153:(Germany), they refused because they would have to fire their staff because the deal required STEMRA staff to take their place. Smaller CMOs started to believe that they would become redundant if IMJV launched. The larger CMOs who had already joined became reluctant to reduce their status and profitability by releasing the information for their repertoire. In late 2001, the initiative dissolved without a single operating office. At its peak, IMJV represented 21% of the world's music.
25:
290:, founded in 2017, has created a music copyright database to help music publishers get paid accurately through better rights data and music users to identify and clear rights. According to Blokur 70% of the music publishing sector uses Blokur to manage their rights and to benefit from automatic conflict reconciliation.
218:(Brazil). More than 80 organizations participated in the initiative. This database was never meant to be for public use, but as a Global Database for music industry major players. Due to some CMOs pulling their support from the initiative, GRD went from having guaranteed financial support to having 8 million euros of
251:
today, there are people who support this bill and people who oppose against this bill. The people who are in support after the
Transparency of Music License Ownership Act say that it will help the music industry grow by cutting costs caused by misinformation and intermediaries. The opposition against
273:
Soon after ASCAP and BMI announced their database, RIAA and NMPA came forward with the information that they have also been working on the database between their two organizations. RIAA and NMPA said they purposely excluded ASCAP and BMI because they believed inviting them would cause a hindrance to
260:
On July 26, 2017, ASCAP and BMI announced a joint database between both organizations, a project that has been in the works for the past year. The first phase, a searchable database, will roll out the first quarter of 2018. 90% of music in the USA is represented by these two organizations. Groups of
84:, co-writing, band contracts, label deals, and similar music contracts. Music ownership databases are created from the idea that with more transparency about the owners of musical compositions, the lower the costs become to create and use music. For example, a
92:, among other genres. In American copyright laws, a derivative work must have permission from every owner of the original work. If it is not known who the original owner of the work was and artists use it anyway, then they can be sued for
149:, but for one reason or another many organizations did not join. Problems started to rise because IMJV was a way for STEMRA to move around employees they could not fire because of the laws in Holland at the time. When IMJV invited
169:
agreed to fund WIPO early on, but WIPO broke their partnership after they thought the alliance would give Google too much power. Instead, WIPO tried to fund the project themselves. In-fighting among the different powerhouses like
395:
199:
261:
people in that industry are excited for this much information to be on one database. At the same time, many have mentioned that the database is incomplete because it does not include music from the CMO
215:
265:(USA). House Representative Jim Sensenbrenner, among others in the industry, have suggested ASCAP and BMI cannot be trusted because of their past withdrawing from the GRD causing it to collapse.
203:
96:. A music ownership database, major industry players speculate, would eliminate this problem. This is apparent through the amount of time and money spent in attempting to create this database.
122:
465:
402:
274:
the overall goal. At the same time, publishers in the music industry have expressed doubt about the ability of RIAA and NMPA to create a database without any CMOs.
516:
490:
443:
186:
The Global
Repertoire Database was started by the PRS in September 2008. This database had representatives from publishing houses, record labels, Google,
568:
191:
162:
109:
The
International Music Joint Venture (IMJV) started in 1998. It was the first joint partnership to create a database between multiple different
240:
138:
542:
620:
175:
698:
594:
358:
110:
150:
756:
252:
this bill believes that the legislation would limit the ability for copyright owners to sue for infringement.
80:
and the people who represent them. Often, a piece of music will have more than one owner. This is caused by
672:
751:
93:
88:
is needed when a portion of a piece of music is used in a different piece, which is a common practice in
142:
646:
466:"PRS confirms Global Repertoire Database "Cannot" Move Forward, Pledges to Find "Alternative Ways""
81:
77:
35:
352:
54:
311:
161:
In 2011, the
International Music Registry (IMR) launched. This was a database headed by the
146:
85:
372:"IMJV Dissolved - SOCAN Remains Committed to State-of-the-Art Technology Development".
745:
244:
118:
89:
247:. It creates a database with the ability to enforce participation by law. Like most
569:"Inside the Music Publishing World's Epic Struggle to Build a Single Song Database"
308:
The
Relevance of Traditional Collective Management Organisations in the Digital Age
171:
329:
Llewellyn, Howell (April 17, 1999). "SGAE Pledges to Work with IMJV". Billboard.
248:
114:
236:
219:
165:(WIPO). IMR was a database not only for composition but also for recordings.
44:
125:(USA) were the founders. The database was supposed to be created using the
24:
315:
126:
699:"Publishing-rights platform Blokur emerges from beta mode - Music Ally"
130:
287:
187:
166:
134:
517:"New Bill Calling For Transparency In Music Is Surprisingly Opaque"
338:
336:
347:. 14-15 Berners Street, London: A Division of Music Sales Limited.
262:
207:
647:"A US Congressman Just Called ASCAP+BMI's Shared Database a Scam"
444:"Global Repertoire Database HQ to be Based in London and Berlin"
211:
195:
595:"War Erupts Over Whose Global Music Rights Database Is Better"
18:
673:"RIAA And NMPA Working On Their Own Song-Database Project"
543:"ASCAP and BMI Join Forces on Comprehensive Song Database"
49:
39:
722:
396:"Transparency and Payment Flows in the Music Industry"
427:
Milosic, Klementina (August 2015). "GRD's
Failure".
345:
Nickels and Dimes: Music
Publishing and How It Works
621:"ASCAP-BMI Song Database Plan Rollout Questioned"
235:The Transparency of Music License Ownership Act
389:
387:
8:
194:(Australasia), ASCAP, BMI, BUMA, GEMA, PRS,
243:on July 20, 2017, by Jim Sensenbrenner and
231:Transparency of Music License Ownership Act
190:, Monifone, and had a total of 13 CMO's:
310:(Master's thesis). University of Agder.
163:World Intellectual Property Organization
491:"A Vibrant Music Licensing Marketplace"
298:
137:computers. IMJV invited many CMOs like
16:Lists of owners of musical compositions
350:
241:United States House of Representatives
7:
111:collective management organizations
697:Dredge, Stuart (29 October 2019).
14:
105:International Music Joint Venture
442:Smirke, Richard (May 12, 2013).
401:. pp. 21–25. Archived from
23:
645:Sanchez, Daniel (2017-07-27).
593:Sanchez, Daniel (2017-08-04).
1:
723:"Blòkur - Better rights data"
567:Christman, Ed (2017-08-02).
178:caused the IMR to collapse.
157:International Music Registry
76:are lists of the owners of
773:
182:Global Repertoire Database
541:Aswad, Jem (2017-07-26).
495:Music InnovationConsumers
306:Kefalas, Andreas (2017).
226:Current American attempts
74:Music ownership databases
357:: CS1 maint: location (
38:, as no other articles
429:Music Business Journal
278:Current Tech Solutions
269:RIAA and NMPA Database
256:ASCAP and BMI Database
239:was introduced to the
94:copyright infringement
470:Complete Music Updata
408:on December 23, 2015
343:Hardy, Phil (2013).
82:Publishing contracts
651:Digital Music News
599:Digital Music News
515:Flanagan, Andrew.
86:derivative license
57:for suggestions.
47:to this page from
210:(Belgium), SGAE,
176:publishing houses
71:
70:
764:
737:
736:
734:
733:
719:
713:
712:
710:
709:
694:
688:
687:
685:
683:
671:Dredge, Stuart.
668:
662:
661:
659:
657:
642:
636:
635:
633:
631:
616:
610:
609:
607:
605:
590:
584:
583:
581:
579:
564:
558:
557:
555:
553:
538:
532:
531:
529:
527:
512:
506:
505:
503:
501:
487:
481:
480:
478:
476:
461:
455:
454:
452:
450:
439:
433:
432:
424:
418:
417:
415:
413:
407:
400:
391:
382:
381:
369:
363:
362:
356:
348:
340:
331:
330:
326:
320:
319:
303:
147:Harry Fox Agency
100:Earlier attempts
66:
63:
52:
50:related articles
27:
19:
772:
771:
767:
766:
765:
763:
762:
761:
757:Music databases
742:
741:
740:
731:
729:
721:
720:
716:
707:
705:
696:
695:
691:
681:
679:
670:
669:
665:
655:
653:
644:
643:
639:
629:
627:
619:Christman, Ed.
618:
617:
613:
603:
601:
592:
591:
587:
577:
575:
566:
565:
561:
551:
549:
540:
539:
535:
525:
523:
514:
513:
509:
499:
497:
489:
488:
484:
474:
472:
463:
462:
458:
448:
446:
441:
440:
436:
426:
425:
421:
411:
409:
405:
398:
394:Rethink Music.
393:
392:
385:
374:Words and Music
371:
370:
366:
349:
342:
341:
334:
328:
327:
323:
305:
304:
300:
296:
285:
280:
271:
258:
233:
228:
184:
159:
107:
102:
67:
61:
58:
48:
45:introduce links
28:
17:
12:
11:
5:
770:
768:
760:
759:
754:
744:
743:
739:
738:
714:
689:
663:
637:
611:
585:
559:
533:
507:
482:
464:Cooke, Chris.
456:
434:
419:
383:
380:(2): 24. 2002.
364:
332:
321:
297:
295:
292:
284:
281:
279:
276:
270:
267:
257:
254:
232:
229:
227:
224:
183:
180:
158:
155:
117:(Netherland),
106:
103:
101:
98:
69:
68:
55:Find link tool
31:
29:
22:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
769:
758:
755:
753:
752:Copyright law
750:
749:
747:
728:
724:
718:
715:
704:
700:
693:
690:
678:
674:
667:
664:
652:
648:
641:
638:
626:
622:
615:
612:
600:
596:
589:
586:
574:
570:
563:
560:
548:
544:
537:
534:
522:
518:
511:
508:
496:
492:
486:
483:
471:
467:
460:
457:
445:
438:
435:
430:
423:
420:
404:
397:
390:
388:
384:
379:
375:
368:
365:
360:
354:
346:
339:
337:
333:
325:
322:
317:
316:11250/2457424
313:
309:
302:
299:
293:
291:
289:
282:
277:
275:
268:
266:
264:
255:
253:
250:
246:
245:Suzan DelBene
242:
238:
230:
225:
223:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
181:
179:
177:
173:
172:record labels
168:
164:
156:
154:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
104:
99:
97:
95:
91:
90:hip hop music
87:
83:
79:
75:
65:
56:
51:
46:
42:
41:
37:
32:This article
30:
26:
21:
20:
730:. Retrieved
726:
717:
706:. Retrieved
702:
692:
680:. Retrieved
676:
666:
654:. Retrieved
650:
640:
628:. Retrieved
624:
614:
602:. Retrieved
598:
588:
576:. Retrieved
572:
562:
550:. Retrieved
546:
536:
524:. Retrieved
520:
510:
498:. Retrieved
494:
485:
473:. Retrieved
469:
459:
447:. Retrieved
437:
428:
422:
410:. Retrieved
403:the original
377:
373:
367:
344:
324:
307:
301:
286:
272:
259:
234:
214:(Italy) and
185:
160:
108:
78:compositions
73:
72:
62:October 2019
59:
33:
249:legislation
115:BUMA/STEMRA
746:Categories
732:2020-06-22
727:blokur.com
708:2020-06-19
682:7 December
656:7 December
630:7 December
604:7 December
578:7 December
552:7 December
526:7 December
500:7 December
475:7 December
449:7 December
294:References
222:scrapped.
220:investment
206:(Canada),
202:(France),
198:(Sweden),
145:(USA) and
129:stored on
53:; try the
40:link to it
703:Musically
677:Musically
625:Billboard
573:Billboard
353:cite book
141:(Spain),
121:(UK) and
43:. Please
127:metadata
113:(CMOs).
547:Variety
412:May 26,
131:Utrecht
288:Blokur
283:Blokur
188:iTunes
167:Google
135:London
36:orphan
34:is an
406:(PDF)
399:(PDF)
263:SESAC
208:SABAM
204:SOCAN
200:SACEM
123:ASCAP
684:2017
658:2017
632:2017
606:2017
580:2017
554:2017
528:2017
502:2017
477:2017
451:2017
414:2022
359:link
237:bill
212:SIAE
196:STIM
192:APRA
174:and
151:GEMA
139:SGAE
133:and
521:NPR
312:hdl
216:UBC
143:BMI
119:PRS
748::
725:.
701:.
675:.
649:.
623:.
597:.
571:.
545:.
519:.
493:.
468:.
386:^
376:.
355:}}
351:{{
335:^
735:.
711:.
686:.
660:.
634:.
608:.
582:.
556:.
530:.
504:.
479:.
453:.
431:.
416:.
378:9
361:)
318:.
314::
64:)
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
