24:
154:'s comments that adultery had to involve "physical contact with an alien and unlawful organ". The court lays down specific rules for adultery: 1- In adultery there must be two parties, physically present and engaging in sexual act. 2- It is not necessary that there is any interaction between the sperm and the ovum.
130:
Mr and Mrs MacLennan were married in August 1952 but their marriage was not a success. The couple separate shortly afterwards and Mrs MacLennan went to the U.S.A. In July 1955, she had a baby girl. Mr MacLennan sued for
157:
The court ruled artificial insemination does not constitute adultery. However, Mrs MacLennan could not provide the court with any proof of her taking artificial insemination. Mr MacLennan therefore got his divorce.
221:
41:
241:
184:
107:
88:
60:
236:
211:
67:
45:
151:
226:
74:
147:
was faced with defining adultery and whether or not artificial insemination could be defined as under this heading.
56:
34:
216:
206:
231:
124:
140:
81:
180:
144:
139:. Mrs MacLennan defended this action and claimed that she had conceived the child through
127:
case that required the court to determine if artificial insemination constituted adultery.
200:
23:
123:
1958 S.C. 105; 1958 S.L.T. 12 (Outer House, Court of
Session, Scotland) was a
136:
132:
17:
177:
Limits: The Role of the Law in
Bioethical Decision Making
48:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
8:
108:Learn how and when to remove this message
179:. Indiana University Press. p. 62.
150:This is where the definition taken from
167:
7:
46:adding citations to reliable sources
14:
222:Divorce law in the United Kingdom
22:
33:needs additional citations for
1:
242:Reproductive rights case law
143:not through adultery. The
258:
175:Dworkin, Roger B. (1996).
237:Artificial insemination
141:artificial insemination
57:"MacLennan v MacLennan"
212:Court of Session cases
121:MacLennan v MacLennan
42:improve this article
227:1958 in British law
186:978-0-253-33075-8
118:
117:
110:
92:
249:
217:1958 in case law
207:1958 in Scotland
191:
190:
172:
145:Court of Session
113:
106:
102:
99:
93:
91:
50:
26:
18:
257:
256:
252:
251:
250:
248:
247:
246:
232:Adultery in law
197:
196:
195:
194:
187:
174:
173:
169:
164:
114:
103:
97:
94:
51:
49:
39:
27:
12:
11:
5:
255:
253:
245:
244:
239:
234:
229:
224:
219:
214:
209:
199:
198:
193:
192:
185:
166:
165:
163:
160:
116:
115:
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
254:
243:
240:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
223:
220:
218:
215:
213:
210:
208:
205:
204:
202:
188:
182:
178:
171:
168:
161:
159:
155:
153:
152:Lord Wheatley
148:
146:
142:
138:
134:
128:
126:
122:
112:
109:
101:
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59: –
58:
54:
53:Find sources:
47:
43:
37:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
176:
170:
156:
149:
129:
120:
119:
104:
95:
85:
78:
71:
64:
52:
40:Please help
35:verification
32:
15:
201:Categories
162:References
68:newspapers
125:civil law
98:July 2022
137:adultery
135:citing
133:divorce
82:scholar
183:
84:
77:
70:
63:
55:
89:JSTOR
75:books
181:ISBN
61:news
44:by
203::
189:.
111:)
105:(
100:)
96:(
86:·
79:·
72:·
65:·
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
