Knowledge (XXG)

Mission command

Source đź“ť

105:. Not unexpectedly, the Swedes turned to their culture of mission command which had grown and developed over decades preparing for expected invasions. Mission command turned out to be a force multiplier and an effective strategic asset. When facing ethical and practical challenges to its clear orders to protect the civilian population, commanders realized they had no choice but to disregard orders that conflicted with the purpose of the mission. Mission command gave permission to every level of command to interpret orders that could be disobeyed and rules could be broken as long as the mission was successful. 42:, and promotes freedom and speed of action, and initiative within defined constraints. Subordinates, understanding the commander's intentions, their own missions, and the context of those missions, are told what effect they are to achieve and the reason that it needs to be achieved. Subordinates then decide within their delegated freedom of action how best to achieve their missions. Orders focus on providing intent, control measures, and objectives and allow for greater freedom of action by subordinate commanders. Mission command is closely related to civilian management concept of 101:(UNPROFOR). The infantry were Swedish volunteers, tanks from a Danish Leopard company, and a Norwegian helicopter detachment, under Swedish command. Coming from a nation that had not experienced war for almost 200 years, the Swedish leaders faced an unresponsive UN bureaucracy, an unclear mandate, and conflicting UN-imposed 112:
helicopter squadron commander called his friend a paratroop battalion commander to volunteer support to move alert-ready troops. IDF Command did not have a clear tactical picture. The squadron commander reported on Israeli television he was ordered to (in translation from Hebrew), "Carry out the
76:. Commanders often separated by miles, communicating through horse-carried dispatches, were expected to maneuver in concert with one another. Beginning as early as 1807, the Prussian high command began to emphasize a battle philosophy that Moltke would later describe as: 96:
The break up of the Former Yugoslavia in the 1990s drew in contingents from several modern militaries to United Nations or two stabilization forces (IFOR and SFOR). One was NORDBAT 2, consisting of a reinforced Swedish-Danish-Norwegian mechanized battalion in
80:
A favourable situation will never be exploited if commanders wait for orders. The highest commander and the youngest soldier must be conscious of the fact that omission and inactivity are worse than resorting to the wrong
165: 276:
Canada Department of National Defence (1996). Conduct of Land Operations – Operational Level Doctrine for the Canadian Army. Publication B-GL-300-001/FP- 000. Ottawa, Ontario: Queen’s Printer.
108:
In a sudden or unexpected tactical situation, personnel on alert may have to react on their best initiative. In 2023 when HAMAS breached the border between Israel and the Gaza Strip, a
285:
Army of the United Kingdom (2005). Land Operations. Shrivenham, UK: United Kingdom Ministry of Defence, Director General, Development, Concepts, & Doctrine, Publication AC 71819.
187: 249:
Stewart, Keith (2009). “Command Approach: Problem Solving in Mission Command.” Proc. 14th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Washington, D.C.
258:
United States Army (2003). Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces. Washington, D.C.: Headquarters, United States Department of the Army, Field Manual No. 6-0.
267:
United States Marine Corps (1996). Command and Control. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Navy, Headquarters, United States Marine Corps, Doctrine Publication MCDP 6.
382: 303:
Vassiliou, Marius (2010). The Evolution Towards Decentralized C2. Proc. 15th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Santa Monica, CA.
85:
Continued focus on tactical initiative at the lowest levels developed within the German army through the First World War and formally became
366: 98: 294:
Alberts, David S. (2002). Information Age Transformation: Getting to a 21st Century Military. Washington, D.C.: CCRP Press
443: 192: 416: 197: 55: 54:, Canada, Netherlands, Australia and the United Kingdom. Mission command is compatible with modern military 35: 155: 102: 397:"An IDF pilot managed to land his helicopter after being hit by a Hamas RPG - Keshet 12 News (IL)" 362: 93:
at the tactical level, mission command was not adopted by NATO commanders until the 1970s.
358: 351: 329: 230: 170: 50:(2011) and Tozer (1995, 2012). It is advocated but not always used by the militaries of the 27: 318:"A command philosophy for the information age: The continuing relevance of mission command" 219:"A command philosophy for the information age: The continuing relevance of mission command" 175: 67: 47: 437: 383:"Trigger-Happy, Autonomous, and Disobedient: Nordbat 2 and Mission Command in Bosnia" 51: 39: 58:
concepts, and less centralized approaches to command and control (C2) in general.
43: 396: 334: 317: 235: 218: 72: 160: 89:
during the Second World War. Despite the exceptional performance of the
401: 31: 166:
International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium
38:
doctrine, combines centralized intent with decentralized execution
109: 46:, and its use in business has been explored by writers such as 353:
A Genius for War: The German Army and General Staff, 1807-1945
70:
concept, increasingly larger armies prevented movement
198:
Stephen Bungay: Moltke – Master of Modern Management
350: 8: 113:mission to the best of your understanding." 357:. London: Macdonald & Jane's. pp.  333: 234: 127:Build cohesive teams through mutual trust 209: 7: 311: 309: 133:Provide a clear commander’s intent 14: 136:Exercise disciplined initiative 99:United Nations Protection Force 1: 30:, which is derived from the 130:Create shared understanding 460: 188:Centre for Army Leadership 335:10.1080/14702430308405081 236:10.1080/14702430308405081 193:ADP 6-0 – Mission Command 16:Style of military command 83: 22:, also referred to as 349:Dupuy, T. N. (1977). 78: 66:Originating from the 44:workplace empowerment 426:. Army Publications. 424:armypubs.us.army.mil 385:. 20 September 2017. 36:mission-type tactics 24:mission-type tactics 444:Command and control 316:Storr, Jim (2003). 217:Storr, Jim (2003). 156:Command by negation 103:rules of engagement 405:. 23 October 2023. 139:Use mission orders 451: 428: 427: 421: 413: 407: 406: 393: 387: 386: 379: 373: 372: 356: 346: 340: 339: 337: 313: 304: 301: 295: 292: 286: 283: 277: 274: 268: 265: 259: 256: 250: 247: 241: 240: 238: 214: 171:Maneuver warfare 145:Risk acceptance. 68:Napoleonic corps 28:military command 26:, is a style of 459: 458: 454: 453: 452: 450: 449: 448: 434: 433: 432: 431: 419: 415: 414: 410: 395: 394: 390: 381: 380: 376: 369: 348: 347: 343: 322:Defence Studies 315: 314: 307: 302: 298: 293: 289: 284: 280: 275: 271: 266: 262: 257: 253: 248: 244: 223:Defence Studies 216: 215: 211: 206: 184: 176:Operational art 152: 124: 119: 64: 20:Mission command 17: 12: 11: 5: 457: 455: 447: 446: 436: 435: 430: 429: 408: 388: 374: 368:978-0133511147 367: 341: 328:(3): 119–129. 305: 296: 287: 278: 269: 260: 251: 242: 229:(3): 119–129. 208: 207: 205: 202: 201: 200: 195: 190: 183: 182:External links 180: 179: 178: 173: 168: 163: 158: 151: 148: 147: 146: 143: 140: 137: 134: 131: 128: 123: 120: 118: 115: 87:Auftragstaktik 63: 60: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 456: 445: 442: 441: 439: 425: 418: 412: 409: 404: 403: 398: 392: 389: 384: 378: 375: 370: 364: 360: 355: 354: 345: 342: 336: 331: 327: 323: 319: 312: 310: 306: 300: 297: 291: 288: 282: 279: 273: 270: 264: 261: 255: 252: 246: 243: 237: 232: 228: 224: 220: 213: 210: 203: 199: 196: 194: 191: 189: 186: 185: 181: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 153: 149: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 129: 126: 125: 121: 116: 114: 111: 106: 104: 100: 94: 92: 88: 82: 77: 75: 74: 69: 61: 59: 57: 53: 52:United States 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 21: 423: 411: 400: 391: 377: 352: 344: 325: 321: 299: 290: 281: 272: 263: 254: 245: 226: 222: 212: 117:Modern usage 107: 95: 90: 86: 84: 79: 71: 65: 40:subsidiarity 23: 19: 18: 56:net-centric 34:-pioneered 204:References 142:Competence 122:Principles 417:"ADP 6-0" 91:Wehrmacht 81:expedient 438:Category 161:Free war 150:See also 32:Prussian 402:YouTube 73:en bloc 62:History 365:  48:Bungay 420:(PDF) 110:CH-53 363:ISBN 359:116 330:doi 231:doi 440:: 422:. 399:. 361:. 324:. 320:. 308:^ 225:. 221:. 371:. 338:. 332:: 326:3 239:. 233:: 227:3

Index

military command
Prussian
mission-type tactics
subsidiarity
workplace empowerment
Bungay
United States
net-centric
Napoleonic corps
en bloc
United Nations Protection Force
rules of engagement
CH-53
Command by negation
Free war
International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium
Maneuver warfare
Operational art
Centre for Army Leadership
ADP 6-0 – Mission Command
Stephen Bungay: Moltke – Master of Modern Management
"A command philosophy for the information age: The continuing relevance of mission command"
doi
10.1080/14702430308405081


"A command philosophy for the information age: The continuing relevance of mission command"
doi
10.1080/14702430308405081
A Genius for War: The German Army and General Staff, 1807-1945

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑