Knowledge (XXG)

Hi-Red Center

Source 📝

186:(1949-1963), the annual exhibition where Hi-Red Center (and other collectives such as Kyushu-ha, Group Ongaku, Zero Dimension , Jikan-ha ) were active. Artists at the Yomiuri IndĂ©pendant Exhibition “advocated making junk art and violent demonstrations to protest the conventional practice of art”, degrading Art's status as rarefied objects to commonplace items. Reiko Tomii notes that Hi-Red Center treated this redefinition of the position of Art more directly, enabling Art to descend to everyday life by making everyday life and spaces the site of their work. The group had suspicions about the constraints of traditional art exhibition spaces—“what is offered to the public, at which venue, by whom, under what circumstances, resulting in what reception?”. 297:). They saw the train systems as a "terrain of the everyday", using the individual bodies of the artists to demonstrate how these symbolic events have long-lasting effects on the citizen body, long after public political discourse and dissent wanes. Thus, this quietness or calmness is qualified on the level of public consciousness, rather than a literal silence or emptiness. The choice of staging the event on the Yamanote loop, one of the busiest commuter lines, demonstrates this prioritisation. Their choice of setting can also be attributed to the larger desire for “direct action” (chokusetsu kodo), in the wake of waning public protests post-Anpo. 124:
and life. Their happenings were not a mere displacement of art to the streets, but inherently reshaped the relationship between objects and performance. Akasegawa in particular questioned the ways in which objects, actions, and environments gained coherence in relationship to each other and how artistic intervention acts could disrupt this. Furthermore, they wished to pronounce how their small gestures and ordinary objects were intertwined with inherent “structures” (as Nakanishi called them) or “systems” (as Akasegawa called them in
686:
toes in various orientations, intercutting as if to trace the process of measurement integral to the piece. This assemblage of fragments from the events question the indexicality of the film document, and its status as capturing the "live" happening. It is also crucial to note that this film work was not conceptualised by Hi-Red Center as an official form of documentation, yet nonetheless provides a document to be studied. Akasegawa himself believed that a document of a performance manifests its power. However, for works such as
287:, Takamatsu had unravelled his 3.5 km long Point-string, knotted with similar domestic objects, on the station platform. Later, he stood on the side of the carriage, reading a newspaper with holes in them. Other participants, such as Murata Kiichi, applied white face paint and brought additional objects, including rope, real eggs and a chicken foot. Murai Tokuji documented the happening with photography, depicting the puzzled expressions of commuters watching Nakanishi. Akasegawa was also present as a photographer. 443:
1000-yen note as a passport. The name, date of birth, address, and belongings of each guest were verified, and fingerprints and body measurements were taken. Each participant was photographed from six points of view—face, left profile, right profile, back, top and bottom—to create a custom-sized model of a shelter that could be ordered in four sizes, ranging from life-size to one-tenth of life-size. They then had to be measured for their body volume by being immersed into a bathtub filled with water.
439:, were invited into the Hi-Red Center suite to have their measurements taken, on the pretence of customising one-person nuclear bomb shelters. The process of inspecting each guest, despite them having received an invitation card and an instruction card, was intended to be alienating and objectifying, as though they had been arrested. The instructions included the following steps: 517:. Drinks were served. By subverting the functions and performativity of exhibition openings and closings, the collective wanted to position the space exterior to the gallery space as the work or panorama on display, rather than what is contained within the gallery space. No longer was the artwork form in question—the exhibition format needed to be challenged as well. 690:, scholars have argued that the group had staged the event with photographic documentation in mind, Daria Melnikova claiming that the event was staged for the camera itself. They go as far as to assert that " documentation as an essential part of performance production, and with an even more radical stance of valuing the image more than the live action." 82:
methods of “direct action” in their work with Hi-Red Center, borrowing a term from prewar socialist agitators. With “direct action,” the artists meant to raise to consciousness the absurdities and contradictions of Japanese society. This interest in Art as direct action has been contextualised as rooted in the atmosphere following massive
283:, transparent forms about the size and shape of an ostrich egg, with sundry or "junk" items such as wristwatches, bits of rope, sunglasses, bottle caps and human hair encased in resin. Nakanishi proceeded to lick his objects, also shining a flashlight upon onlooker’s faces to observe their reactions. Prior to boarding the carriage at 591:
Committee”. The flyer included a list of fictional and actual co-organisers and sponsors, such as the Tokyo’s Olympics Organizing Committee, Fluxus Japanese Section and Group Ongaku, reflecting the collective conception of the work, without full attribution to the group itself. This event was also submitted to
1239:
Tomii, Reiko. "After the “Descent to the Everyday”: Japanese Collectivism from Hi Red Center to The Play, 1964–1973." In Collectivism after Modernism: The Art of Social Imagination after 1945, edited by STIMSON BLAKE and SHOLETTE GREGORY, 45-75. University of Minnesota Press, 2007. Accessed March 28,
685:
signing a contract and lying on a bed, a still shot of Nakanishi's clothespin performance, the name card of the Hi Red Center group and the Imperial Hotel contract/rental form, Mystery Cans and a man taking a bath. It obfuscates the human body and figure, showing segments of the torso, back, head and
590:
Leading up to the happening event itself, the group also prepared flyers as an additional parody of bureaucratic organisation. The flyer posed an open call for participation, detailing arbitrary heuristic information under the organisation of the fictional “Metropolitan Environment Hygiene Execution
520:
Naiqua Gallery was an alternative gallery space adjacent to institutional spaces, existing within a broader system of commercial versus rental galleries which were further distinguished by the curatorial direction and rental paid by the artist. Thus, the space is further encoded with the notion that
492:
ran from May 12–16 at the Naiqua Gallery in Tokyo. A questioning of the exhibition format, the group presented an exhibition that was only ever closed and not visible to its audience. They placed an announcement on the door that the space was closed “by the hands of Hi Red Center. When you have free
220:
Akasegawa referred to the group's work as "secret art", with no "officially fixed form" and existing "in the form of rumours". This reflected the Happenings event nature of their work, despite requiring prior planning by the group members. However, this quality of secrecy was influenced by the group
123:
Hi-Red Center is known for "breaking away from the urban centrality of the Tokyo art scene and the focus on the museum/gallery as the core location for the production and consumption of art." By staging these events in the public realm, they acted anonymously while breaching the boundary between art
718:
event) in court in October 1966. Their demonstrations were intended to enlighten the court on the "happenings" nature of Akesagawa's work, yet inevitably substantiated their defense by arguing that the objects used in their performance events ought to be treated with museum-like care, contradicting
442:
Guests were to enter the hotel through the front door, to wear a tie and gloves, and to bring a bag. They were also asked not to leave any fingerprints in the hotel lobby. Once they were invited upstairs and entered the hotel room, the participants received an HRC stamp—a red exclamation mark—on a
344:
This event was held on May 28–29 at Gallery Naiqua, inaugurating the space. The group (and its members) had frequently worked and exhibited in Naiqua (憅科; internal medicine) Gallery, and continued to do so individually after their disbanding. Nakanishi was childhood friends with the owner, Miyata
578:
The group started cleaning the streets in Ginza with inefficient tools, such as cotton balls with ammonia, dental tools, surgeons sponges, tooth picks, linen napkins or toothbrushes, polishing any metal pieces they could find on the pavement—parodying or emphasising the futility of such cleaning
363:
Nakanishi conceived of the work as interactive, allowing the passerby audience to participate by taking the clothespins off or putting them on. The audience reacted to the work in bemusement, without realising the physical pain Nakanishi had subjected himself to. The group also made suits out of
81:
art magazine held November that year, with Akasegawa as an interloctor. The symposium examined the relationship between artistic and political action, and allowed the three artists to reflect on the waning of political activity in Japan. All three artists had begun as painters but would embrace
571:, as a criticism of how the Japanese government had hastily beautified and modernised Tokyo to present the city as economically advanced post-World War II. More incisively, these cleaning efforts were specifically targeted against unwanted citizens such as the homeless and ‘thought perverts" ( 458:
Scholars such as Jessica Santone have read the work as "a critique of Cold War bureaucratic state machines by mimicking their excessive documentation and surveillant control of bodies, while drawing attention to the specificities of the individuals as they differ from normative ideals." Taro
272:
train heading counter-clockwise on its route, disrupting the normalcy of passenger's commutes through a series of performative actions. While this event was staged prior to the official formation of the group, it demonstrates the core ethos of their subsequent works from 1963 onwards.
496:
A diagram of the space was produced to indicate the parameters of the exhibition space, namely the closed door. The work was structured by its "opening" and "closing events, which in fact were the inverse, with the sealing of the door at the opening and its unsealing at its closing.
617:, the collective participants being against Japan's rapid urbanisation under the auspices of presenting an illusion of "Progress and Harmony" (Expo '70's theme) at an international event. Both events were documented by photographers Hirata Minoru and Hanaga Mitsutoshi. 706:
there was simply nothing left to do.” In fact, around that time Akasegawa was becoming increasingly preoccupied with his own trial for alleged counterfeiting of 1,000-yen notes, and thus did not have time for further events and happenings with Hi-Red Center.
586:
in white. Despite this deliberate self-identification, passersby did not question their clearly heightened act of cleaning—proving the legitimacy of the group's critique of how extreme or performative prior government cleaning initiatives had been.
583:" (Cleaning now) in Japanese. The three core members and their associates were dressed in outfits used by laboratory technicians during the Olympic Games, paired with an incongruous pair of shades and a red armband with the group’s trademark “!” 291: 652:
Photographic documentation of the group's ephemeral activities was crucial for the works to be studied and historicised. Operating during the 1960s, there was rarely any form of filmic of video documentation of artistic activity in
221:
being consisted of anonymous members that participated in the organisation of events, without being officially credited. Even the group's name was intended to form a was a fictional character called Mr. "Hi Red Center", similar to
360:, covered with metal clothespins and carrying balloons. These common clothespins were attached en-masse to canvas, clothing and human flesh. The work had previously been staged at the March 1963 Yomiuri Indépendant Exhibition. 446:
The group also prepared five Mystery Cans or as Akasegawa referred to them, "Universe Cans", which were tin cans marked with the group's signature red “!” insignia and filled with unknown contents. Jƍnouchi Motoharu’s film
197:” (hapuningu), “events” (ivento), and “rituals” (gishiki) in "extraexhibtion projects" required extensive collaboration inter and intra collectives. Thus, Hi-Red Center's form of Anti-Art practice can also be said to be 657:
being a rare exception that was documented by film. Most of the group's works was photographed by Hirata Minoru and Hanaga Mitsutoshi. Hirata described his documentation practice as capturing "Art that jumped outside "
1549: 1573: 500:
At the opening event, the group used hammers and nails to affix the door, with no spectators except for a cockroach trapped in a glass, who was left in sealed gallery space. The closing event was officiated by
540:). After dropping the objects they collected and packed them all into the battered suitcase, placing it in a public locker and sending the key to the locker to someone chosen at random from a phone book. 167:) movements (in the 1970s), with Anti-Art collectivism being more viscerally driven and Non-Art collectivism more cerebrally engaged. These artists' experimentations with form can be characterised as the 53:
as their canvas, the group sought to create interventions that blurred the lines between art and everyday life and raised questions about centralized authority and the role of the individual in society.
1865: 1550:"Takamatsu Jiro's String Continue On and On (Takamatsu Jirƍ's string objects, at Hi Red Center's 5th Mixer Plan exhibition at Shinjuku Dai-Ichi Gallery) (1963) - Hirata Minoru - M+ Collections Beta" 493:
time, please make sure not to visit it." The group made sure to include both Japanese and English renditions of the announcement, conscious of foreigners who might want to enter the gallery.
1685: 290:
William Marotti characterizes this work as an intervention into quietness (or calmness), Nakanishi and Genpei situating the work in the wake of large-scale post-war upheavals (such as the
1467: 624:
has been staged out of Japan, though without reference of consideration of the original event's immediate socio-political context. An American edition of the event was organised by
865:
2013-14, 22 November 2013–9 February 2014. "Great Crescent: Art and Agitation in the 1960s—Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan", curated by Cosmin Costinas, Lesley Ma and Doryun Chong,
151:
suggests it would be a mistake to interpret it through the history and confines Euro-American movements. Instead, Hi-Red Center's activities can be seen to follow the demise of
1574:"Akasegawa Genpei's Wrapped Objects, with Okamoto Tarƍ, at Hi Red Center's 5th Mixer Plan exhibition at Shinjuku Dai-Ichi Gallery (1963) - Hirata Minoru - M+ Collections Beta" 1311:
Tomii, Reiko (2007). "After the 'Descent to the Everyday': Japanese Collectivism from Hi Red Center to The Play, 1964-1973". In Stimson, Blake; Sholette, Gregory (eds.).
140:(1965) represents the corpus of the group's city interventions on a notational cartographic form, implying the confluence of their activities with the urban landscape. 57:
Later considered to have been one of the most prominent and influential Japanese art groups of the 1960s, Hi-Red Center never officially disbanded, but their happening
1258:
Tomii, Reiko. ""Art Outside the Box" in 1960s Japan: An Introduction and Commentary." Review of Japanese Culture and Society 17 (2005): 1-11. Accessed March 28, 2021.
1841: 1140: 2163: 1866:"Audience (Takiguchi ShĆ«zƍ on the left) came to the closing party for Hi Red Center's Closing Event, at Naiqua Gallery (1964) - Hirata Minoru - M+ Collections Beta" 300:
Mark Pendleton argues that this work, and its form of intervention into the everyday, has influenced the ethos of subsequent collectives in the 1970s, such as
93:
These discussions at the symposium led the artists to work together again to present their three-person show, "Fifth Mixer Plan," at the Dai-Ichi Gallery in
764:
2018, 28 September–28 October. "Jiro Takumatsu é«˜æŸæŹĄéƒŽ | Hi Red Center | Hirata Minoru ćčłç”°ćźŸ | Kim Ku Lim êč€ê”ŹëŠŒ" curated by Victor Wang, 111 Great Titchfield St,
1979: 1931: 276:
Nakanishi positioned himself in the centre of the train carriage, his face painted white and seemingly absorbed in a book. He carried Compact Objects or
1686:"Nakanishi Natsuyuki's Clothespins Assert Churning Action, for Hi Red Center's 6th Mixer Plan event, Tokyo (1963) - Hirata Minoru - M+ Collections Beta" 2178: 662:), which also bears the connotations of art existing outside of the institutional site of exhibitions in Japan. Similarly, Nakanishi has described 595:'s "Tone Prize exhibition" (held at Naiqua Gallery in the same month), which critiqued the jury system of salons and competitive exhibitions. 2173: 2007: 521:
not even this alternative space can contain or host the kind of Art worth exhibiting, providing a deeper impetus to seek Art in the streets.
163:
Whirlwind," a Japanese version of gestural abstraction. Hi-Red Center prefigured collaborative collectivism, bridging Anti-Art to Non-Art (
304:. The collective also situated their work in the Tokyo train system, installing a dining table and hosting a meal on a subway carriage in 783: 536:(October 10, 1964), the group heaved a suitcase and its contents off the building of the Ikenobƍ Flower-Arranging School’s headquarters ( 398:
The group was commenting on how the apparatus of media functions in a capitalist society, namely how news reportage preceded the event.
77:(1962) (detailed below) in October 1962, subsequently participating in the "Signs of Discourse on Direct Action" symposium sponsored by 1320: 810: 1955: 1360: 1072: 1041: 971: 940: 730:
There have been a few solo retrospectives dedicated to the activities of Hi-Red Centre, all mainly situated within gallery spaces.
183: 384: 1842:"Jasper Johns opening the door at Hi Red Center's Closing Event, at Naiqua Gallery (1964) - Hirata Minoru - M+ Collections Beta" 1094:
Pendleton, Mark. "Bringing little things to the surface: intervening into the Japanese post-Bubble impasse on the Yamanote." In
2135:
Morgan, Robert C. "Conceptualism: Reevaluation or Revisionism?" Art Journal 58, no. 3 (1999): 109-11. Accessed March 28, 2021.
814: 1906: 505:, who pulled out the first nail of the sealed gallery door. This closing event had a sizeable audience, including art critic 322:
was the three person exhibition that led to the founding of the group, and was staged in May 1963 at the Dai-Ichi Gallery in
463:, stating that the surveillance of bodies by the government was intended to present a veneer of a physically fit populace. 735: 73:, a similar art collective focused on performance art and happenings. Nakanishi and Takamatsu worked together to stage 193:
argues that the shift from the display of objects in an exhibition format to the installation and organisation of “
87: 2168: 1442: 666:
to be a invocation to break out of the box, by stubbornly repeating events that did not belong to the structure (
1713:
Ippolito, Jean M. "The Search for New Media: Early Avant-Garde Momentum for the Digital art Pioneers of Japan."
681:
exists as a form of documentation of the event itself, but includes images of other events. In the film, we see
2075:
Bonehill, Jessica. "Art on the Outside: The contextualising of a Fluxus work in the Urban Environment." (1966).
1064: 1033: 963: 932: 176: 33:(ăƒă‚€ăƒŹăƒƒăƒ‰ăƒ»ă‚»ăƒłă‚żăƒŒ, Haireddo Sentā) was a Japanese artistic collective, founded in May 1963 and consisting of artists 1980:"MITSUTOSHI HANAGA | Hi Red Center Dropping Event at Ikenobo Kaikan in Tokyo, October 10, 1964 (2020) | Artsy" 1932:"'Hi Red Center's Dropping Event at Ikenobo Hall, Tokyo, October 10, 1964', Minoru Hirata, 1964, printed 2011" 1400:
Melnikova, Daria. "Body, Camera, Action: Understanding the Metamorphosis of Performance Art in Japan." (2018).
1507: 1539:
Wade, Mackenzie. "The Yamanote Loop: Unifying Rail Transportation and Disaster Resilience in Tokyo." (2020).
741:
2013-14. “Hi-Red Center: The Documents of “Direct Action””. Dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of the group.
168: 2101:
Tomii, Reiko (2002). "State v. (Anti-)Art: Model 1,000-Yen Note Incident by Akasegawa Genpei and Company".
1283:: The Yomiuri Indépendant Artists and Social Protest Tendencies in the 1960s". In Munroe, Alexandra (ed.). 1191:
Tomii, Reiko. “Hi Red Center, Great Panorama Exhibition” . In Mathieu Copeland and Balthazar Lovau (eds.),
722:
Akesagawa was found guilty, and appealed the verdict to the High and Supreme Courts (in 1970) to no avail.
799: 788: 745: 844:
1999, April 28–August 29. "Global Conceptualism: Points of Origin, 1950s -1980s", curatorial team led by
774:
The group has also been featured in the following seminal post-war Japanese art blockbuster exhibitions.
633: 413: 97:
and thus found the group Hi-Red Center in May 1963. The name "Hi-Red Center" was derived from the first
451:
which documented the even shows that Nakanishi had papered the walls of the suite with images from the
301: 1606:
Tomii, Reiko (2019). "'A Test Tube' of New Art: Naiqua and the Rental Gallery System in 1960s Japan".
702:
happening proved to be their final artistic act. Akasegawa would later cryptically remark that “after
827: 568: 506: 1297:
Tomii, Reiko. "State v.(anti-) art: Model 1,000-yen note incident by Akasegawa Genpei and company."
584: 1726:
Moren, Lisa. "Introduction: Signatures, Music, Computers, Paranoia, Smells, Danger & the Sky."
388: 70: 38: 826:
2012-13, Nov 18, 2012–Feb 25, 2013. "Tokyo 1955–1970: A New Avant-Garde” curated by Doryun Chong,
710:
As part of Akasegawa's trial, the members of the group restaged a few of their works (Takamatsu's
2118: 2035: 1623: 1259: 1112: 637: 1956:"Hi Red Center's Dropping Event, at Ikebonƍ Kaikan (1964) - Hirata Minoru - M+ Collections Beta" 1780:
Nettleton, Taro. "Hi Red Center’s Shelter Plan (1964): The Uncanny Body in the Imperial Hotel."
563:
The group is most known for this performance work, which took place on the bustling district of
1428:
Paik, Nam June. “To Catch Up or Not to Catch Up with the West: Hijikata and Hi Red Center.” In
567:
in Tokyo on Saturday, October 16, 1964. It was intentionally staged during the duration of the
2158: 2030:
DalaiJee, Kuro. "Performance Art And/as Activism: Expo '70 Destruction Joint-Struggle Group."
1366: 1356: 1316: 1068: 1037: 967: 936: 392: 357: 247: 42: 383:) in April 1964. This project highlights the coincidence between the TV broadcast as well as 2136: 2110: 1615: 779: 769: 641: 128:), such as newspapers, currency, commodity circulation, train lines, and public sanitation. 34: 2052: 995:
Faris, Jaimey Hamilton. "Rooms in Alibi: How Akasegawa Genpei Framed Capitalist Reality."
625: 326:. The three artists presented some of their seminal individual works; Takamatsu exhibited 133: 1744:
Experimental Arts in Postwar Japan: Moments of Encounter, Engagement, and Imagined Return
1414:
Art, Anti-Art, Non-Art: Experimentations in the Public Sphere in Postwar Japan, 1950-1970
226: 1165: 894: 861: 1141:"MoMA | Exhibiting Fluxus: Mapping Hi Red Center in Tokyo 1955–1970: A New Avant-Garde" 849: 428: 277: 222: 198: 172: 129: 17: 2152: 2122: 1627: 853: 831: 818: 803: 436: 294: 269: 206: 83: 1811:
Santone, Jessica. "Documentation as group activity: performing the Fluxus network."
1241: 592: 502: 424: 420: 284: 1058: 1027: 957: 926: 835: 416:
in January 1964. The event was titled to be reminiscent of 1950s bombing drills.
354:
Sentaku basal wa kakuhan koi wo shucho suru (Clothes Pegs Assert Churning Action)
182:
Anti-Art gained popularity in the Japanese vanguard art scene through the annual
845: 606: 514: 210: 190: 160: 148: 1798:
Akasegawa, Genpei. “A Can of the Universe. 1984” translated by Reiko Tomii, In
1432:, edited by Alexandra Munroe, 77–82. New York, New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1994. 474:, and was characterised without the specific Japanese socio-political context. 2114: 214: 202: 1370: 1827:
Bilbao Yarto, Ana Edurne. "The closed exhibition: when form needs a break."
1802:, edited by Mathieu Copeland and Balthazar Lovay, 51–53. Koenig Books, 2017. 870: 866: 579:
efforts. They also carried billboard signs with "Be Clean!" in English and "
391:. The leaflets hinted at a possible third assassination of French President 352:
Presenting what would become one of his most famous works, Nakanishi staged
349:). Thus, they did not have to pay any rental fees when they used the space. 194: 90:
in 1960. They were united to move toward “events” for an “uneventful” time.
46: 1207:
Yoshimoto, Midori. "Off Museum! Performance Art That Turned the Street."
792: 682: 613:) protests in 1969-1970. The Expo '70 protests were directly informed by 510: 432: 323: 159:) in Japan (in the 1960s), which can be traced to the phenomenon called " 152: 94: 2039: 1263: 1116: 756: 778:
1994-95. “Japanese Art After 1945: Scream Against the Sky” curated by
1350: 857: 765: 749: 644:). It is said that Maciunas had a deep respect for the group's work. 544:
was documented by photographers Minoru Hirata and Hanaga Mitsutoshi.
395:
in light of the upcoming broadcast testing between Japan and Europe.
144: 2140: 1619: 564: 557:
Campaign to Promote Cleanliness and Order in the Metropolitan Area
99: 50: 1746:, 150. Harvard University Asia Center Publications Program, 2011. 1528:
Money, trains, and guillotines: art and revolution in 1960s Japan
1508:"ABOUT HI-RED CENTER AND THE YAMANOTE LINE INCIDENT – desistfilm" 601:
prefigures later "intercollective networking", being adopted by
1490:
Chong, Doryun, Michio Hayashi, Mika Yoshitake, and Miryam Sas.
387:
and an attempted assassination of the U.S. ambassador to Japan
1008:“Chokusetsu kƍdƍ no kizashi: Hitotsu no jikkenrei ni tsuite” 840:
Their work has also been shown in the following group shows.
268:
Staged on 18 October 1962, Natsuyuki and Takamatsu boarded a
466:
The English Fluxus version of the work was mistranslated as
1760:
Hijikata Tatsumi and Butoh: Dancing in a pool of gray grits
1060:
Japan at the Crossroads: Conflict and Compromise after Anpo
1029:
Japan at the Crossroads: Conflict and Compromise after Anpo
959:
Japan at the Crossroads: Conflict and Compromise after Anpo
928:
Japan at the Crossroads: Conflict and Compromise after Anpo
246:, where the group painted the urinals of a lecture hall at 61:
in October 1964 proved to be their final artistic action.
632:) and at the 1966 Fluxfest (performed by the students of 69:
Akasegawa had previously participated in the short-lived
1412:
Merewether, Charles, Rika Iezumi Hiro, and Reiko Tomii.
381:
Tokuhƍ! TsĆ«shin eisei wa nanimono ni tsukawarete iru ka!
147:
movement (and its Japanese counterparts), art historian
2008:"Hi-Red Center's quiet actions still reverberate today" 1907:""Hi Red Center's 'Dropping Event', at Ikenobƍ Kaikan"" 698:
Although Hi-Red Center never officially disbanded, the
345:
Kunio, and influenced him to open the rental gallery (
377:
News Flash! Who is Using the Communication Satellite?
369:
News Flash! Who is Using the Communication Satellite?
1649:
Into performance: Japanese women artists in New York
459:
Nettleton makes a connection between this event and
755:2014, February 11th–March 23. Shoto Museum of Art, 45:, that organized and performed anti-establishment 1315:. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 53–54. 1195:, 2017, 47-50. London: Koening Books and Fri Art. 364:balloons for performers on the streets of Tokyo. 1242:http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttv1dg.7 1893:Japanese Art After 1945: Scream Against the Sky 1608:Afterall: A Journal of Art, Context and Enquiry 1430:Japanese Art After 1945: Scream Against the Sky 1352:Japanese art after 1945: scream against the sky 1285:Japanese Art After 1945: Scream Against the Sky 1098:, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 257-276. Routledge, 2018. 674:), supplementing events that daily gush forth. 356:, walking around in the square in front of the 2053:"Hirata Minoru - Makers - M+ Collections Beta" 1443:"The importance of politics to Jirƍ Takamatsu" 1416:. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2007. 375:The group published a set of leaflets titled 171:of art, comparable to global developments of 8: 2034:23 (2011): 154-73. Accessed March 28, 2021. 1887: 1885: 734:2013, February 6–March 27. "Hi Red Center", 201:, in its questioning of the notions of sole 920: 918: 916: 914: 912: 910: 908: 620:Through the group's affiliation to Fluxus, 412:was an invite-only event staged at Tokyo’s 798:1995, September 14, 1994–January 8, 1995. 1287:. New York: Harry N. Abrams. p. 150. 605:(Final Art Institute) in 1973 and in the 2084:Goldberg, RoseLee, and Laurie Anderson. 1530:. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 18. 736:Centre of Contemporary Art (CCA) Glasgow 237:Other events not detailed below include 1895:(New York, NY: H.N. Abrams, 1994), 178. 883: 143:While the group is associated with the 2164:Japanese artist groups and collectives 2096: 2094: 2032:Review of Japanese Culture and Society 2001: 1999: 1794: 1792: 1790: 1776: 1774: 1772: 1770: 1768: 1754: 1752: 1738: 1736: 1709: 1707: 1705: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1661: 1659: 1657: 1643: 1641: 1639: 1637: 1396: 1394: 1392: 1390: 1388: 1386: 1384: 1382: 1380: 1299:positions: east asia cultures critique 1254: 1252: 1250: 1203: 1201: 1135: 1133: 1131: 1129: 1127: 1125: 889: 887: 1823: 1821: 1601: 1599: 1597: 1595: 1593: 1502: 1500: 1424: 1422: 1408: 1406: 1344: 1342: 1340: 1338: 1336: 1334: 1332: 1274: 1272: 1235: 1233: 1231: 1229: 1227: 1225: 1223: 1221: 1219: 1217: 1187: 1185: 991: 989: 987: 985: 983: 419:56 guests, including artists such as 7: 2006:Hammond, Jeff Michael (2014-02-26). 1090: 1088: 1086: 1084: 1012:, no. 7 (February 1963): 15–23; and 628:in New York City in 1965 (alongside 470:by Shigeko Kubota, eventually title 385:the assassination of John F. Kennedy 2088:. Harry N. Abrams Publishers, 1998. 1492:Tokyo, 1955-1970: A New Avant-garde 811:San Francisco Museum of Modern Art 719:the principles of their practice. 609:Destruction Joint-Struggle Group ( 292:1960 Anpo US–Japan Security Treaty 103:characters of their surnames: “高, 49:. Taking the urban environment of 25: 1675:. Rowman & Littlefield, 2018. 1651:. Rutgers University Press, 2005. 1494:. The Museum of Modern Art, 2012. 403:Imperial Hotel Body: Shelter Plan 2086:Performance: Live art since 1960 2179:1964 disestablishments in Japan 815:Yerba Buena Center for the Arts 744:2013, November 9–December 23. 453:General Catalogue of Males ’63 184:Yomiuri IndĂ©pendant Exhibition 1: 1800:The Anti-Museum: An Anthology 714:and presenting relics of the 490:The Great Panorama Exhibition 479:The Great Panorama Exhibition 306:Shukutaku ressha/Video Picnic 2174:1963 establishments in Japan 1911:The Art Institute of Chicago 1815:32, no. 3-4 (2016): 263-281. 1313:Collectivism After Modernism 1063:. Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1032:. Cambridge, Massachusetts: 962:. Cambridge, Massachusetts: 931:. Cambridge, Massachusetts: 1829:Revista de HistĂłria Da Arte 1279:Munroe, Alexandra (1994). " 1111:22, no. 2 (2000): 127-34. 860:, United States of America. 834:, United States of America. 821:, United States of America. 806:, United States of America. 787:1994, February 5–March 30. 2195: 1349:Alexandra, Munroe (1994). 1301:10, no. 1 (2002): 141-172. 1166:"Hi-Red Center – Art Term" 88:U.S.-Japan Security Treaty 27:Japanese artist collective 2115:10.1215/10679847-10-1-141 1016:, no. 8 (June 1963): 1–18 895:"Art Term: Hi-Red Center" 328:String Continue On and On 2057:collections.mplus.org.hk 1960:collections.mplus.org.hk 1870:collections.mplus.org.hk 1846:collections.mplus.org.hk 1784:34, no. 1 (2014): 83-99. 1690:collections.mplus.org.hk 1578:collections.mplus.org.hk 1554:collections.mplus.org.hk 1065:Harvard University Press 1034:Harvard University Press 964:Harvard University Press 933:Harvard University Press 828:The Museum of Modern Art 809:1995, May 31–August 27. 603:Kyukyoko Hyogen Kenkyujo 569:1964 Tokyo Olympic Games 330:and Akasegawa exhibited 1905:Hirata, Minoru (1964). 999:4, no. 3 (2015): 40-64. 240:Waseda University Event 800:Guggenheim Museum SoHo 789:Yokohama Museum of Art 746:Nagoya City Art Museum 688:Yamanote Line Incident 664:Yamanote Line Incident 611:Banpaku Hakai KyĂ”tĂ”-ha 573:shisƍteki henshitsusha 358:Shinbashi rail station 262:Yamanote Line Incident 75:Yamanote Line Incident 18:Yamanote Line incident 1762:, 70. Springer, 2012. 1730:40, no. 1 (2006): 28. 1281:Morphology of Revenge 670:) of this container ( 1209:Performance paradigm 1057:Kapur, Nick (2018). 1036:. pp. 198–199. 1026:Kapur, Nick (2018). 966:. pp. 195–196. 956:Kapur, Nick (2018). 925:Kapur, Nick (2018). 559:) (October 16, 1964) 1671:Galliano, Luciana. 1647:Yoshimoto, Midori. 1526:Marotti, W., 2013. 1355:. Harry N. Abrams. 485:) (May 12–16, 1964) 248:Waseda University’s 244:(November 22, 1962) 177:post-minimalist art 136:' edited map sheet 119:Collective Practice 71:Neo-Dada Organizers 39:Natsuyuki Nakanishi 1891:Alexandra Munroe, 1717:10 (2008): 97-112. 1211:2 (2006): 108-122. 852:and Rachel Weiss, 638:Geoffery Hendricks 528:(October 10, 1964) 431:, Kawani Hiroshi, 270:Yamanote loop line 264:(October 18, 1962) 126:Capitalist Realism 1107:Augst, Bertrand. 393:Charles de Gaulle 340:(May 28–29, 1963) 302:Video Earth Tokyo 169:dematerialization 16:(Redirected from 2186: 2169:Culture in Tokyo 2143: 2133: 2127: 2126: 2098: 2089: 2082: 2076: 2073: 2067: 2066: 2064: 2063: 2049: 2043: 2028: 2022: 2021: 2019: 2018: 2003: 1994: 1993: 1991: 1990: 1976: 1970: 1969: 1967: 1966: 1952: 1946: 1945: 1943: 1942: 1927: 1921: 1920: 1918: 1917: 1902: 1896: 1889: 1880: 1879: 1877: 1876: 1862: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1852: 1838: 1832: 1831:(2019): 126-143. 1825: 1816: 1813:Visual Resources 1809: 1803: 1796: 1785: 1782:Japanese Studies 1778: 1763: 1756: 1747: 1740: 1731: 1728:Visible Language 1724: 1718: 1711: 1700: 1699: 1697: 1696: 1682: 1676: 1669: 1652: 1645: 1632: 1631: 1603: 1588: 1587: 1585: 1584: 1570: 1564: 1563: 1561: 1560: 1546: 1540: 1537: 1531: 1524: 1518: 1517: 1515: 1514: 1504: 1495: 1488: 1482: 1481: 1479: 1478: 1472:www.facebook.com 1464: 1458: 1457: 1455: 1454: 1439: 1433: 1426: 1417: 1410: 1401: 1398: 1375: 1374: 1346: 1327: 1326: 1308: 1302: 1295: 1289: 1288: 1276: 1267: 1256: 1245: 1237: 1212: 1205: 1196: 1189: 1180: 1179: 1177: 1176: 1161: 1155: 1154: 1152: 1151: 1137: 1120: 1105: 1099: 1092: 1079: 1078: 1054: 1048: 1047: 1023: 1017: 1006: 1000: 993: 978: 977: 953: 947: 946: 922: 903: 902: 891: 780:Alexandra Munroe 677:Jƍnouchi’s film 642:Grand Army Plaza 427:, Kazakura Shƍ, 389:Edwin Reischauer 338:Sixth Mixer Plan 332:Wrapped Objects. 320:Fifth Mixer Plan 315:(May 7–12, 1963) 313:Fifth Mixer Plan 138:Bundle of Events 35:Genpei Akasegawa 21: 2194: 2193: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2134: 2130: 2100: 2099: 2092: 2083: 2079: 2074: 2070: 2061: 2059: 2051: 2050: 2046: 2029: 2025: 2016: 2014: 2012:The Japan Times 2005: 2004: 1997: 1988: 1986: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1964: 1962: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1940: 1938: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1915: 1913: 1904: 1903: 1899: 1890: 1883: 1874: 1872: 1864: 1863: 1859: 1850: 1848: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1826: 1819: 1810: 1806: 1797: 1788: 1779: 1766: 1757: 1750: 1741: 1734: 1725: 1721: 1712: 1703: 1694: 1692: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1670: 1655: 1646: 1635: 1605: 1604: 1591: 1582: 1580: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1558: 1556: 1548: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1534: 1525: 1521: 1512: 1510: 1506: 1505: 1498: 1489: 1485: 1476: 1474: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1452: 1450: 1447:Apollo Magazine 1441: 1440: 1436: 1427: 1420: 1411: 1404: 1399: 1378: 1363: 1348: 1347: 1330: 1323: 1310: 1309: 1305: 1296: 1292: 1278: 1277: 1270: 1257: 1248: 1238: 1215: 1206: 1199: 1193:The Anti-Museum 1190: 1183: 1174: 1172: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1149: 1147: 1139: 1138: 1123: 1106: 1102: 1093: 1082: 1075: 1067:. p. 198. 1056: 1055: 1051: 1044: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1007: 1003: 994: 981: 974: 955: 954: 950: 943: 935:. p. 199. 924: 923: 906: 893: 892: 885: 880: 728: 696: 660:Tobidashita āto 650: 626:George Maciunas 561: 530: 507:Takiguchi ShĆ«zƍ 487: 468:Human Box Event 407: 373: 342: 317: 266: 235: 134:George Maciunas 121: 111:(red), and “侭, 67: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2192: 2190: 2182: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2166: 2161: 2151: 2150: 2145: 2144: 2141:10.2307/777867 2128: 2109:(1): 141–172. 2090: 2077: 2068: 2044: 2023: 1995: 1971: 1947: 1922: 1897: 1881: 1857: 1833: 1817: 1804: 1786: 1764: 1758:Baird, Bruce. 1748: 1732: 1719: 1701: 1677: 1653: 1633: 1620:10.1086/704206 1614:(1): 146–161. 1589: 1565: 1541: 1532: 1519: 1496: 1483: 1459: 1434: 1418: 1402: 1376: 1361: 1328: 1322:978-0816644629 1321: 1303: 1290: 1268: 1246: 1213: 1197: 1181: 1156: 1121: 1100: 1080: 1073: 1049: 1042: 1018: 1001: 979: 972: 948: 941: 904: 882: 881: 879: 876: 875: 874: 863: 850:Luis Camnitzer 838: 837: 824: 823: 822: 807: 796: 772: 771: 762: 761: 760: 753: 739: 727: 724: 704:Cleaning Event 700:Cleaning Event 695: 692: 649: 646: 622:Cleaning Event 615:Cleaning Event 599:Cleaning Event 560: 549:Cleaning Event 546: 542:Dropping Event 538:Ikenobƍ Kaikan 534:Dropping Event 529: 526:Dropping Event 523: 486: 476: 461:Cleaning Event 429:Tadanori Yokoo 414:Imperial Hotel 406: 405:(January 1964) 400: 372: 366: 341: 335: 316: 310: 265: 259: 234: 231: 223:Marcel Duchamp 189:Art historian 130:Shigeko Kubota 120: 117: 66: 63: 59:Cleaning Event 43:Jirƍ Takamatsu 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2191: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2165: 2162: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2154: 2142: 2138: 2132: 2129: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2097: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2081: 2078: 2072: 2069: 2058: 2054: 2048: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2027: 2024: 2013: 2009: 2002: 2000: 1996: 1985: 1984:www.artsy.net 1981: 1975: 1972: 1961: 1957: 1951: 1948: 1937: 1933: 1926: 1923: 1912: 1908: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1888: 1886: 1882: 1871: 1867: 1861: 1858: 1847: 1843: 1837: 1834: 1830: 1824: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1808: 1805: 1801: 1795: 1793: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1777: 1775: 1773: 1771: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1755: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1742:Sas, Miryam. 1739: 1737: 1733: 1729: 1723: 1720: 1716: 1710: 1708: 1706: 1702: 1691: 1687: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1668: 1666: 1664: 1662: 1660: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1644: 1642: 1640: 1638: 1634: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1602: 1600: 1598: 1596: 1594: 1590: 1579: 1575: 1569: 1566: 1555: 1551: 1545: 1542: 1536: 1533: 1529: 1523: 1520: 1509: 1503: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1487: 1484: 1473: 1469: 1463: 1460: 1448: 1444: 1438: 1435: 1431: 1425: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1409: 1407: 1403: 1397: 1395: 1393: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1385: 1383: 1381: 1377: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1362:0-8109-2593-1 1358: 1354: 1353: 1345: 1343: 1341: 1339: 1337: 1335: 1333: 1329: 1324: 1318: 1314: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1294: 1291: 1286: 1282: 1275: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1255: 1253: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1236: 1234: 1232: 1230: 1228: 1226: 1224: 1222: 1220: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1204: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1188: 1186: 1182: 1171: 1167: 1160: 1157: 1146: 1142: 1136: 1134: 1132: 1130: 1128: 1126: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1091: 1089: 1087: 1085: 1081: 1076: 1074:9780674988484 1070: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1053: 1050: 1045: 1043:9780674988484 1039: 1035: 1031: 1030: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1005: 1002: 998: 992: 990: 988: 986: 984: 980: 975: 973:9780674988484 969: 965: 961: 960: 952: 949: 944: 942:9780674988484 938: 934: 930: 929: 921: 919: 917: 915: 913: 911: 909: 905: 900: 896: 890: 888: 884: 877: 872: 868: 864: 862: 859: 855: 854:Queens Museum 851: 847: 843: 842: 841: 836: 833: 832:New York City 829: 825: 820: 819:San Francisco 816: 812: 808: 805: 804:New York City 801: 797: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 781: 777: 776: 775: 770: 767: 763: 758: 754: 751: 747: 743: 742: 740: 737: 733: 732: 731: 725: 723: 720: 717: 713: 708: 705: 701: 693: 691: 689: 684: 680: 675: 673: 669: 665: 661: 656: 648:Documentation 647: 645: 643: 639: 635: 634:Roberts Watts 631: 627: 623: 618: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 596: 594: 588: 585: 582: 576: 574: 570: 566: 558: 554: 550: 547: 545: 543: 539: 535: 527: 524: 522: 518: 516: 512: 508: 504: 498: 494: 491: 484: 483:Closing Event 480: 477: 475: 473: 469: 464: 462: 456: 454: 450: 444: 440: 438: 437:Nam June Paik 434: 430: 426: 422: 417: 415: 411: 404: 401: 399: 396: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 370: 367: 365: 361: 359: 355: 350: 348: 339: 336: 334: 333: 329: 325: 321: 314: 311: 309: 307: 303: 298: 296: 293: 288: 286: 282: 280: 274: 271: 263: 260: 258: 256: 255:(August 1963) 254: 249: 245: 242: 241: 232: 230: 228: 224: 218: 216: 212: 208: 207:individualism 204: 200: 196: 192: 187: 185: 180: 178: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 141: 139: 135: 131: 127: 118: 116: 114: 110: 106: 102: 101: 96: 91: 89: 85: 84:Anpo protests 80: 76: 72: 64: 62: 60: 55: 52: 48: 44: 40: 36: 32: 31:Hi-Red Center 19: 2131: 2106: 2102: 2085: 2080: 2071: 2060:. Retrieved 2056: 2047: 2031: 2026: 2015:. Retrieved 2011: 1987:. Retrieved 1983: 1974: 1963:. Retrieved 1959: 1950: 1939:. Retrieved 1935: 1925: 1914:. Retrieved 1910: 1900: 1892: 1873:. Retrieved 1869: 1860: 1849:. Retrieved 1845: 1836: 1828: 1812: 1807: 1799: 1781: 1759: 1743: 1727: 1722: 1714: 1693:. Retrieved 1689: 1680: 1673:Japan Fluxus 1672: 1648: 1611: 1607: 1581:. Retrieved 1577: 1568: 1557:. Retrieved 1553: 1544: 1535: 1527: 1522: 1511:. Retrieved 1491: 1486: 1475:. Retrieved 1471: 1462: 1451:. Retrieved 1449:. 2017-07-19 1446: 1437: 1429: 1413: 1351: 1312: 1306: 1298: 1293: 1284: 1280: 1208: 1192: 1173:. Retrieved 1169: 1159: 1148:. Retrieved 1145:www.moma.org 1144: 1108: 1103: 1095: 1059: 1052: 1028: 1021: 1013: 1009: 1004: 996: 958: 951: 927: 898: 839: 773: 729: 721: 716:Shelter Plan 715: 711: 709: 703: 699: 697: 687: 679:Shelter Plan 678: 676: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655:Shelter Plan 654: 651: 630:Shelter Plan 629: 621: 619: 614: 610: 602: 598: 597: 593:Yasunao Tone 589: 580: 577: 572: 562: 556: 552: 548: 541: 537: 533: 531: 525: 519: 509:and artists 503:Jasper Johns 499: 495: 489: 488: 482: 478: 471: 467: 465: 460: 457: 452: 449:Shelter Plan 448: 445: 441: 425:Mieko Shiomi 421:Masao Adachi 418: 410:Shelter Plan 409: 408: 402: 397: 380: 376: 374: 371:(April 1964) 368: 362: 353: 351: 346: 343: 337: 331: 327: 319: 318: 312: 305: 299: 289: 285:Ueno Station 278: 275: 267: 261: 252: 251: 243: 239: 238: 236: 227:Rrose SĂ©lavy 219: 188: 181: 164: 157:Han-geijutsu 156: 142: 137: 125: 122: 112: 108: 107:(high), “蔀, 104: 98: 92: 86:against the 78: 74: 68: 58: 56: 30: 29: 1715:Art Inquiry 1096:Japan Forum 846:Jane Farver 738:, Scotland. 726:Exhibitions 515:Sam Francis 472:Hotel Event 211:originality 191:Reiko Tomii 165:Hi-geijutsu 149:Reiko Tomii 2153:Categories 2062:2021-03-28 2017:2021-02-08 1989:2021-03-29 1965:2021-03-29 1941:2021-03-29 1916:2021-03-29 1875:2021-03-28 1851:2021-03-28 1695:2021-03-28 1583:2021-03-29 1559:2021-03-29 1513:2021-03-28 1477:2021-03-28 1468:"Facebook" 1453:2021-03-28 1175:2021-03-28 1150:2021-02-08 997:ARTMargins 878:References 768:, England. 347:kashi garo 215:modern art 203:authorship 199:postmodern 195:Happenings 173:conceptual 115:(center). 47:happenings 2123:144997715 2103:Positions 1628:169511339 1371:901644432 1109:Discourse 871:Hong Kong 867:Para Site 694:Afterlife 553:Be Clean! 324:Shinjunku 250:red, and 95:Shinjunku 65:Formation 2159:Neo-Dada 2040:42801096 1264:42801108 1117:41389576 795:, Japan. 793:Yokohama 759:, Japan. 752:, Japan. 683:Yoko Ono 607:Expo '70 581:Soji-chu 511:Yoko Ono 433:Yoko Ono 308:(1975). 295:protests 253:Ropology 161:Informel 153:Anti-Art 757:Shibuya 668:kozosei 640:at the 2121:  2038:  1930:Tate. 1626:  1369:  1359:  1319:  1262:  1240:2021. 1164:Tate. 1115:  1071:  1040:  1014:Keisho 1010:Keisho 970:  939:  858:Queens 766:London 750:Nagoya 712:String 672:utsuwa 653:Japan, 233:Events 145:Fluxus 79:Keishƍ 41:, and 2119:S2CID 2036:JSTOR 1624:S2CID 1260:JSTOR 1113:JSTOR 565:Ginza 551:(aka 481:(aka 279:objet 113:naka” 105:taka” 100:kanji 51:Tokyo 1936:Tate 1367:OCLC 1357:ISBN 1317:ISBN 1170:Tate 1069:ISBN 1038:ISBN 968:ISBN 937:ISBN 899:Tate 813:and 636:and 555:aka 513:and 435:and 209:and 175:and 132:and 109:aka” 2137:doi 2111:doi 1616:doi 575:). 532:In 225:’s 213:in 2155:: 2117:. 2107:10 2105:. 2093:^ 2055:. 2010:. 1998:^ 1982:. 1958:. 1934:. 1909:. 1884:^ 1868:. 1844:. 1820:^ 1789:^ 1767:^ 1751:^ 1735:^ 1704:^ 1688:. 1656:^ 1636:^ 1622:. 1612:47 1610:. 1592:^ 1576:. 1552:. 1499:^ 1470:. 1445:. 1421:^ 1405:^ 1379:^ 1365:. 1331:^ 1271:^ 1249:^ 1216:^ 1200:^ 1184:^ 1168:. 1143:. 1124:^ 1083:^ 982:^ 907:^ 897:. 886:^ 869:, 856:, 848:, 830:, 817:, 802:, 791:, 748:, 455:. 423:, 257:. 229:. 217:. 205:, 179:. 37:, 2139:: 2125:. 2113:: 2065:. 2042:. 2020:. 1992:. 1968:. 1944:. 1919:. 1878:. 1854:. 1698:. 1630:. 1618:: 1586:. 1562:. 1516:. 1480:. 1456:. 1373:. 1325:. 1266:. 1244:. 1178:. 1153:. 1119:. 1077:. 1046:. 976:. 945:. 901:. 873:. 782:. 658:( 379:( 281:s 155:( 20:)

Index

Yamanote Line incident
Genpei Akasegawa
Natsuyuki Nakanishi
Jirƍ Takamatsu
happenings
Tokyo
Neo-Dada Organizers
Anpo protests
U.S.-Japan Security Treaty
Shinjunku
kanji
Shigeko Kubota
George Maciunas
Fluxus
Reiko Tomii
Anti-Art
Informel
dematerialization
conceptual
post-minimalist art
Yomiuri Indépendant Exhibition
Reiko Tomii
Happenings
postmodern
authorship
individualism
originality
modern art
Marcel Duchamp
Rrose SĂ©lavy

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑