Knowledge (XXG)

Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright

Source 📝

28: 95:
Mr Wright was a night watchman and was required to work seven nights a week from 5pm to 7am at the employer's office in Glasgow. He got £210 a week. He was permitted to sleep during his shifts. He had been given a mattress. He could have done so for all but four hours. If he had been paid a minimum
112:
regulation 15(1) did not apply to Mr Wright, and he should be paid for all the time spent at work, even if asleep. The contract was paid according to a reference by time work. It was held that r 15(1) only applied to time on call, and not the present case.
99:
The Tribunal held that the four hours when Mr Wright was required to be awake was the relevant time, and so he should be paid for the work when he was on call. The EAT reversed the Tribunal and the case was appealed again.
342: 629: 609: 27: 614: 242: 167: 372: 209: 572: 142: 589: 347: 276: 496: 453: 319: 231: 619: 526: 386: 158: 84: 96:
wage for all the time on duty he would have had an extra £142.80 a week and a total of £34272.20 by the time of his claim.
396: 381: 253: 198: 377: 624: 556: 391: 328: 536: 449: 135: 501: 357: 264: 480: 476: 458: 462: 430: 312: 577: 176: 128: 531: 511: 471: 435: 426: 417: 444: 516: 467: 439: 421: 187: 541: 401: 305: 76: 46: 603: 506: 287: 80: 551: 521: 59: 352: 546: 367: 362: 297: 109: 63: 120: 301: 124: 565: 489: 410: 335: 53: 42: 34: 20: 313: 136: 8: 320: 306: 298: 143: 129: 121: 26: 17: 243:MacCartney v Oversley House Management 168:National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999 221:Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright 210:British Nursing Assn v Inland Revenue 73:Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright 21:Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright 7: 573:Legal services in the United Kingdom 277:Minimum wage in the United Kingdom 14: 232:Walton v Ind Living Organisation 108:Lord President Cullen held that 630:2002 in United Kingdom case law 610:United Kingdom labour case law 159:National Minimum Wage Act 1998 85:National Minimum Wage Act 1998 1: 615:United Kingdom wages case law 254:Leisure Employment Ltd v HMRC 199:James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd 590:United Kingdom law category 646: 454:English administrative law 586: 343:Parliamentary sovereignty 329:Law of the United Kingdom 273: 261: 250: 239: 228: 217: 206: 195: 184: 174: 165: 156: 58: 25: 481:English civil procedure 358:Law of Northern Ireland 620:Court of Session cases 497:British Virgin Islands 265:Nerva v United Kingdom 463:English criminal law 431:English contract law 177:Employment Act 2008 83:case regarding the 472:English family law 348:Constitutional law 597: 596: 578:British penal law 283: 282: 69: 68: 637: 625:2002 in Scotland 557:English case law 440:English land law 422:English tort law 322: 315: 308: 299: 268:(2003) 36 EHRR 4 188:Edmonds v Lawson 151:Sources on wages 145: 138: 131: 122: 38:Court of Session 30: 18: 645: 644: 640: 639: 638: 636: 635: 634: 600: 599: 598: 593: 582: 561: 542:Anglo-Saxon law 490:Related systems 485: 411:Parallel fields 406: 402:Retained EU law 387:Competition law 373:Civil liberties 331: 326: 296: 284: 279: 269: 257: 246: 235: 224: 213: 202: 191: 180: 170: 161: 152: 149: 119: 106: 93: 12: 11: 5: 643: 641: 633: 632: 627: 622: 617: 612: 602: 601: 595: 594: 587: 584: 583: 581: 580: 575: 569: 567: 563: 562: 560: 559: 554: 549: 544: 539: 534: 529: 524: 519: 514: 512:European Union 509: 504: 499: 493: 491: 487: 486: 484: 483: 474: 465: 456: 447: 442: 433: 424: 414: 412: 408: 407: 405: 404: 399: 397:Commercial law 394: 389: 384: 382:insolvency law 375: 370: 365: 360: 355: 350: 345: 339: 337: 333: 332: 327: 325: 324: 317: 310: 302: 295: 292: 291: 290: 281: 280: 274: 271: 270: 262: 259: 258: 251: 248: 247: 240: 237: 236: 229: 226: 225: 218: 215: 214: 207: 204: 203: 196: 193: 192: 185: 182: 181: 175: 172: 171: 166: 163: 162: 157: 154: 153: 150: 148: 147: 140: 133: 125: 118: 115: 105: 102: 92: 89: 67: 66: 56: 55: 51: 50: 44: 40: 39: 36: 32: 31: 23: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 642: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 616: 613: 611: 608: 607: 605: 592: 591: 585: 579: 576: 574: 571: 570: 568: 564: 558: 555: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 538: 537:United States 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 494: 492: 488: 482: 478: 475: 473: 469: 466: 464: 460: 457: 455: 451: 448: 446: 443: 441: 437: 434: 432: 428: 425: 423: 419: 416: 415: 413: 409: 403: 400: 398: 395: 393: 390: 388: 385: 383: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 349: 346: 344: 341: 340: 338: 336:Common fields 334: 330: 323: 318: 316: 311: 309: 304: 303: 300: 293: 289: 288:UK labour law 286: 285: 278: 272: 267: 266: 260: 256: 255: 249: 245: 244: 238: 234: 233: 227: 223: 222: 216: 212: 211: 205: 201: 200: 194: 190: 189: 183: 178: 173: 169: 164: 160: 155: 146: 141: 139: 134: 132: 127: 126: 123: 116: 114: 111: 103: 101: 97: 90: 88: 86: 82: 81:UK labour law 78: 75: 74: 65: 61: 57: 52: 48: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 24: 19: 16: 588: 418:Scots delict 263: 252: 241: 230: 220: 219: 208: 197: 186: 107: 98: 94: 72: 71: 70: 60:Minimum wage 15: 532:New Zealand 353:English law 604:Categories 547:Common law 392:Labour law 77:ScotCS 285 49:, IRLR 21 47:ScotCS 285 517:Hong Kong 502:Australia 368:Welsh law 363:Scots law 110:NMWR 1999 43:Citations 566:See also 117:See also 104:Judgment 54:Keywords 527:Ireland 378:Company 179:ss 8-12 552:Equity 507:Canada 445:Trusts 64:worker 522:India 477:Scots 468:Scots 459:Scots 450:Scots 436:Scots 427:Scots 294:Notes 91:Facts 79:is a 35:Court 479:and 470:and 461:and 452:and 438:and 429:and 420:and 380:and 275:see 606:: 87:. 62:, 321:e 314:t 307:v 144:e 137:t 130:v

Index


ScotCS 285
Minimum wage
worker
ScotCS 285
UK labour law
National Minimum Wage Act 1998
NMWR 1999
v
t
e
National Minimum Wage Act 1998
National Minimum Wage Regulations 1999
Employment Act 2008
Edmonds v Lawson
James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
British Nursing Assn v Inland Revenue
Scottbridge Construction Ltd v Wright
Walton v Ind Living Organisation
MacCartney v Oversley House Management
Leisure Employment Ltd v HMRC
Nerva v United Kingdom
Minimum wage in the United Kingdom
UK labour law
v
t
e
Law of the United Kingdom
Parliamentary sovereignty
Constitutional law

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.