1598:
1589:
31:
1607:
1580:
1571:
1562:
1634:
1625:
1616:
1442:
the article and help it to remain a GA. It currently has a few problems concerning the lead and citation templates & needs about 20 more inline citations for quotes, numbers, etc. Additionally, I will be leaving messages on other WikiProjects and editors affiliated with the page to increase the number of participants assisting in the workload.
1461:
1441:
and have determined that it is in very good shape but need some assistance to remain a GA. I have put the article on hold for seven days until the issues on the talk page of the article are addressed. I wanted to mention it here so that members of the project, if interested, could assist in improving
149:
for featured status. I have been the primary editor at the article, and some concerns were raised that the article needed more eyes on it to improve it further. Some general oversight and editing for clarity, spelling and grammar, and organization is probably needed. Please comment on the state of
1373:
It should be noted this user has been unwilling to even discuss this matter at the infobox's talk page, being more inclined to enter a revert war over it yesterday which led to the article's protection. There now appears to be a bit of forum shopping going on to find a venue amenable to his ideas. I
626:, has had an outstanding expert request filed with the Presidential subproject for some time. I'm not terribly knowledgeable about the topic, but would anyone else be willing to or interested in spearheading a First Lady daughter project, or should the expert request simply be pointed here instead?
1121:
and was irreligious during the
Revolution. I can find no secondary source which contradicts either, and have sourced both; one to the standard history of the Contental army, the other to Adair and Harvey's widely cited paper. Both are vehemently contested by a newbie, who cites no source, and whose
1478:
It's a Wiki-wide call for volunteers. To explain ... a month or so back, we ran a script to list all the articles in categories related to military history. This gave us about 165,000 articles. Some of these are already tagged and assessed as military history; some are military history but not yet
687:
The obvious way to resolve the problem, like for any other factual edit, is to check the sources of the edited information. But the sources for the demographics information in these articles seem to be missing. Instead of a proper, specific citation of the source, there is a peculiar link to a
679:
I've also noticed that regular editors of these articles frequently fail to notice these changes. This means that such errors can remain in the articles for weeks or months, making it hard to spot when the change was made. Unless the change was an increase or decrease so obviously wrong (e.g.,
671:
I believe there is a significant accuracy problem with many U.S. geographic articles because of hard-to-spot vandalism that cannot be easily corrected. Over the past year or two, I've occasionally seen prank edits to the "Demographics" sections of these articles, in which the editors (always
1681:
articles throughout
Vermont to the towns in which they are located. If this is accepted, this would lay precedent for similar action to all other CDP articles to the governmental bodies in which they are located, whether towns, townships, or counties. Please offer your comments on
1200:
1195:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
1007:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
345:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
105:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are
1445:
If you have any questions about what I've said here, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I hope members here assist in addressing the issues within the article, and keep up the good work in improving articles on
Knowledge (XXG)!
1031:
This article is in need of help - the main problem being that, despite world interest in the topic due to the proportion of world energy consumed by the U.S., most section of the article contain very little information on past or present energy policy. Compare to
599:. I don't know that there is a general project for biographies, but anyway, I have already posted this message on 4 WikiProject talk pages (here, History, Ohio, and MILHIST American). If that fails to produce any results, I doubt anything else will. Thanks again,
350:
1281:
Noone interested in a First Ladies working group? Admittedly, I'm not, but I haven't ever met a female government or poli sci teacher that didn't focus overmuch on the topic. Hard to believe there are no takers, or even parties able to clarify the points on
1355:. This will allow all of the articles on government departments, offices, bureaus, commands, administrations, and programs to have a standard infobox, instead of just agencies. Right now this template is used in departments and offices (for example
515:
As far as I'm concerned, it is now good enough to be used, even without the conditional code fix; hardly a crucial matter, and implementing it would probably cause massive code bloat, since it would need to be done for every link in the template. –
926:
I'm Nick Moreau, an accredited reporter for
Wikinews. I'm co-ordinating our 2008 US Presidential election interviews. We will be interviewing as many candidates as possible, from the Democrats, Republicans, and other parties/independents.
826:
Modifying or removing the template from "Other designations" will prevent disruptive editing and accusations of U.S.-centrism. It would be no more acceptable to have a
Regions of Canada or Regions of Mexico (only) template on these pages.
1698:
Please don't over-generalize my proposal. This would only cover those towns in
Vermont that have a single CDP with the exact same name as the town. I don't see how this would be a precedent except for the exact same situations in other
548:
644:
I was looking at the templates that show radio stations across the US, and was considering trying to make them uniform. I already did most of the NY radio templates, and was looking for some feedback before I continue. Any thoughts?
803:
Did anyone bother to consider how readers and editors in countries bordering the U.S. would respond to the inclusion of part(s) of their country as a U.S. region? (For instance, the inclusion of the {{USRegions}} template in the
979:. This message is an attempt to jumpstart lagging discussion, talk page posts on WikiProject pages which have tagged the article went unnoticed as the three projects are less than active at this juncture. Thanks ahead of time.
1069:
287:. It is a rambling, incoherent, unwikified, borderline pov borderline original research article. This was once a Good Article, and a Featured Article Candidate. Not anymore. I would like to ask anyone who knows more about the
880:
725:
as the source. (Actually, it's much worse. Searching whitehouse.gov for text often works; searching the Bureau for a geographic name yields a slew of hits that can be very difficult to decipher for useful content.) Without a
1430:
1418:
1232:
479:
Conditional code to prevent the current page from showing up in the list (we won't die if we don't have this, but it might look funny without it). I may do this myself but would prefer it if someone else did
672:
anonymous) merely change a few digits or insert some into the larger numbers (rearranging the commas to make the numbers look reasonably formatted). I watch very few of these articles, so the frequency that
1729:(MCD) alone when, in reality, they do serve as both MCDs and incorporated places. CDPs in New England are less important than those elsewhere because of strong civic identity of residents with the town. --
976:
902:
to FA. I however have been editing the article in great chunks over the last few months and am in desperate need of fresh perspectives from other editors, in particular on style, grammar and prose.
879:
This list is the largest article on
Knowledge (XXG) (600k in size). To ensure centralised discussion on what to do with it, could any interested editors please discuss the issue over at the list's
547:. One would think that the individual is notable, but the single source in the article seems to be the only information about the subject that is available online. For more details, please see
1012:
110:
971:, while not tagged by this project probably falls within its scope. It is a current Featured article candidate, if anyone here has the time comments would be appreciated after reviewing the
1184:
1359:), but with incorrect subtitles (i.e. it labels it as an agency instead of a department), which my proposal will fix. I'd appreciate people reading the proposal and commenting on it at
909:. The article has over 100 references and is very close to FA, it just needs some finishing touches by other experienced editors. Thank you for your help! (Barnstars will be given!)
263:. However, it is argued ("Talk Page: Misnomer" and "Talk Page: Name of War = Name of Article") that the "Mexican War" is actually the most common name used to refer to that event.
1167:
1152:
734:
the infomation, so it will either be edited in ignorance (as I just did for
Fairfax County) or left with uncertain data, defeating the whole purpose of the demographics sections.
947:
81:
76:
71:
59:
334:
680:
changing the population of a city to a billion or so), which is not usually the case, it becomes impractical to know whether any such change is the prank or an attempt to
930:
I'll be sending out requests for interviews to the major candidates very soon, but I want your input, as people interested in
American politics: what should I ask them?
410:
projects. The first may attract general good biography researcher types, while the latter may attract some with specific expertise. Both are likely to be valuable.
185:
1262:' articles be within the purview of this WikiProject? They're currently orphaned in the vast see of regular biographies, and, if the fawning government-written
737:
Is there some effort, within or outside of this project, to replace these improper sourcing attempts with specific links to Census Bureau data for the specified
942:
937:
544:
537:
47:
17:
1390:
317:
1251:
Initially asked of the
Presidents subproject, but with no takers/no responses. The associated outstanding expert request has been in place since March
1192:
1004:
342:
236:. If you want to join our efforts, just hop into #wikipedia-spotlight on the irc.freenode.net network. If you need any help with this just ask me. ——
102:
407:
1360:
194:, a newly created project. We hope that the discussion will result in a more clean and organized way of explaining such relationships. Thank you.
367:
Just a quicky - Who should I direct an expert request over a First Lady to? You folk? The presidential subproject? A new subproject proposal?
1526:
the ranges are broken down into sub-sections of ten articles, so you work through them at twenty or thirty articles a day if you wish. To make
1221:
seems to be updated to the 2006 estimate but retains the 2000 official census citation. Either the citation or the number needs to be changed.
700:
a source by Knowledge (XXG) standards, because it gives no clue as to how to obtain the actual information. For example, follow the link from
1683:
1266:
is any indication, in dire need of attention. Also, pending an answer, I went ahead and set up an expert request for you folk on that Polk.
906:
190:
regarding bilateral relations between two countries. All articles related to foreign relations between countries are now under the scope of
1196:
1188:
1008:
1000:
798:
346:
338:
106:
98:
1356:
1037:
1033:
812:
448:
1479:
tagged and assessed; some are not military history articles at all. This huge project – working thorough 165,000 articles – is called
1349:
1319:
1305:
1025:
689:
1061:
1054:
856:
849:
543:
I invite any editors interested in American history, particularly those with access to print sources, to take a look at the article
452:
1166:
and for whom Ford legally changed his name has been nominated for deletion as being non-notable. You can make your comments at
1259:
1716:
Thanks for the clarification. However, what's the difference? If any CDP deserves to be redirected, all others do as well.
721:
paragraph is a bare link to the Census Bureau's home page, which is about as useful as quoting the U.S. President and citing
169:
249:
1088:
This article currently has issues that need to be addressed for it to keep its GA status. See the talk page for details.
1485:. To make it manageable, the list has been broken down into 330 ranges each of 500 articles. This is where youcan help.
1437:. I'm specifically going over all of the "Conflicts, battles and military exercises" articles. I have recently reviewed
758:. Factfinder frustrates me to no end (and it beats the . . . out of searching census.gov), but it's a handy way to find
622:
of the United States, but many are simply copied from government sources with little to no real editing. At least one,
496:
Its documentation explains how to add custom sections (e.g. a section for WikiProjects relating to stuff in that state.)
1399:
595:
Thank you for your suggestion ... I have added a note to the talk page of the American military history task force of
292:
1649:
Hey everyone, I thought some of you might be interested in a poll that's currently underway over a proposal to move
820:
38:
1283:
1191:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
1003:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
341:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
101:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to
1737:
1720:
1711:
1690:
1664:
1553:
1450:
1406:
1378:
1367:
1339:
1329:
1294:
1239:
1225:
1207:
1174:
1146:
1104:
1076:
1048:
1019:
983:
957:
913:
888:
869:
839:
782:
748:
656:
634:
605:
590:
557:
527:
510:
470:
397:
379:
357:
324:
302:
267:
204:
174:
125:
1097:
701:
225:
214:
1131:
291:, and about African-American culture in the US in general, to help restore this article to its former glory.
1725:
CDPs nominally exist in unincorporated areas. However, the Census Bureau classifies towns in New England as
1678:
738:
1394:
1375:
1335:
and then the agency template would call that. For non-agency pages, they could just use the more general
1082:
1041:
996:
989:
121:
94:
221:
210:
968:
866:
861:
414:
project is probably too general/"administrative" to be much help in this regard; a bit like turning to
259:
The current title for the page on the conflict between the United States and Mexico, 1846-1848, is the
1726:
1263:
1142:
623:
368:
260:
596:
568:
284:
1597:
1159:
1118:
1089:
1438:
1412:
1114:
1073:
651:
313:
288:
280:
273:
163:
1588:
1533:
1527:
1513:
1507:
1501:
1495:
1480:
1472:
1434:
972:
816:
415:
386:
975:
and comparing those to the article. You can see its entry and participate in the discussion at
1734:
1708:
1539:
1325:
to generalize it to handle more than just agencies. In a nutshell, it would move the code to
1171:
805:
601:
553:
114:
488:
459:. The eventual template should not be subst'd of course, or that would defeat the purpose. –
155:
1700:
1447:
1204:
769:
tab after the "Fact Sheet" loads, because the 2005 American Community Survey is the default.
582:
519:
502:
462:
429:
1426:
564:
419:
403:
371:
needs some work, but I'm not really sure where to start looking for the necessary sources.
191:
151:
146:
135:
1138:
980:
910:
843:
786:
745:
142:
131:
1415:
1065:
1217:
Just wondering what you guys used (guys meaning general population term, not males...)?
754:
Sorry I hadn't noticed this earlier. The U.S. Census data "highlights" are available at
1661:
237:
1606:
731:
1433:
to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the requirements of the
1364:
646:
483:
Deployment on all relevant pages after the above issues are solved. I am definitely
354:
159:
1730:
1717:
1704:
1687:
1674:
1287:
1267:
1016:
954:
899:
755:
627:
372:
264:
1236:
1222:
1163:
321:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
905:
The article is currently at Peer review and I would most welcome any comments!
614:
First ladies - Presidential project, members of metaproject, or new subproject?
1045:
836:
779:
742:
619:
391:
297:
1070:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act
830:
I'm not in a big hurry to move on this, so feedback is welcome before I do.
797:
The U.S. Regions project is on life support, so I'll raise this here and at
423:
1657:
You can see the archived discussion of a previous poll on that issue here:
1512:. Afterwards, as our way of thanking you, you'll be presented with service
1246:
First ladies - Your purview or should they go to the United States project?
1658:
1633:
1624:
1615:
1579:
1570:
1561:
1218:
563:
You'll almost certainly have more luck at the appropriate task forces of
1460:
1650:
1643:
884:
197:
476:
I've set up a skeletal template; has all the stock data in it. Needs:
875:
List of former members of the United States House of Representatives
977:
Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates/Rock Springs massacre
663::If this is not the place for this question, please let me know.
184:
I would like to invite you all to participate in a discussion at
1374:
would suggest the talk page of the template is a better venue.
948:
n:Wikinews:Story preparation/US 2008/Third Party or Independent
1654:
25:
1064:
recently achieved Good Article status. I've nominated it for
722:
312:
Hi there, I've decided to propose a new project dedicated to
1459:
1361:
Template talk:Infobox Government agency#Proposed new version
933:
Please go to any of these three pages, and add a question.
255:
Request for Comments: Mexican-American War vs. Mexican War
859:
is now up for GA. Please have a look if you can. Regards,
1185:
Separation of powers under the United States Constitution
1168:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gerald Rudolff Ford
1153:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Gerald Rudolff Ford
676:
see them makes me believe they are a regular occurrence.
154:, or better yet, if you find anything that needs fixing,
815:
because they appear to have been made to demonstrate a
712:- The United States Census Bureau's 2000 Census data. …
491:
and maybe a few others, but that's it. Not enough time!
233:
229:
823:. After which, the whole process is likely to repeat.
704:'s demographics "citation" and you get the following:
228:. Its now a fully fledged article.We started off with
943:
n:Wikinews:Story preparation/US 2008/Republican Party
938:
n:Wikinews:Story preparation/US 2008/Democratic Party
819:. Otherwise, the article will need to be merged with
335:
Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution
1659:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Georgia/Archive1#Poll
451:in all US wikiprojects need to be replaced with a
1655:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Georgia#Updated_Poll
898:Hi, I am trying to get the biography article of
756:http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html
1506:. The tagging is easy, just follow the simple
487:volunteering to do that part. I'll put it on
18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject United States
1522:based on the number of articles you process.
579:of it), we actually have very few members. –
455:, or it's going to just be a maintainability
8:
545:Thomas Pickering (Revolutionary War soldier)
538:Thomas Pickering (Revolutionary War soldier)
408:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject U.S. Presidents
696:where the information came from. This is
1684:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Vermont
1653:. The discussion is taking place here:
1315:Hi everyone. I just made a proposal at
907:Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/Bill Clinton
762:data by city/ town, county, or zip code.
232:. You guys can check out our changes at
1670:Redirection of census-designated places
1557:
158:and help out where you can. Thanks! --
618:There are articles for each and every
279:An anonymous user brought the article
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1532:a success, we need your help. Please
1385:Wikiproject American History Proposed
690:Knowledge (XXG):Geographic references
7:
919:Questions? Ask them through Wikinews
730:source, we cannot expect editors to
667:Unsourced demographics and vandalism
1357:United States Department of Defense
1235:is where the new number came from.
1038:Energy policy of the European Union
1034:Energy policy of the United Kingdom
1026:Energy policy of the United States
24:
1500:then keep track of your tally on
1311:to handle more than just agencies
1062:Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act
1055:Alaska Mental Health Enabling Act
857:Social class in the United States
850:Social class in the United States
799:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Canada
449:these "Related projects" sections
1677:is proposing the redirection of
1632:
1623:
1614:
1605:
1596:
1587:
1578:
1569:
1560:
1072:. Comments would be welcomed. –
453:Template:US-related WikiProjects
443:New template for all US projects
29:
1345:instead of the agency template
1117:was verifiably involved in the
1044:, for example. Any volunteers?
1295:17:00, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
1240:16:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
1226:16:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
1208:15:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
811:I am going to revert edits by
180:Bilateral relations discussion
1:
1738:20:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1721:20:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1712:20:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1691:20:15, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
1175:05:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
192:WikiProject Foreign relations
1665:20:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
1554:09:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
967:Hello everyone. The article
1451:03:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
1407:15:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
1379:04:12, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
1368:00:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
1147:15:04, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
1105:23:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
1077:22:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
1057:featured article nomination
765:Make sure you click on the
1758:
1389:Comments would be welcome
1274:05:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
1199:. Reviewers' concerns are
1049:01:22, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
1011:. Reviewers' concerns are
821:Northwestern United States
349:. Reviewers' concerns are
325:21:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
303:23:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
268:20:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
250:23:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
136:featured article candidate
109:. Reviewers' concerns are
90:Attack on Pearl Harbor FAR
1427:WikiProject Good Articles
1350:Infobox Government agency
1320:Infobox Government agency
1306:Infobox Government agency
1284:Talk:Sarah Childress Polk
1187:has been nominated for a
1137:Please come have a look.
1020:18:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
999:has been nominated for a
984:09:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
973:featured article criteria
958:14:56, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
914:23:12, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
889:16:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
793:Trans-Border U.S. Regions
723:http://www.whitehouse.gov
571:. Despite the breadth of
389:is another good place. --
337:has been nominated for a
205:18:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
175:16:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
126:20:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
97:has been nominated for a
870:19:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
840:18:25, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
783:04:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
749:15:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
739:Census Designated Places
702:Fairfax County, Virginia
657:00:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
635:07:49, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
606:05:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
591:20:52, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
558:20:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
536:Request for assistance:
528:12:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
511:03:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
471:00:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
398:16:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
380:15:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
358:07:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
308:Proposed new WikiProject
220:Howdy folks, we put the
209:
1189:featured article review
1001:featured article review
992:featured article review
549:the article's talk page
339:featured article review
285:Knowledge (XXG):Cleanup
226:Poor Richard's Almanack
215:Poor Richard's Almanack
99:featured article review
1474:Tag & Assess 2007?
1464:
1083:American popular music
1042:Energy policy of China
997:United States Congress
990:United States Congress
575:project (well, really
385:This is a good start.
145:has been nominated at
95:Attack on Pearl Harbor
1727:minor civil divisions
1529:Tag & Assess 2007
1482:Tag & Assess 2007
1463:
969:Rock Springs massacre
963:Rock Springs massacre
813:Anon IP 71.146.50.237
387:WikiProject Biography
316:. Leave you comments
42:of past discussions.
1264:Sarah Childress Polk
1213:Population standards
1122:arguments are "that
1110:Third opinion needed
1068:status - please see
624:Sarah Childress Polk
369:Sarah Childress Polk
283:to the attention of
261:Mexican-American War
1494:from the available
1160:Gerald Rudolff Ford
1119:Newburgh conspiracy
1503:participants' list
1465:
1439:American Civil War
1413:American Civil War
1258:Do and should the
1158:The biography for
1115:Alexander Hamilton
717:The "citation" to
640:US radio templates
330:12th Amendment FAR
314:Richmond, Virginia
289:Harlem Renaissance
281:Harlem Renaissance
274:Harlem Renaissance
1701:New England towns
1642:Proposal to move
1549:
1545:
1396:Corvus coronoides
1340:Infobox Govt Unit
1330:Infobox Govt Unit
1145:
953:Thanks, Nick –
806:Pacific Northwest
655:
172:
166:
87:
86:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1749:
1636:
1627:
1618:
1609:
1600:
1591:
1582:
1573:
1564:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1354:
1348:
1344:
1338:
1334:
1328:
1324:
1318:
1310:
1304:
1292:
1272:
1193:featured quality
1141:
1102:
1093:
1066:featured article
1005:featured quality
864:
649:
632:
585:
522:
505:
465:
432:
422:for help on the
394:
377:
343:featured quality
300:
295:
247:
242:
200:
170:
164:
118:
103:featured quality
68:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1757:
1756:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1672:
1647:
1637:
1628:
1619:
1610:
1601:
1592:
1583:
1574:
1565:
1540:
1538:now. Thanks. --
1477:
1458:
1425:As part of the
1423:
1421:review: On Hold
1404:
1387:
1352:
1346:
1342:
1336:
1332:
1326:
1322:
1316:
1313:
1308:
1302:
1288:
1268:
1248:
1215:
1182:
1156:
1139:Septentrionalis
1128:Founding Father
1112:
1098:
1091:
1086:
1059:
1029:
994:
965:
921:
896:
877:
862:
854:
795:
669:
642:
628:
616:
581:
541:
518:
501:
461:
445:
428:
426:article. :-) –
392:
373:
365:
332:
310:
298:
293:
277:
257:
243:
238:
218:
198:
182:
150:the article at
143:Plymouth Colony
139:
132:Plymouth Colony
116:
92:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1755:
1753:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1714:
1671:
1668:
1646:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1631:
1629:
1622:
1620:
1613:
1611:
1604:
1602:
1595:
1593:
1586:
1584:
1577:
1575:
1568:
1566:
1559:
1467:
1457:
1454:
1429:, we're doing
1422:
1410:
1400:
1386:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1312:
1299:
1255:
1254:
1252:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1214:
1211:
1181:
1178:
1155:
1150:
1134:respectively.
1132:WP:IDONTKNOWIT
1111:
1108:
1085:
1080:
1058:
1052:
1028:
1023:
993:
987:
964:
961:
951:
950:
945:
940:
920:
917:
895:
892:
876:
873:
853:
847:
794:
791:
790:
789:
776:
775:
771:
770:
763:
715:
714:
668:
665:
641:
638:
615:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
540:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
497:
494:
493:
492:
481:
444:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
364:
361:
331:
328:
309:
306:
276:
271:
256:
253:
217:
208:
181:
178:
138:
134:nominated for
129:
91:
88:
85:
84:
79:
74:
69:
62:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1754:
1739:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1723:
1722:
1719:
1715:
1713:
1710:
1706:
1702:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1692:
1689:
1685:
1680:
1676:
1669:
1667:
1666:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1645:
1641:
1635:
1630:
1626:
1621:
1617:
1612:
1608:
1603:
1599:
1594:
1590:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1572:
1567:
1563:
1558:
1556:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1537:
1536:
1531:
1530:
1525:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1511:
1510:
1505:
1504:
1499:
1498:
1493:
1492:adopt-a-range
1490:
1486:
1484:
1483:
1476:
1475:
1471:
1462:
1455:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1443:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1420:
1417:
1414:
1411:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1398:
1397:
1392:
1384:
1380:
1377:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1366:
1363:. Thanks, --
1362:
1358:
1351:
1341:
1331:
1321:
1307:
1301:Generalizing
1300:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1293:
1291:
1285:
1278:
1275:
1273:
1271:
1265:
1261:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1238:
1234:
1231:To help out,
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1186:
1179:
1177:
1176:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1135:
1133:
1129:
1126:be true of a
1125:
1120:
1116:
1109:
1107:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1095:
1094:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1078:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1050:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
991:
988:
986:
985:
982:
978:
974:
970:
962:
960:
959:
956:
949:
946:
944:
941:
939:
936:
935:
934:
931:
928:
924:
918:
916:
915:
912:
908:
903:
901:
893:
891:
890:
886:
882:
874:
872:
871:
868:
867:
865:
858:
851:
848:
846:
845:
841:
838:
834:
831:
828:
824:
822:
818:
814:
809:
807:
801:
800:
792:
788:
784:
781:
778:
777:
773:
772:
768:
764:
761:
757:
753:
752:
751:
750:
747:
744:
740:
735:
733:
729:
724:
720:
713:
711:
707:
706:
705:
703:
699:
695:
691:
685:
683:
677:
675:
666:
664:
662:
658:
653:
648:
639:
637:
636:
633:
631:
625:
621:
613:
607:
604:
603:
598:
594:
593:
592:
589:
586:
584:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:
560:
559:
556:
555:
551:. Thank you,
550:
546:
539:
535:
529:
526:
523:
521:
514:
513:
512:
509:
506:
504:
498:
495:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
475:
474:
473:
472:
469:
466:
464:
458:
454:
450:
442:
436:
433:
431:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
400:
399:
396:
395:
388:
384:
383:
382:
381:
378:
376:
370:
362:
360:
359:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
329:
327:
326:
323:
320:if you wish.
319:
315:
307:
305:
304:
301:
296:
290:
286:
282:
275:
272:
270:
269:
266:
262:
254:
252:
251:
248:
246:
241:
235:
231:
227:
223:
216:
212:
207:
206:
203:
202:
201:
193:
189:
188:
179:
177:
176:
173:
167:
161:
157:
153:
148:
144:
137:
133:
130:
128:
127:
123:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
89:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
67:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1675:User:Polaron
1673:
1648:
1541:
1534:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1514:
1509:instructions
1508:
1502:
1496:
1491:
1488:
1487:
1481:
1473:
1469:
1466:
1444:
1424:
1401:
1395:
1388:
1376:Orderinchaos
1314:
1289:
1280:
1276:
1269:
1260:First Ladies
1257:
1256:
1216:
1183:
1172:Americasroof
1157:
1136:
1127:
1123:
1113:
1099:
1090:
1087:
1060:
1030:
995:
966:
952:
932:
929:
925:
922:
904:
900:Bill Clinton
897:
894:Bill Clinton
878:
860:
855:
835:
832:
829:
825:
810:
802:
796:
766:
759:
736:
727:
718:
716:
709:
708:
697:
693:
692:that merely
686:
681:
678:
673:
670:
660:
643:
629:
617:
602:Black Falcon
600:
587:
580:
576:
572:
554:Black Falcon
552:
542:
524:
517:
507:
500:
484:
467:
460:
456:
446:
434:
427:
411:
390:
374:
366:
363:First Ladies
333:
311:
278:
258:
244:
239:
224:on the stub
219:
211:WP:SPOTLIGHT
196:
195:
186:
183:
141:The article
140:
93:
65:
43:
37:
1524:Remember...
1456:Please help
1448:Nehrams2020
1435:GA criteria
1205:RelHistBuff
1164:Gerald Ford
1162:who raised
688:section of
684:the prank.
583:SMcCandlish
520:SMcCandlish
503:SMcCandlish
463:SMcCandlish
430:SMcCandlish
418:instead of
187:this thread
36:This is an
1393:. Cheers,
1180:FAR notice
1143:PMAnderson
981:IvoShandor
911:LordHarris
852:up for GA!
808:article.)
620:First Lady
597:WP:MILHIST
569:WP:MILHIST
1662:Helvetica
1519:barnstars
1497:worklists
863:Signature
661:Addendum'
457:nightmare
424:nine-ball
234:this link
222:spotlight
82:Archive 5
77:Archive 4
72:Archive 3
66:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
1365:CapitalR
1219:Illinois
883:page. →
728:specific
694:explains
647:Smokizzy
416:WP:SPORT
406:and the
355:Marskell
213:work on
171:contribs
160:Jayron32
1731:Polaron
1718:Nyttend
1705:Polaron
1688:Nyttend
1651:Georgia
1644:Georgia
1535:sign up
1489:Just...
1290:MrZaius
1270:MrZaius
1017:Sdornan
955:Zanimum
923:Hello,
682:correct
630:MrZaius
588:‹(-¿-)›
577:because
525:‹(-¿-)›
508:‹(-¿-)›
489:WP:WPNM
468:‹(-¿-)›
447:All of
435:‹(-¿-)›
375:MrZaius
265:Kraken7
156:be bold
117:Georgia
39:archive
1515:awards
1431:sweeps
1419:sweeps
1237:Spryde
1223:Spryde
1130:" and
1074:ChrisO
746:(talk)
743:Jeff Q
732:verify
565:WP:BIO
420:WP:CUE
404:WP:BIO
402:Yeah,
322:Neldav
152:WP:FAC
147:WP:FAC
1548:AVIES
1468:What
1124:can't
1092:T Rex
1046:Gralo
837:X ile
817:point
780:X ile
393:Kimon
240:Eagle
115:Sandy
16:<
1735:Talk
1709:Talk
1703:. --
1544:OGER
1517:and
1402:talk
1391:here
1279:bump
1233:here
1203:. --
1201:here
1197:here
1100:talk
1013:here
1009:here
881:talk
844:Talk
787:Talk
767:2000
760:some
741:? ~
719:this
652:talk
573:this
567:and
412:This
351:here
347:here
318:here
299:ecis
230:this
165:talk
122:Talk
111:here
107:here
1686:.
1679:CDP
1036:or
833:.s
710:GR2
698:not
485:not
480:it.
245:101
1733:|
1707:|
1470:is
1446:--
1416:GA
1353:}}
1347:{{
1343:}}
1337:{{
1333:}}
1327:{{
1323:}}
1317:{{
1309:}}
1303:{{
1286:.
1277:**
1170:.
1096:|
1040:/
1015:.
887:–
885:AA
842:-
785:-
774:.s
645:--
499:—
353:.
199:Ed
124:)
113:.
1546:D
1542:R
674:I
659:'
654:)
650:(
294:A
168:|
162:|
120:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.