71:
53:
81:
22:
166:
Frankly, it's either badly scoped - it's focused so much on AI image restoration that it ignores that the field has literal centuries behind it. And the lead image is of an AI colourisation, which I'm not sure even counts as image restoration.
204:
127:
133:
163:, as in, what the public thinks about a brand, and how to fix that after a crisis, it's barely cited, the information seems to engage in some close paraphrasing in a lot of cases, and...
103:
199:
94:
58:
209:
33:
70:
52:
185:
156:
39:
21:
99:
102:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
86:
173:
179:
80:
193:
76:
155:
This article feels... weird. Besides some odd things - there's a link to
15:
98:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
205:Unknown-importance electrical engineering articles
132:This article has not yet received a rating on the
112:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Electrical engineering
8:
115:Template:WikiProject Electrical engineering
200:Stub-Class electrical engineering articles
47:
19:
49:
7:
92:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
95:WikiProject Electrical engineering
14:
79:
69:
51:
20:
210:Electrical engineering articles
118:electrical engineering articles
1:
106:and see a list of open tasks.
170:It's just a weird article.
226:
151:Problems with this article
134:project's importance scale
159:, which is on stuff like
131:
64:
46:
186:08:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
157:image restoration theory
178:Has about 8.4% of all
109:Electrical engineering
100:Electrical engineering
59:Electrical engineering
28:This article is rated
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
87:Engineering portal
34:content assessment
148:
147:
144:
143:
140:
139:
217:
184:
120:
119:
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
225:
224:
220:
219:
218:
216:
215:
214:
190:
189:
183:
171:
153:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
85:
78:
29:
12:
11:
5:
223:
221:
213:
212:
207:
202:
192:
191:
177:
152:
149:
146:
145:
142:
141:
138:
137:
130:
124:
123:
121:
104:the discussion
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
222:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
197:
195:
188:
187:
181:
176:
175:
168:
164:
162:
158:
150:
135:
129:
126:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
82:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
174:Adam Cuerden
172:
169:
165:
160:
154:
93:
40:WikiProjects
161:brand image
194:Categories
30:Stub-class
36:scale.
180:FPs
128:???
196::
182:.
136:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
