265:
of
America, which in the article is called "America"). A comment on this problem has been provided by J. L. Borges: "These ambiguities, redundancies and deficiencies remind us of those which doctor Franz Kuhn attributes to a certain Chinese encyclopaedia entitled 'Celestial Empire of benevolent Knowledge'. In its remote pages it is written that the animals are divided into: (a) belonging to the emperor, (b) embalmed, (c) tame, (d) sucking pigs, (e) sirens, (f) fabulous, (g) stray dogs, (h) included in the present classification, (i) frenzied, (j) innumerable, (k) drawn with a very fine camelhair brush, (l) et cetera, (m) having just broken the water pitcher, (n) that from a long way off look like flies." ("The analytical language of John Wilkins")
31:
321:
institutions involved in the publication of this massive undertaking. In view of the heterodox or dissident, i.e., Marxist, perspective of this publication, effort should be made to see if all nine volumes were published and in what languages they were printed in, in order to provide an alternative view to the orthodox views prevailing in the main article. See also the reference to Vipper's article in the publication from the USSR Academy of
Sciences reviewing this 9 volume history.
95:
85:
64:
22:
320:
The article by Yuri Vipper from 1985 references a 9 volume
History of World Literature in which the first volume had recently been published. The Gorky Institute of World Literature, then under the auspices of the USSR Academy of Sciences, now under the Russian Academy of Sciences, was one of the key
264:
According to the article's first paragraph, "the world" includes: 4 regions that are usually considered continents (Africa, Asia, Europe, and
Australasia), 1 linguistic or cultural entity ("Arabic"), 2 regions within a single continent (Latin America and the Caribbean), 1 country (the United States
215:
World literature is literature from all over the world? It is conceptually similar to world music? I strongly disagree. It should rather be defined as literature that had an influence not only in one country or literature that is considerer the best of the world. The article as it stands now is just
183:
literature has an affect on people every day, eventhough you might not know it. literature is text. narj is text. Literature with a capital "L", is a famous work of text. however small or large, what a person reads everyday, will stay with them forever. i would like to know your thoughts about the
365:
After nearly ten years I have revisited this article. Although it has certainly improved, I am still not sure about defining world literature just by the circulation "beyond its linguistic and cultural point of origin". Being just a simple reader myself, I am not aware of the state of scholarly
297:
Noting that the "world literature" article was in danger of deletion from lack of references, and noting also the talk board comments on problems in the existing article, I've redone both the opening definition and the body of the article, including giving updated references and bibliographical
370:
is mentioned four times in the text, being mentioned one more time as having written a "valuable collection" of essays on this matter and can be found six more times in footnotes and literature. All this not on an article about David
Damrosch or a some highly specialized subject but on "world
245:
436:
451:
141:
441:
431:
151:
375:, this makes me think he - even if he is an expert on the matter - might - even if unintentionally - be pushing his own point of view in this article.
426:
421:
446:
117:
35:
416:
249:
366:
discussion on this matter. But even disregarding my gut feeling about the definition, I have a problem with the fact that scholar
108:
69:
281:
44:
193:
The second sentence of paragraph two in this article is plagiarized from the Amazon book description for a book called
326:
382:
221:
21:
322:
277:
50:
392:
I think if I were you I'd just go ahead and make changes. You seem to make a coherent case for them.
378:
269:
241:
217:
397:
303:
273:
235:
202:
116:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
371:
literature". If we add that one of the more active contributors to this article was a certain
100:
347:
393:
372:
367:
299:
231:
84:
63:
410:
184:
affects of literature on people's every day lives. email me at sjc_o6_chs@yahoo.com
113:
90:
401:
386:
330:
307:
285:
253:
225:
205:
15:
348:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Gorky_Institute_of_World_Literature
112:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
8:
19:
316:A History of World Literature in 9 volumes
239:
238:) 18:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC) why tho?
58:
437:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in Arts
340:
60:
246:2601:204:8500:C53C:CDAA:F78D:501D:D11C
7:
106:This article is within the scope of
452:High-importance Literature articles
49:It is of interest to the following
442:Start-Class vital articles in Arts
432:Start-Class level-5 vital articles
14:
427:Knowledge vital articles in Arts
422:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
126:Knowledge:WikiProject Literature
93:
83:
62:
29:
20:
447:Start-Class Literature articles
146:This article has been rated as
129:Template:WikiProject Literature
1:
308:18:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
226:00:02, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
120:and see a list of open tasks.
387:12:23, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
254:23:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
206:02:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
468:
417:Start-Class vital articles
361:Neutrality of this article
152:project's importance scale
402:17:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
331:09:49, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
286:04:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
145:
78:
57:
195:What is World Literature
298:information and links.
109:WikiProject Literature
230:Revised and expanded
36:level-5 vital article
187:thank you so much,
132:Literature articles
201:Sentence revised.
45:content assessment
289:
272:comment added by
256:
244:comment added by
166:
165:
162:
161:
158:
157:
101:Literature portal
459:
350:
345:
323:Georgi Plekhanov
288:
266:
211:Wrong definition
180:
179:
175:
134:
133:
130:
127:
124:
103:
98:
97:
96:
87:
80:
79:
74:
66:
59:
42:
33:
32:
25:
24:
16:
467:
466:
462:
461:
460:
458:
457:
456:
407:
406:
379:Gunnar Hendrich
363:
355:
354:
353:
346:
342:
318:
295:
267:
262:
218:Gunnar Hendrich
213:
191:
190:sarah cummings
181:
177:
173:
171:
170:
148:High-importance
131:
128:
125:
122:
121:
99:
94:
92:
73:High‑importance
72:
43:on Knowledge's
40:
30:
12:
11:
5:
465:
463:
455:
454:
449:
444:
439:
434:
429:
424:
419:
409:
408:
405:
404:
368:David Damrosch
362:
359:
357:
352:
351:
339:
338:
334:
317:
314:
312:
294:
291:
261:
258:
212:
209:
199:
189:
169:
167:
164:
163:
160:
159:
156:
155:
144:
138:
137:
135:
118:the discussion
105:
104:
88:
76:
75:
67:
55:
54:
48:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
464:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
433:
430:
428:
425:
423:
420:
418:
415:
414:
412:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
374:
369:
360:
358:
349:
344:
341:
337:
333:
332:
328:
324:
315:
313:
310:
309:
305:
301:
292:
290:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
259:
257:
255:
251:
247:
243:
237:
233:
228:
227:
223:
219:
210:
208:
207:
204:
198:
196:
188:
185:
176:
168:
153:
149:
143:
140:
139:
136:
119:
115:
111:
110:
102:
91:
89:
86:
82:
81:
77:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
37:
27:
23:
18:
17:
377:
364:
356:
343:
335:
319:
311:
296:
263:
260:Basic logics
240:— Preceding
229:
214:
200:
194:
192:
186:
182:
147:
107:
51:WikiProjects
34:
268:—Preceding
41:Start-class
411:Categories
336:References
293:Expansions
123:Literature
114:Literature
70:Literature
394:Pinkbeast
373:DDamrosch
300:DDamrosch
232:DDamrosch
39:is rated
282:contribs
274:Irigoye2
270:unsigned
242:unsigned
216:wrong.
203:WeltLit
150:on the
172:": -->
47:scale.
28:This
398:talk
383:talk
327:talk
304:talk
278:talk
250:talk
236:talk
222:talk
174:edit
142:High
413::
400:)
385:)
329:)
306:)
284:)
280:•
252:)
224:)
197:.
396:(
381:(
325:(
302:(
276:(
248:(
234:(
220:(
178:]
154:.
53::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
