Knowledge (XXG)

Controversy

Source πŸ“

94:, Clause 1) states that "the judicial Power shall extend ... to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party". This clause has been deemed to impose a requirement that United States federal courts are not permitted to cases that do not pose an actual controversy—that is, an actual dispute between adverse parties which is capable of being resolved by the . In addition to setting out the scope of the jurisdiction of the federal judiciary, it also prohibits courts from issuing 198:. As with other controversies, it has been suggested that exposure to empirical facts would be sufficient to resolve the debate once and for all. In computer simulations of cultural communities, beliefs were found to polarize within isolated sub-groups, based on the mistaken belief of the community's unhindered access to ground truth. Such confidence in the group to find the ground truth is explicable through the success of 274: 212:
have shown that sensory input from different senses is integrated in a statistically optimal way, in addition, it appears that the kind of inferences used to infer single sources for multiple sensory inputs uses a Bayesian inference about the causal origin of the sensory stimuli. As such, it appears
225:
context – in spite of identical evidence presented, the pre-existing beliefs (or evidence presented first) has an overwhelming effect on the beliefs formed. In addition, the preferences of the agent (the particular rewards that they value) also cause the beliefs formed to change – this explains the
183:
has been particularly identified as relevant in climate change controversies as individuals are found to be more positively inclined to believe in climate change if the outside temperature is higher, if they have been primed to think about heat, and if they are primed with higher temperatures when
216:
Brocas and Carrillo propose a model to make decisions based on noisy sensory inputs, beliefs about the state of the world are modified by Bayesian updating, and then decisions are made based on beliefs passing a threshold. They show that this model, when optimized for single-step decision making,
142:
In other words, it claims that the less factual information is available on a topic, the more controversy can arise around that topic – and the more facts are available, the less controversy can arise. Thus, for example, controversies in physics would be limited to subject areas where experiments
163:, it has been proposed that those who are opposed to the scientific consensus do so because they don't have enough information about the topic. A study of 1540 US adults found instead that levels of scientific literacy correlated with the strength of 491:
Kahan, Dan M.; Maggie Wittlin; Ellen Peters; Paul Slovic; Lisa Larrimore Ouellette; Donald Braman; Gregory N. Mandel (2011). "The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change".
170:
The puzzling phenomenon of two individuals being able to reach different conclusions after being exposed to the same facts has been frequently explained (particularly by Daniel Kahneman) by reference to a
230:) shown above. This model allows the production of controversy to be seen as a consequence of a decision maker optimized for single-step decision making, rather than a result of limited reasoning in the 191:, the same evidence seemed to license inference to radically different conclusions. Kahan et al. explained this by the cognitive biases of biased assimilation and a credibility heuristic. 155:, which only talks about lack of information ("passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available"). For example, in analyses of the political controversy over 143:
cannot be carried out yet, whereas controversies would be inherent to politics, where communities must frequently decide on courses of action based on insufficient information.
793:
Lord, Charles G.; Lee Ross; Mark R. Lepper (1979). "Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence".
91: 87: 698:
Joireman, Jeff; Heather Barnes Truelove; Blythe Duell (December 2010). "Effect of outdoor temperature, heat primes and anchoring on belief in global warming".
208:
allows these failures of rationality to be described as part of a statistically optimized system for decision making. Experiments and computational models in
770:; Paul Slovic; John Gastil (2008-07-15). "Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study of the Mechanisms of Cultural Cognition". 264: 559: 195: 977:
Ernst, Marc O.; Martin S. Banks (2002-01-24). "Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion".
263: 213:
neurobiologically plausible that the brain implements decision-making procedures that are close to optimal for Bayesian inference.
892: 164: 1114: 179:
that work well in every day situations, but are not amenable to decision-making about complex subjects such as climate change.
359: 202:
based inferences. However, if there is no access to the ground truth, as there was not in this model, the method will fail.
355: 677: 151:
Controversies are frequently thought to be a result of a lack of confidence on the part of the disputants – as implied by
133: 156: 31: 448:
Pidgeon, N.; B. Fischhoff (2011). "The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks".
298: 945:
Lee, M.D.; M. Steyvers; M. de Young; B.J. Miller. "A Model-Based Approach to Measuring Expertise in Ranking Tasks".
838:
HOVLAND, CARL I.; WALTER WEISS (1951-12-21). "The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness".
222: 83: 384: 209: 1077:
Brocas, Isabelle; Juan D. Carrillo (2012). "From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes".
294: 1156: 1151: 802: 574: 76: 950: 531: 413:
Ungar, S. (2000). "Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole".
336: 986: 645: 457: 279: 807: 579: 231: 199: 172: 1018: 912: 669: 600: 511: 473: 430: 868:
Braman, Donald; James Grimmelmann; Dan M. Kahan (20 July 2007). "Modeling Cultural Cognition".
194:
Similar effects on reasoning are also seen in non-scientific controversies, for example in the
1094: 1059: 1010: 1002: 893:"Surprising Finding That Cultural Worldviews Don't Explain People's Views on Gun Control, The" 877: 873: 820: 779: 775: 767: 742: 715: 661: 592: 523: 519: 227: 129: 40:
is a state of prolonged public dispute or debate, usually concerning a matter of conflicting
1130: 1086: 1049: 994: 904: 847: 812: 707: 653: 584: 501: 493: 465: 422: 95: 734: 963: 608: 544: 235: 205: 152: 124: 120: 115: 990: 649: 461: 321: 311: 1126: 1145: 673: 160: 64: 515: 477: 426: 434: 72: 657: 1022: 816: 363: 262: 711: 633: 188: 137: 588: 1090: 326: 68: 1098: 1006: 824: 746: 719: 596: 1119: 316: 218: 180: 176: 1063: 1014: 665: 497: 469: 306: 103: 99: 282:
was created from a revision of this article dated 27 June 2013
17: 916: 604: 392: 331: 41: 506: 184:
thinking about the future temperature increases from climate change.
998: 908: 1054: 1037: 851: 175:' – in other words, that most judgments are made using fast acting 560:"Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics" 45: 1038:"Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference" 123:, as expressed by the astrophysicist and science fiction author 1136: 260: 221:
and polarization of opinions – exactly as described in the
167:, but not on which side of the debate that they stood. 102:, meaning that the controversy has not arisen yet, or 634:"Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases" 932:Shooting down the more guns, less crime hypothesis 735:"Furor on Rush to Require Cervical Cancer Vaccine" 106:, meaning that the controversy has already been 187:In other controversies – such as that around the 88:Article Three of the United States Constitution 44:or point of view. The word was coined from the 1036:Wozny, D.R.; U.R. Beierholm; L. Shams (2008). 733:Saul, Stephanie; Andrew Pollack (2007-02-17). 273: 79:, a controversy is a purely civil proceeding. 863: 861: 8: 795:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1123:(SparsnΓ€s, Sweden: Irene Publishing, 2014). 27:State of prolonged public dispute or debate 1053: 806: 578: 505: 159:, which is exceptionally virulent in the 290:, and does not reflect subsequent edits. 98:, or from hearing cases that are either 934:. National Bureau of Economic Research. 347: 196:gun control debate in the United States 71:; while legal cases include all suits, 959: 948: 540: 529: 891:Fremling, G.M.; J.R. Lott Jr (2002). 55:– "turned in an opposite direction". 7: 930:Ayres, I.; J.J. Donohue III (2002). 700:Journal of Environmental Psychology 226:biased assimilation (also known as 25: 632:Tversky, A.; D. Kahneman (1974). 272: 680:from the original on 2018-06-01 558:Kahneman, Daniel (2003-12-01). 415:Public Understanding of Science 67:, a controversy differs from a 766:Kahan, Dan M.; Donald Braman; 360:Electronic Frontier Foundation 1: 658:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 817:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 567:The American Economic Review 362:. 2001-04-09. Archived from 356:"EFF Quotes Collection 19.6" 157:anthropogenic climate change 153:Benford's law of controversy 121:Benford's law of controversy 116:Benford's law of controversy 32:Controversy (disambiguation) 1079:Games and Economic Behavior 712:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.004 385:"Quotations: Computer Laws" 1173: 589:10.1257/000282803322655392 223:global warming controversy 113: 84:Case or Controversy Clause 29: 1091:10.1016/j.geb.2011.10.001 427:10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306 165:opinion on climate change 840:Public Opinion Quarterly 210:multisensory integration 206:Bayesian decision theory 1133:on Knowledge (XXG) data 870:Social Justice Research 1120:The Controversy Manual 958:Cite journal requires 772:Law and Human Behavior 539:Cite journal requires 268: 248:Listen to this article 136:to the amount of real 134:inversely proportional 450:Nature Climate Change 337:Third rail (politics) 267: 1127:Controversial topics 498:10.2139/ssrn.1871503 470:10.1038/nclimate1080 299:More spoken articles 51:, as a composite of 30:For other uses, see 1137:Controversial Today 991:2002Natur.415..429E 650:1974Sci...185.1124T 462:2011NatCC...1...35P 232:bounded rationality 200:wisdom of the crowd 173:bounded rationality 147:Psychological bases 109: 739:The New York Times 269: 1042:Journal of Vision 985:(6870): 429–433. 801:(11): 2098–2109. 768:Geoffrey L. Cohen 644:(4157): 1124–31. 265: 228:confirmation bias 127:in 1980, states: 96:advisory opinions 82:For example, the 16:(Redirected from 1164: 1131:machine learning 1103: 1102: 1074: 1068: 1067: 1057: 1033: 1027: 1026: 974: 968: 967: 961: 956: 954: 946: 942: 936: 935: 927: 921: 920: 903:(4): 1341–1348. 888: 882: 881: 865: 856: 855: 835: 829: 828: 810: 790: 784: 783: 763: 757: 756: 754: 753: 730: 724: 723: 695: 689: 688: 686: 685: 629: 623: 622: 620: 619: 613: 607:. Archived from 582: 573:(5): 1449–1475. 564: 555: 549: 548: 542: 537: 535: 527: 509: 488: 482: 481: 445: 439: 438: 410: 404: 403: 401: 400: 391:. Archived from 381: 375: 374: 372: 371: 352: 289: 287: 276: 275: 266: 256: 254: 249: 217:produces belief 21: 1172: 1171: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1142: 1141: 1111: 1106: 1076: 1075: 1071: 1035: 1034: 1030: 999:10.1038/415429a 976: 975: 971: 957: 947: 944: 943: 939: 929: 928: 924: 909:10.2307/3312932 890: 889: 885: 867: 866: 859: 837: 836: 832: 808:10.1.1.372.1743 792: 791: 787: 765: 764: 760: 751: 749: 732: 731: 727: 697: 696: 692: 683: 681: 631: 630: 626: 617: 615: 611: 580:10.1.1.194.6554 562: 557: 556: 552: 538: 528: 490: 489: 485: 447: 446: 442: 412: 411: 407: 398: 396: 383: 382: 378: 369: 367: 354: 353: 349: 345: 303: 302: 291: 285: 283: 280:This audio file 277: 270: 261: 258: 252: 251: 247: 244: 236:Daniel Kahneman 149: 125:Gregory Benford 118: 112: 61: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1170: 1168: 1160: 1159: 1154: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1139: 1134: 1124: 1110: 1109:External links 1107: 1105: 1104: 1069: 1055:10.1167/8.3.24 1048:(3): 24.1–11. 1028: 969: 960:|journal= 937: 922: 883: 857: 852:10.1086/266350 846:(4): 635–650. 830: 785: 758: 725: 706:(4): 358–367. 690: 624: 550: 541:|journal= 483: 440: 421:(3): 297–312. 405: 376: 346: 344: 341: 340: 339: 334: 329: 324: 322:Misinformation 319: 314: 312:Bipartisanship 309: 292: 278: 271: 259: 246: 245: 243: 240: 148: 145: 114:Main article: 111: 108: 60: 57: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1169: 1158: 1157:English words 1155: 1153: 1152:Controversies 1150: 1149: 1147: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1121: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1073: 1070: 1065: 1061: 1056: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1032: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 973: 970: 965: 952: 941: 938: 933: 926: 923: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 897:U. Pa. L. Rev 894: 887: 884: 879: 875: 871: 864: 862: 858: 853: 849: 845: 841: 834: 831: 826: 822: 818: 814: 809: 804: 800: 796: 789: 786: 781: 777: 773: 769: 762: 759: 748: 744: 740: 736: 729: 726: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 694: 691: 679: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 628: 625: 614:on 2018-02-19 610: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 581: 576: 572: 568: 561: 554: 551: 546: 533: 525: 521: 517: 513: 508: 503: 499: 495: 487: 484: 479: 475: 471: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 444: 441: 436: 432: 428: 424: 420: 416: 409: 406: 395:on 2008-08-22 394: 390: 386: 380: 377: 366:on 2007-09-29 365: 361: 357: 351: 348: 342: 338: 335: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 300: 296: 281: 241: 239: 237: 233: 229: 224: 220: 214: 211: 207: 203: 201: 197: 192: 190: 185: 182: 178: 174: 168: 166: 162: 161:United States 158: 154: 146: 144: 141: 139: 135: 131: 126: 122: 117: 110:Benford's law 107: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 80: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65:theory of law 58: 56: 54: 50: 47: 43: 39: 33: 19: 1118: 1115:Brian Martin 1082: 1078: 1072: 1045: 1041: 1031: 982: 978: 972: 951:cite journal 940: 931: 925: 900: 896: 886: 869: 843: 839: 833: 798: 794: 788: 771: 761: 750:. Retrieved 738: 728: 703: 699: 693: 682:. Retrieved 641: 637: 627: 616:. Retrieved 609:the original 570: 566: 553: 532:cite journal 486: 456:(1): 35–41. 453: 449: 443: 418: 414: 408: 397:. Retrieved 393:the original 388: 379: 368:. Retrieved 364:the original 350: 215: 204: 193: 186: 169: 150: 128: 119: 81: 62: 53:controversus 52: 49:controversia 48: 37: 36: 189:HPV vaccine 138:information 75:as well as 38:Controversy 1146:Categories 1085:: 81–103. 752:2011-11-26 684:2017-08-30 618:2017-10-24 507:1794/22097 399:2007-03-10 370:2016-12-04 343:References 327:ProCon.org 295:Audio help 286:2013-06-27 177:heuristics 140:available. 69:legal case 1129:based on 1099:0899-8256 1007:0028-0836 825:0022-3514 803:CiteSeerX 747:0362-4331 720:0272-4944 674:143452957 597:0002-8282 575:CiteSeerX 317:Dialectic 219:anchoring 181:Anchoring 92:Section 2 1064:18484830 1015:11807554 678:Archived 666:17835457 516:73649608 478:85362091 307:Argument 297: Β· 242:See also 73:criminal 18:Disputed 987:Bibcode 917:3312932 878:1000449 780:1160654 646:Bibcode 638:Science 605:3132137 524:1871503 458:Bibcode 435:7089937 389:SysProg 332:Scandal 284: ( 255:minutes 130:Passion 63:In the 42:opinion 1097:  1062:  1021:  1013:  1005:  979:Nature 915:  876:  823:  805:  778:  745:  718:  672:  664:  603:  595:  577:  522:  514:  476:  433:  100:unripe 1023:47459 1019:S2CID 913:JSTOR 670:S2CID 612:(PDF) 601:JSTOR 563:(PDF) 512:S2CID 474:S2CID 431:S2CID 77:civil 59:Legal 46:Latin 1095:ISSN 1060:PMID 1011:PMID 1003:ISSN 964:help 874:SSRN 821:ISSN 776:SSRN 743:ISSN 716:ISSN 662:PMID 593:ISSN 545:help 520:SSRN 104:moot 1087:doi 1050:doi 995:doi 983:415 905:doi 901:151 848:doi 813:doi 708:doi 654:doi 642:185 585:doi 502:hdl 494:doi 466:doi 423:doi 234:of 132:is 86:of 1148:: 1117:, 1093:. 1083:75 1081:. 1058:. 1044:. 1040:. 1017:. 1009:. 1001:. 993:. 981:. 955:: 953:}} 949:{{ 911:. 899:. 895:. 872:. 860:^ 844:15 842:. 819:. 811:. 799:37 797:. 774:. 741:. 737:. 714:. 704:30 702:. 676:. 668:. 660:. 652:. 640:. 636:. 599:. 591:. 583:. 571:93 569:. 565:. 536:: 534:}} 530:{{ 518:. 510:. 500:. 472:. 464:. 452:. 429:. 417:. 387:. 358:. 238:. 1101:. 1089:: 1066:. 1052:: 1046:8 1025:. 997:: 989:: 966:) 962:( 919:. 907:: 880:. 854:. 850:: 827:. 815:: 782:. 755:. 722:. 710:: 687:. 656:: 648:: 621:. 587:: 547:) 543:( 526:. 504:: 496:: 480:. 468:: 460:: 454:1 437:. 425:: 419:9 402:. 373:. 301:) 293:( 288:) 257:) 253:8 250:( 171:' 90:( 34:. 20:)

Index

Disputed
Controversy (disambiguation)
opinion
Latin
theory of law
legal case
criminal
civil
Case or Controversy Clause
Article Three of the United States Constitution
Section 2
advisory opinions
unripe
moot
Benford's law of controversy
Benford's law of controversy
Gregory Benford
Passion
inversely proportional
information
Benford's law of controversy
anthropogenic climate change
United States
opinion on climate change
bounded rationality
heuristics
Anchoring
HPV vaccine
gun control debate in the United States
wisdom of the crowd

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑