Knowledge

Partitive

Source 📝

563:"of", which indicates a kind-of or type-of relation demonstrated in the phrase "a book of history", in which "of" is used to modify the kind of book denoted, alternatively phrased as the compound noun "a history book". Similarly, "a piece of chocolate" can be analyzed as a certain kind of piece, namely a chocolate piece. The second is a partitive "of", which indicates a part-of relation and means "out of the total number of" in the case of set partitives. A partitive like "a piece of this chocolate" does not refer to any chocolate piece, but a piece taken from the whole of a certain chocolate. 976:. The third sentence has an empty noun holding the final noun position. Altogether this is taken as strong evidence that an empty noun category should be posited to license a partitive meaning. Alternatively, some linguists argued an empty noun placement is unnecessary if one considers the quantifier’s role to be quantifying a subset. The noun following the partitive PP automatically becomes the bigger set and the whole nominal represents a subset-set relation. 243:. The embedded NPs in entity partitives denote either entities at the individual level, such as "a cookie" or entities at the group level, such as "Bob and Sue". Some phrases such as ‘the linguists’ can be interpreted as either a group level entity and thus participate in an entity partitive – "half of the linguists"; alternatively, it can be interpreted as a set of entities, and thus participate in a set partitive – "one of the linguists". 477:. This means that, for example, in the partitive phrase "one of John’s friends", that John must have at least two friends for this to be a proper partitive, and in order for it to satisfy anti-uniqueness by not referring to a unique individual. Similarly, "three of John’s friends" would imply that John has at least four friends, from which an indeterminate three are being referred to. 487:, that there is some inherent indefiniteness in partitives according to their property of anti-uniqueness. This explains why 4b) is ill-formed, since it is unclear which of John’s friends is being singled out, yet can be made to take a definite determiner by adding context, such as in 4c), which now refers to a single specific friend of John matching the 791: 1091:). On the other hand, their pseudo-counterparts lack this implication. Without a definite determiner, pseudo-partitives can only denote an amount of things, and the characteristics of a set are determined by the context of the discourse. In addition, the set denoted in a pseudopartitive does not necessarily have to be bigger. 1519:
such as "dead" or "and killed" to not be ambivalent, and the third sense is only possible by adding the preposition "at".) "To kill" would be an intrinsically bound verb, where the consequence is someone/something being dead. In the data, the morpheme "–a" is the partitive morpheme. In (d), the verb "shot" takes a partitive
1146:
Nor do 12a) and 12b) mean the same. The first is a possessive partitive, referring to someone who is a member of the set of John’s friends. The second includes a postnominal genitive "of" phrase, and refers instead to someone who is a friend in relation to a member of the set of John’s friends, but
1120:
Barker claims that this is a use of the partitive "of", rather than the gentitive ‘of’, distinguishing it from being a gentitive construction. To support this, he notes that prenominal possessives such as "Mary’s child" cannot occur with a following possessor introduced by the genitive "of" such as,
566:
Although the syntactic distribution of partitives and pseudo-partitives seems to be complementary, cross-linguistic data suggests this is not always true. Non-partitives can display an identical syntactic structure as true partitives and the ultimate difference is a semantic one. Vos pointed out that
1139:
Similarly, 11a) does not mean the same as 11b). The first is an instance of the genitive "of", and means that John is in the picture. The second is an instance of the partitive "of", and hence is a possessive partitive; in contrast, it means a picture from the collection of pictures that belong to
817:
Within a partitive PP construct, the preposition "of" contains lexical content similar to ‘out of’ and always projects to a PP, hence the name partitive PP. Supporters of partitive PP often assume the presence of an empty noun following the quantifier in order to specify the two sets in relation and
1518:
In (d) and (e), "to shoot" in Finnish is an intrinsically neither bound nor unbound verb since the shooting can cause the three different results of the target being killed or only wounded or not being hit. (In English, "to shoot" with a direct object has the first two senses and requires additions
1510:
In the case of (c), the partitive object is triggered by the unbounded aspect of the verb, not the quantity of the object, since the openness of the quantity is irrelevant. Unboundedness in verbs denotes whether there is a direct consequence following the action of the verb. The verb's aspect is
551:
While the NP in partitives is usually preceded by a definite determiner, the NP in quantitive constructions containing "of" cannot be preceded by any determiner; this distinguishes the true partitive in 5a) from the quantitative in 5b), which denotes a quantity of chocolates, but does not denote a
443:
It should also be noted that some linguists consider the partitive constraint to be problematic, since there may be cases where the determiner is not always obligatory. Linguists do, however, agree that universal quantifiers, such as: every, and each, cannot be embedded in the partitive position.
419:
However, this approach fails to account for phrases such as "half of a cookie," that are partitives and yet lack a definite determiner. De Hoop instead points to the existence of set partitives and entity partitives in formulating the partitive constraint, rather than the definiteness of the NP.
989:
denotes a subset-set, possessive or part-whole relation. Similarly, de Hoop embraces the idea that only when a quantifier pairs with a desired type of DP, specific kind of partitive relation can then be determined. The preposition "of" plays a crucial role in enabling the selected DP to surface.
259:
such as ‘much’, or those with a fractional meaning, like ‘half’. Other determiners can be combined with either type of partitive, including ‘some’, ‘many’, and ‘all’. The following is a list of different quantifier determiners in English and their classification as either participating in entity
1164:
He proposes that the two constructions have the same logical form, for example 13a), where the word friend has the same referent in both positions. Variations then arise in the phonetic form depending on which "friend" word is ellipsed. In the nominal partitive, the first "friend" is ellipsed,
988:
Under this view, the preposition belongs to a functional category and its existence is solely for grammatical reasons. In other words, the preposition is not registered with any lexical content. Vos claims the internal relation between the first and second noun in a nominal partitive implicitly
1531:
The common factor between aspectual and NP-related functions of the partitive case is the process of marking a verb phrase's (VP) unboundness. A VP has the semantic property of having either an unbounded head or unbounded argument. For example, in Finnish the partitive case suffix denotes an
1515:, involving an ongoing action without a specified endpoint, and is therefore unbounded. This aspectual unboundedness requires the partitive object, and has the effect of concealing the quantity of the object. This shows that aspect is stronger than quantity in conditioning the partitive. 544:
A true partitive, as shown in 5a), has the interpretation of a quantity being a part or subset of an entity or set. Quantitives, simply denote either a quantity of something or the number of members in a set, and contain a few important differences in relation to true partitives.
984:
Closely related to the partitive PP approach, some authors propose an alternate analysis which also focuses on looking at partitive distribution in nominals. Vos claims that it is the relationship between the quantifier and the noun collectively determine the partitive meaning.
1311:
These two examples above show the contrast that exists in Finnish between the partitive object and total object, the former indicating incompleteness of an event or an open quantity. Whereas the partitive object takes the partitive case, the total object can be marked with
971:
In the first example, the notion denotes the set of "three men" is a subset of "those men". The second example has an overt noun inserted between the quantifier and the partitive PP and is still considered grammatical, albeit odd and redundant to a native speaker of
35:
partitives are syntactic constructions, such as "some of the children", and may be classified semantically as either set partitives or entity partitives based on the quantifier and the type of embedded noun used. Partitives should not be confused with
507: 1527:
object and denotes accomplishment of hitting and killing. Hence, the difference of unboundness or boundness in the verb, whether the bear was hit (and killed) by the bullet or not, is reflected by the difference in the morphology of the object.
1116:
A related construction traditionally called the double genitive has been argued by Barker to actually be a partitive, which he terms the possessive partitive (shown in 10b), rather than simply a redundant application of the genitive marker ‘s.
436:(2a) is ungrammatical even though it has a definite article because the denoted entity does not match. "The water" denotes an entity, and "one" is a set entity partitive determiner. (1b) is correct because indefinite and definite singular 75:
word, using a prepositional element to link it to the larger set or whole from which that quantity is partitioned. The partitive constructions of the following languages all have the same translation, with a very similar form:
555:
Quantitives can be interpreted as partitives, though, when modified. Consider the example, "three children in the class"; this means "three children out of the children that are in the class", which has a partitive meaning.
782:
In 1995, Guillermo Lorenzo proposed a partitive (π), which is equivalent to the meaning of "out of" in English, is a functional category by itself and projects to a phrasal level. A partitive phrase (πP) is selected by the
1003:
Syntactic tree of English partitive "Three of my friends" under a quantifier-based approach. Note that in a partitive, the noun is embedded in a DP and the preposition of is a functional element, i.e., without lexical
1643:
Adapted from Stickney, H. (2007). From pseudopartitive to partitive. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), Somerville, MA (pp. 407).
813:
approach claim that the partitive meaning is integrated into a PP. Structurally, a quantifier is followed by a noun, and a preposition in between denotes the quantifier is a subset of the following noun.
250:
in their embedded noun phrase (NP), and can be combined with quantifier determiners such as "many", and specific numbers such as "three". Entity partitives can contain either singular countable nouns or
1199:) verb, that is, one which does not indicate the result of an action. The NP-related (quantity) condition is if the object is quantitatively indeterminate, which means indefinite bare plurals or 454:
It has also been hypothesized that perhaps "of" in sentences, such as the above, do not act as the partitive themselves, but rather the superlative in the sentence provides the role of partition.
1656:
Stickney, H. (2007). From pseudopartitive to partitive. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA), Somerville, MA (pp. 406-415).
1161:
The difference between the nominal partitive and the partitive possessive constructions may in fact be a matter of ellipsis in the phonetic forms, as suggested by Zamparelli.
1536:
denotes a bounded event. Note that when translating Finnish into English, the determiners could surface as "a", "the", "some" or numerals in both unbound and bound events.
559:
One point which is important in distinguishing between partitives and pseudopartitives in English is a separation between two semantically different "of"s. The first is a
1098:, noted in true partitives, the noun always projects to a DP. In contrast, the noun in the phrase-final position projects to a NP (noun phrase) in non-partitives. 1210:
These three conditions are generally considered to be hierarchically ranked according to their strength such that negation > aspect > quantity.
466:; that is, a partitive cannot refer to a unique individual or set of individuals, but must have at least two individuals or sets of individuals in its 1679:
Zamparelli, R. (1998). A Theory of Kinds, Partitives and of/z Possessives. Possessors, Predicates, and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, 22, 259.
774:
While a number of linguists have proposed different approaches to account for the partitive structure, three approaches will be introduced here.
1094:
Intuitively, the last two phrases under the pseudo-partitive column do indicate some kind of partition. However, when they are broken down into
548:
First off, while partitives cannot be preceded by a definite determiner, such as in 6a), quantitatives can be; 6b) is a well-formed quantitive.
425:
Only NPs that can denote entities are allowed in entity partitives and only NPs that can denote sets of entities are allowed in set partitives.
571:
contains nominals fulfilling the syntactic criterion but lacking a partitive interpretation; they are therefore classified as non-partitives.
440:
denote single entities rather than a set of entities, therefore it is grammatical when proceeded by "half", an entity partitive determiner.
1695:
Huumo, T. (2013). On the many faces of incompleteness: Hide-and-seek with the finnish partitive object. Folia Linguistica, 47(1), 89-112.
530:) projects to FP (Functional Phrase) and "of" is a functional element (F) heading FP. FP then projects to QP (Quantitative Phrase) and Q ( 1075:
The nouns in the partitives all refer to a particular bigger set since they are preceded by an internal definite determiner (possessive:
1512: 523: 1609: 1523:
and specifies the activities of "shooting without killing" or "shooting at but not necessarily hitting". In (e), the verb takes an
1000: 483:
Furthermore, Barker states that DP partitive constructions cannot be headed by a definite determiner without being modified by a
1300:
In (a), the object is a mass noun, where the partitive case indicates an open, unspecified quantity of butter using the suffix
1631:
Barker, C. (1998). Partitives, double genitives and anti-uniqueness. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16(4), 679-717.
1125:
John". This phrase is illogical, since nominals are syntactically constrained to only allow one possessor. Yet, prenominal
1750: 1567:
Valkova, Z. (1999). Semantics of case: The partitive genitive in russian. ProQuest, UMI Dissertations Publishing).
738:
phrase above is classified as a non-partitive. This is counter-intuitive at first glance because the phrase has a
510:
A syntactic tree structure of an English partitive shown in (5a). The structure consists of two noun projections (
1192: 1095: 499:
A true partitive should be distinguished from a very similar construction called a quantitative (often called a
72: 526:
A tree structure for an English quantitative (also called pseudo-partitive) in (5b). The most embedded N (
488: 1165:
becoming 13b), whereas the possessive partitive ellipses the second instance of "friend", yielding 13c).
1129:
can be combined with possessive partitives, containing the partitive "of", such as "my favorite story of
784: 467: 32: 390:
is a quantifier word which quantifies over a subset or part of the embedded DP, which either denotes a
46:), which often look similar in form, but behave differently syntactically and have a distinct meaning. 1188: 787:(Num) and in turn the partitive head (π) selects the following DP. A Spanish example is shown below: 43: 1214:
is strongest in that it applies so pervasively to negated events, regardless of aspect or quantity.
412:
proposed a version of the partitive constraint in which the embedded determiner phrase (DP) must be
1725: 1204: 1133:
yours". This phrase is grammatical, taking the meaning "my favourite story out of your stories".
473:
In addition, he limits a partitive to being only able to refer to a proper subset, which he calls
1730: 1452:(Whether the bullet actually hit the bear is unknown, but if it hit the bear, it didn't kill it.) 38: 1605: 766:
is truly a definite determiner and is referring to a particular larger set of funny examples.
395: 391: 188: 54: 1581:
de Hoop, H. (1997). A semantic reanalysis of the partitive constraint. Lingua,103(2), 151-174
1720: 1696: 1520: 1304:, as opposed to a closed quantity or total object, which Finnish would specify by using the 1181: 1173: 973: 819: 750:
in Vos’s terminology) function as an adjectival modifier as opposed to ordinary partitives (
746:
data reveals that in denoting relativation and extraction relationships, non-partitives (or
212: 200: 192: 50: 28: 1755: 1590:
Jackendoff, R., 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
1321: 1313: 1305: 758:
contains an adjectival meaning closer to 'such' and indicates funny examples of a certain
484: 208: 196: 552:
smaller quantity of chocolates taken from a larger quantity of chocolates, as 5a) does.
1735: 1177: 992:
The deciding factor to label a partitive construction concerns with the presence of an
743: 735: 568: 409: 742:
sequence which is a consistent structure observed in partitives. A closer look at the
1744: 1602:
Partitives:Studies on the Syntax and Semantics of Partitive and Related Constructions
1317: 480:
4. a) I met . b) *I met the . c) I met the that you pointed out this morning.
416:, and thus must be headed by a definite determiner, such as "the", "these", or "my". 399: 216: 1645: 1431: 1386: 1367: 1244: 413: 232: 444:
Furthermore, the second determiner can be "all" only if the first determiner is a
445: 256: 20: 506: 1524: 1351: 1126: 437: 403: 387: 247: 68: 1217:
An example of the NP-related condition is shown below, borrowed from Huumo:
1207:
is negated, in which case nearly all objects are marked with the partitive.
1200: 252: 522: 1700: 1506:(The result of the action is that the bullet hit the bear and killed it.) 1211: 1196: 560: 1469: 1415: 1355: 1340: 1273: 1233: 790: 999: 451:
3. a) "The best of all the wines" b) "15% of all the relationships"
1140:
John, but does not say anything about whether John is in the picture.
1533: 998: 789: 521: 505: 204: 1485: 1113:
10. a) Three of John’s friends. b) Three friends of John’s.
1184:
takes the partitive case under the following three conditions:
794:
Tree representation of Lorenzo's view of a partitive structure
394:
or a whole respectively. The second determiner is usually an
1465: 1411: 1336: 1284: 1269: 1229: 255:(and sometimes even plural countable nouns), combining with 1143:
12. a) a friend of John's b) a friend of John's friend
538:
5. a) A box of those chocolates b) A box of chocolates
1324:
and indicates aspectual completeness or closed quantity.
1106:
The partitive nominal construction consists of structure
1670:
Vos, H. M. (1999). A grammar of partitive constructions.
235:
based on whether they involve a part of a whole, called
1558:
MartĂ­ i Girbau, M. N. (2010). The syntax of partitives.
382:
Given the following syntactic structure of partitives,
57:
languages, nominal partitives usually take the form:
754:) carrying a determiner-like element. Therefore, die 1136:
11. a) a picture of John b) a picture of John's
541:
6. a) *The three of those cars b) The three cars
1176:indicates the partitive by inflecting nouns in the 1646:http://www.lingref.com/cpp/galana/2/paper1580.pdf 996:, as demonstrated in the English examples below: 822:provides evidence for this underlying structure: 433:2. a) *one of the water b) half of the water 1395:hold-PST-1SG hand-INE-1SG. book-PTV ~ butter-PTV 1203:. Lastly, the negative condition applies when a 430:1. a) *one of a cookie b) half of a cookie 305:one third of the water; one third of the cats 1191:condition is if the object is governed by an 811:partitive prepositional phrase (partitive PP) 8: 1450:"I shot at the/a bear." /"I shot the bear ." 1398:"I was holding book ~ butter in my hand." 818:the preposition introduces the bigger set. 1639: 1637: 1154:of b) three of c) three friends 801:many of these book +s 1532:unbound event, while the accusative case 1691: 1689: 1687: 1685: 1627: 1625: 1623: 1621: 1554: 1552: 1550: 1548: 1007: 650:"a couple of these(such) funny examples" 262: 78: 1544: 1392:Pitel-i-n kĂ€de-ssĂ€-ni kirja-a ~ voi-ta. 805:Partitive prepositional phrase approach 327:three of the cats; *three of the water 1577: 1575: 1573: 847:three {} {} of-those {} men over-there 752:strong indirect partitive construction 470:, causing a degree of indefiniteness. 239:, or a subset of a larger set, called 1666: 1664: 1662: 338:many of the cats; *many of the water 316:much of the water; *much of the cats 260:partitives, set partitives, or both: 7: 748:weak indirect partitive construction 371:most of the water; most of the cats 349:some of the water; some of the cats 283:half of the water; half of the cats 227:Set partitives and entity partitives 215:, the partitive is expressed by the 770:Structural approaches to partitives 1169:Partitive case: Finnish morphology 730:"a couple of these funny examples" 462:Barker claims that partitives are 360:all of the water; all of the cats 294:20% of the water; 20% of the cats 14: 1147:not necessarily to John himself. 903:three men of-those men over-there 900:tres homes d’aquells homes d’allĂ  503:, or sometimes a non-partitive). 965:three men of-those {} over-there 778:A functional projection approach 727:a couple of those funny examples 647:a couple of those funny examples 231:Partitives can be distinguished 406:, or even another quantifier. 246:Set partitives contain plural 1: 1600:Hoeksema, Jacob, ed. (1996). 762:. In the second example, die 495:Partitives and quantitatives 448:, or fractional expression. 187:Some languages, for example 31:that indicates partialness. 1772: 980:Quantifier-based approach 199:have a special partitive 1504:"I shot the/a bear dead" 1087:, and definite article: 378:The partitive constraint 1293:find-PST-1SG butter-TOT 1253:find-PST-1SG butter-PTV 1102:Partitive constructions 534:) denotes a quantifier 219:, sometimes called the 1308:suffix –n, as in (b). 1256:"I found some butter." 1096:syntactic constituents 1025:three friends of mine 1005: 795: 535: 519: 65: 27:is a word, phrase, or 1701:10.1515/flin.2013.005 1604:. Mouton de Gruyter. 1296:"I found the butter." 1002: 958:tres homes d’aquells 793: 525: 509: 404:possessive determiner 321:three (or any number) 266:Quantifier determiner 59: 1150:13. a) three friends 1110:, as shown in 10a). 1069:a glass of red wine 1047:a group of tourists 724:grappige voorbeelden 644:grappige voorbeelden 1726:English determiners 1731:Finnish noun cases 1498:shoot-PST-1SG bear 1444:shoot-PST-1SG bear 1014:Pseudo-partitives 1006: 796: 536: 520: 475:proper partitivity 221:partitive genitive 85:Nominal partitive 1751:Grammatical cases 1079:, demonstrative: 1073: 1072: 809:Advocates of the 420:She states that: 375: 374: 269:Type of partitive 237:entity partitives 185: 184: 1763: 1721:English articles 1709: 1703: 1693: 1680: 1677: 1671: 1668: 1657: 1654: 1648: 1641: 1632: 1629: 1616: 1615: 1597: 1591: 1588: 1582: 1579: 1568: 1565: 1559: 1556: 1487: 1471: 1467: 1433: 1417: 1413: 1388: 1369: 1357: 1353: 1342: 1338: 1286: 1275: 1271: 1250:Löys-i-n voi-ta. 1246: 1235: 1231: 1121:"Mary’s child of 1058:a piece of cake 1008: 912: 856: 720:een paar van die 640:een paar van die 263: 181:Ï„ÎżÏ…Ï‚ Ï†ÎŻÎ»ÎżÏ…Ï‚ ÎŒÎżÏ… 79: 67:where the first 44:pseudopartitives 16:Grammatical case 1771: 1770: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1760: 1741: 1740: 1717: 1712: 1706: 1694: 1683: 1678: 1674: 1669: 1660: 1655: 1651: 1642: 1635: 1630: 1619: 1612: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1580: 1571: 1566: 1562: 1557: 1546: 1542: 1508: 1505: 1490: 1473: 1458: 1454: 1451: 1436: 1419: 1404: 1400: 1390: 1379: 1371: 1360: 1344: 1329: 1298: 1290:Löys-i-n voi-n. 1288: 1277: 1262: 1258: 1248: 1237: 1222: 1171: 1159: 1157: 1153: 1144: 1137: 1132: 1124: 1114: 1104: 982: 969: 956: 948: 938: 930: 922: 914: 910: 907: 898: 890: 882: 874: 866: 858: 854: 851: 842: 834: 827: 807: 802: 780: 772: 765: 757: 732: 723: 718: 707: 699: 691: 686: 680: 672: 664: 656: 652: 643: 638: 627: 619: 611: 606: 600: 592: 584: 576: 542: 539: 501:pseudopartitive 497: 485:relative clause 481: 460: 458:Anti-uniqueness 452: 434: 431: 380: 248:countable nouns 229: 42:(also known as 17: 12: 11: 5: 1769: 1767: 1759: 1758: 1753: 1743: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1736:Partitive case 1733: 1728: 1723: 1716: 1713: 1711: 1710: 1704: 1681: 1672: 1658: 1649: 1633: 1617: 1610: 1592: 1583: 1569: 1560: 1543: 1541: 1538: 1492:Ammu-i-n karhu 1474: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1438:Ammu-i-n karhu 1420: 1405: 1402: 1401: 1380: 1372: 1361: 1345: 1330: 1327: 1326: 1278: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1238: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1178:partitive case 1170: 1167: 1155: 1151: 1149: 1142: 1135: 1130: 1122: 1112: 1103: 1100: 1071: 1070: 1067: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1049: 1048: 1045: 1043:those tourists 1038: 1037: 1034: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1016: 1015: 1012: 981: 978: 949: 939: 931: 923: 915: 909: 908: 891: 883: 875: 867: 859: 853: 852: 835: 828: 825: 824: 806: 803: 797: 779: 776: 771: 768: 763: 755: 721: 708: 700: 692: 684: 681: 673: 665: 657: 654: 653: 641: 628: 620: 612: 604: 601: 593: 585: 577: 574: 573: 540: 537: 496: 493: 479: 459: 456: 450: 432: 429: 428: 427: 379: 376: 373: 372: 369: 366: 362: 361: 358: 355: 351: 350: 347: 344: 340: 339: 336: 333: 329: 328: 325: 322: 318: 317: 314: 311: 307: 306: 303: 300: 296: 295: 292: 289: 285: 284: 281: 278: 274: 273: 270: 267: 241:set partitives 228: 225: 183: 182: 175: 171: 170: 169:mijn vrienden 163: 159: 158: 151: 147: 146: 139: 135: 134: 127: 123: 122: 115: 111: 110: 103: 99: 98: 91: 87: 86: 83: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1768: 1757: 1754: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1746: 1737: 1734: 1732: 1729: 1727: 1724: 1722: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1708: 1705: 1702: 1698: 1692: 1690: 1688: 1686: 1682: 1676: 1673: 1667: 1665: 1663: 1659: 1653: 1650: 1647: 1640: 1638: 1634: 1628: 1626: 1624: 1622: 1618: 1613: 1611:3-11-014794-7 1607: 1603: 1596: 1593: 1587: 1584: 1578: 1576: 1574: 1570: 1564: 1561: 1555: 1553: 1551: 1549: 1545: 1539: 1537: 1535: 1529: 1526: 1522: 1516: 1514: 1507: 1502: 1501: 1496: 1495: 1489: 1488: 1480: 1479: 1472: 1462: 1453: 1448: 1447: 1442: 1441: 1435: 1434: 1426: 1425: 1418: 1408: 1399: 1396: 1393: 1389: 1383: 1378: 1375: 1370: 1364: 1359: 1348: 1343: 1333: 1325: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1309: 1307: 1303: 1297: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1281: 1276: 1266: 1257: 1254: 1251: 1247: 1241: 1236: 1226: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1208: 1206: 1202: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1185: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1168: 1166: 1162: 1148: 1141: 1134: 1128: 1118: 1111: 1109: 1101: 1099: 1097: 1092: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1068: 1066: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1044: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1024: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1009: 1001: 997: 995: 990: 986: 979: 977: 975: 968: 966: 963: 961: 955: 952: 947: 944: 943: 937: 934: 929: 926: 921: 918: 906: 904: 901: 897: 894: 889: 886: 881: 878: 873: 870: 865: 862: 850: 848: 845: 841: 838: 833: 830: 823: 821: 815: 812: 804: 800: 792: 788: 786: 777: 775: 769: 767: 761: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 731: 728: 725: 717: 714: 713: 706: 703: 698: 695: 690: 687: 679: 676: 671: 668: 663: 660: 651: 648: 645: 637: 634: 633: 632:Non-partitive 626: 623: 618: 615: 610: 607: 599: 596: 591: 588: 583: 580: 572: 570: 564: 562: 557: 553: 549: 546: 533: 529: 524: 517: 513: 508: 504: 502: 494: 492: 490: 486: 478: 476: 471: 469: 465: 457: 455: 449: 447: 441: 439: 426: 423: 422: 421: 417: 415: 411: 407: 405: 401: 400:demonstrative 397: 393: 389: 385: 377: 370: 367: 364: 363: 359: 356: 353: 352: 348: 345: 342: 341: 337: 334: 331: 330: 326: 323: 320: 319: 315: 312: 309: 308: 304: 301: 298: 297: 293: 290: 287: 286: 282: 279: 276: 275: 271: 268: 265: 264: 261: 258: 254: 249: 244: 242: 238: 234: 226: 224: 222: 218: 217:genitive case 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 180: 176: 173: 172: 168: 164: 161: 160: 156: 152: 149: 148: 144: 140: 137: 136: 132: 128: 125: 124: 120: 116: 113: 112: 108: 104: 101: 100: 96: 92: 89: 88: 84: 81: 80: 77: 74: 70: 64: 63: 58: 56: 52: 47: 45: 41: 40: 34: 30: 26: 22: 1707: 1675: 1652: 1601: 1595: 1586: 1563: 1530: 1517: 1509: 1503: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1491: 1483: 1481: 1477: 1475: 1463: 1460: 1449: 1445: 1443: 1439: 1437: 1429: 1427: 1423: 1421: 1409: 1406: 1397: 1394: 1391: 1384: 1381: 1376: 1373: 1365: 1362: 1349: 1346: 1334: 1331: 1310: 1301: 1299: 1295: 1292: 1289: 1282: 1279: 1267: 1264: 1255: 1252: 1249: 1242: 1239: 1227: 1224: 1216: 1209: 1186: 1172: 1163: 1160: 1145: 1138: 1119: 1115: 1107: 1105: 1093: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1074: 1065:the red wine 1064: 1053: 1042: 1031: 1020: 993: 991: 987: 983: 970: 967: 964: 959: 957: 953: 950: 945: 941: 940: 935: 932: 927: 924: 919: 916: 905: 902: 899: 895: 892: 887: 884: 879: 876: 871: 868: 863: 860: 849: 846: 843: 839: 836: 831: 829: 816: 810: 808: 799: 781: 773: 759: 751: 747: 740:Det+of+Det+N 739: 733: 729: 726: 719: 715: 711: 709: 704: 701: 696: 693: 688: 682: 677: 674: 669: 666: 661: 658: 649: 646: 639: 635: 631: 629: 624: 621: 616: 613: 608: 602: 597: 594: 589: 586: 581: 578: 565: 558: 554: 550: 547: 543: 531: 527: 515: 511: 500: 498: 482: 474: 472: 463: 461: 453: 442: 435: 424: 418: 408: 386:, the first 383: 381: 245: 240: 236: 233:semantically 230: 220: 186: 178: 166: 157:meus amigos 154: 142: 130: 118: 106: 94: 66: 61: 60: 48: 37: 24: 18: 1513:progressive 1347:kĂ€de-ssĂ€-ni 1127:possessives 1063:a glass of 1052:a piece of 1041:a group of 1036:many books 1032:those books 994:internal DP 702:voorbeelden 622:voorbeelden 464:anti-unique 446:superlative 438:count nouns 257:determiners 145:miei amici 121:mis amigos 109:meus amics 97:my friends 39:quantitives 21:linguistics 1745:Categories 1540:References 1525:accusative 1322:accusative 1314:nominative 1306:accusative 1201:mass nouns 1021:my friends 1011:Partitives 954:over-there 896:over-there 840:over-there 734:The first 528:chocolates 516:chocolates 410:Jackendoff 388:determiner 253:mass nouns 150:Portuguese 73:quantifier 69:determiner 1332:Pitel-i-n 1205:predicate 1193:unbounded 1189:aspectual 1054:this cake 1019:three of 933:d’aquells 877:d’aquells 712:Partitive 468:extension 368:Ambiguous 357:Ambiguous 346:Ambiguous 299:one third 133:mes amis 25:partitive 1715:See also 1461:Ammu-i-n 1407:Ammu-i-n 1318:genitive 1265:Löys-i-n 1225:Löys-i-n 1212:Negation 1030:many of 1004:content. 936:of-those 880:of-those 798:8. ]]]] 705:examples 694:grappige 625:examples 614:grappige 561:genitive 491:clause. 489:modifier 414:definite 272:Example 189:Estonian 82:Language 55:Germanic 49:In many 1385:butter- 1382:voi-ta. 1363:kirja-a 1283:butter- 1243:butter- 1240:voi-ta. 1174:Finnish 974:Catalan 844:d’allĂ ] 837:d’allĂ ] 820:Catalan 785:Numeral 396:article 213:Russian 193:Finnish 138:Italian 114:Spanish 102:Catalan 90:English 51:Romance 33:Nominal 1756:Syntax 1608:  1534:suffix 1521:object 1464:shoot- 1410:shoot- 1280:voi-n. 1197:atelic 1182:object 1180:. An 962:d’allĂ  951:d’allĂ  946:  893:d’allĂ  716:  670:couple 636:  590:couple 313:Entity 302:Entity 291:Entity 280:Entity 209:German 197:Basque 195:, and 177:τρΔÎčς 129:trois 126:French 93:three 23:, the 1476:karhu 1422:karhu 1366:book- 1350:hand- 1335:hold- 1320:, or 1268:find- 1228:find- 1158:of ] 1085:those 925:homes 920:three 885:homes 869:homes 864:three 826:9. a) 744:Dutch 736:Dutch 697:funny 689:those 617:funny 609:those 569:Dutch 205:Latin 203:. In 174:Greek 165:drie 162:Dutch 153:trĂȘs 117:tres 105:tres 71:is a 1606:ISBN 1500:-ACC 1482:bear 1446:-PTV 1428:bear 1195:(or 1187:The 1131:PART 1083:and 1081:this 917:tres 861:tres 760:type 667:paar 587:paar 514:and 402:, a 398:, a 365:most 343:some 332:many 310:much 277:half 211:and 201:case 141:tre 107:dels 53:and 29:case 1697:doi 1486:ACC 1470:1SG 1466:PST 1457:(e) 1432:PTV 1416:1SG 1412:PST 1403:(d) 1387:PTV 1368:PTV 1356:1SG 1352:INE 1341:1SG 1337:PST 1328:(c) 1302:-ta 1285:TOT 1274:1SG 1270:PST 1261:(b) 1245:PTV 1234:1SG 1230:PST 1221:(a) 1123:GEN 1089:the 928:men 888:men 872:men 832:men 683:die 675:van 659:een 603:die 595:van 579:een 532:box 512:box 392:set 354:all 335:Set 324:Set 288:20% 179:από 167:van 155:dos 143:dei 19:In 1747:: 1684:^ 1661:^ 1636:^ 1620:^ 1572:^ 1547:^ 1494:-n 1478:-n 1440:-a 1424:-a 1316:, 1077:my 913:c) 911:9. 857:b) 855:9. 710:→ 678:of 655:b) 630:→ 598:of 575:a) 518:). 223:. 207:, 191:, 131:de 119:de 95:of 1699:: 1614:. 1484:- 1468:- 1430:- 1414:- 1377:~ 1374:~ 1358:. 1354:- 1339:- 1272:- 1232:- 1156:i 1152:i 1108:] 960:e 942:e 764:s 756:w 722:s 685:s 662:a 642:w 605:w 582:a 384:] 62:]

Index

linguistics
case
Nominal
quantitives
pseudopartitives
Romance
Germanic
determiner
quantifier
Estonian
Finnish
Basque
case
Latin
German
Russian
genitive case
semantically
countable nouns
mass nouns
determiners
determiner
set
article
demonstrative
possessive determiner
Jackendoff
definite
count nouns
superlative

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑