Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 21

1937:

willy-nilly application of the rule. The only reason I made the *small handful* of initial links was because after extensively reading through a very large number of reviews in the Wiki, I saw that it appears to be standard practice on reviews to have external links to outside review sites, and many of those links are to minor sites where the link will likely be broken in a few years when the site goes off line. From that stand point, it seemed that it would be logical to follow form and help out. I see now that it clearly is just a case where editors live with inconsistent application of this rule based on what is convenient to them. I'm not going to be a party to the problem by adding an other links like this. But, just like most everything in Knowledge (XXG), this is all a part of bigger issues that have nothing to do with the video game category, and takes away from the credibility of the service. In my mind, a comprehinsive article would link to *all* coverage no matter the size in an indesciminate manor, and it would likely do so via a tool like Archive.org rather than directly to external sites which will almost always change or fade with the passage of time. Until Knowledge (XXG) can consistently have true authorities on any given subject matter to help with articles, it really is just nothing more than the opinions of largely a bunch of high-school and college students who think they know everything running around pretending they have ownership of the site. I have faith that it will work out in the end which is why I'm trying to be involved myself, but the path down this road is a long one without a clear outcome.

3953:

featured extensive photos of every screen in a game as well as a full story run through and comprehensive strategies. Magazines had published strategy guides before this, but they were usually a limited feature within the greater whole of the magazine, and did not feature 100% of the game content. Publishers sued these new guide publishers under copyright, claiming that the complete reproduction of the contents of the game in book form was a copyright violation that both reproduced the content of the game but also damaged the value of the game in the market as they gave away all of the story elements, surprises, added value elements of a game, etc... The end result was Brady in an effort to protect their business model and avoid litigation approached publishers with the offer to pay them for exclusive rights, and to allow publishers to have input on the content. This pretty much put all of the competition out of business overnight and secured Brady's position also by giving them earlier access to games so that their guides could be developed in tandem with a game being printed nearly simultaneously to release. The lawsuits were not about using photographs of the games. The lawsuits were about photographing the ENTIRE game. ... I sure hope all of this has helped someone.

1058:

want, we offer information, and they either accept it or not. We have demonstrated that several times: we have prevented creation articles and image upload by anonymous users, we require login to edit semi protected articles, we can full protect articles for only administrators to modify, and even protect them so that not even administrators but only those working at the Office can modify. Now deleting articles is only for administrators, when this started anyone was able to delete articles. These are all modifications that were implemented, and that users accepted it. Those who did not, left. And from what I see, Knowledge (XXG) wasn't doomed. Nor it will if someday only a few amount of fair use images survive a general purge. Knowledge (XXG) has a clear goal established in the five pillars. That some users cannot comprehend is a different matter. --

3835:

to the new work, including the photograph! BUT NOT the content of the photograph. Copying the whole comic book would be like making a reproduction of a video game and that is theft. AND! People and locations are not copyrightable, BUT a photograph taken of a person or location IS copyrightable. With the exception of a location that has been altered to be a standalone piece of art such as the recent addition of lights to the Eiffel Tower. You now can not legally take a photo of the tower at night and publish it commercially because someone owns a copyright to the artistic representation of the structure... that's the gist, if you need more read

2293:

The right order? What is the right order? Are you saying this is the right order? #3: Doesn't this argument simply apply to the infobox argument? The release date information is there, it's just displayed in a different way. #4: The existence of article sections is a case-by-case situation, but their order is not. Video games are at heart, the same. Gameplay. Story. Development. Merchandise. Reception. It is up to the editor to decide the content of these sections and their subsections, but the order needs to be consistent through video game articles because they are all on the same "level". --

1009:, that fair use not only keeps us away from our goal of full freedom, but also makes us lazy, especially new users. People prefer to search Google and upload a tree image instead of going out and picturing one. And if such mentality is not changed, it will be even harder to do it as time passes. This discussion about fair use images would have been quite different had it been done four years ago, I am sure. The more we wait, the harder will be for the community to accept that Fair use is the exception, not the rule. That is one of the points of 2077:

the game itself was misspelled and the infromation on it was very basic. the storyline was also way to short even though the game it self was quite long. there are also plenty of games that i have seen that are in need of desprate help since they are old most people dont bother with them, however when someone wants to acctually read about them the information is very vage and almost non exsistant. you stated that there is a project like that already if possable how do i go about joining, and displaying that i am part of that project?

3290:

in question." That doesn't mean that if we have an article with several characters in it we can only illustrate one of them, it just means that we can't have a dozen pics of every character. One picture of each character should be fine--after all, it would be fine if the characters had their own articles, and there's not any significant difference between having their own articles and having their own sections in an aggregate article. At least, that's what I think. --

1784:, etc, but it is that way. There are few big sites and many small ones, and allowing a small one invites several other small ones to be inserted. And truly speaking, if all reviews of that site are like www.gamezero.com/team-0/final_word/snes/cybernator.html, then it adds very little to the article. I usually leave a small site review link if there is no big one there, but whenever someone begins adding a link to many articles, it raises spam alarms everywhere. -- 2135:

databases, however it can help when looking for published resources for reference. All articles were published at one time, although the demise of Games Domain has meant that the database (kept since 1994) is no longer available online. Please contact me via the "Talk" function on my User page for more info. Feel free to browse my User page and ask about the items I have listed. I cannot publish them in their entirety. Please keep requests succinct and precise.

31: 2903:

said page; I even got the page locked down to prevent warring. But, after the page protection came down, the user used his sockpuppet (which I KNOW is a sockpuppet: both have bad grammar and misspell words the exact same way, for one) to make the incorrect edits in the POV of its puppeteer. This incident is very stressful, partially because nothing has been done about it, as of now. I've had to archive the talk page

4200: 631:, it seems that there is a group of editors who feel that album covers can only be used in articles if the cover itself is specifically discussed in an article and should be removed in all other cases. Now, I am currently not aware of a single video game article where the cover is discussed in so we should follow this discussion if we don't want to see a mass deletion of video game covers in the near future. 829:, the album covers used to illustrate artists, screenshot galleries in articles about consoles, etc. I used to think like you, that images made Knowledge (XXG) better, but with time, I understood that was not necessarily true, and that one free image was much better than a full gallery of fair use ones. Of course, it takes time until the concept hits; for me it took over a year. So, talk to you in 2008. -- 803:

Should they be speedied? No, deletion should be selective, starting from the ones that are easier to replace, giving more time to those that are harder to come by. But in the end, the amount of fair use images should be limited, if at all, to very specific points, maybe only logos. Fair use makes us lazy; instead of taking our time to take a picture of a tree, we use one found in some internet page. --

1746:

authorities that can do mass-reverts. The fact a link is left does not necessarily equal approval of that link." This is not acceptable. Either external links to reviews are valid, or they are not. If you're going to strike "linkspam" then you better damn well strike all of it, or leave it alone if you can't be bothered with investigating if it is truly spam or not. Can we get a formal call on this?

3878:

character, then you have claims over the artistic element, but not the design. Since a screenshot keeps the same dimension as the original game, no, you don't own anything. If you take a picture, you are still at 2D, so you can claim nothing. You may claim artistic elements (light, camera angle, etc), but insignificant for our definition of freedom. You can get more information at

254:. I am not condoning copyright violations. Secondly, there is nothing wrong with a template, per se. Links can be made to copyright violated material just as easy without a template. If there is a copyright violation, the link should be removed, not the template. With the template it is possible to get a cross-ref of the linkage and remove them on a per-title basis. -- 1878:

enjoy and not even look for others -- why is that bad? Just because someone skips over one one violation and focuses on another does not grant it as a non-violation. Consider the proverbial speeding analody. A cop cannot pull over everyone who is speeding -- complaining you're going the same 15MPH over the limit as ten others will not make him tear up the ticket.

3868:

copyrighted photo can be made fair use in regards to something like an index (this is how Google's image search is protected). Most opinion says stay away from this space unless you feel you have really good reason to be going there. A direct photo of a photo is a copyright violation as it is a direct copy of the original copyrighted material ala photocopies.

5347:"People in the project should care about the articles" <--- Remember we're all volunteers, and certainly noone can monitor every page, nor have interest in everything the project encompasses. Bringing it up here is a good idea, but, if you think about it, why should we do it and not you? (not meant as an insult, just something to think about). 1842:

ones that had been reprinted to web from the print publication. Alot of the early print reviews were shorter as it was published one review on a page with a number of photos taking up a portion of the page. A good many of the 95' and later reviews were more akin to this in length -- www.gamezero.com/team-0/final_word/playstation/wipeout.html

4663:, I didn't see a stub category for pinball games at all, regardless whether for computer and video games or traditional pinball tables. If no one objects, I will just place the pinball computer and video game stubs in the simulation games category. The only other option is to create a pinball stub category. 3640:

having to be used as fair use anyways, it really doesn't where you get them. So yes, you are allowed to use other sites' screenshots (unless they're watermarked, as that's against our policy even for free images). You still have to link to the source too though. Final technical note, the screenshot owner has

3426:

There is no reason Knowledge (XXG) needs these cruft articles. Encyclopedia, not a fan's guide to every little detail on a game. A popular series doesn't justify the cruft articles at all either. Nothing's in your head, the guidelines shouldn't be changed just because people love to do these cruft articles.

3834:

These lawsuits related to Photographers taking photos of games. Not people copying their photos. My example is not flawed, you don't understand this issue clearly. And taking your example. IF, you scanned a limited portion of a comic and reproduced it as part of a larger work, then you have copyright

3801:

The scarcity argument is only valid (questionably) in regards to screen shots of games that can no longer ever be played to get a screen shot. For instance, X-Band menus, Sega Channel exclusive games, eventually some XBOX360 Live Arcade games, etc... If you can go buy the game and the system and take

2869:

No, if you're having a problem with a video game article that you cannot resolve on the talk page of that article then this is the right place to turn. Could you perhaps summarise what the core of the problem is, the talk page is rather long and doesn' seem very coherent. What is the information that

2808:

I implore anywone who will help me: the above article has experienced much edit warring over the past, and I've done a great deal to resolve the issues surrounding it, but recently, a user, Butterrum, who is a suspected sock puppet, has attempted to contaminate said article with information proven to

2208:

I believe there should be a consensus on the order of sections in articles. A lot of times I see many similarly-related articles with entirely different section orders. Here's what I propose as the standard. Note that "Gameplay" is first because (as stated in the name), it is a game. The sections are

2076:

Mostly PC games and old SNES games that were unreleased in the US and therefor forgotten. and basicly as a way to add more information to older games that just have; a story line and very crude information on characters and or races. a example of this would be Hegemonia which i just read. The name of

1891:

I was less concerned about "this article is this way, so why not that article?", and more with consistency within each article. There isn't any. This wasn't a question about an editor picking one article over another, it was about discriminating over links. And to the point about meta sites... That's

1820:

Let me tell you what I usually do: from time to time I catch a spammer, either because he edits an article in my watch list, or through #wikipedia-spam. At that moment, the most important thing is to warn and stop the spammer, and while reverting his edits, I may cross articles that have already many

1741:

This issue came to a head when after seeing the links on some game pages to sites like Moby, and DefunctGames, etc..., etc... I started adding links to reviews to a site that as been live for 12 years now, and all of the reviews are at the same URLs as they were when they went live (as a part of open

928:

Yeah, you're going to have a hard time convicing some people of that, it seems. But I was thinking, what COULD apply to free in game articles? I can't think of any image of normal retail games where any possible Free contend would even be available. The cover is fair use. Screen shots of the game are

716:

Knowledge (XXG) is built around those five pillars, like it or not. Check your browser's caption, it says "Knowledge (XXG), the 💕", not "Knowledge (XXG), the encyclopedia with fair use images" or "Knowledge (XXG), the visual encyclopedia". Free images or permission to use images can be obtained, but

4217:

I'm not talking about the template, I'm talking about the games in the template. Mario Party 2 all the way through Mario Party 8. I noticed some cleanup did happen, but an editor changed it back (with no discussion). It's not notable to list all the mini-games in each game, that's the issue here. MP

3538:

Oh yeah, it's definately much further along than start. It's probably actually 'Good' class if you ask me. But it needs to go through the process for that. And for future reference, the difference between stub, start, and B is so petty that most people don't really care if you go ahead and just rate

3338:

Well, I would say that if there is a specific section containing at least a paragraph of several sentences of text about the character, that would be okay. I do not think that it would be appropriate to do something like: "The characters are Bob the Sorcerer, Julie the Archer, Billy the Warrior, and

2554:

The Xenosaga lists were started by me as a way to merge the 60+ xenocruft articles (some written by me in my cruft days a year and a half ago) into a few. I've been planning on revamping that entire section, but it's on the backburner like lots of stuff. Don't put it on AFD yet; I'd rather implement

2502:

But is it really that notable to have a list of items and terms? Look at popular series: Zelda and Mario as examples. Neither have term or item lists (that I've seen at least). Enemy and character lists are fine, but when it comes to items... that's a game guide. Knowledge (XXG) isn't a game guide.

2169:

I did actually, and looked there, but it looked like one big table which I couldn't make heads of tails of (some entries were all pasted in one or another column of the table without being separated out, etc. Either that, or I just didn't know what I was doing, as that could very well be, I'm new to

1896:

strategy as well. Also more directly to your analogy about a cop which is farscicle given the nature of the medium we are applying it against. This is more like someone who thinks he is a cop sending in complaints to the police every time he get's a burr up his ass about something he feels is wrong,

1231:

The game I am writing an article on, has about twenty different enemies and about 15 different ammo pickups, would I be right in thinking someone would object to each enemy having a (highly cropped) screenshot showing just that enemy? like...next to the paragraph on the enemy is a picture of it from

1039:

The deletion of all fair use images would (obviously) result in the removal of almost every image in the CVG project. There's no getting around this. No massive contact effort will ever lead to worthwhile results. As I see it, there are two stances that can be taken (we all know that Knowledge (XXG)

475:

Changing a stylistic format that affects the entire project is not "minor" no matter how little code it takes to do. I think the fact that two people were quick to object shows that clearly enough. And I did look, but couldn't be bothered to rework the revert to incorperate what came after the color

212:

I must admit that I am impressed. I am firmly against the illegal use of emulation, and this site's hard work is a big step in the right direction. After reading through the site, I think that we should support it as well. However, perhaps we should only link to games that have been appoved (and not

5175:

Almost all the articles in that template are sloppy cluttered and cruft lists. I've done some cleanup on them, but they need alot of work still. I posted on this page about Tony Hawk a bit ago, but it seems like no one has fixed the articles much. I've never played any Tony Hawk game, so I wouldn't

4288:

Hey well i was trying to start a new prodject to help out with Older and more forgotten games however i dont even know how to start the project. Yes i have read all the guidelines and everything however one of the pages lead me to the spot were i can start the project they just give instructions on

3901:

There is no discussion that you own copyright of the object but not the content. The thumb of rule is used to prevent someone from uploading home-made pictures of album or book covers with a free license. As I said, if you take a picture, you can claim copyright in the artistic elements surrounding

3516:

article to this project, which is a great thing. However, I'm concerned about it being rated as merely 'start' class, one step up from a stub. Myself and a few other editors have worked hard on that article, and I personally feel that it's worthy of B-class status. It includes a lot of information,

3425:

Knowledge (XXG) isn't a game guide, yet people make cruft articles for items and so on. Item lists, term lists (including glossaries.. in my opinion), vehicle lists, weapon lists, etc... are all perfect examples of articles that don't belong here. They belong on video game wikis and fan sites only.

3289:

Well, I get that, but as I understood it, the use of an image to illustrate the subject, when a free alternative cannot be created, falls squarely under fair use--even Knowledge (XXG)'s very narrow definition of it. It specifically says that a limited number may be used to illustrate "the character

2902:

I've submitted a request for investigation, but nothing, as of now, has been done. Basically what is happening is that one, and only one, user (as of right now) is disagreeing with some of the issues that have been resolved on the page. I've done much work to try to clear up most of the issues with

2402:

on this in the guidelines. Admittingly, it needs an update to drop trivia and galleries, but that isn't a detailed, prescriptive "solution", particularly as regards order. I'd rather stick to merely suggesting what should go in each section, and leaving organization to individual articles' editors.

2354:

actually has guidelines for the section order. I don't want it as a "YOU MUST HAVE IT THIS WAY" guideline, simply as a basis for section order when in doubt, or when a consensus issue arises. I can easily see right here that this is not an agreeable issue, but I'm not trying to force some nazi-like

1737:

Hi, I've spent the last couple of weeks looking into this and I'm pretty disgusted at the arbitrary application of "linkspam" reversions in video game entries. It seems some of the more zealot wiki-cops pick and choose where to apply this rv, leaving entries to some sites while deleting others when

1579:

I was trying to point out how the Infobox can get very messy very quickly when a lot of repeat information is added to it. The same goes for categories. My view is that on the whole it should be the first year of release. There will be some special cases where special conditions will apply like the

1170:

Im about to write a bunch of (hopefully) long articles on a few megadrive games I own and have completed which have not got any articles. Any quick advice before i start the long but enjoyable task of writing articles, though I know theres lots of help pages out there for this, but, some short easy

870:

views at all, but am simply pointing out that your views are not consistent with policy. You obviously think the policy should be changed; that is your perogative, but here is not the place to debate that. Arguments used here must be based on current policy, not your desire for policy, or even that

782:

Am I reading this correctly Rey? You're using the five pillars to support the removal of all fair use images from Knowledge (XXG)? Is that what you're trying to say? That because Knowledge (XXG) values free content, fair use images are an abhorrent aberration, which should be speedied because my

5336:

is in need of help. I posted on the anime project talk page in the past about this: and they didn't even seem to care. People in the project should care about the articles, but whatever. The article has a mass of character and location lists that are just cluttered. A proper format is needed: but

4358:

identical spamlinks that lead to the same warez paysite posing as free abandonware, at a rate that I would guess to be once or twice a day. The spam comes from anon IPs used only once each and tracked all over the globe, which I'm told indicates an open proxy. The URL varies, but the format has so

3952:

For what it's worth... Background into the whole screenshot/lawsuit situation. This dates back to the early 1990's in the U.S. In the early days of 2-D SNES and Genesis games, several publishers (chiefly Brady Games) began publishing full stand-alone strategy guides for games. These guides usually

3933:

has confused alot of people. The "expanded rights" that UbiSoft has alotted to the Wiki are legally providing to photographers the ability to use screenshots outside of fair use. Technically, this allowance would allow you to photograph any UbiSoft game, and if you credited it correctly, you could

3891:

Please ReyBrujo, you are mudding the issue here and I think you have alot of this very confused. If you take a photograph of ANYTHING, you own the copyright to that photograph. BUT, you may not be able to use it any capacity depending on any restrictions bound to the content. The photographer does

3639:

You're wrong BcRIPster. The review sites don't own any copyrights to the screenshots they are taking. They are all under copyright of the developers/publishers of the games themselves, as screenshots count as derivative works. So, since all screenshots, taken ourselves or taken from others, end up

3307:

The character pics I were referring to where in a game article, and not on their own character list, so I don't really know what your particular situation is with that. I don't suppose it says anywhere says that many pics aren't allowed, except in the list of licenses that says you’re only allowed

3258:

Well if you look down a little bit there's a heated discussion about the use of fair use images, but it boils down to the fact that companies own the copyright of the game, in some cases the photographer owns certain aspects of the photo, and since we are using these photos without permission, the

2709:

The Mario item pages probably should go as well. Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't have detailed descriptions of in-game items. The Zelda list pages need to go in AFD, that's for sure. In response to Deckiller: combining articles into one isn't the route to go. Instead of many cruft articles, there is one

2292:

A personal attack? That's a bit of a sway from the truth, don't you think? I was just pointing out your hypocrisy. #1: Indeed, subsections do vary by game - if you'll see what I was trying to say, you can remove any of the sections and add subsections - it is simply the order I am focusing on. #2:

1914:

We need people to act like cops and patrol for link spam and vandalism. Adding links to your website is viewed as link spamming. Knowledge (XXG) is not a place to advertise. Please don't take your anger out on the Wikipedian that caught you. Reverting spam is an acceptable way of removing it. This

1831:

tag (as in {{external links|January 2007}}) so that the section is notified as troublesome. Thus I don't think he was approving those links, but instead he was just reverting your edits. Note that the rollback link administrators have make it unnecessary to check the article, so that (if he was an

1719:

I don't see why such info shouldn't be limited to the article itself (though it SHOULD be in the article). Final Fantasy I is not a 1994 videogame, even though Square released it and FFII on a cart that year. It's signicicant info, sure, but it's not nessesary to have it in the catagories as well.

1057:

Considering the articles about videogames are between those that abuse images the most, I have no doubts. However (and thinking you meant a "good" encyclopedia with fair use images instead of what you said) what our readers "would like" is not what we should do. We don't adjust to what our readers

222:

I've been following this debate, and although I don't have anything new to bring to the table, I do agree that SeizureDogs got the best approach. I mean if they have the permission, then there is no legal issue because it's in a white area, not a grey area like 'not being told they can't do it' is

178:

Wouldn't that be similar to post torrent links to full game downloads using the common disclaimer that "if the copyright holder complains, they remove the torrent"? The copyright holder does not need to complain in order for the "copyright violation" to exist, it is there as soon as you breach the

5265:

Does this need to exist? Imagine if we had timeline pages for every popular game: Knowledge (XXG) would be flooded. I certainly wont post on the talk page of it (since I know from past experience: most people will post that they want it left alone). In my opinion, it's better suited for a video

4299:

Didn't you post your idea before? What you want to do is covered under this WikiProject, a new one isn't needed. I doubt creating a new WikiProject will inspire people to find out more info on classic computer and video games. What is your WikiProject going to do that this one doesn't? Answer

3877:

Thumb of rule, to put it extremely simple: if your version has the same "dimension" of the original, no. If the original is 2D (a magazine, a picture, a game even if using "3D"), a picture continues to be 2D, thus you don't have copyright claims over it. If you create a 3D clay figure out of a 2D

3783:

SeisureDog, you are wrong and I strongly suggest you consult an attorney. The owner of copyright has been clearly defined in court cases. The ONLY exception to reuse of a copyrighted photograph without the consent of the photographer is when the photograph has significant historical value and the

3579:

To give an example to help clarify this, there is a website named 3DOToday (it's moved a few times). At the top of each page it had a pair of screen shots from various 3DO games. All of these photos were taken from Game Zero magazine website without permission. When I challenged the author of the

3308:

one screenshot of a game under fair use. That may be outdated and never recognized anymore, but the roots or such a rule seems to lie in the fact that lots of game screenshots (the license used for the Final Fantasy Pics) are bad. You could probably have a detailed fair use for each one saying we

1960:

There is so much crap on the net about Executable files, i dont know what to make of many myself. Anyone interested in populating this category? Millions of people whant to know what all these thousands of diffrnt files are that hang around in the Windows Task Manager and WP can tell them without

1841:

I see. That makes sense as well. So just out of curiosity, what does it take to become an editor in this capacity? I'm curious as I try to gage who is realy an editor around here. Also on your original comment on reviews on that site. They widely vary. The one you specified was one of the shorter

1738:

they are added. Is it or is it not appropriate to make external links to review sites to reviews of the games? This could even be qualified by say... the site has to have been live for "x" amount of time in order to help reduce the amount of links to transient sites. Or something to that effect.

969:

If you don't try, you will never know. As you say, everyone will just use fair use. That is why I am working on a new WikiProject whose task is to contact media outlets to request images for Wikimedia. 99% may turn the request down but, contrary to many, I am willing to fight for that 1% left. --

331:

I'm not sure if it's indicative of anything, but WP:CVG has seemed really quiet lately aside from two throwaway FACs. Anyway, I guess it would depend on the subject. It might be much easier to make star game articles than fix those daunting history articles up. But those are of top importance, so

5356:

I don't know much about the game, and I'm certainly no expert on making tables to format lists. The regular editors of the article (I'm assuming at least): should know about the game more and help, but they haven't. The second best place to try would be the anime project, but that failed before.

2665:

article. No clean-up will occur, it will get longer and longer and more and more cruft. In theory, I could take it to AFD as well - but what's the point, the SIG around Zelda will defeat it, even thought the article does not match (and will never match) the guidelines set down by the Video games

1877:

Actually, I believe general consensus is that each article is treated as its own entity. You can't say "but the other article has it!" or anything else of that nature. The admin is right. We're ALL volunteers here, noone HAS to do anything. If someone wants to edits a few articles on topics they

802:

Wikipedias like the German one had never used fair use images. Others like the French one have decided to remove all fair use images a couple of months ago. Why are we different? Yes, fair use should be removed from Knowledge (XXG) because it goes against the original concept of Knowledge (XXG).

2464:

can be drawn but not policy, per se. The order above is the most logical I've seen, and I structured my own articles after it. It flows very well, as it starts with real world, moves to fictional details, and ends with the powerful information on how the game fared commercially. You might add a

2003:

and moved items into them. Someone came along and re-added them to the licencesd category and now I don't know what has been sorted or not. So I need some help thinning it out and sorting items appropriately. This category is in fact a rather nice collection of games that should be in their own

1449:

Since I spend a lot of time just browsing the Wiki, I find lots of articles that fall under the scope of this project, but don't have the template, so I add the cvgproj thingie and assess the article. However, I was recently thinking... just how much good does this do? Just because I flagged an

2731:

That's not what I said - I said that I had contained the cruft two years ago as a temporary solution, and I've planned on completely redoing the Xenosaga pages for a couple months now. It's not even cleanup, it's starting fresh. The only reaosn I want to keep the article(s) is to preserve edit

3902:

it, but not the content. Since we are talking about screenshots here, and knowing the full game is copyrighted, a picture of the screen will always be copyrighted by the company, unless the company has released all rights, just what Ubisoft did. I guess you did not understood me correctly. --

2134:

I've listed on my User page the archive of gaming articles I presently have from the time I spent as editor at Games Domain. Those searching for reference citations may find what you are looking for in this large archive. The archive is only a small percentage of what Games Domain had in it's

1936:

I think if you read the other portion of this discussion above in an earlier subset of this topic that I do understand what happened, what the error was on my part, and I now understand how the rv was executed technically (a process I was unclear on until this event). My grievance is with the

952:

allow their content to be used like this. Everyone in the world just uses fair-use, so there is little incentive for them to do this, and for most media companies this simply goes inherently against their philosphy. There are some people who feel that it is better to damage the quality of the

2282:

A personal attack. Lovely. Anyways, #1: The subsections needed vary from game to game, so to try and pin that down is a bit pointless. #2: Most articles end up in the right order anyways. #3: If the information is there, the order doesn't matter too much. #4: The infobox is something that is

1745:

Anyways, a wiki-cop mass rv'd all of my additions as linkspam. When I challenged him about his arbitrary removal I was told "I do not have the time or inclination to go around cleaning up spam everywhere. When I notice blatant spam, I go and clean up as I see necessary, or pass on to higher

3867:

If you take a partial photograph of a screenshot or you take a photo of a larger work that contains the screenshot to reuse in a new work, then you are in a very grey area of copyright law, and could try to claim a new derivative work. For instance a thumbnail, or cropped reproduction of a

3963:

What's actually legal and what just gets sued over are entirely different things. We could use copyrighted material from all over the place and not hear very many complaints if we wanted to, but Knowledge (XXG) wants to be all noble and be as free and legal as they can possibly be. Silly

1309:

I used to have a link to a nice little website where you could plug info into some field and the Wikicode for a stub article was put out, but I've since lost it. Does anyone happen to know what I'm talking about? Should be put in an external links section on the project page, it was

1772:. Since they cover most of the reviews around, it prevents reviews from being used directly in articles. It is not as much spam as it is unnecessary. If there is a big renowned site offering content, there is no need for having smaller ones there. Yes, it sounds like we prioritize 160:

try very hard to collect the permission to each and every copyright holder and the games in question may also very well be there in agreement with the copyright holder. Games which have been requested removed have been removed and will be so in the future if requested, typically

5378:

Sorry I forgot you did make those list pages. Moving the problem isn't the complete solution though. Regular editors of the article don't seem to want change either, which is also an issue in this case. The page can't be fixed, if people don't want to accept there is a problem.

3580:

site about it his response was that he personally did not steal the photos, he had picked them up from around the web so he didn't know where they came from. It doesn't matter, it's still a copyright violation and he would not legaly be able to give consent to use those images.

2732:

history and keep the regular editors to those pages interested in helping out; deleting the entries will deter their interest, from my personal experience. And they are editing in good faith; they are just misguided. But, like I said on the AfD page, it's on a lengthy queue. —

3812:

Originally, most of the computer industry assumed that only the program's underlying instructions were protected under copyright law but, beginning in the early 1980s, a series of lawsuits involving the video screens of game programs extended protections to the appearance of

4461:

I think the 'in development' tag is acceptable enough. The tag is used to notify readers that the content might be speculative and will change drastically, something that makes your tag redundant. Readers don't need a giant tag informing them the game is being localized.

2907:

because of how I've tried to convince him why he was incorrect; the only reason why I've tried so hard is because I felt, if I didn't convince him, he would cause problems for the article, which he has done. You can contact me later for more information on this subject.

3818:

Your example is flawed though, as people and locations aren't copyrightable. The issue changes completely when you're talking about taking images of copyrighted works. By your logic, I could scan a comic book and claim copyright just because I took the pictures of it.

838:

You no longer think that "images make Knowledge (XXG) better"? If that's the sort of conclusion it takes you a year to form, then try stopping thinking. Fair Use images do make Knowledge (XXG) better in many cases, you'd prefer to describe the look/graphics of

112:

I noticed that this user has added an external link to the WOS website to very many pages in the past few days. It looks like a spammer to me, but I am not qualified to judge. So I am leaving a message here for the WikiProject to investigate and decide. Cheers!

2420:

Question: Outside of a preference for consistency, is there a problem that this standard solves? I'm all for standards if it solves a problem, but I see no problem that section layout solves. It seems to me that section layout is more of a per article issue.

1651:

If we're going to look at consistency, about half our FAs list 2+ years: most of the FF/etc games, Donkey Kong, and MGS3. The rest do not. In the interests of not making more work than we need to, I'm willing to call that "No Consensus" and leave them as-is.

953:

encyclopedia so that they can forward their moral crusade. Get used to it, it's as old as the free-software/open-source split. It's basically the same thing as Debian saying they won't ship Firefox because the name is trademarked... Ahhhh... fundamentalists.

2333:: "Of course, out-of-universe information needs context; details of creation, development, etc. are more helpful if the reader understands a fictional element's role in its own milieu." To perhaps put too fine a point on it, it makes sense to talk about the 4693:. Then "computer game" would have a separate article. He wants to correct the use of the term "video game" to "a game that uses a video device as its primary form of feedback," which includes computer games, console games, arcade games, etc. I, for one, 3408:

I think there is a bit of a mismatch between the guidelines presented by this project and what's happening on the ground. Do we need to rethink how we are doing articles? or adjust the guidelines? or maybe everything's just fine and it's all in my head.

5491:

up for peer review, but progress on its review has been very slow as of late. So I thought I'd just advertise it here. This is of importance to those working on the Mega Man articles, specifically the Mega Man Zero articles. Anyway, thanks in advance.

3554:

Is it alright to snatch a screenshot from a review site or such, and upload it (provided there are no watermarks and such)? I've found a couple that show exactly what I need, and I'd rather not install the game just to take a couple of screenshots...

1525:

Consider: releases in different countries, re-releases, special editions, ports, enchanced ports (that don't have seperate articles), games of the same name that are functionally different (think any handheld version of a game based off a movie), and

5289:

It was in AFD before, I don't know how to do nominate it for a second time. Usually when I try it, it messes up... and someone fixes it (yet doesn't tell me the correct way to do it). So if anyone could put it in AFD for me, it would be appreciated.

2052:

I want to start a project here for older outdated video games that are somewhat forgotten. How do i go around getting such a project started?? and after its started how do i go around placeing the ad that says im part of the prodject on my profile??

4726:

I came across this today and it has a huge story and huge "historical accuracy" sections. Hardly anything on gameplay and so on. If anyone has played the game (or knows enough about it), could you condense the sections and add more about gameplay?

1821:

inappropriate external links. However, my first priority is to stop him from continuing adding links, and more often than not, I forget to come back to those articles. If you believe an article has excessive amount of external links, you can add a

2601:. All should be in AFD in my opinion. Why do people make articles like those? Item lists are cruft, and should be on video game Wikis only. If these cruft articles exist for Zelda, I wouldn't be surprised if there is Mario and other ones as well. 3357:

What is important here, I think, is to remember that we have been told repeatedly not to try to anticipate legal trouble. The foundation has lawyers to deal with legal situations, and all we are meant to do is follow the guidelines as they are

2328:

de-featured for "not following WP:CVG guidelines" just because its sections are in a different order and it's too much work to try and shoehorn it into said order, but I digress. Near as I can tell the only consistency in order is already in

979:

Well that's definitely a good idea. It's the first time I've heard of a concerted effort to proactively do something about this by creating an alternative, rather than just saying "delete them all". Now, I spend ages myself going through CC

449:

I just reverted the edit. It was made solely on the personal preference of one user, and was very incorrectly tagged as "minor". We should keep the color as is. Any other color clashes with any other templates that may happen to be on the

4228:

You are in the right. I'm deleting those lists right now. If the editor reverts again, you'll want to find an admin to help out. Those articles certainly shouldn't have lists. Have you left a message on the user's talk page or anything?

3565:

No, any photos published on another website will likely be copyrighted to the publisher even if they have not been watermarked. If you would like to first get a written release from the publisher of the website for the photo (or photos)

202:

shows who they have contacted or tried to contact and whether that person/company have given their permission for the files to stay. I'm sure you'll agree, this puts them far higher up the moral ladder than your average torrent site. -

1810:

It was an improper digression and I even acknoldged that to the person doing the rv. My issue was with his indescrimate nature of leaving many other clear linkspams of the exact same nature on the very pages he went out of his way to

1601:

version was probably too extreme, but I do wonder about things such as the mentioned enhanced ports. Another problem: do articles that cover a series of games that don't have individual articles get the categories instead? Currently,

3468:

By me - it's a pretty clear breach of WP:NOT in three ways - it's purely a list of external links, it's a directory, and it's exists solely to describe the nature of those sites (that they are suitable for the playstation portable).

736:

No, you contact the copyright holders and request them permission. Besides, contrary to an album, where you can only get an image of the cover, in a game article you can put a screenshot of the game instead of the game cover. --

5407:

I cleaned it up. I would like to hear opinions about which one is better, because there are a bunch of people (me included) that think the old version was abusive and others who think the old version was perfect. Thank you. --

3520:

I think it needs to be reassessed. If it still feels like a 'start class' article to whoever else looks at it, I would like to know why and what needs to be done to upgrade it. While I would never claim ownership of an article

1349:

The whole thing is written in javascript, so you can select "view source" and that is all there is to the program. You can save it to your computer and edit it any way you like. If you do make some improvements you should let

4248:

I'm not 100% sure if this would violate any gamecruft rules, but maybe to settle this, we can create seperate articles for lists of mini-games. (i.e."List of MArio Party 2 Minigames", "List of Mario Party 3 minigames", etc.)

1006: 988:, so I definitely appreciate what you're doing. I'll keep an eye on your proposal and see if I can help out in some way. We should certainly be promoting more freedom, just not in a way that pisses of half of the community. 3892:

not own copyright to the content of the photo. You own the photograph, NOT the content. I know this is a very confusing subject for nearly everyone, and I appologize that this has had to become such a dwawn out discussion.

656:'s face. Nowhere is his appearance discussed. Let's delete all images of Syd Barrett." Album covers are as important recognising features to an Album, as a photo is of a person. You don't have to write a commentary on 3517:

much of which has footnotes and references - there are no 'citation needed' tags, and no need for any. It clearly sets out what the magazine was about, the kind of content it included, and what happened after it folded.

1853:

You're looking at this in the wrong way: the editor who removed the link to your site was doing so in accordance with Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines and so was improving the site. Criticising him/her for not doing more is

4238:

The same editor has re-added the lists. Now I'm going to leave a message on his talk page, and if he continues this blatant cruft re-adding, I will go to an admin. It's not notable to list each and every mini-game.

2435:

It was intended to be an aide to people whenever there is an argument over what order to have sections in a certain article. Of course it should be a case-by-case basis, but do you not consider the rules in an AfD?

2364:

Given that the whole project covers articles of significantly more variance than WP:FF, I still object on those grounds even if my example isn't spot on. In the interests of replacing a bad example with a good one,

726:

How would you go about obtaining free images of game covers? Would a picture of a box (rather than the simply normal psuedo-scans that are always passed around) be considered free? Otherwise, you pretty much can't.

3770:

Ignore the licensing drop down menu (as you've already included the {{game-screenshot}} tag) and upload the image. Also, you can have more rationale than this, but those are really the only two things you have to

2820: 2399: 2379: 1182: 365: 303: 291: 2809:

be incorrect. Butterrum's puppeteer was also involved somewhat in the previous edit warring. I ask the help of any users who will help me resolve this issue. You can contact me for more details on the subject.

1892:

fine, but this is clearly not the majority of links to external gaming sites. If all articles consistently linked to proven metasites, then I think that would be a very useful thing. Although I do also like the

1274:. I recently overhauled it and it was promoted to GA. Screenshots of each enemy would be overkill and look unprofessional. Also, don't try and list each weapon/enemy. Here is the article before I worked on it: 1004:

While I agree fair use images should be deleted, I don't agree with the way the massive deletions are being done, and I thought I had made that clear in previous discussions. But it is true as Jimbo said at

522:) to the cvgproj tag. That way, those who want the tag to appear in different colors can customize the look in their own CSS files, while the default remains to conform with the other talk page templates. — 4339:

So when can i see the names on the list to be present on the to do list?? please dont tell me I am going to have to do it by my self that is the reason i proposed that new prodject for such games that were

4471:

Articles rarely get very big before they're translated anyways. And even if they did, most characters keep the same names. The impact of localization on an article isn't big enough to warrent a template.--

3026:

Hey I was looking around and I found something else that concerned me. What's the call with having tiny pics of every character in a game? The reason I bring this up is a new editor has been doing this to

198:

The torrent analogy is not a fair one. World of Spectrum actively contact publishers and copyright holders to get their permission, and most do give permission for the files to stay on the site. This page

5276:

Not every popular game's sequels take place in, almost, random different periods of time like the GTA games do, but, if it should be AfD'd, I feel it should be on lack of sources, rather than content. ♣

5368:

If by "didn't seem to care" you mean "didn't seem to want to have to redo things that were reverted", then sure, nobody cared. I put the lists into their own article and they were just merged back in. I

880:

Pak21, if the current policy were applied in full force, only 1/10th of the current fair use images would stay. Fair use must be the exception, not the rule, which is something many don't understand. --

306:. I think having a collaboration once every fortnight is better than every week since there is likely to be more work which will go into these articles than in a typical GCOTW. Only articles that are 1450:

article with the tag doesn't mean anyone will look at it (at least not anyone who didn't already plan on looking at it). So, is what I'm doing worthwhile at all, or should I just stop... thoughts? --

3612:

states (so Game Zero magazine is using the images under fair use from the game developer just like the guy who "stole" the screenshots). We can use these screenshots on Knowledge (XXG) as fair use.

2532:

like that when they are needed to help keep the article, yet adding them in mainspace would give it way too much length. Similar to how some articles have daughter arictles of character lists, etc.

3628:

A photograph taken by a photographer is copyrighted by the photographer. The contents of the photograph are not however and they remain copyright to the creator of the content. You are wrong.

1801:

says "You should avoid linking to a website that you own, maintain or represent, even if the guidelines otherwise imply that it should be linked." What reason do you have for ignoring this? --

754:. The only way the game covers could be free would be if the copyright owners gave up certain parts of their rights to make it GNU or CC compatable, which has no chance in hell of happening.-- 5466:

I know it sounds trivial, but the involved editors are deadlocked after extended discussion, and we have not been able to identify a policy or guideline that clearly applies. Please comment

4618:

describes a pinball videogame for the Turbografix-16. There is neither a pinball stub category, nor a Turbografix-16 stub category, so in which category would a stub such as this be placed?

3570:

that site is the original source of the photos... Then you need to post that notice with the photos showing they have been turned over to the public domain. At that point they are fair game.

578: 298:

that was proposed but that never got off the ground. For the GCOTW only stubs can be nominated and they don't have to be "core" topics. I was thinking we should try to start something like

295: 2937:

As for the "incorrect information," what I meant is the information that the puppet was adding was proven to be erroneous in the earlier stated discussions, yet he persisted to add it.

2369:

puts plot before gameplay due to the near-entirety of the game's plot consisting of why you happen to be rolling stuff up into a ball. The raison d'être, if you will, for the gameplay.

3934:

print out the photograph as a poster and sell it without risk of legal repercussions. This has absolutely no barring on our what we are talking about and the usages we are discussing.

2350:

Considering the way I set out the sections actually complies with Final Fantasy X (even the "Versions and merchandise" section), that won't be happening any time soon. Funnily enough,

4567: 341:

Me, I've just been working on the last thousand or so articles that still need to be rated. I want to get it out of the way so it can be put in the good old "Done for now" category.

3525:, and such), I was the person who created it and I have a large number of edits, including an almost complete rewrite during the summer, and I feel it's better than just a 'start'. 648:

I think Geni is just bored, or trying to push through his own personal crusade. It's ridiculous. Here is what I posted onto both the respective pages, what do you guys think? -

4749:

be used for the screenshots. It's lossless and works well with pallets. We would be able to keep the screenshots at the original size with no loss of information or fuzziness of

1206:

Thanks very much, theres at least 5 articles I am about to write, hopefully to a good standard, I have played them all to death so I know them inside out, thanks for the links:)

397:

one. These workgroups are a good idea for when the whole structure of a new WikiProject with all the bells and whistles attached to it just add too much unnecessary bureaucracy.

3086:

I took care of the of Crystalis, but it what is the temp tag for deleting images? Also, if I see this again, is it sort of group consensus to get rid most of them, if not all?--

2254:

Does anyone have any disagreements or suggestions? The only thing I am not sure about myself is the "Merchandise" section, it could be placed after the "Reception" section. --

97: 89: 84: 72: 67: 59: 2112:

to see if anyone is interested in your idea. If nobody is, then you can personally work on improving forgotten games, and come here for dissucsion, instead of a subproject.--

4313:

I agree with Frecklefoot, a new project isn't needed. Just post what games you want to help improve, and others will help out. Projects of broad scopes don't need to exist.

560:

Moving the article guidelines to a seperate page was definitely a good idea. How about we also split off the all the different template stuff at the bottom into a new page?

1627:

which probably has gotten five or six releases), so I don't see any reason to do anything but the original, unless it's a full-on remake that doesn't have its own article.

4533:

The template doesn't look that notable anyway, seeing as how the things in it aren't very related to each other. Useless templates should be removed from Knowledge (XXG).

459:

What could be more minor than changing two RGB codes? Also, next time you revert, please look what other changes have been made besides the one you decide you don't like.

5209: 5186:

Shame on you for never playing a Tony Hawk game. Go pick one of the older ones up. They sell quite cheaply. But yeah, they do need to be cleaned up. I might work on the

3484:

I've gone one step further and tagged it as CSD A3: "Any article consisting only of links elsewhere". Edit: and it's been deleted. That was nice and quick :-) Cheers --

2088: 1684:

I am for each year a significant edition comes out, specifically per: platform release and country release. Patches, mods, million selllers do not count in my opinion.

439:

Ugh, please choose another color. That one makes me think the talk page has been prodded or sent to AFD :-P Seriously, there are much better colors than _that_ one. --

4571: 2493:

Eh, it's iffy. It's harder to want to delete lists rather than single articles as at least they group a bunch of topics that couldn't stand on their own together. --

2483:

A list of items and terms from a game, seems like a game guide article to me. Should an AFD be put on it? Put articles like this one on a video game Wiki, not here.

4330:

and all the games in red i want to have a article for each and every last one of them. like i was saying they were once games and they should be improved and added

2378:

I don' think that anyone is saying that this should be a policy that must be enforced in every article. Still, I see no harm in adding something about this to the

4650:

I think a pinball stub could be created, since there is many pinball articles that are stubs. If I knew how to make the stub (or suggest it somewhere), I would.

929:

also (supposedly, I don't buy it, honestly, unless it's a title scree or cut scene). So what's left? Hell, how did FFX and Katamari get to be featured articles?

5101: 2066:

Hi Maverick423. Out of interest, which games in particular would you want to add to such a project? Many retro games are already part of the CVG wikiproject. --

3050:

Remove them, tag them with a deletion tag (usually orphaned fair use), and tell the user don't upload images for the sake of decoration, as it contradicts our

1999:

is having a CfD and looks like it will be deleted. However before this happens I'd to do some sorting on it. What happened was that I created a whole bunch of

1460:

I think the basic point is so that, if there's issues with the article, there's an easy link to here to come mention it to others interested in such articles.

179:

EULA, which usually forbids you to redistribute the full version of the game. I haven't checked the site (noticed the user adding templates, though, but sent

1434:

added to your watchlist to find out future updates, or I guess just be pleasantly surprised when you notice the cvgibmaker.html page has suddenly changed. --

652:

I've not yet cycled through the above text and related issues. But straight away this strikes me as an argument such as "There is no critical commentary on

4274:

No. Please no lists. WP:NOT an indiscrimnate collection of information. Cruft isn't a reason for deletion or removal, but indisriminate information is.

3602:

No actually that is not correct. The copyright of the screenshot is not owned by the person who took the screenshot, but by the developer of the game, as

3031:. I don't think this is okay, but I don't want to scare away a new editor who looks like he wants to help. What's the call? The last place I saw this was 299: 294:

page for a long time but other than just listing them we haven't really made a concerted effort to push these articles to at least GA status. There was a

1623:

Looking at album articles, it looks as if they pretty much only use the original release date, no matter how many releases they got (even something like

1417:

Yes, the generator needs some updating, I'll try to get around to it this Monday. In the mean time, anyone with suggestions, comments, feel free to post

4804:

Sounds great to me. Should probably be put on the project page or somewhere for those less aware of the advantages of each type of image file format. --

4780: 4428:

Since I haven't seen one yet, is there a template to notify readers that a game is being translated? If not, I created a test-template in my userspace (

3312:

this picture to show what this dude looks like, so we're bending the rules, but it looks like you didn't do that either. I dunno man, what's your say?--

2177: 2150:? It's where others list the sources they have access to, so you can just do a browser search on the page and find who has the information you need. - 2109: 1407:

The location code also generates the old North American, Europe etc code and also adds flags if you want. Needs changing to the agreed ISO format. -

4840: 2594: 1216:

Assuming that they'll be completely new articles, remember to add them to the new pages section of the main project page so we'll know about them. --

1150: 47: 17: 3244:

I was under the impression that the use of images to illustrate the subject of a section or article was encouraged. Why aren't images like those in

1996: 1915:

user was not checking each one of those articles for spam, but just clicking the "revert" button to remove your edits of self-promotion from them.

5300: 414: 390: 3784:

image can no longer be recreated by a new source. For instance a photo of a famous individual or a location that no longer exists. Please read:

2823:

were to be followed, it seems doubtful that this article would warrant inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), as it's more suitable for a gaming wiki. --

1252:

Ok..so how many do you reccomend throughout the article (wikipedia says 2 screenshots max but even of some featured articles this is exceeded)

394: 763:

As stated by Jacoplane, Ubisoft gave permission to use screenshots taken by users of their games. No fair use, but full permission, otherwise

4000: 1010: 307: 2765:

I'm not sure what the point would be - the special interest groups would turn up on mass and defeat any attempt to remove their material. --

311: 5467: 5441: 3339:

Jimbo the Level 30 Arch-Mage" and then show pictures of them without further comment. Or so is my understanding of the fair use guidelines.

3179: 3148: 697:

You could say getting rid of all Fair Use on Knowledge (XXG) is on of Knowledge (XXG)'s five pillars. Heck IAR is five pillars, sheesh. -

624: 3848:

Fine. Let's use your logic. I'll take a screenshot of a screenshot of a videogame. I get new copyright, yay! Counterpoint that please.--

3245: 3063: 2189: 1259:

As many as is necessary, but no more. Try to use pictures in making a point, as opposed to merely cataloging and illustrating the game.

3685:

Alright, great, even better! I was also wondering, would one of you be kind enough to walk me through uploading an image? For example,

2598: 2512: 2108:

Well if you are serious about creating a subproject (we already have 12, but that shouldn't stop you) you might want to consider going

1494: 1287: 169:). I have no knowledge of the user in question, but in many of the cases he has just replaced ordinary http links with a template. -- 5108: 4913: 4450: 251:

That's not what I'm saying. Firstly, my point was that there is a lot of content on WoS which is explicedly NOT in violation, eg.

4542:

On top of that, only 2 of the 5 items are in the domain of WPCVG. No tear will be shed over the loss of this template at WPCVG. —

3133:

That bot is defunct. Just add {{subst:orfud}} to the image's description and an admin will happily delete it for you in a week. -

4792: 2273:

I'm sure you thought the same when you nominated the abolishment of subscript release dates in video game infoboxes. Oh, wait. --

5452: 5236: 5087: 4922: 4587: 3201: 2028: 1541: 1290:. Also, when images for multiple characters, etc, are needed, try your best to get a group shot. That's usually the best way.-- 985: 146: 2801: 2661:

work, it never works - the Special Interest Groups are just ingrated on wikipedia for the clean-up tag approach to work. Take

4984: 585: 5259: 4659:

I have also seen several pinball stubs. I would consider them more of simulation games than sports games. After reviewing

4326:

Ok dont worry bout Haegemonia i will add as much as i can to it as for the other games that need info well go and check the

3051: 4929: 3442: 1832:

admin and rolled your edits back) he may have not been aware of those articles being polluted with many external links. --

5392: 4833: 4758: 4698: 2676: 2576: 3699: 236:. (Disclaimer: I am one of the secondary maintainers of WoS, and so will take no real part in this discussion). Cheers -- 2283:

consistant throughout all vg articles and not a case by case situation. Therefor, there are guidelines for its useage.--

1706: 1585: 661: 4945: 4574:

due to its bad faith implications on the part of the nom. Commentary of the members of this WikiProject is requested.

4386: 3229: 1661:

I think it's in the CVG's best interest to set a guideline from this moment on. We can fix the other articles later.

1490: 595: 5337:

not new pages. That was tried in the past, and the regular editors of the article just re-added the content anyway.

5094: 5037: 4977: 4970: 4906: 4289:

what to do after you start your project but not instructions on how to acctually start one. can any one help me out?

5488: 5304: 5176:

know what else to do. Some lists should stay I suppose, but they need some kind of format... not just a long list.

4429: 4138: 3644:

38: 2962:

Lately I've been seeing a lot of linkspam popping up all over the place, and I didn't know if I should get rid of

764: 628: 5208:

The article above is currently being considered for deletion. Please feel free to take part in the discussion at

5002: 4952: 4892: 4885: 4878: 3993: 3930: 2790:

should be a Top priority article rather than High. After all, Cvilization and Mario are both Top class priority.

2590: 2476: 1760:

entry for the game should be posted, and all external links put there. If not, a link to a meta review site like

1624: 942: 4436: 3836: 3589:

I had a feeling that's how it is. Thanks! (For the record, I was thinking of getting a couple of screenies from

1588:

to the DS but on the whole my opinion is that one date will suffice and the extra info can go in the article. -

252: 5496: 5477: 5429: 5412: 5383: 5373: 5361: 5351: 5341: 5294: 5284: 5270: 5250: 5241: 5216: 5194: 5180: 5080: 4899: 4826: 4808: 4796: 4731: 4713: 4686: 4667: 4660: 4654: 4645: 4622: 4603: 4593: 4551: 4537: 4527: 4516:

is loosing the vote badly. You might think of putting some kind of project tagging on it ASAP. Best wishes. //

4475: 4466: 4455: 4415: 4402: 4344: 4334: 4317: 4308: 4293: 4278: 4262: 4253: 4243: 4233: 4222: 4184: 4170: 4054: 3968: 3957: 3938: 3906: 3896: 3886: 3872: 3852: 3843: 3823: 3806: 3796: 3775: 3693: 3676: 3663: 3648: 3632: 3606: 3597: 3584: 3574: 3559: 3543: 3532: 3497: 3488: 3473: 3459: 3449: 3430: 3419: 3389: 3364: 3321: 3294: 3280: 3252: 3236: 3223: 3208: 3184: 3175: 3159: 3144: 3128: 3114: 3095: 3081: 3058: 3044: 3013: 2998: 2989: 2975: 2941: 2912: 2864: 2847: 2838: 2827: 2813: 2794: 2769: 2746: 2714: 2699: 2662: 2648: 2625: 2605: 2583: 2569: 2545: 2536: 2519: 2507: 2497: 2487: 2469: 2449: 2440: 2430: 2407: 2373: 2359: 2345: 2309: 2297: 2287: 2277: 2268: 2258: 2193: 2164: 2139: 2121: 2099: 2081: 2070: 2060: 2038: 2011: 1985: 1965: 1954: 1941: 1919: 1901: 1882: 1866: 1846: 1836: 1815: 1805: 1788: 1750: 1724: 1714: 1691: 1674: 1665: 1656: 1645: 1638: 1631: 1610: 1592: 1574: 1565: 1548: 1530: 1507: 1477: 1464: 1454: 1438: 1425: 1411: 1393: 1344: 1314: 1294: 1281: 1263: 1246: 1236: 1220: 1210: 1175: 1157: 1140: 1110: 1100: 1062: 1052: 1030: 1017: 974: 933: 923: 902: 885: 875: 861: 833: 825:

Many images are not being used according to the policy. Those images can and must be deleted. Examples are the

820: 807: 797: 771: 758: 741: 731: 721: 711: 692: 683: 547: 530: 505: 480: 454: 443: 354: 345: 336: 271: 258: 240: 227: 217: 207: 193: 173: 151: 122: 4635: 2690:. Forgot it - the special interest groups (as a whole, not individual members) are not interested in clean-up. 263:

As you point out, links can be made without the template. A much better way to see what links would be to use

5187: 4871: 4614:

When I can, I help this project by sorting the CVG stubs into categories. Some are not easy... for example,

1370:

There were a few bugs I've found, you should edit the file on your computer if you want to use it. See here:

189:

to TFD and forgot about this one), but if it does so, the links must be removed and the template deleted. --

165:

have denied re-distribution of their software. Only reference material is available in such cases (e.g. for

4505: 2185: 1825: 751: 5223: 4374: 3686: 5073: 5044: 4938: 4719: 4560: 4177: 4131: 3317: 3276: 3219: 3124: 3091: 3040: 2971: 2710:

huge cruft article. Glossary articles (terms and so on) simply shouldn't have a place on Knowledge (XXG).

2117: 1270: 129: 133: 4710: 4446: 4305: 4250: 3385:

Well, I know I read just such a thing either on-wiki or on the ml, but I can't find it, so ignore it. --

2096: 2000: 1253: 1233: 1207: 1186: 1172: 156:

In all fairness, the games linked to are not necessarily in violation of copyright. The maintainers of

4496: 4359:

far not. So far, at least 138 links have been removed, seven URLs blacklisted and an eighth submitted.

3879: 3669: 2870:

has "proven to be incorrect"? Have you confirmed by checkuser that Butterrum is using socks abusively?

813: 1897:

and selectively issuing a citizen's arrest because "that guy made a u-turn in my neighbor's driveway".

5201: 4788: 4203: 3986: 2035: 2008: 1975: 1962: 1688: 1603: 1431: 1418: 581:. I was thinking that now that space is no longer such a concern we could list other infoboxes like 5314: 5232: 5009: 4581: 4547: 4463: 4156: 3717: 3619: 3165: 3134: 2877: 2791: 2742: 2644: 2565: 2445:

Does this actually happen often? Or are we trying to settle conflicts that haven't even happened?--

2437: 2426: 2389: 2356: 2294: 2274: 2255: 2022: 1380: 1361: 1331: 1196: 1027: 995: 960: 899: 638: 608: 567: 492: 476:

change. It didn't seem very important anyways; after all, you yourself tagged the edits as minor.--

466: 424: 404: 375: 321: 142: 106: 5278: 2938: 2909: 2861: 2835: 2810: 2678:

This follows under the remit of two of the Special Interest Groups and has been tagged since sept

2302: 1570:

Except that the "released" section is still the same...which is more of what I'm talking about. --

5493: 5247: 5213: 4628: 4522: 4412: 2398:

I think the way "consistency" has been bandied about lately is what concerns me. We already have

2181: 2171: 2136: 1371: 224: 132:. The site it links to distributes the games in violation of copyright, which is not allowed per 4367: 2147: 1119:

beta tester (and super-moderator of the Ambrosia boards), practically no plug-in for any of the

4701:

and cast your vote on the survey. Whether you're opposed to or in support of the move, please

1704:). I think it is important data, especially when the span between releases is significant (eg, 485:

Couldn't be bothered? If you can't be bothered to do something right, then don't do it at all.

5399:

So, I have been messing with this article lately. You can compare how the article looked like

5149: 4124: 3590: 3529: 3470: 3416: 3313: 3272: 3215: 3120: 3087: 3036: 2967: 2766: 2737: 2696: 2639: 2580: 2560: 2113: 1699: 1537: 1278: 816:

on the English Knowledge (XXG) (which is where we are) that fair use materials are allowed. --

157: 1597:

Which of course begs the question: What qualifies as a "special case"? I knew that including

916: 536: 5425:

while the old one didn't. The image caption could do with some sorting out though! Cheers --

5333: 5030: 4706: 4441: 4433: 4341: 4331: 4301: 4290: 2986: 2824: 2618: 2092: 2078: 2067: 2057: 1154: 1133: 1097: 1079: 660:'s face to be able to use a fair use photograph of him, just as we don't need to comment on 4487: 3707: 3703: 3689:

Or, failing that, a link explaining in detail all the steps needed. Must appreciated. :) --

3522: 2330: 1859: 1089: 717:

people are just too lazy to do that, and prefer to use the Fair use blanket everywhere. --

166: 5448: 5370: 5191: 5023: 5016: 4784: 4600: 4472: 4382: 4275: 3965: 3849: 3820: 3772: 3673: 3645: 3540: 3264: 3233: 3205: 3066:

and its ilk are also quite image-heavy. There are a couple other articles I have in mind (

2555:

my anticruft plan first so that I can use redirects and keep the edit histories intact. —

2516: 2494: 2446: 2366: 2325: 2284: 2265: 2032: 2005: 1761: 1685: 1671: 1662: 1642: 1607: 1571: 1527: 1390: 1341: 1311: 1291: 1129: 1107: 1048:

encyclopedia with fair-use images. Guess which stance most of our readers would take? ---

844: 840: 755: 502: 477: 451: 214: 114: 3445:

seems pretty vain and non-notable. Anyone else think it should be put up for deletion? -

2982: 2351: 1794: 200: 5246:

So I'm stupid. Belive me, that really isn't news. Thanks for the correction, though. :)

4491: 3214:

I tried to, but I think something went wrong. When it's working where does it show up?--

898:

You're out of your bloody mind, and I don't think making a good argument is worth it. --

664:'s iconic album art (although we probably should) in order to use it on Knowledge (XXG). 5309: 5227: 4682: 4575: 4543: 4258:

That would violate cruft rules. Simply put, massive lists like that don't belong here.

4163: 4117: 3954: 3935: 3893: 3869: 3840: 3803: 3793: 3712: 3660: 3629: 3614: 3581: 3571: 3386: 3361: 3291: 3260: 3249: 3104: 2872: 2844: 2734: 2636: 2557: 2422: 2384: 2018: 1938: 1898: 1893: 1843: 1812: 1757: 1747: 1711: 1375: 1356: 1326: 1191: 990: 955: 633: 603: 562: 487: 461: 419: 399: 370: 316: 137: 5422: 3228:

There are two other scripts that you have to copy over. You can copy the contents of

1093: 812:

While some may think the removal of all fair use images may be a laudable goal, it is

5409: 5380: 5358: 5338: 5291: 5267: 5177: 4805: 4742: 4728: 4664: 4651: 4619: 4534: 4518: 4327: 4314: 4240: 4219: 4110: 4103: 4096: 4089: 4082: 4075: 4068: 4061: 4037: 3903: 3883: 3789: 3513: 3494: 3446: 3427: 3268: 3156: 3072: 3055: 3010: 2711: 2610: 2602: 2504: 2484: 2161: 2151: 1982: 1833: 1785: 1769: 1435: 1422: 1351: 1059: 1014: 971: 882: 858: 848: 830: 804: 794: 784: 768: 738: 718: 708: 698: 689: 680: 670: 544: 527: 440: 190: 3656: 1992:

need help cleaning up Category:Computer and video games based on licensed properties

223:(unless of course we need permission from the website itself before we link to it!) 213:

just not disapproved) and make sure to mention that it is a legal ROM in the link.--

5474: 5348: 5115: 4849: 4762: 3815: 3100:

I believe if you simply remove them from the page a bot will come along and tag it

2533: 2466: 1879: 1721: 1697:

I would second this, while it will lead to some exhaustive lists of release dates (

1628: 1501: 1461: 1049: 930: 728: 629:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Fair use#Album covers having to be refered to in album article

333: 183: 2460:

Christ, this good suggestion turned sour for no damn reason. Anyhow, I agree that

783:

browser does not read "Knowledge (XXG), the encyclopedia with fair use images"? -

688:

In this case, his "personal crusade" is one of Knowledge (XXG)'s five pillars. --

4769:

and other 8 & 16 bit systems. For 32bit and beyond home consoles I recommend

4486:

You folks are in danger of having a hole in at least half a dozen articles as on

1971:

Not sure if this is the right place to request that. In any case, I have added a

1493:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

314:

would be viable candidates. Good idea or likely to be ignored like the Workshop?

4766: 4615: 4259: 4230: 4027: 4010: 3690: 3594: 3556: 3111: 3078: 3067: 2981:

Well, it's got content relevant to the article. How does it hold up against the

2622: 2614: 2404: 2370: 2342: 2306: 1916: 1653: 1581: 1545: 1474: 1451: 1321: 1260: 920: 657: 653: 342: 255: 170: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

3734:, select image, name image, and copy/paste the following into the summary box: 3232:

file. It shows up in the "toolbox" which is right underneath teh "search" bar.

2004:

series categories, so whatever help I can get towards that end would be great.

233: 5426: 5159: 4818: 4690: 4642: 4399: 4378: 3485: 3456: 2995: 1863: 1802: 1765: 1558: 1243: 1217: 1124: 872: 817: 351: 268: 237: 162: 5421:

better. Put simply, the new version conforms to the non-negotiable policy of

3802:

a photo then it is not impossible to generate a new photo. Learn your facts.

2542: 5144: 5139: 4774: 3028: 1589: 1562: 1408: 1007:

Knowledge (XXG):Elimination of Fair Use Rationale in Promotional Photos/Vote

332:

they would be a good place to start. Let's see if anyone else is reading. --

204: 4741:

I'd like to propose a guideline for image file types: For systems that use

3785: 3003:

Better said, they don't contribute to the article itself. Don't forget the

3164:

OrphanBot orphans images with other tags. It doesn't tag orphan images. -

5154: 5122: 4754: 4022: 2834:

Yes, but that's not the issue; it's the page warring that is the issue.

2529: 1777: 1742:

disclosure I will admit that I am resposible for hosting the said site).

540: 523: 981: 3455:

Tagged for AfD as of about two minutes ago (not by me, FWIW). Cheers --

2819:

It's an impressively detailed (and long, at 76KB!) article, but if the

1781: 1286:

Indeed, don't do lists of weapons/enemies/levels, they end up going to

1183:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computer and video games/Article guidelines

304:

Knowledge (XXG):Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics/Core topics COTF

3035:

when it was being AFDed before I rewrote it to it's current version.--

1641:

listed in the 1999 and 2000 categories, as it came to Europe in 2000.

1340:

Indeed it would be, thanks. May be a tad bit out of date now though.--

4032: 1637:

I thought that we did list every year. This was based off of seeing

1561:(look at the platform box in the template). I know which I prefer. - 1522:, should only the year of the first version be added or all of them? 1092:, but I thought I'd ask here first: do you think this article meets 300:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Computer and video games/Core topic COTF

2634:

Nobody read what I said above, eh? I elaborated on the AfD page. —

4599:

Looks like an unanimous "endorse deletion" is coming out of this.

2589:

I commented at the AFD. Here is some similar game guide articles:

1088:

I recently discovered that article and was going to put it up for

3882:. Note that we can only use Ubisoft images in a free context. -- 2994:

Remove it, links to cheat pages are linkspam and non-notable. --

2087:

What you propose to do is within the scope of this project. See

625:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Albums#Album covers and fair use

4770: 4750: 3731: 2787: 2595:

Masks, weapons and items from The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask

2154: 1389:

Which would assume I know Java, and I most certainly don't :/ --

1023: 851: 787: 701: 673: 4822: 3982: 3204:

to make it easier to tag orfud. Automatic notification - win.

4746: 3978: 2860:

I see this was the wrong place to turn for help. Forgive me.

1997:

Category:Computer and video games based on licensed properties

1862:): as previously pointed out, everyone here is a volunteer. -- 1773: 25: 4777:(whenever the wikimedia software will support it). Thoughts? 2091:

to see how to indicate you are participant in the project. —

5447:

The editors are currently deadlocked about whether the game

4697:

this move, and hope others of you will too. Hop on over to

2355:

guideline, just something that can be used when required. --

1540:

would be a significant-enough exception, but its remake has

1430:

For those interested, I've made another update (1.08). Keep

5357:

Hopefully some editors seeing this section will help out.

1040:

in its current state is incapable of compromise): write a

518:

An idea: Perhaps we could attach a specific CSS ID (e.g.,

5307:, it makes putting articles up for AfD less of a hassle. 2146:

Have you thought about adding them into a new section at

1514:

First version published only or every version published?

5460: 5456: 5404: 5400: 4511: 4508: 4502: 4396: 4363: 4355: 3412: 3032: 3005: 2963: 2683: 1554: 1495:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

1275: 915:

Personally, I have mentally filed the entire debate as

264: 232:

There is no problem linking to the website itself. See

4354:

From the first days of October, articles of old games

5210:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Buyo (Inuyasha)

128:

Check out the talk page of the template he's adding:

2324:

I would rather not wake up tomorrow morning and see

2031:). Gonna need some help undoing the "add cat" mods. 767:

would have been deleted from Commons a year ago. --

5132: 5065: 5058: 4994: 4962: 4863: 4685:has made a great, bold move in recommending moving 4148: 4046: 2528:I believe that it's actually semi-policy to have a 4753:. Platforms this would cover would be things like 4300:that and I might be able to give you some help. — 2465:"Sequel" section under reception and criticism. -- 1486:TfD nomination of Template:Cvg-workshop-nomination 750:be fair use ReyBrujo. It would just get the extra 539:and added the CSS ID "cvgproj" to the template. — 5266:game wiki. Feel free to put it in AFD if needed. 2599:Weapons and items from The Legend of Zelda series 1044:encyclopedia without fair-use images, or write a 5190:one someday since it's such an important game.-- 2341:the game (reception, merch, development, etc). 1580:long gap between the US and European release of 2843:Not if your page gets deleted by a Wikicopy :P 1536:I vastly prefer the first year only. I thought 4350:Open season: Long term, IP-hopping linkspammer 3659:works from the standpoint of the photographer! 5483:Mega Man Zero (video game) request for review 5102:Wakeboarding Unleashed Featuring Shaun Murray 4834: 3994: 3437:Does this article meet requirements to exist? 871:of the German or French Wikipedias. Cheers -- 8: 3512:I note that you've gone ahead and added the 1961:pushing trojan h programs into their faces. 1171:tips to help would be greatly appreciated:) 1151:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/ARPIA2 18:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Video games 5459:) or as "Animal Crossing (GameCube) (e.g., 5436:Request for Comment: Animal Crossing series 2657:with respect - leaving aside how wikipedia 2174:19:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC) Karen Zierler 1242:Yes, I'm thinking that may be too much. -- 866:You're missing my point: I have not stated 5062: 4860: 4841: 4827: 4819: 4001: 3987: 3979: 3706:; otherwise the uploaded material will be 3259:law says to keep the images to a minimum. 4411:Just deleted 11 more links to that site. 3200:(edit conflict) I suggest you install up 938:Well it is possible, like in the case of 577:I went ahead and did it. The new page is 501:Ditto. Discuss changes first next time.-- 3493:That was nice and quick. Thanks guys! - 3415:an example of where I see a mismatch. -- 2802:List of gangs in Grand Theft Auto series 2621:(none of which should be capitalized?)? 1733:Arbitrary application of " linkspam " rv 948:. However, 99% of media companies would 5329:Another article in need of mass cleanup 4815:Tony Hawk games still need alot of work 4745:pallets I would like to recommend that 1354:know so he can add them to his server. 1026:is actually full of free-use images. -- 623:Looking at the discussions going on at 5260:Timeline of Grand Theft Auto III canon 4699:the computer and video games talk page 4218:2 through 8 have mass lists of games. 2264:It should be the editors' choice :/ -- 2017:Ok, most of the stuff was re-added by 1520:Category:XXXX computer and video games 843:in words? Is text alone adequate for 136:. The links would have to be removed. 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4432:) regarding a possible acceptance. - 3443:List of PlayStation Portable websites 3119:Fair enough (is a truth production)-- 7: 3110:, and it will be deleted in a week. 2155: 852: 788: 702: 674: 4641:as not a bad possibility. Cheers -- 4482:Template on the verge of losing TFD 4424:Template for game name localisation 3753:This image is needed to illustrate 3246:List of Final Fantasy VI characters 3077:) and probably ought to clean out. 3064:List of Final Fantasy VI characters 1544:, thereby eliminating the problem. 364:For the moment I've redesigned the 5222:I think you meant to post this in 3052:8th fair use criteria policy point 2170:this Wiki thing. I'll look again. 1445:Adding the template to articles... 1185:page is the most important. Also, 24: 919:. Make encyclopedia, not FU war. 5444:would be greatly appreciated. 5109:Disney's Extreme Skate Adventure 4199: 4198: 3700:Knowledge (XXG):Uploading images 2337:(plot, gameplay) before talking 1553:I have only two things to say, 1491:Template:Cvg-workshop-nomination 1372:User talk:ADeveria#Infobox maker 350:800 left, we're almost there. -- 29: 5453:Animal Crossing series template 4370:--20:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 3271:could probably tell you more.-- 3202:User:Howcheng/quickimgdelete.js 1232:in game? and the pickups also? 5088:Shaun Palmer's Pro Snowboarder 3758:A free use image is impossible 1606:has a bunch of console cats.-- 1: 5393:List of Battlefield 1942 mods 5204:being considered for deletion 4759:Nintendo Entertainment System 4430:User:Tetsuya-san/Localization 4398:found. Will be dealt with. -- 4362:Please report all sightings, 1149:OK, the article is at AFD at 765:Image:Lock_On_Cockpit_MiG.jpg 5497:14:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 5478:14:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 5430:10:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 5413:05:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 5384:22:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 5374:21:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 5362:20:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 5352:23:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 5342:23:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 5295:06:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 5285:23:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 5271:23:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 5251:19:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 5242:18:54, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 5217:18:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 5195:08:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC) 5181:19:10, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 4809:13:52, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 4797:02:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 4732:20:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 4714:16:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4705:in the sections provided. — 4668:20:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 4655:19:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC) 4646:15:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4623:15:14, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4604:07:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 4594:14:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4552:05:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4538:01:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4528:01:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4476:06:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 4467:19:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 4456:13:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 4416:12:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 4403:12:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 4345:17:25, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 4335:22:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4318:21:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4309:19:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4294:17:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4279:07:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 4263:02:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 4254:02:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC) 4244:20:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4234:03:13, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 4223:20:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3969:01:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 3958:00:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 3939:23:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3907:23:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3897:23:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3887:22:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3873:22:46, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3853:22:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3844:22:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3824:22:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3807:22:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3797:22:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3776:22:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3694:21:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3677:23:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3664:22:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3649:21:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3633:21:18, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3598:19:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3585:19:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3575:19:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3560:19:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3544:18:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3533:17:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3498:21:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3489:15:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3474:15:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3460:15:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3450:15:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3431:23:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3420:19:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3390:04:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 3365:03:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 3322:02:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 3295:00:37, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 3281:23:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 3253:19:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC) 3237:00:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 3224:23:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3209:03:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3185:06:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3160:03:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3129:03:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3115:03:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3096:03:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3082:02:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3059:02:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3045:02:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 3014:22:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2999:22:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2990:21:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2976:21:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2942:01:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2913:00:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2865:22:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2848:21:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2839:21:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2828:21:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2814:20:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2795:17:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2770:22:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2747:22:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2715:21:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2700:17:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2649:16:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 2626:23:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 2606:19:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 2584:10:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 2570:07:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC) 2546:17:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC) 2537:22:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2520:21:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2508:21:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2498:21:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2488:19:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2470:02:35, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 2450:07:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2441:06:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2431:06:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2408:06:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2374:05:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2360:05:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2346:05:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2310:05:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2298:05:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2288:05:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2278:05:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2269:04:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2259:04:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2194:19:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2165:18:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2140:04:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 2122:23:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2100:23:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2082:22:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2071:22:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 2061:21:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 1942:18:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC) 1725:20:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1715:20:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC) 1692:13:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1675:07:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1666:06:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1657:06:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1646:05:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC) 1586:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney 1439:00:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 662:Blue Monday (New Order song) 5455:as "Animal Crossing" (e.g., 4368:have the addresses blocked. 3702:. Also, provide a detailed 2782:Doom should be top-priority 2591:List of Earthworm Jim items 2039:10:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 2012:10:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 1986:03:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1966:02:46, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1920:15:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC) 1902:00:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1883:22:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1867:08:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1847:05:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1837:01:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1816:00:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1806:22:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1789:22:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1751:22:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1670:I'm for first year only. -- 1632:13:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1611:11:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1593:11:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1575:10:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1566:10:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1549:09:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1531:09:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1508:05:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1478:19:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1465:12:05, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 1455:11:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC) 1426:01:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1412:22:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1394:22:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1345:22:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1315:20:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1295:17:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1282:16:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1264:16:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1247:16:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1237:15:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1221:16:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1211:00:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1176:00:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1158:15:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC) 1141:21:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1111:09:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1101:14:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 1063:06:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1053:05:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC) 1031:20:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 1018:20:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 975:19:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 934:19:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 924:23:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 903:22:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 886:12:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 876:08:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 862:02:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 834:01:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 821:22:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 808:21:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 798:21:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 772:20:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 759:09:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 742:21:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 732:21:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 722:21:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 712:21:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 693:20:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 684:20:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 548:17:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 531:02:11, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 506:01:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 481:21:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 455:13:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 444:13:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 355:17:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 346:02:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 337:00:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 272:09:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC) 259:18:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 241:16:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 228:16:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 218:15:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 208:14:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 194:13:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 174:13:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC) 152:19:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 123:14:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC) 5512: 5489:Mega Man Zero (video game) 5442:Animal Crossing series RFC 4364:search for other instances 3975:Mario Party problems again 2686:has been tagged since oct 1584:, or the enhanced port of 1473:I suppose so... thanks! -- 1324:what you're referring to? 5299:You should add this this 5095:Kelly Slater's Pro Surfer 4859: 4737:Image filetype guidelines 4194: 4018: 3009:links from this site. -- 2477:List of terms in Xenosaga 2209:obviously not mandatory. 1955:Category:Executable files 1858:unfair (and verging on a 1625:The Dark Side of the Moon 5451:should be listed on the 4687:Computer and video games 4661:Category:Stub categories 3880:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use 3668:I argued that myself at 2239:Versions and re-releases 2130:Archived Gaming Articles 1639:Super Mario Bros. Deluxe 1227:Image and screenshot use 1106:No, delete the sucker.-- 302:which would be based on 286:Working on core articles 3750:==Fair use rationale== 3672:, but had no support.-- 2479:seems like a game guide 2250:Reception and criticism 2204:Section order consensus 1756:Ideally, a link to the 1305:Video game stub creator 1187:here are some more tips 1166:Tips on article writing 1011:WikiProject Free Images 986:searching for PD images 752:Template:Withpermission 5487:Hi, I've recently put 5188:Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 4720:Spartan: Total Warrior 1271:Turok: Dinosaur Hunter 130:Template talk:WoS game 5470:with any thoughts. 5074:Mat Hoffman's Pro BMX 4783:comment was added by 2180:comment was added by 2033:Dread Lord CyberSkull 2006:Dread Lord CyberSkull 1686:Dread Lord CyberSkull 586:General CVG character 42:of past discussions. 5440:Any comments in the 5349:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 4561:Ragnarok Online jobs 3655:Sceenshots count as 3508:Your Sinclair rating 2821:project's guidelines 2675:Take a look at this 2575:Please see the AFD 2534:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1880:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1722:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1629:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 1604:Guilty Gear (series) 1518:In including of the 1462:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 931:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 827:list of xxx episodes 729:♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 393:to be more like the 4963:Remakes / remasters 4722:needs a bit of work 3931:UbiSoft declaration 3766:{{game-screenshot}} 2045:Request Information 1981:template to it. -- 107:User talk:WOSlinker 5319:• 2007-01-22 09:13 4923:American Wasteland 3722:• 2007-01-15 21:59 3704:fair use rationale 3624:• 2007-01-15 21:09 3075:(warning: anigifs) 2882:• 2007-01-12 23:23 2394:• 2007-01-11 06:13 2380:article guidelines 2001:category:foo games 1793:Knowledge (XXG)'s 943:Ubisoft-screenshot 596:Infobox CVG system 389:I've expanded the 366:essential articles 292:Essential articles 265:Special:Linksearch 5320: 5172: 5171: 5168: 5167: 5150:Vicarious Visions 5054: 5053: 4800: 4497:Template:16-32bit 4454: 4391: 4377:comment added by 4214: 4213: 3723: 3625: 3183: 3152: 2966:one. Yes or No?-- 2883: 2395: 2197: 1700:Super Mario Bros. 1555:Battlezone Before 1538:Final Fantasy III 1386: 1385:• 2007-01-5 22:41 1367: 1366:• 2007-01-5 22:31 1337: 1336:• 2007-01-5 20:30 1202: 1201:• 2007-01-5 00:09 1001: 1000:• 2007-01-5 20:06 966: 965:• 2007-01-5 19:28 644: 643:• 2007-01-4 10:37 614: 613:• 2007-01-5 02:05 573: 572:• 2007-01-4 05:48 498: 497:• 2007-01-4 01:39 472: 471:• 2007-01-3 18:11 430: 429:• 2007-01-5 06:14 410: 409:• 2007-01-3 05:53 381: 380:• 2007-01-5 05:04 327: 326:• 2007-01-3 00:18 158:World of Spectrum 103: 102: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 5503: 5334:Jump Super Stars 5317: 5312: 5308: 5305:your monobook.js 5240: 5063: 4985:Pro Skater 1 + 2 4861: 4843: 4836: 4829: 4820: 4778: 4703:discuss it there 4640: 4634: 4590: 4584: 4578: 4525: 4515: 4499: 4444: 4439: 4390: 4371: 4251:guitarhero777777 4202: 4201: 4003: 3996: 3989: 3980: 3720: 3715: 3711: 3622: 3617: 3613: 3611: 3605: 3173: 3171: 3142: 3140: 3109: 3103: 3008: 2880: 2875: 2871: 2740: 2642: 2563: 2541:Summary style.-- 2392: 2387: 2383: 2175: 2159: 2158: 2089:the project page 1980: 1974: 1830: 1824: 1707:Final Fantasy VI 1559:Battlezone after 1504: 1500: 1383: 1378: 1374: 1364: 1359: 1355: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1199: 1194: 1190: 1139: 1136: 998: 993: 989: 963: 958: 954: 947: 941: 856: 855: 792: 791: 746:The image would 706: 705: 678: 677: 641: 636: 632: 611: 606: 602: 600: 594: 590: 584: 570: 565: 561: 521: 495: 490: 486: 469: 464: 460: 427: 422: 418: 415:Capcom workgroup 407: 402: 398: 391:Konami workgroup 378: 373: 369: 324: 319: 315: 188: 182: 150: 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 5511: 5510: 5506: 5505: 5504: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5485: 5449:Animal Crossing 5438: 5397: 5331: 5315: 5310: 5301:AfD helper tool 5263: 5230: 5206: 5202:Buyo (Inuyasha) 5173: 5164: 5128: 5050: 4990: 4958: 4855: 4847: 4817: 4779:—The preceding 4739: 4724: 4680: 4638: 4636:sports-cvg-stub 4632: 4612: 4588: 4582: 4576: 4564: 4550: 4523: 4500: 4495: 4484: 4437: 4426: 4372: 4352: 4286: 4284:Need Help guys! 4215: 4210: 4190: 4144: 4042: 4014: 4007: 3977: 3718: 3713: 3620: 3615: 3609: 3607:Game-screenshot 3603: 3552: 3510: 3439: 3406: 3167: 3136: 3107: 3101: 3024: 3004: 2960: 2878: 2873: 2806: 2784: 2738: 2640: 2561: 2513:LIES! ALL LIES! 2481: 2429: 2390: 2385: 2367:Katamari Damacy 2326:Final Fantasy X 2217: 2206: 2176:—The preceding 2156: 2132: 2047: 1994: 1978: 1972: 1958: 1860:personal attack 1828: 1822: 1762:Rotten Tomatoes 1735: 1542:its own article 1516: 1502: 1498: 1497:. Thank you. -- 1488: 1447: 1381: 1376: 1362: 1357: 1332: 1327: 1307: 1268:Take a look at 1229: 1197: 1192: 1168: 1134: 1127: 1123:s are notable. 1083: 996: 991: 961: 956: 945: 939: 853: 845:The Falling Man 841:3D monster maze 814:explicit policy 789: 703: 675: 639: 634: 621: 609: 604: 598: 592: 588: 582: 568: 563: 558: 519: 493: 488: 467: 462: 437: 425: 420: 405: 400: 387: 376: 371: 322: 317: 288: 186: 180: 140: 110: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 5509: 5507: 5484: 5481: 5437: 5434: 5433: 5432: 5396: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5387: 5386: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5330: 5327: 5326: 5325: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5321: 5262: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5205: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5170: 5169: 5166: 5165: 5163: 5162: 5157: 5152: 5147: 5142: 5136: 5134: 5130: 5129: 5127: 5126: 5119: 5112: 5105: 5098: 5091: 5084: 5077: 5069: 5067: 5060: 5056: 5055: 5052: 5051: 5049: 5048: 5041: 5034: 5027: 5020: 5013: 5006: 4998: 4996: 4992: 4991: 4989: 4988: 4981: 4974: 4966: 4964: 4960: 4959: 4957: 4956: 4949: 4946:Proving Ground 4942: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4903: 4896: 4889: 4882: 4875: 4867: 4865: 4857: 4856: 4848: 4846: 4845: 4838: 4831: 4823: 4816: 4813: 4812: 4811: 4738: 4735: 4723: 4717: 4679: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4611: 4608: 4607: 4606: 4572:being reviewed 4563: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4546: 4483: 4480: 4479: 4478: 4469: 4464:TheEmulatorGuy 4425: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4406: 4405: 4351: 4348: 4325: 4323: 4322: 4321: 4320: 4285: 4282: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4266: 4265: 4212: 4211: 4209: 4208: 4195: 4192: 4191: 4189: 4188: 4181: 4174: 4167: 4160: 4152: 4150: 4146: 4145: 4143: 4142: 4135: 4128: 4121: 4114: 4107: 4100: 4093: 4086: 4079: 4072: 4065: 4058: 4050: 4048: 4044: 4043: 4041: 4040: 4035: 4030: 4025: 4019: 4016: 4015: 4008: 4006: 4005: 3998: 3991: 3983: 3976: 3973: 3972: 3971: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3915: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3889: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3809: 3799: 3768: 3767: 3764: 3761: 3760: 3759: 3756: 3748: 3743: 3740: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3626: 3600: 3577: 3551: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3539:it yourself.-- 3509: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3500: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3463: 3462: 3438: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3405: 3402: 3401: 3400: 3399: 3398: 3397: 3396: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3392: 3374: 3373: 3372: 3371: 3370: 3369: 3368: 3367: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3324: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3284: 3283: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3155:OrphanBot? -- 3131: 3061: 3023: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 2992: 2985:guidelines? -- 2959: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2891: 2890: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2831: 2830: 2805: 2798: 2783: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2749: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2652: 2651: 2631: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2619:Super Mushroom 2573: 2572: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2480: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2438:TheEmulatorGuy 2425: 2418: 2417: 2416: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2357:TheEmulatorGuy 2321: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2295:TheEmulatorGuy 2275:TheEmulatorGuy 2256:TheEmulatorGuy 2252: 2251: 2248: 2245: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2216: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2142:Karen Zierler 2131: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2103: 2102: 2074: 2073: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2041: 1993: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1957: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1894:Open Directory 1886: 1885: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1826:external links 1795:external links 1791: 1758:Open Directory 1734: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1727: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1635: 1634: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1487: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1468: 1467: 1446: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1428: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1306: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1288:the laundromat 1250: 1249: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1204: 1203: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1144: 1143: 1115:Speaking as a 1113: 1082: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1037: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1028:TheEmulatorGuy 984:on flickr and 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 900:TheEmulatorGuy 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 864: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 774: 695: 668: 667: 666: 620: 617: 616: 615: 557: 554: 553: 552: 551: 550: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 436: 433: 432: 431: 386: 383: 362: 361: 360: 359: 358: 357: 290:We've had the 287: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 249: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 109: 104: 101: 100: 95: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5508: 5499: 5498: 5495: 5494:Wolf ODonnell 5490: 5482: 5480: 5479: 5476: 5471: 5469: 5464: 5462: 5458: 5454: 5450: 5445: 5443: 5435: 5431: 5428: 5424: 5423:verifiability 5420: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5414: 5411: 5406: 5402: 5394: 5391: 5385: 5382: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5372: 5367: 5363: 5360: 5355: 5354: 5353: 5350: 5346: 5345: 5344: 5343: 5340: 5335: 5328: 5318: 5313: 5306: 5302: 5298: 5297: 5296: 5293: 5288: 5287: 5286: 5282: 5281: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5269: 5261: 5258: 5252: 5249: 5248:Badbilltucker 5245: 5244: 5243: 5238: 5234: 5229: 5225: 5221: 5220: 5219: 5218: 5215: 5214:Badbilltucker 5212:. Thank you. 5211: 5203: 5200: 5196: 5193: 5189: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5182: 5179: 5161: 5158: 5156: 5153: 5151: 5148: 5146: 5143: 5141: 5138: 5137: 5135: 5131: 5125: 5124: 5120: 5118: 5117: 5113: 5111: 5110: 5106: 5104: 5103: 5099: 5097: 5096: 5092: 5090: 5089: 5085: 5083: 5082: 5078: 5076: 5075: 5071: 5070: 5068: 5064: 5061: 5057: 5047: 5046: 5042: 5040: 5039: 5038:Shred Session 5035: 5033: 5032: 5028: 5026: 5025: 5021: 5019: 5018: 5014: 5012: 5011: 5007: 5005: 5004: 5000: 4999: 4997: 4993: 4987: 4986: 4982: 4980: 4979: 4978:Pro Skater HD 4975: 4973: 4972: 4971:Pro Skater 2x 4968: 4967: 4965: 4961: 4955: 4954: 4950: 4948: 4947: 4943: 4941: 4940: 4936: 4932: 4931: 4927: 4926: 4925: 4924: 4920: 4916: 4915: 4911: 4910: 4909: 4908: 4907:Underground 2 4904: 4902: 4901: 4897: 4895: 4894: 4890: 4888: 4887: 4883: 4881: 4880: 4876: 4874: 4873: 4869: 4868: 4866: 4862: 4858: 4854: 4852: 4844: 4839: 4837: 4832: 4830: 4825: 4824: 4821: 4814: 4810: 4807: 4803: 4802: 4801: 4798: 4794: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4776: 4772: 4768: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4743:indexed color 4736: 4734: 4733: 4730: 4721: 4718: 4716: 4715: 4712: 4708: 4704: 4700: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4684: 4677: 4669: 4666: 4662: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4653: 4649: 4648: 4647: 4644: 4637: 4630: 4627: 4626: 4625: 4624: 4621: 4617: 4609: 4605: 4602: 4598: 4597: 4596: 4595: 4591: 4585: 4579: 4573: 4569: 4562: 4559: 4553: 4549: 4545: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4536: 4532: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4526: 4521: 4520: 4513: 4510: 4507: 4504: 4498: 4493: 4489: 4481: 4477: 4474: 4470: 4468: 4465: 4460: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4452: 4448: 4443: 4440: 4435: 4431: 4423: 4417: 4414: 4413:The Kinslayer 4410: 4409: 4408: 4407: 4404: 4401: 4397: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4388: 4384: 4380: 4376: 4369: 4365: 4360: 4357: 4356:have received 4349: 4347: 4346: 4343: 4337: 4336: 4333: 4329: 4328:List of games 4319: 4316: 4312: 4311: 4310: 4307: 4303: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4295: 4292: 4283: 4281: 4280: 4277: 4264: 4261: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4252: 4247: 4246: 4245: 4242: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4232: 4227: 4226: 4225: 4224: 4221: 4207: 4206: 4197: 4196: 4193: 4187: 4186: 4182: 4180: 4179: 4175: 4173: 4172: 4168: 4166: 4165: 4161: 4159: 4158: 4154: 4153: 4151: 4147: 4141: 4140: 4136: 4134: 4133: 4129: 4127: 4126: 4122: 4120: 4119: 4115: 4113: 4112: 4108: 4106: 4105: 4101: 4099: 4098: 4094: 4092: 4091: 4087: 4085: 4084: 4080: 4078: 4077: 4073: 4071: 4070: 4066: 4064: 4063: 4059: 4057: 4056: 4052: 4051: 4049: 4045: 4039: 4038:Nintendo Cube 4036: 4034: 4031: 4029: 4026: 4024: 4021: 4020: 4017: 4013: 4012: 4004: 3999: 3997: 3992: 3990: 3985: 3984: 3981: 3974: 3970: 3967: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3956: 3940: 3937: 3932: 3929:I think this 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3919: 3908: 3905: 3900: 3899: 3898: 3895: 3890: 3888: 3885: 3881: 3876: 3875: 3874: 3871: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3854: 3851: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3842: 3838: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3825: 3822: 3817: 3814: 3810: 3808: 3805: 3800: 3798: 3795: 3791: 3787: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3774: 3765: 3763:==Licensing== 3762: 3757: 3755: 3752: 3751: 3749: 3747: 3744: 3741: 3739: 3737: 3736: 3735: 3733: 3721: 3716: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3692: 3688: 3684: 3678: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3653: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3647: 3643: 3638: 3634: 3631: 3627: 3623: 3618: 3608: 3601: 3599: 3596: 3592: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3583: 3578: 3576: 3573: 3569: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3558: 3549: 3545: 3542: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3531: 3526: 3524: 3518: 3515: 3514:Your Sinclair 3507: 3499: 3496: 3492: 3491: 3490: 3487: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3475: 3472: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3461: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3448: 3444: 3436: 3432: 3429: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3418: 3414: 3410: 3403: 3391: 3388: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3376: 3375: 3366: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3354: 3353: 3352: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3348: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3323: 3319: 3315: 3311: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3296: 3293: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3285: 3282: 3278: 3274: 3270: 3266: 3262: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3251: 3247: 3238: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3212: 3211: 3210: 3207: 3203: 3186: 3181: 3177: 3172: 3170: 3163: 3162: 3161: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3150: 3146: 3141: 3139: 3132: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3117: 3116: 3113: 3106: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3084: 3083: 3080: 3076: 3074: 3073:Shining Force 3069: 3065: 3062: 3060: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3021: 3015: 3012: 3007: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2997: 2993: 2991: 2988: 2984: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2965: 2957: 2943: 2940: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2914: 2911: 2906: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2895: 2894: 2893: 2892: 2881: 2876: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2863: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2856: 2855: 2854: 2849: 2846: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2829: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2812: 2803: 2799: 2797: 2796: 2793: 2789: 2781: 2771: 2768: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2741: 2736: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2723: 2716: 2713: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2698: 2689: 2685: 2681: 2677: 2674: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2664: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2638: 2633: 2632: 2627: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2611:1-up Mushroom 2609: 2608: 2607: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2586: 2585: 2582: 2578: 2571: 2568: 2567: 2564: 2559: 2553: 2552: 2547: 2544: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2521: 2518: 2514: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2506: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2496: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2486: 2478: 2475: 2471: 2468: 2463: 2459: 2458: 2451: 2448: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2439: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2419: 2409: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2396: 2393: 2388: 2381: 2377: 2376: 2375: 2372: 2368: 2363: 2362: 2361: 2358: 2353: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2327: 2323: 2322: 2311: 2308: 2304: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2296: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2286: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2276: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2267: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2249: 2246: 2243: 2238: 2237: 2235: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2223: 2221: 2215: 2214: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2203: 2195: 2191: 2187: 2183: 2182:Austriancurls 2179: 2173: 2172:Austriancurls 2168: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2160: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2141: 2138: 2137:Austriancurls 2129: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2101: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2083: 2080: 2072: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2059: 2054: 2050: 2044: 2040: 2037: 2034: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2010: 2007: 2002: 1998: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1977: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1964: 1956: 1953: 1943: 1940: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1921: 1918: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1903: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1884: 1881: 1876: 1875: 1868: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1852: 1848: 1845: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1835: 1827: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1814: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1770:Game Rankings 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1749: 1743: 1739: 1732: 1726: 1723: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1713: 1709: 1708: 1703: 1701: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1690: 1687: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1664: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1655: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1633: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1612: 1609: 1605: 1600: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1523: 1521: 1513: 1511: 1509: 1506: 1505: 1496: 1492: 1485: 1479: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1453: 1444: 1440: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1410: 1395: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1379: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1365: 1360: 1353: 1352:User:ADeveria 1348: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1335: 1330: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1313: 1304: 1296: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1262: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254:Fethroesforia 1248: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1234:Fethroesforia 1226: 1222: 1219: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1208:Fethroesforia 1200: 1195: 1189:. Good luck! 1188: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1173:Fethroesforia 1165: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1137: 1131: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1086: 1081: 1078: 1064: 1061: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1038: 1032: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1003: 1002: 999: 994: 987: 983: 978: 977: 976: 973: 968: 967: 964: 959: 951: 944: 937: 936: 935: 932: 927: 926: 925: 922: 918: 914: 904: 901: 897: 887: 884: 879: 878: 877: 874: 869: 865: 863: 860: 857: 850: 846: 842: 837: 836: 835: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 819: 815: 811: 810: 809: 806: 801: 800: 799: 796: 793: 786: 781: 773: 770: 766: 762: 761: 760: 757: 753: 749: 745: 744: 743: 740: 735: 734: 733: 730: 725: 724: 723: 720: 715: 714: 713: 710: 707: 700: 696: 694: 691: 687: 686: 685: 682: 679: 672: 669: 665: 663: 659: 655: 650: 649: 647: 646: 645: 642: 637: 630: 626: 618: 612: 607: 597: 587: 580: 576: 575: 574: 571: 566: 556:Template page 555: 549: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533: 532: 529: 525: 517: 507: 504: 500: 499: 496: 491: 484: 483: 482: 479: 474: 473: 470: 465: 458: 457: 456: 453: 448: 447: 446: 445: 442: 435:Infobox color 434: 428: 423: 416: 413: 412: 411: 408: 403: 396: 392: 384: 382: 379: 374: 367: 356: 353: 349: 348: 347: 344: 340: 339: 338: 335: 330: 329: 328: 325: 320: 313: 309: 308:High priority 305: 301: 297: 293: 285: 273: 270: 266: 262: 261: 260: 257: 253: 250: 242: 239: 235: 231: 230: 229: 226: 225:The Kinslayer 221: 220: 219: 216: 211: 210: 209: 206: 201: 197: 196: 195: 192: 185: 177: 176: 175: 172: 168: 164: 159: 155: 154: 153: 148: 144: 139: 135: 131: 127: 126: 125: 124: 121: 120: 117: 108: 105: 99: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 5486: 5472: 5465: 5446: 5439: 5418: 5398: 5332: 5279: 5264: 5207: 5174: 5121: 5116:MTX Mototrax 5114: 5107: 5100: 5093: 5086: 5079: 5072: 5043: 5036: 5029: 5022: 5015: 5008: 5003:Downhill Jam 5001: 4983: 4976: 4969: 4953:Pro Skater 5 4951: 4944: 4937: 4928: 4921: 4912: 4905: 4898: 4893:Pro Skater 4 4891: 4886:Pro Skater 3 4884: 4879:Pro Skater 2 4877: 4870: 4850: 4763:Sega Genesis 4740: 4725: 4702: 4694: 4681: 4613: 4610:Stub Sorting 4577:Kari Hazzard 4565: 4517: 4485: 4427: 4395:Another URL 4373:— Preceding 4361: 4353: 4338: 4324: 4287: 4273: 4216: 4204: 4183: 4176: 4169: 4162: 4155: 4137: 4130: 4123: 4116: 4109: 4102: 4095: 4088: 4081: 4074: 4067: 4060: 4053: 4009: 3964:internets.-- 3951: 3811: 3769: 3754: 3745: 3738: 3730: 3641: 3567: 3553: 3550:Screenshots? 3530:Stevefarrell 3527: 3519: 3511: 3471:Larry laptop 3440: 3417:Larry laptop 3411: 3407: 3356: 3309: 3243: 3199: 3168: 3137: 3071: 3025: 2961: 2904: 2807: 2785: 2767:Larry laptop 2733: 2697:Larry laptop 2695: 2687: 2679: 2658: 2635: 2581:Larry laptop 2574: 2556: 2482: 2461: 2338: 2334: 2253: 2236:Development 2207: 2133: 2075: 2055: 2051: 2048: 2025: 1995: 1959: 1855: 1798: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1705: 1698: 1683: 1636: 1598: 1524: 1519: 1517: 1489: 1448: 1421:. Thanks! -- 1406: 1308: 1279:Thunderbrand 1269: 1251: 1230: 1205: 1169: 1120: 1116: 1087: 1084: 1045: 1041: 949: 867: 826: 747: 651: 622: 559: 520:id="cvgproj" 438: 388: 363: 312:Top priority 289: 134:WP:COPYRIGHT 118: 115: 111: 78: 43: 37: 4995:Other games 4900:Underground 4864:Main series 4851:Tony Hawk's 4767:Nintendo DS 4707:Frecklefoot 4678:A good move 4616:Alien Crush 4342:Maverick423 4332:Maverick423 4302:Frecklefoot 4291:Maverick423 4185:The Top 100 4171:Island Tour 4055:Mario Party 4028:Hudson Soft 4011:Mario Party 3670:WP:FAIR USE 3248:allowed? -- 3230:my monobook 3068:Gain Ground 2987:Oscarthecat 2825:Oscarthecat 2615:Fire Flower 2247:Merchandise 2093:Frecklefoot 2079:Maverick423 2068:Oscarthecat 2058:Maverick423 1582:Psychonauts 1155:Carabinieri 1098:Carabinieri 658:Kurt Cobain 654:Syd Barrett 619:Game covers 267:. Cheers -- 36:This is an 5371:SeizureDog 5192:SeizureDog 5160:Activision 4872:Pro Skater 4785:CyberSkull 4691:video game 4601:Hbdragon88 4473:SeizureDog 4276:Hbdragon88 4132:Superstars 3966:SeizureDog 3850:SeizureDog 3821:SeizureDog 3773:SeizureDog 3771:mention.-- 3742:==Source== 3674:SeizureDog 3657:derivative 3646:SeizureDog 3541:SeizureDog 3265:SeizureDog 3234:Hbdragon88 3206:Hbdragon88 2543:SidiLemine 2517:SeizureDog 2495:SeizureDog 2462:guidelines 2447:SeizureDog 2305:, people. 2285:SeizureDog 2266:SeizureDog 2228:Characters 1799:explicitly 1797:guideline 1766:Metacritic 1672:SeizureDog 1663:Hbdragon88 1643:Hbdragon88 1608:SeizureDog 1572:SeizureDog 1528:SeizureDog 1391:SeizureDog 1342:SeizureDog 1312:SeizureDog 1292:SeizureDog 1108:SeizureDog 1022:Funny how 756:SeizureDog 503:SeizureDog 478:SeizureDog 452:SeizureDog 385:Workgroups 215:SeizureDog 163:Activision 98:Archive 25 90:Archive 23 85:Archive 22 79:Archive 21 73:Archive 20 68:Archive 19 60:Archive 15 5228:NeoChaosX 5145:Neversoft 5140:Tony Hawk 5081:Pro BMX 2 5045:Skate Jam 4939:Project 8 4775:JPEG-2000 4683:BcRIPster 4631:suggests 4629:StubSense 4544:Mitaphane 4442:tsuya-san 4340:forgotten 4178:Star Rush 3955:BcRIPster 3936:BcRIPster 3894:BcRIPster 3870:BcRIPster 3841:BcRIPster 3813:programs. 3804:BcRIPster 3794:BcRIPster 3687:this one? 3661:BcRIPster 3630:BcRIPster 3582:BcRIPster 3572:BcRIPster 3528:Thanks -- 3387:Sopoforic 3362:Sopoforic 3292:Sopoforic 3261:BcRIPster 3250:Sopoforic 3166:A Man In 3135:A Man In 3029:Crystalis 2845:BcRIPster 2423:Mitaphane 2400:a section 2303:WP:KETTLE 2213:Gameplay 2019:WOSlinker 1939:BcRIPster 1899:BcRIPster 1844:BcRIPster 1813:BcRIPster 1748:BcRIPster 1712:BcRIPster 1526:others.-- 1432:this page 537:been bold 138:NeoChaosX 5473:Thanks! 5410:ReyBrujo 5395:feedback 5381:RobJ1981 5369:tried.-- 5359:RobJ1981 5339:RobJ1981 5292:RobJ1981 5268:RobJ1981 5224:WT:ANIME 5178:RobJ1981 5155:Robomodo 5123:THUG Pro 4806:ADeveria 4793:contribs 4781:unsigned 4755:Game Boy 4729:RobJ1981 4665:New User 4652:RobJ1981 4620:New User 4535:RobJ1981 4451:contribs 4387:contribs 4375:unsigned 4315:RobJ1981 4241:RobJ1981 4220:RobJ1981 4205:Category 4149:Handheld 4139:Jamboree 4023:Nintendo 3904:ReyBrujo 3884:ReyBrujo 3495:ZakuSage 3447:ZakuSage 3428:RobJ1981 3404:mismatch 3358:written. 3269:ReyBrujo 3180:past ops 3176:conspire 3157:ReyBrujo 3149:past ops 3145:conspire 3056:ReyBrujo 3011:ReyBrujo 2958:Linkspam 2804:" fiasco 2792:Korodzik 2786:I think 2712:RobJ1981 2666:project. 2603:RobJ1981 2530:glossary 2505:RobJ1981 2485:RobJ1981 2190:contribs 2178:unsigned 2148:WP:CVG/M 2029:contribs 1983:ReyBrujo 1834:ReyBrujo 1786:ReyBrujo 1778:GameSpot 1436:ADeveria 1423:ADeveria 1310:handy.-- 1060:ReyBrujo 1015:ReyBrujo 982:searches 972:ReyBrujo 917:laaaaame 883:ReyBrujo 831:ReyBrujo 805:ReyBrujo 769:ReyBrujo 739:ReyBrujo 719:ReyBrujo 690:ReyBrujo 441:ReyBrujo 296:Workshop 191:ReyBrujo 5475:TheronJ 5280:Klptyzm 5133:Figures 5059:Related 4930:Sk8land 4695:support 4512:history 4157:Advance 4047:Console 3732:Go here 3708:deleted 2939:Klptyzm 2910:Klptyzm 2862:Klptyzm 2836:Klptyzm 2811:Klptyzm 2735:Deckill 2637:Deckill 2558:Deckill 2467:Zeality 2225:Setting 2056:Thanks 1963:frummer 1782:GameSpy 1050:RockMFR 450:page.-- 334:Zeality 39:archive 5401:before 5010:Motion 4853:series 4488:WP:TFD 4260:Scepia 4231:Scepia 4033:Capcom 3816:Source 3691:VPeric 3595:VPeric 3557:VPeric 3523:WP:OWN 3413:Here's 3112:Nifboy 3079:Nifboy 2659:should 2623:Nifboy 2405:Nifboy 2371:Nifboy 2343:Nifboy 2331:WP:WAF 2307:Nifboy 2152:hahnch 1976:popcat 1917:Jecowa 1856:highly 1654:Nifboy 1546:Nifboy 1475:VPeric 1452:VPeric 1261:Nifboy 1090:WP:AFD 1080:ARPIA2 921:Nifboy 849:hahnch 785:hahnch 699:hahnch 671:hahnch 368:page. 343:Nifboy 256:Frodet 171:Frodet 167:R-Type 5463:). 5427:Pak21 5405:after 5316:PLANE 5066:Games 5031:Shred 4914:Remix 4643:Pak21 4509:links 4400:Kizor 4379:Kizor 4125:Super 3719:PLANE 3621:PLANE 3486:Pak21 3457:Pak21 3314:Clyde 3273:Clyde 3216:Clyde 3169:Bl♟ck 3138:Bl♟ck 3121:Clyde 3105:orfud 3088:Clyde 3054:. -- 3037:Clyde 3033:XEvil 3006:other 2996:PresN 2983:WP:EL 2968:Clyde 2905:twice 2879:PLANE 2515::P -- 2391:PLANE 2352:WP:FF 2339:about 2244:Audio 2231:Story 2222:Plot 2114:Clyde 1864:Pak21 1811:edit. 1803:Pak21 1599:every 1503:demon 1382:PLANE 1363:PLANE 1333:PLANE 1244:PresN 1218:PresN 1198:PLANE 1125:EVula 1013:. -- 997:PLANE 962:PLANE 950:never 873:Pak21 818:Pak21 748:still 640:PLANE 610:PLANE 569:PLANE 535:I've 494:PLANE 468:PLANE 426:PLANE 406:PLANE 377:PLANE 352:PresN 323:PLANE 269:Pak21 238:Pak21 119:broil 116:Royal 16:< 5468:here 5461:here 5457:here 5419:Much 5403:and 5311:JACO 5237:walk 5233:talk 5024:Ride 5017:Vert 4789:talk 4773:and 4771:JPEG 4751:JPEG 4711:Talk 4566:The 4548:talk 4506:talk 4503:edit 4492:here 4447:talk 4383:talk 4366:and 4306:Talk 3837:here 3746:link 3714:JACO 3698:See 3642:some 3616:JACO 3593:) -- 3591:here 3441:The 3318:talk 3310:need 3277:talk 3267:and 3220:talk 3125:talk 3092:talk 3041:talk 3022:Pics 2972:talk 2964:this 2874:JACO 2788:Doom 2688:2005 2684:this 2680:2005 2663:this 2597:and 2577:here 2427:talk 2386:JACO 2335:game 2186:talk 2118:talk 2110:here 2097:Talk 2023:talk 1590:X201 1563:X201 1557:and 1419:here 1409:X201 1377:JACO 1358:JACO 1328:JACO 1322:this 1193:JACO 1181:The 1130:talk 1117:Nova 1094:WP:N 1085:Hi, 1046:good 1042:free 1024:tree 992:JACO 957:JACO 847:? - 635:JACO 627:and 605:JACO 591:and 579:here 564:JACO 545:Talk 528:Talk 489:JACO 463:JACO 421:JACO 401:JACO 395:Sega 372:JACO 318:JACO 234:here 205:X201 147:walk 143:talk 5303:to 4747:PNG 4689:to 4570:is 4568:AFD 4524:nkB 4519:Fra 3568:and 2049:Hi 1774:IGN 1768:or 1320:Is 1153:.-- 1132:// 1128:// 1096:.-- 541:TKD 524:TKD 310:or 184:HOL 5283:♣ 5235:, 5226:. 4795:) 4791:• 4765:, 4761:, 4757:, 4709:| 4639:}} 4633:{{ 4592:) 4586:| 4494:) 4462:-- 4449:: 4389:) 4385:• 4304:| 4164:DS 4118:10 3839:. 3819:-- 3792:. 3788:, 3710:. 3610:}} 3604:{{ 3555:-- 3469:-- 3360:-- 3320:) 3279:) 3263:, 3222:) 3178:| 3147:| 3127:) 3108:}} 3102:{{ 3094:) 3070:, 3043:) 2974:) 2682:, 2617:, 2613:, 2593:, 2579:-- 2436:-- 2382:. 2192:) 2188:• 2120:) 2095:| 2036:✎☠ 2009:✎☠ 1979:}} 1973:{{ 1829:}} 1823:{{ 1780:, 1776:, 1764:, 1710:. 1689:✎☠ 1277:. 1138:// 1121:EV 946:}} 940:{{ 868:my 601:. 599:}} 593:{{ 589:}} 583:{{ 543::: 526::: 417:. 187:}} 181:{{ 145:, 94:→ 64:← 5239:) 5231:( 4842:e 4835:t 4828:v 4799:. 4787:( 4589:C 4583:T 4580:( 4514:) 4501:( 4490:( 4453:) 4445:( 4438:e 4434:T 4381:( 4111:9 4104:8 4097:7 4090:6 4083:5 4076:4 4069:3 4062:2 4002:e 3995:t 3988:v 3790:2 3786:1 3521:( 3316:( 3275:( 3218:( 3182:) 3174:( 3151:) 3143:( 3123:( 3090:( 3039:( 2970:( 2800:" 2743:r 2739:e 2645:r 2641:e 2566:r 2562:e 2421:— 2196:. 2184:( 2162:n 2157:e 2116:( 2026:· 2021:( 1702:! 1499:^ 1135:☯ 859:n 854:e 795:n 790:e 709:n 704:e 681:n 676:e 149:) 141:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 21 - Knowledge (XXG)

Index