31:
241:
I agree with his Honour's conclusion that (Ms Muschinski) intended to give (Mr Dodds) a one-half beneficial interest in the land, and that this intention was based on the assurances which (Mr Dodds) gave to her and not upon the fulfilment of those
170:
for a legal owner of property to deny the beneficial interests of another. In this case the Court held it would be unconscionable for Mr Dodds to retain a half share of the property without first accounting for the purchase price paid by Ms Muschinski.
198:, intending to develop and use the property. Ms Muschinski paid the purchase price while Mr Dodds was going to renovate the cottage and to pay for a kit house. The development did not go ahead and the couple separated.
269:, held that the legal interests of the parties were subject to a constructive trust to (1) repayment any joint debts (2) repay each of their contributions and (3) any residue was to be distributed in equal shares.
456:
302:
482:
317:
546:
218:
dismissed Ms Muschinski's claim and stood the matter over to determine Mr Dodds' cross claim. Ms Muschinski appealed to the
387:
536:
255:
109:
491:
465:
439:
430:
350:
294:
63:
495:
469:
443:
354:
231:
215:
191:
159:
41:
541:
259:
186:
113:
379:
207:
417:
223:
219:
91:
163:
383:
195:
373:
511:
487:
461:
435:
346:
59:
30:
272:
227:
167:
130:
530:
263:
162:
on 6 December 1985. The case was part of a trend of High Court decisions to impose a
117:
276:
134:
251:
The High Court of
Australia found in favour of Ms Muschinski. The majority,
252:
211:
106:
155:
149:
266:
120:
210:
seeking a declaration that she was the sole owner. Mr Dodds made a
214:
for the property to be sold and the proceeds to be divided equally.
152:
338:
336:
334:
126:
102:
97:
87:
75:
70:
55:
47:
37:
23:
206:Ms Muschinski commenced proceedings in the
184:Ms Muschinski and Mr Dodds were in a
367:
365:
363:
457:Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
303:Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
8:
413:
80:
29:
20:
483:Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio
318:Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio
234:
16:Judgement of the High Court of Australia
330:
190:. In 1976 they purchased a property in
375:Australian Principles of Property Law
7:
14:
512:"Cases and articles referring to
372:Hepburn, S (28 February 2006).
1:
547:High Court of Australia cases
311:Cases Considered by this Case
442:137 (10 December 1987),
288:Cases Referring to this Case
353:583 (6 December 1985),
563:
222:who dismissed the appeal.
431:Baumgartner v Baumgartner
295:Baumgartner v Baumgartner
28:
494:447 (12 May 1983),
160:High Court of Australia
62:, (1985) 160
42:High Court of Australia
468:89 (24 May 2007),
244:
488:[1983] HCA 14
462:[2007] HCA 22
436:[1987] HCA 59
347:[1985] HCA 78
239:
187:de facto relationship
60:[1985] HCA 78
380:Cavendish Publishing
208:Supreme Court of NSW
148:, was a significant
418:NSW Court of Appeal
220:NSW Court of Appeal
92:NSW Court of Appeal
514:Muschinski v Dodds
410:Muschinski v Dodds
343:Muschinski v Dodds
166:where it would be
164:constructive trust
145:Muschinski v Dodds
24:Muschinski v Dodds
537:Property case law
196:tenants in common
158:, decided by the
141:
140:
554:
523:
499:
479:
473:
453:
447:
427:
421:
415:
407:
401:
400:
398:
396:
369:
358:
340:
236:
82:
33:
21:
562:
561:
557:
556:
555:
553:
552:
551:
527:
526:
510:
507:
502:
480:
476:
454:
450:
428:
424:
408:
404:
394:
392:
390:
371:
370:
361:
341:
332:
328:
313:
290:
285:
249:
204:
182:
177:
51:6 December 1985
17:
12:
11:
5:
560:
558:
550:
549:
544:
539:
529:
528:
525:
524:
506:
505:External links
503:
501:
500:
474:
448:
422:
416:622 at p 627,
402:
388:
359:
329:
327:
324:
323:
322:
312:
309:
308:
307:
299:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:JJ dissented.
248:
245:
237:agreed, said:
203:
200:
181:
178:
176:
173:
168:unconscionable
139:
138:
128:
124:
123:
104:
100:
99:
95:
94:
89:
85:
84:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
57:
53:
52:
49:
45:
44:
39:
35:
34:
26:
25:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
559:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
534:
532:
521:
517:
515:
509:
508:
504:
497:
493:
490:, (1983) 151
489:
485:
484:
478:
475:
471:
467:
464:, (2007) 230
463:
459:
458:
452:
449:
445:
441:
438:, (1987) 164
437:
433:
432:
426:
423:
419:
411:
406:
403:
391:
389:9781843142232
385:
381:
377:
376:
368:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:, (1985) 160
348:
344:
339:
337:
335:
331:
325:
320:
319:
315:
314:
310:
305:
304:
300:
297:
296:
292:
291:
287:
282:
280:
278:
274:
270:
268:
265:
261:
257:
254:
246:
243:
238:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
202:Prior actions
201:
199:
197:
193:
189:
188:
179:
174:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
147:
146:
136:
132:
129:
125:
122:
119:
115:
111:
108:
105:
101:
98:Case opinions
96:
93:
90:
88:Appealed from
86:
78:
74:
69:
65:
61:
58:
54:
50:
46:
43:
40:
36:
32:
27:
22:
19:
542:Equity (law)
519:
513:
498:(Australia).
481:
477:
472:(Australia).
455:
451:
446:(Australia).
429:
425:
409:
405:
393:. Retrieved
374:
357:(Australia).
342:
316:
301:
293:
271:
250:
240:
226:, with whom
205:
185:
183:
144:
143:
142:
76:Prior action
71:Case history
18:
242:assurances.
212:cross claim
531:Categories
496:High Court
470:High Court
444:High Court
355:High Court
326:References
175:Background
150:Australian
412:(1982) 8
216:Waddell J
79:(1982) 8
66: 583
56:Citations
283:See also
247:Judgment
103:Majority
520:LawCite
395:19 June
273:Brennan
232:Mahoney
228:Samuels
224:Hope JA
131:Brennan
127:Dissent
48:Decided
414:Fam LR
386:
277:Dawson
275:&
262:&
192:Picton
135:Dawson
133:&
116:&
81:Fam LR
486:
460:
434:
345:
264:Deane
260:Mason
253:Gibbs
180:Facts
153:court
118:Deane
114:Mason
107:Gibbs
38:Court
397:2015
384:ISBN
230:and
156:case
492:CLR
466:CLR
440:CLR
351:CLR
235:JJA
194:as
83:622
64:CLR
533::
518:.
382:.
378:.
362:^
333:^
267:JJ
258:,
256:CJ
137:JJ
121:JJ
112:,
110:CJ
522:.
516:"
420:.
399:.
321:.
306:.
298:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
