Knowledge (XXG)

Yerkes–Dodson law

Source 📝

31: 39: 47: 562: 80:
in 1908. The law dictates that performance increases with physiological or mental arousal, but only up to a point. When levels of arousal become too high, performance decreases. The process is often illustrated graphically as a bell-shaped curve which increases and then decreases with higher levels
101:
Because of task differences, the shape of the curve can be highly variable. For simple or well-learned tasks, the relationship is monotonic, and performance improves as arousal increases. For complex, unfamiliar, or difficult tasks, the relationship between arousal and performance reverses after a
128:
There has been research indicating that the correlation suggested by Yerkes and Dodson exists (such as that of Broadhurst (1959), Duffy (1957), and Anderson et al (1988)), but a cause of the correlation has not yet successfully been established (Anderson, Revelle, & Lynch, 1989).
97:
for optimal performance. For example, difficult or intellectually demanding tasks may require a lower level of arousal (to facilitate concentration), whereas tasks demanding stamina or persistence may be performed better with higher levels of arousal (to increase motivation).
173:(LTP) (the process of forming long-term memories) is optimal when glucocorticoid levels are mildly elevated, whereas significant decreases of LTP are observed after adrenalectomy (low GC state) or after exogenous glucocorticoid administration (high GC state). 169:, GC) and human cognition revealed that memory performance vs. circulating levels of glucocorticoids does manifest an upside-down U-shaped curve, and the authors noted the resemblance to the Yerkes–Dodson curve. For example, 196:
It has also been shown that elevated levels of glucocorticoids enhance memory for emotionally arousing events but lead more often than not to poor memory for material unrelated to the source of stress/emotional arousal.
53:
version of the Yerkes–Dodson law (this version leaves out that hyperarousal does not adversely impact simple tasks). This version is the most common version and often incorrectly cited in textbooks.
313:"The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes–Dodson Law" 85:, described as the "dancing mouse") was only referenced ten times over the next half century, yet in four of the citing articles, these findings were described as a psychological "law". 505:
Lupien SJ, Maheu F, Tu M, Fiocco A, Schramek TE (2007). "The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: Implications for the field of brain and cognition".
432:
Anderson, K. J.; Revelle, W.; Lynch, M. J. (1989). "Caffeine, impulsivity, and memory scanning: A comparison of two explanations for the Yerkes–Dodson Effect".
109:. The upward part of the inverted U can be thought of as the energizing effect of arousal. The downward part is caused by negative effects of arousal (or 467:
Anderson KJ, Revelle W, Lynch MJ (1989). "Caffeine, impulsivity, and memory scanning: A comparison of two explanations for the Yerkes–Dodson Effect".
175:
This review also revealed that in order for a situation to induce a stress response, it has to be interpreted as one or more of the following:
105:
The effect of task difficulty led to the hypothesis that the Yerkes–Dodson Law can be decomposed into two distinct factors as in a
206: 566: 582: 514: 170: 77: 397:
Duffy, Elizabeth (1957). "The psychological significance of the concept of "arousal" or "activation"".
311:
Diamond, David M.; Adam M. Campbell; Collin R. Park; Joshua Halonen; Phillip R. Zoladz (2007-03-28).
82: 519: 540: 484: 449: 226: 216: 149:
actively opposes the Yerkes-Dodson law by demonstrating how the psyche operates on the principle
532: 414: 379: 344: 293: 142: 276:
Corbett, Martin (2015-08-10). "From law to folklore: work stress and the Yerkes-Dodson Law".
524: 476: 441: 406: 371: 334: 324: 285: 258: 221: 189: 110: 166: 146: 122: 30: 339: 312: 138: 50: 576: 488: 453: 106: 73: 38: 544: 70: 46: 17: 528: 154: 150: 297: 289: 246: 114: 62: 536: 418: 383: 348: 188:
a social evaluative threat (negative social evaluation possibly leading to
145:
presents a less simplistic understanding of arousal and skill-level match.
561: 262: 329: 93:
Researchers have found that different tasks require different levels of
480: 445: 211: 94: 66: 410: 375: 247:"The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation" 118: 362:
Broadhurst, P. L. (1956). "Emotionality and the Yerkes–Dodson Law".
45: 37: 29: 165:
A 2007 review by Lupien at al of the effects of stress hormones (
102:
point, and performance thereafter declines as arousal increases.
141:
or Yerkes-Dodson curve. The widely supported theory of optimal
34:
Original data from which the Yerkes–Dodson law was derived
137:
Other theories and models of arousal do not affirm the
251:Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 81:of arousal. The original paper (a study of the 8: 27:Relationship between stress and performance 518: 338: 328: 69:and performance, originally developed by 500: 498: 237: 7: 364:Journal of Experimental Psychology 185:not controllable by the individual 25: 560: 278:Journal of Managerial Psychology 161:Relationship to glucocorticoids 113:) on cognitive processes like 1: 245:Yerkes RM, Dodson JD (1908). 529:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.02.007 599: 42:Original Yerkes–Dodson law 117:(e.g., "tunnel vision"), 290:10.1108/jmp-03-2013-0085 469:Motivation and Emotion 434:Motivation and Emotion 171:long-term potentiation 78:John Dillingham Dodson 54: 43: 35: 263:10.1002/cne.920180503 65:relationship between 49: 41: 33: 569:at Wikimedia Commons 399:Psychological Review 83:Japanese house mouse 583:Behavioral concepts 507:Brain and Cognition 481:10.1007/bf00995541 446:10.1007/bf00995541 330:10.1155/2007/60803 227:Low arousal theory 217:Emotion and memory 133:Alternative models 55: 44: 36: 567:Yerkes–Dodson law 565:Media related to 317:Neural Plasticity 89:Levels of arousal 59:Yerkes–Dodson law 18:Yerkes-Dodson law 16:(Redirected from 590: 564: 549: 548: 522: 502: 493: 492: 464: 458: 457: 429: 423: 422: 411:10.1037/h0048837 394: 388: 387: 376:10.1037/h0049114 359: 353: 352: 342: 332: 308: 302: 301: 273: 267: 266: 242: 222:Flashbulb memory 190:social rejection 74:Robert M. Yerkes 21: 598: 597: 593: 592: 591: 589: 588: 587: 573: 572: 557: 552: 520:10.1.1.459.1378 504: 503: 496: 466: 465: 461: 431: 430: 426: 396: 395: 391: 361: 360: 356: 310: 309: 305: 275: 274: 270: 244: 243: 239: 235: 203: 174: 167:glucocorticoids 163: 147:Reversal theory 135: 123:problem-solving 91: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 596: 594: 586: 585: 575: 574: 571: 570: 556: 555:External links 553: 551: 550: 513:(3): 209–237. 494: 459: 424: 405:(5): 265–275. 389: 370:(5): 345–352. 354: 303: 284:(6): 741–752. 268: 257:(5): 459–482. 236: 234: 231: 230: 229: 224: 219: 214: 209: 202: 199: 194: 193: 186: 183: 180: 162: 159: 134: 131: 90: 87: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 595: 584: 581: 580: 578: 568: 563: 559: 558: 554: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 521: 516: 512: 508: 501: 499: 495: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 463: 460: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 428: 425: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 393: 390: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 358: 355: 350: 346: 341: 336: 331: 326: 322: 318: 314: 307: 304: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 272: 269: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 241: 238: 232: 228: 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 204: 200: 198: 191: 187: 184: 182:unpredictable 181: 178: 177: 176: 172: 168: 160: 158: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 132: 130: 126: 124: 120: 116: 112: 108: 107:bathtub curve 103: 99: 96: 88: 86: 84: 79: 75: 72: 71:psychologists 68: 64: 60: 52: 48: 40: 32: 19: 510: 506: 472: 468: 462: 437: 433: 427: 402: 398: 392: 367: 363: 357: 320: 316: 306: 281: 277: 271: 254: 250: 240: 207:Drive theory 195: 164: 153:rather than 136: 127: 104: 100: 92: 58: 56: 155:homeostasis 151:bistability 233:References 515:CiteSeerX 489:144947403 454:144947403 323:: 60803. 298:0268-3946 115:attention 63:empirical 577:Category 537:17466428 475:: 1–20. 440:: 1–20. 419:13494613 384:13481281 349:17641736 201:See also 545:5778988 340:1906714 212:Emotion 95:arousal 67:arousal 51:Hebbian 543:  535:  517:  487:  452:  417:  382:  347:  337:  296:  121:, and 119:memory 111:stress 61:is an 541:S2CID 485:S2CID 450:S2CID 179:novel 533:PMID 415:PMID 380:PMID 345:PMID 321:2007 294:ISSN 143:flow 139:Hebb 76:and 57:The 525:doi 477:doi 442:doi 407:doi 372:doi 335:PMC 325:doi 286:doi 259:doi 579:: 539:. 531:. 523:. 511:65 509:. 497:^ 483:. 473:13 471:. 448:. 438:13 436:. 413:. 403:64 401:. 378:. 368:54 366:. 343:. 333:. 319:. 315:. 292:. 282:30 280:. 255:18 253:. 249:. 192:). 157:. 125:. 547:. 527:: 491:. 479:: 456:. 444:: 421:. 409:: 386:. 374:: 351:. 327:: 300:. 288:: 265:. 261:: 20:)

Index

Yerkes-Dodson law



Hebbian
empirical
arousal
psychologists
Robert M. Yerkes
John Dillingham Dodson
Japanese house mouse
arousal
bathtub curve
stress
attention
memory
problem-solving
Hebb
flow
Reversal theory
bistability
homeostasis
glucocorticoids
long-term potentiation
social rejection
Drive theory
Emotion
Emotion and memory
Flashbulb memory
Low arousal theory

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.