Popularity - Knowledge (XXG)

1464:

group. Without group or team cohesiveness, there is no correlation between leadership and popularity; however, when a group is cohesive, the higher up someone is in the leadership hierarchy, the more popular they are for two reasons. First, a cohesive group feels more personal responsibility for their work, thus placing more value on better performance. Cohesive members see leaders as taking a bulk of the work and investing a lot of personal time, so when they see a job's value they can ascribe its success to the leader. This greatest contribution principle is perceived as a great asset to the team, and members view the leader more favorably and he gains popularity. Secondly, cohesive groups have well established group values. Leaders can become more popular in these groups by realizing and acting on dominant group values. Supporting group morals and standards leads to high positive valuation from the group, leading to popularity.

1396:, where the cohesion is a confounding factor that forces the greater links in the smaller minority, causing them to be more noticed and thus more popular. When considering race as a predictor for perceived popularity by asking a class how popular and important each other person is, African American students were rated most popular by their peers. Popularity in race was found to be correlated with athleticism, and because African Americans have a stereotype of being better at sports than individuals of other races, they are viewed as more popular. Additionally, White and Hispanic children were rated as more popular the better they succeeded in school and came from a higher socioeconomic background. No single factor can explain popularity, but instead the interaction between many factors such as race and athleticism vs. academics. 1246:

purpose. For example, sports teams exist with the goal of being successful in competitions against other sports teams. Study groups exist so that the members of the group can mutually benefit from one another's academic knowledge. In these situations, leaders often emerge because other members of the group perceive them as adding a lot of value to the group as a whole. On a sports team, this means that the best players are usually elected captain and in study groups people might be more inclined to like an individual who has a lot of knowledge to share. It has been argued that this may be a result of our evolutionary tendencies to favor individuals who are most likely to aid in our own survival.

1568:

when it comes down to the bottom line, but there have been many studies which have shown that, in general, attractiveness is not at all a valid predictor of on-the-job performance. Many individuals have previously thought this was only a phenomenon in the more individualistic cultures of the Western world, but research has shown that attractiveness also plays a role in hiring in collectivist cultures as well. Because of the prevalence of this problem during the hiring process in all cultures, researchers have recommended training a group to ignore such influencers, just like legislation has worked to control for differences in sex, race, and disabilities.

1560:

employees typically respond based on perceived popularity; however, they really prefer the social interactions with those who are more sociometrically popular. For each individual to ensure that they are consistent with the group's popularity consensus, those who are high in perceived popularity are treated with the same positive behaviors as those who are more interpersonally, but privately, liked by specific individuals. Well-liked workers are most likely to get salary increases and promotions, while disliked (unpopular) workers are the first to get their salary cut back or laid off during recessions.

1497:

trending. Since people rely on what those before them do, one can manipulate what becomes popular among the public by manipulating a website's download rankings. Experts paid to predict sales often fail but not because they are bad at their jobs; instead, it is because they cannot control the information cascade that ensues after first exposure by consumers. Music is again, an excellent example. Good songs rarely perform poorly on the charts and poor songs rarely perform very well, but there is tremendous variance that still makes predicting the popularity of any one song very difficult.

1230: 1378:

also more likely than women to be socially excluded. Boys tend to become popular based on athletic ability, coolness, toughness, and interpersonal skills; however, the more popular a boy gets, the worse he tends to do on his academic work. On the other hand, this negative view of academics is not seen at all in popular girls, who gain popularity based on family background (primarily socioeconomic status), physical appearance, and social ability. Boys are also known to be more competitive and rule focused, whereas girls have more emotional intimacy.

1556:. The majority of people have about 130 friends, while very few people have larger social networks. However, some individuals do have more than 5,000 friends. This reflects that very few people can be extremely well-connected, but many people are somewhat connected. The number of friends a person has, has been a way to determine how popular an individual is, so the small number of people who have an extremely high number of friends is a way of using social networking services, like Facebook, to illustrate how only a few people are deemed popular. 1419:

for communication with both management and co-workers, causing a greater feeling of responsibility and belongingness at work. Others prefer to work with popular individuals, most notably in manual labor jobs because, although they might not be the most knowledgeable for the job, they are approachable, willing to help, cooperative in group work, and are more likely to treat their coworkers as an equal. If an employee feels good-natured, genial, but not overly independent, more people will say that they most prefer to work with that employee.

52: 1325:

individuals. For unattractive individuals, there is again a strongly negative relationship between overt aggression and sociometric popularity. This means that attractive individuals stand to gain a lot of perceived popularity at the cost of very little sociometric popularity by being overtly aggressive while unattractive individuals stand to gain very little perceived popularity from acts of overt aggression but will be heavily penalized with regards to sociometric popularity.

1522: 1262:, has been shown to have very profound effects on popularity. People who are physically attractive are more likely to be thought of as possessing positive traits. People who are attractive are expected to perform better on tasks and are more likely to be trusted. Additionally, they are judged to possess many other positive traits such as mental health, intelligence, social awareness, and dominance. 1580: 958: 848: 1564:

the workplace. Coworkers agree with each other on who is and who is not popular and, as a group, treat popular coworkers more favorably. While popularity has proven to be a big determiner of getting more positive feedback and interactions from coworkers, such a quality matters less in organizations where workloads and interdependence is high, such as the medical field.

1271:

must prove that they are bringing value to the group. It has been shown empirically that being physically attractive is correlated with both sociometric and perceived popularity. Some possible explanations for this include increased social visibility and an increased level of tolerance for aggressive, social interactions that may increase perceived popularity.

1369:

and interpersonal conduct. By adulthood, work and romantic relationships become much more important. This peer functioning and gaining popularity is a key player in increasing interest in social networks and groups in the workplace. To succeed in such a work environment, adults then place popularity as a higher priority than any other goal, even romance.

1209:. Both popularization and personalization are employed together by tech companies, organizations, governments or individuals as complementing mechanisms to gain economic, political, and social power. Among the social implications of information popularization is the emergence of homogeneity, which often reflects dominant views. An example would be the 1082:. The 3 Factor Model proposed attempts to reconcile the two concepts of sociometric and perceived popularity by combining them orthogonally and providing distinct definitions for each. In doing so, it reconciles the counter intuitive fact that liking does not guarantee perceived popularity nor does perceived popularity guarantee being well liked. 1501:

best light, with the most famous people, or being in the media most often. Such constant exposure is a way of gaining more product followers. Marketers can often make the difference between an average product and a popular product. However, since popularity is primarily constructed as a general consensus of a group's attitude towards something,

1070:. Individuals who have perceived popularity are often highly socially visible and frequently emulated but rarely liked. Since perceived popularity is a measure of visible reputation and emulation, this form of popularity is most openly discussed, agreed upon within a group, and what most people refer to when they call someone popular. 1463:

With a greater focus on groups in the workplace, it is essential that leaders effectively deal with and mediate groups to avoid clashing. Sometimes a leader does not need to be popular to be effective, but there are a few characteristics that can help a leader be more accepted and better liked by his

1409:

More tasks in the workplace are being done in teams, leading to a greater need of people to seek and feel social approval. In academic settings, a high social standing among peers is associated with positive academic outcomes. Popularity also leads to students in academic environments to receive more

1324:

Attractive individuals who are overtly aggressive barely suffer any consequences in terms of sociometric popularity. This is a key difference between overt and relational aggression because relational aggression has a strongly negative relationship on sociometric popularity, especially for attractive

1249:

The actual value which an individual brings to a group is not of consequence in determining his or her popularity; the only thing that is important is his or her value as perceived by the other members of the group. While perceived value and actual value may often overlap, this is not a requisite and

982:

While popularity is a trait often ascribed to an individual, it is an inherently social phenomenon and thus can only be understood in the context of groups of people. Popularity is a collective perception, and individuals report the consensus of a group's feelings towards an individual or object when

1563:

During interactions with others in the work environment, more popular individuals receive more organizational citizenship behavior (helping and courteousness from others) and less counter productive work behavior (rude reactions and withheld information) than those who are considered less popular in

1500:

Experts can determine if a product will sell in the top 50% of related products or not, but it is difficult to be more specific than that. Due to the strong impact that influence plays, this evidence emphasizes the need for marketers. They have a significant opportunity to show their products in the

1496:

Information cascades have strong influence causing individuals to imitate the actions of others, whether or not they are in agreement. For example, when downloading music, people don't decide 100% independently which songs to buy. Often they are influenced by charts depicting which songs are already

1484:

Popularity is a social phenomenon but it can also be ascribed to objects that people interact with. Collective attention is the only way to make something popular, and information cascades play a large role in rapid rises in something's popularity. Rankings for things in popular culture, like movies

1418:

Popularity is positively linked to job satisfaction, individual job performance, and group performance. The popular worker, besides just feeling more satisfied with his job, feels more secure, believes he has better working conditions, trusts his supervisor, and possesses more positive opportunities

1368:

Popularity is gauged primarily through social status. Because of the importance of social status, peers play the primary role in social decision making so that individuals can increase the chances that others like them. However, as children, individuals tend to do this through friendship, academics,

1270:

This means that, in addition to being more well-liked, attractive people are more likely to be seen as bringing actual value to the group, even when they may be of little or no value at all. In essence, physically attractive people are given the benefit of the doubt while less attractive individuals

1190:

The Situation refers to the circumstances that an individual finds themself in. Different circumstances may result in different social outcomes. For example, the same student may be perceived as popular when in the social context of their church youth group but unpopular within the social context of

1051:

Perceived popularity is used to describe those individuals who are known among their peers as being popular. Unlike sociometric popularity, perceived popularity is often associated with aggression and dominance and is not dependent on prosocial behaviors. This form of popularity is often explored by

1179:

refers to all those aspects of a person that are objective: participation in sports, physical appearance, etc. Perceived popularity is primarily the result of what a person is. It is mediated by Input of Energy combining with the Hierarchy of Attraction. This preferential receipt of Input of Energy

1137:

asserting that it is based on a multitude of different factors but primarily those of: socioeconomic status; interpersonal similarity; physical appearance; and efficacy. It proposes the concept of a "Hierarchy of Attraction" which, in simple terms, is just a stylized bell curve that illustrates how

1559:

Popular people may not be those who are best liked interpersonally by their peers, but they do receive most of the positive behavior from coworkers when compared to nonpopular workers. This is a result of the differences between sociometric and perceived popularity. When asked who is most popular,

1377:

These two types of popularity, perceived popularity and sociometric popularity, are more correlated for girls than they are for boys. However, it is said that men can possess these qualities to a larger extent, making them more likely to be a leader, more powerful, and more central in a group, but

1295:

is nonviolent aggression that is emotionally damaging to another individual. Examples of relationally aggressive activities include ignoring or excluding an individual from a group, delivering personal insults to another person, and the spreading of rumors. Relational aggression is more frequently

1265:

Additionally, people who are of above average attractiveness are assumed to also be of above average value to the group. Research shows that attractive people are often perceived to have many positive traits based on nothing other than their looks, regardless of how accurate these perceptions are.

1567:

In many instances, physical appearance has been used as one indicator of popularity. Attractiveness plays a large role in the workplace and physical appearance influences hiring, whether or not the job might benefit from it. For example, some jobs, such as salesperson, benefit from attractiveness

1003:

as popular are not necessarily the most well liked as originally assumed. When students are given the opportunity to freely elect those they like most and those they perceive as popular, a discrepancy often emerges. This is evidence that there are two main forms of personal popularity that social

1320:

It has been shown that overt aggression directly leads to perceived popularity when the aggressor is attractive. Experiments that are controlled for levels of physical attractiveness show that individuals who are attractive and overtly aggressive have a higher degree of perceived popularity than

1245:

One of the most widely agreed upon theories about what leads to an increased level of popularity for an individual is the perceived value which that individual brings to the group. This seems to be true for members of all groups, but is especially demonstrable in groups that exist for a specific

1279:

The degree to which an individual is perceived as popular is often highly correlated with the level of aggression with which that individual interacts with his or her peers. There are two main categories of aggression, relational and overt, both of which have varying consequences for popularity

1144:

Input of Energy is the interpersonal actions that an individual takes, consciously and unconsciously, when they experience an interpersonal attraction. Examples of Input of Energy given in the book include: attempts at physical proximity; changes in verbal communications; changes to non-verbal

1505:

is a more effective way to attract new attention. Websites and blogs start by recommendations from one friend to another, as they move through social networking services. Eventually, when the fad is large enough, the media catches on to the craze. This spreading by word-of-mouth is the social

1299:

It has been found that relational aggression almost always has a strongly negative relationship with sociometric popularity but can have a positive relationship with perceived popularity depending on the perceived level of attractiveness of the aggressor. For an aggressor who is perceived as

1204:

offers analytical framework to understand how popularity is used to gain political and economic power. This model explains the way information is organized and selected based on its popularity among users. It links between information popularization and the opposite mechanism, information

1386:

In some instances, it has been found that in predominantly white high schools, attractive non-white students are on average significantly more sociometrically popular than equally attractive white students. One theory that has been put forth to explain this phenomenon is a high degree of

1186:

refers to the personality of the individual and how they treat other people. It is this factor that is responsible for determining where a student sits along the "liking" and "disliking" dimensions that characterize a student. The more pro-social an individual, the more they will be

1316:

Overt aggression is aggression that involves individuals physically interacting with each other in acts such as pushing, hitting, kicking or otherwise causing physical harm or submission in the other person. This includes threats of violence and physical intimidation as well.

1042:

non-aggressively. This is a more private judgement, characterized by likability, that will not generally be shared in a group setting. Often, it is impossible to know whom individuals find popular on this scale unless confidentiality is ensured.

1300:

unattractive, relational aggression, by both males and females, leads to less perceived popularity. For an attractive aggressor however, relational aggression has been found to actually have a positive relationship with perceived popularity.

1391:

among minority students compared with the relative lack of cohesion amongst members of the majority. Since there is more cohesion, there is more availability for one person to be liked by many since they are all in contact. This acts like

1307:

In short, the more physically attractive an individual is, the more likely they are to experience decreased levels of sociometric popularity but increased levels of perceived popularity for engaging in relationally aggressive activities.

1303:

The relationship between attractiveness and aggression is further intertwined by the finding that increased levels of physical attractiveness actually further decreased the sociometric popularity of relationally aggressive individuals.

915:, superiority, and similar factors. For example, a kind person may be considered likable and therefore more popular than another person, and a wealthy person may be considered superior and therefore more popular than another person. 1350:

Only the responsiveness/rejection culture results in teenagers actively trying to become popular. There is no effort for popularity in Northern or Southern Europe, Latin America or Asia. This emotional bonding is specific for the

1444:

Create connections – others are more likely to approach individuals they have strong relationships with; these can be built by talking about more personal issues, attending work gatherings, and communicating outside the office

2686:

James Silk Buckingham; John Sterling; Frederick Denison Maurice; Henry Stebbing; Charles Wentworth Dilke; Thomas Kibble Hervey; William Hepworth Dixon; Norman Maccoll; Vernon Horace Rendall; John Middleton Murry, eds. (1886).

1987:

Santor, Darcy A.; Messervey, Deanna; Kusumakar, Vivek (April 2000). "Measuring Peer Pressure, Popularity, and Conformity in Adolescent Boys and Girls: Predicting School Performance, Sexual Attitudes, and Substance Abuse".

983:

rating popularity. It takes a group of people to like something, so the more that people advocate for something or claim that someone is best liked, the more attention it will get, and the more popular it will be deemed.

1431:, employees in more central positions that must relate to many others throughout the day, such as a manager, are more likely to be considered popular. There are many characteristics that contribute to popularity: 1355:. In the love/hate cultures, the family and close friends are more important than popularity. In the approval/criticism cultures, actions are more important than persons, so no strong links develop during school. 986:

Notwithstanding the above, popularity as a concept can be applied, assigned, or directed towards objects such as songs, movies, websites, activities, soaps, foods etc. Together, these objects collectively make up

1283:

The relationship also depends on culture. Prinstein notes that studies have found that increased aggression tends to correlate with higher social status in the United States, but lower social status in China.

1438:

Focusing on positive energy – others will feel too drained to be around someone if their interactions are not started on a positive note or they don't have empathy to share in someone else's positive news

1477:

Popularity is a term widely applicable to the modern era thanks primarily to social networking technology. Being "liked" has been taken to a completely different level on ubiquitous sites such as

1112:

The interpersonal feeling of "liking" is not the same as "attraction" and that both are responsible for different human behaviours. The neurological evidence of this comes from the research of

930:

is measured by objectively measuring the number of connections a person has to others in the group. A person can have high perceived popularity without having high sociometric popularity, and

1506:

information cascade that allows something to grow in usage and attention throughout a social group until everyone is telling everyone else about it, at which point it is deemed popular.

1410:

help, have more positive relationships and stereotypes, and be more approached by peers. While this is the research found in schools, it is likely to be generalized to a workplace.

1540:

For example, there are few very popular websites, but many websites have small followings. This is the result of interest; as many people use e-mail, it is common for sites like

2550: 2454: 1632:

Massachusetts Dept. of Corporations and Taxation (1932). Annual Report of the Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation (Report). University of Michigan. p. 101.

1537:, which posits that there is a low frequency of very large quantities and a high frequency of low quantities. This illustrates popularity of many different objects. 1454:

Hands-on or servant leader – is a person that will do the work before anyone else, be the first to do the less desirable jobs, and have a positive attitude about it.

979:, which originally meant "common." The current definition of the word popular, the "fact or condition of being well liked by the people", was first seen in 1601. 1859: 999:

For many years, popularity research focused on a definition of popularity that was based on being "well liked." Eventually, it was discovered that those who are

2816:

Shahani-Denning, C., Dudhat, P., Tevet, R., & Andreoli, N. (2010). Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Selection Decisions in India and the United States.

431: 1250:

it has been shown that there are instances in which an individual's actual value is relatively low, but they are perceived as highly valuable nevertheless.

1448:

Patience – turning away too quickly ignores that relationships take time to grow, especially in the busy and stressful environments that work often induces

2912: 1034:. Those who act in prosocial ways are likely to be deemed sociometrically popular. Often they are known for their interpersonal abilities, their 2220:

de Bruyn, Eddy H.; van den Boom, Dymphna C. (1 November 2005). "Interpersonal Behavior, Peer Popularity, and Self-esteem in Early Adolescence".

963: 456: 1509:

Individuals also rely on what others say when they know that the information they are given could be completely incorrect. This is known as

2872: 1441:

Treating others with respect – others do not like to be around someone if they aren't treated equally and acknowledged for their hard work

2500:

Kennedy, E. (1995). Correlates of perceived popularity among peers: A study of race and gender differences among middle school students.

1952:

Borch, Casey; Allen Hyde, Antonius H. N. Cillessen (13 May 2010). "The role of attractiveness and aggression in high school popularity".

878: 475: 2800: 2409:

Adler, P. A., Kless, S. J., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls.

1919: 1321:

attractive non-overtly aggressive individuals. This was found to be true to a small degree for females and a large degree for males.

2892: 2840: 2477: 2096:

Berger, Joseph; Fişek, M. Hamit (1 January 2006). "Diffuse Status Characteristics and the Spread of Status Value: A Formal Theory".

1352: 817: 807: 511: 471: 2513:

Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology Of Education, 58(3), 154–165.

899:

is how much a person, idea, place, item or other concept is either liked or accorded status by other people. Liking can be due to

2907: 2897: 266: 1234: 566: 351: 102: 2579:

Porter, L. W., & Ghiselli, E. E. (1960). A self-description scale measuring sociometric popularity among manual workers.

2523:

J.C, W, Masters, Furman (1981). "Popularity, individual friendship selection, and specific peer interaction among children".

2383: 2325:

Crick, Nicki R.; Grotpeter, Jennifer K. (1 June 1995). "Relational Aggression, Gender, and Social-Psychological Adjustment".

1544:

to be accessed by large numbers of people; however, a small subset of people would be interested in a blog on a particular

1180:

by a select few is what propels them to the "popular" side of the graph that combines sociometric and perceived popularity.

1093:

was first published as a blog before being converted to a book and various versions have been available online since 2013.

1221:

to organize results based on their popularity, it presents mainly white young females as a result for the query "beauty".

991:, or the consensus of mainstream preferences in society. In essence, anything, human or non-human, can be deemed popular. 832: 486: 1736:"What Makes You Think You're so Popular? Self-Evaluation Maintenance and the Subjective Side of the "Friendship Paradox"" 1513:. Relying on others to influence one's own decisions is a very powerful social influence, but can have negative impacts. 1078:

To date, only one comprehensive theory of interpersonal popularity has been proposed: that of A. L. Freedman in the book

151: 117: 1164:

According to Freedman, an individual's place in the social landscape is determined by a combination of three factors:

938: 795: 121: 71: 1066: 1435:

Expressing and acting in genuine ways – others will turn away if they can detect that someone is being fake to them

812: 310: 1813:

Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive?

2882: 1549: 1333:

According to Talcott Parsons, as rewritten by Fons Trompenaars, there are four main types of culture, marked by:

802: 638: 371: 241: 107: 1548:. In this situation, only Yahoo! would be deemed a popular site by the public. This can additionally be seen in 2867: 1451:

Incorporating others – others feel a sense of trust and belongingness when they are asked for help on a project

1229: 1134: 904: 361: 196: 2740:

Salganik, J. (2006). Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in and Artificial Cultural Market.

2723: 1703:"The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites" 2902: 1502: 1259: 871: 611: 601: 571: 451: 436: 401: 321: 316: 216: 2887: 2140: 596: 526: 516: 496: 481: 411: 381: 301: 206: 1485:

and music, often do not reflect the public's taste, but rather the taste of the first few buyers because

2877: 2696: 2544: 2448: 1292: 827: 652: 581: 556: 461: 386: 346: 306: 291: 256: 229: 156: 1124:

extrapolates the conclusions of this research and applies it to human-human interpersonal interactions.

1428: 1201: 912: 822: 676: 624: 591: 561: 396: 366: 356: 286: 271: 66: 61: 2604:

Theodorson, G. A. (1957). The relationship between leadership and popularity roles in small groups.

2145: 51: 2862: 1490: 696: 441: 341: 179: 166: 2592:

Hawkins, K. (2012). Why Popularity At Work Matters And How To Achieve It. Officepro, 72(2), 22–25.

2648: 2350: 2307: 2299: 2264: 2202: 2113: 2078: 2013: 1969: 1882: 1836: 1755: 1664: 1388: 1117: 1031: 1005: 864: 506: 501: 421: 376: 326: 296: 276: 136: 113: 20: 2053:

Segev, Elad (5 September 2019). "Volume and control: the transition from information to power".

772: 2668: 2483: 2473: 2389: 2379: 2342: 2194: 2131:

Kanazawa, Satoshi; Jody L Kovar (May–June 2004). "Why beautiful people are more intelligent".

2070: 2005: 1915: 900: 724: 688: 668: 648: 606: 586: 416: 406: 336: 186: 131: 2753:

Leskovec, J., Singh, A., and Kleinberg, J. Patterns of Influence in a Recommendation Network.

2375: 2369: 2790: 2658: 2532: 2436: 2334: 2291: 2256: 2229: 2186: 2150: 2105: 2062: 1997: 1961: 1874: 1747: 1714: 1656: 1608: 1486: 1113: 946: 776: 736: 680: 536: 491: 446: 391: 331: 246: 211: 161: 2791: 2174: 2709: 1598: 1206: 1145:

communication; biased interpersonal judgments; cognitive intrusion; and helping behaviour.

988: 784: 780: 764: 744: 672: 660: 549: 521: 466: 426: 191: 141: 2846: 922:

is measured by asking people who the most popular or socially important people in their

2338: 1585: 852: 768: 760: 756: 752: 704: 664: 251: 97: 27: 1280:

depending on several factors, such as the gender and attractiveness of the aggressor.

1008:

popularity and perceived popularity. Prinstein distinguishes between the two types as

2856: 2311: 2268: 2233: 2206: 2117: 2082: 1973: 1878: 1719: 1702: 1668: 1613: 1534: 1393: 1214: 1210: 1014: 908: 740: 728: 712: 708: 634: 146: 92: 2470:

Modeling Dyadic and Interdependent Data in the Developmental and Behavioral Sciences

2017: 1886: 918:

There are two primary types of interpersonal popularity: perceived and sociometric.

2632: 2354: 1786: 1521: 1060: 942: 923: 732: 684: 2689:

The Athenaeum: Journal of Literature, Science, the Fine Arts, Music, and the Drama

2066: 1682:

Blaikie, William Garden (1882). "The Catholic Presbyterian, ed. by W.G. Blaikie".

957: 2617:

Turk, H. (1961). Instrumental values and the popularity of instrumental leaders.

2154: 1773: 1155:

defines eight prototypical student types that can be plotted on the single graph.

2371:

Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in global business

2260: 1603: 1267: 1039: 967:, this image shows one girl behaving with overt aggression towards another girl. 748: 720: 692: 576: 531: 261: 236: 2536: 2440: 2173:

Mulford, Matthew; Orbell, John; Shatto, Catherine; Stockard, Jean (May 1998).

2001: 1965: 1593: 1579: 1575: 1545: 1510: 1054: 847: 281: 201: 2672: 2487: 2424: 2198: 2074: 2009: 1660: 1489:

plays a large role in determining what is popular and what is not through an

1340:

approval/criticism (United Kingdom, Canada, Scandinavia, Germanic countries);

2393: 2282:

Webster Jr., Murray; James E. Driskell Jr. (July 1983). "Beauty as Status".

1839:: Associations of popularity and preference with social roles and behavior. 1142:

Interpersonal attraction (in the broadest sense) results in Input of Energy.

892: 700: 656: 43: 2374:. Hampden-Turner, Charles. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. pp. 1644: 1052:

the popular media. Notable works dealing with perceived popularity include

2346: 2247:

Feingold, Alan (March 1992). "Good-looking people are not what we think".

1026:

Sociometric popularity can be defined by how liked an individual is. This

2762:

Anderson, L. and Holt, C. (1997). Information cascades in the laboratory

1553: 1526: 1478: 1218: 2175:"Physical Attractiveness, Opportunity, and Success in Everyday Exchange" 2849:# Dr. A. L. Freedman; PopularityExplained.com, retrieved July 19, 2015. 2832: 2663: 2636: 2303: 1759: 1149:

Sociometric and perceived popularity are correlated but not equivalent.

1035: 87: 2472:. Selig, James P., Little, Todd D. London: Routledge. pp. 61–86. 1138:

attractive people are relative to each other in terms of a percentile.

1541: 2775:

Adamic, L. (2002). Zipf, power-laws, and pareto-a ranking tutorial.

1751: 1128:

A hierarchy of interpersonal attraction exists in all social groups.

2295: 2190: 2109: 1701:

Ellison, Nicole B.; Steinfield, Charles; Lampe, Cliff (July 2007).

2653: 2563:

SVan Zelst, R. H. (1951). Worker popularity and job satisfaction.

1735: 1520: 1228: 956: 26:"Likable" redirects here. For the song by Toshinori Yonekura, see 1645:"McTV: Understanding the Global Popularity of Television Formats" 2728:

Networks: Course blog for INFO 2040/CS 2850/Econ 2040/SOC 2090

1468:

The popularity of objects as a consequence of social influence

2637:"A Bayesian approach for predicting the popularity of tweets" 1835:

Lansu, T. M., & Cillessen, A. N. (2012). Peer status in

1533:

The popularity of many different things can be described by

1912:

Popular: The Power of Likability in a Status-Obsessed World

1337:

love/hate (Middle East, Mediterranean, Latin America);

941:, "Popularity to do with being the middle point of a 2833:"Interpersonal Relations Among Female Adolescents" 2039:(1). University of North Carolina Press: 15. 1929. 2839:, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Jul., 1985), pp. 154–165; 2048: 2046: 1853: 1851: 1849: 2033:University of North Carolina Extension Bulletin 1684:The Catholic Presbyterian, ed. By W.G. Blaikie 2600: 2598: 1860:"Understanding popularity in the peer system" 1346:responsiveness/rejection (the United States). 937:According to psychologist Tessa Lansu at the 872: 8: 2549:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2453:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 2429:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1905: 1903: 1858:Cillessen, Antonius; Amanda J. Rose (2005). 1867:Current Directions in Psychological Science 2812: 2810: 1707:Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1343:esteem/contempt (Japan, Eastern Asia); and 879: 865: 50: 34: 2662: 2652: 2575: 2573: 2144: 2031:"Correspondence Instruction, 1929–1930". 1718: 2405: 2403: 1947: 1945: 1943: 1941: 1939: 1937: 1935: 1933: 1931: 2730:. Cornell University. 13 November 2011. 1831: 1829: 1827: 1825: 1823: 1809: 1807: 1805: 1803: 1801: 1799: 1797: 1795: 1624: 1110:Liking and attraction are not the same. 42: 2803:from the original on 6 September 2018. 2705: 2694: 2542: 2446: 2425:"Ordinal position and peer popularity" 1400:Effects of popularity in the workplace 2635:; Bradlow, Eric T. (September 2014). 2168: 2166: 2164: 1774:"Popularity an unconscious deterrent" 1101:There are four primary concepts that 1047:Perceived popularity or social status 1038:for others, and their willingness to 1022:Sociometric popularity or likeability 7: 1734:Zuckerman, E.W.; Jost, J.T. (2001). 1133:develops a very broad definition of 2818:International Journal of Management 2055:Journal of Multicultural Discourses 2792:"You've got to have (150) friends" 2789:Dunbar, Robin (25 December 2010). 2339:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x 1787:Etymology Online entry for Popular 1196:Popularization vs. Personalization 14: 2841:American Sociological Association 1529:over time illustrating Zipf's Law 1353:high schools in the United States 1233:"Popularity" artwork featured in 1151:By combining these two concepts, 995:Types of interpersonal popularity 2641:The Annals of Applied Statistics 2234:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00317.x 1990:Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1879:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x 1720:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x 1578: 1266:This phenomenon is known as the 975:is borrowed from the Latin term 846: 2423:N.,G, Miller, Maruyama (1976). 1235:East Texas State Normal College 432:Peace, war, and social conflict 2724:"Information Cascade in Music" 2502:The Journal of Negro Education 1954:Social Psychology of Education 1841:Journal of Adolescent Research 19:For the 2006 indie album, see 1: 2284:American Journal of Sociology 2179:American Journal of Sociology 2098:American Journal of Sociology 2067:10.1080/17447143.2019.1662028 1815:Journal of Applied Psychology 1690:. The Oxford University: 127. 1258:Attractiveness, specifically 1172:they are; and the situation. 2764:The American Economic Review 2606:American Sociological Review 2368:Trompenaars, Alfons (1998). 2155:10.1016/j.intell.2004.03.003 1296:used by females than males. 2913:Majority–minority relations 2873:Interpersonal communication 2261:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304 1740:Social Psychology Quarterly 939:Radboud University Nijmegen 2929: 2537:10.1037/0012-1649.17.3.344 2441:10.1037/0022-3514.33.2.123 1649:Television & New Media 1550:social networking services 964:Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm 961:From the 1917 silent film 103:Human environmental impact 25: 18: 1966:10.1007/s11218-010-9131-1 2893:Sociological terminology 2525:Developmental Psychology 2468:Card, Noel, ed. (2008). 1910:Mitch Prinstein (2017). 1661:10.1177/1527476404268922 1191:their school as a whole. 1135:interpersonal attraction 1067:Ferris Bueller's Day Off 905:interpersonal attraction 197:Structural functionalism 2908:Biological interactions 2898:Experimental psychology 2002:10.1023/A:1005152515264 1359:Demographic differences 1260:physical attractiveness 1004:psychology recognizes, 907:, and similar factors. 217:Symbolic interactionism 112:Industrial revolutions 2837:Sociology of Education 2411:Sociology Of Education 2249:Psychological Bulletin 1530: 1242: 1211:bias of search engines 1097:Conceptual foundations 1086:"Popularity Explained" 1074:Comprehensive theories 968: 928:Sociometric popularity 207:Social constructionism 1524: 1459:Leadership popularity 1293:Relational aggression 1288:Relational aggression 1232: 960: 582:Conversation analysis 157:Social stratification 2581:Personnel Psychology 2565:Personnel Psychology 1643:S, Waisbord (2004). 1473:Information cascades 1429:mere-exposure effect 1423:Contributing factors 1225:Interpersonal causes 1202:Volume-Control Model 1153:Popularity Explained 1131:Popularity Explained 1122:Popularity Explained 1103:Popularity Explained 1091:Popularity Explained 1080:Popularity Explained 1032:prosocial behaviours 920:Perceived popularity 16:Concept in sociology 2847:"How to be Popular" 1516: 1491:information cascade 1030:is correlated with 167:Social cycle theory 38:Part of a series on 2664:10.1214/14-AOAS741 2222:Social Development 1837:emerging adulthood 1531: 1525:The popularity of 1389:group cohesiveness 1243: 1160:Three-factor model 1118:incentive salience 969: 853:Society portal 476:History of science 457:Race and ethnicity 137:Social environment 21:Popularity (album) 2704:Missing or empty 2413:, 65(3), 169–187. 2327:Child Development 1843:, 27(1), 132–150. 1427:According to the 901:reciprocal liking 889: 888: 607:Social experiment 487:Social psychology 132:Social complexity 2920: 2883:Social influence 2821: 2814: 2805: 2804: 2794: 2786: 2780: 2773: 2767: 2760: 2754: 2751: 2745: 2738: 2732: 2731: 2720: 2714: 2713: 2707: 2702: 2700: 2692: 2683: 2677: 2676: 2666: 2656: 2647:(3): 1583–1611. 2628: 2622: 2615: 2609: 2602: 2593: 2590: 2584: 2577: 2568: 2561: 2555: 2554: 2548: 2540: 2520: 2514: 2511: 2505: 2498: 2492: 2491: 2465: 2459: 2458: 2452: 2444: 2420: 2414: 2407: 2398: 2397: 2365: 2359: 2358: 2322: 2316: 2315: 2279: 2273: 2272: 2244: 2238: 2237: 2217: 2211: 2210: 2185:(6): 1565–1592. 2170: 2159: 2158: 2148: 2128: 2122: 2121: 2104:(4): 1038–1079. 2093: 2087: 2086: 2050: 2041: 2040: 2028: 2022: 2021: 1984: 1978: 1977: 1949: 1926: 1925: 1907: 1898: 1897: 1895: 1893: 1864: 1855: 1844: 1833: 1818: 1811: 1790: 1784: 1778: 1777: 1770: 1764: 1763: 1731: 1725: 1724: 1722: 1713:(4): 1143–1168. 1698: 1692: 1691: 1679: 1673: 1672: 1640: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1609:Social influence 1588: 1583: 1582: 1487:social influence 1329:Cultural factors 1312:Overt aggression 1114:Kent C. Berridge 881: 874: 867: 851: 850: 602:Network analysis 492:Sociocybernetics 482:Social movements 212:Social darwinism 162:Social structure 54: 35: 2928: 2927: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2868:Group processes 2853: 2852: 2829: 2827:Further reading 2824: 2820:, 27(1), 37–51. 2815: 2808: 2788: 2787: 2783: 2774: 2770: 2761: 2757: 2752: 2748: 2744:, 311, 854–856. 2739: 2735: 2722: 2721: 2717: 2703: 2693: 2685: 2684: 2680: 2631:Zaman, Tauhid; 2630: 2629: 2625: 2616: 2612: 2603: 2596: 2591: 2587: 2578: 2571: 2562: 2558: 2541: 2522: 2521: 2517: 2512: 2508: 2499: 2495: 2480: 2467: 2466: 2462: 2445: 2422: 2421: 2417: 2408: 2401: 2386: 2367: 2366: 2362: 2324: 2323: 2319: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2246: 2245: 2241: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2172: 2171: 2162: 2146:10.1.1.106.8858 2130: 2129: 2125: 2095: 2094: 2090: 2052: 2051: 2044: 2030: 2029: 2025: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1951: 1950: 1929: 1922: 1909: 1908: 1901: 1891: 1889: 1862: 1857: 1856: 1847: 1834: 1821: 1817:, 94(1), 20–33. 1812: 1793: 1789:, 5 April 2009. 1785: 1781: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1752:10.2307/3090112 1733: 1732: 1728: 1700: 1699: 1695: 1681: 1680: 1676: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1599:School bullying 1584: 1577: 1574: 1535:Zipf's powerlaw 1519: 1475: 1470: 1461: 1425: 1416: 1407: 1402: 1384: 1375: 1366: 1361: 1331: 1314: 1290: 1277: 1256: 1227: 1207:personalization 1198: 1162: 1099: 1088: 1076: 1049: 1024: 997: 989:popular culture 955: 885: 845: 838: 837: 798: 788: 787: 715: 641: 627: 625:Major theorists 617: 616: 552: 542: 541: 232: 222: 221: 192:Critical theory 187:Conflict theory 182: 172: 171: 142:Social equality 83: 31: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2926: 2924: 2916: 2915: 2910: 2905: 2903:Human behavior 2900: 2895: 2890: 2885: 2880: 2875: 2870: 2865: 2855: 2854: 2851: 2850: 2844: 2835:# Donna Eder; 2828: 2825: 2823: 2822: 2806: 2797:New York Times 2781: 2768: 2766:, 87, 847–863. 2755: 2746: 2733: 2715: 2678: 2623: 2621:, 39, 252–260. 2610: 2594: 2585: 2583:, 13, 141–146. 2569: 2556: 2531:(3): 344–350. 2515: 2506: 2504:, 64, 186–185. 2493: 2478: 2460: 2435:(2): 123–131. 2415: 2399: 2384: 2360: 2333:(3): 710–722. 2317: 2296:10.1086/227836 2290:(1): 140–165. 2274: 2255:(2): 304–341. 2239: 2228:(4): 555–573. 2212: 2191:10.1086/231401 2160: 2139:(3): 227–243. 2123: 2110:10.1086/498633 2088: 2061:(3): 240–257. 2042: 2023: 1996:(2): 163–182. 1979: 1927: 1921:978-0399563737 1920: 1899: 1873:(2): 102–105. 1845: 1819: 1791: 1779: 1765: 1746:(3): 207–223. 1726: 1693: 1674: 1655:(4): 359–383. 1635: 1623: 1621: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1611: 1606: 1601: 1596: 1590: 1589: 1586:Society portal 1573: 1570: 1518: 1515: 1474: 1471: 1469: 1466: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1424: 1421: 1415: 1412: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1383: 1380: 1374: 1371: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1348: 1347: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1330: 1327: 1313: 1310: 1289: 1286: 1276: 1273: 1255: 1254:Attractiveness 1252: 1226: 1223: 1197: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1188: 1181: 1161: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1146: 1139: 1125: 1098: 1095: 1087: 1084: 1075: 1072: 1048: 1045: 1023: 1020: 996: 993: 954: 951: 911:can be due to 887: 886: 884: 883: 876: 869: 861: 858: 857: 856: 855: 840: 839: 836: 835: 830: 825: 820: 815: 810: 805: 799: 794: 793: 790: 789: 643: 642: 628: 623: 622: 619: 618: 615: 614: 609: 604: 599: 594: 589: 584: 579: 574: 569: 564: 559: 553: 548: 547: 544: 543: 540: 539: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 509: 504: 499: 494: 489: 484: 479: 469: 464: 459: 454: 449: 444: 439: 434: 429: 424: 419: 414: 409: 404: 399: 394: 389: 384: 379: 374: 369: 364: 359: 354: 349: 344: 339: 334: 329: 324: 319: 314: 304: 299: 294: 289: 284: 279: 274: 269: 264: 259: 254: 252:Astrosociology 249: 244: 239: 233: 228: 227: 224: 223: 220: 219: 214: 209: 204: 199: 194: 189: 183: 178: 177: 174: 173: 170: 169: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 139: 134: 129: 124: 110: 105: 100: 98:Human behavior 95: 90: 84: 81: 80: 77: 76: 75: 74: 69: 64: 56: 55: 47: 46: 40: 39: 28:Likable (song) 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2925: 2914: 2911: 2909: 2906: 2904: 2901: 2899: 2896: 2894: 2891: 2889: 2888:Social status 2886: 2884: 2881: 2879: 2876: 2874: 2871: 2869: 2866: 2864: 2861: 2860: 2858: 2848: 2845: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2831: 2830: 2826: 2819: 2813: 2811: 2807: 2802: 2798: 2793: 2785: 2782: 2779:, 3, 143–150. 2778: 2777:Glottometrics 2772: 2769: 2765: 2759: 2756: 2750: 2747: 2743: 2737: 2734: 2729: 2725: 2719: 2716: 2711: 2698: 2690: 2682: 2679: 2674: 2670: 2665: 2660: 2655: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2633:Fox, Emily B. 2627: 2624: 2620: 2619:Social Forces 2614: 2611: 2607: 2601: 2599: 2595: 2589: 2586: 2582: 2576: 2574: 2570: 2567:, 4, 405–412. 2566: 2560: 2557: 2552: 2546: 2538: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2519: 2516: 2510: 2507: 2503: 2497: 2494: 2489: 2485: 2481: 2479:9780805859737 2475: 2471: 2464: 2461: 2456: 2450: 2442: 2438: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2419: 2416: 2412: 2406: 2404: 2400: 2395: 2391: 2387: 2381: 2377: 2373: 2372: 2364: 2361: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2328: 2321: 2318: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2289: 2285: 2278: 2275: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2250: 2243: 2240: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2216: 2213: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2176: 2169: 2167: 2165: 2161: 2156: 2152: 2147: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2127: 2124: 2119: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2092: 2089: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2049: 2047: 2043: 2038: 2034: 2027: 2024: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1983: 1980: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1948: 1946: 1944: 1942: 1940: 1938: 1936: 1934: 1932: 1928: 1923: 1917: 1913: 1906: 1904: 1900: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1861: 1854: 1852: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1832: 1830: 1828: 1826: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1810: 1808: 1806: 1804: 1802: 1800: 1798: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1783: 1780: 1775: 1769: 1766: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1730: 1727: 1721: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1697: 1694: 1689: 1685: 1678: 1675: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1639: 1636: 1628: 1625: 1619: 1615: 1614:Social status 1612: 1610: 1607: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1592: 1591: 1587: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1538: 1536: 1528: 1523: 1514: 1512: 1507: 1504: 1503:word-of-mouth 1498: 1494: 1492: 1488: 1482: 1480: 1472: 1467: 1465: 1458: 1453: 1450: 1447: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1432: 1430: 1422: 1420: 1413: 1411: 1404: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1390: 1381: 1379: 1372: 1370: 1363: 1358: 1356: 1354: 1345: 1342: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1311: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1274: 1272: 1269: 1263: 1261: 1253: 1251: 1247: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1224: 1222: 1220: 1216: 1215:Google Images 1212: 1208: 1203: 1195: 1189: 1185: 1182: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1167: 1159: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1104: 1096: 1094: 1092: 1085: 1083: 1081: 1073: 1071: 1069: 1068: 1063: 1062: 1057: 1056: 1046: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1021: 1019: 1017: 1016: 1015:social status 1011: 1007: 1002: 994: 992: 990: 984: 980: 978: 974: 966: 965: 959: 952: 950: 948: 944: 940: 935: 933: 929: 925: 921: 916: 914: 910: 909:Social status 906: 902: 898: 894: 882: 877: 875: 870: 868: 863: 862: 860: 859: 854: 849: 844: 843: 842: 841: 834: 831: 829: 826: 824: 821: 819: 818:Organizations 816: 814: 811: 809: 806: 804: 801: 800: 797: 792: 791: 786: 782: 778: 774: 770: 767: · 766: 763: · 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 723: · 722: 719: 716: 714: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 690: 686: 682: 678: 674: 670: 666: 662: 658: 655: · 654: 650: 647: 640: 636: 633: 630: 629: 626: 621: 620: 613: 610: 608: 605: 603: 600: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 578: 575: 573: 572:Computational 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 554: 551: 546: 545: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 488: 485: 483: 480: 477: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 445: 443: 440: 438: 435: 433: 430: 428: 425: 423: 420: 418: 415: 413: 410: 408: 405: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 383: 380: 378: 375: 373: 370: 368: 365: 363: 360: 358: 355: 353: 350: 348: 345: 343: 340: 338: 335: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 317:Environmental 315: 312: 308: 305: 303: 300: 298: 295: 293: 290: 288: 285: 283: 280: 278: 275: 273: 270: 268: 267:Consciousness 265: 263: 260: 258: 255: 253: 250: 248: 245: 243: 240: 238: 235: 234: 231: 226: 225: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 203: 200: 198: 195: 193: 190: 188: 185: 184: 181: 176: 175: 168: 165: 163: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 148: 147:Social equity 145: 143: 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123: 119: 115: 111: 109: 106: 104: 101: 99: 96: 94: 93:Globalization 91: 89: 86: 85: 79: 78: 73: 70: 68: 65: 63: 60: 59: 58: 57: 53: 49: 48: 45: 41: 37: 36: 33: 29: 22: 2878:Anthropology 2836: 2817: 2796: 2784: 2776: 2771: 2763: 2758: 2749: 2741: 2736: 2727: 2718: 2706:|title= 2697:cite journal 2688: 2681: 2644: 2640: 2626: 2618: 2613: 2608:, 22, 58–67. 2605: 2588: 2580: 2564: 2559: 2545:cite journal 2528: 2524: 2518: 2509: 2501: 2496: 2469: 2463: 2449:cite journal 2432: 2428: 2418: 2410: 2370: 2363: 2330: 2326: 2320: 2287: 2283: 2277: 2252: 2248: 2242: 2225: 2221: 2215: 2182: 2178: 2136: 2133:Intelligence 2132: 2126: 2101: 2097: 2091: 2058: 2054: 2036: 2032: 2026: 1993: 1989: 1982: 1960:(1): 23–39. 1957: 1953: 1911: 1890:. Retrieved 1870: 1866: 1840: 1814: 1782: 1768: 1743: 1739: 1729: 1710: 1706: 1696: 1687: 1683: 1677: 1652: 1648: 1638: 1627: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1539: 1532: 1508: 1499: 1495: 1483: 1476: 1462: 1426: 1417: 1408: 1385: 1376: 1367: 1349: 1332: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1291: 1282: 1278: 1264: 1257: 1248: 1244: 1238: 1199: 1183: 1176: 1169: 1165: 1163: 1152: 1148: 1141: 1130: 1127: 1121: 1109: 1102: 1100: 1090: 1089: 1079: 1077: 1065: 1061:Odd Girl Out 1059: 1053: 1050: 1027: 1025: 1013: 1009: 1000: 998: 985: 981: 976: 972: 970: 962: 953:Introduction 936: 931: 927: 924:social group 919: 917: 896: 890: 803:Bibliography 717: 645: 644: 631: 597:Mathematical 577:Ethnographic 557:Quantitative 242:Architecture 180:Perspectives 152:Social power 126: 32: 1604:Self-esteem 1268:Halo effect 1105:relies on. 1010:likeability 1006:sociometric 945:and having 808:Terminology 777:Baudrillard 653:Tocqueville 567:Comparative 562:Qualitative 532:Victimology 362:Immigration 347:Generations 262:Criminology 2863:Popularity 2857:Categories 2385:0786311258 1914:. Viking. 1892:7 November 1620:References 1594:Peer group 1552:, such as 1546:video game 1517:Zipf's Law 1511:groupthink 1405:Importance 1394:Zipf's Law 1275:Aggression 1168:they are; 1055:Mean Girls 973:popularity 932:vice versa 897:popularity 833:By country 587:Historical 512:Technology 452:Punishment 437:Philosophy 412:Mathematic 402:Literature 367:Industrial 357:Historical 282:Demography 202:Positivism 127:Popularity 82:Key themes 2673:1932-6157 2654:1304.6777 2488:221663023 2312:146349353 2269:144166220 2207:144715112 2199:0002-9602 2141:CiteSeerX 2118:144034385 2083:203088993 2075:1744-7143 2010:0047-2891 1974:145421487 1669:220732538 1040:cooperate 1001:perceived 977:popularis 971:The term 947:influence 913:dominance 893:sociology 649:Martineau 592:Interview 517:Terrorism 497:Sociology 442:Political 382:Knowledge 302:Education 44:Sociology 2801:Archived 2394:37513179 2018:38800770 1887:16566957 1572:See also 1554:Facebook 1527:Facebook 1479:Facebook 1414:Benefits 1364:Maturity 1241:yearbook 1237:'s 1922 1219:PageRank 1213:. While 1116:and his 949:on it." 828:Timeline 813:Journals 781:Bourdieu 773:Habermas 769:Luhmann 765:Foucault 709:Mannheim 689:Durkheim 462:Religion 422:Military 387:Language 372:Internet 327:Feminist 311:Jealousy 297:Economic 292:Disaster 287:Deviance 230:Branches 108:Identity 2742:Science 2355:6647537 2347:7789197 2304:2779050 1760:3090112 1120:model. 1036:empathy 785:Giddens 783:· 779:· 771:· 759:· 757:Goffman 753:Schoeck 739:· 731:· 707:· 705:Du Bois 703:· 695:· 691:· 683:· 677:Tönnies 675:· 661:Spencer 659:· 637:· 550:Methods 527:Utopian 472:Science 417:Medical 407:Marxist 397:Leisure 307:Emotion 272:Culture 88:Society 67:Outline 62:History 2671: 2486: 2476: 2392: 2382: 2353: 2345: 2310: 2302: 2267: 2205: 2197: 2143: 2116: 2081: 2073: 2016: 2008: 1972: 1918: 1885: 1758: 1667: 1542:Yahoo! 1373:Gender 1239:Locust 1187:liked. 1064:, and 1028:liking 823:People 761:Bauman 741:Nisbet 737:Merton 729:Gehlen 725:Adorno 718:1900s: 693:Addams 685:Simmel 681:Veblen 673:Pareto 665:Le Bon 646:1800s: 639:Sieyès 632:1700s: 612:Survey 537:Visual 447:Public 352:Health 342:Gender 332:Fiscal 322:Family 2691:: 27. 2649:arXiv 2376:97–98 2351:S2CID 2308:S2CID 2300:JSTOR 2265:S2CID 2203:S2CID 2114:S2CID 2079:S2CID 2014:S2CID 1970:S2CID 1883:S2CID 1863:(PDF) 1756:JSTOR 1665:S2CID 1445:walls 1217:uses 943:group 926:are. 796:Lists 745:Mills 721:Fromm 713:Elias 701:Weber 635:Comte 522:Urban 507:Sport 502:Space 467:Rural 427:Music 377:Jewry 277:Death 237:Aging 72:Index 2710:help 2669:ISSN 2551:link 2484:OCLC 2474:ISBN 2455:link 2390:OCLC 2380:ISBN 2343:PMID 2195:ISSN 2071:ISSN 2006:ISSN 1916:ISBN 1894:2012 1382:Race 1200:The 1177:What 1166:what 1012:vs. 749:Bell 733:Aron 697:Mead 669:Ward 657:Marx 337:Food 257:Body 2659:doi 2533:doi 2437:doi 2335:doi 2292:doi 2257:doi 2253:111 2230:doi 2187:doi 2183:103 2151:doi 2106:doi 2102:111 2063:doi 1998:doi 1962:doi 1875:doi 1748:doi 1715:doi 1657:doi 1184:Who 1170:who 891:In 392:Law 247:Art 2859:: 2809:^ 2799:. 2795:. 2726:. 2701:: 2699:}} 2695:{{ 2667:. 2657:. 2643:. 2639:. 2597:^ 2572:^ 2547:}} 2543:{{ 2529:17 2527:. 2482:. 2451:}} 2447:{{ 2433:33 2431:. 2427:. 2402:^ 2388:. 2378:. 2349:. 2341:. 2331:66 2329:. 2306:. 2298:. 2288:89 2286:. 2263:. 2251:. 2226:14 2224:. 2201:. 2193:. 2181:. 2177:. 2163:^ 2149:. 2137:32 2135:. 2112:. 2100:. 2077:. 2069:. 2059:14 2057:. 2045:^ 2035:. 2012:. 2004:. 1994:29 1992:. 1968:. 1958:14 1956:. 1930:^ 1902:^ 1881:. 1871:14 1869:. 1865:. 1848:^ 1822:^ 1794:^ 1754:. 1744:64 1742:. 1738:. 1711:12 1709:. 1705:. 1686:. 1663:. 1651:. 1647:. 1493:. 1481:. 1058:, 1018:. 934:. 903:, 895:, 775:· 755:· 751:· 747:· 743:· 735:· 727:· 711:· 699:· 687:· 679:· 671:· 667:· 663:· 651:· 120:/ 116:/ 2843:. 2712:) 2708:( 2675:. 2661:: 2651:: 2645:8 2553:) 2539:. 2535:: 2490:. 2457:) 2443:. 2439:: 2396:. 2357:. 2337:: 2314:. 2294:: 2271:. 2259:: 2236:. 2232:: 2209:. 2189:: 2157:. 2153:: 2120:. 2108:: 2085:. 2065:: 2037:9 2020:. 2000:: 1976:. 1964:: 1924:. 1896:. 1877:: 1776:. 1762:. 1750:: 1723:. 1717:: 1688:7 1671:. 1659:: 1653:5 880:e 873:t 866:v 478:) 474:( 313:) 309:( 122:5 118:4 114:3 30:. 23:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.