:Rationalism
865:Objectivism
773:Coherentism
745:Agnosticism
669:FranksValli
647:FranksValli
553:Renaissance
436:Metaphysics
418:Major Works
161:FranksValli
36:This is an
2205:Go for it!
2196:Go for it!
1843:Go for it!
1838:click here
1834:click here
1781:Sbwoodside
1759:Sbwoodside
1629:Go for it!
1592:Go for it!
1570:Go for it!
1540:Go for it!
1524:Go for it!
1473:Go for it!
1414:Go for it!
1384:Go for it!
1364:Go for it!
1347:Go for it!
1329:Go for it!
1311:Go for it!
1294:Go for it!
1066:David Hume
921:Skepticism
889:Relativism
877:Pragmatism
813:Empiricism
496:Influenced
490:ben Maimom
466:Influences
221:Comments?
95:ArchiveĀ 10
2088:Infinity0
2067:Standards
2017:Infinity0
1911:Infinity0
1867:Infinity0
1751:knowledge
1740:knowledge
1688:Trovatore
1684:convinced
1670:Trovatore
1600:Nope. --
1276:Trovatore
1262:The page
1224:Free will
925:Solipsism
861:Mysticism
853:Modernism
789:Communism
761:Anarchism
486:ibn Rushd
470:Aristotle
87:ArchiveĀ 6
82:ArchiveĀ 5
76:ArchiveĀ 4
70:ArchiveĀ 3
65:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
1647:AfD page
1445:and the
1309:Hi. I'm
1246:Identity
1163:Skubicki
1126:Skubicki
1070:Skubicki
1043:Skubicki
1020:Skubicki
995:Skubicki
986:Skubicki
933:Stoicism
837:Humanism
549:Medieval
478:Eriguena
474:Boethius
460:Politics
440:Theology
276:S.P.Daly
240:Skubicki
115:Barnstar
1969:to it!
1202:Uncle G
1003:effect?
929:Sophism
909:Scotism
765:Atheism
600:AEG_B.I
592:AEG_B.I
545:Ancient
438:(incl.
394:Sonnino
364:March 7
39:archive
2011:Added
1811:thing.
1602:Jmabel
1228:Shanel
1090:WhiteC
1041:. ---
809:Egoism
716:WhiteC
692:WhiteC
482:Anselm
456:Ethics
379:Aquino
231:icut4u
2173:Banno
2119:Banno
2003:Banno
1993:Banno
1961:tag!
1920:Banno
1894:Banno
1853:Karol
1769:Banno
1726:logic
1651:Karol
1581:Banno
1553:Banno
1509:Banno
1250:Bryan
1145:Banno
801:Deism
732:Banno
682:Banno
569:1900s
565:1800s
561:1700s
557:1600s
528:Quote
444:Logic
398:Italy
383:Italy
355:Dates
290:Banno
264:is a
223:Banno
139:Banno
109:Banno
16:<
1800:both
1668:. --
1606:Talk
1240:The
726:and
448:Mind
368:1274
360:1225
345:Name
268:!).
266:stub
2157:lot
2051:and
1951:not
1742:to
1111:APH
442:),
331:by
320:by
2049:)
2015:.
1649:.
1604:|
1274:--
947:,
943:,
939:,
935:,
931:,
927:,
923:,
919:,
915:,
911:,
907:,
903:,
899:,
895:,
891:,
887:,
883:,
879:,
875:,
871:,
867:,
863:,
859:,
855:,
851:,
847:,
843:,
839:,
835:,
831:,
827:,
823:,
819:,
815:,
811:,
807:,
803:,
799:,
795:,
791:,
787:,
783:,
779:,
775:,
771:,
767:,
763:,
759:,
755:,
751:,
747:,
576:,
567:,
563:,
559:,
551:,
547:,
543:,
510:,
506:,
502:,
488:,
484:,
480:,
476:,
472:,
458:,
454:,
450:,
446:,
424:,
396:,
381:,
366:,
362:ā
358:c.
274:--
179::
137:.
91:ā
1196:)
1192:(
1186:)
1182:(
955:-
667:-
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
