Knowledge (XXG)

Nova Scotia (AG) v Walsh

Source đź“ť

29: 300: 306: 228:
was an analogously protected ground. On the final step of analysis the court rejected the argument that the exclusion was discriminatory. The difference between the two groups reflects the difference of the relationships and respects the individual autonomy of the parties.
220:
Susan Walsh and Wayne Bona were cohabitating together for over 10 years. Walsh attempted to get spousal and child support under the Act by applying for recognition of their cohabitation as a "spousal" relationship.
197: 253: 243:
The Supreme Court of Canada revisited the distinction between married and unmarried couples in Quebec (Attorney General) v. A., 2013 SCC 5 (CanLII), and Walsh is no longer applicable.
384: 349: 202: 389: 394: 342: 399: 121: 90: 335: 274: 193: 34: 366: 86: 28: 282: 237: 114: 137: 319: 278: 125: 299: 260: 129: 225: 164:
Bastarache J, joined by McLachlin CJ and Iacobucci, Major, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ
378: 145: 133: 60: 315: 207: 149: 232:
Before the final decision was released the Nova Scotia government amended the
141: 214: 217:
couples, was not in violation of the section 15 equality guarantee.
54:
The Attorney General of Nova Scotia v Susan Walsh and Wayne Bona
254:
Hodge v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development)
323: 176: 168: 160: 155: 105: 97: 77: 69: 59: 49: 42: 21: 240:which provides similar rights as married couples. 224:On the section 15 analysis it was determined that 206:and matrimonial property. The Court held that the 192:, 4 S.C.R. 325 was a leading case decided by the 343: 8: 350: 336: 359: 203:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 22:Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v Walsh 18: 7: 295: 293: 236:to include the option to register a 89: (19 April 2000), setting aside 367:SCC Case Information - Docket 28179 322:. You can help Knowledge (XXG) by 14: 385:Section Fifteen Charter case law 304: 298: 27: 1: 390:Supreme Court of Canada cases 16:Supreme Court of Canada case 213:, which excluded unmarried 416: 292: 45:Judgment: 19 December 2002 395:2002 in Canadian case law 110: 26: 211:Matrimonial Property Act 189:Nova Scotia (AG) v Walsh 369:Supreme Court of Canada 275:Supreme Court of Canada 194:Supreme Court of Canada 35:Supreme Court of Canada 277:decision available at 43:Hearing: 14 June 2002 122:Claire L'Heureux-Dubé 238:domestic partnership 234:Vital Statistics Act 314:This article about 93: (20 July 1999) 400:Canadian law stubs 115:Beverley McLachlin 331: 330: 184: 183: 138:Michel Bastarache 407: 370: 364: 352: 345: 338: 310: 309: 308: 307: 302: 294: 180:L'Heureux-Dubé J 126:Charles Gonthier 119:Puisne Justices: 106:Court membership 91:1999 CanLII 2170 31: 19: 415: 414: 410: 409: 408: 406: 405: 404: 375: 374: 373: 365: 361: 357: 356: 305: 303: 297: 290: 270: 261:Miron v. Trudel 249: 186: 130:Frank Iacobucci 117: 44: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 413: 411: 403: 402: 397: 392: 387: 377: 376: 372: 371: 358: 355: 354: 347: 340: 332: 329: 328: 311: 286: 285: 269: 268:External links 266: 265: 264: 257: 248: 245: 226:marital status 182: 181: 178: 174: 173: 170: 166: 165: 162: 158: 157: 153: 152: 112:Chief Justice: 108: 107: 103: 102: 101:Appeal allowed 99: 95: 94: 79: 75: 74: 71: 67: 66: 63: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 32: 24: 23: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 412: 401: 398: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 382: 380: 368: 363: 360: 353: 348: 346: 341: 339: 334: 333: 327: 325: 321: 317: 312: 301: 296: 291: 288: 284: 280: 276: 273:Full text of 272: 271: 267: 263: 262: 258: 256: 255: 251: 250: 246: 244: 241: 239: 235: 230: 227: 222: 218: 216: 212: 209: 205: 204: 199: 195: 191: 190: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156:Reasons given 154: 151: 147: 146:Louise Arbour 143: 139: 135: 134:John C. Major 131: 127: 123: 120: 116: 113: 109: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 83:Walsh v. Bona 80: 78:Prior history 76: 72: 68: 64: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 36: 30: 25: 20: 362: 324:expanding it 316:Canadian law 313: 289: 287: 259: 252: 242: 233: 231: 223: 219: 215:cohabitating 210: 201: 188: 187: 185: 118: 111: 87:2000 NSCA 53 82: 81:APPEAL from 53: 33: 208:Nova Scotia 169:Concurrence 150:Louis LeBel 65:2002 SCC 83 379:Categories 198:section 15 172:Gonthier J 142:Ian Binnie 70:Docket No. 61:Citations 247:See also 161:Majority 200:of the 177:Dissent 85:, 283:CanLII 98:Ruling 73:28179 318:is a 279:LexUM 320:stub 281:and 196:on 381:: 148:, 144:, 140:, 136:, 132:, 128:, 124:, 351:e 344:t 337:v 326:.

Index

Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
2000 NSCA 53
1999 CanLII 2170
Beverley McLachlin
Claire L'Heureux-Dubé
Charles Gonthier
Frank Iacobucci
John C. Major
Michel Bastarache
Ian Binnie
Louise Arbour
Louis LeBel
Supreme Court of Canada
section 15
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Nova Scotia
cohabitating
marital status
domestic partnership
Hodge v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development)
Miron v. Trudel
Supreme Court of Canada
LexUM
CanLII
Flag of Canada
Canadian law
stub
expanding it

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑