462:
Each additional month requires an increasingly higher fee. For example, when an
Examiner sends a restriction requirement, a one-month shortened statutory period applies, and if the applicant sends a response on the 31st or 32nd day (depending on the month, as well as on Saturday/Sunday/holiday practice; note that February is granted 30 days), a petition for a one-month extension, and the associated fee, must accompany the response. Most other Office actions have shortened statutory periods of either two or three months. Note however that an applicant cannot petition for an extension of time beyond the six-month limit.
394:(USPTO), rejecting an application to register a trademark. An Office action typically includes one or both of two elements. The first possible element is the category of "informalities", matters such as an inadequate sample to show use of the mark, providing insufficient information with respect to the nature of the entity seeking the mark (for example, failing to name the partners in a partnership), or providing insufficient information for the examiner to determine what, exactly, the goods and services provided by the applicant are.
454:. Otherwise, the applicant may file an amendment which complies with the requirements set forth in the Office action. Reply to a final rejection must include cancellation of, or appeal from the rejection of, each rejected claim. If any claim stands allowed, the reply to a final rejection must comply with any requirements or objections as to form. Replies to final Office actions must be in accordance with 37 C.F.R. 1.113-1.114.
410:
information. If the action is premised on a defect in the mark itself, such as likelihood of confusion, genericness, or descriptiveness, the applicant may need to present evidence and legal argument to overcome this rejection. If the
Examiner is not convinced by the evidence submitted, a final Office action will issue. This may be appealed to the
401:
with an existing registered mark and genericness or descriptiveness of the mark for which registration is sought. Rarely, a mark will be rejected as "immoral or scandalous", usually if it contains sexually suggestive terms, or vulgarities, for example the rejection of a logo with a defecating dog in
461:
of between one and three months usually applies (justified by the USPTO's desire for speedy prosecution of applications) and responses sent later than the shortened period require the filing of a petition and the payment of a petition fee that varies with the number of additional months requested.
409:
When an Office action is issued, the applicant has three months to respond to the
Examiner with possibility of being extended for an equal period. If the Office action was issued with respect to "informalities", the response may simply be the correction of these matters by providing additional
449:
An Office action may be "final" or "non-final". In a non-final Office action, the applicant is entitled to reply and request reconsideration or further examination, with or without making an amendment. In a final Office action, the applicant has two options for reply. In the first option, the
658:
516:"Changes to Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications," 72
451:
391:
148:
648:
498:
329:
143:
133:
653:
411:
397:
The second possible element of an Office action is an actual basis for rejection of the mark itself. The most frequent bases are
226:
303:
383:
20:
457:
When an Office action is issued, the applicant may take up to six months to respond to the
Examiner. Note that a
594:
190:
169:
118:
427:
322:
231:
138:
398:
351:
252:
196:
87:
56:
51:
618:
606:
61:
315:
298:
221:
211:
206:
201:
102:
365:
Formally, the "O" is supposed to be capitalized, since it refers to the U.S. Patent and
Trademark
435:
387:
347:
174:
82:
77:
247:
216:
123:
530:
262:
128:
92:
431:
288:
267:
257:
582:
443:
558:
642:
493:
583:
Intellectual
Property- INVENTORS Committee: Short Description of the Patent Process
293:
46:
570:
272:
633:
442:
and gives reasons why the examiner has allowed, or approved, the applicant's
439:
359:
153:
438:
after the examiner has examined the application. The Office action cites
97:
355:
41:
634:
Manual of Patent
Examining Procedure (MPEP) on the USPTO web site
354:
examination procedure and mailed to an applicant for a
19:
For information on
Knowledge (XXG) office actions, see
450:applicant may appeal rejection of claims to the
362:. The expression is used in many jurisdictions.
111:Patentability requirements and related concepts
531:"Concise Technical Writing: The Office Action"
430:, an Office action is a document written by a
323:
8:
414:. A final Office action is also known as a
346:is a document written by an examiner in a
330:
316:
25:
659:United States Patent and Trademark Office
452:Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
392:United States Patent and Trademark Office
509:
280:
239:
182:
161:
110:
69:
33:
28:
468:is an acronym used by the USPTO for "
7:
499:Manual of Patent Examining Procedure
404:Greyhound Corp. v. Both Worlds, Inc.
16:Correspondence in patent proceedings
386:, an Office action is issued by an
134:Inventive step and non-obviousness
14:
412:Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
446:, and/or rejected the claims.
21:Knowledge (XXG):Office actions
1:
183:By region / country
649:United States trademark law
571:Patent Prosecution (BitLaw)
559:Trademarks - how to respond
384:United States trademark law
675:
459:shortened statutory period
240:By specific subject matter
18:
342:In the United States, an
191:Patent Cooperation Treaty
170:Sufficiency of disclosure
149:Person skilled in the art
119:Patentable subject matter
654:United States patent law
428:United States patent law
162:Other legal requirements
139:Industrial applicability
520:46716 (August 21, 2007)
399:likelihood of confusion
540:. Lauchman Group 2002
406:, 6 U.S.P.Q.2d 1635.
595:MPEP, section 706.07
70:Procedural concepts
538:lauchmangroup.com/
436:patent application
175:Unity of invention
434:in response to a
340:
339:
666:
622:
616:
610:
604:
598:
592:
586:
580:
574:
568:
562:
556:
550:
549:
547:
545:
535:
527:
521:
518:Federal Register
514:
332:
325:
318:
26:
674:
673:
669:
668:
667:
665:
664:
663:
639:
638:
630:
625:
619:37 C.F.R. 1.114
617:
613:
607:37 C.F.R. 1.113
605:
601:
593:
589:
581:
577:
569:
565:
557:
553:
543:
541:
533:
529:
528:
524:
515:
511:
507:
490:
432:patent examiner
424:
380:
375:
336:
289:Patent analysis
253:Business method
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
672:
670:
662:
661:
656:
651:
641:
640:
637:
636:
629:
628:External links
626:
624:
623:
611:
599:
587:
575:
563:
551:
522:
508:
506:
503:
502:
501:
496:
489:
486:
423:
420:
416:filing refusal
379:
376:
374:
371:
338:
337:
335:
334:
327:
320:
312:
309:
308:
307:
306:
301:
296:
291:
283:
282:
278:
277:
276:
275:
270:
265:
260:
255:
250:
242:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
229:
224:
219:
214:
209:
204:
199:
194:
185:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
172:
164:
163:
159:
158:
157:
156:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
113:
112:
108:
107:
106:
105:
100:
95:
90:
85:
80:
72:
71:
67:
66:
65:
64:
59:
54:
49:
44:
36:
35:
31:
30:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
671:
660:
657:
655:
652:
650:
647:
646:
644:
635:
632:
631:
627:
620:
615:
612:
608:
603:
600:
596:
591:
588:
584:
579:
576:
572:
567:
564:
560:
555:
552:
539:
532:
526:
523:
519:
513:
510:
504:
500:
497:
495:
494:Search report
492:
491:
487:
485:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
455:
453:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
421:
419:
417:
413:
407:
405:
400:
395:
393:
389:
385:
378:Trademark law
377:
373:United States
372:
370:
368:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:Office action
333:
328:
326:
321:
319:
314:
313:
311:
310:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
286:
285:
284:
279:
274:
271:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
238:
233:
232:United States
230:
228:
225:
223:
220:
218:
215:
213:
210:
208:
205:
203:
200:
198:
195:
192:
189:
188:
187:
186:
181:
176:
173:
171:
168:
167:
166:
165:
160:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
116:
115:
114:
109:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
79:
76:
75:
74:
73:
68:
63:
60:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:
45:
43:
40:
39:
38:
37:
32:
27:
22:
614:
602:
590:
578:
566:
554:
542:. Retrieved
537:
525:
517:
512:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
458:
456:
448:
425:
415:
408:
403:
396:
381:
366:
364:
343:
341:
294:Pirate Party
124:Inventorship
103:Infringement
47:Patent claim
227:Netherlands
83:Prosecution
78:Application
643:Categories
544:2 December
505:References
422:Patent law
248:Biological
88:Opposition
29:Patent law
440:prior art
360:trademark
352:trademark
263:Insurance
197:Australia
154:Prior art
98:Licensing
93:Valuation
62:Criticism
57:Economics
34:Overviews
488:See also
484:erits".
390:for the
388:examiner
304:Glossary
299:Category
281:See also
268:Software
258:Chemical
369:ffice.
217:Germany
144:Utility
129:Novelty
52:History
480:n the
476:ction
444:claims
356:patent
348:patent
212:Europe
202:Canada
42:Patent
534:(PDF)
472:irst
222:Japan
207:China
193:(PCT)
546:2016
466:FAOM
426:In
382:In
358:or
350:or
273:Tax
645::
536:.
418:.
621:.
609:.
597:.
585:.
573:.
561:.
548:.
482:m
478:o
474:a
470:f
367:O
331:e
324:t
317:v
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.