279:
269:
242:
90:
63:
345:
210:
32:
104:
439:
that makes sense, such as the example in my initial comment. So that for stations on the core "passageways", the previous (left) station will take you west while the next station (right) will take you east. This is sounding like a lot of work... I'm happy to try and do this but it would take a while!
438:
and the route diagrams complicated already so as far as articles are concerned I think most should stay as separate articles. My proposal then is, at least for the better defined "8 horizontals and 8 vertical" passageways, to consistently name each railway so they're going in the same direction, if
415:
Unless station density is low enough to justify a railway diagram template which appropriately covers the second option (I think the navigation and the diagram should cover the same area - it's always possible to refer to the longer passageway via another navbox or in prose); the first one would be
528:
Sorry I realised I missed your question in your previous comment. I'm not bothered about the article names, I just think it would be easier to navigate the adjacent stations templates if there is a consistent direction where possible (the left box goes roughly west while the right box goes roughly
476:
I'm really not sure to be honest. I only started editing frequently last year and feel a bit lost! I never thought about using redirects, but actually, that would be much easier than renaming articles and allow for a consistent direction for the adjacent stations boxes regardless of the individual
457:
is a consideration. Are there other reasons beyond mere geography for the name changes? It's perfectly valid for these not to be in the same direction, especially if one of the cities is more of a major center. The alternative could possibly be created as a redirect for use in the navboxes.
598:
416:
more appropriate (given what appear to be the rather long distances covered). Or at least I'm writing from a perspective of mostly
European origin, where stations are every few kilometers... Cheers,
608:
603:
359:
354:
252:
613:
477:
line articles. In this case I would only need to edit this module and the left/right fields on individual articles, no renaming of articles required. What do you think?
568:
563:
170:
593:
588:
325:
497:
180:
573:
335:
394:
390:
382:
578:
583:
492:
It's easy to get lost in all the bureaucracy; although usually taking a few moments to think it through (common sense) is a good substitute.
386:
381:
I thought it would be good to raise this here in case anyone else feels strongly about this. Should we use each line segment as the title ("
519:
467:
425:
142:
138:
618:
301:
219:
73:
134:
125:
68:
43:
510:
might get the attention from editors who are more familiar with the area. Redirects are definitively easier, though. Cheers,
292:
247:
17:
300:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
400:
I'm leaning towards using the passageways to organise the stations, perhaps with subtitles for each individual segment.
538:
523:
486:
471:
448:
429:
409:
515:
463:
421:
503:
49:
389:")? The problem with the former option is that some lines are the wrong way round, for example the naming of
454:
534:
511:
482:
459:
444:
417:
405:
397:
is east-to-west. I don't think the ordering is significant, so we could just rename the articles.
507:
268:
241:
493:
530:
478:
440:
401:
130:
89:
62:
557:
146:
113:
529:
east). Good idea, I'll leave a message at the China WikiProject too. Thanks again,
284:
274:
344:
209:
434:
Thanks for your input, the station density is low but these railways are
133:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can visit the
103:
297:
25:
343:
208:
129:, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
137:, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
599:
Template-Class China-related articles of Low-importance
296:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
191:
498:Template:Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines
609:Low-importance Transportation in China articles
604:Template-Class Transportation in China articles
506:, so that might affect things too. A notice at
42:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
614:WikiProject Transportation in China articles
236:
188:
57:
502:. Well in addition to COMMONNAME there's
238:
59:
569:Low-importance rail transport articles
564:Template-Class rail transport articles
355:the Transportation in China task force
594:Low-importance China-related articles
589:Template-Class China-related articles
387:Eurasia Continental Bridge passageway
7:
391:Zhengzhou–Xuzhou high-speed railway
383:Zhengzhou–Xuzhou high-speed railway
377:Individual lines, or "passageways"?
290:This module is within the scope of
192:Associated projects or task forces:
123:This module is within the scope of
48:It is of interest to the following
31:
29:
395:Zhengzhou–Xi'an high-speed railway
155:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Trains
24:
500:are a helpful overview and index.
310:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject China
574:Template-Class Stations articles
277:
267:
240:
102:
88:
61:
30:
385:") or the longer passageways ("
330:This module has been rated as
175:This module has been rated as
1:
579:WikiProject Stations articles
304:and see a list of open tasks.
143:WikiProject Trains to do list
18:Module talk:Adjacent stations
584:All WikiProject Trains pages
496:and the associated template
352:This module is supported by
217:This module is supported by
158:Template:WikiProject Trains
635:
619:WikiProject China articles
336:project's importance scale
313:Template:WikiProject China
181:project's importance scale
539:20:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
524:17:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
487:17:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
472:17:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
449:16:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
430:16:15, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
410:15:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
351:
329:
262:
216:
187:
174:
83:
56:
393:is west-to-east whereas
161:rail transport articles
348:
316:China-related articles
213:
347:
212:
220:WikiProject Stations
349:
214:
126:WikiProject Trains
44:content assessment
501:
374:
373:
370:
369:
366:
365:
293:WikiProject China
235:
234:
231:
230:
227:
226:
121:
120:
626:
491:
318:
317:
314:
311:
308:
287:
282:
281:
280:
271:
264:
263:
258:
255:
244:
237:
199:
189:
163:
162:
159:
156:
153:
106:
97:
96:
92:
85:
84:
79:
76:
65:
58:
35:
34:
33:
26:
634:
633:
629:
628:
627:
625:
624:
623:
554:
553:
379:
315:
312:
309:
306:
305:
283:
278:
276:
256:
250:
197:
160:
157:
154:
151:
150:
122:
108:
107:
77:
71:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
632:
630:
622:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
591:
586:
581:
576:
571:
566:
556:
555:
552:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
512:RandomCanadian
504:WP:CONSISTENCY
460:RandomCanadian
418:RandomCanadian
378:
375:
372:
371:
368:
367:
364:
363:
360:Low-importance
350:
340:
339:
332:Low-importance
328:
322:
321:
319:
302:the discussion
289:
288:
272:
260:
259:
257:Low‑importance
253:Transportation
245:
233:
232:
229:
228:
225:
224:
215:
205:
204:
202:
200:
194:
193:
185:
184:
177:Low-importance
173:
167:
166:
164:
131:rail transport
119:
118:
109:
101:
100:
95:
93:
81:
80:
78:Low‑importance
66:
54:
53:
47:
36:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
631:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
590:
587:
585:
582:
580:
577:
575:
572:
570:
567:
565:
562:
561:
559:
540:
536:
532:
527:
526:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
499:
495:
490:
489:
488:
484:
480:
475:
474:
473:
469:
465:
461:
456:
455:WP:COMMONNAME
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
376:
361:
358:(assessed as
357:
356:
346:
342:
341:
337:
333:
327:
324:
323:
320:
303:
299:
295:
294:
286:
275:
273:
270:
266:
265:
261:
254:
249:
246:
243:
239:
222:
221:
211:
207:
206:
203:
201:
196:
195:
190:
186:
182:
178:
172:
169:
168:
165:
148:
147:Trains Portal
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
117:
116:
115:
114:Trains Portal
110:
105:
99:
98:
94:
91:
87:
86:
82:
75:
70:
67:
64:
60:
55:
51:
45:
41:
37:
28:
27:
19:
435:
399:
380:
353:
331:
291:
285:China portal
218:
176:
141:. See also:
135:project page
124:
112:
111:
50:WikiProjects
39:
558:Categories
139:discussion
531:NemesisAT
479:NemesisAT
441:NemesisAT
402:NemesisAT
520:contribs
508:WP:CHINA
468:contribs
426:contribs
145:and the
74:Stations
334:on the
179:on the
494:WP:PAG
152:Trains
69:Trains
46:scale.
40:module
453:Well
307:China
298:China
248:China
38:This
16:<
535:talk
516:talk
483:talk
464:talk
445:talk
436:long
422:talk
406:talk
522:)
470:)
428:)
326:Low
171:Low
560::
537:)
518:/
485:)
466:/
447:)
424:/
408:)
362:).
251::
198:/
72::
533:(
514:(
481:(
462:(
443:(
420:(
404:(
338:.
223:.
183:.
149:.
52::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
