Knowledge (XXG)

Jury duty

Source πŸ“

240:) for the duration of time spent serving as a juror (also known as court duty or court leave by some organizations). Many quasi-governmental organizations have adopted this provision into their contract manuals. Accordingly, government employees are in a paid status as long as they have received a summons in connection with a judicial proceeding, by a court or authority responsible for the conduct of that proceeding to serve as a juror (or witness) in the District of Columbia or a state, territory, or possession of the United States, 857: 229:. Employers are not allowed to fire an employee for being called to jury duty, but they are typically not required to pay salaries during this time. Jury duty reimbursement is as little as $ 5 per day, although a juror can plead to be excused for financial hardship. An individual who reports to jury duty may be asked to serve as a juror in a trial or as an alternate juror, or they may be dismissed. 97: 113:, and the jury is separate from the court. Generally the point of the jury is to determine whether the prosecution has proven the defendant to be guilty. The jury generally does not choose the penalty. This model is used in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, the United States, and many former British colonies, as well as Austria and Spain. 85:(i.e., in private). In the United States, there have also been objections to requiring jurors to publicly give private information about themselves, such as medical conditions or whether they have used illegal drugs, even though this personal information might be relevant, for example, in a case about 220:
When a person is called for jury duty in the United States, that service is mandatory, and the person summoned for jury duty must attend. Failing to report for jury duty can result in a wide range of penalties, from simply being placed back into the selection pool to immediate criminal prosecution
328:
A mixed tribunal is one in which the case is tried collaboratively by a combination of trained judges and lay jurors. The judges and the jurors are officially considered equal but have distinct roles. The judges and jurors tend, in most cases, to agree with each other, though in a few cases, they
198:, there is about a 35% chance of people in England and Wales being summoned for jury service over the course of their lifetime. In Scotland, the percentage is much higher due to having a lower population as well having juries made up of 15 people (as opposed to 12 people in England and Wales). 340:
In France, judges and lay jurors similarly work together, but the number of lay people involved is much larger, ranging from 9 to 12 jurors plus a panel of three professional judges. French jurors are selected at random and work with the judges only during the final deliberations.
336:
model, a trained judge and two lay judges collaborate to determine whether a defendant is guilty. The jurors are considered part of the court, and work with the judge throughout a trial. The jurors are allowed to ask questions of the prosecution and defense during the trial.
132:
Jurors receive a small payment for each day of attendance. Employers are also required to pay their employees "make-up pay", that is, the usual pay the employee would have earned from working, less the jury duty payment received from the state. Under the
297:
Since 2012, some US citizens have been targets of a "jury scam", wherein they are called by persons posing as officers from a court, claiming that the person did not show up for jury duty and that charges will be pressed. Potential victims of
269:, which prohibits "slavery involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime," does not prohibit "enforcement of those duties which individuals owe to the state, such as services in the army, militia, on the jury, etc." 384:
In some systems, minor cases are decided by an individual who does not have legal training. This can be considered a form of jury service in the sense that the verdict is decided by a citizen with no legal training.
41:. Variations include the kinds of cases tried before a jury, how many jurors hear a trial, and whether the lay person is involved in a single trial or holds a paid job similar to a judge, but without legal training. 137:, make-up pay is required only for the first ten days of jury service; however, the laws of Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia extend the make-up pay requirement for the entire duration of the jury service. 146: 266: 351:
Russia used a mixed tribunal system until 1993, and then converted to an adversarial model that requires juries to answer specific questions about facts, rather than producing a
272:
In both the United States and Canada, jurors having conscientious objection to service are generally excused from service. This chiefly includes religious groups such as the
67:
can dismiss potential jurors for various reasons, which can vary from one state to another, and they can have a specific number of arbitrary dismissals, or unconditional
601: 109:
The English model of a jury draws jurors from among the citizens. This approach is based on the traditions of English common law. This approach uses an
329:
take different perspectives. Compared to the English model, mixed tribunals are more likely to result in agreement between the judge and the jury.
211: 655: 145:
The jury system in New South Wales is administered by the Jury Services Branch of the Office of the Sheriff of New South Wales, an office in the
59:, potential jurors are generally summoned for duty, and then interviewed for their suitability to serve on the jury for a particular trial. The 313: 245: 195: 636: 691: 344:
In a third model of collaborative juries, the court includes jurors with relevant expertise in certain trials. For example, in Croatia,
207: 252: 262: 233: 726: 598: 134: 317: 455: 171:
During the juror selection process, both parties can object to up to three potential jurors without providing reasons.
884: 320:
in their communications with prospective jurors, and any calls that are made will never ask for personal information.
183: 157:. These laws detail persons who are disqualified, ineligible, or may be excused from jury service. In addition, the 20: 861: 894: 189: 174:
The Office of the Sheriff of NSW disseminates resources for jurors. Jurors may be compensated for their service.
363: 307: 277: 573: 310:
recommends that recipients of these calls contact the court directly to avoid falling victim to this scam.
585: 500: 478: 306:, these individuals are then told that the matter can be resolved if personal information is given. The 74:
Some courts had been sympathetic to jurors' privacy concerns and refer to jurors by number, and conduct
776: 652: 468: 879: 281: 257: 68: 828: 525: 473: 215: 86: 560: 110: 90: 727:"The judge who sentenced a man to 10 days in jail for oversleeping jury duty clears his record" 633: 226: 702: 232:
In the United States, government employees are in a paid status of leave (in accordance with
348:
cases are required to have jurors with experience in juvenile education, such as teachers.
889: 659: 640: 605: 64: 71:, which does not require specific reasons. The judge can also dismiss potential jurors. 621: 345: 303: 299: 222: 165:
details other persons who can or may not serve as jurors or otherwise claim exemption.
126: 50: 856: 456:"Making the Case for Juror Privacy: A New Framework for Court Policies and Procedures" 873: 751: 433: 672: 366:
in certain lower courts the verdict is decided by two elected lay people known as
437: 237: 241: 56: 801: 545: 367: 60: 622:
Discussion Paper 12 (1985) – Criminal Procedure: The Jury in a Criminal Trial
752:"Young Thug trial: Essay-writing punishment for woman who skipped jury duty" 379: 122: 81: 76: 96: 168:
Individuals who are blind and/or deaf may be excluded from jury service.
37:
in a legal proceeding. Different countries have different approaches to
359: 352: 777:"Rough economy makes filling N.J. juries more difficult, experts say" 38: 273: 95: 34: 692:"Frequently Asked Questions About Juror Service in New Jersey" 147:
New South Wales Department of Attorney General and Justice
802:"Title 5: Government Organization and Employees β€” Justia" 574:
Report 117 (2007) – Jury selection: 7. "Excuse for cause"
686: 684: 682: 673:"What is the chance of being called for jury service?" 8: 823: 821: 599:"Participating in Political and Public Life" 161:and section 7, "Excuse for cause", of LRC 16:Service as a juror in a legal proceeding 394: 212:Jury nullification in the United States 246:Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands 149:, and operates in accordance with the 624:β€” Law Reform Commission β€” Lawlink NSW 588:β€” Law Reform Commission β€” Lawlink NSW 576:β€” Law Reform Commission β€” Lawlink NSW 428: 426: 424: 422: 420: 418: 7: 416: 414: 412: 410: 408: 406: 404: 402: 400: 398: 370:along with the professional judge. 208:Jury selection in the United States 194:According to 2016 figures from the 586:Report 117 (2007) – Jury selection 14: 699:New Jersey Judiciary Court System 855: 662:β€” CaTS Corporate New South Wales 643:β€” CaTS Corporate New South Wales 442:Cornell Law Faculty Publications 550:β€” ComLaw, Australian Government 438:"Jury Systems Around the World" 125:are randomly selected from an 1: 860:The dictionary definition of 499:Nedim, Ugur (4 August 2014). 135:National Employment Standards 105:Juries based on English model 318:United States Postal Service 701:. June 2017. Archived from 184:Juries in England and Wales 911: 501:"What Does Jury Duty Pay?" 458:, State Justice Institute. 377: 205: 187: 181: 48: 21:Jury duty (disambiguation) 18: 355:of guilty or not guilty. 190:Trial by jury in Scotland 653:Payment for jury service 528:. Legislation.nsw.gov.au 454:Hannaford P. L. (2001.) 308:US Department of Justice 610:Alternative Law Journal 561:Jury Exemption Act 1965 547:Jury Exemption Act 1965 505:Sydney Criminal Lawyers 278:Conservative Mennonites 159:Jury Exemption Act 1965 155:Jury Amendment Act 2010 45:Juror selection process 101: 675:. BBC. 17 March 2017. 479:Australian Government 188:Further information: 182:Further information: 99: 597:McCallum R. (2011.) 293:in the United States 282:Old Order Mennonites 267:Thirteenth Amendment 121:Potential jurors in 69:peremptory challenge 19:For other uses, see 474:Fair Work Ombudsman 216:Taylor v. Louisiana 196:Ministry of Justice 100:A jury duty summons 87:medical malpractice 885:Criminal procedure 658:2014-06-23 at the 639:2014-05-30 at the 604:2017-06-24 at the 111:adversarial system 102: 33:is a service as a 526:"NSW Legislation" 265:(1916), that the 227:contempt of court 163:Report 117 (2007) 902: 895:Local government 859: 843: 842: 840: 839: 825: 816: 815: 813: 812: 798: 792: 791: 789: 788: 773: 767: 766: 764: 763: 748: 742: 741: 739: 738: 723: 717: 716: 714: 713: 707: 696: 688: 677: 676: 669: 663: 650: 644: 631: 625: 619: 613: 595: 589: 583: 577: 571: 565: 557: 551: 543: 537: 536: 534: 533: 522: 516: 515: 513: 511: 496: 490: 489: 487: 485: 465: 459: 452: 446: 445: 434:Hans, Valerie P. 430: 358:In the state of 292: 291: 253:US Supreme Court 91:drug trafficking 910: 909: 905: 904: 903: 901: 900: 899: 870: 869: 852: 847: 846: 837: 835: 827: 826: 819: 810: 808: 800: 799: 795: 786: 784: 775: 774: 770: 761: 759: 750: 749: 745: 736: 734: 725: 724: 720: 711: 709: 705: 694: 690: 689: 680: 671: 670: 666: 660:Wayback Machine 651: 647: 641:Wayback Machine 632: 628: 620: 616: 606:Wayback Machine 596: 592: 584: 580: 572: 568: 558: 554: 544: 540: 531: 529: 524: 523: 519: 509: 507: 498: 497: 493: 483: 481: 467: 466: 462: 453: 449: 432: 431: 396: 391: 382: 376: 326: 316:mostly use the 295: 289: 288: 258:Butler v. Perry 218: 204: 192: 186: 180: 143: 141:New South Wales 119: 107: 53: 47: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 908: 906: 898: 897: 892: 887: 882: 872: 871: 868: 867: 851: 850:External links 848: 845: 844: 817: 806:Law.justia.com 793: 768: 758:. January 2023 743: 733:. October 2019 718: 678: 664: 645: 626: 614: 590: 578: 566: 552: 538: 517: 491: 460: 447: 436:(2008-01-01). 393: 392: 390: 387: 378:Main article: 375: 372: 346:juvenile court 332:In the German 325: 324:Mixed tribunal 322: 314:Federal courts 304:identity fraud 300:identity theft 294: 286: 203: 200: 179: 178:United Kingdom 176: 142: 139: 127:electoral roll 118: 115: 106: 103: 51:Jury selection 49:Main article: 46: 43: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 907: 896: 893: 891: 888: 886: 883: 881: 878: 877: 875: 866:at Wiktionary 865: 864: 858: 854: 853: 849: 834: 830: 829:"Juror Scams" 824: 822: 818: 807: 803: 797: 794: 782: 778: 772: 769: 757: 753: 747: 744: 732: 728: 722: 719: 708:on 2014-10-18 704: 700: 693: 687: 685: 683: 679: 674: 668: 665: 661: 657: 654: 649: 646: 642: 638: 635: 630: 627: 623: 618: 615: 611: 607: 603: 600: 594: 591: 587: 582: 579: 575: 570: 567: 563: 562: 556: 553: 549: 548: 542: 539: 527: 521: 518: 506: 502: 495: 492: 480: 476: 475: 470: 464: 461: 457: 451: 448: 443: 439: 435: 429: 427: 425: 423: 421: 419: 417: 415: 413: 411: 409: 407: 405: 403: 401: 399: 395: 388: 386: 381: 373: 371: 369: 365: 364:United States 361: 356: 354: 349: 347: 342: 338: 335: 330: 323: 321: 319: 315: 311: 309: 305: 301: 287: 285: 283: 279: 275: 270: 268: 264: 260: 259: 255:has held, in 254: 249: 247: 243: 239: 235: 234:5 U.S.C. 230: 228: 224: 223:bench warrant 221:and having a 217: 213: 209: 202:United States 201: 199: 197: 191: 185: 177: 175: 172: 169: 166: 164: 160: 156: 152: 151:Jury Act 1977 148: 140: 138: 136: 130: 128: 124: 116: 114: 112: 104: 98: 94: 92: 88: 84: 83: 79: 78: 72: 70: 66: 62: 58: 57:English model 52: 44: 42: 40: 36: 32: 28: 22: 862: 836:. Retrieved 833:Uscourts.gov 832: 809:. Retrieved 805: 796: 785:. Retrieved 780: 771: 760:. Retrieved 755: 746: 735:. Retrieved 730: 721: 710:. Retrieved 703:the original 698: 667: 648: 634:Jury Service 629: 617: 609: 593: 581: 569: 559: 555: 546: 541: 530:. Retrieved 520: 510:21 September 508:. Retrieved 504: 494: 484:21 September 482:. Retrieved 472: 463: 450: 441: 383: 357: 350: 343: 339: 333: 331: 327: 312: 296: 271: 263:240 U.S. 328 256: 250: 231: 219: 193: 173: 170: 167: 162: 158: 154: 150: 144: 131: 120: 108: 80: 75: 73: 54: 31:jury service 30: 26: 25: 880:Judiciaries 783:. July 2011 781:Star Ledger 469:"Jury duty" 368:side judges 242:Puerto Rico 238:Β§ 6322 225:issued for 874:Categories 838:2012-02-14 811:2012-02-14 787:2019-10-06 762:2023-01-16 737:2019-10-10 712:2017-09-07 532:2012-02-14 389:References 374:Lay judges 206:See also: 61:prosecutor 863:jury duty 380:Lay judge 290:Jury scam 244:, or the 123:Australia 117:Australia 82:in camera 77:voir dire 27:Jury duty 656:Archived 637:Archived 602:Archived 334:SchΓΆffen 362:in the 360:Vermont 353:verdict 65:defense 55:In the 890:Juries 444:. 305. 280:, and 236:  214:, and 39:juries 706:(PDF) 695:(PDF) 564:(Cth) 274:Amish 35:juror 512:2017 486:2017 251:The 153:and 63:and 756:BBC 731:CNN 302:or 89:or 29:or 876:: 831:. 820:^ 804:. 779:. 754:. 729:. 697:. 681:^ 608:, 503:. 477:. 471:. 440:. 397:^ 284:. 276:, 261:, 248:. 210:, 129:. 93:. 841:. 814:. 790:. 765:. 740:. 715:. 612:. 535:. 514:. 488:. 23:.

Index

Jury duty (disambiguation)
juror
juries
Jury selection
English model
prosecutor
defense
peremptory challenge
voir dire
in camera
medical malpractice
drug trafficking

adversarial system
Australia
electoral roll
National Employment Standards
New South Wales Department of Attorney General and Justice
Juries in England and Wales
Trial by jury in Scotland
Ministry of Justice
Jury selection in the United States
Jury nullification in the United States
Taylor v. Louisiana
bench warrant
contempt of court
5 U.S.C.
Β§ 6322
Puerto Rico
Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑