Knowledge (XXG)

After-action review

Source πŸ“

78:"AARs are applicable to almost any event, clinical or otherwise, and whilst the emphasis is on learning after less than perfect events, AARs after successful experiences can also provide rich benefits. Prerequisite to the success of a formal AAR are a few key ingredients, including a trained β€˜conductor’, a suitable safe private environment, allocated time and the assumption of equality of everybody present. Every AAR follows the same structure with the conductor getting agreement for the ground rules at the outset and ensuring everyone is clear about the specific purpose of the AAR and the four apparently simple questions to be used." 43:
distinct from a post-mortem in its tight focus on participants' own actions; learning from the review is taken forward by the participants. Recommendations for others are not produced. AARs in larger operations can be cascaded in order to keep each level of the organization focused on its own performance within a particular event or project.
27:) is a technique for improving process and execution by analyzing the intended outcome and actual outcome of an action and identifying practices to sustain, and practices to improve or initiate, and then practicing those changes at the next iteration of the action AARs in the formal sense were originally developed by the 42:
in that it begins with a clear comparison of intended versus actual results achieved. An AAR is forward-looking, with the goal of informing future planning, preparation, and execution of similar actions. Assigning blame or issuing reprimands is antithetical to the purpose of an AAR. An AAR is
81:
AAR is actively used in a number of NHS organisations including Cambridge University Hospitals, Bedfordshire Hospitals and NEL Healthcare Consulting and has been recommended as an approach to be used in the new NHS Patient Safety Incident Response Framework, which "moves away from reactive and
74:
In 20011, Professor Aidan Hallighan, UCLH's Director of Education, wrote "Healthcare is dominated by the extreme, the unknown and the very improbable with high impact consequences, conditions that demand leadership, and yet we spend our time focusing on what we know and what we can control.
46:
Formal AAR meetings are normally run by a facilitator or trained 'AAR Conductor', and can be chronological reviews or tightly focused on a few key issues selected by the team leader. Short cycle informal AARs are typically run by a team leader or assistant and are very quick.
59:(NHS), AAR is increasingly used as a learning tool to promote patient safety and improve care, as outlined by Walker et al. 2012. In the UK and Europe other healthcare organisations, including pharmaceutical and medical technology businesses such as 124:
Cronin, Gerard; Andrews, Steven (2 June 2009). "After action reviews: a new model for learning: Gerard Cronin and Steven Andrews explain why after action reviews are an ideal model for healthcare professionals to analyse and learn from events".
70:
acted on the realization that bullying and blaming behaviours were impacting on safe and effective care. They commissioned the UCLH Education service to tackle the problem, and AAR was chosen as the tool to use.
67: 75:
Educating staff on the use of After Action Review enables team working and cues behaviours through allowing an emotional mastery of the moment and learning after doing."
465: 305:
Baird, Lloyd; Holland, Phil; Deacon, Sandra (March 1999). "Learning from action: Imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference".
508: 364: 348: 101: 91: 38:
An AAR occurs within a cycle of establishing the leader's intent, planning, preparation, action and review. An AAR is distinct from a
31:. Formal AARs are used by all US military services and by many other non-US organizations. Their use has extended to business as a 82:
hard-to-define thresholds for 'Serious Incident' investigation and towards a proactive approach to learning from incidents."
493: 56: 202: 150: 190:
Morrison, John E.; Meliza, Larry L. (1 July 1999). "Foundations of the After Action Review Process".
32: 96: 260: 447: 412: 344: 252: 191: 142: 439: 402: 394: 314: 287: 278:
Levy, Moria (19 July 2011). "Knowledge retention: minimizing organizational business loss".
242: 134: 215: 231:"Adaptation of the US Army's After-Action Review for Simulation Debriefing in Healthcare" 489:(Alternate Title: Army Training Circular 25-20: Leader's Guide to After-Action Reviews). 430:
Halligan, Aidan (October 2011). "Patient safety: culture eats strategy for breakfast".
407: 382: 318: 169: 502: 264: 138: 60: 443: 247: 230: 486: 194: 154: 291: 39: 398: 28: 451: 416: 381:
Walker, Judy; Andrews, Steve; Grewcock, Dave; Halligan, Aidan (July 2012).
256: 146: 383:"Life in the slow lane: making hospitals safer, slowly but surely" 168:
Darling, Marilyn; Parry, Charles; Moore, Joseph (July 2005).
365:"How can After Action Review (AAR) improve patient safety?" 51:
After action reviews in the British National Health Service
68:
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
170:"Learning in the Thick of Learning in the Thick of It" 63:, are beginning to roll out their own AAR programmes. 376: 374: 229:Sawyer, Taylor Lee; Deering, Shad (December 2013). 466:"Patient Safety Incident Response Framework 2020" 339:Beatty, Carol Anne (2016). "The How of Change". 341:Managing Change: The Easy, Hard and Tough Work 8: 66:In 2008, a group of senior leaders within 406: 246: 387:Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 113: 487:Leader's Guide to After-Action Reviews 211: 200: 7: 432:British Journal of Hospital Medicine 334: 332: 330: 328: 119: 117: 494:After Action Review, September 2015 485:Homeland Security Digital Library 102:Morbidity and mortality conference 92:List of established military terms 14: 509:Military education and training 280:Journal of Knowledge Management 139:10.7748/en2009.06.17.3.32.c7090 1: 319:10.1016/S0090-2616(99)90027-X 444:10.12968/hmed.2011.72.10.548 248:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31829ac85c 525: 292:10.1108/13673271111151974 16:Structured review process 399:10.1258/jrsm.2012.120093 235:Simulation in Healthcare 55:In the United Kingdom's 307:Organizational Dynamics 57:National Health Service 210:Cite journal requires 33:knowledge management 97:After action report 21:after action review 471:. NHS. March 2020. 350:978-0-88886-568-7 516: 473: 472: 470: 462: 456: 455: 427: 421: 420: 410: 378: 369: 368: 361: 355: 354: 336: 323: 322: 302: 296: 295: 275: 269: 268: 250: 226: 220: 219: 213: 208: 206: 198: 187: 181: 180: 178: 176: 165: 159: 158: 121: 524: 523: 519: 518: 517: 515: 514: 513: 499: 498: 482: 477: 476: 468: 464: 463: 459: 438:(10): 548–549. 429: 428: 424: 380: 379: 372: 363: 362: 358: 351: 338: 337: 326: 304: 303: 299: 277: 276: 272: 228: 227: 223: 209: 199: 189: 188: 184: 174: 172: 167: 166: 162: 127:Emergency Nurse 123: 122: 115: 110: 88: 53: 17: 12: 11: 5: 522: 520: 512: 511: 501: 500: 497: 496: 490: 481: 480:External links 478: 475: 474: 457: 422: 393:(7): 283–287. 370: 356: 349: 324: 297: 286:(4): 582–600. 270: 241:(6): 388–397. 221: 212:|journal= 182: 160: 112: 111: 109: 106: 105: 104: 99: 94: 87: 84: 52: 49: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 521: 510: 507: 506: 504: 495: 491: 488: 484: 483: 479: 467: 461: 458: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 426: 423: 418: 414: 409: 404: 400: 396: 392: 388: 384: 377: 375: 371: 366: 360: 357: 352: 346: 342: 335: 333: 331: 329: 325: 320: 316: 312: 308: 301: 298: 293: 289: 285: 281: 274: 271: 266: 262: 258: 254: 249: 244: 240: 236: 232: 225: 222: 217: 204: 196: 193: 186: 183: 171: 164: 161: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 132: 128: 120: 118: 114: 107: 103: 100: 98: 95: 93: 90: 89: 85: 83: 79: 76: 72: 69: 64: 62: 58: 50: 48: 44: 41: 36: 34: 30: 26: 22: 460: 435: 431: 425: 390: 386: 359: 340: 313:(4): 19–32. 310: 306: 300: 283: 279: 273: 238: 234: 224: 203:cite journal 185: 173:. Retrieved 163: 133:(3): 32–35. 130: 126: 80: 77: 73: 65: 54: 45: 37: 24: 20: 18: 108:References 195:ADA368651 175:1 October 155:218273304 29:U.S. Army 503:Category 452:22041722 417:22843646 265:35341227 257:24096913 151:ProQuest 147:19552332 86:See also 40:de-brief 492:UNICEF 408:3407393 450:  415:  405:  347:  263:  255:  153:  145:  35:tool. 469:(PDF) 261:S2CID 448:PMID 413:PMID 345:ISBN 253:PMID 216:help 192:DTIC 177:2022 143:PMID 440:doi 403:PMC 395:doi 391:105 315:doi 288:doi 243:doi 135:doi 25:AAR 19:An 505:: 446:. 436:72 434:. 411:. 401:. 389:. 385:. 373:^ 343:. 327:^ 311:27 309:. 284:15 282:. 259:. 251:. 237:. 233:. 207:: 205:}} 201:{{ 149:. 141:. 131:17 129:. 116:^ 61:BD 454:. 442:: 419:. 397:: 367:. 353:. 321:. 317:: 294:. 290:: 267:. 245:: 239:8 218:) 214:( 197:. 179:. 157:. 137:: 23:(

Index

U.S. Army
knowledge management
de-brief
National Health Service
BD
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
List of established military terms
After action report
Morbidity and mortality conference


doi
10.7748/en2009.06.17.3.32.c7090
PMID
19552332
ProQuest
218273304
"Learning in the Thick of Learning in the Thick of It"
DTIC
ADA368651
cite journal
help
"Adaptation of the US Army's After-Action Review for Simulation Debriefing in Healthcare"
doi
10.1097/SIH.0b013e31829ac85c
PMID
24096913
S2CID
35341227
doi

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑