Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Ricky Martin - Knowledge

Source 📝

21: 32: 196:
and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
80: 313:
parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present.
76: 261:
Quality assessments by Knowledge editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at
299:
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass
266: 110: 247: 286:
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to
296:, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories. 72: 290: 277: 283:, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment. 243: 224: 208: 262: 71:
related articles and improving them. Your work is really great. Could you PLEASE just write your usernames in the
27: 204: 96: 303: 165: 20: 185: 193: 101:
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to
322: 251: 84: 318: 220: 155: 106: 54: 232: 189: 228: 314: 216: 102: 175: 68: 62: 109:. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 203:, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at 139: 118: 15: 265:, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent 75:
section? I'd be very thankful and really appreciate this.
240:
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.
151:
It will work on a variety of links, including those from
127:
John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.
207:. Questions, comments and requests can be made at 269:was approved and has been implemented to add a 8: 113:. The idea is that it takes something like 91:User script to detect unreliable sources 257:Project-independent quality assessments 310: 270: 111:39th most imported script on Knowledge 7: 201:not a script to be mindlessly used 14: 133:and turns it into something like 30:on 19 March 2021. The result of 19: 184:The script is mostly based on 67:Hi, I saw you both working on 1: 209:User talk:Headbomb/unreliable 263:Knowledge:Content assessment 26:This page was nominated for 338: 323:13:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC) 252:16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC) 244:MediaWiki message delivery 94: 85:09:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC) 311:|QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom 291:WikiProject banner shell 278:WikiProject banner shell 205:User:Headbomb/unreliable 125:. Accessed 2020-02-14. ( 97:User:Headbomb/unreliable 47:Wikiproject Ricky Martin 147:. Accessed 2020-02-14. 267:Village pump proposal 199:Do note that this is 107:predatory journals 103:unreliable sources 140:Article of things 119:Article of things 44: 43: 329: 312: 308: 302: 295: 289: 282: 276: 272: 241: 236: 180: 174: 170: 164: 160: 154: 142: 128: 66: 58: 23: 16: 337: 336: 332: 331: 330: 328: 327: 326: 306: 300: 293: 287: 280: 274: 259: 239: 215: 178: 172: 168: 162: 158: 152: 138: 126: 99: 93: 60: 52: 49: 12: 11: 5: 335: 333: 258: 255: 242:Delivered by: 149: 148: 145:Deprecated.com 131: 130: 123:Deprecated.com 92: 89: 88: 87: 48: 45: 42: 41: 33:the discussion 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 334: 325: 324: 320: 316: 305: 297: 292: 284: 279: 273:parameter to 268: 264: 256: 254: 253: 249: 245: 237: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 212: 210: 206: 202: 197: 195: 191: 187: 186:WP:RSPSOURCES 182: 177: 167: 157: 146: 141: 136: 135: 134: 124: 120: 116: 115: 114: 112: 108: 104: 98: 90: 86: 82: 78: 77:آرمین هویدایی 74: 70: 64: 56: 51: 50: 46: 39: 35: 34: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 304:WPBannerMeta 298: 285: 260: 238: 213: 200: 198: 194:WP:CITEWATCH 183: 166:cite journal 150: 144: 137:John Smith " 132: 122: 117:John Smith " 100: 73:Participants 69:Ricky Martin 55:Magiciandude 37: 31: 95:Main page: 315:Aymatth2 217:Headbomb 190:WP:NPPSG 156:cite web 28:deletion 271:|class= 309:a new 63:Tomica 319:talk 248:talk 192:and 171:and 105:and 81:talk 38:keep 36:was 214:- 176:doi 321:) 307:}} 301:{{ 294:}} 288:{{ 281:}} 275:{{ 250:) 231:· 227:· 223:· 211:. 188:, 181:. 179:}} 173:{{ 169:}} 163:{{ 161:, 159:}} 153:{{ 143:" 121:" 83:) 317:( 246:( 235:} 233:b 229:p 225:c 221:t 219:{ 129:) 79:( 65:: 61:@ 59:: 57:: 53:@ 40:.

Index

Miscellany for deletion
deletion
the discussion
Magiciandude
Tomica
Ricky Martin
Participants
آرمین هویدایی
talk
09:04, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
User:Headbomb/unreliable
unreliable sources
predatory journals
39th most imported script on Knowledge
Article of things
Article of things
cite web
cite journal
doi
WP:RSPSOURCES
WP:NPPSG
WP:CITEWATCH
User:Headbomb/unreliable
User talk:Headbomb/unreliable
Headbomb
t
c
p
b
MediaWiki message delivery

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.