Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Swaminarayan/Archive 1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

31: 224:
I think that this occurs at intervals, as seems to be the case with the Vaishnava wikiproject assessments - but I do not understand this process completely. Also, I have begun tagging articles for the project. As I tag them, I am trying to keep with the previous assessments of each article. Please
267: 201: 177:
I think Redtiger's review could be used as a start point on what has to be done to take a step forward to achieving GA status for the article. Redtiger - Thanks for the review ..
108: 85: 71: 66: 204:(the workgroup's assessment log). The template does not show the assessments of importance and quality that all others do. This probelm needs to be resolved 200:
There is only one problem left to solve for the complete completion of this taskforce (workgroup). The problem is located in the formatting somewhere here-
240:
Hi Ism Schism - thanks for taking up the time consuming tagging task. Your assessments in Krishnaism have been great - why do u say ur not good at it.
139:
Now that this workgroup is reality, it will help in collaboration in Swaminarayan articles. I feel the first step should be to collaborate and make
47: 17: 38: 351: 349: 336: 315: 286: 250: 248: 234: 218: 187: 185: 172: 153: 151: 129: 102: 263: 332: 278: 168: 112: 230: 343: 302: 242: 205: 179: 145: 116: 107:
The first 9 members to join the project, including me, joined when the project was being proposed
89: 111:. Others ,within these 9, joined when the construction of the Wikiproject was taking place in my 298: 225:
feel free to review ALL of these, as I am not that good at assessments; just tagging. Thanks.
160: 328: 271: 164: 226: 115:. The names of these members have been moved from these areas to the final project page 324: 140: 202:
Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Swaminarayan articles by quality statistics
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
323:
Great. It was a long time on hold. Finally it is GA. I suggest You initiate a
266:. The importance categories were not defined properly earlier. See the new 270:. I have manually assessed 2 of the remaining unassessed articles. -- 159:
As a GA reviewer, i have listed the issues that may crop up in GAN at
25: 341:
Redtiger, ur prob the best one for the PR, why dont u do it?
88:. A consensus decided upon the creation of this wikiproject 161:
Talk:Swaminarayan#GA_issues_and_Peer_review__by_Redtigerxyz
84:
The creation of this wikiproject was through a decision
258: 143:a GA class article and after that an FA class one. 8: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Swaminarayan 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7: 24: 29: 1: 352:15:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC) 337:05:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC) 316:22:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC) 297:Just to inform all members, 287:09:26, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 251:23:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 235:21:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 219:21:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 188:23:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 173:14:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 154:14:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 130:11:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 103:20:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 372: 80:Creaton of Wikiproject 256:I fixed it the issue 42:of past discussions. 348: 299:Akshardham (Delhi) 247: 184: 150: 135:First Collabration 342: 241: 178: 144: 77: 76: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 363: 346: 345:Around The Globe 313: 312: 311: 310: 245: 244:Around The Globe 216: 215: 214: 213: 182: 181:Around The Globe 148: 147:Around The Globe 127: 126: 125: 124: 100: 99: 98: 97: 63: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 371: 370: 366: 365: 364: 362: 361: 360: 344: 306: 305: 304: 303: 295: 264:WP:Swaminarayan 243: 209: 208: 207: 206: 198: 180: 146: 137: 120: 119: 118: 117: 93: 92: 91: 90: 82: 59: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 369: 367: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 294: 291: 290: 289: 282: 275: 238: 237: 197: 194: 193: 192: 191: 190: 136: 133: 81: 78: 75: 74: 69: 64: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 368: 353: 350: 347: 340: 339: 338: 334: 330: 326: 322: 321: 320: 319: 318: 317: 314: 309: 300: 292: 288: 284: 283: 280: 277: 276: 273: 269: 265: 261: 260: 255: 254: 253: 252: 249: 246: 236: 232: 228: 223: 222: 221: 220: 217: 212: 203: 195: 189: 186: 183: 176: 175: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 157: 156: 155: 152: 149: 142: 134: 132: 131: 128: 123: 114: 110: 105: 104: 101: 96: 87: 79: 73: 70: 68: 65: 62: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 307: 296: 279: 272: 257: 239: 210: 199: 141:Swaminarayan 138: 121: 106: 94: 83: 60: 43: 37: 329:Redtigerxyz 165:Redtigerxyz 36:This is an 293:Akshardham 227:Ism schism 72:Archive 3 67:Archive 2 61:Archive 1 308:Juthani1 301:is a GA 281:Cherian 211:Juthani1 122:Juthani1 95:Juthani1 327:now. -- 196:Problem 113:Sandbox 39:archive 325:WP:PR 268:Stats 16:< 333:talk 274:Tinu 259:here 231:talk 169:talk 109:here 86:here 262:of 335:) 285:- 233:) 171:) 163:-- 331:( 229:( 167:( 50:.

Index

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Swaminarayan
archive
current talk page
Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3
here
   Juthani1   
20:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
here
Sandbox
   Juthani1   
11:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Swaminarayan
Around The Globe

14:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Swaminarayan#GA_issues_and_Peer_review__by_Redtigerxyz
Redtigerxyz
talk
14:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Around The Globe

23:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Swaminarayan articles by quality statistics
   Juthani1   
21:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Ism schism
talk
21:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.