Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Reliability - Knowledge (XXG)

Source šŸ“

2339: 2275:
attached to referenceable statements then I consider litter to be an accurate description and such litter has to make a casual reader question the accuracy of the article; there is no such litter in Britanica. This is particularly so when a tag bomber places 30+ tags in one article to which they have never made a contribution. We obviously disagree and I look forward to continued discussion when I raise the policy question regarding improving the criteria for adding and removing fact tags
2366: 942: 183: 232: 214: 336: 152: 1849:; I just can't find it... Maybe someone else can." I don't know if others felt the same, but if so, I'm sure that overall number would sink dramatically if we were more bold in just removing them. I think the chart was key for my participation, and FYSA on how I found the drive (in case it helps for the future), I found the drive via a notification in my watchlist. Thanks! - 2226:
tags particularly since there is a presumption of "good faith" of the editors who created and allowed the material to stand until the tag bombing. Removing such tags is tedious so they tend to remain in place littering Knowledge (XXG) and making it seem less reliable than it actually is. I think we need a change to the policy to make removal of such tags easier.
294: 1222: 2182:
did not need a cite (I found "he became a free agent after the season" multiple times despite the next sentence being signed to a new contract which proves the prior sentence). I did find a few articles that do have ref-bombing and it made me question the point of doing so (one had 30+ cn tags and it was a rather short article).
2252:, but in its current form with over 6.8 million crowdsourced entries the vast majority of Knowledge (XXG) articles are about as reliable as the rhythm method is at preventing pregnancy. Hit the random article button and you're way more likely to be hit with an unreferenced stub than a reliable, well crafted featured article. 373:{{align|center|{{resbox|'''{{large|{{Random page in category}}}}'''}}}} {{Filter category by topic}} *'''Please help improve an article in this category by adding ] to ] that ] content within the article. Once the reliable source references have been added, the unsourced (citation needed) tag can be removed.''' 1962:
editing another 10% or so were referenceable leaving about 10% for deletion of the tagged statement as not referenceable. I suspect most {{cn}} are attached to valid statements and too many have been applied by tag bombers who have no idea whether the tagged statement is valid or not, see for example
2274:
and found most of them were applied to verifiable statements; although my sample size is small I believe the study is statistically valid and it seems to be supported by qualitative experience of these participants above. There are 500,000+ fact tags throughout Knowledge (XXG), if most of them are
2181:
Of the ones I found (also sports), I'd say about 50% did need a citation and it took some effort to find (either with newspapers.com or book sources), 25% needed a citation and were easy to find, and the remaining 25% were either uncncyclopedic things that I removed as trivial or things that really
2130:
I likewise didn't keep notes, and it's hard to offer anything but vague impressions after the fact. Since this was framed as a drive with a time limit, I was cherry-picking tags that were relatively easy to fix. The majority could be referenced with articles via Newspapers.com ā€“ a resource that not
1063:
Fyi, my laptop broke down the other day so I am currently on a Wikibreak. I'm hoping to get it fixed by the end of the week but I'm having trouble with the warranty so it might take longer. I've tried editing Knowledge (XXG) on my phone and tablet but I absolutely hate it so will be waiting for the
2372:
Hello, we are reaching out to members of this project, because you are experts when it comes to referencing. For many years, community members have requested an easy way to re-use references with different details. Now, a MediaWiki solution is coming: The new sub-referencing feature will work for
2225:
While it is true that everything needs to be verifiable only those "likely to be challenged" require inline citations! When an editor who has never made a contribution to an article adds 30 {{fact}} tages in one edit I have to question whether that editor has a "good faith" basis for adding such
1961:
I'm interested in any statistics regarding the dispositions of the {{cn}} tag during the project. A while back I did a personal project where I resolved about forty or so randomly selected such tags. It turns out with little effort I found valid references for about 80% of them and with minor
1092:
It'll probably be the beginning of next week before I'm back online normally. Today was my birthday. Aging isn't as fun as it used to be - excessive quantities of alcohol had to be consumed to make the day tolerable. I doubt I'll be fit to negotiate laptop warranties in the morning. I've got a
2245:. I've already conceded that some "tag-bombers" as you call them are acting in bad faith but the vast majority of cn tags I have come across in my editing were valid and vilifying those who tag uncited statements because it is "tedious" to remove them appears to me to be incredibly bad faith. 2166:
I was mainly doing sports articles, so a majority of them were needed and easily accessible, but some not so accessible. Only in 5 instances, that I can recall, did a source already exist in the article and be used again for a cn tag. The remaining ones were "source=" tags for sports tables.
1663:
I will be back to distributing barnstars in the coming days. I've had a string of technical issues the past few weeks and unfortunately haven't been able to contribute as much as I'd like. My laptop (which is only 2 months old and had an in-warranty repair last month during the drive) is now
2043:
and found that most fact tags were applied to readily verifiable statements; is this your experience? It would be great if you had some qualitative or quantitative information about your June experience that you would be willing to share. If inclined to do so you can post it below. Thanks
1599:
It is, but I noticed that when this particular template is subst'd, the {{#switch:}} paraphenalia is visible in the source. I guess that isn't that big a deal, since people aren't analyzing the aesthetic value of the source code of their talk pages. But I've also heard of this thing called
2414:
for referencing a source multiple times with different details. The new sub-referencing feature doesnā€™t change anything about existing approaches to referencing, so you can still use sfn. We have created sub-referencing, because existing workarounds donā€™t work well with Visual Editor and
2131:
everyone has access to ā€“ or Google Books. A significant fraction of them, maybe 10%, could be resolved by adding a footnote to one of the citations already present in the article. A small handful of statements weren't verifiable and were sufficiently dubious that I ended up removing them.
1969:
It seems to me that such tag bombing litters Knowledge (XXG) with unjustified questioning of facts which to the casual reader makes Knowledge (XXG) seem to be much less reliable than it actually is. I'm going to propose a change to the policy regarding {{cn}} to make
1447: 1514: 781:. Thanks for implementing the change! However, since weā€™re doing it in June (that monthā€™s when Iā€™m on vacation), I think Iā€™m not going to co-ordinate this drive, actually. I did like to clarify above that if the drive was pushed back to July, then I couldā€™ve. ~ 1840:
I found this to be oddly entertaining hunting for sources, some of which were easy, and some that required a deep dive. Thanks from me as well. The graph shows a serious dent put into the overall number, but it always moves towards an upward slope--almost
1696:
I've finished awarding the barnstars. I'll leave to Cremastra the pleasure of awarding the special barnstar for the highest score (which goes to Iadmc with a whopping 3104 points). I think the drive was a big success. It should be repeated!
2373:
wikitext and Visual Editor and will enhance the existing reference system. You can continue to use different ways of referencing, but you will probably encounter sub-references in articles written by other users. More information on
716: 2068:
tags that were unnecessary. In cases where they were obviously not needed, I removed them altogether, noting this in the edit summary for forensics if someone objected. I didn't find a lot of these, but there were a few dozen
712:, I'm also busy through June as well - early July could also be a bit busy for me. However, I think I could co-ordinate this drive! Any opinions on hosting the drive in July instead? That month could be less busier for us both. 1908:
Bit of an aside here: I don't know what the final value was at 00:00 1 July 2024, but for posterity sake, right now, the total sits at 520,265. Since the number displayed on the main page is a moving target from the category.
2240:
I'd argue that someone attaching a cn tag to a statement means it more than meets the threshold of being "material whose verifiability has been challenged", the second type of statement which requires a citation as per
571:
I wasn't sure if the drive was going ahead, so I didn't touch the drive draft until there was more activity here. I think what we should do is set a hard date for the drive (June?) so that everyone's on the same page.
2206:
must be supported by reliable sources. Any editor who questions the validity or verifiability of any content should always feel free to tag it. If the tag is inappropriate or unnecessary, it can be easily removed.
2201:
I have to say I dislike the characterisation of tag-bombing as intrinsically bad. Yes, there are a few problematic editors who inappropriately tag, but one of the most important policies of Knowledge (XXG) is that
1619:
I see that only a handful of barnstars have been awarded. Should we wait for the return of Cremastra to hand them out? I can do a few if needed (though I suppose it would be weird to hand out one to myself!)
693:
I personally think that scoring criteria is too complicated. Unless its done on an honor system, without a script/tool to assist, that level of granularity would make verifying scoring absolutely laborious.
2106:
tags could be removed, but really only if the credits were verifiable. Some of these classic TV shows did not always list everyone in the onscreen credits, so it's better to verify rather than assume.
1664:
definitively dead and I'm being sent a brand new one. It should arrive in the next few days. I've made the occasional edit on my phone recently but I really hate editing without a mouse and keyboard.
1331:
Update for June 21st: for the first time since the start of the drive, the number of articles in the backlog is lower than 520,000. We've net reduced the backlog by almost 1.5 thousand articles.
1093:
Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, I might have a go at editing on tablet again over the next few days. Will try to keep contributing, at least. Get rid of some unsourced statements if nothing else.
2270:
I believe there is independent evidence that Knowledge (XXG) articles are at least as accurate as Britanica which is quite a bit more reliable than the rhythm method. Personally, I undertook a
2316: 1010:
To be fair, the cn tag is just the flag to add citations or remove the unverifiable content. They are very necessary. But so is the need to cite over them and other unsourced material... ā€”
39: 763:, and filed an edit request for a watchlist notice. I'll make the scoring adjustment, though. And look into semi-automatic scoring; however, the GoCE drives seem to do fine without it. 320: 756: 2425:
team is planning to bring this feature to Wikimedia wikis later this year. We will reach out to creators/maintainers of tools and templates related to references beforehand.
2072:
Also, since I work a lot on the Westerns project and its task forces, I focused on articles in that space. I found that when looking at actor biographies, there were often
675:
Also, ARandomName123 has bowed out of co-ordination, so we might need a second user besides myself to help answer questions, resolve technical problems, hand out barnstars,
139: 491:: Happy to help as well, if needed. imo, the bare url drive you mentioned on the other talk page also sounds good, since its simpler to clean up, and has no concerns about 143: 354: 715:
Also, I agree with Czar's point above - it seems like it's a bit complicated without having scripts or tools. We could have the scoring similar to CactiSteeringCrane's
1845:, yet still entertaining trying to bring it down. I was always more hesitant about removing statements than trying to source them... "There must be a source for this 248: 1144:
Yuk. That module should just disallow adding the information if you don't provide a citation... although I guess we'd likely end up with a boatload of bad citations.
2134:
I don't know that I saw too many instances of clear-cut tag bombing. There were at least a few articles where someone had slapped CN tags on almost every paragraph.
366: 2082:
tags for credits (such as a TV show where the specific episode is noted). These are not necessary, since the credits of the show noted are the primary source (per
1751:
Oh, damn, I forgot about that one. Ideally, I think it would be included, but since I've been saying from the start of the drive that you get points only through
398: 2415:
ReferencePreviews. We are looking forward to your feedback on how our solution compares to your existing methods of re-using references with different details.
2039:
Thanks you all for your efforts in the June 2024 drive to reduce unsourced statements. A while back I ran into a tag bomber at a site I monitor, so I did some
832:, since we seem to be alternating vacations (I'm away in July), would you consider handing out barnstars some time in July after the drive is finished? Thanks, 1431:{{subst:WP:JUN24/B|1= (The point bracket, e.g. 200) |2= (Recommended; the exact number of points) |3= (Optional, any extra message at the end.) }} 74: 719:...and additionally, I feel like the 4 points for replacing a tag with a citation could be bumped down to 3, since I think it's a bit too much. Thanks!Ā :) ~ 415: 1649:
I just sent out thirty or so barnstars (up to and including That Tired Tarantula if anyone else wants to help out). I'll try to do a few more tomorrow.
2096:, emphasis added). In those situations, if I could locate a decent secondary source, I did that. Otherwise, I left the tag. I would feel that these 557:: I don't believe there are plans for one any time soon. Edward did draft a mock up of the page, so planning could be started up again, if necessary. 2397: 80: 992:
Who will win: This drive, or the secret drive to add to unsourced statements? I think that's the better way of interpreting this development! //
910: 2451: 2391: 2347: 659:
Clearing an article of tags is awarded two extra points if the article had five tags or more, and four extra points if it had ten or more.
2343: 2331: 310: 256: 239: 219: 24: 2387: 1978:; it would useful for such a proposal to have more statistics on how many {{cn}} tags have been replaced by readily found references. 1127: 2320: 1577:
Sorry, I just noticed your response (had a wall of notifications the other day). Isn't it standard practice to subst barnstars? E.g.
2433: 2374: 20: 1060:
to remember to check the page again in a couple of weeks and remove content that hasn't been cited. Half the time I forget though.
1501:
No problem, I'll be available to help. A small suggestion, though, could we add "earning you this " or something like that. E.g.:
69: 1932: 1354: 1256: 1209: 1173: 1001: 461: 194: 1582: 60: 509:
I think this looks great! It would be awesome to see the backlog number come down (instead of go up) after such a drive.
2429: 2109:
I don't know if that helps. I'm certainly willing to go back over my stuff and give some specific examples for review.
616: 544: 422: 2155: 1802: 1739: 1411: 1378: 1017: 967: 2289:
FWIW I tried your random page test; only one of the ten pages had an article needs references tag; none were stubs.
1038:
should only be very rarely applied: if you come across unsourced content, you should either add a citation, or, per
151: 134: 1559:
I'll try, to add that; I think it can also be done with {{#switch:}}. Also, I realized that the template probably
1122:
mentioned on Discord that the large amount of cn tags for May 2024 and June 2024 are due to no sources added with
2351: 1781:
and so on, it feels dishonest on my part to let this one in through the back door two-thirds of the way through.
1135: 464:. Hopefully that will help get this off the ground. I'd be happy to help coordinate the drive if it does happen. 1675:
Update: I've sent the barnstars up to Mgp28 (included) if anyone wants to take over. A little over 30 are left.
162: 1830: 1755: 1532: 1465: 916: 602: 562: 500: 472: 408: 387: 846:
Iā€™m out for the first few days of July; but afterwards, I think Iā€™m okay with doing so. Is that alright?Ā :] ~
200: 2248:
If anything, I think we need to be much stricter on verifiability. You claim these tags make Knowledge (XXG)
1635:
It would be wonderful if you could help out. I can do a few, but I'm travelling and on holiday until August.
647: 612: 594: 554: 540: 657:
Each tag replaced with a citation is awarded 4 points. Removing the unsourced statement is worth 1 point.
50: 2271: 2139: 2040: 1871:
to hand put awards while I'm away on vacation. The drive wouldn't have been as successful without them.
1578: 90: 65: 2121: 1424:
This reminds me ā€” I'm going to unavailable at the start of July, starting June 28th or so. I've made
1131: 361:{{align|center|{{resbox|'''{{large|{{Random page in category}}}}'''}}}} {{Filter category by topic}} 313:
on 11 January 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see
2422: 2418: 2148:
Yes. Most tags were attached to easily sourced material. Made it easy to get so many done, though! ā€”
1971: 1425: 1064:
laptop. Anything I can help with in the meantime, leave a message on my talk page or send an email.
679:
I'll be moderately busy around the end of June, and will have less time than usual. Any volunteers?
306: 1946: 1928: 1876: 1826: 1786: 1717: 1640: 1605: 1568: 1492: 1350: 1336: 1308: 1303:
Because was late adding the data to the spreadsheet, so it actually comes from early June 14th.Ā :/
1252: 1238: 1205: 1191: 1169: 1149: 1123: 1117: 1083: 1047: 997: 983: 950: 884: 837: 815: 768: 684: 666: 598: 580: 558: 528: 524: 514: 496: 484: 466: 166: 2242: 1821:
This was the first drive of this type I've taken part in and I really enjoyed it - many thanks to
1039: 376:
After the category has more than about 50 articles would be the appropriate time to add the above.
2294: 2280: 2231: 2049: 1986: 1898: 1702: 1680: 1654: 1625: 854: 789: 727: 440: 167: 2437: 2355: 2324: 2298: 2284: 2258: 2235: 2213: 2192: 2176: 2161: 2143: 2125: 2058:
While I didn't keep any specific quantifiable notes, I can say that, yes, I did experience some
2053: 1990: 1950: 1936: 1918: 1902: 1880: 1858: 1834: 1808: 1790: 1745: 1721: 1706: 1684: 1670: 1658: 1644: 1629: 1609: 1594: 1572: 1553: 1496: 1417: 1399: 1384: 1358: 1340: 1312: 1274: 1260: 1242: 1230: 1213: 1195: 1177: 1153: 1139: 1102: 1087: 1073: 1051: 1023: 1005: 987: 973: 954: 929: 888: 874: 841: 819: 805: 772: 743: 702: 688: 670: 620: 606: 584: 566: 548: 518: 504: 478: 447: 2365: 1910: 1850: 2172: 46: 1525: 1458: 760: 2135: 2030: 2006: 1963: 164: 2265: 2253: 2220: 2208: 2110: 2026: 2018: 1864: 1665: 1586: 1545: 1484: 1391: 1266: 1094: 1065: 652:
Here's what I have for scoring, but I fear it is a bit too complicated. What do you think?
2094:, may be sourced from the works themselves, as long as only basic descriptions are given. 1975: 1042:, remove it entirely, as you are well within your rights to do. I usually do the latter. 429: 244: 1923:
Cremastra said earlier he would be unavailable in some unspecified early part of july //
2183: 2034: 2010: 1942: 1924: 1914: 1872: 1854: 1822: 1782: 1713: 1636: 1601: 1564: 1488: 1346: 1332: 1304: 1248: 1234: 1201: 1187: 1183: 1165: 1145: 1079: 1043: 993: 979: 946: 923: 880: 833: 811: 778: 764: 709: 696: 680: 662: 643: 590: 576: 532: 510: 1126:. It's possible that the spike in the total of cns are from these table tags, like at 2445: 2290: 2276: 2227: 2045: 2022: 1982: 1892: 1868: 1765: 1698: 1676: 1650: 1621: 1480: 1186:
Laziness. I've got all the data in a spreadsheet; I'll upload a new version shortly.
866: 847: 827: 801: 782: 750: 739: 720: 639: 536: 488: 455: 433: 1825:
for organising it. Turns out I'm really motivated by the promise of virtual points!
941: 2408: 2168: 2014: 2002: 862: 797: 735: 597:, how do you feel about pushing the unreferenced article drive back to Aug/Sept? 2100: 2076: 2062: 1775: 1032: 870: 492: 247:
of Knowledge (XXG) articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the
432:, should we start a drive to remove and replace the tags listed above? Thanks! 2150: 2083: 1998: 1797: 1734: 1446: 1406: 1373: 1371:
Will there be a barnstar for reaching 3,000 points? I'm getting there... LOL ā€”
1012: 962: 2315:
A novel written by Charles Eric Maine is not included in his written works@
1842: 1513: 231: 213: 404:
Hi! I'm pretty sure this is the place to ask, so I'm asking if we could do
418:, there's more than 500,000 articles containing either citation needed or 2404:
We are aware that enwiki and other projects already use workarounds like
2400:
to get updates and/or invites to participate in user research activities.
1233:
because there's often quite a lag between my upload and the update here.
879:
That's great. Thanks. I'll probably be able to lend a hand now and then.
1891:
Is the drive properly closed now? At least remove the "Sign up" button?
1538:
backlog drive, earning you this Minor Barnstar. Thanks for helping out!
755:
Unfortunately, it's a bit last-minute to change the date: I've already
1164:
Is there a reason this graph hasn't been updated for some time? //
495:. (though the cn tags are probably more important/time sensitive) 1487:
could hand out some barnstars, I'd really appreciate it. Cheers,
460:
I like this idea a lot; I've drafted a mock-up of the drive page
1457:
You scored 157 points while adding citations to articles during
1966:
wherein an editor admits to tag bombing for nearly two decades
1524:
You scored 25 points while adding citations to articles during
2344:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Citation templates Ā§Ā References not notes
2332:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Citation templates Ā§Ā References not notes
428:
tags. So, in order to reduce those by replacing the tags with
330: 288: 176: 168: 15: 1200:
Yay, AMAZINg! I was afraid something had come in your way. //
2364: 1479:
If at some point in July (I should be able to help as well)
2088:
Plot summaries, and other aspects of a program's content,
717:
unreferenced articles backlog drive back in February 2024
1867:
for lending a hand as well, and for offering along with
1520:
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!
1453:
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!
1428:
to facilitate handing out barnstars. It works like this:
911:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Anarchism#Cleanup drive
414:
tag removal drives. There's a large amountā€“according to
315: 301: 119: 112: 105: 98: 2361:
Coming soon: A new sub-referencing feature ā€“ try it!
1390:
There is a special barnstar awarded to first place.
978:
Updated for 11 Jul. The drive is not going well.Ā :(
302:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
2390:the current state of development on beta wiki and 2346:, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. 399:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Citation cleanup 2383:to make sure this feature works well for you: 1078:No worries. Thanks for all you've done so far. 193:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s 27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks. 8: 1265:Just wondering, why is 13 June asterisked? 574:{The user formerly known as Edward-Woodrow} 416:Category:Articles with unsourced statements 319:; for the discussion at that location, see 2342:You are invited to join the discussion at 940: 208: 1964:Remove tag bombing of Floppy Disk Article 1941:Yes, the drive ended at the end of June. 1581:lists all of the barnstars there like {{ 1434:The rest is automatic. So, for example, 355:All articles lacking reliable references 243:, a collaborative effort to improve the 1508: 1441: 311:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Reliability 265:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Reliability 210: 2250:seem less reliable than it actually is 2249: 2087: 1471:backlog drive. Thanks for helping out! 367:All articles with unsourced statements 350:after the bot creates a new Category: 2428:Please help us spread the message. -- 2317:2601:1C2:100:E9E0:D173:9CB5:2C76:7DB1 1981:Any statistics would be appreciated. 655: 7: 1600:"safesubst", which I'll give a try. 182: 180: 199:It is of interest to the following 14: 1247:Ooooh! That's some great work! // 960:The drive is going well! Great! ā€” 369:, add (Edit) the following lines. 357:, add (Edit) the following lines. 45:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 2337: 1512: 1445: 1345:Oh no, that didn't last long! // 1220: 810:Yeah, I understand. No worries. 334: 292: 268:Template:WikiProject Reliability 230: 212: 181: 150: 40:Click here to start a new topic. 1128:1898 Argentine Primera DivisiĆ³n 1: 2452:WikiProject Reliability pages 1404:Ping pong for me and Conyo! ā€” 519:04:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC) 37:Put new text under old text. 1436:{{subst:WP:JUN24/B|100|157}} 505:16:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC) 479:20:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC) 365:For the new category within 353:For the new category within 2438:11:14, 19 August 2024 (UTC) 2356:10:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC) 1583:subst:The Original Barnstar 2468: 2392:let us know what you think 759:, advertised the drive at 607:20:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 585:20:00, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 567:17:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 549:16:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC) 88: 2325:07:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC) 2299:06:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC) 2285:06:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC) 2259:00:55, 11 July 2024 (UTC) 1809:12:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 1791:12:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 1746:09:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 1722:22:29, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 1707:21:59, 10 July 2024 (UTC) 1610:19:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1595:19:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1573:21:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1554:21:07, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1497:20:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1418:11:26, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1400:11:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1385:10:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC) 1359:22:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 1341:12:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 1313:12:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC) 1275:17:38, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1261:16:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1243:16:49, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1214:16:47, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1196:16:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1178:16:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC) 1154:23:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 1140:22:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 1103:01:13, 12 June 2024 (UTC) 1088:23:56, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 1074:22:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 1052:22:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 1024:21:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 1006:21:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 988:19:37, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 974:12:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC) 448:14:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC) 251:, where you can join the 225: 207: 75:Be welcoming to newcomers 2272:small study of fact tags 2236:17:10, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2214:13:42, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 2193:20:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 2177:19:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 2162:19:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 2144:17:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 2126:16:57, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 2054:16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 1991:00:13, 3 July 2024 (UTC) 1951:21:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 1937:20:02, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 1919:17:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC) 1903:09:31, 2 July 2024 (UTC) 1881:19:24, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 1859:16:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 1835:09:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 1795:Fair enough. Next time ā€” 1685:16:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 1671:13:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC) 1659:22:30, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 1645:21:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 1630:19:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC) 955:22:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC) 930:04:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC) 921:cleanup drive right now 889:23:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC) 875:23:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC) 842:20:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) 820:15:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC) 806:15:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC) 773:00:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC) 744:23:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC) 703:04:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC) 689:21:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC) 671:11:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC) 2430:Johannes Richter (WMDE) 1526:WikiProject Reliability 1459:WikiProject Reliability 621:03:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC) 240:WikiProject Reliability 25:WikiProject Reliability 2369: 1728:Another one to confirm 661: 539:, any update on this? 401:, carried over here.) 70:avoid personal attacks 2419:Wikimedia Deutschland 2381:We want your feedback 2368: 1974:explicitly a form of 1817:Thank you organisers! 777:Ah, thatā€™s alright, @ 593:: June sounds fine. @ 299:The contents of the 237:This page is part of 144:Auto-archiving period 1863:And a big thanks to 1028:Personally, I think 757:moved the drive page 271:Reliability articles 2091:such as its credits 1124:Module:Sports table 423:failed verification 2370: 1976:disruptive editing 1585:|1=message ~~~~}} 1056:I add CN tags and 648:CactiStaccingCrane 613:CactiStaccingCrane 595:CactiStaccingCrane 555:CactiStaccingCrane 541:CactiStaccingCrane 257:list of open tasks 195:content assessment 81:dispute resolution 42: 1957:Statistics if any 1887:Past closing date 1543: 1542: 1476: 1475: 381: 380: 327: 326: 287: 286: 283: 282: 279: 278: 175: 174: 61:Assume good faith 38: 2459: 2423:Technical Wishes 2413: 2407: 2375:the project page 2341: 2340: 2269: 2256: 2224: 2211: 2190: 2160: 2158: 2153: 2118: 2117: 2114: 2105: 2099: 2081: 2075: 2067: 2061: 2038: 1895: 1807: 1805: 1800: 1780: 1774: 1770: 1764: 1760: 1754: 1744: 1742: 1737: 1668: 1592: 1589: 1551: 1548: 1539: 1537: 1531: 1516: 1509: 1472: 1470: 1464: 1449: 1442: 1437: 1416: 1414: 1409: 1397: 1394: 1383: 1381: 1376: 1272: 1269: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1121: 1100: 1097: 1071: 1068: 1037: 1031: 1022: 1020: 1015: 972: 970: 965: 944: 928: 926: 920: 859: 852: 831: 794: 787: 754: 732: 725: 701: 699: 651: 477: 475: 469: 459: 445: 438: 430:reliable sources 427: 421: 413: 407: 392: 386: 349: 343: 338: 337: 331: 318: 296: 295: 289: 273: 272: 269: 266: 263: 234: 227: 226: 216: 209: 186: 185: 184: 177: 169: 155: 154: 145: 122: 115: 108: 101: 16: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2442: 2441: 2411: 2405: 2363: 2348:142.113.140.146 2338: 2335: 2313: 2263: 2254: 2218: 2209: 2184: 2156: 2151: 2149: 2115: 2112: 2111: 2103: 2097: 2079: 2073: 2065: 2059: 1996: 1959: 1893: 1889: 1819: 1803: 1798: 1796: 1778: 1772: 1768: 1762: 1758: 1756:citation needed 1752: 1740: 1735: 1733: 1730: 1712:Great, thanks! 1666: 1590: 1587: 1549: 1546: 1535: 1533:citation needed 1529: 1523: 1521: 1468: 1466:citation needed 1462: 1456: 1454: 1435: 1412: 1407: 1405: 1395: 1392: 1379: 1374: 1372: 1369: 1270: 1267: 1229:. You can look 1221: 1219: 1132:MrLinkinPark333 1115: 1098: 1095: 1069: 1066: 1035: 1029: 1018: 1013: 1011: 968: 963: 961: 938: 924: 922: 917:citation needed 914: 855: 848: 825: 790: 783: 748: 728: 721: 697: 695: 637: 611:Makes senseĀ :) 473: 467: 465: 453: 441: 434: 425: 419: 411: 409:citation needed 405: 397:(directed from 395: 390: 388:Citation needed 384: 374: 362: 345: 341: 335: 314: 293: 270: 267: 264: 261: 260: 171: 170: 165: 142: 128: 127: 126: 125: 118: 111: 104: 97: 93: 86: 56: 23:for discussing 12: 11: 5: 2465: 2463: 2455: 2454: 2444: 2443: 2402: 2401: 2395: 2362: 2359: 2334: 2330:Discussion at 2328: 2312: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2287: 2246: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2164: 2146: 2132: 2128: 2107: 2070: 1958: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1939: 1921: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1861: 1827:Orange sticker 1818: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1732:Does count? ā€” 1729: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1541: 1540: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1502: 1474: 1473: 1455: 1452: 1450: 1440: 1439: 1432: 1429: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1368: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1118:ARandomName123 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1061: 1026: 945: 937: 934: 933: 932: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 713: 707: 706: 705: 658: 653: 635: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 599:ARandomName123 559:ARandomName123 529:Edward-Woodrow 525:ARandomName123 507: 497:ARandomName123 485:Edward-Woodrow 468:Edward-Woodrow 394: 393:removal drive? 382: 379: 378: 372: 371: 370: 360: 359: 358: 339: 325: 324: 297: 285: 284: 281: 280: 277: 276: 274: 235: 223: 222: 217: 205: 204: 198: 187: 173: 172: 163: 161: 160: 157: 156: 130: 129: 124: 123: 116: 109: 102: 94: 89: 87: 85: 84: 77: 72: 63: 57: 55: 54: 43: 34: 33: 30: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2464: 2453: 2450: 2449: 2447: 2440: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2426: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2410: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2389: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2382: 2378: 2376: 2367: 2360: 2358: 2357: 2353: 2349: 2345: 2333: 2329: 2327: 2326: 2322: 2318: 2310: 2300: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2273: 2267: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2251: 2247: 2244: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2222: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2205: 2200: 2194: 2191: 2189: 2188: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2174: 2170: 2165: 2163: 2159: 2154: 2147: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2129: 2127: 2123: 2119: 2108: 2102: 2095: 2093: 2092: 2085: 2078: 2071: 2064: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2051: 2047: 2042: 2036: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1979: 1977: 1973: 1967: 1965: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1940: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1816: 1810: 1806: 1801: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1777: 1767: 1757: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1743: 1738: 1727: 1723: 1719: 1715: 1711: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1669: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1593: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1552: 1534: 1527: 1518: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1477: 1467: 1460: 1451: 1448: 1444: 1443: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1410: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1398: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1377: 1366: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1276: 1273: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1227: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1163: 1155: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1119: 1114: 1104: 1101: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1062: 1059: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1034: 1027: 1025: 1021: 1016: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 990: 989: 985: 981: 977: 976: 975: 971: 966: 959: 958: 957: 956: 952: 948: 943: 935: 931: 927: 918: 912: 908: 907: 890: 886: 882: 878: 877: 876: 872: 868: 864: 860: 858: 853: 851: 845: 844: 843: 839: 835: 829: 823: 822: 821: 817: 813: 809: 808: 807: 803: 799: 795: 793: 788: 786: 780: 776: 775: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 752: 747: 746: 745: 741: 737: 733: 731: 726: 724: 718: 714: 711: 708: 704: 700: 692: 691: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 673: 672: 668: 664: 660: 654: 649: 645: 641: 636: 622: 618: 614: 610: 609: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 587: 586: 582: 578: 575: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 481: 480: 476: 470: 463: 457: 452: 451: 450: 449: 446: 444: 439: 437: 431: 424: 417: 410: 402: 400: 389: 383: 377: 368: 364: 363: 356: 352: 351: 348: 340: 333: 332: 329: 322: 321:its talk page 317: 312: 308: 304: 303: 298: 291: 290: 275: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 241: 236: 233: 229: 228: 224: 221: 218: 215: 211: 206: 202: 196: 192: 188: 179: 178: 159: 158: 153: 149: 141: 138: 136: 132: 131: 121: 117: 114: 110: 107: 103: 100: 96: 95: 92: 82: 78: 76: 73: 71: 67: 64: 62: 59: 58: 52: 48: 47:Learn to edit 44: 41: 36: 35: 32: 31: 26: 22: 18: 17: 2427: 2417: 2403: 2398:Sign up here 2380: 2379: 2371: 2336: 2314: 2203: 2186: 2185: 2090: 2089: 1980: 1968: 1960: 1890: 1846: 1820: 1731: 1695: 1618: 1563:be subst'd. 1560: 1544: 1370: 1225: 1057: 939: 856: 849: 791: 784: 729: 722: 676: 656: 573: 442: 435: 403: 396: 375: 346: 328: 300: 252: 249:project page 238: 201:WikiProjects 191:project page 190: 147: 133: 19:This is the 2136:Nick Number 2031:GranCavallo 2007:Nick Number 1972:tag bombing 1579:WP:BARNSTAR 909:Relatedly, 493:citogenesis 316:its history 262:Reliability 245:reliability 220:Reliability 120:WT:REFCHECK 2388:Please try 2266:Adam Black 2255:Adam Black 2221:Adam Black 2210:Adam Black 2204:everything 2084:MOS:TVPLOT 2027:Ligaturama 2019:Butlerblog 1865:Adam Black 1667:Adam Black 1485:Adam Black 1426:WP:JUN24/B 1218:Should be 913:is a live 824:Actually, 305:page were 255:and see a 253:discussion 2243:WP:VERIFY 2187:Wizardman 2035:Wizardman 2011:Apollo468 1943:Cremastra 1925:Replayful 1873:Cremastra 1847:somewhere 1843:Sisyphean 1823:Cremastra 1783:Cremastra 1714:Cremastra 1637:Cremastra 1602:Cremastra 1565:Cremastra 1561:shouldn't 1528:'s first 1489:Cremastra 1461:'s first 1367:Barnstars 1347:Replayful 1333:Cremastra 1305:Cremastra 1249:Replayful 1235:Cremastra 1202:Replayful 1188:Cremastra 1184:Replayful 1166:Replayful 1146:Cremastra 1080:Cremastra 1044:Cremastra 1040:WP:BURDEN 994:Replayful 980:Cremastra 947:Cremastra 881:Cremastra 834:Cremastra 812:Cremastra 779:Cremastra 765:Cremastra 710:Cremastra 681:Cremastra 663:Cremastra 644:Huntertur 591:Cremastra 577:Cremastra 533:Huntertur 511:huntertur 342:Important 91:Shortcuts 83:if needed 66:Be polite 21:talk page 2446:Category 2291:Tom94022 2277:Tom94022 2228:Tom94022 2046:Tom94022 2041:research 2023:Jpeeling 1983:Tom94022 1933:contribs 1894:Mox Eden 1869:Tails Wx 1699:Pichpich 1677:Pichpich 1651:Pichpich 1622:Pichpich 1481:Tails Wx 1438:gets you 1355:contribs 1257:contribs 1210:contribs 1174:contribs 1002:contribs 828:Tails Wx 751:Tails Wx 640:Tails Wx 537:Tails Wx 489:Tails Wx 456:Tails Wx 135:Archives 51:get help 2169:Conyo14 2033:, and 2015:D-Flo27 2003:Conyo14 1483:and/or 761:WP:WPRE 646:, and 347:Monthly 148:30Ā days 106:WT:WPRE 99:WT:FACT 2113:Butler 2069:maybe. 936:Update 307:merged 197:scale. 113:WT:FRC 2152:Iadmc 1999:Iadmc 1799:Iadmc 1736:Iadmc 1591:Black 1550:Black 1408:Iadmc 1396:Black 1375:Iadmc 1271:Black 1099:Black 1070:Black 1014:Iadmc 964:Iadmc 850:Tails 785:Tails 723:Tails 436:Tails 309:into 189:This 79:Seek 2434:talk 2352:talk 2321:talk 2311:ALPH 2295:talk 2281:talk 2232:talk 2173:talk 2140:talk 2122:talk 2116:Blog 2050:talk 1987:talk 1947:talk 1929:talk 1915:talk 1911:2pou 1899:talk 1877:talk 1855:talk 1851:2pou 1831:talk 1787:talk 1766:fact 1718:talk 1703:talk 1681:talk 1655:talk 1641:talk 1626:talk 1606:talk 1588:Adam 1569:talk 1547:Adam 1493:talk 1393:Adam 1351:talk 1337:talk 1309:talk 1268:Adam 1253:talk 1239:talk 1231:here 1226:Done 1206:talk 1192:talk 1170:talk 1150:talk 1136:talk 1096:Adam 1084:talk 1067:Adam 1048:talk 998:talk 984:talk 951:talk 925:czar 885:talk 838:talk 816:talk 769:talk 698:czar 685:talk 677:etc. 667:talk 617:talk 603:talk 581:talk 563:talk 545:talk 515:talk 501:talk 474:talk 462:here 68:and 2421:ā€™s 2409:sfn 1058:try 605:) 565:) 535:, @ 531:, @ 527:, @ 503:) 487:, @ 2448:: 2436:) 2412:}} 2406:{{ 2377:. 2354:) 2323:) 2297:) 2283:) 2234:) 2175:) 2142:) 2124:) 2104:}} 2101:cn 2098:{{ 2086:: 2080:}} 2077:cn 2074:{{ 2066:}} 2063:cn 2060:{{ 2052:) 2029:, 2025:, 2021:, 2017:, 2013:, 2009:, 2005:, 2001:, 1989:) 1949:) 1935:) 1931:| 1917:) 1901:) 1879:) 1857:) 1833:) 1789:) 1779:}} 1776:cn 1773:{{ 1771:, 1769:}} 1763:{{ 1761:, 1759:}} 1753:{{ 1720:) 1705:) 1683:) 1657:) 1643:) 1628:) 1608:) 1571:) 1536:}} 1530:{{ 1495:) 1469:}} 1463:{{ 1357:) 1353:| 1339:) 1311:) 1259:) 1255:| 1241:) 1212:) 1208:| 1194:) 1176:) 1172:| 1152:) 1138:) 1130:. 1086:) 1050:) 1036:}} 1033:cn 1030:{{ 1004:) 1000:| 986:) 953:) 919:}} 915:{{ 887:) 873:) 871:āš§ļø 869:, 867:ā›ˆļø 865:, 863:šŸ¾ 857:Wx 840:) 818:) 804:) 802:ā›ˆļø 800:, 798:šŸ¾ 792:Wx 771:) 742:) 740:ā›ˆļø 738:, 736:šŸ¾ 730:Wx 687:) 669:) 642:, 619:) 583:) 547:) 517:) 471:ā€¢ 443:Wx 426:}} 420:{{ 412:}} 406:{{ 391:}} 385:{{ 344:- 146:: 49:; 2432:( 2394:. 2350:( 2319:( 2293:( 2279:( 2268:: 2264:@ 2230:( 2223:: 2219:@ 2171:( 2157:ā™« 2138:( 2120:( 2048:( 2037:: 1997:@ 1985:( 1945:( 1927:( 1913:( 1909:- 1897:( 1875:( 1853:( 1829:( 1804:ā™« 1785:( 1741:ā™« 1716:( 1701:( 1679:( 1653:( 1639:( 1624:( 1604:( 1567:( 1491:( 1413:ā™« 1380:ā™« 1349:( 1335:( 1307:( 1251:( 1237:( 1204:( 1190:( 1182:@ 1168:( 1148:( 1134:( 1120:: 1116:@ 1082:( 1046:( 1019:ā™« 996:( 982:( 969:ā™« 949:( 883:( 861:( 836:( 830:: 826:@ 814:( 796:( 767:( 753:: 749:@ 734:( 683:( 665:( 650:: 638:@ 615:( 601:( 589:@ 579:( 572:ā€” 561:( 553:@ 543:( 523:@ 513:( 499:( 483:@ 458:: 454:@ 323:. 259:. 203:: 140:1 137:: 53:.

Index

talk page
WikiProject Reliability
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Shortcuts
WT:FACT
WT:WPRE
WT:FRC
WT:REFCHECK
Archives
1

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Reliability
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Reliability
reliability
project page
discussion
list of open tasks
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
merged

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

ā†‘