Knowledge (XXG)

MacCartney v Oversley House Management

Source 📝

119:
r 12(1), she was entitled to an uninterrupted rest break of 20 minutes. She worked more than six hours a day, but the kind of work did not allow for uninterruption. WTR 1998 regulation 2(1)(a) defined working time to include a worker not actually doing anything, but required to be present and remain
102:
The Tribunal found she was not ‘working’ while on call because she could take rest, and so dismissed her claim. As for the minimum wage, she was said to have ‘unmeasured work’ and not salaried work, so her whole shift was not working time. She therefore got over the minimum for her 40-hour week. Mrs
94:
McCartney was a resident manager at Oversley House, which was originally built as the Alcester Poor Law Union workhouse in 1834. She needed to be within three miles of the residential home and be contactable by mobile phone. She had to respond to emergencies 24 hours a day, four days a week, in her
120:
available at a place determined by an employer. So the whole period on call, within short distance of her home was working time. So she could get daily rest period under r 10(1). Under the NMWR 1999 r 4, she had ‘salaried hours work’. So she was not paid the minimum wage.
349: 99:
rr 10(1) and 12(1). She said she had ‘salaried hours work’ under r 4(1) and that all time on call was working time, so she was getting less than the minimum wage.
95:
contract. She got £8,750 pa, paid monthly, with rent-free accommodation. She claimed that she had been denied proper periods of rest and rest breaks under
621: 626: 616: 174: 379: 227: 216: 579: 149: 596: 354: 283: 503: 460: 326: 238: 533: 393: 165: 83: 403: 388: 260: 205: 384: 29: 563: 398: 335: 543: 456: 142: 508: 364: 271: 487: 483: 465: 115:
r 4 for the whole period, even though much was spent at home and for part of it she was asleep. Under
469: 437: 319: 584: 183: 135: 538: 518: 478: 442: 433: 424: 451: 75: 48: 523: 474: 446: 428: 194: 548: 408: 312: 111:
Richardson J overturned the Tribunal and held that she was employed on salary work within
610: 513: 294: 79: 558: 528: 61: 359: 553: 374: 369: 304: 112: 116: 96: 127: 308: 131: 572: 496: 417: 342: 55: 43: 35: 25: 20: 320: 143: 8: 327: 313: 305: 150: 136: 128: 17: 250:MacCartney v Oversley House Management 175:National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 71:MacCartney v Oversley House Management 21:MacCartney v Oversley House Management 228:Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright 217:British Nursing Assn v Inland Revenue 7: 580:Legal services in the United Kingdom 284:Minimum wage in the United Kingdom 14: 622:Employment Appeal Tribunal cases 239:Walton v Ind Living Organisation 627:2006 in United Kingdom case law 166:National Minimum Wage Act 1998 84:National Minimum Wage Act 1998 1: 617:United Kingdom wages case law 261:Leisure Employment Ltd v HMRC 206:James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd 597:United Kingdom law category 643: 461:English administrative law 30:Employment Appeal Tribunal 593: 350:Parliamentary sovereignty 336:Law of the United Kingdom 280: 268: 257: 246: 235: 224: 213: 202: 191: 181: 172: 163: 60: 488:English civil procedure 365:Law of Northern Ireland 504:British Virgin Islands 272:Nerva v United Kingdom 103:MacCartney appealed. 470:English criminal law 438:English contract law 184:Employment Act 2008 82:case regarding the 479:English family law 355:Constitutional law 604: 603: 585:British penal law 290: 289: 67: 66: 634: 564:English case law 447:English land law 429:English tort law 329: 322: 315: 306: 275:(2003) 36 EHRR 4 195:Edmonds v Lawson 158:Sources on wages 152: 145: 138: 129: 18: 642: 641: 637: 636: 635: 633: 632: 631: 607: 606: 605: 600: 589: 568: 549:Anglo-Saxon law 497:Related systems 492: 418:Parallel fields 413: 409:Retained EU law 394:Competition law 380:Civil liberties 338: 333: 303: 291: 286: 276: 264: 253: 242: 231: 220: 209: 198: 187: 177: 168: 159: 156: 126: 109: 92: 39:31 January 2006 12: 11: 5: 640: 638: 630: 629: 624: 619: 609: 608: 602: 601: 594: 591: 590: 588: 587: 582: 576: 574: 570: 569: 567: 566: 561: 556: 551: 546: 541: 536: 531: 526: 521: 519:European Union 516: 511: 506: 500: 498: 494: 493: 491: 490: 481: 472: 463: 454: 449: 440: 431: 421: 419: 415: 414: 412: 411: 406: 404:Commercial law 401: 396: 391: 389:insolvency law 382: 377: 372: 367: 362: 357: 352: 346: 344: 340: 339: 334: 332: 331: 324: 317: 309: 302: 299: 298: 297: 288: 287: 281: 278: 277: 269: 266: 265: 258: 255: 254: 247: 244: 243: 236: 233: 232: 225: 222: 221: 214: 211: 210: 203: 200: 199: 192: 189: 188: 182: 179: 178: 173: 170: 169: 164: 161: 160: 157: 155: 154: 147: 140: 132: 125: 122: 108: 105: 91: 88: 65: 64: 58: 57: 53: 52: 45: 41: 40: 37: 33: 32: 27: 23: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 639: 628: 625: 623: 620: 618: 615: 614: 612: 599: 598: 592: 586: 583: 581: 578: 577: 575: 571: 565: 562: 560: 557: 555: 552: 550: 547: 545: 544:United States 542: 540: 537: 535: 532: 530: 527: 525: 522: 520: 517: 515: 512: 510: 507: 505: 502: 501: 499: 495: 489: 485: 482: 480: 476: 473: 471: 467: 464: 462: 458: 455: 453: 450: 448: 444: 441: 439: 435: 432: 430: 426: 423: 422: 420: 416: 410: 407: 405: 402: 400: 397: 395: 392: 390: 386: 383: 381: 378: 376: 373: 371: 368: 366: 363: 361: 358: 356: 353: 351: 348: 347: 345: 343:Common fields 341: 337: 330: 325: 323: 318: 316: 311: 310: 307: 300: 296: 295:UK labour law 293: 292: 285: 279: 274: 273: 267: 263: 262: 256: 252: 251: 245: 241: 240: 234: 230: 229: 223: 219: 218: 212: 208: 207: 201: 197: 196: 190: 185: 180: 176: 171: 167: 162: 153: 148: 146: 141: 139: 134: 133: 130: 123: 121: 118: 114: 106: 104: 100: 98: 89: 87: 85: 81: 80:UK labour law 77: 73: 72: 63: 59: 54: 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 31: 28: 24: 19: 16: 595: 425:Scots delict 270: 259: 249: 248: 237: 226: 215: 204: 193: 110: 101: 93: 70: 69: 68: 62:Minimum wage 15: 539:New Zealand 360:English law 611:Categories 554:Common law 399:Labour law 74:IRLR 514 ( 47:IRLR 514 ( 524:Hong Kong 509:Australia 375:Welsh law 370:Scots law 113:NMWR 1999 573:See also 124:See also 117:WTR 1998 107:Judgment 97:WTR 1998 56:Keywords 44:Citation 534:Ireland 385:Company 186:ss 8-12 78:) is a 36:Decided 559:Equity 514:Canada 452:Trusts 529:India 484:Scots 475:Scots 466:Scots 457:Scots 443:Scots 434:Scots 301:Notes 90:Facts 26:Court 486:and 477:and 468:and 459:and 445:and 436:and 427:and 387:and 282:see 76:EAT 49:EAT 613:: 86:. 328:e 321:t 314:v 151:e 144:t 137:v 51:)

Index

Employment Appeal Tribunal
EAT
Minimum wage
EAT
UK labour law
National Minimum Wage Act 1998
WTR 1998
NMWR 1999
WTR 1998
v
t
e
National Minimum Wage Act 1998
National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999
Employment Act 2008
Edmonds v Lawson
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
British Nursing Assn v Inland Revenue
Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright
Walton v Ind Living Organisation
MacCartney v Oversley House Management
Leisure Employment Ltd v HMRC
Nerva v United Kingdom
Minimum wage in the United Kingdom
UK labour law
v
t
e
Law of the United Kingdom
Parliamentary sovereignty

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.