Knowledge talk:WikiProject Philosophy/Archive 16

537:

numbers, reveal this is incorrect. Furthermore, the IP has failed to state explicitly, as requested, even one sentence in my revision that the IP finds wrong. Every single claim is backed up with notable, respectable, published references that even include page numbers. Many claims are backed by more than one citation. The "original status" of the article was incomplete: that is what motivated my editions. Nothing I have added contradicts what was in the "original status" of the article. I have only added details to the article to make the notions of "conditional statement," "strict conditional," and "material conditional," clear to the reader so that they are less confusing and easier to understand. These details are not "off topic for the article," they are essential details that the reader needs in order to come to a full understanding of the material without confusion. Without these necessary details, the article becomes very ambiguous. This is especially so considering there are other types of "conditionals" and "implications" to which the reader may relate. The contender,

4904:" flow blockage causing qi, not the heart, to propel the blood inadequately), and outright false statements about anatomies, developed without the "cutting" of the "tom" in "anatomy" (Greek "tom" means "cut", as in "a-tom" – meaning not further able to be cut, as atoms were thought to be), has also historically been designated "medicine". MEDRS has different standards than accepted common usage, and for good reasons well argued in setting up the policy. I believe that this topic should be noticed at Wikiproject Philosophy, MEDRS talk, and at Wikiproject Rational Skepticism. I am loathe to do so, however, as this will draw kooks and people with other agendas from the "alt med community" with no expertise in this technical topic of discussion, distorting and obscuring the discussion. 1911:). I know there has been a lot of thought about potential vs. actual things, ideals, etc. and people must have applied those ideas to humans. So I expect there should be logical places were other articles should cover/link to such an article. In cases like this I have often found articles that are essentially duplicates under different names, so such might exist in this case as well. However I am not well versed in philosophy, nor in its coverage here, so would appreciate it if those who are would introduce links to the article, or suggest where such links would be reasonable. (The article could also use attention from anyone well versed in philosophy to better connect it's coverage to the other articles here.) Thank you. 5486:

is really lacking on this site). All I desired to do was to point to that work for further interpretation on mythology, backed with sources. From this information, I do not think that my edits would be rejected. The only thing that I am unsure of is new articles, but I guess I will see because they will be backed by sources. This is why I wanted someone to review them and give me feedback on how to include them in the way that Knowledge wanted me to. Like I said before, I am a philosophy teacher and I teach the history and development of philosophy. I am not throwing out ideals that are new: only applying old ideals to our modern times, digging up old forgotten wisdom. There is nothing new under the Sun.

3952:

philosophers in with esotericism, spiritualism, etcetera. This isn't about east v west either. There are plenty of legitimate eastern metaphysicians. My main concern in the cosmology category tree is that editors from the sciences and mathematics will systematically remove legitimate philosophy of time, philosophy of physics, and other legitimate metaphysics content because they don't understand the difference between metaphysics and the esotericism, spiritualism, etcetera. This is why there needs to be a clear line in the sand, on which philosophy of time, philosophy of physics, and other legitimate metaphysics stand on the same side as theoretical physics, etcetera.

5019:. An editor there is pushing to make some major changes which I think are clearly negative and reflect a general misunderstanding of the topic as a whole. The editor appears to be trying to use the talk page to come to an understanding himself of the topic, but meanwhile wants to completely rewrite the delicately-worded lede with his (ever-changing) current best understanding, and hasn't identified any problems in the article as it stands besides that he can't understand it. I have been trying to explain why his proposed edits are not acceptable and would be a major violation of 159:, lurking for weeks and then coming back to make the change again when nobody's looking, and I have been arguing with him the entire time trying to get him to even make clear what the hell his point is. It began as some pseudo-religious POV-pushing in the lede and has now boiled down to this nonsense about one paragraph about one kind of metaphysical libertarianism, but he still seems extremely confused and yet insistent on his point. Nevertheless he seems to be honestly trying to make 340:

Theosophical Societies somehow believe that they own the word. The Encyclopedia of Religion makes a strong distinction that Theosophy is not the Theosophical Societies. I am trying to get this fixed. The lead Page "Theosophy" really belongs in the Philosophy section of Metaphysics. In any case this is a violation of the first Pillar of Knowledge, as I see it. They are attached to that name and seem to be squatting on it some. Guidance appreciated.

31: 3096:. The fact that I'm posting on the philosophy WikiProject page is probably a fair indicator of that. I linked it, and then realised afterwards that it went to the disambiguation page, but thought that the meaning would be obvious. I have commented on the talk page, as well as on the talk page of 'relativism'. If, to an informed editor, the reason why that article is terrible is not apparent, then there's no hope anyway. 1409:. Once it is ready, I'll move it into the mainspace (under a different name which isn't taken) and start to incorporate it into philosophy of religion articles. Before then, I'd like to invite comment on the idea and any specifics, as well as invite any members of this project to help improve the template. Everything that is currently there is provisional - the layout, headings and content can all change. I await your input. 3155:

a favour, to let what grownups might remain here know that there's an article in dire need of help, which has possibly slipped through the net for a while. It should be obvious that it's terrible; it's like marking a substandard first year essay: I could spend ages elucidating every little problem, but to someone familiar with the subject, it will be self-evidently bad. Take it or leave it. --08:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

4684: 2283:). However, I discovered that there was a redirect to "soft paternalism". Some authors have called libertarian paternalism a form of soft paternalism but the terms are certainly not synonyms, or even very close. I tried submitting a new article on libertarian paternalism anyway but had it rejected twice with the only explanation that there is an existing redirect. So now I have updated the old entry on 3813: 3524: 838:

that use the term do not appear to be using it in any other way than just applying "pseudo-" in a regular sense to "rational" in a regular sense, just meaning that what they are describing as "pseudorational" has only the pretense of being rational; i.e, the sources don't appear to be referring to any particular, well-defined topic with their mentioning it. The article is best as a redirect to

3607:, none of which has an article on "entailment" independent of "logical consequence." The article itself is a bit scattered, and this has been a big stumbling block for me to improving it. It is only one of the most important concepts in logic. Please support this move, as it is consistent with the scholarly literature on the subject, and Knowledge is the odd resource out in this regard. 4312: 4428:

Bewußtseinsinhalte es gehört. So ist z. B. der Gedanke, den wir im pythagoreischen Lehrsatz aussprachen, zeitlos wahr, unabhängig davon, ob irgendjemand ihn für wahr hält. Er bedarf keines Trägers. Er ist wahr nicht erst, seitdem er entdeckt worden ist, wie ein Planet, schon bevor jemand ihn gesehen hat, mit andern Planeten in Wechselwirkung gewesen ist.

3353:

planning on updating the "Debate" section to include more about the scholarly discussion that is taking place as it regards the organ trade. I believe this issue is closely tied to ethics and morality, and as such I would greatly appreciate the assistance of this Wikiproject while editing the article. I look forward to working with you all!

5521:

have to have some support from the prevailing scholars in that area. The best thing to do is try to get all sides and present them neutrally. If you have some great new interpretation of things, then you should be able to point to some history or traditions leading up to it, that some other notable philosophers put forward before you.

4509:(Note: Rosen does not provide citations in support of this particular SEP:OR "encyclopedia" article statement, re what he calls "absorption" and "enlistment", likely because of a lack of historical scholarly works to rely on re the etymology of "abstract object". But we at Knowledge have higher standards than SEP when it comes to OR.) 3072:, which is a disambig page. It is not terribly useful to post "such-and-such article is bad". Can you enumerate your top one or two general complaints, or top two or three specific complaints? Do you feel there should or should not be an article about the notion of the absolute in philosophy? If there should not, you may consider 678:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are 2516:. Any input would be welcome. I personally believe at least one of the reasons why many articles in this field have been as contentious as they have been is because of lack of such guidelines, and would very much welcome any input from others to help come up with some generally acceptable solutions to some of these problems. 3591:. I subsequently proposed to move it back. However, it was not. I have always found this to be a very troubling development. Recently, I have been adding reference resources to articles and categories consistent with those resources. This is one that is not consistent (and I said it at the time.) Please take a look at 5393:

have studied my entire life but never cared about getting a PhD because our education system is flawed at its very core, and I saw this reflected in my Father's life throughout my own. A PhD means nothing and I am here to show us all this. What we do with the conscious seconds in front of us means everything.

118:

modern writers (like Copi) point out that from a purely logical viewpoint, the genus and difference are literally interchangeable. That is, in terms of the logic alone, one may as well take "rational thing" as the genus and "is an animal" as the difference in the definition of man as rational animal.

5520:

Well, I hope you reconsider, and find a way to adjust to the situation here. You just can't join Knowledge with the idea of pushing an agenda. The conflict of interest policy has nothing to do with whether or not anyone makes money. It's an encyclopedia, so the facts expressed have to be neutral, and

5504:

I correct myself. My only edit so far with Pygmalion was removed. I am not going to bother with this project. Other people can one day reference me and you lose the original source. It is amazing how people even here lack the ability to do background research to verify the sources and their validity.

5485:

Thanks for your reply Greg. My interpretation of things is in my work and would only be outlined in Knowledge, referencing to other material to further explain metaphors and allegories originally intended from the fables but not yet explored within the current articles (mythology and its deep meaning

5323:

My work is all about me. But I have conditioned my psychology over my life to be all about our human condition. Thus from the reflections of me, if the work is examined in its entirety, we come to learn that my work is all about each and every one of us. I have spent my life attempting to remove bias

4674:

being another; and that's a disambiguation page). The point is just that it's not common usage. The issue is whether Frege's usage is specific enough to require disambiguation, and also whether there's anything special about Frege's reference to a third "realm" - a concept that can be applied in many

1033:

There are several proposals to move philosophy categories to namespaces with parenthetical titles. I am strongly opposed to this, and I am wondering if we need to make an organized project effort to do something about the larger issue. It seems to me that philosophy as a discipline and these articles

963:

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:Philosophy will have interest in putting on events related to women's roles in philosophy - as subjects, philosophers, etc. We've created an event page on English Knowledge (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the

121:

But I think that any treatment of this form of definition needs at least a word or two on its historical origins and Aristotle's philosophy. I am not familiar, however, with this aspect of Aristotelianism and hence would appreciate contributions from someone else on the matter. I'm thinking a short

5414:

will be called into question, and most likely deleted. If there are competing prevailing theories that have scholarly literature behind them, then I would look to make sure that all of that material is covered. Any new, and unpublished work, no matter how brilliant and valid it is needs some back up

5319:

I would assert that I am more closely connected with my work than anyone else in the world because my heart is all in it. I live the life of an anchorite. And when the relational qualities of the dots of our constellations become clear to me, I am thrown into inspiration and then very quickly create

5096:

This is surely an unfortuneate disservice to understanding of philosophical language. I read many examples of appeals mentioned as areas of inquiry, or as an identification of a subject important to an argument. To presuppose that if such identification can be made then fallacy is implied is clearly

3154:

Et cetera. I'm not going to get bogged down in arguments here, and have no particular desire to 'open myself up to specific criticism', not because I'm scared of it, but because I couldn't be bothered getting sucked in to another Knowledge crank impasse. I didn't come here to debate, but rather as

1068:

Please do make your opinion known at the page with the discussion. I will report the results here. However, it will much more difficult to do anything about any problems created once these discussions are closed. At some point I will make a report to WikiProject Philosophy on all the problems in the

1049:

Without reading the full discussion there yet (just passing by in a rush right now), regarding that one example you give, the only reason I'd see for using either title would be if there are separate articles on the subject of "syntax" in different fields. I would more expect there to be one article

837:

The Park source concerning the Soviet Union is just an undergraduate term paper (although, IMO, fairly well written and researched), and it does not quite establish what it is supposed to concerning religion (although it is not an absurd synthesis, given what glasnost was). Anyway, all the sources

117:

I don't propose making Aristotle the focus of this article, since it (sensibly) aims at a discussion of genus-difference in its modern form. This form seems pretty different that Aristotle's ideas since, as I understand it, Aristotle believed that the genus was more or less naturally given, whereas

5463:

Well, I welcome you to contribute. However, I just hope you are clear about how it works around here. If you have a new interpretation of things, it will probably be removed. If there is an interpretation that has been put forward in primary sources, and further supported by secondary sources, then

5335:

I do want to mention that my work is extremely controversial according to our modern society. But when we shine light over the ghosts we always find that they were only sheets draped over a chair. Dionysus is my method and Love is my game. I do all of this for free. I do not want anyone's money but

5327:

I am seeking for a way for my work to be referenced within Knowledge. I have a great amount of work but have really only started creating professional audiovisual productions recently, so my old work would not need articles on them, but may be linked as references. I will not have a problem finding

5315:

I do not separate my "personal" and "professional" life. I am alone in this life and spend it travelling the world, studying society both theoretically and practically while standing outside of it. I then create films (moderately popular considering I am fighting against mainstream) that attempt to

5027:

So I would really like if some other experienced editors would at least keep an eye on the article and talk page discussion and hopefully join in the discussion, so that if I don't have the time to commit to this the other editor doesn't wreck the delicate POV balance that other editors have worked

4721:

Using Third Reich half untranslated only applies to Hitlers monstosity. In case of Frege's concept it can and should be translated unless there are English RS that keep it untranslated. A disambiguation or WP:TWODAB is in order. Mayby ask a music WikiProject for input on the notability of the heavy

4244:

I agree whole-heartedly with your point. I reinserted the category "pseudoscience" to the category, and I will monitor that. One point that the other side has, is that you should propose specific wording and the discussion should be based on that. If you go in and boldly reword it to your liking, I

3921:

Those two were recently put back there, wrongly imo. Those two are more properly under "early scientific cosmologies" which falls under the scholarly "physical cosmology." The other category under cosmology is "religious cosmology" which is for all the non-scholarly items. So those two really don't

3352:

Hello everybody, I am student at Rice University working on a Knowledge article for class. I am proposing to edit the "Organ Trade" article to be more inclusive of the growing amount of information available about how the illegal organ trade impacts those in impoverished nations. Particularly, I am

2104:

was depopulated and then proposed for speedy deletion. That is not the proper way to accomplish that type of thing. So the question is whether or not the works category is a replacement for, or a clarification of the lit category. Is this going to be the trend for the 19 or so other lit categories?

1195:

I don't think that a merge is necessary, but that the two articles should be improved. Utilitarianism is indeed a form of consequentialism, but is a major theory in itself, beyond consequentialism. Consequantialism suggests that an action's morality is determined by its consequences, utilitarianism

536:

is strong evidence that suggests the IP has failed to look at, or at least understand, the cited sources given in the main article. For example, the IP stated that the source "Larson, Boswell, et al. 2007" does not deal with strict conditionals, when a look at the content, especially the cited page

163:

point, and I don't just want to get into a revert war with him. The few other editors who have commented before have expressed similar dismay with understanding what he's even trying to say, but for the most part there's nobody active at that article besides me and him. I'd really love to have some

5375:

Dear Dr. NeSmith, the way in which Knowledge decides whether someone's work is noteworthy, is if it has been noted by thirdparties who have published about it. This means that wikipedia is not the place to publish references to your work untill such a time that the world has already realized what

3411:

which is about a philosophical argument. I wrongly reviewed it (now amended) but I would like to provide some additional guidance to the submitter. I am not familiar even slightly with the subject matter so any suggestions in regards to what the minimum notability/referencing requirements might be

283:

The use of a Knowledge user name in the body of the article is against more than one policy and during discussions this was increased to 14. The main thing I had problems with was that the content of the article is not supported by the reference. This is a serious problem as discussions will show,

5392:

It is sad because I see so many unexplained metaphors and allegories within mythology on Knowledge and it irritates me and I am driven to clear them up. It will happen when the necessity for mass media is blown away by the Internet. BTW, Dr. NeSmith is my father. He is a professor in education. I

4567:

Another point to consider is that most of the ghits seem to be for a heavy-metal band, about which we don't seem to have an article. If the band is notable, it might grab the main name (not because it's more important than Frege's concept, certainly, but because it's more on-point for the search

1612:

I made a few changes, some of which might need further work. I haven't adjusted the navbar to accord with the sidebar, though. I suggest finishing organising the content in one before synchronising the other one. I'll leave it in your hands. I think I've poked my nose in enough :-) BTW, I've also

339:

This lead topic in Metaphysics has been somewhat highjacked by a group of people who believe that the only Theosophy was that of the Blavatsky-Schools. I have been trying to get their page renamed - possibly to Theosophy (Blavatsky-Schools), or other. However - this appears contentious, since the

5311:

Hello everyone, and happy New Year!, I am a philosopher and have spent my life invested into the most difficult subjects of our human condition. This year was spent practically explaining the theory behind our social problem's historical development, and how we could flip everything by creating

3951:

The limitation is the use of reason as methodology. Use of the term outside of that is abuse and an attempt to give credibility to something that is not credible. This is why there is a tendency of scientists and mathematicians to look down at philosophy. It isn't appropriate to lump legitimate

1480:

Thanks for your advice ClaretAsh - I think the collapsible lists are a good idea; I'd forgotten about those. With the collapsible lists, having a full list of philosophers of religion shouldn't be a problem, as it won't get in the way without someone choosing to open it. I'll make the necessary

1200:

does look many other ethical theories besides utilitarianism (state consequentialism, ethical egoism & ethical altruism, for example), which separates it from utilitarianism. Certainly, there could be improved coverage of all of this, and perhaps coverage of other consequentialist theories.

4435:

Mit dem Argument, dass es andernfalls keine Intersubjektivität geben könne, postuliert Frege neben dem Reich der subjektiven Vorstellungen und dem der "objektiv-wirklichen" physischen Gegenstände noch ein "drittes Reich": das der "objektiv-nichtwirklichen" Gedanken. Sie werden vom Bewusstsein

3875:

I have proposed for the category "metaphysical cosmology" to be deleted and its content to be moved to either "religious" or "mythological" cosmology. The word "metaphysics" in Knowledge is reserved for scholarly and academic philosophers, not spiritualism, esoterism, and occultism. Let's not

4427:

Die Gedanken sind weder Dinge der Außenwelt noch Vorstellungen. Ein drittes Reich muß anerkannt werden. Was zu diesem gehört, stimmt mit den Vorstellungen darin überein, daß es nicht mit den Sinnen wahrgenommen werden kann, mit den Dingen aber darin, daß es keines Trägers bedarf, zu dessen

2375:

HI WikiProject Philosophy! I'm writing to inform you of my interest in starting a group that works on articles about globalization, in order to improve coverage of globalization on Knowledge. Your group has banners on some of the articles that are key to this discussion, and I believe many

3318:

has proposed the deletion of a couple of category templates. These templates provide convenient links to categories that are not otherwise convenient due to quirks of the organization (e.g. Category "Ethics" is not easily reached from category "Philosophy" due to being under "Branches of

1050:

on the general subject of syntax, with intermixed discussion on its use in different fields. If the subject matter (i.e. the meaning of the title) differs substantially between fields, then the "syntax (logic)" format is the wikipedia standard way of disambiguating between them. --

2315:

entry was initially about a stage in the building of computerized KBS (Expert Systems), it had nothing to do with philosophy directly. It has now devolved into a third rate entry about philosophy. All mention of KBS has disappeared but the links to Knowledge Engineering remain.

5194:(1906) a week ago. I'm looking for interested editors. The problem is, Philo seems to be too Greek Philosophy leading to Christianity for the Jewish History project and too Jewish for any Christian history editors (can't seem to find the right Christian project page). Help! 1522:). Then, you could either (a) put the series sidebar on the main articles and the navbar everywhere else; (b) put the sidebar on constituent articles and the navbar on non-constituent articles; or (c) add either according to the formatting demands of the respective articles. 5505:

Overlook the source and then get people to write about the source. Wonderful way to build collective knowledge. The mythology sections here are not very accurate and their metaphors and allegories remain hidden. Good bye Knowledge. I have much bigger fish to fry. Happy NY.

2331:

especially as there is an "Acquiring knowledge" section there. I propose that the entry be changed back to something about KBS and all reference to Wikiproject Philosophy deleted. A paragraph at the beginning could point readers to epistemology and to cognitive psychology.

1812:. Although I am pleased with what I have done with it so far, I am not expert in this area - could someone who more expertise perhaps have a look and see what they can do with it? In particular, reactions to Kant's ethics from other philosophers would be helpful. Thanks. 306:

I don't understand many of your criticisms. I might prefer "Definition by genus and difference", but the title is okay. The use of a user name in an article is unusual and might even be criticized on grounds of taste, but is surely not a very deep concern. The article

1214:

I absolutely agree that both consequentialism and utilitarianism are notable. However, I am not sure each notable topic should have its own article. I am effectively wondering what is the most optimal way to cover both utilitarianism and consequentialism in general.

4811:, except in an explanatory fashion (e.g. in parentheses or quotation marks, or preceded by "literally") should be disambiguated. If "third realm" is commonly used in philosophical texts, I do not think a full disambiguation page is necessary; a hatnote (e.g. using 2449:

has undergone major re-structuring. WikiProject Philosophy members are invited to review and comment on the article and add relevant missing information or sections in which your project may have an interest. Also, you may be interested in reviewing the updated

5331:

Me and all of my productions that I would add to this site are EXTREMELY noteworthy and will one day be in physical encyclopaedias. I have given my life entirely to all of my fellow human brothers and sisters and one day the world will realise what I have done.

2000:

in the sense of "object considered as a whole, eligible to be en element of a class"? Searches for phrases like "individual (philosophy)" are confounded by too many hits for the notion of an individual person. Searching for "individual (ontology)", I hit upon

1069:

philosophy department which will require political advocacy to solve. We are not a numerous group here, and the general impression of the hoi polloi prevails over what philosophy academicians think. When something gets screwed up, it tends to stay screwed up.

5489:

I also do all of this for free and the conflict of interest really only stresses those who make money off of their material. I give myself for free to help develop society. My only interest is to help build our collective past, present, and future knowledge.

319:), but some of your criticisms are baffling. In particular, you've added a notability tag to the article! This form of definition is a fairly standard part of every critical thinking course that includes a discussion of the types and uses of definitions. 311:

requires more references (which are surely easy to provide!), but the reference used here is not irrelevant. The authors wanted to refer to a very well-known example of this sort of definition, and they gave a reference to the classical appearance of this

541:

is also masking behind a random IP, unwilling to take responsibilities for its ungrounded claims. I, on the other hand, am a registered user of Knowledge, and am willing to take full responsibility for all my edits, claims, and contributions to the site.

5054:

The category for every field of philosophy has a "theories" subcategory. This makes it possible for readers to easily compare and contrast the competing theories in any of the various fields. It would seem to be a very important feature for our readers.

2999: 769:

Folks, could you take a look at this category name, and my proposal to rename it consistent with all of the others in the philosophy department. I certainly would not like to see a massive restructure that would make it harder to categorize things.

2319:

The current version seems to be the result of changes made by a very inexperience editor. It contains citations to Knowledge (that's right "citations" not links) and the Britannica. It was flagged as within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy by

494:

and is now engaged in a slow burning edit war with an IP who wants to revert to the original status - the IP has argued on the talk page that Hanlon1755's edits are off topic for the article. Those with knowledge of this area, please intervene.

3144:

Criticism section incoherent. Is that criticism of the idea of absoluteness in general, or of specific ideas of it, or of the arguments that specific thinkers mentioned in the article hold it to be true. It seems to be a tangled mess of all

2934: 5432:

My work is all backed up with scholarly sources. But the end result is new work as their relational qualities are examined and compared with our modern times. Most of what I do is reinterpret old wisdom but in this process I find new.

901:, a problem that gets progressively more serious as the article goes along and is worst in the subsection of First Division: Transcendental Analytic dealing with The Metaphysical Reduction. I believe that much of that section violates 4700: 4422:"In dem Aufsatz Der Gedanke des deutschen Philosophen und Mathematikers Gottlob Frege (1918) bezeichnet der Ausdruck Drittes Reich einen Bereich der Realität, in dem die nach seiner Auffassung objektiven Gedanken angesiedelt sind: 1332:

I think I'll stay clear of that. I had a quick look and I felt like taking a knife to it like in Psycho. Infinite dimensions and then the Indian bit, looked like it was about to start on om mani padme hum and karmic crystals. ;-)

2255:

This is a fascinating subject, and I applaud the work done on it so far. The question posed at the end of the lead, to me, is the central question posed by discipline, and I almost feel as though it might deserve to open the

4761:

should both redirect to Nazi Germany as being the overwhelmingly primary use of the terms. Obscure philosophical concepts and in-fashion music groups are surely not on the same level as the empire that changed world history.

2621: 355:

I might add that Theosophy has both Science/Metaphysics and Religion elements. perhaps it is a joint project. Currently the trend in Theosophy is to focus on Physics/Ontology/Brain-Mind etc. Metaphysics seems more relevant.

5103:

To Appeal to a concept would seem to be originally a somewhat poetic device metaphorically gesturing toward whatever concept understanding might be sought from. Alas i don't expect a poetic explanation will suffice today.

621: 1502:? My experience is it'll only be a matter of time before someone TFDs one of them on the grounds of doubling up. My suggestion: synchronise them (visually and content-wise) so that they can complement each other (Compare 5023:

in one direction or another, and one other inexperienced editor is commenting occasionally in my favor, but this discussion is extremely time-consuming and I just don't know that I will always be there to keep this up.

4841:

Following discussion re MEDRS, ontologic status of psychiatric categories, and controversy re the scientific methodologies for attaching the term "disease" and "disorder" to the categories, if they really exist, on the

3440:

I don't think this is complicated. Knowledge policy requires that articles be based on reputable published sources. There is apparently no published source of any sort that uses the term "John Anthony's Wager". QED.

905:

egregiously, and may be flawed beyond redemption. I am considering wiping much of that section, but would like to hear other editors' views of the matter before proceeding with such a potentially controversial move.

2355:

There is a proposal to delete the navigation bar on categories such as logic, aesthetics, etcetera. I am not seeing any very good reasons for the proposal, and it was at least a little bit of effort to create them.

2278:

This is to inform people of a new (political) philosophy entry and ask for advice. My first entry on wikipedia was supposed to be on Libertarian Paternalism (term coined by Thaler and Sunstein in a 2003 article in

3213: 3012:

regarding a proposed addition to that policy page. As topics of this nature tend to spawn some of the most heated and contested discussions we have, any and all informed, neutral opinions are more than welcome.

1846: 1134: 1179:

In conclusion, while there is clearly a difference between both, the difference is not very clear, and there is clearly a lot of overlap in any case. I am wondering whether the articles should remain separate.

5316:

receptively reinterpret wisdom into the actions of our society's individuals. I then distribute these films for free utilising most media distribution formats including many sources on the Internet and DVD's.

3745:

As a newby I'm surprised that General Semantics is not considered to be a philosophical subject. It certainly has a direct relationship to the nature of reality, which is definitely a subject for philosophy.

707:) needs professional help. In my opinion it should list scientific disciplines and explain when they became a formal science. In stead it tends to focus on current protoscience which is a controversial topic. 4944:, an article that your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the 287:

If some editors could take the time to look at the article and title, the one reference and use as related to the article, and the user name that is used in the article multiple times, I would appreciate it.

3123:

It is nevertheless good manners to elucidate specific, and potentially actionable, assertions, thereby opening yourself up to specific criticism in exchange for the criticism you level against the article.

1163:

discusses both topics in the same article, and is our best external link about utilitarianism. The entry discusses utilitarianism and classic utilitarianism without defining the difference between the two.

3500:

to expand the article on this important book by Deleuze & Guattari? We could each take a plateau. (There aren't really a thousand.) Just say hi on the talk page or call dibs on a chapter or something.

2019:

I think Peter Strawson's book "Individuals" deals with this. It starts with "bodies" and the identification of particulars. Persons are dealt with but are not the central issue. Its years since I read it,

4519:

I therefore propose a disabiguation page, but I expect any edit redirecting the main title of the Nazis' asserted third mellinium empire will raise emotions, so the issue should be thoroghly vetted first.

2694:

and found that the lede definition (the very first sentence) was written strictly from the POV of experimental physicists, essentially saying that time is a measurement. The lede said nothing about how

3936:

Gregbard, can you provide some background for your ideas about the limitations on "metaphysics"? In my experience the term is used much more widely than simply to reference academic Western philosophy.

2287:

to be in effect an entry on libertarian paternalism, with a clear statement that this is the case in the first sentence. This is not optimal though. If someone has the clout and expertise to rename the

799: 1294:

yeah it's pretty dire. I've reverted the additions and asked him to talk it to the talk page. Hopefully then he will word out his suggestions so they can be added in a more understandable way.

1429:

as it looks a bit bulky at first glance. Also, to fix the navbar links at the bottom of it, would adding {{subst:PAGENAME}} to the name parameter help? Otherwise, it looks like you've covered

5063:. I am not sure what the alternative is, and this would be a serious loss for the whole project. Please help me keep a consistent category structure, which I have worked so hard to establish. 4635:

is the correct translation. I have seen some modern philosophers discussing the idea of "third realm" in Frege's sense, so redirect to Frege is reasonable since the term has some currency.

1159:, which is a form of the former. For example, both articles cover rule consequentialism/utilitarianism, motive consequentialism/utilitarianism, negative consequentialism/utilitarianism. The 4498:

distinct both from the sensible external world and from the internal world of consciousness... As this new ‘realism’ was absorbed into English speaking philosophy, the traditional term

3328: 3323: 1026: 671: 280:(suggestions provided at the bottom of the article), and article sectioning. There is still a lot of work as there is no history section and others such as a possible etymology section. 4859:

practice is a disciplinary/professional attribute that has little to do with the actual content of psychiatric knowledge or the nature of psychiatric practice. To establish this it is

2071:

Looking for the use of these sources within project pages and dealing with them, as appropriate, e.g. by checking facts, deleting unsubstantiated items, or getting better sources, etc.

5048: 3869: 761: 5324:

from my thought process. And I closely examine each and every detail within my existence and contemplate different methods to understand and interpret this "reality" in front of me.

2194:

Last december, I grossly simplified to the lede in order to remove some confusing prose, poor organization and (possible) original research. My simplification has been reverted with

1934:, but I'm not an expert on the subject. I've made a fair bit of improvement, but it would be really helpful if someone who knows more about it that I do could have a look. Thanks. 2794:

1. A limited stretch or space of continued existence, as the interval between two successive events or acts, or the period through which an action, condition, or state continues.

2451: 2377: 1979: 1560:

and started to add it to a few articles. It may be that I have been slightly hasty and put it in where it may not be appropriate - feedback regarding that would be appreciated.

2857: 2639: 2581:

already where their contributions would be much more appropriate. I would greatly appreciate some experienced editors stopping by to give their opinions on the matter there. --

315:

The article could surely be improved, and there is some concern about OR violations (the multiplicity section consists of some fairly simple observations, but may well violate

3839: 2956: 2349: 1481:

changes then move it to the template namespace and start to add it to the relevant articles. As ever, I'd love other people to make any improvements they think necessary.

5100:

I have not been able to locate a description of appeals meaning in philosophy to correct the definition with reference. Can anyone suggest how to improve the situation?

2830:

The above article was recently, so far as I can tell unilaterally, moved from the first title to the second. There has been a request for a move back to the old title at

2481: 2129: 869: 2066: 1105: 930: 97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 5163: 2376:

perspectives and disciplines needs to come together if we're going to get it right. If you would consider supporting such a project, would you please swing by the

1034:

and categories by extention are marginalized, and these parentetical titles are a symptom of this. Doesn't "logical syntax" make more sense than "Syntax (logic)?"

2513: 4490:

concludes that numbers are neither external ‘concrete’ things nor mental entities of any sort. ... He says that they (thoughts - by which Gideon Rosen means the

3544: 2893:

I put it up for speedy, it's just a page that a student created for himself. If the bar of notability is this low then I am notable: that is not a good sign.

964:

inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here:

3679: 2040: 1655:

Thanks for your tinkering and suggestions - they look good. I'll finish organising the content as you suggest, then look to resynchronise with the navbox.

1587:

is a link both as a a heading and in the concepts of religion section, for example). Although that is not a big problem, I'll try to improve on that soon.

5093:. There it is simply summarized as "Various types of informal fallacy are described as an appeal to something:" followed by a list of proposed fallacies. 4061:, professor emeritus of philosophy at Georgia State University, is a reliable source. Several editors have objected to it because Almeder published it in 114:

is evidently part of the series of Aristotelianism. Unfortunately, at present, Aristotle is mentioned only in the most tangential and trivial fashion.

2907:

I agree. I just can't bring myself to propose deletion of any articles in the philosophy department. So I try to bring this to people's attention here.

1196:

goes on to say that a good consequence is one that fills the principle of utility (generally achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest number).

2235:

There has been an attempt to reinstate the manifestly defective lead that I have replaced. I don't mean to be high-handed; but the case was very clear.

1853:. I've asked here before but the review page hasn't had a comment in the last 16 days - it would be good if someone could give their comments. Thanks. 1271:, though, it is an incomprehensible morass of bad english, random quotes and content of vague relevance. Other editor's opinions would be appreciated. 1201:

However, I do not think a merge would be appropriate, as utilitarianism is a notable concept in its own right, independent of its meta-ethical parent.

2739:

d. A similar number representing a specific point on this continuum, reckoned in hours and minutes: checked her watch and recorded the time, 6:17 a.m.

4560:

is necessarily correct. First of all, is Frege's conception more specific than abstract objects in general? If so, possibly it should redirect to

2778:

d. A similar number representing a specific point on this continuum, reckoned in hours and minutes:checked her watch and recorded the time, 6:17 AM.

2699:

is normally experienced by humans (and other being) as, for lack of better words, our sequential progress in our existence. This is what is in the

2495: 2055:, etc. I am sure there are others. I am asking a few projects to help turn the tide against the invasion of Knowledge by self-published sources by: 444: 1703:

I fixed the dabs. Most of them linked to dab-pages which are not related to philosophy at all. All the specific articles are included in the index.

3646: 3638: 3627: 2052: 1557: 1423: 4896:", as defined in that article and by MEDRS standards. The only allowable edits are that TCM practitioners "claim" to heal. TCM uses supernatural 1681: 2191:. We are looking for a few short paragraphs that introduce the term in much the same way it might be introduced to a freshman philosophy class. 1312:

Even the old version was pretty bad. "In philosophy, infinity can be attributed to infinite dimensions"? Worse, that's the opening clause...!

675: 620:

A logical inconsistency can often (always?) be reformulted in the form of a pradox. Can anyone help with such a formulation on the talk page of

4068: 4014: 3793: 3669: 3408: 2078: 254: 3076:; if there should, then perhaps you can say a few words about what material such an article should cover, and what it should say about it. -- 723: 264:

2)- The use of a Knowledge user name in the article. During discussions one challenged entry was multiplied to 14 instances of the same name.

47: 17: 1351:

and the like -- but it's certainly not central to the conception of the infinite in general, and less so in philosophy than in mathematics.

1133:

was recently nominated as a Featured Article, which might be of interest to some people in this WikiProject. You can find the nomination at

4205: 3008: 2805: 1406: 965: 3151:

Structurally a tad bizarre: why would an article entitled 'Absolute (philosophy) need a subsection entitled 'The Absolute in Philosophy'?

5139: 4976: 4470: 3731: 3297: 3186: 1747: 1728: 4703:

first produces results for a music band, a band whose fans have somehow not managed to establish notability and get them a Wiki page.

4319: 4300: 3162: 3103: 3049: 2769:

a. A nonspatial continuum in which events occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future.

2730:

a. A nonspatial continuum in which events occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future.

1793: 1389: 1361: 1322: 740: 423:

You can check the literature on tests of a hypothesis in the philosophy of classical mathematical statistics literature for sources.

5464:

it will most likely stay. Knowledge is just not a place for an author to get him or herself referenced in general because we have a

4063: 3896: 2062: 2044: 679: 273: 3876:

mish-mash the two. It is a disservice to legitimate scholars and hurts the credibility of WP, especially the philosophy department.

3547:. I've put a bit of effort into this as part of a featured portal drive related to portals linked from the top-right corner of the 2573:"philobabble" and questioning whether we should even have an article on that subject at all), or for that matter to have even read 250: 2292:

entry that would be swell. Or break the redirect and move the content to a new entry, or whatever is the best technical solution.

5257: 2962: 1440: 857: 2711:

has no meaning outside of measurement. Especially when it ignores the dictionary definition and especially when there exists a

5449: 5361: 3656: 3003: 1690: 1499: 5166:

is probably relevant here. One should base articles on topics which have actually been discussed as a unit in the literature.

977: 4466:- There is often a problem when Kant, Frege, Wittgenstein, etc., are translated by lighter weight thinkers (i.e., by anyone). 2101: 1899:

has almost no links to it from various philosophical articles. (It is mostly linked to be articles on abortion debate, plus

2757:

b : a nonspatial continuum that is measured in terms of events which succeed one another from past through present to future

2736:

c. A number, as of years, days, or minutes, representing such an interval: ran the course in a time just under four minutes.

2733:

b. An interval separating two points on this continuum; a duration: a long time since the last war; passed the time reading.

2775:

c. A number, as of years, days, or minutes, representing such an interval:ran the course in a time just under four minutes.

2772:

b. An interval separating two points on this continuum; a duration:a long time since the last war; passed the time reading.

2217:

litany of impenetrabilities back again, please. The whole article needs work, but the lead was in deplorable condition. ☺♪

1962: 1957: 1731:

regarding possible more closely coordinated activity between the various religion, philosophy, and mythology WikiProjects.

5291: 5268: 5261: 5123:

Does anyone think its a good idea to make an article about supernatural entities such as heaven hell, angels, devils etc?

3141:

Lacks citations for some very bold claims (the five things all conceptions of 'the Absolute' have in common, for example).

942: 911: 483: 475: 4670:

I fail to see how "Third Realm" is an "incorrect" translation. It's perfectly correct, though not the only possible one (

4131:. In my opinion, Arthur's issues are POV related, and any merge will most likely result in substantial content deletion. 2512:

There is now a proposed general Manual of Style for Religion and other articles relating to ethoses or belief systems at

1972: 1967: 4885: 4211: 4193: 2490: 504: 372: 156: 111: 1952: 5113: 3434: 2203: 1775: 400: 223: 5060: 4945: 4067:, a journal that deals with anomalies (fringe issues). Uninvolved input from philosophers would be very helpful. See 3864: 3381: 2834:, and I would welcome the input of any editors regarding the name and content of the article in question. Thank you. 2596:"Philobabble"?! I do wish Derek Parfit had time to go and re-educate certain people, preferably with a cricket bat. — 1770:

I noticed that Drift chamber, who was recently blocked for largely incoherent additions to many articles, especially

4948:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. 4010: 3907: 3377: 2930: 2617: 1685: 1246: 38: 5328:

additional references for the articles because that is all included in my work anyway: I am a philosophy teacher.

4030:

person. Otherwise it is susceptible to being deleted. Remember to always sign your talk posts with ~~~~. Welcome.

3466: 2754:

a : the measured or measurable period during which an action, process, or condition exists or continues : duration

122:

section on the topic would suffice, perhaps with a word or two of how attitudes have shifted over the centuries.

5295: 2788: 2663: 842:, and maybe a sentence can be included at that page giving a basic definition of the word referencing the OED at 795: 785: 151:

who has been tendentiously pushing to have some nonsense about non-physicalist metaphysical libertarianism being

5410:

There's no reason to be sad. If you would like to clarify things, please feel free. However, do expect that any

4861:

unnecessary to evaluate whether in any or all instances psychiatry adheres to the so-called 'scientific method'.

3789: 4680:

A google search of "there is a third realm" indicates that Frege's is the most common usage in English for the

4494:

of declarative sentences, apparently with Rosen using Frege's highly technical meaning of "sense") belong to a

4315: 4304: 3497: 2831: 2809: 2025: 1830: 907: 187: 182: 5530: 5514: 5499: 5477: 5453: 5424: 5402: 5384: 5365: 5301: 5235: 5221: 5206: 5175: 5157: 5072: 5037: 4984: 4962: 4931: 4830: 4785: 4745: 4712: 4694: 4661: 4614: 4593: 4528: 4331: 4289: 4275: 4254: 4238: 4140: 4100: 4077: 4039: 4018: 3975: 3961: 3946: 3931: 3912: 3885: 3853: 3797: 3760: 3735: 3708: 3616: 3566: 3510: 3482: 3450: 3397: 3362: 3342: 3305: 3274: 3249: 3220: 3198: 3133: 3111: 3085: 3057: 3030: 3000:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts#Proposed changes to WP:NOT

2985: 2941: 2916: 2902: 2887: 2864: 2843: 2813: 2676: 2651: 2628: 2605: 2590: 2525: 2502: 2463: 2435: 2413: 2389: 2365: 2338: 2301: 2265: 2246: 2226: 2207: 2174: 2136: 2114: 2090: 2029: 2014: 1986: 1938: 1920: 1885: 1857: 1834: 1816: 1798: 1759: 1740: 1716: 1697: 1659: 1630: 1591: 1564: 1539: 1485: 1471: 1413: 1394: 1366: 1342: 1327: 1303: 1288: 1251: 1224: 1205: 1189: 1141: 1119: 1078: 1059: 1043: 1013: 1003: 953: 915: 881: 862: 831: 810: 779: 748: 691: 656: 633: 610: 582: 568: 554: 509: 456: 432: 417: 376: 349: 328: 297: 240: 202: 134: 5085:

seem to be a commonly used concept in philosophical texts, but the closest Knowledge has to a description of

3148:

Crucially, lacks detail about such conceptions as 'absolute truth' (which is different to 'universal truth').

3138:

Combines many traditions into a single article in a way which does not distinguish sufficiently between them.

5135: 5090: 4980: 3899:, neither religion nor mythology, much less "spiritualism, esoterism, and occultism" are appropriate. Let's 3727: 3329:

Knowledge:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_September_29#Template:Category-Philosophical_literature.2Fheader

3301: 2485: 2170: 2077:

Eventually we will write a bot that checks these and leaves messages about them, and suggestions on that on

1712: 1263:

Hi there. Can editors from this project please look into the recent edits at the above article. As shown in

894: 887: 843: 533: 529: 521: 496: 4815: 4006: 3785: 2086: 1379:

The article could really use more eyes. Please check it; there's a serial editor there worsening the page.

4941: 4026:

Well, it looks like it was deleted pretty quickly. You should always start out by including why this is a

3166: 3107: 3053: 2261: 2199: 1789: 1516: 1385: 1357: 1318: 973: 893:

Hello. I'm not a member of the philosophy project, however, I was wondering if anyone could help with the

744: 598: 389:

Hi, I could use some input on how we might present the meaning of "reject" within the field of philosophy

2565:. My objections on the redundancy of this seem to fall on deaf ears; they don't seem to acknowledge that 5109: 4972: 4690: 3971: 3942: 3506: 3393: 3194: 3093: 3065: 3018: 2976:

article, rather than the grab-bag that it currently is and that people are objecting to. Have a look.

2839: 2703:

definitions of all three major English dictionaries. It's highly POV to require the lede definition of

2521: 2312: 1931: 1822:

I've left Zippy a message that I would take a look at it. Any second opinions would be welcome ofcourse.

1771: 1736: 1257: 804: 687: 538: 525: 4170:

A discussion involving retoring content from sources describing alternative medicine as being based on

3995: 2082: 5437: 5349: 5127: 4927: 4916: 4881: 4876:

is a MEDRS issue at Knowledge, not just a matter of determining common usage on the street. The same

4781: 4767: 4741: 4727: 4708: 4657: 4610: 4524: 4271: 4234: 4222: 4159: 4112: 4027: 4002: 3781: 3756: 3425: 3209: 3158: 3099: 3045: 2601: 1881: 1850: 1556:

Thanks for your advice again. I think I will synchronise the two, then. I have moved the template to

1238: 1130: 877: 853: 578: 574: 564: 550: 546: 471: 452: 360: 5506: 5491: 5441: 5394: 5353: 4837:

Ontological status of psychiatric mental categories, philosophy of scientific methodology, and MEDRS

4054: 2198:. I don't want to get in an edit war over this, so I would appreciate a few more eyes. Thanks. ---- 5510: 5495: 5445: 5398: 5357: 5191: 5033: 4912: 4589: 3600: 3584: 3489: 3245: 3129: 3081: 2952: 2898: 2875: 2861: 2824: 2586: 2333: 2162: 2021: 2010: 2002: 1826: 1622: 1531: 1463: 1299: 1280: 1055: 644: 198: 5526: 5473: 5420: 5231: 5217: 5202: 5153: 5131: 5068: 4285: 4250: 4136: 4096: 4035: 3957: 3927: 3881: 3723: 3612: 3478: 3446: 3338: 3315: 3270: 2912: 2883: 2672: 2647: 2477: 2424: 2385: 2361: 2166: 2125: 2110: 1867: 1708: 1430: 1074: 1039: 902: 898: 827: 775: 491: 487: 479: 467: 261:

1)- The current title name. There was given valid suggestions but there are more severe problems.

213: 4261:

I am copying your comment to that talk page discussion for others to see and comment on, using

5287: 4959: 4199: 4120: 4087:

I thought I would pass this along... You can download a ten volume Encyclopedia of Philosophy

3892: 3694: 3686: 3634: 3385: 3373: 3324:

Knowledge:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_September_29#Template:Category-Philosophy.2Fheader

3293: 2981: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2539: 2321: 2297: 2257: 1983: 1871: 1784: 1380: 1352: 1313: 1220: 1185: 997: 969: 949: 926: 816: 735: 2549:

right now, where two other editors are wanting to add substantial material on the subject of

5381: 5276: 5253: 5105: 4686: 4640: 4265:

reasoning, but if you only wanted it here on this project page, feel free to revert my move.

3967: 3938: 3552: 3502: 3389: 3190: 3014: 2969: 2835: 2820: 2517: 2497: 2459: 2410: 2289: 2284: 1896: 1732: 1197: 1152: 683: 368: 345: 324: 293: 277: 130: 4773: 4733: 1583:

I have synchronised the two; however, within each template, there are duplicates of links (

272:

I tagged the article and some discussion ensued that resulted in improvements according to

5056: 4923: 4889: 4877: 4846:

and related talk page, FiachraByrne wrote (bolfaced for emphasis of most relevant part -

4826: 4777: 4763: 4737: 4723: 4704: 4653: 4606: 4557: 4520: 4403: 4378: 4346: 4267: 4230: 4217: 4128: 4072: 3774: 3767: 3752: 3577: 3540: 3413: 2742:

e. A system by which such intervals are measured or such numbers are reckoned: solar time.

2712: 2597: 2158: 2147: 1916: 1877: 1584: 1506: 1234: 873: 847: 560: 448: 408: 231: 3998:, but i think it needs to be corrected and improved. I think it needs more information. 3592: 2781:

e. A system by which such intervals are measured or such numbers are reckoned:solar time.

2405:

where another editor and I are attempting to work towards a better definition of "mind".

559:

Did this suddenly become an AfD rather than a WikiProject discussion area or something? —

5197:

Why isn't there an archive search box on this page like on other voluminous talk pages?

2667:, has a diagram constructed using the "influenced by" section of philosopher infoboxes. 2187:

I wonder if there is someone here with the expertise to rewrite the lede of the article

5171: 5049:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_December_9#Category:Metatheory_of_religion

5029: 5020: 5016: 4628: 4585: 4327: 4058: 4047: 3870:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_November_1#Category:Metaphysical_cosmology

3849: 3835: 3827: 3818: 3719: 3704: 3562: 3536: 3529: 3358: 3241: 3234: 3125: 3077: 3026: 2894: 2853: 2582: 2431:

soon - I would appreciate it if someone could copyedit the article, please. Thank you,

2154: 2143: 2006: 1809: 1755: 1617: 1526: 1458: 1338: 1295: 1275: 1165: 1156: 1115: 1051: 652: 643:

Help wanted: Looking for Meta-Counsel for the insane, conflicted, or misrepresented at

629: 428: 194: 188:

Talk:Free_will/Archive_8#.22Common_understanding.22_vs_the_lack_of_consensus_of_experts

172: 4888:(TCM) is also one of the oldest "medical" practices. There is rigorous enforcement by 4481: 1436:

Oh BTW, regarding the long list of philosophers you've included, may I suggest either

1160: 5522: 5469: 5465: 5416: 5227: 5213: 5198: 5149: 5064: 4796: 4758: 4646: 4561: 4456: 4370: 4338: 4281: 4262: 4246: 4132: 4092: 4031: 3953: 3923: 3877: 3608: 3474: 3442: 3334: 3266: 3217: 3073: 2992: 2938: 2908: 2879: 2668: 2643: 2625: 2446: 2432: 2428: 2381: 2357: 2213:

I did what needed desperately to be done. What a disaster zone! Don't let anyone put

2133: 2106: 2048: 1935: 1854: 1813: 1656: 1588: 1561: 1482: 1410: 1202: 1138: 1070: 1035: 1010: 823: 788: 771: 667: 390: 3903:

mish-mash the two, they're entirely legitimate... apparently it's a content dispute

1498:

You're welcome. A question, though. How do you intend to reconcile the sidebar with

1446:

Redirecting the article to the relevant category (if there is one) and listing them

1405:

I've been experimenting with a new navigation sidebox for philosophy of religion at

5411: 5280: 5272: 4998: 4949: 4800: 4671: 4548: 4474: 4460: 4386: 4354: 3289: 2977: 2350:

Knowledge:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_May_23#Template:Category-Logic.2Fheader

2328: 2293: 1904: 1348: 1216: 1181: 993: 988: 934: 704: 697: 639:

Help wanted: Looking for Meta-Counsel for the insane, conflicted, or misrepresented

316: 4997:

Hi, a series of proposed changes to the atheism article and have been outlined at

2856:, a recently created category, has been nominated for deletion. The discussion is 2764: 4318:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

3645:

List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here:

3187:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Religion#Newsletter for religion/philosophy/mythology?

2749: 1845:

Hi there again. I'm just wondering if anyone here would be willing to review the

5377: 5249: 4808: 4792: 4754: 4636: 4632: 4452: 4374: 4342: 2937:; I'd appreciate it if anyone else could have a look and give comments. Thanks. 2546: 2455: 2406: 1101: 1093: 968:. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! 839: 364: 341: 320: 289: 126: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4226: 3596: 3473:

This is an article that talks a bit about the philosophy articles at Knowledge.

794:

Hi, as a related WikiProject, you might be interested to know that the article

5015:

I'm looking to get other experienced editors involved at a dispute ongoing at

4908: 4843: 4822: 4631:'s comments, "third realm" is merely an incorrect translation of the German. 3812: 3808: 3588: 3523: 3519: 2578: 2558: 2550: 2535: 2128:; I was wondering if anyone here could take a look for me? The review page is 1912: 1908: 845:(Sorry, if you don't have OED access, but dictionary.com does not have it). -- 645:

Talk:Marsden motion#Meta Counsel for the insane, conflicted, or misrepresented

395: 218: 173:

Talk:Free_will#emphasize_how_the_agent_is_known_in_metaphysical_libertarianism

5256:. I lack the expertise to do the article justice, so I'm calling editors in 1176:

is problematic and the topic of the SEP entry's "What is Consequentialism?".

718:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_protosciences&oldid=2241750

482:, an existing article, for deletion. That debate is now closed as withdrawn. 5167: 5006: 4323: 4124: 3844: 3699: 3557: 3548: 3388:

is in pathetic condition, and some help editing this topic would be useful.

3354: 3022: 2402: 1751: 1334: 1110: 648: 625: 424: 336: 148: 141: 5190:

needs lots of work. It was completely unattributed copy and paste from the

4088: 3009:

Knowledge talk:What Knowledge is not#Is wikipedia a devotional compendium?

544:

I strongly recommend keeping the current (revised) version of the article.

155:

by "freely choosing to believe whether or not a soul exists". He has been

4897: 4893: 4856: 3069: 3042:

What a pile of excrement. Embarrassing. Someone ought to take a look.

3036: 2327:

I do not think that Knowledge Acquisition can be treated separately from

1900: 164:

experienced editors come and give their say to try to sort this all out!

4053:

There is a discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard about whether

3380:, who is opposed to any change, there has been no interest shown on the 2724: 2047:. It seems that some of those publishers are used in this project, e.g. 1870:

describes a limited opportunity for Knowledge editors to have access to

622:

Knowledge:Primary and secondary source paradoxes in law related articles

267:

3)- The use of a reference that does not support content of the article.

5336:

instead, their heart. Love is free and my heart belongs to all of you.

2569:

exists at all (ADDENDUM: One of the editors in question is now calling

385:(meaning of "reject" in philosophy) Clarification regarding term of art 4650: 4500:‘abstract’ was enlisted to apply to the denizens of this ‘third realm’ 3006:

as it effects all religion editors: "There is currently discussion at

1930:

Hello, fellow philosophers. I've recently been doing a bit of work on

712:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Protoscience&oldid=464537545

4804: 4390: 4358: 3412:

for something like this would be helpful. Thoughts much appreciated,

3285: 2574: 2554: 2531: 532:) has raised. The IP has yet to do the same for me. The IP's talk in 3749:

I beg your pardon, please ignore the preceding. I found the topic.

1723:

Possible greater cooperation across religion and philosophy projects

5271:, I'm further challenging both WikiProjects to work to get this to 3665:

Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using

2005:, but this seems to be more from a computer-science perspective. -- 1245:

rv, that's a good question :) I'll tag it with a merge suggestion.—

1135:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Augustinian theodicy/archive1

5187: 5059:

has proposed to delete this category under philosophy of religion

4920: 4487: 4407: 4382: 4350: 2188: 2180: 1684:? It has 16 links to dab-pages and nobody seems to care about it. 3662:

to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.

3633:

Hi there, I'm notifying this WikiProject due to its relevance to

3604: 3292:

have been proposed to be renamed to the Pinyin romanization, see

2577:

beyond the lede, or to realize that we have an entire article on

933:. If anyone is interested in improving the article, please do.-- 4892:

hawks (of which I am one) that assertions re TCM being healing "

2801: 2691: 2683: 2395: 2041:

Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Self_publishing_list

1748:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Religion#Seven Point Counter Proposal

276:. Two items were; the title name that did not appear to reflect 5097:

nonsense (?) Yet that is all WPs present definition eludes to.

3260: 2401:

It would be great with some extra attention to a discussion at

1948:

FYI, the following categories have been proposed for deletion:

1161:

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's entry on consequentialism

5254:

Talk:God is dead#This article needs re-factoring or re-writing

4915:, and related articles be held to a lower MEDRS standard than 3641:. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do: 157:

pushing this for over a year now, and works on no other topics

25: 5415:

in the literature before it can be a part of an encyclopedia.

4807:"Third Realm", which is not commonly used as a term for the 4649:, this comment was copied from identical discussion section 729:

but I understand it is part of "the philosophy of science".

4901: 4853:"Psychiatry is one of the oldest medical specialisms. It's 4259:

I have now made some specific proposals at that talk page.

3922:

belong under "metaphysical cosmology" as it had been used.

674:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets 5320:

very moving productions that will stand the test of time.

3004:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy)#Proposed changes to WP:NOT

1347:

Infinite dimensions is a useful concept in mathematics --

5376:

you have done, and published articles or books about it.

4580:

if it can be established that anyone actually translates

4480:- According to reliable secondary source Gideon Rosen in 4320:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

4106:

Repeated proposals to merge Metalogic and Metamathematics

3718:

Can we do something about this dogs breakfast of a page?

3181:

Possible religion/philosophy/mythology topical newsletter

2719:

Primary definitions from 3 English language dictionaries:

5043:

Proposed deletion of category "metatheories of religion"

3261:

_Philosopher" title="Knowledge talk:Vital articles": -->

1996:

Is there an article somewhere that treats the notion of

1727:

Please feel free to make any comments you might wish at

1027:

Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_February_15

4183: 3904: 2947:

A haunting philosophy draft, with ghosts and everything

2624:. If anyone could review the article, I'd be grateful. 2195: 1268: 1264: 727: 717: 711: 682:. The article is within the scope of this WikiProject. 5089:

meaning in philosophy is in the 'Argument' section of

897:

article? Much of it is written in a way that violates

616:

Help needed stating Knowledge Secondary Source Paradox

183:

Talk:Free_will/Archive_8#How_free_will_is_talked_about

5312:

quality free education, distributed on the Internet.

4069:

Knowledge:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Robert_Almeder

2452:

Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Globalization

284:

and I feel the discussion went circular and stagnant.

5264:

to quickly improve the article at least to B-class.

3647:

Knowledge:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants

2380:

and expressing that interest? Thanks so very much!

1891:

Potential person - please introduce links to article

4363:(or to a music band without a Wiki page per Google) 3840:

Knowledge:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Society

2707:to be defined only in terms of measurement. As if 1944:

Philosophers-by-language categories up for deletion

593:

An RM of interest: the computer game called "Eidos"

3226:Requested move discussion - John Major / John Mair 2620:is currently a featured article candidate; listed 4601:(Note: I updated and modified my opening comment 3259:Members of this wikiProject may be interested in 870:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Pseudorationalism 4880:standards should be applied to psychiatry as to 4699:Interestingly Paul B is not only correct, but a 3994:Hello can you help me out? I wrote a page about 3838:for featured portal candidacy, discussion is at 3805:Portal:Society for featured portal consideration 3578:Talk:Entailment#Move_back_to_logical_consequence 3262:Knowledge talk:Vital articles#Mathematics -: --> 2067:Knowledge talk:List of self-publishing companies 1106:Knowledge:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Arts 1104:for featured portal candidacy, discussion is at 5252:from B- to C-class for the reasons outlined in 5164:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Ethereal beings 5028:so hard to established over the years there. -- 3685:Notify others you think might be interested in 2878:? It appears he may have created this himself. 2832:Talk:Existence of God(s)#Article title question 762:Proposed move of History_books_about_philosophy 4188:Journal of the Association of Medical Colleges 2514:Knowledge:WikiProject Religion/Manual of style 2035:Self-published references used in this project 1808:Hi there. I am currently working on improving 253:: There has been an ongoing discussion on the 5162:Sorry to pour cold water on this but I think 4999:Talk:Atheism#article_.2F_source_discrepancies 4543:? But nobody says that; the fixed form uses 3551:, and feedback would be appreciated prior to 3545:Knowledge:Portal peer review/Society/archive1 1087:Portal:Arts for featured portal consideration 8: 5267:In recognition of the Feb 28, 2012 death of 3680:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech 3407:Could someone please have a look at the AFC 2274:Libertarian Paternalism and Soft Paternalism 2039:Hi, Some time ago I started a discussion on 1781:Any thoughts on what should happen to this? 1729:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Religion#Activity 1267:, the article was once stable and readable. 518:Strong Keep. (Keep current revised version). 4874:As to the designation as a medical practice 3372:I've made several proposals for changes to 3216:; any comments there would be appreciated. 1774:, had created a copy/paste move article at 5468:. (remember to sign your posts with ~~~~) 5212:I will look into the archive search issue. 4975:has been nominated for speedy deletion -- 4772:(Note:Comment copied from other talk page 4732:(Note:Comment copied from other talk page 4547:untranslated. So I think the redirect to 2484:. Any comments are appreciated. Regards.-- 2454:proposal for a new WikiProject. Regards, 2124:Hi there. I've requested a peer review of 1439:Removing the list and linking directly to 524:, I have addressed each and every concern 3021:) 15:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)" Thank you, 5275:status if possible. Please follow up on 4182:, tradition, and bad science, including 2638:There is a discussion for the category: 3637:. I've recently gone ahead and created 2998:Please see the recent notifications at 2849:Category for discussion: Category:Style 989:Talk:Fallacy#Fallacy_vs_logical_fallacy 216:which could use more comments. Thanks! 140:Additional input desperately needed at 4535:My two cents: I'm assuming here that 4164:Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 2690:I have recently come upon the article 2557:, which is a summary-style article of 2079:Talk:List_of_self-publishing_companies 2053:Bertrand Russell's views on philosophy 1613:commented on the sidebar's talk page. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4821:would be sufficient, in my opinion.-- 4539:is being used as an Anglicization of 4482:the "Abstract Objects" article at SEP 1963:Category:German-language philosophers 1958:Category:Arabic-language philosophers 1401:Philosophy of religion navigation box 994:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 921:Pope John Paul II article improvement 724:Knowledge:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Philosophy 7: 5307:Philosopher Seeking to be Referenced 4436:erfasst, aber nicht hervorgebracht." 4206:Canadian Medical Association Journal 4184:the first 14 sources of this version 3460:Article about SEP v Knowledge, et al 3348:Proposal to edit Organ Trade article 1407:User:ItsZippy/Philosophy of religion 868:I've nominated it for deletion. See 439:Current Science is based on modeling 4993:Proposed Changes to Atheism Article 4471:Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 4083:McMillan Encyclopedia of Philosophy 3622:Freedom of speech = New WikiProject 2972:, of how this could be as a proper 1973:Category:Urdu-language philosophers 1968:Category:Latin-writing philosophers 1746:See the counter-proposal there at: 1147:Consequentialism and utilitarianism 5345:Thanks! - Wendell Charles NeSmith 4919:and its related articles?" is here 4556:That doesn't mean the redirect to 2860:. All are welcome to participate. 2664:Graphing the history of philosophy 2081:will also be appreciated. Thanks. 1682:Index of philosophy articles (R–Z) 1676:Index of philosophy articles (R–Z) 822:This new article is questionable. 710:The article use to look like this: 24: 5001:, comments would be appreciated. 4730:) 16:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4643:) 16:09, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4064:Journal of Scientific Exploration 3897:Dynamics of the celestial spheres 2344:Header template deletion proposal 2120:Peer review of religious language 2063:List of self-publishing companies 2045:List of self-publishing companies 1953:Category:Philosophers by language 1151:There is a large overlap between 274:Knowledge policies and guidelines 5258:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy 4770:) 18:41, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4310: 3811: 3639:WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech 3628:WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech 3522: 2963:User:Uncle G/Non-physical entity 2929:Hi there. Just to let you know, 1558:Philosophy of religion (sidebar) 1441:List of philosophers of religion 520:I will point out that by now in 29: 4245:will join in and help you out. 3865:Category:Metaphysical_cosmology 3773:Hello, do you have anything on 3693:Thank you for your interest in 2642:that could do with your input. 2469:Peer review: Fyodor Dostoyevsky 2233:This really will need watching. 2003:ontology components#Individuals 5466:policy on conflict of interest 4701:Google search of "third realm" 4113:Talk:Metamathematics#Metalogic 3343:23:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC) 3306:22:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC) 3275:15:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC) 3250:05:07, 15 September 2012 (UTC) 2968:I've put a draft together, as 2800:Can we get some help there at 2476:I requested a peer review for 2423:Hi all. I am hoping to submit 2378:Globalization Project Proposal 2371:Globalization Project Proposal 2043:and it eventually resulted in 1424:sidebar with collapsible lists 1172:too without defining it. Even 106:Aristotle on Genus/Difference? 1: 5531:21:52, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5515:12:15, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5500:12:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5478:08:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5454:07:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5425:05:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5403:04:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5385:01:35, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5366:01:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC) 5302:20:09, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 5269:William Hamilton (theologian) 5262:Knowledge:WikiProject Atheism 5236:16:02, 21 December 2012 (UTC) 5222:21:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC) 5207:21:27, 20 December 2012 (UTC) 5176:17:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 5158:16:29, 19 December 2012 (UTC) 5114:04:21, 12 December 2012 (UTC) 4963:12:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC) 4932:17:39, 29 November 2012 (UTC) 4831:00:54, 27 November 2012 (UTC) 4786:16:45, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4746:16:45, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4713:19:37, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4695:17:13, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4662:16:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4615:15:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4594:04:23, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4529:17:28, 26 November 2012 (UTC) 4451:- I don't speak German, but " 4332:15:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 4290:06:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 4276:06:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 4255:04:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 4239:02:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 4141:15:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC) 4101:02:00, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 4078:16:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 4040:14:47, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 4019:12:40, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3976:06:49, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3966:Thank you, very interesting. 3962:04:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 3947:15:48, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 3854:22:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 3842:. Thank you for your time, — 3670:WikiProject Freedom of speech 3555:. Thank you for your time, — 3516:Portal:Society at peer review 3185:Please see the discussion at 2545:A debate is going on over at 1698:22:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC) 1680:Anybody interested in fixing 1289:22:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC) 1225:22:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC) 1206:22:40, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 1190:22:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 1142:20:56, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 1120:20:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC) 1108:. Thank you for your time, — 1079:06:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC) 1060:06:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 1044:04:58, 15 February 2012 (UTC) 958: 732:Any advice would be helpful. 726:recently decided to delete it 611:22:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC) 597:Editors may be interested in 583:08:07, 31 December 2011 (UTC) 569:12:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 555:23:07, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 510:21:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 484:Conditional statement (logic) 476:Conditional statement (logic) 457:17:36, 25 December 2011 (UTC) 433:20:39, 25 December 2011 (UTC) 418:12:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC) 377:13:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 350:12:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC) 241:12:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC) 203:02:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC) 178:Relevant past talk sections: 135:19:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC) 5073:20:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC) 5038:20:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC) 4985:00:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC) 4886:Traditional Chinese Medicine 4212:Medical Journal of Australia 4194:New York Academy of Sciences 3932:09:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 3913:08:46, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 3886:02:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC) 3798:11:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC) 3761:20:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC) 3736:19:38, 27 October 2012 (UTC) 3709:22:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC) 3617:07:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC) 3567:02:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC) 3511:04:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC) 3483:19:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC) 3451:16:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 3435:03:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC) 2765:American Heritage Dictionary 2324:I think this was a mistake. 2281:The American Economic Review 1014:21:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 1004:21:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC) 978:19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC) 954:21:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 916:03:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 882:22:08, 29 January 2012 (UTC) 863:21:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 832:20:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 811:11:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 780:06:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 672:featured article review here 490:. Hanlon1755 has "revamped" 329:13:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 298:08:36, 9 December 2011 (UTC) 251:Genus–differentia definition 112:Genus-differentia definition 4055:an article on reincarnation 3891:There are only 2 articles, 3498:interested in collaborating 3398:13:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC) 3363:01:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC) 3221:19:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC) 3199:21:00, 20 August 2012 (UTC) 3134:00:51, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 3112:00:27, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 3086:00:18, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 3058:00:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC) 2231:I have done a little more. 1776:Infinity (Oriental thought) 749:13:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC) 692:21:53, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 657:21:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 634:21:35, 1 January 2012 (UTC) 257:concerning several things. 208:More input requested at RSN 147:There is an editor over at 5547: 5244:Please improve God is dead 4907:Discussion of "Should the 3583:A while back, the article 3319:philosophy"). Please see: 3311:Proposed template deletion 3214:Featured Article candidate 3204:Featured article candidate 3031:08:23, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 2931:Religious language problem 2925:Featured article candidate 2750:Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2727:(obviously drawn from AH) 2618:Religious language problem 2612:Religious language problem 2553:directly into the lede of 2115:06:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC) 2091:21:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC) 2030:05:09, 25 April 2012 (UTC) 2015:19:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC) 1987:23:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 1939:20:42, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 1858:18:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC) 1835:04:15, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 1817:22:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC) 1799:02:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC) 1760:09:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 1741:21:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC) 1717:17:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC) 167:Current talk section link: 5148:What would be the title? 4158:as part of definition in 3553:featured portal candidacy 3467:A Homepage for Philosophy 2986:19:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 2942:19:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 2935:feature article candidate 2917:00:21, 13 July 2012 (UTC) 2903:22:02, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 2888:21:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 2865:05:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC) 2789:Oxford English Dictionary 2677:04:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC) 2652:16:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC) 2629:14:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 2606:15:33, 15 June 2012 (UTC) 2591:09:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 2526:22:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 2508:Proposed MOS for Religion 1921:21:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 1886:15:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 1660:19:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 1631:10:35, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 1592:19:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 1565:18:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 1540:14:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 1486:11:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 1472:23:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 1414:17:21, 3 March 2012 (UTC) 1395:22:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC) 1367:00:40, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 1343:16:47, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 1328:16:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC) 1304:22:19, 1 March 2012 (UTC) 1252:01:31, 4 March 2012 (UTC) 966:WikiWomen's History Month 959:WikiWomen's History Month 796:Consolation of Philosophy 786:Consolation of Philosophy 676:featured article criteria 5182:Philo and archive search 4576:), and just possibly to 4568:term) with a hatnote to 4316:Template:Logical symbols 4305:Template:Logical symbols 4225:article is now going on 4046:Discussion at RSN about 3859:"Metaphysical" cosmology 3689:to join the WikiProject. 3543:, the review page is at 2970:I said I might to Drmies 2874:What do people think of 2844:20:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC) 2814:14:45, 4 July 2012 (UTC) 2682:Can we get some help at 2503:15:40, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 2464:14:52, 3 June 2012 (UTC) 2436:17:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC) 2414:01:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC) 2390:17:16, 24 May 2012 (UTC) 2366:22:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC) 2339:07:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC) 2302:14:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC) 2266:20:07, 19 May 2012 (UTC) 1841:Augustinian theodicy FAC 1431:what people would expect 1125:Augustinian theodicy FAC 5277:the article's talk page 5091:Appeal_(disambiguation) 4301:Nomination for deletion 4162:article, using sources 2791:(1971 Compact Edition) 2634:Category for discussion 2247:00:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC) 2227:10:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 2208:09:03, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 2175:15:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 2137:20:55, 2 May 2012 (UTC) 1419:I suggest basing it on 895:Critique of Pure Reason 888:Critique of Pure Reason 716:We use to have a list: 534:Talk:Strict conditional 522:Talk:Strict conditional 5061:Metatheory of religion 4942:Periyar E. V. Ramasamy 4937:Periyar E. V. Ramasamy 4146:Discussion to restore 4123:has proposed to merge 3678:Join in discussion at 3657:User Freedom of speech 3208:Just to let you know, 1170:classic utilitarianism 1129:Just to let you know, 212:There is a discussion 5077: 4408:Drittes Reich (Frege) 4369:Should redirect for " 4337:Should redirect for " 3402: 3094:absolute (philosophy) 3066:absolute (philosophy) 2725:thefreedictionary.com 2313:Knowledge Acquisition 2307:Knowledge Acquisition 2183:needs a few more eyes 2102:Aesthetics literature 2061:Adding more items to 1932:divine command theory 1926:Divine command theory 1772:Infinity (philosophy) 1687:Night of the Big Wind 1258:Infinity (philosophy) 42:of past discussions. 4917:alternative medicine 4882:alternative medicine 4605:Trovatore made his. 4223:Alternative medicine 4160:Alternative medicine 3409:John Anthony's Wager 3403:John Anthony's Wager 3210:Augustinian theodicy 2991:Proposed changes to 2153:A proposal to merge 1851:Augustinian theodicy 1241:be separate artcles? 1239:Socratic questioning 1131:Augustinian theodicy 5192:Jewish Encyclopedia 5078:Meaning of 'Appeal' 4913:forensic psychiatry 4799:should redirect to 4459:" both redirect to 3585:Logical consequence 3572:Logical consequence 3490:A Thousand Plateaus 3280:Taoism/Tao Te Ching 2953:Non-physical entity 2825:Existence of God(s) 2161:is being discussed 1500:the existing navbar 908:Polisher of Cobwebs 800:Good Article Review 599:this requested move 478:and then nominated 4973:File:WJStein 1.jpg 4968:File:WJStein 1.jpg 3541:portal peer review 3316:User:Alan_Liefting 3064:I assume you mean 2478:Fyodor Dostoyevsky 2425:religious language 2322:user: Pollinosisss 2126:religious language 1868:Knowledge:HighBeam 1863:Knowledge:HighBeam 1766:Drift chamber fork 1009:I'll take a look. 754:Rename of category 492:Strict conditional 488:Strict conditional 480:Strict conditional 468:Strict conditional 462:Strict conditional 5457: 5440:comment added by 5412:original research 5369: 5352:comment added by 5300: 5299: 5144: 5130:comment added by 5005:Major changes at 4946:reassessment page 4789: 4749: 4665: 4618: 4510: 4438: 4431: 4417: 4414: 4411: 4364: 4266: 4200:Academic Medicine 4121:User:Arthur Rubin 4076: 4022: 4005:comment added by 3996:William Vorinlong 3893:Celestial spheres 3801: 3784:comment added by 3741:General Semantics 3695:Freedom of speech 3687:Freedom of speech 3635:Freedom of speech 3386:Mind-body problem 3376:, but aside from 3374:Mind-body problem 3368:Mind-body problem 3294:Talk:Tao Te Ching 3161:comment added by 3102:comment added by 3048:comment added by 2657:Interesting graph 2571:Personal identity 2567:Personal identity 2563:Personal identity 2540:Personal identity 2244: 2224: 2200:CharlesGillingham 2142:Merger proposal: 1872:HighBeam Research 1797: 1393: 1365: 1326: 951: 947: 941: 927:Pope John Paul II 817:Pseudorationalism 736:talk:Protoscience 666:I have nominated 662:FAR Transhumanism 608: 486:now redirects to 443:I don't see that 380: 363:comment added by 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5538: 5456: 5434: 5368: 5346: 5285: 5284: 5143: 5124: 4957: 4820: 4814: 4771: 4731: 4644: 4600: 4551:is surely wrong. 4508: 4433: 4419: 4416: 4413: 4401: 4362: 4314: 4313: 4260: 4075: 4021: 4007:Scotia me genuit 3999: 3990:William Vorilong 3910: 3821: 3816: 3815: 3800: 3786:William Meltdown 3778: 3674: 3668: 3661: 3655: 3532: 3527: 3526: 3431: 3423: 3422: 3170: 3114: 3060: 2821:Existence of God 2488: 2419:Copyedit request 2336: 2290:soft paternalism 2285:soft paternalism 2245: 2242: 2225: 2222: 2196:this recent edit 1897:potential person 1787: 1688: 1629: 1625: 1620: 1538: 1534: 1529: 1521: 1515: 1511: 1505: 1470: 1466: 1461: 1428: 1422: 1383: 1355: 1316: 1287: 1283: 1278: 1269:As it stands now 1249: 1198:Consequentialism 1174:consequentialism 1153:consequentialism 1000: 983:Fallacy question 950: 946: 943: 939: 937: 861: 850: 807: 798:is now up for a 609: 606: 573:No, it did not. 507: 503: 499: 445:here (philo-sci) 391:in plain English 379: 357: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5546: 5545: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5435: 5347: 5309: 5246: 5186:The article on 5184: 5125: 5121: 5080: 5057:User:Editor2020 5045: 5010: 4995: 4970: 4951: 4939: 4855:designation as 4839: 4818: 4812: 4584:in this way. -- 4574:abstract object 4558:abstract object 4379:Abstract object 4367: 4347:Abstract object 4311: 4308: 4221:, etc., to the 4218:Nature Medicine 4168: 4129:Metamathematics 4108: 4089:using this link 4085: 4071:. Many thanks, 4051: 4000: 3992: 3908: 3861: 3834:I've nominated 3817: 3810: 3807: 3779: 3775:Augustin Sesmat 3771: 3768:Augustin Sesmat 3743: 3716: 3672: 3666: 3659: 3653: 3624: 3574: 3528: 3521: 3518: 3494: 3462: 3427: 3418: 3414: 3405: 3370: 3350: 3313: 3282: 3257: 3228: 3206: 3183: 3156: 3097: 3043: 3040: 2996: 2949: 2927: 2872: 2862:Good Ol’factory 2851: 2828: 2819:Recent move of 2713:Time in physics 2688: 2659: 2636: 2614: 2543: 2510: 2500: 2493: 2486: 2471: 2443: 2421: 2399: 2373: 2346: 2334: 2309: 2276: 2241: 2238: 2221: 2218: 2185: 2159:Laws of science 2151: 2148:Laws of science 2122: 2098: 2037: 1994: 1946: 1928: 1893: 1865: 1843: 1806: 1768: 1725: 1695: 1686: 1678: 1623: 1618: 1614: 1585:Problem of evil 1532: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1513: 1509: 1503: 1464: 1459: 1455: 1426: 1420: 1403: 1281: 1276: 1272: 1261: 1247: 1243: 1235:Socratic method 1149: 1127: 1100:I've nominated 1089: 1022: 1002: 998: 985: 961: 944: 935: 923: 891: 851: 846: 820: 805: 792: 756: 701: 664: 641: 618: 605: 602: 595: 505: 501: 497: 472:User:Hanlon1755 464: 441: 387: 358: 248: 210: 145: 108: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5544: 5542: 5534: 5533: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5480: 5430: 5429: 5428: 5427: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5387: 5343: 5342: 5340: 5308: 5305: 5245: 5242: 5241: 5240: 5239: 5238: 5183: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5160: 5120: 5117: 5079: 5076: 5052: 5051: 5044: 5041: 5017:Talk:Free will 5009: 5003: 4994: 4991: 4989: 4969: 4966: 4938: 4935: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4868: 4838: 4835: 4834: 4833: 4790: 4751: 4750: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4677: 4676: 4667: 4666: 4629:User:Trovatore 4624: 4623: 4622: 4621: 4620: 4619: 4565: 4553: 4552: 4532: 4531: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4513: 4512: 4511: 4478: 4467: 4464: 4448: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4439: 4430: 4424: 4402:(See also the 4366: 4335: 4307: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4167: 4144: 4117: 4116: 4107: 4104: 4084: 4081: 4059:Robert Almeder 4050: 4048:Robert Almeder 4044: 4043: 4042: 3991: 3988: 3987: 3986: 3985: 3984: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3916: 3915: 3873: 3872: 3867: 3860: 3857: 3836:Portal:Society 3832: 3831: 3828:Portal:Society 3823: 3822: 3819:Society portal 3806: 3803: 3770: 3765: 3742: 3739: 3720:Category:Logic 3715: 3714:Category:Logic 3712: 3691: 3690: 3683: 3676: 3663: 3650: 3631: 3630: 3623: 3620: 3581: 3580: 3573: 3570: 3539:is now up for 3537:Portal:Society 3534: 3533: 3530:Society portal 3517: 3514: 3493: 3486: 3471: 3470: 3461: 3458: 3456: 3454: 3453: 3404: 3401: 3384:. The article 3369: 3366: 3349: 3346: 3332: 3331: 3326: 3312: 3309: 3281: 3278: 3256: 3255:Vital articles 3253: 3238: 3237: 3235:Talk:John Mair 3227: 3224: 3205: 3202: 3182: 3179: 3178: 3177: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3173: 3172: 3171: 3152: 3149: 3146: 3142: 3139: 3116: 3115: 3089: 3088: 3039: 3034: 2995: 2989: 2966: 2965: 2960: 2957:AfD discussion 2948: 2945: 2926: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2871: 2868: 2854:Category:Style 2850: 2847: 2827: 2817: 2806:71.169.176.253 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2779: 2776: 2773: 2770: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2755: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2740: 2737: 2734: 2731: 2721: 2720: 2687: 2680: 2661:This article, 2658: 2655: 2635: 2632: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2608: 2542: 2529: 2509: 2506: 2498: 2491: 2470: 2467: 2442: 2439: 2420: 2417: 2398: 2393: 2372: 2369: 2353: 2352: 2345: 2342: 2335:Logicalgregory 2308: 2305: 2275: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2268: 2250: 2249: 2239: 2236: 2229: 2219: 2184: 2178: 2155:Scientific law 2150: 2144:Scientific law 2140: 2121: 2118: 2097: 2094: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2036: 2033: 2022:Logicalgregory 1993: 1990: 1978:Discussion is 1976: 1975: 1970: 1965: 1960: 1955: 1945: 1942: 1927: 1924: 1892: 1889: 1875: 1864: 1861: 1847:FAC nomination 1842: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1827:Fan Singh Long 1823: 1810:Kantian ethics 1805: 1804:Kantian ethics 1802: 1767: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1724: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1705: 1704: 1691: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1642: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1491: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1475: 1474: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450:in the navbar. 1444: 1434: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1307: 1306: 1260: 1255: 1242: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1209: 1208: 1166:Utilitarianism 1157:utilitarianism 1148: 1145: 1126: 1123: 1098: 1097: 1088: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1063: 1062: 1031: 1030: 1021: 1020:Category moves 1018: 1017: 1016: 992: 984: 981: 960: 957: 929:article is on 922: 919: 890: 885: 866: 865: 819: 814: 791: 783: 767: 766: 755: 752: 703:This article ( 700: 695: 663: 660: 640: 637: 617: 614: 603: 594: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 571: 463: 460: 440: 437: 436: 435: 386: 383: 382: 381: 334: 333: 332: 331: 313: 301: 300: 285: 281: 269: 268: 265: 262: 247: 244: 209: 206: 191: 190: 185: 176: 175: 168: 144: 138: 107: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5543: 5532: 5528: 5524: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5512: 5508: 5502: 5501: 5497: 5493: 5487: 5479: 5475: 5471: 5467: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5455: 5451: 5447: 5443: 5439: 5426: 5422: 5418: 5413: 5409: 5408: 5407: 5406: 5405: 5404: 5400: 5396: 5386: 5383: 5379: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5367: 5363: 5359: 5355: 5351: 5341: 5339: 5338: 5337: 5333: 5329: 5325: 5321: 5317: 5313: 5306: 5304: 5303: 5297: 5293: 5289: 5282: 5278: 5274: 5270: 5265: 5263: 5259: 5255: 5251: 5243: 5237: 5233: 5229: 5225: 5224: 5223: 5219: 5215: 5211: 5210: 5209: 5208: 5204: 5200: 5195: 5193: 5189: 5181: 5177: 5173: 5169: 5165: 5161: 5159: 5155: 5151: 5147: 5146: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5133: 5132:Pass a Method 5129: 5118: 5116: 5115: 5111: 5107: 5101: 5098: 5094: 5092: 5088: 5084: 5075: 5074: 5070: 5066: 5062: 5058: 5050: 5047: 5046: 5042: 5040: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5025: 5022: 5018: 5013: 5012:Hi everyone, 5008: 5004: 5002: 5000: 4992: 4990: 4987: 4986: 4982: 4978: 4977:70.24.250.110 4974: 4967: 4965: 4964: 4961: 4958: 4956: 4955: 4947: 4943: 4936: 4934: 4933: 4929: 4925: 4921: 4918: 4914: 4910: 4905: 4903: 4899: 4895: 4891: 4887: 4883: 4879: 4875: 4867: 4865: 4864: 4860: 4858: 4851: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4847: 4845: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4817: 4810: 4806: 4802: 4798: 4797:Drittes Reich 4794: 4791: 4787: 4783: 4779: 4775: 4769: 4765: 4760: 4759:Drittes Reich 4756: 4753: 4752: 4747: 4743: 4739: 4735: 4729: 4725: 4722:metal group. 4720: 4719: 4714: 4710: 4706: 4702: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4685: 4683: 4679: 4678: 4673: 4669: 4668: 4663: 4659: 4655: 4652: 4648: 4642: 4638: 4634: 4630: 4626: 4625: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4599: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4591: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4572:(or maybe to 4571: 4566: 4563: 4562:Gottlob Frege 4559: 4555: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4533: 4530: 4526: 4522: 4518: 4517: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4501: 4497: 4496:‘third realm’ 4491: 4489: 4483: 4479: 4476: 4472: 4468: 4465: 4462: 4458: 4457:Drittes Reich 4454: 4450: 4449: 4437: 4432: 4429: 4425: 4423: 4420: 4418: 4415: 4412: 4409: 4406:-Knowledge's 4405: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4372: 4371:Drittes Reich 4360: 4356: 4352: 4348: 4344: 4340: 4339:Drittes Reich 4336: 4334: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4321: 4317: 4306: 4302: 4299: 4291: 4287: 4283: 4279: 4278: 4277: 4273: 4269: 4264: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4252: 4248: 4243: 4242: 4241: 4240: 4236: 4232: 4228: 4224: 4220: 4219: 4214: 4213: 4208: 4207: 4202: 4201: 4196: 4195: 4189: 4185: 4181: 4180: 4175: 4174: 4173:pseudoscience 4165: 4161: 4157: 4156: 4151: 4150: 4149:pseudoscience 4145: 4143: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4126: 4122: 4115: 4114: 4110: 4109: 4105: 4103: 4102: 4098: 4094: 4090: 4082: 4080: 4079: 4074: 4070: 4066: 4065: 4060: 4056: 4049: 4045: 4041: 4037: 4033: 4029: 4025: 4024: 4023: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4008: 4004: 3997: 3989: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3959: 3955: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3944: 3940: 3935: 3934: 3933: 3929: 3925: 3920: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3914: 3911: 3905: 3902: 3898: 3894: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3883: 3879: 3871: 3868: 3866: 3863: 3862: 3858: 3856: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3846: 3841: 3837: 3830: 3829: 3825: 3824: 3820: 3814: 3809: 3804: 3802: 3799: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3783: 3776: 3769: 3766: 3764: 3762: 3758: 3754: 3750: 3747: 3740: 3738: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3725: 3724:Alan Liefting 3721: 3713: 3711: 3710: 3706: 3702: 3701: 3696: 3688: 3684: 3681: 3677: 3671: 3664: 3658: 3651: 3648: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3640: 3636: 3629: 3626: 3625: 3621: 3619: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3587:was moved to 3586: 3579: 3576: 3575: 3571: 3569: 3568: 3564: 3560: 3559: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3531: 3525: 3520: 3515: 3513: 3512: 3508: 3504: 3499: 3492: 3491: 3487: 3485: 3484: 3480: 3476: 3469: 3468: 3464: 3463: 3459: 3457: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3433: 3430: 3424: 3421: 3417: 3410: 3400: 3399: 3395: 3391: 3387: 3383: 3379: 3375: 3367: 3365: 3364: 3360: 3356: 3347: 3345: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3330: 3327: 3325: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3317: 3310: 3308: 3307: 3303: 3299: 3298:76.65.131.248 3295: 3291: 3287: 3279: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3254: 3252: 3251: 3247: 3243: 3236: 3233: 3232: 3231: 3225: 3223: 3222: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3203: 3201: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3189:. Thank you. 3188: 3180: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3153: 3150: 3147: 3143: 3140: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3122: 3121: 3120: 3119: 3118: 3117: 3113: 3109: 3105: 3101: 3095: 3091: 3090: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3063: 3062: 3061: 3059: 3055: 3051: 3047: 3038: 3035: 3033: 3032: 3028: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3011: 3010: 3005: 3001: 2994: 2990: 2988: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2964: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2951: 2950: 2946: 2944: 2943: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2924: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2876:Max H. Siegel 2869: 2867: 2866: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2848: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2816: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2793: 2792: 2790: 2787: 2786: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2768: 2767: 2766: 2763: 2762: 2756: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2748: 2747: 2741: 2738: 2735: 2732: 2729: 2728: 2726: 2723: 2722: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2693: 2685: 2681: 2679: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2665: 2656: 2654: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2633: 2631: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2616:Hi everyone. 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2530: 2528: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2507: 2505: 2504: 2501: 2496: 2494: 2489: 2483: 2479: 2474: 2468: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2448: 2447:Globalization 2441:Globalization 2440: 2438: 2437: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2418: 2416: 2415: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2391: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2370: 2368: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2351: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2341: 2340: 2337: 2330: 2325: 2323: 2317: 2314: 2306: 2304: 2303: 2299: 2295: 2291: 2286: 2282: 2273: 2267: 2263: 2259: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2248: 2237: 2234: 2230: 2228: 2216: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2192: 2190: 2182: 2179: 2177: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2167:RockMagnetist 2164: 2160: 2156: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2139: 2138: 2135: 2131: 2127: 2119: 2117: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2103: 2100:The category 2095: 2093: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2070: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2057: 2056: 2054: 2050: 2049:Vantage Press 2046: 2042: 2034: 2032: 2031: 2027: 2023: 2017: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 1999: 1991: 1989: 1988: 1985: 1981: 1974: 1971: 1969: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956: 1954: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1943: 1941: 1940: 1937: 1933: 1925: 1923: 1922: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1890: 1888: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1873: 1869: 1862: 1860: 1859: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1815: 1811: 1803: 1801: 1800: 1795: 1791: 1786: 1782: 1779: 1777: 1773: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1750:. Thank you, 1749: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1709:Sapere aude22 1707: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1689: 1683: 1675: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1621: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1593: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1530: 1518: 1517:Fibre sidebar 1508: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1487: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1476: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1462: 1454: 1449: 1445: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1425: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1408: 1400: 1396: 1391: 1387: 1382: 1378: 1377: 1368: 1363: 1359: 1354: 1350: 1349:Banach spaces 1346: 1345: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1324: 1320: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1279: 1270: 1266: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1253: 1250: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1207: 1204: 1199: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1177: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1146: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1124: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1107: 1103: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1001: 995: 990: 982: 980: 979: 975: 971: 967: 956: 955: 952: 948: 938: 932: 928: 920: 918: 917: 913: 909: 904: 900: 896: 889: 886: 884: 883: 879: 875: 871: 864: 859: 858:Contributions 855: 849: 844: 841: 836: 835: 834: 833: 829: 825: 818: 815: 813: 812: 809: 808: 806:It Is Me Here 801: 797: 790: 787: 784: 782: 781: 777: 773: 765: 764: 763: 758: 757: 753: 751: 750: 746: 742: 738: 737: 733: 730: 728: 725: 720: 719: 714: 713: 708: 706: 699: 696: 694: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 668:Transhumanism 661: 659: 658: 654: 650: 646: 638: 636: 635: 631: 627: 623: 615: 613: 612: 600: 592: 584: 580: 576: 572: 570: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 552: 548: 545: 540: 539:202.124.72.22 535: 531: 527: 526:202.124.72.22 523: 519: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 508: 500: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 461: 459: 458: 454: 450: 446: 438: 434: 430: 426: 422: 421: 420: 419: 416: 415: 414: 411: 407: 406: 403: 399: 398: 392: 384: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 354: 353: 352: 351: 347: 343: 338: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 305: 304: 303: 302: 299: 295: 291: 286: 282: 279: 278:a common name 275: 271: 270: 266: 263: 260: 259: 258: 256: 252: 245: 243: 242: 239: 238: 237: 234: 230: 229: 226: 222: 221: 215: 207: 205: 204: 200: 196: 189: 186: 184: 181: 180: 179: 174: 171: 170: 169: 165: 162: 158: 154: 150: 143: 139: 137: 136: 132: 128: 123: 119: 115: 113: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5503: 5488: 5484: 5436:— Preceding 5431: 5391: 5348:— Preceding 5344: 5334: 5330: 5326: 5322: 5318: 5314: 5310: 5273:Good Article 5266: 5247: 5196: 5185: 5126:— Preceding 5122: 5102: 5099: 5095: 5086: 5082: 5081: 5053: 5026: 5014: 5011: 4996: 4988: 4971: 4953: 4952: 4940: 4906: 4873: 4872: 4866: 4862: 4854: 4852: 4840: 4816:Distinguish2 4801:Nazi Germany 4681: 4672:Third Empire 4602: 4581: 4578:Nazi Germany 4577: 4573: 4569: 4549:Nazi Germany 4544: 4540: 4536: 4499: 4495: 4493: 4485: 4461:Nazi Germany 4434: 4426: 4421: 4387:Nazi Germany 4368: 4355:Nazi Germany 4309: 4280:Sounds good. 4216: 4210: 4204: 4198: 4191: 4187: 4178: 4177: 4172: 4171: 4169: 4163: 4154: 4153: 4148: 4147: 4119:Once again, 4118: 4111: 4086: 4062: 4052: 4001:— Preceding 3993: 3909:Machine Elf 3900: 3874: 3843: 3833: 3826: 3780:— Preceding 3772: 3751: 3748: 3744: 3717: 3698: 3692: 3652:Add userbox 3632: 3582: 3556: 3535: 3495: 3488: 3472: 3465: 3455: 3428: 3419: 3415: 3406: 3371: 3351: 3333: 3314: 3290:Tao Te Ching 3283: 3258: 3239: 3230:Please see: 3229: 3207: 3184: 3163:87.112.23.99 3157:— Preceding 3104:87.112.23.99 3098:— Preceding 3092:Yes, I mean 3068:rather than 3050:87.112.23.99 3044:— Preceding 3041: 3007: 2997: 2973: 2967: 2928: 2873: 2852: 2829: 2799: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2689: 2662: 2660: 2637: 2615: 2544: 2511: 2475: 2472: 2445:The article 2444: 2422: 2400: 2374: 2354: 2329:epistemology 2326: 2318: 2310: 2280: 2277: 2258:Jasonnewyork 2232: 2214: 2193: 2186: 2152: 2123: 2099: 2076: 2038: 2018: 1997: 1995: 1977: 1947: 1929: 1905:antinatalism 1895:The article 1894: 1866: 1844: 1807: 1785:CRGreathouse 1783: 1780: 1769: 1726: 1692: 1679: 1616: 1615: 1525: 1524: 1457: 1456: 1447: 1404: 1381:CRGreathouse 1353:CRGreathouse 1314:CRGreathouse 1274: 1273: 1265:this version 1262: 1248:Machine Elf 1244: 1178: 1173: 1169: 1150: 1128: 1109: 1099: 1092: 1032: 1025: 986: 970:SarahStierch 962: 924: 892: 867: 821: 803: 793: 768: 760: 759: 741:84.106.26.81 739: 734: 731: 721: 715: 709: 705:Protoscience 702: 698:protoscience 665: 642: 619: 596: 543: 517: 465: 442: 412: 409: 404: 401: 396: 394: 388: 359:— Preceding 335: 308: 249: 246:Help request 235: 232: 227: 224: 219: 217: 211: 192: 177: 166: 160: 152: 146: 125:Any takers? 124: 120: 116: 110:The article 109: 78: 43: 37: 5250:God is dead 5106:Lisnabreeny 4898:etiological 4809:Third Reich 4793:Third Reich 4776:per WP:RTP 4755:Third Reich 4736:per WP:RTP 4633:Third Reich 4541:Third Reich 4537:Third Realm 4453:Third Realm 4375:Third Realm 4343:Third Realm 4179:antiscience 4155:antiscience 3968:groupuscule 3939:groupuscule 3763:Sui docuit 3503:groupuscule 3390:Brews ohare 3263:Philosopher 3191:John Carter 3015:John Carter 2933:is still a 2836:John Carter 2640:Abstraction 2547:Talk:Person 2518:John Carter 2083:History2007 1733:John Carter 1102:Portal:Arts 1094:Portal:Arts 987:Please see 931:peer review 903:WP:NOTESSAY 899:WP:NOTESSAY 840:Rationality 684:Itsmejudith 36:This is an 5248:I demoted 5087:an appeals 4924:ParkSehJik 4909:psychiatry 4900:objects (" 4884:articles. 4844:psychiatry 4803:, but the 4778:ParkSehJik 4764:Bermicourt 4738:ParkSehJik 4724:Agathoclea 4705:ParkSehJik 4654:ParkSehJik 4607:ParkSehJik 4521:ParkSehJik 4268:ParkSehJik 4231:ParkSehJik 4192:Annals of 4186:, such as 4073:SlimVirgin 3753:Sui docuit 3601:PhilPapers 3589:Entailment 3496:Is anyone 3378:MachineElf 3284:FYI, both 3240:Thanks. -- 2974:philosophy 2598:Tom Morris 2579:Personhood 2559:Personhood 2551:Personhood 2536:Personhood 2256:lead/lede? 2132:. Thanks. 2020:however.-- 1998:individual 1992:Individual 1909:personhood 1878:Wavelength 1168:refers to 999:talk to me 874:Tom Morris 854:Discussion 848:Atethnekos 575:Hanlon1755 561:Tom Morris 547:Hanlon1755 470:, please. 449:John Bessa 309:definitely 193:Thanks, -- 98:Archive 20 90:Archive 18 85:Archive 17 79:Archive 16 73:Archive 15 68:Archive 14 60:Archive 10 5523:Greg Bard 5507:Wcnesmith 5492:Wcnesmith 5470:Greg Bard 5442:Wcnesmith 5417:Greg Bard 5395:Wcnesmith 5354:Wcnesmith 5214:Greg Bard 5065:Greg Bard 5030:Pfhorrest 5007:Free will 4586:Trovatore 4473:(SEP) is 4385:), or to 4353:), or to 4282:Greg Bard 4247:Greg Bard 4133:Greg Bard 4125:Metalogic 4093:Greg Bard 4032:Greg Bard 3954:Greg Bard 3924:Greg Bard 3878:Greg Bard 3609:Greg Bard 3549:Main Page 3475:Greg Bard 3382:Talk page 3335:Greg Bard 3242:Mais oui! 3126:Trovatore 3078:Trovatore 2909:Greg Bard 2895:IRWolfie- 2880:Greg Bard 2715:article. 2669:Greg Bard 2583:Pfhorrest 2403:Talk:Mind 2358:Greg Bard 2107:Greg Bard 2007:Trovatore 1296:IRWolfie- 1071:Greg Bard 1052:Pfhorrest 1036:Greg Bard 824:Greg Bard 772:Greg Bard 337:Theosophy 255:talk page 195:Pfhorrest 149:Free will 142:Free will 5450:contribs 5438:unsigned 5362:contribs 5350:unsigned 5292:contribs 5228:Mnnlaxer 5226:Thanks! 5199:Mnnlaxer 5150:Looie496 5140:contribs 5128:unsigned 4894:medicine 4890:WP:MEDRS 4878:WP:MEDRS 4377:" be to 4345:" be to 4015:contribs 4003:unsigned 3794:contribs 3782:unsigned 3732:contribs 3443:Looie496 3267:Yaris678 3218:ItsZippy 3159:unsigned 3100:unsigned 3070:absolute 3046:unsigned 3037:Absolute 2939:ItsZippy 2870:Notable? 2644:Brad7777 2626:ItsZippy 2433:ItsZippy 2382:LizFlash 2134:ItsZippy 1936:ItsZippy 1901:natalism 1855:ItsZippy 1814:ItsZippy 1657:ItsZippy 1589:ItsZippy 1562:ItsZippy 1483:ItsZippy 1411:ItsZippy 1203:ItsZippy 1139:ItsZippy 1011:ItsZippy 802:. Best, 474:created 466:Eyes on 373:contribs 361:unsigned 312:example. 5382:snunɐw· 5378:·ʍaunus 5281:davidwr 5083:Appeals 5021:WP:NPOV 4857:medical 4627:As per 4455:" and " 4373:" and " 4341:" and " 4028:notable 2978:Uncle G 2701:primary 2473:hello, 2411:snunɐw· 2407:·ʍaunus 2294:Filofil 1984:Lambiam 1233:Should 1217:Chealer 1182:Chealer 506:Windows 153:defined 39:archive 5296:e-mail 4960:(talk) 4805:calque 4687:Paul B 4682:phrase 4675:areas. 4647:WP:RTP 4637:Tkuvho 4492:senses 4391:Hitler 4359:Hitler 4263:WP:RTP 4166:, etc. 3603:, and 3416:France 3286:Taoism 3145:three. 3074:WP:AFD 2993:WP:NOT 2575:Person 2555:Person 2538:, and 2532:Person 2480:, see 2456:Meclee 2243:oetica 2223:oetica 1619:Claret 1528:Claret 1507:Fibers 1460:Claret 1277:Claret 670:for a 607:oetica 498:Fences 365:JEMead 342:JEMead 321:Phiwum 290:Otr500 127:Phiwum 5188:Philo 5119:Exist 4823:Boson 4645:(Per 4603:after 4582:Reich 4570:Frege 4545:Reich 4488:Frege 4475:WP:RS 4389:(per 4383:Frege 4381:(per 4357:(per 4351:Frege 4349:(per 3722:. -- 3597:InPho 3212:is a 2189:Being 2181:Being 2157:into 2146:into 2096:Works 1982:. -- 1913:Zodon 1512:with 936:Marek 502:& 317:WP:OR 16:< 5527:talk 5511:talk 5496:talk 5474:talk 5446:talk 5421:talk 5399:talk 5358:talk 5288:talk 5260:and 5232:talk 5218:talk 5203:talk 5172:talk 5168:Dmcq 5154:talk 5136:talk 5110:talk 5069:talk 5034:talk 4981:talk 4954:corn 4928:talk 4827:talk 4795:and 4782:talk 4774:here 4768:talk 4757:and 4742:talk 4734:here 4728:talk 4709:talk 4691:talk 4658:talk 4651:here 4641:talk 4611:talk 4590:talk 4525:talk 4328:talk 4324:Dmcq 4286:talk 4272:talk 4251:talk 4235:talk 4227:here 4152:and 4137:talk 4127:and 4097:talk 4036:talk 4011:talk 3972:talk 3958:talk 3943:talk 3928:talk 3895:and 3882:talk 3850:talk 3845:Cirt 3790:talk 3757:talk 3728:talk 3705:talk 3700:Cirt 3697:, — 3613:talk 3563:talk 3558:Cirt 3507:talk 3479:talk 3447:talk 3429:talk 3420:3470 3394:talk 3359:talk 3355:CoeA 3339:talk 3302:talk 3288:and 3271:talk 3246:talk 3195:talk 3167:talk 3130:talk 3108:talk 3082:talk 3054:talk 3027:talk 3023:IZAK 3019:talk 3002:and 2982:talk 2913:talk 2899:talk 2884:talk 2858:here 2840:talk 2810:talk 2802:Time 2709:time 2705:time 2697:time 2692:Time 2684:Time 2673:talk 2648:talk 2622:here 2602:talk 2587:talk 2561:and 2522:talk 2482:here 2460:talk 2396:Mind 2386:talk 2362:talk 2311:The 2298:talk 2262:talk 2215:that 2204:talk 2171:talk 2163:here 2130:here 2111:talk 2087:talk 2065:and 2026:talk 2011:talk 1980:here 1917:talk 1907:and 1882:talk 1831:talk 1756:talk 1752:IZAK 1737:talk 1713:talk 1693:talk 1443:, or 1339:talk 1335:Dmcq 1300:talk 1237:and 1221:talk 1186:talk 1155:and 1116:talk 1111:Cirt 1075:talk 1056:talk 1040:talk 991:. -- 974:talk 925:The 912:talk 878:talk 828:talk 776:talk 745:talk 722:The 688:talk 680:here 653:talk 649:PPdd 630:talk 626:PPdd 579:talk 565:talk 551:talk 530:talk 453:talk 429:talk 425:PPdd 369:talk 346:talk 325:talk 294:talk 214:here 199:talk 161:some 131:talk 5294:)/( 5290:)/( 4950:AIR 4922:. 4404:독일의 4393:)? 4361:), 4303:of 4197:, 4057:by 3901:not 3777:? 3605:IEP 3593:SEP 3296:-- 3265:. 2823:to 2487:GoP 2429:FAC 2427:to 2051:on 1849:of 1624:Ash 1533:Ash 1465:Ash 1448:all 1282:Ash 872:. — 789:GAR 447:.-- 5529:) 5513:) 5498:) 5476:) 5452:) 5448:• 5423:) 5401:) 5364:) 5360:• 5279:. 5234:) 5220:) 5205:) 5174:) 5156:) 5142:) 5138:• 5112:) 5071:) 5036:) 4983:) 4930:) 4911:, 4902:qi 4829:) 4819:}} 4813:{{ 4784:) 4762:-- 4744:) 4711:) 4693:) 4660:) 4613:) 4592:) 4527:) 4502:." 4484:, 4469:- 4410:- 4330:) 4322:. 4288:) 4274:) 4253:) 4237:) 4229:. 4215:, 4209:, 4203:, 4190:, 4176:, 4139:) 4099:) 4038:) 4017:) 4013:• 3974:) 3960:) 3945:) 3930:) 3906:.— 3884:) 3852:) 3796:) 3792:• 3759:) 3734:) 3730:- 3707:) 3673:}} 3667:{{ 3660:}} 3654:{{ 3615:) 3599:, 3595:, 3565:) 3509:) 3481:) 3449:) 3396:) 3361:) 3341:) 3304:) 3273:) 3248:) 3197:) 3169:) 3132:) 3124:-- 3110:) 3084:) 3056:) 3029:) 2984:) 2915:) 2901:) 2886:) 2842:) 2812:) 2804:? 2675:) 2650:) 2604:) 2589:) 2534:, 2524:) 2462:) 2388:) 2364:) 2332:-- 2300:) 2264:) 2206:) 2173:) 2165:. 2113:) 2089:) 2028:) 2013:) 1919:) 1903:, 1884:) 1874:. 1833:) 1825:-- 1792:| 1778:. 1758:) 1739:) 1715:) 1520:}} 1514:{{ 1510:}} 1504:{{ 1427:}} 1421:{{ 1388:| 1360:| 1341:) 1321:| 1302:) 1223:) 1215:-- 1188:) 1180:-- 1137:. 1118:) 1077:) 1058:) 1042:) 976:) 945:69 914:) 880:) 856:, 830:) 778:) 747:) 690:) 655:) 647:. 632:) 624:? 601:. 581:) 567:) 553:) 455:) 431:) 393:. 375:) 371:• 348:) 327:) 296:) 201:) 133:) 94:→ 64:← 5525:( 5509:( 5494:( 5472:( 5444:( 5419:( 5397:( 5380:· 5356:( 5298:) 5286:( 5283:/ 5230:( 5216:( 5201:( 5170:( 5152:( 5134:( 5108:( 5067:( 5032:( 4979:( 4926:( 4863:" 4825:( 4788:) 4780:( 4766:( 4748:) 4740:( 4726:( 4707:( 4689:( 4664:) 4656:( 4639:( 4617:) 4609:( 4588:( 4564:. 4523:( 4486:" 4477:. 4463:. 4365:? 4326:( 4284:( 4270:( 4249:( 4233:( 4135:( 4095:( 4091:. 4034:( 4009:( 3970:( 3956:( 3941:( 3926:( 3880:( 3848:( 3788:( 3755:( 3726:( 3703:( 3682:. 3675:. 3649:. 3611:( 3561:( 3505:( 3477:( 3445:( 3432:) 3426:( 3392:( 3357:( 3337:( 3300:( 3269:( 3244:( 3193:( 3165:( 3128:( 3106:( 3080:( 3052:( 3025:( 3017:( 2980:( 2959:) 2955:( 2911:( 2897:( 2882:( 2838:( 2808:( 2686:? 2671:( 2646:( 2600:( 2585:( 2520:( 2499:N 2492:T 2458:( 2409:· 2384:( 2360:( 2296:( 2260:( 2240:N 2220:N 2202:( 2169:( 2109:( 2085:( 2024:( 2009:( 1915:( 1880:( 1876:— 1829:( 1796:) 1794:c 1790:t 1788:( 1754:( 1735:( 1711:( 1433:. 1392:) 1390:c 1386:t 1384:( 1364:) 1362:c 1358:t 1356:( 1337:( 1325:) 1323:c 1319:t 1317:( 1298:( 1219:( 1184:( 1114:( 1073:( 1054:( 1038:( 996:| 972:( 940:. 910:( 876:( 860:) 852:( 826:( 774:( 743:( 686:( 651:( 628:( 604:N 577:( 563:( 549:( 528:( 451:( 427:( 413:i 410:m 405:☯ 402:n 397:u 367:( 344:( 323:( 292:( 236:i 233:m 228:☯ 225:n 220:u 197:( 129:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.