1157:. Furthermore, while completely irrelevant to our discussion, if someone got pulled over on what is signed as the Red Hill Valley Parkway but the ticket said Lincoln M. Alexander parkway due to this confusion and someone attempted to fight the validity based on that alone, the Crown could easily ask for the ticket to be amended to note the correct name. Your argument that you are not guilty on that fact alone is therefore wholly incorrect, albeit it is something I'm sure people could try and perhaps - with the right JP - get away with. Therefore, in that specific context you brought up, the bylaw -is- moot and, while something that we should certainly get to the bottom of, is not worth the tizzy and the condescending tone of your reply. Let's stick to the topic at hand - the demarcation point between the two highways, where it is signed - as in,
1179:. I have come across more than a few personal injury cases where two jurisdictions (usually the province and a city or region) are fighting over who is responsible for damages due to road defects, and it has come down to the two jurisdictions attempting to claim the other is responsible due to where a sign was placed. While I completely understand the importance of bylaws, signage is extremely important in a legal context as well. But like I said, that's going well beyond the scope of this discussion. I just wanted to point this out before someone tries to say that signs are irrelevant.
1043:), with Rymal Road being the southerly limit of both of them. The jog in the alignment of Rymal at Pritchard shows how Ontario townships often don't match exactly. City of Hamilton By-Law 07-308 which defines the RHVP only includes land in Saltfleet and not any land in Barton. Regional By-Law R97-077, which defines the LINC, does include parts of Lots 1 and 2, Concession 7 in Barton, which are the lots between Pritchard and Dartnall where the highway is built. Did someone put the signs in the wrong place? Should they be "300m
643:
the transition signs were located, but it sort of made sense as the extension to Mud Street was an early precursor to the RHVP and constructed separately from the rest of the Linc. I'm not trying to be a prick about this. Still, we need to come to some sort of consensus - do we base these articles on where the City of
Hamilton has placed signage to indicate the transition from one highway to the other, or do we base it on the best sourced legal definition if it has not been changed and note the potential signing error?
90:
156:
234:
200:
244:
1161:(how you claimed this was originally research in the first place when you can drive down the highway yourself and see the signs is beyond me, but whatever) and try to figure out what Hamilton says on the matter: Is it a signage error? Do Hamilton officials even know the correct demarcation point? etc etc. Segues into other topics are unnecessary and take away from the intended goal of this discussion.
168:
80:
338:
53:
583:
several years later connecting with that and completing the interchange. The construction maps are just going to show the work left to complete. We need a post construction ref to know what the actual terminus of the roads are. I could also fire off an email to the
Hamilton Public Works Department and see what the official word is (even though we can't use it as a ref). -
22:
360:
220:
1153:. If Hamilton is unsure of their own bylaws (and frankly, that does not surprise me in the least but that is another discussion well outside the scope of this) that can be noted in the article, but that is ultimately their issue to correct and the article should still note the demarcation point where the signage is because
658:
parcels of land with more recent dates, but there is no map and I do not know how to establish where those parcels are. The signs are in the same spot in both directions, which seems intentional; the signs at
Dartnall would not show the RHVP for a westbound exit if it becomes the Linc by Upper Gage. -
1283:
In 2005, Council directed staff to change the name of the north-south portion of the
Parkway. This created some difficulty in choosing the appropriate demarcation line given that it is a continuous road. It was decided to place the signs some 300 metres west of the Dartnall Road interchange because
1148:
You're reading way too much into my comments and getting into way too much of a tizzy over this than it warranted. We're talking about a
Knowledge article, not a legal proceeding. If the signs show that one designation begins and the other ends west of Darnall Road, the article should reflect it as
1114:
Could this be a simple East vs. West error? This whole situation seems very odd. I look forward to their response and, hopefully, some clarification. As for the
Streetview images, regardless of what the bylaw says, Hamilton has signs that show the demarcation point as West of Darnall Road, so that
701:
with subsequent amendments. Perhaps the legal description in 07-308 does not match the sketch, which shows the dedication as being between
Pritchard Road and the QEW. I will also patiently await the answer from the city, which is probably more efficient than searching their entire on-line database of
883:
on-line? They can then be cited and linked (or LINC-ed), even if they don't have a description that is easily understood, they are still the legal definition. Who can read legal stuff anyway? Oh - I can. I will look for more info on the
Concessions and Lots in the original Township, which might help
1133:
or any relevant municipal by-laws governing local traffic restrictions like parking or speeding. If someone gets a traffic ticket with incorrect information on it, that infraction can be disputed in court. If you were illegally parked on "Queen Street" and get a ticket that says "King Street", then
657:
I've fired an email off to the City of
Hamilton requesting a bylaw for the formal demarcation line. The way I see it, the bylaws and plans correspond to show what was likely the designation of a right-of-way out of greenspace and parkland, prior to construction. There are further bylaws designating
642:
If this is true and there was no subsequent bylaw I'm almost wondering if the city screwed up where they put their signs, this wouldn't be the first time something like this has happened and won't be the last. Trust me when I say I was was rather surprised the first time I drove this and saw where
716:
Either way, the signs speak for themselves regardless of bylaw. If the city does come back and say it ends at
Pritchard Road, a decision needs to be made with regards to noting this in the article, because the city has marked the demarcation point with their signage right between Upper Ottawa and
1093:
Oi. This isn't the first time I've run into this problem... For Highway 410 I've got a source from the Star in 1985 saying "its open to here today, next year it will open to there", but the official Ontario road maps show it completed to "there" in 1982. I've responded to Marco with this insight,
810:
the two PDFs just contain lot and parcel numbers, which could very well be verified with a survey of Hamilton (probably only accessible at the city hall), but the response from Marco seems to verify that the signs placed on the parkway are in the proper location, and Dartnall Road is part of the
582:
I was referencing the signs on the Red Hill / Linc that indicate that one ends and the other begins (the second url). When they were constructed, the part that became the Linc (both parts were originally the Red Hill Creek Expressway) forced drivers off at Dartnell Road. The RHVP was constructed
464:
Yes, this new highway will be taking all the east-west traffic out of the freeman interchange (and diverting in through the east end and the mountain, thus finally proving the DiIanni city council to have been idiots - just wait and see). But the RHVP is not "needed" because of any supposed
1134:
you were obviously not guilty of that. If you are speeding on "The Lincoln M. Alexander Parkway" and get a ticket that says "The Red Hill Valley Parkway", then you are also not guilty as charged. That is why I have been trying to confirm the correct location of those signs with references.
1468:
Well, now we know for sure and the issue is settled. Certainly interesting to see their rationale for the demarcation line, as that is the approximate area where the design switches from the Linc's weird curbed cross-section to the more standard setup that the rest of the RHVP uses.
1387:
Oh, wait a minute! That's not what it says. But I am suprised that there is not a subsequent report of some kind rather than "It was decided to place the signs". That sounds very casual, since the prior report and By-laws were very specific. Oh well, thanks for your digging.
737:
There are two blue signs for westbound traffic indicating the LINC "BEGINS" and two green signs for eastbound traffic noting the RHVP "BEGINS". These signs are in the median and right shoulder of the parkway and are located approximately 300m west of the Dartnall Road
1210:
Not upset anymore. Your replies just came across as bit condescending and your most recent reply was off-topic and out of context. It's already forgotten. Let's just try to get to the bottom of this so that we can make sure the articles are correct. Sound good?
1225:
Amen. I sent the email directly to Marco, so hopefully he'll reply on Monday. Worst case, we mention the signs and the bylaws, and the infobox for the RHVP shows the Linc as its southern terminus and vice-versa for the eastern terminus of the Linc. -
465:
deficiency in the Freeman Interchange. The capacity of the Freeman ramps was determined by MTO without any assumption that RHVP would be completed, and with current data - and if MTO thought the RHVP was needed to reduce congestion on their highways,
628:] on a By-law to establish the RHVP which shows the limit at Prichard Road. Perhaps that has subsequently been changed - the city will let you know that. An amending By-law might also be available on their web site. That would be convenient.
494:
489:
499:
504:
Darnall Road is officially on the RHVP and its last exit, not the Linc. I've reverted the article to my previous edit. One can take a look at the linked streetview shots to see the Begins signage and their location for themselves.
567:
The signs at Mud Street also point to both highways. This is because the join is between the interchanges, near Prichard Road, where there is no interchange. Look at the reference I have given above for construction details.
534:
If the signs are posted there, its probably where it ends. Can we find a post-construction source that isn't streetview to validate it though? Does Hamilton have an online street classification list with lengths? -
623:
OK I see that now - thanks. By-laws define these limits. Cities don't just stick up signs, there is an official process that takes place dedicating the road as a public highway - but you already know that. Here is
678:
Be sure to let us know what they say, I'd be very interested to hear what you find out. The fact that Mud Street and Dartnall both show the RHVP -and- the Linc on their signs make things even more confusing.
953:
which may be hard to find online given its age. The RHVP should be online since its from 2007, City of Hamilton By-Law 07-308 (To Incorporate City Land, Designated as Below, Into the Red Hill Valley Parkway)
495:
http://maps.google.ca/?ll=43.202517,-79.829922&spn=0.00976,0.032573&t=h&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=43.202522,-79.829902&panoid=rHd-j8YYGV3jVdwXWbN5yw&cbp=11,325.61,,0,-0.83&z=15
490:
http://maps.google.ca/?ll=43.196604,-79.829364&spn=0.009761,0.032573&t=h&z=15&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=43.196599,-79.829374&panoid=rrdvpBkSsGEISa9Bd-vi4g&cbp=11,45.56,,2,-1.93
434:
Despite fierce lobbying by citizens who want the controversial road named after former mayor Jack MacDonald, the group tasked with coming up with a title voted 4-1 for that more or less obvious choice.
500:
http://maps.google.ca/?ll=43.20308,-79.830437&spn=0.00976,0.032573&t=h&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=43.203077,-79.830439&panoid=Qffv_7yIWPElwvgyq2vHAg&cbp=11,175.2,,1,-0.65&z=15
450:
I found this article to be too biased in favour of the construction, which has been a major, well-publicized controversy. I have made a relatively minor change in order to provide some more balance. --
1280:
In 1997, the by-law established the lands as Public Highway from Hwy. 403 to the hydro easement located east of Pritchard Road. At that time, it was intended to have one name for the entire Parkway.
1535:
1525:
1319:
I say that we put this email in a hidden html note beside the two bylaws (since it can't be sourced obviously), and declare the point 300m west of Dartnall as the demarcation line. -
298:
1129:
Did you really say "regardless of the law"? I think you fail to understand the impact of these by-laws. If a road is not dedicated as a public highway then it is not subject to the
1051:? I had hoped we would come up with a solution which would give us proper references rather than Google images, but we see to have uncovered something a little out of sync.
1094:
will see if the city has anything to say... We may have to just indicate in the text, and make the terminus for the two parkways be the other parkway (in the infobox). -
1545:
1555:
1530:
425:
The Red Hill expressway has been in the hopper for more than 50 years, but it took a group of city councillors less than half an hour to pick a formal name for it.
1520:
1500:
136:
308:
511:, based on guess work and speculation. Dartnall Road interchange was built as the last on the Linc and Mud Street was the first interchange on the RHVP. See
346:
210:
950:
The first one (for the Linc) is Regional By-Law R97-077 (A By-Law to Establish and Lay Out Certain Lands as Part of the Lincoln M. Alexander Parkway),
1550:
1540:
1510:
1495:
1196:
I was hoping to find proper on-line supporting references for your discovery of the signs at an unexpected location on the highway - not upset you.
274:
146:
1515:
262:
1402:
If they're published yet, it would probably be in the council minutes for 2005... but I highly doubt you'd find anything of those online. -
410:
270:
257:
205:
1505:
269:
provinces, territories and counties. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
112:
954:
951:
625:
1412:
1329:
1236:
1104:
966:
821:
668:
593:
545:
1040:
1130:
181:
63:
1036:
103:
58:
33:
694:
475:
Just putting in my own 2 cents, here, since I know how MTO works and have worked on a lot of the highways around here.
476:
734:
The attached PDF's contain the by-laws outlining the Lincoln M. Alexander (LINC) and Red Hill Valley (RHVP) Parkways.
702:
agendas, minutes and reports, where I have been trying to find supporting references for your photographic evidence.
717:
Dartnall and that's what people see when they drive. Probably jumping the gun, the city has yet to say anything.
472:
I know about Freeman Interchange because I was out there before it was open to traffic, inspecting the bridges.
1455:
1393:
1378:
1201:
1139:
1056:
889:
707:
633:
573:
520:
1287:
The 2007 by-law established the remainder of the lands as Public Highway from the hydro easement to the QEW.
880:
698:
406:
39:
398:
21:
1474:
1451:
1446:
1389:
1374:
1251:
1216:
1197:
1184:
1166:
1135:
1120:
1052:
885:
722:
703:
684:
648:
629:
569:
516:
391:
111:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1410:
1327:
1234:
1102:
964:
819:
666:
591:
543:
1284:
the Parkway transitions from an urban cross section to a rural cross section at this location.
512:
451:
402:
1175:
Also I should note - in the context of road designations and responsibility, signage means
1246:
I'm down with that. Frankly, I'm surprised that this has gone on for as long as it has.
1470:
1247:
1212:
1180:
1162:
1116:
718:
680:
644:
173:
1489:
1404:
1321:
1228:
1096:
958:
813:
660:
585:
537:
95:
1478:
1459:
1417:
1397:
1382:
1373:. . . . and now I'll be looking at every Hamilton City Council report from 2005!!!
1334:
1255:
1241:
1220:
1205:
1188:
1170:
1143:
1124:
1109:
1060:
971:
893:
826:
726:
711:
688:
673:
652:
637:
598:
577:
550:
524:
479:
454:
414:
249:
155:
1290:
I hope that this answers your question and apologize for the delay in responding.
233:
199:
394:
for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/): -->
239:
163:
85:
79:
52:
337:
1450:
has online Council Agendas and Minutes since 2001 and By-laws since 2004.
879:
That's good! But what are the by-law numbers, and are they available at
515:
at the City of Hamilton. There is no substitute for proper research.
266:
108:
359:
1260:
Ok, here we go. This email spells out the details of those bylaws:
15:
358:
336:
261:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
154:
1035:
Pritchard Road is the line between the Township of Barton (
273:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
1115:
is what the vast majority of people see and would think.
697:
referred to in the report above, but could not find any
753:
Environment & Sustainable Infrastructure Division
219:
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
319:
467:they would have paid for the RHVP and would own it
750:Construction Section, Engineering Services Group
1536:High-importance Ontario road transport articles
1526:High-importance Canada road transport articles
1047:of the Dartnall Road interchange" rather than
8:
1447:City of Hamilton, Office of the City Clerk
316:
194:
47:
1546:Ontario road transport articles with KML
1556:High-importance Road transport articles
1531:B-Class Ontario road transport articles
428:And the name is -- drum roll, please.
196:
49:
19:
1521:B-Class Canada road transport articles
1501:Low-importance Canada-related articles
7:
460:removed stuff on Freeman Interchange
101:This article is within the scope of
884:define the dividing point. Thanks.
38:It is of interest to the following
283:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada Roads
14:
1039:) and the Township of Saltfleet (
286:Template:WikiProject Canada Roads
242:
232:
218:
198:
166:
88:
78:
51:
20:
1551:B-Class Road transport articles
1541:Ontario road transport articles
1511:Low-importance Ontario articles
1496:B-Class Canada-related articles
1159:what people see when they drive
303:This article has been rated as
141:This article has been rated as
1151:because that's what people see
431:The Red Hill Valley Parkway.
289:Canada road transport articles
1:
1033:Hamilton - we have a problem!
179:This article is supported by
115:and see a list of open tasks.
1516:All WikiProject Canada pages
1479:05:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
1460:22:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
1418:01:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
1398:23:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
1383:23:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
1335:22:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
1256:03:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1242:03:25, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1221:01:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
1206:22:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
1189:04:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
1171:04:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
1144:00:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
1125:22:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
1110:17:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
1061:17:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
972:15:46, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
894:00:22, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
827:21:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
727:05:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
712:17:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
689:22:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
674:18:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
653:16:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
638:17:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
599:16:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
578:16:22, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
551:15:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
525:14:46, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
415:05:32, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
255:This article is part of the
121:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
513:The Red Hill Valley Project
124:Template:WikiProject Canada
1572:
309:project's importance scale
147:project's importance scale
455:18:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
366:
344:
315:
302:
227:
162:
140:
73:
46:
1506:B-Class Ontario articles
1444:Hey - I wasn't kiddin'!
881:City of Hamilton By-laws
699:City of Hamilton By-laws
258:Canada Roads WikiProject
756:Public Works Department
480:01:05, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
127:Canada-related articles
1155:that's what people see
747:Senior Project Manager
477:AllGloryToTheHypnotoad
363:
341:
159:
28:This article is rated
811:RHVP, not the Linc -
362:
340:
158:
1131:Highway Traffic Act
392:Knowledge:Footnotes
367:This article has a
182:WikiProject Ontario
744:Marco Oddi, P.Eng.
440:Hamilton Spectator
364:
342:
160:
104:WikiProject Canada
34:content assessment
695:By-Law No. 07-308
509:This is nonesense
417:
401:comment added by
383:
382:
379:
378:
375:
374:
353:
352:
193:
192:
189:
188:
1563:
1407:
1324:
1231:
1099:
961:
816:
731:Got a response:
663:
588:
540:
396:
327:
317:
291:
290:
287:
284:
281:
252:
247:
246:
245:
236:
229:
228:
223:
222:
221:
216:
213:
202:
195:
176:
171:
170:
169:
129:
128:
125:
122:
119:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
1571:
1570:
1566:
1565:
1564:
1562:
1561:
1560:
1486:
1485:
1415:
1405:
1332:
1322:
1239:
1229:
1107:
1097:
969:
959:
824:
814:
671:
661:
596:
586:
548:
538:
487:
462:
448:
423:
388:
325:
305:High-importance
288:
285:
282:
279:
278:
248:
243:
241:
217:
215:High‑importance
214:
208:
172:
167:
165:
126:
123:
120:
117:
116:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
1569:
1567:
1559:
1558:
1553:
1548:
1543:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1488:
1487:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1481:
1463:
1462:
1452:Secondarywaltz
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1413:
1390:Secondarywaltz
1375:Secondarywaltz
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1330:
1293:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1237:
1198:Secondarywaltz
1173:
1136:Secondarywaltz
1105:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1053:Secondarywaltz
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
967:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
886:Secondarywaltz
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
822:
784:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
754:
751:
748:
745:
742:
739:
735:
704:Secondarywaltz
669:
630:Secondarywaltz
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
594:
570:Secondarywaltz
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
546:
517:Secondarywaltz
486:
483:
461:
458:
447:
444:
442:, 4 May 2005)
422:
419:
387:
384:
381:
380:
377:
376:
373:
372:
365:
355:
354:
351:
350:
343:
333:
332:
330:
328:
322:
321:
313:
312:
301:
295:
294:
292:
254:
253:
237:
225:
224:
203:
191:
190:
187:
186:
178:
177:
174:Ontario portal
161:
151:
150:
143:Low-importance
139:
133:
132:
130:
113:the discussion
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1568:
1557:
1554:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1542:
1539:
1537:
1534:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1524:
1522:
1519:
1517:
1514:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1499:
1497:
1494:
1493:
1491:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1448:
1443:
1442:
1419:
1416:
1411:
1409:
1408:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1336:
1333:
1328:
1326:
1325:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1297:
1296:Kind regards
1294:
1291:
1288:
1285:
1281:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1235:
1233:
1232:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1132:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1108:
1103:
1101:
1100:
1092:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
973:
970:
965:
963:
962:
955:
952:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
895:
891:
887:
882:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
828:
825:
820:
818:
817:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
755:
752:
749:
746:
743:
740:
736:
733:
732:
730:
729:
728:
724:
720:
715:
714:
713:
709:
705:
700:
696:
692:
691:
690:
686:
682:
677:
676:
675:
672:
667:
665:
664:
656:
655:
654:
650:
646:
641:
640:
639:
635:
631:
627:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
600:
597:
592:
590:
589:
581:
580:
579:
575:
571:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
552:
549:
544:
542:
541:
533:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
501:
497:
496:
492:
491:
484:
482:
481:
478:
473:
470:
468:
459:
457:
456:
453:
445:
443:
441:
436:
432:
429:
426:
420:
418:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
393:
385:
370:
361:
357:
356:
349:
348:
339:
335:
334:
331:
329:
324:
323:
318:
314:
310:
306:
300:
297:
296:
293:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:
251:
240:
238:
235:
231:
230:
226:
212:
207:
204:
201:
197:
184:
183:
175:
164:
157:
153:
152:
148:
144:
138:
135:
134:
131:
114:
110:
106:
105:
97:
96:Canada portal
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
1445:
1403:
1320:
1298:
1295:
1292:
1289:
1286:
1282:
1279:
1227:
1193:
1176:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1095:
1048:
1044:
1032:
957:
812:
783:
738:interchange.
659:
584:
536:
508:
507:
503:
498:
493:
488:
474:
471:
466:
463:
452:Spmarshall42
449:
439:
437:
433:
430:
427:
424:
403:Nhl4hamilton
389:
368:
345:
304:
280:Canada Roads
271:project page
256:
250:Roads portal
206:Canada Roads
180:
142:
102:
40:WikiProjects
397:—Preceding
1490:Categories
1177:everything
386:References
275:discussion
1471:Snickerdo
1248:Snickerdo
1213:Snickerdo
1181:Snickerdo
1163:Snickerdo
1117:Snickerdo
719:Snickerdo
681:Snickerdo
645:Snickerdo
1406:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
1323:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
1230:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
1098:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
960:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
815:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
693:I found
662:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
626:a report
587:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
539:ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ
485:Terminus
411:contribs
399:unsigned
369:KML file
267:Canadian
1041:see MAP
1037:see MAP
741:Regards
347:Ontario
320:Topics:
307:on the
211:Ontario
145:on the
64:Ontario
30:B-class
1299:Marco
1194:Oh my!
395:tags
118:Canada
109:Canada
59:Canada
36:scale.
1149:such
263:roads
1475:talk
1456:talk
1394:talk
1379:talk
1252:talk
1217:talk
1202:talk
1185:talk
1167:talk
1140:talk
1121:talk
1057:talk
1049:west
1045:east
890:talk
723:talk
708:talk
685:talk
649:talk
634:talk
574:talk
521:talk
421:Name
407:talk
390:See
299:High
446:POV
265:in
137:Low
1492::
1477:)
1458:)
1396:)
1381:)
1254:)
1219:)
1204:)
1187:)
1169:)
1142:)
1123:)
1059:)
956:-
892:)
725:)
710:)
687:)
651:)
636:)
576:)
523:)
469:.
413:)
409:•
326:/
209::
62::
1473:(
1454:(
1414:¢
1392:(
1377:(
1331:¢
1250:(
1238:¢
1215:(
1200:(
1183:(
1165:(
1138:(
1119:(
1106:¢
1055:(
968:¢
888:(
823:¢
721:(
706:(
683:(
670:¢
647:(
632:(
595:¢
572:(
547:¢
519:(
438:(
405:(
371:.
311:.
277:.
185:.
149:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
