Knowledge (XXG)

Williams v Bayley

Source 📝

27: 191:
Mr Bayley’s son forged his father’s signature on promissory notes and gave them to Mr Williams. Mr Williams threatened Mr Bayley that he would bring criminal prosecution against his son unless he granted an equitable mortgage to get back the notes.
324: 229: 200:
House of Lords upheld the cancellation of the agreement, on account of undue influence. The agreement was cancelled on the ground that he was influenced by threat.
529: 363: 477: 500: 309: 222: 463: 44: 215: 110: 91: 63: 447: 180: 48: 351: 534: 70: 544: 77: 37: 539: 336: 282: 59: 469: 294: 458: 176: 84: 270: 246: 162: 437: 422: 396: 432: 299: 523: 409: 370: 383: 341: 314: 26: 207: 211: 20: 156: 148: 138: 130: 125: 51:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 498:Fisher, Michael J., and Desmond G. Greenwood. 223: 8: 365:Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) 230: 216: 208: 143:Henry Williams and Others v James Bayley 122: 406:National Commercial Bank of Jamaica v Hew 111:Learn how and when to remove this message 504:. Hong Kong University Press, 2007. 262. 491: 478:Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. 310:National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan 7: 380:National Westminster Bank plc v Amin 49:adding citations to reliable sources 530:English unconscionability case law 464:Iniquitous pressure in English law 14: 438:[2009] EWHC 1076 (Ch) 25: 36:needs additional citations for 448:Undue influence in English law 1: 481:350 F.2d 445 (C.A. D.C. 1965) 423:[2004] EWCA Civ 372 397:[2002] EWCA Civ 885 352:Barclays Bank plc v O'Brien 561: 501:Contract Law in Hong Kong 444: 429: 416: 403: 390: 377: 360: 348: 337:CIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt 333: 321: 306: 300:[1974] EWCA Civ 8 291: 283:Bank of Montreal v Stuart 279: 267: 255: 243: 175:(1866) LR 1 HL 200 is an 161: 16:English contract law case 238:Cases on undue influence 470:Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy 295:Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy 410:[2003] UKPC 51 371:[2001] UKHL 41 384:[2002] UKHL 9 342:[1993] UKHL 7 315:[1985] UKHL 2 274:(1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 250:(1887) LR 36 Ch D 145 535:House of Lords cases 459:English contract law 177:English contract law 45:improve this article 545:1866 in British law 60:"Williams v Bayley" 262:(1866) LR 1 HL 200 454: 453: 271:Tate v Williamson 259:Williams v Bayley 247:Allcard v Skinner 179:case relating to 172:Williams v Bayley 168: 167: 152:(1866) LR 1 HL 20 126:Williams v Bayley 121: 120: 113: 95: 552: 540:1866 in case law 505: 496: 419:Pesticcio v Huet 393:Hammond v Osborn 366: 232: 225: 218: 209: 123: 116: 109: 105: 102: 96: 94: 53: 29: 21: 560: 559: 555: 554: 553: 551: 550: 549: 520: 519: 514: 509: 508: 497: 493: 488: 455: 450: 440: 425: 412: 399: 386: 373: 364: 356: 344: 329: 317: 302: 287: 275: 263: 251: 239: 236: 206: 198: 189: 181:undue influence 163:Undue influence 117: 106: 100: 97: 54: 52: 42: 30: 17: 12: 11: 5: 558: 556: 548: 547: 542: 537: 532: 522: 521: 518: 517: 513: 510: 507: 506: 490: 489: 487: 484: 483: 482: 474: 466: 461: 452: 451: 445: 442: 441: 433:Thompson v Foy 430: 427: 426: 417: 414: 413: 404: 401: 400: 391: 388: 387: 378: 375: 374: 361: 358: 357: 349: 346: 345: 334: 331: 330: 322: 319: 318: 307: 304: 303: 292: 289: 288: 280: 277: 276: 268: 265: 264: 256: 253: 252: 244: 241: 240: 237: 235: 234: 227: 220: 212: 205: 202: 197: 194: 188: 185: 166: 165: 159: 158: 154: 153: 150: 146: 145: 140: 139:Full case name 136: 135: 134:House of Lords 132: 128: 127: 119: 118: 33: 31: 24: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 557: 546: 543: 541: 538: 536: 533: 531: 528: 527: 525: 516: 515: 511: 503: 502: 495: 492: 485: 480: 479: 475: 472: 471: 467: 465: 462: 460: 457: 456: 449: 443: 439: 435: 434: 428: 424: 420: 415: 411: 407: 402: 398: 394: 389: 385: 381: 376: 372: 368: 367: 359: 354: 353: 347: 343: 339: 338: 332: 327: 326: 325:BCCI v Aboody 320: 316: 312: 311: 305: 301: 297: 296: 290: 285: 284: 278: 273: 272: 266: 261: 260: 254: 249: 248: 242: 233: 228: 226: 221: 219: 214: 213: 210: 203: 201: 195: 193: 186: 184: 182: 178: 174: 173: 164: 160: 155: 151: 147: 144: 141: 137: 133: 129: 124: 115: 112: 104: 101:February 2024 93: 90: 86: 83: 79: 76: 72: 69: 65: 62: –  61: 57: 56:Find sources: 50: 46: 40: 39: 34:This article 32: 28: 23: 22: 19: 499: 494: 476: 468: 431: 418: 405: 392: 379: 362: 355:4 All ER 417 350: 335: 328:4 All ER 955 323: 308: 293: 281: 269: 258: 257: 245: 199: 190: 171: 170: 169: 142: 107: 98: 88: 81: 74: 67: 55: 43:Please help 38:verification 35: 18: 524:Categories 512:References 71:newspapers 204:See also 196:Judgment 157:Keywords 149:Citation 85:scholar 473:QB 326 286:AC 120 87:  80:  73:  66:  58:  486:Notes 436: 421: 408: 395: 382: 369: 340: 313: 298: 187:Facts 131:Court 92:JSTOR 78:books 446:see 64:news 47:by 526:: 183:. 231:e 224:t 217:v 114:) 108:( 103:) 99:( 89:· 82:· 75:· 68:· 41:.

Index


verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Williams v Bayley"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
Undue influence
English contract law
undue influence
v
t
e
Allcard v Skinner
Williams v Bayley
Tate v Williamson
Bank of Montreal v Stuart
Lloyds Bank Ltd v Bundy
[1974] EWCA Civ 8
National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan
[1985] UKHL 2
BCCI v Aboody
CIBC Mortgages plc v Pitt
[1993] UKHL 7
Barclays Bank plc v O'Brien
Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.