372:
43:
assumptions about how maturity evolves. When using a bottom-up approach, such as suggested by
Lahrmann et al., distinct characteristics or assessment items are determined first and clustered in a second step into maturity levels to induce a more general view of the different steps of maturity evolution.
42:
Two approaches to implementing maturity models exist. With a top-down approach, such as proposed by Becker et al., a fixed number of maturity stages or levels is specified first and further corroborated with characteristics (typically in form of specific assessment items) that support the initial
36:). The higher the maturity, the higher will be the chances that incidents or errors will lead to improvements either in the quality or in the use of the resources of the discipline as implemented by the organization.
318:
Lahrmann G, Marx F, Mettler T, Winter R, Wortmann F (2011). "Inductive Design of
Maturity Models: Applying the Rasch Algorithm for Design Science Research".
69:
95:
33:
136:
335:
212:
124:
186:
82:
29:
380:
404:
118:
142:
108:
130:
57:
272:
199:
154:
39:
Most maturity models assess qualitatively people/culture, processes/structures, and objects/technology.
390:
incorrectly led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.
305:
331:
21:
323:
287:
24:
within an organization, with maturity being defined as a measurement of the ability of an
236:
398:
148:
306:
Developing
Maturity Models for IT Management – A Procedure Model and its Application
25:
327:
322:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6629. Springer. pp. 176–191.
383:
includes a list of related items that share the same name (or similar names).
291:
371:
20:
is a framework for measuring an organization's maturity, or that of a
232:
273:"Maturity assessment models: a design science research approach"
173:
167:
112:
352:
308:. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(3), 213-222
250:
111:(CMM, focusing on software development, largely superseded by
176:(Portfolio, Programme and Project Management Maturity Model)
320:
387:
239:, published 2 February 2021, accessed 26 August 2023
202:(TMM) (assessing test processes in an organization)
170:(Organisational Project Management Maturity Model)
304:Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuß, J. (2009)
280:International Journal of Society Systems Science
377:Index of articles associated with the same name
157:(for Information technology Process assessment)
8:
85:(PCMM) (for the management of human assets)
353:"Open Information Security Maturity Model"
251:"Open Information Security Maturity Model"
70:Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification
32:in a particular discipline (as defined in
237:How mature is your procurement function?
96:Open Information Security Maturity Model
225:
137:Darwin Information Typing Architecture
121:(for open-source software development)
213:Capability Maturity Model Integration
7:
151:(for process maturity, deprecated)
125:Service Integration Maturity Model
14:
370:
187:Quality Management Maturity Grid
83:People Capability Maturity Model
90:Information security management
1:
145:(for HTTP-based web services)
328:10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_13
133:(for software specification)
421:
369:
119:Open Source Maturity Model
292:10.1504/IJSSS.2011.038934
143:Richardson Maturity Model
109:Capability Maturity Model
131:Modeling Maturity Levels
58:Big data maturity model
200:Testing Maturity Model
103:Information technology
30:continuous improvement
139:(DITA) Maturity Model
155:ISO/IEC 33000 series
351:Aceituno, Vicente.
249:Aceituno, Vicente.
405:Set index articles
271:Mettler T (2011).
181:Quality management
162:Project management
381:set index article
337:978-3-642-20632-0
22:business function
412:
391:
374:
364:
363:
361:
359:
348:
342:
341:
315:
309:
302:
296:
295:
286:(1/2): 213–222.
277:
268:
262:
261:
259:
257:
246:
240:
230:
420:
419:
415:
414:
413:
411:
410:
409:
395:
394:
393:
392:
385:
384:
378:
368:
367:
357:
355:
350:
349:
345:
338:
317:
316:
312:
303:
299:
275:
270:
269:
265:
255:
253:
248:
247:
243:
231:
227:
222:
209:
196:
183:
164:
105:
92:
79:
77:Human resources
66:
54:
49:
12:
11:
5:
418:
416:
408:
407:
397:
396:
376:
375:
366:
365:
343:
336:
310:
297:
263:
241:
224:
223:
221:
218:
217:
216:
208:
205:
204:
203:
195:
192:
191:
190:
182:
179:
178:
177:
171:
163:
160:
159:
158:
152:
146:
140:
134:
128:
122:
116:
104:
101:
100:
99:
91:
88:
87:
86:
78:
75:
74:
73:
65:
62:
61:
60:
53:
50:
48:
47:Notable models
45:
18:maturity model
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
417:
406:
403:
402:
400:
389:
388:internal link
382:
373:
354:
347:
344:
339:
333:
329:
325:
321:
314:
311:
307:
301:
298:
293:
289:
285:
281:
274:
267:
264:
252:
245:
242:
238:
234:
229:
226:
219:
214:
211:
210:
206:
201:
198:
197:
193:
188:
185:
184:
180:
175:
172:
169:
166:
165:
161:
156:
153:
150:
149:ISO/IEC 15504
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
129:
126:
123:
120:
117:
114:
110:
107:
106:
102:
97:
94:
93:
89:
84:
81:
80:
76:
71:
68:
67:
64:Cybersecurity
63:
59:
56:
55:
51:
46:
44:
40:
37:
35:
31:
27:
23:
19:
356:. Retrieved
346:
319:
313:
300:
283:
279:
266:
254:. Retrieved
244:
228:
41:
38:
26:organization
17:
15:
358:12 February
256:12 February
220:References
207:Universal
127:(for SOA)
52:Analytics
399:Category
98:(O-ISM3)
194:Testing
386:If an
334:
233:Capita
215:(CMMI)
189:(QMMG)
72:(CMMC)
34:O-ISM3
379:This
276:(PDF)
360:2017
332:ISBN
258:2017
174:P3M3
168:OPM3
113:CMMI
28:for
324:doi
288:doi
401::
330:.
282:.
278:.
235:,
16:A
362:.
340:.
326::
294:.
290::
284:3
260:.
115:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.