Knowledge (XXG)

Edit count

Source 📝

63: 1479: 1467: 79:
associated with a specific article without indicating improvements to the quality of the article. The edit count recorded for a particular article tends to reflect the general level of editor interest in the article, with relatively obscure or unfamiliar topics sustaining low overall edit counts over time. Reader interest, however, is more immediately gauged through
130:
The researchers analyzed 25 trillion PWVs attributable to registered users in the interval September 1, 2002 − October 31, 2006. At the end of this period, the top 10% of editors (by edit count) were credited with 86% of PWVs, the top 1% about 70%, and the top 0.1% (4200 users) were attributed 44% of
147:
on content. By edit count, bots dominate Knowledge (XXG); 9 of the top 10 and 20 of the top 50 are bots. In contrast, in the PWV ranking, only two bots appear in the top 50, and none in the top 10. Based on the steady growth of the influence on those top 0.1% editors by PWV, the study concluded that
74:
An editor's edit count is often used as a shorthand for determining their level of activity within a wiki, to the extent that it has been said that "one's edit count is a sort of coin of the realm". Tools exist on Knowledge (XXG) "to compare contributors by the number of edits they have made", and a
126:
measured the relationship between editors' edit count and the editors' ability to convey their writings to Knowledge (XXG) readers, measured in terms of persistent word views (PWV)—the number of times a word introduced by an edit is viewed. The accounting method is best described using the author's
91:"engage in 'drive-by reversing' so as to drive up their edit count", with such edits sometimes being made too quickly for the editor to have actually read the content being reverted. The development of "an unhealthy obsession with the notion of edit count" has locally been deemed "editcountitis". 78:
It has been noted, however, that the measure fails to reflect the quality of contributions, with minor improvements and even acts of vandalism potentially registering the same number of edits as substantial additions and improvements of content. Vandalism can similarly increase the edit count
131:
PWVs, i.e. nearly half of Knowledge (XXG)'s "value" as measured in this study. The top 10 editors (by PWV) contributed only 2.6% of PWVs, and only three of them were in top 50 by edit count. From the data, the study authors concluded that "rowth of PWV share increases
86:
At the extreme end, editors who are more focused on increasing their edit count than on improving the quality of work being performed may suffer social consequences due to excessive time invested in making edits. Historically, it has been asserted that some
127:
own words: "each time an article is viewed, each of its words is also viewed. When a word written by editor X is viewed, he or she is credited with one PWV". The number of times an article was viewed was estimated from the web server logs.
103:
running automated tasks, rather than by human editors. Among human editors, it has been observed that a small percentage of editors are responsible for a substantial proportion of the total number of edits that have been made.
75:
Knowledge (XXG) editor's edit count "may bring suffrage in elections where only community members may participate". Edit counts are also often weighed in community determinations of whether to grant editors extended rights.
1097: 94:
The total edit count for all Wikipedians combined was reported as having reached one billion in mid-January 2021, with the billionth edit being registered by the most prolific non-bot Knowledge (XXG) editor,
1087: 99:, though it was also noted that several hundred thousand early Knowledge (XXG) edits were lost in a software upgrade. Notably, some of the highest edit counts in Knowledge (XXG) are achieved by 253:
Claudia Müller-Birn, Janette Lehmann, and Sabina Jeschke, "A Composite Calculation for Author Activity in Wikis: Accuracy Needed", Sabina Jeschke, Ingrid Isenhardt, and Klaus Henning, eds.,
1389: 1165: 1208: 412:
Priedhorsky, Reid; Chen, Jilin; Lam, Shyong (Tony) K.; Panciera, Katherine; Terveen, Loren; Riedl, John (November 2007). "Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia".
462:
Priedhorsky, Reid; Chen, Jilin; Lam, Snider (Tony); Panciera, Katherine; Terveen, Loren; Austin, Shane (2007). "Creating, Destroying, and Restoring Value in Knowledge (XXG)".
624: 67: 1407: 1213: 167:, which found that the number of edits was a factor in the success of such efforts. Edit counts in certain Knowledge (XXG) namespaces were more valuable to this end. 1064: 1357: 1152: 666: 619: 283:", Journalism and Media Studies Centre, University of Hong Kong; Paper for the 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism (April 16–17, 2004), p. 20. 1157: 587: 1186: 1059: 54:, a number of tools exist to determine and compare edit counts, resulting in their usage for various purposes, with both positive and negative effects. 753: 1306: 1069: 1127: 1198: 695: 671: 553: 483: 1191: 661: 266:
Adele Godoy Vrana, Anasuya Sengupta, and Siko Bouterse, "Toward a Knowledge (XXG) For and From Us All", in Joseph Reagle, Jackie Koerner,
1372: 1265: 490: 113: 1362: 1114: 429: 392: 341: 1132: 961: 644: 1280: 649: 62: 1432: 580: 1203: 705: 281:
Knowledge (XXG) as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource
1447: 838: 538:
Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08
1270: 690: 1401: 996: 892: 743: 700: 654: 639: 156: 88: 160: 614: 1483: 573: 719: 631: 879: 797: 123: 1275: 1049: 1025: 604: 1505: 792: 299: 1395: 1352: 1285: 729: 916: 507: 1437: 1246: 414:
Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Conference on supporting group work - GROUP '07
1422: 1147: 1122: 1011: 869: 828: 132: 295:"Collaboration in context: Comparing article evolution among subject disciplines in Knowledge (XXG)" 152: 148:
the editors with the highest edit count "dominate what people see when they visit Knowledge (XXG)".
901: 864: 1233: 1471: 1427: 1239: 1142: 1137: 991: 931: 780: 435: 397: 1412: 986: 951: 936: 906: 549: 479: 425: 347: 337: 135:
by edit count rank; in other words, elite editors (those who edit the most times) account for
51: 1321: 1054: 763: 100: 1417: 926: 874: 859: 679: 541: 471: 467: 417: 329: 304: 228: 280: 196: 941: 711: 494: 66:
Pie chart of all edits to the English Knowledge (XXG), with a slice for each thousand of
1290: 976: 966: 956: 50:, in this context, is an individually recorded change to the content of a page. Within 1499: 1452: 1170: 1001: 971: 946: 921: 758: 96: 439: 1074: 981: 807: 786: 164: 144: 118: 596: 31: 1006: 911: 833: 823: 802: 1442: 1326: 255:
Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010
464:
Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work
351: 17: 843: 748: 685: 545: 475: 421: 140: 42:
is a record of the number of edits performed by a certain editor, or by all
309: 294: 1331: 1079: 333: 80: 1347: 1316: 1311: 1042: 293:
Ehmann, Katherine; Large, Andrew; Beheshti, Jamshid (October 6, 2008).
43: 768: 1367: 1037: 565: 393:"The English Language Knowledge (XXG) Just Had Its Billionth Edit" 61: 35: 569: 1390:
The Iraq War: A Historiography of Knowledge (XXG) Changelogs
214:(2014), p. 39, quoting Joseph M. Reagle Jr. (2010), p. 157. 197:
How Knowledge (XXG) Works: And How You Can Be a Part of It
268:
Knowledge (XXG) @ 20: Stories of an Incomplete Revolution
194:
Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, and Ben Yates (2008).
143:
relationship". The study also analyzed the impact of
366:
Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Knowledge (XXG)
326:
Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
212:
Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Knowledge (XXG)
1381: 1340: 1299: 1256: 1226: 1179: 1113: 1024: 888: 852: 816: 728: 603: 379:
Wikis: Tools for information Work and Collaboration
116:was a 2007 peer-reviewed paper, also mentioned in 70:, and everyone else in brown (as of July 3, 2019) 157:the peer review process to become administrators 328:. London; New York: Pluto Press. p. 163. 122:, in which a team of six researchers from the 1408:People imprisoned for editing Knowledge (XXG) 581: 8: 222: 220: 1070:Hillsborough disaster Knowledge (XXG) posts 1466: 1030: 736: 588: 574: 566: 457: 455: 453: 451: 449: 508:"How I fell in love with Knowledge (XXG)" 308: 1166:United States congressional staff edits 235:. Vol. 82, no. 23. p. 40 190: 188: 186: 184: 182: 180: 176: 114:academic studies about Knowledge (XXG) 7: 1128:Carlos Bandeirense Mirandópolis hoax 1098:on the Arabic and Persian Wikipedias 532:Burke, Moira; Kraut, Robert (2008). 155:editors who had successfully passed 506:Baker, Nicholson (April 10, 2008). 468:Conference on Supporting Group Work 391:Gault, Matthew (January 15, 2021). 27:Statistic of Wikimedia contributors 1433:Knowledge (XXG) for World Heritage 68:the 10,000 most active Wikipedians 25: 1478: 1477: 1465: 696:Predictions of the project's end 112:One of the earliest significant 1153:Seigenthaler biography incident 470:. ACM Press. pp. 259–268. 227:Schiff, Stacy (July 31, 2006). 139:value than they would given a 1088:on the Chinese Knowledge (XXG) 89:Knowledge (XXG) administrators 1: 1084:Wikimedia Foundation actions 58:Use and misuse of edit counts 1448:List of online encyclopedias 1209:Israeli–Palestinian conflict 839:WikiConference North America 667:deletionism and inclusionism 620:Conflict-of-interest editing 1402:Magna Carta (An Embroidery) 1214:Russian invasion of Ukraine 997:Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight 625:political editing incidents 1522: 1358:Google and Knowledge (XXG) 161:Carnegie Mellon University 1461: 1396:LGBTQ and Knowledge (XXG) 1353:Depths of Knowledge (XXG) 1286:Listen to Knowledge (XXG) 1060:Internet Watch Foundation 1033: 739: 46:on a particular page. An 1438:Knowledge (XXG) in India 1247:Knowledge (XXG) Monument 324:O'Neil, Mathieu (2009). 1159:Star Trek Into Darkness 798:Wikipedian in residence 546:10.1145/1358628.1358871 476:10.1145/1316624.1316663 422:10.1145/1316624.1316663 153:English Knowledge (XXG) 124:University of Minnesota 1234:274301 Knowledge (XXG) 793:Wikimedian of the Year 493:June 12, 2009, at the 310:10.5210/fm.v13i10.2217 71: 1413:Print Knowledge (XXG) 754:Arbitration Committee 65: 1423:Wikimedia Foundation 1322:Knowledge (XXG) Zero 1123:Alan MacMasters hoax 829:WikiConference India 662:Deletion of articles 364:Dariusz Jemielniak, 334:10.2307/j.ctt183pc3c 210:Dariusz Jemielniak, 159:by researchers from 1373:Science information 133:super-exponentially 1428:Wikimedia movement 1363:Health information 1240:Viola angustifolia 1143:Henryk Batuta hoax 1138:Essjay controversy 992:Lisa Seitz-Gruwell 932:Dariusz Jemielniak 781:List of Wikipedias 72: 52:Wikimedia projects 1493: 1492: 1222: 1221: 1199:COVID-19 pandemic 1187:American politics 1148:Jar'Edo Wens hoax 1020: 1019: 952:Ira Brad Matetsky 937:Rebecca MacKinnon 907:Florence Devouard 555:978-1-60558-012-8 534:Taking up the mop 485:978-1-59593-845-9 199:. No Starch Press 16:(Redirected from 1513: 1481: 1480: 1469: 1468: 1418:Wiki rabbit hole 1266:Academic studies 1031: 927:Maryana Iskander 902:Esra'a Al Shafei 737: 680:Ignore all rules 590: 583: 576: 567: 560: 559: 540:. p. 3441. 529: 523: 522: 520: 518: 503: 497: 489: 459: 444: 443: 409: 403: 402: 388: 382: 375: 369: 362: 356: 355: 321: 315: 314: 312: 290: 284: 277: 271: 264: 258: 251: 245: 244: 242: 240: 224: 215: 208: 202: 192: 151:A 2008 study of 108:Academic studies 21: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1489: 1457: 1377: 1336: 1295: 1258: 1252: 1218: 1175: 1109: 1016: 942:Katherine Maher 890: 884: 848: 812: 731: 724: 712:Citation needed 606: 599: 597:Knowledge (XXG) 594: 564: 563: 556: 531: 530: 526: 516: 514: 505: 504: 500: 495:Wayback Machine 486: 461: 460: 447: 432: 416:. p. 259. 411: 410: 406: 390: 389: 385: 381:(2006), p. 199. 376: 372: 363: 359: 344: 323: 322: 318: 292: 291: 287: 278: 274: 270:(2020), p. 253. 265: 261: 257:(2010), p. 138. 252: 248: 238: 236: 226: 225: 218: 209: 205: 193: 178: 173: 110: 60: 32:Knowledge (XXG) 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1519: 1517: 1509: 1508: 1498: 1497: 1491: 1490: 1488: 1487: 1475: 1462: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1455: 1450: 1445: 1440: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1420: 1415: 1410: 1405: 1398: 1393: 1385: 1383: 1379: 1378: 1376: 1375: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1355: 1350: 1344: 1342: 1338: 1337: 1335: 1334: 1329: 1324: 1319: 1314: 1309: 1303: 1301: 1297: 1296: 1294: 1293: 1291:Wikipediocracy 1288: 1283: 1278: 1273: 1268: 1262: 1260: 1254: 1253: 1251: 1250: 1243: 1236: 1230: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1183: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1174: 1173: 1168: 1163: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1119: 1117: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1103: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1067: 1062: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1034: 1028: 1022: 1021: 1018: 1017: 1015: 1014: 1009: 1004: 999: 994: 989: 987:María Sefidari 984: 979: 977:Annie Rauwerda 974: 969: 967:Raju Narisetti 964: 959: 954: 949: 944: 939: 934: 929: 924: 919: 914: 909: 904: 898: 896: 886: 885: 883: 882: 877: 872: 867: 862: 856: 854: 850: 849: 847: 846: 841: 836: 831: 826: 820: 818: 814: 813: 811: 810: 805: 800: 795: 790: 783: 778: 773: 772: 771: 761: 756: 751: 746: 744:Administrators 740: 734: 726: 725: 723: 722: 717: 716: 715: 708: 698: 693: 688: 683: 676: 675: 674: 669: 659: 658: 657: 652: 647: 642: 634: 629: 628: 627: 617: 611: 609: 601: 600: 595: 593: 592: 585: 578: 570: 562: 561: 554: 524: 498: 484: 445: 430: 404: 383: 370: 368:(2014), p. 40. 357: 342: 316: 285: 272: 259: 246: 233:The New Yorker 216: 203: 175: 174: 172: 169: 109: 106: 59: 56: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1518: 1507: 1506:Wiki concepts 1504: 1503: 1501: 1486: 1485: 1476: 1474: 1473: 1464: 1463: 1460: 1454: 1453:List of wikis 1451: 1449: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1439: 1436: 1434: 1431: 1429: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1414: 1411: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1391: 1387: 1386: 1384: 1380: 1374: 1371: 1369: 1366: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1356: 1354: 1351: 1349: 1346: 1345: 1343: 1339: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1325: 1323: 1320: 1318: 1315: 1313: 1310: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1302: 1298: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1282: 1279: 1277: 1274: 1272: 1269: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1261: 1255: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1231: 1229: 1225: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1185: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1172: 1171:Zhemao hoaxes 1169: 1167: 1164: 1162: 1160: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1118: 1116: 1115:Controversies 1112: 1101: 1100: 1099: 1096: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1086: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1078: 1076: 1073: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1063: 1061: 1058: 1056: 1053: 1051: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1023: 1013: 1010: 1008: 1005: 1003: 1002:Lila Tretikov 1000: 998: 995: 993: 990: 988: 985: 983: 980: 978: 975: 973: 972:Steven Pruitt 970: 968: 965: 963: 960: 958: 955: 953: 950: 948: 947:Magnus Manske 945: 943: 940: 938: 935: 933: 930: 928: 925: 923: 922:James Heilman 920: 918: 915: 913: 910: 908: 905: 903: 900: 899: 897: 894: 887: 881: 878: 876: 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 861: 858: 857: 855: 851: 845: 842: 840: 837: 835: 832: 830: 827: 825: 822: 821: 819: 815: 809: 806: 804: 801: 799: 796: 794: 791: 789: 788: 784: 782: 779: 777: 774: 770: 767: 766: 765: 762: 760: 757: 755: 752: 750: 747: 745: 742: 741: 738: 735: 733: 732:(Wikipedians) 727: 721: 718: 714: 713: 709: 707: 706:Fact-checking 704: 703: 702: 699: 697: 694: 692: 689: 687: 684: 681: 677: 673: 670: 668: 665: 664: 663: 660: 656: 653: 651: 648: 646: 643: 641: 638: 637: 635: 633: 630: 626: 623: 622: 621: 618: 616: 613: 612: 610: 608: 602: 598: 591: 586: 584: 579: 577: 572: 571: 568: 557: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 528: 525: 513: 509: 502: 499: 496: 492: 487: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 458: 456: 454: 452: 450: 446: 441: 437: 433: 431:9781595938459 427: 423: 419: 415: 408: 405: 400: 399: 394: 387: 384: 380: 377:Jane Klobas, 374: 371: 367: 361: 358: 353: 349: 345: 343:9781849644037 339: 335: 331: 327: 320: 317: 311: 306: 302: 301: 296: 289: 286: 282: 279:Andrew Lih, " 276: 273: 269: 263: 260: 256: 250: 247: 234: 230: 229:"Know It All" 223: 221: 217: 213: 207: 204: 200: 198: 191: 189: 187: 185: 183: 181: 177: 170: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 149: 146: 142: 138: 134: 128: 125: 121: 120: 115: 107: 105: 102: 98: 97:Steven Pruitt 92: 90: 84: 82: 76: 69: 64: 57: 55: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 19: 18:Editcountitis 1482: 1470: 1400: 1388: 1271:Bibliography 1259:and analysis 1245: 1238: 1192:Donald Trump 1158: 1075:VisualEditor 982:Larry Sanger 917:David Gerard 808:Women in Red 787:The Signpost 785: 775: 759:Art+Feminism 710: 645:geographical 537: 533: 527: 517:November 29, 515:. Retrieved 512:The Guardian 511: 501: 463: 413: 407: 396: 386: 378: 373: 365: 360: 325: 319: 300:First Monday 298: 288: 275: 267: 262: 254: 249: 237:. Retrieved 232: 211: 206: 195: 165:probit model 150: 136: 129: 119:The Guardian 117: 111: 93: 85: 77: 73: 47: 39: 34:and similar 29: 1341:Content use 1065:Scientology 1012:Molly White 1007:Jimmy Wales 962:Jason Moore 957:Erik Möller 912:Sue Gardner 834:Wiki Indaba 824:Edit-a-thon 803:WikiProject 701:Reliability 650:ideological 398:Motherboard 1443:Wikiracing 1327:WikiReader 1257:References 1050:First edit 853:Wiki Loves 776:Edit count 691:Plagiarism 672:notability 615:Censorship 201:p. 323–24. 171:References 163:devised a 40:edit count 1133:Edit wars 1080:#1Lib1Ref 870:Monuments 844:Wikimania 749:AfroCrowd 730:Community 720:Vandalism 686:MediaWiki 632:Criticism 607:(outline) 352:656841493 141:power-law 81:pageviews 1500:Category 1484:Category 1332:Wikiwand 1276:Cultural 1180:Coverage 865:Folklore 605:Overview 491:Archived 440:15350808 239:March 6, 1382:Related 1348:DBpedia 1317:Wapedia 1312:QRpedia 1043:Nupedia 1026:History 880:Science 636:Biases 44:editors 1300:Mobile 1227:Honors 1161:debate 889:People 817:Events 769:Lsjbot 655:racial 640:gender 552:  482:  438:  428:  350:  340:  1368:Kiwix 1281:Films 1204:Death 1038:Bomis 875:Pride 860:Earth 436:S2CID 38:, an 36:wikis 1472:List 1307:Apps 1102:2022 1092:2021 1055:Logo 893:list 764:Bots 550:ISBN 519:2010 480:ISBN 426:ISBN 348:OCLC 338:ISBN 241:2021 145:bots 137:more 101:bots 48:edit 542:doi 472:doi 418:doi 330:doi 305:doi 30:In 1502:: 548:. 536:. 510:. 478:. 466:. 448:^ 434:. 424:. 395:. 346:. 336:. 303:. 297:. 231:. 219:^ 179:^ 83:. 895:) 891:( 682:" 678:" 589:e 582:t 575:v 558:. 544:: 521:. 488:. 474:: 442:. 420:: 401:. 354:. 332:: 313:. 307:: 243:. 20:)

Index

Editcountitis
Knowledge (XXG)
wikis
editors
Wikimedia projects

the 10,000 most active Wikipedians
pageviews
Knowledge (XXG) administrators
Steven Pruitt
bots
academic studies about Knowledge (XXG)
The Guardian
University of Minnesota
super-exponentially
power-law
bots
English Knowledge (XXG)
the peer review process to become administrators
Carnegie Mellon University
probit model






How Knowledge (XXG) Works: And How You Can Be a Part of It

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.