Knowledge (XXG)

Orphan film

Source 📝

130:
context. Orphan Film Symposium I was entitled “Orphans of the Storm: Saving Orphan Films in the Digital Age” and was held in September 1999. Orphan Film Symposium II, “Documenting the 20th Century,” was held in March 2001; Orphan Film Symposium III, “Sound/Music/Voice: Listening to Orphan Films,” in September 2002; and Orphan Film Symposium IV, “On Location: Place and Region in Forgotten Films,” in March 2004. These four symposia have functioned to generate new research and curatorial activities and have lent increased visibility to the orphan film cause. They have also provided a significant academic and curatorial context for amateur film research. The Orphan Film symposia, together with an important presence for orphan, amateur, and small-gauge films within the Association of Moving Image Archivists throughout the 1990s and afterward, suggest the coalescing of various international and regional movements to look more closely at these subaltern cinemas.
67:, orphan films are those “that lack either clear copyright holders or commercial potential” to pay for their preservation. However, a much wider group of works fall under the orphan rubric when the term is expanded to refer to all manner of films that have been neglected. The neglect might be physical (a deteriorated film print), commercial (an unreleased movie), cultural (censored footage), historical (a forgotten World War I-era production) or technical (footage from television commercials and series or music videos). 248:, Federation Internationale Des Associations De Producteurs De Films, and the International Federation Of Film Distributors. In 2010, the Association of European Film Archives and Cinematheques carried out a survey among its members to assess the dimension of orphan films. According to this survey, more than 210,000 films preserved in Europe's Film Archives are considered orphan. In October 2012, the EU adopted the Orphan Works 74:(1994), the Librarian of Congress enumerated newsreels, actuality footage, silent films, experimental works, home movies, independent fiction and documentary films, political commercials, amateur footage, along with advertising, educational and industrial films as culturally significant orphans. To this the National Film Preservation Foundation adds animation, ethnic films, anthropological footage, and fragments. (See 212:
working quite separately in different nations have used the orphan metaphor for a decade. At the Cinemateca de Cuba, for example, the term "huérfanos" has been used to conceptualize the lost and abandoned works of Cuban film history, its "orfandad." The Nederlands Filmmuseum preserves and programs its "Bits & Pieces" series of unidentified film fragments, its "foundlings." The
162: 157:
In 2001, members of these academic-archival professions began referring to an “orphan film movement.” As archivist-scholar Caroline Frick has written, some of the most active participants identify themselves as “orphanistas,” passionate advocates for saving, studying, and screening neglected cinema.
256:
is addressing copyright, access, and preservation issues via FORWARD, a three-year project (2013-2016) to create a registry of orphan films. Officially termed "Framework for a EU-wide Audiovisual Orphan Works Registry," the project aims to create simplified process for determining the rights status
211:
Although U.S. copyright stakeholders confine their discussion to the narrower definition of an orphan (a work with no identifiable rightsholder or whose rights holder cannot be located), the broader conception—an orphan film as a neglected object—continues to be used internationally. Film archivists
219:
Another indication of the international interest in orphan films was filmmaker Martin Scorsese's announcement of a World Cinema Foundation (WCF) at the 2007 Cannes Film Festival. Press reports stated that the WCF would preserve "orphan" films. By 2008, however, the WCF's mission statement referred
109:
The resurgent interest in these films is due to their value as cultural and historical artifacts. Documentarians, filmmakers, historians, curators, collectors and scholars have joined forces with archivists because they deem orphans not only historical documents, but also evidence of alternative,
46:
The exact origin of the term orphan film is unclear. By the 1990s, however, film archivists were commonly using this colloquialism to refer to motion pictures abandoned by their owners. Before the end of the decade, the phrase emerged as the governing metaphor for film preservation, first in the
235:
which stated "FIAF supports efforts to clarify the legal status of 'orphan' motion pictures and related promotional and historical materials for the purpose of preservation and public access." Shortly thereafter, on June 4, 2008, the European Union announced the signing of a new "Memorandum of
129:
In 1999, film historian Dan Streible and several other interdisciplinary faculty members at the University of South Carolina initiated a symposium on orphan films that drew together archivists, film historians, artists, curators, and other to discuss and screen works within a rigorous scholarly
323:
Gregory Lukow, "The Politics of Orphanage: The Rise and Impact of the 'Orphan Film' Metaphor on Contemporary Preservation Practice", paper delivered at the University of South Carolina symposium, "Orphans of the Storm: Saving Orphan Films in the Digital Age", September 23, 1999.
332:
magazine referred to 16mm industrial sales movies as orphan films. Restoration expert Robert Gitt was quoted using the metaphor as early as 1992, to refer to silent-era films, newsreels, and kinescopes. Robert Epstein, “Mining Hollywood's Old Movie Gold,”
142:. Orphans 6, 7, and 8 took place in New York City. The 2008 symposium focused on neglected films and videos by, about, against, and under "the state." The 2010 edition, "Moving Pictures Around the World," included speakers from 17 nations. In 2012, 167: 166: 163: 168: 236:
Understanding" on orphan works. The EU's Digital Libraries Initiative produced the statement. Signatories included key institutions in moving image archiving and representatives of rightsholders: Association Des Cinematheques Europeennes -
554:. "What Is an Orphan Film? Definition, Rationale, Controversy." Paper delivered at the symposium "Orphans of the Storm: Saving Orphan Films in the Digital Age", University of South Carolina, September 23, 1999. Transcript at 165: 85:(2004), for example, Timothy Corrigan and Patricia White include a section on orphan films, defining them simply as "Any sort of films that have survived but have no commercial interests to pay the costs of their preservation." 191:
More pragmatically, in the United States the group's rising influence affected discourse and policies about copyright reform, joining the broader media reform movement. Examples of this include the 2003 Supreme Court case
88:
Defined in this way, more films are orphans than not. Many are more accurately described as “footage,” recordings shot on celluloid but not intended to be completed works or theatrical releases. The millions of feet of
208:
passed a bill (S.2913) "to provide a limitation on judicial remedies in copyright infringement cases involving orphan works," but the House of Representatives adjourned before addressing the measure.
220:
only to "neglected" films rather than orphans, as the foundation helps fund preservation of lesser known theatrical motion pictures, which remain under the legal ownership of some party.
237: 1140:, Internet Archive. Created May 3, 2010; last updated July 4, 2022. Audiovisual documentation generated at the Orphan Film Symposium and miscellaneous short orphan films and videos. 164: 1065: 150:
hosted Orphans 9 ("The Future of Obsolescence," 2014) in Amsterdam, attracting attendees from 30 nations. Orphans 10 ("Sound," 2016) convened at the Library of Congress
1072:
Van Gompel, Stef; Hugenholtz, P. Bernt (2010). "The Orphan Works Problem: The Copyright Conundrum of Digitizing Large-Scale Audiovisual Archives, and How to Solve It".
1101: 504: 151: 252:
which legally allows the (online) use of orphan works across Europe, provided that a search for the rights holder has been carried before. Currently, the
143: 228: 362:
Redefining Film Preservation: A National Plan; Recommendations of the Librarian Of Congress in Consultation with the National Film Preservation Board
935: 138:
took up the project, incorporating it into the Department of Cinema Studies and its Moving Image Archiving and Preservation master's program at the
146:
in Queens co-hosted the eighth symposium, "Made to Persuade". The ninth and tenth symposiums took place at major institutions outside of New York.
245: 647:
de Klerk, Nico. "Entwurf eines Heims. 'Orphan Films' im Werk Gustav Deutsch / Designing a Home: Orphan Films in the Work of Gustav Deutsch." In
285: 158:
In 2004, visual anthropologist Emily Cohen wrote that the movement's creative and intellectual ferment constituted an “Orphanista Manifesto.”
422: 886:
Devin Orgeron (2008). "Conference Report: Orphans Take Manhattan: The 6th Biannual Orphan Film Symposium, March 26–29, 2008, New York City".
290: 183:(NYU professor of cinema studies) answer the questions "What is an orphan film?" and "What is the Orphan Film Symposium?" (Recorded at the 134:
After the fifth Orphan Film Symposium ("Science, Industry & Education") took place at the University of South Carolina (March 2006),
224:
In 2013 the foundation proper was renamed the World Cinema Project, which is overseen by The Film Foundation Scorsese created in 1990.
519:, submission to the Copyright Office, from the Center for the Study of the Public Domain, Duke University Law School, March 2005. 433:(Oxford University Press, forthcoming); Emily Cohen, “The Orphanista Manifesto: Orphan Films and the Politics of Reproduction,” 232: 147: 514: 931: 380:(Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2004), 391–98. They add to the list of orphaned genres government-produced films, citing 184: 347:
Film Preservation 1993: A Study of the Current State of American Film Preservation: Report of the Librarian Of Congress
1175: 737:
Horak, Jan-Christopher (2005). "The Strange Case of the Fall of Jerusalem : Orphans and Film Identification".
462: 1149: 476: 968:
Schwartz, Eric J.; Williams, Matt. (2007). "Access to Orphan Works: Copyright Law, Preservation, and Politics".
942: 698: 139: 20: 523:
Dylan Cave (2008). ""Born Digital"—Raised an Orphan?: Acquiring Digital Media through an Analog Paradigm".
1127:
and at the University of South Carolina (Film and Media Studies Program, College of Arts & Sciences),
774: 769:. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2012. See chapter 3, subtitled "Orphans and the Culture Wars." 122: 1180: 1124:
Orphan Film Symposium websites at New York University (Cinema Studies Dept., Tisch School of the Arts),
551: 56: 249: 1110:
Ziebell Mann, Sarah. “A Meditation on the Orphan, via the University of South Carolina Symposium,”
934:, blog, May 30, 2007. Republished as "Prelinger Manifesto: On the Virtues of Preexisting Material," 652: 419: 135: 952: 1089: 833: 797: 754: 725: 683: 605: 540: 325: 275: 213: 194: 176: 55:
Historians and archivists define the term in both a narrow and a broad sense. A report from the
617:
Cohen, Emily (2004). "The Orphanista Manifesto: Orphan Films and the Politics of Reproduction".
555: 694:
Frick, Caroline. 'Saving Cinema: The Politics of Preservation' (Oxford University Press, 2010).
913: 280: 1026:
Streible, Dan. “Saving, Studying, and Screening: A History of the Orphan Film Symposium.” In
1081: 1047: 1015: 994: 977: 895: 858: 825: 789: 746: 717: 675: 626: 597: 574: 532: 638: 426: 241: 816:
Longo, Regina. (2007). "Fifth Orphan Film Symposium: Science, Industry, and Education".
1030:. Edited by Alex Marlow-Mann (St. Andrews, UK: St. Andrews Film Studies, 2013), 163–76. 666:
Frick, Caroline (2008). "Beyond Hollywood: Enhancing Heritage with the 'Orphan' Film".
660:
The Public Domain: How to Find & Use Copyright-free Writing, Music, Art, & More
448: 389: 253: 172: 31: 1169: 1093: 998: 837: 801: 758: 729: 687: 609: 544: 364:, coordinated by Annette Melville and Scott Simmon, Washington, DC: NFPB/LOC, 1994. 180: 98: 1100:
Wilson, Rachel. "Moving Pictures Around the World: The 7th Orphan Film Symposium,"
295: 270: 70:
This broader conception is typically illustrated by a list of orphaned genres. In
64: 1137: 1131: 960:
Ruffino, Paul. “Orphan Films: Neglecting Festival Jewels - The Forgotten Films,”
38:
holder. The term can also sometimes refer to any film that has suffered neglect.
1134:. These sites include audio and video recordings of talks given at the symposia. 300: 205: 90: 1006:
Streible, Dan. (2007). "The Role of Orphan Films in the 21st Century Archive".
1085: 679: 630: 388:
as part of the Prelinger Collection of “ephemeral films.” Collector-activist
808:
Libby, Jenn. "Foundling Films: Orphans 5: Science, Industry and Education",
1159:
Orphaned Entertainment Podcast - Reviews public domain and orphaned films -
1060:
Tynes, Teri. "*Gustav Deutsch and the Art of Found Footage.” Originally for
793: 392:
is one of the people most responsible for raising awareness of orphan films.
35: 775:"Gathering in the orphans: Essay films and archives in the information age" 588:
Coffey, Liz (2003). "Orphans of the Storm III: Listening to Orphan Films".
385: 829: 750: 721: 699:"Adventures in Preservation: A Report from the 7th Orphan Film Symposium," 601: 477:"ACE Orphan Works Survey | Association des CinémathÚques Européennes" 349:, by Annette Melville and Scott Simmon, Washington, DC: NFPB/LOC, 1993. 1019: 981: 416:
Restoration Nation: Motion Picture Archives and 'American' Film Heritage
94: 1160: 1052: 1035: 579: 562: 536: 505:"Three Questions for Cullen Gallagher About the Orphan Film Symposium," 221: 81:
Within a decade the epithet was adopted by scholars and educators. In
899: 878:“Orphans No More: Ephemeral Films and American Culture,” issue of the 863: 846: 767:
The Past Is a Moving Picture: Preserving the Twentieth Century on Film
480: 446:
Dan Streible, "The Role of Orphan Films in the 21st Century Archive,"
350: 113:
Since 1999, hundreds of these devotees have gathered for the biennial
365: 639:“Orphanistas! Academics and Amateurs Unite to Save the Orphan Film,” 199: 97:
alone outnumber the quantity of film stock used to make all of the
1143: 1128: 954:
Vectors: Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular
160: 75: 906:“‘Orphan Films’ Course to Screen Eight Neglected Works at Guild,” 1154: 1125: 258: 114: 927:. San Francisco: National Film Preservation Foundation, 2006. 914:
Orphan Works and Mass Digitization: Obstacles and Opportunities
16:
Film that has been abandoned by its creator or copyright holder
875:
by Dan Streible (University of California Press, 2008), x–xvi.
326:
http://www.sc.edu/filmsymposium/archive/orphans2001/lukow.html
882:
37 (Fall 2009), ed. Elizabeth Heffelfinger and Heide Solbrig.
556:
http://www.sc.edu/filmsymposium/archive/orphans2001/usai.html
216:
in Beijing uses a translatable orphan film metaphor as well.
403:
Mining the Home Movie: Excavations in Histories and Memories
930:
Prelinger, Rick. "On the Virtues of Preexisting Material,"
563:"Are All (Analog) Films "Orphans"?: A Predigital Appraisal" 951:
Prelinger, Rick, with Raegan Kelly. “Panorama Ephemera,”
405:(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008), 12–13. 63:
offered a first definition. As a category of so-called
1150:
Association of European Film Archives and Cinematheques
246:
Federation Europeenne Des Realisateurs De L'audiovisuel
238:
Association of European Film Archives and Cinematheques
708:
Horak, Jan-Christopher. (2006). "Editor's Foreword".
19:
For films named "Orphan" or with similar titles, see
873:
Fight Pictures: A History of Boxing and Early Cinema
401:Karen L. Ishizuka and Patricia R. Zimmermann, eds. 384:(1952) This film is viewable as a digital file at 1036:"The State of Orphan Films: Editor's Introduction" 1028:Film Festival Yearbook 5: Archival Film Festivals 418:, PhD diss. University of Texas at Austin, 2005, 1132:http://www.sc.edu/filmsymposium/orphanfilm.html 1066:footage.html Access via the filmmaker’s website 127: 382:What You Should Know about Biological Warfare 110:suppressed, minority or forgotten histories. 72:Redefining Film Preservation: A National Plan 34:work that has been abandoned by its owner or 8: 1064:(Tribeca Film Institute blog), May 6, 2009. 431:Saving Cinema: The Politics of Preservation, 152:Packard Campus for Audio-Visual Conservation 847:"Discovering Union Films and Its Archives" 117:. In their introduction to the anthology 1051: 862: 668:International Journal of Heritage Studies 578: 229:International Federation of Film Archives 386:https://archive.org/details/WhatYouS1952 1130:, including "What is an orphan film?" 316: 125:assess the impact of these symposiums: 989:Streible, Dan (2013). "Orphan Films". 880:Journal of Popular Film and Television 286:Association of Moving Image Archivists 1161:https://www.orphanedentertainment.com 1144:National Film Preservation Foundation 378:The Film Experience: An Introduction 376:Timothy Corrigan and Patricia White, 291:The Texas Archive of the Moving Image 83:The Film Experience: An Introduction 47:United States, then internationally. 7: 662:, 3rd ed. Berkeley, CA: Nolo, 2006. 244:, European Film Companies Alliance, 233:"Declaration on Fair Use and Access" 101:ever released by Hollywood studios. 651:ed. Wilbirg Brainin-Donnenberg and 351:https://www.loc.gov/film/study.html 21:Orphan (disambiguation) § Film 925:The Field Guide to Sponsored Films 366:https://www.loc.gov/film/plan.html 14: 1138:Orphan Film Symposium Collection 964:, Feb. 2012 www.orphanfilms.org 918:Berkeley Technology Law Journal 655:(Vienna: SYNEMA, 2009): 113–22. 187:, March 2006) running time 2:55 999:10.1093/obo/9780199791286-0064 198:and the 2006 Copyright Office 148:EYE Film Institute Netherlands 1: 871:Musser, Charles. Foreword to 1148:Orphan Works Website of the 328:. As early as October 1950 185:University of South Carolina 561:Paolo Cherchi Usai (2009). 452:46.3 (Spring 2007): 124–28. 257:of moving image works. See 1197: 144:Museum of the Moving Image 121:(2008) Karen Ishizuka and 18: 1114:47 (Winter 2000), 30, 33. 1086:10.1080/15405700903502361 782:Journal of Media Practice 773:Kay, Olivia Lory (2010). 680:10.1080/13527250802155828 631:10.1525/aa.2004.106.4.719 204:. In September 2008, the 937:Enclosure of the Commons 845:Musser, Charles (2014). 437:(December 2004), 719–31. 140:Tisch School of the Arts 1155:FORWARD project website 920:27.3 (2012): 1251-1550. 794:10.1386/jmpr.11.3.253_1 619:American Anthropologist 435:American Anthropologist 337:, July 16, 1992, p. F1. 222:World Cinema Foundation 154:in Culpeper, Virginia. 76:"What Are Orphan Films" 61:Film Preservation 1993, 941:Feb. 23, 2010; and in 516:Access to Orphan Films 513:Boyle, James, et al. 201:Report on Orphan Works 188: 132: 1074:Popular Communication 1034:Dan Streible (2009). 991:Oxford Bibliographies 830:10.1353/mov.2007.0024 751:10.1353/mov.2005.0029 722:10.1353/mov.2007.0006 602:10.1353/mov.2003.0023 420:UT Austin library PDF 171: 119:Mining the Home Movie 115:Orphan Film Symposium 57:Librarian of Congress 1020:10.1353/cj.2007.0031 982:10.1353/cj.2007.0017 932:Black Oyster Catcher 812:(May/June 2006): 11. 702:Moving Image Source, 330:Industrial Marketing 250:Directive 2012/28/EU 658:Fishman, Stephen. 653:Michael Loebenstein 552:Cherchi Usai, Paolo 227:In April 2008, the 136:New York University 123:Patricia Zimmermann 1053:10.1353/mov.0.0024 962:OC Film Commission 923:Prelinger, Rick. 908:Los Angeles Times, 580:10.1353/mov.0.0028 537:10.1353/mov.0.0002 425:2011-06-04 at the 276:Public domain film 259:Project-FORWARD.eu 231:(FIAF) endorsed a 214:China Film Archive 195:Eldred v. Ashcroft 189: 177:Prelinger Archives 1176:Film preservation 1103:Senses of Cinema, 900:10.1353/cj.0.0086 864:10.7202/1025151ar 510:January 22, 2010. 429:, and in Frick's 335:Los Angeles Times 281:Film preservation 169: 1188: 1097: 1057: 1055: 1040:The Moving Image 1023: 1002: 985: 903: 868: 866: 857:(2–3): 125–160. 841: 818:The Moving Image 805: 779: 762: 739:The Moving Image 733: 710:The Moving Image 697:Goldsmith, Leo. 691: 644:, Apr. 26, 2001. 634: 613: 590:The Moving Image 584: 582: 567:The Moving Image 548: 525:The Moving Image 492: 491: 489: 488: 479:. Archived from 473: 467: 466: 459: 453: 444: 438: 414:Caroline Frick, 412: 406: 399: 393: 374: 368: 359: 353: 344: 338: 321: 170: 1196: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1166: 1165: 1121: 1112:AMIA Newsletter 1071: 1033: 1005: 988: 967: 885: 844: 815: 777: 772: 736: 707: 665: 649:Gustav Deutsch, 616: 587: 560: 522: 508:The L Magazine, 500: 495: 486: 484: 475: 474: 470: 461: 460: 456: 445: 441: 427:Wayback Machine 413: 409: 400: 396: 375: 371: 360: 356: 345: 341: 322: 318: 314: 309: 267: 242:British Library 161: 107: 53: 44: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1194: 1192: 1184: 1183: 1178: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1163: 1157: 1152: 1146: 1141: 1135: 1120: 1119:External links 1117: 1116: 1115: 1108: 1098: 1069: 1058: 1031: 1024: 1014:(3): 124–128. 1008:Cinema Journal 1003: 986: 976:(2): 139–145. 970:Cinema Journal 965: 958: 949: 946:magazine no. 5 928: 921: 911: 910:Nov. 23, 1979. 904: 894:(2): 114–118. 888:Cinema Journal 883: 876: 869: 842: 813: 806: 788:(3): 253–266. 770: 765:Jones, Janna. 763: 734: 705: 704:June 10, 2010. 695: 692: 674:(4): 319–331. 663: 656: 645: 637:Cullum, Paul. 635: 625:(4): 719–731. 614: 596:(2): 128–132. 585: 558: 549: 520: 511: 499: 496: 494: 493: 468: 454: 449:Cinema Journal 439: 407: 394: 390:Rick Prelinger 369: 354: 339: 315: 313: 310: 308: 305: 304: 303: 298: 293: 288: 283: 278: 273: 266: 263: 254:European Union 173:Rick Prelinger 106: 103: 52: 49: 43: 40: 32:motion picture 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1193: 1182: 1179: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1162: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1113: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 966: 963: 959: 956: 955: 950: 947: 945: 940: 938: 933: 929: 926: 922: 919: 915: 912: 909: 905: 901: 897: 893: 889: 884: 881: 877: 874: 870: 865: 860: 856: 852: 848: 843: 839: 835: 831: 827: 823: 819: 814: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 776: 771: 768: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 735: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 706: 703: 700: 696: 693: 689: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 664: 661: 657: 654: 650: 646: 643: 640: 636: 632: 628: 624: 620: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 586: 581: 576: 572: 568: 564: 559: 557: 553: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 521: 518: 517: 512: 509: 506: 502: 501: 497: 483:on 2014-11-11 482: 478: 472: 469: 464: 458: 455: 451: 450: 443: 440: 436: 432: 428: 424: 421: 417: 411: 408: 404: 398: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 373: 370: 367: 363: 358: 355: 352: 348: 343: 340: 336: 331: 327: 320: 317: 311: 306: 302: 299: 297: 294: 292: 289: 287: 284: 282: 279: 277: 274: 272: 269: 268: 264: 262: 260: 255: 251: 247: 243: 239: 234: 230: 225: 223: 217: 215: 209: 207: 203: 202: 197: 196: 186: 182: 181:Howard Besser 178: 174: 159: 155: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 131: 126: 124: 120: 116: 111: 104: 102: 100: 99:feature films 96: 93:and newsreel 92: 86: 84: 79: 77: 73: 68: 66: 62: 58: 50: 48: 41: 39: 37: 33: 29: 22: 1181:Orphan works 1111: 1102: 1077: 1073: 1061: 1043: 1039: 1027: 1011: 1007: 990: 973: 969: 961: 953: 943: 936: 924: 917: 907: 891: 887: 879: 872: 854: 850: 821: 817: 809: 785: 781: 766: 745:(2): 26–49. 742: 738: 713: 709: 701: 671: 667: 659: 648: 641: 622: 618: 593: 589: 570: 566: 528: 524: 515: 507: 503:Asch, Mark. 498:Bibliography 485:. Retrieved 481:the original 471: 457: 447: 442: 434: 430: 415: 410: 402: 397: 381: 377: 372: 361: 357: 346: 342: 334: 329: 319: 296:Alan Smithee 271:Orphan works 226: 218: 210: 200: 193: 190: 156: 133: 128: 118: 112: 108: 87: 82: 80: 71: 69: 65:orphan works 60: 54: 45: 30:photos is a 27: 25: 716:(2): vi–x. 642:L.A. Weekly 301:Abandonware 206:U.S. Senate 91:home movies 28:orphan film 1170:Categories 810:Afterimage 487:2014-08-11 307:References 51:Definition 1094:144805153 1080:: 61–71. 957:, vol. 2. 838:194009607 824:: 92–94. 802:191598793 759:191463772 730:201783292 688:143785649 610:191491354 545:191967115 312:Footnotes 36:copyright 944:Contents 573:: 1–18. 531:: 1–13. 423:Archived 265:See also 105:Movement 95:outtakes 1107:(2010). 1062:Reframe 948:(2013). 851:CinĂ©mas 463:"Sorry" 42:History 1092:  836:  800:  757:  728:  686:  608:  543:  240:, the 179:) and 1090:S2CID 834:S2CID 798:S2CID 778:(PDF) 755:S2CID 726:S2CID 684:S2CID 606:S2CID 541:S2CID 939:blog 1082:doi 1048:doi 1016:doi 995:doi 978:doi 896:doi 859:doi 826:doi 790:doi 747:doi 718:doi 676:doi 627:doi 623:106 598:doi 575:doi 533:doi 78:.) 26:An 1172:: 1105:55 1088:. 1076:. 1046:. 1042:. 1038:. 1012:46 1010:. 993:. 974:46 972:. 916:, 892:48 890:. 855:24 853:. 849:. 832:. 820:. 796:. 786:11 784:. 780:. 753:. 741:. 724:. 712:. 682:. 672:14 670:. 621:. 604:. 592:. 569:. 565:. 539:. 527:. 261:. 59:, 1096:. 1084:: 1078:8 1068:. 1056:. 1050:: 1044:9 1022:. 1018:: 1001:. 997:: 984:. 980:: 902:. 898:: 867:. 861:: 840:. 828:: 822:7 804:. 792:: 761:. 749:: 743:5 732:. 720:: 714:6 690:. 678:: 633:. 629:: 612:. 600:: 594:3 583:. 577:: 571:9 547:. 535:: 529:8 490:. 465:. 175:( 23:.

Index

Orphan (disambiguation) § Film
motion picture
copyright
Librarian of Congress
orphan works
"What Are Orphan Films"
home movies
outtakes
feature films
Orphan Film Symposium
Patricia Zimmermann
New York University
Tisch School of the Arts
Museum of the Moving Image
EYE Film Institute Netherlands
Packard Campus for Audio-Visual Conservation
Rick Prelinger
Prelinger Archives
Howard Besser
University of South Carolina
Eldred v. Ashcroft
Report on Orphan Works
U.S. Senate
China Film Archive
World Cinema Foundation
International Federation of Film Archives
"Declaration on Fair Use and Access"
Association of European Film Archives and Cinematheques
British Library
Federation Europeenne Des Realisateurs De L'audiovisuel

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑