39:
149:
contract type, and three held there was the same kind of work. The majority held the firefighters were all in category of regulation 2(3)(a). It did not matter under regulation 2(4)(a)(ii) that the full-time fire fighters did a few extra tasks, because their jobs were still broadly similar. The case was remitted to the tribunal to be finalised.
148:
The House of Lords held by a majority that the two requirements for comparability are that there is the same type of contract being used (not the same terms) or a broadly similar kind of work being done. The
Directive clause 3(2) indicated the broad nature of the inquiry. Four held there was the same
139:
The
Employment Tribunal held that the full-time firefighters fell under regulation 2(3)(a) and the part-time firefighters under regulation 2(3)(d), nor did they do broadly similar work under regulation 4(a)(ii). The EAT upheld the Tribunal. The Court of Appeal held that they had had the same kind of
152:
Lady Hale remarked, ‘in answering particular weight should be given to the extent to which their work is in fact the same and to the importance of that work to the enterprise as a whole. Otherwise one runs the risk of giving too much weight to differences which are the almost inevitable result of
420:
416:
329:
140:
contract under regulation 2(3), because the categories were meant to be mutually exclusive. However, the appeal was still dismissed because the firefighters did not do the same or broadly similar work under regulation 4(a).
136:. Full-time firefighters responded to emergencies and were engaged in educational, preventive and administrative tasks, while part-time firefighters did not do the administrative work.
228:
500:
185:
490:
269:
38:
384:
357:
213:
412:
343:
369:
284:
495:
315:
178:
244:
360:
201:
436:
301:
306:
291:
260:
257:
204:
17:
171:
132:
Part and full-time fire fighters were being paid differently, and claimed unlawful discrimination under the
96:
Lord
Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Hope of Craighead, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Carswell and Lord Mance
398:
333:
273:
217:
388:
402:
347:
319:
49:
373:
484:
431:
121:
463:
248:
234:
117:
67:
133:
163:
124:
case concerning discrimination of part-time workers, and justifications.
167:
100:
92:
87:
79:
74:
63:
55:
45:
31:
114:Matthews v Kent & Medway Towns Fire Authority
32:Matthews v Kent & Medway Towns Fire Authority
18:Matthews v Kent & Medway Towns Fire Authority
179:
8:
186:
172:
164:
37:
28:
230:Matthews v Kent and Medway Fire Authority
286:Adeneler v Ellinikos Organismos Galaktos
156:Lord Carswell and Lord Mance dissented.
447:
270:Fixed-term Employees Regulations 2002
7:
385:Dacas v Brook Street Bureau (UK) Ltd
330:Employment Agencies Regulations 2003
358:Temporary and Agency Work Directive
214:Part-time Workers Regulations 2000
25:
344:Gangmasters (Licensing) Act 2004
501:2006 in United Kingdom case law
370:Agency Workers Regulations 2010
491:United Kingdom labour case law
153:one worker working full-time’
1:
302:Del Cerro Alonso v Osakidetza
245:O'Brien v Ministry of Justice
316:Employment Agencies Act 1973
202:Part-time Workers Directive
517:
437:UK employment equality law
409:
395:
381:
367:
355:
341:
327:
313:
298:
281:
267:
258:Fixed-Term Work Directive
255:
241:
225:
211:
199:
105:
36:
194:Sources on atypical work
399:James v Greenwich LBC
496:House of Lords cases
427:
426:
110:
109:
16:(Redirected from
508:
467:
461:
455:
452:
287:
231:
188:
181:
174:
165:
88:Court membership
41:
29:
21:
516:
515:
511:
510:
509:
507:
506:
505:
481:
480:
475:
470:
462:
458:
453:
449:
445:
428:
423:
421:fixed term work
405:
391:
377:
363:
351:
337:
323:
309:
294:
285:
277:
263:
251:
237:
229:
221:
207:
195:
192:
162:
146:
130:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
514:
512:
504:
503:
498:
493:
483:
482:
479:
478:
474:
471:
469:
468:
456:
446:
444:
441:
440:
439:
434:
425:
424:
410:
407:
406:
396:
393:
392:
382:
379:
378:
368:
365:
364:
356:
353:
352:
342:
339:
338:
328:
325:
324:
314:
311:
310:
299:
296:
295:
282:
279:
278:
268:
265:
264:
256:
253:
252:
242:
239:
238:
226:
223:
222:
212:
209:
208:
200:
197:
196:
193:
191:
190:
183:
176:
168:
161:
158:
145:
142:
129:
126:
108:
107:
106:Discrimination
103:
102:
98:
97:
94:
93:Judges sitting
90:
89:
85:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
71:
65:
61:
60:
57:
53:
52:
50:House of Lords
47:
43:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
513:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
488:
486:
477:
476:
472:
465:
460:
457:
451:
448:
442:
438:
435:
433:
432:UK labour law
430:
429:
422:
418:
414:
408:
404:
401:
400:
394:
390:
387:
386:
380:
375:
371:
366:
362:
359:
354:
349:
345:
340:
335:
331:
326:
321:
317:
312:
308:
304:
303:
297:
293:
289:
288:
280:
275:
271:
266:
262:
259:
254:
250:
247:
246:
240:
236:
233:
232:
224:
219:
215:
210:
206:
203:
198:
189:
184:
182:
177:
175:
170:
169:
166:
159:
157:
154:
150:
143:
141:
137:
135:
127:
125:
123:
122:UK labour law
119:
116:
115:
104:
99:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
73:
69:
66:
62:
58:
54:
51:
48:
44:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
459:
450:
397:
383:
334:SI 2003/3319
300:
283:
274:SI 2002/2034
243:
227:
218:SI 2000/1551
155:
151:
147:
138:
131:
113:
112:
111:
80:Prior action
75:Case history
59:1 March 2006
26:
403:EWCA Civ 35
389:EWCA Civ 21
361:2008/104/EC
70:, IRLR 367
485:Categories
473:References
374:SI 2010/93
417:part time
413:UK agency
134:PTWR 2000
64:Citations
307:C-307/05
292:C-212/04
261:99/70/EC
205:97/81/EC
160:See also
144:Judgment
101:Keywords
305:(2007)
290:(2006)
56:Decided
464:UKHL 8
454:ICR 84
249:UKSC 6
235:UKHL 8
118:UKHL 8
83:ICR 84
68:UKHL 8
443:Notes
128:Facts
120:is a
46:Court
419:and
411:see
348:c 11
320:c 35
487::
466:,
415:,
376:)
372:(
350:)
346:(
336:)
332:(
322:)
318:(
276:)
272:(
220:)
216:(
187:e
180:t
173:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
