133:
501:, writing for the dissent, argued that there is federal jurisdiction whenever a federal question is an ingredient of the action. Furthermore, there may be federal question jurisdiction even though both the right asserted and the remedy sought by a plaintiff are state created. Additionally, federal courts are much more adept at interpreting and applying federal law, and more likely to correctly understand Congress’ intent in enacting legislation than are state courts.
24:
486:, writing for the majority, took as his starting point the conclusion that Congress did not intend a private Federal cause of action for violations of the FDCA; in other words, private parties may not bring a suit solely on the basis of a violation of the Act. This was the Sixth Circuit's determination, and it was not disputed by any of the parties to the suit.
565:
465:"The general rule is that where it appears from the bill or statement of the plaintiff that the right to relief depends upon the construction or application of the Constitution or laws of the United States, and that such federal claim is not merely colorable, and rests upon a reasonable foundation, the District Court has jurisdiction under ."
489:
The Court states that the significance of the lack of a
Federal cause of action "cannot be overstated." The ruling relies heavily on the notion of respect for congressional intent. The Court interprets the fact that Congress did not create a cause of action to be conclusive evidence that Congress did
409:
The case was filed in state court and then removed to federal district court where it was found that Count IV (the misbranding count) of the complaint alleged a cause of action arising under federal law and the motion to remand was denied. It then granted petitioner's motion to dismiss on
426:
The question raised was whether the federal district courts have original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 when a claim arises out of a federal statute that has not specifically granted a private right to a
571:
727:
511:
529:
238:
A violation of a federal statute, as part of a claim, is not sufficient for the federal courts to claim original jurisdiction if the statute does not create a private remedy for violations of the statute.
1829:
1809:
1799:
1092:
1577:
1773:
654:
846:
760:
732:
707:
682:
634:
552:
524:
221:
174:
1519:
612:
415:
213:
1225:
1350:
629:
1297:
1725:
509:
It was not entirely clear from the opinion whether lack of a private cause of action will always be dispositive in every case. The Court clarified the issue in
1017:
1218:
942:
1072:
431:. The case considered several different tests to determine when a case is covered under original jurisdiction for the federal courts. These tests include:
88:
1804:
1444:
490:
not intend for claimed violations of the FDCA as elements of a state cause of action to be "substantial" enough to confer federal-question jurisdiction.
60:
1570:
515:, saying that the absence of a right of action is relevant evidence of congressional intent, but does not necessarily decide the question in all cases.
989:
839:
702:
67:
454:
The Court has also granted jurisdiction "where the vindication of a right under state law necessarily turned on some construction of federal law."
1814:
1010:
418:
reversed claiming that the FDCA did not create or imply a private right to sue for injury resulting in no federal subject matter jurisdiction.
74:
1488:
1433:
1204:
1170:
832:
390:
1752:
56:
1824:
1481:
1156:
904:
1745:
587:
358:
340:
137:
1639:
107:
45:
38:
1611:
1343:
1357:
1177:
1604:
1304:
771:
1819:
1684:
1537:
474:
362:
81:
1111:
1675:
1378:
958:
477:
382:
1426:
1163:
34:
1646:
1329:
1290:
911:
440:
1766:
1561:
1263:
608:
209:
807:
1695:
1467:
855:
498:
305:
261:
1083:
1003:
764:
736:
711:
686:
638:
556:
386:
225:
166:
156:
Merrell Dow
Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson, et al., as next friends and guardians of Thompson, et al.
1704:
1597:
1243:
982:
973:
411:
1385:
1188:
789:
285:
1618:
1419:
1256:
1247:
1037:
996:
798:
1588:
1474:
1320:
1316:
1281:
1232:
1197:
1149:
897:
883:
483:
297:
293:
273:
1759:
1736:
1718:
1711:
1552:
1453:
1364:
1336:
1270:
1211:
1142:
1055:
1044:
1028:
969:
951:
931:
922:
780:
253:
714:
641:
1653:
1412:
1403:
1392:
1371:
890:
874:
689:
428:
439:
The "vast majority" of cases that come within this grant of jurisdiction are covered by
1625:
1460:
1065:
739:
559:
281:
389:, claiming negligence, fraud, breach of warranty, and misbranding in violation of the
1793:
1133:
443:' statement that a "`suit arises under the law that creates the cause of action.'"
591:
361:
decision involving the original jurisdiction of the federal district courts under
344:
169:
269:
23:
1124:
1103:
217:
185:
398:
394:
181:
401:
which they claimed caused harm to their children including birth defects.
1503:
824:
816:
378:
870:
728:
Grable & Sons Metal
Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.
512:
Grable & Sons Metal
Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg.
374:
473:
The Court affirmed the Sixth
Circuit and ruled that there was no
530:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court
206:
828:
132:
655:"Why is Federal Question Jurisdiction Such a Mess? | Casetext"
17:
679:
Franchise Tax Board v. Construction
Laborers Vacation Trust
1093:
Redbox
Automated Retail LLC v. Universal City Studios LLLP
1578:
Indiana Harbor Belt
Railroad Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.
572:
public domain material from this U.S government document
1774:
State Farm Mutual
Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell
322:
Stevens, joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor
1830:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
525:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 478
393:(FDCA). The mother in each family had taken the drug
1810:
United States federal question jurisdiction case law
1520:
Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.
416:
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1735:
1694:
1674:
1667:
1587:
1560:
1551:
1529:
1511:
1502:
1443:
1402:
1314:
1280:
1242:
1226:
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
1187:
1132:
1123:
1102:
1082:
1054:
1027:
968:
941:
921:
869:
862:
334:
326:
318:
313:
242:
232:
198:
193:
161:
151:
144:
125:
1800:United States Constitution Article Three case law
630:American Well Works Co. v. Layne & Bowler Co.
1351:Seong Sil Kim v. New York City Transit Authority
1298:Farwell v. Boston & Worcester Railroad Corp.
381:, filed virtually identical complaints against
1018:Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Stout
57:"Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson"
840:
604:Thompson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
203:Thompson v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
8:
1633:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
1219:Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital
943:intentional infliction of emotional distress
757:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
549:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
354:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
330:Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Blackmun
126:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson
1726:American Motorcycle Ass'n v. Superior Court
1571:Alwin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
1073:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
1671:
1557:
1508:
1445:Negligent infliction of emotional distress
1129:
866:
847:
833:
825:
703:Smith v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.
122:
990:CompuServe Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc.
108:Learn how and when to remove this message
583:
581:
1011:United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. Britt
541:
44:Please improve this article by adding
1489:Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
1434:Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.
1205:Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Botsford
120:1986 United States Supreme Court case
7:
1171:Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
391:Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
377:, and the MacTavishes, residents of
1482:Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.
1157:Jablonski by Pahls v. United States
905:Picard v. Barry Pontiac-Buick, Inc.
1746:BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore
138:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1805:United States Supreme Court cases
1753:Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
1640:Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.
767:804 (1986) is available from:
365:(federal question jurisdiction).
1612:Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.
1344:United States v. GlaxoSmithKline
563:
385:in the Court of Common Pleas in
131:
22:
1358:United States v. Johnson (1987)
1178:Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court
1815:1986 in United States case law
1605:Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories
1305:Vance v. Ball State University
1:
1685:Walt Disney World Co. v. Wood
1538:Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.
357:, 478 U.S. 804 (1986), was a
46:secondary or tertiary sources
1112:United States defamation law
373:The Thompsons, residents of
1676:Joint and several liability
1379:Yount v. City of Sacramento
959:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
627:, 478 U.S. at 808, quoting
463:(Quoting from the dissent):
383:Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
359:United States Supreme Court
1846:
1825:Product liability case law
1427:Ultramares Corp. v. Touche
1164:Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.
817:Oyez (oral argument audio)
570:This article incorporates
1647:Chysky v. Drake Bros. Co.
1330:Boub v. Township of Wayne
1291:Albro v. Agawam Canal Co.
912:Sheridan v. United States
339:
247:
237:
130:
1767:Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg
1562:Ultrahazardous activity
1264:Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.
435:Holmes' "Creation" Test
1696:Comparative negligence
1468:Archibald v. Braverman
856:United States tort law
262:William J. Brennan Jr.
33:relies excessively on
1084:Tortious interference
1004:Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
609:766 F.2d 1005
387:Hamilton County, Ohio
188:143; 54 U.S.L.W. 5088
145:Argued April 28, 1986
1820:Dow Chemical Company
1705:Li v. Yellow Cab Co.
1598:Thomas v. Winchester
983:Rowland v. Christian
974:Trespass to chattels
412:forum non conveniens
180:106 S. Ct. 3229; 92
147:Decided July 7, 1986
1386:Pearson v. Callahan
1189:Medical malpractice
808:Library of Congress
448:Franchise Tax Board
306:Sandra Day O'Connor
286:Lewis F. Powell Jr.
1619:Loop v. Litchfield
1420:Ybarra v. Spangard
1315:Public Authority,
1257:Cahoon v. Cummings
1248:Loss of consortium
1058:, Publicity rights
1038:Haslem v. Lockwood
997:Dougherty v. Stepp
405:Procedural history
258:Associate Justices
1787:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1663:
1662:
1589:Product liability
1547:
1546:
1498:
1497:
1475:Thing v. La Chusa
1321:Negligence per se
1282:Common employment
1233:Scott v. Bradford
1198:Landeros v. Flood
1150:Trimarco v. Klein
1119:
1118:
898:Vosburg v. Putney
884:Garratt v. Dailey
863:Intentional Torts
350:
349:
294:William Rehnquist
274:Thurgood Marshall
118:
117:
110:
92:
1837:
1760:Pearson v. Chung
1737:Punitive damages
1719:Hoffman v. Jones
1712:Knight v. Jewett
1672:
1558:
1553:Strict liability
1509:
1454:Krouse v. Graham
1365:Martin v. Herzog
1337:Briscoe v. LaHue
1271:Werling v. Sandy
1212:Mohr v. Williams
1143:Brown v. Kendall
1130:
1045:Popov v. Hayashi
970:Trespass to land
952:Snyder v. Phelps
932:Hartman v. Moore
923:Abuse of process
867:
849:
842:
835:
826:
821:
815:
812:
806:
803:
797:
794:
788:
785:
779:
776:
770:
743:
724:
718:
699:
693:
676:
670:
669:
667:
665:
651:
645:
622:
616:
606:
600:
594:
585:
576:
567:
566:
546:
475:federal question
469:Majority opinion
363:28 U.S.C. § 1331
254:Warren E. Burger
243:Court membership
228:1004 (1985).
135:
134:
123:
113:
106:
102:
99:
93:
91:
50:
26:
18:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1779:
1731:
1690:
1659:
1654:Devlin v. Smith
1583:
1543:
1525:
1494:
1439:
1413:Summers v. Tice
1398:
1393:Saucier v. Katz
1372:Tedla v. Ellman
1310:
1276:
1238:
1183:
1115:
1098:
1078:
1050:
1023:
964:
937:
917:
891:Katko v. Briney
858:
853:
819:
813:
810:
804:
801:
795:
792:
786:
783:
777:
774:
768:
752:
747:
746:
725:
721:
700:
696:
677:
673:
663:
661:
653:
652:
648:
623:
619:
602:
601:
597:
586:
579:
564:
547:
543:
538:
521:
507:
499:Justice Brennan
496:
484:Justice Stevens
471:
464:
453:
438:
429:cause of action
424:
407:
371:
298:John P. Stevens
296:
284:
272:
189:
146:
140:
121:
114:
103:
97:
94:
51:
49:
43:
39:primary sources
27:
12:
11:
5:
1843:
1841:
1833:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1802:
1792:
1791:
1785:
1784:
1781:
1780:
1778:
1777:
1770:
1763:
1756:
1749:
1741:
1739:
1733:
1732:
1730:
1729:
1722:
1715:
1708:
1700:
1698:
1692:
1691:
1689:
1688:
1680:
1678:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1661:
1660:
1658:
1657:
1650:
1643:
1636:
1629:
1626:Losee v. Clute
1622:
1615:
1608:
1601:
1593:
1591:
1585:
1584:
1582:
1581:
1574:
1566:
1564:
1555:
1549:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1542:
1541:
1533:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1524:
1523:
1515:
1513:
1506:
1500:
1499:
1496:
1495:
1493:
1492:
1485:
1478:
1471:
1464:
1461:Dillon v. Legg
1457:
1449:
1447:
1441:
1440:
1438:
1437:
1430:
1423:
1416:
1408:
1406:
1400:
1399:
1397:
1396:
1389:
1382:
1375:
1368:
1361:
1354:
1347:
1340:
1333:
1325:
1323:
1317:Fireman's rule
1312:
1311:
1309:
1308:
1301:
1294:
1286:
1284:
1278:
1277:
1275:
1274:
1267:
1260:
1252:
1250:
1244:Wrongful death
1240:
1239:
1237:
1236:
1229:
1222:
1215:
1208:
1201:
1193:
1191:
1185:
1184:
1182:
1181:
1174:
1167:
1160:
1153:
1146:
1138:
1136:
1127:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1116:
1108:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1097:
1096:
1088:
1086:
1080:
1079:
1077:
1076:
1069:
1066:Taus v. Loftus
1061:
1059:
1052:
1051:
1049:
1048:
1041:
1033:
1031:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1021:
1014:
1007:
1000:
993:
986:
978:
976:
966:
965:
963:
962:
955:
947:
945:
939:
938:
936:
935:
927:
925:
919:
918:
916:
915:
908:
901:
894:
887:
879:
877:
864:
860:
859:
854:
852:
851:
844:
837:
829:
823:
822:
790:Google Scholar
751:
750:External links
748:
745:
744:
719:
694:
671:
646:
617:
595:
588:28 U.S.C.
577:
540:
539:
537:
534:
533:
532:
527:
520:
517:
506:
503:
495:
492:
470:
467:
441:Justice Holmes
423:
420:
406:
403:
370:
367:
348:
347:
341:28 U.S.C.
337:
336:
332:
331:
328:
324:
323:
320:
316:
315:
311:
310:
309:
308:
282:Harry Blackmun
259:
256:
251:
245:
244:
240:
239:
235:
234:
230:
229:
200:
196:
195:
191:
190:
179:
163:
159:
158:
153:
152:Full case name
149:
148:
142:
141:
136:
128:
127:
119:
116:
115:
30:
28:
21:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1842:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1811:
1808:
1806:
1803:
1801:
1798:
1797:
1795:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1762:
1761:
1757:
1755:
1754:
1750:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1742:
1740:
1738:
1734:
1728:
1727:
1723:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1709:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1701:
1699:
1697:
1693:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1681:
1679:
1677:
1673:
1670:
1666:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1649:
1648:
1644:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1635:
1634:
1630:
1628:
1627:
1623:
1621:
1620:
1616:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1607:
1606:
1602:
1600:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1592:
1590:
1586:
1580:
1579:
1575:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1565:
1563:
1559:
1556:
1554:
1550:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1534:
1532:
1528:
1522:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1514:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1501:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1484:
1483:
1479:
1477:
1476:
1472:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1463:
1462:
1458:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1450:
1448:
1446:
1442:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1429:
1428:
1424:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1407:
1405:
1401:
1395:
1394:
1390:
1388:
1387:
1383:
1381:
1380:
1376:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1326:
1324:
1322:
1318:
1313:
1307:
1306:
1302:
1300:
1299:
1295:
1293:
1292:
1288:
1287:
1285:
1283:
1279:
1273:
1272:
1268:
1266:
1265:
1261:
1259:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1251:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1235:
1234:
1230:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1214:
1213:
1209:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1200:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1192:
1190:
1186:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1173:
1172:
1168:
1166:
1165:
1161:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1152:
1151:
1147:
1145:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1137:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1126:
1122:
1114:
1113:
1107:
1105:
1101:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1087:
1085:
1081:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1068:
1067:
1063:
1062:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1032:
1030:
1026:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1006:
1005:
1001:
999:
998:
994:
992:
991:
987:
985:
984:
980:
979:
977:
975:
971:
967:
961:
960:
956:
954:
953:
949:
948:
946:
944:
940:
934:
933:
929:
928:
926:
924:
920:
914:
913:
909:
907:
906:
902:
900:
899:
895:
893:
892:
888:
886:
885:
881:
880:
878:
876:
872:
868:
865:
861:
857:
850:
845:
843:
838:
836:
831:
830:
827:
818:
809:
800:
791:
782:
773:
772:CourtListener
766:
762:
758:
754:
753:
749:
741:
738:
734:
730:
729:
723:
720:
716:
713:
709:
705:
704:
698:
695:
691:
688:
684:
680:
675:
672:
660:
656:
650:
647:
643:
640:
636:
632:
631:
626:
621:
618:
614:
610:
605:
599:
596:
593:
589:
584:
582:
578:
575:
573:
562: (1986).
561:
558:
554:
550:
545:
542:
535:
531:
528:
526:
523:
522:
518:
516:
514:
513:
504:
502:
500:
493:
491:
487:
485:
481:
479:
476:
468:
466:
462:
460:
455:
451:
449:
444:
442:
436:
432:
430:
421:
419:
417:
414:grounds. The
413:
404:
402:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
368:
366:
364:
360:
356:
355:
346:
342:
338:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:Case opinions
312:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:Chief Justice
249:
248:
246:
241:
236:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
204:
201:
197:
192:
187:
183:
177:
176:
171:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
150:
143:
139:
129:
124:
112:
109:
101:
98:November 2019
90:
87:
83:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59: –
58:
54:
53:Find sources:
47:
41:
40:
36:
31:This article
29:
25:
20:
19:
16:
1772:
1765:
1758:
1751:
1744:
1724:
1717:
1710:
1703:
1683:
1652:
1645:
1638:
1632:
1631:
1624:
1617:
1610:
1603:
1596:
1576:
1569:
1536:
1518:
1487:
1480:
1473:
1466:
1459:
1452:
1432:
1425:
1418:
1411:
1391:
1384:
1377:
1370:
1363:
1356:
1349:
1342:
1335:
1328:
1303:
1296:
1289:
1269:
1262:
1255:
1231:
1224:
1217:
1210:
1203:
1196:
1176:
1169:
1162:
1155:
1148:
1141:
1134:Duty of care
1109:
1091:
1071:
1064:
1043:
1036:
1016:
1009:
1002:
995:
988:
981:
957:
950:
930:
910:
903:
896:
889:
882:
756:
742: (2005).
726:
722:
717: (1921).
701:
697:
692: (1983).
678:
674:
662:. Retrieved
659:casetext.com
658:
649:
644: (1916).
628:
624:
620:
603:
598:
569:
548:
544:
510:
508:
497:
488:
482:
478:jurisdiction
472:
458:
457:
456:
447:
446:
445:
434:
433:
425:
408:
372:
353:
352:
351:
335:Laws applied
301:
289:
277:
265:
202:
194:Case history
173:
155:
104:
95:
85:
78:
71:
64:
52:
32:
15:
625:Merrell Dow
615: 1985).
592:§ 1331
345:§ 1331
270:Byron White
220:. granted,
1794:Categories
1125:Negligence
1104:Defamation
1029:Conversion
664:August 20,
536:References
369:Background
186:U.S. LEXIS
184:650; 1986
68:newspapers
35:references
1404:Causation
505:Aftermath
399:pregnancy
395:Bendectin
182:L. Ed. 2d
162:Citations
1504:Nuisance
755:Text of
715:180, 199
642:257, 260
613:6th Cir.
519:See also
379:Scotland
319:Majority
214:6th Cir.
1668:Damages
1530:Private
1056:Privacy
875:Battery
871:Assault
781:Findlaw
690:1, 9-10
494:Dissent
397:during
327:Dissent
233:Holding
216:1985);
82:scholar
1512:Public
972:&
873:&
820:
814:
811:
805:
802:
799:Justia
796:
793:
787:
784:
778:
775:
769:
731:,
706:,
681:,
633:,
611: (
607:,
590:
568:
551:,
375:Canada
343:
304:
302:·
300:
292:
290:·
288:
280:
278:·
276:
268:
266:·
264:
205:, 766
84:
77:
70:
63:
55:
763:
735:
710:
685:
637:
555:
459:Smith
422:Issue
224:
199:Prior
89:JSTOR
75:books
1110:See
765:U.S.
737:U.S.
712:U.S.
687:U.S.
666:2020
639:U.S.
557:U.S.
461:Test
450:Test
226:U.S.
218:cert
210:1005
207:F.2d
175:more
167:U.S.
165:478
61:news
761:478
740:308
733:545
708:255
683:463
635:241
560:804
553:478
222:474
170:804
37:to
1796::
1319:,
1246:,
759:,
657:.
580:^
480:.
48:.
848:e
841:t
834:v
668:.
574:.
452::
437::
212:(
178:)
172:(
111:)
105:(
100:)
96:(
86:·
79:·
72:·
65:·
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
