Knowledge (XXG)

One-repetition maximum

Source 📝

94: 78:
between this weight and the next highest attempted weight. This type of assessment is considered the most accurate way to determine 1RM, and is considered safe when performed correctly. However, as adequate rest must be given between attempts, proper 1RM assessment may be very time-consuming if the initial weight is far from the 1RM.
982:
Compared to a formal 1RM test, the submaximal estimation method is safer and quicker. The estimate may not be accurate, but can be used as the starting point for a 1RM test. The formulas can also be used the other way, to calculate what weight is needed for a given repetition maximum, as a percent of
101:
The 1RM can also be estimated indirectly using repetition testing on submaximal loads, as popularized by the use of 1RM calculators. Although in many cases the estimate is reasonable, in other cases the estimate may vary by 10% or more from the actual 1RM. Using a specialized formula for the specific
975:
Of the formulas, the Epley and the Brzycki formulas are most commonly used. Epley and Brzycki return identical results for 10 repetitions. However, for fewer than 10 reps, Epley returns a slightly higher estimated maximum. For example, if a person can lift 100 pounds on a given exercise for 10 reps,
77:
Most commonly, 1RM is determined directly using trial and error testing. The participant lifts progressively heavier free weights, resting for several minutes between each attempt, until the maximum weight for which the participant can complete one full repetition is determined. The 1RM then lies
60:
One repetition maximum can also be used as an upper limit, in order to determine the desired "load" for an exercise (as a percentage of the 1RM). Weight training protocols often use 1RM when programming to ensure the exerciser reaches resistance overload, especially when the exercise objective is
106:
variables such as gender, age, height, weight, body fat percentage, and girth does not improve accuracy. Also, most formulas are for experienced weightlifters, and novices may find their actual one rep maximum is much lower because their nervous system cannot handle the stress of a high weight.
1161: 374: 976:
the estimated one rep max would be 133 pounds for both formulae. However, if the person were to complete only 6 reps, then Epley would estimate a one rep maximum of approximately 120 pounds, while Brzycki would return an estimate of approximately 116 pounds.
648: 968: 797: 528: 854: 698: 276: 41:
is the maximum amount of weight that a person can possibly lift for one repetition. It may also be considered as the maximum amount of force that can be generated in one maximal contraction.
905: 424: 239: 81:
Novices may find the procedure intimidating and unnerving, and be reluctant to add weight. There is also a risk of injury if a participant is unfamiliar with the proper form. A
572: 471: 1465:
Lesuer, DA, Mccormick, JH, Mayhew, JL; et al. (1997). "The accuracy of prediction equations for estimating 1-RM performance in the bench press, squat, and deadlift".
1394:
McNair, P.J.; Colvin, M.; Reid, D. (February 2011). "Predicting maximal strength of quadriceps from submaximal performance in individuals with knee joint osteoarthritis".
734: 1484: 265: 168: 148: 128: 1492:
Campanholi Neto, José; Cedin, Luísa; Dato, Carla Cristina; Rodrigues Bertucci, Danilo; de Andrade Perez, Sérgio Eduardo; Baldissera, Vilmar (Jun 2015).
979:
Several more complex formulae have been proposed which use different coefficients for different rep numbers and sometimes even for different exercises.
49:
One repetition maximum can be used for determining an individual's maximum strength and is the method for determining the winner in events such as
1089: 1234: 1446: 1020: 1041:"Accuracy of Prediction Equations for Determining One Repetition Maximum Bench Press in Women Before and After Resistance Training" 583: 916: 745: 482: 369:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {36}{37-r}}={\frac {w}{{\frac {37}{36}}-{\frac {1}{36}}r}}\approx {\frac {w}{1.0278-0.0278r}}} 808: 659: 1121:"The 225–1b Reps-to-Fatigue Test as a Submaximal Estimate of 1-RM Bench Press Performance in College Football Players" 1338:
LeSuer, Dale A.; McCormick, James H.; Mayhew, Jerry L.; Wasserstein, Ronald L.; Arnold, Michael D. (November 1997).
82: 865: 385: 1525: 1340:"The Accuracy of Prediction Equations for Estimating 1-RM Performance in the Bench Press, Squat, and Deadlift" 192: 1162:"Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry" 1039:
Mayhew, Jerry L; Johnson, Blair D; LaMonte, Michael J; Lauber, Dirk; Kemmler, Wolfgang (September 2008).
66: 1478: 54: 539: 435: 20: 1494:"A Single Session of Testing for One Repetition Maximum (1RM) with Eight Exercises is Trustworthy" 1305:
Naclerio Ayllón, Fernando; Jiménez Gutiérrez, Alfonso; Alvar, Brent A.; Peterson, Mark D. (2009).
1419: 1361: 1287: 1192: 1142: 1070: 110:
There are many formulas used to estimate 1RM using the submaximal method. In the formulas below,
62: 709: 93: 1504: 1442: 1411: 1279: 1271: 1230: 1184: 1062: 1016: 244: 97:
This chart compares the different formulas. The formulas greatly diverge after about 10 reps.
1403: 1351: 1318: 1263: 1176: 1132: 1052: 1493: 992: 38: 1250:
Kemmler, Wolfgang K.; Lauber, Dirk; Wassermann, Alfred; Mayhew, Jerry L. (2006-11-01).
153: 133: 113: 1519: 1423: 1365: 1356: 1339: 1146: 1137: 1120: 103: 1291: 1196: 1074: 50: 1057: 1040: 65:. By understanding the maximal potential of the muscle, it is possible to reach 1508: 1275: 1323: 1306: 1251: 1415: 1283: 1188: 1119:
Chapman, Paul P.; Whitehead, James R.; Binkert, Ronald H. (November 1998).
1066: 170:
is a factor of each formula, so the unit of measurement doesn't matter).
1407: 1267: 1180: 1088:
Knutzen, Kathleen; Brilla, Lorraine; Caine, Dennis (August 1999).
92: 1381:
Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, 2nd edition
1252:"Predicting maximal strength in trained postmenopausal woman" 643:{\displaystyle w(0.988+0.0104r+0.00190r^{2}-0.0000584r^{3})} 963:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{0.4880+0.538e^{-0.075r}}}} 1439:
The essential guide to fitness: for the fitness instructor
1013:
The essential guide to fitness: for the fitness instructor
792:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{0.522+0.419e^{-0.055r}}}} 69:
by increasing the number of repetitions for an exercise.
1090:"Validity of 1RM Prediction Equations for Older Adults" 523:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{1.0261e^{-0.0262r}}}} 1307:"Assessing strength and power in resistance training" 1160:
Reynolds, JM; Gordon, TJ; Robergs, RA (August 2006).
919: 868: 811: 748: 712: 662: 586: 542: 485: 438: 388: 279: 247: 195: 156: 136: 116: 1441:. Sydney, NSW: Pearson Australia. pp. 158–159. 849:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{0.951e^{-0.021r}}}} 693:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{1.013-0.0267123r}}} 1094:
The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
962: 899: 848: 791: 728: 692: 642: 566: 522: 465: 418: 368: 259: 233: 162: 142: 122: 1383:. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. p. 395-425. 1015:. Sydney, NSW: Pearson Australia. p. 135. 19:"1RM" redirects here. Not to be confused with 1344:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1256:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1169:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1125:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 1045:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 8: 1483:: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( 1214:. Lincoln, NE: Body Enterprises. p. 86. 1034: 1032: 900:{\displaystyle w\cdot \left(1+0.025r\right)} 419:{\displaystyle w\cdot {\frac {1}{1-0.02r}}} 130:is the number of repetitions performed and 1437:Marchese, Rosemary; Hill, Andrew (2011). 1355: 1322: 1227:A Practical Approach To Strength Training 1136: 1056: 1011:Marchese, Rosemary; Hill, Andrew (2011). 945: 926: 918: 867: 831: 818: 810: 774: 755: 747: 720: 711: 669: 661: 631: 615: 585: 541: 505: 492: 484: 437: 395: 387: 345: 326: 313: 307: 286: 278: 246: 218: 213: 194: 155: 135: 115: 16:Maximum weight that can be lifted at once 172: 150:is the amount of weight used (note that 1003: 234:{\displaystyle w\left(1+r/{30}\right),} 102:exercise improves accuracy. The use of 1476: 1210:Epley, Boyd (1985). "Poundage Chart". 1501:Journal of Exercise Physiology Online 7: 1311:Journal of Human Sport and Exercise 1100:(3): Vol 13, Issue 3, Page 242–246 14: 567:{\displaystyle w(0.9849+0.0328r)} 466:{\displaystyle w\cdot (1+0.033r)} 1357:10.1519/00124278-199711000-00001 1138:10.1519/00124278-199811000-00010 61:muscular strength, endurance or 637: 590: 561: 546: 460: 445: 85:can alleviate these concerns. 1: 1396:Arthritis Care & Research 1379:Earle; Baechle, eds. (2000). 983:the estimated or actual 1RM. 1058:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817b02ad 174:Formulas for estimating 1RM 1542: 18: 729:{\displaystyle wr^{0.10}} 1324:10.4100/jhse.2009.42.04 260:{\displaystyle r>1.} 1225:Brzycki, Matt (1998). 964: 901: 850: 793: 730: 694: 644: 568: 524: 467: 420: 370: 261: 235: 164: 144: 124: 98: 27:One-repetition maximum 965: 902: 851: 794: 731: 695: 645: 569: 525: 468: 421: 371: 262: 236: 165: 145: 125: 96: 917: 866: 809: 746: 710: 660: 584: 540: 483: 436: 386: 277: 245: 193: 154: 134: 114: 1467:J Strength Cond Res 175: 67:resistance overload 1212:Boyd Epley Workout 960: 897: 846: 789: 726: 690: 640: 564: 520: 463: 416: 366: 257: 231: 173: 160: 140: 120: 99: 1408:10.1002/acr.20368 1268:10.1519/R-18905.1 1236:978-1-57028-018-4 1181:10.1519/R-15304.1 973: 972: 958: 844: 787: 688: 518: 414: 364: 340: 334: 321: 302: 163:{\displaystyle w} 143:{\displaystyle w} 123:{\displaystyle r} 1533: 1512: 1498: 1488: 1482: 1474: 1453: 1452: 1434: 1428: 1427: 1391: 1385: 1384: 1376: 1370: 1369: 1359: 1335: 1329: 1328: 1326: 1302: 1296: 1295: 1247: 1241: 1240: 1222: 1216: 1215: 1207: 1201: 1200: 1166: 1157: 1151: 1150: 1140: 1116: 1110: 1109: 1107: 1105: 1085: 1079: 1078: 1060: 1051:(5): 1570–1577. 1036: 1027: 1026: 1008: 969: 967: 966: 961: 959: 957: 956: 955: 927: 906: 904: 903: 898: 896: 892: 855: 853: 852: 847: 845: 843: 842: 841: 819: 798: 796: 795: 790: 788: 786: 785: 784: 756: 735: 733: 732: 727: 725: 724: 699: 697: 696: 691: 689: 687: 670: 649: 647: 646: 641: 636: 635: 620: 619: 573: 571: 570: 565: 529: 527: 526: 521: 519: 517: 516: 515: 493: 472: 470: 469: 464: 425: 423: 422: 417: 415: 413: 396: 375: 373: 372: 367: 365: 363: 346: 341: 339: 335: 327: 322: 314: 308: 303: 301: 287: 266: 264: 263: 258: 240: 238: 237: 232: 227: 223: 222: 217: 176: 169: 167: 166: 161: 149: 147: 146: 141: 129: 127: 126: 121: 1541: 1540: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1526:Weight training 1516: 1515: 1496: 1491: 1475: 1464: 1461: 1459:Further reading 1456: 1449: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1337: 1336: 1332: 1304: 1303: 1299: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1237: 1229:. McGraw-Hill. 1224: 1223: 1219: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1164: 1159: 1158: 1154: 1118: 1117: 1113: 1103: 1101: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1038: 1037: 1030: 1023: 1010: 1009: 1005: 1001: 993:Weight training 989: 941: 931: 915: 914: 879: 875: 864: 863: 860:O'Conner et al. 827: 823: 807: 806: 803:Naclerio et al. 770: 760: 744: 743: 716: 708: 707: 674: 658: 657: 627: 611: 582: 581: 578:Kemmler et al. 538: 537: 501: 497: 481: 480: 434: 433: 400: 384: 383: 350: 312: 291: 275: 274: 243: 242: 203: 199: 191: 190: 152: 151: 132: 131: 112: 111: 91: 75: 57:competitions. 47: 39:weight training 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1539: 1537: 1529: 1528: 1518: 1517: 1514: 1513: 1489: 1460: 1457: 1455: 1454: 1447: 1429: 1402:(2): 216–222. 1386: 1371: 1350:(4): 211–213. 1330: 1317:(2): 100–113. 1297: 1262:(4): 838–842. 1242: 1235: 1217: 1202: 1152: 1131:(4): 258–261. 1111: 1080: 1028: 1021: 1002: 1000: 997: 996: 995: 988: 985: 971: 970: 954: 951: 948: 944: 940: 937: 934: 930: 925: 922: 912: 908: 907: 895: 891: 888: 885: 882: 878: 874: 871: 861: 857: 856: 840: 837: 834: 830: 826: 822: 817: 814: 804: 800: 799: 783: 780: 777: 773: 769: 766: 763: 759: 754: 751: 741: 737: 736: 723: 719: 715: 705: 701: 700: 686: 683: 680: 677: 673: 668: 665: 655: 651: 650: 639: 634: 630: 626: 623: 618: 614: 610: 607: 604: 601: 598: 595: 592: 589: 579: 575: 574: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 548: 545: 535: 531: 530: 514: 511: 508: 504: 500: 496: 491: 488: 478: 474: 473: 462: 459: 456: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 431: 427: 426: 412: 409: 406: 403: 399: 394: 391: 381: 377: 376: 362: 359: 356: 353: 349: 344: 338: 333: 330: 325: 320: 317: 311: 306: 300: 297: 294: 290: 285: 282: 272: 268: 267: 256: 253: 250: 230: 226: 221: 216: 212: 209: 206: 202: 198: 188: 184: 183: 180: 159: 139: 119: 104:anthropometric 90: 89:Estimating 1RM 87: 74: 71: 46: 43: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1538: 1527: 1524: 1523: 1521: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1495: 1490: 1486: 1480: 1472: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1450: 1448:9781442510203 1444: 1440: 1433: 1430: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1390: 1387: 1382: 1375: 1372: 1367: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1334: 1331: 1325: 1320: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1301: 1298: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1246: 1243: 1238: 1232: 1228: 1221: 1218: 1213: 1206: 1203: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1175:(3): 584–92. 1174: 1170: 1163: 1156: 1153: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1115: 1112: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1084: 1081: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1024: 1022:9781442510203 1018: 1014: 1007: 1004: 998: 994: 991: 990: 986: 984: 980: 977: 952: 949: 946: 942: 938: 935: 932: 928: 923: 920: 913: 910: 909: 893: 889: 886: 883: 880: 876: 872: 869: 862: 859: 858: 838: 835: 832: 828: 824: 820: 815: 812: 805: 802: 801: 781: 778: 775: 771: 767: 764: 761: 757: 752: 749: 742: 740:Mayhew et al. 739: 738: 721: 717: 713: 706: 703: 702: 684: 681: 678: 675: 671: 666: 663: 656: 653: 652: 632: 628: 624: 621: 616: 612: 608: 605: 602: 599: 596: 593: 587: 580: 577: 576: 558: 555: 552: 549: 543: 536: 533: 532: 512: 509: 506: 502: 498: 494: 489: 486: 479: 476: 475: 457: 454: 451: 448: 442: 439: 432: 429: 428: 410: 407: 404: 401: 397: 392: 389: 382: 379: 378: 360: 357: 354: 351: 347: 342: 336: 331: 328: 323: 318: 315: 309: 304: 298: 295: 292: 288: 283: 280: 273: 270: 269: 254: 251: 248: 228: 224: 219: 214: 210: 207: 204: 200: 196: 189: 186: 185: 181: 178: 177: 171: 157: 137: 117: 108: 105: 95: 88: 86: 84: 79: 73:Measuring 1RM 72: 70: 68: 64: 58: 56: 55:weightlifting 52: 44: 42: 40: 36: 32: 28: 22: 1500: 1479:cite journal 1470: 1466: 1438: 1432: 1399: 1395: 1389: 1380: 1374: 1347: 1343: 1333: 1314: 1310: 1300: 1259: 1255: 1245: 1226: 1220: 1211: 1205: 1172: 1168: 1155: 1128: 1124: 1114: 1102:. Retrieved 1097: 1093: 1083: 1048: 1044: 1012: 1006: 981: 978: 974: 182:1RM Formula 109: 100: 80: 76: 59: 51:powerlifting 48: 34: 30: 26: 25: 63:hypertrophy 31:one-rep max 1473:: 211–213. 999:References 1509:1097-9751 1424:205221382 1366:144001941 1276:1064-8011 1147:220562559 947:− 924:⋅ 873:⋅ 833:− 816:⋅ 776:− 753:⋅ 682:0.0267123 679:− 667:⋅ 625:0.0000584 622:− 507:− 490:⋅ 443:⋅ 405:− 393:⋅ 355:− 343:≈ 324:− 296:− 284:⋅ 241:assuming 1520:Category 1416:20890972 1292:12769411 1284:17194251 1197:17050039 1189:16937972 1075:22631870 1067:18714230 987:See also 704:Lombardi 1104:11 July 654:Landers 609:0.00190 430:Baechle 271:Brzycki 83:spotter 1507:  1445:  1422:  1414:  1364:  1290:  1282:  1274:  1233:  1195:  1187:  1145:  1073:  1065:  1019:  933:0.4880 911:Wathen 600:0.0104 556:0.0328 550:0.9849 510:0.0262 499:1.0261 477:Berger 358:0.0278 352:1.0278 1497:(PDF) 1420:S2CID 1362:S2CID 1288:S2CID 1193:S2CID 1165:(PDF) 1143:S2CID 1071:S2CID 950:0.075 939:0.538 887:0.025 836:0.021 825:0.951 779:0.055 768:0.419 762:0.522 676:1.013 594:0.988 534:Brown 455:0.033 380:Adams 187:Epley 45:Usage 37:) in 1505:ISSN 1485:link 1443:ISBN 1412:PMID 1280:PMID 1272:ISSN 1231:ISBN 1185:PMID 1106:2014 1063:PMID 1017:ISBN 722:0.10 408:0.02 252:> 179:Name 53:and 1404:doi 1352:doi 1319:doi 1264:doi 1177:doi 1133:doi 1053:doi 35:1RM 33:or 21:RM1 1522:: 1503:. 1499:. 1481:}} 1477:{{ 1471:11 1469:. 1418:. 1410:. 1400:63 1398:. 1360:. 1348:11 1346:. 1342:. 1313:. 1309:. 1286:. 1278:. 1270:. 1260:20 1258:. 1254:. 1191:. 1183:. 1173:20 1171:. 1167:. 1141:. 1129:12 1127:. 1123:. 1098:13 1096:. 1092:. 1069:. 1061:. 1049:22 1047:. 1043:. 1031:^ 332:36 319:36 316:37 293:37 289:36 255:1. 220:30 1511:. 1487:) 1451:. 1426:. 1406:: 1368:. 1354:: 1327:. 1321:: 1315:4 1294:. 1266:: 1239:. 1199:. 1179:: 1149:. 1135:: 1108:. 1077:. 1055:: 1025:. 953:r 943:e 936:+ 929:1 921:w 894:) 890:r 884:+ 881:1 877:( 870:w 839:r 829:e 821:1 813:w 782:r 772:e 765:+ 758:1 750:w 718:r 714:w 685:r 672:1 664:w 638:) 633:3 629:r 617:2 613:r 606:+ 603:r 597:+ 591:( 588:w 562:) 559:r 553:+ 547:( 544:w 513:r 503:e 495:1 487:w 461:) 458:r 452:+ 449:1 446:( 440:w 411:r 402:1 398:1 390:w 361:r 348:w 337:r 329:1 310:w 305:= 299:r 281:w 249:r 229:, 225:) 215:/ 211:r 208:+ 205:1 201:( 197:w 158:w 138:w 118:r 29:( 23:.

Index

RM1
weight training
powerlifting
weightlifting
hypertrophy
resistance overload
spotter

anthropometric
Weight training
ISBN
9781442510203


"Accuracy of Prediction Equations for Determining One Repetition Maximum Bench Press in Women Before and After Resistance Training"
doi
10.1519/JSC.0b013e31817b02ad
PMID
18714230
S2CID
22631870
"Validity of 1RM Prediction Equations for Older Adults"
"The 225–1b Reps-to-Fatigue Test as a Submaximal Estimate of 1-RM Bench Press Performance in College Football Players"
doi
10.1519/00124278-199811000-00010
S2CID
220562559
"Prediction of one repetition maximum strength from multiple repetition maximum testing and anthropometry"
doi
10.1519/R-15304.1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.