255:
22:
146:
held that the state gave all power to companies. If companies acted outside the power granted, such actions were necessarily contrary to the public interest, null and void. The fact that people contracting with a corporation may be thoroughly disappointed and suffer loss was legitimated on the basis
290:
The Cohen
Committee (Cmnd 6659, 1945) para 12 recommended every company ‘should, notwithstanding anything omitted from its memorandum of association, have as regards third parties the same powers as an individual. Existing provisions in memoranda as regards the powers of companies… should operate
291:
solely as a contract between a company and its shareholders as to the powers exercisable by the directors’. This was not abandoned because it was thought reform of the constructive notice rule was too essential, and needed more research (if you constructively knew an object you would be bound).
396:
doctrine, based on a company's objects, remains fully functional for internal purposes. Under the
Companies Act 2006 section 171 directors must observe the constitutional limits on their powers, and are liable to pay compensation if they fail. A member can seek an injunction to restrain an
193:
was not within the company's objects. A money lender knew that the purpose of the loan was for pig breeding. Held, it was unable to enforce the loan. Furthermore, though there was an object for the company to borrow money, this object was construed as not being a substantive and separate
301:
was put in place, section 9, based on
Directive 77/91/EEC (requiring a company to state objects, but not to have them) lead to mandatory protections for people transacting with companies. As a result, the Companies Act 1985 was amended to include sections 35 and 35A-B.
376:. A third party may still find that a contract is voidable (though not void, meaning that equitable bars to rescission of agreements operate) if it was clear that the person they dealt with was conducting themselves beyond the scope of their authority.
173:(1880) 5 App Cas 473, companies have the power to do things reasonably incidental to their objects. Care must be taken to distinguish cases where directors abused their authority, but had not acted beyond the company's capacity.
119:
The legal problems concerning objects clauses are now largely historical artifacts. Newly registered companies no longer have to register objects under the
Companies Act 2006 section 31, and that even if they do, the
99:, or power, of a company to act. To avoid problems, long and unwieldy 'catch-all' objects clauses were often drafted to include as much potential activity as possible, and thus avoid dealings being found to be
551:
305:
The
Prentice Report (1986) led to the Companies Act 1989. This recommended abolishing constructive notice and that actions of a company could not be called into question for lack of capacity, but still no
198:
294:
Then the
Jenkins Committee (Cmnd 1749, 1962) para 42 would have replaced constructive notice with various statutory rules but not abolished the ultra vires doctrine itself.
161:
360:(1) The validity of an act done by a company shall not be called into question on the ground of lack of capacity by reason of anything in the company’s constitution...
32:
537:
436:
365:
Charitable companies, however, under sections 39(2) and 42 are still subject to the common law, meaning that they may be afforded some greater protection.
142:
and the lifting on restrictions for private individuals to start companies, corporations were granted concessions from the state to operate a trade. The
511:
489:
465:
347:(3) Any such amendment does not affect any rights or obligations of the company or render defective any legal proceedings by or against it.
674:
602:
298:
66:
169:
429:
242:
525:
477:
453:
210:
218:
177:
126:
doctrine has been abolished against third parties under section 39. A clause is only relevant in an action against a
422:
658:
E Ferran, 'The Reform of the Law On
Corporate Capacity and Directors' and Officers' Authority' Company Lawyer 124
330:(1) Unless a company’s articles specifically restrict the objects of the company, its objects are unrestricted.
48:
583:
333:(2) Where a company amends its articles so as to add, remove or alter a statement of the company’s objects—
403:
185:
234:
139:
352:
If companies do register objects, it is irrelevant for the validity of contracts with outside parties.
130:
for breach of duty under section 171 for failure to observe the limits of their constitutional power.
385:
226:
87:'s constitution stating the purpose and range of activities for which the company is carried on. In
44:
500:
319:
92:
143:
127:
615:
661:
J Poole, 'Abolition of the Ultra Vires
Doctrine and Agency Problems' Company Lawyer 43
578:
567:
147:
that every member of the public could see the law defining the corporation's capacity.
96:
88:
254:
668:
373:
110:
401:
act. Directors who overstep an objects clause may be disqualified for doing so (see
372:
doctrine, however, does not affect the operation of the ordinary principles of the
190:
557:
392:
122:
101:
84:
342:(c) the amendment is not effective until entry of that notice on the register.
105:: the legal position was that any contract entered into beyond the power, or
230:
2 Ch 46 (S&W 148) confusion of ‘implied powers’ and ‘directors’ duties’
414:
138:
Objects clauses were first seen in chartered corporations. Before the
206:
for not holding that the directors had not merely abused their power.
322:, companies need not register any objects according to section 31.
339:(b) on receipt of the notice, the registrar shall register it, and
214:(1883) 23 Ch D 654, gifts must be ‘for the benefit of the company’
603:
Objects clause and
Memorandum of Association: a whistle-stop tour
418:
249:
31:
deal primarily with the United
Kingdom and do not represent a
15:
181:
2 QB 656, objects clauses can give directors full discretion
91:, until reforms enacted in the Companies Act 1989 and the
199:
Rolled Steel Products (Holdings) Ltd v British Steel Corp
605:, published 11 October 2017, accessed 15 September 2018
266:
40:
162:Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co Ltd v Riche
354:
324:
539:Panorama Ltd v Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd
430:
29:The examples and perspective in this article
8:
553:Meridian Global Ltd v Securities Commission
170:Attorney General v Great Eastern Railway Co
437:
423:
415:
336:(a) it must give notice to the registrar,
67:Learn how and when to remove this message
513:Freeman and Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Ltd
243:Charterbridge Corp Ltd v Lloyds Bank Ltd
594:
95:, an objects clause circumscribed the
490:Rolled Steel Ltd v British Steel Corp
7:
466:Ashbury Railway Carriage Ltd v Riche
326:31 Statement of company’s objects
219:Evans v Brunner, Mond & Co Ltd
178:Bell Houses v City Wall Properties
14:
253:
20:
380:Relevance for directors' duties
526:Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd
1:
478:Hutton v West Cork Railway Co
454:Royal British Bank v Turquand
299:European Communities Act 1972
211:Hutton v West Cork Railway Co
149:Ignorantia juris non excusat
43:, discuss the issue on the
691:
675:United Kingdom company law
383:
630:(5th edn OUP 2009) p. 245
601:Machins Solicitors, LLP,
564:
548:
534:
522:
508:
498:
486:
474:
462:
450:
655:(5th edn OUP 2009) ch 12
356:39 A company’s capacity
584:Capacity in English law
445:Company liability cases
651:A Dignam and J Lowry,
626:A Dignam and J Lowry,
363:
350:
134:Historical development
404:Re Samuel Sherman plc
379:
368:The abolition of the
140:Industrial Revolution
457:(1856) 6 E&B 327
286:Background to reform
204:Re Introductions Ltd
186:Re Introductions Ltd
83:is a provision in a
49:create a new article
41:improve this article
314:Present legislation
235:Re Horsley v Weight
202:Ch 246, criticised
501:Companies Act 2006
481:(1883) 39 Ch D 156
469:(1875) LR 7 HL 653
320:Companies Act 2006
265:. You can help by
165:(1875) LR 7 HL 653
109:, would be deemed
93:Companies Act 2006
574:
573:
386:Directors' duties
283:
282:
144:concession theory
77:
76:
69:
51:, as appropriate.
682:
640:
637:
631:
624:
618:
612:
606:
599:
554:
540:
514:
439:
432:
425:
416:
278:
275:
257:
250:
72:
65:
61:
58:
52:
24:
23:
16:
690:
689:
685:
684:
683:
681:
680:
679:
665:
664:
648:
646:Further reading
643:
638:
634:
625:
621:
616:Bubble Act 1720
613:
609:
600:
596:
592:
575:
570:
560:
552:
544:
538:
530:
518:
512:
504:
494:
482:
470:
458:
446:
443:
413:
388:
382:
316:
288:
279:
273:
270:
263:needs expansion
157:
136:
73:
62:
56:
53:
38:
25:
21:
12:
11:
5:
688:
686:
678:
677:
667:
666:
663:
662:
659:
656:
647:
644:
642:
641:
632:
619:
607:
593:
591:
588:
587:
586:
581:
579:UK company law
572:
571:
568:UK company law
565:
562:
561:
549:
546:
545:
535:
532:
531:
523:
520:
519:
509:
506:
505:
499:
496:
495:
487:
484:
483:
475:
472:
471:
463:
460:
459:
451:
448:
447:
444:
442:
441:
434:
427:
419:
412:
409:
381:
378:
362:
361:
349:
348:
345:
344:
343:
340:
337:
331:
315:
312:
287:
284:
281:
280:
260:
258:
248:
247:
239:
231:
227:Re Lee Behrens
223:
215:
207:
195:
182:
174:
166:
156:
155:Relevant cases
153:
135:
132:
89:UK company law
81:objects clause
75:
74:
35:of the subject
33:worldwide view
28:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
687:
676:
673:
672:
670:
660:
657:
654:
650:
649:
645:
636:
633:
629:
623:
620:
617:
611:
608:
604:
598:
595:
589:
585:
582:
580:
577:
576:
569:
563:
559:
556:
555:
547:
542:
541:
533:
528:
527:
521:
516:
515:
507:
502:
497:
492:
491:
485:
480:
479:
473:
468:
467:
461:
456:
455:
449:
440:
435:
433:
428:
426:
421:
420:
417:
410:
408:
406:
405:
400:
395:
394:
387:
377:
375:
374:law of agency
371:
366:
359:
358:
357:
353:
346:
341:
338:
335:
334:
332:
329:
328:
327:
323:
321:
313:
311:
309:
303:
300:
295:
292:
285:
277:
268:
264:
261:This section
259:
256:
252:
251:
245:
244:
240:
238:3 All ER 1045
237:
236:
232:
229:
228:
224:
221:
220:
216:
213:
212:
208:
205:
201:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:
183:
180:
179:
175:
172:
171:
167:
164:
163:
159:
158:
154:
152:
150:
145:
141:
133:
131:
129:
125:
124:
117:
115:
112:
108:
104:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
71:
68:
60:
50:
46:
42:
36:
34:
27:
18:
17:
652:
635:
627:
622:
610:
597:
550:
536:
524:
510:
488:
476:
464:
452:
402:
398:
391:
389:
369:
367:
364:
355:
351:
325:
317:
307:
304:
296:
293:
289:
271:
267:adding to it
262:
241:
233:
225:
217:
209:
203:
197:
191:pig breeding
184:
176:
168:
160:
148:
137:
121:
118:
113:
106:
100:
80:
78:
63:
54:
30:
653:Company Law
628:Company Law
399:ultra vires
393:ultra vires
370:ultra vires
310:abolition.
308:ultra vires
123:ultra vires
107:ultra vires
102:ultra vires
639:1 WLR 1070
590:References
384:See also:
318:Under the
297:When the
274:July 2010
114:ab initio
57:June 2022
45:talk page
669:Category
543:2 QB 711
529:1 QB 549
517:2 QB 480
503:ss 39-41
411:See also
222:1 Ch 359
189:Ch 199,
128:director
97:capacity
39:You may
194:object.
85:company
558:UKPC 5
493:Ch 246
246:Ch 62
47:, or
614:See
566:see
390:The
111:void
407:).
269:.
79:An
671::
151:.
116:.
438:e
431:t
424:v
276:)
272:(
70:)
64:(
59:)
55:(
37:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
